<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_03_1722200</id>
	<title>Next X-Prize &mdash;  $10M For a Brain-Computer Interface</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265218080000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>The first X-Prize was about reaching space. Now, reader destinyland writes <i>"This time it's inner space, as Peter Diamandis holds a workshop at MIT discussing a <a href="http://hplusmagazine.com/articles/neuro/bci-x-prize-time-it\%E2\%80\%99s-inner-space">$10 million X-Prize for building a brain-computer interface</a>. This article includes video of Ray Kurzweil's 36-minute presentation, 'Merging the Human Brain with Its Creations,' and MIT synthetic neuroscientist Ed Boyden also made a presentation, followed by discussion groups about Input/Output, Control, Sensory, and Learning. Besides the ability to communicate by thought, the article argues, a Brain-Computer Interface X Prize 'will reward nothing less than a team that provides vision to the blind, new bodies to disabled people, and perhaps even a geographical 'sixth sense' akin to a GPS iPhone app in the brain.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>The first X-Prize was about reaching space .
Now , reader destinyland writes " This time it 's inner space , as Peter Diamandis holds a workshop at MIT discussing a $ 10 million X-Prize for building a brain-computer interface .
This article includes video of Ray Kurzweil 's 36-minute presentation , 'Merging the Human Brain with Its Creations, ' and MIT synthetic neuroscientist Ed Boyden also made a presentation , followed by discussion groups about Input/Output , Control , Sensory , and Learning .
Besides the ability to communicate by thought , the article argues , a Brain-Computer Interface X Prize 'will reward nothing less than a team that provides vision to the blind , new bodies to disabled people , and perhaps even a geographical 'sixth sense ' akin to a GPS iPhone app in the brain .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first X-Prize was about reaching space.
Now, reader destinyland writes "This time it's inner space, as Peter Diamandis holds a workshop at MIT discussing a $10 million X-Prize for building a brain-computer interface.
This article includes video of Ray Kurzweil's 36-minute presentation, 'Merging the Human Brain with Its Creations,' and MIT synthetic neuroscientist Ed Boyden also made a presentation, followed by discussion groups about Input/Output, Control, Sensory, and Learning.
Besides the ability to communicate by thought, the article argues, a Brain-Computer Interface X Prize 'will reward nothing less than a team that provides vision to the blind, new bodies to disabled people, and perhaps even a geographical 'sixth sense' akin to a GPS iPhone app in the brain.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226</id>
	<title>communicate from dreams</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264962900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want a way to communicate with the outside world from within a dream. If you could get lucid dreaming perfected you could get a day's work in while your physical body is resting. Then when you're awake you have the day off.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...of course i'm sure this will just devolve into working during the day and when you're asleep too heh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want a way to communicate with the outside world from within a dream .
If you could get lucid dreaming perfected you could get a day 's work in while your physical body is resting .
Then when you 're awake you have the day off .
...of course i 'm sure this will just devolve into working during the day and when you 're asleep too heh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want a way to communicate with the outside world from within a dream.
If you could get lucid dreaming perfected you could get a day's work in while your physical body is resting.
Then when you're awake you have the day off.
...of course i'm sure this will just devolve into working during the day and when you're asleep too heh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013222</id>
	<title>Re:Virtual telekinesis and telepathy</title>
	<author>Mashdar</author>
	<datestamp>1264967460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Brain DRM has already been patented. If you attempt to implement it, expect years in and out of court, and finally an order to compensate the patent holder with some fraction of the souls of your customers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Brain DRM has already been patented .
If you attempt to implement it , expect years in and out of court , and finally an order to compensate the patent holder with some fraction of the souls of your customers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brain DRM has already been patented.
If you attempt to implement it, expect years in and out of court, and finally an order to compensate the patent holder with some fraction of the souls of your customers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013618</id>
	<title>Re:Virtual telekinesis and telepathy</title>
	<author>MortimerGraves</author>
	<datestamp>1264969200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And who are you going to trust enough to buy their direct brain interface?</p><p>The Apple iMind?  All shiny, but locked down and proprietary...</p><p>
The MSBrain?  With that unfortunate "blue scream of death"...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And who are you going to trust enough to buy their direct brain interface ? The Apple iMind ?
All shiny , but locked down and proprietary.. . The MSBrain ?
With that unfortunate " blue scream of death " ... : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And who are you going to trust enough to buy their direct brain interface?The Apple iMind?
All shiny, but locked down and proprietary...
The MSBrain?
With that unfortunate "blue scream of death"... :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012402</id>
	<title>iPhone GPS app?</title>
	<author>spammeister</author>
	<datestamp>1264963620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Need some way to know where you are at? There's a map for that!<br> <br>Seriously, let's just work on getting "brain in a jar" to a functional state, and get the kinks worked out before Apple gets a hold of it and turns it into an iBody.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Need some way to know where you are at ?
There 's a map for that !
Seriously , let 's just work on getting " brain in a jar " to a functional state , and get the kinks worked out before Apple gets a hold of it and turns it into an iBody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Need some way to know where you are at?
There's a map for that!
Seriously, let's just work on getting "brain in a jar" to a functional state, and get the kinks worked out before Apple gets a hold of it and turns it into an iBody.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012338</id>
	<title>Re:communicate from dreams</title>
	<author>SerpensV</author>
	<datestamp>1264963320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Try this: <a href="http://xkcd.com/269/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">http://xkcd.com/269/</a> [xkcd.com]
Apart from that, I've heard about experiments where vertical or horizontal eye movement was used to comunucate yes/no signals from the sleepers to the outside world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try this : http : //xkcd.com/269/ [ xkcd.com ] Apart from that , I 've heard about experiments where vertical or horizontal eye movement was used to comunucate yes/no signals from the sleepers to the outside world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try this: http://xkcd.com/269/ [xkcd.com]
Apart from that, I've heard about experiments where vertical or horizontal eye movement was used to comunucate yes/no signals from the sleepers to the outside world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013576</id>
	<title>Re:Virtual telekinesis and telepathy</title>
	<author>kvezach</author>
	<datestamp>1264968960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yay for a hive mind, perhaps?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yay for a hive mind , perhaps ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yay for a hive mind, perhaps?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014560</id>
	<title>does-it-come-in-small dept.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264930980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know who writes those little dept. tags on the
summaries but this one is absolute comic genius.</p><p>
Bravo!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know who writes those little dept .
tags on the summaries but this one is absolute comic genius .
Bravo !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know who writes those little dept.
tags on the
summaries but this one is absolute comic genius.
Bravo!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012314</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My understanding -- as a complete outsider to the field -- is that a lot of the elements are already there.</p></div><p>My understanding -- as an insider in the field -- is that you are correct.  I work in the field of visual prosthetics.  There are Phase II clinical trials underway for visual prostheses based on retinal stimulation, and a handful of researchers, like myself, who are looking at alternate approaches that include a more direct brain interface.  To create a crude machine-brain visual interface, you need: (1) a digital imaging device, like a web cam, (2) a means to translate the image into the neural signal, like a wearable computer, (3) a computer-controlled multi-channel stimulator, like are used for cochlear implants, (4) a brain electrode, like are used to treat Parkinson's disease through Deep Brain Stimulation, or are used on the cortical surface to treat epilepsy.  The parts are all there; it's really just a matter of integration, optimization, and getting FDA approval to try it in blind volunteers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding -- as a complete outsider to the field -- is that a lot of the elements are already there.My understanding -- as an insider in the field -- is that you are correct .
I work in the field of visual prosthetics .
There are Phase II clinical trials underway for visual prostheses based on retinal stimulation , and a handful of researchers , like myself , who are looking at alternate approaches that include a more direct brain interface .
To create a crude machine-brain visual interface , you need : ( 1 ) a digital imaging device , like a web cam , ( 2 ) a means to translate the image into the neural signal , like a wearable computer , ( 3 ) a computer-controlled multi-channel stimulator , like are used for cochlear implants , ( 4 ) a brain electrode , like are used to treat Parkinson 's disease through Deep Brain Stimulation , or are used on the cortical surface to treat epilepsy .
The parts are all there ; it 's really just a matter of integration , optimization , and getting FDA approval to try it in blind volunteers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding -- as a complete outsider to the field -- is that a lot of the elements are already there.My understanding -- as an insider in the field -- is that you are correct.
I work in the field of visual prosthetics.
There are Phase II clinical trials underway for visual prostheses based on retinal stimulation, and a handful of researchers, like myself, who are looking at alternate approaches that include a more direct brain interface.
To create a crude machine-brain visual interface, you need: (1) a digital imaging device, like a web cam, (2) a means to translate the image into the neural signal, like a wearable computer, (3) a computer-controlled multi-channel stimulator, like are used for cochlear implants, (4) a brain electrode, like are used to treat Parkinson's disease through Deep Brain Stimulation, or are used on the cortical surface to treat epilepsy.
The parts are all there; it's really just a matter of integration, optimization, and getting FDA approval to try it in blind volunteers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012474</id>
	<title>Have you seen Al Gore?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That guy has to be running off a ti-83.  TRS-80 CoCo at best.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That guy has to be running off a ti-83 .
TRS-80 CoCo at best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That guy has to be running off a ti-83.
TRS-80 CoCo at best.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012870</id>
	<title>Bad Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264965900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It will cause a Standalone Complex!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will cause a Standalone Complex !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will cause a Standalone Complex!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198</id>
	<title>This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contests</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264962840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>My understanding -- as a complete outsider to the field -- is that a lot of the elements are already there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding -- as a complete outsider to the field -- is that a lot of the elements are already there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding -- as a complete outsider to the field -- is that a lot of the elements are already there.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31018334</id>
	<title>TEN?? I offer $100,000,000.00 for this...!</title>
	<author>The Living Fractal</author>
	<datestamp>1264952940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I will pay $100,000,000 for a device that does this, and allows things like curing of blindness.

The only catch is that I require a measly 20\% of the global net profit, and I will only pay the 'reward' once the technology has been 'proven' on the open market for two years.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I will pay $ 100,000,000 for a device that does this , and allows things like curing of blindness .
The only catch is that I require a measly 20 \ % of the global net profit , and I will only pay the 'reward ' once the technology has been 'proven ' on the open market for two years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I will pay $100,000,000 for a device that does this, and allows things like curing of blindness.
The only catch is that I require a measly 20\% of the global net profit, and I will only pay the 'reward' once the technology has been 'proven' on the open market for two years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014504</id>
	<title>So how much for a straight-up Singularity?</title>
	<author>Singularity42</author>
	<datestamp>1264930740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think you can and should offer <i>less</i>.  Maybe a million dollars.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you can and should offer less .
Maybe a million dollars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you can and should offer less.
Maybe a million dollars.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013890</id>
	<title>Does someone actually think the Dollhouse is real?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264970640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously. The X-Prize guys are pretending to be Rossum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously .
The X-Prize guys are pretending to be Rossum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously.
The X-Prize guys are pretending to be Rossum.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012304</id>
	<title>Re:communicate from dreams</title>
	<author>kiehlster</author>
	<datestamp>1264963200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Personally, I'd prefer an interface from the subconscious to the outside world.  Then you can do your work without even thinking about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Personally , I 'd prefer an interface from the subconscious to the outside world .
Then you can do your work without even thinking about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Personally, I'd prefer an interface from the subconscious to the outside world.
Then you can do your work without even thinking about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012468</id>
	<title>Great Idea, probably won't affect consumers</title>
	<author>TheRon6</author>
	<datestamp>1264963860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I *love* this idea.  Neural interfaces are still very much in their infancy with the best commercially available probably being the <a href="http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/ocz\_peripherals/nia-neural\_impulse\_actuator" title="ocztechnology.com" rel="nofollow">OCZ NIA</a> [ocztechnology.com] and even it is mostly a glitchy gimmick at this point.  But the standards they're considering for this X-Prize seem very high.  Providing vision to the blind and being able to control virtual bodies both require an understanding of very intricate neural operations that we probably won't see for many years.  Sure, there's been devices created that can <i>sort of</i> do these things already but not on levels that can significantly help the disabled.  All the more reason that this prize is a good idea since it will hopefully draw interest to the appropriate fields of study.  Unfortunately the kind of things that they're talking about will almost certainly require implants.  Further advancement in non-implanted interfaces will undoubtedly be much slower so don't assume that you're going to be roaming the hills of Azeroth as if you were actually there any time in the next 20 years.  But hey, hopefully I'm wrong.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I * love * this idea .
Neural interfaces are still very much in their infancy with the best commercially available probably being the OCZ NIA [ ocztechnology.com ] and even it is mostly a glitchy gimmick at this point .
But the standards they 're considering for this X-Prize seem very high .
Providing vision to the blind and being able to control virtual bodies both require an understanding of very intricate neural operations that we probably wo n't see for many years .
Sure , there 's been devices created that can sort of do these things already but not on levels that can significantly help the disabled .
All the more reason that this prize is a good idea since it will hopefully draw interest to the appropriate fields of study .
Unfortunately the kind of things that they 're talking about will almost certainly require implants .
Further advancement in non-implanted interfaces will undoubtedly be much slower so do n't assume that you 're going to be roaming the hills of Azeroth as if you were actually there any time in the next 20 years .
But hey , hopefully I 'm wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I *love* this idea.
Neural interfaces are still very much in their infancy with the best commercially available probably being the OCZ NIA [ocztechnology.com] and even it is mostly a glitchy gimmick at this point.
But the standards they're considering for this X-Prize seem very high.
Providing vision to the blind and being able to control virtual bodies both require an understanding of very intricate neural operations that we probably won't see for many years.
Sure, there's been devices created that can sort of do these things already but not on levels that can significantly help the disabled.
All the more reason that this prize is a good idea since it will hopefully draw interest to the appropriate fields of study.
Unfortunately the kind of things that they're talking about will almost certainly require implants.
Further advancement in non-implanted interfaces will undoubtedly be much slower so don't assume that you're going to be roaming the hills of Azeroth as if you were actually there any time in the next 20 years.
But hey, hopefully I'm wrong.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31017194</id>
	<title>Surrogates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264944060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Surrogates! Surrogates! Surrogates!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Surrogates !
Surrogates ! Surrogates !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Surrogates!
Surrogates! Surrogates!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013230</id>
	<title>i am homer of borg</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264967520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013826</id>
	<title>Re:I can think of a few people ...</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1264970220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It would be very interesting to be able to pull up a personal task manager. I could watch how the digestive system varies after lunch, follow how hard my immune system is working when I have a cold... it could also be insightful to see how my brain functions when I attempt to multitask.<br> <br>
The only problem is if management makes me upload the data so they can make sure Job.exe is getting the most attention.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be very interesting to be able to pull up a personal task manager .
I could watch how the digestive system varies after lunch , follow how hard my immune system is working when I have a cold... it could also be insightful to see how my brain functions when I attempt to multitask .
The only problem is if management makes me upload the data so they can make sure Job.exe is getting the most attention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be very interesting to be able to pull up a personal task manager.
I could watch how the digestive system varies after lunch, follow how hard my immune system is working when I have a cold... it could also be insightful to see how my brain functions when I attempt to multitask.
The only problem is if management makes me upload the data so they can make sure Job.exe is getting the most attention.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012538</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012958</id>
	<title>Please no iPhone app in my head!</title>
	<author>ChilyWily</author>
	<datestamp>1264966380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>...even a geographical 'sixth sense' akin to a GPS iPhone app in the brain.'</p></div></blockquote><p>

The possibilities for such an interface are amazing yet I have to say that I really find it distasteful when 'product placement' intervenes in an otherwise fun comment. It casts a pall over the entire comment and denigrates it to marketing-speak.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...even a geographical 'sixth sense ' akin to a GPS iPhone app in the brain .
' The possibilities for such an interface are amazing yet I have to say that I really find it distasteful when 'product placement ' intervenes in an otherwise fun comment .
It casts a pall over the entire comment and denigrates it to marketing-speak .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...even a geographical 'sixth sense' akin to a GPS iPhone app in the brain.
'

The possibilities for such an interface are amazing yet I have to say that I really find it distasteful when 'product placement' intervenes in an otherwise fun comment.
It casts a pall over the entire comment and denigrates it to marketing-speak.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014270</id>
	<title>Re:Virtual telekinesis and telepathy</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1264929480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Yay for virtual telekinesis</i></p><p>My girlfriend already has telekinesis.  All she has to do is visualize what she wants moved, express that desire verbally, and then I got move it for her, <i>all without the power of her mind!</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yay for virtual telekinesisMy girlfriend already has telekinesis .
All she has to do is visualize what she wants moved , express that desire verbally , and then I got move it for her , all without the power of her mind !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yay for virtual telekinesisMy girlfriend already has telekinesis.
All she has to do is visualize what she wants moved, express that desire verbally, and then I got move it for her, all without the power of her mind!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012224</id>
	<title>Sight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264962900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't sight for the blind already getting close?  (ok, last I heard it was B/W only and the resolution was ridiculously low, but it was still a brain machine interface)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't sight for the blind already getting close ?
( ok , last I heard it was B/W only and the resolution was ridiculously low , but it was still a brain machine interface )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't sight for the blind already getting close?
(ok, last I heard it was B/W only and the resolution was ridiculously low, but it was still a brain machine interface)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013304</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Yevoc</author>
	<datestamp>1264967700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The elements are not really "there," unfortunately, as this demands electrode implants, which are a long ways off from being reliable/safe.  As an electrical engineer who built electrode devices to read muscle commands, I can also tell you with confidence that invasive methods are the only possibility, as noninvasive brain/nerve scans are simply too weak to make confident guesses on what you're thinking.  95\% is the absolute best I've ever seen for non-invasive in very unrealistic settings (thinking of a single word or looking at a particular picture for tens of seconds), and while 95\% sounds great, it means it would do the wrong thing for you in 1 out of 20 commands.


Granted, there is a lot of work on invasives, but most engineers won't touch it with a 100 foot pole, as invading a person's skull = FDA regulation until you drown.  Because of this, progress is glacial instead of the frantic pace of innovation people are used to in the electronics industry.


If you get your technology wrong in even a very subtle way, the class action lawsuit you face from incapacitated customers will dwarf the $10 million prize.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The elements are not really " there , " unfortunately , as this demands electrode implants , which are a long ways off from being reliable/safe .
As an electrical engineer who built electrode devices to read muscle commands , I can also tell you with confidence that invasive methods are the only possibility , as noninvasive brain/nerve scans are simply too weak to make confident guesses on what you 're thinking .
95 \ % is the absolute best I 've ever seen for non-invasive in very unrealistic settings ( thinking of a single word or looking at a particular picture for tens of seconds ) , and while 95 \ % sounds great , it means it would do the wrong thing for you in 1 out of 20 commands .
Granted , there is a lot of work on invasives , but most engineers wo n't touch it with a 100 foot pole , as invading a person 's skull = FDA regulation until you drown .
Because of this , progress is glacial instead of the frantic pace of innovation people are used to in the electronics industry .
If you get your technology wrong in even a very subtle way , the class action lawsuit you face from incapacitated customers will dwarf the $ 10 million prize .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The elements are not really "there," unfortunately, as this demands electrode implants, which are a long ways off from being reliable/safe.
As an electrical engineer who built electrode devices to read muscle commands, I can also tell you with confidence that invasive methods are the only possibility, as noninvasive brain/nerve scans are simply too weak to make confident guesses on what you're thinking.
95\% is the absolute best I've ever seen for non-invasive in very unrealistic settings (thinking of a single word or looking at a particular picture for tens of seconds), and while 95\% sounds great, it means it would do the wrong thing for you in 1 out of 20 commands.
Granted, there is a lot of work on invasives, but most engineers won't touch it with a 100 foot pole, as invading a person's skull = FDA regulation until you drown.
Because of this, progress is glacial instead of the frantic pace of innovation people are used to in the electronics industry.
If you get your technology wrong in even a very subtle way, the class action lawsuit you face from incapacitated customers will dwarf the $10 million prize.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014476</id>
	<title>Re:communicate from dreams</title>
	<author>thesandtiger</author>
	<datestamp>1264930560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, there's something to this, though not necessarily from dreaming.</p><p>I often find that in the 9-10 minutes between my alarm going off the first time and after I've hit the snooze button waiting for the alarm to go off again, I spend what feels like hours thinking about things. My brain slows down again when I have to deal with physical stimulus.</p><p>So, if I could have my brain connected into a body/device that could work at the speed of my thoughts rather than the speed of my meat self, that would likely make me more productive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , there 's something to this , though not necessarily from dreaming.I often find that in the 9-10 minutes between my alarm going off the first time and after I 've hit the snooze button waiting for the alarm to go off again , I spend what feels like hours thinking about things .
My brain slows down again when I have to deal with physical stimulus.So , if I could have my brain connected into a body/device that could work at the speed of my thoughts rather than the speed of my meat self , that would likely make me more productive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, there's something to this, though not necessarily from dreaming.I often find that in the 9-10 minutes between my alarm going off the first time and after I've hit the snooze button waiting for the alarm to go off again, I spend what feels like hours thinking about things.
My brain slows down again when I have to deal with physical stimulus.So, if I could have my brain connected into a body/device that could work at the speed of my thoughts rather than the speed of my meat self, that would likely make me more productive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012326</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1264963260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My understanding is that while brain-to-CPU is now quite advanced, direct feedback is missing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding is that while brain-to-CPU is now quite advanced , direct feedback is missing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding is that while brain-to-CPU is now quite advanced, direct feedback is missing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013350</id>
	<title>Re:communicate from dreams</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264967940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm guessing you're half jesting, but I see a few problems with that concept. First, even if you could get lucid dreaming perfected, could you keep up a lucid dream for 6+ hours? Second, I have to believe maintaining a constant conscious state couldn't be good for one's health. It just doesn't strike me as likely that either evolution (or God) would have developed a sleep cycle for no good reason. If we could function day and night without sleep, we'd have a major survival advantage and would have almost certainly developed that ability.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm guessing you 're half jesting , but I see a few problems with that concept .
First , even if you could get lucid dreaming perfected , could you keep up a lucid dream for 6 + hours ?
Second , I have to believe maintaining a constant conscious state could n't be good for one 's health .
It just does n't strike me as likely that either evolution ( or God ) would have developed a sleep cycle for no good reason .
If we could function day and night without sleep , we 'd have a major survival advantage and would have almost certainly developed that ability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm guessing you're half jesting, but I see a few problems with that concept.
First, even if you could get lucid dreaming perfected, could you keep up a lucid dream for 6+ hours?
Second, I have to believe maintaining a constant conscious state couldn't be good for one's health.
It just doesn't strike me as likely that either evolution (or God) would have developed a sleep cycle for no good reason.
If we could function day and night without sleep, we'd have a major survival advantage and would have almost certainly developed that ability.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013290</id>
	<title>Baud rate?</title>
	<author>adipocere</author>
	<datestamp>1264967700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For a commercial takeoff, we need to expand beyond quadruplegic patients and the locked-in.  Always loved the idea, but let's be honest -- if typing is faster, typing will still win.  And that's just output.  For input, I don't think competing with something high-speed like vision is all that important.  Just a BCI that would allow for IM rates might as well be freakin' telepathy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For a commercial takeoff , we need to expand beyond quadruplegic patients and the locked-in .
Always loved the idea , but let 's be honest -- if typing is faster , typing will still win .
And that 's just output .
For input , I do n't think competing with something high-speed like vision is all that important .
Just a BCI that would allow for IM rates might as well be freakin ' telepathy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For a commercial takeoff, we need to expand beyond quadruplegic patients and the locked-in.
Always loved the idea, but let's be honest -- if typing is faster, typing will still win.
And that's just output.
For input, I don't think competing with something high-speed like vision is all that important.
Just a BCI that would allow for IM rates might as well be freakin' telepathy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012302</id>
	<title>Depressing</title>
	<author>symes</author>
	<datestamp>1264963200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>But if we pipe the internet directly into the brain will this make us even more depressed?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But if we pipe the internet directly into the brain will this make us even more depressed ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if we pipe the internet directly into the brain will this make us even more depressed?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014314</id>
	<title>Cybus Industries</title>
	<author>HTH NE1</author>
	<datestamp>1264929780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>new bodies to disabled people</p></div><p>You will be upgraded.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>new bodies to disabled peopleYou will be upgraded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>new bodies to disabled peopleYou will be upgraded.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012274</id>
	<title>Win Criteria?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder what the criteria is for winning?  Do you have to be able to move something physical?  Move a mouse or press a button?  According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain\%E2\%80\%93computer\_interface" title="wikipedia.org">this wiki article,</a> [wikipedia.org] they've already had some success with the non-humans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder what the criteria is for winning ?
Do you have to be able to move something physical ?
Move a mouse or press a button ?
According to this wiki article , [ wikipedia.org ] they 've already had some success with the non-humans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder what the criteria is for winning?
Do you have to be able to move something physical?
Move a mouse or press a button?
According to this wiki article, [wikipedia.org] they've already had some success with the non-humans.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013424</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>trust\_jmh</author>
	<datestamp>1264968240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My understanding is very little has changed in the last 10 years. Slashdot keeps posting on supposed BCI progress but it just seems more of what has been available beforehand is making the headlines.<br><br>The problem seems almost like asking for true AI but people are so board of hearing it for 60 years, something different has been set.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding is very little has changed in the last 10 years .
Slashdot keeps posting on supposed BCI progress but it just seems more of what has been available beforehand is making the headlines.The problem seems almost like asking for true AI but people are so board of hearing it for 60 years , something different has been set .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding is very little has changed in the last 10 years.
Slashdot keeps posting on supposed BCI progress but it just seems more of what has been available beforehand is making the headlines.The problem seems almost like asking for true AI but people are so board of hearing it for 60 years, something different has been set.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012390</id>
	<title>Actual information</title>
	<author>Stone Rhino</author>
	<datestamp>1264963560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article linked is spammy and terrible.  For  the actual information, see the <a href="http://www.xprize.org/media-center/features/bci-x-prize-igniting-a-brain-computer-interface-revolution" title="xprize.org">newsitem on the xprize site</a> [xprize.org] or the <a href="http://singularityhub.com/2010/01/21/igniting-a-brain-computer-interface-revolution-bci-x-prize/" title="singularityhub.com">linked details</a> [singularityhub.com].  Basically, there is no prize <i>yet</i> but they had a workshop to begin working out A. Rules for a prize and B. What is achievable.  The actual prize would be announced in about 8-14 months.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article linked is spammy and terrible .
For the actual information , see the newsitem on the xprize site [ xprize.org ] or the linked details [ singularityhub.com ] .
Basically , there is no prize yet but they had a workshop to begin working out A. Rules for a prize and B. What is achievable .
The actual prize would be announced in about 8-14 months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article linked is spammy and terrible.
For  the actual information, see the newsitem on the xprize site [xprize.org] or the linked details [singularityhub.com].
Basically, there is no prize yet but they had a workshop to begin working out A. Rules for a prize and B. What is achievable.
The actual prize would be announced in about 8-14 months.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012680</id>
	<title>Re:Not enough.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264964880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True, but they'll just reprogram our brains not to care.  So no one will care.  And then it will be all good.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True , but they 'll just reprogram our brains not to care .
So no one will care .
And then it will be all good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True, but they'll just reprogram our brains not to care.
So no one will care.
And then it will be all good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012462</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012636</id>
	<title>Wait a second, how dangerous is this?</title>
	<author>Rhalin</author>
	<datestamp>1264964700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok, I know the "X-Prize" in general is not without it's risks.  But with the Ansari X-Prize, a lot of those dangers could be mitigated before testing.  Yes, we can passively monitor the brain for all kinds of great things- memory, motor control, etc.  However, it looks like what they want is active input directly -to- the brain from a device.  I think they're treading on very dangerous ground here, and "somebody working in their shed" would be a bad person to be feeding electrical current into a live brain...  Just my opinion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , I know the " X-Prize " in general is not without it 's risks .
But with the Ansari X-Prize , a lot of those dangers could be mitigated before testing .
Yes , we can passively monitor the brain for all kinds of great things- memory , motor control , etc .
However , it looks like what they want is active input directly -to- the brain from a device .
I think they 're treading on very dangerous ground here , and " somebody working in their shed " would be a bad person to be feeding electrical current into a live brain... Just my opinion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, I know the "X-Prize" in general is not without it's risks.
But with the Ansari X-Prize, a lot of those dangers could be mitigated before testing.
Yes, we can passively monitor the brain for all kinds of great things- memory, motor control, etc.
However, it looks like what they want is active input directly -to- the brain from a device.
I think they're treading on very dangerous ground here, and "somebody working in their shed" would be a bad person to be feeding electrical current into a live brain...  Just my opinion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31018610</id>
	<title>I've had a question...</title>
	<author>utenaslashed</author>
	<datestamp>1264955940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Suppose we have a interface, just a connector, nothing more, nothing less.

Can't we just connect a memory chip or some artificial network whatever and see how the brain cope with those? (ignoring whether there's such a connector or not. oh and any ethical problem put aside also)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Suppose we have a interface , just a connector , nothing more , nothing less .
Ca n't we just connect a memory chip or some artificial network whatever and see how the brain cope with those ?
( ignoring whether there 's such a connector or not .
oh and any ethical problem put aside also )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Suppose we have a interface, just a connector, nothing more, nothing less.
Can't we just connect a memory chip or some artificial network whatever and see how the brain cope with those?
(ignoring whether there's such a connector or not.
oh and any ethical problem put aside also)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013866</id>
	<title>10 million to fuck up humanity as we know it?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264970520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>sounds like a bargain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>sounds like a bargain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sounds like a bargain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012194</id>
	<title>I've got that right now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264962780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called my hands on the keyboard.</p><p>ok, where's my 10mil</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called my hands on the keyboard.ok , where 's my 10mil</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called my hands on the keyboard.ok, where's my 10mil</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012538</id>
	<title>I can think of a few people ...</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1264964160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... that need the occasional "Alt+Ctrl+Del" combo.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... that need the occasional " Alt + Ctrl + Del " combo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... that need the occasional "Alt+Ctrl+Del" combo.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012688</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Mashdar</author>
	<datestamp>1264964940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have a small bit of experience in this field (having attended lab meetings for a University group partnered with the lab of Duke's Dr. Miguel Nicolelis).<br> <br>

I frankly have to say that the resolution in non-surgical methods is just not there, and is not promising. Surgical methods, on the other hand, are fairly invasive, and have yet to yield long-term success. And by success, I mean prediction of a single motor event, ie a mouse pushing a lever. Implants tend to degrade in signal quality over time.<br> <br>

Given that we cannot yet accurately predict simple motor events (which should have very easy-to-identify motor cortex manifestations), the idea that we are anywhere near interacting with conscious thought (which we still have no concept of the physical manifestation of which), is wrong. To put it in CS terms: Our data path is lossy and degrades with time. We have no idea what format the data is in, or even the data structures involved. We can tell that there is traffic on the network, but little else.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have a small bit of experience in this field ( having attended lab meetings for a University group partnered with the lab of Duke 's Dr. Miguel Nicolelis ) .
I frankly have to say that the resolution in non-surgical methods is just not there , and is not promising .
Surgical methods , on the other hand , are fairly invasive , and have yet to yield long-term success .
And by success , I mean prediction of a single motor event , ie a mouse pushing a lever .
Implants tend to degrade in signal quality over time .
Given that we can not yet accurately predict simple motor events ( which should have very easy-to-identify motor cortex manifestations ) , the idea that we are anywhere near interacting with conscious thought ( which we still have no concept of the physical manifestation of which ) , is wrong .
To put it in CS terms : Our data path is lossy and degrades with time .
We have no idea what format the data is in , or even the data structures involved .
We can tell that there is traffic on the network , but little else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have a small bit of experience in this field (having attended lab meetings for a University group partnered with the lab of Duke's Dr. Miguel Nicolelis).
I frankly have to say that the resolution in non-surgical methods is just not there, and is not promising.
Surgical methods, on the other hand, are fairly invasive, and have yet to yield long-term success.
And by success, I mean prediction of a single motor event, ie a mouse pushing a lever.
Implants tend to degrade in signal quality over time.
Given that we cannot yet accurately predict simple motor events (which should have very easy-to-identify motor cortex manifestations), the idea that we are anywhere near interacting with conscious thought (which we still have no concept of the physical manifestation of which), is wrong.
To put it in CS terms: Our data path is lossy and degrades with time.
We have no idea what format the data is in, or even the data structures involved.
We can tell that there is traffic on the network, but little else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012282</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1264963080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One aspect to this is programming the mind itself.</p><p>To some extent we already do this naturally with our learning and memory forming cognitive capabilities. Simple programs are easily written to our minds.</p><p>THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHING<br>YOU ARE NOW BREATHING MANUALLY</p><p>It will take time to build a language in which we can program more complex behaviors, but I have no doubt it is possible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One aspect to this is programming the mind itself.To some extent we already do this naturally with our learning and memory forming cognitive capabilities .
Simple programs are easily written to our minds.THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHINGYOU ARE NOW BREATHING MANUALLYIt will take time to build a language in which we can program more complex behaviors , but I have no doubt it is possible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One aspect to this is programming the mind itself.To some extent we already do this naturally with our learning and memory forming cognitive capabilities.
Simple programs are easily written to our minds.THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHINGYOU ARE NOW BREATHING MANUALLYIt will take time to build a language in which we can program more complex behaviors, but I have no doubt it is possible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014010</id>
	<title>neurophone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264971300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i could be wrong but i think the hardware end is already done, look up the neurophone. again i could be wrong but the holographic view of the brain isn't that neurons simply fire but that there are channels at different frequencies , sound, visual, sleep-mode(for alpha-theta something like 1-20 Hz i think)), and various other channels, these frequencies hit all the neurons at once and if a particular neuron has something relevant it can respond. only software modeling is needed at this point to interpret the waves, and there was a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. article not long ago where they were doing just that (showing cards, or having people think about words while a computer listened)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i could be wrong but i think the hardware end is already done , look up the neurophone .
again i could be wrong but the holographic view of the brain is n't that neurons simply fire but that there are channels at different frequencies , sound , visual , sleep-mode ( for alpha-theta something like 1-20 Hz i think ) ) , and various other channels , these frequencies hit all the neurons at once and if a particular neuron has something relevant it can respond .
only software modeling is needed at this point to interpret the waves , and there was a / .
article not long ago where they were doing just that ( showing cards , or having people think about words while a computer listened )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i could be wrong but i think the hardware end is already done, look up the neurophone.
again i could be wrong but the holographic view of the brain isn't that neurons simply fire but that there are channels at different frequencies , sound, visual, sleep-mode(for alpha-theta something like 1-20 Hz i think)), and various other channels, these frequencies hit all the neurons at once and if a particular neuron has something relevant it can respond.
only software modeling is needed at this point to interpret the waves, and there was a /.
article not long ago where they were doing just that (showing cards, or having people think about words while a computer listened)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012576</id>
	<title>Re:Virtual telekinesis and telepathy</title>
	<author>netruner</author>
	<datestamp>1264964340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's one good thing about the human brain - the designer doesn't claim DMCA protections on it.  However, there's also no warranty - oh, and you only <i>thought</i> that Microsoft was tight lipped about their APIs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's one good thing about the human brain - the designer does n't claim DMCA protections on it .
However , there 's also no warranty - oh , and you only thought that Microsoft was tight lipped about their APIs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's one good thing about the human brain - the designer doesn't claim DMCA protections on it.
However, there's also no warranty - oh, and you only thought that Microsoft was tight lipped about their APIs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012654</id>
	<title>Cyberbrain sclerosis</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264964760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what will we do when people start developing Cyberbrain sclerosis?   Who will be liable, will it be the indivdual or group who invents the interface or the one who manufactures it or the neurosurgeon  who installed it?</p><p>And also will section 9 be involved?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what will we do when people start developing Cyberbrain sclerosis ?
Who will be liable , will it be the indivdual or group who invents the interface or the one who manufactures it or the neurosurgeon who installed it ? And also will section 9 be involved ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what will we do when people start developing Cyberbrain sclerosis?
Who will be liable, will it be the indivdual or group who invents the interface or the one who manufactures it or the neurosurgeon  who installed it?And also will section 9 be involved?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014740</id>
	<title>NIA</title>
	<author>TwiztidK</author>
	<datestamp>1264931880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The first thing I thought of was OCZ's Neural Impulse Actuator...then I read the part about "restoring vision to the blind".</htmltext>
<tokenext>The first thing I thought of was OCZ 's Neural Impulse Actuator...then I read the part about " restoring vision to the blind " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The first thing I thought of was OCZ's Neural Impulse Actuator...then I read the part about "restoring vision to the blind".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013454</id>
	<title>Not enough of a prize</title>
	<author>proslack</author>
	<datestamp>1264968360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like they expect quite a bit for a paltry 10 million in prize money. Anyone that develops any one of those will probably go public and pocket a hundred times that much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like they expect quite a bit for a paltry 10 million in prize money .
Anyone that develops any one of those will probably go public and pocket a hundred times that much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like they expect quite a bit for a paltry 10 million in prize money.
Anyone that develops any one of those will probably go public and pocket a hundred times that much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31018992</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>7-Vodka</author>
	<datestamp>1264960200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Your post was exceptionally good at putting MY breathing into manual just by reading it.
Now I've got to wait until it goes back to auto before I feel normal again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your post was exceptionally good at putting MY breathing into manual just by reading it .
Now I 've got to wait until it goes back to auto before I feel normal again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Your post was exceptionally good at putting MY breathing into manual just by reading it.
Now I've got to wait until it goes back to auto before I feel normal again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31020174</id>
	<title>Re:I've got that right now</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265279700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what you might have missed would be the part with the disabled people.</p><p>Imagine your hands on your keyboard but you couldn't move your hands.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what you might have missed would be the part with the disabled people.Imagine your hands on your keyboard but you could n't move your hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what you might have missed would be the part with the disabled people.Imagine your hands on your keyboard but you couldn't move your hands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012420</id>
	<title>iPhone</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"a GPS iPhone app"</p><p>What? This doesn't have anything to do with iPhones</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" a GPS iPhone app " What ?
This does n't have anything to do with iPhones</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"a GPS iPhone app"What?
This doesn't have anything to do with iPhones</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012860</id>
	<title>Prize not needed and too small</title>
	<author>Grond</author>
	<datestamp>1264965780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A $10 million prize is absolute peanuts compared to the obvious commercial value of a usable, non-invasive (or at least low-risk) BCI.  Just for starters, an effective BCI would largely solve some of the major side effects of a stroke.  That right there is a massive, multi-billion dollar market.  Another $10 million is not going to substantially stimulate research and development in this area.  It's like offering $10 million for a cure for cancer.</p><p>Furthermore, this is an invention with applications in dozens of areas.  The company or individual that invents it would be swamped with licensing offers.</p><p>Compare this to the original X-Prize. There a prize was useful because there was no substantial pre-existing market for the technology being developed and there were relatively few areas of application for the technology.  Under those circumstances a prize model makes sense.</p><p>But for situations like this one we already have a prize; it's called a patent.  Even better, the value of the prize is determined by the market, so there's less of a risk of under or overvaluing the invention.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A $ 10 million prize is absolute peanuts compared to the obvious commercial value of a usable , non-invasive ( or at least low-risk ) BCI .
Just for starters , an effective BCI would largely solve some of the major side effects of a stroke .
That right there is a massive , multi-billion dollar market .
Another $ 10 million is not going to substantially stimulate research and development in this area .
It 's like offering $ 10 million for a cure for cancer.Furthermore , this is an invention with applications in dozens of areas .
The company or individual that invents it would be swamped with licensing offers.Compare this to the original X-Prize .
There a prize was useful because there was no substantial pre-existing market for the technology being developed and there were relatively few areas of application for the technology .
Under those circumstances a prize model makes sense.But for situations like this one we already have a prize ; it 's called a patent .
Even better , the value of the prize is determined by the market , so there 's less of a risk of under or overvaluing the invention .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A $10 million prize is absolute peanuts compared to the obvious commercial value of a usable, non-invasive (or at least low-risk) BCI.
Just for starters, an effective BCI would largely solve some of the major side effects of a stroke.
That right there is a massive, multi-billion dollar market.
Another $10 million is not going to substantially stimulate research and development in this area.
It's like offering $10 million for a cure for cancer.Furthermore, this is an invention with applications in dozens of areas.
The company or individual that invents it would be swamped with licensing offers.Compare this to the original X-Prize.
There a prize was useful because there was no substantial pre-existing market for the technology being developed and there were relatively few areas of application for the technology.
Under those circumstances a prize model makes sense.But for situations like this one we already have a prize; it's called a patent.
Even better, the value of the prize is determined by the market, so there's less of a risk of under or overvaluing the invention.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014982</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264933200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you think that what you are breathing Is air?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you think that what you are breathing Is air ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you think that what you are breathing Is air?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31015158</id>
	<title>Re:communicate from dreams</title>
	<author>doug141</author>
	<datestamp>1264934040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <i>If you could get lucid dreaming perfected you could get a day's work in while your physical body is resting.</i></p></div> </blockquote><p>

Sleep is for the mind, not the body.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you could get lucid dreaming perfected you could get a day 's work in while your physical body is resting .
Sleep is for the mind , not the body .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> If you could get lucid dreaming perfected you could get a day's work in while your physical body is resting.
Sleep is for the mind, not the body.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014040</id>
	<title>Ten Million?!?</title>
	<author>Hasai</author>
	<datestamp>1264971420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Pfft; if someone solves this, ten million will be pocket change.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Pfft ; if someone solves this , ten million will be pocket change .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Pfft; if someone solves this, ten million will be pocket change.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012804</id>
	<title>Re:Win Criteria?</title>
	<author>mhajicek</author>
	<datestamp>1264965420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are some pretty good bionic / cybernetic / prosthetic arms with over twenty degrees of freedom, that are controlled by what's left of the arms original nerves.  As for the requirements, the TFA looks like they haven't yet been determined.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are some pretty good bionic / cybernetic / prosthetic arms with over twenty degrees of freedom , that are controlled by what 's left of the arms original nerves .
As for the requirements , the TFA looks like they have n't yet been determined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are some pretty good bionic / cybernetic / prosthetic arms with over twenty degrees of freedom, that are controlled by what's left of the arms original nerves.
As for the requirements, the TFA looks like they haven't yet been determined.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012274</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012676</id>
	<title>Non-Standard Interface</title>
	<author>lobiusmoop</author>
	<datestamp>1264964880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The big problem I see is that unlike regular computer interfaces, which have tightly defined specs for physical connectivity, voltage levels, signalling etc, brains tend to be unique, irregular and dynamic, with only very rough maps available of which area has which function.<br>
&nbsp; Unlike TCP/IP, There's no clear distinction between the link, transport and application layers to work with in the brain, they blend together. So it might be possible to implement on an individual level with a ton of work, but I can't see it happening generally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The big problem I see is that unlike regular computer interfaces , which have tightly defined specs for physical connectivity , voltage levels , signalling etc , brains tend to be unique , irregular and dynamic , with only very rough maps available of which area has which function .
  Unlike TCP/IP , There 's no clear distinction between the link , transport and application layers to work with in the brain , they blend together .
So it might be possible to implement on an individual level with a ton of work , but I ca n't see it happening generally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The big problem I see is that unlike regular computer interfaces, which have tightly defined specs for physical connectivity, voltage levels, signalling etc, brains tend to be unique, irregular and dynamic, with only very rough maps available of which area has which function.
  Unlike TCP/IP, There's no clear distinction between the link, transport and application layers to work with in the brain, they blend together.
So it might be possible to implement on an individual level with a ton of work, but I can't see it happening generally.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012270</id>
	<title>The Keyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have this device with 104 keys on it that, without even speaking or looking at said device, can transmit commands to a computer.  It only requires neurological impulses to transmit down to one's fingers causing a force compression on an electric button, which then sends a signal to the computer, which interprets said signal as directed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have this device with 104 keys on it that , without even speaking or looking at said device , can transmit commands to a computer .
It only requires neurological impulses to transmit down to one 's fingers causing a force compression on an electric button , which then sends a signal to the computer , which interprets said signal as directed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have this device with 104 keys on it that, without even speaking or looking at said device, can transmit commands to a computer.
It only requires neurological impulses to transmit down to one's fingers causing a force compression on an electric button, which then sends a signal to the computer, which interprets said signal as directed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012916</id>
	<title>KVM...</title>
	<author>fahrbot-bot</author>
	<datestamp>1264966140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...my brain and computer have been using this interface successfully for years.<br>
Where's my money.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>...my brain and computer have been using this interface successfully for years .
Where 's my money .
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...my brain and computer have been using this interface successfully for years.
Where's my money.
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31021620</id>
	<title>Chair in Antarctica</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1265295480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We could have a chair in Antarctica, with a brain attachment, where we could simply use our brain waves to activate and operate<br>under possible invasion from a distant alien life form???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We could have a chair in Antarctica , with a brain attachment , where we could simply use our brain waves to activate and operateunder possible invasion from a distant alien life form ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We could have a chair in Antarctica, with a brain attachment, where we could simply use our brain waves to activate and operateunder possible invasion from a distant alien life form??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31016294</id>
	<title>Correct me if I'm wrong...</title>
	<author>Unkyjar</author>
	<datestamp>1264938840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and I'm sure many of you will.  But wasn't this already accomplished, at least at a basic, rudimentary level with Braingate?  And that was seven years ago, I would have thought that there would been much more improvement on their system by now.</p><p><a href="http://www.braingate.com/" title="braingate.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.braingate.com/</a> [braingate.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and I 'm sure many of you will .
But was n't this already accomplished , at least at a basic , rudimentary level with Braingate ?
And that was seven years ago , I would have thought that there would been much more improvement on their system by now.http : //www.braingate.com/ [ braingate.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and I'm sure many of you will.
But wasn't this already accomplished, at least at a basic, rudimentary level with Braingate?
And that was seven years ago, I would have thought that there would been much more improvement on their system by now.http://www.braingate.com/ [braingate.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31015790</id>
	<title>Re:Prize not needed and too small</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264936740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not sure if you are all super intelegent on this subject or a little dense. I guess, it all depends on what you call an adequate interface.<br>Look, an intuitive interface has already been done. It was implemented via images.</p><p>(as you know) An array was placed on a person's back with little moveable magnetic beads in each element. Then a person was trained to use sight thru this, and after while they were no longer aware of the input source, the images just appeared in the mind.</p><p>If you can monitor an array of nerves in the skin or other attributes such as voltage or capacitance, it may only be a matter of communication in picture symbology and training the individual. At some point they are not aware of the mechanics and translations involved, it will just feel like thought transference.</p><p>All you need is an effective image symbology. Maybe a different symbology for in vs out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not sure if you are all super intelegent on this subject or a little dense .
I guess , it all depends on what you call an adequate interface.Look , an intuitive interface has already been done .
It was implemented via images .
( as you know ) An array was placed on a person 's back with little moveable magnetic beads in each element .
Then a person was trained to use sight thru this , and after while they were no longer aware of the input source , the images just appeared in the mind.If you can monitor an array of nerves in the skin or other attributes such as voltage or capacitance , it may only be a matter of communication in picture symbology and training the individual .
At some point they are not aware of the mechanics and translations involved , it will just feel like thought transference.All you need is an effective image symbology .
Maybe a different symbology for in vs out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not sure if you are all super intelegent on this subject or a little dense.
I guess, it all depends on what you call an adequate interface.Look, an intuitive interface has already been done.
It was implemented via images.
(as you know) An array was placed on a person's back with little moveable magnetic beads in each element.
Then a person was trained to use sight thru this, and after while they were no longer aware of the input source, the images just appeared in the mind.If you can monitor an array of nerves in the skin or other attributes such as voltage or capacitance, it may only be a matter of communication in picture symbology and training the individual.
At some point they are not aware of the mechanics and translations involved, it will just feel like thought transference.All you need is an effective image symbology.
Maybe a different symbology for in vs out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31015246</id>
	<title>Re:It's already done</title>
	<author>Foobar\_</author>
	<datestamp>1264934520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx\_\_8XmMiv0" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx\_\_8XmMiv0</a> [youtube.com]  Play a piano with your brain and this stylish electrode hat</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = bx \ _ \ _8XmMiv0 [ youtube.com ] Play a piano with your brain and this stylish electrode hat</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bx\_\_8XmMiv0 [youtube.com]  Play a piano with your brain and this stylish electrode hat</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012564</id>
	<title>Real Futuristic Technology</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264964280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yea!  Let's hear it for real futuristic technology, and not plebian cellphones!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yea !
Let 's hear it for real futuristic technology , and not plebian cellphones !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yea!
Let's hear it for real futuristic technology, and not plebian cellphones!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013256</id>
	<title>Re:communicate from dreams</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264967580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're forgetting that as soon as it's possible to complete work from inside your head, work schedules will change to reflect the worker's ability to work while sleeping. You think that a brain control interface while sleeping would be used to give yourself free time during your waking hours? No, it would be used to turn the last bastion of the human experience, sleeping and dreaming, into the 24 hour schedule.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're forgetting that as soon as it 's possible to complete work from inside your head , work schedules will change to reflect the worker 's ability to work while sleeping .
You think that a brain control interface while sleeping would be used to give yourself free time during your waking hours ?
No , it would be used to turn the last bastion of the human experience , sleeping and dreaming , into the 24 hour schedule .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're forgetting that as soon as it's possible to complete work from inside your head, work schedules will change to reflect the worker's ability to work while sleeping.
You think that a brain control interface while sleeping would be used to give yourself free time during your waking hours?
No, it would be used to turn the last bastion of the human experience, sleeping and dreaming, into the 24 hour schedule.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012354</id>
	<title>And the other obvious use.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>'will reward nothing less than a team that provides vision to the blind, new bodies to disabled people, and perhaps even a geographical 'sixth sense' akin to a GPS iPhone app in the brain.'"</i></p><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>....and let's you jerk off without even pulling your pants down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'will reward nothing less than a team that provides vision to the blind , new bodies to disabled people , and perhaps even a geographical 'sixth sense ' akin to a GPS iPhone app in the brain .
' " ....and let 's you jerk off without even pulling your pants down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'will reward nothing less than a team that provides vision to the blind, new bodies to disabled people, and perhaps even a geographical 'sixth sense' akin to a GPS iPhone app in the brain.
'" ....and let's you jerk off without even pulling your pants down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013028</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264966560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHING<br>
YOU ARE NOW BREATHING MANUALLY</p></div><p>Oh no! Now what do I do? How do I know that once I stop thinking about breathing that it will continue?  Oh, cruel Fate!  Must not get distracted...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHING YOU ARE NOW BREATHING MANUALLYOh no !
Now what do I do ?
How do I know that once I stop thinking about breathing that it will continue ?
Oh , cruel Fate !
Must not get distracted.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHING
YOU ARE NOW BREATHING MANUALLYOh no!
Now what do I do?
How do I know that once I stop thinking about breathing that it will continue?
Oh, cruel Fate!
Must not get distracted...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013122</id>
	<title>interesting paradox</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264967040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, come on, this will only attract any new talent if it is completely free of a clue, and clueless won't solve this one.  Having that would be worth so much more than any X prize could ever pay that you'd be much better off keeping it a secret outside of some government buyers -- or just selling it.</p><p>This is like awarding 10 million for a workable, portable, reliable free energy source, fusion in your pocket.  Who would be stupid enough to apply for that prize if they had that?  Doh!  Yeah, sure, I need a couple mil now, you take the trillions this is worth and take care of all that for me, right?</p><p>Double your IQ or no money back, duh, sounds like a good deal to anyone who'd take this one on.</p><p>And yes, I know more than a little about the topic.  As a published expert on DSP, nerve impulse driven prosthetic arms and legs were simply hard to do -- vision, thoughts?  Come now.  And who would volunteer for a test and what government would allow such testing even if someone was half close?  Could you try this on a monkey and know if it was worth trying on a human?<br>Dream on, guys.</p><p>Yes, one of my alumni did go ahead and do functional MRI brain scans in real time....simple by comparison.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , come on , this will only attract any new talent if it is completely free of a clue , and clueless wo n't solve this one .
Having that would be worth so much more than any X prize could ever pay that you 'd be much better off keeping it a secret outside of some government buyers -- or just selling it.This is like awarding 10 million for a workable , portable , reliable free energy source , fusion in your pocket .
Who would be stupid enough to apply for that prize if they had that ?
Doh ! Yeah , sure , I need a couple mil now , you take the trillions this is worth and take care of all that for me , right ? Double your IQ or no money back , duh , sounds like a good deal to anyone who 'd take this one on.And yes , I know more than a little about the topic .
As a published expert on DSP , nerve impulse driven prosthetic arms and legs were simply hard to do -- vision , thoughts ?
Come now .
And who would volunteer for a test and what government would allow such testing even if someone was half close ?
Could you try this on a monkey and know if it was worth trying on a human ? Dream on , guys.Yes , one of my alumni did go ahead and do functional MRI brain scans in real time....simple by comparison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, come on, this will only attract any new talent if it is completely free of a clue, and clueless won't solve this one.
Having that would be worth so much more than any X prize could ever pay that you'd be much better off keeping it a secret outside of some government buyers -- or just selling it.This is like awarding 10 million for a workable, portable, reliable free energy source, fusion in your pocket.
Who would be stupid enough to apply for that prize if they had that?
Doh!  Yeah, sure, I need a couple mil now, you take the trillions this is worth and take care of all that for me, right?Double your IQ or no money back, duh, sounds like a good deal to anyone who'd take this one on.And yes, I know more than a little about the topic.
As a published expert on DSP, nerve impulse driven prosthetic arms and legs were simply hard to do -- vision, thoughts?
Come now.
And who would volunteer for a test and what government would allow such testing even if someone was half close?
Could you try this on a monkey and know if it was worth trying on a human?Dream on, guys.Yes, one of my alumni did go ahead and do functional MRI brain scans in real time....simple by comparison.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014640</id>
	<title>Please Forward U.S. $10,000,000 To This Address</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264931400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>as a certified check payble to:</p><p>Kilgore Trout<br>Astrakhan,<br>
&nbsp; Province of Astrakhan<br>Russian Federation</p><p>My winning entry is:</p><p>My fingers are my Brain-Computer Interface because you<br>need a keyboard to enter commands into the 'Puter.</p><p>Thanks For Your Money.</p><p>Yours In Astrakhan,<br>Kilgore Trout</p><p>P.S.: Waterboard Tony Blair !!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as a certified check payble to : Kilgore TroutAstrakhan ,   Province of AstrakhanRussian FederationMy winning entry is : My fingers are my Brain-Computer Interface because youneed a keyboard to enter commands into the 'Puter.Thanks For Your Money.Yours In Astrakhan,Kilgore TroutP.S .
: Waterboard Tony Blair ! ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as a certified check payble to:Kilgore TroutAstrakhan,
  Province of AstrakhanRussian FederationMy winning entry is:My fingers are my Brain-Computer Interface because youneed a keyboard to enter commands into the 'Puter.Thanks For Your Money.Yours In Astrakhan,Kilgore TroutP.S.
: Waterboard Tony Blair !!!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31019198</id>
	<title>The coming of the Cylons</title>
	<author>ALeader71</author>
	<datestamp>1264962900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All hail our future overlords!</p><p>Let's hope we have a few hot machine-made-flesh cylons to serve</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All hail our future overlords ! Let 's hope we have a few hot machine-made-flesh cylons to serve</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All hail our future overlords!Let's hope we have a few hot machine-made-flesh cylons to serve</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013772</id>
	<title>Monsters from the id</title>
	<author>nsaspook</author>
	<datestamp>1264969980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Direct mind-computer interfaces always makes me think of this classic. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbidden\_Planet" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbidden\_Planet</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k97JZHTCVbM" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k97JZHTCVbM</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Direct mind-computer interfaces always makes me think of this classic .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbidden \ _Planet [ wikipedia.org ] http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = k97JZHTCVbM [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Direct mind-computer interfaces always makes me think of this classic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbidden\_Planet [wikipedia.org]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k97JZHTCVbM [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012220</id>
	<title>It's already done</title>
	<author>SerpensV</author>
	<datestamp>1264962900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What are the exact rules? Some BCI devices have already been made.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What are the exact rules ?
Some BCI devices have already been made .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are the exact rules?
Some BCI devices have already been made.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013712</id>
	<title>The Russians are already WAY ahead of us...</title>
	<author>mmell</author>
	<datestamp>1264969680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org">MiG-31 "Firefox"</a> [wikipedia.org].<p>
The web browser was obviously just a spinoff technology!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>with the MiG-31 " Firefox " [ wikipedia.org ] .
The web browser was obviously just a spinoff technology !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>with the MiG-31 "Firefox" [wikipedia.org].
The web browser was obviously just a spinoff technology!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013344</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Mikkeles</author>
	<datestamp>1264967940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah; for example: does banging your head on the keyboard count?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah ; for example : does banging your head on the keyboard count ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah; for example: does banging your head on the keyboard count?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012684</id>
	<title>Re:communicate from dreams</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1264964880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had lucid dreaming perfected during high school, though I'll be honest, I would prefer to work the day and rest in my dream.</p><p>My dreams could be anything I wanted them to be. More fantastical than a Role playing game and more stimulating than a girlfriend. Now that I look back on it, I don't think I'd be able to get any work done, even more distractions than the internet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had lucid dreaming perfected during high school , though I 'll be honest , I would prefer to work the day and rest in my dream.My dreams could be anything I wanted them to be .
More fantastical than a Role playing game and more stimulating than a girlfriend .
Now that I look back on it , I do n't think I 'd be able to get any work done , even more distractions than the internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had lucid dreaming perfected during high school, though I'll be honest, I would prefer to work the day and rest in my dream.My dreams could be anything I wanted them to be.
More fantastical than a Role playing game and more stimulating than a girlfriend.
Now that I look back on it, I don't think I'd be able to get any work done, even more distractions than the internet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210</id>
	<title>Virtual telekinesis and telepathy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264962840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yay for virtual telekinesis, telepathy, auxiliary video in and digital "videographic" memory.<br><br>Except that DRM and restrictive Copyright laws will probably cripple it...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yay for virtual telekinesis , telepathy , auxiliary video in and digital " videographic " memory.Except that DRM and restrictive Copyright laws will probably cripple it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yay for virtual telekinesis, telepathy, auxiliary video in and digital "videographic" memory.Except that DRM and restrictive Copyright laws will probably cripple it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014052</id>
	<title>Don't Bother</title>
	<author>jriding</author>
	<datestamp>1264971480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft Already patented it!</p><p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=6609" title="zdnet.com">http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=6609</a> [zdnet.com]</p><p>United States Patent Application     20070185697<br>Kind Code     A1<br>Tan; Desney S. ; et al.     August 9, 2007<br>Using electroencephalograph signals for task classification and activity recognition<br>Abstract<br>A method for classifying brain states in electroencephalograph (EEG) signals comprising building a classifier model and classifying brain states using the classifier model is described. Brain states are determined. Labeled EEG data is collected and divided into overlapping time windows. The time dimension is removed from each time window. Features are generated by computing the base features; combining the base features to form a larger feature set; pruning the large feature set; and further pruning the feature set for a particular machine learning technique. Brain states in unlabeled EEG data are classified using the classifier model by dividing the unlabeled EEG data into overlapping time windows and removing the time dimension from each time window. Features required by the classifier model are generated. Artifacts in the labeled and unlabeled EEG data comprise cognitive artifacts and non-cognitive artifacts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft Already patented it ! http : //blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/ ? p = 6609 [ zdnet.com ] United States Patent Application 20070185697Kind Code A1Tan ; Desney S. ; et al .
August 9 , 2007Using electroencephalograph signals for task classification and activity recognitionAbstractA method for classifying brain states in electroencephalograph ( EEG ) signals comprising building a classifier model and classifying brain states using the classifier model is described .
Brain states are determined .
Labeled EEG data is collected and divided into overlapping time windows .
The time dimension is removed from each time window .
Features are generated by computing the base features ; combining the base features to form a larger feature set ; pruning the large feature set ; and further pruning the feature set for a particular machine learning technique .
Brain states in unlabeled EEG data are classified using the classifier model by dividing the unlabeled EEG data into overlapping time windows and removing the time dimension from each time window .
Features required by the classifier model are generated .
Artifacts in the labeled and unlabeled EEG data comprise cognitive artifacts and non-cognitive artifacts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft Already patented it!http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=6609 [zdnet.com]United States Patent Application     20070185697Kind Code     A1Tan; Desney S. ; et al.
August 9, 2007Using electroencephalograph signals for task classification and activity recognitionAbstractA method for classifying brain states in electroencephalograph (EEG) signals comprising building a classifier model and classifying brain states using the classifier model is described.
Brain states are determined.
Labeled EEG data is collected and divided into overlapping time windows.
The time dimension is removed from each time window.
Features are generated by computing the base features; combining the base features to form a larger feature set; pruning the large feature set; and further pruning the feature set for a particular machine learning technique.
Brain states in unlabeled EEG data are classified using the classifier model by dividing the unlabeled EEG data into overlapping time windows and removing the time dimension from each time window.
Features required by the classifier model are generated.
Artifacts in the labeled and unlabeled EEG data comprise cognitive artifacts and non-cognitive artifacts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013138</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Mashdar</author>
	<datestamp>1264967100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I grant that some vision restoration experiments are promising, the rest of what they are talking about is not at all within our grasp. The only reason vision (and for that matter auditory) implants are successful is because the person already has a functioning nerve group for input and the brain systems developed through prior use. In cases where people have been without vision for too long, or where there has been damage/degeneration of the neural pathway, such techniques have had little positive effect.<br>
When you start talking about the "replacement body", this may have similar nerve bundles pre-existing if the injury is outside the brain and occurred in the recent past. I will yield there is fair promise in the programs in which they re-map nerves to enervate existing muscle and then use sensors to detect muscle twitches, but there are no great methods of establishing direct signaling from nerve to machine yet.<br>
None of the above are <b>brain</b> machine interfaces, at least not in the direct sense. Direct BMIs (not relying on existing nerves for IO) have so far not been able to do much of anything in real time.<br>
And the GPS "feature" is likely many decades away. And would probably require claiming some significant portion of the brain already in use. A compass would probably be implementable in the near future (10+ years), if we can find some long-lasting solution to encourage nerve-diode interfacing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I grant that some vision restoration experiments are promising , the rest of what they are talking about is not at all within our grasp .
The only reason vision ( and for that matter auditory ) implants are successful is because the person already has a functioning nerve group for input and the brain systems developed through prior use .
In cases where people have been without vision for too long , or where there has been damage/degeneration of the neural pathway , such techniques have had little positive effect .
When you start talking about the " replacement body " , this may have similar nerve bundles pre-existing if the injury is outside the brain and occurred in the recent past .
I will yield there is fair promise in the programs in which they re-map nerves to enervate existing muscle and then use sensors to detect muscle twitches , but there are no great methods of establishing direct signaling from nerve to machine yet .
None of the above are brain machine interfaces , at least not in the direct sense .
Direct BMIs ( not relying on existing nerves for IO ) have so far not been able to do much of anything in real time .
And the GPS " feature " is likely many decades away .
And would probably require claiming some significant portion of the brain already in use .
A compass would probably be implementable in the near future ( 10 + years ) , if we can find some long-lasting solution to encourage nerve-diode interfacing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I grant that some vision restoration experiments are promising, the rest of what they are talking about is not at all within our grasp.
The only reason vision (and for that matter auditory) implants are successful is because the person already has a functioning nerve group for input and the brain systems developed through prior use.
In cases where people have been without vision for too long, or where there has been damage/degeneration of the neural pathway, such techniques have had little positive effect.
When you start talking about the "replacement body", this may have similar nerve bundles pre-existing if the injury is outside the brain and occurred in the recent past.
I will yield there is fair promise in the programs in which they re-map nerves to enervate existing muscle and then use sensors to detect muscle twitches, but there are no great methods of establishing direct signaling from nerve to machine yet.
None of the above are brain machine interfaces, at least not in the direct sense.
Direct BMIs (not relying on existing nerves for IO) have so far not been able to do much of anything in real time.
And the GPS "feature" is likely many decades away.
And would probably require claiming some significant portion of the brain already in use.
A compass would probably be implementable in the near future (10+ years), if we can find some long-lasting solution to encourage nerve-diode interfacing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012228</id>
	<title>Just remember for safety</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1264962900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>use optoisolators for any sensors attached to the human body.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>use optoisolators for any sensors attached to the human body .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>use optoisolators for any sensors attached to the human body.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013950</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264970940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHING<br>YOU ARE NOW BREATHING MANUALLY</p></div><p>You are also aware of your blinking and your tongue.  Have fun.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHINGYOU ARE NOW BREATHING MANUALLYYou are also aware of your blinking and your tongue .
Have fun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THINK ABOUT YOUR BREATHINGYOU ARE NOW BREATHING MANUALLYYou are also aware of your blinking and your tongue.
Have fun.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012914</id>
	<title>Unfair</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264966080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So Carmack has already won, I presume?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So Carmack has already won , I presume ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Carmack has already won, I presume?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013754</id>
	<title>I already have a couple...</title>
	<author>joeyblades</author>
	<datestamp>1264969920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
My keyboard and mouse already provide a brain-computer interface.
</p><p>
What!? Not the same thing, you say?
</p><p>
I beg to differ. All of the current technologies that might be used for this purpose are just fancy keyboards using some other kind of sensing technology rather than hall-effect switches. The systems don't <b> <i>understand</i> </b> what you're thinking they just interpret the activation of certain neuron groups as on-off switches. You can train your brain to trigger these neuron groups in pretty much the same way you can train your brain to move your fingers over a keyboard.
</p><p>
To think that the current brain-interfaces anywhere approach the holy grail of brain-computer interfaces that most people have in mind completely misunderstands the problem.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My keyboard and mouse already provide a brain-computer interface .
What ! ? Not the same thing , you say ?
I beg to differ .
All of the current technologies that might be used for this purpose are just fancy keyboards using some other kind of sensing technology rather than hall-effect switches .
The systems do n't understand what you 're thinking they just interpret the activation of certain neuron groups as on-off switches .
You can train your brain to trigger these neuron groups in pretty much the same way you can train your brain to move your fingers over a keyboard .
To think that the current brain-interfaces anywhere approach the holy grail of brain-computer interfaces that most people have in mind completely misunderstands the problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
My keyboard and mouse already provide a brain-computer interface.
What!? Not the same thing, you say?
I beg to differ.
All of the current technologies that might be used for this purpose are just fancy keyboards using some other kind of sensing technology rather than hall-effect switches.
The systems don't  understand  what you're thinking they just interpret the activation of certain neuron groups as on-off switches.
You can train your brain to trigger these neuron groups in pretty much the same way you can train your brain to move your fingers over a keyboard.
To think that the current brain-interfaces anywhere approach the holy grail of brain-computer interfaces that most people have in mind completely misunderstands the problem.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012796</id>
	<title>Does this count?</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1264965420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If so, I hope they <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxIgdOlT2cY" title="youtube.com">have their checkbook out</a> [youtube.com]</p><p><a href="http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/02/18/2111225" title="slashdot.org">Slashdot covered it</a> [slashdot.org], so it must be legit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If so , I hope they have their checkbook out [ youtube.com ] Slashdot covered it [ slashdot.org ] , so it must be legit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If so, I hope they have their checkbook out [youtube.com]Slashdot covered it [slashdot.org], so it must be legit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012760</id>
	<title>Re:communicate from dreams</title>
	<author>Mashdar</author>
	<datestamp>1264965240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I do not believe you would experience the benefits of REM sleep if there was real input.
Sleep is not for your body, but for your brain<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do not believe you would experience the benefits of REM sleep if there was real input .
Sleep is not for your body , but for your brain : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do not believe you would experience the benefits of REM sleep if there was real input.
Sleep is not for your body, but for your brain :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012950</id>
	<title>Keyboard.</title>
	<author>jitterman</author>
	<datestamp>1264966320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll take that reward as a direct-deposit, thanks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll take that reward as a direct-deposit , thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll take that reward as a direct-deposit, thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012586</id>
	<title>We're not even close</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264964340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you read the article you would have noticed that they require a full feedback loop and in fact full neural communication between a human brain and a computer. The article surmises that this prize will be won in 10-20 years which is reasonable considering that we still do not have the ability to even accurately map active neural networks in the brain let alone communicate with them in real time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read the article you would have noticed that they require a full feedback loop and in fact full neural communication between a human brain and a computer .
The article surmises that this prize will be won in 10-20 years which is reasonable considering that we still do not have the ability to even accurately map active neural networks in the brain let alone communicate with them in real time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read the article you would have noticed that they require a full feedback loop and in fact full neural communication between a human brain and a computer.
The article surmises that this prize will be won in 10-20 years which is reasonable considering that we still do not have the ability to even accurately map active neural networks in the brain let alone communicate with them in real time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012462</id>
	<title>Not enough.</title>
	<author>santax</author>
	<datestamp>1264963800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To sell my soul. Cause we all know where they will be using this technique. And it will cost us all a lot.

-we don't need no education, we don't need no mind control. It's just another brick in the.... -</htmltext>
<tokenext>To sell my soul .
Cause we all know where they will be using this technique .
And it will cost us all a lot .
-we do n't need no education , we do n't need no mind control .
It 's just another brick in the.... -</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To sell my soul.
Cause we all know where they will be using this technique.
And it will cost us all a lot.
-we don't need no education, we don't need no mind control.
It's just another brick in the.... -</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31029760</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Thing 1</author>
	<datestamp>1265293260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's interesting about your programming example is: deep breathing is helpful in many regards, and <i>requires</i> conscious control.  (It's useful for meditation, helping you get to sleep, calming you down from a fight-or-flight response in the workplace where either of those responses are not helpful, and energy healing.)  Otherwise, we tend to sigh once every hundred breaths or so (an unconscious deep breath).</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's interesting about your programming example is : deep breathing is helpful in many regards , and requires conscious control .
( It 's useful for meditation , helping you get to sleep , calming you down from a fight-or-flight response in the workplace where either of those responses are not helpful , and energy healing .
) Otherwise , we tend to sigh once every hundred breaths or so ( an unconscious deep breath ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's interesting about your programming example is: deep breathing is helpful in many regards, and requires conscious control.
(It's useful for meditation, helping you get to sleep, calming you down from a fight-or-flight response in the workplace where either of those responses are not helpful, and energy healing.
)  Otherwise, we tend to sigh once every hundred breaths or so (an unconscious deep breath).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31016898</id>
	<title>Emotiv EPOC!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264942260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see people mentioning the OCZ NIA, but no mention of the Emotiv EPOC? wireless 14 channel eeg for 300 bucks!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see people mentioning the OCZ NIA , but no mention of the Emotiv EPOC ?
wireless 14 channel eeg for 300 bucks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see people mentioning the OCZ NIA, but no mention of the Emotiv EPOC?
wireless 14 channel eeg for 300 bucks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012552</id>
	<title>I was reluctant at first</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264964220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I used to be reluctant about the idea of a brain-computer interface. I wasn't so sure I wanted to become dependent on a computer to function. Then, while I was looking at the 6th work-related wikipedia article of the day (and probably 20th wikpedia article of the day), I realized I was already dependent on a computer to function. Since then, I say, bring it on! Wire the internet directly into my brain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to be reluctant about the idea of a brain-computer interface .
I was n't so sure I wanted to become dependent on a computer to function .
Then , while I was looking at the 6th work-related wikipedia article of the day ( and probably 20th wikpedia article of the day ) , I realized I was already dependent on a computer to function .
Since then , I say , bring it on !
Wire the internet directly into my brain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to be reluctant about the idea of a brain-computer interface.
I wasn't so sure I wanted to become dependent on a computer to function.
Then, while I was looking at the 6th work-related wikipedia article of the day (and probably 20th wikpedia article of the day), I realized I was already dependent on a computer to function.
Since then, I say, bring it on!
Wire the internet directly into my brain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31036998</id>
	<title>I think I brain my damaged.</title>
	<author>h5inz</author>
	<datestamp>1265397060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well the brain to computer interface is one thing but what I do with all those zombies that have left over from my testing of computer to brain interface? I am sure they could be used in some military applications. They seem kind of hostile, in fact I have trouble from keeping them from invading my house. I run my router and pc on my UPS battery because the power is down for some mysterious reason. Please help!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well the brain to computer interface is one thing but what I do with all those zombies that have left over from my testing of computer to brain interface ?
I am sure they could be used in some military applications .
They seem kind of hostile , in fact I have trouble from keeping them from invading my house .
I run my router and pc on my UPS battery because the power is down for some mysterious reason .
Please help !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well the brain to computer interface is one thing but what I do with all those zombies that have left over from my testing of computer to brain interface?
I am sure they could be used in some military applications.
They seem kind of hostile, in fact I have trouble from keeping them from invading my house.
I run my router and pc on my UPS battery because the power is down for some mysterious reason.
Please help!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013026</id>
	<title>I think it's already here.</title>
	<author>Fantastic Lad</author>
	<datestamp>1264966560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd be very surprised if this technology doesn't already exist.</p><p>Richard Dolan speaks <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=veQ-LCjDCAc" title="youtube.com">here</a> [youtube.com] about what he terms the, "Break Away Civilization".</p><p>The idea being that black budget technology is so advanced, has been growing of its own accord for so long, and is so impossible to reveal given its nature, the result is that people working within its structure are essentially no longer dealing with the same reality as the rest of us.  The slaves get sticks and fire while the master of the house gets to use the current technology.  The only difference here being that the slaves don't even get to see the technology made possible by their sweat and bondage.</p><p>-FL</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd be very surprised if this technology does n't already exist.Richard Dolan speaks here [ youtube.com ] about what he terms the , " Break Away Civilization " .The idea being that black budget technology is so advanced , has been growing of its own accord for so long , and is so impossible to reveal given its nature , the result is that people working within its structure are essentially no longer dealing with the same reality as the rest of us .
The slaves get sticks and fire while the master of the house gets to use the current technology .
The only difference here being that the slaves do n't even get to see the technology made possible by their sweat and bondage.-FL</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd be very surprised if this technology doesn't already exist.Richard Dolan speaks here [youtube.com] about what he terms the, "Break Away Civilization".The idea being that black budget technology is so advanced, has been growing of its own accord for so long, and is so impossible to reveal given its nature, the result is that people working within its structure are essentially no longer dealing with the same reality as the rest of us.
The slaves get sticks and fire while the master of the house gets to use the current technology.
The only difference here being that the slaves don't even get to see the technology made possible by their sweat and bondage.-FL</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013294</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1264967700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>My understanding -- as an insider in the field -- is that you are correct. I work in the field of visual prosthetics. There are Phase II clinical trials underway for visual prostheses based on retinal stimulation, and a handful of researchers, like myself, who are looking at alternate approaches that include a more direct brain interface.</p></div><p>Then what are you doing posting on slashdot!?!  There's 10 million at stake!  If you're really so close, get back in the lab and make yourself a multi-millionaire!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>My understanding -- as an insider in the field -- is that you are correct .
I work in the field of visual prosthetics .
There are Phase II clinical trials underway for visual prostheses based on retinal stimulation , and a handful of researchers , like myself , who are looking at alternate approaches that include a more direct brain interface.Then what are you doing posting on slashdot ! ? !
There 's 10 million at stake !
If you 're really so close , get back in the lab and make yourself a multi-millionaire !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My understanding -- as an insider in the field -- is that you are correct.
I work in the field of visual prosthetics.
There are Phase II clinical trials underway for visual prostheses based on retinal stimulation, and a handful of researchers, like myself, who are looking at alternate approaches that include a more direct brain interface.Then what are you doing posting on slashdot!?!
There's 10 million at stake!
If you're really so close, get back in the lab and make yourself a multi-millionaire!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012708</id>
	<title>What's the Frequency?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264965060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK I have to ask, they're beaming it into by brain, What's the Frequency? I'm told it works best on people named Kenneth?<br>That's my name .</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK I have to ask , they 're beaming it into by brain , What 's the Frequency ?
I 'm told it works best on people named Kenneth ? That 's my name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK I have to ask, they're beaming it into by brain, What's the Frequency?
I'm told it works best on people named Kenneth?That's my name .</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31020024</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265277480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How did it go?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How did it go ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How did it go?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012446</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It depends. I've read about a lot of low-bandwidth, one way brain-&gt;computer interfaces, and a lot of clever hacks to have sensory-restoring computer-&gt;brain interfaces, but if the rules call for a two-way computer-brain interface, that still seems a far way off.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It depends .
I 've read about a lot of low-bandwidth , one way brain- &gt; computer interfaces , and a lot of clever hacks to have sensory-restoring computer- &gt; brain interfaces , but if the rules call for a two-way computer-brain interface , that still seems a far way off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It depends.
I've read about a lot of low-bandwidth, one way brain-&gt;computer interfaces, and a lot of clever hacks to have sensory-restoring computer-&gt;brain interfaces, but if the rules call for a two-way computer-brain interface, that still seems a far way off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31018880</id>
	<title>Re:communicate from dreams</title>
	<author>simoncpu was here</author>
	<datestamp>1264959000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd rather not let my subconscious have free reign over the outside world.  We have violent tendencies that are kept in check by our rational, conscious thoughts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather not let my subconscious have free reign over the outside world .
We have violent tendencies that are kept in check by our rational , conscious thoughts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather not let my subconscious have free reign over the outside world.
We have violent tendencies that are kept in check by our rational, conscious thoughts.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013096</id>
	<title>Banging my head on the keyboard...</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1264966920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does that count?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does that count ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does that count?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31042890</id>
	<title>Re:This will be one of the shorter X-Prize contest</title>
	<author>Freebirth Toad</author>
	<datestamp>1265387520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The parts are all there; it's really just a matter of integration, optimization, and getting FDA approval to try it in blind volunteers.</p></div><p>
Yeah, I'll bet that last bit is hard.  I've heard that it's routine for the FDA to approve double-blind studies, but I don't think that would be statistically significant in your case.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The parts are all there ; it 's really just a matter of integration , optimization , and getting FDA approval to try it in blind volunteers .
Yeah , I 'll bet that last bit is hard .
I 've heard that it 's routine for the FDA to approve double-blind studies , but I do n't think that would be statistically significant in your case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The parts are all there; it's really just a matter of integration, optimization, and getting FDA approval to try it in blind volunteers.
Yeah, I'll bet that last bit is hard.
I've heard that it's routine for the FDA to approve double-blind studies, but I don't think that would be statistically significant in your case.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014308</id>
	<title>6th sense, 60" vertical ...</title>
	<author>gnipgnop</author>
	<datestamp>1264929780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So this new class of people that inherit these super skills (e.g., 6th sense, 65" vertical jump, cheetah speed, etc.), will they dominate sports or will they even be allowed to play? Sounds like a new batch of recruits for the ACLU.

Can't wait to see amputee Grandma who once had inoperable cataracts slam dunkin over the top of Kobe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So this new class of people that inherit these super skills ( e.g. , 6th sense , 65 " vertical jump , cheetah speed , etc .
) , will they dominate sports or will they even be allowed to play ?
Sounds like a new batch of recruits for the ACLU .
Ca n't wait to see amputee Grandma who once had inoperable cataracts slam dunkin over the top of Kobe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this new class of people that inherit these super skills (e.g., 6th sense, 65" vertical jump, cheetah speed, etc.
), will they dominate sports or will they even be allowed to play?
Sounds like a new batch of recruits for the ACLU.
Can't wait to see amputee Grandma who once had inoperable cataracts slam dunkin over the top of Kobe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013804</id>
	<title>Ray Doesn't Know How to Make a Good Interface</title>
	<author>DreDawgie</author>
	<datestamp>1264970160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
As a proud owner of a Kurzeill K2600xs keyboard, I know that his biggest weakness is making interfaces, because the one his (otherwise wonderful) keyboards suck.
In fact, they even suck on his subsequent keyboards. He's a brilliant guy, but he just can't make a good interface. I shudder to think what his brain interface would be like.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As a proud owner of a Kurzeill K2600xs keyboard , I know that his biggest weakness is making interfaces , because the one his ( otherwise wonderful ) keyboards suck .
In fact , they even suck on his subsequent keyboards .
He 's a brilliant guy , but he just ca n't make a good interface .
I shudder to think what his brain interface would be like .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
As a proud owner of a Kurzeill K2600xs keyboard, I know that his biggest weakness is making interfaces, because the one his (otherwise wonderful) keyboards suck.
In fact, they even suck on his subsequent keyboards.
He's a brilliant guy, but he just can't make a good interface.
I shudder to think what his brain interface would be like.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012538
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31029760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31020174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31042890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31015790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31018992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31020024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012462
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31018880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31015246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012220
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012804
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012274
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31015158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1722200_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013350
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31020174
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31018334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013826
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012220
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31015246
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31015790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012708
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012226
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013350
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012304
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31018880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31015158
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012474
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31016294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013096
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012636
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013950
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013028
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014982
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31020024
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31029760
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31018992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012314
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013294
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013138
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31042890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013304
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013230
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012302
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012916
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31014270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31013222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012680
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1722200.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1722200.31012552
</commentlist>
</conversation>
