<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_03_2139206</id>
	<title>Nexus One Update Fixes 3G, Adds Multitouch</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265193480000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.infoworld.com/" rel="nofollow">snydeq</a> writes <i>"Google is pushing out an update for the Nexus One that will <a href="http://infoworld.com/d/mobilize/nexus-one-update-fixes-3g-problem-adds-multitouch-810">fix a 3G connectivity problem and add limited support for multitouch</a>. After receiving over <a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/android?hl=en">1,500 messages in a support forum</a> from people complaining about trouble connecting to 3G, Google said it has identified the problem and <a href="http://googlenexusoneboard.blogspot.com/2010/02/new-software-update-for-nexus-one.html">has started delivering the fix</a>. In addition to fixing 3G, the update adds the first applications to support multitouch. While the recent versions of the Android OS include multitouch capability, no phone in the US has supported it."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>snydeq writes " Google is pushing out an update for the Nexus One that will fix a 3G connectivity problem and add limited support for multitouch .
After receiving over 1,500 messages in a support forum from people complaining about trouble connecting to 3G , Google said it has identified the problem and has started delivering the fix .
In addition to fixing 3G , the update adds the first applications to support multitouch .
While the recent versions of the Android OS include multitouch capability , no phone in the US has supported it .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>snydeq writes "Google is pushing out an update for the Nexus One that will fix a 3G connectivity problem and add limited support for multitouch.
After receiving over 1,500 messages in a support forum from people complaining about trouble connecting to 3G, Google said it has identified the problem and has started delivering the fix.
In addition to fixing 3G, the update adds the first applications to support multitouch.
While the recent versions of the Android OS include multitouch capability, no phone in the US has supported it.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016352</id>
	<title>Re:OLD News</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1264939140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shut. Up.</p><p>No one cares, and not everyone is on top of every single tech story ever single day.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. is no exception. In fact the whole concept is to talk abouit event in the news, so naturally you read about it after it has been in the news.<br>This has always been the case....except for spoiling TV shows, THAT they put on the front page immediately after it showing regardless of time zones.</p><p>Bastards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shut .
Up.No one cares , and not everyone is on top of every single tech story ever single day .
/. is no exception .
In fact the whole concept is to talk abouit event in the news , so naturally you read about it after it has been in the news.This has always been the case....except for spoiling TV shows , THAT they put on the front page immediately after it showing regardless of time zones.Bastards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shut.
Up.No one cares, and not everyone is on top of every single tech story ever single day.
/. is no exception.
In fact the whole concept is to talk abouit event in the news, so naturally you read about it after it has been in the news.This has always been the case....except for spoiling TV shows, THAT they put on the front page immediately after it showing regardless of time zones.Bastards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016568</id>
	<title>Other US phone don't support multitouch....?</title>
	<author>wolf1oo</author>
	<datestamp>1264940520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just curious, what do they mean when saying that other US phones don't support the multitouch?</p><p>I own an HTC Droid Eris, and it seems to have a bunch of apps that support multitouch, and I actively utilize it. Is there something more that I am missing out here when they say that no other phones support the Android OS multitouch?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just curious , what do they mean when saying that other US phones do n't support the multitouch ? I own an HTC Droid Eris , and it seems to have a bunch of apps that support multitouch , and I actively utilize it .
Is there something more that I am missing out here when they say that no other phones support the Android OS multitouch ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just curious, what do they mean when saying that other US phones don't support the multitouch?I own an HTC Droid Eris, and it seems to have a bunch of apps that support multitouch, and I actively utilize it.
Is there something more that I am missing out here when they say that no other phones support the Android OS multitouch?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019258</id>
	<title>Re:3G Fix?</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1264963800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Yes, those geniuses at google, wrote a piece of software that rerouted power form the rear deflectors to modulate the refresh rate of the lcd screen to emit an interference signal that modifies the TMobile compatible 3G signal from 1700 MHz for download and 2100 MHz for upload to the A&amp;TT frequency of 1900 MHz. I'm just not sure what they're going to do to handle the excess tachyon radiation pressure on the the glass.</p></div></blockquote><p>

They may have to eject the core.<br> <br>

At the very least, a monitor in Google's NOC is going to kill the operator in a less then spectacular explosion.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , those geniuses at google , wrote a piece of software that rerouted power form the rear deflectors to modulate the refresh rate of the lcd screen to emit an interference signal that modifies the TMobile compatible 3G signal from 1700 MHz for download and 2100 MHz for upload to the A&amp;TT frequency of 1900 MHz .
I 'm just not sure what they 're going to do to handle the excess tachyon radiation pressure on the the glass .
They may have to eject the core .
At the very least , a monitor in Google 's NOC is going to kill the operator in a less then spectacular explosion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, those geniuses at google, wrote a piece of software that rerouted power form the rear deflectors to modulate the refresh rate of the lcd screen to emit an interference signal that modifies the TMobile compatible 3G signal from 1700 MHz for download and 2100 MHz for upload to the A&amp;TT frequency of 1900 MHz.
I'm just not sure what they're going to do to handle the excess tachyon radiation pressure on the the glass.
They may have to eject the core.
At the very least, a monitor in Google's NOC is going to kill the operator in a less then spectacular explosion.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017014</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>initialE</author>
	<datestamp>1264942920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think Apple owns the patent on "zooming". It is prominently featured on the Microsoft Surface, HP coffee table, and an early concept multitouch screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think Apple owns the patent on " zooming " .
It is prominently featured on the Microsoft Surface , HP coffee table , and an early concept multitouch screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think Apple owns the patent on "zooming".
It is prominently featured on the Microsoft Surface, HP coffee table, and an early concept multitouch screen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016580</id>
	<title>Re:LOL. Or you could just buy an iPhone!</title>
	<author>Mark19960</author>
	<datestamp>1264940520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Troll much?<br>There are 500 apps on the apple store that do the same thing.<br>It's not as bad on the android market but anything you can find on the apple store I can probably find something that does the same thing on the android market.</p><p>Oh.. let's see I already did this with someone I know, matching apps on the apple store with the android market.... aww shucks.<br>For all of his paid for apps I found free ones to boot....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Troll much ? There are 500 apps on the apple store that do the same thing.It 's not as bad on the android market but anything you can find on the apple store I can probably find something that does the same thing on the android market.Oh.. let 's see I already did this with someone I know , matching apps on the apple store with the android market.... aww shucks.For all of his paid for apps I found free ones to boot... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Troll much?There are 500 apps on the apple store that do the same thing.It's not as bad on the android market but anything you can find on the apple store I can probably find something that does the same thing on the android market.Oh.. let's see I already did this with someone I know, matching apps on the apple store with the android market.... aww shucks.For all of his paid for apps I found free ones to boot....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017464</id>
	<title>Re:Other US phone don't support multitouch....?</title>
	<author>Aranykai</author>
	<datestamp>1264945800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its because our version of google maps does not support pinch zooming. Presumably, this is due to agreements between apple and google, but evidently google has decided to do away with it.</p><p>HTC ships their software with pinch to zoom support so our devices utilize it fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its because our version of google maps does not support pinch zooming .
Presumably , this is due to agreements between apple and google , but evidently google has decided to do away with it.HTC ships their software with pinch to zoom support so our devices utilize it fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its because our version of google maps does not support pinch zooming.
Presumably, this is due to agreements between apple and google, but evidently google has decided to do away with it.HTC ships their software with pinch to zoom support so our devices utilize it fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016652</id>
	<title>Summary is Wrong About Multitouch</title>
	<author>MBoffin</author>
	<datestamp>1264940880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No surprise, but the summary is wrong. True, there has been multitouch capability in recent versions of Android, but not true that no phones in the US support it. Even my HTC Hero (running Android 1.5) has multitouch built into the basic system apps like the browser and the gallery. Additionally there are apps on the marketplace that make use of multitouch, such as the Dolphin browser.</p><p>The summary should indicate that no other phones have previously had multitouch built into <i>the system apps that Google ships with the stock OS</i>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No surprise , but the summary is wrong .
True , there has been multitouch capability in recent versions of Android , but not true that no phones in the US support it .
Even my HTC Hero ( running Android 1.5 ) has multitouch built into the basic system apps like the browser and the gallery .
Additionally there are apps on the marketplace that make use of multitouch , such as the Dolphin browser.The summary should indicate that no other phones have previously had multitouch built into the system apps that Google ships with the stock OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No surprise, but the summary is wrong.
True, there has been multitouch capability in recent versions of Android, but not true that no phones in the US support it.
Even my HTC Hero (running Android 1.5) has multitouch built into the basic system apps like the browser and the gallery.
Additionally there are apps on the marketplace that make use of multitouch, such as the Dolphin browser.The summary should indicate that no other phones have previously had multitouch built into the system apps that Google ships with the stock OS.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016226</id>
	<title>HTC Hero</title>
	<author>Kotoku</author>
	<datestamp>1264938540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>My Sprint HTC Hero phone uses multi-touch in the browser.

Same pinch gestures the iPod Touch had me accustomed to.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>My Sprint HTC Hero phone uses multi-touch in the browser .
Same pinch gestures the iPod Touch had me accustomed to .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My Sprint HTC Hero phone uses multi-touch in the browser.
Same pinch gestures the iPod Touch had me accustomed to.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016142</id>
	<title>No Love Down Under</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264938240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If anyone from google reads this please speed up the release of the Nexus One in Australia. We can't handle the wait!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone from google reads this please speed up the release of the Nexus One in Australia .
We ca n't handle the wait !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone from google reads this please speed up the release of the Nexus One in Australia.
We can't handle the wait!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31021122</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1265292000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It depends on the patent.  I believe the heaviest patent was the first software patent, applied for some time in the '60s, which included a copy of the code on punch cards.  This came in a stack of boxes and probably weighed a good 200KG.  This would make the lower limit for the number of patents in a ton around 5.  The upper limit is a lot higher - patents like Microsoft's is-not-identical-to-object operator only way a gram or two.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It depends on the patent .
I believe the heaviest patent was the first software patent , applied for some time in the '60s , which included a copy of the code on punch cards .
This came in a stack of boxes and probably weighed a good 200KG .
This would make the lower limit for the number of patents in a ton around 5 .
The upper limit is a lot higher - patents like Microsoft 's is-not-identical-to-object operator only way a gram or two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It depends on the patent.
I believe the heaviest patent was the first software patent, applied for some time in the '60s, which included a copy of the code on punch cards.
This came in a stack of boxes and probably weighed a good 200KG.
This would make the lower limit for the number of patents in a ton around 5.
The upper limit is a lot higher - patents like Microsoft's is-not-identical-to-object operator only way a gram or two.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017346</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>Aranykai</author>
	<datestamp>1264945020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its a rumor. HTC android devices support it on our apps and web browser. The only app that doesn't support it is google maps.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/HTC Hero owner</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its a rumor .
HTC android devices support it on our apps and web browser .
The only app that does n't support it is google maps .
/HTC Hero owner</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its a rumor.
HTC android devices support it on our apps and web browser.
The only app that doesn't support it is google maps.
/HTC Hero owner</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016566</id>
	<title>What about my Acer Liquid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264940460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm really pleased with my Acer Liquid, it has almost the same hardware (some processor) as the Nexus One and costed half, of what it would have costed me, to import the Nexus One in my country.
But perhaps I underestimated the value of the phone not being a Google Experience phone.

Acer has just released the kernel for the Liquid, but they have not given any good configs and have generelly done everything they can, to make it difficult to put custom roms on the Liquid.
I would really want to have Android 2.1 on the Liquid, it has 1.6 now. I was sure that it would be no problem getting newer versions of Android on this phone, but with Acer trying to limit the community efforts, perhaps it will never happen.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(

The phone is still nice though, but the uninstallable programs that Acer has put on the phone are redicules and annoying! You can root it and remove some of them, but I would really like just having the stock Android instead!

Next time, Im gonna go for a Google Experience phone!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm really pleased with my Acer Liquid , it has almost the same hardware ( some processor ) as the Nexus One and costed half , of what it would have costed me , to import the Nexus One in my country .
But perhaps I underestimated the value of the phone not being a Google Experience phone .
Acer has just released the kernel for the Liquid , but they have not given any good configs and have generelly done everything they can , to make it difficult to put custom roms on the Liquid .
I would really want to have Android 2.1 on the Liquid , it has 1.6 now .
I was sure that it would be no problem getting newer versions of Android on this phone , but with Acer trying to limit the community efforts , perhaps it will never happen .
: ( The phone is still nice though , but the uninstallable programs that Acer has put on the phone are redicules and annoying !
You can root it and remove some of them , but I would really like just having the stock Android instead !
Next time , Im gon na go for a Google Experience phone !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm really pleased with my Acer Liquid, it has almost the same hardware (some processor) as the Nexus One and costed half, of what it would have costed me, to import the Nexus One in my country.
But perhaps I underestimated the value of the phone not being a Google Experience phone.
Acer has just released the kernel for the Liquid, but they have not given any good configs and have generelly done everything they can, to make it difficult to put custom roms on the Liquid.
I would really want to have Android 2.1 on the Liquid, it has 1.6 now.
I was sure that it would be no problem getting newer versions of Android on this phone, but with Acer trying to limit the community efforts, perhaps it will never happen.
:(

The phone is still nice though, but the uninstallable programs that Acer has put on the phone are redicules and annoying!
You can root it and remove some of them, but I would really like just having the stock Android instead!
Next time, Im gonna go for a Google Experience phone!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31029318</id>
	<title>Droid Eris</title>
	<author>slapout</author>
	<datestamp>1265290680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Droid Eris supports multi-touch in it's browser and photo app.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Droid Eris supports multi-touch in it 's browser and photo app .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Droid Eris supports multi-touch in it's browser and photo app.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31021906</id>
	<title>Re:Summary is Wrong About Multitouch</title>
	<author>CNeb96</author>
	<datestamp>1265296980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;&gt;Even my HTC Hero (running Android 1.5) has multitouch built into the basic system apps like the <b>browser</b> and the gallery.<br>&gt;&gt;The summary should indicate that no other phones have previously had multitouch built into the system apps that Google ships with the stock OS.</p><p>If it came with a browser as a basic system app which supported multi-touch but none of the Google apps support it, what browser did it come with?  (I would have thought stock chrome or chromimum).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; &gt; Even my HTC Hero ( running Android 1.5 ) has multitouch built into the basic system apps like the browser and the gallery. &gt; &gt; The summary should indicate that no other phones have previously had multitouch built into the system apps that Google ships with the stock OS.If it came with a browser as a basic system app which supported multi-touch but none of the Google apps support it , what browser did it come with ?
( I would have thought stock chrome or chromimum ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;&gt;Even my HTC Hero (running Android 1.5) has multitouch built into the basic system apps like the browser and the gallery.&gt;&gt;The summary should indicate that no other phones have previously had multitouch built into the system apps that Google ships with the stock OS.If it came with a browser as a basic system app which supported multi-touch but none of the Google apps support it, what browser did it come with?
(I would have thought stock chrome or chromimum).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016652</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017284</id>
	<title>Re:3G Fix?</title>
	<author>cvtan</author>
	<datestamp>1264944660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was almost buying this until I saw "A&amp;TT".  At least you spelled the unit MHz correctly unlike my local utility that spells kWh as "KwH".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was almost buying this until I saw " A&amp;TT " .
At least you spelled the unit MHz correctly unlike my local utility that spells kWh as " KwH " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was almost buying this until I saw "A&amp;TT".
At least you spelled the unit MHz correctly unlike my local utility that spells kWh as "KwH".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019154</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>AvitarX</author>
	<datestamp>1264962420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>FWIW, the multi-touch I've used on my G1 (with custom ROM), does not infringe.</p><p>It does the zoom in increments so that your pinch/depinch is equivalent to pushing the zoom button.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>FWIW , the multi-touch I 've used on my G1 ( with custom ROM ) , does not infringe.It does the zoom in increments so that your pinch/depinch is equivalent to pushing the zoom button .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FWIW, the multi-touch I've used on my G1 (with custom ROM), does not infringe.It does the zoom in increments so that your pinch/depinch is equivalent to pushing the zoom button.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016420</id>
	<title>So my droid that does multitouch</title>
	<author>Liquidrage</author>
	<datestamp>1264939560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>doesn't support multitouch? Should I stop doing it then?</htmltext>
<tokenext>does n't support multitouch ?
Should I stop doing it then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>doesn't support multitouch?
Should I stop doing it then?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016384</id>
	<title>LOL. Or you could just buy an iPhone!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264939380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's see, buy a Nexus One and get a niche phone that does nothing but copy the existing features of the iPhone, but with fewer applications and almost no developer support, or just buy an iPhone.... what to do what to do...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's see , buy a Nexus One and get a niche phone that does nothing but copy the existing features of the iPhone , but with fewer applications and almost no developer support , or just buy an iPhone.... what to do what to do.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's see, buy a Nexus One and get a niche phone that does nothing but copy the existing features of the iPhone, but with fewer applications and almost no developer support, or just buy an iPhone.... what to do what to do...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017904</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264949340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Long ton or short ton? Or metric ton? Did you try google? You can put in "1 patent in tons" and see what google math says. oh, and it depends on whether they are a troll or not - troll patents weigh more (at least they weigh more heavily on the legal system).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Long ton or short ton ?
Or metric ton ?
Did you try google ?
You can put in " 1 patent in tons " and see what google math says .
oh , and it depends on whether they are a troll or not - troll patents weigh more ( at least they weigh more heavily on the legal system ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Long ton or short ton?
Or metric ton?
Did you try google?
You can put in "1 patent in tons" and see what google math says.
oh, and it depends on whether they are a troll or not - troll patents weigh more (at least they weigh more heavily on the legal system).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016092</id>
	<title>3G Fix?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264938000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; fix a 3G connectivity problem<br>So will it work on AT&amp;T now? T-Mobile doesn't have crap anywhere near where I live.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; fix a 3G connectivity problemSo will it work on AT&amp;T now ?
T-Mobile does n't have crap anywhere near where I live .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; fix a 3G connectivity problemSo will it work on AT&amp;T now?
T-Mobile doesn't have crap anywhere near where I live.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016082</id>
	<title>Come on Google</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264937940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm still waiting for the port of IE6..</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm still waiting for the port of IE6. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm still waiting for the port of IE6..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31024902</id>
	<title>Flagship</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1265311140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'm amused that it took them so long to fix problems with Google's Flagship, but I can't say I'm suprised.</p></div></blockquote><p>Google's flagship product, depending on how you look at it, is either adwords or the search page at www.google.com.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm amused that it took them so long to fix problems with Google 's Flagship , but I ca n't say I 'm suprised.Google 's flagship product , depending on how you look at it , is either adwords or the search page at www.google.com .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm amused that it took them so long to fix problems with Google's Flagship, but I can't say I'm suprised.Google's flagship product, depending on how you look at it, is either adwords or the search page at www.google.com.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31018204</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>BlueBoxSW.com</author>
	<datestamp>1264951920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Market Cap of Palm is less than 2 billion. It would be cheaper to just buy them for the patents than to litigate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Market Cap of Palm is less than 2 billion .
It would be cheaper to just buy them for the patents than to litigate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Market Cap of Palm is less than 2 billion.
It would be cheaper to just buy them for the patents than to litigate.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31020730</id>
	<title>Nexus One patch updates the default apps?</title>
	<author>gimmebeer</author>
	<datestamp>1265287620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Doesn't that make it an Android patch? Is the goog going to start down this slippery road of releasing specialized patches for its baby while leaving all other Android users out in the cold, no-feature-having darkness? It would seem that a move like that could only hurt the popularity of their flagship mobile iphone-killer OS. I can understand a 3G related patch being phone-specific, but it seems that what they are doing is diverging their OS into 'Android' and 'Android for Nexus One'.  Not cool guys.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does n't that make it an Android patch ?
Is the goog going to start down this slippery road of releasing specialized patches for its baby while leaving all other Android users out in the cold , no-feature-having darkness ?
It would seem that a move like that could only hurt the popularity of their flagship mobile iphone-killer OS .
I can understand a 3G related patch being phone-specific , but it seems that what they are doing is diverging their OS into 'Android ' and 'Android for Nexus One' .
Not cool guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Doesn't that make it an Android patch?
Is the goog going to start down this slippery road of releasing specialized patches for its baby while leaving all other Android users out in the cold, no-feature-having darkness?
It would seem that a move like that could only hurt the popularity of their flagship mobile iphone-killer OS.
I can understand a 3G related patch being phone-specific, but it seems that what they are doing is diverging their OS into 'Android' and 'Android for Nexus One'.
Not cool guys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102</id>
	<title>multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>sourcerror</author>
	<datestamp>1264938060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've heard rumors, that the zooming gesture won't be officially supported, because it would violate Apple patents. Does anyone know anything about that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've heard rumors , that the zooming gesture wo n't be officially supported , because it would violate Apple patents .
Does anyone know anything about that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've heard rumors, that the zooming gesture won't be officially supported, because it would violate Apple patents.
Does anyone know anything about that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017252</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>Meski</author>
	<datestamp>1264944480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're using this gesture, in response to Apple patents.

<a href="http://media.photobucket.com/image/middle\%20finger/munbk/middle\_finger.jpg?o=1" title="photobucket.com" rel="nofollow">http://media.photobucket.com/image/middle\%20finger/munbk/middle\_finger.jpg?o=1</a> [photobucket.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're using this gesture , in response to Apple patents .
http : //media.photobucket.com/image/middle \ % 20finger/munbk/middle \ _finger.jpg ? o = 1 [ photobucket.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're using this gesture, in response to Apple patents.
http://media.photobucket.com/image/middle\%20finger/munbk/middle\_finger.jpg?o=1 [photobucket.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017510</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>Ohrion</author>
	<datestamp>1264946100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How much do patents weigh? I'm trying to figure out how many patents are in a ton.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How much do patents weigh ?
I 'm trying to figure out how many patents are in a ton .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How much do patents weigh?
I'm trying to figure out how many patents are in a ton.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31020446</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>the\_lesser\_gatsby</author>
	<datestamp>1265283600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is that a patent? Surely a patent describes how an apparatus is made, not what the desired outcome should be.
<br> <br>
It's like patenting TV as 'a box which show moving pictures captured by another box with a lens' rather than 'apparatus for modulating an electron beam in rectangular matrix...'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that a patent ?
Surely a patent describes how an apparatus is made , not what the desired outcome should be .
It 's like patenting TV as 'a box which show moving pictures captured by another box with a lens ' rather than 'apparatus for modulating an electron beam in rectangular matrix...' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that a patent?
Surely a patent describes how an apparatus is made, not what the desired outcome should be.
It's like patenting TV as 'a box which show moving pictures captured by another box with a lens' rather than 'apparatus for modulating an electron beam in rectangular matrix...'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017302</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016854</id>
	<title>Re:LOL. Or you could just buy an iPhone!</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1264941960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do realise that the Iphone is a niche phone too?&lt;/Nokia user&gt;</p><p>And yes, Nokia and everyone else were doing those features long before Apple joined the party late.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do realise that the Iphone is a niche phone too ? And yes , Nokia and everyone else were doing those features long before Apple joined the party late .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do realise that the Iphone is a niche phone too?And yes, Nokia and everyone else were doing those features long before Apple joined the party late.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016530</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>rm999</author>
	<datestamp>1264940220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have heard something similar, but I think it's more complex than a single court case (which is peanuts to these 100+ billion dollar companies; Google could drag that case out and retaliate with their own lawsuits). Worst-case scenario - things go back to the way they were. What's the harm in trying? I believe it was more like Apple saying "if you guys infringe on our multitouch patents it will permanently hurt our relationship". At this point, Google's relationship with Apple is already strained; they now believe they more to gain than to lose.</p><p>Both Google and Apple realize how valuable multitouch is - I personally would rather not switch away from having pinch-to-zoom in my applications, especially maps and the web browser.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have heard something similar , but I think it 's more complex than a single court case ( which is peanuts to these 100 + billion dollar companies ; Google could drag that case out and retaliate with their own lawsuits ) .
Worst-case scenario - things go back to the way they were .
What 's the harm in trying ?
I believe it was more like Apple saying " if you guys infringe on our multitouch patents it will permanently hurt our relationship " .
At this point , Google 's relationship with Apple is already strained ; they now believe they more to gain than to lose.Both Google and Apple realize how valuable multitouch is - I personally would rather not switch away from having pinch-to-zoom in my applications , especially maps and the web browser .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have heard something similar, but I think it's more complex than a single court case (which is peanuts to these 100+ billion dollar companies; Google could drag that case out and retaliate with their own lawsuits).
Worst-case scenario - things go back to the way they were.
What's the harm in trying?
I believe it was more like Apple saying "if you guys infringe on our multitouch patents it will permanently hurt our relationship".
At this point, Google's relationship with Apple is already strained; they now believe they more to gain than to lose.Both Google and Apple realize how valuable multitouch is - I personally would rather not switch away from having pinch-to-zoom in my applications, especially maps and the web browser.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017144</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>unix1</author>
	<datestamp>1264943700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's because they know they'll lose.</p><p>Here's <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;p=1&amp;u=\%2Fnetahtml\%2FPTO\%2Fsearch-bool.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;co1=AND&amp;d=PTXT&amp;s1=multi-touch&amp;s2=multitouch&amp;OS=multi-touch+AND+multitouch&amp;RS=multi-touch+AND+multitouch" title="uspto.gov" rel="nofollow">Apple's "multi-touch" patent</a> [uspto.gov].<br>Date filed: July 3, 2006</p><p>Here's <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/jeff\_han\_demos\_his\_breakthrough\_touchscreen.html" title="ted.com" rel="nofollow">Jeff Han demonstrating multi-touch interface</a> [ted.com] in Feb. 2006 that he had been working on. Pinch and zoom? Gestures? Multiple fingers/hands? It's all there. You can tell he didn't come up with that overnight.</p><p>Looks like someone at Apple noticed his or similar technology/research and said - hey, this hasn't been patented yet!</p><p>Give props to the USPTO and the patent system, as usual.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's because they know they 'll lose.Here 's Apple 's " multi-touch " patent [ uspto.gov ] .Date filed : July 3 , 2006Here 's Jeff Han demonstrating multi-touch interface [ ted.com ] in Feb. 2006 that he had been working on .
Pinch and zoom ?
Gestures ? Multiple fingers/hands ?
It 's all there .
You can tell he did n't come up with that overnight.Looks like someone at Apple noticed his or similar technology/research and said - hey , this has n't been patented yet ! Give props to the USPTO and the patent system , as usual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's because they know they'll lose.Here's Apple's "multi-touch" patent [uspto.gov].Date filed: July 3, 2006Here's Jeff Han demonstrating multi-touch interface [ted.com] in Feb. 2006 that he had been working on.
Pinch and zoom?
Gestures? Multiple fingers/hands?
It's all there.
You can tell he didn't come up with that overnight.Looks like someone at Apple noticed his or similar technology/research and said - hey, this hasn't been patented yet!Give props to the USPTO and the patent system, as usual.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017594</id>
	<title>Re:Other US phone don't support multitouch....?</title>
	<author>bigstrat2003</author>
	<datestamp>1264946760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They're spreading misinformation, although unintentionally (I hope). Android OS has had support for multitouch events since 1.6 (I think? Someone correct me if I'm wrong), and other phones support it in the hardware. The Droid, for example, supports multitouch just fine, despite the fact that the Google apps don't use it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're spreading misinformation , although unintentionally ( I hope ) .
Android OS has had support for multitouch events since 1.6 ( I think ?
Someone correct me if I 'm wrong ) , and other phones support it in the hardware .
The Droid , for example , supports multitouch just fine , despite the fact that the Google apps do n't use it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're spreading misinformation, although unintentionally (I hope).
Android OS has had support for multitouch events since 1.6 (I think?
Someone correct me if I'm wrong), and other phones support it in the hardware.
The Droid, for example, supports multitouch just fine, despite the fact that the Google apps don't use it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017392</id>
	<title>Re:LOL. Or you could just buy an iPhone!</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1264945320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have an iphone. I live in a major city. Its using Edge 50\% of the time and about 20\% of the time I use 3G, I get a long pause, then it drops to EDGE. If you think only tmobile and Nexus have reception issues then youre pretty ignorant of how smartphones work and shouldnt be giving advice to anyone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have an iphone .
I live in a major city .
Its using Edge 50 \ % of the time and about 20 \ % of the time I use 3G , I get a long pause , then it drops to EDGE .
If you think only tmobile and Nexus have reception issues then youre pretty ignorant of how smartphones work and shouldnt be giving advice to anyone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have an iphone.
I live in a major city.
Its using Edge 50\% of the time and about 20\% of the time I use 3G, I get a long pause, then it drops to EDGE.
If you think only tmobile and Nexus have reception issues then youre pretty ignorant of how smartphones work and shouldnt be giving advice to anyone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017752</id>
	<title>G1?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264947960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why has Google abandoned the G1?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why has Google abandoned the G1 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why has Google abandoned the G1?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016148</id>
	<title>Whoops!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264938300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>All the iPhone fanboys based all their criticism on the lack of multitouch. Now they've got nothing to stand on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All the iPhone fanboys based all their criticism on the lack of multitouch .
Now they 've got nothing to stand on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the iPhone fanboys based all their criticism on the lack of multitouch.
Now they've got nothing to stand on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017216</id>
	<title>Too bad they're only fixing a symptom</title>
	<author>Pherlin</author>
	<datestamp>1264944180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm amused that it took them so long to fix problems with Google's Flagship, but I can't say I'm suprised.
<br>
Bought a G1 last March. Couldn't have been happier with it, until the 1.6 update. Afterward everything got slower, I would not recieve calls despite having full signal, be unable to place calls either. Rebooting the phone would fix the problem, but only very temporarily.
<br> <br>
2 Replacement Phones with the same problem later they were still insisting the problem wasn't with the firmware. I wound up having to file an FCC and BBB Complaint to get released without an ETF, T-Mobile's 'solution' was to charge me the contract price on a new phone.
<br> <br>
This is all relavant, because, well, As soon as I saw the first story on the Nexus one problems, I was not one bit suprised. Call it a matter of opinion but based on what I've seen I get the feeling something got whacked somewhere in the baseband package's firmware/drivers.
<br> <br>
This problem gets difficult to detect, however, when the end users are so incompetent that they don't understand that their phone shouldn't be freezing up the way it is. I'm still waiting to see if Samsung screws up the moment yet. (It still seems to be functional, albiet running on 1.5. If it survives the 2.x update I'll trust it.) But as it stands my experience with Android led me to hope for the best as far as WinMo 7. If there's one feeling I got from Android, it was that it was 'beta,' and to be blunt you shouln't play beta with phones you're selling to people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm amused that it took them so long to fix problems with Google 's Flagship , but I ca n't say I 'm suprised .
Bought a G1 last March .
Could n't have been happier with it , until the 1.6 update .
Afterward everything got slower , I would not recieve calls despite having full signal , be unable to place calls either .
Rebooting the phone would fix the problem , but only very temporarily .
2 Replacement Phones with the same problem later they were still insisting the problem was n't with the firmware .
I wound up having to file an FCC and BBB Complaint to get released without an ETF , T-Mobile 's 'solution ' was to charge me the contract price on a new phone .
This is all relavant , because , well , As soon as I saw the first story on the Nexus one problems , I was not one bit suprised .
Call it a matter of opinion but based on what I 've seen I get the feeling something got whacked somewhere in the baseband package 's firmware/drivers .
This problem gets difficult to detect , however , when the end users are so incompetent that they do n't understand that their phone should n't be freezing up the way it is .
I 'm still waiting to see if Samsung screws up the moment yet .
( It still seems to be functional , albiet running on 1.5 .
If it survives the 2.x update I 'll trust it .
) But as it stands my experience with Android led me to hope for the best as far as WinMo 7 .
If there 's one feeling I got from Android , it was that it was 'beta, ' and to be blunt you shoul n't play beta with phones you 're selling to people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm amused that it took them so long to fix problems with Google's Flagship, but I can't say I'm suprised.
Bought a G1 last March.
Couldn't have been happier with it, until the 1.6 update.
Afterward everything got slower, I would not recieve calls despite having full signal, be unable to place calls either.
Rebooting the phone would fix the problem, but only very temporarily.
2 Replacement Phones with the same problem later they were still insisting the problem wasn't with the firmware.
I wound up having to file an FCC and BBB Complaint to get released without an ETF, T-Mobile's 'solution' was to charge me the contract price on a new phone.
This is all relavant, because, well, As soon as I saw the first story on the Nexus one problems, I was not one bit suprised.
Call it a matter of opinion but based on what I've seen I get the feeling something got whacked somewhere in the baseband package's firmware/drivers.
This problem gets difficult to detect, however, when the end users are so incompetent that they don't understand that their phone shouldn't be freezing up the way it is.
I'm still waiting to see if Samsung screws up the moment yet.
(It still seems to be functional, albiet running on 1.5.
If it survives the 2.x update I'll trust it.
) But as it stands my experience with Android led me to hope for the best as far as WinMo 7.
If there's one feeling I got from Android, it was that it was 'beta,' and to be blunt you shouln't play beta with phones you're selling to people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019186</id>
	<title>Disappointment ...</title>
	<author>Asadullah Ahmad</author>
	<datestamp>1264962720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What happened to extensive testing and user feedback periods of electronic equipment? You would expect stuff like this from Microsoft, but now Google too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What happened to extensive testing and user feedback periods of electronic equipment ?
You would expect stuff like this from Microsoft , but now Google too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What happened to extensive testing and user feedback periods of electronic equipment?
You would expect stuff like this from Microsoft, but now Google too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016170</id>
	<title>3G</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264938360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The good news is, Google has fixed the 3G problems.  The bad news is, the fix is going out via the 3G network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The good news is , Google has fixed the 3G problems .
The bad news is , the fix is going out via the 3G network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The good news is, Google has fixed the 3G problems.
The bad news is, the fix is going out via the 3G network.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019014</id>
	<title>Coming to Verizon Droid?</title>
	<author>edmicman</author>
	<datestamp>1264960440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So when's 2.1 and this multitouch goodness going to trickle down to my Moto Droid?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So when 's 2.1 and this multitouch goodness going to trickle down to my Moto Droid ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So when's 2.1 and this multitouch goodness going to trickle down to my Moto Droid?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017166</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264943880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple can bite me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple can bite me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple can bite me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017224</id>
	<title>Re:Come on Google</title>
	<author>Meski</author>
	<datestamp>1264944300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lighten up, moderators.  That's a funny, not a flamebait.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lighten up , moderators .
That 's a funny , not a flamebait .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lighten up, moderators.
That's a funny, not a flamebait.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017434</id>
	<title>No Telstra support (Australia)</title>
	<author>AbRASiON</author>
	<datestamp>1264945620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not interested.<br>I can't stand Telstra but they do unfortunately have the best network. I believe this is due to some kind of lack of 850mhz or something option on the phone.<br>The vast majority of business's use Telstra in this country too.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not interested.I ca n't stand Telstra but they do unfortunately have the best network .
I believe this is due to some kind of lack of 850mhz or something option on the phone.The vast majority of business 's use Telstra in this country too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not interested.I can't stand Telstra but they do unfortunately have the best network.
I believe this is due to some kind of lack of 850mhz or something option on the phone.The vast majority of business's use Telstra in this country too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016458</id>
	<title>It really did help.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264939740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't care for the multitouch thing..... I liked the old way and will use the old way..<br>As far as 3G it's much more stable on 3G and on EDGE as well.<br>I only get EDGE at home because I am at the end of 3G coverage and EDGE is actually much faster than it was.<br>So, whatever they changed in the radio firmware improved both.<br>Everything seems to move a little faster as well, so no complaints.<br>I got my OTA update last night.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't care for the multitouch thing..... I liked the old way and will use the old way..As far as 3G it 's much more stable on 3G and on EDGE as well.I only get EDGE at home because I am at the end of 3G coverage and EDGE is actually much faster than it was.So , whatever they changed in the radio firmware improved both.Everything seems to move a little faster as well , so no complaints.I got my OTA update last night .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't care for the multitouch thing..... I liked the old way and will use the old way..As far as 3G it's much more stable on 3G and on EDGE as well.I only get EDGE at home because I am at the end of 3G coverage and EDGE is actually much faster than it was.So, whatever they changed in the radio firmware improved both.Everything seems to move a little faster as well, so no complaints.I got my OTA update last night.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264938360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rumors only so far.  Apple hasn't sued Palm for it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rumors only so far .
Apple has n't sued Palm for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rumors only so far.
Apple hasn't sued Palm for it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016276</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>tacroy</author>
	<datestamp>1264938780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mainly because Apple is violating tons of Palms patents and they don't want to wake that (IP) giant.
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/" title="engadget.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/</a> [engadget.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mainly because Apple is violating tons of Palms patents and they do n't want to wake that ( IP ) giant .
http : //www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/ [ engadget.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mainly because Apple is violating tons of Palms patents and they don't want to wake that (IP) giant.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/ [engadget.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017302</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>Froomb</author>
	<datestamp>1264944720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about   <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&amp;Sect2=HITOFF&amp;p=1&amp;u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.html&amp;r=1&amp;f=G&amp;l=50&amp;co1=AND&amp;d=PTXT&amp;s1=7,479,949.PN.&amp;OS=PN/7,479,949&amp;RS=PN/7,479,949" title="uspto.gov" rel="nofollow">Patent 7,479,949</a> [uspto.gov](358 pages) granted to Apple on January 20, 2009, which contains language such as:<p>

<i>"In some embodiments, a multi-finger de-pinching gesture magnifies the image 1606 by a variable amount in accordance with the position of the multi-finger de-pinching gesture and the amount of finger movement in the multi-finger de-pinching gesture. In some embodiments, a multi-finger pinching gesture demagnifies the image 1606 by a variable amount in accordance with the position of the multi-finger pinching gesture and the amount of finger movement in the multi-finger pinching gesture."</i> </p><p>

IANAL, but almost certainly  prior art was considered at every stage of the drafting and granting of this patent.  IMO those who cavalierly invoke early versions of multitouch technology as inherently rendering such a patent invalid have the burden of proof to demonstrate their case.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about Patent 7,479,949 [ uspto.gov ] ( 358 pages ) granted to Apple on January 20 , 2009 , which contains language such as : " In some embodiments , a multi-finger de-pinching gesture magnifies the image 1606 by a variable amount in accordance with the position of the multi-finger de-pinching gesture and the amount of finger movement in the multi-finger de-pinching gesture .
In some embodiments , a multi-finger pinching gesture demagnifies the image 1606 by a variable amount in accordance with the position of the multi-finger pinching gesture and the amount of finger movement in the multi-finger pinching gesture .
" IANAL , but almost certainly prior art was considered at every stage of the drafting and granting of this patent .
IMO those who cavalierly invoke early versions of multitouch technology as inherently rendering such a patent invalid have the burden of proof to demonstrate their case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about   Patent 7,479,949 [uspto.gov](358 pages) granted to Apple on January 20, 2009, which contains language such as:

"In some embodiments, a multi-finger de-pinching gesture magnifies the image 1606 by a variable amount in accordance with the position of the multi-finger de-pinching gesture and the amount of finger movement in the multi-finger de-pinching gesture.
In some embodiments, a multi-finger pinching gesture demagnifies the image 1606 by a variable amount in accordance with the position of the multi-finger pinching gesture and the amount of finger movement in the multi-finger pinching gesture.
" 

IANAL, but almost certainly  prior art was considered at every stage of the drafting and granting of this patent.
IMO those who cavalierly invoke early versions of multitouch technology as inherently rendering such a patent invalid have the burden of proof to demonstrate their case.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019022</id>
	<title>Re:3G Fix?</title>
	<author>boobox</author>
	<datestamp>1264960500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Reverse the polarity to the deflector screen shield.  Duh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Reverse the polarity to the deflector screen shield .
Duh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reverse the polarity to the deflector screen shield.
Duh.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016252</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016112</id>
	<title>OLD News</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264938180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>seriously slashdot? you're gonna feed us with news that is almost two days old now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>seriously slashdot ?
you 're gon na feed us with news that is almost two days old now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>seriously slashdot?
you're gonna feed us with news that is almost two days old now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31018116</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264951200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Depends how big you are when their crushing weight is applied.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends how big you are when their crushing weight is applied .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends how big you are when their crushing weight is applied.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017510</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016252</id>
	<title>Re:3G Fix?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264938600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, those geniuses at google, wrote a piece of software that rerouted power form the rear deflectors to modulate the refresh rate of the lcd screen to emit an interference signal that modifies the TMobile compatible 3G signal from 1700 MHz for download and 2100 MHz for upload to the A&amp;TT frequency of 1900 MHz. I'm just not sure what they're going to do to handle the excess tachyon radiation pressure on the the glass.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , those geniuses at google , wrote a piece of software that rerouted power form the rear deflectors to modulate the refresh rate of the lcd screen to emit an interference signal that modifies the TMobile compatible 3G signal from 1700 MHz for download and 2100 MHz for upload to the A&amp;TT frequency of 1900 MHz .
I 'm just not sure what they 're going to do to handle the excess tachyon radiation pressure on the the glass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, those geniuses at google, wrote a piece of software that rerouted power form the rear deflectors to modulate the refresh rate of the lcd screen to emit an interference signal that modifies the TMobile compatible 3G signal from 1700 MHz for download and 2100 MHz for upload to the A&amp;TT frequency of 1900 MHz.
I'm just not sure what they're going to do to handle the excess tachyon radiation pressure on the the glass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016092</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31021816</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265296620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are quoting some teenager at Engadget as your source?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are quoting some teenager at Engadget as your source ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are quoting some teenager at Engadget as your source?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017858</id>
	<title>Re:multitouch and Apple</title>
	<author>jmac1492</author>
	<datestamp>1264948920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Microsoft uses the same zoom gesture in the Zune HD.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft uses the same zoom gesture in the Zune HD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft uses the same zoom gesture in the Zune HD.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31018204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31021906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016652
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31021122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31021816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31024902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31020446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016092
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017594
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016568
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31018116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2139206_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016170
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019258
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019022
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017014
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017302
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31020446
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31019154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016190
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016276
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31018204
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017510
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31018116
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31021122
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017904
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31021816
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017252
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016226
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016458
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31016652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31021906
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2139206.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31017216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2139206.31024902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
