<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_06_058253</id>
	<title>Red Hat Exchange Is Dead</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265480400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>darthcamaro writes <i>"In 2007, Red Hat launched the Red Hat Exchange (RHX) &mdash; an appstore, if you will, of open source partner applications sold from a Red Hat website. Sounds like a good idea, right? While an appstore works well for Apple, turns out that <a href="http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/6975/1/">an appstore for open source (from a Linux vendor) isn't such a good idea</a>. 'When we came out with RHX we were hoping for more ambitious adoption but we've learned that selling third-party applications via a marketplace is challenging,' Mike Evans, Red Hat's vice president of corporate development said. 'When you've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves, which is what our marketplace was, there isn't a real efficient marketplace.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>darthcamaro writes " In 2007 , Red Hat launched the Red Hat Exchange ( RHX )    an appstore , if you will , of open source partner applications sold from a Red Hat website .
Sounds like a good idea , right ?
While an appstore works well for Apple , turns out that an appstore for open source ( from a Linux vendor ) is n't such a good idea .
'When we came out with RHX we were hoping for more ambitious adoption but we 've learned that selling third-party applications via a marketplace is challenging, ' Mike Evans , Red Hat 's vice president of corporate development said .
'When you 've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves , which is what our marketplace was , there is n't a real efficient marketplace .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>darthcamaro writes "In 2007, Red Hat launched the Red Hat Exchange (RHX) — an appstore, if you will, of open source partner applications sold from a Red Hat website.
Sounds like a good idea, right?
While an appstore works well for Apple, turns out that an appstore for open source (from a Linux vendor) isn't such a good idea.
'When we came out with RHX we were hoping for more ambitious adoption but we've learned that selling third-party applications via a marketplace is challenging,' Mike Evans, Red Hat's vice president of corporate development said.
'When you've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves, which is what our marketplace was, there isn't a real efficient marketplace.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043774</id>
	<title>It's not DRM ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265398320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... but the fact that OSS comes with the notion of "libre", which many people, rightly or wrongly, equate with "Free of Charge".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... but the fact that OSS comes with the notion of " libre " , which many people , rightly or wrongly , equate with " Free of Charge " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... but the fact that OSS comes with the notion of "libre", which many people, rightly or wrongly, equate with "Free of Charge".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044632</id>
	<title>Maybe it's cuz</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265458500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>yer tryin to sell shit to people who think everything is free. Duh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>yer tryin to sell shit to people who think everything is free .
Duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yer tryin to sell shit to people who think everything is free.
Duh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043804</id>
	<title>Best Guess</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265398860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Pricing on enterprise software is somewhat variable depending on purchase quantities. Red Hat probably had everything at list price or maybe slightly below. In addition to not being a good deal for most of their customers, they probably also ticked off the sales guys that were earring fat commissions on the software sales.

So basically they pissed off their customers and their partners. Which, my business skilled friends tell me, is not a good way to make money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pricing on enterprise software is somewhat variable depending on purchase quantities .
Red Hat probably had everything at list price or maybe slightly below .
In addition to not being a good deal for most of their customers , they probably also ticked off the sales guys that were earring fat commissions on the software sales .
So basically they pissed off their customers and their partners .
Which , my business skilled friends tell me , is not a good way to make money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pricing on enterprise software is somewhat variable depending on purchase quantities.
Red Hat probably had everything at list price or maybe slightly below.
In addition to not being a good deal for most of their customers, they probably also ticked off the sales guys that were earring fat commissions on the software sales.
So basically they pissed off their customers and their partners.
Which, my business skilled friends tell me, is not a good way to make money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044698</id>
	<title>History gonna repeat itself</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265459460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Linspire was acquired by Xandros, and guess what?</p><p>http://www.apps2market.com/PR\_launch\_1109.php</p><p>Press Releases: New Xandros Company Launches First Custom White Label App Store Service</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Linspire was acquired by Xandros , and guess what ? http : //www.apps2market.com/PR \ _launch \ _1109.phpPress Releases : New Xandros Company Launches First Custom White Label App Store Service</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Linspire was acquired by Xandros, and guess what?http://www.apps2market.com/PR\_launch\_1109.phpPress Releases: New Xandros Company Launches First Custom White Label App Store Service</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045658</id>
	<title>a very important lesson</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265473260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for all the free software fanboys and fan-gran-ma's !</p><p>Nobody dies virgin, free software fu*cks all !</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for all the free software fanboys and fan-gran-ma 's ! Nobody dies virgin , free software fu * cks all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for all the free software fanboys and fan-gran-ma's !Nobody dies virgin, free software fu*cks all !</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728</id>
	<title>Maybe...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265397660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybed if they loaded it up with DRM, put restrictive policies in place to block certain apps and prevented open source publication of published apps, they would have been more successful.</p><p>Then again, maybe not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybed if they loaded it up with DRM , put restrictive policies in place to block certain apps and prevented open source publication of published apps , they would have been more successful.Then again , maybe not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybed if they loaded it up with DRM, put restrictive policies in place to block certain apps and prevented open source publication of published apps, they would have been more successful.Then again, maybe not.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045378</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe...</title>
	<author>seandiggity</author>
	<datestamp>1265470080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That Apple "seal of approval" doesn't mean much as far as bugs go.  The reaction of an iPhone app to a bug seems to be just crashing without giving feedback to the user, so it's tough to pinpoint problems.<br> <br>At any rate, I think app stores are a hug step backwards from package management and repositories.  There was some buzz about Canonical going the app store route with Ubuntu, I hope Red Hat's experience turns them away from that direction.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That Apple " seal of approval " does n't mean much as far as bugs go .
The reaction of an iPhone app to a bug seems to be just crashing without giving feedback to the user , so it 's tough to pinpoint problems .
At any rate , I think app stores are a hug step backwards from package management and repositories .
There was some buzz about Canonical going the app store route with Ubuntu , I hope Red Hat 's experience turns them away from that direction .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That Apple "seal of approval" doesn't mean much as far as bugs go.
The reaction of an iPhone app to a bug seems to be just crashing without giving feedback to the user, so it's tough to pinpoint problems.
At any rate, I think app stores are a hug step backwards from package management and repositories.
There was some buzz about Canonical going the app store route with Ubuntu, I hope Red Hat's experience turns them away from that direction.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043762</id>
	<title>The ideal would be to merge Freshmeat with Yum</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265398140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Would that work?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Would that work ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would that work?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044770</id>
	<title>PR is what's wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265460900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use Linux daily since 1994 and never heard of this RedHat Exchange.<br>I've never used Apple, but I knew about iPhone way before it was released.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use Linux daily since 1994 and never heard of this RedHat Exchange.I 've never used Apple , but I knew about iPhone way before it was released .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use Linux daily since 1994 and never heard of this RedHat Exchange.I've never used Apple, but I knew about iPhone way before it was released.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31068326</id>
	<title>Try advertising it?</title>
	<author>ebvwfbw</author>
	<datestamp>1265645220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have been to their site probably hundreds of times over the past 15 years.  We have onsite dudes as well.  Not one single time do I remember one word about it.  Make it easy guys, advertise it, at least say something.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have been to their site probably hundreds of times over the past 15 years .
We have onsite dudes as well .
Not one single time do I remember one word about it .
Make it easy guys , advertise it , at least say something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have been to their site probably hundreds of times over the past 15 years.
We have onsite dudes as well.
Not one single time do I remember one word about it.
Make it easy guys, advertise it, at least say something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043932</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe...</title>
	<author>sneilan</author>
	<datestamp>1265487720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Make more score 5 funny comments! NOW!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Make more score 5 funny comments !
NOW !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make more score 5 funny comments!
NOW!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31046814</id>
	<title>Apple is the one who copied</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265483460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Lol. Linux fails copying Apple again.</i></p><p>Actually, Apple copied app store from Danger.</p><p><i>every opportunity to copy all the best features</i></p><p>The "best features" of the Apple App Store are Apple's marketing department and Apple's monopolistic approach; that's something Linux isn't going to copy.</p><p><i>Will Linux forever be mired in 80's Unix technology? Looks like it.</i></p><p>Sadly, Apple remains mired in 80's technology.</p><p><i>Think Different. Think Better. Think Apple.</i></p><p>More like "turn off your brain and bend over for Steve".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lol .
Linux fails copying Apple again.Actually , Apple copied app store from Danger.every opportunity to copy all the best featuresThe " best features " of the Apple App Store are Apple 's marketing department and Apple 's monopolistic approach ; that 's something Linux is n't going to copy.Will Linux forever be mired in 80 's Unix technology ?
Looks like it.Sadly , Apple remains mired in 80 's technology.Think Different .
Think Better .
Think Apple.More like " turn off your brain and bend over for Steve " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lol.
Linux fails copying Apple again.Actually, Apple copied app store from Danger.every opportunity to copy all the best featuresThe "best features" of the Apple App Store are Apple's marketing department and Apple's monopolistic approach; that's something Linux isn't going to copy.Will Linux forever be mired in 80's Unix technology?
Looks like it.Sadly, Apple remains mired in 80's technology.Think Different.
Think Better.
Think Apple.More like "turn off your brain and bend over for Steve".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31049854</id>
	<title>Re:A Linux 'app store' is like a church of atheism</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1265471400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ironically, the same is true for the Apple AppStore, minus the FOSS part.  Apps are either Hobbyist (sometimes turned professional thanks to AppStore sales) or big-name corporations.</p><p>Yet seems its doing fine.</p><p>Perhaps the App Store is only part of the equation?  Perhaps target audience, actual value of the store to that audience, and value of the items on the store have a little bit to do with it as well?</p><p>Perhaps the fact that this is the first time I've ever heard of it has something to do with it, I heard about the Apple store before it even opened, and the Redhat store I didn't know existed till it closed.</p><p>Perhaps you're spending too much time coming up with excuses for failure that you can blame on something/someone else rather than fixing the problem.</p><p>On think FOSS people never seem to have a problem with is faith in themselves.  At some point, you might want to consider breaking down and coming to the conclusion that while you think its 'perfect in every way' that you are part of an amazingly small minority and that you need to target the majority.</p><p>Or, better yet, stop dicking around and trying to half assed act like a commercial/proprietary software eco system.  Either jump on the train, learn the rules and compete, or stop trying to take over the world by being a shitty copy of what people want and thinking you'll when on technical superiority.</p><p>Technically superior products and ideas NEVER WIN because thats not ALL PEOPLE WANT out of a product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ironically , the same is true for the Apple AppStore , minus the FOSS part .
Apps are either Hobbyist ( sometimes turned professional thanks to AppStore sales ) or big-name corporations.Yet seems its doing fine.Perhaps the App Store is only part of the equation ?
Perhaps target audience , actual value of the store to that audience , and value of the items on the store have a little bit to do with it as well ? Perhaps the fact that this is the first time I 've ever heard of it has something to do with it , I heard about the Apple store before it even opened , and the Redhat store I did n't know existed till it closed.Perhaps you 're spending too much time coming up with excuses for failure that you can blame on something/someone else rather than fixing the problem.On think FOSS people never seem to have a problem with is faith in themselves .
At some point , you might want to consider breaking down and coming to the conclusion that while you think its 'perfect in every way ' that you are part of an amazingly small minority and that you need to target the majority.Or , better yet , stop dicking around and trying to half assed act like a commercial/proprietary software eco system .
Either jump on the train , learn the rules and compete , or stop trying to take over the world by being a shitty copy of what people want and thinking you 'll when on technical superiority.Technically superior products and ideas NEVER WIN because thats not ALL PEOPLE WANT out of a product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ironically, the same is true for the Apple AppStore, minus the FOSS part.
Apps are either Hobbyist (sometimes turned professional thanks to AppStore sales) or big-name corporations.Yet seems its doing fine.Perhaps the App Store is only part of the equation?
Perhaps target audience, actual value of the store to that audience, and value of the items on the store have a little bit to do with it as well?Perhaps the fact that this is the first time I've ever heard of it has something to do with it, I heard about the Apple store before it even opened, and the Redhat store I didn't know existed till it closed.Perhaps you're spending too much time coming up with excuses for failure that you can blame on something/someone else rather than fixing the problem.On think FOSS people never seem to have a problem with is faith in themselves.
At some point, you might want to consider breaking down and coming to the conclusion that while you think its 'perfect in every way' that you are part of an amazingly small minority and that you need to target the majority.Or, better yet, stop dicking around and trying to half assed act like a commercial/proprietary software eco system.
Either jump on the train, learn the rules and compete, or stop trying to take over the world by being a shitty copy of what people want and thinking you'll when on technical superiority.Technically superior products and ideas NEVER WIN because thats not ALL PEOPLE WANT out of a product.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045458</id>
	<title>Re:Lol. Linux fails copying Apple again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265471100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Open source company fails to make a closed source, proprietary, walled off app store? OS company fails to convince people that DRM is a good option? News at 11.</p><p>Think Different, Better, Apple? What's different about their tablet? What's better about a Super Sized iTouch? And more importantly... how is following a company line thinking for YOURSELF?</p><p>But as mentioned above... you enjoy your kool-aid... while supporting a company that prides itself on being open and different... while surfing on a closed platform, from a company that just released a has-been product that's been around for 10 years yet is now ever so shiny.</p><p>Fuck you iSheeple. Baaaaaaaaaa.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Open source company fails to make a closed source , proprietary , walled off app store ?
OS company fails to convince people that DRM is a good option ?
News at 11.Think Different , Better , Apple ?
What 's different about their tablet ?
What 's better about a Super Sized iTouch ?
And more importantly... how is following a company line thinking for YOURSELF ? But as mentioned above... you enjoy your kool-aid... while supporting a company that prides itself on being open and different... while surfing on a closed platform , from a company that just released a has-been product that 's been around for 10 years yet is now ever so shiny.Fuck you iSheeple .
Baaaaaaaaaa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Open source company fails to make a closed source, proprietary, walled off app store?
OS company fails to convince people that DRM is a good option?
News at 11.Think Different, Better, Apple?
What's different about their tablet?
What's better about a Super Sized iTouch?
And more importantly... how is following a company line thinking for YOURSELF?But as mentioned above... you enjoy your kool-aid... while supporting a company that prides itself on being open and different... while surfing on a closed platform, from a company that just released a has-been product that's been around for 10 years yet is now ever so shiny.Fuck you iSheeple.
Baaaaaaaaaa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043882</id>
	<title>As compared with?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265486700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I never used RHX, so this is a serious question: What did this give people that, for example, Synaptic Package Manager or even the Ubuntu Software Center doesn't?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I never used RHX , so this is a serious question : What did this give people that , for example , Synaptic Package Manager or even the Ubuntu Software Center does n't ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I never used RHX, so this is a serious question: What did this give people that, for example, Synaptic Package Manager or even the Ubuntu Software Center doesn't?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045628</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265473080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe linux users are cheapskates who refuse to pay for other peoples hard work. But they hide this by saying they are all about "freedom".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe linux users are cheapskates who refuse to pay for other peoples hard work .
But they hide this by saying they are all about " freedom " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe linux users are cheapskates who refuse to pay for other peoples hard work.
But they hide this by saying they are all about "freedom".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043808</id>
	<title>Au contraire...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265398920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>'When you've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves, which is what our marketplace was, there isn't a real efficient marketplace.'</p></div><p>Actually, it sounds like the market worked with almost textbook efficiency.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'When you 've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves , which is what our marketplace was , there is n't a real efficient marketplace .
'Actually , it sounds like the market worked with almost textbook efficiency .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'When you've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves, which is what our marketplace was, there isn't a real efficient marketplace.
'Actually, it sounds like the market worked with almost textbook efficiency.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043930</id>
	<title>Netcraft</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265487720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>But has Netcraft confirmed it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But has Netcraft confirmed it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But has Netcraft confirmed it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044492</id>
	<title>Re:Best Guess</title>
	<author>sourcerror</author>
	<datestamp>1265456280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Another thing is, that the mediating should have different price for cheap (targeted to end-users) and enterprisy software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Another thing is , that the mediating should have different price for cheap ( targeted to end-users ) and enterprisy software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Another thing is, that the mediating should have different price for cheap (targeted to end-users) and enterprisy software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31046802</id>
	<title>Re:A Linux 'app store' is like a church of atheism</title>
	<author>dimeglio</author>
	<datestamp>1265483400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple app store is for consumers (i.e. mom and grand dad). RHX is selling enterprise solutions via an app store. I think that was the problem here. The business model failed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple app store is for consumers ( i.e .
mom and grand dad ) .
RHX is selling enterprise solutions via an app store .
I think that was the problem here .
The business model failed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple app store is for consumers (i.e.
mom and grand dad).
RHX is selling enterprise solutions via an app store.
I think that was the problem here.
The business model failed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044660</id>
	<title>Re:Phone Message for Redhat</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265458920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That should have been big. It failed only because the idiot Michael Robertson meddling and changing course a dozen times. Not to mention screwing up and getting rid of the person who finally let things happen the way they should of happened from the beginning (free'd basic cnr service, freed linspire,  and probably would have separated non-free software/drivers from the distribution like Ubuntu has done, moved away from defaulting to root, etc) and got contracts with other larger distributors. Robertson did make a few smart moves and then allot of bad ones. The name was a smart move. He got the company 15 million dollars to work with from a 5 million initial investment. That Microsoft lawsuit was a great idea. He lost it all though by outright theft and ruined the company in the process after a successful business model had been proven to work. The only thing left was to increase the user base by increasing the number of users that could access the CNR service. That never happened. It could have- the contract was a done deal until Kevin Carmony left and then nothing was followed up on. A year went by and the company flopped. I honestly think that there LAST chance to fix it was me... and they lost me. They actually never had me. Long story short we couldn't come to an arrangement. The company had already collapsed practically. They had 20 employees. My risk was significant and I wanted more than they could offer to offset that risk. I figured the company had several months before it probably would collapse and I was right on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That should have been big .
It failed only because the idiot Michael Robertson meddling and changing course a dozen times .
Not to mention screwing up and getting rid of the person who finally let things happen the way they should of happened from the beginning ( free 'd basic cnr service , freed linspire , and probably would have separated non-free software/drivers from the distribution like Ubuntu has done , moved away from defaulting to root , etc ) and got contracts with other larger distributors .
Robertson did make a few smart moves and then allot of bad ones .
The name was a smart move .
He got the company 15 million dollars to work with from a 5 million initial investment .
That Microsoft lawsuit was a great idea .
He lost it all though by outright theft and ruined the company in the process after a successful business model had been proven to work .
The only thing left was to increase the user base by increasing the number of users that could access the CNR service .
That never happened .
It could have- the contract was a done deal until Kevin Carmony left and then nothing was followed up on .
A year went by and the company flopped .
I honestly think that there LAST chance to fix it was me... and they lost me .
They actually never had me .
Long story short we could n't come to an arrangement .
The company had already collapsed practically .
They had 20 employees .
My risk was significant and I wanted more than they could offer to offset that risk .
I figured the company had several months before it probably would collapse and I was right on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That should have been big.
It failed only because the idiot Michael Robertson meddling and changing course a dozen times.
Not to mention screwing up and getting rid of the person who finally let things happen the way they should of happened from the beginning (free'd basic cnr service, freed linspire,  and probably would have separated non-free software/drivers from the distribution like Ubuntu has done, moved away from defaulting to root, etc) and got contracts with other larger distributors.
Robertson did make a few smart moves and then allot of bad ones.
The name was a smart move.
He got the company 15 million dollars to work with from a 5 million initial investment.
That Microsoft lawsuit was a great idea.
He lost it all though by outright theft and ruined the company in the process after a successful business model had been proven to work.
The only thing left was to increase the user base by increasing the number of users that could access the CNR service.
That never happened.
It could have- the contract was a done deal until Kevin Carmony left and then nothing was followed up on.
A year went by and the company flopped.
I honestly think that there LAST chance to fix it was me... and they lost me.
They actually never had me.
Long story short we couldn't come to an arrangement.
The company had already collapsed practically.
They had 20 employees.
My risk was significant and I wanted more than they could offer to offset that risk.
I figured the company had several months before it probably would collapse and I was right on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043966</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045204</id>
	<title>Another nail in Linux's coffin.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265468040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>haha! Soon Linsux will be dead!</htmltext>
<tokenext>haha !
Soon Linsux will be dead !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>haha!
Soon Linsux will be dead!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31070340</id>
	<title>Just me that's never heard of it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265718300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe they used Commodore's style of marketing but I've never even heard of it, despite working as a RHEL sysadmin for last 10 years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe they used Commodore 's style of marketing but I 've never even heard of it , despite working as a RHEL sysadmin for last 10 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe they used Commodore's style of marketing but I've never even heard of it, despite working as a RHEL sysadmin for last 10 years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043806</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265398920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, maybe they could have gotten content providers to agree to offer things that people actually *wanted*.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , maybe they could have gotten content providers to agree to offer things that people actually * wanted * .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, maybe they could have gotten content providers to agree to offer things that people actually *wanted*.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043966</id>
	<title>Phone Message for Redhat</title>
	<author>Xeleema</author>
	<datestamp>1265488320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Hey guys! This is Mike over here at Linspire!  Listen, I'm calling from 2002 so I have to make this short; We have this great idea called 'Click-N-Run', where people will be able to use a client-side application to buy Linux software from commercial 3rd party vendors.  We're gonna be huge!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hey guys !
This is Mike over here at Linspire !
Listen , I 'm calling from 2002 so I have to make this short ; We have this great idea called 'Click-N-Run ' , where people will be able to use a client-side application to buy Linux software from commercial 3rd party vendors .
We 're gon na be huge !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hey guys!
This is Mike over here at Linspire!
Listen, I'm calling from 2002 so I have to make this short; We have this great idea called 'Click-N-Run', where people will be able to use a client-side application to buy Linux software from commercial 3rd party vendors.
We're gonna be huge!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044126</id>
	<title>Re:As compared with?</title>
	<author>MSG</author>
	<datestamp>1265449380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RHX was intended to be a marketplace.  Software and support contracts were to be sold there.  <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2007/tc20070314\_617979.htm?chan=top+news\_top+news+index\_businessweek+exclusives" title="businessweek.com">Here</a> [businessweek.com] is an article covering its release; it's one of the wikipedia references.</p><p>Synaptic and Software Center are tools, like PackageKit and up2date are in Fedora and RHEL.  RHX wasn't an tool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RHX was intended to be a marketplace .
Software and support contracts were to be sold there .
Here [ businessweek.com ] is an article covering its release ; it 's one of the wikipedia references.Synaptic and Software Center are tools , like PackageKit and up2date are in Fedora and RHEL .
RHX was n't an tool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RHX was intended to be a marketplace.
Software and support contracts were to be sold there.
Here [businessweek.com] is an article covering its release; it's one of the wikipedia references.Synaptic and Software Center are tools, like PackageKit and up2date are in Fedora and RHEL.
RHX wasn't an tool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043882</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31060186</id>
	<title>What about package managers?</title>
	<author>Bootarn</author>
	<datestamp>1265641980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you will, a package repository can be viewed as some kind of appstore, in the sense that it's a centralized repository for applications. Perhaps a contributing factor to RHX's demise is that there already exists a plethora of package management systems, and that Red Hat users felt that it was a confusing addition to the mix. Freedom of choice is a good thing, but too many options are more likely to confuse consumers, making no solution stand out.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you will , a package repository can be viewed as some kind of appstore , in the sense that it 's a centralized repository for applications .
Perhaps a contributing factor to RHX 's demise is that there already exists a plethora of package management systems , and that Red Hat users felt that it was a confusing addition to the mix .
Freedom of choice is a good thing , but too many options are more likely to confuse consumers , making no solution stand out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you will, a package repository can be viewed as some kind of appstore, in the sense that it's a centralized repository for applications.
Perhaps a contributing factor to RHX's demise is that there already exists a plethora of package management systems, and that Red Hat users felt that it was a confusing addition to the mix.
Freedom of choice is a good thing, but too many options are more likely to confuse consumers, making no solution stand out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043780</id>
	<title>A Linux 'app store' is like a church of atheism</title>
	<author>eparker05</author>
	<datestamp>1265398380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Most Linux projects are either made by FOSS hobbyists, or by big-name corporations, neither of those groups want to be tied into a distribution system owned by Red Hat.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most Linux projects are either made by FOSS hobbyists , or by big-name corporations , neither of those groups want to be tied into a distribution system owned by Red Hat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most Linux projects are either made by FOSS hobbyists, or by big-name corporations, neither of those groups want to be tied into a distribution system owned by Red Hat.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045756</id>
	<title>It probably depends on the product...</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1265474280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>When you've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves, which is what our marketplace was, there isn't a real efficient marketplace.</i></p><p>It depends on the product, I guess. <a href="http://www.palmgear.com/en/usd/index.html" title="palmgear.com">Palmgear</a> [palmgear.com] seems to be staying in business even though there's always been the option of going direct to the vendor. When I've bought handheld software I've sometimes bought it from an "app store" like Palmgear, and sometimes from the vendor. Once or twice I've even found it through Palmgear and then bypassed them because I needed to research the product more.</p><p>It's not just that Palmgear sells software suited for casual impulse buys (though of course you're more likely to just "click buy" for Bejeweled than for several hundred dollars worth of database engine) because when I've bought software for the company I'm as likely to go through "the usual reseller" as go direct to Microsoft or Symantec, because that's what the purchasing department is set up for.</p><p>But those are still pretty much standalone products. You don't need to have a relationship with Symantec to roll out another 50 copies of antivirus. Are there really any products like that for Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you 've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves , which is what our marketplace was , there is n't a real efficient marketplace.It depends on the product , I guess .
Palmgear [ palmgear.com ] seems to be staying in business even though there 's always been the option of going direct to the vendor .
When I 've bought handheld software I 've sometimes bought it from an " app store " like Palmgear , and sometimes from the vendor .
Once or twice I 've even found it through Palmgear and then bypassed them because I needed to research the product more.It 's not just that Palmgear sells software suited for casual impulse buys ( though of course you 're more likely to just " click buy " for Bejeweled than for several hundred dollars worth of database engine ) because when I 've bought software for the company I 'm as likely to go through " the usual reseller " as go direct to Microsoft or Symantec , because that 's what the purchasing department is set up for.But those are still pretty much standalone products .
You do n't need to have a relationship with Symantec to roll out another 50 copies of antivirus .
Are there really any products like that for Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves, which is what our marketplace was, there isn't a real efficient marketplace.It depends on the product, I guess.
Palmgear [palmgear.com] seems to be staying in business even though there's always been the option of going direct to the vendor.
When I've bought handheld software I've sometimes bought it from an "app store" like Palmgear, and sometimes from the vendor.
Once or twice I've even found it through Palmgear and then bypassed them because I needed to research the product more.It's not just that Palmgear sells software suited for casual impulse buys (though of course you're more likely to just "click buy" for Bejeweled than for several hundred dollars worth of database engine) because when I've bought software for the company I'm as likely to go through "the usual reseller" as go direct to Microsoft or Symantec, because that's what the purchasing department is set up for.But those are still pretty much standalone products.
You don't need to have a relationship with Symantec to roll out another 50 copies of antivirus.
Are there really any products like that for Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043834</id>
	<title>Lol.  Linux fails copying Apple again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265399400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So let me get this straight.  Even with the LARGEST Linux company putting its full weight behind the effort, and even with every opportunity to copy all the best features of the app store model from Apple,  you guys still couldn't keep the lights on?  This would be hilarious if it weren't so sad.  Will Linux forever be mired in 80's Unix technology?   Looks like it.</p><p>Think Different.  Think Better.  Think Apple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So let me get this straight .
Even with the LARGEST Linux company putting its full weight behind the effort , and even with every opportunity to copy all the best features of the app store model from Apple , you guys still could n't keep the lights on ?
This would be hilarious if it were n't so sad .
Will Linux forever be mired in 80 's Unix technology ?
Looks like it.Think Different .
Think Better .
Think Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So let me get this straight.
Even with the LARGEST Linux company putting its full weight behind the effort, and even with every opportunity to copy all the best features of the app store model from Apple,  you guys still couldn't keep the lights on?
This would be hilarious if it weren't so sad.
Will Linux forever be mired in 80's Unix technology?
Looks like it.Think Different.
Think Better.
Think Apple.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044984</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe...</title>
	<author>Waccoon</author>
	<datestamp>1265464800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>OSS...<br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...know that it is going to work.</p></div><p>If there's one thing I've always known since my Amiga days, it's that design always trumps technology.  Always.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>OSS... ...know that it is going to work.If there 's one thing I 've always known since my Amiga days , it 's that design always trumps technology .
Always .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OSS... ...know that it is going to work.If there's one thing I've always known since my Amiga days, it's that design always trumps technology.
Always.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044960</id>
	<title>Odd statement quoted</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265464440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>'When you've got <i>marklar</i> that offer buyers the choice of buying in the <i>marklar</i> or directly from the vendor themselves, which is what our <i>marklar</i> was, there isn't a real efficient <i>marklar</i>.'</p><p>Heh?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'When you 've got marklar that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marklar or directly from the vendor themselves , which is what our marklar was , there is n't a real efficient marklar .
'Heh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'When you've got marklar that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marklar or directly from the vendor themselves, which is what our marklar was, there isn't a real efficient marklar.
'Heh?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044610</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265458200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot the mass-brainwash and Reality Distortion Field.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot the mass-brainwash and Reality Distortion Field .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot the mass-brainwash and Reality Distortion Field.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043842</id>
	<title>Re:Maybe...</title>
	<author>Tiger4</author>
	<datestamp>1265399520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the App store offered some kind of seal of approval it might have done better.  Say what you will about DRM at Apple, the app store at least gives the impression that all the apps there will work seamlessly together.</p><p>OSS may be the greatest development model, bug fixes better and faster, blah blah blah, but really what people want to know is that it is going to work.  If a knowledgeable, trusted, third party says it will, people value ($$$) that highly.  No one likes to waste time on crappy apps, hoping a fix will come along RSN.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the App store offered some kind of seal of approval it might have done better .
Say what you will about DRM at Apple , the app store at least gives the impression that all the apps there will work seamlessly together.OSS may be the greatest development model , bug fixes better and faster , blah blah blah , but really what people want to know is that it is going to work .
If a knowledgeable , trusted , third party says it will , people value ( $ $ $ ) that highly .
No one likes to waste time on crappy apps , hoping a fix will come along RSN .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the App store offered some kind of seal of approval it might have done better.
Say what you will about DRM at Apple, the app store at least gives the impression that all the apps there will work seamlessly together.OSS may be the greatest development model, bug fixes better and faster, blah blah blah, but really what people want to know is that it is going to work.
If a knowledgeable, trusted, third party says it will, people value ($$$) that highly.
No one likes to waste time on crappy apps, hoping a fix will come along RSN.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043888</id>
	<title>RHX may be dead; captive markets are for zombies</title>
	<author>ipX</author>
	<datestamp>1265486880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The summary left out the important bit of the quote...<p><div class="quote"><p>"When you've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves, which is what our marketplace was, there isn't a real efficient marketplace."</p></div><p>I think part of the problem here is not so much the App store itself, but the fact that there is no FLOSS captive market to force $1.99 apps upon. Another factor may be that Red Hat is great since they support and tailor their product for a very specific purpose, but I'm not sure they really have the pull to make an App store with enough sales volume.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary left out the important bit of the quote... " When you 've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves , which is what our marketplace was , there is n't a real efficient marketplace .
" I think part of the problem here is not so much the App store itself , but the fact that there is no FLOSS captive market to force $ 1.99 apps upon .
Another factor may be that Red Hat is great since they support and tailor their product for a very specific purpose , but I 'm not sure they really have the pull to make an App store with enough sales volume .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary left out the important bit of the quote..."When you've got marketplaces that offer buyers the choice of buying in the marketplace or directly from the vendor themselves, which is what our marketplace was, there isn't a real efficient marketplace.
"I think part of the problem here is not so much the App store itself, but the fact that there is no FLOSS captive market to force $1.99 apps upon.
Another factor may be that Red Hat is great since they support and tailor their product for a very specific purpose, but I'm not sure they really have the pull to make an App store with enough sales volume.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045930</id>
	<title>Red Hat had an App store?</title>
	<author>mvfranz</author>
	<datestamp>1265476200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry, but this is the first I heard of an App store from Red Hat.  What kind of software can you get there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry , but this is the first I heard of an App store from Red Hat .
What kind of software can you get there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry, but this is the first I heard of an App store from Red Hat.
What kind of software can you get there?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044578</id>
	<title>Re:A Linux 'app store' is like a church of atheism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265457720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Debian repositories are an app store, and I don't see FOSS people avoiding those.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Debian repositories are an app store , and I do n't see FOSS people avoiding those .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Debian repositories are an app store, and I don't see FOSS people avoiding those.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044308</id>
	<title>Using the logic behind this..</title>
	<author>sleeponthemic</author>
	<datestamp>1265453340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm releasing a twitter for dogs.  I know it'll be popular because twitter is.  I shall name it Woofer.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm releasing a twitter for dogs .
I know it 'll be popular because twitter is .
I shall name it Woofer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm releasing a twitter for dogs.
I know it'll be popular because twitter is.
I shall name it Woofer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044842</id>
	<title>It's the 'free as in beer' problem</title>
	<author>sproketboy</author>
	<datestamp>1265461920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not to be confused with 'free as in freedom'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to be confused with 'free as in freedom' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to be confused with 'free as in freedom'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043806
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045458
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043966
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31046814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31046802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044126
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043882
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31049854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_058253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043728
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043842
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044984
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043806
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31049854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31046802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31046814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31045458
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043808
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044492
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31043882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044632
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_058253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_058253.31044960
</commentlist>
</conversation>
