<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_08_0221241</id>
	<title>Google Airs Super Bowl Ad</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1265642340000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>theodp writes <i>"CNET's hunch that <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852\_3-10448744-71.html">Google might run a Super Bowl ad entitled 'Parisian Love'</a> proved to be well-founded. The ad just ran (did you know that you can search the Internet using Google?), and Apple certainly doesn't have to worry about losing its claim to having produced the best Super Bowl ad ever. In fact, you might want to check out the spoof 'Parisian Love' apparently inspired &mdash; <a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/5466225/the-best-google-commercial-youre-never-going-to-see-air">'Is Tiger Feeling Lucky?'</a> &mdash; if you want to see a better pitch for Google."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>theodp writes " CNET 's hunch that Google might run a Super Bowl ad entitled 'Parisian Love ' proved to be well-founded .
The ad just ran ( did you know that you can search the Internet using Google ?
) , and Apple certainly does n't have to worry about losing its claim to having produced the best Super Bowl ad ever .
In fact , you might want to check out the spoof 'Parisian Love ' apparently inspired    'Is Tiger Feeling Lucky ?
'    if you want to see a better pitch for Google .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>theodp writes "CNET's hunch that Google might run a Super Bowl ad entitled 'Parisian Love' proved to be well-founded.
The ad just ran (did you know that you can search the Internet using Google?
), and Apple certainly doesn't have to worry about losing its claim to having produced the best Super Bowl ad ever.
In fact, you might want to check out the spoof 'Parisian Love' apparently inspired — 'Is Tiger Feeling Lucky?
' — if you want to see a better pitch for Google.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058184</id>
	<title>Re:Best Ever?</title>
	<author>ToasterMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1265566560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh gawd. That ad was based around a lame, confusing reference to a certain novel -- a novel that the makers obviously had not read. It doesn't make sense to anybody who doesn't already think that Apple products are Destined to Save the World. Anybody who thinks this is "best ever" needs to get out more.</p></div><p>What was the computing industry like back then?  I've always wanted to hear from someone familiar with the industry at the time to explain what that ad was getting at.</p><p>You mean get out less, right?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh gawd .
That ad was based around a lame , confusing reference to a certain novel -- a novel that the makers obviously had not read .
It does n't make sense to anybody who does n't already think that Apple products are Destined to Save the World .
Anybody who thinks this is " best ever " needs to get out more.What was the computing industry like back then ?
I 've always wanted to hear from someone familiar with the industry at the time to explain what that ad was getting at.You mean get out less , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh gawd.
That ad was based around a lame, confusing reference to a certain novel -- a novel that the makers obviously had not read.
It doesn't make sense to anybody who doesn't already think that Apple products are Destined to Save the World.
Anybody who thinks this is "best ever" needs to get out more.What was the computing industry like back then?
I've always wanted to hear from someone familiar with the industry at the time to explain what that ad was getting at.You mean get out less, right?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058576</id>
	<title>Re:I Don't Get It</title>
	<author>azenpunk</author>
	<datestamp>1265571840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for culture, yes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for culture , yes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for culture, yes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31064744</id>
	<title>Re:I see how you might be confused</title>
	<author>pock3ts</author>
	<datestamp>1265622720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Amen.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Amen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Amen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059332</id>
	<title>What are you smoking</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1265629560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "Paris" ad was sweet and thoughtful, the "Tiger" ad was just nasty and mean-spirited.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " Paris " ad was sweet and thoughtful , the " Tiger " ad was just nasty and mean-spirited .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "Paris" ad was sweet and thoughtful, the "Tiger" ad was just nasty and mean-spirited.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060310</id>
	<title>Eric Schmidt YOU LIED</title>
	<author>PHPNerd</author>
	<datestamp>1265642940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Before the Superbowl, Eric Schmidt (CEO of Google) tweeted:<br> <br>"Can't wait to watch the Superbowl tomorrow. Be sure to watch the ads in the 3rd quarter (someone said "Hell has indeed frozen over.")"<br> <br>It was a nice ad (very touching), but...SERIOUSLY???  I did NOT watch that ad and say "Hell has indeed frozen over"!  In fact, thanks to his silly hype, I was left incredibly underwhelmed.  Thanks alot, Schmidt.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Before the Superbowl , Eric Schmidt ( CEO of Google ) tweeted : " Ca n't wait to watch the Superbowl tomorrow .
Be sure to watch the ads in the 3rd quarter ( someone said " Hell has indeed frozen over .
" ) " It was a nice ad ( very touching ) , but...SERIOUSLY ? ? ?
I did NOT watch that ad and say " Hell has indeed frozen over " !
In fact , thanks to his silly hype , I was left incredibly underwhelmed .
Thanks alot , Schmidt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before the Superbowl, Eric Schmidt (CEO of Google) tweeted: "Can't wait to watch the Superbowl tomorrow.
Be sure to watch the ads in the 3rd quarter (someone said "Hell has indeed frozen over.
")" It was a nice ad (very touching), but...SERIOUSLY???
I did NOT watch that ad and say "Hell has indeed frozen over"!
In fact, thanks to his silly hype, I was left incredibly underwhelmed.
Thanks alot, Schmidt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059184</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>operator\_error</author>
	<datestamp>1265627040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, Parisians are not allowed to use www.ashleymadison.com, which only operates within the USA. All non-US IPs see on the web page is:<blockquote><div><p>LIFE IS SHORT, HAVE AN AFFAIR.(TM)

<br>


We are unable to process your request due to your present location.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , Parisians are not allowed to use www.ashleymadison.com , which only operates within the USA .
All non-US IPs see on the web page is : LIFE IS SHORT , HAVE AN AFFAIR .
( TM ) We are unable to process your request due to your present location .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, Parisians are not allowed to use www.ashleymadison.com, which only operates within the USA.
All non-US IPs see on the web page is:LIFE IS SHORT, HAVE AN AFFAIR.
(TM)




We are unable to process your request due to your present location.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546</id>
	<title>Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265560500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...who thought this ad was pretty damn brilliant? Low-key, sure, but also sweet, memorable, and focused on the product/service itself rather than hype and glitz? I thought it promoted the both the company's values and the value of what they provide to their customers extraordinarily well.</p><p>Maybe I'm just not cynical enough, but it sure gets my vote.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/tsg/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...who thought this ad was pretty damn brilliant ?
Low-key , sure , but also sweet , memorable , and focused on the product/service itself rather than hype and glitz ?
I thought it promoted the both the company 's values and the value of what they provide to their customers extraordinarily well.Maybe I 'm just not cynical enough , but it sure gets my vote .
/tsg/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...who thought this ad was pretty damn brilliant?
Low-key, sure, but also sweet, memorable, and focused on the product/service itself rather than hype and glitz?
I thought it promoted the both the company's values and the value of what they provide to their customers extraordinarily well.Maybe I'm just not cynical enough, but it sure gets my vote.
/tsg/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31064082</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>DutchUncle</author>
	<datestamp>1265619840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>EXACTLY!  And that's the point!  They managed to fit a typical romantic comedy movie into a 30-second "elevator pitch" without even stating anything directly!  Look at it as a short story - a MICRO-story - and think of how much story they compressed into it - because it's just references, so viewers are really making up the whole story in their own heads.</htmltext>
<tokenext>EXACTLY !
And that 's the point !
They managed to fit a typical romantic comedy movie into a 30-second " elevator pitch " without even stating anything directly !
Look at it as a short story - a MICRO-story - and think of how much story they compressed into it - because it 's just references , so viewers are really making up the whole story in their own heads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>EXACTLY!
And that's the point!
They managed to fit a typical romantic comedy movie into a 30-second "elevator pitch" without even stating anything directly!
Look at it as a short story - a MICRO-story - and think of how much story they compressed into it - because it's just references, so viewers are really making up the whole story in their own heads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058150</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058150</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>PeanutButterBreath</author>
	<datestamp>1265566380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google has been in business now (if your a 20 something) for over half our lives, and this was a sped up version of what an "average" person may have Googled over their lifetime.</p> </div><p>If you're a 20 something, WTF do you think you know about an "average" lifetime?</p><p>At best, this was Google shorthand for the plot of some hackneyed romantic movie.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google has been in business now ( if your a 20 something ) for over half our lives , and this was a sped up version of what an " average " person may have Googled over their lifetime .
If you 're a 20 something , WTF do you think you know about an " average " lifetime ? At best , this was Google shorthand for the plot of some hackneyed romantic movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google has been in business now (if your a 20 something) for over half our lives, and this was a sped up version of what an "average" person may have Googled over their lifetime.
If you're a 20 something, WTF do you think you know about an "average" lifetime?At best, this was Google shorthand for the plot of some hackneyed romantic movie.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057936</id>
	<title>I did study abroad in france!</title>
	<author>dawilcox</author>
	<datestamp>1265564040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those were my Google searches! I just recently built that crib!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those were my Google searches !
I just recently built that crib !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those were my Google searches!
I just recently built that crib!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31069420</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>AncientPC</author>
	<datestamp>1265746380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's fun breaking down the ad stats on Hulu.  I'm not sure why the two numbers don't add up to 1.00, but males like it 0.75/0.34.  Females like it 0.91/0.28.</p><p>The highest rating is the 25-29 age group and decreases until the 65+ where it jumps up particularly high.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's fun breaking down the ad stats on Hulu .
I 'm not sure why the two numbers do n't add up to 1.00 , but males like it 0.75/0.34 .
Females like it 0.91/0.28.The highest rating is the 25-29 age group and decreases until the 65 + where it jumps up particularly high .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's fun breaking down the ad stats on Hulu.
I'm not sure why the two numbers don't add up to 1.00, but males like it 0.75/0.34.
Females like it 0.91/0.28.The highest rating is the 25-29 age group and decreases until the 65+ where it jumps up particularly high.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057782</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>retchdog</author>
	<datestamp>1265562720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It <i>was</i> a great ad on many levels. For one, its emotional content countered the Bing! attack (of claiming more relevant results), without appearing to be defensive.</p><p>If you want to be cynical, point out how the slashdot summary is pandering to its own stereotypes and in so doing missing the point entirely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a great ad on many levels .
For one , its emotional content countered the Bing !
attack ( of claiming more relevant results ) , without appearing to be defensive.If you want to be cynical , point out how the slashdot summary is pandering to its own stereotypes and in so doing missing the point entirely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a great ad on many levels.
For one, its emotional content countered the Bing!
attack (of claiming more relevant results), without appearing to be defensive.If you want to be cynical, point out how the slashdot summary is pandering to its own stereotypes and in so doing missing the point entirely.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059406</id>
	<title>Telling a story vs. setting a mood</title>
	<author>davide marney</author>
	<datestamp>1265630580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting how so many ads were trying to put the viewer into a desired mood, and then associate it with a product (the TV ads, the car ads, Coke, etc.), while Google's ad was just a straight-forward story.  The Google sequence of search terms were exactly like frames of a comic, where the viewer fills in the storyline inferred by the sequence.  (Having just read <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Understanding\_Comics" title="wikipedia.org">Understanding Comics</a> [wikipedia.org] by Scott McCloud, I now know that technique is called "closure" -- thanks, Scott.)</p><p>Telling a story instead of setting a mood really highlights the Google esthetic: function, always function, before form.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting how so many ads were trying to put the viewer into a desired mood , and then associate it with a product ( the TV ads , the car ads , Coke , etc .
) , while Google 's ad was just a straight-forward story .
The Google sequence of search terms were exactly like frames of a comic , where the viewer fills in the storyline inferred by the sequence .
( Having just read Understanding Comics [ wikipedia.org ] by Scott McCloud , I now know that technique is called " closure " -- thanks , Scott .
) Telling a story instead of setting a mood really highlights the Google esthetic : function , always function , before form .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting how so many ads were trying to put the viewer into a desired mood, and then associate it with a product (the TV ads, the car ads, Coke, etc.
), while Google's ad was just a straight-forward story.
The Google sequence of search terms were exactly like frames of a comic, where the viewer fills in the storyline inferred by the sequence.
(Having just read Understanding Comics [wikipedia.org] by Scott McCloud, I now know that technique is called "closure" -- thanks, Scott.
)Telling a story instead of setting a mood really highlights the Google esthetic: function, always function, before form.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059676</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265636280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The searches represent several years of time, indicated that at the start the user is looking for an overseas study program, then later for a job vacancy that would let him move permanently.</p><blockquote><div><p>all while he dosen't even know French*.</p></div></blockquote><p>There are some people who are able to learn foreign languages. It is rumored that even Americans can do so, particularly while they are studying abroad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The searches represent several years of time , indicated that at the start the user is looking for an overseas study program , then later for a job vacancy that would let him move permanently.all while he dose n't even know French * .There are some people who are able to learn foreign languages .
It is rumored that even Americans can do so , particularly while they are studying abroad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The searches represent several years of time, indicated that at the start the user is looking for an overseas study program, then later for a job vacancy that would let him move permanently.all while he dosen't even know French*.There are some people who are able to learn foreign languages.
It is rumored that even Americans can do so, particularly while they are studying abroad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058286</id>
	<title>Re:Best Ever?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265568000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What apple ad is the submitter saying 'best superbowl ad ever'?  I doubt it is, just want to see what they claim is the best ad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What apple ad is the submitter saying 'best superbowl ad ever ' ?
I doubt it is , just want to see what they claim is the best ad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What apple ad is the submitter saying 'best superbowl ad ever'?
I doubt it is, just want to see what they claim is the best ad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060362</id>
	<title>Chuck Norris</title>
	<author>ndavis</author>
	<datestamp>1265643420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>All these comments and no one noticed that when they did the search for Church one of the queries that came up when they had only typed 'Chu' was 'Chuck Norris'

Which makes this the coolest ad and now the Google employees better watch out for roundhouse kick related incidents.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All these comments and no one noticed that when they did the search for Church one of the queries that came up when they had only typed 'Chu ' was 'Chuck Norris ' Which makes this the coolest ad and now the Google employees better watch out for roundhouse kick related incidents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All these comments and no one noticed that when they did the search for Church one of the queries that came up when they had only typed 'Chu' was 'Chuck Norris'

Which makes this the coolest ad and now the Google employees better watch out for roundhouse kick related incidents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31062396</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265654880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yahoo did the same thing a few years ago. They showed a couple chatting and emailing while they met, got married and had kids. The look of the Yahoo mail and chat changed over the years from the classic to the new AJAX site.</p><p>Of course, with Google keeping the same minimalist theme for their search page, you can't use a changing UI to show the advancing years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yahoo did the same thing a few years ago .
They showed a couple chatting and emailing while they met , got married and had kids .
The look of the Yahoo mail and chat changed over the years from the classic to the new AJAX site.Of course , with Google keeping the same minimalist theme for their search page , you ca n't use a changing UI to show the advancing years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yahoo did the same thing a few years ago.
They showed a couple chatting and emailing while they met, got married and had kids.
The look of the Yahoo mail and chat changed over the years from the classic to the new AJAX site.Of course, with Google keeping the same minimalist theme for their search page, you can't use a changing UI to show the advancing years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057798</id>
	<title>I thought it was sweet.</title>
	<author>Orp</author>
	<datestamp>1265562840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it was a sweet ad. At the end, though, I had him googling "divorce lawyer."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was a sweet ad .
At the end , though , I had him googling " divorce lawyer .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was a sweet ad.
At the end, though, I had him googling "divorce lawyer.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058860</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265620440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it was great, especially coming on the heels of the KGB commercial.  KGB, Bing and others have taken on the air of infomercials lately, showcasing people too stupid to be real who have incomprehensible difficulties completing menial tasks like a GIS.  The Google ad very subtly but effectively eviscerated those other ads.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was great , especially coming on the heels of the KGB commercial .
KGB , Bing and others have taken on the air of infomercials lately , showcasing people too stupid to be real who have incomprehensible difficulties completing menial tasks like a GIS .
The Google ad very subtly but effectively eviscerated those other ads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was great, especially coming on the heels of the KGB commercial.
KGB, Bing and others have taken on the air of infomercials lately, showcasing people too stupid to be real who have incomprehensible difficulties completing menial tasks like a GIS.
The Google ad very subtly but effectively eviscerated those other ads.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057482</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265560020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, actually.  Would never have crossed my mind.</p><p>I think you just have issues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , actually .
Would never have crossed my mind.I think you just have issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, actually.
Would never have crossed my mind.I think you just have issues.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057578</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>lyinhart</author>
	<datestamp>1265560800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, of course, there's supposed to be a passage of time in between each search, but they do a pretty bad job of showing that in the ad. They should have shown the Google home page on a monitor while the backdrop changes after each search, and provide some indicator of how much time has past in between in each search (e.g. a calendar, a window showing the weather of the season and location).<br> <br>

The way I figure it, the next logical search after the last one would been:<br>
"ashley madison"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , of course , there 's supposed to be a passage of time in between each search , but they do a pretty bad job of showing that in the ad .
They should have shown the Google home page on a monitor while the backdrop changes after each search , and provide some indicator of how much time has past in between in each search ( e.g .
a calendar , a window showing the weather of the season and location ) .
The way I figure it , the next logical search after the last one would been : " ashley madison " : P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, of course, there's supposed to be a passage of time in between each search, but they do a pretty bad job of showing that in the ad.
They should have shown the Google home page on a monitor while the backdrop changes after each search, and provide some indicator of how much time has past in between in each search (e.g.
a calendar, a window showing the weather of the season and location).
The way I figure it, the next logical search after the last one would been:
"ashley madison" :P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057738</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265562300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Buy cafes near the louve on ebay</i></p><p>Unlikely.  It would spelled <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louvre" title="wikipedia.org">correctly</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Buy cafes near the louve on ebayUnlikely .
It would spelled correctly [ wikipedia.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buy cafes near the louve on ebayUnlikely.
It would spelled correctly [wikipedia.org].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31067746</id>
	<title>They've been running ads like this in Japan</title>
	<author>Armage Bedar</author>
	<datestamp>1265638560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They've been running ads like this in Japan for several months now:</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro0dc4sMku4" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro0dc4sMku4</a> [youtube.com]<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msWY2Lt3dFE" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msWY2Lt3dFE</a> [youtube.com]<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNf6HYl6r5E" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNf6HYl6r5E</a> [youtube.com]<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oblhekZd-tA" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oblhekZd-tA</a> [youtube.com]<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzelkn9lvF0" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzelkn9lvF0</a> [youtube.com]<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmYE\_58jNvI" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmYE\_58jNvI</a> [youtube.com]<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLJYFkkAIas" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLJYFkkAIas</a> [youtube.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...mostly likely because their market share here is around 35-40\%, less than Yahoo! Japan's 50\%.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've been running ads like this in Japan for several months now : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = ro0dc4sMku4 [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = msWY2Lt3dFE [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = XNf6HYl6r5E [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = oblhekZd-tA [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = mzelkn9lvF0 [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = PmYE \ _58jNvI [ youtube.com ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = JLJYFkkAIas [ youtube.com ] ...mostly likely because their market share here is around 35-40 \ % , less than Yahoo !
Japan 's 50 \ % .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've been running ads like this in Japan for several months now:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro0dc4sMku4 [youtube.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msWY2Lt3dFE [youtube.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNf6HYl6r5E [youtube.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oblhekZd-tA [youtube.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzelkn9lvF0 [youtube.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmYE\_58jNvI [youtube.com]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLJYFkkAIas [youtube.com] ...mostly likely because their market share here is around 35-40\%, less than Yahoo!
Japan's 50\%.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057554</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>poormanjoe</author>
	<datestamp>1265560620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>No I didn't find it creepy.  I was very impressed with the commercial.  It instantly came to me near the end that they were illustrating they're long term commitment to excellent searches.  Google has been in business now (if your a 20 something) for over half our lives, and this was a sped up version of what an "average" person may have Googled over their lifetime.  It has always been there for you.  It has always got you what you wanted to know.  The top result is always what you wanted.  All this was illustrated very elegantly and effectively.  Unlike most technology commercials that have a very busy, and annoying feeling with people who are nothing like "you."</htmltext>
<tokenext>No I did n't find it creepy .
I was very impressed with the commercial .
It instantly came to me near the end that they were illustrating they 're long term commitment to excellent searches .
Google has been in business now ( if your a 20 something ) for over half our lives , and this was a sped up version of what an " average " person may have Googled over their lifetime .
It has always been there for you .
It has always got you what you wanted to know .
The top result is always what you wanted .
All this was illustrated very elegantly and effectively .
Unlike most technology commercials that have a very busy , and annoying feeling with people who are nothing like " you .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No I didn't find it creepy.
I was very impressed with the commercial.
It instantly came to me near the end that they were illustrating they're long term commitment to excellent searches.
Google has been in business now (if your a 20 something) for over half our lives, and this was a sped up version of what an "average" person may have Googled over their lifetime.
It has always been there for you.
It has always got you what you wanted to know.
The top result is always what you wanted.
All this was illustrated very elegantly and effectively.
Unlike most technology commercials that have a very busy, and annoying feeling with people who are nothing like "you.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058840</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265620080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google search spy keeps track of your search history etc.</p><p>Why not search privately using an engine with the reach of Google and even more features?</p><p>Check out IntelliFETCH at http://www.repubx.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google search spy keeps track of your search history etc.Why not search privately using an engine with the reach of Google and even more features ? Check out IntelliFETCH at http : //www.repubx.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google search spy keeps track of your search history etc.Why not search privately using an engine with the reach of Google and even more features?Check out IntelliFETCH at http://www.repubx.com</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057590</id>
	<title>Obligtory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265560920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Worst Commercial Ever!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Worst Commercial Ever !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Worst Commercial Ever!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059512</id>
	<title>Re:I Don't Get It</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1265632740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it is a very distinguished bird, sheesh I though everybody new that.</p><p>Suberb Owl!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it is a very distinguished bird , sheesh I though everybody new that.Suberb Owl !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it is a very distinguished bird, sheesh I though everybody new that.Suberb Owl!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31061114</id>
	<title>Re:Autocomplete Search Results</title>
	<author>JakeD409</author>
	<datestamp>1265648520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's going to be difficult to do, as they change frequently (and the fact that these ones were in a Superbowl commercial will probably make them change even faster).</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's going to be difficult to do , as they change frequently ( and the fact that these ones were in a Superbowl commercial will probably make them change even faster ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's going to be difficult to do, as they change frequently (and the fact that these ones were in a Superbowl commercial will probably make them change even faster).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057776</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059368</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>VShael</author>
	<datestamp>1265630280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>It's just you. Any idiot could see the story: An American guy went to study abroad in Paris, went to a cafe, met a French girl who told him he was cute, bought her some chocolate, found out about her favorite films, and eventually moved to Paris to be the handyman to her and her husband.</i></p><p>Ah to be the handyman in a Parisian family... you have all the sex with the Mrs, but none of the responsibility of raising/paying for the children.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just you .
Any idiot could see the story : An American guy went to study abroad in Paris , went to a cafe , met a French girl who told him he was cute , bought her some chocolate , found out about her favorite films , and eventually moved to Paris to be the handyman to her and her husband.Ah to be the handyman in a Parisian family... you have all the sex with the Mrs , but none of the responsibility of raising/paying for the children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just you.
Any idiot could see the story: An American guy went to study abroad in Paris, went to a cafe, met a French girl who told him he was cute, bought her some chocolate, found out about her favorite films, and eventually moved to Paris to be the handyman to her and her husband.Ah to be the handyman in a Parisian family... you have all the sex with the Mrs, but none of the responsibility of raising/paying for the children.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060102</id>
	<title>http://autocompleteme.com/</title>
	<author>tresstatus</author>
	<datestamp>1265641260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was watching and waiting for something funny to pop up in the autocomplete so I could post it on <a href="http://autocompleteme.com/" title="autocompleteme.com" rel="nofollow">http://autocompleteme.com/</a> [autocompleteme.com]
<br> <br>
8)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was watching and waiting for something funny to pop up in the autocomplete so I could post it on http : //autocompleteme.com/ [ autocompleteme.com ] 8 )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was watching and waiting for something funny to pop up in the autocomplete so I could post it on http://autocompleteme.com/ [autocompleteme.com]
 
8)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057666</id>
	<title>Strip clubs in Paris</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265561640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ATM machines in Paris</p><p>How to make quick cash in Paris</p><p>Where is the consulate in Paris?</p><p>How to say "I am broke" to French airline official</p><p>Homeless life for foreign nationals in paris</p><p>What can I say?  I would have made better use of the weekend in Paris than this dude did.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ATM machines in ParisHow to make quick cash in ParisWhere is the consulate in Paris ? How to say " I am broke " to French airline officialHomeless life for foreign nationals in parisWhat can I say ?
I would have made better use of the weekend in Paris than this dude did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ATM machines in ParisHow to make quick cash in ParisWhere is the consulate in Paris?How to say "I am broke" to French airline officialHomeless life for foreign nationals in parisWhat can I say?
I would have made better use of the weekend in Paris than this dude did.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060148</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>Lorien\_the\_first\_one</author>
	<datestamp>1265641740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought it was a great ad because of the way the ad illustrated the simplicity of using Google.  I still remember the last line about the crib.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was a great ad because of the way the ad illustrated the simplicity of using Google .
I still remember the last line about the crib .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was a great ad because of the way the ad illustrated the simplicity of using Google.
I still remember the last line about the crib.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057948</id>
	<title>Apparently google doesn't know about it...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265564160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How's this for not having your act together: <a href="http://video.google.com/superbowl.html" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/superbowl.html</a> [google.com]</p><p>(incidentally one of the first search results)</p><p>Missed a big opportunity... Just saying.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How 's this for not having your act together : http : //video.google.com/superbowl.html [ google.com ] ( incidentally one of the first search results ) Missed a big opportunity... Just saying .
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How's this for not having your act together: http://video.google.com/superbowl.html [google.com](incidentally one of the first search results)Missed a big opportunity... Just saying.
;-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060906</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>Zordak</author>
	<datestamp>1265647380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well played, sir.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well played , sir .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well played, sir.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31061814</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1265651640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sitting on the couch yesterday, my gf asked when is the Stupid Bowl.  So I put in a natural language query (sans quotes of course:)</p><blockquote><div><p>when is the damn super bowl motherfucker?</p></div></blockquote><p>The first result was "Super Bowl XLIV - New orleans Saints vs. Indianapolis Colts.  Sunday, Feb. 7 2010 -6:25 pm ET on CBS" with a link to nfl.com.  Each team name was a link to their team website.</p><p>I don't think they could have done a better job on the first result than that.</p><p>We wandered around the house, got bored, eventually turned on the Stupid Bowl and watched most of it.  I know, cool story bro, and disqualified because none of us have gfs in real life.  But I do have the screenshot of search results.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sitting on the couch yesterday , my gf asked when is the Stupid Bowl .
So I put in a natural language query ( sans quotes of course : ) when is the damn super bowl motherfucker ? The first result was " Super Bowl XLIV - New orleans Saints vs. Indianapolis Colts .
Sunday , Feb. 7 2010 -6 : 25 pm ET on CBS " with a link to nfl.com .
Each team name was a link to their team website.I do n't think they could have done a better job on the first result than that.We wandered around the house , got bored , eventually turned on the Stupid Bowl and watched most of it .
I know , cool story bro , and disqualified because none of us have gfs in real life .
But I do have the screenshot of search results .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sitting on the couch yesterday, my gf asked when is the Stupid Bowl.
So I put in a natural language query (sans quotes of course:)when is the damn super bowl motherfucker?The first result was "Super Bowl XLIV - New orleans Saints vs. Indianapolis Colts.
Sunday, Feb. 7 2010 -6:25 pm ET on CBS" with a link to nfl.com.
Each team name was a link to their team website.I don't think they could have done a better job on the first result than that.We wandered around the house, got bored, eventually turned on the Stupid Bowl and watched most of it.
I know, cool story bro, and disqualified because none of us have gfs in real life.
But I do have the screenshot of search results.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060196</id>
	<title>Pretty good until the crib part (baby cage issue)</title>
	<author>Paul Fernhout</author>
	<datestamp>1265642040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Keeping babies in cages is frowned on by most other societies, according to anthropologist Meredith Small:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; "Our Babies, Ourselves: How Biology and Culture Shape the Way We Parent"<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Our-Babies-Ourselves-Biology-Culture/dp/0385483627" title="amazon.com">http://www.amazon.com/Our-Babies-Ourselves-Biology-Culture/dp/0385483627</a> [amazon.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=925HAAAAMAAJ" title="google.com">http://books.google.com/books?id=925HAAAAMAAJ</a> [google.com]<br>"""<br>"In the winter of 1995, in a dimly lit room in Atlanta, Georgia, I witnessed a birth. Not the birth of a baby, but of a new science, ethnopediatrics." Thus begins Meredith Small's new, groundbreaking book on the study of parents and infants across cultures and the way different caretaking styes affect the health, well-being, and survival of infants. Pediatricians, child development researchers, and anthropologists today have turned their research efforts to studying this new science of why we parent our children the way we do. Each culture, and often each family, offers advice and directives on the right and wrong way to raise and care for infants, from feeding, interaction, emotional support, sleeping, and more. Yet scientists are finding that what we are taught is the right way to parent our children is based on nothing more than cultural directives-and may even run directly counter to a baby's biological needs. Should a child be encouraged to sleep alone from an early age, as parents do here in the U.S.? Is breastfeeding better than bottlefeeding, or is that just the myth of the '90s? How frequently should children be nursed-or does it matter? Do children in all cultures develop colic? How do mothers in different cultures respond to a crying baby? And how important to our infants' ultimate development is it to talk, sing, and interact with them? These are but a few of the questions Meredith Small, through the research emerging from this new science, answers-and the answers are not only surprising, but may even change the way that we think and go about raising our children. Written for general audiences and parents alike, Our Babies, Ourselves shows what makes us bring up our kids the way we do-and what is actually best for babies.<br>"""</p><p>From a review there: "A look at the not-so-new idea that how babies eat, sleep, and cry is determined by the culture into which they are born -- including a subtext that the ever-evolving parenting mode in the US may still not be all that baby-friendly. "</p><p>Also related:<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=attachment+parenting" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/search?q=attachment+parenting</a> [google.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=cosleeping" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/search?q=cosleeping</a> [google.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=extended+breastfeeding" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/search?q=extended+breastfeeding</a> [google.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=continuum+concept" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/search?q=continuum+concept</a> [google.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=crib+cage" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/search?q=crib+cage</a> [google.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=unschooling" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/search?q=unschooling</a> [google.com]<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=free+range+children" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/search?q=free+range+children</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Keeping babies in cages is frowned on by most other societies , according to anthropologist Meredith Small :     " Our Babies , Ourselves : How Biology and Culture Shape the Way We Parent "     http : //www.amazon.com/Our-Babies-Ourselves-Biology-Culture/dp/0385483627 [ amazon.com ]     http : //books.google.com/books ? id = 925HAAAAMAAJ [ google.com ] " " " " In the winter of 1995 , in a dimly lit room in Atlanta , Georgia , I witnessed a birth .
Not the birth of a baby , but of a new science , ethnopediatrics .
" Thus begins Meredith Small 's new , groundbreaking book on the study of parents and infants across cultures and the way different caretaking styes affect the health , well-being , and survival of infants .
Pediatricians , child development researchers , and anthropologists today have turned their research efforts to studying this new science of why we parent our children the way we do .
Each culture , and often each family , offers advice and directives on the right and wrong way to raise and care for infants , from feeding , interaction , emotional support , sleeping , and more .
Yet scientists are finding that what we are taught is the right way to parent our children is based on nothing more than cultural directives-and may even run directly counter to a baby 's biological needs .
Should a child be encouraged to sleep alone from an early age , as parents do here in the U.S. ?
Is breastfeeding better than bottlefeeding , or is that just the myth of the '90s ?
How frequently should children be nursed-or does it matter ?
Do children in all cultures develop colic ?
How do mothers in different cultures respond to a crying baby ?
And how important to our infants ' ultimate development is it to talk , sing , and interact with them ?
These are but a few of the questions Meredith Small , through the research emerging from this new science , answers-and the answers are not only surprising , but may even change the way that we think and go about raising our children .
Written for general audiences and parents alike , Our Babies , Ourselves shows what makes us bring up our kids the way we do-and what is actually best for babies .
" " " From a review there : " A look at the not-so-new idea that how babies eat , sleep , and cry is determined by the culture into which they are born -- including a subtext that the ever-evolving parenting mode in the US may still not be all that baby-friendly .
" Also related :     http : //www.google.com/search ? q = attachment + parenting [ google.com ]     http : //www.google.com/search ? q = cosleeping [ google.com ]     http : //www.google.com/search ? q = extended + breastfeeding [ google.com ]     http : //www.google.com/search ? q = continuum + concept [ google.com ]     http : //www.google.com/search ? q = crib + cage [ google.com ]     http : //www.google.com/search ? q = unschooling [ google.com ]     http : //www.google.com/search ? q = free + range + children [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keeping babies in cages is frowned on by most other societies, according to anthropologist Meredith Small:
    "Our Babies, Ourselves: How Biology and Culture Shape the Way We Parent"
    http://www.amazon.com/Our-Babies-Ourselves-Biology-Culture/dp/0385483627 [amazon.com]
    http://books.google.com/books?id=925HAAAAMAAJ [google.com]""""In the winter of 1995, in a dimly lit room in Atlanta, Georgia, I witnessed a birth.
Not the birth of a baby, but of a new science, ethnopediatrics.
" Thus begins Meredith Small's new, groundbreaking book on the study of parents and infants across cultures and the way different caretaking styes affect the health, well-being, and survival of infants.
Pediatricians, child development researchers, and anthropologists today have turned their research efforts to studying this new science of why we parent our children the way we do.
Each culture, and often each family, offers advice and directives on the right and wrong way to raise and care for infants, from feeding, interaction, emotional support, sleeping, and more.
Yet scientists are finding that what we are taught is the right way to parent our children is based on nothing more than cultural directives-and may even run directly counter to a baby's biological needs.
Should a child be encouraged to sleep alone from an early age, as parents do here in the U.S.?
Is breastfeeding better than bottlefeeding, or is that just the myth of the '90s?
How frequently should children be nursed-or does it matter?
Do children in all cultures develop colic?
How do mothers in different cultures respond to a crying baby?
And how important to our infants' ultimate development is it to talk, sing, and interact with them?
These are but a few of the questions Meredith Small, through the research emerging from this new science, answers-and the answers are not only surprising, but may even change the way that we think and go about raising our children.
Written for general audiences and parents alike, Our Babies, Ourselves shows what makes us bring up our kids the way we do-and what is actually best for babies.
"""From a review there: "A look at the not-so-new idea that how babies eat, sleep, and cry is determined by the culture into which they are born -- including a subtext that the ever-evolving parenting mode in the US may still not be all that baby-friendly.
"Also related:
    http://www.google.com/search?q=attachment+parenting [google.com]
    http://www.google.com/search?q=cosleeping [google.com]
    http://www.google.com/search?q=extended+breastfeeding [google.com]
    http://www.google.com/search?q=continuum+concept [google.com]
    http://www.google.com/search?q=crib+cage [google.com]
    http://www.google.com/search?q=unschooling [google.com]
    http://www.google.com/search?q=free+range+children [google.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31062780</id>
	<title>Re:Holy shit, Google knows everything about him!</title>
	<author>slashdotjunker</author>
	<datestamp>1265656680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Scene: the office of Joe the 60 year old congressman.



Alice: Hey Joe, some computer activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google. The do internet search stuff.

Joe: Google? I've heard of them, but isn't that mostly used by geeks to search for Star Wars quotes?



Alice: Hey Joe, some computer activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google. The do internet search stuff.

Joe: I saw their ad. Powerful stuff. Let's have Bob look into this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scene : the office of Joe the 60 year old congressman .
Alice : Hey Joe , some computer activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google .
The do internet search stuff .
Joe : Google ?
I 've heard of them , but is n't that mostly used by geeks to search for Star Wars quotes ?
Alice : Hey Joe , some computer activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google .
The do internet search stuff .
Joe : I saw their ad .
Powerful stuff .
Let 's have Bob look into this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scene: the office of Joe the 60 year old congressman.
Alice: Hey Joe, some computer activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google.
The do internet search stuff.
Joe: Google?
I've heard of them, but isn't that mostly used by geeks to search for Star Wars quotes?
Alice: Hey Joe, some computer activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google.
The do internet search stuff.
Joe: I saw their ad.
Powerful stuff.
Let's have Bob look into this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057710</id>
	<title>Holy shit, Google knows everything about him!</title>
	<author>Dr. Spork</author>
	<datestamp>1265562060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>So the ad is telling us that some horny dude knocked up some chick in Paris and was looking for a church to confess his sins, and they told him that he can't leave the country or Jesus will zap him, and that he better buy a crib, but he's so poor that he has to build it instead, and next he'll probably search for "best suicide method"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... so thank God for Google, the benign giant who knows every minute detail of his pathetic life.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So the ad is telling us that some horny dude knocked up some chick in Paris and was looking for a church to confess his sins , and they told him that he ca n't leave the country or Jesus will zap him , and that he better buy a crib , but he 's so poor that he has to build it instead , and next he 'll probably search for " best suicide method " ... so thank God for Google , the benign giant who knows every minute detail of his pathetic life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the ad is telling us that some horny dude knocked up some chick in Paris and was looking for a church to confess his sins, and they told him that he can't leave the country or Jesus will zap him, and that he better buy a crib, but he's so poor that he has to build it instead, and next he'll probably search for "best suicide method" ... so thank God for Google, the benign giant who knows every minute detail of his pathetic life.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058096</id>
	<title>Could this be....?</title>
	<author>zerospeaks</author>
	<datestamp>1265565720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could this be a sign that google  (the company famous for NOT needing to advertise), decided it was time to start advertising?
Why? Are they scared of losing marketshare?

I loved the commercial, simple to the point, and relaxing, while pulling at heart strings.  But what gives? Why is google advertising when they are a noun and verb?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could this be a sign that google ( the company famous for NOT needing to advertise ) , decided it was time to start advertising ?
Why ? Are they scared of losing marketshare ?
I loved the commercial , simple to the point , and relaxing , while pulling at heart strings .
But what gives ?
Why is google advertising when they are a noun and verb ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could this be a sign that google  (the company famous for NOT needing to advertise), decided it was time to start advertising?
Why? Are they scared of losing marketshare?
I loved the commercial, simple to the point, and relaxing, while pulling at heart strings.
But what gives?
Why is google advertising when they are a noun and verb?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058514</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265571120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> <i>Buy cafes near the louve on ebay</i> </p><p>Unlikely.  It would spelled <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louvre" title="wikipedia.org">correctly</a> [wikipedia.org].</p></div><p>I love that a post complaining about spelling has such horrible grammar.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Buy cafes near the louve on ebay Unlikely .
It would spelled correctly [ wikipedia.org ] .I love that a post complaining about spelling has such horrible grammar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Buy cafes near the louve on ebay Unlikely.
It would spelled correctly [wikipedia.org].I love that a post complaining about spelling has such horrible grammar.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057700</id>
	<title>DBE VIOLATION</title>
	<author>cosm</author>
	<datestamp>1265561940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Paying 3 million dollars for 30 seconds of television time. And it wasn't even funny!!! I am jaded, forgive me, but damn, not as impressive as it could have been. I imagine the majority of people are familiar with the suggestive search, what market segment were they going for?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Paying 3 million dollars for 30 seconds of television time .
And it was n't even funny ! ! !
I am jaded , forgive me , but damn , not as impressive as it could have been .
I imagine the majority of people are familiar with the suggestive search , what market segment were they going for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Paying 3 million dollars for 30 seconds of television time.
And it wasn't even funny!!!
I am jaded, forgive me, but damn, not as impressive as it could have been.
I imagine the majority of people are familiar with the suggestive search, what market segment were they going for?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058504</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>IntlHarvester</author>
	<datestamp>1265571060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They should have shown the Google home page on a monitor while the backdrop changes after each search, and provide some indicator of how much time has past in between in each search </i></p><p>Good point. For example, they could have had the Google logo change, which it actually does on a regular basis.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should have shown the Google home page on a monitor while the backdrop changes after each search , and provide some indicator of how much time has past in between in each search Good point .
For example , they could have had the Google logo change , which it actually does on a regular basis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should have shown the Google home page on a monitor while the backdrop changes after each search, and provide some indicator of how much time has past in between in each search Good point.
For example, they could have had the Google logo change, which it actually does on a regular basis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057808</id>
	<title>Re:Actually, I liked it.</title>
	<author>billsayswow</author>
	<datestamp>1265562960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>...didn't watch the Superbowl... because the cable's out? You know, they make these great pointy metal things you can plug into the back of your TV... let's you watch CBS even while the cable is out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...did n't watch the Superbowl... because the cable 's out ?
You know , they make these great pointy metal things you can plug into the back of your TV... let 's you watch CBS even while the cable is out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...didn't watch the Superbowl... because the cable's out?
You know, they make these great pointy metal things you can plug into the back of your TV... let's you watch CBS even while the cable is out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057776</id>
	<title>Autocomplete Search Results</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265562660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did anyone freeze frames on those search autocompletes? I saw one that said "Who is the antichrist?" I was hoping to see some more nasty stuff, but they were censored out. Sopmeone should compare the TV ad. and the real search engine results. [grin]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone freeze frames on those search autocompletes ?
I saw one that said " Who is the antichrist ?
" I was hoping to see some more nasty stuff , but they were censored out .
Sopmeone should compare the TV ad .
and the real search engine results .
[ grin ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone freeze frames on those search autocompletes?
I saw one that said "Who is the antichrist?
" I was hoping to see some more nasty stuff, but they were censored out.
Sopmeone should compare the TV ad.
and the real search engine results.
[grin]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057956</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>TooMuchToDo</author>
	<datestamp>1265564220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you watch all the Super Bowl ads through Hulu (AdZone), they show the aggregate ratings people gave to each ad (like/dislike). The Google ad has the highest like rating so far.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you watch all the Super Bowl ads through Hulu ( AdZone ) , they show the aggregate ratings people gave to each ad ( like/dislike ) .
The Google ad has the highest like rating so far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you watch all the Super Bowl ads through Hulu (AdZone), they show the aggregate ratings people gave to each ad (like/dislike).
The Google ad has the highest like rating so far.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059950</id>
	<title>Where's Batman?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265640300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's sad is that this ad was the best one that was aired during the Super Bowl, and it is 6 months or so old. To top it off, it wasn't even the best in the series. It seems that the internet has forgotten the Batman one that they used to have. I can't find a copy of it ANYWHERE now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's sad is that this ad was the best one that was aired during the Super Bowl , and it is 6 months or so old .
To top it off , it was n't even the best in the series .
It seems that the internet has forgotten the Batman one that they used to have .
I ca n't find a copy of it ANYWHERE now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's sad is that this ad was the best one that was aired during the Super Bowl, and it is 6 months or so old.
To top it off, it wasn't even the best in the series.
It seems that the internet has forgotten the Batman one that they used to have.
I can't find a copy of it ANYWHERE now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057756</id>
	<title>Why not Chrome?</title>
	<author>Nightspirit</author>
	<datestamp>1265562480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Doesn't everyone already use google search? Wouldn't they have gotten much more bang for the buck with a Chrome ad?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't everyone already use google search ?
Would n't they have gotten much more bang for the buck with a Chrome ad ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't everyone already use google search?
Wouldn't they have gotten much more bang for the buck with a Chrome ad?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058090</id>
	<title>Gotham</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265565660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My farvorite Search Story was the Gotham-themed one, but it seems to be gone from YouTube now!  What happened to it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My farvorite Search Story was the Gotham-themed one , but it seems to be gone from YouTube now !
What happened to it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My farvorite Search Story was the Gotham-themed one, but it seems to be gone from YouTube now!
What happened to it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</id>
	<title>First Polanski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265559600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here are the searches from the commercial, in order:<ul>
<li>"study abroad paris france"</li><li>"cafes near the louve"</li><li>"translate tu es tres mignon"</li><li>"impress a french girl"</li><li>"chocolate shops paris"</li><li>"what are truffles"</li><li>"who is traffaut"</li><li>"long distance relationship advice"</li><li>"jobs in paris"</li><li>"AA120"</li><li>"churches in paris</li><li>"how to assemble a crib"</li></ul><p>

Did anybody else find that kinda...creepy? Like some Roman Polanski just met a possibly underage girl* in a chat room and now he's going to stalk her* while fantasizing about moving near her*, gettin married*, and having a kid* all while he dosen't even know French*.<br> <br>


* <i> the "girl", "AA 120" airline, "jobs", "church", "crib", and "translate" searches; respectively.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here are the searches from the commercial , in order : " study abroad paris france " " cafes near the louve " " translate tu es tres mignon " " impress a french girl " " chocolate shops paris " " what are truffles " " who is traffaut " " long distance relationship advice " " jobs in paris " " AA120 " " churches in paris " how to assemble a crib " Did anybody else find that kinda...creepy ?
Like some Roman Polanski just met a possibly underage girl * in a chat room and now he 's going to stalk her * while fantasizing about moving near her * , gettin married * , and having a kid * all while he dose n't even know French * .
* the " girl " , " AA 120 " airline , " jobs " , " church " , " crib " , and " translate " searches ; respectively .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here are the searches from the commercial, in order:
"study abroad paris france""cafes near the louve""translate tu es tres mignon""impress a french girl""chocolate shops paris""what are truffles""who is traffaut""long distance relationship advice""jobs in paris""AA120""churches in paris"how to assemble a crib"

Did anybody else find that kinda...creepy?
Like some Roman Polanski just met a possibly underage girl* in a chat room and now he's going to stalk her* while fantasizing about moving near her*, gettin married*, and having a kid* all while he dosen't even know French*.
*  the "girl", "AA 120" airline, "jobs", "church", "crib", and "translate" searches; respectively.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057732</id>
	<title>Undertones</title>
	<author>dougmwne</author>
	<datestamp>1265562300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I detect a big Googly brother undertone. Anyone remember the accidentally released Yahoo searches that told the story of people's personal lives through their search queries?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I detect a big Googly brother undertone .
Anyone remember the accidentally released Yahoo searches that told the story of people 's personal lives through their search queries ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I detect a big Googly brother undertone.
Anyone remember the accidentally released Yahoo searches that told the story of people's personal lives through their search queries?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058464</id>
	<title>Silly Americans</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265570580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>thinking us French girls will actually marry you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>thinking us French girls will actually marry you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thinking us French girls will actually marry you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058536</id>
	<title>Re:Best Ever?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265571360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The 1984 ad prophecied of Steve Jobs' second coming; the worshipped, restrictive control freak, stronger than ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The 1984 ad prophecied of Steve Jobs ' second coming ; the worshipped , restrictive control freak , stronger than ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The 1984 ad prophecied of Steve Jobs' second coming; the worshipped, restrictive control freak, stronger than ever.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059744</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265637540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Then why would be be translating French to English?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Then why would be be translating French to English ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then why would be be translating French to English?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059542</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058166</id>
	<title>Re:Best Ever?</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1265566440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jeez, I didn't expect to get modded up. Is everybody feeling OK?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeez , I did n't expect to get modded up .
Is everybody feeling OK ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeez, I didn't expect to get modded up.
Is everybody feeling OK?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31061782</id>
	<title>Translation from Spanish to English</title>
	<author>jluzwick</author>
	<datestamp>1265651460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I found it funny that google believes you want to translate spanish to english when you type in

"translate tu es tres mignon"

Google Return:
Translation for tu es tres mignon: Spanish  English

tu es tres mignon - you're very cute
translate.google.com</htmltext>
<tokenext>I found it funny that google believes you want to translate spanish to english when you type in " translate tu es tres mignon " Google Return : Translation for tu es tres mignon : Spanish English tu es tres mignon - you 're very cute translate.google.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I found it funny that google believes you want to translate spanish to english when you type in

"translate tu es tres mignon"

Google Return:
Translation for tu es tres mignon: Spanish  English

tu es tres mignon - you're very cute
translate.google.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31063694</id>
	<title>Re:I Don't Get It</title>
	<author>npsimons</author>
	<datestamp>1265661060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Is a super bowl some kind of large toilet?</p></div></blockquote><p>No, you parsed that wrong: it's supposed to read "Superb Owl".  What this has to do with kicking the inflated skin of a pig through something that symbolizes an erect bifurcated penis, I cannot fathom.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is a super bowl some kind of large toilet ? No , you parsed that wrong : it 's supposed to read " Superb Owl " .
What this has to do with kicking the inflated skin of a pig through something that symbolizes an erect bifurcated penis , I can not fathom .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is a super bowl some kind of large toilet?No, you parsed that wrong: it's supposed to read "Superb Owl".
What this has to do with kicking the inflated skin of a pig through something that symbolizes an erect bifurcated penis, I cannot fathom.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057974</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265564400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's just you.  Any idiot could see the story: An American guy went to study abroad in Paris, went to a cafe, met a French girl who told him he was cute, bought her some chocolate, found out about her favorite films, and eventually moved to Paris to be the handyman to her and her husband.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just you .
Any idiot could see the story : An American guy went to study abroad in Paris , went to a cafe , met a French girl who told him he was cute , bought her some chocolate , found out about her favorite films , and eventually moved to Paris to be the handyman to her and her husband .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just you.
Any idiot could see the story: An American guy went to study abroad in Paris, went to a cafe, met a French girl who told him he was cute, bought her some chocolate, found out about her favorite films, and eventually moved to Paris to be the handyman to her and her husband.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058338</id>
	<title>Ads</title>
	<author>yoshi\_mon</author>
	<datestamp>1265568600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Googles ad was one of the better ones imo.  Only a few other standouts and both of them were beer commercials.  Course ymmv on what you consider good.</p><p>On a side not I was pleased to see that CBS did at least reach a compromise with their...lets say selective censorship and only ran a very short Tim Tebow ad as opposed to something longer and more dogmatic.</p><p>Disclamer:  I'm a Florida Gator, I like Tim a lot, I'm also a (weak) atheist who is pro-choice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Googles ad was one of the better ones imo .
Only a few other standouts and both of them were beer commercials .
Course ymmv on what you consider good.On a side not I was pleased to see that CBS did at least reach a compromise with their...lets say selective censorship and only ran a very short Tim Tebow ad as opposed to something longer and more dogmatic.Disclamer : I 'm a Florida Gator , I like Tim a lot , I 'm also a ( weak ) atheist who is pro-choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Googles ad was one of the better ones imo.
Only a few other standouts and both of them were beer commercials.
Course ymmv on what you consider good.On a side not I was pleased to see that CBS did at least reach a compromise with their...lets say selective censorship and only ran a very short Tim Tebow ad as opposed to something longer and more dogmatic.Disclamer:  I'm a Florida Gator, I like Tim a lot, I'm also a (weak) atheist who is pro-choice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058290</id>
	<title>Re:I see how you might be confused</title>
	<author>jollyreaper</author>
	<datestamp>1265568120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This being Slashdot, I understand how this might seem confusing to some readers, but that's actually the way some romances happen. A guy meets a girl, likes her, tries to impress her, and amazingly, it works.</p></div><p>Maybe it's just me but I was also expecting to see searches for "lotion," "skin," and "hoses."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This being Slashdot , I understand how this might seem confusing to some readers , but that 's actually the way some romances happen .
A guy meets a girl , likes her , tries to impress her , and amazingly , it works.Maybe it 's just me but I was also expecting to see searches for " lotion , " " skin , " and " hoses .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This being Slashdot, I understand how this might seem confusing to some readers, but that's actually the way some romances happen.
A guy meets a girl, likes her, tries to impress her, and amazingly, it works.Maybe it's just me but I was also expecting to see searches for "lotion," "skin," and "hoses.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060792</id>
	<title>Response...</title>
	<author>Dausha</author>
	<datestamp>1265646540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is Google's response to both Bing and KGB.</p><p>But, does this mean the age of the DotCom Superbowl Commercial is back?</p><p>And, what about the political advertisements? We had one about debt (we pay<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.5 billion per day, mostly to foreign investors) and one on pro-choice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Google 's response to both Bing and KGB.But , does this mean the age of the DotCom Superbowl Commercial is back ? And , what about the political advertisements ?
We had one about debt ( we pay .5 billion per day , mostly to foreign investors ) and one on pro-choice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Google's response to both Bing and KGB.But, does this mean the age of the DotCom Superbowl Commercial is back?And, what about the political advertisements?
We had one about debt (we pay .5 billion per day, mostly to foreign investors) and one on pro-choice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057642</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265561280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google could bend you over and give it to you up the ass and you would tell us what an amazing experience it was.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google could bend you over and give it to you up the ass and you would tell us what an amazing experience it was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google could bend you over and give it to you up the ass and you would tell us what an amazing experience it was.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057730</id>
	<title>I Don't Get It</title>
	<author>pipingguy</author>
	<datestamp>1265562300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is a super bowl some kind of large toilet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is a super bowl some kind of large toilet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is a super bowl some kind of large toilet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060670</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>Sancho</author>
	<datestamp>1265645880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was a love story in 30 seconds told through Google search queries and results.  It was absolutely brilliant.  I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a love story in 30 seconds told through Google search queries and results .
It was absolutely brilliant .
I do n't think I 've ever seen anything quite like it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a love story in 30 seconds told through Google search queries and results.
It was absolutely brilliant.
I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059170</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>u38cg</author>
	<datestamp>1265626800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think most of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. will miss the point of this ad.  We all treat Google like a very low transaction cost oracle: any time we have the stupidest of queries, we throw it in, no matter how inane or silly our question.  A lot of people, however, treat a Google Search like something that requires capital letters and a cup of tea.  I've seen people make notes of their search results before clicking on something.  I think a large part of the intent of this ad (besides simple brand cementation for us lot) is to encourage that freewheeling approach.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think most of / .
will miss the point of this ad .
We all treat Google like a very low transaction cost oracle : any time we have the stupidest of queries , we throw it in , no matter how inane or silly our question .
A lot of people , however , treat a Google Search like something that requires capital letters and a cup of tea .
I 've seen people make notes of their search results before clicking on something .
I think a large part of the intent of this ad ( besides simple brand cementation for us lot ) is to encourage that freewheeling approach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think most of /.
will miss the point of this ad.
We all treat Google like a very low transaction cost oracle: any time we have the stupidest of queries, we throw it in, no matter how inane or silly our question.
A lot of people, however, treat a Google Search like something that requires capital letters and a cup of tea.
I've seen people make notes of their search results before clicking on something.
I think a large part of the intent of this ad (besides simple brand cementation for us lot) is to encourage that freewheeling approach.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059034</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>djupedal</author>
	<datestamp>1265623740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you live in France and write crib assembly documentation for a living....you don't need Google - that's what the ad says to me.
<br>
<br>
Google is just a bridge to content. Want to give some credit? Give it to the people that create the content.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you live in France and write crib assembly documentation for a living....you do n't need Google - that 's what the ad says to me .
Google is just a bridge to content .
Want to give some credit ?
Give it to the people that create the content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you live in France and write crib assembly documentation for a living....you don't need Google - that's what the ad says to me.
Google is just a bridge to content.
Want to give some credit?
Give it to the people that create the content.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057646</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>dwillden</author>
	<datestamp>1265561280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmm, when I saw it the flight was DL1820 not AA, the rest was the same.
<br> <br>
Perhaps they targeted the markets, I do live near a major Delta Hub.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm , when I saw it the flight was DL1820 not AA , the rest was the same .
Perhaps they targeted the markets , I do live near a major Delta Hub .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm, when I saw it the flight was DL1820 not AA, the rest was the same.
Perhaps they targeted the markets, I do live near a major Delta Hub.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057572</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1265560800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><ul><li>Buy cafes near the louve on ebay</li><li>Buy impress a french girl on ebay</li><li>Buy long distance relationship on ebay</li><li>Buy churches in paris on ebay</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Buy cafes near the louve on ebayBuy impress a french girl on ebayBuy long distance relationship on ebayBuy churches in paris on ebay</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Buy cafes near the louve on ebayBuy impress a french girl on ebayBuy long distance relationship on ebayBuy churches in paris on ebay</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058374</id>
	<title>Screw the fact that Google made a commercial</title>
	<author>Khyber</author>
	<datestamp>1265569440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Applaud it's fucking awesome placement just a few commercials after the KGB ad. *BIG* 'Fuck You' to both KGB and Bing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Applaud it 's fucking awesome placement just a few commercials after the KGB ad .
* BIG * 'Fuck You ' to both KGB and Bing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Applaud it's fucking awesome placement just a few commercials after the KGB ad.
*BIG* 'Fuck You' to both KGB and Bing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059484</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265632020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, it was pretty well done and also works great without sound (watching in the office) which is pretty clever in itself, as it gets the message over even if you're talking over the ads (or if, as they do over here, they double the volume of the ads compared to the programmes to try and force you to pay attention but actually just causing you to mute them). I loved the simplicity, as you said it didn't need glitz, it didn't need fashion or big name stars, and it really makes you think about how integral this little service is to everyday life. I can still remember when I first started using search engines, there was always a disconnect between me thinking "hmm, I wonder how to do <i>x</i>" and then "I know, I'll search for it". Now firing up search is the first instinct.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it was pretty well done and also works great without sound ( watching in the office ) which is pretty clever in itself , as it gets the message over even if you 're talking over the ads ( or if , as they do over here , they double the volume of the ads compared to the programmes to try and force you to pay attention but actually just causing you to mute them ) .
I loved the simplicity , as you said it did n't need glitz , it did n't need fashion or big name stars , and it really makes you think about how integral this little service is to everyday life .
I can still remember when I first started using search engines , there was always a disconnect between me thinking " hmm , I wonder how to do x " and then " I know , I 'll search for it " .
Now firing up search is the first instinct .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it was pretty well done and also works great without sound (watching in the office) which is pretty clever in itself, as it gets the message over even if you're talking over the ads (or if, as they do over here, they double the volume of the ads compared to the programmes to try and force you to pay attention but actually just causing you to mute them).
I loved the simplicity, as you said it didn't need glitz, it didn't need fashion or big name stars, and it really makes you think about how integral this little service is to everyday life.
I can still remember when I first started using search engines, there was always a disconnect between me thinking "hmm, I wonder how to do x" and then "I know, I'll search for it".
Now firing up search is the first instinct.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057562</id>
	<title>I loved the ad.</title>
	<author>Labarna</author>
	<datestamp>1265560680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It was well done.  It described what many people use Google for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It was well done .
It described what many people use Google for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was well done.
It described what many people use Google for.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057940</id>
	<title>all that and no porn?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265564100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Every search I saw on that google commercial, I kept thinking... oh yeah porn coming up from that one.<br>Safe search must have been on I guess.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/got unintentional porn tonight searching for "ethnic persian"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/WTF</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Every search I saw on that google commercial , I kept thinking... oh yeah porn coming up from that one.Safe search must have been on I guess .
/got unintentional porn tonight searching for " ethnic persian " /WTF</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Every search I saw on that google commercial, I kept thinking... oh yeah porn coming up from that one.Safe search must have been on I guess.
/got unintentional porn tonight searching for "ethnic persian" /WTF</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059498</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>delinear</author>
	<datestamp>1265632440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Here are the searches from the commercial, in order:</p><ul>
<li>"study abroad paris france"</li><li>"cafes near the louve"</li><li>"translate tu es tres mignon"</li></ul><p>[SNIP]</p></div><p>Ack, dude, spoiler warning, spoiler warning!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here are the searches from the commercial , in order : " study abroad paris france " " cafes near the louve " " translate tu es tres mignon " [ SNIP ] Ack , dude , spoiler warning , spoiler warning !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here are the searches from the commercial, in order:
"study abroad paris france""cafes near the louve""translate tu es tres mignon"[SNIP]Ack, dude, spoiler warning, spoiler warning!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057606</id>
	<title>Not quite the same...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265560980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the ad during the superbowl, the airline was Delta. In the transcript posted above, it's AA.<br>(I might be wrong)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the ad during the superbowl , the airline was Delta .
In the transcript posted above , it 's AA .
( I might be wrong )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the ad during the superbowl, the airline was Delta.
In the transcript posted above, it's AA.
(I might be wrong)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058214</id>
	<title>Re:I Don't Get It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265566980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why don't you google it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do n't you google it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why don't you google it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057730</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31062454</id>
	<title>Parody Ads</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265655240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They say write what you know!</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNbMnDem3ro</p><p>In my defense - I was converting my company's mail from Exchange to Gmail at the time, and it was going so swimmingly I had some free time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They say write what you know ! http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = fNbMnDem3roIn my defense - I was converting my company 's mail from Exchange to Gmail at the time , and it was going so swimmingly I had some free time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They say write what you know!http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNbMnDem3roIn my defense - I was converting my company's mail from Exchange to Gmail at the time, and it was going so swimmingly I had some free time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057864</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>willutah</author>
	<datestamp>1265563440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Agreed! I thought that Google's commercial showed a plausible series of interactions with a customer and how his/her life could be improved because of them. Lots of other companies could learn from that model.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed !
I thought that Google 's commercial showed a plausible series of interactions with a customer and how his/her life could be improved because of them .
Lots of other companies could learn from that model .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed!
I thought that Google's commercial showed a plausible series of interactions with a customer and how his/her life could be improved because of them.
Lots of other companies could learn from that model.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057654</id>
	<title>Unbelievable</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265561460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess money can get you anything... even a SuperBowl ad. I had NO idea. VERY impressive, I must say. Who would've thought?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess money can get you anything... even a SuperBowl ad .
I had NO idea .
VERY impressive , I must say .
Who would 've thought ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess money can get you anything... even a SuperBowl ad.
I had NO idea.
VERY impressive, I must say.
Who would've thought?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058228</id>
	<title>Re:Best Ever?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1265567100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You must be new here (in the Apple reality distortion bubble). ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You must be new here ( in the Apple reality distortion bubble ) .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You must be new here (in the Apple reality distortion bubble).
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058022</id>
	<title>Apple? Apple!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265564760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple?  Apple! Steve jobs.  Macintosh.  iPod iPad iTunes Quicktime.  Best best best.  1984 Nineteen Eighty Four.  Slashdot?  Apple!  Google?  Apple!  Microsoft?  Apple!  Linux?  Apple!  Apple?  Apple!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple ?
Apple ! Steve jobs .
Macintosh. iPod iPad iTunes Quicktime .
Best best best .
1984 Nineteen Eighty Four .
Slashdot ? Apple !
Google ? Apple !
Microsoft ? Apple !
Linux ? Apple !
Apple ? Apple !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple apple?
Apple! Steve jobs.
Macintosh.  iPod iPad iTunes Quicktime.
Best best best.
1984 Nineteen Eighty Four.
Slashdot?  Apple!
Google?  Apple!
Microsoft?  Apple!
Linux?  Apple!
Apple?  Apple!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057840</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>penguinchris</author>
	<datestamp>1265563140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought it was excellent as well. Why I even watched part of the game I don't know, but I'm glad I did because I really enjoyed this ad. I don't even remember any of the others, and I was actually watching them, not getting a sandwich (saved that for the actual game). Others have pointed out what's brilliant about it already.</p><p>It struck a personal chord for me, since I fell in love overseas recently myself and am at a certain point in the relationship that's covered in the ad, and it makes me hopeful that it will work out as in the ad... advertising is about getting into people's heads, and I think that even if one hasn't been in a similar situation that this ad really succeeds. It's a great fantasy (especially for nerdy types!) and the ad made a touching story.</p><p>It's an effective short film... the kind of thing someone might make as art. Keep in mind that like any good slashdotter, I loathe advertising - even other Google-related advertising - and I still feel this way about this ad.</p><p>The poster is a little deluded to think that everyone is going to think this was a dumb ad - I suspect that even among the slashdot crowd most people will like it. Seems typical of slashdot... strong opinions get posted in the summaries and it's worded in a way that makes it seem like you'd have to be an idiot to not agree, and then it turns out 95\% or more of slashdot disagrees. Well, it gets the comments rolling, anyway.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought it was excellent as well .
Why I even watched part of the game I do n't know , but I 'm glad I did because I really enjoyed this ad .
I do n't even remember any of the others , and I was actually watching them , not getting a sandwich ( saved that for the actual game ) .
Others have pointed out what 's brilliant about it already.It struck a personal chord for me , since I fell in love overseas recently myself and am at a certain point in the relationship that 's covered in the ad , and it makes me hopeful that it will work out as in the ad... advertising is about getting into people 's heads , and I think that even if one has n't been in a similar situation that this ad really succeeds .
It 's a great fantasy ( especially for nerdy types !
) and the ad made a touching story.It 's an effective short film... the kind of thing someone might make as art .
Keep in mind that like any good slashdotter , I loathe advertising - even other Google-related advertising - and I still feel this way about this ad.The poster is a little deluded to think that everyone is going to think this was a dumb ad - I suspect that even among the slashdot crowd most people will like it .
Seems typical of slashdot... strong opinions get posted in the summaries and it 's worded in a way that makes it seem like you 'd have to be an idiot to not agree , and then it turns out 95 \ % or more of slashdot disagrees .
Well , it gets the comments rolling , anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought it was excellent as well.
Why I even watched part of the game I don't know, but I'm glad I did because I really enjoyed this ad.
I don't even remember any of the others, and I was actually watching them, not getting a sandwich (saved that for the actual game).
Others have pointed out what's brilliant about it already.It struck a personal chord for me, since I fell in love overseas recently myself and am at a certain point in the relationship that's covered in the ad, and it makes me hopeful that it will work out as in the ad... advertising is about getting into people's heads, and I think that even if one hasn't been in a similar situation that this ad really succeeds.
It's a great fantasy (especially for nerdy types!
) and the ad made a touching story.It's an effective short film... the kind of thing someone might make as art.
Keep in mind that like any good slashdotter, I loathe advertising - even other Google-related advertising - and I still feel this way about this ad.The poster is a little deluded to think that everyone is going to think this was a dumb ad - I suspect that even among the slashdot crowd most people will like it.
Seems typical of slashdot... strong opinions get posted in the summaries and it's worded in a way that makes it seem like you'd have to be an idiot to not agree, and then it turns out 95\% or more of slashdot disagrees.
Well, it gets the comments rolling, anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057620</id>
	<title>Actually, I liked it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265561040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I thought it was simple and to the point (something you don't see very much in Super Bowl ads).</p><p>I didn't watch the Superbowl (cable's out), and so far three friends have called me to tell me to watch this ad, while I haven't heard a peep about any of the other ads that aired.  I'd qualify that as a pretty significant success.</p><p>Also consider that the ad's simplistic nature can be thought of as a reflection of Google's products.  Apple's used same strategy very successfully while marketing the iPhone, albeit from a somewhat different angle.</p><p>I also wouldn't list Apple's '1984' as a particularly good ad.  It was expensive, confusing, and made absolutely no mention of the product being advertised.  My favorite super bowl ad is still the E-Trade monkey <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnQMq5wtZcg" title="youtube.com">ad</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I thought it was simple and to the point ( something you do n't see very much in Super Bowl ads ) .I did n't watch the Superbowl ( cable 's out ) , and so far three friends have called me to tell me to watch this ad , while I have n't heard a peep about any of the other ads that aired .
I 'd qualify that as a pretty significant success.Also consider that the ad 's simplistic nature can be thought of as a reflection of Google 's products .
Apple 's used same strategy very successfully while marketing the iPhone , albeit from a somewhat different angle.I also would n't list Apple 's '1984 ' as a particularly good ad .
It was expensive , confusing , and made absolutely no mention of the product being advertised .
My favorite super bowl ad is still the E-Trade monkey ad [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I thought it was simple and to the point (something you don't see very much in Super Bowl ads).I didn't watch the Superbowl (cable's out), and so far three friends have called me to tell me to watch this ad, while I haven't heard a peep about any of the other ads that aired.
I'd qualify that as a pretty significant success.Also consider that the ad's simplistic nature can be thought of as a reflection of Google's products.
Apple's used same strategy very successfully while marketing the iPhone, albeit from a somewhat different angle.I also wouldn't list Apple's '1984' as a particularly good ad.
It was expensive, confusing, and made absolutely no mention of the product being advertised.
My favorite super bowl ad is still the E-Trade monkey ad [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058620</id>
	<title>Re:Actually, I liked it.</title>
	<author>jabbathewocket</author>
	<datestamp>1265572620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think that people calling their slashdot reading geek friend to ask/tell about the "tech" ad they just saw on the superbowl is not saying much about the success or failure of the commercial.. it says far more about you and your friends than about the commercial</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that people calling their slashdot reading geek friend to ask/tell about the " tech " ad they just saw on the superbowl is not saying much about the success or failure of the commercial.. it says far more about you and your friends than about the commercial</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that people calling their slashdot reading geek friend to ask/tell about the "tech" ad they just saw on the superbowl is not saying much about the success or failure of the commercial.. it says far more about you and your friends than about the commercial</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060120</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>evan\_arrrr!</author>
	<datestamp>1265641440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The idea that Google is trying to convey is simplicity. Google's approach to Internet searches has ALWAYS been simplicity. That's why the interface has hardly changed in the 12 years it's been operating. I imagine the simplicity of the advert was meant to convey that same sort of simplicity that Google has always been known for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The idea that Google is trying to convey is simplicity .
Google 's approach to Internet searches has ALWAYS been simplicity .
That 's why the interface has hardly changed in the 12 years it 's been operating .
I imagine the simplicity of the advert was meant to convey that same sort of simplicity that Google has always been known for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The idea that Google is trying to convey is simplicity.
Google's approach to Internet searches has ALWAYS been simplicity.
That's why the interface has hardly changed in the 12 years it's been operating.
I imagine the simplicity of the advert was meant to convey that same sort of simplicity that Google has always been known for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057578</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059392</id>
	<title>That ad is fucking awesome</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1265630460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't get the criticism of the Google ad, I thought it was just perfect.</p><p>It has a story.<br>The story is not offensive, but rather personal and endearing.<br>There is a positive message.<br>There is a happy end (since we're expecting a baby any day, I am quite biased on this one).<br>And google is there, from the very beginning, like a faithful, useful, reliable friend.</p><p>I think this ad has genius written all over it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get the criticism of the Google ad , I thought it was just perfect.It has a story.The story is not offensive , but rather personal and endearing.There is a positive message.There is a happy end ( since we 're expecting a baby any day , I am quite biased on this one ) .And google is there , from the very beginning , like a faithful , useful , reliable friend.I think this ad has genius written all over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get the criticism of the Google ad, I thought it was just perfect.It has a story.The story is not offensive, but rather personal and endearing.There is a positive message.There is a happy end (since we're expecting a baby any day, I am quite biased on this one).And google is there, from the very beginning, like a faithful, useful, reliable friend.I think this ad has genius written all over it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059542</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>AbRASiON</author>
	<datestamp>1265633400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Interesting how we read that differently, I assumed he found a way of telling her that he thought she was cute.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting how we read that differently , I assumed he found a way of telling her that he thought she was cute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting how we read that differently, I assumed he found a way of telling her that he thought she was cute.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057974</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058250</id>
	<title>Re:Actually, I liked it.</title>
	<author>kimvette</author>
	<datestamp>1265567520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My favorite is the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzbMcsrK-tw" title="youtube.com">"shooting gerbils through the O in outpost"</a> [youtube.com] ad - for its blatent disregard for political correctness, its originality, and its appreciation for humor.</p><p>1984 wasn't all that great - to get much out of it you had to be somewhat familiar with George Orwell's book.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My favorite is the " shooting gerbils through the O in outpost " [ youtube.com ] ad - for its blatent disregard for political correctness , its originality , and its appreciation for humor.1984 was n't all that great - to get much out of it you had to be somewhat familiar with George Orwell 's book .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My favorite is the "shooting gerbils through the O in outpost" [youtube.com] ad - for its blatent disregard for political correctness, its originality, and its appreciation for humor.1984 wasn't all that great - to get much out of it you had to be somewhat familiar with George Orwell's book.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058288</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>CaptainStacks</author>
	<datestamp>1265568060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's exactly how I felt, I thought it was a great commercial.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's exactly how I felt , I thought it was a great commercial .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's exactly how I felt, I thought it was a great commercial.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059678</id>
	<title>Re:Why not Chrome?</title>
	<author>demonlapin</author>
	<datestamp>1265636340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You use it. I use it. Normal people don't use it like you and I do. <br> <br> They don't realize that Google will correct their misspellings, show them maps, translate languages, define words, track flights, and show them street views with reviews of places. My mother in law is the target of this ad, because she's one of the millions of people who don't realize what all this amazing technology will do for us.  (And it <em>is</em> amazing.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>You use it .
I use it .
Normal people do n't use it like you and I do .
They do n't realize that Google will correct their misspellings , show them maps , translate languages , define words , track flights , and show them street views with reviews of places .
My mother in law is the target of this ad , because she 's one of the millions of people who do n't realize what all this amazing technology will do for us .
( And it is amazing .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You use it.
I use it.
Normal people don't use it like you and I do.
They don't realize that Google will correct their misspellings, show them maps, translate languages, define words, track flights, and show them street views with reviews of places.
My mother in law is the target of this ad, because she's one of the millions of people who don't realize what all this amazing technology will do for us.
(And it is amazing.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057604</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>friedmud</author>
	<datestamp>1265560980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My wife and I thought it was well done as well.  We've also recently gone to Paris... and it brought back good memories for us.</p><p>I think it did a beautiful job of showing the service off... and reminding people that Google still works and is extremely efficient.  It didn't need to be all in your face and loud... unlike other search engine adds. (Yaaaaaaaaaaahooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)</p><p>I'm sure it will get ripped apart here on Slashdot... but it definitely wasn't aimed at the Geek crowd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My wife and I thought it was well done as well .
We 've also recently gone to Paris... and it brought back good memories for us.I think it did a beautiful job of showing the service off... and reminding people that Google still works and is extremely efficient .
It did n't need to be all in your face and loud... unlike other search engine adds .
( Yaaaaaaaaaaahooooooooooooooooooo ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ) I 'm sure it will get ripped apart here on Slashdot... but it definitely was n't aimed at the Geek crowd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My wife and I thought it was well done as well.
We've also recently gone to Paris... and it brought back good memories for us.I think it did a beautiful job of showing the service off... and reminding people that Google still works and is extremely efficient.
It didn't need to be all in your face and loud... unlike other search engine adds.
(Yaaaaaaaaaaahooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)I'm sure it will get ripped apart here on Slashdot... but it definitely wasn't aimed at the Geek crowd.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058054</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one...?</title>
	<author>microbee</author>
	<datestamp>1265565120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No you are not the only one. I think it's very sweet and touching.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No you are not the only one .
I think it 's very sweet and touching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No you are not the only one.
I think it's very sweet and touching.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696</id>
	<title>Best Ever?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265561940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>Apple certainly doesn't have to worry about losing its claim to having produced the best Super Bowl ad ever.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>Oh gawd. That ad was based around a lame, confusing reference to a certain novel &mdash; a novel that the makers obviously had not read. It doesn't make sense to anybody who doesn't already think that Apple products are Destined to Save the World. Anybody who thinks this is "best ever" needs to get out more.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple certainly does n't have to worry about losing its claim to having produced the best Super Bowl ad ever .
Oh gawd .
That ad was based around a lame , confusing reference to a certain novel    a novel that the makers obviously had not read .
It does n't make sense to anybody who does n't already think that Apple products are Destined to Save the World .
Anybody who thinks this is " best ever " needs to get out more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Apple certainly doesn't have to worry about losing its claim to having produced the best Super Bowl ad ever.
Oh gawd.
That ad was based around a lame, confusing reference to a certain novel — a novel that the makers obviously had not read.
It doesn't make sense to anybody who doesn't already think that Apple products are Destined to Save the World.
Anybody who thinks this is "best ever" needs to get out more.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057928</id>
	<title>Plebs Eat Up More Useless Corporate Bread</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265563980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Enjoying your stuperbowl, useless plebs?</p><p>after the titty bar, another binged weekend of beer, you'll be back to work and consume even more, then celebrate this mindless consumption and slavery to produce more useless goods by watching a gay circus known as football where sweaty men dance around in tights and unending repetition.</p><p>Then you will say octomom and you betcha and that will be the extent of your participation in public life and politics.</p><p>ooooh! ooooh! who will catch the ball next?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Enjoying your stuperbowl , useless plebs ? after the titty bar , another binged weekend of beer , you 'll be back to work and consume even more , then celebrate this mindless consumption and slavery to produce more useless goods by watching a gay circus known as football where sweaty men dance around in tights and unending repetition.Then you will say octomom and you betcha and that will be the extent of your participation in public life and politics.ooooh !
ooooh ! who will catch the ball next ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Enjoying your stuperbowl, useless plebs?after the titty bar, another binged weekend of beer, you'll be back to work and consume even more, then celebrate this mindless consumption and slavery to produce more useless goods by watching a gay circus known as football where sweaty men dance around in tights and unending repetition.Then you will say octomom and you betcha and that will be the extent of your participation in public life and politics.ooooh!
ooooh! who will catch the ball next?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059202</id>
	<title>kudos to Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265627340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was a well done Ad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a well done Ad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a well done Ad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057484</id>
	<title>I see how you might be confused</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265560020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This being Slashdot, I understand how this might seem confusing to some readers, but that's actually the way some romances happen.  A guy meets a girl, likes her, tries to impress her, and amazingly, it works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This being Slashdot , I understand how this might seem confusing to some readers , but that 's actually the way some romances happen .
A guy meets a girl , likes her , tries to impress her , and amazingly , it works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This being Slashdot, I understand how this might seem confusing to some readers, but that's actually the way some romances happen.
A guy meets a girl, likes her, tries to impress her, and amazingly, it works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31062892</id>
	<title>Re:Holy shit, Google knows everything about him!</title>
	<author>slashdotjunker</author>
	<datestamp>1265657160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really liked the ad. I think it clearly shows the power of search engines to help people accomplish tasks by stringing together a set of simple search queries. Unfortunately, it also clearly shows the power of Google to collect those time ordered search queries and reconstruct a story that is intimately private. This ad could really backfire on Google.
<br> <br>
Scene: the office of Joe the 60 year old congressman.
<br> <br>
(before the Google super bowl ad)
<br> <br>
Alice: Hey Joe, some computer privacy activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google. They do internet search stuff.
<br> <br>
Joe: Google? I've heard of them, but isn't that mostly used by geeks to search for Star Wars quotes?
<br> <br>
(after the Google super bowl ad)
<br> <br>
Alice: Hey Joe, some computer privacy activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google. They do internet search stuff.
<br> <br>
Joe: I saw their ad. Powerful stuff. Let's have Bob look into this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really liked the ad .
I think it clearly shows the power of search engines to help people accomplish tasks by stringing together a set of simple search queries .
Unfortunately , it also clearly shows the power of Google to collect those time ordered search queries and reconstruct a story that is intimately private .
This ad could really backfire on Google .
Scene : the office of Joe the 60 year old congressman .
( before the Google super bowl ad ) Alice : Hey Joe , some computer privacy activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google .
They do internet search stuff .
Joe : Google ?
I 've heard of them , but is n't that mostly used by geeks to search for Star Wars quotes ?
( after the Google super bowl ad ) Alice : Hey Joe , some computer privacy activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google .
They do internet search stuff .
Joe : I saw their ad .
Powerful stuff .
Let 's have Bob look into this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really liked the ad.
I think it clearly shows the power of search engines to help people accomplish tasks by stringing together a set of simple search queries.
Unfortunately, it also clearly shows the power of Google to collect those time ordered search queries and reconstruct a story that is intimately private.
This ad could really backfire on Google.
Scene: the office of Joe the 60 year old congressman.
(before the Google super bowl ad)
 
Alice: Hey Joe, some computer privacy activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google.
They do internet search stuff.
Joe: Google?
I've heard of them, but isn't that mostly used by geeks to search for Star Wars quotes?
(after the Google super bowl ad)
 
Alice: Hey Joe, some computer privacy activists are asking us to look into regulating a company called Google.
They do internet search stuff.
Joe: I saw their ad.
Powerful stuff.
Let's have Bob look into this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057710</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058212</id>
	<title>Re:First Polanski</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265566920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hope English isn't your native language, because your command of it is very poor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope English is n't your native language , because your command of it is very poor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope English isn't your native language, because your command of it is very poor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057554</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059180</id>
	<title>More Search Stories</title>
	<author>Paaskonijn</author>
	<datestamp>1265626980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are six more of them here: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/searchstories" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/searchstories</a> [youtube.com]

It's a really good campaign. Most of the videos have the awww factor and it shows off Google's services very effectively.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are six more of them here : http : //www.youtube.com/searchstories [ youtube.com ] It 's a really good campaign .
Most of the videos have the awww factor and it shows off Google 's services very effectively .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are six more of them here: http://www.youtube.com/searchstories [youtube.com]

It's a really good campaign.
Most of the videos have the awww factor and it shows off Google's services very effectively.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059770</id>
	<title>Re:Actually, I liked it.</title>
	<author>geoff2</author>
	<datestamp>1265638080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"so far three friends have called me to tell me to watch this ad"</p><p>Perhaps they know you're the type to post on Slashdot and therefore think that you might be interested in Google's first-ever Super Bowl advertisement.</p><p>As for your other points, I think most people in this world have an inkling that Google has some kind of search service. In fact, it's the most popular search service in the world. Makes me wonder what the point of the ad is. "Gosh, I think I'm going to use Google to search on the internet from now on, instead of Alta Vista!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" so far three friends have called me to tell me to watch this ad " Perhaps they know you 're the type to post on Slashdot and therefore think that you might be interested in Google 's first-ever Super Bowl advertisement.As for your other points , I think most people in this world have an inkling that Google has some kind of search service .
In fact , it 's the most popular search service in the world .
Makes me wonder what the point of the ad is .
" Gosh , I think I 'm going to use Google to search on the internet from now on , instead of Alta Vista !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"so far three friends have called me to tell me to watch this ad"Perhaps they know you're the type to post on Slashdot and therefore think that you might be interested in Google's first-ever Super Bowl advertisement.As for your other points, I think most people in this world have an inkling that Google has some kind of search service.
In fact, it's the most popular search service in the world.
Makes me wonder what the point of the ad is.
"Gosh, I think I'm going to use Google to search on the internet from now on, instead of Alta Vista!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057620</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31063694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31061114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057776
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31062780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31069420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31062892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057710
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059498
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057730
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31061814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059184
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31062396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31064744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31064082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057554
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_08_0221241_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058184
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058166
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057710
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31062780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31062892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057572
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057738
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057484
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058290
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31064744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057974
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059542
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058840
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060906
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057554
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058212
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058150
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31064082
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059170
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31061814
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057578
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060120
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059184
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31062396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057732
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059678
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31063694
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057808
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057700
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058338
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31061114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31059484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057642
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057956
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31069420
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31060670
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058374
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31058464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_08_0221241.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_08_0221241.31057798
</commentlist>
</conversation>
