<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_03_2052211</id>
	<title>The Final Release of Apache HTTP Server 1.3</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265189400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:kyle.hamilton@NOSPaM.gmail.com" rel="nofollow">Kyle Hamilton</a> writes <i>"The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the <a href="http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement1.3.html">release of version 1.3.42 of the Apache HTTP Server</a> ('Apache'). This release is intended as the final release of version 1.3 of the Apache HTTP Server, which has reached end of life status There will be no more full releases of Apache HTTP Server 1.3. However, <a href="http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/patches/">critical security updates may be made available</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kyle Hamilton writes " The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 1.3.42 of the Apache HTTP Server ( 'Apache ' ) .
This release is intended as the final release of version 1.3 of the Apache HTTP Server , which has reached end of life status There will be no more full releases of Apache HTTP Server 1.3 .
However , critical security updates may be made available .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kyle Hamilton writes "The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are pleased to announce the release of version 1.3.42 of the Apache HTTP Server ('Apache').
This release is intended as the final release of version 1.3 of the Apache HTTP Server, which has reached end of life status There will be no more full releases of Apache HTTP Server 1.3.
However, critical security updates may be made available.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31020476</id>
	<title>Static HTML wrong if it is used properly?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265284080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What exactly is wrong with static HTML if it is used properly? You have a bunch of documents written in plain HTML which live up to expectations (not impossible, ask a LaTeX user...), maybe a dynamically generated index page if you want.  And it doesn't need to be a bare-bones experience, the dynamically generated indices could be where the interactivity could be.  I fully recognize that what I just said applies only to particular people, but in principle a HTML document is no different in function to the end user than a plain text file or a PDF.</p><p>A lot could be done with static HTML pages, except that it is not shiny and new and so not worth paying money for (and therefore bad).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What exactly is wrong with static HTML if it is used properly ?
You have a bunch of documents written in plain HTML which live up to expectations ( not impossible , ask a LaTeX user... ) , maybe a dynamically generated index page if you want .
And it does n't need to be a bare-bones experience , the dynamically generated indices could be where the interactivity could be .
I fully recognize that what I just said applies only to particular people , but in principle a HTML document is no different in function to the end user than a plain text file or a PDF.A lot could be done with static HTML pages , except that it is not shiny and new and so not worth paying money for ( and therefore bad ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What exactly is wrong with static HTML if it is used properly?
You have a bunch of documents written in plain HTML which live up to expectations (not impossible, ask a LaTeX user...), maybe a dynamically generated index page if you want.
And it doesn't need to be a bare-bones experience, the dynamically generated indices could be where the interactivity could be.
I fully recognize that what I just said applies only to particular people, but in principle a HTML document is no different in function to the end user than a plain text file or a PDF.A lot could be done with static HTML pages, except that it is not shiny and new and so not worth paying money for (and therefore bad).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015410</id>
	<title>Re:Amazingly OLD news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264935180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>From the Apache web site:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Apache 1.3.42 Released          <b> <i>2008-01-19</i> </b> </p></div><p>Emphasis mine...</p></div><p>Are we seeing the same site?</p><blockquote><div><p>1.3.42 (released 2010-02-02)</p></div></blockquote><blockquote><div><p> <tt>$ curl -Is http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/apache\_1.3.42.tar.bz2 | grep Last-Modified<br>Last-Modified: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:48:14 GMT</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the Apache web site : Apache 1.3.42 Released 2008-01-19 Emphasis mine...Are we seeing the same site ? 1.3.42 ( released 2010-02-02 ) $ curl -Is http : //www.apache.org/dist/httpd/apache \ _1.3.42.tar.bz2 | grep Last-ModifiedLast-Modified : Tue , 02 Feb 2010 23 : 48 : 14 GMT</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the Apache web site:Apache 1.3.42 Released           2008-01-19  Emphasis mine...Are we seeing the same site?1.3.42 (released 2010-02-02) $ curl -Is http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/apache\_1.3.42.tar.bz2 | grep Last-ModifiedLast-Modified: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:48:14 GMT 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015178</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015662</id>
	<title>Finished???</title>
	<author>KlomDark</author>
	<datestamp>1264936200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought the whole point of a patchy web server was that it was never done.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the whole point of a patchy web server was that it was never done .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the whole point of a patchy web server was that it was never done.
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016030</id>
	<title>Re:web servers to app servers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264937700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What you're heralding is nothing short of the eradication of a publicly accessible information pool. The registered-users-only part of Web 2.0 is basically opaque to external search engines. Links are nondescript blobs - short, short-lived and with at least one redirection through a slow third party server. If Web 1.0 was a library, Web 2.0 is a shopping mall. Banter and business, but hardly any real information.</p><p>I've recently shown a friend how to set up a web page the old fashioned way, i.e. write HTML with a text editor, edit, resize and prune images locally, upload through (S)FTP. He wouldn't have it any other way now. I know because I've tried integrating a common ad content management system. It was just too complicated: In the end, a multi-megabyte online script and database system was replaced with a handful of static files. The whole site is lightning fast, has absolutely no attack surface, is trivially easy to backup, works unmodified with every web space and doesn't overload the server, not even when the site is featured on high-traffic aggregators (i.e. slashdotted).</p><p>I think the advantages of static files are lost on people because they simply don't know any other way but online content management systems. When you "buy" web space nowadays, the feature list is full of pre-installed this, pre-installed that. In the end, most web pages are completely static and the servers are pointlessly creating a "dynamic" page from a static menu and static content on every page view. Nothing gained but a hard to maintain, always online content management system, which has poorly thought out security and a worse implementation. To call Web 2.0 the Windows of the web would be an insult to Windows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What you 're heralding is nothing short of the eradication of a publicly accessible information pool .
The registered-users-only part of Web 2.0 is basically opaque to external search engines .
Links are nondescript blobs - short , short-lived and with at least one redirection through a slow third party server .
If Web 1.0 was a library , Web 2.0 is a shopping mall .
Banter and business , but hardly any real information.I 've recently shown a friend how to set up a web page the old fashioned way , i.e .
write HTML with a text editor , edit , resize and prune images locally , upload through ( S ) FTP .
He would n't have it any other way now .
I know because I 've tried integrating a common ad content management system .
It was just too complicated : In the end , a multi-megabyte online script and database system was replaced with a handful of static files .
The whole site is lightning fast , has absolutely no attack surface , is trivially easy to backup , works unmodified with every web space and does n't overload the server , not even when the site is featured on high-traffic aggregators ( i.e .
slashdotted ) .I think the advantages of static files are lost on people because they simply do n't know any other way but online content management systems .
When you " buy " web space nowadays , the feature list is full of pre-installed this , pre-installed that .
In the end , most web pages are completely static and the servers are pointlessly creating a " dynamic " page from a static menu and static content on every page view .
Nothing gained but a hard to maintain , always online content management system , which has poorly thought out security and a worse implementation .
To call Web 2.0 the Windows of the web would be an insult to Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What you're heralding is nothing short of the eradication of a publicly accessible information pool.
The registered-users-only part of Web 2.0 is basically opaque to external search engines.
Links are nondescript blobs - short, short-lived and with at least one redirection through a slow third party server.
If Web 1.0 was a library, Web 2.0 is a shopping mall.
Banter and business, but hardly any real information.I've recently shown a friend how to set up a web page the old fashioned way, i.e.
write HTML with a text editor, edit, resize and prune images locally, upload through (S)FTP.
He wouldn't have it any other way now.
I know because I've tried integrating a common ad content management system.
It was just too complicated: In the end, a multi-megabyte online script and database system was replaced with a handful of static files.
The whole site is lightning fast, has absolutely no attack surface, is trivially easy to backup, works unmodified with every web space and doesn't overload the server, not even when the site is featured on high-traffic aggregators (i.e.
slashdotted).I think the advantages of static files are lost on people because they simply don't know any other way but online content management systems.
When you "buy" web space nowadays, the feature list is full of pre-installed this, pre-installed that.
In the end, most web pages are completely static and the servers are pointlessly creating a "dynamic" page from a static menu and static content on every page view.
Nothing gained but a hard to maintain, always online content management system, which has poorly thought out security and a worse implementation.
To call Web 2.0 the Windows of the web would be an insult to Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31030388</id>
	<title>Re:Open Source</title>
	<author>toddestan</author>
	<datestamp>1265298840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would guess that 1.3.42 is probably pretty stable, given that no new features have been added for years, and is only a minor update to version 1.3.41 which is over 2 years old as it is.  So I would guess anyone still using 1.3 can continue with 1.3.42 for the forseeable future without worries.  And if something really bad did come up, apparently they left the option of issuing a security update open.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would guess that 1.3.42 is probably pretty stable , given that no new features have been added for years , and is only a minor update to version 1.3.41 which is over 2 years old as it is .
So I would guess anyone still using 1.3 can continue with 1.3.42 for the forseeable future without worries .
And if something really bad did come up , apparently they left the option of issuing a security update open .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would guess that 1.3.42 is probably pretty stable, given that no new features have been added for years, and is only a minor update to version 1.3.41 which is over 2 years old as it is.
So I would guess anyone still using 1.3 can continue with 1.3.42 for the forseeable future without worries.
And if something really bad did come up, apparently they left the option of issuing a security update open.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015758</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>b4dc0d3r</author>
	<datestamp>1264936620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I regularly get either 5 or 15, usually 15.</p><p>I think it's because I tend to comment in bursts - nothing for a week, then 2 or 3 at a time, and then only when I have something useful to say.  Except for the odd sarcastic or joking comment, or if I'm heavily medicated.</p><p>Plus I don't log in all that much, so when I do I have like 3 comments all at +5, or something like that, and bingo 15 mods.</p><p>Posting anon, but if you want to look for patterns in my comments my username is b4dc0d3r.  I tend to get in to conversations late so most are un-moderated (+1 for logged in, with karma bonus).  So it only takes 3 people willing to waste points on me to get +5.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I regularly get either 5 or 15 , usually 15.I think it 's because I tend to comment in bursts - nothing for a week , then 2 or 3 at a time , and then only when I have something useful to say .
Except for the odd sarcastic or joking comment , or if I 'm heavily medicated.Plus I do n't log in all that much , so when I do I have like 3 comments all at + 5 , or something like that , and bingo 15 mods.Posting anon , but if you want to look for patterns in my comments my username is b4dc0d3r .
I tend to get in to conversations late so most are un-moderated ( + 1 for logged in , with karma bonus ) .
So it only takes 3 people willing to waste points on me to get + 5 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I regularly get either 5 or 15, usually 15.I think it's because I tend to comment in bursts - nothing for a week, then 2 or 3 at a time, and then only when I have something useful to say.
Except for the odd sarcastic or joking comment, or if I'm heavily medicated.Plus I don't log in all that much, so when I do I have like 3 comments all at +5, or something like that, and bingo 15 mods.Posting anon, but if you want to look for patterns in my comments my username is b4dc0d3r.
I tend to get in to conversations late so most are un-moderated (+1 for logged in, with karma bonus).
So it only takes 3 people willing to waste points on me to get +5.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017780</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1264948200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>(As an aside, can somebody explain to me how I ended up with 15 mod points? I've never seen this before)</p></div></blockquote><p>Those are to be used for moderating all of my last month's comments +1 Insightful. CmdrTaco told me himself, so you can trust me.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( As an aside , can somebody explain to me how I ended up with 15 mod points ?
I 've never seen this before ) Those are to be used for moderating all of my last month 's comments + 1 Insightful .
CmdrTaco told me himself , so you can trust me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(As an aside, can somebody explain to me how I ended up with 15 mod points?
I've never seen this before)Those are to be used for moderating all of my last month's comments +1 Insightful.
CmdrTaco told me himself, so you can trust me.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224</id>
	<title>Too late</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264934400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They should have stopped at version 1.3.37</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They should have stopped at version 1.3.37</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They should have stopped at version 1.3.37</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016656</id>
	<title>Re:Too late</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264940880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They better start moving as quickly as possible to 5.3.x series and then on to 8.0.0.8.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They better start moving as quickly as possible to 5.3.x series and then on to 8.0.0.8 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They better start moving as quickly as possible to 5.3.x series and then on to 8.0.0.8.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016510</id>
	<title>But.....</title>
	<author>ducomputergeek</author>
	<datestamp>1264940100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the real question is: Has Netcraft confirmed it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the real question is : Has Netcraft confirmed it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the real question is: Has Netcraft confirmed it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015660</id>
	<title>Does this mean</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264936200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OpenBSD will upgrade to 2.x?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OpenBSD will upgrade to 2.x ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OpenBSD will upgrade to 2.x?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016558</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>Tynin</author>
	<datestamp>1264940460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've gotten better karma which gives more mod points it seems. I've been getting 15 points for some time now. Comically, I just logged in to tell you this and noticed I've gotten another allotment of points<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've gotten better karma which gives more mod points it seems .
I 've been getting 15 points for some time now .
Comically , I just logged in to tell you this and noticed I 've gotten another allotment of points : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've gotten better karma which gives more mod points it seems.
I've been getting 15 points for some time now.
Comically, I just logged in to tell you this and noticed I've gotten another allotment of points :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017104</id>
	<title>Re:Too late</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1264943520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But now, it contains the answer to life, the universe, and everything! Which makes it clear why it will never need a change again. ^^</p><p>Bonus: The dude in the THHGTTG movie, with the British accent, going: &ldquo;Forty-twoohoooo-ooo???&rdquo;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But now , it contains the answer to life , the universe , and everything !
Which makes it clear why it will never need a change again .
^ ^ Bonus : The dude in the THHGTTG movie , with the British accent , going :    Forty-twoohoooo-ooo ? ?
?   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>But now, it contains the answer to life, the universe, and everything!
Which makes it clear why it will never need a change again.
^^Bonus: The dude in the THHGTTG movie, with the British accent, going: “Forty-twoohoooo-ooo??
?”</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015570</id>
	<title>FrisT sto4?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264935780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">will recall that it pa ranoid conspiracy Gloves, condoms to foster a gay and</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>will recall that it pa ranoid conspiracy Gloves , condoms to foster a gay and [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will recall that it pa ranoid conspiracy Gloves, condoms to foster a gay and [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015176</id>
	<title>How could they!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264934160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How DARE they?! BOYCOTT APACHE! (insert pitchforks and torches here)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How DARE they ? !
BOYCOTT APACHE !
( insert pitchforks and torches here )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How DARE they?!
BOYCOTT APACHE!
(insert pitchforks and torches here)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015584</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264935840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>15 points? Karma whoring really pays off I suppose.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>15 points ?
Karma whoring really pays off I suppose .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>15 points?
Karma whoring really pays off I suppose.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015682</id>
	<title>err, not dead yet?</title>
	<author>goga\_russian</author>
	<datestamp>1264936260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apache: releasing last version, 1.3 on death bed.<br>
Nginx: whats apache?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apache : releasing last version , 1.3 on death bed .
Nginx : whats apache ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apache: releasing last version, 1.3 on death bed.
Nginx: whats apache?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017774</id>
	<title>Re:web servers to app servers</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1264948080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>It seems that basic web sites made by uploading html and other files are going extinct, in favor of web apps like CMSs and blogs. As a result, the majority of the functionality provided by web servers like Apache is becoming unnecessary.</p></div></blockquote><p>Not so. Apache is a general-purpose HTTP server. It has a lot more power and capability than what 99\% of websites use it for, which is serving static content and CGI script output. There are loads of web servers that are capable of these menial tasks and they use a fraction of the resources that Apache does. Apache is only as popular as it is because it's what most web hosting companies, documentation, and sysadmins default to.</p><p>The reason you see CMSs and blogs adopting alternative HTTP daemons is because they want to reduce the complexity of their software stack and configuration. Apache is big and somewhat unwieldy. It's like using a 30-volt industrial electric screwdriver change a video card.</p><p>Apache's popularity might wane as lighter, more application-focused HTTP daemons become more common but it will never go away until HTTP does. It's just too darn flexible, even if it can't (usually) scale to millions of hits per second like newer servers can.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that basic web sites made by uploading html and other files are going extinct , in favor of web apps like CMSs and blogs .
As a result , the majority of the functionality provided by web servers like Apache is becoming unnecessary.Not so .
Apache is a general-purpose HTTP server .
It has a lot more power and capability than what 99 \ % of websites use it for , which is serving static content and CGI script output .
There are loads of web servers that are capable of these menial tasks and they use a fraction of the resources that Apache does .
Apache is only as popular as it is because it 's what most web hosting companies , documentation , and sysadmins default to.The reason you see CMSs and blogs adopting alternative HTTP daemons is because they want to reduce the complexity of their software stack and configuration .
Apache is big and somewhat unwieldy .
It 's like using a 30-volt industrial electric screwdriver change a video card.Apache 's popularity might wane as lighter , more application-focused HTTP daemons become more common but it will never go away until HTTP does .
It 's just too darn flexible , even if it ca n't ( usually ) scale to millions of hits per second like newer servers can .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that basic web sites made by uploading html and other files are going extinct, in favor of web apps like CMSs and blogs.
As a result, the majority of the functionality provided by web servers like Apache is becoming unnecessary.Not so.
Apache is a general-purpose HTTP server.
It has a lot more power and capability than what 99\% of websites use it for, which is serving static content and CGI script output.
There are loads of web servers that are capable of these menial tasks and they use a fraction of the resources that Apache does.
Apache is only as popular as it is because it's what most web hosting companies, documentation, and sysadmins default to.The reason you see CMSs and blogs adopting alternative HTTP daemons is because they want to reduce the complexity of their software stack and configuration.
Apache is big and somewhat unwieldy.
It's like using a 30-volt industrial electric screwdriver change a video card.Apache's popularity might wane as lighter, more application-focused HTTP daemons become more common but it will never go away until HTTP does.
It's just too darn flexible, even if it can't (usually) scale to millions of hits per second like newer servers can.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015360</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015902</id>
	<title>Farewell</title>
	<author>StrifeJester</author>
	<datestamp>1264937160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>In my early days of running servers at home I used 1.x Apache a lot, it will be missed but I must say I love 2.x releases these days and haven't seen much 1.x out there lately.</htmltext>
<tokenext>In my early days of running servers at home I used 1.x Apache a lot , it will be missed but I must say I love 2.x releases these days and have n't seen much 1.x out there lately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my early days of running servers at home I used 1.x Apache a lot, it will be missed but I must say I love 2.x releases these days and haven't seen much 1.x out there lately.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015178</id>
	<title>Amazingly OLD news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264934160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the Apache web site:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Apache 1.3.42 Released          <b> <i>2008-01-19</i></b></p>  </div><p>Emphasis mine...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the Apache web site : Apache 1.3.42 Released 2008-01-19 Emphasis mine.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the Apache web site:Apache 1.3.42 Released           2008-01-19  Emphasis mine...
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017568</id>
	<title>Re:Open Source</title>
	<author>Sir\_Lewk</author>
	<datestamp>1264946640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, because a project dying and all the people that still use it being left out in the cold is really an attractive alternative.</p><p>Not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , because a project dying and all the people that still use it being left out in the cold is really an attractive alternative.Not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, because a project dying and all the people that still use it being left out in the cold is really an attractive alternative.Not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402</id>
	<title>Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>RoFLKOPTr</author>
	<datestamp>1264935180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of commentors seem to think that this is the final release of Apache. It is not. This is the final release of Apache 1.3... Apache HTTP Servers 2.0 and 2.2 are still being maintained.</p><p>(As an aside, can somebody explain to me how I ended up with <b>15</b> mod points? I've never seen this before)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of commentors seem to think that this is the final release of Apache .
It is not .
This is the final release of Apache 1.3... Apache HTTP Servers 2.0 and 2.2 are still being maintained .
( As an aside , can somebody explain to me how I ended up with 15 mod points ?
I 've never seen this before )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of commentors seem to think that this is the final release of Apache.
It is not.
This is the final release of Apache 1.3... Apache HTTP Servers 2.0 and 2.2 are still being maintained.
(As an aside, can somebody explain to me how I ended up with 15 mod points?
I've never seen this before)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016448</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264939680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It seems to me (warning: this is an anecdote, not data) that if you are on the site long enough you'll start getting 15 mod points regularly (I get 15 mod points once or twice a week and I don't actually comment all that much, maybe once a week). Course my ID is a low 5 digits which probably helps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems to me ( warning : this is an anecdote , not data ) that if you are on the site long enough you 'll start getting 15 mod points regularly ( I get 15 mod points once or twice a week and I do n't actually comment all that much , maybe once a week ) .
Course my ID is a low 5 digits which probably helps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems to me (warning: this is an anecdote, not data) that if you are on the site long enough you'll start getting 15 mod points regularly (I get 15 mod points once or twice a week and I don't actually comment all that much, maybe once a week).
Course my ID is a low 5 digits which probably helps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017290</id>
	<title>1.3</title>
	<author>jjohn</author>
	<datestamp>1264944720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For my money, apache 1.3 is the only apache.  It's extremely stable and most of the security issues have been patched.  Solid, solid code and a breeze to compile.</p><p>But remember: I am a grumpy old man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For my money , apache 1.3 is the only apache .
It 's extremely stable and most of the security issues have been patched .
Solid , solid code and a breeze to compile.But remember : I am a grumpy old man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For my money, apache 1.3 is the only apache.
It's extremely stable and most of the security issues have been patched.
Solid, solid code and a breeze to compile.But remember: I am a grumpy old man.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015196</id>
	<title>Open Source</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264934280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the beauty of open source.  Apache 1.3 is still widely used, and many products are still based on it.  If the Apache Foundation no longer wants to maintain it, others are free to pick it up and carry on.  I wouldn't be surprised if this happened sooner rather than later.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the beauty of open source .
Apache 1.3 is still widely used , and many products are still based on it .
If the Apache Foundation no longer wants to maintain it , others are free to pick it up and carry on .
I would n't be surprised if this happened sooner rather than later .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the beauty of open source.
Apache 1.3 is still widely used, and many products are still based on it.
If the Apache Foundation no longer wants to maintain it, others are free to pick it up and carry on.
I wouldn't be surprised if this happened sooner rather than later.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015694</id>
	<title>Re:Too late</title>
	<author>KlomDark</author>
	<datestamp>1264936380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Until I "got" the joke, I was wondering why you didn't say "They should have stopped at version 1.3.41"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Until I " got " the joke , I was wondering why you did n't say " They should have stopped at version 1.3.41 " : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Until I "got" the joke, I was wondering why you didn't say "They should have stopped at version 1.3.41" :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015118</id>
	<title>End of the line, now move on</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264933860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's end of the line. Move on, there's nothing to see.

But give it a one-minute silence break to honour what server us for such a long time.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's end of the line .
Move on , there 's nothing to see .
But give it a one-minute silence break to honour what server us for such a long time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's end of the line.
Move on, there's nothing to see.
But give it a one-minute silence break to honour what server us for such a long time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31022098</id>
	<title>Re:1.3</title>
	<author>jrexilius</author>
	<datestamp>1265298000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Agreed.  I have been working on upgrading for quite a while but there is one issue I haven't figured out yet:</p><p>lingerd in apache 2.2 \_with\_ mod\_php in pref\_fork (as many linux source libs used in PHP not thread-safe).</p><p>As soon as the question comes up about linger\_close people say "it doesn't matter in cuz its so multi-thredded coolz" but that does no good in a PHP app server model.</p><p>Anyone know if lingerd is still needed in 2.2-pre-fork mode?  Cuz I know the module has not been updated for 2 family..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Agreed .
I have been working on upgrading for quite a while but there is one issue I have n't figured out yet : lingerd in apache 2.2 \ _with \ _ mod \ _php in pref \ _fork ( as many linux source libs used in PHP not thread-safe ) .As soon as the question comes up about linger \ _close people say " it does n't matter in cuz its so multi-thredded coolz " but that does no good in a PHP app server model.Anyone know if lingerd is still needed in 2.2-pre-fork mode ?
Cuz I know the module has not been updated for 2 family. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Agreed.
I have been working on upgrading for quite a while but there is one issue I haven't figured out yet:lingerd in apache 2.2 \_with\_ mod\_php in pref\_fork (as many linux source libs used in PHP not thread-safe).As soon as the question comes up about linger\_close people say "it doesn't matter in cuz its so multi-thredded coolz" but that does no good in a PHP app server model.Anyone know if lingerd is still needed in 2.2-pre-fork mode?
Cuz I know the module has not been updated for 2 family..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015400</id>
	<title>Re:Open Source</title>
	<author>Improv</author>
	<datestamp>1264935180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing is, it'd take someone with both considerable energy and a good name to manage it - when a product is declared dead, pretenders might pop up like weeds but, just like the French/Iranian/Prussian/Russian/Persian royal family, nobody takes them seriously.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is , it 'd take someone with both considerable energy and a good name to manage it - when a product is declared dead , pretenders might pop up like weeds but , just like the French/Iranian/Prussian/Russian/Persian royal family , nobody takes them seriously .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is, it'd take someone with both considerable energy and a good name to manage it - when a product is declared dead, pretenders might pop up like weeds but, just like the French/Iranian/Prussian/Russian/Persian royal family, nobody takes them seriously.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015196</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016674</id>
	<title>Re:web servers to app servers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264941000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea who cares about:<br>- redirects<br>- URL remapping<br>- mod\_php<br>- mod\_perl<br>- mod\_svn<br>- web dav<br>- https</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea who cares about : - redirects- URL remapping- mod \ _php- mod \ _perl- mod \ _svn- web dav- https</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea who cares about:- redirects- URL remapping- mod\_php- mod\_perl- mod\_svn- web dav- https</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015360</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015568</id>
	<title>Re:web servers to app servers</title>
	<author>jgreco</author>
	<datestamp>1264935780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The day of the static web page is indeed drawing to a close.  With Facebook rewriting PHP into HipHop, other middleware products becoming capable of also serving content, and the general transition to "Web 2.0", the largely static Web of the '90's is nearer than ever to its eventual end.

Apache 1 has been an absolutely fantastic tool over the years, and even though it's well past its "sell-by" date, the fact that many have continued to use it says a lot about the overall quality and robustness.  Thanks to every Apache author, contributor, bug-fixer, administrator, and even user who has made this one rockin' Web server.  It's been amazing to watch, NCSA httpd becoming Apache, and constantly evolving...

i</htmltext>
<tokenext>The day of the static web page is indeed drawing to a close .
With Facebook rewriting PHP into HipHop , other middleware products becoming capable of also serving content , and the general transition to " Web 2.0 " , the largely static Web of the '90 's is nearer than ever to its eventual end .
Apache 1 has been an absolutely fantastic tool over the years , and even though it 's well past its " sell-by " date , the fact that many have continued to use it says a lot about the overall quality and robustness .
Thanks to every Apache author , contributor , bug-fixer , administrator , and even user who has made this one rockin ' Web server .
It 's been amazing to watch , NCSA httpd becoming Apache , and constantly evolving.. . i</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The day of the static web page is indeed drawing to a close.
With Facebook rewriting PHP into HipHop, other middleware products becoming capable of also serving content, and the general transition to "Web 2.0", the largely static Web of the '90's is nearer than ever to its eventual end.
Apache 1 has been an absolutely fantastic tool over the years, and even though it's well past its "sell-by" date, the fact that many have continued to use it says a lot about the overall quality and robustness.
Thanks to every Apache author, contributor, bug-fixer, administrator, and even user who has made this one rockin' Web server.
It's been amazing to watch, NCSA httpd becoming Apache, and constantly evolving...

i</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015360</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31047954</id>
	<title>Re:Too late</title>
	<author>mebrahim</author>
	<datestamp>1265451420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>, but their fate chose 42 for them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>, but their fate chose 42 for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>, but their fate chose 42 for them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016178</id>
	<title>Re:Too late</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1264938360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1.3.37 is reserved for the OpenBSD fork.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1.3.37 is reserved for the OpenBSD fork .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.3.37 is reserved for the OpenBSD fork.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015436</id>
	<title>Will Slashdot Upgrade?</title>
	<author>swajr</author>
	<datestamp>1264935300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if slashdot is actually going to upgrade now...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if slashdot is actually going to upgrade now.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if slashdot is actually going to upgrade now...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017676</id>
	<title>Re:Open Source</title>
	<author>Vellmont</author>
	<datestamp>1264947420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i><br>So after a project dies it forks off into a slew a Legacy systems all needed independent modifications and changes. That is the Ugly side of Open Source to me.<br></i><br>Unless all the owners of the legacy systems got together and formed some sort of..  foundation to maintain the old version.  They could all share the code and benefit from the modifications.  They could call it something like the Apache Software Foundation (oops, I guess that one's already taken).</p><p>Kidding aside, the "problem" you describe has nothing to do with "open source", and everything to do with the rest of the world moving on to something new.  With open source at least the people dependent on the old version could maintain it if they wanted to/needed to.  With closed source, it's upgrade or suffer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So after a project dies it forks off into a slew a Legacy systems all needed independent modifications and changes .
That is the Ugly side of Open Source to me.Unless all the owners of the legacy systems got together and formed some sort of.. foundation to maintain the old version .
They could all share the code and benefit from the modifications .
They could call it something like the Apache Software Foundation ( oops , I guess that one 's already taken ) .Kidding aside , the " problem " you describe has nothing to do with " open source " , and everything to do with the rest of the world moving on to something new .
With open source at least the people dependent on the old version could maintain it if they wanted to/needed to .
With closed source , it 's upgrade or suffer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So after a project dies it forks off into a slew a Legacy systems all needed independent modifications and changes.
That is the Ugly side of Open Source to me.Unless all the owners of the legacy systems got together and formed some sort of..  foundation to maintain the old version.
They could all share the code and benefit from the modifications.
They could call it something like the Apache Software Foundation (oops, I guess that one's already taken).Kidding aside, the "problem" you describe has nothing to do with "open source", and everything to do with the rest of the world moving on to something new.
With open source at least the people dependent on the old version could maintain it if they wanted to/needed to.
With closed source, it's upgrade or suffer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31033352</id>
	<title>Re:1.3</title>
	<author>Sunnz</author>
	<datestamp>1265376240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would have been in the same boat if I didn't want to use SNI with Apache 2.</p><p>Or does Apache 1.3 actually support SNI now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would have been in the same boat if I did n't want to use SNI with Apache 2.Or does Apache 1.3 actually support SNI now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would have been in the same boat if I didn't want to use SNI with Apache 2.Or does Apache 1.3 actually support SNI now?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017290</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31018350</id>
	<title>Re:web servers to app servers</title>
	<author>colinrichardday</author>
	<datestamp>1264953180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The day of the static web page is indeed drawing to a close. With Facebook rewriting PHP into HipHop, other middleware products becoming capable of also serving content, and the general transition to "Web 2.0", the largely static Web of the '90's is nearer than ever to its eventual end.</i></p><p>But some content may well be better static, such as a web version of a textbook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The day of the static web page is indeed drawing to a close .
With Facebook rewriting PHP into HipHop , other middleware products becoming capable of also serving content , and the general transition to " Web 2.0 " , the largely static Web of the '90 's is nearer than ever to its eventual end.But some content may well be better static , such as a web version of a textbook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The day of the static web page is indeed drawing to a close.
With Facebook rewriting PHP into HipHop, other middleware products becoming capable of also serving content, and the general transition to "Web 2.0", the largely static Web of the '90's is nearer than ever to its eventual end.But some content may well be better static, such as a web version of a textbook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015568</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015360</id>
	<title>web servers to app servers</title>
	<author>Lord Ender</author>
	<datestamp>1264935060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It seems that basic web sites made by uploading html and other files are going extinct, in favor of web apps like CMSs and blogs. As a result, the majority of the functionality provided by web servers like Apache is becoming unnecessary.</p><p>As an example, any web app which interfaces with Apache via <a href="http://rack.rubyforge.org/" title="rubyforge.org">Rack</a> [rubyforge.org]middleware needs only the enabling of mod\_rack. Other than that, you don't need to touch apache2.conf. Apache basically just handles the sockets; the rest of its functionality goes unused.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It seems that basic web sites made by uploading html and other files are going extinct , in favor of web apps like CMSs and blogs .
As a result , the majority of the functionality provided by web servers like Apache is becoming unnecessary.As an example , any web app which interfaces with Apache via Rack [ rubyforge.org ] middleware needs only the enabling of mod \ _rack .
Other than that , you do n't need to touch apache2.conf .
Apache basically just handles the sockets ; the rest of its functionality goes unused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It seems that basic web sites made by uploading html and other files are going extinct, in favor of web apps like CMSs and blogs.
As a result, the majority of the functionality provided by web servers like Apache is becoming unnecessary.As an example, any web app which interfaces with Apache via Rack [rubyforge.org]middleware needs only the enabling of mod\_rack.
Other than that, you don't need to touch apache2.conf.
Apache basically just handles the sockets; the rest of its functionality goes unused.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31020068</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>Bacon Bits</author>
	<datestamp>1265278140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For quite awhile I was getting 10 and 15 points, but after burning some karma defending things the SlashDot hivemind dislikes, I'm back to getting only 5.  I'm glad.  Now I don't feel like I'm wasting so many points all the time as even now I usually have 1-2 expire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For quite awhile I was getting 10 and 15 points , but after burning some karma defending things the SlashDot hivemind dislikes , I 'm back to getting only 5 .
I 'm glad .
Now I do n't feel like I 'm wasting so many points all the time as even now I usually have 1-2 expire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For quite awhile I was getting 10 and 15 points, but after burning some karma defending things the SlashDot hivemind dislikes, I'm back to getting only 5.
I'm glad.
Now I don't feel like I'm wasting so many points all the time as even now I usually have 1-2 expire.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015496</id>
	<title>Re:Misleading Summary</title>
	<author>jopsen</author>
	<datestamp>1264935480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(As an aside, can somebody explain to me how I ended up with <b>15</b> mod points? I've never seen this before)</p></div><p>You probably deserve them for being as kind as to point out that the apache HTTP server isn't finished...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( As an aside , can somebody explain to me how I ended up with 15 mod points ?
I 've never seen this before ) You probably deserve them for being as kind as to point out that the apache HTTP server is n't finished... : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(As an aside, can somebody explain to me how I ended up with 15 mod points?
I've never seen this before)You probably deserve them for being as kind as to point out that the apache HTTP server isn't finished... :)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015832</id>
	<title>Re:End of the line, now move on</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264936860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But does netcraft confirm it ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But does netcraft confirm it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does netcraft confirm it ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015118</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015726</id>
	<title>Re:Open Source</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264936440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So after a project dies it forks off into a slew a Legacy systems all needed independent modifications and changes.  That is the Ugly side of Open Source to me.  A more beauty side is if the tools that did need to work on 1.3 once apache stopped 1.3 support went and modified their apps to work on newer web browsers.</p><p>Forking code to keep your project going is not the way,  it is just a bad idea.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So after a project dies it forks off into a slew a Legacy systems all needed independent modifications and changes .
That is the Ugly side of Open Source to me .
A more beauty side is if the tools that did need to work on 1.3 once apache stopped 1.3 support went and modified their apps to work on newer web browsers.Forking code to keep your project going is not the way , it is just a bad idea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So after a project dies it forks off into a slew a Legacy systems all needed independent modifications and changes.
That is the Ugly side of Open Source to me.
A more beauty side is if the tools that did need to work on 1.3 once apache stopped 1.3 support went and modified their apps to work on newer web browsers.Forking code to keep your project going is not the way,  it is just a bad idea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015196</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31022098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015178
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31030388
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016558
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31020068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31047954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31033352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017290
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015496
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015832
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015118
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31018350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015360
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_2052211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015196
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2052211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015726
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017676
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31030388
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2052211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015832
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2052211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015410
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2052211.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31047954
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017104
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016656
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2052211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015360
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015568
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31018350
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2052211.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31022098
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31033352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2052211.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015436
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2052211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31020068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31017780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31016558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_2052211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_2052211.31015176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
