<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_03_1647207</id>
	<title>Sun's Project Darkstar Game Server Platform No More</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265216400000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>sproketboy writes <i>"<a href="http://www.projectdarkstar.com/">Project Darkstar</a>, an open source software platform from Sun labs that simplifies the development of horizontally scalable servers for online games,  is being <a href="http://www.projectdarkstar.com/forum/?topic=1540.msg10397#msg10397">discontinued as of the Oracle acquisition</a>. This project, <a href="http://games.slashdot.org/story/07/04/27/1628239/Sun-Surges-Into-Research-Virtual-Worlds">mentioned a couple of years back on Slashdot</a>, was a unique concept for building an application server specific to on-line gaming.  Sadly they were so close at version 0.9.11 (which is still very stable). Hopefully the open source community can <a href="http://www.projectdarkstar.com/forum/?topic=1540.msg10411\%3Btopicseen#new">get involved and help continue work</a> on this project."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>sproketboy writes " Project Darkstar , an open source software platform from Sun labs that simplifies the development of horizontally scalable servers for online games , is being discontinued as of the Oracle acquisition .
This project , mentioned a couple of years back on Slashdot , was a unique concept for building an application server specific to on-line gaming .
Sadly they were so close at version 0.9.11 ( which is still very stable ) .
Hopefully the open source community can get involved and help continue work on this project .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>sproketboy writes "Project Darkstar, an open source software platform from Sun labs that simplifies the development of horizontally scalable servers for online games,  is being discontinued as of the Oracle acquisition.
This project, mentioned a couple of years back on Slashdot, was a unique concept for building an application server specific to on-line gaming.
Sadly they were so close at version 0.9.11 (which is still very stable).
Hopefully the open source community can get involved and help continue work on this project.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012074</id>
	<title>Re:One of many...</title>
	<author>Ardaen</author>
	<datestamp>1264962420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Define rational. Is money your primary or only measure? Only in the short term? The next quarter, maybe the next year?
<br> <br>
A project like this, if it took off, could be quite good for expanding the usage of the Java language. It might not be a success or a big success, but calling it a blue-sky project seems a bit unfair. Unless of course value is only defined by the next quarter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Define rational .
Is money your primary or only measure ?
Only in the short term ?
The next quarter , maybe the next year ?
A project like this , if it took off , could be quite good for expanding the usage of the Java language .
It might not be a success or a big success , but calling it a blue-sky project seems a bit unfair .
Unless of course value is only defined by the next quarter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Define rational.
Is money your primary or only measure?
Only in the short term?
The next quarter, maybe the next year?
A project like this, if it took off, could be quite good for expanding the usage of the Java language.
It might not be a success or a big success, but calling it a blue-sky project seems a bit unfair.
Unless of course value is only defined by the next quarter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31018144</id>
	<title>Re:One of many...</title>
	<author>sproketboy</author>
	<datestamp>1264951380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>True but there are also a dozen client implementations in other <a href="http://www.projectdarkstar.com/wiki/Projects?Itemid=135" title="projectdarkstar.com" rel="nofollow">languages</a> [projectdarkstar.com]  so this can benefit any client side game development platform.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>True but there are also a dozen client implementations in other languages [ projectdarkstar.com ] so this can benefit any client side game development platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>True but there are also a dozen client implementations in other languages [projectdarkstar.com]  so this can benefit any client side game development platform.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011888</id>
	<title>Is anyone I know using this?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264961760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is anyone I know using this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is anyone I know using this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is anyone I know using this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014186</id>
	<title>Re:One of many...</title>
	<author>petermgreen</author>
	<datestamp>1264929000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>MYSQL made thier money by putting the client libs under the GPL and trying to claim that the GPL applied to the wire protocol (a dubious claim but still not something I'd want to risk ending up in court over if I could help it) and then selling commercial licenses to let people get out of those restrictions.</p><p>Sure someone can fork mysql but I don't see much money in a database that can only be used with FOSS software and it won't help those who are already using commercial mysql with non-gpl software.</p><p>Not that I think oracle would kill mysql, that would just encourage the rise of postgresql which is a much better database and therefore a lot more of a threat than mysql is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>MYSQL made thier money by putting the client libs under the GPL and trying to claim that the GPL applied to the wire protocol ( a dubious claim but still not something I 'd want to risk ending up in court over if I could help it ) and then selling commercial licenses to let people get out of those restrictions.Sure someone can fork mysql but I do n't see much money in a database that can only be used with FOSS software and it wo n't help those who are already using commercial mysql with non-gpl software.Not that I think oracle would kill mysql , that would just encourage the rise of postgresql which is a much better database and therefore a lot more of a threat than mysql is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MYSQL made thier money by putting the client libs under the GPL and trying to claim that the GPL applied to the wire protocol (a dubious claim but still not something I'd want to risk ending up in court over if I could help it) and then selling commercial licenses to let people get out of those restrictions.Sure someone can fork mysql but I don't see much money in a database that can only be used with FOSS software and it won't help those who are already using commercial mysql with non-gpl software.Not that I think oracle would kill mysql, that would just encourage the rise of postgresql which is a much better database and therefore a lot more of a threat than mysql is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013808</id>
	<title>Re:Sad</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1264970160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Runescape uses Java &amp; C++. I suspect C++ is used on the server side.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Runescape uses Java &amp; C + + .
I suspect C + + is used on the server side .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Runescape uses Java &amp; C++.
I suspect C++ is used on the server side.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31018082</id>
	<title>Re:Is anyone I know using this?</title>
	<author>sproketboy</author>
	<datestamp>1264950900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well Sun's marketing being what it's been - not very many but there are production systems out there using it.  I was planning on using it for my goldbox reboot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well Sun 's marketing being what it 's been - not very many but there are production systems out there using it .
I was planning on using it for my goldbox reboot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well Sun's marketing being what it's been - not very many but there are production systems out there using it.
I was planning on using it for my goldbox reboot.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011904</id>
	<title>One of many...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264961820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...blue sky projects that will disappear now that Sun is under rational management.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...blue sky projects that will disappear now that Sun is under rational management .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...blue sky projects that will disappear now that Sun is under rational management.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31020204</id>
	<title>Re:More important projects to be chopped</title>
	<author>CowboyBob500</author>
	<datestamp>1265280420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Having worked at a company that ditched Directory Server in favour of Open LDAP I can tell you that the migration from one to the other is a piece of cake. Just export the Directory Server schema in LDIF format, import into Open LDAP, transfer the data, and job done. Nothing to worry about at all, other than saving a few $$$ on license fees.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Having worked at a company that ditched Directory Server in favour of Open LDAP I can tell you that the migration from one to the other is a piece of cake .
Just export the Directory Server schema in LDIF format , import into Open LDAP , transfer the data , and job done .
Nothing to worry about at all , other than saving a few $ $ $ on license fees .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Having worked at a company that ditched Directory Server in favour of Open LDAP I can tell you that the migration from one to the other is a piece of cake.
Just export the Directory Server schema in LDIF format, import into Open LDAP, transfer the data, and job done.
Nothing to worry about at all, other than saving a few $$$ on license fees.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015292</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011966</id>
	<title>Version 0.9.11</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264962060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The terrorists strike again!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The terrorists strike again !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The terrorists strike again!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011812</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013570</id>
	<title>Re:Sad</title>
	<author>pjt33</author>
	<datestamp>1264968900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you calling RuneScape immature?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you calling RuneScape immature ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you calling RuneScape immature?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014946</id>
	<title>Let's rewrite the headline</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264933020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Sun's Project Darkstar Game Server Platform No More"</p><p>Hmm. That doesn't seem right. Let's move a word.</p><p>"Project Darkstar Game Server Platform No More Sun's"</p><p>There. Not grammatically great, but it gets the point across. It's an open source project. The corporate backer is no longer backing it. It's still an open source project, and can be developed by the community.</p><p>That's a primary point of open source, isn't it?</p><p>If most OSS projects can't survive without corporate sponsorship and guidance, then the OSS model is a failure and needs to be rexamined.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Sun 's Project Darkstar Game Server Platform No More " Hmm .
That does n't seem right .
Let 's move a word .
" Project Darkstar Game Server Platform No More Sun 's " There .
Not grammatically great , but it gets the point across .
It 's an open source project .
The corporate backer is no longer backing it .
It 's still an open source project , and can be developed by the community.That 's a primary point of open source , is n't it ? If most OSS projects ca n't survive without corporate sponsorship and guidance , then the OSS model is a failure and needs to be rexamined .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Sun's Project Darkstar Game Server Platform No More"Hmm.
That doesn't seem right.
Let's move a word.
"Project Darkstar Game Server Platform No More Sun's"There.
Not grammatically great, but it gets the point across.
It's an open source project.
The corporate backer is no longer backing it.
It's still an open source project, and can be developed by the community.That's a primary point of open source, isn't it?If most OSS projects can't survive without corporate sponsorship and guidance, then the OSS model is a failure and needs to be rexamined.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015076</id>
	<title>echo</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1264933680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>echo<br>
&nbsp; echo<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; echo<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; echo</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>echo   echo     echo       echo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>echo
  echo
    echo
      echo</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011810</id>
	<title>As long as Elfstar is ok</title>
	<author>BadAnalogyGuy</author>
	<datestamp>1264961460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mo, Marcie! You didn't <i>have</i> to do that!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mo , Marcie !
You did n't have to do that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mo, Marcie!
You didn't have to do that!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012464</id>
	<title>Save this write as a template</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>blurb = "The Sun \%s project, which we &lt;a href=\"\%s\"&gt;mentioned a few years ago&lt;/a&gt; on Slashdot, is being &lt;a href=\"\%s\"&gt;shut down&lt;/a&gt; in the wake of the Oracle acquisition.</tt><p>That should save the editors a little time over the next few weeks as they iterate over every minimally-viable, staff-of-three Sun mini-project that has been terminated by Oracle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>blurb = " The Sun \ % s project , which we mentioned a few years ago on Slashdot , is being shut down in the wake of the Oracle acquisition.That should save the editors a little time over the next few weeks as they iterate over every minimally-viable , staff-of-three Sun mini-project that has been terminated by Oracle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>blurb = "The Sun \%s project, which we mentioned a few years ago on Slashdot, is being shut down in the wake of the Oracle acquisition.That should save the editors a little time over the next few weeks as they iterate over every minimally-viable, staff-of-three Sun mini-project that has been terminated by Oracle.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013678</id>
	<title>Re:Is anyone I know using this?</title>
	<author>fusiongyro</author>
	<datestamp>1264969500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was looking into it for one of my little side projects. If you know Java and have the time to look at it, I recommend it. To call it a game server is really to limit it; it's actually a framework and server for persistent, low-latency agent-based computing. Seems to scale quite well and the API isn't too intimidating. On the website they have some <a href="http://www.projectdarkstar.com/application-showcase.html" title="projectdarkstar.com">showcased apps</a> [projectdarkstar.com] as well as <a href="http://www.projectdarkstar.com/wiki/Project\_Darkstar\_Case\_Studies?Itemid=225" title="projectdarkstar.com">case studies</a> [projectdarkstar.com], but if you're really looking to find out a bit more, you should look at <a href="https://project-snowman.dev.java.net/" title="java.net">Project Snowman</a> [java.net], a sample game of 3D snowmen wandering around a landscape hitting each other with snowballs.</p><p>All the same, I don't see much other use of it. Then again I think the gaming industry tends to keep its cards close to the chest (apart from rendering engines, I guess.)</p><p>I think it's a shame, but I'm not altogether surprised. At the same time, I'd be surprised if the community didn't rescue the project.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was looking into it for one of my little side projects .
If you know Java and have the time to look at it , I recommend it .
To call it a game server is really to limit it ; it 's actually a framework and server for persistent , low-latency agent-based computing .
Seems to scale quite well and the API is n't too intimidating .
On the website they have some showcased apps [ projectdarkstar.com ] as well as case studies [ projectdarkstar.com ] , but if you 're really looking to find out a bit more , you should look at Project Snowman [ java.net ] , a sample game of 3D snowmen wandering around a landscape hitting each other with snowballs.All the same , I do n't see much other use of it .
Then again I think the gaming industry tends to keep its cards close to the chest ( apart from rendering engines , I guess .
) I think it 's a shame , but I 'm not altogether surprised .
At the same time , I 'd be surprised if the community did n't rescue the project .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was looking into it for one of my little side projects.
If you know Java and have the time to look at it, I recommend it.
To call it a game server is really to limit it; it's actually a framework and server for persistent, low-latency agent-based computing.
Seems to scale quite well and the API isn't too intimidating.
On the website they have some showcased apps [projectdarkstar.com] as well as case studies [projectdarkstar.com], but if you're really looking to find out a bit more, you should look at Project Snowman [java.net], a sample game of 3D snowmen wandering around a landscape hitting each other with snowballs.All the same, I don't see much other use of it.
Then again I think the gaming industry tends to keep its cards close to the chest (apart from rendering engines, I guess.
)I think it's a shame, but I'm not altogether surprised.
At the same time, I'd be surprised if the community didn't rescue the project.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012276</id>
	<title>Re:Sad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oracle has repeatedly stated that Solaris, along with SPARC, is going to have increased investment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oracle has repeatedly stated that Solaris , along with SPARC , is going to have increased investment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oracle has repeatedly stated that Solaris, along with SPARC, is going to have increased investment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011852</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015130</id>
	<title>Re:One of many...</title>
	<author>bertok</author>
	<datestamp>1264933920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Define rational. Is money your primary or only measure? Only in the short term? The next quarter, maybe the next year?</p><p>A project like this, if it took off, could be quite good for expanding the usage of the Java language. It might not be a success or a big success, but calling it a blue-sky project seems a bit unfair. Unless of course value is only defined by the next quarter.</p></div><p>Except that it's forcing a restriction that isn't going to work for real-world game development.</p><p><i>On the server side, Project Darkstar applications must be delivered as Java Byte Code.</i> (<a href="http://www.projectdarkstar.com/core-technology.html" title="projectdarkstar.com">source</a> [projectdarkstar.com])</p><p>The issue is that practically all real-time 3D PC or console games are written in C++. The server is not usually a totally isolated module, because it shares a lot of common code with the client. It would have the same network communication stack, it has to load the same resources, it has to do much of the same 3D maths, apply AI and game logic, etc... All of that is often shared with the client code base. It's not unusual for 50\% or more shared code between the two. If the client is written in C++, and the server is in Java, expect that to drop to 5\% or less. At best, developers could embed the Java runtime into the client-side for some scripted logic, like WoW does with Lua.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Define rational .
Is money your primary or only measure ?
Only in the short term ?
The next quarter , maybe the next year ? A project like this , if it took off , could be quite good for expanding the usage of the Java language .
It might not be a success or a big success , but calling it a blue-sky project seems a bit unfair .
Unless of course value is only defined by the next quarter.Except that it 's forcing a restriction that is n't going to work for real-world game development.On the server side , Project Darkstar applications must be delivered as Java Byte Code .
( source [ projectdarkstar.com ] ) The issue is that practically all real-time 3D PC or console games are written in C + + .
The server is not usually a totally isolated module , because it shares a lot of common code with the client .
It would have the same network communication stack , it has to load the same resources , it has to do much of the same 3D maths , apply AI and game logic , etc... All of that is often shared with the client code base .
It 's not unusual for 50 \ % or more shared code between the two .
If the client is written in C + + , and the server is in Java , expect that to drop to 5 \ % or less .
At best , developers could embed the Java runtime into the client-side for some scripted logic , like WoW does with Lua .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Define rational.
Is money your primary or only measure?
Only in the short term?
The next quarter, maybe the next year?A project like this, if it took off, could be quite good for expanding the usage of the Java language.
It might not be a success or a big success, but calling it a blue-sky project seems a bit unfair.
Unless of course value is only defined by the next quarter.Except that it's forcing a restriction that isn't going to work for real-world game development.On the server side, Project Darkstar applications must be delivered as Java Byte Code.
(source [projectdarkstar.com])The issue is that practically all real-time 3D PC or console games are written in C++.
The server is not usually a totally isolated module, because it shares a lot of common code with the client.
It would have the same network communication stack, it has to load the same resources, it has to do much of the same 3D maths, apply AI and game logic, etc... All of that is often shared with the client code base.
It's not unusual for 50\% or more shared code between the two.
If the client is written in C++, and the server is in Java, expect that to drop to 5\% or less.
At best, developers could embed the Java runtime into the client-side for some scripted logic, like WoW does with Lua.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31019514</id>
	<title>Re:Sad</title>
	<author>sowth</author>
	<datestamp>1264967640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You may have a point about Linux not being perfect for all enterprise uses, but I don't see where it limits those values to a 32 bit int. It appears to limit it to the system int size. On 64 bit systems, wouldn't this be 64 bits and therefore much larger?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You may have a point about Linux not being perfect for all enterprise uses , but I do n't see where it limits those values to a 32 bit int .
It appears to limit it to the system int size .
On 64 bit systems , would n't this be 64 bits and therefore much larger ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You may have a point about Linux not being perfect for all enterprise uses, but I don't see where it limits those values to a 32 bit int.
It appears to limit it to the system int size.
On 64 bit systems, wouldn't this be 64 bits and therefore much larger?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013572</id>
	<title>Re:One of many...</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1264968900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just because somebody <i>can<i> pick up this project doesn't mean somebody <i>will</i>. Might happen &mdash; don't know, don't care.</i></i></p><p><i><i>My point was about Sun's habit of starting ambitious projects that are supposed to revolutionize this or that, but don't go anywhere. As far as I could tell when I worked there, they were mostly about keeping busy people who were no longer useful to Sun (if they ever were) but were too well-connected to be let go. Sun always had a big problem with cronyism.</i></i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just because somebody can pick up this project does n't mean somebody will .
Might happen    do n't know , do n't care.My point was about Sun 's habit of starting ambitious projects that are supposed to revolutionize this or that , but do n't go anywhere .
As far as I could tell when I worked there , they were mostly about keeping busy people who were no longer useful to Sun ( if they ever were ) but were too well-connected to be let go .
Sun always had a big problem with cronyism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just because somebody can pick up this project doesn't mean somebody will.
Might happen — don't know, don't care.My point was about Sun's habit of starting ambitious projects that are supposed to revolutionize this or that, but don't go anywhere.
As far as I could tell when I worked there, they were mostly about keeping busy people who were no longer useful to Sun (if they ever were) but were too well-connected to be let go.
Sun always had a big problem with cronyism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31019782</id>
	<title>Re:Is anyone I know using this?</title>
	<author>Lissajous</author>
	<datestamp>1265274060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes. It's the backend to Call of the Kings by Gamalocus. <a href="http://www.callofthekings.com/" title="callofthekings.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.callofthekings.com/</a> [callofthekings.com] if you're interested.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
It 's the backend to Call of the Kings by Gamalocus .
http : //www.callofthekings.com/ [ callofthekings.com ] if you 're interested .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
It's the backend to Call of the Kings by Gamalocus.
http://www.callofthekings.com/ [callofthekings.com] if you're interested.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014648</id>
	<title>Re:Sad</title>
	<author>samkass</author>
	<datestamp>1264931400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Puzzle Pirates was (is?) 100\% Java and was an interesting take on MMOs, IMHO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Puzzle Pirates was ( is ?
) 100 \ % Java and was an interesting take on MMOs , IMHO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Puzzle Pirates was (is?
) 100\% Java and was an interesting take on MMOs, IMHO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013684</id>
	<title>Re:One of many...</title>
	<author>fm6</author>
	<datestamp>1264969500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A project like this, if it took off, could be quite good for expanding the usage of the Java language.</p> </div><p>Maybe true. Doesn't matter. When I say "blue sky", I'm referring to the "if" part, not the "could be good" part. Since this project has been around for a couple years without seeming to go anywhere, I think it's safe to say it isn't going to take off.</p><p>Which makes it like a lot of other projects that Sun announced with great fanfare but that never go anywhere.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A project like this , if it took off , could be quite good for expanding the usage of the Java language .
Maybe true .
Does n't matter .
When I say " blue sky " , I 'm referring to the " if " part , not the " could be good " part .
Since this project has been around for a couple years without seeming to go anywhere , I think it 's safe to say it is n't going to take off.Which makes it like a lot of other projects that Sun announced with great fanfare but that never go anywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A project like this, if it took off, could be quite good for expanding the usage of the Java language.
Maybe true.
Doesn't matter.
When I say "blue sky", I'm referring to the "if" part, not the "could be good" part.
Since this project has been around for a couple years without seeming to go anywhere, I think it's safe to say it isn't going to take off.Which makes it like a lot of other projects that Sun announced with great fanfare but that never go anywhere.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012074</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012484</id>
	<title>Re:One of many...</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1264963920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand you, or the original title of this submission: no more? Canceled? Disappear?</p><p>It's an open source project - anyone can, at any time, now or in the future, work on it, by him/herself or in a group. Opensource is more than just a fancy term. It's like the adamantium armor of +1000 protection.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand you , or the original title of this submission : no more ?
Canceled ? Disappear ? It 's an open source project - anyone can , at any time , now or in the future , work on it , by him/herself or in a group .
Opensource is more than just a fancy term .
It 's like the adamantium armor of + 1000 protection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand you, or the original title of this submission: no more?
Canceled? Disappear?It's an open source project - anyone can, at any time, now or in the future, work on it, by him/herself or in a group.
Opensource is more than just a fancy term.
It's like the adamantium armor of +1000 protection.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011904</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011960</id>
	<title>Duplicate of OS services</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264962060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I looked at Darkstar, it looked like a duplicate of OS services.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I looked at Darkstar , it looked like a duplicate of OS services .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I looked at Darkstar, it looked like a duplicate of OS services.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012060</id>
	<title>9.11</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264962360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...never forget.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...never forget .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...never forget.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015292</id>
	<title>More important projects to be chopped</title>
	<author>swordgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1264934700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So an open source beta platform being axed is too bad. Sadly, there will be a lot more of them.</p><p>Personally, I'm more worried about seeing commercial products slashed - Directory Server is almost certainly going to be on the chopping block.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So an open source beta platform being axed is too bad .
Sadly , there will be a lot more of them.Personally , I 'm more worried about seeing commercial products slashed - Directory Server is almost certainly going to be on the chopping block .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So an open source beta platform being axed is too bad.
Sadly, there will be a lot more of them.Personally, I'm more worried about seeing commercial products slashed - Directory Server is almost certainly going to be on the chopping block.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012848</id>
	<title>Unfortunate project name ?</title>
	<author>Zoxed</author>
	<datestamp>1264965780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great film, bit IIRC it all ended badly when the computers malfunctioned in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark\_Star\_(film)" title="wikipedia.org">Dark Star</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great film , bit IIRC it all ended badly when the computers malfunctioned in Dark Star [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great film, bit IIRC it all ended badly when the computers malfunctioned in Dark Star [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011852</id>
	<title>Sad</title>
	<author>buruonbrails</author>
	<datestamp>1264961580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's next? Solaris? JavaFX?.. These projects eat lots of money and do not bring direct revenue, so Oracle may simply close them to cut expenses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's next ?
Solaris ? JavaFX ? . .
These projects eat lots of money and do not bring direct revenue , so Oracle may simply close them to cut expenses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's next?
Solaris? JavaFX?..
These projects eat lots of money and do not bring direct revenue, so Oracle may simply close them to cut expenses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014890</id>
	<title>Re:Sad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264932720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I see the timestamps on those are more than 4 years old</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I see the timestamps on those are more than 4 years old</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see the timestamps on those are more than 4 years old</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012736</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31018208</id>
	<title>Lots of games already scale horizontally</title>
	<author>trawg</author>
	<datestamp>1264951920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most games that use a client/server based model where the usual gameplay instance is small (ie, not an MMO) scale perfectly already. You just throw in more hardware, start a few new server instances, and presto.</p><p>I can see a system like this being useful for MMOs, but for all the other games that<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/aren't/ MMOs - all they need to do to create a scalable multiplayer architecture is just do what the likes of id Software, Epic, and Valve have done for years - make a decent dedicated server platform for your game and release it for free.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most games that use a client/server based model where the usual gameplay instance is small ( ie , not an MMO ) scale perfectly already .
You just throw in more hardware , start a few new server instances , and presto.I can see a system like this being useful for MMOs , but for all the other games that /are n't/ MMOs - all they need to do to create a scalable multiplayer architecture is just do what the likes of id Software , Epic , and Valve have done for years - make a decent dedicated server platform for your game and release it for free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most games that use a client/server based model where the usual gameplay instance is small (ie, not an MMO) scale perfectly already.
You just throw in more hardware, start a few new server instances, and presto.I can see a system like this being useful for MMOs, but for all the other games that /aren't/ MMOs - all they need to do to create a scalable multiplayer architecture is just do what the likes of id Software, Epic, and Valve have done for years - make a decent dedicated server platform for your game and release it for free.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012992</id>
	<title>Wonderland is suffering a similar fate</title>
	<author>Simon Carr</author>
	<datestamp>1264966440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just did a <a href="http://devlab.ca/?p=4617" title="devlab.ca">write-up on Wonderland</a> [devlab.ca].  Development resources are no longer being applied to the project.  From what I'm reading the community is going to keep it going, but it's still disappointing to hear that something so forward thinking is being cut from the vine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just did a write-up on Wonderland [ devlab.ca ] .
Development resources are no longer being applied to the project .
From what I 'm reading the community is going to keep it going , but it 's still disappointing to hear that something so forward thinking is being cut from the vine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just did a write-up on Wonderland [devlab.ca].
Development resources are no longer being applied to the project.
From what I'm reading the community is going to keep it going, but it's still disappointing to hear that something so forward thinking is being cut from the vine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012530</id>
	<title>Groovy/Griffon Project??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264964160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe we are lucky and it's going to get to rewritten as a Groovy/Griffon project. Belive it or not, I'm not trolling. It seems like all the cool stuff is being done outside Sun these days.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe we are lucky and it 's going to get to rewritten as a Groovy/Griffon project .
Belive it or not , I 'm not trolling .
It seems like all the cool stuff is being done outside Sun these days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe we are lucky and it's going to get to rewritten as a Groovy/Griffon project.
Belive it or not, I'm not trolling.
It seems like all the cool stuff is being done outside Sun these days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014232</id>
	<title>Oracle</title>
	<author>decipher\_saint</author>
	<datestamp>1264929240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess Oracle didn't want to feed the alien...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess Oracle did n't want to feed the alien.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess Oracle didn't want to feed the alien...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013004</id>
	<title>Re:Sad</title>
	<author>boilednut</author>
	<datestamp>1264966440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Correct. From <a href="http://www.crn.com/storage/222600138" title="crn.com" rel="nofollow">Oracle Outlines Plans To Tie Sun Hardware To Oracle Software</a> [crn.com]:<blockquote><div><p>In terms of the server business, Oracle, in addition to increasing its investment in the Solaris operating system, will also accelerate its investment in its SPARC processor-based server line, and will continue to focus on forward binary compatibility, Fowler said.</p></div>
</blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct .
From Oracle Outlines Plans To Tie Sun Hardware To Oracle Software [ crn.com ] : In terms of the server business , Oracle , in addition to increasing its investment in the Solaris operating system , will also accelerate its investment in its SPARC processor-based server line , and will continue to focus on forward binary compatibility , Fowler said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct.
From Oracle Outlines Plans To Tie Sun Hardware To Oracle Software [crn.com]:In terms of the server business, Oracle, in addition to increasing its investment in the Solaris operating system, will also accelerate its investment in its SPARC processor-based server line, and will continue to focus on forward binary compatibility, Fowler said.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31016800</id>
	<title>Wrong priorities</title>
	<author>SteveFoerster</author>
	<datestamp>1264941660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>If most OSS projects can't survive without corporate sponsorship and guidance, then the OSS model is a failure and needs to be rexamined.</em></p><p>That's only the case if the real goal of the OSS model is to oppose corporations, which was not my understanding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If most OSS projects ca n't survive without corporate sponsorship and guidance , then the OSS model is a failure and needs to be rexamined.That 's only the case if the real goal of the OSS model is to oppose corporations , which was not my understanding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If most OSS projects can't survive without corporate sponsorship and guidance, then the OSS model is a failure and needs to be rexamined.That's only the case if the real goal of the OSS model is to oppose corporations, which was not my understanding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012444</id>
	<title>I guess it's pretty serious.</title>
	<author>Phizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1264963740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl whose older brother used this. Man what a bummer! On a related note same person saw Ferris Bueller pass out at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty serious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My best friend 's sister 's boyfriend 's brother 's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who 's going with the girl whose older brother used this .
Man what a bummer !
On a related note same person saw Ferris Bueller pass out at 31 Flavors last night .
I guess it 's pretty serious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with the girl whose older brother used this.
Man what a bummer!
On a related note same person saw Ferris Bueller pass out at 31 Flavors last night.
I guess it's pretty serious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31033840</id>
	<title>I wonder if there is any significance..</title>
	<author>Veretax</author>
	<datestamp>1265381220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if there is any significance to name DarkStar, or is it just a Code name for the project.  Cause I remember that Dynamix, formerly a subsidiary of Sierra Online used to have a game engine called DarkStar.  I believe that both Starsiege and Starsiege: Tribes were developed on that platform. Hence my curiosity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if there is any significance to name DarkStar , or is it just a Code name for the project .
Cause I remember that Dynamix , formerly a subsidiary of Sierra Online used to have a game engine called DarkStar .
I believe that both Starsiege and Starsiege : Tribes were developed on that platform .
Hence my curiosity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if there is any significance to name DarkStar, or is it just a Code name for the project.
Cause I remember that Dynamix, formerly a subsidiary of Sierra Online used to have a game engine called DarkStar.
I believe that both Starsiege and Starsiege: Tribes were developed on that platform.
Hence my curiosity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012736</id>
	<title>Re:Sad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264965120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oracle has repeatedly stated that Solaris, along with SPARC, is going to have increased investment.</p></div><p>What would they replace Solaris with?  Linux?</p><p>Please.</p><p><a href="http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=e28cc715" title="kernel.org" rel="nofollow">Linux isn't even 64-bit safe enough to allow single IO operations greater than 2 gigabytes</a> [kernel.org]:</p><p>+/*<br>+ * rw\_verify\_area doesn't like huge counts. We limit<br>+ * them to something that fits in "int" so that others<br>+ * won't have to do range checks all the time.<br>+ */</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oracle has repeatedly stated that Solaris , along with SPARC , is going to have increased investment.What would they replace Solaris with ?
Linux ? Please.Linux is n't even 64-bit safe enough to allow single IO operations greater than 2 gigabytes [ kernel.org ] : + / * + * rw \ _verify \ _area does n't like huge counts .
We limit + * them to something that fits in " int " so that others + * wo n't have to do range checks all the time. + * /</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oracle has repeatedly stated that Solaris, along with SPARC, is going to have increased investment.What would they replace Solaris with?
Linux?Please.Linux isn't even 64-bit safe enough to allow single IO operations greater than 2 gigabytes [kernel.org]:+/*+ * rw\_verify\_area doesn't like huge counts.
We limit+ * them to something that fits in "int" so that others+ * won't have to do range checks all the time.+ */
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012276</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011832</id>
	<title>Sad</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264961520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sadly I think this is the only real alternative for developing any mature MMOs under Java... so it's either the community taking the workload and continuing the project or it's back to C++<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-(</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly I think this is the only real alternative for developing any mature MMOs under Java... so it 's either the community taking the workload and continuing the project or it 's back to C + + : - (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly I think this is the only real alternative for developing any mature MMOs under Java... so it's either the community taking the workload and continuing the project or it's back to C++ :-(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015806</id>
	<title>Pffft - redundant technology anyway</title>
	<author>pookemon</author>
	<datestamp>1264936800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Those of us that play MW2 will already know that "Servers" are entirely unecessary.  MW2 proves that everyone on the Net has a 10M symmetrical link with a small Cray running their game meaning totally flawless gameplay every second of the day (as opposed to 1 in 4 games having a great host and hours wasted waiting to find a game that doesn't spit you out as soon as the game starts - coz that would just be stupid).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Those of us that play MW2 will already know that " Servers " are entirely unecessary .
MW2 proves that everyone on the Net has a 10M symmetrical link with a small Cray running their game meaning totally flawless gameplay every second of the day ( as opposed to 1 in 4 games having a great host and hours wasted waiting to find a game that does n't spit you out as soon as the game starts - coz that would just be stupid ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Those of us that play MW2 will already know that "Servers" are entirely unecessary.
MW2 proves that everyone on the Net has a 10M symmetrical link with a small Cray running their game meaning totally flawless gameplay every second of the day (as opposed to 1 in 4 games having a great host and hours wasted waiting to find a game that doesn't spit you out as soon as the game starts - coz that would just be stupid).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011812</id>
	<title>Oops?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264961460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nothing helps out the community more than slashdotting their forum.</p><p>At least they have measures in place for when the site goes down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing helps out the community more than slashdotting their forum.At least they have measures in place for when the site goes down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing helps out the community more than slashdotting their forum.At least they have measures in place for when the site goes down.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011812
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31020204
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015292
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014890
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31016800
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31019782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31019514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011852
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31018082
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1647207_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31018144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011904
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1647207.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012074
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015130
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31018144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012484
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013572
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014186
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1647207.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012276
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013004
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012736
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014890
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31019514
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1647207.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31016800
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1647207.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31018082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31019782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015076
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1647207.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015806
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1647207.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31014648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013570
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31013808
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1647207.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1647207.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1647207.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31012992
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1647207.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011812
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31011966
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1647207.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31015292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1647207.31020204
</commentlist>
</conversation>
