<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_06_0113229</id>
	<title>Google Docs Replaces OpenOffice In Ubuntu Netbook Edition</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265462580000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>uneuser writes <i>"Digitizor reports that the Ubuntu developers have dropped OpenOffice from the default installation of Ubuntu Netbook Edition (UNE) 10.04 and <a href="http://digitizor.com/2010/02/05/openoffice-dropped-from-ubuntu-netbook-edition-10-04/">replaced it with Google Docs</a>. Documents in Ubuntu Netbook Edition will now be opened in Google Docs by default."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>uneuser writes " Digitizor reports that the Ubuntu developers have dropped OpenOffice from the default installation of Ubuntu Netbook Edition ( UNE ) 10.04 and replaced it with Google Docs .
Documents in Ubuntu Netbook Edition will now be opened in Google Docs by default .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>uneuser writes "Digitizor reports that the Ubuntu developers have dropped OpenOffice from the default installation of Ubuntu Netbook Edition (UNE) 10.04 and replaced it with Google Docs.
Documents in Ubuntu Netbook Edition will now be opened in Google Docs by default.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044744</id>
	<title>Re:Why does OpenOffice need 350MB, anyway?</title>
	<author>tokul</author>
	<datestamp>1265460060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Why is "soffice.exe" 7MB in size? It's just the launcher. The work is done in "sdraw.exe", "swriter.exe", etc.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>~$ ls -l<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/bin/ooffice<br>
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 52 2009-07-26 14:50<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/bin/ooffice
</p><p>
Maybe you look at the wrong file. OpenOffice files are in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/lib/openoffice and not in C:\Program files. soffice.bin is less than 500KB, soffice is 10KB shell script.
</p><p>
sdraw and others are just launchers. OpenOffice is derived from StarOffice and StarOffice had all programs and desktop environment in one place.
</p><p>Netbooks don't need OpenOffice. Gnome Office works just fine.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is " soffice.exe " 7MB in size ?
It 's just the launcher .
The work is done in " sdraw.exe " , " swriter.exe " , etc .
~ $ ls -l /usr/bin/ooffice -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 52 2009-07-26 14 : 50 /usr/bin/ooffice Maybe you look at the wrong file .
OpenOffice files are in /usr/lib/openoffice and not in C : \ Program files .
soffice.bin is less than 500KB , soffice is 10KB shell script .
sdraw and others are just launchers .
OpenOffice is derived from StarOffice and StarOffice had all programs and desktop environment in one place .
Netbooks do n't need OpenOffice .
Gnome Office works just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is "soffice.exe" 7MB in size?
It's just the launcher.
The work is done in "sdraw.exe", "swriter.exe", etc.
~$ ls -l /usr/bin/ooffice
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 52 2009-07-26 14:50 /usr/bin/ooffice

Maybe you look at the wrong file.
OpenOffice files are in /usr/lib/openoffice and not in C:\Program files.
soffice.bin is less than 500KB, soffice is 10KB shell script.
sdraw and others are just launchers.
OpenOffice is derived from StarOffice and StarOffice had all programs and desktop environment in one place.
Netbooks don't need OpenOffice.
Gnome Office works just fine.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024</id>
	<title>Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265380020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think this is good, it leaves more space on your already small disk to do other things. This is a net-oriented device, afterall. If you want a full-fledged computer, then get a full-fledged computer. This sounds exactly like what a NETbook should do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think this is good , it leaves more space on your already small disk to do other things .
This is a net-oriented device , afterall .
If you want a full-fledged computer , then get a full-fledged computer .
This sounds exactly like what a NETbook should do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think this is good, it leaves more space on your already small disk to do other things.
This is a net-oriented device, afterall.
If you want a full-fledged computer, then get a full-fledged computer.
This sounds exactly like what a NETbook should do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043054</id>
	<title>Bradley was spot-on...</title>
	<author>Qubit</author>
	<datestamp>1265388840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What the everlasting f*ck, guys?</p><p>Here, let me go dig up the Ubuntu motto or whatever you're calling it now.</p><p><div class="quote"><p> <b>The Ubuntu promise</b></p><p>Ubuntu will always be free of charge, along with its regular enterprise releases and security updates...Ubuntu core applications are all free and open source. We want you to use free and open source software, improve it and pass it on.</p></div><p>So they took a Free Software application <em>out</em> and replace it with a <em>non-Free</em> application from Google. What a <em>great</em> idea!</p><p>Although an office suite isn't necessary for one to run Ubuntu, being able to create and consume office documents is admittedly a very common task. Making UNR able to interoperate "right out of the box" seems like a very high priority.</p><p><a href="http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2010/01/14/ubuntu-debian.html" title="ebb.org">Bradley Kuhn was spot-on</a> [ebb.org] when he recently said <em>"It seems clear that one of Canonical's top goals is to convince every Ubuntu user to rely regularly on new proprietary software and services"</em>. Bradley's solution to the problem? Go back to Debian.</p><p>My experience with Ubuntu has been, on the whole, a rather pleasant one, so I wish that Ubuntu would find a better solution to this problem. OOo might take up a certain amount of space on netbooks, sure, so perhaps they should install a stripped-down package that doesn't install extra fonts until you need them. Or maybe just prompt the user during the install, letting them know how much space OOo will take up?</p><p>I've been willing to deal with non-free drivers and binary blobs in the past, as that has sometimes been the <em>only</em> way to get key parts of my system up and running. But when the only limitation to using a completely Free program is a few hundred MB of disk space, in nearly all cases one could (and should) just get a little more disk.</p><p>Software Freedom is worth it!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What the everlasting f * ck , guys ? Here , let me go dig up the Ubuntu motto or whatever you 're calling it now .
The Ubuntu promiseUbuntu will always be free of charge , along with its regular enterprise releases and security updates...Ubuntu core applications are all free and open source .
We want you to use free and open source software , improve it and pass it on.So they took a Free Software application out and replace it with a non-Free application from Google .
What a great idea ! Although an office suite is n't necessary for one to run Ubuntu , being able to create and consume office documents is admittedly a very common task .
Making UNR able to interoperate " right out of the box " seems like a very high priority.Bradley Kuhn was spot-on [ ebb.org ] when he recently said " It seems clear that one of Canonical 's top goals is to convince every Ubuntu user to rely regularly on new proprietary software and services " .
Bradley 's solution to the problem ?
Go back to Debian.My experience with Ubuntu has been , on the whole , a rather pleasant one , so I wish that Ubuntu would find a better solution to this problem .
OOo might take up a certain amount of space on netbooks , sure , so perhaps they should install a stripped-down package that does n't install extra fonts until you need them .
Or maybe just prompt the user during the install , letting them know how much space OOo will take up ? I 've been willing to deal with non-free drivers and binary blobs in the past , as that has sometimes been the only way to get key parts of my system up and running .
But when the only limitation to using a completely Free program is a few hundred MB of disk space , in nearly all cases one could ( and should ) just get a little more disk.Software Freedom is worth it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What the everlasting f*ck, guys?Here, let me go dig up the Ubuntu motto or whatever you're calling it now.
The Ubuntu promiseUbuntu will always be free of charge, along with its regular enterprise releases and security updates...Ubuntu core applications are all free and open source.
We want you to use free and open source software, improve it and pass it on.So they took a Free Software application out and replace it with a non-Free application from Google.
What a great idea!Although an office suite isn't necessary for one to run Ubuntu, being able to create and consume office documents is admittedly a very common task.
Making UNR able to interoperate "right out of the box" seems like a very high priority.Bradley Kuhn was spot-on [ebb.org] when he recently said "It seems clear that one of Canonical's top goals is to convince every Ubuntu user to rely regularly on new proprietary software and services".
Bradley's solution to the problem?
Go back to Debian.My experience with Ubuntu has been, on the whole, a rather pleasant one, so I wish that Ubuntu would find a better solution to this problem.
OOo might take up a certain amount of space on netbooks, sure, so perhaps they should install a stripped-down package that doesn't install extra fonts until you need them.
Or maybe just prompt the user during the install, letting them know how much space OOo will take up?I've been willing to deal with non-free drivers and binary blobs in the past, as that has sometimes been the only way to get key parts of my system up and running.
But when the only limitation to using a completely Free program is a few hundred MB of disk space, in nearly all cases one could (and should) just get a little more disk.Software Freedom is worth it!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044940</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares?</title>
	<author>sensei moreh</author>
	<datestamp>1265464260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Are defaults really that important?</p></div><p>Not for anybody participating in this particular discussion. However, from what I've seen in some of the netbook forums, there are people out there who are using Linux on their netbooks only because that's what came on the SSD. The percentage of those folks savvy enough to install something like AbiWord is probably not all that high.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are defaults really that important ? Not for anybody participating in this particular discussion .
However , from what I 've seen in some of the netbook forums , there are people out there who are using Linux on their netbooks only because that 's what came on the SSD .
The percentage of those folks savvy enough to install something like AbiWord is probably not all that high .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are defaults really that important?Not for anybody participating in this particular discussion.
However, from what I've seen in some of the netbook forums, there are people out there who are using Linux on their netbooks only because that's what came on the SSD.
The percentage of those folks savvy enough to install something like AbiWord is probably not all that high.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047690</id>
	<title>Re:Normal ubuntu</title>
	<author>apoc.famine</author>
	<datestamp>1265448480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just drop in an SD card and be done with it. I've got an 8gb SD card in it for just that purpose. I partitioned it to hold<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/tmp<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/opt<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/var<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/home and swap to save lots of read/write cycles on the SSD. So far, it works pretty damn well.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/opt and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/var usually take up several hundred mb each, unless you're really good about keeping them cleaned out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just drop in an SD card and be done with it .
I 've got an 8gb SD card in it for just that purpose .
I partitioned it to hold /tmp /opt /var /home and swap to save lots of read/write cycles on the SSD .
So far , it works pretty damn well .
/opt and /var usually take up several hundred mb each , unless you 're really good about keeping them cleaned out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just drop in an SD card and be done with it.
I've got an 8gb SD card in it for just that purpose.
I partitioned it to hold /tmp /opt /var /home and swap to save lots of read/write cycles on the SSD.
So far, it works pretty damn well.
/opt and /var usually take up several hundred mb each, unless you're really good about keeping them cleaned out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043396</id>
	<title>WARNING - GOOGLE ALERT</title>
	<author>doug20r</author>
	<datestamp>1265392620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Quoting from their terms of use for Google Docs "Google reserves the right in its sole discretion to decide whether your conduct is inappropriate and whether it complies with these Terms of Service..." "Google may terminate your access for such inappropriate conduct in violation of these Terms of Service at any time ".

Google may for any reason terminate your use of this software causing you damage and loss.  Be warned that Google have a bad reputation for such behaviour.  They are currently threatening China so do you think they give a shit for us little people!

Sorry Google I do not accept your right to decide who can use a document editing system on their own netbook - get your soft wares out of their system.  Do not allow Google into your computer, you do not want to be in bed with this commercial entity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Quoting from their terms of use for Google Docs " Google reserves the right in its sole discretion to decide whether your conduct is inappropriate and whether it complies with these Terms of Service... " " Google may terminate your access for such inappropriate conduct in violation of these Terms of Service at any time " .
Google may for any reason terminate your use of this software causing you damage and loss .
Be warned that Google have a bad reputation for such behaviour .
They are currently threatening China so do you think they give a shit for us little people !
Sorry Google I do not accept your right to decide who can use a document editing system on their own netbook - get your soft wares out of their system .
Do not allow Google into your computer , you do not want to be in bed with this commercial entity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quoting from their terms of use for Google Docs "Google reserves the right in its sole discretion to decide whether your conduct is inappropriate and whether it complies with these Terms of Service..." "Google may terminate your access for such inappropriate conduct in violation of these Terms of Service at any time ".
Google may for any reason terminate your use of this software causing you damage and loss.
Be warned that Google have a bad reputation for such behaviour.
They are currently threatening China so do you think they give a shit for us little people!
Sorry Google I do not accept your right to decide who can use a document editing system on their own netbook - get your soft wares out of their system.
Do not allow Google into your computer, you do not want to be in bed with this commercial entity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045158</id>
	<title>Re:So it's now a closed-source distribution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265467440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For students is makes sense to have their documents safely stored on a remote computer whether the school or Google provides that service is another matter entirely. Realistically, a netbook would be an ideal thin client for students who are generally at school or at home where Internet access is always available in both cases. And with Google Gears offline access to documents is possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For students is makes sense to have their documents safely stored on a remote computer whether the school or Google provides that service is another matter entirely .
Realistically , a netbook would be an ideal thin client for students who are generally at school or at home where Internet access is always available in both cases .
And with Google Gears offline access to documents is possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For students is makes sense to have their documents safely stored on a remote computer whether the school or Google provides that service is another matter entirely.
Realistically, a netbook would be an ideal thin client for students who are generally at school or at home where Internet access is always available in both cases.
And with Google Gears offline access to documents is possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31046426</id>
	<title>Re:LaTex</title>
	<author>colinrichardday</author>
	<datestamp>1265480400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But without Open Office, how do you generate the ounce sign (unicode x2125)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But without Open Office , how do you generate the ounce sign ( unicode x2125 ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But without Open Office, how do you generate the ounce sign (unicode x2125)?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044324</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265453640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Docs has better usability. On that area OpenOffice is a disaster.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Docs has better usability .
On that area OpenOffice is a disaster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Docs has better usability.
On that area OpenOffice is a disaster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045170</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1265467560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Google docs doesn't exactly offer more features,</i></p><p>It offers one very important feature: no need to sync anything.</p><p>For a netbook, that's exactly what's needed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google docs does n't exactly offer more features,It offers one very important feature : no need to sync anything.For a netbook , that 's exactly what 's needed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google docs doesn't exactly offer more features,It offers one very important feature: no need to sync anything.For a netbook, that's exactly what's needed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042634</id>
	<title>Bah. Anything worth writing can be written with vi</title>
	<author>NotQuiteReal</author>
	<datestamp>1265385000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or any other text editor of your choice.
<br>
<br>
The formatting can be done later.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or any other text editor of your choice .
The formatting can be done later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or any other text editor of your choice.
The formatting can be done later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047410</id>
	<title>Re:Bradley was spot-on...</title>
	<author>Larryish</author>
	<datestamp>1265489220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IMO Canonical really lost it after 8.04</p><p>The newer distros are bug-riddled and klunky.</p><p>Hopefully 10.04.1 will be an actual step forward, instead of a big steaming pile of feature bloat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IMO Canonical really lost it after 8.04The newer distros are bug-riddled and klunky.Hopefully 10.04.1 will be an actual step forward , instead of a big steaming pile of feature bloat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IMO Canonical really lost it after 8.04The newer distros are bug-riddled and klunky.Hopefully 10.04.1 will be an actual step forward, instead of a big steaming pile of feature bloat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042098</id>
	<title>can i haz internets?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265380440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or, more accurately: what do I do if I DON'T have internet access? Just 'cause it's called a netbook, doesn't mean the Internet is actually INSTALLED on it. (At least, not the latest version.)</p><p>Oh, but I see they've included Gwibber, a "microblogging client". Oh well that makes up for it then.</p><p>Disclaimer: I'm just being snarky; it's probably a good overall decision, considering the limited HD space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , more accurately : what do I do if I DO N'T have internet access ?
Just 'cause it 's called a netbook , does n't mean the Internet is actually INSTALLED on it .
( At least , not the latest version .
) Oh , but I see they 've included Gwibber , a " microblogging client " .
Oh well that makes up for it then.Disclaimer : I 'm just being snarky ; it 's probably a good overall decision , considering the limited HD space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, more accurately: what do I do if I DON'T have internet access?
Just 'cause it's called a netbook, doesn't mean the Internet is actually INSTALLED on it.
(At least, not the latest version.
)Oh, but I see they've included Gwibber, a "microblogging client".
Oh well that makes up for it then.Disclaimer: I'm just being snarky; it's probably a good overall decision, considering the limited HD space.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>Darkness404</author>
	<datestamp>1265380320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The thing is, I don't see really any benefit for this. Google docs doesn't exactly offer more features, most netbooks come with at least 20 gigs of storage (even the SSD based ones) and performance is only increasing. It might have made sense for some of the early netbooks, but with faster and faster netbooks, I just don't see the point.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is , I do n't see really any benefit for this .
Google docs does n't exactly offer more features , most netbooks come with at least 20 gigs of storage ( even the SSD based ones ) and performance is only increasing .
It might have made sense for some of the early netbooks , but with faster and faster netbooks , I just do n't see the point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is, I don't see really any benefit for this.
Google docs doesn't exactly offer more features, most netbooks come with at least 20 gigs of storage (even the SSD based ones) and performance is only increasing.
It might have made sense for some of the early netbooks, but with faster and faster netbooks, I just don't see the point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042928</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>Billly Gates</author>
	<datestamp>1265387820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The only good thing about google docs are superior<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.docx support and its ability to share documents.</p><p>Otherwise, I feel like I am using Word 2.0 on Windows 3.0 or macOS 5 back in the 1980s.</p><p>Its not practical that it does not even have a grammar check.</p><p>How much more powerful is a netbook compared to a late 1980's computer with the same feature set of Google Docs?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The only good thing about google docs are superior .docx support and its ability to share documents.Otherwise , I feel like I am using Word 2.0 on Windows 3.0 or macOS 5 back in the 1980s.Its not practical that it does not even have a grammar check.How much more powerful is a netbook compared to a late 1980 's computer with the same feature set of Google Docs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only good thing about google docs are superior .docx support and its ability to share documents.Otherwise, I feel like I am using Word 2.0 on Windows 3.0 or macOS 5 back in the 1980s.Its not practical that it does not even have a grammar check.How much more powerful is a netbook compared to a late 1980's computer with the same feature set of Google Docs?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042190</id>
	<title>The thing I like most about my Netbook...</title>
	<author>longhunt</author>
	<datestamp>1265381160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>....is that it's easy to take on the subway.  I get about half of my writing done underground where there is no wireless.

<br> <br>But at least OpenOffice is easy to download if you need it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>....is that it 's easy to take on the subway .
I get about half of my writing done underground where there is no wireless .
But at least OpenOffice is easy to download if you need it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....is that it's easy to take on the subway.
I get about half of my writing done underground where there is no wireless.
But at least OpenOffice is easy to download if you need it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045012</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>yelvington</author>
	<datestamp>1265465160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're living in the past.</p><p>This project isn't aimed at the $450 mini-laptops that claim to be netbooks. It's aimed at the $199 reference designs for ARM-powered true netbooks that may have touchscreens and may not necessarily have a keyboard.</p><p>If you want Ubuntu for a 10-inch, 2-gig laptop with a 250-gig drive, install the regular version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're living in the past.This project is n't aimed at the $ 450 mini-laptops that claim to be netbooks .
It 's aimed at the $ 199 reference designs for ARM-powered true netbooks that may have touchscreens and may not necessarily have a keyboard.If you want Ubuntu for a 10-inch , 2-gig laptop with a 250-gig drive , install the regular version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're living in the past.This project isn't aimed at the $450 mini-laptops that claim to be netbooks.
It's aimed at the $199 reference designs for ARM-powered true netbooks that may have touchscreens and may not necessarily have a keyboard.If you want Ubuntu for a 10-inch, 2-gig laptop with a 250-gig drive, install the regular version.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168</id>
	<title>What is a netbook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265381100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't even know what a netbook is now. At the start they were defined by their tiny form-factors, low-ish power-consumption.<br>The revolutionary part was the LOW price. Sony VAIOs of similar size had been around for absolutely ages, but those were just shit, overpriced laptops.</p><p>Then microsoft moved in and netbook grew in size and power. I think my early eeepc IS a netbook, and despite the 600px screen height, I run stock Ubuntu rather than a netbook specific edition.<br>Running open office has never been a problem, so I don't see the point in getting all cloud dependent for nothing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't even know what a netbook is now .
At the start they were defined by their tiny form-factors , low-ish power-consumption.The revolutionary part was the LOW price .
Sony VAIOs of similar size had been around for absolutely ages , but those were just shit , overpriced laptops.Then microsoft moved in and netbook grew in size and power .
I think my early eeepc IS a netbook , and despite the 600px screen height , I run stock Ubuntu rather than a netbook specific edition.Running open office has never been a problem , so I do n't see the point in getting all cloud dependent for nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't even know what a netbook is now.
At the start they were defined by their tiny form-factors, low-ish power-consumption.The revolutionary part was the LOW price.
Sony VAIOs of similar size had been around for absolutely ages, but those were just shit, overpriced laptops.Then microsoft moved in and netbook grew in size and power.
I think my early eeepc IS a netbook, and despite the 600px screen height, I run stock Ubuntu rather than a netbook specific edition.Running open office has never been a problem, so I don't see the point in getting all cloud dependent for nothing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31048068</id>
	<title>Re:Who cares?</title>
	<author>bjourne</author>
	<datestamp>1265452500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ubuntu is a free software OS. Google Docs is not free software. That the developers are replacing a free alternative with a proprietary one is disconcerting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ubuntu is a free software OS .
Google Docs is not free software .
That the developers are replacing a free alternative with a proprietary one is disconcerting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ubuntu is a free software OS.
Google Docs is not free software.
That the developers are replacing a free alternative with a proprietary one is disconcerting.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043052</id>
	<title>Netbook = spying?</title>
	<author>cstec</author>
	<datestamp>1265388840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are netbook users really second class citizens with no right to privacy for their work?</p><p>I'd rather use <i>notepad</i> than let Google access my private data!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are netbook users really second class citizens with no right to privacy for their work ? I 'd rather use notepad than let Google access my private data !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are netbook users really second class citizens with no right to privacy for their work?I'd rather use notepad than let Google access my private data!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31046312</id>
	<title>Re:So it's now a closed-source distribution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265479380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was about to say "Fucking Gentool," because only a Gentool even -talks- like you do any more, but then you took the step of adding in that self-righteous, crusading "emerge" reference and label yourself a Gentool FOR me.</p><p>Thanks for saving me all that effort. Fucking Gentool. Feel free to write back some witty retort when you're done waiting for your bleeding-edge version of lynx is done compiling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was about to say " Fucking Gentool , " because only a Gentool even -talks- like you do any more , but then you took the step of adding in that self-righteous , crusading " emerge " reference and label yourself a Gentool FOR me.Thanks for saving me all that effort .
Fucking Gentool .
Feel free to write back some witty retort when you 're done waiting for your bleeding-edge version of lynx is done compiling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was about to say "Fucking Gentool," because only a Gentool even -talks- like you do any more, but then you took the step of adding in that self-righteous, crusading "emerge" reference and label yourself a Gentool FOR me.Thanks for saving me all that effort.
Fucking Gentool.
Feel free to write back some witty retort when you're done waiting for your bleeding-edge version of lynx is done compiling.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042142</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265380800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>on your already small disk to do other things.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Hi there 2007, </p><p>

The netbooks in the future (2010, welcome) have 160GB+ space... Oh, also</p><blockquote><div><p>This is a net-oriented device, afterall.</p></div></blockquote><p>

No, it's not. </p><p>

When are you going back home, by the way? </p><p> Sincerely.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>on your already small disk to do other things .
Hi there 2007 , The netbooks in the future ( 2010 , welcome ) have 160GB + space... Oh , alsoThis is a net-oriented device , afterall .
No , it 's not .
When are you going back home , by the way ?
Sincerely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>on your already small disk to do other things.
Hi there 2007, 

The netbooks in the future (2010, welcome) have 160GB+ space... Oh, alsoThis is a net-oriented device, afterall.
No, it's not.
When are you going back home, by the way?
Sincerely.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044882</id>
	<title>Dropped BY DEFAULT</title>
	<author>Tapewolf</author>
	<datestamp>1265462820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article - even the summary - quite clearly says that they're dropping it from the <i>default install</i>.  If you want it, you install it.  Problem solved.<br>
Personally I ended up removing it anyway since it took too much space on the SSD and I almost never used it while travelling...</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article - even the summary - quite clearly says that they 're dropping it from the default install .
If you want it , you install it .
Problem solved .
Personally I ended up removing it anyway since it took too much space on the SSD and I almost never used it while travelling.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article - even the summary - quite clearly says that they're dropping it from the default install.
If you want it, you install it.
Problem solved.
Personally I ended up removing it anyway since it took too much space on the SSD and I almost never used it while travelling...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043492</id>
	<title>Re:So it's now a closed-source distribution?</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1265394180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>To me, this takes Ubuntu NE out of the equation for all possible uses.</p></div><p>Likewise.  I use my netbook offline all the time, and have spotty connectivity most of the day.  This would make Ubuntu useless to me out of the box, and it reflects a very strange set of priorities:  closed source proprietary remote apps vs open source free local ones is about the worst choice imaginable for a linux distro.</p><p>I used to use Abiword on my netbook, an d found it annoyingly sluggish saving largish documents.  Replaced it with OOo and have been very happy.</p><p>The big thing for me about a netbook is long battery life (&gt; 6 hours) and light weight ( 1.5g).  Compared to my laptop it's a feather.  Network connectivity is the third priority, and not nearly important enough to give up freedom, privacy  and control for.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To me , this takes Ubuntu NE out of the equation for all possible uses.Likewise .
I use my netbook offline all the time , and have spotty connectivity most of the day .
This would make Ubuntu useless to me out of the box , and it reflects a very strange set of priorities : closed source proprietary remote apps vs open source free local ones is about the worst choice imaginable for a linux distro.I used to use Abiword on my netbook , an d found it annoyingly sluggish saving largish documents .
Replaced it with OOo and have been very happy.The big thing for me about a netbook is long battery life ( &gt; 6 hours ) and light weight ( 1.5g ) .
Compared to my laptop it 's a feather .
Network connectivity is the third priority , and not nearly important enough to give up freedom , privacy and control for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To me, this takes Ubuntu NE out of the equation for all possible uses.Likewise.
I use my netbook offline all the time, and have spotty connectivity most of the day.
This would make Ubuntu useless to me out of the box, and it reflects a very strange set of priorities:  closed source proprietary remote apps vs open source free local ones is about the worst choice imaginable for a linux distro.I used to use Abiword on my netbook, an d found it annoyingly sluggish saving largish documents.
Replaced it with OOo and have been very happy.The big thing for me about a netbook is long battery life (&gt; 6 hours) and light weight ( 1.5g).
Compared to my laptop it's a feather.
Network connectivity is the third priority, and not nearly important enough to give up freedom, privacy  and control for.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31052250</id>
	<title>Zoho</title>
	<author>mahadiga</author>
	<datestamp>1265556600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not <a href="http://www.zoho.com/" title="zoho.com" rel="nofollow">Zoho</a> [zoho.com]? Anybody?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not Zoho [ zoho.com ] ?
Anybody ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not Zoho [zoho.com]?
Anybody?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043356</id>
	<title>So we still have GIMP for doing images</title>
	<author>Palpatine\_li</author>
	<datestamp>1265392080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...oh wait...I still remember someone said that Openoffice should be enough after dropping GIMP.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...oh wait...I still remember someone said that Openoffice should be enough after dropping GIMP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...oh wait...I still remember someone said that Openoffice should be enough after dropping GIMP.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045122</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265466960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Gears is supposed to allow running Google Apps in offline mode, right? Therefore, there is no issue with being off the 'Net if you plan ahead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Gears is supposed to allow running Google Apps in offline mode , right ?
Therefore , there is no issue with being off the 'Net if you plan ahead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Gears is supposed to allow running Google Apps in offline mode, right?
Therefore, there is no issue with being off the 'Net if you plan ahead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042900</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>WidgetGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1265387640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just FYI, you can work off-line with Google Docs.  Next time you go on-line, everything is automatically synchronized courtesy of the Google Gears plug-in (for Firefox &amp; Internet Exploder).  You only need to be net-connected when you want to send or share a document (but that would also be the case for OpenOffice).
<br> <br>
Google Docs gets its "size" advantage because it is browser-based (even when being used off-line).  Unless Google Docs has been significantly improved over the last six months or so, though, it's no replacement for OpenOffice (unless you use OpenOffice only to compose emails).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just FYI , you can work off-line with Google Docs .
Next time you go on-line , everything is automatically synchronized courtesy of the Google Gears plug-in ( for Firefox &amp; Internet Exploder ) .
You only need to be net-connected when you want to send or share a document ( but that would also be the case for OpenOffice ) .
Google Docs gets its " size " advantage because it is browser-based ( even when being used off-line ) .
Unless Google Docs has been significantly improved over the last six months or so , though , it 's no replacement for OpenOffice ( unless you use OpenOffice only to compose emails ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just FYI, you can work off-line with Google Docs.
Next time you go on-line, everything is automatically synchronized courtesy of the Google Gears plug-in (for Firefox &amp; Internet Exploder).
You only need to be net-connected when you want to send or share a document (but that would also be the case for OpenOffice).
Google Docs gets its "size" advantage because it is browser-based (even when being used off-line).
Unless Google Docs has been significantly improved over the last six months or so, though, it's no replacement for OpenOffice (unless you use OpenOffice only to compose emails).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042096</id>
	<title>Stupid!!</title>
	<author>linuxgurugamer</author>
	<datestamp>1265380440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The net isn't everywhere.  Sometimes people use the computer/netbook in places where there is no network access.  So what is going to happen in these cases?  It sounds like to me that those people will be SOL, unless they were savvy enough to have installed OpenOffice themselves.</p><p>I use Ubuntu professionally, as well as CentOS &amp; Fedora.  By constantly changing the application mix they will discourage people from using Ubuntu because of future incompatibilities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The net is n't everywhere .
Sometimes people use the computer/netbook in places where there is no network access .
So what is going to happen in these cases ?
It sounds like to me that those people will be SOL , unless they were savvy enough to have installed OpenOffice themselves.I use Ubuntu professionally , as well as CentOS &amp; Fedora .
By constantly changing the application mix they will discourage people from using Ubuntu because of future incompatibilities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The net isn't everywhere.
Sometimes people use the computer/netbook in places where there is no network access.
So what is going to happen in these cases?
It sounds like to me that those people will be SOL, unless they were savvy enough to have installed OpenOffice themselves.I use Ubuntu professionally, as well as CentOS &amp; Fedora.
By constantly changing the application mix they will discourage people from using Ubuntu because of future incompatibilities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045080</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>icebraining</author>
	<datestamp>1265466360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I can think of two benefits: Google Docs is generally quicker than OpenOffice and it takes up less space. If you're talking about a relatively underpowered computer with a small hard drive, then I can imagine preferring a lightweight, quick office suite rather than a fully-featured one.</p></div></blockquote><p>Doesn't that hold true for Abiword, though? It's faster and definitively smaller (30MB with deps) than OO.o, and supports<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.doc and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.docx.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can think of two benefits : Google Docs is generally quicker than OpenOffice and it takes up less space .
If you 're talking about a relatively underpowered computer with a small hard drive , then I can imagine preferring a lightweight , quick office suite rather than a fully-featured one.Does n't that hold true for Abiword , though ?
It 's faster and definitively smaller ( 30MB with deps ) than OO.o , and supports .doc and .docx .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can think of two benefits: Google Docs is generally quicker than OpenOffice and it takes up less space.
If you're talking about a relatively underpowered computer with a small hard drive, then I can imagine preferring a lightweight, quick office suite rather than a fully-featured one.Doesn't that hold true for Abiword, though?
It's faster and definitively smaller (30MB with deps) than OO.o, and supports .doc and .docx.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31051938</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>mikechant</author>
	<datestamp>1265551920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>If it doesn't have a decent offline word-processor then you can pretty much kiss goodbye to anybody using it except smart PDA users.</i></p><p>It only takes a couple of clicks and a password to install openoffice if it's not installed by default.</p><p>And google docs etc. work fine offline and then sync when reconnected.</p><p>What's the problem?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it does n't have a decent offline word-processor then you can pretty much kiss goodbye to anybody using it except smart PDA users.It only takes a couple of clicks and a password to install openoffice if it 's not installed by default.And google docs etc .
work fine offline and then sync when reconnected.What 's the problem ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it doesn't have a decent offline word-processor then you can pretty much kiss goodbye to anybody using it except smart PDA users.It only takes a couple of clicks and a password to install openoffice if it's not installed by default.And google docs etc.
work fine offline and then sync when reconnected.What's the problem?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043962</id>
	<title>Re:So it's now a closed-source distribution?</title>
	<author>xtracto</author>
	<datestamp>1265488200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup,</p><p>Being plenty of other options aside of OO.o they had to go with the most propertary one.</p><p>Geez, it would have better for them to use a  Microsoft Office version with Wine (at least, you control the program and your data).</p><p>Of course because Google is teh goodzor and Microsoft is teh Evilz, the typical anti-propertary slashdotters are getting warm feelings</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup,Being plenty of other options aside of OO.o they had to go with the most propertary one.Geez , it would have better for them to use a Microsoft Office version with Wine ( at least , you control the program and your data ) .Of course because Google is teh goodzor and Microsoft is teh Evilz , the typical anti-propertary slashdotters are getting warm feelings</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup,Being plenty of other options aside of OO.o they had to go with the most propertary one.Geez, it would have better for them to use a  Microsoft Office version with Wine (at least, you control the program and your data).Of course because Google is teh goodzor and Microsoft is teh Evilz, the typical anti-propertary slashdotters are getting warm feelings</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044380</id>
	<title>Re:What is a netbook?</title>
	<author>QuoteMstr</author>
	<datestamp>1265454540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of the laptops I've had, the one with the best form factor was the 12.1" iBook. Its keyboard was just big enough for my hands, and it fit into most spaces designed for letter-sized notebooks and papers. The screen's size was good enough for me. I got a lot of work done on that machine.</p><p>My current 13" MacBook is cumbersome by comparison: it's too long, and the extra keyboard and screen area doesn't do anything for me. It's still a good machine, but not as elegantly portable as my old iBook (RIP --- it died of an LCD fracture in a car accident.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of the laptops I 've had , the one with the best form factor was the 12.1 " iBook .
Its keyboard was just big enough for my hands , and it fit into most spaces designed for letter-sized notebooks and papers .
The screen 's size was good enough for me .
I got a lot of work done on that machine.My current 13 " MacBook is cumbersome by comparison : it 's too long , and the extra keyboard and screen area does n't do anything for me .
It 's still a good machine , but not as elegantly portable as my old iBook ( RIP --- it died of an LCD fracture in a car accident .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of the laptops I've had, the one with the best form factor was the 12.1" iBook.
Its keyboard was just big enough for my hands, and it fit into most spaces designed for letter-sized notebooks and papers.
The screen's size was good enough for me.
I got a lot of work done on that machine.My current 13" MacBook is cumbersome by comparison: it's too long, and the extra keyboard and screen area doesn't do anything for me.
It's still a good machine, but not as elegantly portable as my old iBook (RIP --- it died of an LCD fracture in a car accident.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042512</id>
	<title>Re:What is a netbook?</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1265383620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My Earlier EEE 701SD has only 480 lines, so I run UNR in the form of Jolicloud. If it were easier to find alt and tab, I would just run ordinary Ubuntu. When I get home again, I'm going to install vanilla UNR so I can run a more recent release and hopefully fix some problems. Jolicloud is a lagger. My LT3103u has normal Karmic, in fact I run with Compiz and Avant Window Navigator. But it also has a 720p display, and it's basically a cheap subnotebook. It came at a netbook price, though...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My Earlier EEE 701SD has only 480 lines , so I run UNR in the form of Jolicloud .
If it were easier to find alt and tab , I would just run ordinary Ubuntu .
When I get home again , I 'm going to install vanilla UNR so I can run a more recent release and hopefully fix some problems .
Jolicloud is a lagger .
My LT3103u has normal Karmic , in fact I run with Compiz and Avant Window Navigator .
But it also has a 720p display , and it 's basically a cheap subnotebook .
It came at a netbook price , though.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Earlier EEE 701SD has only 480 lines, so I run UNR in the form of Jolicloud.
If it were easier to find alt and tab, I would just run ordinary Ubuntu.
When I get home again, I'm going to install vanilla UNR so I can run a more recent release and hopefully fix some problems.
Jolicloud is a lagger.
My LT3103u has normal Karmic, in fact I run with Compiz and Avant Window Navigator.
But it also has a 720p display, and it's basically a cheap subnotebook.
It came at a netbook price, though...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043584</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>koona</author>
	<datestamp>1265395620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>with faster and faster netbooks, I just don't see the point...................</i>

Well I <b>do</b>,

<p>Ms Office, Ooffice, and other full blown word processors are just too cumbersome for realisticly integrating with fast paced net work. A notepad replacement, or richtext editor would usually fill the bill. Adding  a google docs option puts some nice iceing on the cake without all the native overhead involved with the others. I call that lean, clean elegance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>with faster and faster netbooks , I just do n't see the point.................. . Well I do , Ms Office , Ooffice , and other full blown word processors are just too cumbersome for realisticly integrating with fast paced net work .
A notepad replacement , or richtext editor would usually fill the bill .
Adding a google docs option puts some nice iceing on the cake without all the native overhead involved with the others .
I call that lean , clean elegance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>with faster and faster netbooks, I just don't see the point...................

Well I do,

Ms Office, Ooffice, and other full blown word processors are just too cumbersome for realisticly integrating with fast paced net work.
A notepad replacement, or richtext editor would usually fill the bill.
Adding  a google docs option puts some nice iceing on the cake without all the native overhead involved with the others.
I call that lean, clean elegance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045010</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>jgrahn</author>
	<datestamp>1265465100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The thing is, I don't see really any benefit for this. Google docs doesn't exactly offer more features, most netbooks come with at least 20 gigs of storage (even the SSD based ones) and performance is only increasing.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Can you still get SSD netbooks?  I see none for sale here.
My old Acer Aspire One came with a 8GB one, and OpenOffice.
(Of course, that Lin-pus stuff was useless so I blew it all away, and installed Debian.
Without OpenOffice; if you like word processors, you're probably better off with Windows.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is , I do n't see really any benefit for this .
Google docs does n't exactly offer more features , most netbooks come with at least 20 gigs of storage ( even the SSD based ones ) and performance is only increasing .
Can you still get SSD netbooks ?
I see none for sale here .
My old Acer Aspire One came with a 8GB one , and OpenOffice .
( Of course , that Lin-pus stuff was useless so I blew it all away , and installed Debian .
Without OpenOffice ; if you like word processors , you 're probably better off with Windows .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is, I don't see really any benefit for this.
Google docs doesn't exactly offer more features, most netbooks come with at least 20 gigs of storage (even the SSD based ones) and performance is only increasing.
Can you still get SSD netbooks?
I see none for sale here.
My old Acer Aspire One came with a 8GB one, and OpenOffice.
(Of course, that Lin-pus stuff was useless so I blew it all away, and installed Debian.
Without OpenOffice; if you like word processors, you're probably better off with Windows.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044296</id>
	<title>Wow, complete Slashdot article based on blueprint</title>
	<author>Pecisk</author>
	<datestamp>1265453100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those who want to know: Launchpad blueprints are ideas converted in subprojects. For example, there have been thousand blueprints which while have been completed, have never been implemented.</p><p>So first - no official announcement in mailing list, no blog post, but a *blueprint* is a basis of the whole fact in this blog (which is full of ads and snags). Impressive.</p><p><a href="https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-lucid-arm-webservice-for-office" title="launchpad.net">https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-lucid-arm-webservice-for-office</a> [launchpad.net]</p><p>Wow, first of all, it's for ARM UNE (small subvariant of Ubuntu Netbook Edition), implementation is not started yet and motivation is more clear than ad-riddened blog wrote - OO.o is simply slow on ARM. Yes, you can try to use Abiword, but I think it is not tweaked to run ARM too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those who want to know : Launchpad blueprints are ideas converted in subprojects .
For example , there have been thousand blueprints which while have been completed , have never been implemented.So first - no official announcement in mailing list , no blog post , but a * blueprint * is a basis of the whole fact in this blog ( which is full of ads and snags ) .
Impressive.https : //blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/ + spec/mobile-lucid-arm-webservice-for-office [ launchpad.net ] Wow , first of all , it 's for ARM UNE ( small subvariant of Ubuntu Netbook Edition ) , implementation is not started yet and motivation is more clear than ad-riddened blog wrote - OO.o is simply slow on ARM .
Yes , you can try to use Abiword , but I think it is not tweaked to run ARM too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those who want to know: Launchpad blueprints are ideas converted in subprojects.
For example, there have been thousand blueprints which while have been completed, have never been implemented.So first - no official announcement in mailing list, no blog post, but a *blueprint* is a basis of the whole fact in this blog (which is full of ads and snags).
Impressive.https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/mobile-lucid-arm-webservice-for-office [launchpad.net]Wow, first of all, it's for ARM UNE (small subvariant of Ubuntu Netbook Edition), implementation is not started yet and motivation is more clear than ad-riddened blog wrote - OO.o is simply slow on ARM.
Yes, you can try to use Abiword, but I think it is not tweaked to run ARM too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31060446</id>
	<title>Cell phone companies trying to get everybody on 3g</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265644080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like a move supported by the cell phone companies to get everybody on a 3g data plan. What better way than force more online apps into the netbooks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a move supported by the cell phone companies to get everybody on a 3g data plan .
What better way than force more online apps into the netbooks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a move supported by the cell phone companies to get everybody on a 3g data plan.
What better way than force more online apps into the netbooks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31067258</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265634120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>HAHAHA sounds like pebcak to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>HAHAHA sounds like pebcak to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>HAHAHA sounds like pebcak to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042946</id>
	<title>Google docs is severely limited</title>
	<author>feranick</author>
	<datestamp>1265388000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I actually use my netbook to give presentations, which I prepare obviously with my regular desktop. Now, I can only imagine the problems and issues that I would have in using Google docs. The files are limited in size and my presentations usually don't fit within the actual limits imposed by Google. The same for text documents, as it is not uncommon for me to receive large (&gt;10MB) word files. What should I do then? <br> <br>

The only consolation is that (hopefully) OpenOffice is only an "apt-get install" away.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually use my netbook to give presentations , which I prepare obviously with my regular desktop .
Now , I can only imagine the problems and issues that I would have in using Google docs .
The files are limited in size and my presentations usually do n't fit within the actual limits imposed by Google .
The same for text documents , as it is not uncommon for me to receive large ( &gt; 10MB ) word files .
What should I do then ?
The only consolation is that ( hopefully ) OpenOffice is only an " apt-get install " away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually use my netbook to give presentations, which I prepare obviously with my regular desktop.
Now, I can only imagine the problems and issues that I would have in using Google docs.
The files are limited in size and my presentations usually don't fit within the actual limits imposed by Google.
The same for text documents, as it is not uncommon for me to receive large (&gt;10MB) word files.
What should I do then?
The only consolation is that (hopefully) OpenOffice is only an "apt-get install" away.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31061086</id>
	<title>Re:Why does OpenOffice need 350MB, anyway?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265648400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or, you could just run Gentoo on your netbook and build OOo without all that crap.<br>*ducks*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , you could just run Gentoo on your netbook and build OOo without all that crap .
* ducks *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, you could just run Gentoo on your netbook and build OOo without all that crap.
*ducks*</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042990</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>hairyfeet</author>
	<datestamp>1265388420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree with you and go one step further...if all they cared about was the space why not go with <a href="http://www.abiword.com/" title="abiword.com">Abiword</a> [abiword.com]? It is small and light, thus great for Netbooks, runs on all the major OSes, again great because if one likes it they can use it at home as well as on the road, and gives you a full featured word processor without the bloat.</p><p>

Who knows, maybe Google cut them a check. But it seems to me Abiword would be a better fit for a netbook than Google Docs. Can anyone tell us how Google Docs runs on ultra low powered devices like low end netbooks? Because I have run Abiword on machines as low as 400MHz and it was quite snappy and very comfortable to work in.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with you and go one step further...if all they cared about was the space why not go with Abiword [ abiword.com ] ?
It is small and light , thus great for Netbooks , runs on all the major OSes , again great because if one likes it they can use it at home as well as on the road , and gives you a full featured word processor without the bloat .
Who knows , maybe Google cut them a check .
But it seems to me Abiword would be a better fit for a netbook than Google Docs .
Can anyone tell us how Google Docs runs on ultra low powered devices like low end netbooks ?
Because I have run Abiword on machines as low as 400MHz and it was quite snappy and very comfortable to work in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with you and go one step further...if all they cared about was the space why not go with Abiword [abiword.com]?
It is small and light, thus great for Netbooks, runs on all the major OSes, again great because if one likes it they can use it at home as well as on the road, and gives you a full featured word processor without the bloat.
Who knows, maybe Google cut them a check.
But it seems to me Abiword would be a better fit for a netbook than Google Docs.
Can anyone tell us how Google Docs runs on ultra low powered devices like low end netbooks?
Because I have run Abiword on machines as low as 400MHz and it was quite snappy and very comfortable to work in.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042198</id>
	<title>Normal ubuntu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265381280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I run ubuntu on my eeepc 701. It works fine. I have considered uninstalling open office and installing more lightweight office tools. I will do that if I run out of space (again).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I run ubuntu on my eeepc 701 .
It works fine .
I have considered uninstalling open office and installing more lightweight office tools .
I will do that if I run out of space ( again ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I run ubuntu on my eeepc 701.
It works fine.
I have considered uninstalling open office and installing more lightweight office tools.
I will do that if I run out of space (again).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042558</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>NPerez</author>
	<datestamp>1265384220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are defaults really that important? I'd assume that, at least for now, anyone using Linux (even on a netbook) is probably savvy enough to install whatever Office apps they personally prefer. I think installing stuff in Ubuntu is even easier than on Windows - you just check it off &amp; seconds later you have it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are defaults really that important ?
I 'd assume that , at least for now , anyone using Linux ( even on a netbook ) is probably savvy enough to install whatever Office apps they personally prefer .
I think installing stuff in Ubuntu is even easier than on Windows - you just check it off &amp; seconds later you have it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are defaults really that important?
I'd assume that, at least for now, anyone using Linux (even on a netbook) is probably savvy enough to install whatever Office apps they personally prefer.
I think installing stuff in Ubuntu is even easier than on Windows - you just check it off &amp; seconds later you have it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044156</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265450100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hasn't anyone seen this...http://www.google.com/google-d-s/hpp/offline\_en\_in.html you can now edit google docs, spreadsheets and slideshows offline.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Has n't anyone seen this...http : //www.google.com/google-d-s/hpp/offline \ _en \ _in.html you can now edit google docs , spreadsheets and slideshows offline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hasn't anyone seen this...http://www.google.com/google-d-s/hpp/offline\_en\_in.html you can now edit google docs, spreadsheets and slideshows offline.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042630</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265384940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm glad they finally got rid of OpenOffice.  I was getting tired of deleting OO every time I wanted to reinstall UNR + Crysis on my netbook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad they finally got rid of OpenOffice .
I was getting tired of deleting OO every time I wanted to reinstall UNR + Crysis on my netbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad they finally got rid of OpenOffice.
I was getting tired of deleting OO every time I wanted to reinstall UNR + Crysis on my netbook.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043248</id>
	<title>Re:Normal ubuntu</title>
	<author>Vexorian</author>
	<datestamp>1265390760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>UNR actually targets even heavier "netbooks". An Atom processor is on the requirements list and also the 1024x600 resolution. In those machines there is definitely no issues with ooo in my experience. In fact I didn't really have much issues on my old 701 either. <br>
<br>
Honestly, I think it is just that the current ubuntu heads would just keep using disk space as an excuse to replace perfectly working apps with proprietary ones. I think we need a new flag distro...</htmltext>
<tokenext>UNR actually targets even heavier " netbooks " .
An Atom processor is on the requirements list and also the 1024x600 resolution .
In those machines there is definitely no issues with ooo in my experience .
In fact I did n't really have much issues on my old 701 either .
Honestly , I think it is just that the current ubuntu heads would just keep using disk space as an excuse to replace perfectly working apps with proprietary ones .
I think we need a new flag distro.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>UNR actually targets even heavier "netbooks".
An Atom processor is on the requirements list and also the 1024x600 resolution.
In those machines there is definitely no issues with ooo in my experience.
In fact I didn't really have much issues on my old 701 either.
Honestly, I think it is just that the current ubuntu heads would just keep using disk space as an excuse to replace perfectly working apps with proprietary ones.
I think we need a new flag distro...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044000</id>
	<title>this sucks!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265489400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just great.... replace something that sucked with something that sucks even more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just great.... replace something that sucked with something that sucks even more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just great.... replace something that sucked with something that sucks even more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044946</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265464320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does Abiword do spreadsheets?  Google Docs does.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does Abiword do spreadsheets ?
Google Docs does .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does Abiword do spreadsheets?
Google Docs does.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31060238</id>
	<title>Re:So it's now a closed-source distribution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265642400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep. You cant surf the web on Ubuntu NE now that OpenOffice has been replaced.</p><p>Dramatize, much?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep .
You cant surf the web on Ubuntu NE now that OpenOffice has been replaced.Dramatize , much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep.
You cant surf the web on Ubuntu NE now that OpenOffice has been replaced.Dramatize, much?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044596</id>
	<title>Re:So it's now a closed-source distribution?</title>
	<author>forebees</author>
	<datestamp>1265457960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The big thing for me about a netbook is long battery life (&gt; 6 hours) and light weight ( 1.5g). "</p><p>1.5 grams?</p><p>Holy Crap...can you post your netbook to me please?</p><p>I'll even send you the postage!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The big thing for me about a netbook is long battery life ( &gt; 6 hours ) and light weight ( 1.5g ) .
" 1.5 grams ? Holy Crap...can you post your netbook to me please ? I 'll even send you the postage !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The big thing for me about a netbook is long battery life (&gt; 6 hours) and light weight ( 1.5g).
"1.5 grams?Holy Crap...can you post your netbook to me please?I'll even send you the postage!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043950</id>
	<title>Open Office?? WTF??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265487900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use a slightly hacked version of CP/M on my netbook, ansd programs like WordStar and dBase work well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use a slightly hacked version of CP/M on my netbook , ansd programs like WordStar and dBase work well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use a slightly hacked version of CP/M on my netbook, ansd programs like WordStar and dBase work well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047696</id>
	<title>Re:Why does OpenOffice need 350MB, anyway?</title>
	<author>apoc.famine</author>
	<datestamp>1265448540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fonts and graphics. And as you mentioned, Java.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fonts and graphics .
And as you mentioned , Java .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fonts and graphics.
And as you mentioned, Java.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042796</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042248</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>horza</author>
	<datestamp>1265381580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eh? I think you are confusing netbook and thin client. I have a netbook and the installed packages are practically identical to my PC except for games via wine. If it doesn't have a decent offline word-processor then you can pretty much kiss goodbye to anybody using it except smart PDA users.</p><p>Phillip.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eh ?
I think you are confusing netbook and thin client .
I have a netbook and the installed packages are practically identical to my PC except for games via wine .
If it does n't have a decent offline word-processor then you can pretty much kiss goodbye to anybody using it except smart PDA users.Phillip .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eh?
I think you are confusing netbook and thin client.
I have a netbook and the installed packages are practically identical to my PC except for games via wine.
If it doesn't have a decent offline word-processor then you can pretty much kiss goodbye to anybody using it except smart PDA users.Phillip.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044618</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>blackest\_k</author>
	<datestamp>1265458380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's quite possible to have a full install of ubuntu on a EEE701 with a 4GB sdd drive and still have swap on.</p><p>Space isn't that much of an issue with the sd card slot  or usb drives adding more storage is easy. Data can be used easily from anywhere.</p><p>Ubuntu does have a few dependency issues with packages being connected that don't need to be really. For example default games or no default games there is no middle ground can't just keep the couple i play now and again.</p><p>UNR is a failure for me because they do silly things like this. open office is a good thing to have on a base install disk. However it shouldn't be made awkward to delete it.</p><p>UNR could concentrate on fixing the UI's of applications that don't fit on the screen.<br>or removing unnecessary dependencies such as mono or lumping all the default games into one package</p><p>They  shouldnt be tweaking the kernel (dropping reiserfs support for one example)<br>taking nano out of the default install was another annoyance (at least that was easy to add back).</p><p>The people working on unr  seem to be lacking in experience in fact recently even mainstream ubuntu maintainers seem to be intent on driving people to debian.</p><p>I won't use UNR I have no confidence in the maintainers at all.  Seems like UNR is training wheels for new distro maintainers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's quite possible to have a full install of ubuntu on a EEE701 with a 4GB sdd drive and still have swap on.Space is n't that much of an issue with the sd card slot or usb drives adding more storage is easy .
Data can be used easily from anywhere.Ubuntu does have a few dependency issues with packages being connected that do n't need to be really .
For example default games or no default games there is no middle ground ca n't just keep the couple i play now and again.UNR is a failure for me because they do silly things like this .
open office is a good thing to have on a base install disk .
However it should n't be made awkward to delete it.UNR could concentrate on fixing the UI 's of applications that do n't fit on the screen.or removing unnecessary dependencies such as mono or lumping all the default games into one packageThey shouldnt be tweaking the kernel ( dropping reiserfs support for one example ) taking nano out of the default install was another annoyance ( at least that was easy to add back ) .The people working on unr seem to be lacking in experience in fact recently even mainstream ubuntu maintainers seem to be intent on driving people to debian.I wo n't use UNR I have no confidence in the maintainers at all .
Seems like UNR is training wheels for new distro maintainers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's quite possible to have a full install of ubuntu on a EEE701 with a 4GB sdd drive and still have swap on.Space isn't that much of an issue with the sd card slot  or usb drives adding more storage is easy.
Data can be used easily from anywhere.Ubuntu does have a few dependency issues with packages being connected that don't need to be really.
For example default games or no default games there is no middle ground can't just keep the couple i play now and again.UNR is a failure for me because they do silly things like this.
open office is a good thing to have on a base install disk.
However it shouldn't be made awkward to delete it.UNR could concentrate on fixing the UI's of applications that don't fit on the screen.or removing unnecessary dependencies such as mono or lumping all the default games into one packageThey  shouldnt be tweaking the kernel (dropping reiserfs support for one example)taking nano out of the default install was another annoyance (at least that was easy to add back).The people working on unr  seem to be lacking in experience in fact recently even mainstream ubuntu maintainers seem to be intent on driving people to debian.I won't use UNR I have no confidence in the maintainers at all.
Seems like UNR is training wheels for new distro maintainers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043104</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31046688</id>
	<title>Why not Koffice then?</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1265482500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its smaller and lighter.  Wifi is not around 100\% of the time and not everyone can afford an extra 3G ( does ubuntu even support a 3g usb adapter? ).. so often times your shiny net book becomes just a shiny paperweight.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its smaller and lighter .
Wifi is not around 100 \ % of the time and not everyone can afford an extra 3G ( does ubuntu even support a 3g usb adapter ?
) .. so often times your shiny net book becomes just a shiny paperweight .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its smaller and lighter.
Wifi is not around 100\% of the time and not everyone can afford an extra 3G ( does ubuntu even support a 3g usb adapter?
).. so often times your shiny net book becomes just a shiny paperweight.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044316</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1265453520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I agree with you and go one step further...if all they cared about was the space why not go with Abiword [abiword.com]?</p></div><p>I'll make a guess: they didn't select Abiword, because it's probably still instable and bug-ridden. I try Abiword from time to time, and it usually crashes when trying to open even the simplest Word document, or while I try to edit a formula, or while I try to do something even slightly exotic (read: anything that isn't just plain text without formatting). In my view, anyone who praises Abiword, hasn't used it very much.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with you and go one step further...if all they cared about was the space why not go with Abiword [ abiword.com ] ? I 'll make a guess : they did n't select Abiword , because it 's probably still instable and bug-ridden .
I try Abiword from time to time , and it usually crashes when trying to open even the simplest Word document , or while I try to edit a formula , or while I try to do something even slightly exotic ( read : anything that is n't just plain text without formatting ) .
In my view , anyone who praises Abiword , has n't used it very much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with you and go one step further...if all they cared about was the space why not go with Abiword [abiword.com]?I'll make a guess: they didn't select Abiword, because it's probably still instable and bug-ridden.
I try Abiword from time to time, and it usually crashes when trying to open even the simplest Word document, or while I try to edit a formula, or while I try to do something even slightly exotic (read: anything that isn't just plain text without formatting).
In my view, anyone who praises Abiword, hasn't used it very much.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042990</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043616</id>
	<title>Why haven't they done this for desktop versions?</title>
	<author>masmullin</author>
	<datestamp>1265396100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really dont want OOo/Evolution/etc as a dependency to Gnome.  If I need these packages, I'll apt-get them, dont assume I need these things please!</p><p>I hope Ubuntu does an "Ubuntu lean edition" where only the basic packages to get a Gnome environment are default installed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really dont want OOo/Evolution/etc as a dependency to Gnome .
If I need these packages , I 'll apt-get them , dont assume I need these things please ! I hope Ubuntu does an " Ubuntu lean edition " where only the basic packages to get a Gnome environment are default installed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really dont want OOo/Evolution/etc as a dependency to Gnome.
If I need these packages, I'll apt-get them, dont assume I need these things please!I hope Ubuntu does an "Ubuntu lean edition" where only the basic packages to get a Gnome environment are default installed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042102</id>
	<title>I am sure</title>
	<author>Stumbles</author>
	<datestamp>1265380500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>glad I am not a Ubuntu addict.</htmltext>
<tokenext>glad I am not a Ubuntu addict .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>glad I am not a Ubuntu addict.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31050484</id>
	<title>I live in Bhumphuk Novere</title>
	<author>dogzdik</author>
	<datestamp>1265479440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I like the idea of "connectivity" provided it can be maintained in almost all times in almost all places.

The last time someone ran a backhoe through a single fiber optic cable, 2/3 of Australia went "out"....

It was several days with much rerouting and other shit, before connectivity could be restored.

There are many places in the country where there is no broadband or wireless reception.

I dunno - I'd rather have the sock on the foot, in the shoe that I wear; rather than the sock on another country, the shoe in another state, and my foot in the other city.


Naaaaa keep it all in the one machine and then collaborate if necessary - from there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like the idea of " connectivity " provided it can be maintained in almost all times in almost all places .
The last time someone ran a backhoe through a single fiber optic cable , 2/3 of Australia went " out " ... . It was several days with much rerouting and other shit , before connectivity could be restored .
There are many places in the country where there is no broadband or wireless reception .
I dunno - I 'd rather have the sock on the foot , in the shoe that I wear ; rather than the sock on another country , the shoe in another state , and my foot in the other city .
Naaaaa keep it all in the one machine and then collaborate if necessary - from there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like the idea of "connectivity" provided it can be maintained in almost all times in almost all places.
The last time someone ran a backhoe through a single fiber optic cable, 2/3 of Australia went "out"....

It was several days with much rerouting and other shit, before connectivity could be restored.
There are many places in the country where there is no broadband or wireless reception.
I dunno - I'd rather have the sock on the foot, in the shoe that I wear; rather than the sock on another country, the shoe in another state, and my foot in the other city.
Naaaaa keep it all in the one machine and then collaborate if necessary - from there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045152</id>
	<title>Vote for the fix!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265467380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/23490/" title="ubuntu.com" rel="nofollow">Brainstorm</a> [ubuntu.com]</p><p>This would allow a list for specifying default choices while setting up your install.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Brainstorm [ ubuntu.com ] This would allow a list for specifying default choices while setting up your install .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brainstorm [ubuntu.com]This would allow a list for specifying default choices while setting up your install.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044702</id>
	<title>They should use KOffice instead</title>
	<author>ingwa</author>
	<datestamp>1265459520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This makes no sense.  An office suite like OpenOffice.org can't be replaced with an online service.  They should put some effort into KOffice instead and then use that.  That's what Nokia is doing for their N900 Linux phone and it's the best choice for this situation.

I know that many are going to say now that KOffice will bring in many megs of dependencies, but that's not strictly true.  There are ways to cut out what you need from Qt and kdelibs, and that is what the developers did on the N900.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes no sense .
An office suite like OpenOffice.org ca n't be replaced with an online service .
They should put some effort into KOffice instead and then use that .
That 's what Nokia is doing for their N900 Linux phone and it 's the best choice for this situation .
I know that many are going to say now that KOffice will bring in many megs of dependencies , but that 's not strictly true .
There are ways to cut out what you need from Qt and kdelibs , and that is what the developers did on the N900 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes no sense.
An office suite like OpenOffice.org can't be replaced with an online service.
They should put some effort into KOffice instead and then use that.
That's what Nokia is doing for their N900 Linux phone and it's the best choice for this situation.
I know that many are going to say now that KOffice will bring in many megs of dependencies, but that's not strictly true.
There are ways to cut out what you need from Qt and kdelibs, and that is what the developers did on the N900.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>nmb3000</author>
	<datestamp>1265381280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>This is a net-oriented device, afterall. If you want a full-fledged computer, then get a full-fledged computer. This sounds exactly like what a NETbook should do.</i></p><p>Except that netbooks are also designed to be ultra-portable.  Unless you're always around an available wireless access point, not having office productivity software installed might be pretty annoying on that flight, bus trip, on the road, visiting family, etc.</p><p>If these NETbooks had some kind of always-available Internet access (say a 3G modem or something else) then I'd probably agree with you, but unfortunately lots of people use these devices while not online. I'm not sure this decision makes a lot of sense given the way the devices are actually <i>used</i>, their misleading name notwithstanding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is a net-oriented device , afterall .
If you want a full-fledged computer , then get a full-fledged computer .
This sounds exactly like what a NETbook should do.Except that netbooks are also designed to be ultra-portable .
Unless you 're always around an available wireless access point , not having office productivity software installed might be pretty annoying on that flight , bus trip , on the road , visiting family , etc.If these NETbooks had some kind of always-available Internet access ( say a 3G modem or something else ) then I 'd probably agree with you , but unfortunately lots of people use these devices while not online .
I 'm not sure this decision makes a lot of sense given the way the devices are actually used , their misleading name notwithstanding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is a net-oriented device, afterall.
If you want a full-fledged computer, then get a full-fledged computer.
This sounds exactly like what a NETbook should do.Except that netbooks are also designed to be ultra-portable.
Unless you're always around an available wireless access point, not having office productivity software installed might be pretty annoying on that flight, bus trip, on the road, visiting family, etc.If these NETbooks had some kind of always-available Internet access (say a 3G modem or something else) then I'd probably agree with you, but unfortunately lots of people use these devices while not online.
I'm not sure this decision makes a lot of sense given the way the devices are actually used, their misleading name notwithstanding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043488</id>
	<title>Re:What is a netbook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265394060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I don't even know what a netbook is now. At the start they were defined by their tiny form-factors, low-ish power-consumption. The revolutionary part was the LOW price. Then microsoft moved in and netbook grew in size and power</i> </p><p>The "tiny form factor" becomes a deal breaker as you grow older.</p><p>The keyboard awkward and uncomfortable to use. The display hard to read. It's surely no coincidence that Walmart's in-store selection of netbooks has been reduced to a single <a href="http://www.walmart.com/ip/Dell-10.1-160-GB-IM10-3067SWH/12456228" title="walmart.com">Nickelodeon branded laptop for kids.</a> [walmart.com] </p><p>The netbook strikes me as being a second or third purchase - and not the first choice for the low income buyer that the geek fondly believes. That's the second shoe you hear dropping at Walmart.</p><p>The low-end netbook competes for attention and sales with a dozen other high-tech gadgets at the same price point - and it just might be the product that gives the retailer most grief.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't even know what a netbook is now .
At the start they were defined by their tiny form-factors , low-ish power-consumption .
The revolutionary part was the LOW price .
Then microsoft moved in and netbook grew in size and power The " tiny form factor " becomes a deal breaker as you grow older.The keyboard awkward and uncomfortable to use .
The display hard to read .
It 's surely no coincidence that Walmart 's in-store selection of netbooks has been reduced to a single Nickelodeon branded laptop for kids .
[ walmart.com ] The netbook strikes me as being a second or third purchase - and not the first choice for the low income buyer that the geek fondly believes .
That 's the second shoe you hear dropping at Walmart.The low-end netbook competes for attention and sales with a dozen other high-tech gadgets at the same price point - and it just might be the product that gives the retailer most grief .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't even know what a netbook is now.
At the start they were defined by their tiny form-factors, low-ish power-consumption.
The revolutionary part was the LOW price.
Then microsoft moved in and netbook grew in size and power The "tiny form factor" becomes a deal breaker as you grow older.The keyboard awkward and uncomfortable to use.
The display hard to read.
It's surely no coincidence that Walmart's in-store selection of netbooks has been reduced to a single Nickelodeon branded laptop for kids.
[walmart.com] The netbook strikes me as being a second or third purchase - and not the first choice for the low income buyer that the geek fondly believes.
That's the second shoe you hear dropping at Walmart.The low-end netbook competes for attention and sales with a dozen other high-tech gadgets at the same price point - and it just might be the product that gives the retailer most grief.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043170</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265389980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OO.o is bloated and slow.  Google Docs isn't.  I don't see the problem here.  It doesn't seem as though we should automatically prefer large, bloated software because we feel some promotional need to boost it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OO.o is bloated and slow .
Google Docs is n't .
I do n't see the problem here .
It does n't seem as though we should automatically prefer large , bloated software because we feel some promotional need to boost it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OO.o is bloated and slow.
Google Docs isn't.
I don't see the problem here.
It doesn't seem as though we should automatically prefer large, bloated software because we feel some promotional need to boost it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31046726</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265482920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, although there was a market originally called UMPC (for tiny computers), the so called netbooks appeared as a solution for people complaining about tiny PCs to browse the Internet and typing on small keyboards or using stylus type of devices. <br> <br>
But, of course, that doesn't mean that you can't add functionality and features. The "old" music devices ran off the FM/AM networks, then they added cassette decks, CD drives and now flash memory for your pleasure. Why the NETbooks should be running from Internet, and not allowing people to have their local stuff?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , although there was a market originally called UMPC ( for tiny computers ) , the so called netbooks appeared as a solution for people complaining about tiny PCs to browse the Internet and typing on small keyboards or using stylus type of devices .
But , of course , that does n't mean that you ca n't add functionality and features .
The " old " music devices ran off the FM/AM networks , then they added cassette decks , CD drives and now flash memory for your pleasure .
Why the NETbooks should be running from Internet , and not allowing people to have their local stuff ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, although there was a market originally called UMPC (for tiny computers), the so called netbooks appeared as a solution for people complaining about tiny PCs to browse the Internet and typing on small keyboards or using stylus type of devices.
But, of course, that doesn't mean that you can't add functionality and features.
The "old" music devices ran off the FM/AM networks, then they added cassette decks, CD drives and now flash memory for your pleasure.
Why the NETbooks should be running from Internet, and not allowing people to have their local stuff?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045798</id>
	<title>I was considering switching to the new suse anyway</title>
	<author>Uzik2</author>
	<datestamp>1265474640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The version of Ubuntu I tried gets high marks for a great install, but low marks for usability. The cd burner doesn't work at all, the archive manager and file system explorer both have horrible bugs and very poor usability design. That they're choosing to put my documents at risk further emphasizes their poor judgment at the leadership level.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The version of Ubuntu I tried gets high marks for a great install , but low marks for usability .
The cd burner does n't work at all , the archive manager and file system explorer both have horrible bugs and very poor usability design .
That they 're choosing to put my documents at risk further emphasizes their poor judgment at the leadership level .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The version of Ubuntu I tried gets high marks for a great install, but low marks for usability.
The cd burner doesn't work at all, the archive manager and file system explorer both have horrible bugs and very poor usability design.
That they're choosing to put my documents at risk further emphasizes their poor judgment at the leadership level.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042746</id>
	<title>Re:What is a netbook?</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1265386080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I don't even know what a netbook is now.</p></div></blockquote><p>Same thing it was at the beginning:  A EEE or a MSI Wind.  Maybe a Dell Mini.  Cheap, small and useful.</p><p>I've got the newest EEE with SSD and I use the hell out of it.  When I travel, it's all I need and fits in the front pocket of my backpack.  Since there's WiFi just about everywhere I go, it fits my needs exactly. I started out with the hard drive model, but after a year gave it to my daughter and bought the SSD model.  Now <i>she</i> uses the hell out of it for school.  It doesn't run Mathematica or Maple, but for those she waits until she gets home.</p><p>I figure that by the time I'm ready to replace mine, it'll be an Android or ChromeOS machine with more SSD storage, but if it runs some other flavor of Linux, I won't mind.</p><p>But I promise this:  It won't be any machine that only runs apps from one store, and it won't cost more than $400.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't even know what a netbook is now.Same thing it was at the beginning : A EEE or a MSI Wind .
Maybe a Dell Mini .
Cheap , small and useful.I 've got the newest EEE with SSD and I use the hell out of it .
When I travel , it 's all I need and fits in the front pocket of my backpack .
Since there 's WiFi just about everywhere I go , it fits my needs exactly .
I started out with the hard drive model , but after a year gave it to my daughter and bought the SSD model .
Now she uses the hell out of it for school .
It does n't run Mathematica or Maple , but for those she waits until she gets home.I figure that by the time I 'm ready to replace mine , it 'll be an Android or ChromeOS machine with more SSD storage , but if it runs some other flavor of Linux , I wo n't mind.But I promise this : It wo n't be any machine that only runs apps from one store , and it wo n't cost more than $ 400 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't even know what a netbook is now.Same thing it was at the beginning:  A EEE or a MSI Wind.
Maybe a Dell Mini.
Cheap, small and useful.I've got the newest EEE with SSD and I use the hell out of it.
When I travel, it's all I need and fits in the front pocket of my backpack.
Since there's WiFi just about everywhere I go, it fits my needs exactly.
I started out with the hard drive model, but after a year gave it to my daughter and bought the SSD model.
Now she uses the hell out of it for school.
It doesn't run Mathematica or Maple, but for those she waits until she gets home.I figure that by the time I'm ready to replace mine, it'll be an Android or ChromeOS machine with more SSD storage, but if it runs some other flavor of Linux, I won't mind.But I promise this:  It won't be any machine that only runs apps from one store, and it won't cost more than $400.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044504</id>
	<title>Shuttleworth's business model</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265456460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>0) Use your technical understanding of an open source web server which you are involved with, to make several hundred million dollars, while everyone else is still figuring out what http.conf does. Sell the company; go up in space; never come down to earth.<br>1) Embrace open source software, and make a big song and dance about it to catch the attention of the community<br>2) Pay open source developers money to make their free software more business friendly.<br>3) Bundle a whole bunch of software created by other people and make it available for free. Call it Ubuntu to make people feel warm and cosy about it (good so far)<br>4) Set up a services company and charge for support of said software bundle (Ok, you need to make a living, and the bundle is still free. Great)<br>5) Mess about with the default web browser so that it favours Google, reports home about stuff. Make sure that the GNU foundation version is kept well away from the depositories (hmm, something's wrong here)<br>6) Introduce a Software Shop, err... I mean, Software Centre to allow your service company a privileged shot at selling software direct to the suckers... I mean customers, erm... users. Get rid of competing software download applications so that you get a clear run at it.<br>7) Quietly introduce a paid for service into the default menu, and disguise it by using the 'Ubuntu' label, maybe call it Ubuntu One. Be careful to make the first few Gigabytes free, so you can come back at those pesky malcontents who claim that you shouldn't put paid for services directly into the install.<br>8) Replace core utilities and applications with MONO based versions to make the bundle reliant on Microsoft technologies. (hold on a minute...)<br>9) Increasingly tie the customer in so that they cannot easily migrate away to another Ubuntu... I mean Linux distribution.<br>10) More profits (see 0 ).</p><p>If you've read Animal Farm, you'll know how it goes from there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>0 ) Use your technical understanding of an open source web server which you are involved with , to make several hundred million dollars , while everyone else is still figuring out what http.conf does .
Sell the company ; go up in space ; never come down to earth.1 ) Embrace open source software , and make a big song and dance about it to catch the attention of the community2 ) Pay open source developers money to make their free software more business friendly.3 ) Bundle a whole bunch of software created by other people and make it available for free .
Call it Ubuntu to make people feel warm and cosy about it ( good so far ) 4 ) Set up a services company and charge for support of said software bundle ( Ok , you need to make a living , and the bundle is still free .
Great ) 5 ) Mess about with the default web browser so that it favours Google , reports home about stuff .
Make sure that the GNU foundation version is kept well away from the depositories ( hmm , something 's wrong here ) 6 ) Introduce a Software Shop , err... I mean , Software Centre to allow your service company a privileged shot at selling software direct to the suckers... I mean customers , erm... users. Get rid of competing software download applications so that you get a clear run at it.7 ) Quietly introduce a paid for service into the default menu , and disguise it by using the 'Ubuntu ' label , maybe call it Ubuntu One .
Be careful to make the first few Gigabytes free , so you can come back at those pesky malcontents who claim that you should n't put paid for services directly into the install.8 ) Replace core utilities and applications with MONO based versions to make the bundle reliant on Microsoft technologies .
( hold on a minute... ) 9 ) Increasingly tie the customer in so that they can not easily migrate away to another Ubuntu... I mean Linux distribution.10 ) More profits ( see 0 ) .If you 've read Animal Farm , you 'll know how it goes from there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>0) Use your technical understanding of an open source web server which you are involved with, to make several hundred million dollars, while everyone else is still figuring out what http.conf does.
Sell the company; go up in space; never come down to earth.1) Embrace open source software, and make a big song and dance about it to catch the attention of the community2) Pay open source developers money to make their free software more business friendly.3) Bundle a whole bunch of software created by other people and make it available for free.
Call it Ubuntu to make people feel warm and cosy about it (good so far)4) Set up a services company and charge for support of said software bundle (Ok, you need to make a living, and the bundle is still free.
Great)5) Mess about with the default web browser so that it favours Google, reports home about stuff.
Make sure that the GNU foundation version is kept well away from the depositories (hmm, something's wrong here)6) Introduce a Software Shop, err... I mean, Software Centre to allow your service company a privileged shot at selling software direct to the suckers... I mean customers, erm... users. Get rid of competing software download applications so that you get a clear run at it.7) Quietly introduce a paid for service into the default menu, and disguise it by using the 'Ubuntu' label, maybe call it Ubuntu One.
Be careful to make the first few Gigabytes free, so you can come back at those pesky malcontents who claim that you shouldn't put paid for services directly into the install.8) Replace core utilities and applications with MONO based versions to make the bundle reliant on Microsoft technologies.
(hold on a minute...)9) Increasingly tie the customer in so that they cannot easily migrate away to another Ubuntu... I mean Linux distribution.10) More profits (see 0 ).If you've read Animal Farm, you'll know how it goes from there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045528</id>
	<title>as long as it works offline</title>
	<author>DavoMan</author>
	<datestamp>1265471940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As long as it works offline, then nothing is lost.
However Ubuntu has gone from having awesome default programs to rather questionable ones:
Pidgin: Empathy (no features)
GIMP: Replaced with some basic program forgot its name
OpenOffice: Now replaced with some web app thing

Is anyone going to think that Ubuntu is amazing superior if you cant say 'and it comes with a full fledged XYZ for free!'</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as it works offline , then nothing is lost .
However Ubuntu has gone from having awesome default programs to rather questionable ones : Pidgin : Empathy ( no features ) GIMP : Replaced with some basic program forgot its name OpenOffice : Now replaced with some web app thing Is anyone going to think that Ubuntu is amazing superior if you cant say 'and it comes with a full fledged XYZ for free !
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as it works offline, then nothing is lost.
However Ubuntu has gone from having awesome default programs to rather questionable ones:
Pidgin: Empathy (no features)
GIMP: Replaced with some basic program forgot its name
OpenOffice: Now replaced with some web app thing

Is anyone going to think that Ubuntu is amazing superior if you cant say 'and it comes with a full fledged XYZ for free!
'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044338</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1265453940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Google docs doesn't exactly offer more features</p></div><p>I am a big OpenOffice fan AND user. I think it's great and I will continue to use it for my scientific documents, presentations and drawings. It's a nearly unbeatable package for many reasons. That said, Google Docs does have ONE feature that none other office suite has, at least not quite as well implemented: groupwork. Google Docs allows concurrent editing in a way and scale that I have not seen anywhere else, and the only reason people are not crazy about it, is (I guess) because it's a paradigm shift in way of working. If/when people realize the potential of groupwork offered by Google Docs, this office suite could become one of the most popular, without actually replacing the others. It could also increase the popularity of OpenOffice and the other office suites that save in ODF formats. I can imagine doing part of the work with Google Docs for parallele editing with a co-author, and then finalize it with OpenOffice. For example.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google docs does n't exactly offer more featuresI am a big OpenOffice fan AND user .
I think it 's great and I will continue to use it for my scientific documents , presentations and drawings .
It 's a nearly unbeatable package for many reasons .
That said , Google Docs does have ONE feature that none other office suite has , at least not quite as well implemented : groupwork .
Google Docs allows concurrent editing in a way and scale that I have not seen anywhere else , and the only reason people are not crazy about it , is ( I guess ) because it 's a paradigm shift in way of working .
If/when people realize the potential of groupwork offered by Google Docs , this office suite could become one of the most popular , without actually replacing the others .
It could also increase the popularity of OpenOffice and the other office suites that save in ODF formats .
I can imagine doing part of the work with Google Docs for parallele editing with a co-author , and then finalize it with OpenOffice .
For example .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google docs doesn't exactly offer more featuresI am a big OpenOffice fan AND user.
I think it's great and I will continue to use it for my scientific documents, presentations and drawings.
It's a nearly unbeatable package for many reasons.
That said, Google Docs does have ONE feature that none other office suite has, at least not quite as well implemented: groupwork.
Google Docs allows concurrent editing in a way and scale that I have not seen anywhere else, and the only reason people are not crazy about it, is (I guess) because it's a paradigm shift in way of working.
If/when people realize the potential of groupwork offered by Google Docs, this office suite could become one of the most popular, without actually replacing the others.
It could also increase the popularity of OpenOffice and the other office suites that save in ODF formats.
I can imagine doing part of the work with Google Docs for parallele editing with a co-author, and then finalize it with OpenOffice.
For example.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894</id>
	<title>So it's now a closed-source distribution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265387580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because as far as I know, Google Docs is not only closed-source and proprietary. It&rsquo;s one step worse: It&rsquo;s not even controlled by you, as it&rsquo;s on another computer.</p><p>No, it being a netbook is not making it OK, that it is only accessible when you have reception. &ldquo;Netbook&rdquo; is <em>just a (marketing) name</em>. It&rsquo;s still just a small computer. It still has to be able to perform normal things without an Internet connection.</p><p>This, to me, is one step worse, than replacing OOo by MS Office. At least with MS Office, your private data won&rsquo;t be sold of to anyone, and you can still cut the connection.<br>Were they drunk? Was someone payed?</p><p>To me, this takes Ubuntu NE out of the equation for all possible uses.</p><p><strong>root@livecd ~ # emerge world</strong></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because as far as I know , Google Docs is not only closed-source and proprietary .
It    s one step worse : It    s not even controlled by you , as it    s on another computer.No , it being a netbook is not making it OK , that it is only accessible when you have reception .
   Netbook    is just a ( marketing ) name .
It    s still just a small computer .
It still has to be able to perform normal things without an Internet connection.This , to me , is one step worse , than replacing OOo by MS Office .
At least with MS Office , your private data won    t be sold of to anyone , and you can still cut the connection.Were they drunk ?
Was someone payed ? To me , this takes Ubuntu NE out of the equation for all possible uses.root @ livecd ~ # emerge world</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because as far as I know, Google Docs is not only closed-source and proprietary.
It’s one step worse: It’s not even controlled by you, as it’s on another computer.No, it being a netbook is not making it OK, that it is only accessible when you have reception.
“Netbook” is just a (marketing) name.
It’s still just a small computer.
It still has to be able to perform normal things without an Internet connection.This, to me, is one step worse, than replacing OOo by MS Office.
At least with MS Office, your private data won’t be sold of to anyone, and you can still cut the connection.Were they drunk?
Was someone payed?To me, this takes Ubuntu NE out of the equation for all possible uses.root@livecd ~ # emerge world</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042438</id>
	<title>Re:The thing I like most about my Netbook...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265383080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless you live in someplace nice like Tokyo or... or... well, Tokyo... aren't you afraid of getting it stolen on the subway?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless you live in someplace nice like Tokyo or... or... well , Tokyo... are n't you afraid of getting it stolen on the subway ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless you live in someplace nice like Tokyo or... or... well, Tokyo... aren't you afraid of getting it stolen on the subway?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31048908</id>
	<title>Re:Bradley was spot-on...</title>
	<author>mei\_mei\_mei</author>
	<datestamp>1265460420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You're right, but how come no one else mentioned it to this point? First thing I thought if.

Googleopen source</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're right , but how come no one else mentioned it to this point ?
First thing I thought if .
Googleopen source</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're right, but how come no one else mentioned it to this point?
First thing I thought if.
Googleopen source</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043054</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042574</id>
	<title>kickback?</title>
	<author>pz</author>
	<datestamp>1265384400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What sort of kickback did the Ubuntu folk get from Google for this?  On the face of it, it's a bad decision from the user experience standpoint, as many others have pointed out, because of the potential lack of a network connection.  Therefore, it's reasonable to assume that there must be a greater good, at least from the Ubtuntu viewpoint, to screwing their users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What sort of kickback did the Ubuntu folk get from Google for this ?
On the face of it , it 's a bad decision from the user experience standpoint , as many others have pointed out , because of the potential lack of a network connection .
Therefore , it 's reasonable to assume that there must be a greater good , at least from the Ubtuntu viewpoint , to screwing their users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What sort of kickback did the Ubuntu folk get from Google for this?
On the face of it, it's a bad decision from the user experience standpoint, as many others have pointed out, because of the potential lack of a network connection.
Therefore, it's reasonable to assume that there must be a greater good, at least from the Ubtuntu viewpoint, to screwing their users.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044108</id>
	<title>"Netbook" my a$$... it is a cheap mini-laptop.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265448900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It makes me laugh to see people say that a machine with a gig of ram and 160 gigs of storage is "only for cloud-related use". While I was growing up, we had garbage machines that ran at 25 MHz and had 3 megs of RAM.</p><p>I think anyone who makes the above claim has a financial interest in concealing the fact that these "netbooks" are just small computers. They don't want the average Joe to buy a cheap $350 computer that can fulfill mother's needs. This is why Microsoft releases OS's that require &gt;512 megs of ram to function. You've gotta keep those grand-parents  upgrading somehow... just to browse the web!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes me laugh to see people say that a machine with a gig of ram and 160 gigs of storage is " only for cloud-related use " .
While I was growing up , we had garbage machines that ran at 25 MHz and had 3 megs of RAM.I think anyone who makes the above claim has a financial interest in concealing the fact that these " netbooks " are just small computers .
They do n't want the average Joe to buy a cheap $ 350 computer that can fulfill mother 's needs .
This is why Microsoft releases OS 's that require &gt; 512 megs of ram to function .
You 've got ta keep those grand-parents upgrading somehow... just to browse the web !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes me laugh to see people say that a machine with a gig of ram and 160 gigs of storage is "only for cloud-related use".
While I was growing up, we had garbage machines that ran at 25 MHz and had 3 megs of RAM.I think anyone who makes the above claim has a financial interest in concealing the fact that these "netbooks" are just small computers.
They don't want the average Joe to buy a cheap $350 computer that can fulfill mother's needs.
This is why Microsoft releases OS's that require &gt;512 megs of ram to function.
You've gotta keep those grand-parents  upgrading somehow... just to browse the web!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044522</id>
	<title>Re: Google Docs work offline</title>
	<author>!the!bad!fish!</author>
	<datestamp>1265456820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The point is that Google Docs will be available <a href="http://goo.gl/Sbd7" title="goo.gl">offline</a> [goo.gl].</htmltext>
<tokenext>The point is that Google Docs will be available offline [ goo.gl ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The point is that Google Docs will be available offline [goo.gl].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044952</id>
	<title>Re:So it's now a closed-source distribution?</title>
	<author>yelvington</author>
	<datestamp>1265464380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google Docs works offline, and has for more than two years. If you have evidence that Google is selling private Google Docs data, I suggest you provide it.</p><p>If you don't want to use Google Docs, both abiword and OO are one-click installs. Not a problem.</p><p>UNR is clearly being prepped for the coming sub-$200 ultralight, driveless, ARM-powered real netbooks, not the 2-gig, dual-core laptops that masquerade as netbooks now. For those, you're better off with a full Ubuntu install.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google Docs works offline , and has for more than two years .
If you have evidence that Google is selling private Google Docs data , I suggest you provide it.If you do n't want to use Google Docs , both abiword and OO are one-click installs .
Not a problem.UNR is clearly being prepped for the coming sub- $ 200 ultralight , driveless , ARM-powered real netbooks , not the 2-gig , dual-core laptops that masquerade as netbooks now .
For those , you 're better off with a full Ubuntu install .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google Docs works offline, and has for more than two years.
If you have evidence that Google is selling private Google Docs data, I suggest you provide it.If you don't want to use Google Docs, both abiword and OO are one-click installs.
Not a problem.UNR is clearly being prepped for the coming sub-$200 ultralight, driveless, ARM-powered real netbooks, not the 2-gig, dual-core laptops that masquerade as netbooks now.
For those, you're better off with a full Ubuntu install.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31048678</id>
	<title>Re:So it's now a closed-source distribution?</title>
	<author>Eli Gottlieb</author>
	<datestamp>1265458500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do you really think everyone has the time to waste sitting and waiting for Gentoo to compile packages <i>on a netbook</i>?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you really think everyone has the time to waste sitting and waiting for Gentoo to compile packages on a netbook ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you really think everyone has the time to waste sitting and waiting for Gentoo to compile packages on a netbook?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31052930</id>
	<title>Re:What is a netbook?</title>
	<author>LordVader717</author>
	<datestamp>1265564940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd say the defining feature was originally the SSD (They were among the first) and the small form. People realized that conventional laptops were totally clumsy designs when all they used them for was 90\% web browsing.<br>I don't think web applications were ever an important aspect. Every device shipped since Asus's eeepc has had more than enough power to run sophisticated office suites, photo processing and almost any other 2D application. I think it's precisely because they run all these other "necessities" that that they're so popular.<br>Then on the other hand you have some manufacturers that try to convince everyone that *real* laptops come with Blu-ray burners, 500 gigs of hard drive space and have a 20 inch screen with an insane resolution.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd say the defining feature was originally the SSD ( They were among the first ) and the small form .
People realized that conventional laptops were totally clumsy designs when all they used them for was 90 \ % web browsing.I do n't think web applications were ever an important aspect .
Every device shipped since Asus 's eeepc has had more than enough power to run sophisticated office suites , photo processing and almost any other 2D application .
I think it 's precisely because they run all these other " necessities " that that they 're so popular.Then on the other hand you have some manufacturers that try to convince everyone that * real * laptops come with Blu-ray burners , 500 gigs of hard drive space and have a 20 inch screen with an insane resolution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd say the defining feature was originally the SSD (They were among the first) and the small form.
People realized that conventional laptops were totally clumsy designs when all they used them for was 90\% web browsing.I don't think web applications were ever an important aspect.
Every device shipped since Asus's eeepc has had more than enough power to run sophisticated office suites, photo processing and almost any other 2D application.
I think it's precisely because they run all these other "necessities" that that they're so popular.Then on the other hand you have some manufacturers that try to convince everyone that *real* laptops come with Blu-ray burners, 500 gigs of hard drive space and have a 20 inch screen with an insane resolution.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042730</id>
	<title>Just goes to show</title>
	<author>dawilcox</author>
	<datestamp>1265386020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This just goes to show how monopolistic practices kill innovation and industry.

<p>

Oh wait! This is Google Docs on Ubuntu and not Microsoft Office on Windows?

</p><p>

This just goes to show how the open source community can embrace and package quality products with their software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This just goes to show how monopolistic practices kill innovation and industry .
Oh wait !
This is Google Docs on Ubuntu and not Microsoft Office on Windows ?
This just goes to show how the open source community can embrace and package quality products with their software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just goes to show how monopolistic practices kill innovation and industry.
Oh wait!
This is Google Docs on Ubuntu and not Microsoft Office on Windows?
This just goes to show how the open source community can embrace and package quality products with their software.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042768</id>
	<title>LaTex</title>
	<author>CranberryKing</author>
	<datestamp>1265386320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>run it off the thumb drive.</htmltext>
<tokenext>run it off the thumb drive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>run it off the thumb drive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042216</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>ozmanjusri</author>
	<datestamp>1265381400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Google docs doesn't exactly offer more features</i>
<p>
For many people in the netbook market, that IS a feature.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google docs does n't exactly offer more features For many people in the netbook market , that IS a feature .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google docs doesn't exactly offer more features

For many people in the netbook market, that IS a feature.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042366</id>
	<title>Does it work while offline?</title>
	<author>kandresen</author>
	<datestamp>1265382420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am skeptic about online applications, unless of course the application can be cached or the Google doc server application in fact is running on the netbook.<br>I am however totally agreeing that Open Office is way to heavy for a Netbook. I do however myself usually use Abi-word and Gnumerics when finding OO too heavy.<br>How does Google Docs compare to Abi-word?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am skeptic about online applications , unless of course the application can be cached or the Google doc server application in fact is running on the netbook.I am however totally agreeing that Open Office is way to heavy for a Netbook .
I do however myself usually use Abi-word and Gnumerics when finding OO too heavy.How does Google Docs compare to Abi-word ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am skeptic about online applications, unless of course the application can be cached or the Google doc server application in fact is running on the netbook.I am however totally agreeing that Open Office is way to heavy for a Netbook.
I do however myself usually use Abi-word and Gnumerics when finding OO too heavy.How does Google Docs compare to Abi-word?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042866</id>
	<title>Inconsistency: Yahoo! search, but Google Docs</title>
	<author>feranick</author>
	<datestamp>1265387220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If I am not mistaken, Ubuntu 10.04 will drop Google as the default search engine for Firefox in favor of Yahoo! search. Now it's funny they will be using Google docs, as I am sure it will create a little bit of inconsistency... <br> <br>What's next, Bing maps?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If I am not mistaken , Ubuntu 10.04 will drop Google as the default search engine for Firefox in favor of Yahoo !
search. Now it 's funny they will be using Google docs , as I am sure it will create a little bit of inconsistency... What 's next , Bing maps ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If I am not mistaken, Ubuntu 10.04 will drop Google as the default search engine for Firefox in favor of Yahoo!
search. Now it's funny they will be using Google docs, as I am sure it will create a little bit of inconsistency...  What's next, Bing maps?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047794</id>
	<title>Re:What is a netbook?</title>
	<author>AthanasiusKircher</author>
	<datestamp>1265449440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The "tiny form factor" becomes a deal breaker as you grow older.</p></div><p>Depends.  What's part of your body starts to go -- your eyes or your back?  If the latter, perhaps carrying around 2 lbs. instead of 5-7 lbs. all the time in your bag might be something to look into.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The keyboard awkward and uncomfortable to use.</p></div><p>I agree that used to be the case.  I bought an expensive ultraportable a few years back which had an 80\% keyboard that was annoying, but usable.  Smaller keyboards just hurt my hands.  Nowadays, netbooks often have a keyboard that is 90\% full-size or larger... not annoying at all.  I haven't measured, but they feel like the keyboard on the laptop I had in the mid to late 90s, which was a rather popular model.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The display hard to read.</p></div><p>Why?  If you have eyesight problems and can't focus on small things, I agree that this device is not for you.  If you're complaining that the screens are dark or not sharp enough or something -- well, look at the netbooks today.  Even the cheap ones blow the crap out of the screen on my laptop from 5 years ago that cost 6 times as much.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The netbook strikes me as being a second or third purchase - and not the first choice for the low income buyer that the geek fondly believes.</p></div><p>That's probably true if you're talking about person who is buying both a business computer and a personal one.  If, as for most people, their primary business computer is provided by their employer, why the heck wouldn't they buy a netbook for personal use?  Most people use their <i>personal</i> computers to do non-processor-intensive tasks that netbooks are designed for, like email, chat, social networking, blogging, online purchases, looking things up, etc.</p><p>

The iPhone (or similar device) is a good replacement as well, but it suffers from the problems you mention (small display, small keyboard, "tiny form factor") to a MUCH greater degree.  And yet lots of people are buying them.  For someone who wants the convenience of a small device, but needs to do a little more typing, surfing, etc. so the iPhone is uncomfortable or annoying, why wouldn't they use a netbook?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The low-end netbook competes for attention and sales with a dozen other high-tech gadgets at the same price point</p></div><p>Exactly, like the iPhone.  Maybe you're right that people will continue to flock toward iPhones but won't embrace netbooks.  But if so, it's not because of the reasons you cite, because the iPhone and similar gadgets in that price category suffer from the same criticisms you mention, except to a greater degree.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " tiny form factor " becomes a deal breaker as you grow older.Depends .
What 's part of your body starts to go -- your eyes or your back ?
If the latter , perhaps carrying around 2 lbs .
instead of 5-7 lbs .
all the time in your bag might be something to look into.The keyboard awkward and uncomfortable to use.I agree that used to be the case .
I bought an expensive ultraportable a few years back which had an 80 \ % keyboard that was annoying , but usable .
Smaller keyboards just hurt my hands .
Nowadays , netbooks often have a keyboard that is 90 \ % full-size or larger... not annoying at all .
I have n't measured , but they feel like the keyboard on the laptop I had in the mid to late 90s , which was a rather popular model.The display hard to read.Why ?
If you have eyesight problems and ca n't focus on small things , I agree that this device is not for you .
If you 're complaining that the screens are dark or not sharp enough or something -- well , look at the netbooks today .
Even the cheap ones blow the crap out of the screen on my laptop from 5 years ago that cost 6 times as much.The netbook strikes me as being a second or third purchase - and not the first choice for the low income buyer that the geek fondly believes.That 's probably true if you 're talking about person who is buying both a business computer and a personal one .
If , as for most people , their primary business computer is provided by their employer , why the heck would n't they buy a netbook for personal use ?
Most people use their personal computers to do non-processor-intensive tasks that netbooks are designed for , like email , chat , social networking , blogging , online purchases , looking things up , etc .
The iPhone ( or similar device ) is a good replacement as well , but it suffers from the problems you mention ( small display , small keyboard , " tiny form factor " ) to a MUCH greater degree .
And yet lots of people are buying them .
For someone who wants the convenience of a small device , but needs to do a little more typing , surfing , etc .
so the iPhone is uncomfortable or annoying , why would n't they use a netbook ? The low-end netbook competes for attention and sales with a dozen other high-tech gadgets at the same price pointExactly , like the iPhone .
Maybe you 're right that people will continue to flock toward iPhones but wo n't embrace netbooks .
But if so , it 's not because of the reasons you cite , because the iPhone and similar gadgets in that price category suffer from the same criticisms you mention , except to a greater degree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "tiny form factor" becomes a deal breaker as you grow older.Depends.
What's part of your body starts to go -- your eyes or your back?
If the latter, perhaps carrying around 2 lbs.
instead of 5-7 lbs.
all the time in your bag might be something to look into.The keyboard awkward and uncomfortable to use.I agree that used to be the case.
I bought an expensive ultraportable a few years back which had an 80\% keyboard that was annoying, but usable.
Smaller keyboards just hurt my hands.
Nowadays, netbooks often have a keyboard that is 90\% full-size or larger... not annoying at all.
I haven't measured, but they feel like the keyboard on the laptop I had in the mid to late 90s, which was a rather popular model.The display hard to read.Why?
If you have eyesight problems and can't focus on small things, I agree that this device is not for you.
If you're complaining that the screens are dark or not sharp enough or something -- well, look at the netbooks today.
Even the cheap ones blow the crap out of the screen on my laptop from 5 years ago that cost 6 times as much.The netbook strikes me as being a second or third purchase - and not the first choice for the low income buyer that the geek fondly believes.That's probably true if you're talking about person who is buying both a business computer and a personal one.
If, as for most people, their primary business computer is provided by their employer, why the heck wouldn't they buy a netbook for personal use?
Most people use their personal computers to do non-processor-intensive tasks that netbooks are designed for, like email, chat, social networking, blogging, online purchases, looking things up, etc.
The iPhone (or similar device) is a good replacement as well, but it suffers from the problems you mention (small display, small keyboard, "tiny form factor") to a MUCH greater degree.
And yet lots of people are buying them.
For someone who wants the convenience of a small device, but needs to do a little more typing, surfing, etc.
so the iPhone is uncomfortable or annoying, why wouldn't they use a netbook?The low-end netbook competes for attention and sales with a dozen other high-tech gadgets at the same price pointExactly, like the iPhone.
Maybe you're right that people will continue to flock toward iPhones but won't embrace netbooks.
But if so, it's not because of the reasons you cite, because the iPhone and similar gadgets in that price category suffer from the same criticisms you mention, except to a greater degree.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044638</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>azgard</author>
	<datestamp>1265458740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I use netbook (EEE 901) every day in the subway, and there is no wireless. In fact, I don't use wireless on my netbook except I am at home (where I connect to my router, but since I also have a desktop, I don't do that often).</p><p>Either way, I prefer normal Ubuntu (customized a little to take less screen space) to UNR, so I don't care about this move.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I use netbook ( EEE 901 ) every day in the subway , and there is no wireless .
In fact , I do n't use wireless on my netbook except I am at home ( where I connect to my router , but since I also have a desktop , I do n't do that often ) .Either way , I prefer normal Ubuntu ( customized a little to take less screen space ) to UNR , so I do n't care about this move .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I use netbook (EEE 901) every day in the subway, and there is no wireless.
In fact, I don't use wireless on my netbook except I am at home (where I connect to my router, but since I also have a desktop, I don't do that often).Either way, I prefer normal Ubuntu (customized a little to take less screen space) to UNR, so I don't care about this move.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042268</id>
	<title>Re:can i haz internets?</title>
	<author>biryokumaru</author>
	<datestamp>1265381760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I have a 4 gig netbook and thought I would be able to save a lot of room by eliminating OpenOffice and doing everything with Google Docs. That lasted about a week.</p><p>If I can afford it on my 4 gig netbook, they have <i>oodles</i> of space on a 20 gig one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I have a 4 gig netbook and thought I would be able to save a lot of room by eliminating OpenOffice and doing everything with Google Docs .
That lasted about a week.If I can afford it on my 4 gig netbook , they have oodles of space on a 20 gig one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I have a 4 gig netbook and thought I would be able to save a lot of room by eliminating OpenOffice and doing everything with Google Docs.
That lasted about a week.If I can afford it on my 4 gig netbook, they have oodles of space on a 20 gig one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042296</id>
	<title>Baby Bath Water</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265381880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm guessing the Ubuntu powers that be have good 24/7 net connectivity, but forget that many people in the world only connect to the net sporadically: either due to cost (being charged per hour), lack of an internet connection (not every train and eatery has wifi) or being forced to us dialup. Even in developed countries, our internal company development net is isolated from the Internet for security. There are entire government departments set up like this. The Ubuntu people may be mistaking their own personal needs for that of everyone in the world.</p><p>350Mb isn't a big deal, given the function that offers and the size of HDDs on even the scrawniest netbooks.</p><p>Corollary: If Microsoft had given it's Vista developers "normal PCs" it wouldn't have turned out so big and bloated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing the Ubuntu powers that be have good 24/7 net connectivity , but forget that many people in the world only connect to the net sporadically : either due to cost ( being charged per hour ) , lack of an internet connection ( not every train and eatery has wifi ) or being forced to us dialup .
Even in developed countries , our internal company development net is isolated from the Internet for security .
There are entire government departments set up like this .
The Ubuntu people may be mistaking their own personal needs for that of everyone in the world.350Mb is n't a big deal , given the function that offers and the size of HDDs on even the scrawniest netbooks.Corollary : If Microsoft had given it 's Vista developers " normal PCs " it would n't have turned out so big and bloated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing the Ubuntu powers that be have good 24/7 net connectivity, but forget that many people in the world only connect to the net sporadically: either due to cost (being charged per hour), lack of an internet connection (not every train and eatery has wifi) or being forced to us dialup.
Even in developed countries, our internal company development net is isolated from the Internet for security.
There are entire government departments set up like this.
The Ubuntu people may be mistaking their own personal needs for that of everyone in the world.350Mb isn't a big deal, given the function that offers and the size of HDDs on even the scrawniest netbooks.Corollary: If Microsoft had given it's Vista developers "normal PCs" it wouldn't have turned out so big and bloated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043000</id>
	<title>bad move</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265388420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Questions:</p><p>1.) Can you use Google Documents without being forced to sign up for a Google account? Answer: NO</p><p>2.) Do your personal, intimate, and potentially sensitive documents stay securely on your machine? Answer: NO</p><p>Many corporations, institutions, and agencies do not even permit storage or transfer of certain documents outside their own facilities e.g. onto some other companies cloud because of the risk of corporate or other espionage.</p><p>Conclusion: Google Docs = bad idea. Case closed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Questions : 1 .
) Can you use Google Documents without being forced to sign up for a Google account ?
Answer : NO2 .
) Do your personal , intimate , and potentially sensitive documents stay securely on your machine ?
Answer : NOMany corporations , institutions , and agencies do not even permit storage or transfer of certain documents outside their own facilities e.g .
onto some other companies cloud because of the risk of corporate or other espionage.Conclusion : Google Docs = bad idea .
Case closed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Questions:1.
) Can you use Google Documents without being forced to sign up for a Google account?
Answer: NO2.
) Do your personal, intimate, and potentially sensitive documents stay securely on your machine?
Answer: NOMany corporations, institutions, and agencies do not even permit storage or transfer of certain documents outside their own facilities e.g.
onto some other companies cloud because of the risk of corporate or other espionage.Conclusion: Google Docs = bad idea.
Case closed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042500</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid!!</title>
	<author>stickystyle</author>
	<datestamp>1265383560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or they will just use google docs in offline mode, like people have been doing for quite some time now...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or they will just use google docs in offline mode , like people have been doing for quite some time now.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or they will just use google docs in offline mode, like people have been doing for quite some time now...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042796</id>
	<title>Why does OpenOffice need 350MB, anyway?</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1265386560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Why does OpenOffice need 350MB, anyway?
</p><ul>
<li>
Why is "soffice.exe" 7MB in size?  It's just the launcher.  The work is done in "sdraw.exe", "swriter.exe", etc.</li>
<li>Why is there also "soffice.bin", another 7MB?</li>
<li>Does OpenOffice have to have its very own full Python installation? It's only used for scripting OpenOffice from your own applications; OpenOffice itself doesn't need it.</li>
<li>Is the whole Java/UNO system, for scripting OpenOffice from Java, really used much?</li>
<li>OpenOffice has about 100 DLLs, doing who knows what.  How many of those are really used?</li>
<li>
In fact, most users don't need any of the Java stuff. It's mainly for the OpenOffice database engine, and you're probably not running a relational DBMS on your netbook.</li>
</ul><p>
OpenOffice could probably be brought down below 100MB for netbooks without much work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why does OpenOffice need 350MB , anyway ?
Why is " soffice.exe " 7MB in size ?
It 's just the launcher .
The work is done in " sdraw.exe " , " swriter.exe " , etc .
Why is there also " soffice.bin " , another 7MB ?
Does OpenOffice have to have its very own full Python installation ?
It 's only used for scripting OpenOffice from your own applications ; OpenOffice itself does n't need it .
Is the whole Java/UNO system , for scripting OpenOffice from Java , really used much ?
OpenOffice has about 100 DLLs , doing who knows what .
How many of those are really used ?
In fact , most users do n't need any of the Java stuff .
It 's mainly for the OpenOffice database engine , and you 're probably not running a relational DBMS on your netbook .
OpenOffice could probably be brought down below 100MB for netbooks without much work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Why does OpenOffice need 350MB, anyway?
Why is "soffice.exe" 7MB in size?
It's just the launcher.
The work is done in "sdraw.exe", "swriter.exe", etc.
Why is there also "soffice.bin", another 7MB?
Does OpenOffice have to have its very own full Python installation?
It's only used for scripting OpenOffice from your own applications; OpenOffice itself doesn't need it.
Is the whole Java/UNO system, for scripting OpenOffice from Java, really used much?
OpenOffice has about 100 DLLs, doing who knows what.
How many of those are really used?
In fact, most users don't need any of the Java stuff.
It's mainly for the OpenOffice database engine, and you're probably not running a relational DBMS on your netbook.
OpenOffice could probably be brought down below 100MB for netbooks without much work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043104</id>
	<title>Re:Remember folks, it's a NETbook.</title>
	<author>nine-times</author>
	<datestamp>1265389260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can think of two benefits: Google Docs is generally quicker than OpenOffice and it takes up less space.  If you're talking about a relatively underpowered computer with a small hard drive, then I can imagine preferring a lightweight, quick office suite rather than a fully-featured one.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>most netbooks come with at least 20 gigs of storage (even the SSD based ones) and performance is only increasing... with faster and faster netbooks, I just don't see the point.</p></div><p>With faster and faster netbooks, I start to wonder whether "netbook" is a meaningful classification anymore.  When people started talking about netbooks, I asked, "What's the difference between a netbook and an ultraportable laptop?"  The answer came back, "It's only really powerful enough to run a web browser and has almost no internal storage.  The idea is that you'll mostly only use it to run web applications."  As netbooks get faster, have bigger hard drives, and are running full desktop operating systems, I'd like to re-ask my question.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can think of two benefits : Google Docs is generally quicker than OpenOffice and it takes up less space .
If you 're talking about a relatively underpowered computer with a small hard drive , then I can imagine preferring a lightweight , quick office suite rather than a fully-featured one.most netbooks come with at least 20 gigs of storage ( even the SSD based ones ) and performance is only increasing... with faster and faster netbooks , I just do n't see the point.With faster and faster netbooks , I start to wonder whether " netbook " is a meaningful classification anymore .
When people started talking about netbooks , I asked , " What 's the difference between a netbook and an ultraportable laptop ?
" The answer came back , " It 's only really powerful enough to run a web browser and has almost no internal storage .
The idea is that you 'll mostly only use it to run web applications .
" As netbooks get faster , have bigger hard drives , and are running full desktop operating systems , I 'd like to re-ask my question .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can think of two benefits: Google Docs is generally quicker than OpenOffice and it takes up less space.
If you're talking about a relatively underpowered computer with a small hard drive, then I can imagine preferring a lightweight, quick office suite rather than a fully-featured one.most netbooks come with at least 20 gigs of storage (even the SSD based ones) and performance is only increasing... with faster and faster netbooks, I just don't see the point.With faster and faster netbooks, I start to wonder whether "netbook" is a meaningful classification anymore.
When people started talking about netbooks, I asked, "What's the difference between a netbook and an ultraportable laptop?
"  The answer came back, "It's only really powerful enough to run a web browser and has almost no internal storage.
The idea is that you'll mostly only use it to run web applications.
"  As netbooks get faster, have bigger hard drives, and are running full desktop operating systems, I'd like to re-ask my question.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31061086
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31051938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31048908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043054
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043170
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042098
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31048678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045012
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042796
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31048068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31060238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31067258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31046426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31052930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31046726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31046312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_06_0113229_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31061086
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042268
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042074
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043584
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043170
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044338
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045170
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044324
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042216
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042928
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045012
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043104
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045080
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044618
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042168
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044380
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042746
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042512
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043488
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047794
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31052930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042248
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31051938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042196
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042990
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044946
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044316
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31067258
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042900
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044522
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31046726
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044156
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044638
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044882
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042946
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047690
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042634
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042296
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042866
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31048068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31047410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31048908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042894
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31060238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31043492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044596
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31045158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31048678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31046312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31046426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31042438
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044702
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_06_0113229.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_06_0113229.31044296
</commentlist>
</conversation>
