<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_08_132212</id>
	<title>Google Mystery Domain Reroutes 3\% of Net Surfers</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1265637060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"A new Google domain &mdash; 1e100.net, a nod to the company's famously misspelled name &mdash; is now the net's <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/08/google\_mystery\_domain/">44th most visited site</a>. Google says the domain is used to 'identify servers' on its internal network, hinting that reverse DNS plays a role. The domain was registered in September and launched in October, about the same time Google unveiled Spanner, a new addition to its backend infrastructure designed to shift loads automatically among its data centers."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " A new Google domain    1e100.net , a nod to the company 's famously misspelled name    is now the net 's 44th most visited site .
Google says the domain is used to 'identify servers ' on its internal network , hinting that reverse DNS plays a role .
The domain was registered in September and launched in October , about the same time Google unveiled Spanner , a new addition to its backend infrastructure designed to shift loads automatically among its data centers .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "A new Google domain — 1e100.net, a nod to the company's famously misspelled name — is now the net's 44th most visited site.
Google says the domain is used to 'identify servers' on its internal network, hinting that reverse DNS plays a role.
The domain was registered in September and launched in October, about the same time Google unveiled Spanner, a new addition to its backend infrastructure designed to shift loads automatically among its data centers.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060740</id>
	<title>Re:what a load of crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265646240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1e100.net = one e-loo network = one electronic toilet network. I like the name, it suits them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1e100.net = one e-loo network = one electronic toilet network .
I like the name , it suits them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1e100.net = one e-loo network = one electronic toilet network.
I like the name, it suits them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060544</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061162</id>
	<title>Um, no, not that funny...</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1265648700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A mathematician mibht misspell 'google' as '1e100'.</p><p>And I hear tell some mathematicians have a sense of humor.  But the rest mistake obsucrity for humor.</p><p>Just so you know (and you know who you are), obscurity is not inherently funny.  And neither are you.</p><p>There are not 10 kinds of people in the world.  There are only two.  Your number base doesn't change that.  Put them side by side and see.</p><p>So there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A mathematician mibht misspell 'google ' as '1e100'.And I hear tell some mathematicians have a sense of humor .
But the rest mistake obsucrity for humor.Just so you know ( and you know who you are ) , obscurity is not inherently funny .
And neither are you.There are not 10 kinds of people in the world .
There are only two .
Your number base does n't change that .
Put them side by side and see.So there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A mathematician mibht misspell 'google' as '1e100'.And I hear tell some mathematicians have a sense of humor.
But the rest mistake obsucrity for humor.Just so you know (and you know who you are), obscurity is not inherently funny.
And neither are you.There are not 10 kinds of people in the world.
There are only two.
Your number base doesn't change that.
Put them side by side and see.So there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060408</id>
	<title>Its not a "site" per se...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Really, what google has done is change their reverse information for a LOT of their stuff to point to 1e100.net rather than google, since Google these days is so much more than google: you have youtube, blogger, analytics, doubleclick, and a host of others.</p><p>The 1e100.net name is nice because it allows admins etc to go "this is GOOGLE" rather than "this is X" (which got assimilated by google).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Really , what google has done is change their reverse information for a LOT of their stuff to point to 1e100.net rather than google , since Google these days is so much more than google : you have youtube , blogger , analytics , doubleclick , and a host of others.The 1e100.net name is nice because it allows admins etc to go " this is GOOGLE " rather than " this is X " ( which got assimilated by google ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Really, what google has done is change their reverse information for a LOT of their stuff to point to 1e100.net rather than google, since Google these days is so much more than google: you have youtube, blogger, analytics, doubleclick, and a host of others.The 1e100.net name is nice because it allows admins etc to go "this is GOOGLE" rather than "this is X" (which got assimilated by google).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060370</id>
	<title>3\%</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of my lettrs were routed by 1e100.net.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of my lettrs were routed by 1e100.net .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of my lettrs were routed by 1e100.net.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060026</id>
	<title>Accuracy?</title>
	<author>6031769</author>
	<datestamp>1265640960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Presumably that should be 1e100.net? And presumably it isn't actually "rerouting" anything. Hmmm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Presumably that should be 1e100.net ?
And presumably it is n't actually " rerouting " anything .
Hmmm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Presumably that should be 1e100.net?
And presumably it isn't actually "rerouting" anything.
Hmmm.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31152166</id>
	<title>Re:1e400 or?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1266255540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Gogols, they do nothing but write funny stories.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Gogols , they do nothing but write funny stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Gogols, they do nothing but write funny stories.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060254</id>
	<title>Re:1e400 or?</title>
	<author>IceCreamGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1265642520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>1e100=1</p></div></blockquote><p>
Scientific notation does not work like that. <br>
1e1 = 1*10^1 = 10
<br>
1e10 = 1*10^10 = 10000000000
<br>
1e100 = 1*10^100 = Slashdot doesn't let you write 100 zeros in a row. You get the idea.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1e100 = 1 Scientific notation does not work like that .
1e1 = 1 * 10 ^ 1 = 10 1e10 = 1 * 10 ^ 10 = 10000000000 1e100 = 1 * 10 ^ 100 = Slashdot does n't let you write 100 zeros in a row .
You get the idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1e100=1
Scientific notation does not work like that.
1e1 = 1*10^1 = 10

1e10 = 1*10^10 = 10000000000

1e100 = 1*10^100 = Slashdot doesn't let you write 100 zeros in a row.
You get the idea.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060366</id>
	<title>Re:Why with all the mystery?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cross-site scripting.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cross-site scripting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cross-site scripting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31062730</id>
	<title>Google briefly took over Wikipedia that way</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1265656500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
For a brief period on February 5, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'\_noticeboard/IncidentArchive595#English\_Wikipedia\_briefly\_redirected\_to\_Google.3F" title="wikipedia.org">"en.wikipedia.org" was directed by DNS to an address at "pw-in-f139.1e100.net"</a> [wikipedia.org]. That was quickly corrected, although it may have happened more than once.  Apparently somebody at Google sent out some bad DNS records.  (Google is <a href="http://code.google.com/speed/public-dns/" title="google.com">now in the DNS business, remember.)</a> [google.com]  They need to be more careful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a brief period on February 5 , " en.wikipedia.org " was directed by DNS to an address at " pw-in-f139.1e100.net " [ wikipedia.org ] .
That was quickly corrected , although it may have happened more than once .
Apparently somebody at Google sent out some bad DNS records .
( Google is now in the DNS business , remember .
) [ google.com ] They need to be more careful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
For a brief period on February 5, "en.wikipedia.org" was directed by DNS to an address at "pw-in-f139.1e100.net" [wikipedia.org].
That was quickly corrected, although it may have happened more than once.
Apparently somebody at Google sent out some bad DNS records.
(Google is now in the DNS business, remember.
) [google.com]  They need to be more careful.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060342</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>azav</author>
	<datestamp>1265643240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1^100 = 1.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ^ 100 = 1 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1^100 = 1.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010</id>
	<title>1e400.net?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265640840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"1e400.net, a nod to the company's famously misspelled name"</p><p>Could someone explain that one cause I really don't get it or see the nod.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" 1e400.net , a nod to the company 's famously misspelled name " Could someone explain that one cause I really do n't get it or see the nod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"1e400.net, a nod to the company's famously misspelled name"Could someone explain that one cause I really don't get it or see the nod.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060690</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265646000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;Could someone explain that one cause I really don't get it or see the nod.</p><p>After a long mescaline trip Eric Schmidt and Larry Page decided the company should be called LEE00 (pronounced lee-ooooo) and the l33t-speak domain 1e400.net was born.</p><p>After poor reception from investors and users alike a memo was written up asking all employees to suggest a new domain name.  A young intern, who later committed suicide in a bizarre self decapitation with a chainsaw, suggested that 1 to the 400th power was actually a gogool.  Schmidt and Page were impressed and after accepting how less fun it is to say gogool than "leeee-oooooo" decided to change the name. Because its difficult to trademark a real word, they just went with "google."  1e400.net is a nod to the good old leeee-ooooo days.</p><p>*actually its 1 to 100th power</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Could someone explain that one cause I really do n't get it or see the nod.After a long mescaline trip Eric Schmidt and Larry Page decided the company should be called LEE00 ( pronounced lee-ooooo ) and the l33t-speak domain 1e400.net was born.After poor reception from investors and users alike a memo was written up asking all employees to suggest a new domain name .
A young intern , who later committed suicide in a bizarre self decapitation with a chainsaw , suggested that 1 to the 400th power was actually a gogool .
Schmidt and Page were impressed and after accepting how less fun it is to say gogool than " leeee-oooooo " decided to change the name .
Because its difficult to trademark a real word , they just went with " google .
" 1e400.net is a nod to the good old leeee-ooooo days .
* actually its 1 to 100th power</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;Could someone explain that one cause I really don't get it or see the nod.After a long mescaline trip Eric Schmidt and Larry Page decided the company should be called LEE00 (pronounced lee-ooooo) and the l33t-speak domain 1e400.net was born.After poor reception from investors and users alike a memo was written up asking all employees to suggest a new domain name.
A young intern, who later committed suicide in a bizarre self decapitation with a chainsaw, suggested that 1 to the 400th power was actually a gogool.
Schmidt and Page were impressed and after accepting how less fun it is to say gogool than "leeee-oooooo" decided to change the name.
Because its difficult to trademark a real word, they just went with "google.
"  1e400.net is a nod to the good old leeee-ooooo days.
*actually its 1 to 100th power</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060032</id>
	<title>wtf?</title>
	<author>iCantSpell</author>
	<datestamp>1265640960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this on a qwerty board? How do you 1e400 trying to type google?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this on a qwerty board ?
How do you 1e400 trying to type google ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this on a qwerty board?
How do you 1e400 trying to type google?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31064656</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>PCM2</author>
	<datestamp>1265622300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Besides, google-analytics.com is way too easy for people to remember to block. Now change it to 1e100.net and they probably get a lot more data.</p></div><p>Honestly, the people who block domains don't "remember" to block anything. They add it to a list and forget about it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Besides , google-analytics.com is way too easy for people to remember to block .
Now change it to 1e100.net and they probably get a lot more data.Honestly , the people who block domains do n't " remember " to block anything .
They add it to a list and forget about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Besides, google-analytics.com is way too easy for people to remember to block.
Now change it to 1e100.net and they probably get a lot more data.Honestly, the people who block domains don't "remember" to block anything.
They add it to a list and forget about it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060142</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060266</id>
	<title>Re:1e400 or?</title>
	<author>Stooshie</author>
	<datestamp>1265642520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Erm,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... no!

In what universe does 1x10^100 (or 1e100) = 1?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Erm , ... no ! In what universe does 1x10 ^ 100 ( or 1e100 ) = 1 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Erm, ... no!

In what universe does 1x10^100 (or 1e100) = 1?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31063994</id>
	<title>Re:wtf?</title>
	<author>Idbar</author>
	<datestamp>1265662620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If trying to type Gogol you type Google, why not getting 1E400 when typing 1E100, although perhaps I'd assume is more like dyslexia, rather than a typo<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>If trying to type Gogol you type Google , why not getting 1E400 when typing 1E100 , although perhaps I 'd assume is more like dyslexia , rather than a typo ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If trying to type Gogol you type Google, why not getting 1E400 when typing 1E100, although perhaps I'd assume is more like dyslexia, rather than a typo ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061922</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265652300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>have you gone to 1e400.net?  it's a web cam</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>have you gone to 1e400.net ?
it 's a web cam</tokentext>
<sentencetext>have you gone to 1e400.net?
it's a web cam</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31065334</id>
	<title>The story from Google...</title>
	<author>chrisd</author>
	<datestamp>1265624940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey, the fellows in netops asked me to clarify for you folks here's the story:
<p>
1e100.net is a Google-owned domain name used to identify the servers in our network. Following standard industry practice, we make sure each IP address has a corresponding hostname. Starting in October 2009, we started using a single domain name to identify our servers across all Google products, rather than use different product domains such as youtube.com, blogger.com, and google.com. We did this for two reasons: first, to keep things simpler, and second, to proactively improve security by protecting against potential threats such as cross-site scripting attacks. Most typical Internet users will never see 1e100.net, but we picked we picked a Googley name for it just in case (1e100 is scientific notation for 1 googol).
</p><p>
So there you go!
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , the fellows in netops asked me to clarify for you folks here 's the story : 1e100.net is a Google-owned domain name used to identify the servers in our network .
Following standard industry practice , we make sure each IP address has a corresponding hostname .
Starting in October 2009 , we started using a single domain name to identify our servers across all Google products , rather than use different product domains such as youtube.com , blogger.com , and google.com .
We did this for two reasons : first , to keep things simpler , and second , to proactively improve security by protecting against potential threats such as cross-site scripting attacks .
Most typical Internet users will never see 1e100.net , but we picked we picked a Googley name for it just in case ( 1e100 is scientific notation for 1 googol ) .
So there you go !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, the fellows in netops asked me to clarify for you folks here's the story:

1e100.net is a Google-owned domain name used to identify the servers in our network.
Following standard industry practice, we make sure each IP address has a corresponding hostname.
Starting in October 2009, we started using a single domain name to identify our servers across all Google products, rather than use different product domains such as youtube.com, blogger.com, and google.com.
We did this for two reasons: first, to keep things simpler, and second, to proactively improve security by protecting against potential threats such as cross-site scripting attacks.
Most typical Internet users will never see 1e100.net, but we picked we picked a Googley name for it just in case (1e100 is scientific notation for 1 googol).
So there you go!
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060242</id>
	<title>Lazy (or penny pinching?) Slashdot geeks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265642400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Such an egregious spelling mistake, and nobody yet has snatched up the name and directed it to goatse.fr? Come on guys, you can do better than that!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Such an egregious spelling mistake , and nobody yet has snatched up the name and directed it to goatse.fr ?
Come on guys , you can do better than that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Such an egregious spelling mistake, and nobody yet has snatched up the name and directed it to goatse.fr?
Come on guys, you can do better than that!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060404</id>
	<title>Re:Why with all the mystery?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That pissed me off too.  I about dropped dead when I looked at my network traffic and saw all the open connections to 1e100, and feared I had some kind of awful virus running amok on my network.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That pissed me off too .
I about dropped dead when I looked at my network traffic and saw all the open connections to 1e100 , and feared I had some kind of awful virus running amok on my network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That pissed me off too.
I about dropped dead when I looked at my network traffic and saw all the open connections to 1e100, and feared I had some kind of awful virus running amok on my network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060022</id>
	<title>Blocked in my hosts file.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265640900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've just blocked it in my<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/etc/hosts file. I don't really care what sort of games they're playing here, but the fuck if I'm being part of them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've just blocked it in my /etc/hosts file .
I do n't really care what sort of games they 're playing here , but the fuck if I 'm being part of them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've just blocked it in my /etc/hosts file.
I don't really care what sort of games they're playing here, but the fuck if I'm being part of them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060516</id>
	<title>Very mysterious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265644680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google says the domain is used to 'identify servers' on its internal network, hinting that reverse DNS plays a role.</p><p>Some fucking mystery.  Identifying servers is what reverse DNS does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google says the domain is used to 'identify servers ' on its internal network , hinting that reverse DNS plays a role.Some fucking mystery .
Identifying servers is what reverse DNS does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google says the domain is used to 'identify servers' on its internal network, hinting that reverse DNS plays a role.Some fucking mystery.
Identifying servers is what reverse DNS does.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31063342</id>
	<title>Re:Its not a "site" per se...</title>
	<author>TooMuchToDo</author>
	<datestamp>1265659320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>+1; Sane and Rational. Reverse DNS domain for administration purposes. Move along folks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 ; Sane and Rational .
Reverse DNS domain for administration purposes .
Move along folks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1; Sane and Rational.
Reverse DNS domain for administration purposes.
Move along folks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060408</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061954</id>
	<title>Don't believe it.</title>
	<author>whoever57</author>
	<datestamp>1265652420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At home, I run a squid proxy and all port 80 requests must go through it.</p><p>I checked the logs, which go back 8 weeks, and there is not a single instance of 1e100.net in them. It might be on an alternate port, but my personal browser is explicitly set to use the proxy.</p><p>Clearly Alexa sees the requests to this domain, but, Alexa only has information from people who have installed the Alexa toolbar, so perhaps the 1e100.net domain is somehow only used by people who have the Alexa toolbar?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At home , I run a squid proxy and all port 80 requests must go through it.I checked the logs , which go back 8 weeks , and there is not a single instance of 1e100.net in them .
It might be on an alternate port , but my personal browser is explicitly set to use the proxy.Clearly Alexa sees the requests to this domain , but , Alexa only has information from people who have installed the Alexa toolbar , so perhaps the 1e100.net domain is somehow only used by people who have the Alexa toolbar ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At home, I run a squid proxy and all port 80 requests must go through it.I checked the logs, which go back 8 weeks, and there is not a single instance of 1e100.net in them.
It might be on an alternate port, but my personal browser is explicitly set to use the proxy.Clearly Alexa sees the requests to this domain, but, Alexa only has information from people who have installed the Alexa toolbar, so perhaps the 1e100.net domain is somehow only used by people who have the Alexa toolbar?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060110</id>
	<title>The googol network?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265641320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA:<i>As pointed out by Sebastian Stadil, founder of the Silicon Valley Cloud Computing Group, 1e100.net translates to "Google Network"</i>. <br> <br>

Tha would be the <b>googol</b> network. Why not: -o-o-o-.net? (That would be a goggle with an extra "o".)</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : As pointed out by Sebastian Stadil , founder of the Silicon Valley Cloud Computing Group , 1e100.net translates to " Google Network " .
Tha would be the googol network .
Why not : -o-o-o-.net ?
( That would be a goggle with an extra " o " .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:As pointed out by Sebastian Stadil, founder of the Silicon Valley Cloud Computing Group, 1e100.net translates to "Google Network".
Tha would be the googol network.
Why not: -o-o-o-.net?
(That would be a goggle with an extra "o".
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060274</id>
	<title>Re:1e400 or?</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1265642580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>1e1 = 1*10^1 = <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1e1" title="wolframalpha.com">10</a> [wolframalpha.com] <br>
1e10 = 1*10^10 = <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1e10" title="wolframalpha.com">10000000000</a> [wolframalpha.com] <br>
1e100 = 1*10^100 = a Googol =  <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1e100" title="wolframalpha.com"> 10 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 </a> [wolframalpha.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>1e1 = 1 * 10 ^ 1 = 10 [ wolframalpha.com ] 1e10 = 1 * 10 ^ 10 = 10000000000 [ wolframalpha.com ] 1e100 = 1 * 10 ^ 100 = a Googol = 10 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 [ wolframalpha.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1e1 = 1*10^1 = 10 [wolframalpha.com] 
1e10 = 1*10^10 = 10000000000 [wolframalpha.com] 
1e100 = 1*10^100 = a Googol =   10 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000  [wolframalpha.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31067384</id>
	<title>Re:Slashdot helps</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265634960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slashdot has an Alexa rank of 1250 right now. What makes you think a mention on its front page would have any noticeable effect on the site ranked #44?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slashdot has an Alexa rank of 1250 right now .
What makes you think a mention on its front page would have any noticeable effect on the site ranked # 44 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slashdot has an Alexa rank of 1250 right now.
What makes you think a mention on its front page would have any noticeable effect on the site ranked #44?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060430</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060544</id>
	<title>what a load of crap</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265644860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I imagine someone pointed out that a million bucks a year of bandwidth costs could be saved by using a shorter domain name.  What a non-story.</p><p>And what's this about Google being "misspelled"?  That's the stupidest thing I ever heard.  "Google" is a great brand name loosely based on a word that would have been a terrible brand name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I imagine someone pointed out that a million bucks a year of bandwidth costs could be saved by using a shorter domain name .
What a non-story.And what 's this about Google being " misspelled " ?
That 's the stupidest thing I ever heard .
" Google " is a great brand name loosely based on a word that would have been a terrible brand name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I imagine someone pointed out that a million bucks a year of bandwidth costs could be saved by using a shorter domain name.
What a non-story.And what's this about Google being "misspelled"?
That's the stupidest thing I ever heard.
"Google" is a great brand name loosely based on a word that would have been a terrible brand name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060580</id>
	<title>Not misspelled</title>
	<author>joeyblades</author>
	<datestamp>1265645220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Googol is the name of a number, Google is the name of a company. How could anyone claim that the company misspelled their own name?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Googol is the name of a number , Google is the name of a company .
How could anyone claim that the company misspelled their own name ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Googol is the name of a number, Google is the name of a company.
How could anyone claim that the company misspelled their own name?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31065936</id>
	<title>Re:Lazy (or penny pinching?) Slashdot geeks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265627100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Give us a break,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/ is down for Verison Wireless users and we're <a href="http://tinyurl.com/plkat" title="tinyurl.com" rel="nofollow">too busy DDoSing their servers</a> [tinyurl.com] to care about yet another<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. spelling error.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Give us a break , /b/ is down for Verison Wireless users and we 're too busy DDoSing their servers [ tinyurl.com ] to care about yet another / .
spelling error .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give us a break, /b/ is down for Verison Wireless users and we're too busy DDoSing their servers [tinyurl.com] to care about yet another /.
spelling error.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060018</id>
	<title>So that would be...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265640900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a Quoogle?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a Quoogle ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a Quoogle?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061412</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>Chapter80</author>
	<datestamp>1265649960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A young intern, who later committed suicide in a bizarre self decapitation with a chainsaw, suggested that 1 to the 400th power was actually a gogool.  </p><p>*actually its 1 to 100th power</p></div><p>Of course, 1 to the 100th power is the same as 1 to the 400th power, is the same as 1.<br>You mean TEN to the 100th power.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A young intern , who later committed suicide in a bizarre self decapitation with a chainsaw , suggested that 1 to the 400th power was actually a gogool .
* actually its 1 to 100th powerOf course , 1 to the 100th power is the same as 1 to the 400th power , is the same as 1.You mean TEN to the 100th power .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A young intern, who later committed suicide in a bizarre self decapitation with a chainsaw, suggested that 1 to the 400th power was actually a gogool.
*actually its 1 to 100th powerOf course, 1 to the 100th power is the same as 1 to the 400th power, is the same as 1.You mean TEN to the 100th power.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061298</id>
	<title>Re:And... so what?</title>
	<author>hduff</author>
	<datestamp>1265649360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What's the significance of this? Why should I care? Article neglected to mention that.</p></div><p>You <i>have</i> read Slashdot before, yes? </p><p>"Slashdot" is a proto-Sanskrit word meaning redundant, useless, confusing, wildly inaccurate, poorly documented bumfuggery.</p><p>For an example, please read this this entire thread, which makes FARK appear erudite and meaningful by comparison.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the significance of this ?
Why should I care ?
Article neglected to mention that.You have read Slashdot before , yes ?
" Slashdot " is a proto-Sanskrit word meaning redundant , useless , confusing , wildly inaccurate , poorly documented bumfuggery.For an example , please read this this entire thread , which makes FARK appear erudite and meaningful by comparison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the significance of this?
Why should I care?
Article neglected to mention that.You have read Slashdot before, yes?
"Slashdot" is a proto-Sanskrit word meaning redundant, useless, confusing, wildly inaccurate, poorly documented bumfuggery.For an example, please read this this entire thread, which makes FARK appear erudite and meaningful by comparison.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31062138</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>Inda</author>
	<datestamp>1265653380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't believe everyone has this wrong.<br><br>"le hoonet" (hoo-nay) is French for "the indexer". It's a reference to the cult French film, which is ultimately a remake of The Matrix.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe everyone has this wrong .
" le hoonet " ( hoo-nay ) is French for " the indexer " .
It 's a reference to the cult French film , which is ultimately a remake of The Matrix .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe everyone has this wrong.
"le hoonet" (hoo-nay) is French for "the indexer".
It's a reference to the cult French film, which is ultimately a remake of The Matrix.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060492</id>
	<title>In other news...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265644500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>W-U03B1.net ranks in the top 1e100 domains, according to Alexa.</htmltext>
<tokenext>W-U03B1.net ranks in the top 1e100 domains , according to Alexa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>W-U03B1.net ranks in the top 1e100 domains, according to Alexa.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060052</id>
	<title>err</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265641020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1e400 or 100?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1e400 or 100 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1e400 or 100?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060142</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1265641680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's right in the article..</p><p><div class="quote"><p>But on closer inspection, the domain is obviously Google's, chosen with a mathematician's wink at the search giant's famously misspelled name. This mystery domain is 1e100.net. "1e100" would be scientific notation for 10 100, a one followed by 100 zeros, also known as a googol.</p></div><p>Besides, google-analytics.com is way too easy for people to remember to block. Now change it to 1e100.net and they probably get a lot more data.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's right in the article..But on closer inspection , the domain is obviously Google 's , chosen with a mathematician 's wink at the search giant 's famously misspelled name .
This mystery domain is 1e100.net .
" 1e100 " would be scientific notation for 10 100 , a one followed by 100 zeros , also known as a googol.Besides , google-analytics.com is way too easy for people to remember to block .
Now change it to 1e100.net and they probably get a lot more data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's right in the article..But on closer inspection, the domain is obviously Google's, chosen with a mathematician's wink at the search giant's famously misspelled name.
This mystery domain is 1e100.net.
"1e100" would be scientific notation for 10 100, a one followed by 100 zeros, also known as a googol.Besides, google-analytics.com is way too easy for people to remember to block.
Now change it to 1e100.net and they probably get a lot more data.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020</id>
	<title>1e400 or?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265640900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFA says 1e100 as in...a gogol.</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA says 1e100 as in...a gogol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA says 1e100 as in...a gogol.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060430</id>
	<title>Slashdot helps</title>
	<author>wesw02</author>
	<datestamp>1265643900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure being listed on the front page of Slashdot will help push that domain up a few spots.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure being listed on the front page of Slashdot will help push that domain up a few spots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure being listed on the front page of Slashdot will help push that domain up a few spots.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061522</id>
	<title>79 comment about the scientific notation of google</title>
	<author>terraformer</author>
	<datestamp>1265650380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and 1 comment asking what the article means to all of us. Not a single comment on why are they redirecting things through this domain.</p><p>Yup, this is<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and 1 comment asking what the article means to all of us .
Not a single comment on why are they redirecting things through this domain.Yup , this is / .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and 1 comment asking what the article means to all of us.
Not a single comment on why are they redirecting things through this domain.Yup, this is /.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060132</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265641500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Some thoughts about the domain name itself. Google probably wanted to use 10e100, since that character string means 10 to the 100 power - in other words, a googol. Not sure why they settled for 1e100, because that only comes out to a measly 1.</p></div></blockquote><p>
<a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/021639.html" title="seroundtable.com" rel="nofollow">Source</a> [seroundtable.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some thoughts about the domain name itself .
Google probably wanted to use 10e100 , since that character string means 10 to the 100 power - in other words , a googol .
Not sure why they settled for 1e100 , because that only comes out to a measly 1 .
Source [ seroundtable.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some thoughts about the domain name itself.
Google probably wanted to use 10e100, since that character string means 10 to the 100 power - in other words, a googol.
Not sure why they settled for 1e100, because that only comes out to a measly 1.
Source [seroundtable.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060212</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>Jimmy\_B</author>
	<datestamp>1265642160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>XeY means X*10^Y, not X^Y.</htmltext>
<tokenext>XeY means X * 10 ^ Y , not X ^ Y .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>XeY means X*10^Y, not X^Y.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060294</id>
	<title>Re:1e400 or?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265642700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What is this? Everyone is coming up with incorrect corrections?</p><p>1e1 = 10  (for real)<br>1e10 = 1 followed by 10 zeroes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What is this ?
Everyone is coming up with incorrect corrections ? 1e1 = 10 ( for real ) 1e10 = 1 followed by 10 zeroes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What is this?
Everyone is coming up with incorrect corrections?1e1 = 10  (for real)1e10 = 1 followed by 10 zeroes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060556</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>Cyberwasteland</author>
	<datestamp>1265644980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They mistyped it there, it's actually a 1e100.net

Which is a reference to 1e100 (1 x 10) or a "googol", the name of which google is derived.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They mistyped it there , it 's actually a 1e100.net Which is a reference to 1e100 ( 1 x 10 ) or a " googol " , the name of which google is derived .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They mistyped it there, it's actually a 1e100.net

Which is a reference to 1e100 (1 x 10) or a "googol", the name of which google is derived.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060262</id>
	<title>Re:1e400 or?</title>
	<author>loupgarou21</author>
	<datestamp>1265642520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1e1 = 1*10^1</p><p>1e10 = 1*10^10</p><p>1e100 = 1*10^100</p><p>1e10 is not the same as 1^10</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1e1 = 1 * 10 ^ 11e10 = 1 * 10 ^ 101e100 = 1 * 10 ^ 1001e10 is not the same as 1 ^ 10</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1e1 = 1*10^11e10 = 1*10^101e100 = 1*10^1001e10 is not the same as 1^10</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060050</id>
	<title>do no evil</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265641020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>rerouting traffic is only adware activity until google starts doing it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>rerouting traffic is only adware activity until google starts doing it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>rerouting traffic is only adware activity until google starts doing it</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140</id>
	<title>Re:1e400 or?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265641620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1e1=1
</p><p>1e10=1
</p><p>1e100=1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1e1 = 1 1e10 = 1 1e100 = 1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1e1=1
1e10=1
1e100=1</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060064</id>
	<title>400?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265641020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Looks like googol grew by quite a few orders of magnitude.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like googol grew by quite a few orders of magnitude .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like googol grew by quite a few orders of magnitude.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060162</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265641800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1e100 is the same as 1^100, which is a Googol, or if you're a google founder, spelled "Google"<br>
&nbsp; <br>
&nbsp; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>
&nbsp; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1e100 is the same as 1 ^ 100 , which is a Googol , or if you 're a google founder , spelled " Google "     http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol [ wikipedia.org ]   http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1e100 is the same as 1^100, which is a Googol, or if you're a google founder, spelled "Google"
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol [wikipedia.org] 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060840</id>
	<title>And... so what?</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1265646900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the significance of this? Why should I care? Article neglected to mention that.</p><p>"Oh wow, Google registered a domain name and now they're using it. THAT IS DEFINITELY NEWSWORTHY!!!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the significance of this ?
Why should I care ?
Article neglected to mention that .
" Oh wow , Google registered a domain name and now they 're using it .
THAT IS DEFINITELY NEWSWORTHY ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the significance of this?
Why should I care?
Article neglected to mention that.
"Oh wow, Google registered a domain name and now they're using it.
THAT IS DEFINITELY NEWSWORTHY!!!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061914</id>
	<title>Nothing too new...</title>
	<author>Qubit</author>
	<datestamp>1265652240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had to do some network analysis last year to try to track down the source of massive overload on our firewall. The domain <tt>1e100.net</tt> came up a few times, and it took me a second before I figured out the clever naming choice.</p><p>I guess I never thought that the name was a big enough deal to be worthy of a whole Slashdot story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had to do some network analysis last year to try to track down the source of massive overload on our firewall .
The domain 1e100.net came up a few times , and it took me a second before I figured out the clever naming choice.I guess I never thought that the name was a big enough deal to be worthy of a whole Slashdot story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had to do some network analysis last year to try to track down the source of massive overload on our firewall.
The domain 1e100.net came up a few times, and it took me a second before I figured out the clever naming choice.I guess I never thought that the name was a big enough deal to be worthy of a whole Slashdot story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060234</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>Bromskloss</author>
	<datestamp>1265642400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>1e100 is the same as 1^100, which is a Googol, or if you're a google founder, spelled "Google"</p></div><p>I hope that was a typo.</p><ul>
<li>1e100 = 1E100 = 10^100 = a googol</li><li>1^100 = 1</li></ul></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1e100 is the same as 1 ^ 100 , which is a Googol , or if you 're a google founder , spelled " Google " I hope that was a typo .
1e100 = 1E100 = 10 ^ 100 = a googol1 ^ 100 = 1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1e100 is the same as 1^100, which is a Googol, or if you're a google founder, spelled "Google"I hope that was a typo.
1e100 = 1E100 = 10^100 = a googol1^100 = 1
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060382</id>
	<title>Re:1e400.net?</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1265643600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Could someone explain that one cause I really don't get it or see the nod.</p></div><p>Someone screwed up because it should have been 4e100.net, aka "four googol" aka "for google"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could someone explain that one cause I really do n't get it or see the nod.Someone screwed up because it should have been 4e100.net , aka " four googol " aka " for google "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could someone explain that one cause I really don't get it or see the nod.Someone screwed up because it should have been 4e100.net, aka "four googol" aka "for google"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060248</id>
	<title>Re:1e400 or?</title>
	<author>tehniobium</author>
	<datestamp>1265642460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Remember to think before you post<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember to think before you post ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember to think before you post ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060036</id>
	<title>1e400.net?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265640960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A new Google domain &mdash; 1e400.net, a nod to the company's famously misspelled name</p></div><p>Surely you mean 1e100.net, as the original report states.</p><p>(Note; summary will probably be corrected by the time most people see this)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A new Google domain    1e400.net , a nod to the company 's famously misspelled nameSurely you mean 1e100.net , as the original report states .
( Note ; summary will probably be corrected by the time most people see this )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A new Google domain — 1e400.net, a nod to the company's famously misspelled nameSurely you mean 1e100.net, as the original report states.
(Note; summary will probably be corrected by the time most people see this)
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060072</id>
	<title>Why with all the mystery?</title>
	<author>Dachannien</author>
	<datestamp>1265641080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why not just call it 1e400.google.com?  Screwy domain names with numbers in them make me think of ads, spam, or malware.  I'd be a lot more likely to allow javascript/cookies and not put the site in Adblock or the hosts file if it was clearly a Google domain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not just call it 1e400.google.com ?
Screwy domain names with numbers in them make me think of ads , spam , or malware .
I 'd be a lot more likely to allow javascript/cookies and not put the site in Adblock or the hosts file if it was clearly a Google domain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not just call it 1e400.google.com?
Screwy domain names with numbers in them make me think of ads, spam, or malware.
I'd be a lot more likely to allow javascript/cookies and not put the site in Adblock or the hosts file if it was clearly a Google domain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31062524</id>
	<title>Google.HT</title>
	<author>wsanders</author>
	<datestamp>1265655540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought the same thing as parent, actually, and looked up the domain myself when I saw it on my netstat output.</p><p>Anyway, you don't want to DoS<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.com Spread the load around.</p><p>Or you could just give Google their own TLD.</p><p>Better yet, Google could register google.ht. The process of registering a host name for every molecule in the universe would bail that country out in no time at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the same thing as parent , actually , and looked up the domain myself when I saw it on my netstat output.Anyway , you do n't want to DoS .com Spread the load around.Or you could just give Google their own TLD.Better yet , Google could register google.ht .
The process of registering a host name for every molecule in the universe would bail that country out in no time at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the same thing as parent, actually, and looked up the domain myself when I saw it on my netstat output.Anyway, you don't want to DoS .com Spread the load around.Or you could just give Google their own TLD.Better yet, Google could register google.ht.
The process of registering a host name for every molecule in the universe would bail that country out in no time at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060334</id>
	<title>Re:1e400 or?</title>
	<author>Potor</author>
	<datestamp>1265643120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>my bad</htmltext>
<tokenext>my bad</tokentext>
<sentencetext>my bad</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060886</id>
	<title>Re:Why with all the mystery?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265647260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Screwy domain names with numbers in them make me think of ads, spam, or malware..</p></div><p>Congrats! You broke the code. It turns out google does ads, and spam and malware often come along for the ride.</p><p>Jimmy, tell him what he's won....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screwy domain names with numbers in them make me think of ads , spam , or malware..Congrats !
You broke the code .
It turns out google does ads , and spam and malware often come along for the ride.Jimmy , tell him what he 's won... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screwy domain names with numbers in them make me think of ads, spam, or malware..Congrats!
You broke the code.
It turns out google does ads, and spam and malware often come along for the ride.Jimmy, tell him what he's won....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060072</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061070</id>
	<title>Re:And... so what?</title>
	<author>Xest</author>
	<datestamp>1265648340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Rather than repeat myself, see my post here:</p><p><a href="http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1541436&amp;cid=31060452" title="slashdot.org">http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1541436&amp;cid=31060452</a> [slashdot.org]</p><p>Effectively it's a non-story, hyped up into a story by typical The Register anti-Google trolling.</p><p>I don't like a lot of things Google does, particularly Schmidt's "done nothing wrong, got nothing to hide" style comments, but really, non-stories like this are just utterly stupid and as they're part of The Register's agenda based bullshit wagon, don't even deserve to be entertained.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rather than repeat myself , see my post here : http : //slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 1541436&amp;cid = 31060452 [ slashdot.org ] Effectively it 's a non-story , hyped up into a story by typical The Register anti-Google trolling.I do n't like a lot of things Google does , particularly Schmidt 's " done nothing wrong , got nothing to hide " style comments , but really , non-stories like this are just utterly stupid and as they 're part of The Register 's agenda based bullshit wagon , do n't even deserve to be entertained .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rather than repeat myself, see my post here:http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1541436&amp;cid=31060452 [slashdot.org]Effectively it's a non-story, hyped up into a story by typical The Register anti-Google trolling.I don't like a lot of things Google does, particularly Schmidt's "done nothing wrong, got nothing to hide" style comments, but really, non-stories like this are just utterly stupid and as they're part of The Register's agenda based bullshit wagon, don't even deserve to be entertained.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060840</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31067384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060430
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060366
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31152166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31065936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060404
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31062138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31064656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31063342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060408
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31063994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31062524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060072
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061070
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060254
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_132212_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060544
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060064
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31067384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060022
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060036
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061162
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060580
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060026
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31063994
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061922
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060690
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31062138
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31061412
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060342
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060142
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31064656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31065936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31063342
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31152166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060140
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060294
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060334
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060262
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060254
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060266
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31062524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31060492
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_132212.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_132212.31065334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
