<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_09_2138200</id>
	<title>XCore's EduBook, a Netbook That Runs on AA Batteries</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265709960000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>I'm typing this on a netbook with no hard drive, not using a chip from Intel or AMD, and powered by AA batteries. Eight rechargeable AAs, to be precise, in a bank of cells right where a Li-Ion battery would sit in a conventional laptop. The batteries charge in place, too (regulation prevents overcharging) meaning that the power cord is a simple three-prong-to-cloverleaf cord, no wall-wart required. It's the <a href="http://www.norhtec.com/products/gecko/index.html">EduBook</a> from Xcore (see that page for some photos of the internals, too), and it's a cool concept. Despite some warts, it's one of the most interesting things I ran into on the CES show floor last month (Xcore's Michael Barnes kindly supplied the laptop, straight from the display case). Read on for my review.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm typing this on a netbook with no hard drive , not using a chip from Intel or AMD , and powered by AA batteries .
Eight rechargeable AAs , to be precise , in a bank of cells right where a Li-Ion battery would sit in a conventional laptop .
The batteries charge in place , too ( regulation prevents overcharging ) meaning that the power cord is a simple three-prong-to-cloverleaf cord , no wall-wart required .
It 's the EduBook from Xcore ( see that page for some photos of the internals , too ) , and it 's a cool concept .
Despite some warts , it 's one of the most interesting things I ran into on the CES show floor last month ( Xcore 's Michael Barnes kindly supplied the laptop , straight from the display case ) .
Read on for my review .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm typing this on a netbook with no hard drive, not using a chip from Intel or AMD, and powered by AA batteries.
Eight rechargeable AAs, to be precise, in a bank of cells right where a Li-Ion battery would sit in a conventional laptop.
The batteries charge in place, too (regulation prevents overcharging) meaning that the power cord is a simple three-prong-to-cloverleaf cord, no wall-wart required.
It's the EduBook from Xcore (see that page for some photos of the internals, too), and it's a cool concept.
Despite some warts, it's one of the most interesting things I ran into on the CES show floor last month (Xcore's Michael Barnes kindly supplied the laptop, straight from the display case).
Read on for my review.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079548</id>
	<title>Re:SD slot???</title>
	<author>Tetsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1265716740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>SD slot??? WHY??? How about just a USB reader and a USB port on the machine?</p><p>Then you can use SD, CF, microSD, xD, miniSD, MMS,...</p></div><p>If you look at the pictures: the SD slot is internal.  It's one of the options for <em>primary</em> storage.  I can only hope the thing has a very good SD card interface...  The reason they included this slot is to provide a <em>cheap</em> way to configure the machine with solid-state storage.  SD cards can't compete with good-quality SSDs, but it's very cheap to add an SD slot to a machine, the SD cards themselves are cheap and easy to find, and it doesn't take much physical space inside the machine.</p><p>I own a EEE 901 - personally I find the built-in card reader quite convenient.  IMO it beats dragging around a USB accessory, at least in cases where I'm just dealing with one memory card format.  (It's actually very rare these days that I have to deal with anything other than SD - though I do sometimes travel with a USB card reader just in case.)  I like that even if I forget to bring a card reader with me, my 901 can read SD cards for me...  Other netbooks are even more handy in this regard, as they feature multiformat readers...</p><p>I honestly wouldn't want to run a machine like this on AA's, and I'm not sure that having that capability is worth the trouble - but I do kind of like that they threw that feature in there.  I can imagine a couple years down the road having trouble finding a replacement battery for my 901 (well, Asus uses the same battery pack in other models, so maybe I've got a while before that would be a problem)  It's kind of nice that this machine uses "off-the-rack" li-po batteries instead of proprietary packs, and the AA fallback option is interesting...  Reminds me of my old TRS-80 model 100, actually.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  I've seen tons of old laptops at flea markets - rendered not only obsolete but fairly useless as well as a result of the batteries having gone.  Meanwhile, I was using my model 100 to type up reports in the late 1990s.  The idea of a machine like this being genericized to the point where replacement batteries can be found <em>anywhere</em> is really appealing - even if the machine is very weak by today's standards.</p><p>Overall, I'd say the machine is pretty much junk.  XD  But it's fun junk, like the way the original EEE 7 and 9 inch models were fun junk.  When they mention an internal USB slot it makes me think that they've got hobbyists in mind as much as anything...   Netbook hackers just love an internal USB slot.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Though it does seem that you need that slot for wi-fi, so maybe not?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>SD slot ? ? ?
WHY ? ? ? How about just a USB reader and a USB port on the machine ? Then you can use SD , CF , microSD , xD , miniSD , MMS,...If you look at the pictures : the SD slot is internal .
It 's one of the options for primary storage .
I can only hope the thing has a very good SD card interface... The reason they included this slot is to provide a cheap way to configure the machine with solid-state storage .
SD cards ca n't compete with good-quality SSDs , but it 's very cheap to add an SD slot to a machine , the SD cards themselves are cheap and easy to find , and it does n't take much physical space inside the machine.I own a EEE 901 - personally I find the built-in card reader quite convenient .
IMO it beats dragging around a USB accessory , at least in cases where I 'm just dealing with one memory card format .
( It 's actually very rare these days that I have to deal with anything other than SD - though I do sometimes travel with a USB card reader just in case .
) I like that even if I forget to bring a card reader with me , my 901 can read SD cards for me... Other netbooks are even more handy in this regard , as they feature multiformat readers...I honestly would n't want to run a machine like this on AA 's , and I 'm not sure that having that capability is worth the trouble - but I do kind of like that they threw that feature in there .
I can imagine a couple years down the road having trouble finding a replacement battery for my 901 ( well , Asus uses the same battery pack in other models , so maybe I 've got a while before that would be a problem ) It 's kind of nice that this machine uses " off-the-rack " li-po batteries instead of proprietary packs , and the AA fallback option is interesting... Reminds me of my old TRS-80 model 100 , actually .
: ) I 've seen tons of old laptops at flea markets - rendered not only obsolete but fairly useless as well as a result of the batteries having gone .
Meanwhile , I was using my model 100 to type up reports in the late 1990s .
The idea of a machine like this being genericized to the point where replacement batteries can be found anywhere is really appealing - even if the machine is very weak by today 's standards.Overall , I 'd say the machine is pretty much junk .
XD But it 's fun junk , like the way the original EEE 7 and 9 inch models were fun junk .
When they mention an internal USB slot it makes me think that they 've got hobbyists in mind as much as anything... Netbook hackers just love an internal USB slot .
: ) ...Though it does seem that you need that slot for wi-fi , so maybe not ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SD slot???
WHY??? How about just a USB reader and a USB port on the machine?Then you can use SD, CF, microSD, xD, miniSD, MMS,...If you look at the pictures: the SD slot is internal.
It's one of the options for primary storage.
I can only hope the thing has a very good SD card interface...  The reason they included this slot is to provide a cheap way to configure the machine with solid-state storage.
SD cards can't compete with good-quality SSDs, but it's very cheap to add an SD slot to a machine, the SD cards themselves are cheap and easy to find, and it doesn't take much physical space inside the machine.I own a EEE 901 - personally I find the built-in card reader quite convenient.
IMO it beats dragging around a USB accessory, at least in cases where I'm just dealing with one memory card format.
(It's actually very rare these days that I have to deal with anything other than SD - though I do sometimes travel with a USB card reader just in case.
)  I like that even if I forget to bring a card reader with me, my 901 can read SD cards for me...  Other netbooks are even more handy in this regard, as they feature multiformat readers...I honestly wouldn't want to run a machine like this on AA's, and I'm not sure that having that capability is worth the trouble - but I do kind of like that they threw that feature in there.
I can imagine a couple years down the road having trouble finding a replacement battery for my 901 (well, Asus uses the same battery pack in other models, so maybe I've got a while before that would be a problem)  It's kind of nice that this machine uses "off-the-rack" li-po batteries instead of proprietary packs, and the AA fallback option is interesting...  Reminds me of my old TRS-80 model 100, actually.
:)  I've seen tons of old laptops at flea markets - rendered not only obsolete but fairly useless as well as a result of the batteries having gone.
Meanwhile, I was using my model 100 to type up reports in the late 1990s.
The idea of a machine like this being genericized to the point where replacement batteries can be found anywhere is really appealing - even if the machine is very weak by today's standards.Overall, I'd say the machine is pretty much junk.
XD  But it's fun junk, like the way the original EEE 7 and 9 inch models were fun junk.
When they mention an internal USB slot it makes me think that they've got hobbyists in mind as much as anything...   Netbook hackers just love an internal USB slot.
:) ...Though it does seem that you need that slot for wi-fi, so maybe not?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31090588</id>
	<title>Re:Charging AAs</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1265018340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>&gt; There isn't a good reason to use AAs for a device<br>&gt; which goes through one charge in a matter of days<br><br>Depends where you're shipping the things.<br><br>For someone living in the developed world, you're probably right.<br><br>But AA is the single most standard, widely-available battery form factor in existence by a WIDE margin.  They're more common than the next four most common form factors (C, 9-volt, AAA, and D) combined. You can get AA batteries absolutely EVERYWHERE, including places where you can only get Coca-Cola sporadically.  The things are easier to find than T-shirts.<br><br>For a computer that you're going to replace in three years, this is unimportant.  The built-in lithium-ion battery will last the life of the device.  So for most of the slashdot crowd, yeah, the appeal is just not there.<br><br>But for a device that you want to be able to keep using well past the five-year mark, it can be VERY important.  Four years after you buy the thing, the particular model of lithium-ion battery it came with is often no longer available even in the US.<br><br>Now, I'm not entirely sure the EduBook really qualifies as such a device.  I mean yeah, they say they're shipping them to Nigeria, but how MANY of them are they really shipping there, honestly, and how many of those that they do ship to Nigeria are going anywhere beyond Lagos or Port Harcourt?  And how useful would the devices even be in the middle of nowhere?  Internet access can be pretty hard to find in the rural third world, and when you can find it it ain't free.  How useful are these things without the internet?  So maybe they're fooling themselves on that count.<br><br>But if it were the kind of device that would be distributed to the rural third world, running on AA batteries would be a major plus.  It's a pretty big deal for cheap AM/FM receivers, for instance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; There is n't a good reason to use AAs for a device &gt; which goes through one charge in a matter of daysDepends where you 're shipping the things.For someone living in the developed world , you 're probably right.But AA is the single most standard , widely-available battery form factor in existence by a WIDE margin .
They 're more common than the next four most common form factors ( C , 9-volt , AAA , and D ) combined .
You can get AA batteries absolutely EVERYWHERE , including places where you can only get Coca-Cola sporadically .
The things are easier to find than T-shirts.For a computer that you 're going to replace in three years , this is unimportant .
The built-in lithium-ion battery will last the life of the device .
So for most of the slashdot crowd , yeah , the appeal is just not there.But for a device that you want to be able to keep using well past the five-year mark , it can be VERY important .
Four years after you buy the thing , the particular model of lithium-ion battery it came with is often no longer available even in the US.Now , I 'm not entirely sure the EduBook really qualifies as such a device .
I mean yeah , they say they 're shipping them to Nigeria , but how MANY of them are they really shipping there , honestly , and how many of those that they do ship to Nigeria are going anywhere beyond Lagos or Port Harcourt ?
And how useful would the devices even be in the middle of nowhere ?
Internet access can be pretty hard to find in the rural third world , and when you can find it it ai n't free .
How useful are these things without the internet ?
So maybe they 're fooling themselves on that count.But if it were the kind of device that would be distributed to the rural third world , running on AA batteries would be a major plus .
It 's a pretty big deal for cheap AM/FM receivers , for instance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; There isn't a good reason to use AAs for a device&gt; which goes through one charge in a matter of daysDepends where you're shipping the things.For someone living in the developed world, you're probably right.But AA is the single most standard, widely-available battery form factor in existence by a WIDE margin.
They're more common than the next four most common form factors (C, 9-volt, AAA, and D) combined.
You can get AA batteries absolutely EVERYWHERE, including places where you can only get Coca-Cola sporadically.
The things are easier to find than T-shirts.For a computer that you're going to replace in three years, this is unimportant.
The built-in lithium-ion battery will last the life of the device.
So for most of the slashdot crowd, yeah, the appeal is just not there.But for a device that you want to be able to keep using well past the five-year mark, it can be VERY important.
Four years after you buy the thing, the particular model of lithium-ion battery it came with is often no longer available even in the US.Now, I'm not entirely sure the EduBook really qualifies as such a device.
I mean yeah, they say they're shipping them to Nigeria, but how MANY of them are they really shipping there, honestly, and how many of those that they do ship to Nigeria are going anywhere beyond Lagos or Port Harcourt?
And how useful would the devices even be in the middle of nowhere?
Internet access can be pretty hard to find in the rural third world, and when you can find it it ain't free.
How useful are these things without the internet?
So maybe they're fooling themselves on that count.But if it were the kind of device that would be distributed to the rural third world, running on AA batteries would be a major plus.
It's a pretty big deal for cheap AM/FM receivers, for instance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002</id>
	<title>$199 too high!</title>
	<author>jbridges</author>
	<datestamp>1265714400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can buy a Lenovo S10 with 1GB of ram, 1.6Ghz CPU and 160GB harddrive for $249, and that includes WinXP.</p><p>The AA batteries sounds interesting, but since all the netbooks come with a battery, and they are cheap enough to buy an entire new netbook with new battery when anything breaks or wears out.</p><p>If this unit was $150 or less, it's slow CPU and AA battery power might make sense.  But at $199 it's not worth it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can buy a Lenovo S10 with 1GB of ram , 1.6Ghz CPU and 160GB harddrive for $ 249 , and that includes WinXP.The AA batteries sounds interesting , but since all the netbooks come with a battery , and they are cheap enough to buy an entire new netbook with new battery when anything breaks or wears out.If this unit was $ 150 or less , it 's slow CPU and AA battery power might make sense .
But at $ 199 it 's not worth it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can buy a Lenovo S10 with 1GB of ram, 1.6Ghz CPU and 160GB harddrive for $249, and that includes WinXP.The AA batteries sounds interesting, but since all the netbooks come with a battery, and they are cheap enough to buy an entire new netbook with new battery when anything breaks or wears out.If this unit was $150 or less, it's slow CPU and AA battery power might make sense.
But at $199 it's not worth it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081270</id>
	<title>Re:uhhhhh.......</title>
	<author>Mage66</author>
	<datestamp>1265728140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It doesn't use Alkaline batteries, only NImH rechargeables or a LIon battery pack.

So, you won't be replacing batteries for $1.79 a set. But a $13 set of AA Rechargeables (bought in bulk) is a lot cheaper than a $50 - $100 proprietary battery pack, and a available easily from multiple sources.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't use Alkaline batteries , only NImH rechargeables or a LIon battery pack .
So , you wo n't be replacing batteries for $ 1.79 a set .
But a $ 13 set of AA Rechargeables ( bought in bulk ) is a lot cheaper than a $ 50 - $ 100 proprietary battery pack , and a available easily from multiple sources .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't use Alkaline batteries, only NImH rechargeables or a LIon battery pack.
So, you won't be replacing batteries for $1.79 a set.
But a $13 set of AA Rechargeables (bought in bulk) is a lot cheaper than a $50 - $100 proprietary battery pack, and a available easily from multiple sources.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079370</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079498</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1265716500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I also had a model 100.  Its important to note that the FOUR AA batteries literally lasted weeks.  Perhaps 50 hours of continuous use?  I know I went thru a set of batteries every month or so.  Also the ancient static ram drew enough current in sleep mode to drain the batteries in about one year.</p><p>This thing drains its EIGHT AA batteries in the traditional laptop 3 hours or whatever.  Lame.</p><p>My palmIII ran for weeks on two AAA, my ipod touch runs about one day per charge.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I also had a model 100 .
Its important to note that the FOUR AA batteries literally lasted weeks .
Perhaps 50 hours of continuous use ?
I know I went thru a set of batteries every month or so .
Also the ancient static ram drew enough current in sleep mode to drain the batteries in about one year.This thing drains its EIGHT AA batteries in the traditional laptop 3 hours or whatever .
Lame.My palmIII ran for weeks on two AAA , my ipod touch runs about one day per charge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I also had a model 100.
Its important to note that the FOUR AA batteries literally lasted weeks.
Perhaps 50 hours of continuous use?
I know I went thru a set of batteries every month or so.
Also the ancient static ram drew enough current in sleep mode to drain the batteries in about one year.This thing drains its EIGHT AA batteries in the traditional laptop 3 hours or whatever.
Lame.My palmIII ran for weeks on two AAA, my ipod touch runs about one day per charge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081166</id>
	<title>Throwable netbooks?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265727240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;and they are cheap enough to buy an entire new netbook with new battery when anything breaks or wears out.</p><p>Sorry, but 300$ isnt cheap enough for most people.</p><p>ANd what you are saying is that new netbooks come with a battery already and when it wears out you can just buy a new one?</p><p>Nice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; and they are cheap enough to buy an entire new netbook with new battery when anything breaks or wears out.Sorry , but 300 $ isnt cheap enough for most people.ANd what you are saying is that new netbooks come with a battery already and when it wears out you can just buy a new one ? Nice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;and they are cheap enough to buy an entire new netbook with new battery when anything breaks or wears out.Sorry, but 300$ isnt cheap enough for most people.ANd what you are saying is that new netbooks come with a battery already and when it wears out you can just buy a new one?Nice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080124</id>
	<title>Re:$199 too high!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265720040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Buy an entire new netbook for $249 instead of eight rechargeable AA cells at $2 each?  You must be made of money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Buy an entire new netbook for $ 249 instead of eight rechargeable AA cells at $ 2 each ?
You must be made of money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buy an entire new netbook for $249 instead of eight rechargeable AA cells at $2 each?
You must be made of money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082990</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>Calinous</author>
	<datestamp>1265057820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One issue with rechargeable batteries is that they don't hold a load so well (higher internal discharge current) - so you put a set of batteries in your flashlight, and a couple of months from now when you need them, they're empty.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One issue with rechargeable batteries is that they do n't hold a load so well ( higher internal discharge current ) - so you put a set of batteries in your flashlight , and a couple of months from now when you need them , they 're empty .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One issue with rechargeable batteries is that they don't hold a load so well (higher internal discharge current) - so you put a set of batteries in your flashlight, and a couple of months from now when you need them, they're empty.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31087486</id>
	<title>AAs for laptops, I remember the TRS-80 Model 100</title>
	<author>awtbfb</author>
	<datestamp>1265047800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop.</p></div><p>Actually, the old <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS-80\_Model\_100" title="wikipedia.org">TRS-80 Model 100</a> [wikipedia.org] from the early 80's ran on AA batteries. There was some merit to being able to run down to the corner store when you were in a bind. Yes, I used to use one of these. It was a damn cool computer at the time.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop.Actually , the old TRS-80 Model 100 [ wikipedia.org ] from the early 80 's ran on AA batteries .
There was some merit to being able to run down to the corner store when you were in a bind .
Yes , I used to use one of these .
It was a damn cool computer at the time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop.Actually, the old TRS-80 Model 100 [wikipedia.org] from the early 80's ran on AA batteries.
There was some merit to being able to run down to the corner store when you were in a bind.
Yes, I used to use one of these.
It was a damn cool computer at the time.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079106</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265714940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an older consumer digital camera made by sony that had rechargeable batteries that were AA's.  Worked extremely well as long as I owned the camera.  The nice thing was in a pinch, say a long day of pictures or forgetting to recharge the batteries, I could run into any store and grab a pack of AA and keep on going.  Granted, only got about 3 hours of shooting time on 2AA's, but it was handy.</p><p>I imagine this would be the same way, some kind of rechargeable that are in the same form factor as AA and then you can pop in AA's in a pinch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an older consumer digital camera made by sony that had rechargeable batteries that were AA 's .
Worked extremely well as long as I owned the camera .
The nice thing was in a pinch , say a long day of pictures or forgetting to recharge the batteries , I could run into any store and grab a pack of AA and keep on going .
Granted , only got about 3 hours of shooting time on 2AA 's , but it was handy.I imagine this would be the same way , some kind of rechargeable that are in the same form factor as AA and then you can pop in AA 's in a pinch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an older consumer digital camera made by sony that had rechargeable batteries that were AA's.
Worked extremely well as long as I owned the camera.
The nice thing was in a pinch, say a long day of pictures or forgetting to recharge the batteries, I could run into any store and grab a pack of AA and keep on going.
Granted, only got about 3 hours of shooting time on 2AA's, but it was handy.I imagine this would be the same way, some kind of rechargeable that are in the same form factor as AA and then you can pop in AA's in a pinch.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082732</id>
	<title>Re:Very interesting except...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265055300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know, are you often irrationally scared by foreign cultures?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , are you often irrationally scared by foreign cultures ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, are you often irrationally scared by foreign cultures?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31088486</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>Dan Ost</author>
	<datestamp>1265051880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Low self discharge NiMh cells are supposed to keep 80\% of their charge for a whole year. They're also more robust cells than the higher capacity NiMh cells, so they'll keep their capacity longer and provide a better band for your buck in the long run.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Low self discharge NiMh cells are supposed to keep 80 \ % of their charge for a whole year .
They 're also more robust cells than the higher capacity NiMh cells , so they 'll keep their capacity longer and provide a better band for your buck in the long run .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Low self discharge NiMh cells are supposed to keep 80\% of their charge for a whole year.
They're also more robust cells than the higher capacity NiMh cells, so they'll keep their capacity longer and provide a better band for your buck in the long run.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082984</id>
	<title>axioo pico</title>
	<author>LingNoi</author>
	<datestamp>1265057760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This looks exactly like the <a href="http://www.liliputing.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/axioo-pico.jpg" title="liliputing.com" rel="nofollow">Axioo's Pico</a> [liliputing.com]. Is it done by the same company? Are these the factory rejects or something?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This looks exactly like the Axioo 's Pico [ liliputing.com ] .
Is it done by the same company ?
Are these the factory rejects or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This looks exactly like the Axioo's Pico [liliputing.com].
Is it done by the same company?
Are these the factory rejects or something?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079844</id>
	<title>Not interesting.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265718240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wireless (WiFi) should be built in.  Otherwise you're guaranteed a configuration headache to use a feature that should work right out of the box.  Built-in camera is pretty much expected on these machines too.  And, quite frankly, I'll stick with the "proprietary" battery packs that give another 2-4 hours of run-time, thanks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wireless ( WiFi ) should be built in .
Otherwise you 're guaranteed a configuration headache to use a feature that should work right out of the box .
Built-in camera is pretty much expected on these machines too .
And , quite frankly , I 'll stick with the " proprietary " battery packs that give another 2-4 hours of run-time , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wireless (WiFi) should be built in.
Otherwise you're guaranteed a configuration headache to use a feature that should work right out of the box.
Built-in camera is pretty much expected on these machines too.
And, quite frankly, I'll stick with the "proprietary" battery packs that give another 2-4 hours of run-time, thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080052</id>
	<title>Re:$199 too high!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265719560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is about damn time. Using standard rechargeable AA would be awesome. Right now, each laptop, netbook, and mobi has unique and expensive to replace battpacks, cords, and warts that have to be specially ordered instead of purchased off the shelf. You could replace AAs easily and inexpensively. Hopefully this will start a new open power revolution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is about damn time .
Using standard rechargeable AA would be awesome .
Right now , each laptop , netbook , and mobi has unique and expensive to replace battpacks , cords , and warts that have to be specially ordered instead of purchased off the shelf .
You could replace AAs easily and inexpensively .
Hopefully this will start a new open power revolution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is about damn time.
Using standard rechargeable AA would be awesome.
Right now, each laptop, netbook, and mobi has unique and expensive to replace battpacks, cords, and warts that have to be specially ordered instead of purchased off the shelf.
You could replace AAs easily and inexpensively.
Hopefully this will start a new open power revolution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083260</id>
	<title>Re:Waiting for Recall</title>
	<author>Inda</author>
	<datestamp>1265017980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What sort of backward country do you live in that doesn't use "trip switches" (RCD)?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What sort of backward country do you live in that does n't use " trip switches " ( RCD ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What sort of backward country do you live in that doesn't use "trip switches" (RCD)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080342</id>
	<title>Using CLI at school?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265721480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sir! Ill make a bet you will not get laid this semester!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sir !
Ill make a bet you will not get laid this semester !
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sir!
Ill make a bet you will not get laid this semester!
;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079370</id>
	<title>Re:uhhhhh.......</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265715960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The name of the product is the Gecko EduBook.  It is targeted for classroom use.  If you are going to pass out 20 of these things to a classroom of students you are not going to have power cords running all over the place.  You can buy AA batteries in bulk, and they are super cheep.  It will cost around $1.79 to replace batteries in one of these things.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The name of the product is the Gecko EduBook .
It is targeted for classroom use .
If you are going to pass out 20 of these things to a classroom of students you are not going to have power cords running all over the place .
You can buy AA batteries in bulk , and they are super cheep .
It will cost around $ 1.79 to replace batteries in one of these things .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The name of the product is the Gecko EduBook.
It is targeted for classroom use.
If you are going to pass out 20 of these things to a classroom of students you are not going to have power cords running all over the place.
You can buy AA batteries in bulk, and they are super cheep.
It will cost around $1.79 to replace batteries in one of these things.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31115960</id>
	<title>Re:Solar?</title>
	<author>wvmarle</author>
	<datestamp>1266001800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That 1.2W is only for the Xcore processor.
</p><p>The LCD is backlit, and likely by itself uses more than the rest of the device. Much more. There is your problem to get this solar powered, and your problem to get that battery life issue solved (solved: &gt;24 hours normal use on a single charge).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 1.2W is only for the Xcore processor .
The LCD is backlit , and likely by itself uses more than the rest of the device .
Much more .
There is your problem to get this solar powered , and your problem to get that battery life issue solved ( solved : &gt; 24 hours normal use on a single charge ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That 1.2W is only for the Xcore processor.
The LCD is backlit, and likely by itself uses more than the rest of the device.
Much more.
There is your problem to get this solar powered, and your problem to get that battery life issue solved (solved: &gt;24 hours normal use on a single charge).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081636</id>
	<title>Re:Waiting for Recall</title>
	<author>corrie</author>
	<datestamp>1265731620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Serial jokes are so lame</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Serial jokes are so lame</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Serial jokes are so lame</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083222</id>
	<title>Nice Review</title>
	<author>RAMMS+EIN</author>
	<datestamp>1265017560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hi,</p><p>I liked that review. It was interesting enough for me to read it in full, and you seems to have covered everything I wanted to know, with no uncalled for overhyping or bashing.</p><p>One minor gripe I have, not necessarily with your review per se but in general:</p><p>Sure, GNOME and OpenOffice.org take a long time to start up, and Flash runs like molasses unless you have a beast of a CPU, but let's not hold that against the devices. It's the software that makes it that way. Every time a low-power device is introduced, people note that it doesn't run $heavy\_software\_of\_choice speedily. Well, of course not. That software was developed so that it runs passably on the fastest generation of desktop hardware.</p><p>Imagine not, what the experience could be like running heavy software on faster hardware. Imagine what the experience could be like running lighter software on the same hardware.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi,I liked that review .
It was interesting enough for me to read it in full , and you seems to have covered everything I wanted to know , with no uncalled for overhyping or bashing.One minor gripe I have , not necessarily with your review per se but in general : Sure , GNOME and OpenOffice.org take a long time to start up , and Flash runs like molasses unless you have a beast of a CPU , but let 's not hold that against the devices .
It 's the software that makes it that way .
Every time a low-power device is introduced , people note that it does n't run $ heavy \ _software \ _of \ _choice speedily .
Well , of course not .
That software was developed so that it runs passably on the fastest generation of desktop hardware.Imagine not , what the experience could be like running heavy software on faster hardware .
Imagine what the experience could be like running lighter software on the same hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi,I liked that review.
It was interesting enough for me to read it in full, and you seems to have covered everything I wanted to know, with no uncalled for overhyping or bashing.One minor gripe I have, not necessarily with your review per se but in general:Sure, GNOME and OpenOffice.org take a long time to start up, and Flash runs like molasses unless you have a beast of a CPU, but let's not hold that against the devices.
It's the software that makes it that way.
Every time a low-power device is introduced, people note that it doesn't run $heavy\_software\_of\_choice speedily.
Well, of course not.
That software was developed so that it runs passably on the fastest generation of desktop hardware.Imagine not, what the experience could be like running heavy software on faster hardware.
Imagine what the experience could be like running lighter software on the same hardware.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079740</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265717760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, 4 AA cells can do wonders with an 8 x 40 coarse pitch B&amp;W LCD screen with a refresh rate that barely kept up with it's 300 baud modem (maybe it was a 1200, mine is buried somewhere in the junk pile) and everything essentially in ROM.<br> <br>
You do realize that your watch is more powerful than that computer?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , 4 AA cells can do wonders with an 8 x 40 coarse pitch B&amp;W LCD screen with a refresh rate that barely kept up with it 's 300 baud modem ( maybe it was a 1200 , mine is buried somewhere in the junk pile ) and everything essentially in ROM .
You do realize that your watch is more powerful than that computer ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, 4 AA cells can do wonders with an 8 x 40 coarse pitch B&amp;W LCD screen with a refresh rate that barely kept up with it's 300 baud modem (maybe it was a 1200, mine is buried somewhere in the junk pile) and everything essentially in ROM.
You do realize that your watch is more powerful than that computer?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080614</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265723160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Be there, done that... with half the batteries. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS-80\_Model\_100" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS-80\_Model\_100</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Be there , done that... with half the batteries .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS-80 \ _Model \ _100 [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Be there, done that... with half the batteries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS-80\_Model\_100 [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079428</id>
	<title>Re:$199 too high!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265716200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and this apparently doesn't do Flash (even though its x86) - thought I wager that might just be Timothy being retarded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and this apparently does n't do Flash ( even though its x86 ) - thought I wager that might just be Timothy being retarded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and this apparently doesn't do Flash (even though its x86) - thought I wager that might just be Timothy being retarded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079950</id>
	<title>Have to know...</title>
	<author>SuperKendall</author>
	<datestamp>1265718900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>DId you JUST change your signature to what it says now, or is that entirely coincidence...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>DId you JUST change your signature to what it says now , or is that entirely coincidence.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DId you JUST change your signature to what it says now, or is that entirely coincidence...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079918</id>
	<title>Re:uhhhhh.......</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265718660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>***for the times you run out of power and can find AA batteries but not an outlet?***</p><p>More for the times you left the charger in Dayton, or the charger pins don't match the wall plug, or the $#@(*&amp; charger just won't work for no very obvious reason.  You really can get AA cells just about anywhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* * * for the times you run out of power and can find AA batteries but not an outlet ?
* * * More for the times you left the charger in Dayton , or the charger pins do n't match the wall plug , or the $ # @ ( * &amp; charger just wo n't work for no very obvious reason .
You really can get AA cells just about anywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>***for the times you run out of power and can find AA batteries but not an outlet?
***More for the times you left the charger in Dayton, or the charger pins don't match the wall plug, or the $#@(*&amp; charger just won't work for no very obvious reason.
You really can get AA cells just about anywhere.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079104</id>
	<title>I have a very similar machine from 1983</title>
	<author>laing</author>
	<datestamp>1265714940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Somewhere in the bottom of one of my closets is a TRS-80 model 100.  It also ran off 4 AA batteries.  It sported a LCD display which could do 8 lines of 40 characters each and was likely the last computer that Bill Gates actually wrote any software for.
<p>
See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS-80\_Model\_100" title="wikipedia.org">here</a> [wikipedia.org] for more info.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somewhere in the bottom of one of my closets is a TRS-80 model 100 .
It also ran off 4 AA batteries .
It sported a LCD display which could do 8 lines of 40 characters each and was likely the last computer that Bill Gates actually wrote any software for .
See here [ wikipedia.org ] for more info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somewhere in the bottom of one of my closets is a TRS-80 model 100.
It also ran off 4 AA batteries.
It sported a LCD display which could do 8 lines of 40 characters each and was likely the last computer that Bill Gates actually wrote any software for.
See here [wikipedia.org] for more info.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078990</id>
	<title>SD slot???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265714340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>SD slot??? WHY??? How about just a USB reader and a USB port on the machine?</p><p>Then you can use SD, CF, microSD, xD, miniSD, MMS,...</p><p>I wonder about those batteries, mind. 2000mAh from four? They're making 3200mAh now.</p><p>Mind you, compare this against a Psion 3a.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>SD slot ? ? ?
WHY ? ? ? How about just a USB reader and a USB port on the machine ? Then you can use SD , CF , microSD , xD , miniSD , MMS,...I wonder about those batteries , mind .
2000mAh from four ?
They 're making 3200mAh now.Mind you , compare this against a Psion 3a .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SD slot???
WHY??? How about just a USB reader and a USB port on the machine?Then you can use SD, CF, microSD, xD, miniSD, MMS,...I wonder about those batteries, mind.
2000mAh from four?
They're making 3200mAh now.Mind you, compare this against a Psion 3a.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080796</id>
	<title>Well...</title>
	<author>rinoid</author>
	<datestamp>1265724420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd still be using my Newton if I thought AA batteries were the best way to go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd still be using my Newton if I thought AA batteries were the best way to go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd still be using my Newton if I thought AA batteries were the best way to go.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31084878</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1265036040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AA is a form factor.  It is a popular form factor for rechargeable NiMH batteries.</p><p>Reading between the lines, this device has a battery pack made out of rechargeable AA batteries, which it recharges when it is plugged into AC.   Just like a laptop really, except instead of an expensive Li ion battery it uses something cheaper like NiMH, and in a pinch you can throw any old AAs in, although you'll need a screwdriver to extract the "battery pack".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AA is a form factor .
It is a popular form factor for rechargeable NiMH batteries.Reading between the lines , this device has a battery pack made out of rechargeable AA batteries , which it recharges when it is plugged into AC .
Just like a laptop really , except instead of an expensive Li ion battery it uses something cheaper like NiMH , and in a pinch you can throw any old AAs in , although you 'll need a screwdriver to extract the " battery pack " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AA is a form factor.
It is a popular form factor for rechargeable NiMH batteries.Reading between the lines, this device has a battery pack made out of rechargeable AA batteries, which it recharges when it is plugged into AC.
Just like a laptop really, except instead of an expensive Li ion battery it uses something cheaper like NiMH, and in a pinch you can throw any old AAs in, although you'll need a screwdriver to extract the "battery pack".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081410</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079486</id>
	<title>Re:Waiting for Recall</title>
	<author>djdavetrouble</author>
	<datestamp>1265716440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How dare they conduct themselves in that fashion!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How dare they conduct themselves in that fashion !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How dare they conduct themselves in that fashion!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896</id>
	<title>uhhhhh.......</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265713920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the times you run out of power and can find AA batteries but not an outlet?</p><p>DUMB.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the times you run out of power and can find AA batteries but not an outlet ? DUMB .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the times you run out of power and can find AA batteries but not an outlet?DUMB.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31101448</id>
	<title>Re:I got one of these!</title>
	<author>MathiasRav</author>
	<datestamp>1265913000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A big downside for me was that it is i586, something I didn't think off when buying it, meaning that distros such as Arch Linux won't run on it natively.</p></div><p>I was about to suggest for speed, why not use Arch+dwm? Your post covers it slightly, but what about installing dwm in Ubuntu, or in another i586-native Linux distro? My laptop is getting old, and after neither Windows XP nor Ubuntu ran acceptably fast, I switched to Arch and dwm, and while boot is only slightly faster, time to login is basically nil, since it's as simple as 'su user -e startx' in inittab. timothy is complaining about Gnome startup times<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... so fix it!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A big downside for me was that it is i586 , something I did n't think off when buying it , meaning that distros such as Arch Linux wo n't run on it natively.I was about to suggest for speed , why not use Arch + dwm ?
Your post covers it slightly , but what about installing dwm in Ubuntu , or in another i586-native Linux distro ?
My laptop is getting old , and after neither Windows XP nor Ubuntu ran acceptably fast , I switched to Arch and dwm , and while boot is only slightly faster , time to login is basically nil , since it 's as simple as 'su user -e startx ' in inittab .
timothy is complaining about Gnome startup times ... so fix it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A big downside for me was that it is i586, something I didn't think off when buying it, meaning that distros such as Arch Linux won't run on it natively.I was about to suggest for speed, why not use Arch+dwm?
Your post covers it slightly, but what about installing dwm in Ubuntu, or in another i586-native Linux distro?
My laptop is getting old, and after neither Windows XP nor Ubuntu ran acceptably fast, I switched to Arch and dwm, and while boot is only slightly faster, time to login is basically nil, since it's as simple as 'su user -e startx' in inittab.
timothy is complaining about Gnome startup times ... so fix it!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078976</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080224</id>
	<title>Big Deal!</title>
	<author>Cornwallis</author>
	<datestamp>1265720640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My Bluetooth-enabled Tandy Model 101 runs on four AA batteries.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My Bluetooth-enabled Tandy Model 101 runs on four AA batteries .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Bluetooth-enabled Tandy Model 101 runs on four AA batteries.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081554</id>
	<title>Re:Waiting for Recall</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265730600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seems you all are missing something: 8 1.5 V cells = 12 V DC. This happens to be the most common electrical power source on the planet. It is in virtually every automobile, and most boats (talking working and fishing here...not just pleasure yachts). Also most solar and wind electrical generation systems are 12 V DC.</p><p>It should be very east to clip on to the + and - battery terminals and hook into a 12 V battery system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems you all are missing something : 8 1.5 V cells = 12 V DC .
This happens to be the most common electrical power source on the planet .
It is in virtually every automobile , and most boats ( talking working and fishing here...not just pleasure yachts ) .
Also most solar and wind electrical generation systems are 12 V DC.It should be very east to clip on to the + and - battery terminals and hook into a 12 V battery system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems you all are missing something: 8 1.5 V cells = 12 V DC.
This happens to be the most common electrical power source on the planet.
It is in virtually every automobile, and most boats (talking working and fishing here...not just pleasure yachts).
Also most solar and wind electrical generation systems are 12 V DC.It should be very east to clip on to the + and - battery terminals and hook into a 12 V battery system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080200</id>
	<title>Re:Waiting for Recall</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265720520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Recently, I received shock from my iron even though it had a ground pin (I was not ironing, so I was trying to test, if it was hot enough). When I opened it, I found that the ground wire was broken and live wire was touching the metallic case. This was just at the place where it was receiving 3 pin input. So even if the AC to DC converter is sealed, you may not be safe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Recently , I received shock from my iron even though it had a ground pin ( I was not ironing , so I was trying to test , if it was hot enough ) .
When I opened it , I found that the ground wire was broken and live wire was touching the metallic case .
This was just at the place where it was receiving 3 pin input .
So even if the AC to DC converter is sealed , you may not be safe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Recently, I received shock from my iron even though it had a ground pin (I was not ironing, so I was trying to test, if it was hot enough).
When I opened it, I found that the ground wire was broken and live wire was touching the metallic case.
This was just at the place where it was receiving 3 pin input.
So even if the AC to DC converter is sealed, you may not be safe.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079188</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079392</id>
	<title>Re:$199 too high!</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1265716020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The price is determined by what they can get for it, which is determined in part by the price of the Lenovo. If they don't sell enough the price will come down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The price is determined by what they can get for it , which is determined in part by the price of the Lenovo .
If they do n't sell enough the price will come down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The price is determined by what they can get for it, which is determined in part by the price of the Lenovo.
If they don't sell enough the price will come down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078910</id>
	<title>opinion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265713980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>more ghey than an ipad</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>more ghey than an ipad</tokentext>
<sentencetext>more ghey than an ipad</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083556</id>
	<title>Re:Very interesting except...</title>
	<author>Daengbo</author>
	<datestamp>1265022000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NorhTec (the manufacturer) is a Thai company, about 3km away from my condo in the Software PArk building. I'm not surprised that the default country is Thailand. Why are you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NorhTec ( the manufacturer ) is a Thai company , about 3km away from my condo in the Software PArk building .
I 'm not surprised that the default country is Thailand .
Why are you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NorhTec (the manufacturer) is a Thai company, about 3km away from my condo in the Software PArk building.
I'm not surprised that the default country is Thailand.
Why are you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078976</id>
	<title>I got one of these!</title>
	<author>hatten</author>
	<datestamp>1265714280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I got one of these, and I were very surprised that it was covered here!

I certainly don't think the case is very sturdy, a few millimetres plastic was easy to crack, and I've done that. I've got some evil pixels on the screen too after dropping it once.
I got mine with ubuntu, but I managed to thrash X and have not taken my time to fix it, I use it on daily basis exclusively with vim, but being the CLI junky I am I almost like it more that way than with a gui. I carry it around for all my lessons in school and I'm very happy that I bought it.
A little weird thing with it is that the usb ports are upside down, no clue if that's a feature or something stupid =p
A big downside for me was that it is i586, something I didn't think off when buying it, meaning that distros such as Arch Linux won't run on it natively.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I got one of these , and I were very surprised that it was covered here !
I certainly do n't think the case is very sturdy , a few millimetres plastic was easy to crack , and I 've done that .
I 've got some evil pixels on the screen too after dropping it once .
I got mine with ubuntu , but I managed to thrash X and have not taken my time to fix it , I use it on daily basis exclusively with vim , but being the CLI junky I am I almost like it more that way than with a gui .
I carry it around for all my lessons in school and I 'm very happy that I bought it .
A little weird thing with it is that the usb ports are upside down , no clue if that 's a feature or something stupid = p A big downside for me was that it is i586 , something I did n't think off when buying it , meaning that distros such as Arch Linux wo n't run on it natively .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I got one of these, and I were very surprised that it was covered here!
I certainly don't think the case is very sturdy, a few millimetres plastic was easy to crack, and I've done that.
I've got some evil pixels on the screen too after dropping it once.
I got mine with ubuntu, but I managed to thrash X and have not taken my time to fix it, I use it on daily basis exclusively with vim, but being the CLI junky I am I almost like it more that way than with a gui.
I carry it around for all my lessons in school and I'm very happy that I bought it.
A little weird thing with it is that the usb ports are upside down, no clue if that's a feature or something stupid =p
A big downside for me was that it is i586, something I didn't think off when buying it, meaning that distros such as Arch Linux won't run on it natively.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082674</id>
	<title>Re:uhhhhh.......</title>
	<author>F34nor</author>
	<datestamp>1265745480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if you could add one more battery and be able to then swap out all of the batteries one at a time without losing power.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if you could add one more battery and be able to then swap out all of the batteries one at a time without losing power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if you could add one more battery and be able to then swap out all of the batteries one at a time without losing power.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078872</id>
	<title>Woah.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265713860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>tl;dr</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>tl ; dr</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tl;dr</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078952</id>
	<title>Very interesting except...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265714220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Should I be scared that the default country for the order form is Thailand?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Should I be scared that the default country for the order form is Thailand ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Should I be scared that the default country for the order form is Thailand?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080826</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1265724720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can get AA form li-ion batteries. The advantages are many though. AA batteries are easily replaceable being everywhere. They are a very common standard so if you want so li-ion ones you can. Since they are so common they are cheap! And available in poor countries. This is not something that is so useful for you or me. <br> <br>But I think this type of design could eventually/soon get laptops under 100~150$ and that would be a very good thing for poor countries. By type of design I mean using as many common and flexible parts as humanly possible, and simplifying the design as much as possible. This allows people to repair it themselves for some parts. Replace broken parts with whatever they can find if compatibility is high (also good for upgrading). And people can more easily learn to do it. Look at poor countries and you'll see amazingly ingenious kluges. Jury-rigging whatever they have available to suit their purposes. Carts built from bits of fence, bicycle, table and an old motorcycle motor for example. Assuming this is going to continue, designing a computer that embraces it as much as possible will be successful.<br> <br>Side note: I think they should have dropped the SD card completely and had another USB slot instead. This allows for greater flexibility and simplicity. Stick a drive or USB stick in there, done. Probably more common than SD cards, more or equally portable as well. As well, the screen could be plugged into a VGA plug, might add 40c~1$ to the cost but if the screen breaks people could find a monitor in a dump w/e and get it working. (Keyboard has this functionality through USB already, plus KBs rarely break.) You could probably have the thing charge through USB as well. Technically you could probably design the CPU to use a USB stick as ram but that might be a little shitty (like 1/8th the speed lol). Either way I see the power of standards being underused here.<br> <br>BTW, everything I listed is the opposite of apple. So your suggestion was pretty friggen idiotic. An irremovable untouchable unmodifiable non-standard expensive ass machine is fucking retarded for this use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get AA form li-ion batteries .
The advantages are many though .
AA batteries are easily replaceable being everywhere .
They are a very common standard so if you want so li-ion ones you can .
Since they are so common they are cheap !
And available in poor countries .
This is not something that is so useful for you or me .
But I think this type of design could eventually/soon get laptops under 100 ~ 150 $ and that would be a very good thing for poor countries .
By type of design I mean using as many common and flexible parts as humanly possible , and simplifying the design as much as possible .
This allows people to repair it themselves for some parts .
Replace broken parts with whatever they can find if compatibility is high ( also good for upgrading ) .
And people can more easily learn to do it .
Look at poor countries and you 'll see amazingly ingenious kluges .
Jury-rigging whatever they have available to suit their purposes .
Carts built from bits of fence , bicycle , table and an old motorcycle motor for example .
Assuming this is going to continue , designing a computer that embraces it as much as possible will be successful .
Side note : I think they should have dropped the SD card completely and had another USB slot instead .
This allows for greater flexibility and simplicity .
Stick a drive or USB stick in there , done .
Probably more common than SD cards , more or equally portable as well .
As well , the screen could be plugged into a VGA plug , might add 40c ~ 1 $ to the cost but if the screen breaks people could find a monitor in a dump w/e and get it working .
( Keyboard has this functionality through USB already , plus KBs rarely break .
) You could probably have the thing charge through USB as well .
Technically you could probably design the CPU to use a USB stick as ram but that might be a little shitty ( like 1/8th the speed lol ) .
Either way I see the power of standards being underused here .
BTW , everything I listed is the opposite of apple .
So your suggestion was pretty friggen idiotic .
An irremovable untouchable unmodifiable non-standard expensive ass machine is fucking retarded for this use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get AA form li-ion batteries.
The advantages are many though.
AA batteries are easily replaceable being everywhere.
They are a very common standard so if you want so li-ion ones you can.
Since they are so common they are cheap!
And available in poor countries.
This is not something that is so useful for you or me.
But I think this type of design could eventually/soon get laptops under 100~150$ and that would be a very good thing for poor countries.
By type of design I mean using as many common and flexible parts as humanly possible, and simplifying the design as much as possible.
This allows people to repair it themselves for some parts.
Replace broken parts with whatever they can find if compatibility is high (also good for upgrading).
And people can more easily learn to do it.
Look at poor countries and you'll see amazingly ingenious kluges.
Jury-rigging whatever they have available to suit their purposes.
Carts built from bits of fence, bicycle, table and an old motorcycle motor for example.
Assuming this is going to continue, designing a computer that embraces it as much as possible will be successful.
Side note: I think they should have dropped the SD card completely and had another USB slot instead.
This allows for greater flexibility and simplicity.
Stick a drive or USB stick in there, done.
Probably more common than SD cards, more or equally portable as well.
As well, the screen could be plugged into a VGA plug, might add 40c~1$ to the cost but if the screen breaks people could find a monitor in a dump w/e and get it working.
(Keyboard has this functionality through USB already, plus KBs rarely break.
) You could probably have the thing charge through USB as well.
Technically you could probably design the CPU to use a USB stick as ram but that might be a little shitty (like 1/8th the speed lol).
Either way I see the power of standards being underused here.
BTW, everything I listed is the opposite of apple.
So your suggestion was pretty friggen idiotic.
An irremovable untouchable unmodifiable non-standard expensive ass machine is fucking retarded for this use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079188</id>
	<title>Re:Waiting for Recall</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265715240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Direct AC connection? 110-240V? I don't know about you guys, but I ain't gonna put that damn thing on my lap. This is a laptop. I have spilled coffee, juice, other drinks on my laptops. I don't want 240V shock on my private parts. I let my young kids to use laptop too and certainly wouldn't allow this one to them.</p></div><p>Most likely the AC-DC power converter is sealed up.  Take a look at a "wall wart" power supply sometime - do you see anywhere for liquid to leak in?  Even my EEE's AC adaptor, which isn't sealed, also doesn't feature any openings into which liquid could readily flow.</p><p>And then, what do you think this combination of liquid and voltage is going to do, exactly?  Is the voltage going to follow the liquid's electrical path <em>out</em> of the abundantly ground-planed environment of the power supply and computer, and follow a path up your arms, through your heart, and then back down to the computer to get to a ground path?</p><p>I'm not feeling too scared, really.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Direct AC connection ?
110-240V ? I do n't know about you guys , but I ai n't gon na put that damn thing on my lap .
This is a laptop .
I have spilled coffee , juice , other drinks on my laptops .
I do n't want 240V shock on my private parts .
I let my young kids to use laptop too and certainly would n't allow this one to them.Most likely the AC-DC power converter is sealed up .
Take a look at a " wall wart " power supply sometime - do you see anywhere for liquid to leak in ?
Even my EEE 's AC adaptor , which is n't sealed , also does n't feature any openings into which liquid could readily flow.And then , what do you think this combination of liquid and voltage is going to do , exactly ?
Is the voltage going to follow the liquid 's electrical path out of the abundantly ground-planed environment of the power supply and computer , and follow a path up your arms , through your heart , and then back down to the computer to get to a ground path ? I 'm not feeling too scared , really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Direct AC connection?
110-240V? I don't know about you guys, but I ain't gonna put that damn thing on my lap.
This is a laptop.
I have spilled coffee, juice, other drinks on my laptops.
I don't want 240V shock on my private parts.
I let my young kids to use laptop too and certainly wouldn't allow this one to them.Most likely the AC-DC power converter is sealed up.
Take a look at a "wall wart" power supply sometime - do you see anywhere for liquid to leak in?
Even my EEE's AC adaptor, which isn't sealed, also doesn't feature any openings into which liquid could readily flow.And then, what do you think this combination of liquid and voltage is going to do, exactly?
Is the voltage going to follow the liquid's electrical path out of the abundantly ground-planed environment of the power supply and computer, and follow a path up your arms, through your heart, and then back down to the computer to get to a ground path?I'm not feeling too scared, really.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916</id>
	<title>Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265713980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop. Why not power a car with them? The energy density sucks.</p><p>The only 'convenient' thing about them is when you can't get power, you could possibly get new ones at any store. Then what when that set goes dead? Trash? People in developing countries have little regard for the environment.* So</p><p>And what type of AAs are they going to be? NiMH? NiCad?</p><p>I can get 999+ pictures out of my SLR on one LiOn charge. When I power it with an external grip using 8 AAs (which take up 4x the space) I may get 1/3 of that.</p><p>I know you guys hate Apple for it, but there's a reason they're getting 8 hours out of a 17" laptop. It's because they threw away all the 'packaging' crap that comes with normal batteries and only packaged the 'energy storing' part.</p><p>*I don't know if this is because of their nature or because the structure isn't setup. When I went to Rural india there was TRASH everywhere. AAs in the gutters. Because there wasn't anywhere to throw stuff away. That and every single thing was individually packaged. Shampoo came in a 5Rs 'sampler' sized package. Everything. So there was litter everywhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop .
Why not power a car with them ?
The energy density sucks.The only 'convenient ' thing about them is when you ca n't get power , you could possibly get new ones at any store .
Then what when that set goes dead ?
Trash ? People in developing countries have little regard for the environment .
* SoAnd what type of AAs are they going to be ?
NiMH ? NiCad ? I can get 999 + pictures out of my SLR on one LiOn charge .
When I power it with an external grip using 8 AAs ( which take up 4x the space ) I may get 1/3 of that.I know you guys hate Apple for it , but there 's a reason they 're getting 8 hours out of a 17 " laptop .
It 's because they threw away all the 'packaging ' crap that comes with normal batteries and only packaged the 'energy storing ' part .
* I do n't know if this is because of their nature or because the structure is n't setup .
When I went to Rural india there was TRASH everywhere .
AAs in the gutters .
Because there was n't anywhere to throw stuff away .
That and every single thing was individually packaged .
Shampoo came in a 5Rs 'sampler ' sized package .
Everything. So there was litter everywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop.
Why not power a car with them?
The energy density sucks.The only 'convenient' thing about them is when you can't get power, you could possibly get new ones at any store.
Then what when that set goes dead?
Trash? People in developing countries have little regard for the environment.
* SoAnd what type of AAs are they going to be?
NiMH? NiCad?I can get 999+ pictures out of my SLR on one LiOn charge.
When I power it with an external grip using 8 AAs (which take up 4x the space) I may get 1/3 of that.I know you guys hate Apple for it, but there's a reason they're getting 8 hours out of a 17" laptop.
It's because they threw away all the 'packaging' crap that comes with normal batteries and only packaged the 'energy storing' part.
*I don't know if this is because of their nature or because the structure isn't setup.
When I went to Rural india there was TRASH everywhere.
AAs in the gutters.
Because there wasn't anywhere to throw stuff away.
That and every single thing was individually packaged.
Shampoo came in a 5Rs 'sampler' sized package.
Everything. So there was litter everywhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31090910</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>h4rr4r</author>
	<datestamp>1265019720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stop buying shitty old technology.</p><p>NIMH LSD(low self discharge) solves this, sanyo eneloop or rayovac hybrid are two decent brands.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stop buying shitty old technology.NIMH LSD ( low self discharge ) solves this , sanyo eneloop or rayovac hybrid are two decent brands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stop buying shitty old technology.NIMH LSD(low self discharge) solves this, sanyo eneloop or rayovac hybrid are two decent brands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31084520</id>
	<title>Re:$199 too high!</title>
	<author>maitas</author>
	<datestamp>1265033100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, according to <a href="http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/controller/e/web/LenovoPortal/en\_US/catalog.workflow:expandcategory?current-catalog-id=12F0696583E04D86B9B79B0FEC01C087&amp;current-category-id=0549C687E3D24BBD998B20D96BBB1281" title="lenovo.com">http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/controller/e/web/LenovoPortal/en\_US/catalog.workflow:expandcategory?current-catalog-id=12F0696583E04D86B9B79B0FEC01C087&amp;current-category-id=0549C687E3D24BBD998B20D96BBB1281</a> [lenovo.com] the Lenovo S10 Starts at 330 USD. Can you please post a reference for the 250 USD ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , according to http : //shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/controller/e/web/LenovoPortal/en \ _US/catalog.workflow : expandcategory ? current-catalog-id = 12F0696583E04D86B9B79B0FEC01C087&amp;current-category-id = 0549C687E3D24BBD998B20D96BBB1281 [ lenovo.com ] the Lenovo S10 Starts at 330 USD .
Can you please post a reference for the 250 USD ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, according to http://shop.lenovo.com/SEUILibrary/controller/e/web/LenovoPortal/en\_US/catalog.workflow:expandcategory?current-catalog-id=12F0696583E04D86B9B79B0FEC01C087&amp;current-category-id=0549C687E3D24BBD998B20D96BBB1281 [lenovo.com] the Lenovo S10 Starts at 330 USD.
Can you please post a reference for the 250 USD ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079008</id>
	<title>Re:Waiting for Recall</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1265714460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did the first couple of spills do any damage?</p><p>Are you really that thirsty that you can't avoid dumping liquid on expensive electronics?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did the first couple of spills do any damage ? Are you really that thirsty that you ca n't avoid dumping liquid on expensive electronics ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did the first couple of spills do any damage?Are you really that thirsty that you can't avoid dumping liquid on expensive electronics?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31084300</id>
	<title>Re:It runs XP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265031000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which is a result of running a "x586 system-on-chip" (FTFS) - why would someone design a machine using AA batteries and <i>not</i> use an ARM processor?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is a result of running a " x586 system-on-chip " ( FTFS ) - why would someone design a machine using AA batteries and not use an ARM processor ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which is a result of running a "x586 system-on-chip" (FTFS) - why would someone design a machine using AA batteries and not use an ARM processor?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080844</id>
	<title>Prelink?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1265724900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would accelerate startup times of programs. (But at the expense of RAM, if not properly done.)</p><p>One question: If the chip forces you to use Linux anyway, then why did they not use a ARM chip, and save even more energy?<br>There are so many easy-to-solve problems in this one, that it boggles the mind.<br>Batteries: Use a normal lid. Maybe with a locking mechanism. But not with screws.<br>SD: cut a opening in the case, and you have a SD slot.<br>WLAN: Same thing. Just make it so it has one smooth surface with the case, when the stick in inserted. And offer a way to eject it / pull it out. (A mechanical button will do.)<br>etc.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would accelerate startup times of programs .
( But at the expense of RAM , if not properly done .
) One question : If the chip forces you to use Linux anyway , then why did they not use a ARM chip , and save even more energy ? There are so many easy-to-solve problems in this one , that it boggles the mind.Batteries : Use a normal lid .
Maybe with a locking mechanism .
But not with screws.SD : cut a opening in the case , and you have a SD slot.WLAN : Same thing .
Just make it so it has one smooth surface with the case , when the stick in inserted .
And offer a way to eject it / pull it out .
( A mechanical button will do. ) etc .
: /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would accelerate startup times of programs.
(But at the expense of RAM, if not properly done.
)One question: If the chip forces you to use Linux anyway, then why did they not use a ARM chip, and save even more energy?There are so many easy-to-solve problems in this one, that it boggles the mind.Batteries: Use a normal lid.
Maybe with a locking mechanism.
But not with screws.SD: cut a opening in the case, and you have a SD slot.WLAN: Same thing.
Just make it so it has one smooth surface with the case, when the stick in inserted.
And offer a way to eject it / pull it out.
(A mechanical button will do.)etc.
:/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31085032</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1265036880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So?</p><p>This kind of reminds me of  the initial reaction many people had  to the Wii, which was that it was not very impressive.   But it's often not the computational power (or rendering power) of a system that matters as all the stuff that goes around it, the software and user interface hardware.   It all has to fit together to provide a useful (or entertaining) user experience.</p><p>The computer used on Apollo 11 is less powerful than most cheap digital watches these days.  That doesn't mean that you can navigate a dumb spaceship to the moon with your watch.  A lot of stuff went around those primitive CPUs to make things happen.</p><p>I've worked with scientists and other field workers who don't necessarily have access to a wall socket every few hours.  One of the big pains we had was when Palm stopped powering their devices with AAA.  We used to be able to send people into the field with one of those big shrink wrapped blocks of AAAs, and we'd know there wasn't going to be any issue with power.  The PDA became a lot more powerful, but not really any more useful for our purposes.   Removable storage was a huge plus, but switching to expensive battery packs wasn't so great from our standpoint.   Some of the people I worked with resorted to buying expensive solar panels, which are great in the bush if you can afford them and if they don't get stolen. An AAA powered device with an SD slot would have been perfect.</p><p>I understand the reporters used m100s for years after much more powerful laptops existed for similar concerns about being caught without power. I imagine the keyboard must be fairly good to inspire that kind of loyalty too. Maybe cheap lousy keyboard technology hadn't advanced so far in those days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So ? This kind of reminds me of the initial reaction many people had to the Wii , which was that it was not very impressive .
But it 's often not the computational power ( or rendering power ) of a system that matters as all the stuff that goes around it , the software and user interface hardware .
It all has to fit together to provide a useful ( or entertaining ) user experience.The computer used on Apollo 11 is less powerful than most cheap digital watches these days .
That does n't mean that you can navigate a dumb spaceship to the moon with your watch .
A lot of stuff went around those primitive CPUs to make things happen.I 've worked with scientists and other field workers who do n't necessarily have access to a wall socket every few hours .
One of the big pains we had was when Palm stopped powering their devices with AAA .
We used to be able to send people into the field with one of those big shrink wrapped blocks of AAAs , and we 'd know there was n't going to be any issue with power .
The PDA became a lot more powerful , but not really any more useful for our purposes .
Removable storage was a huge plus , but switching to expensive battery packs was n't so great from our standpoint .
Some of the people I worked with resorted to buying expensive solar panels , which are great in the bush if you can afford them and if they do n't get stolen .
An AAA powered device with an SD slot would have been perfect.I understand the reporters used m100s for years after much more powerful laptops existed for similar concerns about being caught without power .
I imagine the keyboard must be fairly good to inspire that kind of loyalty too .
Maybe cheap lousy keyboard technology had n't advanced so far in those days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So?This kind of reminds me of  the initial reaction many people had  to the Wii, which was that it was not very impressive.
But it's often not the computational power (or rendering power) of a system that matters as all the stuff that goes around it, the software and user interface hardware.
It all has to fit together to provide a useful (or entertaining) user experience.The computer used on Apollo 11 is less powerful than most cheap digital watches these days.
That doesn't mean that you can navigate a dumb spaceship to the moon with your watch.
A lot of stuff went around those primitive CPUs to make things happen.I've worked with scientists and other field workers who don't necessarily have access to a wall socket every few hours.
One of the big pains we had was when Palm stopped powering their devices with AAA.
We used to be able to send people into the field with one of those big shrink wrapped blocks of AAAs, and we'd know there wasn't going to be any issue with power.
The PDA became a lot more powerful, but not really any more useful for our purposes.
Removable storage was a huge plus, but switching to expensive battery packs wasn't so great from our standpoint.
Some of the people I worked with resorted to buying expensive solar panels, which are great in the bush if you can afford them and if they don't get stolen.
An AAA powered device with an SD slot would have been perfect.I understand the reporters used m100s for years after much more powerful laptops existed for similar concerns about being caught without power.
I imagine the keyboard must be fairly good to inspire that kind of loyalty too.
Maybe cheap lousy keyboard technology hadn't advanced so far in those days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079740</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081478</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265729880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.newlaunches.com/archives/forget\_tesla\_panasonic\_develops\_aa\_battery\_powered\_car\_which\_runs\_at\_100\_kmhr.php" title="newlaunches.com" rel="nofollow">Car powered by AA batteries!</a> [newlaunches.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Car powered by AA batteries !
[ newlaunches.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Car powered by AA batteries!
[newlaunches.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079056</id>
	<title>Re:Woah.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265714640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; That's gotta be one of the longest press releases (written to be an review) that I've seen in a long time.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I wonder what it costs to have your ad run on the front of Slashdot as a story these days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>    That 's got ta be one of the longest press releases ( written to be an review ) that I 've seen in a long time .
    I wonder what it costs to have your ad run on the front of Slashdot as a story these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
    That's gotta be one of the longest press releases (written to be an review) that I've seen in a long time.
    I wonder what it costs to have your ad run on the front of Slashdot as a story these days.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079410</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265716080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TRS-80 m100 (and the improved 102) are boss.</p><p>Used one to take notes for a few years before the glut of horrid little netbooks - 20 hours of battery life, plus built in MS basic and it can function as a simple serial terminal too. If you have a parallel port printer still, you can even use a motherboard parallel port adapter to print.</p><p>Nevermind it has the best @#$! keyboard ever put on a laptop. Period. If a bit loud. It also doesn't mind being dropped.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>TRS-80 m100 ( and the improved 102 ) are boss.Used one to take notes for a few years before the glut of horrid little netbooks - 20 hours of battery life , plus built in MS basic and it can function as a simple serial terminal too .
If you have a parallel port printer still , you can even use a motherboard parallel port adapter to print.Nevermind it has the best @ # $ !
keyboard ever put on a laptop .
Period. If a bit loud .
It also does n't mind being dropped .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TRS-80 m100 (and the improved 102) are boss.Used one to take notes for a few years before the glut of horrid little netbooks - 20 hours of battery life, plus built in MS basic and it can function as a simple serial terminal too.
If you have a parallel port printer still, you can even use a motherboard parallel port adapter to print.Nevermind it has the best @#$!
keyboard ever put on a laptop.
Period. If a bit loud.
It also doesn't mind being dropped.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080406</id>
	<title>Re:uhhhhh.......</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265721900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This reminds me of the time when I was in Nuremberg and the batteries for my camera died.</p><p>I ran into some random shop and managed to get a new pack of AAs without even needing to speak the language (I speak \_some\_ German, but I have no clue how to say 'AA batteries')</p><p>So, say you're in some random city outside and the batteries die. Where do you plan on plugging in? Sure, a laptop is a bit different than a camera, but still. You can't plug in everywhere. You \_can\_ usually find batteries everywhere. What if you're taking a 12 hour flight? Sure is nice to have extra batteries to switch out in such a case (I carry a spare for my laptop in such occasions). Or if you're on a train? Or even a coffeehouse without public outlets or where the public outlets are all in use or far away.</p><p>Let's see, this week alone I've been in the following situations where I would \_like\_ to be able to charge my laptop but no outlet was available:<br>Running a table for a student organization on my campus. There are no outlets where they place the tables, and I can't exactly just move. And hell, in the summer we do those things outside.<br>Attending a meeting. Yes, there are outlets in the room. Two of them. No, there weren't any open chairs near the outlets.<br>Hosting a meeting. For some reason they didn't think to install a power outlet anywhere near the VGA input for the projector...<br>Just sitting outside doing work.</p><p>And this is on a college campus, where everyone has laptops with them damn near all the time. What about third world countries, which is what this laptop is really \_designed\_ for? You really expect children in a third world country to have access to a power outlet absolutely everywhere that they go?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This reminds me of the time when I was in Nuremberg and the batteries for my camera died.I ran into some random shop and managed to get a new pack of AAs without even needing to speak the language ( I speak \ _some \ _ German , but I have no clue how to say 'AA batteries ' ) So , say you 're in some random city outside and the batteries die .
Where do you plan on plugging in ?
Sure , a laptop is a bit different than a camera , but still .
You ca n't plug in everywhere .
You \ _can \ _ usually find batteries everywhere .
What if you 're taking a 12 hour flight ?
Sure is nice to have extra batteries to switch out in such a case ( I carry a spare for my laptop in such occasions ) .
Or if you 're on a train ?
Or even a coffeehouse without public outlets or where the public outlets are all in use or far away.Let 's see , this week alone I 've been in the following situations where I would \ _like \ _ to be able to charge my laptop but no outlet was available : Running a table for a student organization on my campus .
There are no outlets where they place the tables , and I ca n't exactly just move .
And hell , in the summer we do those things outside.Attending a meeting .
Yes , there are outlets in the room .
Two of them .
No , there were n't any open chairs near the outlets.Hosting a meeting .
For some reason they did n't think to install a power outlet anywhere near the VGA input for the projector...Just sitting outside doing work.And this is on a college campus , where everyone has laptops with them damn near all the time .
What about third world countries , which is what this laptop is really \ _designed \ _ for ?
You really expect children in a third world country to have access to a power outlet absolutely everywhere that they go ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This reminds me of the time when I was in Nuremberg and the batteries for my camera died.I ran into some random shop and managed to get a new pack of AAs without even needing to speak the language (I speak \_some\_ German, but I have no clue how to say 'AA batteries')So, say you're in some random city outside and the batteries die.
Where do you plan on plugging in?
Sure, a laptop is a bit different than a camera, but still.
You can't plug in everywhere.
You \_can\_ usually find batteries everywhere.
What if you're taking a 12 hour flight?
Sure is nice to have extra batteries to switch out in such a case (I carry a spare for my laptop in such occasions).
Or if you're on a train?
Or even a coffeehouse without public outlets or where the public outlets are all in use or far away.Let's see, this week alone I've been in the following situations where I would \_like\_ to be able to charge my laptop but no outlet was available:Running a table for a student organization on my campus.
There are no outlets where they place the tables, and I can't exactly just move.
And hell, in the summer we do those things outside.Attending a meeting.
Yes, there are outlets in the room.
Two of them.
No, there weren't any open chairs near the outlets.Hosting a meeting.
For some reason they didn't think to install a power outlet anywhere near the VGA input for the projector...Just sitting outside doing work.And this is on a college campus, where everyone has laptops with them damn near all the time.
What about third world countries, which is what this laptop is really \_designed\_ for?
You really expect children in a third world country to have access to a power outlet absolutely everywhere that they go?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078974</id>
	<title>It runs XP</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1265714280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One thing that review did gloss over, but which is right there in TFA, among the first things listed.</p><p><a href="http://www.norhtec.com/products/gecko/geckoedubook2.jpg" title="norhtec.com">"It can support Microsoft Windows XP."</a> [norhtec.com]</p><p>So Linux is one of the options for this thing (they actually list a bunch of distros that work, apart from the one they specifically designed for the thing), not the only option.</p><p>Given the cries of how OLPC had sold out when they said they're going to support XP, I thought it would be kinda relevant...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing that review did gloss over , but which is right there in TFA , among the first things listed .
" It can support Microsoft Windows XP .
" [ norhtec.com ] So Linux is one of the options for this thing ( they actually list a bunch of distros that work , apart from the one they specifically designed for the thing ) , not the only option.Given the cries of how OLPC had sold out when they said they 're going to support XP , I thought it would be kinda relevant.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing that review did gloss over, but which is right there in TFA, among the first things listed.
"It can support Microsoft Windows XP.
" [norhtec.com]So Linux is one of the options for this thing (they actually list a bunch of distros that work, apart from the one they specifically designed for the thing), not the only option.Given the cries of how OLPC had sold out when they said they're going to support XP, I thought it would be kinda relevant...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079504</id>
	<title>Re:I have a very similar machine from 1983</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265716500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sigh. EduBook uses twice as many batteries for only 4 to 6 <i>hours</i>. With the Model 100 you got at least a week out of alkalines.</p><p>Yes, sure the EduBook does a lot more, but the headline got me excited that maybe were were finally going to exceed or at least equal the power usage of the late, great 100. (Note to youngsters - read the wiki link above. This thing came out only two years after the best portable was a 12 kilo suitcase. It had a real keyboard, ran on AA's, and did telnet as VT-52. I used mine into the early 90s. It's one of the best pieces of kit ever made. Play with one if you get a chance.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sigh .
EduBook uses twice as many batteries for only 4 to 6 hours .
With the Model 100 you got at least a week out of alkalines.Yes , sure the EduBook does a lot more , but the headline got me excited that maybe were were finally going to exceed or at least equal the power usage of the late , great 100 .
( Note to youngsters - read the wiki link above .
This thing came out only two years after the best portable was a 12 kilo suitcase .
It had a real keyboard , ran on AA 's , and did telnet as VT-52 .
I used mine into the early 90s .
It 's one of the best pieces of kit ever made .
Play with one if you get a chance .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sigh.
EduBook uses twice as many batteries for only 4 to 6 hours.
With the Model 100 you got at least a week out of alkalines.Yes, sure the EduBook does a lot more, but the headline got me excited that maybe were were finally going to exceed or at least equal the power usage of the late, great 100.
(Note to youngsters - read the wiki link above.
This thing came out only two years after the best portable was a 12 kilo suitcase.
It had a real keyboard, ran on AA's, and did telnet as VT-52.
I used mine into the early 90s.
It's one of the best pieces of kit ever made.
Play with one if you get a chance.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081848</id>
	<title>Re:SD slot???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265734020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the web site:</p><p>&gt; Internally, there is a SD socket which can be used as a low cost boot or storage device.  There is also space for a 2.5 inch hard disk. Externally there is another SD socket. that can be used for transferring data from mobile phones, digital cameras or other devices.</p><p>Perhaps you could use the external SD socket as, well, an external SD socket.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the web site : &gt; Internally , there is a SD socket which can be used as a low cost boot or storage device .
There is also space for a 2.5 inch hard disk .
Externally there is another SD socket .
that can be used for transferring data from mobile phones , digital cameras or other devices.Perhaps you could use the external SD socket as , well , an external SD socket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the web site:&gt; Internally, there is a SD socket which can be used as a low cost boot or storage device.
There is also space for a 2.5 inch hard disk.
Externally there is another SD socket.
that can be used for transferring data from mobile phones, digital cameras or other devices.Perhaps you could use the external SD socket as, well, an external SD socket.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31085938</id>
	<title>Re:uhhhhh.......</title>
	<author>Grayputer</author>
	<datestamp>1265040900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Airport + plane ride, Kids in car, field work,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Airport + plane ride , Kids in car , field work , .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Airport + plane ride, Kids in car, field work, ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079082</id>
	<title>Charging AAs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265714760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AAs are typically charged in series by in-device chargers. That is significantly worse than single-cell chargers because small differences in the capacity of the single cells result in over-charging which kills the batteries. Li-Ion batteries on the other hand are always charged individually because they are actually dangerous when overcharged.<br>There isn't a good reason to use AAs for a device which goes through one charge in a matter of days, especially when an unsophisticated charger is used. What we really need is a standard Li-Ion rechargeable battery format.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AAs are typically charged in series by in-device chargers .
That is significantly worse than single-cell chargers because small differences in the capacity of the single cells result in over-charging which kills the batteries .
Li-Ion batteries on the other hand are always charged individually because they are actually dangerous when overcharged.There is n't a good reason to use AAs for a device which goes through one charge in a matter of days , especially when an unsophisticated charger is used .
What we really need is a standard Li-Ion rechargeable battery format .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AAs are typically charged in series by in-device chargers.
That is significantly worse than single-cell chargers because small differences in the capacity of the single cells result in over-charging which kills the batteries.
Li-Ion batteries on the other hand are always charged individually because they are actually dangerous when overcharged.There isn't a good reason to use AAs for a device which goes through one charge in a matter of days, especially when an unsophisticated charger is used.
What we really need is a standard Li-Ion rechargeable battery format.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31115776</id>
	<title>Re:It runs XP</title>
	<author>wvmarle</author>
	<datestamp>1266001080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And it indicates how far behind Microsoft is falling.
</p><p>All they have to offer for a computer like this is an OS that is almost a decade old. It's not that the hardware is low spec. Not at all. Only the "hard drive" is actually slow in there. I still think these small, cheap, relatively low specced devices are going to be a major part of the computer market in the near future.
</p><p>The competition on the other hand has products that are fully up-to-date available.
</p><p>I have never been a fan of MS but for a company that size with such enormous influence on computing, it's still kinda sad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And it indicates how far behind Microsoft is falling .
All they have to offer for a computer like this is an OS that is almost a decade old .
It 's not that the hardware is low spec .
Not at all .
Only the " hard drive " is actually slow in there .
I still think these small , cheap , relatively low specced devices are going to be a major part of the computer market in the near future .
The competition on the other hand has products that are fully up-to-date available .
I have never been a fan of MS but for a company that size with such enormous influence on computing , it 's still kinda sad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it indicates how far behind Microsoft is falling.
All they have to offer for a computer like this is an OS that is almost a decade old.
It's not that the hardware is low spec.
Not at all.
Only the "hard drive" is actually slow in there.
I still think these small, cheap, relatively low specced devices are going to be a major part of the computer market in the near future.
The competition on the other hand has products that are fully up-to-date available.
I have never been a fan of MS but for a company that size with such enormous influence on computing, it's still kinda sad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080634</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1265723220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Actually when you think about it AA batteries do kinda suck... At least non-rechargeable ones are a bad idea. It is a nice way to needlessly fill landfills with horrible chemicals. We should probably put some sorta tax on them tbh (like shitty incandescents), people would switch to liions or rechargeables without any issues. <br> <br>And yes I do realize there is some sort of rule about disposing batteries that is completely ignored in north america. My japanese prof actually asked the class one year wth we were supposed to do with them since she'd had a bag in her house filling for like 3years. Clearly it isn't effective.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually when you think about it AA batteries do kinda suck... At least non-rechargeable ones are a bad idea .
It is a nice way to needlessly fill landfills with horrible chemicals .
We should probably put some sorta tax on them tbh ( like shitty incandescents ) , people would switch to liions or rechargeables without any issues .
And yes I do realize there is some sort of rule about disposing batteries that is completely ignored in north america .
My japanese prof actually asked the class one year wth we were supposed to do with them since she 'd had a bag in her house filling for like 3years .
Clearly it is n't effective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually when you think about it AA batteries do kinda suck... At least non-rechargeable ones are a bad idea.
It is a nice way to needlessly fill landfills with horrible chemicals.
We should probably put some sorta tax on them tbh (like shitty incandescents), people would switch to liions or rechargeables without any issues.
And yes I do realize there is some sort of rule about disposing batteries that is completely ignored in north america.
My japanese prof actually asked the class one year wth we were supposed to do with them since she'd had a bag in her house filling for like 3years.
Clearly it isn't effective.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080910</id>
	<title>Re:It runs XP</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1265725440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I'm going to put windows on it I'm better off just spending $30 more and getting <a href="http://www.liliputing.com/2009/12/walmart-to-offer-228-emachines-netbook-the-day-after-christmas.html" title="liliputing.com">this</a> [liliputing.com] with a intel atom, one gig ram, 160gb hard drive and windows 7.
<br> <br>
drop the price to $100 and I'll consider it</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I 'm going to put windows on it I 'm better off just spending $ 30 more and getting this [ liliputing.com ] with a intel atom , one gig ram , 160gb hard drive and windows 7 . drop the price to $ 100 and I 'll consider it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I'm going to put windows on it I'm better off just spending $30 more and getting this [liliputing.com] with a intel atom, one gig ram, 160gb hard drive and windows 7.
 
drop the price to $100 and I'll consider it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081410</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265729280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(opinion alert)</p><p>Doesn't sound stupid to me. Batteries that are not rechargeable are whats stupid. You're stupid for using them, and companies are stupid for producing them. They create a ton of waste, have terrible energy storage, and are still pretty expensive. Why not power a TV remote with a small Li-ion battery? I personally wouldn't mind charging it every once in a while if it means never having to swap out the batteries again, and in the long run it would be much cheaper. Also, phones are already powered by various forms of rechargeable batters, so I'm not sure why you even mentioned them. Even devices that are much cheaper than a single rechargeable battery would benefit from rechargeable batteries. In the long run, the consumer would spend less money and there is always the bonus of creating less waste.</p><p>As mentioned, rechargeable batters are more expensive than non-rechargeables but this can change with time and mass-production. They may even be harder to recycle and create more waste per battery (I don't really know and don't care enough to research), but you only need ONE set per device instead of a new set every time they die. That *has* to cut down on waste, pollution, and cost enough to tip the scales but again, I am not willing to research and am not an expert.</p><p>To summarize, <b>Non-rechargeable batteries are a horrible way to power anything.</b> I whole-heartedly disagree with your post, and am sad that it got a +5 Informative mod when, at best, it should have been Interesting. In my opinion you should have been modded Troll because you are only instigating and not providing any more insight or information on the subject.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( opinion alert ) Does n't sound stupid to me .
Batteries that are not rechargeable are whats stupid .
You 're stupid for using them , and companies are stupid for producing them .
They create a ton of waste , have terrible energy storage , and are still pretty expensive .
Why not power a TV remote with a small Li-ion battery ?
I personally would n't mind charging it every once in a while if it means never having to swap out the batteries again , and in the long run it would be much cheaper .
Also , phones are already powered by various forms of rechargeable batters , so I 'm not sure why you even mentioned them .
Even devices that are much cheaper than a single rechargeable battery would benefit from rechargeable batteries .
In the long run , the consumer would spend less money and there is always the bonus of creating less waste.As mentioned , rechargeable batters are more expensive than non-rechargeables but this can change with time and mass-production .
They may even be harder to recycle and create more waste per battery ( I do n't really know and do n't care enough to research ) , but you only need ONE set per device instead of a new set every time they die .
That * has * to cut down on waste , pollution , and cost enough to tip the scales but again , I am not willing to research and am not an expert.To summarize , Non-rechargeable batteries are a horrible way to power anything .
I whole-heartedly disagree with your post , and am sad that it got a + 5 Informative mod when , at best , it should have been Interesting .
In my opinion you should have been modded Troll because you are only instigating and not providing any more insight or information on the subject .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(opinion alert)Doesn't sound stupid to me.
Batteries that are not rechargeable are whats stupid.
You're stupid for using them, and companies are stupid for producing them.
They create a ton of waste, have terrible energy storage, and are still pretty expensive.
Why not power a TV remote with a small Li-ion battery?
I personally wouldn't mind charging it every once in a while if it means never having to swap out the batteries again, and in the long run it would be much cheaper.
Also, phones are already powered by various forms of rechargeable batters, so I'm not sure why you even mentioned them.
Even devices that are much cheaper than a single rechargeable battery would benefit from rechargeable batteries.
In the long run, the consumer would spend less money and there is always the bonus of creating less waste.As mentioned, rechargeable batters are more expensive than non-rechargeables but this can change with time and mass-production.
They may even be harder to recycle and create more waste per battery (I don't really know and don't care enough to research), but you only need ONE set per device instead of a new set every time they die.
That *has* to cut down on waste, pollution, and cost enough to tip the scales but again, I am not willing to research and am not an expert.To summarize, Non-rechargeable batteries are a horrible way to power anything.
I whole-heartedly disagree with your post, and am sad that it got a +5 Informative mod when, at best, it should have been Interesting.
In my opinion you should have been modded Troll because you are only instigating and not providing any more insight or information on the subject.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079478</id>
	<title>Re:Woah.</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1265716380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For me it is an unusually interesting slashvertisement so I think it belongs on the front page.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For me it is an unusually interesting slashvertisement so I think it belongs on the front page .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For me it is an unusually interesting slashvertisement so I think it belongs on the front page.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920</id>
	<title>Waiting for Recall</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265713980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Direct AC connection? 110-240V? I don't know about you guys, but I ain't gonna put that damn thing on my lap. This is a laptop. I have spilled coffee, juice, other drinks on my laptops. I don't want 240V shock on my private parts. I let my young kids to use laptop too and certainly wouldn't allow this one to them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Direct AC connection ?
110-240V ? I do n't know about you guys , but I ai n't gon na put that damn thing on my lap .
This is a laptop .
I have spilled coffee , juice , other drinks on my laptops .
I do n't want 240V shock on my private parts .
I let my young kids to use laptop too and certainly would n't allow this one to them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Direct AC connection?
110-240V? I don't know about you guys, but I ain't gonna put that damn thing on my lap.
This is a laptop.
I have spilled coffee, juice, other drinks on my laptops.
I don't want 240V shock on my private parts.
I let my young kids to use laptop too and certainly wouldn't allow this one to them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081086</id>
	<title>No suspend/resume is a dealbreaker</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265726580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Suspend/resume is hard to get right.  It didn't work on the XO for quite a while, and then when it finally was a supported feature it could trash the external SD card.  (That bug was squashed several months later, wasn't it?)  There are potential problems with devices on USB (like the wifi in in this EduBook).  I think the XO-1.5 redesign included several changes for the purpose of better enabling suspend/resume.  (And the XO also had the audacious goal of supporting micro-naps with near-instant resume to really extend battery life, which unfortunately they never achieved.)</p><p>Really, having no suspend/resume is just a total dealbreaker for a laptop that isn't chained to the classroom wall.  Plus it's an indication of a not-well-tested product IMHO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Suspend/resume is hard to get right .
It did n't work on the XO for quite a while , and then when it finally was a supported feature it could trash the external SD card .
( That bug was squashed several months later , was n't it ?
) There are potential problems with devices on USB ( like the wifi in in this EduBook ) .
I think the XO-1.5 redesign included several changes for the purpose of better enabling suspend/resume .
( And the XO also had the audacious goal of supporting micro-naps with near-instant resume to really extend battery life , which unfortunately they never achieved .
) Really , having no suspend/resume is just a total dealbreaker for a laptop that is n't chained to the classroom wall .
Plus it 's an indication of a not-well-tested product IMHO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suspend/resume is hard to get right.
It didn't work on the XO for quite a while, and then when it finally was a supported feature it could trash the external SD card.
(That bug was squashed several months later, wasn't it?
)  There are potential problems with devices on USB (like the wifi in in this EduBook).
I think the XO-1.5 redesign included several changes for the purpose of better enabling suspend/resume.
(And the XO also had the audacious goal of supporting micro-naps with near-instant resume to really extend battery life, which unfortunately they never achieved.
)Really, having no suspend/resume is just a total dealbreaker for a laptop that isn't chained to the classroom wall.
Plus it's an indication of a not-well-tested product IMHO.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081476</id>
	<title>Solar?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265729820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>12 Volts, 1.2 watts<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... my eee needs 36 watts (12V * 3A = 36 watts)  according to the power adaptor.</p><p>For 31.65 + s/h I can make this Solar powered</p><p><a href="http://www.altestore.com/store/Solar-Panels/1-to-50-Watt-Solar-Panels/Kyocera-12W-12V-Mini-Solar-Panel/p718/" title="altestore.com">http://www.altestore.com/store/Solar-Panels/1-to-50-Watt-Solar-Panels/Kyocera-12W-12V-Mini-Solar-Panel/p718/</a> [altestore.com]</p><p>I can see the application in this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>12 Volts , 1.2 watts .... my eee needs 36 watts ( 12V * 3A = 36 watts ) according to the power adaptor.For 31.65 + s/h I can make this Solar poweredhttp : //www.altestore.com/store/Solar-Panels/1-to-50-Watt-Solar-Panels/Kyocera-12W-12V-Mini-Solar-Panel/p718/ [ altestore.com ] I can see the application in this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>12 Volts, 1.2 watts .... my eee needs 36 watts (12V * 3A = 36 watts)  according to the power adaptor.For 31.65 + s/h I can make this Solar poweredhttp://www.altestore.com/store/Solar-Panels/1-to-50-Watt-Solar-Panels/Kyocera-12W-12V-Mini-Solar-Panel/p718/ [altestore.com]I can see the application in this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082584</id>
	<title>Re:uhhhhh.......</title>
	<author>JWSmythe</author>
	<datestamp>1265744040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You really expect children in a third world country to have access to a power outlet absolutely everywhere that they go?</p></div></blockquote><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Likewise, do you really expect children in a third world country to be able to run down to the 7-11 and pick up 8 new AA batteries? Remember that whole "$0.50 feeds this child for a week".   Hmmm, batteries for my laptop for a few hours, or food for the next three weeks.  That becomes a pretty tough decision, where batteries won't win.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; I will agree with you, it's been nice to be able to swap batteries in my camera on demand.  But then again, I've been in civilized parts of the world when I wanted new batteries.  It doesn't take going to a starving country to find batteries difficult to acquire.  On a few cross country road trips, we didn't bring enough AA batteries, and stopped at tiny gas stations in the middle of nowhere.  Like areas where it's 100 miles between exits with anything resembling civilization, and even that is just a gas station with an old generator powering it, because there's no way the power company will run 100 miles of wire for one store.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Usually you do ok with the shelf life of batteries in most stores.  There are places that may sell a set of batteries every decade.  Sometimes we'd get the batteries, and be on our way before we put them in the camera, just to find out that they were well beyond their shelf life.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; That's in the luxurious United States of America, where we have paved roads almost everywhere, and you won't find entire cities of people starving.  Ya, I don't expect they can just buy more batteries when they want.  But, batteries may be more accessible than power outlets.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You really expect children in a third world country to have access to a power outlet absolutely everywhere that they go ?
    Likewise , do you really expect children in a third world country to be able to run down to the 7-11 and pick up 8 new AA batteries ?
Remember that whole " $ 0.50 feeds this child for a week " .
Hmmm , batteries for my laptop for a few hours , or food for the next three weeks .
That becomes a pretty tough decision , where batteries wo n't win .
    I will agree with you , it 's been nice to be able to swap batteries in my camera on demand .
But then again , I 've been in civilized parts of the world when I wanted new batteries .
It does n't take going to a starving country to find batteries difficult to acquire .
On a few cross country road trips , we did n't bring enough AA batteries , and stopped at tiny gas stations in the middle of nowhere .
Like areas where it 's 100 miles between exits with anything resembling civilization , and even that is just a gas station with an old generator powering it , because there 's no way the power company will run 100 miles of wire for one store .
    Usually you do ok with the shelf life of batteries in most stores .
There are places that may sell a set of batteries every decade .
Sometimes we 'd get the batteries , and be on our way before we put them in the camera , just to find out that they were well beyond their shelf life .
    That 's in the luxurious United States of America , where we have paved roads almost everywhere , and you wo n't find entire cities of people starving .
Ya , I do n't expect they can just buy more batteries when they want .
But , batteries may be more accessible than power outlets .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>You really expect children in a third world country to have access to a power outlet absolutely everywhere that they go?
    Likewise, do you really expect children in a third world country to be able to run down to the 7-11 and pick up 8 new AA batteries?
Remember that whole "$0.50 feeds this child for a week".
Hmmm, batteries for my laptop for a few hours, or food for the next three weeks.
That becomes a pretty tough decision, where batteries won't win.
    I will agree with you, it's been nice to be able to swap batteries in my camera on demand.
But then again, I've been in civilized parts of the world when I wanted new batteries.
It doesn't take going to a starving country to find batteries difficult to acquire.
On a few cross country road trips, we didn't bring enough AA batteries, and stopped at tiny gas stations in the middle of nowhere.
Like areas where it's 100 miles between exits with anything resembling civilization, and even that is just a gas station with an old generator powering it, because there's no way the power company will run 100 miles of wire for one store.
    Usually you do ok with the shelf life of batteries in most stores.
There are places that may sell a set of batteries every decade.
Sometimes we'd get the batteries, and be on our way before we put them in the camera, just to find out that they were well beyond their shelf life.
    That's in the luxurious United States of America, where we have paved roads almost everywhere, and you won't find entire cities of people starving.
Ya, I don't expect they can just buy more batteries when they want.
But, batteries may be more accessible than power outlets.
   
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079112</id>
	<title>Re:Waiting for Recall</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1265714940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No 12 Vdc power input? How do I run this in my car? Now I've got to buy an inverter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No 12 Vdc power input ?
How do I run this in my car ?
Now I 've got to buy an inverter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No 12 Vdc power input?
How do I run this in my car?
Now I've got to buy an inverter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079000</id>
	<title>Performance compared to Atom?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265714400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Form factor is almost irrelevant here. What matters is the following:</p><p>1) Can XCore continue to improve the SOC with higher clockspeeds and features?<br>2) Can the XCore86 CPU compete performance-wise with Atom?<br>3) For almost $200, how do they intend to compete against existing UMPCs from makers like Asus?</p><p>This EduBook is cute, but the question remains whether this SOC can truly compete against the Atom+US15W in the marketplace. Getting a free device because you're some hotshot Slashdot editor isn't quite the same thing as comparison shopping for the right solution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Form factor is almost irrelevant here .
What matters is the following : 1 ) Can XCore continue to improve the SOC with higher clockspeeds and features ? 2 ) Can the XCore86 CPU compete performance-wise with Atom ? 3 ) For almost $ 200 , how do they intend to compete against existing UMPCs from makers like Asus ? This EduBook is cute , but the question remains whether this SOC can truly compete against the Atom + US15W in the marketplace .
Getting a free device because you 're some hotshot Slashdot editor is n't quite the same thing as comparison shopping for the right solution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Form factor is almost irrelevant here.
What matters is the following:1) Can XCore continue to improve the SOC with higher clockspeeds and features?2) Can the XCore86 CPU compete performance-wise with Atom?3) For almost $200, how do they intend to compete against existing UMPCs from makers like Asus?This EduBook is cute, but the question remains whether this SOC can truly compete against the Atom+US15W in the marketplace.
Getting a free device because you're some hotshot Slashdot editor isn't quite the same thing as comparison shopping for the right solution.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083740</id>
	<title>Re:uhhhhh.......</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265024400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember to smuggle a little screwdriver onto the plane for the battery compartment</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember to smuggle a little screwdriver onto the plane for the battery compartment</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember to smuggle a little screwdriver onto the plane for the battery compartment</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079604</id>
	<title>Re:$199 too high!</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1265717040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'd be surprised at how many people will go out and by a Laptop simply because its $199. They don't care what it runs, how fast it runs, or even battery life. They want a computer they can carry around that they can plug in somewhere, and use it to type up stuff while they watch TV.</p><p>And a $199 desktop, while probably more powerful, is too clunky to carry around, especially when you add the monitor on top of that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'd be surprised at how many people will go out and by a Laptop simply because its $ 199 .
They do n't care what it runs , how fast it runs , or even battery life .
They want a computer they can carry around that they can plug in somewhere , and use it to type up stuff while they watch TV.And a $ 199 desktop , while probably more powerful , is too clunky to carry around , especially when you add the monitor on top of that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'd be surprised at how many people will go out and by a Laptop simply because its $199.
They don't care what it runs, how fast it runs, or even battery life.
They want a computer they can carry around that they can plug in somewhere, and use it to type up stuff while they watch TV.And a $199 desktop, while probably more powerful, is too clunky to carry around, especially when you add the monitor on top of that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080510</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for ...cars!</title>
	<author>zogger</author>
	<datestamp>1265722560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>6831 cells, form factor 18650-common industry standard for small devices, slightly larger than an AA, more storage and higher voltage (just for reference)</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_battery\_sizes#18650" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_battery\_sizes#18650</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Tesla roadster battery pack system</p><p><a href="http://www.teslamotors.com/display\_data/TeslaRoadsterBatterySystem.pdf" title="teslamotors.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.teslamotors.com/display\_data/TeslaRoadsterBatterySystem.pdf</a> [teslamotors.com]</p><p>So it almost is being done with cars like that..close enough. They use some fancy wiring and cooling for the Tesla though...</p><p>You have good points on trash and packing though. That's a big price people pay for a lot of things today, then it just turns to junk instantly. My non favorite is blisterpacks. I keep aviation snips handy just for dealing with those things. They *are* good packaging, but a pain to open and then how to dispose of them cleanly?</p><p>
&nbsp; Sometimes I wish they had an area right outside the checkout lanes where you could open your purchases, and they had a recycle bin sitting there for the packaging junk. Or just have lockable generic packages with clear covers to see what is in there. You pay for the item, it gets unlocked right then after ring up, they retain the packaging and it goes to the back where the next item-whatever that item might be that could fit in it, gets placed in there, then back out to the shelf.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>6831 cells , form factor 18650-common industry standard for small devices , slightly larger than an AA , more storage and higher voltage ( just for reference ) http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List \ _of \ _battery \ _sizes # 18650 [ wikipedia.org ] Tesla roadster battery pack systemhttp : //www.teslamotors.com/display \ _data/TeslaRoadsterBatterySystem.pdf [ teslamotors.com ] So it almost is being done with cars like that..close enough .
They use some fancy wiring and cooling for the Tesla though...You have good points on trash and packing though .
That 's a big price people pay for a lot of things today , then it just turns to junk instantly .
My non favorite is blisterpacks .
I keep aviation snips handy just for dealing with those things .
They * are * good packaging , but a pain to open and then how to dispose of them cleanly ?
  Sometimes I wish they had an area right outside the checkout lanes where you could open your purchases , and they had a recycle bin sitting there for the packaging junk .
Or just have lockable generic packages with clear covers to see what is in there .
You pay for the item , it gets unlocked right then after ring up , they retain the packaging and it goes to the back where the next item-whatever that item might be that could fit in it , gets placed in there , then back out to the shelf .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>6831 cells, form factor 18650-common industry standard for small devices, slightly larger than an AA, more storage and higher voltage (just for reference)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List\_of\_battery\_sizes#18650 [wikipedia.org]Tesla roadster battery pack systemhttp://www.teslamotors.com/display\_data/TeslaRoadsterBatterySystem.pdf [teslamotors.com]So it almost is being done with cars like that..close enough.
They use some fancy wiring and cooling for the Tesla though...You have good points on trash and packing though.
That's a big price people pay for a lot of things today, then it just turns to junk instantly.
My non favorite is blisterpacks.
I keep aviation snips handy just for dealing with those things.
They *are* good packaging, but a pain to open and then how to dispose of them cleanly?
  Sometimes I wish they had an area right outside the checkout lanes where you could open your purchases, and they had a recycle bin sitting there for the packaging junk.
Or just have lockable generic packages with clear covers to see what is in there.
You pay for the item, it gets unlocked right then after ring up, they retain the packaging and it goes to the back where the next item-whatever that item might be that could fit in it, gets placed in there, then back out to the shelf.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079378</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265715960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree that AA's suck as a battery choice, but they do also come in Lithium.</p><p>I've been using these in my old hp 3.1 megapixel camera, these last longer than any other AA I've used, it may help you the next time you have to use AA's.</p><p><a href="http://www.energizer.com/products/hightech-batteries/lithium/pages/lithium-batteries.aspx" title="energizer.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.energizer.com/products/hightech-batteries/lithium/pages/lithium-batteries.aspx</a> [energizer.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that AA 's suck as a battery choice , but they do also come in Lithium.I 've been using these in my old hp 3.1 megapixel camera , these last longer than any other AA I 've used , it may help you the next time you have to use AA 's.http : //www.energizer.com/products/hightech-batteries/lithium/pages/lithium-batteries.aspx [ energizer.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that AA's suck as a battery choice, but they do also come in Lithium.I've been using these in my old hp 3.1 megapixel camera, these last longer than any other AA I've used, it may help you the next time you have to use AA's.http://www.energizer.com/products/hightech-batteries/lithium/pages/lithium-batteries.aspx [energizer.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079276</id>
	<title>Re:Waiting for Recall</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265715540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, if your kids do use this, spill a drink on it, and get shocked... Just tell them they're grounded!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , if your kids do use this , spill a drink on it , and get shocked... Just tell them they 're grounded !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, if your kids do use this, spill a drink on it, and get shocked... Just tell them they're grounded!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079308</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>schon</author>
	<datestamp>1265715660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop. Why not power a car with them?</p></div><p>Last time I checked, a laptop wasn't an automobile.</p><p>And by your logic, AA batteries are a "horrible" way to power *anything*.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>AAs are a horrible way to power a TV remote.  Why not power a car with them?</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>AAs are a horrible way to power a phone.  Why not power a car with them?</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p>AAs are a horrible way to power a <b>portable device</b>.  Why not power a car with them?</p></div><p>See how stupid it sounds?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop .
Why not power a car with them ? Last time I checked , a laptop was n't an automobile.And by your logic , AA batteries are a " horrible " way to power * anything * .AAs are a horrible way to power a TV remote .
Why not power a car with them ? AAs are a horrible way to power a phone .
Why not power a car with them ? AAs are a horrible way to power a portable device .
Why not power a car with them ? See how stupid it sounds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AAs are a horrible way to power a laptop.
Why not power a car with them?Last time I checked, a laptop wasn't an automobile.And by your logic, AA batteries are a "horrible" way to power *anything*.AAs are a horrible way to power a TV remote.
Why not power a car with them?AAs are a horrible way to power a phone.
Why not power a car with them?AAs are a horrible way to power a portable device.
Why not power a car with them?See how stupid it sounds?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079576</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>Korin43</author>
	<datestamp>1265716800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're right, batteries are a terrible idea! We should be powering our laptops with gasoline engines!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right , batteries are a terrible idea !
We should be powering our laptops with gasoline engines !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right, batteries are a terrible idea!
We should be powering our laptops with gasoline engines!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083374</id>
	<title>Best of both</title>
	<author>cyclomedia</author>
	<datestamp>1265019240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is hardly revolutionary technology the <a href="http://www.minidisc.org/part\_Sony\_MZ-R700.html" title="minidisc.org">Sony MZ R700</a> [minidisc.org] MiniDisc walkman came with a rechargable battery and a charging circuit so you can charge it from the wall wart. The best part is that its an AA battery, so not only can you swap it out for a standard AA in a pinch you can also stick any other rechargable AA in and use that/recharge it internally. And that came out in 2001 and is the tiniest most amazing piece of electronics i've ever laid hands on, I bought a "new" one off ebay just a couple of weeks ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is hardly revolutionary technology the Sony MZ R700 [ minidisc.org ] MiniDisc walkman came with a rechargable battery and a charging circuit so you can charge it from the wall wart .
The best part is that its an AA battery , so not only can you swap it out for a standard AA in a pinch you can also stick any other rechargable AA in and use that/recharge it internally .
And that came out in 2001 and is the tiniest most amazing piece of electronics i 've ever laid hands on , I bought a " new " one off ebay just a couple of weeks ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is hardly revolutionary technology the Sony MZ R700 [minidisc.org] MiniDisc walkman came with a rechargable battery and a charging circuit so you can charge it from the wall wart.
The best part is that its an AA battery, so not only can you swap it out for a standard AA in a pinch you can also stick any other rechargable AA in and use that/recharge it internally.
And that came out in 2001 and is the tiniest most amazing piece of electronics i've ever laid hands on, I bought a "new" one off ebay just a couple of weeks ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079598</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1265716980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have a 4-cell charger that will charge 2200MaH Ni-MH cells in 15 minutes.  Special cells, but damn, I can recharge a spare set in about a half hour.  Not unreasonably priced back then.  These were the IC3 cells.  I can't find them any more, apparently Ray-O-Vac discontinued them in favor of hybrid cells, not the same thing...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a 4-cell charger that will charge 2200MaH Ni-MH cells in 15 minutes .
Special cells , but damn , I can recharge a spare set in about a half hour .
Not unreasonably priced back then .
These were the IC3 cells .
I ca n't find them any more , apparently Ray-O-Vac discontinued them in favor of hybrid cells , not the same thing.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a 4-cell charger that will charge 2200MaH Ni-MH cells in 15 minutes.
Special cells, but damn, I can recharge a spare set in about a half hour.
Not unreasonably priced back then.
These were the IC3 cells.
I can't find them any more, apparently Ray-O-Vac discontinued them in favor of hybrid cells, not the same thing...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081288</id>
	<title>Re:SD slot???</title>
	<author>Mage66</author>
	<datestamp>1265728320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can also use a 2.5" Laptop HDD or an SSD in the same form factor or interface. As far as I have been able to find out, there is a lot of flexibility in options.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can also use a 2.5 " Laptop HDD or an SSD in the same form factor or interface .
As far as I have been able to find out , there is a lot of flexibility in options .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can also use a 2.5" Laptop HDD or an SSD in the same form factor or interface.
As far as I have been able to find out, there is a lot of flexibility in options.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079548</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079688</id>
	<title>Re:Waiting for Recall</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265717520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK. You ARE grounded.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK. You ARE grounded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK. You ARE grounded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082954</id>
	<title>Re:uhhhhh.......</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265057580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do you say "AA" battery in Romanian?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; R6<br>How do you say "AA" battery in German?<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Mignon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do you say " AA " battery in Romanian ?
      R6How do you say " AA " battery in German ?
      Mignon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do you say "AA" battery in Romanian?
      R6How do you say "AA" battery in German?
      Mignon</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080406</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079022</id>
	<title>Re:Hurray for LandFills!</title>
	<author>toastar</author>
	<datestamp>1265714460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know you guys hate Apple for it, but there's a reason they're getting 8 hours out of a 17" laptop. It's because they threw away all the 'packaging' crap that comes with normal batteries and only packaged the 'energy storing' part.</p></div><p>So when it explodes you get more bang for your buck.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know you guys hate Apple for it , but there 's a reason they 're getting 8 hours out of a 17 " laptop .
It 's because they threw away all the 'packaging ' crap that comes with normal batteries and only packaged the 'energy storing ' part.So when it explodes you get more bang for your buck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know you guys hate Apple for it, but there's a reason they're getting 8 hours out of a 17" laptop.
It's because they threw away all the 'packaging' crap that comes with normal batteries and only packaged the 'energy storing' part.So when it explodes you get more bang for your buck.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079518</id>
	<title>I have one too!</title>
	<author>joe\_n\_bloe</author>
	<datestamp>1265716560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I loved it. I'm sure it still works. I also have the acoustic (300 baud) coupler for the built-in modem.</p><p>Also, there's the Newton.</p><p>Some day maybe 2 week battery life will be back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I loved it .
I 'm sure it still works .
I also have the acoustic ( 300 baud ) coupler for the built-in modem.Also , there 's the Newton.Some day maybe 2 week battery life will be back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I loved it.
I'm sure it still works.
I also have the acoustic (300 baud) coupler for the built-in modem.Also, there's the Newton.Some day maybe 2 week battery life will be back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081130</id>
	<title>Re:Very interesting except...</title>
	<author>chilvence</author>
	<datestamp>1265727000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why should you be, all American electronics already come from Asia anyway<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why should you be , all American electronics already come from Asia anyway : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why should you be, all American electronics already come from Asia anyway :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083406</id>
	<title>Re:It runs XP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265019660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The EduBook is primarily aimed at the market space of the Classmate and the OLPC XO.  However, a lot of Linux people have bought it because it is a very modular system that allows them to repackage the EduBook for special projects.  The $199.95 prices is a suggested end-user price but the goal is to allow dealers and distributors to buy in volume and be able to offer at special discounts -- particularly to teachers and students.</p><p>The EduBook is sold either as a kit or fully assembled so that it can be imported into countries that offer incentives for local assembly.  The assembled price for 10,000 units is $145.00 and the price for the kit version is $135.00. At 100,000 units (which is the typical quantity for the OLPC, the price is $99.95.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The EduBook is primarily aimed at the market space of the Classmate and the OLPC XO .
However , a lot of Linux people have bought it because it is a very modular system that allows them to repackage the EduBook for special projects .
The $ 199.95 prices is a suggested end-user price but the goal is to allow dealers and distributors to buy in volume and be able to offer at special discounts -- particularly to teachers and students.The EduBook is sold either as a kit or fully assembled so that it can be imported into countries that offer incentives for local assembly .
The assembled price for 10,000 units is $ 145.00 and the price for the kit version is $ 135.00 .
At 100,000 units ( which is the typical quantity for the OLPC , the price is $ 99.95 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The EduBook is primarily aimed at the market space of the Classmate and the OLPC XO.
However, a lot of Linux people have bought it because it is a very modular system that allows them to repackage the EduBook for special projects.
The $199.95 prices is a suggested end-user price but the goal is to allow dealers and distributors to buy in volume and be able to offer at special discounts -- particularly to teachers and students.The EduBook is sold either as a kit or fully assembled so that it can be imported into countries that offer incentives for local assembly.
The assembled price for 10,000 units is $145.00 and the price for the kit version is $135.00.
At 100,000 units (which is the typical quantity for the OLPC, the price is $99.95.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079780</id>
	<title>website is so bad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265717940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>u have to wonder how good the product is<br>they put like, 2 nanoseconds of thought into the web page - you have to wonder if the same lazy, screw the user attitude is in their engineering dept<br>and i'm not just talking lack of glitzy useless flashcrap either;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>u have to wonder how good the product isthey put like , 2 nanoseconds of thought into the web page - you have to wonder if the same lazy , screw the user attitude is in their engineering deptand i 'm not just talking lack of glitzy useless flashcrap either ;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>u have to wonder how good the product isthey put like, 2 nanoseconds of thought into the web page - you have to wonder if the same lazy, screw the user attitude is in their engineering deptand i'm not just talking lack of glitzy useless flashcrap either;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31084878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31115960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081476
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078872
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31085938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31115776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31088486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31084300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31085032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31084520
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079104
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31090588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080124
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31090910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081848
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078974
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078952
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31087486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31101448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078976
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_2138200_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31115776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080910
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31084300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078976
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31101448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080342
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078896
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31085938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080406
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083740
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082584
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079918
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079370
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079106
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079308
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081410
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31084878
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080634
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082990
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31088486
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31090910
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31087486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079378
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080796
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080124
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31084520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079056
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079478
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31082732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079548
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081848
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081288
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079844
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31090588
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31115960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31078920
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31083260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079276
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079688
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079486
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081636
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31080200
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31081554
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_2138200.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079518
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079498
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079740
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31085032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_2138200.31079504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
