<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_09_1452238</id>
	<title>Microsoft Phasing Out FAST Search For Linux, Unix</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1265731440000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>viralMeme writes <i>"Microsoft plans to begin <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13846\_3-10448610-62.html">phasing out Unix and Linux platform support</a> for its FAST enterprise search products, as of its next release. According to <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/enterprisesearch/archive/2010/02/04/innovation-on-linux-and-unix.aspx">a Thursday blog post</a> from Microsoft Distinguished Engineer Bj&#248;rn Olstad, 'We&rsquo;ve continued to sell, support, and update the Linux and UNIX versions of FAST ESP, and we&rsquo;ve designed the next wave of FAST products (scheduled for release in the first half of calendar year 2010) to include a cross-platform search core that has been extended to take advantage of web services and support mixed-platform deployment models. With our 2010 products scheduled for release in a few months, we&rsquo;ve just started to plan for our next wave of products.  As a part of that planning process, we have decided that in order to deliver more innovation per release in the future, the 2010 products will be the last to include a search core that runs on Linux and UNIX.  Many of our customers run FAST ESP on Linux and UNIX today, and we recognize that our future focus on Windows means change.  To ease the transition, we&rsquo;re investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems, reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products, and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>viralMeme writes " Microsoft plans to begin phasing out Unix and Linux platform support for its FAST enterprise search products , as of its next release .
According to a Thursday blog post from Microsoft Distinguished Engineer Bj   rn Olstad , 'We    ve continued to sell , support , and update the Linux and UNIX versions of FAST ESP , and we    ve designed the next wave of FAST products ( scheduled for release in the first half of calendar year 2010 ) to include a cross-platform search core that has been extended to take advantage of web services and support mixed-platform deployment models .
With our 2010 products scheduled for release in a few months , we    ve just started to plan for our next wave of products .
As a part of that planning process , we have decided that in order to deliver more innovation per release in the future , the 2010 products will be the last to include a search core that runs on Linux and UNIX .
Many of our customers run FAST ESP on Linux and UNIX today , and we recognize that our future focus on Windows means change .
To ease the transition , we    re investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems , reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products , and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>viralMeme writes "Microsoft plans to begin phasing out Unix and Linux platform support for its FAST enterprise search products, as of its next release.
According to a Thursday blog post from Microsoft Distinguished Engineer Bjørn Olstad, 'We’ve continued to sell, support, and update the Linux and UNIX versions of FAST ESP, and we’ve designed the next wave of FAST products (scheduled for release in the first half of calendar year 2010) to include a cross-platform search core that has been extended to take advantage of web services and support mixed-platform deployment models.
With our 2010 products scheduled for release in a few months, we’ve just started to plan for our next wave of products.
As a part of that planning process, we have decided that in order to deliver more innovation per release in the future, the 2010 products will be the last to include a search core that runs on Linux and UNIX.
Many of our customers run FAST ESP on Linux and UNIX today, and we recognize that our future focus on Windows means change.
To ease the transition, we’re investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems, reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products, and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075316</id>
	<title>Re:cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265743440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its slimming!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its slimming !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its slimming!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073118</id>
	<title>Re:cool</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265735640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, but how much does it hurt the world to be squeezed out through someone's fingers...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , but how much does it hurt the world to be squeezed out through someone 's fingers.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, but how much does it hurt the world to be squeezed out through someone's fingers...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073494</id>
	<title>Invention of Lock-in</title>
	<author>Statecraftsman</author>
	<datestamp>1265736900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hi I'm Steve. I work for Microsoft and I'm going to ask you to keep buying Microsoft products. There's not much new here, we've decided make this software run only on Microsoft products so that should help you decide. If you don't use FAST, this probably won't affect you but we're looking for more ways to get you to use only Microsoft. Thanks!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hi I 'm Steve .
I work for Microsoft and I 'm going to ask you to keep buying Microsoft products .
There 's not much new here , we 've decided make this software run only on Microsoft products so that should help you decide .
If you do n't use FAST , this probably wo n't affect you but we 're looking for more ways to get you to use only Microsoft .
Thanks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hi I'm Steve.
I work for Microsoft and I'm going to ask you to keep buying Microsoft products.
There's not much new here, we've decided make this software run only on Microsoft products so that should help you decide.
If you don't use FAST, this probably won't affect you but we're looking for more ways to get you to use only Microsoft.
Thanks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073252</id>
	<title>It is a tiny market.</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1265736180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The total *revenue* last year in enterprise search is just 1.1 billion dollars, according to Gartner, according to the article. It is going to touch 2 billion may be in 2013, again according the article. Considering that Microsoft gets 6.5 billion dollars *profit* per quarter, this is chump change. Further, Google is synonymous with search. It sells the Google Server in a Box, that does mail, calender, shared docs all behind the firewall of the client, unreachable by either the pings from the internet, or by subpoena. If this market segment grows, it is going to be growing the way Google wants it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The total * revenue * last year in enterprise search is just 1.1 billion dollars , according to Gartner , according to the article .
It is going to touch 2 billion may be in 2013 , again according the article .
Considering that Microsoft gets 6.5 billion dollars * profit * per quarter , this is chump change .
Further , Google is synonymous with search .
It sells the Google Server in a Box , that does mail , calender , shared docs all behind the firewall of the client , unreachable by either the pings from the internet , or by subpoena .
If this market segment grows , it is going to be growing the way Google wants it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The total *revenue* last year in enterprise search is just 1.1 billion dollars, according to Gartner, according to the article.
It is going to touch 2 billion may be in 2013, again according the article.
Considering that Microsoft gets 6.5 billion dollars *profit* per quarter, this is chump change.
Further, Google is synonymous with search.
It sells the Google Server in a Box, that does mail, calender, shared docs all behind the firewall of the client, unreachable by either the pings from the internet, or by subpoena.
If this market segment grows, it is going to be growing the way Google wants it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073392</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is FAST?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265736660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indeed: "Microsoft plans to begin phasing out Unix and Linux platform support for something nobody has heard of or cares about....."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed : " Microsoft plans to begin phasing out Unix and Linux platform support for something nobody has heard of or cares about..... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed: "Microsoft plans to begin phasing out Unix and Linux platform support for something nobody has heard of or cares about....."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075650</id>
	<title>Re:It is a tiny market.</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1265744700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't deal with corporations a lot, do you? It's 1.1 billions they <i>do not have yet</i>.</p><p>So they want them. At least if it costs less than 1.1 billions to get them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't deal with corporations a lot , do you ?
It 's 1.1 billions they do not have yet.So they want them .
At least if it costs less than 1.1 billions to get them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't deal with corporations a lot, do you?
It's 1.1 billions they do not have yet.So they want them.
At least if it costs less than 1.1 billions to get them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073228</id>
	<title>SLOW Search Thingie?</title>
	<author>quangdog</author>
	<datestamp>1265736060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seems to me that if they are going to drop the FAST searching they should continue to support the SLOW search that we all know and love.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems to me that if they are going to drop the FAST searching they should continue to support the SLOW search that we all know and love .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems to me that if they are going to drop the FAST searching they should continue to support the SLOW search that we all know and love.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074790</id>
	<title>Re:Fear and Opportunity</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1265741700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I'd certainly not migrate to Windows for FAST. I'd guess it would make my machine SLOWer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I 'd certainly not migrate to Windows for FAST .
I 'd guess it would make my machine SLOWer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I'd certainly not migrate to Windows for FAST.
I'd guess it would make my machine SLOWer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073088</id>
	<title>I'll continue using Linux</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265735580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Linux is getting better and better, with more features added, and I'm not a pawn in corporate revenue/greed/forced upgrade strategy.<br> <br>
Thanks Linux. <br>
F.U. Microsoft.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Linux is getting better and better , with more features added , and I 'm not a pawn in corporate revenue/greed/forced upgrade strategy .
Thanks Linux .
F.U. Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linux is getting better and better, with more features added, and I'm not a pawn in corporate revenue/greed/forced upgrade strategy.
Thanks Linux.
F.U. Microsoft.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31078394</id>
	<title>Re:cool</title>
	<author>Merc248</author>
	<datestamp>1265711820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.pond5.com/stock-footage/124619/squeezing-an-orange.html" title="pond5.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pond5.com/stock-footage/124619/squeezing-an-orange.html</a> [pond5.com]</p><p>About as much as having the skin slightly tear off a bit after the half way mark.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.pond5.com/stock-footage/124619/squeezing-an-orange.html [ pond5.com ] About as much as having the skin slightly tear off a bit after the half way mark .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.pond5.com/stock-footage/124619/squeezing-an-orange.html [pond5.com]About as much as having the skin slightly tear off a bit after the half way mark.
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076202</id>
	<title>Re:Fear and Opportunity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265746380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Especially as the Year of Linux on the desktop is coming!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially as the Year of Linux on the desktop is coming !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially as the Year of Linux on the desktop is coming!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075056</id>
	<title>Re:Monoculture, yes monoculture!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265742780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>All hail the IT monoculture! Praise and glory to the brand!</p></div><p>Wait! How did Apple get into the discussion?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>All hail the IT monoculture !
Praise and glory to the brand ! Wait !
How did Apple get into the discussion ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All hail the IT monoculture!
Praise and glory to the brand!Wait!
How did Apple get into the discussion?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073344</id>
	<title>obligatory</title>
	<author>peterprior</author>
	<datestamp>1265736480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was fast..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was fast. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was fast..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31079654</id>
	<title>Re:And nothing was lost</title>
	<author>IMightB</author>
	<datestamp>1265717340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My company was seriously considering FAST it was by far the best performing solution at the time.   Then MS bought them, and since we run on a Linux (RHEL5) platform, we ended up going with a Lucene/Solr solution.   a bit slower, but we saw the writing on the wall for FAST when they were purchased.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My company was seriously considering FAST it was by far the best performing solution at the time .
Then MS bought them , and since we run on a Linux ( RHEL5 ) platform , we ended up going with a Lucene/Solr solution .
a bit slower , but we saw the writing on the wall for FAST when they were purchased .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My company was seriously considering FAST it was by far the best performing solution at the time.
Then MS bought them, and since we run on a Linux (RHEL5) platform, we ended up going with a Lucene/Solr solution.
a bit slower, but we saw the writing on the wall for FAST when they were purchased.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990</id>
	<title>Fear and Opportunity</title>
	<author>dreamchaser</author>
	<datestamp>1265735220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's a clear sign that MS still has a (probably growing) fear of *nix, especially Linux.</p><p>It's also an opportunity for some enterprising company or group to fill the void.  All it will do is cost MS some sales.  I doubt many organizations will migrate to Windows Server just for FAST.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a clear sign that MS still has a ( probably growing ) fear of * nix , especially Linux.It 's also an opportunity for some enterprising company or group to fill the void .
All it will do is cost MS some sales .
I doubt many organizations will migrate to Windows Server just for FAST .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a clear sign that MS still has a (probably growing) fear of *nix, especially Linux.It's also an opportunity for some enterprising company or group to fill the void.
All it will do is cost MS some sales.
I doubt many organizations will migrate to Windows Server just for FAST.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31080900</id>
	<title>"Concrete steps" implies...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265725380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, in Microsoft terms, I assume that "taking concrete steps" implies something about "wearing concrete shoes", no?  So, basically, they're saying that they'll size up their customers for a new pair, right?</p><p>Cynically yours,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , in Microsoft terms , I assume that " taking concrete steps " implies something about " wearing concrete shoes " , no ?
So , basically , they 're saying that they 'll size up their customers for a new pair , right ? Cynically yours,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, in Microsoft terms, I assume that "taking concrete steps" implies something about "wearing concrete shoes", no?
So, basically, they're saying that they'll size up their customers for a new pair, right?Cynically yours,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073310</id>
	<title>shiT!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265736360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>of HIV and other OUTER SPACE THE</htmltext>
<tokenext>of HIV and other OUTER SPACE THE</tokentext>
<sentencetext>of HIV and other OUTER SPACE THE</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076356</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>Froboz23</author>
	<datestamp>1265746920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>To better understand Microsoft's commitment to supporting non-Windows products, a more exhaustive analysis of the word "commit" is required.  Here's what Merriam-Webster has to say about the definition of commit:<br> <br>

transitive verb 1 a : to put into charge or trust : entrust <b>b : to place in a prison or mental institution</b> c : to consign or record for preservation &lt;commit it to memory&gt; <b>d : to put into a place for disposal</b> or safekeeping e : to refer (as a legislative bill) to a committee for consideration and report<br> <br>

It appears they're focusing on definitions "b" and "d."</htmltext>
<tokenext>To better understand Microsoft 's commitment to supporting non-Windows products , a more exhaustive analysis of the word " commit " is required .
Here 's what Merriam-Webster has to say about the definition of commit : transitive verb 1 a : to put into charge or trust : entrust b : to place in a prison or mental institution c : to consign or record for preservation d : to put into a place for disposal or safekeeping e : to refer ( as a legislative bill ) to a committee for consideration and report It appears they 're focusing on definitions " b " and " d. "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To better understand Microsoft's commitment to supporting non-Windows products, a more exhaustive analysis of the word "commit" is required.
Here's what Merriam-Webster has to say about the definition of commit: 

transitive verb 1 a : to put into charge or trust : entrust b : to place in a prison or mental institution c : to consign or record for preservation  d : to put into a place for disposal or safekeeping e : to refer (as a legislative bill) to a committee for consideration and report 

It appears they're focusing on definitions "b" and "d."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073798</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>sexconker</author>
	<datestamp>1265737920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"To ease the transition, we&rsquo;re investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems, reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products, and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future."</p><p>Translation:</p><p>"Any slashdotter bitching about us dropping UNIX FAST in 10 years is a fucking idiot - we will support it for 10 fucking years, it will still work after that, and if you're one of the 8 people who use it we'll help you switch to something else."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" To ease the transition , we    re investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems , reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products , and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future .
" Translation : " Any slashdotter bitching about us dropping UNIX FAST in 10 years is a fucking idiot - we will support it for 10 fucking years , it will still work after that , and if you 're one of the 8 people who use it we 'll help you switch to something else .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"To ease the transition, we’re investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems, reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products, and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future.
"Translation:"Any slashdotter bitching about us dropping UNIX FAST in 10 years is a fucking idiot - we will support it for 10 fucking years, it will still work after that, and if you're one of the 8 people who use it we'll help you switch to something else.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073738</id>
	<title>Re:It is a tiny market.</title>
	<author>liquiddark</author>
	<datestamp>1265737800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nobody's buying Google products in the enterprise search sector.  Endeca, FAST, Lucene, yes.  Google?  Not likely, unless you count Google Desktop Search.  Google doesn't even pitch enterprise search right now.  They're focused on a much less fickle set of markets.  If you've never experienced a pitch by an enterprise search vendor, you don't know what you're talking about.  These guys do things that appear to literally be magical in nature, organizing millions of highly custom data points into a coherent data set and slapping a slick UI over top in a matter of weeks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody 's buying Google products in the enterprise search sector .
Endeca , FAST , Lucene , yes .
Google ? Not likely , unless you count Google Desktop Search .
Google does n't even pitch enterprise search right now .
They 're focused on a much less fickle set of markets .
If you 've never experienced a pitch by an enterprise search vendor , you do n't know what you 're talking about .
These guys do things that appear to literally be magical in nature , organizing millions of highly custom data points into a coherent data set and slapping a slick UI over top in a matter of weeks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody's buying Google products in the enterprise search sector.
Endeca, FAST, Lucene, yes.
Google?  Not likely, unless you count Google Desktop Search.
Google doesn't even pitch enterprise search right now.
They're focused on a much less fickle set of markets.
If you've never experienced a pitch by an enterprise search vendor, you don't know what you're talking about.
These guys do things that appear to literally be magical in nature, organizing millions of highly custom data points into a coherent data set and slapping a slick UI over top in a matter of weeks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074464</id>
	<title>Re:Thats why theres lucene</title>
	<author>ThePhilips</author>
	<datestamp>1265740500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> I have seen also mentions of the <a href="http://xapian.org/" title="xapian.org">Xapian</a> [xapian.org] which is written in C++.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have seen also mentions of the Xapian [ xapian.org ] which is written in C + + .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I have seen also mentions of the Xapian [xapian.org] which is written in C++.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004</id>
	<title>cool</title>
	<author>JustNiz</author>
	<datestamp>1265735220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The more they tighten their grip, the more the world will slip through their fingers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The more they tighten their grip , the more the world will slip through their fingers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The more they tighten their grip, the more the world will slip through their fingers.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074154</id>
	<title>Whoah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265739180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>amazing how nobody saw that one coming...</p><p>Seriously, folks, is this really news? I'd imagine that when Microsoft does a takeover these days, one of the criteria they're using is "are we going to have a repeat of the Hotmail clusterfuck?" They were planning on doing this before they bought the company, and the only question was when and what excuse they'd be using...</p><p>c.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>amazing how nobody saw that one coming...Seriously , folks , is this really news ?
I 'd imagine that when Microsoft does a takeover these days , one of the criteria they 're using is " are we going to have a repeat of the Hotmail clusterfuck ?
" They were planning on doing this before they bought the company , and the only question was when and what excuse they 'd be using...c .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>amazing how nobody saw that one coming...Seriously, folks, is this really news?
I'd imagine that when Microsoft does a takeover these days, one of the criteria they're using is "are we going to have a repeat of the Hotmail clusterfuck?
" They were planning on doing this before they bought the company, and the only question was when and what excuse they'd be using...c.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074190</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>jalefkowit</author>
	<datestamp>1265739300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you mean it's not interoperable? It works with ALL versions of Windows!</p><p>Kind of like how they have both kinds of music at Bob's Country Bunker... <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSZfUnCK5qk" title="youtube.com">Country <i>and</i> Western!</a> [youtube.com] </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you mean it 's not interoperable ?
It works with ALL versions of Windows ! Kind of like how they have both kinds of music at Bob 's Country Bunker... Country and Western !
[ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you mean it's not interoperable?
It works with ALL versions of Windows!Kind of like how they have both kinds of music at Bob's Country Bunker... Country and Western!
[youtube.com] </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073202</id>
	<title>Wait, what?</title>
	<author>chill</author>
	<datestamp>1265735940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft makes a search product?  Really?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft makes a search product ?
Really ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft makes a search product?
Really?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073380</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is FAST?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265736600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31077900</id>
	<title>Linux is a KERNEL ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265710020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and GNU/Linux is a Operating System.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and GNU/Linux is a Operating System .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and GNU/Linux is a Operating System.
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008</id>
	<title>Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1265735280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...As a part of that planning process, we have decided that in order to deliver more innovation per release in the future, the 2010 products will be the last to include a search core that runs on Linux and UNIX...."</p><p>Translation:</p><p>"We are canning Linux and UNIX support to solidify Microsoft lock-in."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...As a part of that planning process , we have decided that in order to deliver more innovation per release in the future , the 2010 products will be the last to include a search core that runs on Linux and UNIX.... " Translation : " We are canning Linux and UNIX support to solidify Microsoft lock-in .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...As a part of that planning process, we have decided that in order to deliver more innovation per release in the future, the 2010 products will be the last to include a search core that runs on Linux and UNIX...."Translation:"We are canning Linux and UNIX support to solidify Microsoft lock-in.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073030</id>
	<title>"more innovation per release"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265735340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Innovation is a unit of measurement now?  Is that imperial or metric innovations?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Innovation is a unit of measurement now ?
Is that imperial or metric innovations ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Innovation is a unit of measurement now?
Is that imperial or metric innovations?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073076</id>
	<title>It's a company after all...</title>
	<author>Robert Zenz</author>
	<datestamp>1265735520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>"...and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future."<br>
Reads:<br>
"We'll try to force everyone to use Windows in the future."<br>
<br>
Well...who expected something different anyway?</htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future .
" Reads : " We 'll try to force everyone to use Windows in the future .
" Well...who expected something different anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future.
"
Reads:
"We'll try to force everyone to use Windows in the future.
"

Well...who expected something different anyway?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073184</id>
	<title>What kind of music do we like?</title>
	<author>ratboy666</author>
	<datestamp>1265735880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Both kinds.</p><p>Country AND Western.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Both kinds.Country AND Western .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Both kinds.Country AND Western.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074496</id>
	<title>Surprising</title>
	<author>aceofspades1217</author>
	<datestamp>1265740680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft not wanting to support a competitor to its core product, particularly a competitor that is kicking their ass in the server market...how surprising.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft not wanting to support a competitor to its core product , particularly a competitor that is kicking their ass in the server market...how surprising .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft not wanting to support a competitor to its core product, particularly a competitor that is kicking their ass in the server market...how surprising.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075648</id>
	<title>Not a surprise</title>
	<author>mfaine</author>
	<datestamp>1265744640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We've seen this coming for a long time.  Ever since MS bought fast.  We use an OEM packaged FAST with our Documentum content server. EMC is planning to move away from FAST to Lucene in the next version.  Honestly, I say good riddance to FAST.  FAST has been nothing but a headache but FAST on Windows, now that is a nightmare.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 've seen this coming for a long time .
Ever since MS bought fast .
We use an OEM packaged FAST with our Documentum content server .
EMC is planning to move away from FAST to Lucene in the next version .
Honestly , I say good riddance to FAST .
FAST has been nothing but a headache but FAST on Windows , now that is a nightmare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We've seen this coming for a long time.
Ever since MS bought fast.
We use an OEM packaged FAST with our Documentum content server.
EMC is planning to move away from FAST to Lucene in the next version.
Honestly, I say good riddance to FAST.
FAST has been nothing but a headache but FAST on Windows, now that is a nightmare.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076958</id>
	<title>this is part 1 of a strategy</title>
	<author>commodoresloat</author>
	<datestamp>1265706120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First they eliminate FAST search, but it will soon be replaced by Microsoft's patented SLOW search technology, and the world will again belong to M$!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First they eliminate FAST search , but it will soon be replaced by Microsoft 's patented SLOW search technology , and the world will again belong to M $ !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First they eliminate FAST search, but it will soon be replaced by Microsoft's patented SLOW search technology, and the world will again belong to M$!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073716</id>
	<title>This just in!</title>
	<author>gaelfx</author>
	<datestamp>1265737680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In a surprise move, Microsoft announced today that more innovation actually means less compatibility. More on this at 11. In other news, the South Pole will now be referred to as the North Pole and East will become West. No word from Santa yet on how this will affect next year's operations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In a surprise move , Microsoft announced today that more innovation actually means less compatibility .
More on this at 11 .
In other news , the South Pole will now be referred to as the North Pole and East will become West .
No word from Santa yet on how this will affect next year 's operations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In a surprise move, Microsoft announced today that more innovation actually means less compatibility.
More on this at 11.
In other news, the South Pole will now be referred to as the North Pole and East will become West.
No word from Santa yet on how this will affect next year's operations.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074732</id>
	<title>Remind me... why is MONO a good thing</title>
	<author>Rob Y.</author>
	<datestamp>1265741520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is exactly why nobody should ever get sucked into Microsoft 'interoperability' ploys.  They are <i>not</i> about interoperability.  They are <i>always</i> about extending the MS monopoly into areas that they could not reach without paying lip service to interoperability.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is exactly why nobody should ever get sucked into Microsoft 'interoperability ' ploys .
They are not about interoperability .
They are always about extending the MS monopoly into areas that they could not reach without paying lip service to interoperability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is exactly why nobody should ever get sucked into Microsoft 'interoperability' ploys.
They are not about interoperability.
They are always about extending the MS monopoly into areas that they could not reach without paying lip service to interoperability.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073098</id>
	<title>Monoculture, yes monoculture!</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1265735580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All hail the IT monoculture! Praise and glory to the brand!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All hail the IT monoculture !
Praise and glory to the brand !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All hail the IT monoculture!
Praise and glory to the brand!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074382</id>
	<title>Re:Thats why theres lucene</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265740140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Learn where to put periods between your sentences.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Learn where to put periods between your sentences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Learn where to put periods between your sentences.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073268</id>
	<title>WTF is FAST?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265736180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would it kill you to spell out the damn acronym at least once in the article summary?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would it kill you to spell out the damn acronym at least once in the article summary ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would it kill you to spell out the damn acronym at least once in the article summary?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073364</id>
	<title>Bj&#248;rn Olstad</title>
	<author>DogAlmity</author>
	<datestamp>1265736600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A moose once bit his sister.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A moose once bit his sister .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A moose once bit his sister.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073146</id>
	<title>And nothing was lost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265735700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>FAST died on the vine a long time ago.  It was a dot-com that just missed the tail of the dot-com mania.  So they sold their hype to Microsoft and then disappeared off the face of the planet until this week.  Track down the marketeers that stired up the FAST mud again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>FAST died on the vine a long time ago .
It was a dot-com that just missed the tail of the dot-com mania .
So they sold their hype to Microsoft and then disappeared off the face of the planet until this week .
Track down the marketeers that stired up the FAST mud again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FAST died on the vine a long time ago.
It was a dot-com that just missed the tail of the dot-com mania.
So they sold their hype to Microsoft and then disappeared off the face of the planet until this week.
Track down the marketeers that stired up the FAST mud again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074336</id>
	<title>Re:Thats why theres lucene</title>
	<author>Lord Grey</author>
	<datestamp>1265739900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Lucene has the same abilities as FAST and is a lot more efficient  , its used by most of the ediscovery vendors and its free in it base format
yes you will have to do some work on the interface and other support areas but its the solution to MS ditching Linux support for search</p></div><p>
You clearly know less, or assume more, than you think you do.
</p><p>
Lucene is a great search engine.  But neither it nor its commercial add-ons can touch what FAST can do in its entirety.  When you have hundreds of millions of document to search, tens of millions of those documents to update throughout a single day, a requirement to deliver any single updated document within minutes of the update to an end user, and keep it all running 7x24, you don't want to use Lucene.
</p><p>
Sure, you could <i>"do some work on the interface and other support areas"</i> and make it work.  Eventually.  I could probably write something much faster myself, in hand-coded assembler.  But I, like a lot of other people out there, have better things to do with my time.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lucene has the same abilities as FAST and is a lot more efficient , its used by most of the ediscovery vendors and its free in it base format yes you will have to do some work on the interface and other support areas but its the solution to MS ditching Linux support for search You clearly know less , or assume more , than you think you do .
Lucene is a great search engine .
But neither it nor its commercial add-ons can touch what FAST can do in its entirety .
When you have hundreds of millions of document to search , tens of millions of those documents to update throughout a single day , a requirement to deliver any single updated document within minutes of the update to an end user , and keep it all running 7x24 , you do n't want to use Lucene .
Sure , you could " do some work on the interface and other support areas " and make it work .
Eventually. I could probably write something much faster myself , in hand-coded assembler .
But I , like a lot of other people out there , have better things to do with my time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lucene has the same abilities as FAST and is a lot more efficient  , its used by most of the ediscovery vendors and its free in it base format
yes you will have to do some work on the interface and other support areas but its the solution to MS ditching Linux support for search
You clearly know less, or assume more, than you think you do.
Lucene is a great search engine.
But neither it nor its commercial add-ons can touch what FAST can do in its entirety.
When you have hundreds of millions of document to search, tens of millions of those documents to update throughout a single day, a requirement to deliver any single updated document within minutes of the update to an end user, and keep it all running 7x24, you don't want to use Lucene.
Sure, you could "do some work on the interface and other support areas" and make it work.
Eventually.  I could probably write something much faster myself, in hand-coded assembler.
But I, like a lot of other people out there, have better things to do with my time.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073138</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073408</id>
	<title>Re:Fear and Opportunity</title>
	<author>Xupa</author>
	<datestamp>1265736720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's awesome is that you people honestly believe that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's awesome is that you people honestly believe that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's awesome is that you people honestly believe that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073618</id>
	<title>do the math</title>
	<author>the\_fat\_kid</author>
	<datestamp>1265737320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's not chump change.<br>I make a little over $10,000 quarterly.<br>For $1700 I will dance a jig.<br>Hell, for $1700 I might even try windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's not chump change.I make a little over $ 10,000 quarterly.For $ 1700 I will dance a jig.Hell , for $ 1700 I might even try windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's not chump change.I make a little over $10,000 quarterly.For $1700 I will dance a jig.Hell, for $1700 I might even try windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073854</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265738100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Have you written code that runs on more than one platform? It's a real headache (...)</p></div><p>Must<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... resist<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... lame<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... Java<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... joke<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you written code that runs on more than one platform ?
It 's a real headache ( ... ) Must ... resist ... lame ... Java ... joke ... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you written code that runs on more than one platform?
It's a real headache (...)Must ... resist ... lame ... Java ... joke ....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073410</id>
	<title>I don't use FAST or Lucene but I suspect</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265736720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That innovation per cycle might mean fix and add more vulnerabilities per cycle.  Can't have the Unix/Linux version showing up the Microsoft version without more vulnerabilities to fix and so few added..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That innovation per cycle might mean fix and add more vulnerabilities per cycle .
Ca n't have the Unix/Linux version showing up the Microsoft version without more vulnerabilities to fix and so few added. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That innovation per cycle might mean fix and add more vulnerabilities per cycle.
Can't have the Unix/Linux version showing up the Microsoft version without more vulnerabilities to fix and so few added..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075926</id>
	<title>Re:It is a tiny market.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265745480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google has yet to penetrate enterprise search in a meaningful way.  Large companies don't want swiss army knives, they want surgical scalpels.  FAST is the de-facto leader in enterprise search.  I code with it every week and it is a beast.  If FAST was a baseball player it would be Barry Bonds on roids, Google would be a JV high school player and Solr would be kids t-ball.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google has yet to penetrate enterprise search in a meaningful way .
Large companies do n't want swiss army knives , they want surgical scalpels .
FAST is the de-facto leader in enterprise search .
I code with it every week and it is a beast .
If FAST was a baseball player it would be Barry Bonds on roids , Google would be a JV high school player and Solr would be kids t-ball .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google has yet to penetrate enterprise search in a meaningful way.
Large companies don't want swiss army knives, they want surgical scalpels.
FAST is the de-facto leader in enterprise search.
I code with it every week and it is a beast.
If FAST was a baseball player it would be Barry Bonds on roids, Google would be a JV high school player and Solr would be kids t-ball.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074016</id>
	<title>Re:And nothing was lost</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265738700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have no idea what you are talking about.  Gardner has consistently rated FAST as either the #1 or #2 search engine technology.  And under the hood, FAST was very open-source friendly -- most of the building blocks to make it came from open source projects.  It was a VERY Linux friendly product.  But when they sold out to Microsoft the writing was on the wall.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have no idea what you are talking about .
Gardner has consistently rated FAST as either the # 1 or # 2 search engine technology .
And under the hood , FAST was very open-source friendly -- most of the building blocks to make it came from open source projects .
It was a VERY Linux friendly product .
But when they sold out to Microsoft the writing was on the wall .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have no idea what you are talking about.
Gardner has consistently rated FAST as either the #1 or #2 search engine technology.
And under the hood, FAST was very open-source friendly -- most of the building blocks to make it came from open source projects.
It was a VERY Linux friendly product.
But when they sold out to Microsoft the writing was on the wall.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074052</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>Imagix</author>
	<datestamp>1265738820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, routinely.  And it's not that hard to do while you're not attempting to twiddle with either OS internals, or direct hardware.  And even for those, there's likely an interop layer that exists, or could be written, to smooth over even those differences.  It \_does\_ require some discipline when coding though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , routinely .
And it 's not that hard to do while you 're not attempting to twiddle with either OS internals , or direct hardware .
And even for those , there 's likely an interop layer that exists , or could be written , to smooth over even those differences .
It \ _does \ _ require some discipline when coding though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, routinely.
And it's not that hard to do while you're not attempting to twiddle with either OS internals, or direct hardware.
And even for those, there's likely an interop layer that exists, or could be written, to smooth over even those differences.
It \_does\_ require some discipline when coding though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074208</id>
	<title>Re:WTF is FAST?</title>
	<author>Tetsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1265739420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Would it kill you to spell out the damn acronym at least once in the article summary?</p></div><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel\_And\_Sensor\_Tactical\_(FAST)\_Packs" title="wikipedia.org">Fuel and Sensor Tactical</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would it kill you to spell out the damn acronym at least once in the article summary ?
Fuel and Sensor Tactical [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would it kill you to spell out the damn acronym at least once in the article summary?
Fuel and Sensor Tactical [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073316</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265736420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never heard of it before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never heard of it before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never heard of it before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073694</id>
	<title>Re:cool</title>
	<author>TDyl</author>
	<datestamp>1265737620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>About as much as having your brain smashed out by a slice of lemon wrapped around a large tarnished gold win server 2k3 box.</htmltext>
<tokenext>About as much as having your brain smashed out by a slice of lemon wrapped around a large tarnished gold win server 2k3 box .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>About as much as having your brain smashed out by a slice of lemon wrapped around a large tarnished gold win server 2k3 box.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31083544</id>
	<title>We swiched from FAST ESP to Apache Solr</title>
	<author>verdante</author>
	<datestamp>1265021760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been runing FAST ESP 5 clusters on RHEL for since 2008, used for web and site search.  I found FAST ESP 5.2 especially to be terribly buggy on large deployments, and some issues their support never did resolve.</p><p>Moving to a unit that just needed to search a db, we ran ESP 5.3 for a year, but have now switched completely to Apache Solr.  For searching records from a database, Solr does everything we need without gouging the company for $$$$$$ in annual support fees.</p><p>In just a few weeks we were able to set up a Solr cluster, integrate it using SolrNet, and tune Solr to produce excellent relevant results with very flexible matching.  Relevance is excellent because we could tune Solr's ranking algorithm - FAST ESP was always a black box. Over about a week we tuned the parameters, and Solr now delivers better results than FAST ESP did on our data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been runing FAST ESP 5 clusters on RHEL for since 2008 , used for web and site search .
I found FAST ESP 5.2 especially to be terribly buggy on large deployments , and some issues their support never did resolve.Moving to a unit that just needed to search a db , we ran ESP 5.3 for a year , but have now switched completely to Apache Solr .
For searching records from a database , Solr does everything we need without gouging the company for $ $ $ $ $ $ in annual support fees.In just a few weeks we were able to set up a Solr cluster , integrate it using SolrNet , and tune Solr to produce excellent relevant results with very flexible matching .
Relevance is excellent because we could tune Solr 's ranking algorithm - FAST ESP was always a black box .
Over about a week we tuned the parameters , and Solr now delivers better results than FAST ESP did on our data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been runing FAST ESP 5 clusters on RHEL for since 2008, used for web and site search.
I found FAST ESP 5.2 especially to be terribly buggy on large deployments, and some issues their support never did resolve.Moving to a unit that just needed to search a db, we ran ESP 5.3 for a year, but have now switched completely to Apache Solr.
For searching records from a database, Solr does everything we need without gouging the company for $$$$$$ in annual support fees.In just a few weeks we were able to set up a Solr cluster, integrate it using SolrNet, and tune Solr to produce excellent relevant results with very flexible matching.
Relevance is excellent because we could tune Solr's ranking algorithm - FAST ESP was always a black box.
Over about a week we tuned the parameters, and Solr now delivers better results than FAST ESP did on our data.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073306</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>ircmaxell</author>
	<datestamp>1265736360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, yeah, but then they say this:<blockquote><div><p> To ease the transition, we're investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems, reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products, and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future.</p></div></blockquote><p>

I'm REALLY confused now.  So they are dropping *NIX support, to futher their goal of interoperability?  WTF?  Can someone explain how these 2 are NOT related?<br> <br>Either that, or the subtext of "reaffirming (their) commitment" by dropping non-win os support sheds some insight on their "commitment" in the first place...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , yeah , but then they say this : To ease the transition , we 're investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems , reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products , and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future .
I 'm REALLY confused now .
So they are dropping * NIX support , to futher their goal of interoperability ?
WTF ? Can someone explain how these 2 are NOT related ?
Either that , or the subtext of " reaffirming ( their ) commitment " by dropping non-win os support sheds some insight on their " commitment " in the first place.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, yeah, but then they say this: To ease the transition, we're investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems, reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products, and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future.
I'm REALLY confused now.
So they are dropping *NIX support, to futher their goal of interoperability?
WTF?  Can someone explain how these 2 are NOT related?
Either that, or the subtext of "reaffirming (their) commitment" by dropping non-win os support sheds some insight on their "commitment" in the first place...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074236</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265739480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><blockquote><div><p>To ease the transition, we're investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems, reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products, and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future.</p></div></blockquote><p>I'm REALLY confused now. So they are dropping *NIX support, to futher their goal of interoperability? WTF? Can someone explain how these 2 are NOT related?</p></div></blockquote><p>Easy, they said they drop UNIX (and Linux) support, and will encourage people to migrate to Windows. In the meantime, they will offer support for their Services for Unix product to ease the transition. (SFU is a bunch of services - NFS, NIS, etc that run on Windows - and naturally integrates into Active Directory). It's how you get interoperability between Unix and Windows, with Windows being the "master" of course.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To ease the transition , we 're investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems , reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products , and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future.I 'm REALLY confused now .
So they are dropping * NIX support , to futher their goal of interoperability ?
WTF ? Can someone explain how these 2 are NOT related ? Easy , they said they drop UNIX ( and Linux ) support , and will encourage people to migrate to Windows .
In the meantime , they will offer support for their Services for Unix product to ease the transition .
( SFU is a bunch of services - NFS , NIS , etc that run on Windows - and naturally integrates into Active Directory ) .
It 's how you get interoperability between Unix and Windows , with Windows being the " master " of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To ease the transition, we're investing in interoperability between Windows and other operating systems, reaffirming our commitment to 10 years of support for our non-Windows products, and taking concrete steps to help customers plan for the future.I'm REALLY confused now.
So they are dropping *NIX support, to futher their goal of interoperability?
WTF? Can someone explain how these 2 are NOT related?Easy, they said they drop UNIX (and Linux) support, and will encourage people to migrate to Windows.
In the meantime, they will offer support for their Services for Unix product to ease the transition.
(SFU is a bunch of services - NFS, NIS, etc that run on Windows - and naturally integrates into Active Directory).
It's how you get interoperability between Unix and Windows, with Windows being the "master" of course.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076404</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265747220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Have you written code that runs on more than one platform? </i></p><p>Yes I do it professionally.</p><p><i>It's a real headache, and the headache goes up exponentially as the number of systems do. By focusing on one platform, they have the ability to use their resources to innovate and not just port.</i></p><p>LOL, in effect what you are saying is that Microsoft, the worlds largest and wealthiest software development company, is unable to handle cross platform code development.  The open source community (and even many big companies like Oracle, IBM, etc) have been designing and building huge cross platform code bases for decades now, but Microsoft with all their comp.sci. phd's and billions of dollars, can't handle it?  What a joke.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you written code that runs on more than one platform ?
Yes I do it professionally.It 's a real headache , and the headache goes up exponentially as the number of systems do .
By focusing on one platform , they have the ability to use their resources to innovate and not just port.LOL , in effect what you are saying is that Microsoft , the worlds largest and wealthiest software development company , is unable to handle cross platform code development .
The open source community ( and even many big companies like Oracle , IBM , etc ) have been designing and building huge cross platform code bases for decades now , but Microsoft with all their comp.sci .
phd 's and billions of dollars , ca n't handle it ?
What a joke .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you written code that runs on more than one platform?
Yes I do it professionally.It's a real headache, and the headache goes up exponentially as the number of systems do.
By focusing on one platform, they have the ability to use their resources to innovate and not just port.LOL, in effect what you are saying is that Microsoft, the worlds largest and wealthiest software development company, is unable to handle cross platform code development.
The open source community (and even many big companies like Oracle, IBM, etc) have been designing and building huge cross platform code bases for decades now, but Microsoft with all their comp.sci.
phd's and billions of dollars, can't handle it?
What a joke.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074314</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265739780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it is secret code that tries to tell people that purchase products but don't understand them one bit that "We gave this thing 'Linux' thing a try, but EVERYONE CAN AGREE that continuing to try to support this clearly inferior kids toy and get back to making things for big time special executive people like you!"</p><p>Instead of FUD, next version of Microsoft product you don't understand comes FREE with an ego stroke you would normally cost you $5 from a homeless guy in a back alley.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it is secret code that tries to tell people that purchase products but do n't understand them one bit that " We gave this thing 'Linux ' thing a try , but EVERYONE CAN AGREE that continuing to try to support this clearly inferior kids toy and get back to making things for big time special executive people like you !
" Instead of FUD , next version of Microsoft product you do n't understand comes FREE with an ego stroke you would normally cost you $ 5 from a homeless guy in a back alley .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it is secret code that tries to tell people that purchase products but don't understand them one bit that "We gave this thing 'Linux' thing a try, but EVERYONE CAN AGREE that continuing to try to support this clearly inferior kids toy and get back to making things for big time special executive people like you!
"Instead of FUD, next version of Microsoft product you don't understand comes FREE with an ego stroke you would normally cost you $5 from a homeless guy in a back alley.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076216</id>
	<title>Re:cool</title>
	<author>jimmydigital</author>
	<datestamp>1265746440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now that's change I can believe in.  Of course... you would have to understand my opinion of Microsoft for that to make sense.  <a href="http://amsoc.us/" title="amsoc.us" rel="nofollow">http://amsoc.us/</a> [amsoc.us]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that 's change I can believe in .
Of course... you would have to understand my opinion of Microsoft for that to make sense .
http : //amsoc.us/ [ amsoc.us ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that's change I can believe in.
Of course... you would have to understand my opinion of Microsoft for that to make sense.
http://amsoc.us/ [amsoc.us]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073994</id>
	<title>Re:What kind of music do we like?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265738640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Offtopic? You kids need to watch more movies. Now get off my lawn!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Offtopic ?
You kids need to watch more movies .
Now get off my lawn !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Offtopic?
You kids need to watch more movies.
Now get off my lawn!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073184</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>dirtyhippie</author>
	<datestamp>1265736840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you written code that runs on more than one platform? It's a real headache, and the headache goes up exponentially as the number of systems do. By focusing on one platform, they have the ability to use their resources to innovate and not just port. People using FAST ESP don't care what OS it's running on - just buy a windows machine for it if you don't have one. And who wants to run MS code on a linux/unix box these days anyway?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you written code that runs on more than one platform ?
It 's a real headache , and the headache goes up exponentially as the number of systems do .
By focusing on one platform , they have the ability to use their resources to innovate and not just port .
People using FAST ESP do n't care what OS it 's running on - just buy a windows machine for it if you do n't have one .
And who wants to run MS code on a linux/unix box these days anyway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you written code that runs on more than one platform?
It's a real headache, and the headache goes up exponentially as the number of systems do.
By focusing on one platform, they have the ability to use their resources to innovate and not just port.
People using FAST ESP don't care what OS it's running on - just buy a windows machine for it if you don't have one.
And who wants to run MS code on a linux/unix box these days anyway?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31078604</id>
	<title>Re:Fear and Opportunity</title>
	<author>jonadab</author>
	<datestamp>1265712720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suspect it's more likely a sign that they know full well nobody *needs* their "FAST" search product on a Unix system, because it's redundant with standard basic system utilities that every Unix geek has taken for granted since the seventies.  They would never say it that way, of course, because that way makes Windows sound inferior.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suspect it 's more likely a sign that they know full well nobody * needs * their " FAST " search product on a Unix system , because it 's redundant with standard basic system utilities that every Unix geek has taken for granted since the seventies .
They would never say it that way , of course , because that way makes Windows sound inferior .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suspect it's more likely a sign that they know full well nobody *needs* their "FAST" search product on a Unix system, because it's redundant with standard basic system utilities that every Unix geek has taken for granted since the seventies.
They would never say it that way, of course, because that way makes Windows sound inferior.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075508</id>
	<title>Re:Yes</title>
	<author>lwriemen</author>
	<datestamp>1265744100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's the basic tenet of all my software development direction. I find it ridiculously easy, but the average software developer doesn't program at my chosen level of abstraction. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XtUML" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XtUML</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's the basic tenet of all my software development direction .
I find it ridiculously easy , but the average software developer does n't program at my chosen level of abstraction .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XtUML [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's the basic tenet of all my software development direction.
I find it ridiculously easy, but the average software developer doesn't program at my chosen level of abstraction.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XtUML [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074434</id>
	<title>Re:Fear and Opportunity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265740320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And in other news they're starting to get their butt kicked out of the <a href="http://samygo.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">entertainment industry</a> [sourceforge.net] too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And in other news they 're starting to get their butt kicked out of the entertainment industry [ sourceforge.net ] too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And in other news they're starting to get their butt kicked out of the entertainment industry [sourceforge.net] too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31079302</id>
	<title>Re:cool</title>
	<author>Dogtanian</author>
	<datestamp>1265715600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The more they tighten their grip, the more the world will slip through their fingers.</p></div><p>The original quote and variations of it- such as yours- appear here on a fairly regular basis. Despite the implied tongue-in-cheek (self-consciously geeky), it's still being used sincerely to make a similar point to the one Leia was arguing in the film.<br> <br>
<b>The absolutely massive irony</b> here is that if you see the original film- which I caught on TV recently and I'd have assumed the fanboys knew inside out- you'll know that this is a prelude to Darth Vader's somewhat effective verbal response and his significantly more effective physical response of destroying her entire f*****g homeworld.<br> <br>
It doesn't undermine the point you're trying to make so much as, er.... blast it into little pieces with a moon-sized weapon.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The more they tighten their grip , the more the world will slip through their fingers.The original quote and variations of it- such as yours- appear here on a fairly regular basis .
Despite the implied tongue-in-cheek ( self-consciously geeky ) , it 's still being used sincerely to make a similar point to the one Leia was arguing in the film .
The absolutely massive irony here is that if you see the original film- which I caught on TV recently and I 'd have assumed the fanboys knew inside out- you 'll know that this is a prelude to Darth Vader 's somewhat effective verbal response and his significantly more effective physical response of destroying her entire f * * * * * g homeworld .
It does n't undermine the point you 're trying to make so much as , er.... blast it into little pieces with a moon-sized weapon .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The more they tighten their grip, the more the world will slip through their fingers.The original quote and variations of it- such as yours- appear here on a fairly regular basis.
Despite the implied tongue-in-cheek (self-consciously geeky), it's still being used sincerely to make a similar point to the one Leia was arguing in the film.
The absolutely massive irony here is that if you see the original film- which I caught on TV recently and I'd have assumed the fanboys knew inside out- you'll know that this is a prelude to Darth Vader's somewhat effective verbal response and his significantly more effective physical response of destroying her entire f*****g homeworld.
It doesn't undermine the point you're trying to make so much as, er.... blast it into little pieces with a moon-sized weapon.
;-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31091678</id>
	<title>opensource ?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265022660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they will open source it and give the lucene/solr stack a run for its money.</p><p>NOT!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they will open source it and give the lucene/solr stack a run for its money.NOT !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they will open source it and give the lucene/solr stack a run for its money.NOT!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073114</id>
	<title>Oh no!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265735640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh no!! How will the Linux and Unix communities cope?!?<br>Who gives a shit?!?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh no ! !
How will the Linux and Unix communities cope ? !
? Who gives a shit ? ! ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh no!!
How will the Linux and Unix communities cope?!
?Who gives a shit?!?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073824</id>
	<title>Re:Uh, yeah...</title>
	<author>ocularsinister</author>
	<datestamp>1265737980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Two words: "Java" and "Qt"*. Writing a cross platform tool kit <b>is</b> hard. Fortunately, someone has already done that. Several times, in fact. If you are trying to write cross platform code and you are not writing a tool kit, then you are probably using the wrong tool for the job.<p>* Yes, I know there are others...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Two words : " Java " and " Qt " * .
Writing a cross platform tool kit is hard .
Fortunately , someone has already done that .
Several times , in fact .
If you are trying to write cross platform code and you are not writing a tool kit , then you are probably using the wrong tool for the job .
* Yes , I know there are others.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Two words: "Java" and "Qt"*.
Writing a cross platform tool kit is hard.
Fortunately, someone has already done that.
Several times, in fact.
If you are trying to write cross platform code and you are not writing a tool kit, then you are probably using the wrong tool for the job.
* Yes, I know there are others...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073870</id>
	<title>Re:Fear and Opportunity</title>
	<author>plague3106</author>
	<datestamp>1265738160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But there will be some that migrate, so it would appear to be a net plus for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But there will be some that migrate , so it would appear to be a net plus for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But there will be some that migrate, so it would appear to be a net plus for them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073254</id>
	<title>Re:"more innovation per release"</title>
	<author>Robert Zenz</author>
	<datestamp>1265736180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It must be metric, the imperial innovations are called "Software Patents".</htmltext>
<tokenext>It must be metric , the imperial innovations are called " Software Patents " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It must be metric, the imperial innovations are called "Software Patents".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073696</id>
	<title>Trend?</title>
	<author>srpape</author>
	<datestamp>1265737620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They just dropped support for the original XBox live too. Are they looking for ways to tick off customers or what?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They just dropped support for the original XBox live too .
Are they looking for ways to tick off customers or what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They just dropped support for the original XBox live too.
Are they looking for ways to tick off customers or what?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073198</id>
	<title>Poor design?</title>
	<author>auntieNeo</author>
	<datestamp>1265735940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It amuses me how he says:<p><div class="quote"><p>we've designed the next wave of FAST products (scheduled for release in the first half of calendar year 2010) to include a cross-platform search core</p></div><p>but immediately after that he says:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>in order to deliver more innovation per release in the future, the 2010 products will be the last to include a search core that runs on Linux and UNIX</p></div><p>It sounds to me like one of two things happened. Either they decided to stop designing their product, or management decided that they didn't like *nix. And to think, you'd be hard pressed to find a mainstream open source app not ported to three or more platforms. Proprietary software is silly.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It amuses me how he says : we 've designed the next wave of FAST products ( scheduled for release in the first half of calendar year 2010 ) to include a cross-platform search corebut immediately after that he says : in order to deliver more innovation per release in the future , the 2010 products will be the last to include a search core that runs on Linux and UNIXIt sounds to me like one of two things happened .
Either they decided to stop designing their product , or management decided that they did n't like * nix .
And to think , you 'd be hard pressed to find a mainstream open source app not ported to three or more platforms .
Proprietary software is silly .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It amuses me how he says:we've designed the next wave of FAST products (scheduled for release in the first half of calendar year 2010) to include a cross-platform search corebut immediately after that he says:in order to deliver more innovation per release in the future, the 2010 products will be the last to include a search core that runs on Linux and UNIXIt sounds to me like one of two things happened.
Either they decided to stop designing their product, or management decided that they didn't like *nix.
And to think, you'd be hard pressed to find a mainstream open source app not ported to three or more platforms.
Proprietary software is silly.
:(
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073138</id>
	<title>Thats why theres lucene</title>
	<author>cridanb</author>
	<datestamp>1265735700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lucene has the same abilities as FAST and is a lot more efficient  , its used by most of the ediscovery vendors and its free in it base format
yes you will have to do some work on the interface and other support areas but its the solution to MS ditching Linux support for search</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lucene has the same abilities as FAST and is a lot more efficient , its used by most of the ediscovery vendors and its free in it base format yes you will have to do some work on the interface and other support areas but its the solution to MS ditching Linux support for search</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lucene has the same abilities as FAST and is a lot more efficient  , its used by most of the ediscovery vendors and its free in it base format
yes you will have to do some work on the interface and other support areas but its the solution to MS ditching Linux support for search</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31078604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31079654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073184
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073252
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073268
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31078394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073138
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31079302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_09_1452238_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31080900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073306
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074190
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074236
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073454
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076404
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073824
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074052
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075508
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073854
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073198
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073364
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31072990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31078604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074016
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31079654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073716
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31080900
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073994
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073254
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073392
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31074208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073118
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073694
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075316
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31078394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31079302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31076958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_09_1452238.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31073618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_09_1452238.31075926
</commentlist>
</conversation>
