<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_11_1441223</id>
	<title>Bark Beetles Hate Rush Limbaugh and Heavy Metal</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1265912640000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Aryabhata writes <i>"According to scientists, climate change and human activity have allowed bark beetle populations to soar. They decided to fight the beetles by using the 'nastiest, most offensive sounds' that they could think of. These sounds included <a href="http://news.discovery.com/animals/beetles-acoustic-stress-heavy-metal-music.html">recordings of Guns &amp; Roses, Queen, Rush Limbaugh</a> and manipulated versions of the insects' own sounds. The research project titled 'Beetle Mania' has concluded that acoustic stress can disrupt their feeding and even cause the beetles to kill each other."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Aryabhata writes " According to scientists , climate change and human activity have allowed bark beetle populations to soar .
They decided to fight the beetles by using the 'nastiest , most offensive sounds ' that they could think of .
These sounds included recordings of Guns &amp; Roses , Queen , Rush Limbaugh and manipulated versions of the insects ' own sounds .
The research project titled 'Beetle Mania ' has concluded that acoustic stress can disrupt their feeding and even cause the beetles to kill each other .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Aryabhata writes "According to scientists, climate change and human activity have allowed bark beetle populations to soar.
They decided to fight the beetles by using the 'nastiest, most offensive sounds' that they could think of.
These sounds included recordings of Guns &amp; Roses, Queen, Rush Limbaugh and manipulated versions of the insects' own sounds.
The research project titled 'Beetle Mania' has concluded that acoustic stress can disrupt their feeding and even cause the beetles to kill each other.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31112576</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265988360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did they try the sound of a vacuum cleaner? Science knows nature abhors a vacuum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did they try the sound of a vacuum cleaner ?
Science knows nature abhors a vacuum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did they try the sound of a vacuum cleaner?
Science knows nature abhors a vacuum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31109450</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>ThurstonMoore</author>
	<datestamp>1265909220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>* There are homosexual Republicans</p><p>Name two.</p><p>1.  Glenn Beck<br>2.  Larry Craig</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* There are homosexual RepublicansName two.1 .
Glenn Beck2 .
Larry Craig</tokentext>
<sentencetext>* There are homosexual RepublicansName two.1.
Glenn Beck2.
Larry Craig</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31105458</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103562</id>
	<title>Re:The opposite must be true</title>
	<author>NotBornYesterday</author>
	<datestamp>1265920800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Only if funded by a massive stimulus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Only if funded by a massive stimulus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only if funded by a massive stimulus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31106614</id>
	<title>African-Americans?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265889480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lol. Yeah, no true black person is a republican. they are *really* white. you know the kind i'm talkin about. ashamed of they skin. actin all uppity.<br>
&nbsp; <br>besides, basically every GOP convention i've been to was quickly "followed" by a kkk meeting...coincidence? don't let 'em pull that abe lincoln crap either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lol .
Yeah , no true black person is a republican .
they are * really * white .
you know the kind i 'm talkin about .
ashamed of they skin .
actin all uppity .
  besides , basically every GOP convention i 've been to was quickly " followed " by a kkk meeting...coincidence ?
do n't let 'em pull that abe lincoln crap either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lol.
Yeah, no true black person is a republican.
they are *really* white.
you know the kind i'm talkin about.
ashamed of they skin.
actin all uppity.
  besides, basically every GOP convention i've been to was quickly "followed" by a kkk meeting...coincidence?
don't let 'em pull that abe lincoln crap either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103274</id>
	<title>junk science</title>
	<author>Jodka</author>
	<datestamp>1265919720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The study authors compared the response of insect pests to playing Rush Limbaugh  to their response to playing nothing at them.  Readers are going to concluded from this that insect pests are, like liberals, aggravated by conservative speech.  Yet it's a bogus conclusion on the basis of that evidence.  The correct experiment to perform to divine the political feelings of insect pests would be one which measured the differential response of insects to Rush Limbaugh and Al Franken.</p><p>But seriously.  If you wanted to study the response of insects to sound then  choose  sounds for your stimulus set with which vary by known quantities along physical dimensions such as amplitude and frequency.  Or use an ecological approach and choose sounds from the insect's natural environment, such as those generated by prey and predators.  The choice of stimulus set in the experiment was pretty retarded. Of course it was chosen to be humorous to liberals.  Humor in science can be great.  But not one-sided political humor which compromises the integrity of the science.  </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The study authors compared the response of insect pests to playing Rush Limbaugh to their response to playing nothing at them .
Readers are going to concluded from this that insect pests are , like liberals , aggravated by conservative speech .
Yet it 's a bogus conclusion on the basis of that evidence .
The correct experiment to perform to divine the political feelings of insect pests would be one which measured the differential response of insects to Rush Limbaugh and Al Franken.But seriously .
If you wanted to study the response of insects to sound then choose sounds for your stimulus set with which vary by known quantities along physical dimensions such as amplitude and frequency .
Or use an ecological approach and choose sounds from the insect 's natural environment , such as those generated by prey and predators .
The choice of stimulus set in the experiment was pretty retarded .
Of course it was chosen to be humorous to liberals .
Humor in science can be great .
But not one-sided political humor which compromises the integrity of the science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The study authors compared the response of insect pests to playing Rush Limbaugh  to their response to playing nothing at them.
Readers are going to concluded from this that insect pests are, like liberals, aggravated by conservative speech.
Yet it's a bogus conclusion on the basis of that evidence.
The correct experiment to perform to divine the political feelings of insect pests would be one which measured the differential response of insects to Rush Limbaugh and Al Franken.But seriously.
If you wanted to study the response of insects to sound then  choose  sounds for your stimulus set with which vary by known quantities along physical dimensions such as amplitude and frequency.
Or use an ecological approach and choose sounds from the insect's natural environment, such as those generated by prey and predators.
The choice of stimulus set in the experiment was pretty retarded.
Of course it was chosen to be humorous to liberals.
Humor in science can be great.
But not one-sided political humor which compromises the integrity of the science.  </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102648</id>
	<title>Black metal</title>
	<author>WarlockSquire</author>
	<datestamp>1265917680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I want aggressive and loud white noise I turn to:<br>Emperor, Immortal, Gorgoroth, Dimmu-Borgir etc.</p><p>Good for coding when I'm pissed off and in a hurry...<br>As a bonus, it also keeps people out of my office.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I want aggressive and loud white noise I turn to : Emperor , Immortal , Gorgoroth , Dimmu-Borgir etc.Good for coding when I 'm pissed off and in a hurry...As a bonus , it also keeps people out of my office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I want aggressive and loud white noise I turn to:Emperor, Immortal, Gorgoroth, Dimmu-Borgir etc.Good for coding when I'm pissed off and in a hurry...As a bonus, it also keeps people out of my office.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103498</id>
	<title>Attention seeking ho</title>
	<author>Quiet\_Desperation</author>
	<datestamp>1265920560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Queen and Guns&amp;Roses are considered heavy metal now? And this is "science" is it?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>that "the most annoying sound" his colleague, Reagan McGuire, "could think of was Rush Limbaugh or rock music."</p></div><p>Pfft. Clearly an Abba fan. Or he sits around with his nose in the air as he listens to his collection of "thinking man's music" on reel to reel tape or his $2500 oil balanced, laser tracked turntable.</p><p>The Hercules beetle video *was* cool, though.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Queen and Guns&amp;Roses are considered heavy metal now ?
And this is " science " is it ? that " the most annoying sound " his colleague , Reagan McGuire , " could think of was Rush Limbaugh or rock music. " Pfft .
Clearly an Abba fan .
Or he sits around with his nose in the air as he listens to his collection of " thinking man 's music " on reel to reel tape or his $ 2500 oil balanced , laser tracked turntable.The Hercules beetle video * was * cool , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Queen and Guns&amp;Roses are considered heavy metal now?
And this is "science" is it?that "the most annoying sound" his colleague, Reagan McGuire, "could think of was Rush Limbaugh or rock music."Pfft.
Clearly an Abba fan.
Or he sits around with his nose in the air as he listens to his collection of "thinking man's music" on reel to reel tape or his $2500 oil balanced, laser tracked turntable.The Hercules beetle video *was* cool, though.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31108182</id>
	<title>So...Liberal democrats are bark beetles?</title>
	<author>tiqui</author>
	<datestamp>1265897160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Overtly-political pseudo-scientific claptrap "science" deserves overtly-political pseudo-analytical claptrap "analysis".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Overtly-political pseudo-scientific claptrap " science " deserves overtly-political pseudo-analytical claptrap " analysis " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Overtly-political pseudo-scientific claptrap "science" deserves overtly-political pseudo-analytical claptrap "analysis".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102542</id>
	<title>Obama wants warrantless wiretapping of cellphones</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265917380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2 years ago KDawson would've had 4 articles on the front page about this... Now?  More AGW-esque science about how they've "proven" that even bugs are irritated by Rush Limbaugh...</p><p>And the Obama article?  &gt;cricketcricket</p><p>http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578\_3-10451518-38.html</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2 years ago KDawson would 've had 4 articles on the front page about this... Now ? More AGW-esque science about how they 've " proven " that even bugs are irritated by Rush Limbaugh...And the Obama article ?
&gt; cricketcrickethttp : //news.cnet.com/8301-13578 \ _3-10451518-38.html</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2 years ago KDawson would've had 4 articles on the front page about this... Now?  More AGW-esque science about how they've "proven" that even bugs are irritated by Rush Limbaugh...And the Obama article?
&gt;cricketcrickethttp://news.cnet.com/8301-13578\_3-10451518-38.html</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31107798</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265894760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Well, look at all of the powerful people conspiring to take away the rights of Republicans:</p><p>
&nbsp; * Illegal immigrants</p><p>
&nbsp; * Gays</p><p>
&nbsp; * The poor</p><p>
&nbsp; * African-Americans</p><p>
&nbsp; * Environmentalists</p><p>
&nbsp; * College professors</p><p>
&nbsp; * Peaceniks</p><p>
&nbsp; * Atheists</p><p>
&nbsp; * Potheads</p></div><p>You forgot the President of the United States, the VP, Speaker of the House, Senate Pro Tem, congressional democrats, 1/2 the supreme court, the AFL-CIO, SEIU, and teacher's unions.</p><p>But other than that, yes, no problems.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , look at all of the powerful people conspiring to take away the rights of Republicans :   * Illegal immigrants   * Gays   * The poor   * African-Americans   * Environmentalists   * College professors   * Peaceniks   * Atheists   * PotheadsYou forgot the President of the United States , the VP , Speaker of the House , Senate Pro Tem , congressional democrats , 1/2 the supreme court , the AFL-CIO , SEIU , and teacher 's unions.But other than that , yes , no problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, look at all of the powerful people conspiring to take away the rights of Republicans:
  * Illegal immigrants
  * Gays
  * The poor
  * African-Americans
  * Environmentalists
  * College professors
  * Peaceniks
  * Atheists
  * PotheadsYou forgot the President of the United States, the VP, Speaker of the House, Senate Pro Tem, congressional democrats, 1/2 the supreme court, the AFL-CIO, SEIU, and teacher's unions.But other than that, yes, no problems.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103230</id>
	<title>Re:So, any loud noise will work?</title>
	<author>adonoman</author>
	<datestamp>1265919540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Or even Ozzy doing whatever he was doing when he thought he was singing?</p></div><p>I'd much prefer to hear him sing than talk.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or even Ozzy doing whatever he was doing when he thought he was singing ? I 'd much prefer to hear him sing than talk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or even Ozzy doing whatever he was doing when he thought he was singing?I'd much prefer to hear him sing than talk.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102292</id>
	<title>Front page news?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265916720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is some front page news that some people dislike Rush Limbaugh and some old music?</p><p>How about this?  I kill the black mold in my shower by showing it pictures of Rachel Maddow.</p><p>This isn't news for nerds.  This is stupid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is some front page news that some people dislike Rush Limbaugh and some old music ? How about this ?
I kill the black mold in my shower by showing it pictures of Rachel Maddow.This is n't news for nerds .
This is stupid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is some front page news that some people dislike Rush Limbaugh and some old music?How about this?
I kill the black mold in my shower by showing it pictures of Rachel Maddow.This isn't news for nerds.
This is stupid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102246</id>
	<title>Caused the beetles to kill each other</title>
	<author>Qzukk</author>
	<datestamp>1265916540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>o/~ Here we are! Born to be kings, we're the princes of the uuuuuuniverse o/~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>o/ ~ Here we are !
Born to be kings , we 're the princes of the uuuuuuniverse o/ ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>o/~ Here we are!
Born to be kings, we're the princes of the uuuuuuniverse o/~</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102372</id>
	<title>G&amp;R? Wimps!</title>
	<author>Anita Coney</author>
	<datestamp>1265916900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I had to get family of raccoons out of my attic I played <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brujeria\_(band)" title="wikipedia.org">Brujeria</a> [wikipedia.org], <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melt-Banana" title="wikipedia.org">Melt Banana</a> [wikipedia.org] and John Zorn's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naked\_City\_(band)" title="wikipedia.org">Naked City</a> [wikipedia.org] for an entire night.  That did the trick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I had to get family of raccoons out of my attic I played Brujeria [ wikipedia.org ] , Melt Banana [ wikipedia.org ] and John Zorn 's Naked City [ wikipedia.org ] for an entire night .
That did the trick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I had to get family of raccoons out of my attic I played Brujeria [wikipedia.org], Melt Banana [wikipedia.org] and John Zorn's Naked City [wikipedia.org] for an entire night.
That did the trick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103224</id>
	<title>Re:So, any loud noise will work?</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1265919540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it's the way it was reported....what they really seemed to be trying to do was find out the effect of playing aggressive beetle noises to the beetles and seeing what happened (apparently beetles make noises). I'm guessing they tried some of the other noises as a kind of control, and found that the beetles ignored the other noises after a while, as opposed to the beetle noises which made them angrier and angrier (assuming beetles can get angry) and they started killing each other.<br> <br>
However, in reporting it to the mainstream press, the Rush Limbaugh thing was more exciting, so they focused on that, even though from a scientific perspective the beetle noises were the main focus.<br> <br>
If you hear a report of an experiment in mainstream media, and it sounds scientifically suspect, 99.9\% of the time it is because of the way the media reported it, not because of the work the scientists did; and if you look back at the original report, the work is a lot more sound.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's the way it was reported....what they really seemed to be trying to do was find out the effect of playing aggressive beetle noises to the beetles and seeing what happened ( apparently beetles make noises ) .
I 'm guessing they tried some of the other noises as a kind of control , and found that the beetles ignored the other noises after a while , as opposed to the beetle noises which made them angrier and angrier ( assuming beetles can get angry ) and they started killing each other .
However , in reporting it to the mainstream press , the Rush Limbaugh thing was more exciting , so they focused on that , even though from a scientific perspective the beetle noises were the main focus .
If you hear a report of an experiment in mainstream media , and it sounds scientifically suspect , 99.9 \ % of the time it is because of the way the media reported it , not because of the work the scientists did ; and if you look back at the original report , the work is a lot more sound .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's the way it was reported....what they really seemed to be trying to do was find out the effect of playing aggressive beetle noises to the beetles and seeing what happened (apparently beetles make noises).
I'm guessing they tried some of the other noises as a kind of control, and found that the beetles ignored the other noises after a while, as opposed to the beetle noises which made them angrier and angrier (assuming beetles can get angry) and they started killing each other.
However, in reporting it to the mainstream press, the Rush Limbaugh thing was more exciting, so they focused on that, even though from a scientific perspective the beetle noises were the main focus.
If you hear a report of an experiment in mainstream media, and it sounds scientifically suspect, 99.9\% of the time it is because of the way the media reported it, not because of the work the scientists did; and if you look back at the original report, the work is a lot more sound.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102298</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31109262</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>hamburger lady</author>
	<datestamp>1265906580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oh noes, rappers! they're totally out to oppress the GOP!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oh noes , rappers !
they 're totally out to oppress the GOP !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh noes, rappers!
they're totally out to oppress the GOP!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102366</id>
	<title>Hmm</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1265916900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems like they only tried "rush," "heavy metal," and manipulated beatle noises, and rush and heavy metal came out *below* beatle noises.</p><p>They did not try white noise, other radio commentators (Al Franken, perhaps), other genres of music, or even other animals.  Also unmentioned is whether they tried <em>silence</em>.</p><p>I think a more appropriate title would be "Biologists manage to get paid for amazingly inadequate experiment, while making jabs at completely unrelated fields they really don't know much about."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems like they only tried " rush , " " heavy metal , " and manipulated beatle noises , and rush and heavy metal came out * below * beatle noises.They did not try white noise , other radio commentators ( Al Franken , perhaps ) , other genres of music , or even other animals .
Also unmentioned is whether they tried silence.I think a more appropriate title would be " Biologists manage to get paid for amazingly inadequate experiment , while making jabs at completely unrelated fields they really do n't know much about .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems like they only tried "rush," "heavy metal," and manipulated beatle noises, and rush and heavy metal came out *below* beatle noises.They did not try white noise, other radio commentators (Al Franken, perhaps), other genres of music, or even other animals.
Also unmentioned is whether they tried silence.I think a more appropriate title would be "Biologists manage to get paid for amazingly inadequate experiment, while making jabs at completely unrelated fields they really don't know much about.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102264</id>
	<title>Also proven disruptive to Beatles...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265916660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yoko Ono.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yoko Ono .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yoko Ono.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103972</id>
	<title>Dung Beetles</title>
	<author>Ukab the Great</author>
	<datestamp>1265879160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bark Beetles don't like Rush Libaugh but Dung Beetles eat the stuff up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bark Beetles do n't like Rush Libaugh but Dung Beetles eat the stuff up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bark Beetles don't like Rush Libaugh but Dung Beetles eat the stuff up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31111662</id>
	<title>Re:Queen != Heavy Metal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265982180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Listen to the first album! Excellent heavy riffing pretty close to Black Sabbath.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Listen to the first album !
Excellent heavy riffing pretty close to Black Sabbath .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Listen to the first album!
Excellent heavy riffing pretty close to Black Sabbath.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102244</id>
	<title>Queen != Heavy Metal</title>
	<author>Janthkin</author>
	<datestamp>1265916540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not much else to say, really.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not much else to say , really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not much else to say, really.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103866</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1265921940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wonder if this article would have made it to the front page of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ if it hadn't provided an opportunity for certain folks to get a political jab in again at the "evil republicans".</p></div><p>Oh, it would have been posted for the Beetle Mania pun. The bit with Limbaugh was just icing on the cake.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this article would have made it to the front page of ./ if it had n't provided an opportunity for certain folks to get a political jab in again at the " evil republicans " .Oh , it would have been posted for the Beetle Mania pun .
The bit with Limbaugh was just icing on the cake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this article would have made it to the front page of ./ if it hadn't provided an opportunity for certain folks to get a political jab in again at the "evil republicans".Oh, it would have been posted for the Beetle Mania pun.
The bit with Limbaugh was just icing on the cake.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258</id>
	<title>+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265916600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if this article would have made it to the front page of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ if it hadn't provided an opportunity for certain folks to get a political jab in again at the "evil republicans".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this article would have made it to the front page of ./ if it had n't provided an opportunity for certain folks to get a political jab in again at the " evil republicans " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this article would have made it to the front page of ./ if it hadn't provided an opportunity for certain folks to get a political jab in again at the "evil republicans".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102952</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>AmonTheMetalhead</author>
	<datestamp>1265918640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't see the link with TFS &amp; politics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see the link with TFS &amp; politics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see the link with TFS &amp; politics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103182</id>
	<title>Oh God</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265919360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those poor little creatures will blow their brains out when confronted with half the music produced in the 90's.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those poor little creatures will blow their brains out when confronted with half the music produced in the 90 's .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those poor little creatures will blow their brains out when confronted with half the music produced in the 90's.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104984</id>
	<title>Re:Proof of no scientific method</title>
	<author>10101001 10101001</author>
	<datestamp>1265883240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The 'most annoying sound' was a biased opinion of one scientists: ""the most annoying sound" his colleague, Reagan McGuire, "could think of was Rush Limbaugh or rock music.""(from TFA)</p></div></blockquote><p>Yep, one scientist (truck-driver-turned-research assistant, specifically) thought that certain human based sounds he found offensive might offend the beetles.</p><blockquote><div><p>In fact the assumption of it 'working' is wrong because: "[Richard Hofstetter] and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles, the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while."(from TFA)</p></div></blockquote><p>Yep, they proved rather nicely that beetles will ignore various human based sounds.  That's some good science.</p><blockquote><div><p>So what did we learn? 1. Beetles don't like loud 'stuff', but after a while they get used to it.</p></div></blockquote><p>Not quite.  Beetles don't like loud 'beetle' stuff and will become very aggressive over it.  Beetles will ignore loud 'human' stuff.</p><blockquote><div><p>2. Global warming scientists don't like Rush Limbaugh</p></div></blockquote><p>Funny how "one scientist" (who, btw, works at the Northern Arizona University School of Forestry lab, which sounds like it's interest in trees, not the climate) becomes "[All] global warming scientists".  It'd be just as well if the same person had chosen Al Frankin or whoever they wished, really.  The results would have been the same.</p><blockquote><div><p>3. Science is a lost discipline, replaced by partisan political calculation.</p></div></blockquote><p>Perhaps for you.  It's funny how you're not offended at all that Reagan McGuire doesn't like Queen or Guns N' Roses.  But, keep on harping on how he doesn't like Rush Limbaugh either.  Clearly it's he, not you, with the political calculations.</p><blockquote><div><p>4. Tax payers yet again fund clown-pseudo-science.</p></div></blockquote><p>You well admit that their first hypothesis, that loud Queens, Guns N' Roses, and Rush Limbaugh might aggravate the beetles, was tested and proven incorrect.  Hence, they falsified their hypothesis, a rather critical part of science.  After, they created a new hypothesis (beetles might well hate loud beetle noise), and tested it out and found that their second hypothesis seemed correct (although it'd take more tests to verify it was the beetle sound specifically and not various other factors).  Overall, it sounds like good science.  And if some less polarizing celebrity had been suggested as an annoying sound (Fran Drescher's nasal voice seems like an obvious choice), I doubt you'd say a thing.</p><p>The only way, then, I see it as clownish is that instead of choosing a different voice, to avoid any reasonably possibly contrived controversy, they allowed the Rush Limbaugh suggest to be used.  I wouldn't go as far as say that lack of oversight was a conspiracy to gain publicity, but it wouldn't surprise me if someone involved well knew that the research might be used by someone in the media and hence would drive a bit more attention to their research.  Of course, if people like you or me really cared about ending such clownishness, we wouldn't even be talking about the research at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 'most annoying sound ' was a biased opinion of one scientists : " " the most annoying sound " his colleague , Reagan McGuire , " could think of was Rush Limbaugh or rock music .
" " ( from TFA ) Yep , one scientist ( truck-driver-turned-research assistant , specifically ) thought that certain human based sounds he found offensive might offend the beetles.In fact the assumption of it 'working ' is wrong because : " [ Richard Hofstetter ] and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles , the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while .
" ( from TFA ) Yep , they proved rather nicely that beetles will ignore various human based sounds .
That 's some good science.So what did we learn ?
1. Beetles do n't like loud 'stuff ' , but after a while they get used to it.Not quite .
Beetles do n't like loud 'beetle ' stuff and will become very aggressive over it .
Beetles will ignore loud 'human ' stuff.2 .
Global warming scientists do n't like Rush LimbaughFunny how " one scientist " ( who , btw , works at the Northern Arizona University School of Forestry lab , which sounds like it 's interest in trees , not the climate ) becomes " [ All ] global warming scientists " .
It 'd be just as well if the same person had chosen Al Frankin or whoever they wished , really .
The results would have been the same.3 .
Science is a lost discipline , replaced by partisan political calculation.Perhaps for you .
It 's funny how you 're not offended at all that Reagan McGuire does n't like Queen or Guns N ' Roses .
But , keep on harping on how he does n't like Rush Limbaugh either .
Clearly it 's he , not you , with the political calculations.4 .
Tax payers yet again fund clown-pseudo-science.You well admit that their first hypothesis , that loud Queens , Guns N ' Roses , and Rush Limbaugh might aggravate the beetles , was tested and proven incorrect .
Hence , they falsified their hypothesis , a rather critical part of science .
After , they created a new hypothesis ( beetles might well hate loud beetle noise ) , and tested it out and found that their second hypothesis seemed correct ( although it 'd take more tests to verify it was the beetle sound specifically and not various other factors ) .
Overall , it sounds like good science .
And if some less polarizing celebrity had been suggested as an annoying sound ( Fran Drescher 's nasal voice seems like an obvious choice ) , I doubt you 'd say a thing.The only way , then , I see it as clownish is that instead of choosing a different voice , to avoid any reasonably possibly contrived controversy , they allowed the Rush Limbaugh suggest to be used .
I would n't go as far as say that lack of oversight was a conspiracy to gain publicity , but it would n't surprise me if someone involved well knew that the research might be used by someone in the media and hence would drive a bit more attention to their research .
Of course , if people like you or me really cared about ending such clownishness , we would n't even be talking about the research at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 'most annoying sound' was a biased opinion of one scientists: ""the most annoying sound" his colleague, Reagan McGuire, "could think of was Rush Limbaugh or rock music.
""(from TFA)Yep, one scientist (truck-driver-turned-research assistant, specifically) thought that certain human based sounds he found offensive might offend the beetles.In fact the assumption of it 'working' is wrong because: "[Richard Hofstetter] and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles, the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while.
"(from TFA)Yep, they proved rather nicely that beetles will ignore various human based sounds.
That's some good science.So what did we learn?
1. Beetles don't like loud 'stuff', but after a while they get used to it.Not quite.
Beetles don't like loud 'beetle' stuff and will become very aggressive over it.
Beetles will ignore loud 'human' stuff.2.
Global warming scientists don't like Rush LimbaughFunny how "one scientist" (who, btw, works at the Northern Arizona University School of Forestry lab, which sounds like it's interest in trees, not the climate) becomes "[All] global warming scientists".
It'd be just as well if the same person had chosen Al Frankin or whoever they wished, really.
The results would have been the same.3.
Science is a lost discipline, replaced by partisan political calculation.Perhaps for you.
It's funny how you're not offended at all that Reagan McGuire doesn't like Queen or Guns N' Roses.
But, keep on harping on how he doesn't like Rush Limbaugh either.
Clearly it's he, not you, with the political calculations.4.
Tax payers yet again fund clown-pseudo-science.You well admit that their first hypothesis, that loud Queens, Guns N' Roses, and Rush Limbaugh might aggravate the beetles, was tested and proven incorrect.
Hence, they falsified their hypothesis, a rather critical part of science.
After, they created a new hypothesis (beetles might well hate loud beetle noise), and tested it out and found that their second hypothesis seemed correct (although it'd take more tests to verify it was the beetle sound specifically and not various other factors).
Overall, it sounds like good science.
And if some less polarizing celebrity had been suggested as an annoying sound (Fran Drescher's nasal voice seems like an obvious choice), I doubt you'd say a thing.The only way, then, I see it as clownish is that instead of choosing a different voice, to avoid any reasonably possibly contrived controversy, they allowed the Rush Limbaugh suggest to be used.
I wouldn't go as far as say that lack of oversight was a conspiracy to gain publicity, but it wouldn't surprise me if someone involved well knew that the research might be used by someone in the media and hence would drive a bit more attention to their research.
Of course, if people like you or me really cared about ending such clownishness, we wouldn't even be talking about the research at all.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102234</id>
	<title>Listening to Rush</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265916540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After listening to Rush, the beetles decided to get off the dole of this research project and go out to get their own jobs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After listening to Rush , the beetles decided to get off the dole of this research project and go out to get their own jobs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After listening to Rush, the beetles decided to get off the dole of this research project and go out to get their own jobs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103122</id>
	<title>What a tragic story</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265919120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Too bad. They all worked really hard in a meat packing plant, but got infections under their fingernails from the poor working conditions. After they couldn't continue working, they were fired and thrown off of the company PPO on a technicality. They went to a hospital for treatment, and walked out a month later with $250,000 in medical bills. This destroyed their credit, so they were unable to get a decent apartment in a safe neighborhood. After struggling for years to get ahead, the beetles wondered... could they have stayed on and helped to try and advance the cause of science?</p><p>Or was it better to follow the advice of a narrow-minded, bigoted, meritless, and anti-human demagogue simply because he had a microphone. They realized that he was right all along. Societal progress can only be accomplished by performing some menial task for someone else. Everything else is just a waste of time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Too bad .
They all worked really hard in a meat packing plant , but got infections under their fingernails from the poor working conditions .
After they could n't continue working , they were fired and thrown off of the company PPO on a technicality .
They went to a hospital for treatment , and walked out a month later with $ 250,000 in medical bills .
This destroyed their credit , so they were unable to get a decent apartment in a safe neighborhood .
After struggling for years to get ahead , the beetles wondered... could they have stayed on and helped to try and advance the cause of science ? Or was it better to follow the advice of a narrow-minded , bigoted , meritless , and anti-human demagogue simply because he had a microphone .
They realized that he was right all along .
Societal progress can only be accomplished by performing some menial task for someone else .
Everything else is just a waste of time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Too bad.
They all worked really hard in a meat packing plant, but got infections under their fingernails from the poor working conditions.
After they couldn't continue working, they were fired and thrown off of the company PPO on a technicality.
They went to a hospital for treatment, and walked out a month later with $250,000 in medical bills.
This destroyed their credit, so they were unable to get a decent apartment in a safe neighborhood.
After struggling for years to get ahead, the beetles wondered... could they have stayed on and helped to try and advance the cause of science?Or was it better to follow the advice of a narrow-minded, bigoted, meritless, and anti-human demagogue simply because he had a microphone.
They realized that he was right all along.
Societal progress can only be accomplished by performing some menial task for someone else.
Everything else is just a waste of time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102206</id>
	<title>Did they ever consider...</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1265916420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/victim\_in\_fatal\_car\_accident" title="theonion.com">Glenn Beck</a> [theonion.com]?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Glenn Beck [ theonion.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Glenn Beck [theonion.com]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31106908</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>Locando</author>
	<datestamp>1265890680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Powerful movie stars, rappers, and musicians. Riiight. When people dream of being movie stars, do they desire the power that comes with that position? Or is it that if you care about having actual power you go into, oh, I don't know, business or politics?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Powerful movie stars , rappers , and musicians .
Riiight. When people dream of being movie stars , do they desire the power that comes with that position ?
Or is it that if you care about having actual power you go into , oh , I do n't know , business or politics ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Powerful movie stars, rappers, and musicians.
Riiight. When people dream of being movie stars, do they desire the power that comes with that position?
Or is it that if you care about having actual power you go into, oh, I don't know, business or politics?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31107524</id>
	<title>Nastiest sounds? hah!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265893380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guns and Roses? Maybe a few beetle deaths.</p><p>One Hate Eternal album however, would level the entire colony.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guns and Roses ?
Maybe a few beetle deaths.One Hate Eternal album however , would level the entire colony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guns and Roses?
Maybe a few beetle deaths.One Hate Eternal album however, would level the entire colony.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104626</id>
	<title>Re:Pitiful.</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1265881800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mods are FUCKING STUPID as well as IGNORANT OF POP CULTURE.</p><p>THAT IS ALL.</p><p>Someone re-moderate BobNET's comment to it's proper place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mods are FUCKING STUPID as well as IGNORANT OF POP CULTURE.THAT IS ALL.Someone re-moderate BobNET 's comment to it 's proper place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mods are FUCKING STUPID as well as IGNORANT OF POP CULTURE.THAT IS ALL.Someone re-moderate BobNET's comment to it's proper place.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103708</id>
	<title>Well, at least...</title>
	<author>robinstar1574</author>
	<datestamp>1265921280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>At least my moms not the only idiot who hates rush limbaugh</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least my moms not the only idiot who hates rush limbaugh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least my moms not the only idiot who hates rush limbaugh</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31105544</id>
	<title>Re:Pitiful.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265885160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why didn't they just play the beetles some Beetles? That crap ought to be more than enough to drive any living creature out of its habitat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did n't they just play the beetles some Beetles ?
That crap ought to be more than enough to drive any living creature out of its habitat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why didn't they just play the beetles some Beetles?
That crap ought to be more than enough to drive any living creature out of its habitat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31112456</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>DaveV1.0</author>
	<datestamp>1265987760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rei(128717) makes a statement that is not just wrong but either deliberately misleading or just plain ignorant and gets modded +5 insightful. I make a response with factual information and get modded -1 troll for disagreeing with him and showing his falsehoods.</p><p>I love the hypocrisy of Slashdot. "Conform to our non-conformist believes or DIE!!!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rei ( 128717 ) makes a statement that is not just wrong but either deliberately misleading or just plain ignorant and gets modded + 5 insightful .
I make a response with factual information and get modded -1 troll for disagreeing with him and showing his falsehoods.I love the hypocrisy of Slashdot .
" Conform to our non-conformist believes or DIE ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rei(128717) makes a statement that is not just wrong but either deliberately misleading or just plain ignorant and gets modded +5 insightful.
I make a response with factual information and get modded -1 troll for disagreeing with him and showing his falsehoods.I love the hypocrisy of Slashdot.
"Conform to our non-conformist believes or DIE!!!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102308</id>
	<title>Scientists' Opinions on Music and Politics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265916780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right up there with Lady Gaga's perspectives on Quantum Mechanics or Keith Olberman's taste in pop music.</p><p>Thanks, I'll pass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right up there with Lady Gaga 's perspectives on Quantum Mechanics or Keith Olberman 's taste in pop music.Thanks , I 'll pass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right up there with Lady Gaga's perspectives on Quantum Mechanics or Keith Olberman's taste in pop music.Thanks, I'll pass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104406</id>
	<title>even cause the liberals to kill each other</title>
	<author>OrangeTide</author>
	<datestamp>1265880960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was his plan all along.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was his plan all along .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was his plan all along.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31107430</id>
	<title>Paul listens Rush Limbaugh, ...</title>
	<author>porky\_pig\_jr</author>
	<datestamp>1265892900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>kills Ringo. More news at 11.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>kills Ringo .
More news at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kills Ringo.
More news at 11.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31112792</id>
	<title>Beetle Snuff</title>
	<author>TheTyrannyOfForcedRe</author>
	<datestamp>1265989260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The researchers next decided to record and manipulate the beetle-produced sounds. They focused on an aggression call produced by males of the "tree killer" Dendroctonus species.

</p><p>...</p><p>This was particularly graphic when the researchers played the manipulated sounds right as a male and female beetle were about to mate.</p><p>Hofstetter said his team would "watch in horror as the male beetle would tear the female apart."</p></div><p>Beetle stuff!!!  How long before the scientists have <a href="http://www.now.org/" title="now.org" rel="nofollow">NOW</a> [now.org] banging down their door? Maybe they can play some of those altered Rush Limbaugh tapes.  NOW activists + high volume Limbaugh shows.  Imagine the carnage!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The researchers next decided to record and manipulate the beetle-produced sounds .
They focused on an aggression call produced by males of the " tree killer " Dendroctonus species .
...This was particularly graphic when the researchers played the manipulated sounds right as a male and female beetle were about to mate.Hofstetter said his team would " watch in horror as the male beetle would tear the female apart .
" Beetle stuff ! ! !
How long before the scientists have NOW [ now.org ] banging down their door ?
Maybe they can play some of those altered Rush Limbaugh tapes .
NOW activists + high volume Limbaugh shows .
Imagine the carnage !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The researchers next decided to record and manipulate the beetle-produced sounds.
They focused on an aggression call produced by males of the "tree killer" Dendroctonus species.
...This was particularly graphic when the researchers played the manipulated sounds right as a male and female beetle were about to mate.Hofstetter said his team would "watch in horror as the male beetle would tear the female apart.
"Beetle stuff!!!
How long before the scientists have NOW [now.org] banging down their door?
Maybe they can play some of those altered Rush Limbaugh tapes.
NOW activists + high volume Limbaugh shows.
Imagine the carnage!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103888</id>
	<title>That works out quite well</title>
	<author>RogueWarrior65</author>
	<datestamp>1265878800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>See, in many places where there is a bark beetle problem, the population is pretty conservative so listening to Rush is a pleasure; win-win.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>See , in many places where there is a bark beetle problem , the population is pretty conservative so listening to Rush is a pleasure ; win-win .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>See, in many places where there is a bark beetle problem, the population is pretty conservative so listening to Rush is a pleasure; win-win.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102486</id>
	<title>Just shows</title>
	<author>Nidi62</author>
	<datestamp>1265917260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>that scientists have no clue about music.  Although, if they had used real metal, half the beetles would probably have moshed the other half to death.  Which would probably have supported their conclusions.

Although, it would be interesting to see what music like Megadeth, Slayer, Killswitch Engage, or the like would do to insects.  Maybe contrast it to something like Tool?  Now, that's an experiment I wouldn't mind doing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that scientists have no clue about music .
Although , if they had used real metal , half the beetles would probably have moshed the other half to death .
Which would probably have supported their conclusions .
Although , it would be interesting to see what music like Megadeth , Slayer , Killswitch Engage , or the like would do to insects .
Maybe contrast it to something like Tool ?
Now , that 's an experiment I would n't mind doing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that scientists have no clue about music.
Although, if they had used real metal, half the beetles would probably have moshed the other half to death.
Which would probably have supported their conclusions.
Although, it would be interesting to see what music like Megadeth, Slayer, Killswitch Engage, or the like would do to insects.
Maybe contrast it to something like Tool?
Now, that's an experiment I wouldn't mind doing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265918100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I wonder if this article would have made it to the front page of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ if it hadn't provided an opportunity for certain folks to get a political jab in again at the "evil republicans".</p></div><p>Ah, yes.  Republicans.  Nature's eternal victims.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if this article would have made it to the front page of ./ if it had n't provided an opportunity for certain folks to get a political jab in again at the " evil republicans " .Ah , yes .
Republicans. Nature 's eternal victims .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if this article would have made it to the front page of ./ if it hadn't provided an opportunity for certain folks to get a political jab in again at the "evil republicans".Ah, yes.
Republicans.  Nature's eternal victims.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104580</id>
	<title>Re:Pitiful.</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1265881680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Clearly you fail at knowing what was considered 'Metal' back in the 60's, or 70's, or 80's.</p><p>Hint: Metal doesn't fucking exist, per-se. It's classified as 'Fusion'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Clearly you fail at knowing what was considered 'Metal ' back in the 60 's , or 70 's , or 80 's.Hint : Metal does n't fucking exist , per-se .
It 's classified as 'Fusion'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Clearly you fail at knowing what was considered 'Metal' back in the 60's, or 70's, or 80's.Hint: Metal doesn't fucking exist, per-se.
It's classified as 'Fusion'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31109246</id>
	<title>Re:Listening to Rush</title>
	<author>hamburger lady</author>
	<datestamp>1265906400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>exactly. cause if anything says 'working class hero' its a drug addict who gets paid 30 million a year to talk into a microphone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>exactly .
cause if anything says 'working class hero ' its a drug addict who gets paid 30 million a year to talk into a microphone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>exactly.
cause if anything says 'working class hero' its a drug addict who gets paid 30 million a year to talk into a microphone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102304</id>
	<title>Re:Pitiful. but accurate</title>
	<author>DarthSensate</author>
	<datestamp>1265916780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would think G&amp;R and Queen would be really offensive to anyone who likes metal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would think G&amp;R and Queen would be really offensive to anyone who likes metal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would think G&amp;R and Queen would be really offensive to anyone who likes metal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102284</id>
	<title>Masochism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265916720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh Oh!  Torture me!  Torture me!<br>Those beetles have no taste.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh Oh !
Torture me !
Torture me ! Those beetles have no taste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh Oh!
Torture me!
Torture me!Those beetles have no taste.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104714</id>
	<title>Re:Pitiful.</title>
	<author>Vintermann</author>
	<datestamp>1265882160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess they assumed bark beetles are homophobic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess they assumed bark beetles are homophobic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess they assumed bark beetles are homophobic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31107062</id>
	<title>Re:Also proven disruptive to Beatles...</title>
	<author>Foobar of Borg</author>
	<datestamp>1265891340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Yoko Ono is a concept by which we measure our pain." - Paul McCartney</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Yoko Ono is a concept by which we measure our pain .
" - Paul McCartney</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Yoko Ono is a concept by which we measure our pain.
" - Paul McCartney</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102298</id>
	<title>So, any loud noise will work?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265916720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Limbaugh may be obnoxious and rude, but I can't think of anything particularly offensive about his voice that I don't hear pretty much every day walking down the street.
</p><p>Likewise, Guns &amp; Roses and Queen aren't especially anything other than loud - nothing especially offensive about the sounds of either.
</p><p>Did they consider trying a really offensive noise?  Like a jet engine spinning up?  Or a Shuttle taking off?  Or a machinegun firing?
</p><p>Or even Ozzy doing whatever he was doing when he thought he was singing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Limbaugh may be obnoxious and rude , but I ca n't think of anything particularly offensive about his voice that I do n't hear pretty much every day walking down the street .
Likewise , Guns &amp; Roses and Queen are n't especially anything other than loud - nothing especially offensive about the sounds of either .
Did they consider trying a really offensive noise ?
Like a jet engine spinning up ?
Or a Shuttle taking off ?
Or a machinegun firing ?
Or even Ozzy doing whatever he was doing when he thought he was singing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Limbaugh may be obnoxious and rude, but I can't think of anything particularly offensive about his voice that I don't hear pretty much every day walking down the street.
Likewise, Guns &amp; Roses and Queen aren't especially anything other than loud - nothing especially offensive about the sounds of either.
Did they consider trying a really offensive noise?
Like a jet engine spinning up?
Or a Shuttle taking off?
Or a machinegun firing?
Or even Ozzy doing whatever he was doing when he thought he was singing?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104056</id>
	<title>Evidence of lack of your understanding of science.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265879460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To base a "conclusion" that science is a lost discipline on one study is ridiculous.  That said, the experimental design of this is fine.  They provided four different treatments to test the effect of "dynamic music" (FTA - and this counts at two treatments), loud conversation, and natural cues the insects would understand.  The utilized their educated opinion (based on personal experience) to come up with their hypothesis and to design their test treatments, and had a control that was subjected to no noise.  They observed the behavior and came to the conclusion that beetle's response is selective to known cues, as opposed to just noise (which could be new information, or simply add to a body of evidence that already exists - which is a primary mechanism in the scientific method).  Next up, they plan on refining their experiment by focusing on ultra-sonic noise as a treatment for infestation as opposed to simply loud noise.  </p><p>If you're complaining that their hypothesis and treatments had bias, well that's always the case: both of these are based on prior experience and knowledge, which is inherently biased.  The method was not biased and proper controls were in-place.  I'm sure they could have exposed it to very loud recordings of Keith Olberman to similar effect.  Again, slashdotters provide more evidence that they know little of actual scientific method.  Go back to your virtually useless sys-admining and keep your nose out of things you don't understand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To base a " conclusion " that science is a lost discipline on one study is ridiculous .
That said , the experimental design of this is fine .
They provided four different treatments to test the effect of " dynamic music " ( FTA - and this counts at two treatments ) , loud conversation , and natural cues the insects would understand .
The utilized their educated opinion ( based on personal experience ) to come up with their hypothesis and to design their test treatments , and had a control that was subjected to no noise .
They observed the behavior and came to the conclusion that beetle 's response is selective to known cues , as opposed to just noise ( which could be new information , or simply add to a body of evidence that already exists - which is a primary mechanism in the scientific method ) .
Next up , they plan on refining their experiment by focusing on ultra-sonic noise as a treatment for infestation as opposed to simply loud noise .
If you 're complaining that their hypothesis and treatments had bias , well that 's always the case : both of these are based on prior experience and knowledge , which is inherently biased .
The method was not biased and proper controls were in-place .
I 'm sure they could have exposed it to very loud recordings of Keith Olberman to similar effect .
Again , slashdotters provide more evidence that they know little of actual scientific method .
Go back to your virtually useless sys-admining and keep your nose out of things you do n't understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To base a "conclusion" that science is a lost discipline on one study is ridiculous.
That said, the experimental design of this is fine.
They provided four different treatments to test the effect of "dynamic music" (FTA - and this counts at two treatments), loud conversation, and natural cues the insects would understand.
The utilized their educated opinion (based on personal experience) to come up with their hypothesis and to design their test treatments, and had a control that was subjected to no noise.
They observed the behavior and came to the conclusion that beetle's response is selective to known cues, as opposed to just noise (which could be new information, or simply add to a body of evidence that already exists - which is a primary mechanism in the scientific method).
Next up, they plan on refining their experiment by focusing on ultra-sonic noise as a treatment for infestation as opposed to simply loud noise.
If you're complaining that their hypothesis and treatments had bias, well that's always the case: both of these are based on prior experience and knowledge, which is inherently biased.
The method was not biased and proper controls were in-place.
I'm sure they could have exposed it to very loud recordings of Keith Olberman to similar effect.
Again, slashdotters provide more evidence that they know little of actual scientific method.
Go back to your virtually useless sys-admining and keep your nose out of things you don't understand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102306</id>
	<title>better representation</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1265916780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The summary makes it sound like the beetles were killing each other to get rid of Rush Limbaugh.  Here is a more accurate quote from the article:<p><div class="quote"><p>He and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles, the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while.
<br> <br>
The researchers next decided to record and manipulate the beetle-produced sounds. They focused on an aggression call produced by males of the "tree killer" Dendroctonus species.
<br> <br>
By making this call longer and louder than usual, they altered the beetles' behavior.</p></div><p>Apparently if you want to alter beetle behavior, using sounds that beetles understand is more effective.  Just like Rush Limbaugh is more effective at making human subjects froth at the mouth.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary makes it sound like the beetles were killing each other to get rid of Rush Limbaugh .
Here is a more accurate quote from the article : He and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles , the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while .
The researchers next decided to record and manipulate the beetle-produced sounds .
They focused on an aggression call produced by males of the " tree killer " Dendroctonus species .
By making this call longer and louder than usual , they altered the beetles ' behavior.Apparently if you want to alter beetle behavior , using sounds that beetles understand is more effective .
Just like Rush Limbaugh is more effective at making human subjects froth at the mouth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary makes it sound like the beetles were killing each other to get rid of Rush Limbaugh.
Here is a more accurate quote from the article:He and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles, the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while.
The researchers next decided to record and manipulate the beetle-produced sounds.
They focused on an aggression call produced by males of the "tree killer" Dendroctonus species.
By making this call longer and louder than usual, they altered the beetles' behavior.Apparently if you want to alter beetle behavior, using sounds that beetles understand is more effective.
Just like Rush Limbaugh is more effective at making human subjects froth at the mouth.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104850</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>DaveV1.0</author>
	<datestamp>1265882700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The powerful people conspiring to take away the rights of Republicans?<br>* Labor Unions<br>* Special interest groups who want funding by the federal government, such as ACORN, the group that helps pimps get houses and import underage prostitutes as well as falsify voter registration forms and violate other election laws.<br>* Movie stars<br>* Famous Rappers<br>* Famous Musicians<br>* Most of Hollywood for that matter. You know, people who lead the trends and most of the American idiot class around by the nose. Of course, those people have feet of clay. After all, how many said they would leave the country if Bush won election and re-election?</p><p>You also seem to forget that:<br>* Illegal <b>aliens</b> don't belong in the country and have no say in the government. People like you use the terms "illegal immigrant" or "undocumented immigrant" so you can say about people against illegal aliens "They are against immigration" thus muddying the waters and painting them with false colors.<br>* Homosexuals are on average, much more successful and richer than heterosexuals<br>* There are atheist Republicans<br>* There are black Republicans ("African American" is a term that should only apply to immigrants and their children.)<br>* There are homosexual Republicans<br>* College professors get to preach their doctrine to a captive audience and have been known to punish students who do not slavishly follow the professors' political agenda. I have seen it happen and have read about it in the newspaper and on news sites.</p><p>How about if I paint Democrats as crime-loving, drug-abusing apologist for brain-washers, drug-dealers, child-molesters, corrupt unions, organized crime, and illegal aliens who drive down the wages of working Americans by taking jobs under the table that pay less than minimum wage?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The powerful people conspiring to take away the rights of Republicans ?
* Labor Unions * Special interest groups who want funding by the federal government , such as ACORN , the group that helps pimps get houses and import underage prostitutes as well as falsify voter registration forms and violate other election laws .
* Movie stars * Famous Rappers * Famous Musicians * Most of Hollywood for that matter .
You know , people who lead the trends and most of the American idiot class around by the nose .
Of course , those people have feet of clay .
After all , how many said they would leave the country if Bush won election and re-election ? You also seem to forget that : * Illegal aliens do n't belong in the country and have no say in the government .
People like you use the terms " illegal immigrant " or " undocumented immigrant " so you can say about people against illegal aliens " They are against immigration " thus muddying the waters and painting them with false colors .
* Homosexuals are on average , much more successful and richer than heterosexuals * There are atheist Republicans * There are black Republicans ( " African American " is a term that should only apply to immigrants and their children .
) * There are homosexual Republicans * College professors get to preach their doctrine to a captive audience and have been known to punish students who do not slavishly follow the professors ' political agenda .
I have seen it happen and have read about it in the newspaper and on news sites.How about if I paint Democrats as crime-loving , drug-abusing apologist for brain-washers , drug-dealers , child-molesters , corrupt unions , organized crime , and illegal aliens who drive down the wages of working Americans by taking jobs under the table that pay less than minimum wage ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The powerful people conspiring to take away the rights of Republicans?
* Labor Unions* Special interest groups who want funding by the federal government, such as ACORN, the group that helps pimps get houses and import underage prostitutes as well as falsify voter registration forms and violate other election laws.
* Movie stars* Famous Rappers* Famous Musicians* Most of Hollywood for that matter.
You know, people who lead the trends and most of the American idiot class around by the nose.
Of course, those people have feet of clay.
After all, how many said they would leave the country if Bush won election and re-election?You also seem to forget that:* Illegal aliens don't belong in the country and have no say in the government.
People like you use the terms "illegal immigrant" or "undocumented immigrant" so you can say about people against illegal aliens "They are against immigration" thus muddying the waters and painting them with false colors.
* Homosexuals are on average, much more successful and richer than heterosexuals* There are atheist Republicans* There are black Republicans ("African American" is a term that should only apply to immigrants and their children.
)* There are homosexual Republicans* College professors get to preach their doctrine to a captive audience and have been known to punish students who do not slavishly follow the professors' political agenda.
I have seen it happen and have read about it in the newspaper and on news sites.How about if I paint Democrats as crime-loving, drug-abusing apologist for brain-washers, drug-dealers, child-molesters, corrupt unions, organized crime, and illegal aliens who drive down the wages of working Americans by taking jobs under the table that pay less than minimum wage?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31105458</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265884860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>* There are atheist Republicans</p></div><p>Name two.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>* There are black Republicans ("African American" is a term that should only apply to immigrants and their children.)</p></div><p>Name two.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>* There are homosexual Republicans</p></div><p>Name two.</p><p>Actually, I know there are more than two for each of those categories, but frankly, most people could not name any prominent republicans on any of those bullets with the exception of Colin Powell.  The republican party is inherently exclusive, which is why you have the RINO moniker for any politician who follows the party line in all but one or two rail issues.</p><p>It's fine to be angry when people pigeon-hole your party, but like most stereotypes those about both parties tend to be mostly fact with just a little fiction.</p><p>The only widely held belief about the republican party, which is truly false, is that they are fiscally responsible or good for business.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>* There are atheist RepublicansName two .
* There are black Republicans ( " African American " is a term that should only apply to immigrants and their children .
) Name two .
* There are homosexual RepublicansName two.Actually , I know there are more than two for each of those categories , but frankly , most people could not name any prominent republicans on any of those bullets with the exception of Colin Powell .
The republican party is inherently exclusive , which is why you have the RINO moniker for any politician who follows the party line in all but one or two rail issues.It 's fine to be angry when people pigeon-hole your party , but like most stereotypes those about both parties tend to be mostly fact with just a little fiction.The only widely held belief about the republican party , which is truly false , is that they are fiscally responsible or good for business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>* There are atheist RepublicansName two.
* There are black Republicans ("African American" is a term that should only apply to immigrants and their children.
)Name two.
* There are homosexual RepublicansName two.Actually, I know there are more than two for each of those categories, but frankly, most people could not name any prominent republicans on any of those bullets with the exception of Colin Powell.
The republican party is inherently exclusive, which is why you have the RINO moniker for any politician who follows the party line in all but one or two rail issues.It's fine to be angry when people pigeon-hole your party, but like most stereotypes those about both parties tend to be mostly fact with just a little fiction.The only widely held belief about the republican party, which is truly false, is that they are fiscally responsible or good for business.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31105344</id>
	<title>Politics and science do not mix</title>
	<author>snmpkid</author>
	<datestamp>1265884500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously the "Scientists" wanted to get into the news with their little science lab project which had not much science involved with it.</p><p>Now these are the clowns getting money for research rather than manned spaceflight and the ignorant left are following right along because it is the era of Jon Stewart political thought. Make people laugh, ridicule the other side and they wont notice that our liberties are more in danger from the left than when the right was in charge. At least when the republicans were running things we had a news media that would take them to task for the decisions they made.</p><p>Instead of asking the present administration why they advocate warrantless location finding with gps enabled phones the cronies in the press are asking the administration what they think about some ignorant woman writing notes on her palm or why the president took 3 months longer deliberating on what kind of dog than his decision to provide more corporate welfare than any president before him.</p><p>Slashdotters should think more critically than this</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously the " Scientists " wanted to get into the news with their little science lab project which had not much science involved with it.Now these are the clowns getting money for research rather than manned spaceflight and the ignorant left are following right along because it is the era of Jon Stewart political thought .
Make people laugh , ridicule the other side and they wont notice that our liberties are more in danger from the left than when the right was in charge .
At least when the republicans were running things we had a news media that would take them to task for the decisions they made.Instead of asking the present administration why they advocate warrantless location finding with gps enabled phones the cronies in the press are asking the administration what they think about some ignorant woman writing notes on her palm or why the president took 3 months longer deliberating on what kind of dog than his decision to provide more corporate welfare than any president before him.Slashdotters should think more critically than this</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously the "Scientists" wanted to get into the news with their little science lab project which had not much science involved with it.Now these are the clowns getting money for research rather than manned spaceflight and the ignorant left are following right along because it is the era of Jon Stewart political thought.
Make people laugh, ridicule the other side and they wont notice that our liberties are more in danger from the left than when the right was in charge.
At least when the republicans were running things we had a news media that would take them to task for the decisions they made.Instead of asking the present administration why they advocate warrantless location finding with gps enabled phones the cronies in the press are asking the administration what they think about some ignorant woman writing notes on her palm or why the president took 3 months longer deliberating on what kind of dog than his decision to provide more corporate welfare than any president before him.Slashdotters should think more critically than this</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103070</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1265918940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's redundant.</p><p>Zing!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's redundant.Zing !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's redundant.Zing!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104262</id>
	<title>Re:Did they ever consider...</title>
	<author>Moryath</author>
	<datestamp>1265880300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Go for the gusto. Play Obama's latest SOTU speech. It's nasty, offensive, AND completely untruthful for a 3-in-1.</p><p>Besides, if you really want them to fight each other, you have to give them something to fight about. Right now they're arguing over whether GnR is better than Queen, just imagine if we can get the beetles to go to war over their political differences!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Go for the gusto .
Play Obama 's latest SOTU speech .
It 's nasty , offensive , AND completely untruthful for a 3-in-1.Besides , if you really want them to fight each other , you have to give them something to fight about .
Right now they 're arguing over whether GnR is better than Queen , just imagine if we can get the beetles to go to war over their political differences !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Go for the gusto.
Play Obama's latest SOTU speech.
It's nasty, offensive, AND completely untruthful for a 3-in-1.Besides, if you really want them to fight each other, you have to give them something to fight about.
Right now they're arguing over whether GnR is better than Queen, just imagine if we can get the beetles to go to war over their political differences!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102206</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103142</id>
	<title>Re:Not necessarily the bark beetles...</title>
	<author>macintard</author>
	<datestamp>1265919180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why do the scientists obviously hate Limbaugh?  If these beetles were instead attracted by his voice, would you somehow be offended too?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do the scientists obviously hate Limbaugh ?
If these beetles were instead attracted by his voice , would you somehow be offended too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do the scientists obviously hate Limbaugh?
If these beetles were instead attracted by his voice, would you somehow be offended too?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102610</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102326</id>
	<title>The opposite must be true</title>
	<author>vvaduva</author>
	<datestamp>1265916840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This means that Obama's speeches would really encourage pests to grow and have healthy development?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This means that Obama 's speeches would really encourage pests to grow and have healthy development ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This means that Obama's speeches would really encourage pests to grow and have healthy development?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102610</id>
	<title>Not necessarily the bark beetles...</title>
	<author>G-Man</author>
	<datestamp>1265917560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...but the scientists obviously hate Rush Limbaugh. They could have picked anyone's voice - not a polarizing political figure. How about Gilbert Gottfried? How about low male voices like James Earl Jones versus high pitched female voices?</p><p>How do you, Mr. 'Scientist', expect me to take your research seriously when you demonstrate that you are irrational and let your politics color your work?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...but the scientists obviously hate Rush Limbaugh .
They could have picked anyone 's voice - not a polarizing political figure .
How about Gilbert Gottfried ?
How about low male voices like James Earl Jones versus high pitched female voices ? How do you , Mr. 'Scientist ' , expect me to take your research seriously when you demonstrate that you are irrational and let your politics color your work ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...but the scientists obviously hate Rush Limbaugh.
They could have picked anyone's voice - not a polarizing political figure.
How about Gilbert Gottfried?
How about low male voices like James Earl Jones versus high pitched female voices?How do you, Mr. 'Scientist', expect me to take your research seriously when you demonstrate that you are irrational and let your politics color your work?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103964</id>
	<title>Re:Listening to Rush</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1265879160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... in broadcasting.</p><p>"I can do that better. Except the shouting," our reporter was told by a spokesbeetle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... in broadcasting .
" I can do that better .
Except the shouting , " our reporter was told by a spokesbeetle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... in broadcasting.
"I can do that better.
Except the shouting," our reporter was told by a spokesbeetle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31109860</id>
	<title>Ha ha hah</title>
	<author>Le Marteau</author>
	<datestamp>1265913780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tee hee.  Silly scientists.   Limbaugh is annoying.  A thousand laughs.   How original!   Cutting edge!   How.... EDGY!</p><p>Did they do a double blind study including Al Franken?</p><p>No?    Didn't think so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tee hee .
Silly scientists .
Limbaugh is annoying .
A thousand laughs .
How original !
Cutting edge !
How.... EDGY ! Did they do a double blind study including Al Franken ? No ?
Did n't think so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tee hee.
Silly scientists.
Limbaugh is annoying.
A thousand laughs.
How original!
Cutting edge!
How.... EDGY!Did they do a double blind study including Al Franken?No?
Didn't think so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104336</id>
	<title>More Lib waste of time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265880600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel like my IQ dropped just from having to see this asinine post.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel like my IQ dropped just from having to see this asinine post .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel like my IQ dropped just from having to see this asinine post.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104312</id>
	<title>Rush Limbaugh?  Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265880480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do I need to point out that Rush is "annoying" for the actual <i>words</i> he says and not the <i>sound</i> he actually makes?  This experiment is completely absurd, unless they engineered beetles capable of understanding English (or politics).
<br> <br>
Now, <i>that</i> would have been impressive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do I need to point out that Rush is " annoying " for the actual words he says and not the sound he actually makes ?
This experiment is completely absurd , unless they engineered beetles capable of understanding English ( or politics ) .
Now , that would have been impressive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do I need to point out that Rush is "annoying" for the actual words he says and not the sound he actually makes?
This experiment is completely absurd, unless they engineered beetles capable of understanding English (or politics).
Now, that would have been impressive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103966</id>
	<title>Re:Pitiful. but accurate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265879160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's not really true either...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's not really true either.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's not really true either...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104872</id>
	<title>Hate, no, no,</title>
	<author>Icegryphon</author>
	<datestamp>1265882760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They are Scared and jealous of the manliness.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They are Scared and jealous of the manliness .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are Scared and jealous of the manliness.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104008</id>
	<title>Ha ha, nice flamebait...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265879280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>More realistically, it appears that Limbaugh and the heavy metal music didn&rsquo;t have much of an effect, other than being unusual at first and causing some disturbance until the beetles got used to the noise:</p><blockquote><div><p>He and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles, the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while.</p><p>The researchers next decided to record and manipulate the beetle-produced sounds. They focused on an aggression call produced by males of the "tree killer" Dendroctonus species.</p><p>By making this call longer and louder than usual, they altered the beetles' behavior.</p><p>"We found we could disrupt mating, tunneling and reproduction," Hofstetter said. "We could even make the beetles turn on each other, which normally they would not do."</p><p>This was particularly graphic when the researchers played the manipulated sounds right as a male and female beetle were about to mate.</p><p>Hofstetter said his team would "watch in horror as the male beetle would tear the female apart."</p></div></blockquote><p>...holy shit, did I just read what I think I just read?</p><p>Somebody get 4chan on the line, they&rsquo;re going to love this...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>More realistically , it appears that Limbaugh and the heavy metal music didn    t have much of an effect , other than being unusual at first and causing some disturbance until the beetles got used to the noise : He and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles , the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while.The researchers next decided to record and manipulate the beetle-produced sounds .
They focused on an aggression call produced by males of the " tree killer " Dendroctonus species.By making this call longer and louder than usual , they altered the beetles ' behavior .
" We found we could disrupt mating , tunneling and reproduction , " Hofstetter said .
" We could even make the beetles turn on each other , which normally they would not do .
" This was particularly graphic when the researchers played the manipulated sounds right as a male and female beetle were about to mate.Hofstetter said his team would " watch in horror as the male beetle would tear the female apart .
" ...holy shit , did I just read what I think I just read ? Somebody get 4chan on the line , they    re going to love this.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More realistically, it appears that Limbaugh and the heavy metal music didn’t have much of an effect, other than being unusual at first and causing some disturbance until the beetles got used to the noise:He and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles, the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while.The researchers next decided to record and manipulate the beetle-produced sounds.
They focused on an aggression call produced by males of the "tree killer" Dendroctonus species.By making this call longer and louder than usual, they altered the beetles' behavior.
"We found we could disrupt mating, tunneling and reproduction," Hofstetter said.
"We could even make the beetles turn on each other, which normally they would not do.
"This was particularly graphic when the researchers played the manipulated sounds right as a male and female beetle were about to mate.Hofstetter said his team would "watch in horror as the male beetle would tear the female apart.
"...holy shit, did I just read what I think I just read?Somebody get 4chan on the line, they’re going to love this...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31108648</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265900940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot about the 'Educated Elite'.  I hate those 'Educated Elite', always acting so... educated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot about the 'Educated Elite' .
I hate those 'Educated Elite ' , always acting so... educated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot about the 'Educated Elite'.
I hate those 'Educated Elite', always acting so... educated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102492</id>
	<title>Does this mean..</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1265917260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this mean that bark beetles are Democrats?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean that bark beetles are Democrats ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean that bark beetles are Democrats?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102348</id>
	<title>Re:Pitiful.</title>
	<author>bit9</author>
	<datestamp>1265916840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No kidding. Guns N' Roses and Queen are not even remotely in the "heavy metal" category. Especially Guns N' Roses' later stuff (by which I mean everything after their first album), which devolved more and more into overwrought ballads that didn't even sound like rock, much less heavy metal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No kidding .
Guns N ' Roses and Queen are not even remotely in the " heavy metal " category .
Especially Guns N ' Roses ' later stuff ( by which I mean everything after their first album ) , which devolved more and more into overwrought ballads that did n't even sound like rock , much less heavy metal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No kidding.
Guns N' Roses and Queen are not even remotely in the "heavy metal" category.
Especially Guns N' Roses' later stuff (by which I mean everything after their first album), which devolved more and more into overwrought ballads that didn't even sound like rock, much less heavy metal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265879580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, look at all of the powerful people conspiring to take away the rights of Republicans:</p><p>
&nbsp; * Illegal immigrants<br>
&nbsp; * Gays<br>
&nbsp; * The poor<br>
&nbsp; * African-Americans<br>
&nbsp; * Environmentalists<br>
&nbsp; * College professors<br>
&nbsp; * Peaceniks<br>
&nbsp; * Atheists<br>
&nbsp; * Potheads</p><p>How do you stand up against such massive, organized forces when all you have on your side is caucasians, the wealthy, and evangelicals?  It's no surprise that Republicans are so oppressed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , look at all of the powerful people conspiring to take away the rights of Republicans :   * Illegal immigrants   * Gays   * The poor   * African-Americans   * Environmentalists   * College professors   * Peaceniks   * Atheists   * PotheadsHow do you stand up against such massive , organized forces when all you have on your side is caucasians , the wealthy , and evangelicals ?
It 's no surprise that Republicans are so oppressed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, look at all of the powerful people conspiring to take away the rights of Republicans:
  * Illegal immigrants
  * Gays
  * The poor
  * African-Americans
  * Environmentalists
  * College professors
  * Peaceniks
  * Atheists
  * PotheadsHow do you stand up against such massive, organized forces when all you have on your side is caucasians, the wealthy, and evangelicals?
It's no surprise that Republicans are so oppressed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103822</id>
	<title>Re:Proof of no scientific method</title>
	<author>d34dluk3</author>
	<datestamp>1265921760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"[Richard Hofstetter] and his colleagues.</p></div><p>Please tell me this guy is related to Leonard Hofstadter!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" [ Richard Hofstetter ] and his colleagues.Please tell me this guy is related to Leonard Hofstadter !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"[Richard Hofstetter] and his colleagues.Please tell me this guy is related to Leonard Hofstadter!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104722</id>
	<title>elp, elp, Im being oppressed!</title>
	<author>TiggertheMad</author>
	<datestamp>1265882160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>It's no surprise that Republicans are so oppressed.</i>
<br> <br>
The republicans aren't oppressed, they are just disliked because they are hypocritical dickheads. They are about the most pampered pack of 'victims' I have ever seen.
<br> <br>
 I con only imagine how they would whine and carry on if they actually were oppressed...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's no surprise that Republicans are so oppressed .
The republicans are n't oppressed , they are just disliked because they are hypocritical dickheads .
They are about the most pampered pack of 'victims ' I have ever seen .
I con only imagine how they would whine and carry on if they actually were oppressed.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's no surprise that Republicans are so oppressed.
The republicans aren't oppressed, they are just disliked because they are hypocritical dickheads.
They are about the most pampered pack of 'victims' I have ever seen.
I con only imagine how they would whine and carry on if they actually were oppressed...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103578</id>
	<title>Re:The opposite must be true</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265920860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, it just encourages the pests to have false hope that things will actually change in Washington.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , it just encourages the pests to have false hope that things will actually change in Washington .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, it just encourages the pests to have false hope that things will actually change in Washington.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103962</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265879160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate to tell you this, but Rush Limbaugh isn't a Republican.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to tell you this , but Rush Limbaugh is n't a Republican .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to tell you this, but Rush Limbaugh isn't a Republican.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103266</id>
	<title>Re:Pitiful.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265919660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could've been worse, they could have tried <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammy\_Award\_for\_Best\_Hard\_Rock/Metal\_Performance\_Vocal\_or\_Instrumental#Award\_winner\_and\_controversy" title="wikipedia.org">Jethro Tull</a> [wikipedia.org]...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could 've been worse , they could have tried Jethro Tull [ wikipedia.org ] .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could've been worse, they could have tried Jethro Tull [wikipedia.org]...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104090</id>
	<title>Re:Obama wants warrantless wiretapping of cellphon</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1265879580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>2 years ago KDawson would've had 4 articles on the front page about this... Now? More AGW-esque science about how they've "proven" that even bugs are irritated by Rush Limbaugh...<br> <br>

And the Obama article? &gt;cricketcricket<br> <br>

<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578\_3-10451518-38.html" title="cnet.com" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578\_3-10451518-38.html</a> [cnet.com]</p> </div><p>Don't worry, Mr. Anonymous, Timothy posted it, and it seems to be getting more traffic.<br>
<a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/02/11/1822225" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/02/11/1822225</a> [slashdot.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>2 years ago KDawson would 've had 4 articles on the front page about this... Now ? More AGW-esque science about how they 've " proven " that even bugs are irritated by Rush Limbaugh.. . And the Obama article ?
&gt; cricketcricket http : //news.cnet.com/8301-13578 \ _3-10451518-38.html [ cnet.com ] Do n't worry , Mr. Anonymous , Timothy posted it , and it seems to be getting more traffic .
http : //yro.slashdot.org/article.pl ? sid = 10/02/11/1822225 [ slashdot.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2 years ago KDawson would've had 4 articles on the front page about this... Now? More AGW-esque science about how they've "proven" that even bugs are irritated by Rush Limbaugh... 

And the Obama article?
&gt;cricketcricket 

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578\_3-10451518-38.html [cnet.com] Don't worry, Mr. Anonymous, Timothy posted it, and it seems to be getting more traffic.
http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/02/11/1822225 [slashdot.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102666</id>
	<title>Proof of no scientific method</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265917740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The 'most annoying sound' was a biased opinion of one scientists:  ""the most annoying sound" his colleague, Reagan McGuire, "could think of was Rush Limbaugh or rock music.""(from TFA)
In fact the assumption of it 'working' is wrong because:
"[Richard Hofstetter] and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles, the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while."(from TFA)
So what did we learn?
1. Beetles don't like loud 'stuff', but after a while they get used to it.
2. Global warming scientists don't like Rush Limbaugh
3. Science is a lost discipline, replaced by partisan political calculation.
4. Tax payers yet again fund clown-pseudo-science.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The 'most annoying sound ' was a biased opinion of one scientists : " " the most annoying sound " his colleague , Reagan McGuire , " could think of was Rush Limbaugh or rock music .
" " ( from TFA ) In fact the assumption of it 'working ' is wrong because : " [ Richard Hofstetter ] and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles , the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while .
" ( from TFA ) So what did we learn ?
1. Beetles do n't like loud 'stuff ' , but after a while they get used to it .
2. Global warming scientists do n't like Rush Limbaugh 3 .
Science is a lost discipline , replaced by partisan political calculation .
4. Tax payers yet again fund clown-pseudo-science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 'most annoying sound' was a biased opinion of one scientists:  ""the most annoying sound" his colleague, Reagan McGuire, "could think of was Rush Limbaugh or rock music.
""(from TFA)
In fact the assumption of it 'working' is wrong because:
"[Richard Hofstetter] and his colleagues found that while Limbaugh and the heavy metal initially bothered the beetles, the insects mostly ignored the sounds after a while.
"(from TFA)
So what did we learn?
1. Beetles don't like loud 'stuff', but after a while they get used to it.
2. Global warming scientists don't like Rush Limbaugh
3.
Science is a lost discipline, replaced by partisan political calculation.
4. Tax payers yet again fund clown-pseudo-science.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31112638</id>
	<title>Re:+5 Flamebait</title>
	<author>TheTyrannyOfForcedRe</author>
	<datestamp>1265988660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ah, yes. Republicans. Nature's eternal victims.</p></div><p>It's hard to be a rich white guy in 21st century America.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , yes .
Republicans. Nature 's eternal victims.It 's hard to be a rich white guy in 21st century America .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, yes.
Republicans. Nature's eternal victims.It's hard to be a rich white guy in 21st century America.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102216</id>
	<title>So we're more alike then we thought...</title>
	<author>Orga</author>
	<datestamp>1265916480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So by feeding insects our media we have made them more human (killing themselves etc.)...  good find!</htmltext>
<tokenext>So by feeding insects our media we have made them more human ( killing themselves etc. ) .. .
good find !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So by feeding insects our media we have made them more human (killing themselves etc.)...
good find!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102224</id>
	<title>And they didn't try other politicians?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265916480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pretty sure the likes of Pelosi and Boxer would do much better at driving the beetles crazy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pretty sure the likes of Pelosi and Boxer would do much better at driving the beetles crazy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pretty sure the likes of Pelosi and Boxer would do much better at driving the beetles crazy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188</id>
	<title>Pitiful.</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1265916360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They wanted "the nastiest and most offensive" and they picked Guns &amp; Roses and Queen?"<br> <br>

Clearly they fail at knowing anything about actual metal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They wanted " the nastiest and most offensive " and they picked Guns &amp; Roses and Queen ?
" Clearly they fail at knowing anything about actual metal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They wanted "the nastiest and most offensive" and they picked Guns &amp; Roses and Queen?
" 

Clearly they fail at knowing anything about actual metal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31109450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31105458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31106614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31107062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102298
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31112456
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31106908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31109262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31105544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102542
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31107798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31108648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31112576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102206
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31111662
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102244
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31109246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31112638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102234
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_11_1441223_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102246
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102304
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31105544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103266
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104262
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103562
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104984
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104090
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103070
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102790
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31112576
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104106
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31108648
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31107798
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104722
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31104850
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31105458
-----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31109450
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31112456
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31106908
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31109262
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31106614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31112638
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31107062
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31109246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103122
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31111662
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102492
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31102292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_11_1441223.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_11_1441223.31103274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
