<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_08_149205</id>
	<title>Shuttle Endeavour Blasts Off For Space Station</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1265639280000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Gwmaw writes <i>"The space shuttle Endeavour <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100208/shuttle-endeavour.htm">bolted off its seaside launch pad</a> on Monday on a voyage to install the last two main pieces of the International Space Station. The 4:14 a.m. EST (0914 GMT) blastoff from the Kennedy Space Center shattered the predawn tranquility with a deafening roar and a brilliant tower of flames that momentarily turned the dark Florida sky as bright as day."</i>  HD video of launch attached.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gwmaw writes " The space shuttle Endeavour bolted off its seaside launch pad on Monday on a voyage to install the last two main pieces of the International Space Station .
The 4 : 14 a.m. EST ( 0914 GMT ) blastoff from the Kennedy Space Center shattered the predawn tranquility with a deafening roar and a brilliant tower of flames that momentarily turned the dark Florida sky as bright as day .
" HD video of launch attached .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gwmaw writes "The space shuttle Endeavour bolted off its seaside launch pad on Monday on a voyage to install the last two main pieces of the International Space Station.
The 4:14 a.m. EST (0914 GMT) blastoff from the Kennedy Space Center shattered the predawn tranquility with a deafening roar and a brilliant tower of flames that momentarily turned the dark Florida sky as bright as day.
"  HD video of launch attached.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31063652</id>
	<title>Re:Is this really news?</title>
	<author>Rhys</author>
	<datestamp>1265660760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're ready to deliver a fully competent human-level AI to NASA then right? Otherwise you need to read up on all the delays and similar problems with Spirit and Opportunity before you talk about robots being the clearly superior advantage. Until the robot can take some brains with it, it is vastly inferior to a human. Sure, Spirit and Opportunity have done a fantastic job. But stop and ask when they measure movement in a few meters per day, max, how much more could have been done if there was an iss-alike orbiting Mars where the human controllers had near-instant responsiveness to the robots?</p><p>Unless you have FTL communication or true AIs, us meatbags still have a point in space. Maybe not in near-earth orbit where the speed of light is good enough. Though without doing some technology development with ourselves up in a nearby orbit we aren't going to be ready to be orbiting Mars driving a rover anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're ready to deliver a fully competent human-level AI to NASA then right ?
Otherwise you need to read up on all the delays and similar problems with Spirit and Opportunity before you talk about robots being the clearly superior advantage .
Until the robot can take some brains with it , it is vastly inferior to a human .
Sure , Spirit and Opportunity have done a fantastic job .
But stop and ask when they measure movement in a few meters per day , max , how much more could have been done if there was an iss-alike orbiting Mars where the human controllers had near-instant responsiveness to the robots ? Unless you have FTL communication or true AIs , us meatbags still have a point in space .
Maybe not in near-earth orbit where the speed of light is good enough .
Though without doing some technology development with ourselves up in a nearby orbit we are n't going to be ready to be orbiting Mars driving a rover anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're ready to deliver a fully competent human-level AI to NASA then right?
Otherwise you need to read up on all the delays and similar problems with Spirit and Opportunity before you talk about robots being the clearly superior advantage.
Until the robot can take some brains with it, it is vastly inferior to a human.
Sure, Spirit and Opportunity have done a fantastic job.
But stop and ask when they measure movement in a few meters per day, max, how much more could have been done if there was an iss-alike orbiting Mars where the human controllers had near-instant responsiveness to the robots?Unless you have FTL communication or true AIs, us meatbags still have a point in space.
Maybe not in near-earth orbit where the speed of light is good enough.
Though without doing some technology development with ourselves up in a nearby orbit we aren't going to be ready to be orbiting Mars driving a rover anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060890</id>
	<title>Re:Last Night Launch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265647320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for this post - makes me nostalgic as I will probably not see it from my own eyes (I'm in Europe and no transatlantic hop planned for this year).<br>But more and more seriously (even more reading your post, you lucky mate<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)) considering a mission to go and see one of the last STS launches<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for this post - makes me nostalgic as I will probably not see it from my own eyes ( I 'm in Europe and no transatlantic hop planned for this year ) .But more and more seriously ( even more reading your post , you lucky mate ; - ) ) considering a mission to go and see one of the last STS launches : - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for this post - makes me nostalgic as I will probably not see it from my own eyes (I'm in Europe and no transatlantic hop planned for this year).But more and more seriously (even more reading your post, you lucky mate ;-)) considering a mission to go and see one of the last STS launches :-(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060936</id>
	<title>I actually saw the shuttle in the morning sky...</title>
	<author>Mysticalfruit</author>
	<datestamp>1265647620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was up taking care of my infant daughter, looking out my sliding glass windows I could see it like a blue diamond in the sky rising.<br><br>Totally amazing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was up taking care of my infant daughter , looking out my sliding glass windows I could see it like a blue diamond in the sky rising.Totally amazing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was up taking care of my infant daughter, looking out my sliding glass windows I could see it like a blue diamond in the sky rising.Totally amazing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061202</id>
	<title>Re:Decommission the shuttles in space?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265648940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How would you get the astronauts back down?  Also in low earth orbit you need to burn full regularly to keep things up there, because of atmospheric drag.  But the biggest problem might be when the shuttle de-orbits, which it would have to eventually.  The ISS would probably break apart and burn up, but the shuttle is specifically designed to not burn up, which means it could very likely crash into something on earth and cause significant damage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How would you get the astronauts back down ?
Also in low earth orbit you need to burn full regularly to keep things up there , because of atmospheric drag .
But the biggest problem might be when the shuttle de-orbits , which it would have to eventually .
The ISS would probably break apart and burn up , but the shuttle is specifically designed to not burn up , which means it could very likely crash into something on earth and cause significant damage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would you get the astronauts back down?
Also in low earth orbit you need to burn full regularly to keep things up there, because of atmospheric drag.
But the biggest problem might be when the shuttle de-orbits, which it would have to eventually.
The ISS would probably break apart and burn up, but the shuttle is specifically designed to not burn up, which means it could very likely crash into something on earth and cause significant damage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31067164</id>
	<title>Re:Is this really news?</title>
	<author>R3d M3rcury</author>
	<datestamp>1265633340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While we're at it, we should close <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMurdo\_Station" title="wikipedia.org">McMurdo Station</a> [wikipedia.org], <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amundsen-Scott\_South\_Pole\_Station" title="wikipedia.org">Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station</a> [wikipedia.org], and cancel the plans to reopen the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byrd\_Station" title="wikipedia.org">Byrd Station</a> [wikipedia.org].  It is a colossal waste of money to send us weak-ass little humans, who need protection for our weak bodies, plus food, water, a place to go to the toilet, etc., instead of robots.  The robots are cheaper, take up less resources, can stay longer and thus get more work done, just better all around.</p><p>In case you're missing it, I'm being sarcastic.</p><p>I don't necessarily disagree with you, however.  Personally, I'd like to see a little less exploration and a little more exploitation going on.  I've babbled here a few times about setting up launch facilities on the Moon--complete with production--so that we can use some of the more exotic drive technologies that exist without worrying about polluting our atmosphere or the dreaded "What-If" scenarios.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While we 're at it , we should close McMurdo Station [ wikipedia.org ] , Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station [ wikipedia.org ] , and cancel the plans to reopen the Byrd Station [ wikipedia.org ] .
It is a colossal waste of money to send us weak-ass little humans , who need protection for our weak bodies , plus food , water , a place to go to the toilet , etc. , instead of robots .
The robots are cheaper , take up less resources , can stay longer and thus get more work done , just better all around.In case you 're missing it , I 'm being sarcastic.I do n't necessarily disagree with you , however .
Personally , I 'd like to see a little less exploration and a little more exploitation going on .
I 've babbled here a few times about setting up launch facilities on the Moon--complete with production--so that we can use some of the more exotic drive technologies that exist without worrying about polluting our atmosphere or the dreaded " What-If " scenarios .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While we're at it, we should close McMurdo Station [wikipedia.org], Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station [wikipedia.org], and cancel the plans to reopen the Byrd Station [wikipedia.org].
It is a colossal waste of money to send us weak-ass little humans, who need protection for our weak bodies, plus food, water, a place to go to the toilet, etc., instead of robots.
The robots are cheaper, take up less resources, can stay longer and thus get more work done, just better all around.In case you're missing it, I'm being sarcastic.I don't necessarily disagree with you, however.
Personally, I'd like to see a little less exploration and a little more exploitation going on.
I've babbled here a few times about setting up launch facilities on the Moon--complete with production--so that we can use some of the more exotic drive technologies that exist without worrying about polluting our atmosphere or the dreaded "What-If" scenarios.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060604</id>
	<title>I saw it from New Jersey!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265645400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was watching on NasaTV and knew when to look. I didn't really expect much, if anything.<br>It was Awesome! At least as bright as Jupiter, and it rocketed (heehee) right past an airplane that was on the same line of sight. I saw from about six minutes after launch to cutoff, apparently at twice the height of the houses around mine.<br>Awesome - I saw a real spaceship launch. I DO believe!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was watching on NasaTV and knew when to look .
I did n't really expect much , if anything.It was Awesome !
At least as bright as Jupiter , and it rocketed ( heehee ) right past an airplane that was on the same line of sight .
I saw from about six minutes after launch to cutoff , apparently at twice the height of the houses around mine.Awesome - I saw a real spaceship launch .
I DO believe !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was watching on NasaTV and knew when to look.
I didn't really expect much, if anything.It was Awesome!
At least as bright as Jupiter, and it rocketed (heehee) right past an airplane that was on the same line of sight.
I saw from about six minutes after launch to cutoff, apparently at twice the height of the houses around mine.Awesome - I saw a real spaceship launch.
I DO believe!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060374</id>
	<title>Extended?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now that the return to the moon has been cancelled, I wonder if NASA will extend Shuttle missions beyond this year?  They have already hinted they may extend the life of the ISS, but are they going to rely on the Russians for the next ten years?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now that the return to the moon has been cancelled , I wonder if NASA will extend Shuttle missions beyond this year ?
They have already hinted they may extend the life of the ISS , but are they going to rely on the Russians for the next ten years ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now that the return to the moon has been cancelled, I wonder if NASA will extend Shuttle missions beyond this year?
They have already hinted they may extend the life of the ISS, but are they going to rely on the Russians for the next ten years?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061214</id>
	<title>Re:Decommission the shuttles in space?</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1265649000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now the ISS will have shuttles up on blocks in the yard.... a mangy pitbull in a space suit tethered by the front porch..</p><p>Rednecks in spaaaaace......  Nope the other countries wont put up with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now the ISS will have shuttles up on blocks in the yard.... a mangy pitbull in a space suit tethered by the front porch..Rednecks in spaaaaace...... Nope the other countries wont put up with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now the ISS will have shuttles up on blocks in the yard.... a mangy pitbull in a space suit tethered by the front porch..Rednecks in spaaaaace......  Nope the other countries wont put up with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636</id>
	<title>Decommission the shuttles in space?</title>
	<author>jgtg32a</author>
	<datestamp>1265645700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just had a random thought, would it be useful to just decommission shuttles in space, meaning just leave them up there, possibly integrate them into the ISS?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just had a random thought , would it be useful to just decommission shuttles in space , meaning just leave them up there , possibly integrate them into the ISS ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just had a random thought, would it be useful to just decommission shuttles in space, meaning just leave them up there, possibly integrate them into the ISS?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31064034</id>
	<title>NASA TV</title>
	<author>MavEtJu</author>
	<datestamp>1265619600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As usual the NASA TV channel (well, the stream since that's all I can get from it here in Australia) provided me with the last three days and will provide me in the coming days with untouched unhyped `just the facts' 24x7 reality TV. Just the way I love it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As usual the NASA TV channel ( well , the stream since that 's all I can get from it here in Australia ) provided me with the last three days and will provide me in the coming days with untouched unhyped ` just the facts ' 24x7 reality TV .
Just the way I love it : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As usual the NASA TV channel (well, the stream since that's all I can get from it here in Australia) provided me with the last three days and will provide me in the coming days with untouched unhyped `just the facts' 24x7 reality TV.
Just the way I love it :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060480</id>
	<title>Made in Italy</title>
	<author>GhigoRenzulli</author>
	<datestamp>1265644440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's always very nice when made in Italy stuff reaches (literally) the top of the world.</p><p>It's not very nice that I have to learn it reading here (and it's not a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. fault this time).</p><p>No one in Italy (television, newspapers and so on) gave a decent review of this important achievement.</p><p>Information system in Italy is <strong>TFU</strong>.</p><p>Help us! We need CowboyNeal at government!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's always very nice when made in Italy stuff reaches ( literally ) the top of the world.It 's not very nice that I have to learn it reading here ( and it 's not a / .
fault this time ) .No one in Italy ( television , newspapers and so on ) gave a decent review of this important achievement.Information system in Italy is TFU.Help us !
We need CowboyNeal at government !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's always very nice when made in Italy stuff reaches (literally) the top of the world.It's not very nice that I have to learn it reading here (and it's not a /.
fault this time).No one in Italy (television, newspapers and so on) gave a decent review of this important achievement.Information system in Italy is TFU.Help us!
We need CowboyNeal at government!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060570</id>
	<title>Re:Is this really news?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265645160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which right there tells me we shouldn't be sending people out into space anymore. It is a colossal waste of money to send us weak ass little humans, who need protection for our weak bodies, plus food, water, a place to go to the toilet, etc, instead of robots. The robots are cheaper, take up less resources, can stay longer and thus get more work done, just better all around.</p><p>

Until we figure out some new forms of propulsion it is just a waste of time and money to send us weak little humans. While the whole "Buck Rogers/ Star trek" idea is nice, with current means of transportation it is just too impractical, when the robots can do it better for cheaper. We just need to accept with current tech space is for the robots, who can take the multi-year trips necessary to get anywhere interesting and get any real work done. Humans in space was fine during the Cold War when we wanted an American standing there with a flag as an FU to the Russians, but that time is past folks. Time to let it go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which right there tells me we should n't be sending people out into space anymore .
It is a colossal waste of money to send us weak ass little humans , who need protection for our weak bodies , plus food , water , a place to go to the toilet , etc , instead of robots .
The robots are cheaper , take up less resources , can stay longer and thus get more work done , just better all around .
Until we figure out some new forms of propulsion it is just a waste of time and money to send us weak little humans .
While the whole " Buck Rogers/ Star trek " idea is nice , with current means of transportation it is just too impractical , when the robots can do it better for cheaper .
We just need to accept with current tech space is for the robots , who can take the multi-year trips necessary to get anywhere interesting and get any real work done .
Humans in space was fine during the Cold War when we wanted an American standing there with a flag as an FU to the Russians , but that time is past folks .
Time to let it go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which right there tells me we shouldn't be sending people out into space anymore.
It is a colossal waste of money to send us weak ass little humans, who need protection for our weak bodies, plus food, water, a place to go to the toilet, etc, instead of robots.
The robots are cheaper, take up less resources, can stay longer and thus get more work done, just better all around.
Until we figure out some new forms of propulsion it is just a waste of time and money to send us weak little humans.
While the whole "Buck Rogers/ Star trek" idea is nice, with current means of transportation it is just too impractical, when the robots can do it better for cheaper.
We just need to accept with current tech space is for the robots, who can take the multi-year trips necessary to get anywhere interesting and get any real work done.
Humans in space was fine during the Cold War when we wanted an American standing there with a flag as an FU to the Russians, but that time is past folks.
Time to let it go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31062218</id>
	<title>Extended?</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1265653800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Am I the only one that is completely confused?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one that is completely confused ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one that is completely confused?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602</id>
	<title>Last Night Launch</title>
	<author>realsilly</author>
	<datestamp>1265645340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was a glorious morning when my alarm beeped at 4:10am.  I awoke, turned on the TV to the pre-set NASA channel, checked to make sure the launch was still 'a Go'.  I then donned a bathrobe over my birthday suit, watched the last 10 seconds on TV until I heard "We have Liftoff" and stepped out on my back porch.  I looked to the east and the tree line was shadowed in a orange glow that was beautiful during the pre-dawn hours.  The sky was clear and the air was crisp and the sight of the flames was facinating even at 50 miles away.  I watched at the shuttle began to head in a northward direction.  It was around 6.5 minutes later that the sound waves rumbled through the still night air.  It was more of a low rumble, but it was distinctly felt and heard.  At aroun 7.5 mintues, between my screen porch, the trajectory and my poor vision I could no longer see the bright spec of light that was the shuttle that was now a couple hundred miles away.  I stepped back inside watched NASA TV until about the 9.5 minute mark during the last separation, and knew our astronauts doing ok.  I hung up the robe, climbed back into bed, turned off the TV and went back to sleep.</p><p>What a beautiful way to wake up in the pre-dawn hours.  And to think,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sniffle that was the last manned night launch we'll see for quite some time.  Oh how I wish everyon could have seen this first hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a glorious morning when my alarm beeped at 4 : 10am .
I awoke , turned on the TV to the pre-set NASA channel , checked to make sure the launch was still 'a Go' .
I then donned a bathrobe over my birthday suit , watched the last 10 seconds on TV until I heard " We have Liftoff " and stepped out on my back porch .
I looked to the east and the tree line was shadowed in a orange glow that was beautiful during the pre-dawn hours .
The sky was clear and the air was crisp and the sight of the flames was facinating even at 50 miles away .
I watched at the shuttle began to head in a northward direction .
It was around 6.5 minutes later that the sound waves rumbled through the still night air .
It was more of a low rumble , but it was distinctly felt and heard .
At aroun 7.5 mintues , between my screen porch , the trajectory and my poor vision I could no longer see the bright spec of light that was the shuttle that was now a couple hundred miles away .
I stepped back inside watched NASA TV until about the 9.5 minute mark during the last separation , and knew our astronauts doing ok. I hung up the robe , climbed back into bed , turned off the TV and went back to sleep.What a beautiful way to wake up in the pre-dawn hours .
And to think , /sniffle that was the last manned night launch we 'll see for quite some time .
Oh how I wish everyon could have seen this first hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a glorious morning when my alarm beeped at 4:10am.
I awoke, turned on the TV to the pre-set NASA channel, checked to make sure the launch was still 'a Go'.
I then donned a bathrobe over my birthday suit, watched the last 10 seconds on TV until I heard "We have Liftoff" and stepped out on my back porch.
I looked to the east and the tree line was shadowed in a orange glow that was beautiful during the pre-dawn hours.
The sky was clear and the air was crisp and the sight of the flames was facinating even at 50 miles away.
I watched at the shuttle began to head in a northward direction.
It was around 6.5 minutes later that the sound waves rumbled through the still night air.
It was more of a low rumble, but it was distinctly felt and heard.
At aroun 7.5 mintues, between my screen porch, the trajectory and my poor vision I could no longer see the bright spec of light that was the shuttle that was now a couple hundred miles away.
I stepped back inside watched NASA TV until about the 9.5 minute mark during the last separation, and knew our astronauts doing ok.  I hung up the robe, climbed back into bed, turned off the TV and went back to sleep.What a beautiful way to wake up in the pre-dawn hours.
And to think, /sniffle that was the last manned night launch we'll see for quite some time.
Oh how I wish everyon could have seen this first hand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061284</id>
	<title>Re:Extended?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265649300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>FY 2011 Budget request specifically outlines an expectation of continuing ISS utilization until 2020.  As other posters have mentioned, we have already shut down the External Tank factories, making it pretty certain the shuttle will not stay up till 2016. <br>
<br>
The implied assumption that a gap won't exist is misleading at best.  The Augustine Report found that the gap would be 6 years minimum with Constellation.  Contracting with private corps for delivery of humans to space was estimated at 5-8 years to complete.  And of course neither of these options is ten years.
<br>
<br>
The Ares V is likely to be saved in some form.  We have a large need for a SHLV.  FY2011 Budget Request begins funding for development of SHLV technology 5 years before the program of record would have begun funding Ares V.  Program of Record funding was also contingent on ISS deorbit in 2016.  Which means the choice in 2016 was super heavy lift or ISS maintenance.  The choice has been shifted by the administration to SHLV vs HLV in 2011.  Now would you pick a launcher in a crowded field (20-30,000 kg to LEO) or one that would be unique (130-160,000 kg to LEO)?<br>
<br>
Obligatory citation:<br>
<a href="http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/396093main\_HSF\_Cmte\_FinalReport.pdf" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/396093main\_HSF\_Cmte\_FinalReport.pdf</a> [nasa.gov] <br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison\_of\_heavy\_lift\_launch\_systems" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison\_of\_heavy\_lift\_launch\_systems</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison\_of\_super\_heavy\_lift\_launch\_systems" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison\_of\_super\_heavy\_lift\_launch\_systems</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>
<a href="http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/420990main\_FY\_201\_\%20Budget\_Overview\_1\_Feb\_2010.pdf" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/420990main\_FY\_201\_\%20Budget\_Overview\_1\_Feb\_2010.pdf</a> [nasa.gov]</htmltext>
<tokenext>FY 2011 Budget request specifically outlines an expectation of continuing ISS utilization until 2020 .
As other posters have mentioned , we have already shut down the External Tank factories , making it pretty certain the shuttle will not stay up till 2016 .
The implied assumption that a gap wo n't exist is misleading at best .
The Augustine Report found that the gap would be 6 years minimum with Constellation .
Contracting with private corps for delivery of humans to space was estimated at 5-8 years to complete .
And of course neither of these options is ten years .
The Ares V is likely to be saved in some form .
We have a large need for a SHLV .
FY2011 Budget Request begins funding for development of SHLV technology 5 years before the program of record would have begun funding Ares V. Program of Record funding was also contingent on ISS deorbit in 2016 .
Which means the choice in 2016 was super heavy lift or ISS maintenance .
The choice has been shifted by the administration to SHLV vs HLV in 2011 .
Now would you pick a launcher in a crowded field ( 20-30,000 kg to LEO ) or one that would be unique ( 130-160,000 kg to LEO ) ?
Obligatory citation : http : //www.nasa.gov/pdf/396093main \ _HSF \ _Cmte \ _FinalReport.pdf [ nasa.gov ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison \ _of \ _heavy \ _lift \ _launch \ _systems [ wikipedia.org ] http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison \ _of \ _super \ _heavy \ _lift \ _launch \ _systems [ wikipedia.org ] http : //www.nasa.gov/pdf/420990main \ _FY \ _201 \ _ \ % 20Budget \ _Overview \ _1 \ _Feb \ _2010.pdf [ nasa.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FY 2011 Budget request specifically outlines an expectation of continuing ISS utilization until 2020.
As other posters have mentioned, we have already shut down the External Tank factories, making it pretty certain the shuttle will not stay up till 2016.
The implied assumption that a gap won't exist is misleading at best.
The Augustine Report found that the gap would be 6 years minimum with Constellation.
Contracting with private corps for delivery of humans to space was estimated at 5-8 years to complete.
And of course neither of these options is ten years.
The Ares V is likely to be saved in some form.
We have a large need for a SHLV.
FY2011 Budget Request begins funding for development of SHLV technology 5 years before the program of record would have begun funding Ares V.  Program of Record funding was also contingent on ISS deorbit in 2016.
Which means the choice in 2016 was super heavy lift or ISS maintenance.
The choice has been shifted by the administration to SHLV vs HLV in 2011.
Now would you pick a launcher in a crowded field (20-30,000 kg to LEO) or one that would be unique (130-160,000 kg to LEO)?
Obligatory citation:
http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/396093main\_HSF\_Cmte\_FinalReport.pdf [nasa.gov] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison\_of\_heavy\_lift\_launch\_systems [wikipedia.org] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison\_of\_super\_heavy\_lift\_launch\_systems [wikipedia.org] 
http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/420990main\_FY\_201\_\%20Budget\_Overview\_1\_Feb\_2010.pdf [nasa.gov]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061652</id>
	<title>Re:Last Night Launch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265650980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why didn't you capture this on video for us, you silly insensitive birthday suit clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did n't you capture this on video for us , you silly insensitive birthday suit clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why didn't you capture this on video for us, you silly insensitive birthday suit clod!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060448</id>
	<title>Is this really news?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265644080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>And, considering the bleak future of the shuttle program, the ISS, and manned spaceflight in general, wouldn't a more appropriate headline be "NASA puts another $700 million on the national credit card for our grandkids to pay off"?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And , considering the bleak future of the shuttle program , the ISS , and manned spaceflight in general , would n't a more appropriate headline be " NASA puts another $ 700 million on the national credit card for our grandkids to pay off " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And, considering the bleak future of the shuttle program, the ISS, and manned spaceflight in general, wouldn't a more appropriate headline be "NASA puts another $700 million on the national credit card for our grandkids to pay off"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060410</id>
	<title>Boom rumble rumble rumble</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First?</p><p>Best part was the sound... oh the glorious rumble.</p><p>My dog loved it too.</p><p>
&nbsp; Paul's Steakhouse Rocks the block and Arby's sucks... you know why!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First ? Best part was the sound... oh the glorious rumble.My dog loved it too .
  Paul 's Steakhouse Rocks the block and Arby 's sucks... you know why !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First?Best part was the sound... oh the glorious rumble.My dog loved it too.
  Paul's Steakhouse Rocks the block and Arby's sucks... you know why!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31062832</id>
	<title>Re:Is this really news?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1265656860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Our grandkids aren't paying shit off.  The US will default.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Our grandkids are n't paying shit off .
The US will default .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Our grandkids aren't paying shit off.
The US will default.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31067378</id>
	<title>Re:Is this really news?</title>
	<author>initialE</author>
	<datestamp>1265634960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"For while we cannot guarantee that we shall one day be first, we can guarantee that any failure to make this effort will make us last." - JFK. Solving the national debt issue may be important, but so is securing the future. In any case, if you were serious about ending debt then you should be looking at the war expenses first anyway - it is several orders of magnitude higher than anything else you are spending money on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" For while we can not guarantee that we shall one day be first , we can guarantee that any failure to make this effort will make us last .
" - JFK .
Solving the national debt issue may be important , but so is securing the future .
In any case , if you were serious about ending debt then you should be looking at the war expenses first anyway - it is several orders of magnitude higher than anything else you are spending money on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"For while we cannot guarantee that we shall one day be first, we can guarantee that any failure to make this effort will make us last.
" - JFK.
Solving the national debt issue may be important, but so is securing the future.
In any case, if you were serious about ending debt then you should be looking at the war expenses first anyway - it is several orders of magnitude higher than anything else you are spending money on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31062846</id>
	<title>Re:Decommission the shuttles in space?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265656980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about 6-7 people that brought the shuttle into space?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about 6-7 people that brought the shuttle into space ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about 6-7 people that brought the shuttle into space?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060322</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Blasts off with a First Post Bitches!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Blasts off with a First Post Bitches !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Blasts off with a First Post Bitches!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061272</id>
	<title>I love the Shuttle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265649300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think it is the most amazing and marvelous piece of human engineering. Every time I watch a launch on tv I become amazed  once more time.
I live in Argentina and I am trying to save money to be able to see a launch before the end<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:S
Hope to get the money and go to enjoy it.
If someone want to send me tickets...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it is the most amazing and marvelous piece of human engineering .
Every time I watch a launch on tv I become amazed once more time .
I live in Argentina and I am trying to save money to be able to see a launch before the end : S Hope to get the money and go to enjoy it .
If someone want to send me tickets... : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it is the most amazing and marvelous piece of human engineering.
Every time I watch a launch on tv I become amazed  once more time.
I live in Argentina and I am trying to save money to be able to see a launch before the end :S
Hope to get the money and go to enjoy it.
If someone want to send me tickets... :D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060588</id>
	<title>Space Diner</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265645280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I foresee the day when a new roadside American icon takes the place of the Pullman diner car, a decommissioned roadside space shuttle fuselage.</p><p>Breakfast: The Challenger Omellette<br>Lunch:     The Endeavor Burger<br>Dinner:    Carne Asada Columbia</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I foresee the day when a new roadside American icon takes the place of the Pullman diner car , a decommissioned roadside space shuttle fuselage.Breakfast : The Challenger OmelletteLunch : The Endeavor BurgerDinner : Carne Asada Columbia</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I foresee the day when a new roadside American icon takes the place of the Pullman diner car, a decommissioned roadside space shuttle fuselage.Breakfast: The Challenger OmelletteLunch:     The Endeavor BurgerDinner:    Carne Asada Columbia</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060474</id>
	<title>Political correctness</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265644380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We don't say "blast" any more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We do n't say " blast " any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We don't say "blast" any more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061952</id>
	<title>Re:Decommission the shuttles in space?</title>
	<author>Graymalkin</author>
	<datestamp>1265652420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not in the slightest. There's two big hurdles using the Shuttles as long term space stations or hooking them up to the ISS. The first is the electrical power systems of the Shuttles. To provide power while in space the Shuttle uses hydrogen fuel cells where the ISS uses solar panels. While the fuel cells provide a lot of power to the Shuttle they do have a finite fuel supply. The life support system aboard the Shuttle is also a short duration design using chemical CO2 scrubbers. At best a Shuttle station would need to be refueled and resupplied every few weeks. Besides power and life support the Shuttle doesn't really carry its own scientific payload. If you were going to leave one in orbit you would need to send it up with a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacelab" title="wikipedia.org">SpaceLab</a> [wikipedia.org] module or something to be able to do anything useful.</p><p>Hooking a Shuttle up to the ISS for long periods would also not be very useful since without the weekly resupply of hydrogen and oxygen the Shuttle would be a power and life support vampire for the ISS. It would also affect the ISS' atmospheric drag such that it would require more reboosts than it already does. These could not be performed by the Shuttle because it carries a limited fuel for its OMS/RCS system which can't be refueled in orbit. A Shuttle plugged into the ISS for a long period of time would end up being a dead weight with no real scientific utility of its own.</p><p>The Shuttles were designed for relatively short term missions and for resupply and refurbishment on the ground. Leaving them parked in orbit is a nice thought but ultimately impractical.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not in the slightest .
There 's two big hurdles using the Shuttles as long term space stations or hooking them up to the ISS .
The first is the electrical power systems of the Shuttles .
To provide power while in space the Shuttle uses hydrogen fuel cells where the ISS uses solar panels .
While the fuel cells provide a lot of power to the Shuttle they do have a finite fuel supply .
The life support system aboard the Shuttle is also a short duration design using chemical CO2 scrubbers .
At best a Shuttle station would need to be refueled and resupplied every few weeks .
Besides power and life support the Shuttle does n't really carry its own scientific payload .
If you were going to leave one in orbit you would need to send it up with a SpaceLab [ wikipedia.org ] module or something to be able to do anything useful.Hooking a Shuttle up to the ISS for long periods would also not be very useful since without the weekly resupply of hydrogen and oxygen the Shuttle would be a power and life support vampire for the ISS .
It would also affect the ISS ' atmospheric drag such that it would require more reboosts than it already does .
These could not be performed by the Shuttle because it carries a limited fuel for its OMS/RCS system which ca n't be refueled in orbit .
A Shuttle plugged into the ISS for a long period of time would end up being a dead weight with no real scientific utility of its own.The Shuttles were designed for relatively short term missions and for resupply and refurbishment on the ground .
Leaving them parked in orbit is a nice thought but ultimately impractical .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not in the slightest.
There's two big hurdles using the Shuttles as long term space stations or hooking them up to the ISS.
The first is the electrical power systems of the Shuttles.
To provide power while in space the Shuttle uses hydrogen fuel cells where the ISS uses solar panels.
While the fuel cells provide a lot of power to the Shuttle they do have a finite fuel supply.
The life support system aboard the Shuttle is also a short duration design using chemical CO2 scrubbers.
At best a Shuttle station would need to be refueled and resupplied every few weeks.
Besides power and life support the Shuttle doesn't really carry its own scientific payload.
If you were going to leave one in orbit you would need to send it up with a SpaceLab [wikipedia.org] module or something to be able to do anything useful.Hooking a Shuttle up to the ISS for long periods would also not be very useful since without the weekly resupply of hydrogen and oxygen the Shuttle would be a power and life support vampire for the ISS.
It would also affect the ISS' atmospheric drag such that it would require more reboosts than it already does.
These could not be performed by the Shuttle because it carries a limited fuel for its OMS/RCS system which can't be refueled in orbit.
A Shuttle plugged into the ISS for a long period of time would end up being a dead weight with no real scientific utility of its own.The Shuttles were designed for relatively short term missions and for resupply and refurbishment on the ground.
Leaving them parked in orbit is a nice thought but ultimately impractical.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060320</id>
	<title>Your official guide to the Jigaboo presidency</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger! If handled properly, your apeman will give years of valuable, if reluctant, service.</p><p>INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.<br>You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model. Field niggers work best in a serial configuration, i.e. chained together. Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it, and don't even think about taking that chain off, ever. Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them. This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud. House niggers work best as standalone units, but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape. At this stage, your nigger can also be given a name. Most owners use the same names over and over, since niggers become confused by too much data. Rufus, Rastus, Remus, Toby, Carslisle, Carlton, Hey-You!-Yes-you!, Yeller, Blackstar, and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger. If your nigger is a ho, it should be called Latrelle, L'Tanya, or Jemima. Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke. Pearl, Blossom, and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes. These names go straight over your nigger's head, by the way.</p><p>CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGER<br>Owing to a design error, your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords. Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - "muh dick" being the most popular. However, others make barking, yelping, yapping noises and appear to be in some pain, so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger's tongue. Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least, you won't hear it complaining anywhere near as much. Niggers have nothing interesting to say, anyway. Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons (yours, mine, and that of women, not the nigger's). This is strongly recommended, and frankly, it's a mystery why this is not done on the boat</p><p>HOUSING YOUR NIGGER.<br>Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars. Make sure, however, that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through. The rule of thumb is, four niggers per square yard of cage. So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers. You can site a nigger cage anywhere, even on soft ground. Don't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage. Niggers never invented the shovel before and they're not about to now. In any case, your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape. As long as the free food holds out, your nigger is living better than it did in Africa, so it will stay put. Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage, as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.</p><p>FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.<br>Your Nigger likes fried chicken, corn bread, and watermelon. You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly doesn't deserve it. Instead, feed it on porridge with salt, and creek water. Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields, other niggers, etc. Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat, but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day. Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer, since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives. He reports he doesn't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result. You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work, since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained. You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton. You really would. Coffee beans? Don't ask. You have no idea.</p><p>MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.<br>Niggers are very, very averse to work of any kind. The nigger's most</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger !
If handled properly , your apeman will give years of valuable , if reluctant , service.INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model .
Field niggers work best in a serial configuration , i.e .
chained together .
Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it , and do n't even think about taking that chain off , ever .
Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them .
This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud .
House niggers work best as standalone units , but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape .
At this stage , your nigger can also be given a name .
Most owners use the same names over and over , since niggers become confused by too much data .
Rufus , Rastus , Remus , Toby , Carslisle , Carlton , Hey-You ! -Yes-you ! , Yeller , Blackstar , and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger .
If your nigger is a ho , it should be called Latrelle , L'Tanya , or Jemima .
Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke .
Pearl , Blossom , and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes .
These names go straight over your nigger 's head , by the way.CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGEROwing to a design error , your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords .
Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - " muh dick " being the most popular .
However , others make barking , yelping , yapping noises and appear to be in some pain , so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger 's tongue .
Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least , you wo n't hear it complaining anywhere near as much .
Niggers have nothing interesting to say , anyway .
Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons ( yours , mine , and that of women , not the nigger 's ) .
This is strongly recommended , and frankly , it 's a mystery why this is not done on the boatHOUSING YOUR NIGGER.Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars .
Make sure , however , that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through .
The rule of thumb is , four niggers per square yard of cage .
So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers .
You can site a nigger cage anywhere , even on soft ground .
Do n't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage .
Niggers never invented the shovel before and they 're not about to now .
In any case , your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape .
As long as the free food holds out , your nigger is living better than it did in Africa , so it will stay put .
Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage , as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.Your Nigger likes fried chicken , corn bread , and watermelon .
You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly does n't deserve it .
Instead , feed it on porridge with salt , and creek water .
Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields , other niggers , etc .
Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat , but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day .
Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer , since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives .
He reports he does n't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result .
You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work , since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained .
You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton .
You really would .
Coffee beans ?
Do n't ask .
You have no idea.MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.Niggers are very , very averse to work of any kind .
The nigger 's most</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Congratulations on your purchase of a brand new nigger!
If handled properly, your apeman will give years of valuable, if reluctant, service.INSTALLING YOUR NIGGER.You should install your nigger differently according to whether you have purchased the field or house model.
Field niggers work best in a serial configuration, i.e.
chained together.
Chain your nigger to another nigger immediately after unpacking it, and don't even think about taking that chain off, ever.
Many niggers start singing as soon as you put a chain on them.
This habit can usually be thrashed out of them if nipped in the bud.
House niggers work best as standalone units, but should be hobbled or hamstrung to prevent attempts at escape.
At this stage, your nigger can also be given a name.
Most owners use the same names over and over, since niggers become confused by too much data.
Rufus, Rastus, Remus, Toby, Carslisle, Carlton, Hey-You!-Yes-you!, Yeller, Blackstar, and Sambo are all effective names for your new buck nigger.
If your nigger is a ho, it should be called Latrelle, L'Tanya, or Jemima.
Some owners call their nigger hoes Latrine for a joke.
Pearl, Blossom, and Ivory are also righteous names for nigger hoes.
These names go straight over your nigger's head, by the way.CONFIGURING YOUR NIGGEROwing to a design error, your nigger comes equipped with a tongue and vocal chords.
Most niggers can master only a few basic human phrases with this apparatus - "muh dick" being the most popular.
However, others make barking, yelping, yapping noises and appear to be in some pain, so you should probably call a vet and have him remove your nigger's tongue.
Once de-tongued your nigger will be a lot happier - at least, you won't hear it complaining anywhere near as much.
Niggers have nothing interesting to say, anyway.
Many owners also castrate their niggers for health reasons (yours, mine, and that of women, not the nigger's).
This is strongly recommended, and frankly, it's a mystery why this is not done on the boatHOUSING YOUR NIGGER.Your nigger can be accommodated in cages with stout iron bars.
Make sure, however, that the bars are wide enough to push pieces of nigger food through.
The rule of thumb is, four niggers per square yard of cage.
So a fifteen foot by thirty foot nigger cage can accommodate two hundred niggers.
You can site a nigger cage anywhere, even on soft ground.
Don't worry about your nigger fashioning makeshift shovels out of odd pieces of wood and digging an escape tunnel under the bars of the cage.
Niggers never invented the shovel before and they're not about to now.
In any case, your nigger is certainly too lazy to attempt escape.
As long as the free food holds out, your nigger is living better than it did in Africa, so it will stay put.
Buck niggers and hoe niggers can be safely accommodated in the same cage, as bucks never attempt sex with black hoes.FEEDING YOUR NIGGER.Your Nigger likes fried chicken, corn bread, and watermelon.
You should therefore give it none of these things because its lazy ass almost certainly doesn't deserve it.
Instead, feed it on porridge with salt, and creek water.
Your nigger will supplement its diet with whatever it finds in the fields, other niggers, etc.
Experienced nigger owners sometimes push watermelon slices through the bars of the nigger cage at the end of the day as a treat, but only if all niggers have worked well and nothing has been stolen that day.
Mike of the Old Ranch Plantation reports that this last one is a killer, since all niggers steal something almost every single day of their lives.
He reports he doesn't have to spend much on free watermelon for his niggers as a result.
You should never allow your nigger meal breaks while at work, since if it stops work for more than ten minutes it will need to be retrained.
You would be surprised how long it takes to teach a nigger to pick cotton.
You really would.
Coffee beans?
Don't ask.
You have no idea.MAKING YOUR NIGGER WORK.Niggers are very, very averse to work of any kind.
The nigger's most</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061806</id>
	<title>Re:Decommission the shuttles in space?</title>
	<author>dweinst</author>
	<datestamp>1265651580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fallen Angels? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen\_Angels\_(science\_fiction\_novel)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen\_Angels\_(science\_fiction\_novel)</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fallen Angels ?
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen \ _Angels \ _ ( science \ _fiction \ _novel ) [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fallen Angels?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallen\_Angels\_(science\_fiction\_novel) [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060990</id>
	<title>Re:Last Night Launch</title>
	<author>L4t3r4lu5</author>
	<datestamp>1265647920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well shit, you could have filmed it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well shit , you could have filmed it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well shit, you could have filmed it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060534</id>
	<title>Re:Extended?</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1265644860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shuttle supply chain is winding now for quite some time, I wouldn't be very surprised if continuing it would be end up similarly costly to pushing Constellation and both Ares rockets forward...but with only three orbiters and not much to do with them.</p><p>Shuttle is past its time; it wasn't really used as intented (landing quickly after launch to escape shutdown attempt), bringing down satellites was quickly abandoned, new space telescopes are beyond its abilities anyway, and we can launch space station modules performing rendezvous by themselves. We just need it this last few times to launch modules...designed to be launched by Shuttle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shuttle supply chain is winding now for quite some time , I would n't be very surprised if continuing it would be end up similarly costly to pushing Constellation and both Ares rockets forward...but with only three orbiters and not much to do with them.Shuttle is past its time ; it was n't really used as intented ( landing quickly after launch to escape shutdown attempt ) , bringing down satellites was quickly abandoned , new space telescopes are beyond its abilities anyway , and we can launch space station modules performing rendezvous by themselves .
We just need it this last few times to launch modules...designed to be launched by Shuttle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shuttle supply chain is winding now for quite some time, I wouldn't be very surprised if continuing it would be end up similarly costly to pushing Constellation and both Ares rockets forward...but with only three orbiters and not much to do with them.Shuttle is past its time; it wasn't really used as intented (landing quickly after launch to escape shutdown attempt), bringing down satellites was quickly abandoned, new space telescopes are beyond its abilities anyway, and we can launch space station modules performing rendezvous by themselves.
We just need it this last few times to launch modules...designed to be launched by Shuttle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31065140</id>
	<title>Re:Decommission the shuttles in space?</title>
	<author>Grishnakh</author>
	<datestamp>1265624220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any way they could send one into a high orbit as a floating museum?  Just in case we destroy ourselves, we'd at least leave something behind in good shape (besides the lunar lander) that visiting alien archaeologists could investigate.</p><p>This would probably take too much fuel though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any way they could send one into a high orbit as a floating museum ?
Just in case we destroy ourselves , we 'd at least leave something behind in good shape ( besides the lunar lander ) that visiting alien archaeologists could investigate.This would probably take too much fuel though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any way they could send one into a high orbit as a floating museum?
Just in case we destroy ourselves, we'd at least leave something behind in good shape (besides the lunar lander) that visiting alien archaeologists could investigate.This would probably take too much fuel though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31065770</id>
	<title>godspeed</title>
	<author>MrKaos</author>
	<datestamp>1265626440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hope it all goes well</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hope it all goes well</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hope it all goes well</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060786</id>
	<title>The first shuttle launch......today</title>
	<author>voodoo cheesecake</author>
	<datestamp>1265646540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember when a television was wheeled my third grade classroom for the first shuttle launch. And now you'd be hard pressed to find a third grader who knows what a space shuttle is, let alone know where Cape Canaveral is or even what it's famous for. NASA has left a huge wake of technology that we all benefit from. Hey, maybe China will foot the bill or buy NASA out. We've sold them everything else, why not cash in on our infrastructure while we're at it. Anyone else want to vomit?


The times they are a changin'</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember when a television was wheeled my third grade classroom for the first shuttle launch .
And now you 'd be hard pressed to find a third grader who knows what a space shuttle is , let alone know where Cape Canaveral is or even what it 's famous for .
NASA has left a huge wake of technology that we all benefit from .
Hey , maybe China will foot the bill or buy NASA out .
We 've sold them everything else , why not cash in on our infrastructure while we 're at it .
Anyone else want to vomit ?
The times they are a changin'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember when a television was wheeled my third grade classroom for the first shuttle launch.
And now you'd be hard pressed to find a third grader who knows what a space shuttle is, let alone know where Cape Canaveral is or even what it's famous for.
NASA has left a huge wake of technology that we all benefit from.
Hey, maybe China will foot the bill or buy NASA out.
We've sold them everything else, why not cash in on our infrastructure while we're at it.
Anyone else want to vomit?
The times they are a changin'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061046</id>
	<title>Re:Last Night Launch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265648160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eh, up in Atlanta I tried to watch, woke up both potential early-mornings--but all I was greeted with was a couple of stars and the sickly grey of horrendous light pollution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eh , up in Atlanta I tried to watch , woke up both potential early-mornings--but all I was greeted with was a couple of stars and the sickly grey of horrendous light pollution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eh, up in Atlanta I tried to watch, woke up both potential early-mornings--but all I was greeted with was a couple of stars and the sickly grey of horrendous light pollution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060892</id>
	<title>Re:Is this really news?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265647320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your grandkids maybe..</p><p>I'm a geek.  I wont be having kids.  Let alone grandkids..</p><p>So fuckit!  Blast that money into space! screw all those grandkids!  aaaaaaahahahaha!</p><p>We'll bail their asses out anyway...  Dont act like we wont.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your grandkids maybe..I 'm a geek .
I wont be having kids .
Let alone grandkids..So fuckit !
Blast that money into space !
screw all those grandkids !
aaaaaaahahahaha ! We 'll bail their asses out anyway... Dont act like we wont .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your grandkids maybe..I'm a geek.
I wont be having kids.
Let alone grandkids..So fuckit!
Blast that money into space!
screw all those grandkids!
aaaaaaahahahaha!We'll bail their asses out anyway...  Dont act like we wont.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31064712</id>
	<title>Did not know there was even a shuttle launch today</title>
	<author>axl917</author>
	<datestamp>1265622600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I still recall fondly the days when all (3!) TV stations would cut to live shuttle takeoff coverage.</p><p>The wondrous has become the routine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I still recall fondly the days when all ( 3 !
) TV stations would cut to live shuttle takeoff coverage.The wondrous has become the routine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still recall fondly the days when all (3!
) TV stations would cut to live shuttle takeoff coverage.The wondrous has become the routine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060756</id>
	<title>I'm a rocket scientist, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265646360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>One thing I don't understand is why the astronauts and CAPCOM sound like they are talking on tin cans &amp; string. Anyone understand this? It's called SKYPE! Look into it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing I do n't understand is why the astronauts and CAPCOM sound like they are talking on tin cans &amp; string .
Anyone understand this ?
It 's called SKYPE !
Look into it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing I don't understand is why the astronauts and CAPCOM sound like they are talking on tin cans &amp; string.
Anyone understand this?
It's called SKYPE!
Look into it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060354</id>
	<title>That's impressive !</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>NEWS : I've done my job today. More at 11.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>NEWS : I 've done my job today .
More at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NEWS : I've done my job today.
More at 11.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061058</id>
	<title>Re:Last Night Launch</title>
	<author>realsilly</author>
	<datestamp>1265648220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry about the mis-spellings, I re-read what I wrote and my poor typing made me kick myself.  Hopefully, it doesn't diminish the beauty that I tried to convey.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry about the mis-spellings , I re-read what I wrote and my poor typing made me kick myself .
Hopefully , it does n't diminish the beauty that I tried to convey .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry about the mis-spellings, I re-read what I wrote and my poor typing made me kick myself.
Hopefully, it doesn't diminish the beauty that I tried to convey.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060584</id>
	<title>two pre-order for Shuttle parts</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1265645220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those factories have been mothballed and the employees reassigned or laid off.
There might be enough spare parts for an extra science mission Bush canceled a few years ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those factories have been mothballed and the employees reassigned or laid off .
There might be enough spare parts for an extra science mission Bush canceled a few years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those factories have been mothballed and the employees reassigned or laid off.
There might be enough spare parts for an extra science mission Bush canceled a few years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060374</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31067164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31065140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31063652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060374
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31062846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31062832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31067378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_149205_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_149205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_149205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060320
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_149205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060374
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_149205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060570
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31067164
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31063652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31067378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31062832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_149205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_149205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061272
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_149205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060410
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_149205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31062846
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061202
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31061952
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31065140
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_149205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_149205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_149205.31060604
</commentlist>
</conversation>
