<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_07_1444239</id>
	<title>Superbowl Tech Ads, 1976&ndash;Present</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1265557260000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Ian Lamont writes <i>"Computerworld has put together a collection of interesting, funny, and just plain weird <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9152078/Top\_10\_Super\_Bowl\_tech\_ads">Superbowl television advertisements from tech companies</a> &mdash; excluding Internet retailers. Everyone has seen the Macintosh ad that played during the 1984 Superbowl, but there are a bunch of other gems, starting with a long-winded ad for the Xerox 9200 from 1976. The funniest is probably EDS's 'herding cats' ad from 2000, but there are some oddities, too, including a bizarre ad for Network Associates depicting a Russian nuclear missile launch, and a very dated ad for Sharp from the mid-1980s. Intel has one ad in the collection from 1997, and it turns out that it is <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9151598/Intel\_to\_flaunt\_its\_geek\_chic\_in\_two\_Super\_Bowl\_ads">returning with two ads this year</a> that it says feature 'geek humor.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ian Lamont writes " Computerworld has put together a collection of interesting , funny , and just plain weird Superbowl television advertisements from tech companies    excluding Internet retailers .
Everyone has seen the Macintosh ad that played during the 1984 Superbowl , but there are a bunch of other gems , starting with a long-winded ad for the Xerox 9200 from 1976 .
The funniest is probably EDS 's 'herding cats ' ad from 2000 , but there are some oddities , too , including a bizarre ad for Network Associates depicting a Russian nuclear missile launch , and a very dated ad for Sharp from the mid-1980s .
Intel has one ad in the collection from 1997 , and it turns out that it is returning with two ads this year that it says feature 'geek humor .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ian Lamont writes "Computerworld has put together a collection of interesting, funny, and just plain weird Superbowl television advertisements from tech companies — excluding Internet retailers.
Everyone has seen the Macintosh ad that played during the 1984 Superbowl, but there are a bunch of other gems, starting with a long-winded ad for the Xerox 9200 from 1976.
The funniest is probably EDS's 'herding cats' ad from 2000, but there are some oddities, too, including a bizarre ad for Network Associates depicting a Russian nuclear missile launch, and a very dated ad for Sharp from the mid-1980s.
Intel has one ad in the collection from 1997, and it turns out that it is returning with two ads this year that it says feature 'geek humor.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882</id>
	<title>Why bother?</title>
	<author>Weaselmancer</author>
	<datestamp>1265564400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Intel has one ad in the collection from 1997, and it turns out that it is returning with two ads this year that it says feature 'geek humor.'</i>

</p><p>Seriously - why bother?

</p><p>Geeks, at least the type of geek who cares who is making their cpu generally don't watch the superbowl.  I know it's a stereotype, but it does have a basis in reality.  I know of maybe one person at work that I would suspect *might* watch the game.

</p><p>If the commercials are actually funny Fark will let me know and I'll catch them on YouTube tomorrow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Intel has one ad in the collection from 1997 , and it turns out that it is returning with two ads this year that it says feature 'geek humor .
' Seriously - why bother ?
Geeks , at least the type of geek who cares who is making their cpu generally do n't watch the superbowl .
I know it 's a stereotype , but it does have a basis in reality .
I know of maybe one person at work that I would suspect * might * watch the game .
If the commercials are actually funny Fark will let me know and I 'll catch them on YouTube tomorrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Intel has one ad in the collection from 1997, and it turns out that it is returning with two ads this year that it says feature 'geek humor.
'

Seriously - why bother?
Geeks, at least the type of geek who cares who is making their cpu generally don't watch the superbowl.
I know it's a stereotype, but it does have a basis in reality.
I know of maybe one person at work that I would suspect *might* watch the game.
If the commercials are actually funny Fark will let me know and I'll catch them on YouTube tomorrow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052766</id>
	<title>What happens during the ads?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265562780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm in the UK and was thinking of watching this curious game tonight on the BBC, which alas means I'll miss out on what may be the best part of the show. During these precious minutes, will I  just be twiddling my thumbs and such or will there be something to look at as compensation?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm in the UK and was thinking of watching this curious game tonight on the BBC , which alas means I 'll miss out on what may be the best part of the show .
During these precious minutes , will I just be twiddling my thumbs and such or will there be something to look at as compensation ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm in the UK and was thinking of watching this curious game tonight on the BBC, which alas means I'll miss out on what may be the best part of the show.
During these precious minutes, will I  just be twiddling my thumbs and such or will there be something to look at as compensation?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053058</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>wkurzius</author>
	<datestamp>1265566020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Seriously - why bother?</p><p>Geeks, at least the type of geek who cares who is making their cpu generally don't watch the superbowl.</p></div><p>Based on your small circle of friends? I could make the opposite based on the "geeks" that I know.  Computer science majors, run their own web-design company, as well as build their own computers as a hobby.  We've been playing in a fantasy football league together for 5+ years now.</p><p>You're also forgetting that the Super Bowl is more of a social event.  I'm a Giants fan, so I barely paid attention to the playoffs, but I'm watching the game today because someone is having a party for it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously - why bother ? Geeks , at least the type of geek who cares who is making their cpu generally do n't watch the superbowl.Based on your small circle of friends ?
I could make the opposite based on the " geeks " that I know .
Computer science majors , run their own web-design company , as well as build their own computers as a hobby .
We 've been playing in a fantasy football league together for 5 + years now.You 're also forgetting that the Super Bowl is more of a social event .
I 'm a Giants fan , so I barely paid attention to the playoffs , but I 'm watching the game today because someone is having a party for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously - why bother?Geeks, at least the type of geek who cares who is making their cpu generally don't watch the superbowl.Based on your small circle of friends?
I could make the opposite based on the "geeks" that I know.
Computer science majors, run their own web-design company, as well as build their own computers as a hobby.
We've been playing in a fantasy football league together for 5+ years now.You're also forgetting that the Super Bowl is more of a social event.
I'm a Giants fan, so I barely paid attention to the playoffs, but I'm watching the game today because someone is having a party for it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053042</id>
	<title>Half the ads on the article require a username</title>
	<author>jaymz666</author>
	<datestamp>1265565840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Half the ads in the article require a username and password, you would think a site like computerworld would be savvy enough not to post content restricted by login credentials in an article for the web</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Half the ads in the article require a username and password , you would think a site like computerworld would be savvy enough not to post content restricted by login credentials in an article for the web</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Half the ads in the article require a username and password, you would think a site like computerworld would be savvy enough not to post content restricted by login credentials in an article for the web</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31066514</id>
	<title>Re:What happens during the ads?</title>
	<author>Curmudgeonlyoldbloke</author>
	<datestamp>1265629680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With cricket you get 11 days of actual play time per 3 day match...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With cricket you get 11 days of actual play time per 3 day match.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With cricket you get 11 days of actual play time per 3 day match...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31054876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31055672</id>
	<title>I still miss Outpost.com commercials</title>
	<author>valdezjuan</author>
	<datestamp>1265542920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*sigh*</p><p><a href="http://adland.tv/search/node/outpost.com" title="adland.tv">http://adland.tv/search/node/outpost.com</a> [adland.tv]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* sigh * http : //adland.tv/search/node/outpost.com [ adland.tv ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*sigh*http://adland.tv/search/node/outpost.com [adland.tv]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053196</id>
	<title>Sun:Just when your competition thought it was safe</title>
	<author>D4C5CE</author>
	<datestamp>1265566920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...to do business.<br>
<br>
Last time the "greatest Superbowl tech ads of all time" came up, they were already missing the iconic Sun commercial as well:<br>
<a href="http://idle.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=440612&amp;cid=22285924" title="slashdot.org">http://idle.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=440612&amp;cid=22285924</a> [slashdot.org] <br>
<a href="http://www.ephemeraweb.org/journal/1-3/decocketal/FTads/FT031/FT31.htm" title="ephemeraweb.org">http://www.ephemeraweb.org/journal/1-3/decocketal/FTads/FT031/FT31.htm</a> [ephemeraweb.org] <br>
<br>
Still not on YouTube?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...to do business .
Last time the " greatest Superbowl tech ads of all time " came up , they were already missing the iconic Sun commercial as well : http : //idle.slashdot.org/comments.pl ? sid = 440612&amp;cid = 22285924 [ slashdot.org ] http : //www.ephemeraweb.org/journal/1-3/decocketal/FTads/FT031/FT31.htm [ ephemeraweb.org ] Still not on YouTube ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to do business.
Last time the "greatest Superbowl tech ads of all time" came up, they were already missing the iconic Sun commercial as well:
http://idle.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=440612&amp;cid=22285924 [slashdot.org] 
http://www.ephemeraweb.org/journal/1-3/decocketal/FTads/FT031/FT31.htm [ephemeraweb.org] 

Still not on YouTube?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>KingSkippus</author>
	<datestamp>1265565840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Geeks, at least the type of geek who cares who is making their cpu generally don't watch the superbowl. I know it's a stereotype, but it does have a basis in reality.</p></div></blockquote><p>That <i>is</i> a stereotype, and it most certainly does not have a basis in reality.</p><p>I'm a geek, most of the people I work with are geeks, and about half will probably watch the Super Bowl.  If you ask around, you'll probably find that around the same proportion of geeks are into football as about any other random segment of the population.  Maybe even more, since "geek" is a predominantly male demographic, as is "Super Bowl watcher."  I have a Falcons tag on the front of my car, thank you very much, and I've gotta say, that red and black logo on my red car does look sweet.</p><p>Granted, I'm not into fantasy football leagues, and I can't quote a bunch of stats or tell you who led the league in touchdown receptions, but that doesn't apply to most average Joes, either.  I do enjoy watching the competition at its highest level, the ads are generally the cream of the crop and funny, <i>plus</i> a Who concert to boot?  Jesus, count me in, let's kick off already!</p><p>Oh, and lest I forget, Go Colts!  Sorry Saints, I don't <i>hate</i> you, but I just don't think it's not your year yet.  Plus, any chance that Peyton Manning gets to prove that he's a better QB than Pretty Boy Brady is a sure-fire opportunity for me to root for his team.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Geeks , at least the type of geek who cares who is making their cpu generally do n't watch the superbowl .
I know it 's a stereotype , but it does have a basis in reality.That is a stereotype , and it most certainly does not have a basis in reality.I 'm a geek , most of the people I work with are geeks , and about half will probably watch the Super Bowl .
If you ask around , you 'll probably find that around the same proportion of geeks are into football as about any other random segment of the population .
Maybe even more , since " geek " is a predominantly male demographic , as is " Super Bowl watcher .
" I have a Falcons tag on the front of my car , thank you very much , and I 've got ta say , that red and black logo on my red car does look sweet.Granted , I 'm not into fantasy football leagues , and I ca n't quote a bunch of stats or tell you who led the league in touchdown receptions , but that does n't apply to most average Joes , either .
I do enjoy watching the competition at its highest level , the ads are generally the cream of the crop and funny , plus a Who concert to boot ?
Jesus , count me in , let 's kick off already ! Oh , and lest I forget , Go Colts !
Sorry Saints , I do n't hate you , but I just do n't think it 's not your year yet .
Plus , any chance that Peyton Manning gets to prove that he 's a better QB than Pretty Boy Brady is a sure-fire opportunity for me to root for his team .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Geeks, at least the type of geek who cares who is making their cpu generally don't watch the superbowl.
I know it's a stereotype, but it does have a basis in reality.That is a stereotype, and it most certainly does not have a basis in reality.I'm a geek, most of the people I work with are geeks, and about half will probably watch the Super Bowl.
If you ask around, you'll probably find that around the same proportion of geeks are into football as about any other random segment of the population.
Maybe even more, since "geek" is a predominantly male demographic, as is "Super Bowl watcher.
"  I have a Falcons tag on the front of my car, thank you very much, and I've gotta say, that red and black logo on my red car does look sweet.Granted, I'm not into fantasy football leagues, and I can't quote a bunch of stats or tell you who led the league in touchdown receptions, but that doesn't apply to most average Joes, either.
I do enjoy watching the competition at its highest level, the ads are generally the cream of the crop and funny, plus a Who concert to boot?
Jesus, count me in, let's kick off already!Oh, and lest I forget, Go Colts!
Sorry Saints, I don't hate you, but I just don't think it's not your year yet.
Plus, any chance that Peyton Manning gets to prove that he's a better QB than Pretty Boy Brady is a sure-fire opportunity for me to root for his team.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052678</id>
	<title>One page link</title>
	<author>bobdotorg</author>
	<datestamp>1265561460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9152078/Top\_10\_Super\_Bowl\_tech\_ads?taxonomyName=Hardware&amp;taxonomyId=12" title="computerworld.com">http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9152078/Top\_10\_Super\_Bowl\_tech\_ads?taxonomyName=Hardware&amp;taxonomyId=12</a> [computerworld.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9152078/Top \ _10 \ _Super \ _Bowl \ _tech \ _ads ? taxonomyName = Hardware&amp;taxonomyId = 12 [ computerworld.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/print/9152078/Top\_10\_Super\_Bowl\_tech\_ads?taxonomyName=Hardware&amp;taxonomyId=12 [computerworld.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31055842</id>
	<title>Re:Disable Advertising?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265544240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Watching the Super Bowl for the commercials is just about the most womanish thing a person can do that does not involve performing fellatio on a man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Watching the Super Bowl for the commercials is just about the most womanish thing a person can do that does not involve performing fellatio on a man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Watching the Super Bowl for the commercials is just about the most womanish thing a person can do that does not involve performing fellatio on a man.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31058198</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>Machtyn</author>
	<datestamp>1265566740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Who concert was classy.  They did a really good job.  And, thankfully, there were no wardrobe malfunctions (which is not what made this concert classe<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Who concert was classy .
They did a really good job .
And , thankfully , there were no wardrobe malfunctions ( which is not what made this concert classe ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Who concert was classy.
They did a really good job.
And, thankfully, there were no wardrobe malfunctions (which is not what made this concert classe ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053214</id>
	<title>How could they leave out the "Lemmings" ad?</title>
	<author>RevWaldo</author>
	<datestamp>1265567040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple's 2nd over-the-top so-bad-it's-great SuperBowl ad for the (unsuccessful) <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh\_Office" title="wikipedia.org">Macintosh Office</a> [wikipedia.org]. <br> <br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mISsehE7tp4" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mISsehE7tp4</a> [youtube.com] <br> <br>
Now <i>that's</i> some smack talk!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple 's 2nd over-the-top so-bad-it 's-great SuperBowl ad for the ( unsuccessful ) Macintosh Office [ wikipedia.org ] .
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = mISsehE7tp4 [ youtube.com ] Now that 's some smack talk !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple's 2nd over-the-top so-bad-it's-great SuperBowl ad for the (unsuccessful) Macintosh Office [wikipedia.org].
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mISsehE7tp4 [youtube.com]  
Now that's some smack talk!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31055330</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265540580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> any chance that Peyton Manning gets to prove that he's a better QB than Pretty Boy Brady</i></p><p>Since Manning is 1-2 vs Brady in post-season play, whatever happens today is irrelevant as to prove who is better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>any chance that Peyton Manning gets to prove that he 's a better QB than Pretty Boy BradySince Manning is 1-2 vs Brady in post-season play , whatever happens today is irrelevant as to prove who is better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> any chance that Peyton Manning gets to prove that he's a better QB than Pretty Boy BradySince Manning is 1-2 vs Brady in post-season play, whatever happens today is irrelevant as to prove who is better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052672</id>
	<title>EDS Ad</title>
	<author>jav1231</author>
	<datestamp>1265561460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>That EDS ad was pretty funny until you realized that YOU were the cats. Without EDS to "herd" those aimless technical staffers why where would your company be? Thank goodness HP bought them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That EDS ad was pretty funny until you realized that YOU were the cats .
Without EDS to " herd " those aimless technical staffers why where would your company be ?
Thank goodness HP bought them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That EDS ad was pretty funny until you realized that YOU were the cats.
Without EDS to "herd" those aimless technical staffers why where would your company be?
Thank goodness HP bought them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052858</id>
	<title>slashdot effect</title>
	<author>lithero04</author>
	<datestamp>1265563980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Looks like slashdot effect on adland.tv.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Looks like slashdot effect on adland.tv .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Looks like slashdot effect on adland.tv.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053132</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>jcombel</author>
	<datestamp>1265566680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>this is the most confusing post i've ever read<br> <br>

everyone in my department is a sports fan, and the only people i know that read fark are middle-aged housewives</htmltext>
<tokenext>this is the most confusing post i 've ever read everyone in my department is a sports fan , and the only people i know that read fark are middle-aged housewives</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is the most confusing post i've ever read 

everyone in my department is a sports fan, and the only people i know that read fark are middle-aged housewives</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053950</id>
	<title>Slashed</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265574000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>TFA: CompuServe: "Not Busy" (1997)<br>This commercial is a great reminder of what it was like to dial up to the Internet in 1997 -- <b>extremely frustrating if you couldn't get through</b> to your ISP.</p></div></blockquote><p>Kind of like trying to watch videos on a slashdotted site.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA : CompuServe : " Not Busy " ( 1997 ) This commercial is a great reminder of what it was like to dial up to the Internet in 1997 -- extremely frustrating if you could n't get through to your ISP.Kind of like trying to watch videos on a slashdotted site .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA: CompuServe: "Not Busy" (1997)This commercial is a great reminder of what it was like to dial up to the Internet in 1997 -- extremely frustrating if you couldn't get through to your ISP.Kind of like trying to watch videos on a slashdotted site.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052638</id>
	<title>Disable Advertising?</title>
	<author>MrMr</author>
	<datestamp>1265561100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suppose TFA consists of blank pages if I check the disable advertising box?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose TFA consists of blank pages if I check the disable advertising box ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose TFA consists of blank pages if I check the disable advertising box?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31060502</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265644560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess in a sense, a geek may watch the superbowl to see all the "Jocks" that used to pick on him, and wait for some of them to hurt themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess in a sense , a geek may watch the superbowl to see all the " Jocks " that used to pick on him , and wait for some of them to hurt themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess in a sense, a geek may watch the superbowl to see all the "Jocks" that used to pick on him, and wait for some of them to hurt themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053612</id>
	<title>Google's add</title>
	<author>hallucinogen</author>
	<datestamp>1265570460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read Google will air <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnsSUqgkDwU" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [youtube.com] tonight.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read Google will air this [ youtube.com ] tonight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read Google will air this [youtube.com] tonight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052936</id>
	<title>Apple had an ad scheduled for this year...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265565000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but it wa denied: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VMqHb03p74" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VMqHb03p74</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>but it wa denied : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 0VMqHb03p74 [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but it wa denied: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VMqHb03p74 [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31054844</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265537460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A falcons fan.  Into S &amp; M then huh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A falcons fan .
Into S &amp; M then huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A falcons fan.
Into S &amp; M then huh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053488</id>
	<title>Insensitive clod</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1265569260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> Everyone has seen the Macintosh ad that played during the 1984 Superbowl</p></div></blockquote><p>Two words: Stevie Wonder.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone has seen the Macintosh ad that played during the 1984 SuperbowlTwo words : Stevie Wonder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Everyone has seen the Macintosh ad that played during the 1984 SuperbowlTwo words: Stevie Wonder.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052872</id>
	<title>Re:What happens during the ads?</title>
	<author>Grimnir512</author>
	<datestamp>1265564160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>O\_o Why is this modded flamebait?

I remember them saying this morning on Breakfast that they'll be returning to the studio and talking when the commercials are on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>O \ _o Why is this modded flamebait ?
I remember them saying this morning on Breakfast that they 'll be returning to the studio and talking when the commercials are on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>O\_o Why is this modded flamebait?
I remember them saying this morning on Breakfast that they'll be returning to the studio and talking when the commercials are on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053888</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>eharvill</author>
	<datestamp>1265573460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because the geeks don't typically have the authority to make purchasing decisions.  Sure, in some organizations they might have some input or influence, but it's typically the non-geek Director, VP or higher that signs off on the final PO.

<p> I don't think these ads are targeted towards the geek that might have a few systems in their house.  That's peanuts compared to all the enterprise level opportunities out there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because the geeks do n't typically have the authority to make purchasing decisions .
Sure , in some organizations they might have some input or influence , but it 's typically the non-geek Director , VP or higher that signs off on the final PO .
I do n't think these ads are targeted towards the geek that might have a few systems in their house .
That 's peanuts compared to all the enterprise level opportunities out there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because the geeks don't typically have the authority to make purchasing decisions.
Sure, in some organizations they might have some input or influence, but it's typically the non-geek Director, VP or higher that signs off on the final PO.
I don't think these ads are targeted towards the geek that might have a few systems in their house.
That's peanuts compared to all the enterprise level opportunities out there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053464</id>
	<title>HP Mopier ad?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265569080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This may be somewhat offtopic, as I'm not sure if it appeared during a superbowl...</p><p>Best tech advert I ever saw was for an HP Mopier.  Had a spokesguy singing the praises of this new multifunction copier they had just created.  A couple of white lab coated engineers listen appreciatively.  Then the spokesguy says:</p><p>"It does everything except mow the lawn!"</p><p>Engineer dudes turn to each other, start talking and gesturing.</p><p>Cut away to a computer screen and see someone click the menu bar, pull down some optionsan and then click on "Mow".</p><p>Cut away again, but now to a mopier bouncing around a field spewing grass clippings all over the place!</p><p>I've searched for a copy of the ad on a few occasions, but no luck.  Does anyone here remember the ad?  Even better do you have a link where I could see it again?</p><p>Thanks for the memories!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This may be somewhat offtopic , as I 'm not sure if it appeared during a superbowl...Best tech advert I ever saw was for an HP Mopier .
Had a spokesguy singing the praises of this new multifunction copier they had just created .
A couple of white lab coated engineers listen appreciatively .
Then the spokesguy says : " It does everything except mow the lawn !
" Engineer dudes turn to each other , start talking and gesturing.Cut away to a computer screen and see someone click the menu bar , pull down some optionsan and then click on " Mow " .Cut away again , but now to a mopier bouncing around a field spewing grass clippings all over the place ! I 've searched for a copy of the ad on a few occasions , but no luck .
Does anyone here remember the ad ?
Even better do you have a link where I could see it again ? Thanks for the memories !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This may be somewhat offtopic, as I'm not sure if it appeared during a superbowl...Best tech advert I ever saw was for an HP Mopier.
Had a spokesguy singing the praises of this new multifunction copier they had just created.
A couple of white lab coated engineers listen appreciatively.
Then the spokesguy says:"It does everything except mow the lawn!
"Engineer dudes turn to each other, start talking and gesturing.Cut away to a computer screen and see someone click the menu bar, pull down some optionsan and then click on "Mow".Cut away again, but now to a mopier bouncing around a field spewing grass clippings all over the place!I've searched for a copy of the ad on a few occasions, but no luck.
Does anyone here remember the ad?
Even better do you have a link where I could see it again?Thanks for the memories!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053000</id>
	<title>Unfortunately for anyone wanting to view the ads</title>
	<author>x1n933k</author>
	<datestamp>1265565540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apparently they have embed to a web site that wasn't too happy about the extra traffic and has a user/pass lock on most of the videos mentioned in TFA. Some of the Youtube ones are still available.</p><p>[J]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently they have embed to a web site that was n't too happy about the extra traffic and has a user/pass lock on most of the videos mentioned in TFA .
Some of the Youtube ones are still available .
[ J ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently they have embed to a web site that wasn't too happy about the extra traffic and has a user/pass lock on most of the videos mentioned in TFA.
Some of the Youtube ones are still available.
[J]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053084</id>
	<title>Usually a couple days after the game...</title>
	<author>IANAAC</author>
	<datestamp>1265566140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Usually a couple days after the game, a page with all Super Bowl ads will be online and you should be able to watch them all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Usually a couple days after the game , a page with all Super Bowl ads will be online and you should be able to watch them all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Usually a couple days after the game, a page with all Super Bowl ads will be online and you should be able to watch them all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31054450</id>
	<title>Dot bomb era</title>
	<author>plopez</author>
	<datestamp>1265534820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnQMq5wtZcg" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnQMq5wtZcg</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>And there was another one, from a dot bomb company (1999?). I can't find it but it went something like this:</p><p>Guy standing before blank screen<br>Says:<br>"We got a bunch of money for a Super Bowl ad. But it was too late to put one together. So I'll just stand here for 30 seconds."</p><p>Looks at watch and commercial eventually fades out.</p><p>Those two ads epitomize the dot bomb stupidity for me. The market crashed in spring of 2000</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = BnQMq5wtZcg [ youtube.com ] And there was another one , from a dot bomb company ( 1999 ? ) .
I ca n't find it but it went something like this : Guy standing before blank screenSays : " We got a bunch of money for a Super Bowl ad .
But it was too late to put one together .
So I 'll just stand here for 30 seconds .
" Looks at watch and commercial eventually fades out.Those two ads epitomize the dot bomb stupidity for me .
The market crashed in spring of 2000</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnQMq5wtZcg [youtube.com]And there was another one, from a dot bomb company (1999?).
I can't find it but it went something like this:Guy standing before blank screenSays:"We got a bunch of money for a Super Bowl ad.
But it was too late to put one together.
So I'll just stand here for 30 seconds.
"Looks at watch and commercial eventually fades out.Those two ads epitomize the dot bomb stupidity for me.
The market crashed in spring of 2000</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053406</id>
	<title>EDS</title>
	<author>bwcbwc</author>
	<datestamp>1265568660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting that the "herding cats" ad still gets mentioned after all these years. In some ways the "running of the squirrels" ad was even funnier, but IIRC it never aired on a superbowl.<br><br>I wonder if their new HP overlords will ever produce a commercial that is remembered 10 years later (or more).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting that the " herding cats " ad still gets mentioned after all these years .
In some ways the " running of the squirrels " ad was even funnier , but IIRC it never aired on a superbowl.I wonder if their new HP overlords will ever produce a commercial that is remembered 10 years later ( or more ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting that the "herding cats" ad still gets mentioned after all these years.
In some ways the "running of the squirrels" ad was even funnier, but IIRC it never aired on a superbowl.I wonder if their new HP overlords will ever produce a commercial that is remembered 10 years later (or more).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31054876</id>
	<title>Re:What happens during the ads?</title>
	<author>Alinabi</author>
	<datestamp>1265537700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You would be twiddling your thumbs most of the time even if you were watching it in the US, because there are only<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704281204575002852055561406.html" title="wsj.com"> 11 minutes of actual play time</a> [wsj.com] in a 3 hour long game. That is why the ads are the centrepiece of the show.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You would be twiddling your thumbs most of the time even if you were watching it in the US , because there are only 11 minutes of actual play time [ wsj.com ] in a 3 hour long game .
That is why the ads are the centrepiece of the show .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You would be twiddling your thumbs most of the time even if you were watching it in the US, because there are only 11 minutes of actual play time [wsj.com] in a 3 hour long game.
That is why the ads are the centrepiece of the show.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31057442</id>
	<title>Re:Why bother?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265559540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Sorry Saints, I don't hate you, but I just don't think it's not your year yet.</i></p><p><i>any chance that Peyton Manning gets to prove that he's a better QB than Pretty Boy Brady is a sure-fire opportunity for me to root for his team</i></p><p>Oops</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry Saints , I do n't hate you , but I just do n't think it 's not your year yet.any chance that Peyton Manning gets to prove that he 's a better QB than Pretty Boy Brady is a sure-fire opportunity for me to root for his teamOops</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry Saints, I don't hate you, but I just don't think it's not your year yet.any chance that Peyton Manning gets to prove that he's a better QB than Pretty Boy Brady is a sure-fire opportunity for me to root for his teamOops</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31060502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31066514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31054876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31055842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31055330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052766
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31057442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31058198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31054844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_07_1444239_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_1444239.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_1444239.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31055672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_1444239.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052858
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_1444239.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053040
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31058198
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31054844
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31055330
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31057442
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31060502
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053132
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_1444239.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_1444239.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_1444239.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053950
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_1444239.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31054876
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31066514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31053084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_1444239.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052672
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_07_1444239.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31052638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_07_1444239.31055842
</commentlist>
</conversation>
