<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_07_2122245</id>
	<title>Statistical Analysis of U of Chicago Graffiti</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1265567640000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:al@nOSpam.alstevens.org" rel="nofollow">quaith</a> writes <i>"Quinn Dombrowski, a member of the University of Chicago's central IT staff, has been recording the graffiti left in the Joseph Regenstein Library Since September 2007. To date she has photographed and transcribed over 620 pieces of graffiti; over 410 of them are datable to within a week of their creation. She has now published in Inkling Magazine a <a href="http://www.inklingmagazine.com/articles/crescat-graffiti-vita-excolatur/">statistical analysis of the entire graffiti collection</a> covering such subjects as love, hate, despair, sex, anatomy, and temporal fluctuations of each of these. After November, both love and despair graffiti drop off significantly until spring, while sex graffiti reaches its one and only peak in December before declining for the rest of the school year. The story includes links to all of the original graffiti photos, which the researcher has made freely available to use under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>quaith writes " Quinn Dombrowski , a member of the University of Chicago 's central IT staff , has been recording the graffiti left in the Joseph Regenstein Library Since September 2007 .
To date she has photographed and transcribed over 620 pieces of graffiti ; over 410 of them are datable to within a week of their creation .
She has now published in Inkling Magazine a statistical analysis of the entire graffiti collection covering such subjects as love , hate , despair , sex , anatomy , and temporal fluctuations of each of these .
After November , both love and despair graffiti drop off significantly until spring , while sex graffiti reaches its one and only peak in December before declining for the rest of the school year .
The story includes links to all of the original graffiti photos , which the researcher has made freely available to use under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>quaith writes "Quinn Dombrowski, a member of the University of Chicago's central IT staff, has been recording the graffiti left in the Joseph Regenstein Library Since September 2007.
To date she has photographed and transcribed over 620 pieces of graffiti; over 410 of them are datable to within a week of their creation.
She has now published in Inkling Magazine a statistical analysis of the entire graffiti collection covering such subjects as love, hate, despair, sex, anatomy, and temporal fluctuations of each of these.
After November, both love and despair graffiti drop off significantly until spring, while sex graffiti reaches its one and only peak in December before declining for the rest of the school year.
The story includes links to all of the original graffiti photos, which the researcher has made freely available to use under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061800</id>
	<title>Re:Some more UChicago graffiti</title>
	<author>keytoe</author>
	<datestamp>1265651520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's funny - I thought 'grout puns' were somewhat unique to my local pub men's room. Except our graffiti is all literary references:</p><ul>
<li>Grout Expectations</li><li>The Grouting of the Shrew</li><li>The Grout Gatsby</li></ul><p>And no, it's not like we're near the university or anything. It's a pretty low-brow suburban pub in a strip mall, so I was surprised to see graffiti veer in a literary direction.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's funny - I thought 'grout puns ' were somewhat unique to my local pub men 's room .
Except our graffiti is all literary references : Grout ExpectationsThe Grouting of the ShrewThe Grout GatsbyAnd no , it 's not like we 're near the university or anything .
It 's a pretty low-brow suburban pub in a strip mall , so I was surprised to see graffiti veer in a literary direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's funny - I thought 'grout puns' were somewhat unique to my local pub men's room.
Except our graffiti is all literary references:
Grout ExpectationsThe Grouting of the ShrewThe Grout GatsbyAnd no, it's not like we're near the university or anything.
It's a pretty low-brow suburban pub in a strip mall, so I was surprised to see graffiti veer in a literary direction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058554</id>
	<title>My Hypothesis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265571540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Could this all be just one guy who just hasn't found slashdot yet?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Could this all be just one guy who just has n't found slashdot yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could this all be just one guy who just hasn't found slashdot yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059612</id>
	<title>Re:License?</title>
	<author>YourExperiment</author>
	<datestamp>1265634900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's okay, this is all a part of the wider Google Graffiti settlement.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's okay , this is all a part of the wider Google Graffiti settlement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's okay, this is all a part of the wider Google Graffiti settlement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059594</id>
	<title>Its not a "false need"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265634720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"and the false need of some people, to control that information."</p><p>
&nbsp; What a load of reactionary BS. People control information for a number of reasons but copyright is there so the people who created the work - you know , the ones who spent months or years creating a piece of music or a book (surprise! They don't just magic themselves into existence!) - can earn some money from their efforts before ungrateful and clueless morons like you think you're entitled to it for free just because you can copy it easily.</p><p>Grow up!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" and the false need of some people , to control that information .
"   What a load of reactionary BS .
People control information for a number of reasons but copyright is there so the people who created the work - you know , the ones who spent months or years creating a piece of music or a book ( surprise !
They do n't just magic themselves into existence !
) - can earn some money from their efforts before ungrateful and clueless morons like you think you 're entitled to it for free just because you can copy it easily.Grow up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"and the false need of some people, to control that information.
"
  What a load of reactionary BS.
People control information for a number of reasons but copyright is there so the people who created the work - you know , the ones who spent months or years creating a piece of music or a book (surprise!
They don't just magic themselves into existence!
) - can earn some money from their efforts before ungrateful and clueless morons like you think you're entitled to it for free just because you can copy it easily.Grow up!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060224</id>
	<title>Re:do not pay interest to graffiti</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265642280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If art is a crime may god forgive me</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If art is a crime may god forgive me</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If art is a crime may god forgive me</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059626</id>
	<title>Re:Blah...</title>
	<author>ZeroExistenZ</author>
	<datestamp>1265635200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>When they build a new library with modern non-wood tables, the graffiti no longer existed. The florescent pen graffiti on the condom machines in the restrooms was a poor substitute.</p></div></blockquote><p>I agree with that underlaying thought; the sterility of our society makes it not as authentic as it can be. It's like holding a book, with some smudges, signs of usage, people leaving trails and the object being a subject of a living, organic process.</p><p>While I feel it shouldn't be "allowed", it should to a certain degree be tolerated as organic expression and a capture of time.</p><p>It's not just a modern phenomomen, <a href="http://www.pompeionline.net/pompeii/graffiti.htm" title="pompeionline.net">in pompei they already knew grafitti</a> [pompeionline.net] which painted a picture of daily life for us today.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When they build a new library with modern non-wood tables , the graffiti no longer existed .
The florescent pen graffiti on the condom machines in the restrooms was a poor substitute.I agree with that underlaying thought ; the sterility of our society makes it not as authentic as it can be .
It 's like holding a book , with some smudges , signs of usage , people leaving trails and the object being a subject of a living , organic process.While I feel it should n't be " allowed " , it should to a certain degree be tolerated as organic expression and a capture of time.It 's not just a modern phenomomen , in pompei they already knew grafitti [ pompeionline.net ] which painted a picture of daily life for us today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When they build a new library with modern non-wood tables, the graffiti no longer existed.
The florescent pen graffiti on the condom machines in the restrooms was a poor substitute.I agree with that underlaying thought; the sterility of our society makes it not as authentic as it can be.
It's like holding a book, with some smudges, signs of usage, people leaving trails and the object being a subject of a living, organic process.While I feel it shouldn't be "allowed", it should to a certain degree be tolerated as organic expression and a capture of time.It's not just a modern phenomomen, in pompei they already knew grafitti [pompeionline.net] which painted a picture of daily life for us today.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31076696</id>
	<title>Re:do not pay interest to graffiti</title>
	<author>TrisexualPuppy</author>
	<datestamp>1265748420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hey Hitroll...I got my karma back up from terrible to excellent. Want to troll some?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey Hitroll...I got my karma back up from terrible to excellent .
Want to troll some ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey Hitroll...I got my karma back up from terrible to excellent.
Want to troll some?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058624</id>
	<title>Re:License?</title>
	<author>Finn61</author>
	<datestamp>1265572620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kilroy?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kilroy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kilroy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058558</id>
	<title>graffiti is for faggots</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265571600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>only a total fag would plaster his gay name over something worthwhile.</p><p>It figures that some gay shit like this would come out of Chicago, home of Barack Hussein Obama.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>only a total fag would plaster his gay name over something worthwhile.It figures that some gay shit like this would come out of Chicago , home of Barack Hussein Obama .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>only a total fag would plaster his gay name over something worthwhile.It figures that some gay shit like this would come out of Chicago, home of Barack Hussein Obama.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061320</id>
	<title>Re:do not pay interest to graffiti</title>
	<author>Chapter80</author>
	<datestamp>1265649480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>the researcher has made freely available to use under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike license</p></div></blockquote><p>I do not take kindly to this researcher releasing my copyrighted chronicles of a man from Nantucket.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the researcher has made freely available to use under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike licenseI do not take kindly to this researcher releasing my copyrighted chronicles of a man from Nantucket .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the researcher has made freely available to use under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike licenseI do not take kindly to this researcher releasing my copyrighted chronicles of a man from Nantucket.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059742</id>
	<title>Soldier Port-a-John graffiti overseas</title>
	<author>adosch</author>
	<datestamp>1265637540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think regardless of where you find it or what type of person are, graffiti is pretty entertaining and intriguing.  I think the most amusing graffiti I've seen that encompasses about every walk of life, rank or status and is among the same topic fairing FTFA above was in a Port-a-john during different points in my life, most notably when I was deployed in Iraq.  Considering the type of foot traffic that hit these port-a-john's is much more broader than the foot traffic that hits a university library and the fact that, at least when I was in basic training, it was a push-up affair every time you didn't have a black ballpoint pen on your person, the odds were pretty high for someone to carve their <i>opinion</i> in any artistic form into the wall for everyone else to ponder AND respond to.</p><p>It's almost a comical affair now to realize I used to go out of my way to keep track of all the "Black Ninja Rule Number <i>n</i>" and actually look for them when I was pouring sweat trying to take a crap or try to unbuckle 50lbs worth of gear and stow it beside me with I pissed in those crackjack boxes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think regardless of where you find it or what type of person are , graffiti is pretty entertaining and intriguing .
I think the most amusing graffiti I 've seen that encompasses about every walk of life , rank or status and is among the same topic fairing FTFA above was in a Port-a-john during different points in my life , most notably when I was deployed in Iraq .
Considering the type of foot traffic that hit these port-a-john 's is much more broader than the foot traffic that hits a university library and the fact that , at least when I was in basic training , it was a push-up affair every time you did n't have a black ballpoint pen on your person , the odds were pretty high for someone to carve their opinion in any artistic form into the wall for everyone else to ponder AND respond to.It 's almost a comical affair now to realize I used to go out of my way to keep track of all the " Black Ninja Rule Number n " and actually look for them when I was pouring sweat trying to take a crap or try to unbuckle 50lbs worth of gear and stow it beside me with I pissed in those crackjack boxes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think regardless of where you find it or what type of person are, graffiti is pretty entertaining and intriguing.
I think the most amusing graffiti I've seen that encompasses about every walk of life, rank or status and is among the same topic fairing FTFA above was in a Port-a-john during different points in my life, most notably when I was deployed in Iraq.
Considering the type of foot traffic that hit these port-a-john's is much more broader than the foot traffic that hits a university library and the fact that, at least when I was in basic training, it was a push-up affair every time you didn't have a black ballpoint pen on your person, the odds were pretty high for someone to carve their opinion in any artistic form into the wall for everyone else to ponder AND respond to.It's almost a comical affair now to realize I used to go out of my way to keep track of all the "Black Ninja Rule Number n" and actually look for them when I was pouring sweat trying to take a crap or try to unbuckle 50lbs worth of gear and stow it beside me with I pissed in those crackjack boxes.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062114</id>
	<title>Re:Some more UChicago graffiti</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1265653260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You forgot, "Don't be a great writer... be a grout writer!" (From <a href="http://openlibrary.org/b/OL4257389M/Graffiti\_in\_the\_PAC\_Ten" title="openlibrary.org">Graffiti in the PAC Ten</a> [openlibrary.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot , " Do n't be a great writer... be a grout writer !
" ( From Graffiti in the PAC Ten [ openlibrary.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot, "Don't be a great writer... be a grout writer!
" (From Graffiti in the PAC Ten [openlibrary.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058930</id>
	<title>Re:License?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265621640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>&ldquo;Licensing&rdquo;/&ldquo;copyright&ldquo; is a concept, based on the misconception that ideas/information would be physical objects,</p></div><p>Except that it's not. Where the hell did you get this bizarre idea from? It's nowhere in copyright law, which separates "the work" from the physical object it is presented upon.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>   Licensing    /    copyright    is a concept , based on the misconception that ideas/information would be physical objects,Except that it 's not .
Where the hell did you get this bizarre idea from ?
It 's nowhere in copyright law , which separates " the work " from the physical object it is presented upon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>“Licensing”/“copyright“ is a concept, based on the misconception that ideas/information would be physical objects,Except that it's not.
Where the hell did you get this bizarre idea from?
It's nowhere in copyright law, which separates "the work" from the physical object it is presented upon.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058776</id>
	<title>Re:Window into their heads ...</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1265661780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I remember being in a train in melbourne</p></div><p>Have you been around long enough to remember <i>MAX+GJE</i>? Any ideas on where it came from?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember being in a train in melbourneHave you been around long enough to remember MAX + GJE ?
Any ideas on where it came from ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember being in a train in melbourneHave you been around long enough to remember MAX+GJE?
Any ideas on where it came from?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058612</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060312</id>
	<title>Banksy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265642940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone defaced one of his paintings recently. It's the one near College Green (Bristol) that is a window on the side of a house with a guy hanging on the window ledge.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone defaced one of his paintings recently .
It 's the one near College Green ( Bristol ) that is a window on the side of a house with a guy hanging on the window ledge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone defaced one of his paintings recently.
It's the one near College Green (Bristol) that is a window on the side of a house with a guy hanging on the window ledge.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062536</id>
	<title>What a waste</title>
	<author>gx5000</author>
	<datestamp>1265655540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this considered trendy ? Of scientific merit ?
How much money went into this nonsense ??
We still don't have cures for the worst of our ills but we'll study
pot modern cave paintings ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this considered trendy ?
Of scientific merit ?
How much money went into this nonsense ? ?
We still do n't have cures for the worst of our ills but we 'll study pot modern cave paintings ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this considered trendy ?
Of scientific merit ?
How much money went into this nonsense ??
We still don't have cures for the worst of our ills but we'll study
pot modern cave paintings ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058612</id>
	<title>Window into their heads ...</title>
	<author>Gopal.V</author>
	<datestamp>1265572560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
They're thinking, they're feeling. And they want you to know. That's why they paint it on walls, cliffs and carve it into the school benches. There's this school of thought that believes that it will go away if nobody reads it. But they've really never done something, stood a few feet away and sighed about getting it off your head. Ignoring it and waiting for it to go away is dumb.
</p><p>
Keeping tabs on the expression gives you a much more clear indication of what the pulse of the otherwise silent are thinking. This is a fun experiment because nobody wall painting is doing it because they want to be part of a statistic<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... unlike a girl with a clipboard asking questions.
</p><p>
I remember being in a train in melbourne, riding past a few walls full of legal graffiti (union lane?) and wondering what the line between art and vandalism really was.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're thinking , they 're feeling .
And they want you to know .
That 's why they paint it on walls , cliffs and carve it into the school benches .
There 's this school of thought that believes that it will go away if nobody reads it .
But they 've really never done something , stood a few feet away and sighed about getting it off your head .
Ignoring it and waiting for it to go away is dumb .
Keeping tabs on the expression gives you a much more clear indication of what the pulse of the otherwise silent are thinking .
This is a fun experiment because nobody wall painting is doing it because they want to be part of a statistic ... unlike a girl with a clipboard asking questions .
I remember being in a train in melbourne , riding past a few walls full of legal graffiti ( union lane ?
) and wondering what the line between art and vandalism really was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
They're thinking, they're feeling.
And they want you to know.
That's why they paint it on walls, cliffs and carve it into the school benches.
There's this school of thought that believes that it will go away if nobody reads it.
But they've really never done something, stood a few feet away and sighed about getting it off your head.
Ignoring it and waiting for it to go away is dumb.
Keeping tabs on the expression gives you a much more clear indication of what the pulse of the otherwise silent are thinking.
This is a fun experiment because nobody wall painting is doing it because they want to be part of a statistic ... unlike a girl with a clipboard asking questions.
I remember being in a train in melbourne, riding past a few walls full of legal graffiti (union lane?
) and wondering what the line between art and vandalism really was.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058658</id>
	<title>Re:License?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265659860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, what did you expect, from a mindset is not attached to physical reality?<br>That it would make any sense at all?</p><p>The wall with the graffiti is a physical object.<br>A paper photo in your hand would be a physical object.</p><p>But neither the graffiti itself, nor a photo of it, are physical works.<br>They are ideas/information. Other rules apply.</p><p>&ldquo;Licensing&rdquo;/&ldquo;copyright&ldquo; is a concept, based on the misconception that ideas/information would be physical objects, and the false need of some people, to control that information.<br>Trying to argue with it, using logic, is (because of that false base assumption) by definition impossible.</p><p>The real physical rules for information are: If it&rsquo;s out there, it&rsquo;s out. Period.<br>So you either never give it out, and won&rsquo;t be able to prove that it exists at all. Or you give it out to your chosen group.<br>Which can for example be people that you trust. Or, as in this case, everybody.<br>In case you gave it to everybody who wants it... well, you should have thought earlier about that everybody could store and copy it at will. (Just like looking at the physical wall and then telling someone, or drawing it from memory, is storing and copying.)</p><p>It does not matter if people want to accept that. Just as it does not matter if people want to accept gravity.<br>You can try to enforce weird rules of behavior onto people, trough mental tricks of psychology. And it may be easier to do in this case, than it is for gravity. But in the end it&rsquo;s futile. Because you can&rsquo;t control the whole world. Even with ACTA.<br>If nothing else, you will end up banning the ability to look at it, because some people became really good at memorizing and reproducing it later. And everybody who can&rsquo;t remember it, will by definition not remember that it existed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , what did you expect , from a mindset is not attached to physical reality ? That it would make any sense at all ? The wall with the graffiti is a physical object.A paper photo in your hand would be a physical object.But neither the graffiti itself , nor a photo of it , are physical works.They are ideas/information .
Other rules apply.    Licensing    /    copyright    is a concept , based on the misconception that ideas/information would be physical objects , and the false need of some people , to control that information.Trying to argue with it , using logic , is ( because of that false base assumption ) by definition impossible.The real physical rules for information are : If it    s out there , it    s out .
Period.So you either never give it out , and won    t be able to prove that it exists at all .
Or you give it out to your chosen group.Which can for example be people that you trust .
Or , as in this case , everybody.In case you gave it to everybody who wants it... well , you should have thought earlier about that everybody could store and copy it at will .
( Just like looking at the physical wall and then telling someone , or drawing it from memory , is storing and copying .
) It does not matter if people want to accept that .
Just as it does not matter if people want to accept gravity.You can try to enforce weird rules of behavior onto people , trough mental tricks of psychology .
And it may be easier to do in this case , than it is for gravity .
But in the end it    s futile .
Because you can    t control the whole world .
Even with ACTA.If nothing else , you will end up banning the ability to look at it , because some people became really good at memorizing and reproducing it later .
And everybody who can    t remember it , will by definition not remember that it existed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, what did you expect, from a mindset is not attached to physical reality?That it would make any sense at all?The wall with the graffiti is a physical object.A paper photo in your hand would be a physical object.But neither the graffiti itself, nor a photo of it, are physical works.They are ideas/information.
Other rules apply.“Licensing”/“copyright“ is a concept, based on the misconception that ideas/information would be physical objects, and the false need of some people, to control that information.Trying to argue with it, using logic, is (because of that false base assumption) by definition impossible.The real physical rules for information are: If it’s out there, it’s out.
Period.So you either never give it out, and won’t be able to prove that it exists at all.
Or you give it out to your chosen group.Which can for example be people that you trust.
Or, as in this case, everybody.In case you gave it to everybody who wants it... well, you should have thought earlier about that everybody could store and copy it at will.
(Just like looking at the physical wall and then telling someone, or drawing it from memory, is storing and copying.
)It does not matter if people want to accept that.
Just as it does not matter if people want to accept gravity.You can try to enforce weird rules of behavior onto people, trough mental tricks of psychology.
And it may be easier to do in this case, than it is for gravity.
But in the end it’s futile.
Because you can’t control the whole world.
Even with ACTA.If nothing else, you will end up banning the ability to look at it, because some people became really good at memorizing and reproducing it later.
And everybody who can’t remember it, will by definition not remember that it existed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062798</id>
	<title>xkcd?</title>
	<author>Spacepup</author>
	<datestamp>1265656740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Someone is seriously doing this as research? <br>
It's like XKCD just happened in real life.<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>.<br>
Wait.<br>
What?<br>
<a href="http://xkcd.com/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/</a> [xkcd.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone is seriously doing this as research ?
It 's like XKCD just happened in real life .
. .
. Wait .
What ? http : //xkcd.com/ [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone is seriously doing this as research?
It's like XKCD just happened in real life.
. .
.
Wait.
What?
http://xkcd.com/ [xkcd.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058784</id>
	<title>Let me be the first to say...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265661900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy fuck, that shit is fucking awesome! Well done, Quinn!</p><p>I was going to post some ASCII graffiti here, but couldn't because of the lameness/whitespace filter, so <a href="http://www.inklingmagazine.com/articles/comments/crescat-graffiti-vita-excolatur/" title="inklingmagazine.com" rel="nofollow">I posted my graffiti comment on inklingmagazine.com</a> [inklingmagazine.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy fuck , that shit is fucking awesome !
Well done , Quinn ! I was going to post some ASCII graffiti here , but could n't because of the lameness/whitespace filter , so I posted my graffiti comment on inklingmagazine.com [ inklingmagazine.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy fuck, that shit is fucking awesome!
Well done, Quinn!I was going to post some ASCII graffiti here, but couldn't because of the lameness/whitespace filter, so I posted my graffiti comment on inklingmagazine.com [inklingmagazine.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059588</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>jaminJay</author>
	<datestamp>1265634600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
I wonder if the FOIA would include all of the photos snapped along the lines before the scrubbers paint a fresh new "canvas" up...  There would be literally <em>decades</em> of data, and I believe they already do analysis such that they can identify any person's style such that, if nabbed for one, you're done for all.
</p><p>
PS: I know this occurs because I was at a freshly tagged station when the poor sod was taking (digital) photos and documenting everything before painting over them in a not-quite-the-same tan.  Interest was piqued, questioning ensued.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if the FOIA would include all of the photos snapped along the lines before the scrubbers paint a fresh new " canvas " up... There would be literally decades of data , and I believe they already do analysis such that they can identify any person 's style such that , if nabbed for one , you 're done for all .
PS : I know this occurs because I was at a freshly tagged station when the poor sod was taking ( digital ) photos and documenting everything before painting over them in a not-quite-the-same tan .
Interest was piqued , questioning ensued .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I wonder if the FOIA would include all of the photos snapped along the lines before the scrubbers paint a fresh new "canvas" up...  There would be literally decades of data, and I believe they already do analysis such that they can identify any person's style such that, if nabbed for one, you're done for all.
PS: I know this occurs because I was at a freshly tagged station when the poor sod was taking (digital) photos and documenting everything before painting over them in a not-quite-the-same tan.
Interest was piqued, questioning ensued.
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058706</id>
	<title>Interesting, but...</title>
	<author>uvajed\_ekil</author>
	<datestamp>1265660640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I doubt any widely-relevant conclusions at all can be drawn from this analysis. It is somewhat interesting, but the hundreds of samples (which is not really that many) are probably created by a mere handful of individuals, most all of whom belong to a particular group - male undergraduate students, 18-24, residing in or near a certain Chicago neighborhood. So certainly there is no way to apply any findings to any larger group. A fun exercise for statistics nerds, perhaps, but of little scientific value.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt any widely-relevant conclusions at all can be drawn from this analysis .
It is somewhat interesting , but the hundreds of samples ( which is not really that many ) are probably created by a mere handful of individuals , most all of whom belong to a particular group - male undergraduate students , 18-24 , residing in or near a certain Chicago neighborhood .
So certainly there is no way to apply any findings to any larger group .
A fun exercise for statistics nerds , perhaps , but of little scientific value .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt any widely-relevant conclusions at all can be drawn from this analysis.
It is somewhat interesting, but the hundreds of samples (which is not really that many) are probably created by a mere handful of individuals, most all of whom belong to a particular group - male undergraduate students, 18-24, residing in or near a certain Chicago neighborhood.
So certainly there is no way to apply any findings to any larger group.
A fun exercise for statistics nerds, perhaps, but of little scientific value.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061602</id>
	<title>Re:do not pay interest to graffiti?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265650800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You don't solve crime by ignoring it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do n't solve crime by ignoring it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You don't solve crime by ignoring it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550</id>
	<title>do not pay interest to graffiti</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265571540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's still illegal and often makes local people unhappy.</p><p>I know there's banksy but he's one in a billion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's still illegal and often makes local people unhappy.I know there 's banksy but he 's one in a billion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's still illegal and often makes local people unhappy.I know there's banksy but he's one in a billion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058908</id>
	<title>Re:Some more UChicago graffiti</title>
	<author>techno-vampire</author>
	<datestamp>1265621280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's it all agrout, Alfie?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's it all agrout , Alfie ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's it all agrout, Alfie?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058656</id>
	<title>Blah...</title>
	<author>creimer</author>
	<datestamp>1265659860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>When the library at the local community college had a wooden tables in the study area, there was a rich history of graffiti from 20 years of students studying for exams.  When they build a new library with modern non-wood tables, the graffiti no longer existed.  The florescent pen graffiti on the condom machines in the restrooms was a poor substitute.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When the library at the local community college had a wooden tables in the study area , there was a rich history of graffiti from 20 years of students studying for exams .
When they build a new library with modern non-wood tables , the graffiti no longer existed .
The florescent pen graffiti on the condom machines in the restrooms was a poor substitute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the library at the local community college had a wooden tables in the study area, there was a rich history of graffiti from 20 years of students studying for exams.
When they build a new library with modern non-wood tables, the graffiti no longer existed.
The florescent pen graffiti on the condom machines in the restrooms was a poor substitute.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059192</id>
	<title>Barbarians at the gates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265627220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only a fool would damage  a library.<br>I remember when I was younger in school, checking the Merck index and I would find certain pages related to drug precursors were not in the books I ordered for viewing. I asked the librarians if they had been censored and the librarians assured they had not. They didn't know about it, it didn't affect my research as an "academic", whatever that is, I feel that destroying books of any kind is surly a slight against all of modern civilization. Only a barbarian would damage a book, regardless of their motive, be it for profit or otherwise. Damaging a library isn't any better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only a fool would damage a library.I remember when I was younger in school , checking the Merck index and I would find certain pages related to drug precursors were not in the books I ordered for viewing .
I asked the librarians if they had been censored and the librarians assured they had not .
They did n't know about it , it did n't affect my research as an " academic " , whatever that is , I feel that destroying books of any kind is surly a slight against all of modern civilization .
Only a barbarian would damage a book , regardless of their motive , be it for profit or otherwise .
Damaging a library is n't any better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only a fool would damage  a library.I remember when I was younger in school, checking the Merck index and I would find certain pages related to drug precursors were not in the books I ordered for viewing.
I asked the librarians if they had been censored and the librarians assured they had not.
They didn't know about it, it didn't affect my research as an "academic", whatever that is, I feel that destroying books of any kind is surly a slight against all of modern civilization.
Only a barbarian would damage a book, regardless of their motive, be it for profit or otherwise.
Damaging a library isn't any better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059028</id>
	<title>No conclusions ....</title>
	<author>petes\_PoV</author>
	<datestamp>1265623620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All that work and she hasn't been able to come up with any conclusions or reasons for her observed results. Surely that's the (only) point of spending such a long time collecting that data. However, it only represents one single place in one single country so it's not really representative of anything. Plus she breaks the data down by month, so there are really only two data points for each time period, therefore no possibility of showing a year-on-year (let alone generational) trend.
<p>
Maybe she should come back in 10 years or so, when there's a reasonable body of data. Then there'd be the start of something worth publishing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All that work and she has n't been able to come up with any conclusions or reasons for her observed results .
Surely that 's the ( only ) point of spending such a long time collecting that data .
However , it only represents one single place in one single country so it 's not really representative of anything .
Plus she breaks the data down by month , so there are really only two data points for each time period , therefore no possibility of showing a year-on-year ( let alone generational ) trend .
Maybe she should come back in 10 years or so , when there 's a reasonable body of data .
Then there 'd be the start of something worth publishing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All that work and she hasn't been able to come up with any conclusions or reasons for her observed results.
Surely that's the (only) point of spending such a long time collecting that data.
However, it only represents one single place in one single country so it's not really representative of anything.
Plus she breaks the data down by month, so there are really only two data points for each time period, therefore no possibility of showing a year-on-year (let alone generational) trend.
Maybe she should come back in 10 years or so, when there's a reasonable body of data.
Then there'd be the start of something worth publishing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060660</id>
	<title>terrorists</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265645820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's still illegal and often makes local people unhappy.</p></div><p>I think that meets the criteria of a terrorist action. Let's have a Senate committee start a federal task force to data mine SWIFT data for possible suspects.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's still illegal and often makes local people unhappy.I think that meets the criteria of a terrorist action .
Let 's have a Senate committee start a federal task force to data mine SWIFT data for possible suspects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's still illegal and often makes local people unhappy.I think that meets the criteria of a terrorist action.
Let's have a Senate committee start a federal task force to data mine SWIFT data for possible suspects.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058572</id>
	<title>Well Documented</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265571780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I must say there is a good amount of documentation. Now I know that I am more likely to come across a happy smile face than a sad face.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I must say there is a good amount of documentation .
Now I know that I am more likely to come across a happy smile face than a sad face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I must say there is a good amount of documentation.
Now I know that I am more likely to come across a happy smile face than a sad face.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684</id>
	<title>Some more UChicago graffiti</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265660460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We also have some brilliant graffiti in the grout between the tiles in the downstairs bathroom in the Bartlett dining commons. For example,<br>"I'm a celebrity, get me grout of here!"<br>"Commutator subgrout of prime order"<br>"I'm on the groutside looking in"<br>"What's this all agrout?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We also have some brilliant graffiti in the grout between the tiles in the downstairs bathroom in the Bartlett dining commons .
For example , " I 'm a celebrity , get me grout of here !
" " Commutator subgrout of prime order " " I 'm on the groutside looking in " " What 's this all agrout ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We also have some brilliant graffiti in the grout between the tiles in the downstairs bathroom in the Bartlett dining commons.
For example,"I'm a celebrity, get me grout of here!
""Commutator subgrout of prime order""I'm on the groutside looking in""What's this all agrout?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060348</id>
	<title>Re:Copyright violation?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not necessarily. Somebody can take a picture of the Eiffel Tower or another piece of 'art' (the French would disagree on my definition of art though) and sell that picture for profit and/or have copyright on that picture. However if you paint another wall the same as the graffiti-artist did on the original wall or you make it look like or claim that your picture is the original art then you could run into copyright issues.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not necessarily .
Somebody can take a picture of the Eiffel Tower or another piece of 'art ' ( the French would disagree on my definition of art though ) and sell that picture for profit and/or have copyright on that picture .
However if you paint another wall the same as the graffiti-artist did on the original wall or you make it look like or claim that your picture is the original art then you could run into copyright issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not necessarily.
Somebody can take a picture of the Eiffel Tower or another piece of 'art' (the French would disagree on my definition of art though) and sell that picture for profit and/or have copyright on that picture.
However if you paint another wall the same as the graffiti-artist did on the original wall or you make it look like or claim that your picture is the original art then you could run into copyright issues.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059628</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061432</id>
	<title>Re:do not pay interest to graffiti</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1265650020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It's still illegal and often makes local people unhappy.</p></div><p>What isn't illegal in the U.S. now days?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sarcasm<br>As a local of an area with a lot of creative graffiti artist I can say that a lot of what I see is very interesting and much nicer than looking at the bare concrete...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's still illegal and often makes local people unhappy.What is n't illegal in the U.S. now days ?
/sarcasmAs a local of an area with a lot of creative graffiti artist I can say that a lot of what I see is very interesting and much nicer than looking at the bare concrete.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's still illegal and often makes local people unhappy.What isn't illegal in the U.S. now days?
/sarcasmAs a local of an area with a lot of creative graffiti artist I can say that a lot of what I see is very interesting and much nicer than looking at the bare concrete...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059804</id>
	<title>Re:Well Documented</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265638560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><nobr> <wbr></nobr>..... Now I know that I am more likely to come across a happy smile face than a sad face.</i></p><p>Only if you live in the University of Chicago Library. =)</p><p>I wonder how much the results would change in other places....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..... Now I know that I am more likely to come across a happy smile face than a sad face.Only if you live in the University of Chicago Library .
= ) I wonder how much the results would change in other places... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ..... Now I know that I am more likely to come across a happy smile face than a sad face.Only if you live in the University of Chicago Library.
=)I wonder how much the results would change in other places....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059668</id>
	<title>Re:do not pay interest to graffiti</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265636040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who stuck a pinecone up your ass?  I'm supposed to ignore graffiti because it's illegal?  Really?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who stuck a pinecone up your ass ?
I 'm supposed to ignore graffiti because it 's illegal ?
Really ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who stuck a pinecone up your ass?
I'm supposed to ignore graffiti because it's illegal?
Really?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059616</id>
	<title>The result of the analysis</title>
	<author>Viol8</author>
	<datestamp>1265635020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Graffiti is done by underachieving teenagers and immature 20-somethings who generally can't spell, have no respect for other peoples property and have little or no talent artistic or otherwise anyway.</p><p>Now move along please, nothing more to see</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Graffiti is done by underachieving teenagers and immature 20-somethings who generally ca n't spell , have no respect for other peoples property and have little or no talent artistic or otherwise anyway.Now move along please , nothing more to see</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Graffiti is done by underachieving teenagers and immature 20-somethings who generally can't spell, have no respect for other peoples property and have little or no talent artistic or otherwise anyway.Now move along please, nothing more to see</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060372</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265643480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quinn calls it a "pseudo-scientific" analysis on her blog and adds "disclaimers for the pedantic." '<br>http://www.crescatgraffiti.com/2010/02/02/pseudo-scientific-analysis-of-graffiti-with-disclaimers-for-pedanti/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quinn calls it a " pseudo-scientific " analysis on her blog and adds " disclaimers for the pedantic .
" 'http : //www.crescatgraffiti.com/2010/02/02/pseudo-scientific-analysis-of-graffiti-with-disclaimers-for-pedanti/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quinn calls it a "pseudo-scientific" analysis on her blog and adds "disclaimers for the pedantic.
" 'http://www.crescatgraffiti.com/2010/02/02/pseudo-scientific-analysis-of-graffiti-with-disclaimers-for-pedanti/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062050</id>
	<title>Not very original</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1265652960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Something similar was done <a href="http://openlibrary.org/b/OL4257389M/Graffiti\_in\_the\_PAC\_Ten" title="openlibrary.org">almost 30 years ago</a> [openlibrary.org].</htmltext>
<tokenext>Something similar was done almost 30 years ago [ openlibrary.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Something similar was done almost 30 years ago [openlibrary.org].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061438</id>
	<title>Re:Well Documented</title>
	<author>Loconut1389</author>
	<datestamp>1265650020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oddly enough on my way in to work this morning, I noticed they'd repainted the elevator doors which formerly had a bit of everything, but they still hadn't done the wall which had a little smiley. I chuckled a little, having read your comment earlier.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oddly enough on my way in to work this morning , I noticed they 'd repainted the elevator doors which formerly had a bit of everything , but they still had n't done the wall which had a little smiley .
I chuckled a little , having read your comment earlier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oddly enough on my way in to work this morning, I noticed they'd repainted the elevator doors which formerly had a bit of everything, but they still hadn't done the wall which had a little smiley.
I chuckled a little, having read your comment earlier.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059340</id>
	<title>"do not pay interest to cultural phenomena</title>
	<author>k2r</author>
	<datestamp>1265629680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>because they are illegal!"</p><p>I don't consider your comment insightful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>because they are illegal !
" I do n't consider your comment insightful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>because they are illegal!
"I don't consider your comment insightful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061100</id>
	<title>Re:License?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265648460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you write a graffiti on someone else's wall do you really believe you own any copyright to it???</p><p>I would say the owner of the wall owns the copyright to the graffiti. I mean someone writes something on your house and you take a picture, of course the picture is yours!</p><p>It could be different if the "artist/writer" takes the picture himself he can try to claim some copyright,<br>but he would have to accept to clean the wall<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you write a graffiti on someone else 's wall do you really believe you own any copyright to it ? ?
? I would say the owner of the wall owns the copyright to the graffiti .
I mean someone writes something on your house and you take a picture , of course the picture is yours ! It could be different if the " artist/writer " takes the picture himself he can try to claim some copyright,but he would have to accept to clean the wall .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you write a graffiti on someone else's wall do you really believe you own any copyright to it??
?I would say the owner of the wall owns the copyright to the graffiti.
I mean someone writes something on your house and you take a picture, of course the picture is yours!It could be different if the "artist/writer" takes the picture himself he can try to claim some copyright,but he would have to accept to clean the wall ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062566</id>
	<title>Re:Its not a "false need"</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1265655720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And no, hard work doesn't entitle you to get money,</p></div><p>Since when did copyright law entitle people to get money? Your entire post is based on a flawed premise.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Maybe you should consider getting a day job, and composing/writing on your free time? Then you wouldn't have to try to control other people to make profit,</p> </div><p>But every type of employment is subject to laws, and therefore, by your philosophy "controlling people for profit."</p><p><div class="quote"><p> and the rest of us wouldn't have to subsidy you indulging your creative impulses through government monopoly.</p></div><p>Wait, what? You do realize that the government doesn't pay people for simply creating a copyrighted works, don't you?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And no , hard work does n't entitle you to get money,Since when did copyright law entitle people to get money ?
Your entire post is based on a flawed premise.Maybe you should consider getting a day job , and composing/writing on your free time ?
Then you would n't have to try to control other people to make profit , But every type of employment is subject to laws , and therefore , by your philosophy " controlling people for profit .
" and the rest of us would n't have to subsidy you indulging your creative impulses through government monopoly.Wait , what ?
You do realize that the government does n't pay people for simply creating a copyrighted works , do n't you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And no, hard work doesn't entitle you to get money,Since when did copyright law entitle people to get money?
Your entire post is based on a flawed premise.Maybe you should consider getting a day job, and composing/writing on your free time?
Then you wouldn't have to try to control other people to make profit, But every type of employment is subject to laws, and therefore, by your philosophy "controlling people for profit.
" and the rest of us wouldn't have to subsidy you indulging your creative impulses through government monopoly.Wait, what?
You do realize that the government doesn't pay people for simply creating a copyrighted works, don't you?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059736</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1265637420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know about other cities but in Bristol, UK there are at least two people whose job it is to find, photograph, document and then remove graffiti.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about other cities but in Bristol , UK there are at least two people whose job it is to find , photograph , document and then remove graffiti .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about other cities but in Bristol, UK there are at least two people whose job it is to find, photograph, document and then remove graffiti.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31068108</id>
	<title>... or just in time for Valentine's Day...</title>
	<author>tomatoguy</author>
	<datestamp>1265642640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>By the same author, The Calculus of Saying I Love You

<p>
<a href="http://www.inklingmagazine.com/articles/the-calculus-of-saying-i-love-you/" title="inklingmagazine.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.inklingmagazine.com/articles/the-calculus-of-saying-i-love-you/</a> [inklingmagazine.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By the same author , The Calculus of Saying I Love You http : //www.inklingmagazine.com/articles/the-calculus-of-saying-i-love-you/ [ inklingmagazine.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By the same author, The Calculus of Saying I Love You


http://www.inklingmagazine.com/articles/the-calculus-of-saying-i-love-you/ [inklingmagazine.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060180</id>
	<title>Re:Its not a "false need"</title>
	<author>ultranova</author>
	<datestamp>1265641920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>People control information for a number of reasons but copyright is there so the people who created the work - you know , the ones who spent months or years creating a piece of music or a book (surprise! They don't just magic themselves into existence!) - can earn some money from their efforts before ungrateful and clueless morons like you think you're entitled to it for free just because you can copy it easily.</p></div> </blockquote><p>Isn't insisting that other people behave in a certain way just so you can make money kinda implying a sense of entitlement on <em>your</em> part? And no, hard work doesn't entitle you to get money, even if you persist for years; and it most certainly doesn't entitle you to enforce rules designed to make you money on others.</p><p>Maybe you should consider getting a day job, and composing/writing on your free time? Then you wouldn't have to try to control other people to make profit, and the rest of us wouldn't have to subsidy you indulging your creative impulses through government monopoly.</p><blockquote><div><p>Grow up!</p></div> </blockquote><p>Oh the irony.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People control information for a number of reasons but copyright is there so the people who created the work - you know , the ones who spent months or years creating a piece of music or a book ( surprise !
They do n't just magic themselves into existence !
) - can earn some money from their efforts before ungrateful and clueless morons like you think you 're entitled to it for free just because you can copy it easily .
Is n't insisting that other people behave in a certain way just so you can make money kinda implying a sense of entitlement on your part ?
And no , hard work does n't entitle you to get money , even if you persist for years ; and it most certainly does n't entitle you to enforce rules designed to make you money on others.Maybe you should consider getting a day job , and composing/writing on your free time ?
Then you would n't have to try to control other people to make profit , and the rest of us would n't have to subsidy you indulging your creative impulses through government monopoly.Grow up !
Oh the irony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People control information for a number of reasons but copyright is there so the people who created the work - you know , the ones who spent months or years creating a piece of music or a book (surprise!
They don't just magic themselves into existence!
) - can earn some money from their efforts before ungrateful and clueless morons like you think you're entitled to it for free just because you can copy it easily.
Isn't insisting that other people behave in a certain way just so you can make money kinda implying a sense of entitlement on your part?
And no, hard work doesn't entitle you to get money, even if you persist for years; and it most certainly doesn't entitle you to enforce rules designed to make you money on others.Maybe you should consider getting a day job, and composing/writing on your free time?
Then you wouldn't have to try to control other people to make profit, and the rest of us wouldn't have to subsidy you indulging your creative impulses through government monopoly.Grow up!
Oh the irony.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059594</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061020</id>
	<title>Missing pictures of...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265648100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the article says that there are virtually no pictures of Vajayjays in the graffiti, I find this odd. As somebody who spends a good deal of time working on construction sites and has seen a great deal of stuff on the walls. I definitely see more pictures referring to female genitals than male.</p><p>Can anybody else corroborate?</p><p>Also on a side note perhaps one of the best was a drawing of a bear and a tree stump asking of bears $hit in the woods. Seen any others of interest?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the article says that there are virtually no pictures of Vajayjays in the graffiti , I find this odd .
As somebody who spends a good deal of time working on construction sites and has seen a great deal of stuff on the walls .
I definitely see more pictures referring to female genitals than male.Can anybody else corroborate ? Also on a side note perhaps one of the best was a drawing of a bear and a tree stump asking of bears $ hit in the woods .
Seen any others of interest ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the article says that there are virtually no pictures of Vajayjays in the graffiti, I find this odd.
As somebody who spends a good deal of time working on construction sites and has seen a great deal of stuff on the walls.
I definitely see more pictures referring to female genitals than male.Can anybody else corroborate?Also on a side note perhaps one of the best was a drawing of a bear and a tree stump asking of bears $hit in the woods.
Seen any others of interest?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058700</id>
	<title>95\% of grafitti provided by the researcher</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265660640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>she faked it, she is woman</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>she faked it , she is woman</tokentext>
<sentencetext>she faked it, she is woman</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059164</id>
	<title>Re:Some more UChicago graffiti</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265626740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is also all over the bathrooms of Reed College, along with some variations:<br>"Grout White Whale"<br>"Trade Groutes"<br>"Wireless Grouter"<br>"404 Tile Not Found" (written on the tile, rather than between)</p><p>It also migrated to the men's bathroom at Powell's Books (a local independent book store), prompting a response of "I hate Reedies."</p><p>(For those of you not familiar with either school, there exists somewhat of a psuedo-rivalry between the two, as the intersection of their two applicant pools is pretty large).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is also all over the bathrooms of Reed College , along with some variations : " Grout White Whale " " Trade Groutes " " Wireless Grouter " " 404 Tile Not Found " ( written on the tile , rather than between ) It also migrated to the men 's bathroom at Powell 's Books ( a local independent book store ) , prompting a response of " I hate Reedies .
" ( For those of you not familiar with either school , there exists somewhat of a psuedo-rivalry between the two , as the intersection of their two applicant pools is pretty large ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is also all over the bathrooms of Reed College, along with some variations:"Grout White Whale""Trade Groutes""Wireless Grouter""404 Tile Not Found" (written on the tile, rather than between)It also migrated to the men's bathroom at Powell's Books (a local independent book store), prompting a response of "I hate Reedies.
"(For those of you not familiar with either school, there exists somewhat of a psuedo-rivalry between the two, as the intersection of their two applicant pools is pretty large).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059628</id>
	<title>Copyright violation?</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1265635320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just wanted to throw out that technically she's violating the copyright of the graffiti owner, and cannot be distributing that work. I think all the graffiti authors should step forward and claim their share of her enormous royalties.  If you are a graffiti writer, please click [this is a joke] to claim your giant prize.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just wanted to throw out that technically she 's violating the copyright of the graffiti owner , and can not be distributing that work .
I think all the graffiti authors should step forward and claim their share of her enormous royalties .
If you are a graffiti writer , please click [ this is a joke ] to claim your giant prize .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just wanted to throw out that technically she's violating the copyright of the graffiti owner, and cannot be distributing that work.
I think all the graffiti authors should step forward and claim their share of her enormous royalties.
If you are a graffiti writer, please click [this is a joke] to claim your giant prize.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059740</id>
	<title>Re:do not pay interest to graffiti</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265637480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the same reason I've ignored the "findings" of Galileo until 1992. Up until then, he was just some heretic trying to upset everyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the same reason I 've ignored the " findings " of Galileo until 1992 .
Up until then , he was just some heretic trying to upset everyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the same reason I've ignored the "findings" of Galileo until 1992.
Up until then, he was just some heretic trying to upset everyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31063568</id>
	<title>Re:Some more UChicago graffiti</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1265660340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer this little diddy from the early 70s:</p><p>Don't change Dicks in the middle of a screw,<br>Vote for Nixon in 72.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer this little diddy from the early 70s : Do n't change Dicks in the middle of a screw,Vote for Nixon in 72 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer this little diddy from the early 70s:Don't change Dicks in the middle of a screw,Vote for Nixon in 72.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061860</id>
	<title>Who is Davin Reed?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265651820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who is Davin Reed?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who is Davin Reed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who is Davin Reed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060006</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting, but...</title>
	<author>dissy</author>
	<datestamp>1265640840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A fun exercise for statistics nerds, perhaps, but of little scientific value.</p></div><p>The same can be said about making posts to Slashdot.<br>I don't think you really have the right to complain about other peoples hobbies not being scientific when you do the exact same thing, just like all of us do.</p><p>Perhaps if she was claiming this was scientific in some way, your statement could be read as a criticism instead...  But all we have is some IT geek having senseless fun, and others complaining it is not scientific.  Whatever happened to the Slashdot for nerds?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A fun exercise for statistics nerds , perhaps , but of little scientific value.The same can be said about making posts to Slashdot.I do n't think you really have the right to complain about other peoples hobbies not being scientific when you do the exact same thing , just like all of us do.Perhaps if she was claiming this was scientific in some way , your statement could be read as a criticism instead... But all we have is some IT geek having senseless fun , and others complaining it is not scientific .
Whatever happened to the Slashdot for nerds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A fun exercise for statistics nerds, perhaps, but of little scientific value.The same can be said about making posts to Slashdot.I don't think you really have the right to complain about other peoples hobbies not being scientific when you do the exact same thing, just like all of us do.Perhaps if she was claiming this was scientific in some way, your statement could be read as a criticism instead...  But all we have is some IT geek having senseless fun, and others complaining it is not scientific.
Whatever happened to the Slashdot for nerds?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058706</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058694</id>
	<title>Re:License?</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1265660580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For some of the drawings that might be the case, but the vast majority are short snippets of text that probably aren't copyrightable at all. If anything's copyrightable, it might be the photograph, which is what the license is releasing as CC.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For some of the drawings that might be the case , but the vast majority are short snippets of text that probably are n't copyrightable at all .
If anything 's copyrightable , it might be the photograph , which is what the license is releasing as CC .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For some of the drawings that might be the case, but the vast majority are short snippets of text that probably aren't copyrightable at all.
If anything's copyrightable, it might be the photograph, which is what the license is releasing as CC.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31082426</id>
	<title>scientifically appropriate</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265741280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>"However, a close examination of context shows that the sexual usage of these terms amounts to a mere 19\% for fuck, 22\% for suck, and 20\% for ass(hole)."
This is the most exciting scientific statement I've ever read.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" However , a close examination of context shows that the sexual usage of these terms amounts to a mere 19 \ % for fuck , 22 \ % for suck , and 20 \ % for ass ( hole ) .
" This is the most exciting scientific statement I 've ever read .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"However, a close examination of context shows that the sexual usage of these terms amounts to a mere 19\% for fuck, 22\% for suck, and 20\% for ass(hole).
"
This is the most exciting scientific statement I've ever read.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062184</id>
	<title>Dear Quinn Dombrowski...</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1265653560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You really, really, really need to <b>get a life</b>! You've got nothing better to do on a Saturday night than photography graffiti?!? That sad... really sad. Perhaps you should consider changing your name to something more appealing, e.g. "Tiffany Minx". That might make it easier for you to get a date, so you wouldn't need to continue to sublimate your unmet desires by documenting the musings of sexually frustrated males, while simultaneously wondering why none of them are desperate enough to actually ask you out...</htmltext>
<tokenext>You really , really , really need to get a life !
You 've got nothing better to do on a Saturday night than photography graffiti ? ! ?
That sad... really sad .
Perhaps you should consider changing your name to something more appealing , e.g .
" Tiffany Minx " .
That might make it easier for you to get a date , so you would n't need to continue to sublimate your unmet desires by documenting the musings of sexually frustrated males , while simultaneously wondering why none of them are desperate enough to actually ask you out.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You really, really, really need to get a life!
You've got nothing better to do on a Saturday night than photography graffiti?!?
That sad... really sad.
Perhaps you should consider changing your name to something more appealing, e.g.
"Tiffany Minx".
That might make it easier for you to get a date, so you wouldn't need to continue to sublimate your unmet desires by documenting the musings of sexually frustrated males, while simultaneously wondering why none of them are desperate enough to actually ask you out...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058756</id>
	<title>Interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265661540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>But a sample of 620 pieces over three years isn't large enough for useful analysis.  I'd like to see this concept applied to graffiti large cities.  I'm sure there are crews responsible for removing the graffiti that could document it in the process.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But a sample of 620 pieces over three years is n't large enough for useful analysis .
I 'd like to see this concept applied to graffiti large cities .
I 'm sure there are crews responsible for removing the graffiti that could document it in the process .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But a sample of 620 pieces over three years isn't large enough for useful analysis.
I'd like to see this concept applied to graffiti large cities.
I'm sure there are crews responsible for removing the graffiti that could document it in the process.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592</id>
	<title>License?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265572140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who is this researcher to relicense their works of art? Just because they can't complain!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who is this researcher to relicense their works of art ?
Just because they ca n't complain !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who is this researcher to relicense their works of art?
Just because they can't complain!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059668
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31063568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062566
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058612
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059628
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31076696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058706
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_2122245_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059736
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060348
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060372
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060006
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062184
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058908
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061800
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31063568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31076696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061438
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_2122245.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058930
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059594
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31060180
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31062566
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31061100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31059612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_2122245.31058694
</commentlist>
</conversation>
