<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_05_0036235</id>
	<title>Pluto &mdash; a Complex and Changing World</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265378220000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.astroengine.com/" rel="nofollow">astroengine</a> writes <i>"After 4 years of processing the highest resolution photographs the Hubble Space Telescope could muster, <a href="http://news.discovery.com/space/pluto-high-resolution-hubble.html">we now have the highest resolution view of Pluto's surface ever produced</a>. Most excitingly, these new observations show an active world with seasonal changes altering the dwarf planet's surface. It turns out that this far-flung world has more in common with Earth than we would have ever imagined."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>astroengine writes " After 4 years of processing the highest resolution photographs the Hubble Space Telescope could muster , we now have the highest resolution view of Pluto 's surface ever produced .
Most excitingly , these new observations show an active world with seasonal changes altering the dwarf planet 's surface .
It turns out that this far-flung world has more in common with Earth than we would have ever imagined .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>astroengine writes "After 4 years of processing the highest resolution photographs the Hubble Space Telescope could muster, we now have the highest resolution view of Pluto's surface ever produced.
Most excitingly, these new observations show an active world with seasonal changes altering the dwarf planet's surface.
It turns out that this far-flung world has more in common with Earth than we would have ever imagined.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033816</id>
	<title>Re:Can't wait for a good picture!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265380980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait so you corrected his sentence without actually correcting it? Ok.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait so you corrected his sentence without actually correcting it ?
Ok .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait so you corrected his sentence without actually correcting it?
Ok.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074</id>
	<title>High res?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265295600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it just me, or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030470</id>
	<title>Another Earth(like)?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265299680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...more in common with Earth than we would have ever imagined."</p><p>If this is going to be along the lines of the the "Earthlike" exoplanets, it means something like Pluto has a surface, and probably some elements.</p><p>Why is it every planet that's not obviously entirely unlike Earth is "Earthlike"? Are we really that desperate for a refuge should we ruin this planet completely?</p><p>Hell no. Most people with even a slight interest and modest education know better, and don't try to make a point anything like that. No, these asinine statements are almost invariably made by 'science journalists' which are rapidly becoming less and less of both of those. They know they can't keep your interest recounting the bare facts so they have to come up with some bullshit that they're probably not even aware how bag of hammers stoopid it sounds. Pluto has an axial tilt, therefore it has seasons... like Earth.  Sure, seasons with an average summer of 60 degrees Kelvin and winters at 30 Kelvin. How very Earthlike.</p><p>See, there's a downside to all these magazines and other media making stuff available on the net. Since they're making it available for free, they're not making anything directly from them, so they have nothing to lose by making them crap. Then they can get you to subscribe for the better stuff. In theory. Rather than paying some real and knowledgeable science journalists, or even specialists in that field, to write better material, they go the cheap route and use the same mediocre hacks for their print versions as for their e-versions.</p><p>So, naturally Pluto is Earthlike. It's because the source is Sciencelike. Sure, and those writers' and editors' asses are Hatlike.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...more in common with Earth than we would have ever imagined .
" If this is going to be along the lines of the the " Earthlike " exoplanets , it means something like Pluto has a surface , and probably some elements.Why is it every planet that 's not obviously entirely unlike Earth is " Earthlike " ?
Are we really that desperate for a refuge should we ruin this planet completely ? Hell no .
Most people with even a slight interest and modest education know better , and do n't try to make a point anything like that .
No , these asinine statements are almost invariably made by 'science journalists ' which are rapidly becoming less and less of both of those .
They know they ca n't keep your interest recounting the bare facts so they have to come up with some bullshit that they 're probably not even aware how bag of hammers stoopid it sounds .
Pluto has an axial tilt , therefore it has seasons... like Earth .
Sure , seasons with an average summer of 60 degrees Kelvin and winters at 30 Kelvin .
How very Earthlike.See , there 's a downside to all these magazines and other media making stuff available on the net .
Since they 're making it available for free , they 're not making anything directly from them , so they have nothing to lose by making them crap .
Then they can get you to subscribe for the better stuff .
In theory .
Rather than paying some real and knowledgeable science journalists , or even specialists in that field , to write better material , they go the cheap route and use the same mediocre hacks for their print versions as for their e-versions.So , naturally Pluto is Earthlike .
It 's because the source is Sciencelike .
Sure , and those writers ' and editors ' asses are Hatlike .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...more in common with Earth than we would have ever imagined.
"If this is going to be along the lines of the the "Earthlike" exoplanets, it means something like Pluto has a surface, and probably some elements.Why is it every planet that's not obviously entirely unlike Earth is "Earthlike"?
Are we really that desperate for a refuge should we ruin this planet completely?Hell no.
Most people with even a slight interest and modest education know better, and don't try to make a point anything like that.
No, these asinine statements are almost invariably made by 'science journalists' which are rapidly becoming less and less of both of those.
They know they can't keep your interest recounting the bare facts so they have to come up with some bullshit that they're probably not even aware how bag of hammers stoopid it sounds.
Pluto has an axial tilt, therefore it has seasons... like Earth.
Sure, seasons with an average summer of 60 degrees Kelvin and winters at 30 Kelvin.
How very Earthlike.See, there's a downside to all these magazines and other media making stuff available on the net.
Since they're making it available for free, they're not making anything directly from them, so they have nothing to lose by making them crap.
Then they can get you to subscribe for the better stuff.
In theory.
Rather than paying some real and knowledgeable science journalists, or even specialists in that field, to write better material, they go the cheap route and use the same mediocre hacks for their print versions as for their e-versions.So, naturally Pluto is Earthlike.
It's because the source is Sciencelike.
Sure, and those writers' and editors' asses are Hatlike.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034702</id>
	<title>Re:Pluto = Asteroid WIth Attitude and Ego!</title>
	<author>BodhiCat</author>
	<datestamp>1265386740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the pictures show that its round and has seasons, it should be a planet</htmltext>
<tokenext>the pictures show that its round and has seasons , it should be a planet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the pictures show that its round and has seasons, it should be a planet</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31035182</id>
	<title>Re:Space porn?</title>
	<author>Amorymeltzer</author>
	<datestamp>1265389380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(This goes without saying on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. but) If that's what you're noticing in those pictures then you REALLY need to get laid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( This goes without saying on / .
but ) If that 's what you 're noticing in those pictures then you REALLY need to get laid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(This goes without saying on /.
but) If that's what you're noticing in those pictures then you REALLY need to get laid.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030168</id>
	<title>Re:High res?</title>
	<author>pushing-robot</author>
	<datestamp>1265296500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it just me, or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays?</p></div><p>Based on my experience, all planets look like that from space.  And on the surface they all look like southern California.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays ? Based on my experience , all planets look like that from space .
And on the surface they all look like southern California .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays?Based on my experience, all planets look like that from space.
And on the surface they all look like southern California.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030734</id>
	<title>Re:Pluto is not a planet, just a large asteroid...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265302080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The whole scheme is arbitrary.  The term "planet" was only <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition\_of\_planet" title="wikipedia.org">nailed down</a> [wikipedia.org] in 2006, and of course it's going to take people time to adjust to the rigorous definition.</p><p>I'm not sure how useful the classification is anyway.  The differences between Mercury and Jupiter are greater than the differences between Mercury and Pluto. Earth is more different still than any of the three with its complex and varied forms of life.</p><p>I think the astronomers should use their definition, and I suppose it ought to be taught in schools for the sake of consistency (though I question the value of making kids memorize the planets in the first place), but it's really not a big deal what you call it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole scheme is arbitrary .
The term " planet " was only nailed down [ wikipedia.org ] in 2006 , and of course it 's going to take people time to adjust to the rigorous definition.I 'm not sure how useful the classification is anyway .
The differences between Mercury and Jupiter are greater than the differences between Mercury and Pluto .
Earth is more different still than any of the three with its complex and varied forms of life.I think the astronomers should use their definition , and I suppose it ought to be taught in schools for the sake of consistency ( though I question the value of making kids memorize the planets in the first place ) , but it 's really not a big deal what you call it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole scheme is arbitrary.
The term "planet" was only nailed down [wikipedia.org] in 2006, and of course it's going to take people time to adjust to the rigorous definition.I'm not sure how useful the classification is anyway.
The differences between Mercury and Jupiter are greater than the differences between Mercury and Pluto.
Earth is more different still than any of the three with its complex and varied forms of life.I think the astronomers should use their definition, and I suppose it ought to be taught in schools for the sake of consistency (though I question the value of making kids memorize the planets in the first place), but it's really not a big deal what you call it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180</id>
	<title>News Flash</title>
	<author>MyLongNickName</author>
	<datestamp>1265296620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pluto IS a planet. It was a planet when I was in school, so it will always be a planet, dadgummit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pluto IS a planet .
It was a planet when I was in school , so it will always be a planet , dadgummit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pluto IS a planet.
It was a planet when I was in school, so it will always be a planet, dadgummit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031428</id>
	<title>Mm hmm..</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1265307420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now is this better... or worse?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now is this better... or worse ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now is this better... or worse?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030124</id>
	<title>Pluto having seasonal changes is well known</title>
	<author>Trepidity</author>
	<datestamp>1265296080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These new high-resolution views no doubt provide important new information about Pluto's seasons, but the fact that Pluto undergoes significant seasonal cycles has been known for quite a while. (<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=ukpGOp1tj\_QC&amp;pg=PA203&amp;dq=seasonal+changes" title="google.com">Here's</a> [google.com] one randomly chosen mention.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These new high-resolution views no doubt provide important new information about Pluto 's seasons , but the fact that Pluto undergoes significant seasonal cycles has been known for quite a while .
( Here 's [ google.com ] one randomly chosen mention .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These new high-resolution views no doubt provide important new information about Pluto's seasons, but the fact that Pluto undergoes significant seasonal cycles has been known for quite a while.
(Here's [google.com] one randomly chosen mention.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031810</id>
	<title>Re:High res?</title>
	<author>end15</author>
	<datestamp>1265311020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of a big dark blur, I see a big bright blur.</p><p>hum...  wait a minute...  that means Pluto is actually Tatooine!</p><p>I knew it was real...  I knew it!</p><p>(runs off to become a Jedi)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of a big dark blur , I see a big bright blur.hum... wait a minute... that means Pluto is actually Tatooine ! I knew it was real... I knew it !
( runs off to become a Jedi )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of a big dark blur, I see a big bright blur.hum...  wait a minute...  that means Pluto is actually Tatooine!I knew it was real...  I knew it!
(runs off to become a Jedi)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033536</id>
	<title>Re:Classification</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265378520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, it's not a Class M planet.</p><p>Maybe a Class P.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , it 's not a Class M planet.Maybe a Class P .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, it's not a Class M planet.Maybe a Class P.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31041316</id>
	<title>Re:Classification</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265374620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No that means earth is not a planet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No that means earth is not a planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No that means earth is not a planet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031418</id>
	<title>Re:Pluto = Asteroid WIth Attitude and Ego!</title>
	<author>ILuvRamen</author>
	<datestamp>1265307300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also, it appears that once you impersonate a planet for decades and get caught, they blur your face in photos<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P Get it cuz the photo says "faces" of pluto and it's blurry?  For every one of you who thought I didn't have to explain it, there's a person who needed it explained lol.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , it appears that once you impersonate a planet for decades and get caught , they blur your face in photos : -P Get it cuz the photo says " faces " of pluto and it 's blurry ?
For every one of you who thought I did n't have to explain it , there 's a person who needed it explained lol .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, it appears that once you impersonate a planet for decades and get caught, they blur your face in photos :-P Get it cuz the photo says "faces" of pluto and it's blurry?
For every one of you who thought I didn't have to explain it, there's a person who needed it explained lol.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032020</id>
	<title>Re:High res?</title>
	<author>jbezorg</author>
	<datestamp>1265313540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it just me, or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays?</p></div><p>Blurry photos.... I feel like I'm watching an episode of "In Search Of"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays ? Blurry photos.... I feel like I 'm watching an episode of " In Search Of "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays?Blurry photos.... I feel like I'm watching an episode of "In Search Of"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030514</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>iceborer</author>
	<datestamp>1265300100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You seem a little down; perhaps your humors are imbalanced.  A good leeching should fix that right up!</htmltext>
<tokenext>You seem a little down ; perhaps your humors are imbalanced .
A good leeching should fix that right up !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You seem a little down; perhaps your humors are imbalanced.
A good leeching should fix that right up!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034900</id>
	<title>Re:High res?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265387880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it just me, or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays?</p></div><p>If you'd take the time to look carefully, you'd be able to see irrigation canals. There is now proof that we are not alone in the universe.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays ? If you 'd take the time to look carefully , you 'd be able to see irrigation canals .
There is now proof that we are not alone in the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays?If you'd take the time to look carefully, you'd be able to see irrigation canals.
There is now proof that we are not alone in the universe.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031356</id>
	<title>Re:Can't wait for a good picture!</title>
	<author>slashqwerty</author>
	<datestamp>1265306940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The data rate from Pluto is expected to be 1000 bits per second.  It would take over two years to transfer the entire 8GB buffer at that speed.  Granted, New Horizons could send back a 1MB picture in about two hours.  But the mission planners have other plans for the immediate flyby.  They are going send radio signals from Earth to New Horizons to measure Doppler shift (inferring the gravitational pull and mass of Pluto) and to detect the effect Pluto's atmosphere has on the signal.

<br> <br>Compressed pictures should be available to the public a few <i>days</i> after the flyby.  They are expecting the full data set to take nine months.

<br> <br>So for decent pictures you had best revise your estimate:<blockquote><div><p>Five more years until we have a GOOD picture of Pluto. July 14, 2015...can't wait!</p></div>
</blockquote><p>July 2015</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The data rate from Pluto is expected to be 1000 bits per second .
It would take over two years to transfer the entire 8GB buffer at that speed .
Granted , New Horizons could send back a 1MB picture in about two hours .
But the mission planners have other plans for the immediate flyby .
They are going send radio signals from Earth to New Horizons to measure Doppler shift ( inferring the gravitational pull and mass of Pluto ) and to detect the effect Pluto 's atmosphere has on the signal .
Compressed pictures should be available to the public a few days after the flyby .
They are expecting the full data set to take nine months .
So for decent pictures you had best revise your estimate : Five more years until we have a GOOD picture of Pluto .
July 14 , 2015...ca n't wait !
July 2015</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The data rate from Pluto is expected to be 1000 bits per second.
It would take over two years to transfer the entire 8GB buffer at that speed.
Granted, New Horizons could send back a 1MB picture in about two hours.
But the mission planners have other plans for the immediate flyby.
They are going send radio signals from Earth to New Horizons to measure Doppler shift (inferring the gravitational pull and mass of Pluto) and to detect the effect Pluto's atmosphere has on the signal.
Compressed pictures should be available to the public a few days after the flyby.
They are expecting the full data set to take nine months.
So for decent pictures you had best revise your estimate:Five more years until we have a GOOD picture of Pluto.
July 14, 2015...can't wait!
July 2015
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030680</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265301540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To settle this, let's borrow from the IT field and classify orbs as super-planets, mainframe-planets, mini-planets, micro-planets, and iPlanets. Done!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To settle this , let 's borrow from the IT field and classify orbs as super-planets , mainframe-planets , mini-planets , micro-planets , and iPlanets .
Done !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To settle this, let's borrow from the IT field and classify orbs as super-planets, mainframe-planets, mini-planets, micro-planets, and iPlanets.
Done!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030440</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>RuBLed</author>
	<datestamp>1265299380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes it is a planet, a dwarf planet. Things change.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes it is a planet , a dwarf planet .
Things change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes it is a planet, a dwarf planet.
Things change.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031648</id>
	<title>Re:Can't wait for a good picture!</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1265309280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>James Webb Space Telescope might beat it in giving us "good" pictures of Pluto; assuming it will be launched in 2014, as planned currently. And who knows what Herschel Space Observatory might give us soon, if pointed at Pluto...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>James Webb Space Telescope might beat it in giving us " good " pictures of Pluto ; assuming it will be launched in 2014 , as planned currently .
And who knows what Herschel Space Observatory might give us soon , if pointed at Pluto.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>James Webb Space Telescope might beat it in giving us "good" pictures of Pluto; assuming it will be launched in 2014, as planned currently.
And who knows what Herschel Space Observatory might give us soon, if pointed at Pluto...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032090</id>
	<title>Re:Pluto is not a planet, just a large asteroid...</title>
	<author>SpryGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1265401020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The key definition to me is that planets orbit in the plane of the ecliptic, all in the same direction.</p><p>Pluto does not orbit in the plane of the ecliptic.  It's orbit also crosses the paths of existing planets.  It's clearly an Oort cloud object.  And not even the largest one.  It has more in common with a comet than with any of the other planets, in both orbit and composition.</p><p>I don't understand why there's even a controversy here.  Even as a child, when I looked at the diagram of the planets, Pluto stood out in a "One of these things is not like the others" way to me.  It simply doesn't fit.</p><p>The decision to demote Pluto from planethood was and is a good one, and everyone upset by it just needs to get over it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The key definition to me is that planets orbit in the plane of the ecliptic , all in the same direction.Pluto does not orbit in the plane of the ecliptic .
It 's orbit also crosses the paths of existing planets .
It 's clearly an Oort cloud object .
And not even the largest one .
It has more in common with a comet than with any of the other planets , in both orbit and composition.I do n't understand why there 's even a controversy here .
Even as a child , when I looked at the diagram of the planets , Pluto stood out in a " One of these things is not like the others " way to me .
It simply does n't fit.The decision to demote Pluto from planethood was and is a good one , and everyone upset by it just needs to get over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The key definition to me is that planets orbit in the plane of the ecliptic, all in the same direction.Pluto does not orbit in the plane of the ecliptic.
It's orbit also crosses the paths of existing planets.
It's clearly an Oort cloud object.
And not even the largest one.
It has more in common with a comet than with any of the other planets, in both orbit and composition.I don't understand why there's even a controversy here.
Even as a child, when I looked at the diagram of the planets, Pluto stood out in a "One of these things is not like the others" way to me.
It simply doesn't fit.The decision to demote Pluto from planethood was and is a good one, and everyone upset by it just needs to get over it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031680</id>
	<title>Re:tux head?</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1265309700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We have a proof!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We have a proof !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We have a proof!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030094</id>
	<title>Can't wait for a good picture!</title>
	<author>mykos</author>
	<datestamp>1265295720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Five more years until we have a GOOD picture of Pluto.  July 14, 2015...can't wait!</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New\_Horizons" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New\_Horizons</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Five more years until we have a GOOD picture of Pluto .
July 14 , 2015...ca n't wait ! http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New \ _Horizons [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Five more years until we have a GOOD picture of Pluto.
July 14, 2015...can't wait!http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New\_Horizons [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030902</id>
	<title>Re:Pluto = Asteroid WIth Attitude and Ego!</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265303580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>the amateur astronomer understands that Pluto is nothing more than an asteroid with a big ego</p></div></blockquote><p>There's a Rush Limbaugh + Jupiter joke just waiting to be born....<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the amateur astronomer understands that Pluto is nothing more than an asteroid with a big egoThere 's a Rush Limbaugh + Jupiter joke just waiting to be born... .    </tokentext>
<sentencetext>the amateur astronomer understands that Pluto is nothing more than an asteroid with a big egoThere's a Rush Limbaugh + Jupiter joke just waiting to be born....
   
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030048</id>
	<title>I know I was shocked to learn that</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265295480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not a dog!  Why would Disney lie to me?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not a dog !
Why would Disney lie to me ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not a dog!
Why would Disney lie to me?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033878</id>
	<title>Re:Can't wait for a good picture!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265381520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>detect the effect Pluto's atmosphere has on the signal.</p></div><p>Pluto has an atmosphere?  I figured a body that small wouldn't have the necessary gravity to hold one.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>detect the effect Pluto 's atmosphere has on the signal.Pluto has an atmosphere ?
I figured a body that small would n't have the necessary gravity to hold one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>detect the effect Pluto's atmosphere has on the signal.Pluto has an atmosphere?
I figured a body that small wouldn't have the necessary gravity to hold one.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030154</id>
	<title>Re:High res?</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1265296380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering it normally looks like this: <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/" title="nationalgeographic.com">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/</a> [nationalgeographic.com], those blobs of yellow and grays are pretty impressive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering it normally looks like this : http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/ [ nationalgeographic.com ] , those blobs of yellow and grays are pretty impressive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering it normally looks like this: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/ [nationalgeographic.com], those blobs of yellow and grays are pretty impressive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030092</id>
	<title>Space porn?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265295720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sorry, but the photos look like an interracial gangbang to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , but the photos look like an interracial gangbang to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, but the photos look like an interracial gangbang to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031888</id>
	<title>Re:High res?</title>
	<author>genner</author>
	<datestamp>1265311920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Considering it normally looks like this: <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/" title="nationalgeographic.com">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/</a> [nationalgeographic.com], those blobs of yellow and grays are pretty impressive.</p></div><p>But the normal picture looks shiny. <br>
Pluto is one of those chicks that looks better from a distance.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering it normally looks like this : http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/ [ nationalgeographic.com ] , those blobs of yellow and grays are pretty impressive.But the normal picture looks shiny .
Pluto is one of those chicks that looks better from a distance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering it normally looks like this: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/ [nationalgeographic.com], those blobs of yellow and grays are pretty impressive.But the normal picture looks shiny.
Pluto is one of those chicks that looks better from a distance.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030110</id>
	<title>At the same time</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1265295960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's not just the seasons that change: In those four years Pluto has gone from being a planet to not being a planet to being a planet again to being kind of a planet... Complex and changing indeed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not just the seasons that change : In those four years Pluto has gone from being a planet to not being a planet to being a planet again to being kind of a planet... Complex and changing indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not just the seasons that change: In those four years Pluto has gone from being a planet to not being a planet to being a planet again to being kind of a planet... Complex and changing indeed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031802</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>R.Mo\_Robert</author>
	<datestamp>1265310960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceres\_(dwarf\_planet)" title="wikipedia.org">Ceres</a> [wikipedia.org] was classified as a planet for 50 years, but we got over that--we can probably get over this, too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ceres [ wikipedia.org ] was classified as a planet for 50 years , but we got over that--we can probably get over this , too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Ceres [wikipedia.org] was classified as a planet for 50 years, but we got over that--we can probably get over this, too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030212</id>
	<title>tux head?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265296980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>am I the only one who sees a blurry tux face in the 180 photo?</htmltext>
<tokenext>am I the only one who sees a blurry tux face in the 180 photo ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>am I the only one who sees a blurry tux face in the 180 photo?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030376</id>
	<title>Re:Space porn?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265298720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>rule 34</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>rule 34</tokentext>
<sentencetext>rule 34</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030408</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265299140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Pluto IS a planet. It was a planet when I was in school, so it will always be a planet, dadgummit.</p></div><p>Where they screwed up. They should have established three classes of planets, Gas Giants, Rocky planets like Earth, and smaller ice planets. Instead of removing a planet they simply would have added one or two. What makes an ice planet? Large enough to have enough gravity to take on a round shape and orbits the Sun. The defining thing needs to be mass and orbiting the Sun. If the Earth orbited Jupiter it'd be a Moon. It's the only solution that makes sense. Saying an icy body can't be a planet means that there is a limit to how much water a planet can have and/or if it has water it has to orbit the goldielocks zone. That's a poor definition but currently it fits. Say there's an Earth sized planet orbiting near Pluto that is 90\% water and the rest rock and metals. Is that a planet? They've already found a planet several Earth's in size that may be mostly water. No one has said it can't be a planet.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Pluto IS a planet .
It was a planet when I was in school , so it will always be a planet , dadgummit.Where they screwed up .
They should have established three classes of planets , Gas Giants , Rocky planets like Earth , and smaller ice planets .
Instead of removing a planet they simply would have added one or two .
What makes an ice planet ?
Large enough to have enough gravity to take on a round shape and orbits the Sun .
The defining thing needs to be mass and orbiting the Sun .
If the Earth orbited Jupiter it 'd be a Moon .
It 's the only solution that makes sense .
Saying an icy body ca n't be a planet means that there is a limit to how much water a planet can have and/or if it has water it has to orbit the goldielocks zone .
That 's a poor definition but currently it fits .
Say there 's an Earth sized planet orbiting near Pluto that is 90 \ % water and the rest rock and metals .
Is that a planet ?
They 've already found a planet several Earth 's in size that may be mostly water .
No one has said it ca n't be a planet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pluto IS a planet.
It was a planet when I was in school, so it will always be a planet, dadgummit.Where they screwed up.
They should have established three classes of planets, Gas Giants, Rocky planets like Earth, and smaller ice planets.
Instead of removing a planet they simply would have added one or two.
What makes an ice planet?
Large enough to have enough gravity to take on a round shape and orbits the Sun.
The defining thing needs to be mass and orbiting the Sun.
If the Earth orbited Jupiter it'd be a Moon.
It's the only solution that makes sense.
Saying an icy body can't be a planet means that there is a limit to how much water a planet can have and/or if it has water it has to orbit the goldielocks zone.
That's a poor definition but currently it fits.
Say there's an Earth sized planet orbiting near Pluto that is 90\% water and the rest rock and metals.
Is that a planet?
They've already found a planet several Earth's in size that may be mostly water.
No one has said it can't be a planet.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31045350</id>
	<title>Re:Another Earth(like)?</title>
	<author>Geminii</author>
	<datestamp>1265469660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>so they have nothing to lose by making them crap.</i>
</p><p>
Reputation. Eyeballs. Advertising. Money. Existence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so they have nothing to lose by making them crap .
Reputation. Eyeballs .
Advertising. Money .
Existence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> so they have nothing to lose by making them crap.
Reputation. Eyeballs.
Advertising. Money.
Existence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030078</id>
	<title>Pluto = Asteroid WIth Attitude and Ego!</title>
	<author>loose electron</author>
	<datestamp>1265295660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the amateur astronomer understands that Pluto is noting more than an asteroid with a big ego</p><p>The attitude gets even bigger when its closer to the sun than Neptune.....</p><p>How would you like to be demoted?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the amateur astronomer understands that Pluto is noting more than an asteroid with a big egoThe attitude gets even bigger when its closer to the sun than Neptune.....How would you like to be demoted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the amateur astronomer understands that Pluto is noting more than an asteroid with a big egoThe attitude gets even bigger when its closer to the sun than Neptune.....How would you like to be demoted?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030432</id>
	<title>Re:tux head?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265299320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>4 years for that... i could have painted something way better with gimp and noone would have noticed the difference...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>4 years for that... i could have painted something way better with gimp and noone would have noticed the difference.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>4 years for that... i could have painted something way better with gimp and noone would have noticed the difference...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030582</id>
	<title>Re:tux head?</title>
	<author>keeboo</author>
	<datestamp>1265300640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Uh... That's not a Rorschach test.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh... That 's not a Rorschach test .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh... That's not a Rorschach test.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030212</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030254</id>
	<title>When can we have google pluto</title>
	<author>spribyl</author>
	<datestamp>1265297340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nuf said</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nuf said</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nuf said</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030368</id>
	<title>GAH!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265298600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"From Earth, the disk of Pluto is ten times smaller than the typical resolution limit of a ground-based telescope."</p><p>"Ten times smaller?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" From Earth , the disk of Pluto is ten times smaller than the typical resolution limit of a ground-based telescope .
" " Ten times smaller ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"From Earth, the disk of Pluto is ten times smaller than the typical resolution limit of a ground-based telescope.
""Ten times smaller?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31129316</id>
	<title>Re:Classification</title>
	<author>laurele</author>
	<datestamp>1266094500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is a real planet. The fact is, there are more subclasses of planets than just terrestrials and jovians. Dwarf planets are planets too, regardless of the nonsensical decree of the IAU.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a real planet .
The fact is , there are more subclasses of planets than just terrestrials and jovians .
Dwarf planets are planets too , regardless of the nonsensical decree of the IAU .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a real planet.
The fact is, there are more subclasses of planets than just terrestrials and jovians.
Dwarf planets are planets too, regardless of the nonsensical decree of the IAU.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030738</id>
	<title>Re:Classification</title>
	<author>Tablizer</author>
	<datestamp>1265302140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>[Earth-like features] Should we maybe think of classifying Pluto as a real planet?</p></div></blockquote><p>There are moons with complex surfaces also, such as Titan, Europa, Io, Enceladus, etc. Having complex or dynamic surfaces is not unique to planets.<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>[ Earth-like features ] Should we maybe think of classifying Pluto as a real planet ? There are moons with complex surfaces also , such as Titan , Europa , Io , Enceladus , etc .
Having complex or dynamic surfaces is not unique to planets .
   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>[Earth-like features] Should we maybe think of classifying Pluto as a real planet?There are moons with complex surfaces also, such as Titan, Europa, Io, Enceladus, etc.
Having complex or dynamic surfaces is not unique to planets.
   
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31037022</id>
	<title>Re:High res?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265397240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Considering it normally looks like this: <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/" title="nationalgeographic.com" rel="nofollow">http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/</a> [nationalgeographic.com], those blobs of yellow and grays are pretty impressive.</p></div><p>Picture in the Nat Geo article is quite the same picture as the one in the Discovery article; I'm assuming you pasted the wrong link (why it has +5 informative then, I don't know.. even a casual glance would reveal both the first article and your link relate to and show the same pictures)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering it normally looks like this : http : //news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/ [ nationalgeographic.com ] , those blobs of yellow and grays are pretty impressive.Picture in the Nat Geo article is quite the same picture as the one in the Discovery article ; I 'm assuming you pasted the wrong link ( why it has + 5 informative then , I do n't know.. even a casual glance would reveal both the first article and your link relate to and show the same pictures )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering it normally looks like this: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100204-pluto-hubble-best-pictures/ [nationalgeographic.com], those blobs of yellow and grays are pretty impressive.Picture in the Nat Geo article is quite the same picture as the one in the Discovery article; I'm assuming you pasted the wrong link (why it has +5 informative then, I don't know.. even a casual glance would reveal both the first article and your link relate to and show the same pictures)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031742</id>
	<title>Re:Pluto = Asteroid WIth Attitude and Ego!</title>
	<author>earlymon</author>
	<datestamp>1265310240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pluto replies:</p><p><a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/unisex/sciencemath/8964/" title="thinkgeek.com">http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/unisex/sciencemath/8964/</a> [thinkgeek.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pluto replies : http : //www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/unisex/sciencemath/8964/ [ thinkgeek.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pluto replies:http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts-apparel/unisex/sciencemath/8964/ [thinkgeek.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030078</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030296</id>
	<title>Pluto is not a planet, just a large asteroid...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265297940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pluto is not a planet, just a large asteroid the size of other asteroids at that distance from the star by the name sun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pluto is not a planet , just a large asteroid the size of other asteroids at that distance from the star by the name sun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pluto is not a planet, just a large asteroid the size of other asteroids at that distance from the star by the name sun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032842</id>
	<title>Re:Classification</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265368380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i dunno.  has it met that blue fairy and gone on a quest with an insect yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i dunno .
has it met that blue fairy and gone on a quest with an insect yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i dunno.
has it met that blue fairy and gone on a quest with an insect yet?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031620</id>
	<title>Re:Another Earth(like)?</title>
	<author>WillDraven</author>
	<datestamp>1265309040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Minor nitpick, Pluto's seasons are primarily driven by its highly elliptical orbit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Minor nitpick , Pluto 's seasons are primarily driven by its highly elliptical orbit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Minor nitpick, Pluto's seasons are primarily driven by its highly elliptical orbit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034224</id>
	<title>Re:Can't wait for a good picture!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265383860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Hubble's map is the best view of Pluto we'll have until the New Horizons probe is six months from close encounter. "</p><p>We'll be getting better views of the planet well before New Horizon passes by.  January 2015... can't wait!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hubble 's map is the best view of Pluto we 'll have until the New Horizons probe is six months from close encounter .
" We 'll be getting better views of the planet well before New Horizon passes by .
January 2015... ca n't wait !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hubble's map is the best view of Pluto we'll have until the New Horizons probe is six months from close encounter.
"We'll be getting better views of the planet well before New Horizon passes by.
January 2015... can't wait!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031356</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034526</id>
	<title>Re:High res?</title>
	<author>zapakh</author>
	<datestamp>1265385660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is it just me, or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays?</p></div><p>I sort of see a face in the last one.  Admittedly, it is the face of Rorschach, but it's still a start!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it just me , or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays ? I sort of see a face in the last one .
Admittedly , it is the face of Rorschach , but it 's still a start !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it just me, or do the photos look like a big blob of yellows and grays?I sort of see a face in the last one.
Admittedly, it is the face of Rorschach, but it's still a start!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030942</id>
	<title>Re:Another Earth(like)?</title>
	<author>scdeimos</author>
	<datestamp>1265303820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know any of this surprises you. Media outlets are very Businesslike. Like businesses, they are driven to be Profitlike. You make profit by maximising your income (none, or maybe banner clicks) while minimising your expenses (lights, power, reporters' salaries).</p><p>Thus, we have "no truth in advertising - nor in news media."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know any of this surprises you .
Media outlets are very Businesslike .
Like businesses , they are driven to be Profitlike .
You make profit by maximising your income ( none , or maybe banner clicks ) while minimising your expenses ( lights , power , reporters ' salaries ) .Thus , we have " no truth in advertising - nor in news media .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know any of this surprises you.
Media outlets are very Businesslike.
Like businesses, they are driven to be Profitlike.
You make profit by maximising your income (none, or maybe banner clicks) while minimising your expenses (lights, power, reporters' salaries).Thus, we have "no truth in advertising - nor in news media.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032994</id>
	<title>Re:Another Earth(like)?</title>
	<author>Tim C</author>
	<datestamp>1265370840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>an average summer of 60 degrees Kelvin</i></p><p>Nitpick, but you don't say "degrees Kelvin". I suspect that this was a typo though, as you use it correctly further on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>an average summer of 60 degrees KelvinNitpick , but you do n't say " degrees Kelvin " .
I suspect that this was a typo though , as you use it correctly further on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>an average summer of 60 degrees KelvinNitpick, but you don't say "degrees Kelvin".
I suspect that this was a typo though, as you use it correctly further on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414</id>
	<title>Classification</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265299200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> It turns out that this far-flung world has more in common with Earth than we would have ever imagined.</p></div><p>

Should we maybe think of classifying Pluto as a real planet?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It turns out that this far-flung world has more in common with Earth than we would have ever imagined .
Should we maybe think of classifying Pluto as a real planet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> It turns out that this far-flung world has more in common with Earth than we would have ever imagined.
Should we maybe think of classifying Pluto as a real planet?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033156</id>
	<title>Re:News Flash</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265373780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since when did the IAU have the authority, anyway?</p><p>It's like a bunch of biologists saying "You know, now that we've discovered emus and kiwis, we don't really like it that ostriches are birds.  From here on out, we're defining birds as creatures that have a keel on their sternum."</p><p>An organization is perfectly allowed to define what internal definitions they want to use, but it's somewhat Orwellian for them to then inflict them upon others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since when did the IAU have the authority , anyway ? It 's like a bunch of biologists saying " You know , now that we 've discovered emus and kiwis , we do n't really like it that ostriches are birds .
From here on out , we 're defining birds as creatures that have a keel on their sternum .
" An organization is perfectly allowed to define what internal definitions they want to use , but it 's somewhat Orwellian for them to then inflict them upon others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since when did the IAU have the authority, anyway?It's like a bunch of biologists saying "You know, now that we've discovered emus and kiwis, we don't really like it that ostriches are birds.
From here on out, we're defining birds as creatures that have a keel on their sternum.
"An organization is perfectly allowed to define what internal definitions they want to use, but it's somewhat Orwellian for them to then inflict them upon others.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034526
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032090
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31041316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31129316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31037022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31035182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31045350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030432
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030212
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030078
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_05_0036235_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030180
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033156
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031802
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030154
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31037022
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034900
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030414
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31129316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31041316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31035182
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030110
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31045350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031620
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31032090
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030432
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030048
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031356
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034224
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033816
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31033878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030124
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_05_0036235.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31034702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31031742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_05_0036235.31030902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
