<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_03_1339246</id>
	<title>Membrane That Turns Any Surface Into a Touchscreen</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1265205120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:alx5000NO@SPAMalx5000.net" rel="nofollow">alx5000</a> writes <i>"Engadget has a story about <a href="http://www.displax.com/">Displax Interactive Systems</a>, a Portuguese company that has created a new polymer film that, when stuck onto a surface, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/displax-film-could-turn-nearly-any-surface-into-touchscreen-mak/">converts it into a multitouch touchscreen</a> with up to 16 contact points. The article states that 'if all goes well, the first Displax-enabled wares will start shipping this July.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>alx5000 writes " Engadget has a story about Displax Interactive Systems , a Portuguese company that has created a new polymer film that , when stuck onto a surface , converts it into a multitouch touchscreen with up to 16 contact points .
The article states that 'if all goes well , the first Displax-enabled wares will start shipping this July .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>alx5000 writes "Engadget has a story about Displax Interactive Systems, a Portuguese company that has created a new polymer film that, when stuck onto a surface, converts it into a multitouch touchscreen with up to 16 contact points.
The article states that 'if all goes well, the first Displax-enabled wares will start shipping this July.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009682</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264953060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can I wrap this thing around my dick and expect grrlls to want to touch it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can I wrap this thing around my dick and expect grrlls to want to touch it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can I wrap this thing around my dick and expect grrlls to want to touch it?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010210</id>
	<title>Re:Usefulness of touchscreens is overrated.</title>
	<author>imakemusic</author>
	<datestamp>1264955340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Touchscreens are useful for certain situations. It's like the use of Flash on webpages. There is a time and a place for Flash (youtube wouldn't have been half as good without it, for example) but when most of the Flash you see is annoying banner ads, entire websites made of Flash or 5-minute unskippable intros for sites with no real content then you start wanting to reject it completely.</p><p>(cue comments about Flash security risk blah blah blah...Hopefully you get my point.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Touchscreens are useful for certain situations .
It 's like the use of Flash on webpages .
There is a time and a place for Flash ( youtube would n't have been half as good without it , for example ) but when most of the Flash you see is annoying banner ads , entire websites made of Flash or 5-minute unskippable intros for sites with no real content then you start wanting to reject it completely .
( cue comments about Flash security risk blah blah blah...Hopefully you get my point .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Touchscreens are useful for certain situations.
It's like the use of Flash on webpages.
There is a time and a place for Flash (youtube wouldn't have been half as good without it, for example) but when most of the Flash you see is annoying banner ads, entire websites made of Flash or 5-minute unskippable intros for sites with no real content then you start wanting to reject it completely.
(cue comments about Flash security risk blah blah blah...Hopefully you get my point.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009116</id>
	<title>Usefulness of touchscreens is overrated.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264950120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The usefulness of touchscreens is truly overrated.</p><p>I used to work at a pizza chain where we had to ring in orders using a touchscreen. They were the biggest pieces of shit ever. It'd take five or six taps to perform any action.</p><p>Just last week I was at the airport, and ran into the same problem using a much more modern ticket printer station that used a touchscreen.</p><p>I can't help but be very skeptical about this technology, given how poorly existing touchscreens work. And those existing touchscreens are just basic rectangles, in very predictable and controlled environments.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The usefulness of touchscreens is truly overrated.I used to work at a pizza chain where we had to ring in orders using a touchscreen .
They were the biggest pieces of shit ever .
It 'd take five or six taps to perform any action.Just last week I was at the airport , and ran into the same problem using a much more modern ticket printer station that used a touchscreen.I ca n't help but be very skeptical about this technology , given how poorly existing touchscreens work .
And those existing touchscreens are just basic rectangles , in very predictable and controlled environments .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The usefulness of touchscreens is truly overrated.I used to work at a pizza chain where we had to ring in orders using a touchscreen.
They were the biggest pieces of shit ever.
It'd take five or six taps to perform any action.Just last week I was at the airport, and ran into the same problem using a much more modern ticket printer station that used a touchscreen.I can't help but be very skeptical about this technology, given how poorly existing touchscreens work.
And those existing touchscreens are just basic rectangles, in very predictable and controlled environments.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014980</id>
	<title>Re:Applications</title>
	<author>Translation Error</author>
	<datestamp>1264933200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suppose it's a bit better than thinking, "Now I can play DDR anywhere!"
<br> <br>
I'm sure we'd all be interested in hearing more of your thoughts on this matter.  It seems like this subject would be right up your alley.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suppose it 's a bit better than thinking , " Now I can play DDR anywhere !
" I 'm sure we 'd all be interested in hearing more of your thoughts on this matter .
It seems like this subject would be right up your alley .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suppose it's a bit better than thinking, "Now I can play DDR anywhere!
"
 
I'm sure we'd all be interested in hearing more of your thoughts on this matter.
It seems like this subject would be right up your alley.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31012878</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-touch, but...</title>
	<author>srmalloy</author>
	<datestamp>1264965900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Take an appropriately-shaped block of wood, screen-print a keyboard layout on it, put the film on top, and you have a keyboard with no moving parts.</p><p>More generally, since this is being described as something you can put over an existing display (and therefore must be transparent), you can make a programmable keypad device where the touch-surface film is on a transparent plate, under which can be slid a template laying out what the 'buttons' are; because you would be able to define the position and dimensions (and, with sufficient sophistication of the drivers, shape), you could make the keypad layout whatever you wanted, with buttons of different sizes and orientations. Look at the <a href="http://www.steelseries.com/int/products/keyboards/zboard/information" title="steelseries.com">Steelseries Zboard gaming keyboard</a> [steelseries.com]; you get a customized keyboard layout by <b>replacing</b> the top of the keyboard with a new key panel. Consider how much easier it would be for a company to be able to release a cardstock insert to go under the sensor surface (where it won't get grimed and worn in use) and a layout configuration file than to <b>manufacture</b> an entire custom keyboard face. Crank it up another notch, and put a display panel in place of the insert, and you get something that can compete with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimus\_Maximus\_keyboard" title="wikipedia.org">Optimus Maximus keyboard</a> [wikipedia.org] for customizability at what I expect to be a much lower price point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Take an appropriately-shaped block of wood , screen-print a keyboard layout on it , put the film on top , and you have a keyboard with no moving parts.More generally , since this is being described as something you can put over an existing display ( and therefore must be transparent ) , you can make a programmable keypad device where the touch-surface film is on a transparent plate , under which can be slid a template laying out what the 'buttons ' are ; because you would be able to define the position and dimensions ( and , with sufficient sophistication of the drivers , shape ) , you could make the keypad layout whatever you wanted , with buttons of different sizes and orientations .
Look at the Steelseries Zboard gaming keyboard [ steelseries.com ] ; you get a customized keyboard layout by replacing the top of the keyboard with a new key panel .
Consider how much easier it would be for a company to be able to release a cardstock insert to go under the sensor surface ( where it wo n't get grimed and worn in use ) and a layout configuration file than to manufacture an entire custom keyboard face .
Crank it up another notch , and put a display panel in place of the insert , and you get something that can compete with the Optimus Maximus keyboard [ wikipedia.org ] for customizability at what I expect to be a much lower price point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Take an appropriately-shaped block of wood, screen-print a keyboard layout on it, put the film on top, and you have a keyboard with no moving parts.More generally, since this is being described as something you can put over an existing display (and therefore must be transparent), you can make a programmable keypad device where the touch-surface film is on a transparent plate, under which can be slid a template laying out what the 'buttons' are; because you would be able to define the position and dimensions (and, with sufficient sophistication of the drivers, shape), you could make the keypad layout whatever you wanted, with buttons of different sizes and orientations.
Look at the Steelseries Zboard gaming keyboard [steelseries.com]; you get a customized keyboard layout by replacing the top of the keyboard with a new key panel.
Consider how much easier it would be for a company to be able to release a cardstock insert to go under the sensor surface (where it won't get grimed and worn in use) and a layout configuration file than to manufacture an entire custom keyboard face.
Crank it up another notch, and put a display panel in place of the insert, and you get something that can compete with the Optimus Maximus keyboard [wikipedia.org] for customizability at what I expect to be a much lower price point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010408</id>
	<title>Re:Usefulness of touchscreens is overrated.</title>
	<author>jacktherobot</author>
	<datestamp>1264956240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>most of the touch screens used in point of sale (i.e. cash register) applications are old resistive touch films.  This tech suffers from the drawback that in order for the resistance of the film to change you have to physically deform it to register a touch.  This opens you up to all kinds of mechanical fatigue problems like the one you're talking about.  Capacative touch systems (like the iphone) which work by sensing the proximity of your finger electrically don't have this problem.  The material in the article sounds like an evolution of resistive touch, so it would probably still wear out after a lot of use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>most of the touch screens used in point of sale ( i.e .
cash register ) applications are old resistive touch films .
This tech suffers from the drawback that in order for the resistance of the film to change you have to physically deform it to register a touch .
This opens you up to all kinds of mechanical fatigue problems like the one you 're talking about .
Capacative touch systems ( like the iphone ) which work by sensing the proximity of your finger electrically do n't have this problem .
The material in the article sounds like an evolution of resistive touch , so it would probably still wear out after a lot of use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>most of the touch screens used in point of sale (i.e.
cash register) applications are old resistive touch films.
This tech suffers from the drawback that in order for the resistance of the film to change you have to physically deform it to register a touch.
This opens you up to all kinds of mechanical fatigue problems like the one you're talking about.
Capacative touch systems (like the iphone) which work by sensing the proximity of your finger electrically don't have this problem.
The material in the article sounds like an evolution of resistive touch, so it would probably still wear out after a lot of use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011862</id>
	<title>Re:And the drivers are available for????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264961640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One of the <a href="http://www.displax.com/en/products/families/overlay.html" title="displax.com" rel="nofollow">product lines</a> [displax.com] have Linux drivers available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One of the product lines [ displax.com ] have Linux drivers available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One of the product lines [displax.com] have Linux drivers available.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31013200</id>
	<title>I got just 2 words for ya...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264967400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Realdoll Skin.</p><p>
&nbsp; I did RTFA and it explicitly states 'breath' as a means of exciting a response. And yes, that was intentional wording of that sentence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Realdoll Skin .
  I did RTFA and it explicitly states 'breath ' as a means of exciting a response .
And yes , that was intentional wording of that sentence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Realdoll Skin.
  I did RTFA and it explicitly states 'breath' as a means of exciting a response.
And yes, that was intentional wording of that sentence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009174</id>
	<title>The 'multitouch' is the new bit</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1264950420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've been able to get membranes that could be put on normal screens and make them touchscreens for a long time.  I remember a school where my mother worked got some in the mid '90s and put them on monitors.  A bit later there were companies advertising them for putting on laptops, with a serial adaptor so you got something that looked like a serial mouse to Windows 3.11 but was a touch screen.  The news here is that they now support multitouch.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've been able to get membranes that could be put on normal screens and make them touchscreens for a long time .
I remember a school where my mother worked got some in the mid '90s and put them on monitors .
A bit later there were companies advertising them for putting on laptops , with a serial adaptor so you got something that looked like a serial mouse to Windows 3.11 but was a touch screen .
The news here is that they now support multitouch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've been able to get membranes that could be put on normal screens and make them touchscreens for a long time.
I remember a school where my mother worked got some in the mid '90s and put them on monitors.
A bit later there were companies advertising them for putting on laptops, with a serial adaptor so you got something that looked like a serial mouse to Windows 3.11 but was a touch screen.
The news here is that they now support multitouch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014782</id>
	<title>Hallelujah</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1264932120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been wanting to build a multitouch table, but I haven't been able to afford a high-resolution projector and a pair of high-res video cameras. I do, however, have a fairly sizable LCD television. All I need now is a way to bring the television level, and a layer of glass over the display so that I can press on it without damaging the display.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been wanting to build a multitouch table , but I have n't been able to afford a high-resolution projector and a pair of high-res video cameras .
I do , however , have a fairly sizable LCD television .
All I need now is a way to bring the television level , and a layer of glass over the display so that I can press on it without damaging the display .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been wanting to build a multitouch table, but I haven't been able to afford a high-resolution projector and a pair of high-res video cameras.
I do, however, have a fairly sizable LCD television.
All I need now is a way to bring the television level, and a layer of glass over the display so that I can press on it without damaging the display.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009460</id>
	<title>Re:Touchscreen now means any tactile interface?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264952160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, so what, i want to put a touch<i>pad</i> on my window so i can click on people outside to make them trip.<br>AND NOBODY WILL STOP ME, I WILL MAKE EVERYONE FALL TO THEIR KNEES.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , so what , i want to put a touchpad on my window so i can click on people outside to make them trip.AND NOBODY WILL STOP ME , I WILL MAKE EVERYONE FALL TO THEIR KNEES .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, so what, i want to put a touchpad on my window so i can click on people outside to make them trip.AND NOBODY WILL STOP ME, I WILL MAKE EVERYONE FALL TO THEIR KNEES.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009204</id>
	<title>untouched</title>
	<author>Qlither</author>
	<datestamp>1264950660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone else think the phrase, "no corner of the Earth will be untouched" fitting?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else think the phrase , " no corner of the Earth will be untouched " fitting ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else think the phrase, "no corner of the Earth will be untouched" fitting?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010316</id>
	<title>Re:16 contact points</title>
	<author>Devout\_IPUite</author>
	<datestamp>1264955760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know a gun-carrying environmentalist linux friendly atheist... He was never a marine though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know a gun-carrying environmentalist linux friendly atheist... He was never a marine though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know a gun-carrying environmentalist linux friendly atheist... He was never a marine though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31022846</id>
	<title>What is new about this?</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1265301600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm confused why this is new.  Resistive touch screens have always been a polymer surface that could be attached to anything.  For example:<br><a href="http://www.elotouch.com/Technologies/AccuTouch/howitworks.asp" title="elotouch.com">http://www.elotouch.com/Technologies/AccuTouch/howitworks.asp</a> [elotouch.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm confused why this is new .
Resistive touch screens have always been a polymer surface that could be attached to anything .
For example : http : //www.elotouch.com/Technologies/AccuTouch/howitworks.asp [ elotouch.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm confused why this is new.
Resistive touch screens have always been a polymer surface that could be attached to anything.
For example:http://www.elotouch.com/Technologies/AccuTouch/howitworks.asp [elotouch.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010284</id>
	<title>Multi-touch, but...</title>
	<author>Dyne09</author>
	<datestamp>1264955640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>does it actually have a visual display?

Am I missing something?  This turns surfaces into multi-touch inputs, but does it actually turn into a display device as well?  What is the point of placing this film "over a wood surface" if you can't see what the hell you're actually dong?</htmltext>
<tokenext>does it actually have a visual display ?
Am I missing something ?
This turns surfaces into multi-touch inputs , but does it actually turn into a display device as well ?
What is the point of placing this film " over a wood surface " if you ca n't see what the hell you 're actually dong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>does it actually have a visual display?
Am I missing something?
This turns surfaces into multi-touch inputs, but does it actually turn into a display device as well?
What is the point of placing this film "over a wood surface" if you can't see what the hell you're actually dong?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014612</id>
	<title>Re:Usefulness of touchscreens is overrated.</title>
	<author>BlackBloq</author>
	<datestamp>1264931220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>  Wow you are off base on this one sorry! Proof positive... the Nintendo DS! Kids beat the crap out and tap, scape and probably bite. They take one hella beating! They last longer then a controller with buttons. True dat!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow you are off base on this one sorry !
Proof positive... the Nintendo DS !
Kids beat the crap out and tap , scape and probably bite .
They take one hella beating !
They last longer then a controller with buttons .
True dat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  Wow you are off base on this one sorry!
Proof positive... the Nintendo DS!
Kids beat the crap out and tap, scape and probably bite.
They take one hella beating!
They last longer then a controller with buttons.
True dat!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31012984</id>
	<title>HardStudi</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264966440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I heard this shyt causes e-cancer in usb mice.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I heard this shyt causes e-cancer in usb mice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I heard this shyt causes e-cancer in usb mice.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31021674</id>
	<title>Re:MC Hammer</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1265295840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh no, they proved MC Hammer wrong!</p></div><p>I thought the last two decades proved MC Hammer wrong.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh no , they proved MC Hammer wrong ! I thought the last two decades proved MC Hammer wrong .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh no, they proved MC Hammer wrong!I thought the last two decades proved MC Hammer wrong.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31015452</id>
	<title>Re:ATM's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264935360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unnecessary. Just lift prints from the screen/number pad. Still some guessing involved, but that can be reduced with the slightest bit of info.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unnecessary .
Just lift prints from the screen/number pad .
Still some guessing involved , but that can be reduced with the slightest bit of info .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unnecessary.
Just lift prints from the screen/number pad.
Still some guessing involved, but that can be reduced with the slightest bit of info.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010772</id>
	<title>Re:MC Hammer</title>
	<author>zookeeperme</author>
	<datestamp>1264957620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How touching.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How touching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How touching.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31012802</id>
	<title>Re:ATM's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264965420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> I think it won't be long before someone puts this technology to use in some diabolical and illegal manor.</p></div></blockquote><p>  Like the estate surrounding Dracula's Castle!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it wo n't be long before someone puts this technology to use in some diabolical and illegal manor .
Like the estate surrounding Dracula 's Castle !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I think it won't be long before someone puts this technology to use in some diabolical and illegal manor.
Like the estate surrounding Dracula's Castle!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014928</id>
	<title>Re:Touchscreen now means any tactile interface?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264932900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And there are other kinds of screen that by definition don't let light pass through, so they screen whatever's behind them.</p><p>Therefore all flat objects are screens, presumably.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And there are other kinds of screen that by definition do n't let light pass through , so they screen whatever 's behind them.Therefore all flat objects are screens , presumably .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And there are other kinds of screen that by definition don't let light pass through, so they screen whatever's behind them.Therefore all flat objects are screens, presumably.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009284</id>
	<title>Portuguese  ppl</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264951020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>rock<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</htmltext>
<tokenext>rock .... : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>rock .... :D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009102</id>
	<title>4 x 4?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264950060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>16 contact points, as in 4 x 4? That's only slightly useful for kiosks, etc, not much for general interactivity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>16 contact points , as in 4 x 4 ?
That 's only slightly useful for kiosks , etc , not much for general interactivity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>16 contact points, as in 4 x 4?
That's only slightly useful for kiosks, etc, not much for general interactivity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011208</id>
	<title>Re:16 contact points</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264959180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>AP31R0N is not even a word.</p><p>(side note: Anonymous Coward is two words.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>AP31R0N is not even a word .
( side note : Anonymous Coward is two words .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>AP31R0N is not even a word.
(side note: Anonymous Coward is two words.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31019784</id>
	<title>Re:Multi-touch, but...</title>
	<author>drkim</author>
	<datestamp>1265274120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>yeah that would be as bad as using a mouse...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah that would be as bad as using a mouse... : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah that would be as bad as using a mouse... :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31029744</id>
	<title>Re:ATM's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265293140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought they already did that, well not a touchscreen overlay, but in the form of a fake pad the sits over the real one.  I think they sometimes place a small camera to view the pin as it is being entered.</p><p>Other than picking up pin numbers, which can already be done with a fake pad, I can't think of any diabolical and illegal things this would enable, i.e. things that can't already be done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought they already did that , well not a touchscreen overlay , but in the form of a fake pad the sits over the real one .
I think they sometimes place a small camera to view the pin as it is being entered.Other than picking up pin numbers , which can already be done with a fake pad , I ca n't think of any diabolical and illegal things this would enable , i.e .
things that ca n't already be done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought they already did that, well not a touchscreen overlay, but in the form of a fake pad the sits over the real one.
I think they sometimes place a small camera to view the pin as it is being entered.Other than picking up pin numbers, which can already be done with a fake pad, I can't think of any diabolical and illegal things this would enable, i.e.
things that can't already be done.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009056</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1264949760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think of the pr0n possibilities!</p><p>Japanese sexbots + touchscreen membrane = teh sex</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of the pr0n possibilities ! Japanese sexbots + touchscreen membrane = teh sex</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of the pr0n possibilities!Japanese sexbots + touchscreen membrane = teh sex</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009566</id>
	<title>Finally!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264952580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally, I can turn my life-size colonel Sanders cut-out into a data entry device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally , I can turn my life-size colonel Sanders cut-out into a data entry device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally, I can turn my life-size colonel Sanders cut-out into a data entry device.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014518</id>
	<title>Re:And the drivers are available for????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264930860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>*follow link*<br>*scroll scroll scroll*</p><p>Oh look! Contact info!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>* follow link * * scroll scroll scroll * Oh look !
Contact info !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>*follow link**scroll scroll scroll*Oh look!
Contact info!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31018438</id>
	<title>Try reading the article and their web site</title>
	<author>tlambert</author>
	<datestamp>1264953960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try reading the article and their web site.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>I used to work at a pizza chain where we had to ring in orders using a touchscreen.</p></div><p>Most touch screens for data entry are layers on top of the glass.  This is capacitive, and can go under the glass.  If it were under the glass, you'd have a much harder time wearing it out than if it were a simple touch screen like the type they use at Pizza Hut.</p><p>Personally, I was disappointed that they wanted contact information, and gave zero information on where to obtain engineering samples, since I's really like a 27" touch screen iMac (my iPhone has already got me trained to the point I am leaving fingerprints all over every display I own).  They are really only interested in talking to people already interested in buying quantity, sight unseen.</p><p>-- Terry</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Try reading the article and their web site.I used to work at a pizza chain where we had to ring in orders using a touchscreen.Most touch screens for data entry are layers on top of the glass .
This is capacitive , and can go under the glass .
If it were under the glass , you 'd have a much harder time wearing it out than if it were a simple touch screen like the type they use at Pizza Hut.Personally , I was disappointed that they wanted contact information , and gave zero information on where to obtain engineering samples , since I 's really like a 27 " touch screen iMac ( my iPhone has already got me trained to the point I am leaving fingerprints all over every display I own ) .
They are really only interested in talking to people already interested in buying quantity , sight unseen.-- Terry</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try reading the article and their web site.I used to work at a pizza chain where we had to ring in orders using a touchscreen.Most touch screens for data entry are layers on top of the glass.
This is capacitive, and can go under the glass.
If it were under the glass, you'd have a much harder time wearing it out than if it were a simple touch screen like the type they use at Pizza Hut.Personally, I was disappointed that they wanted contact information, and gave zero information on where to obtain engineering samples, since I's really like a 27" touch screen iMac (my iPhone has already got me trained to the point I am leaving fingerprints all over every display I own).
They are really only interested in talking to people already interested in buying quantity, sight unseen.-- Terry
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010332</id>
	<title>ATM's</title>
	<author>hAckz0r</author>
	<datestamp>1264955880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>With the rash of card skimmers being placed on ATM's I have to wonder just how long it will be before someone "overlays" an ATM's console to grab pin numbers too. These days it pays to be observant of minor differences in hardware because these creeps are getting more and more sophisticated with microelectronics and wireless transceivers. I think it won't be long before someone puts this technology to use in some diabolical and illegal manor.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With the rash of card skimmers being placed on ATM 's I have to wonder just how long it will be before someone " overlays " an ATM 's console to grab pin numbers too .
These days it pays to be observant of minor differences in hardware because these creeps are getting more and more sophisticated with microelectronics and wireless transceivers .
I think it wo n't be long before someone puts this technology to use in some diabolical and illegal manor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the rash of card skimmers being placed on ATM's I have to wonder just how long it will be before someone "overlays" an ATM's console to grab pin numbers too.
These days it pays to be observant of minor differences in hardware because these creeps are getting more and more sophisticated with microelectronics and wireless transceivers.
I think it won't be long before someone puts this technology to use in some diabolical and illegal manor.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009522</id>
	<title>Early adoption..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264952340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm sure the porn industry will be an early adopter on this one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure the porn industry will be an early adopter on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure the porn industry will be an early adopter on this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009400</id>
	<title>Re:16 contact points</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1264951860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>17 if you're a dude.</p><p>(side note: atheist is not a proper noun, so it should be capitalized only when it's the first word of a sentence or part of a book title)<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/atheist</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>17 if you 're a dude .
( side note : atheist is not a proper noun , so it should be capitalized only when it 's the first word of a sentence or part of a book title ) /atheist</tokentext>
<sentencetext>17 if you're a dude.
(side note: atheist is not a proper noun, so it should be capitalized only when it's the first word of a sentence or part of a book title) /atheist</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009282</id>
	<title>Touchscreen or Touchserface</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264951020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this truly a touch-screen, as in OLED membrane with touch, or just a touch surface that can be stuck to a screen? The article doesn't really give many details to determine this.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this truly a touch-screen , as in OLED membrane with touch , or just a touch surface that can be stuck to a screen ?
The article does n't really give many details to determine this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this truly a touch-screen, as in OLED membrane with touch, or just a touch surface that can be stuck to a screen?
The article doesn't really give many details to determine this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011552</id>
	<title>Re:Obligatory</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1264960380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Think of the portable computing and condom industries.<br>You can [blank] to your favorite [blank] with a broadband connection and not get messy with [blank] while controlling it with your crank.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of the portable computing and condom industries.You can [ blank ] to your favorite [ blank ] with a broadband connection and not get messy with [ blank ] while controlling it with your crank .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of the portable computing and condom industries.You can [blank] to your favorite [blank] with a broadband connection and not get messy with [blank] while controlling it with your crank.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010944</id>
	<title>"if all goes well..." meaning -</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264958160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We could realisticly hope to see shaky first implementations by next January.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We could realisticly hope to see shaky first implementations by next January .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We could realisticly hope to see shaky first implementations by next January.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009414</id>
	<title>Where are the trolls???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264951920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I am sure there are some NPE salivating over this news....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I am sure there are some NPE salivating over this news... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am sure there are some NPE salivating over this news....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010100</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264954800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know, but being able to turn anything into a touchpad/screen seems pretty sweet. And since it seems that it can be attached to any kind of surface, I guess museums can have bones that are touchable to give information on a screen next to it, maps, windows that protect items can be touched to select or interact with something on the other side of the glass.<br>I would think that ppl that gather around here would have a bit more of an open mind regarding tech...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know , but being able to turn anything into a touchpad/screen seems pretty sweet .
And since it seems that it can be attached to any kind of surface , I guess museums can have bones that are touchable to give information on a screen next to it , maps , windows that protect items can be touched to select or interact with something on the other side of the glass.I would think that ppl that gather around here would have a bit more of an open mind regarding tech.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know, but being able to turn anything into a touchpad/screen seems pretty sweet.
And since it seems that it can be attached to any kind of surface, I guess museums can have bones that are touchable to give information on a screen next to it, maps, windows that protect items can be touched to select or interact with something on the other side of the glass.I would think that ppl that gather around here would have a bit more of an open mind regarding tech...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009184</id>
	<title>Dear /.</title>
	<author>capnkr</author>
	<datestamp>1264950480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't blame me that you're getting your News for Nerds <a href="http://slashdot.org/submission/1164376/Displax-film-can-turn-any-surface-into-touchscreen" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">over 12 hours later</a> [slashdot.org] than you could have otherwise. I tried!<p>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't blame me that you 're getting your News for Nerds over 12 hours later [ slashdot.org ] than you could have otherwise .
I tried !
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't blame me that you're getting your News for Nerds over 12 hours later [slashdot.org] than you could have otherwise.
I tried!
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31017172</id>
	<title>Re: seriously, think of the robots</title>
	<author>ThinkOfaNumber</author>
	<datestamp>1264943880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You make an interesting point, if not necessarily for sexbots...</p><p>Think of the Star Trek movie First Contact where Data gets feeling on his arm from the Borg - image what a difference this could make to a robot?!</p><p>Imagine not only touch sensitive fingers, but the ability to detect wind, or feel past objects such as trees or guage the movement of a crowd.  For a robot that's pretty cool.</p><p>This has big implications for the robot industry.  They shouldn't <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny\_valley" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">look like us</a> [wikipedia.org], but they should be as functionally similar to us as possible (or better).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You make an interesting point , if not necessarily for sexbots...Think of the Star Trek movie First Contact where Data gets feeling on his arm from the Borg - image what a difference this could make to a robot ?
! Imagine not only touch sensitive fingers , but the ability to detect wind , or feel past objects such as trees or guage the movement of a crowd .
For a robot that 's pretty cool.This has big implications for the robot industry .
They should n't look like us [ wikipedia.org ] , but they should be as functionally similar to us as possible ( or better ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You make an interesting point, if not necessarily for sexbots...Think of the Star Trek movie First Contact where Data gets feeling on his arm from the Borg - image what a difference this could make to a robot?
!Imagine not only touch sensitive fingers, but the ability to detect wind, or feel past objects such as trees or guage the movement of a crowd.
For a robot that's pretty cool.This has big implications for the robot industry.
They shouldn't look like us [wikipedia.org], but they should be as functionally similar to us as possible (or better).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010330</id>
	<title>Re:MC Hammer</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1264955880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, they haven&rsquo;t tried putting it on him yet. Or the headline would read differently.</p><p>MC Hammer is to this membrane, like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfBWds4HChI" title="youtube.com">that aquarium is to that phone</a> [youtube.com].<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , they haven    t tried putting it on him yet .
Or the headline would read differently.MC Hammer is to this membrane , like that aquarium is to that phone [ youtube.com ] .
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, they haven’t tried putting it on him yet.
Or the headline would read differently.MC Hammer is to this membrane, like that aquarium is to that phone [youtube.com].
:D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010598</id>
	<title>Re:Touchscreen now means any tactile interface?</title>
	<author>hitmark</author>
	<datestamp>1264956900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>a pico projector could help with that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>a pico projector could help with that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a pico projector could help with that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31013284</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, I'M Portuguese</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264967700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>We invented the Prepaid, Via Verde... and we have the best bank ATM network in the world...</htmltext>
<tokenext>We invented the Prepaid , Via Verde... and we have the best bank ATM network in the world.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We invented the Prepaid, Via Verde... and we have the best bank ATM network in the world...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009856</id>
	<title>Re:16 contact points</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264953720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Oh great, so I can use all my fingers...elbows...uh, my nose...tongue?...WTF?</p></div><p>Crazy idea: How about having a friend (omfg what dat?) so that the number of fingers increase?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh great , so I can use all my fingers...elbows...uh , my nose...tongue ? ...WTF ? Crazy idea : How about having a friend ( omfg what dat ?
) so that the number of fingers increase ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh great, so I can use all my fingers...elbows...uh, my nose...tongue?...WTF?Crazy idea: How about having a friend (omfg what dat?
) so that the number of fingers increase?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009086</id>
	<title>16 contact points</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264949940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh great, so I can use all my fingers...elbows...uh, my nose...tongue?...WTF?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh great , so I can use all my fingers...elbows...uh , my nose...tongue ? ...WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh great, so I can use all my fingers...elbows...uh, my nose...tongue?...WTF?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31022828</id>
	<title>Re:And the drivers are available for????</title>
	<author>MobyDisk</author>
	<datestamp>1265301540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do those devices require drivers?  They should just act like a mouse.</p><p>I work on an embedded medical device and we use Elo touch screens (www.elotouch.com).  Technically, the devices don't require drivers at all - just plug-into USB or serial.  You do need the drivers if you want to run the calibration, or use any of the fancy features.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do those devices require drivers ?
They should just act like a mouse.I work on an embedded medical device and we use Elo touch screens ( www.elotouch.com ) .
Technically , the devices do n't require drivers at all - just plug-into USB or serial .
You do need the drivers if you want to run the calibration , or use any of the fancy features .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do those devices require drivers?
They should just act like a mouse.I work on an embedded medical device and we use Elo touch screens (www.elotouch.com).
Technically, the devices don't require drivers at all - just plug-into USB or serial.
You do need the drivers if you want to run the calibration, or use any of the fancy features.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009786</id>
	<title>Re:Touchscreen now means any tactile interface?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264953420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If light passes through it it is by definition a screen.</p><p>screen != display</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If light passes through it it is by definition a screen.screen ! = display</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If light passes through it it is by definition a screen.screen != display</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009242</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009052</id>
	<title>MC Hammer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264949700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh no, they proved MC Hammer wrong!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh no , they proved MC Hammer wrong !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh no, they proved MC Hammer wrong!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011630</id>
	<title>Wait, I'M Portuguese</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264960680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How are we in the news? We never do real scientific work. There must be some sort of mistake.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How are we in the news ?
We never do real scientific work .
There must be some sort of mistake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How are we in the news?
We never do real scientific work.
There must be some sort of mistake.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014200</id>
	<title>Old news - tried this 2 years ago</title>
	<author>SplatMan\_DK</author>
	<datestamp>1264929060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't get it. This is old stuff. I tried such a membrane at <a href="http://www.cebit.de/" title="cebit.de">CeBit</a> [cebit.de] in Hannover almost two years ago. It was made by a Japanese firm and could register "only" four concurrent touchpoints, but it is still very similar to this.<br> <br>
It was delivered as a thin plastic film in a black plastic frame about one inch wide all around and with a USB cable sticking out the lower left corner. They had sizes for 32, 37, 40, 42 and 50 inch LCD/plasma screens and showcased two 42 inch screens running Vista at their booth.<br> <br>
I wonder if the membrane is strong enough to used as a table surface. One of these membranes with a cheap 42 inch LCD TV and an Asus EE-PC could be a very cheap way to make a "Surface computer". And I would love to put such a homebrew surface/table computer between my sofa and my lounge chair<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't get it .
This is old stuff .
I tried such a membrane at CeBit [ cebit.de ] in Hannover almost two years ago .
It was made by a Japanese firm and could register " only " four concurrent touchpoints , but it is still very similar to this .
It was delivered as a thin plastic film in a black plastic frame about one inch wide all around and with a USB cable sticking out the lower left corner .
They had sizes for 32 , 37 , 40 , 42 and 50 inch LCD/plasma screens and showcased two 42 inch screens running Vista at their booth .
I wonder if the membrane is strong enough to used as a table surface .
One of these membranes with a cheap 42 inch LCD TV and an Asus EE-PC could be a very cheap way to make a " Surface computer " .
And I would love to put such a homebrew surface/table computer between my sofa and my lounge chair ... : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't get it.
This is old stuff.
I tried such a membrane at CeBit [cebit.de] in Hannover almost two years ago.
It was made by a Japanese firm and could register "only" four concurrent touchpoints, but it is still very similar to this.
It was delivered as a thin plastic film in a black plastic frame about one inch wide all around and with a USB cable sticking out the lower left corner.
They had sizes for 32, 37, 40, 42 and 50 inch LCD/plasma screens and showcased two 42 inch screens running Vista at their booth.
I wonder if the membrane is strong enough to used as a table surface.
One of these membranes with a cheap 42 inch LCD TV and an Asus EE-PC could be a very cheap way to make a "Surface computer".
And I would love to put such a homebrew surface/table computer between my sofa and my lounge chair ... :-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010656</id>
	<title>Re:ATM's</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264957140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>yeah, like some dastardly Wayne Manor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>yeah , like some dastardly Wayne Manor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>yeah, like some dastardly Wayne Manor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31012252</id>
	<title>Re:And the drivers are available for????</title>
	<author>eu\_virtual</author>
	<datestamp>1264962960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.displax.com/en/products/families/overlay.html" title="displax.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.displax.com/en/products/families/overlay.html</a> [displax.com] has linux in text, so it appears their search sucks.
<br>
<br>

It's a different product, but at least it seems to indicate they do have some linux support. Their press release doesn't seem to indicate any OS (google maps, social networking, display photos, all of which can be done in any OS.) though, so I guess you'll have to check back later.
<br>
<br>

Also, a search around the internet gets you some news that say it can work with e-ink and oled, and since most (all?) of the e-book readers run linux, if they where thinking about that market, they can probably make it work with it. If those news are correct of course, as I couldn't find anything about e-ink in their press release.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.displax.com/en/products/families/overlay.html [ displax.com ] has linux in text , so it appears their search sucks .
It 's a different product , but at least it seems to indicate they do have some linux support .
Their press release does n't seem to indicate any OS ( google maps , social networking , display photos , all of which can be done in any OS .
) though , so I guess you 'll have to check back later .
Also , a search around the internet gets you some news that say it can work with e-ink and oled , and since most ( all ?
) of the e-book readers run linux , if they where thinking about that market , they can probably make it work with it .
If those news are correct of course , as I could n't find anything about e-ink in their press release .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.displax.com/en/products/families/overlay.html [displax.com] has linux in text, so it appears their search sucks.
It's a different product, but at least it seems to indicate they do have some linux support.
Their press release doesn't seem to indicate any OS (google maps, social networking, display photos, all of which can be done in any OS.
) though, so I guess you'll have to check back later.
Also, a search around the internet gets you some news that say it can work with e-ink and oled, and since most (all?
) of the e-book readers run linux, if they where thinking about that market, they can probably make it work with it.
If those news are correct of course, as I couldn't find anything about e-ink in their press release.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010388</id>
	<title>And the drivers are available for????</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264956180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been trying to find touchscreens to incorporate into an embedded system, and few of the touchscreen vendors have drivers for anything other than Windows - as such they get eliminated from my consideration.</p><p>I've just check Displax's site, and a search for "linux" gives no hits - so either:<br>a) They are just doing the actual sensing system, and letting somebody else build the actual interface chips<br>or<br>b) They only support Windows.</p><p>Which makes them a non-starter in my line of work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been trying to find touchscreens to incorporate into an embedded system , and few of the touchscreen vendors have drivers for anything other than Windows - as such they get eliminated from my consideration.I 've just check Displax 's site , and a search for " linux " gives no hits - so either : a ) They are just doing the actual sensing system , and letting somebody else build the actual interface chipsorb ) They only support Windows.Which makes them a non-starter in my line of work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been trying to find touchscreens to incorporate into an embedded system, and few of the touchscreen vendors have drivers for anything other than Windows - as such they get eliminated from my consideration.I've just check Displax's site, and a search for "linux" gives no hits - so either:a) They are just doing the actual sensing system, and letting somebody else build the actual interface chipsorb) They only support Windows.Which makes them a non-starter in my line of work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010572</id>
	<title>Getting closer...</title>
	<author>Overzeetop</author>
	<datestamp>1264956840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...to my 62" QuadHD monitor with input so I can mark up architectural prints, full size, on my screen (placed flat<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/sloped like a drafting table, of course)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...to my 62 " QuadHD monitor with input so I can mark up architectural prints , full size , on my screen ( placed flat /sloped like a drafting table , of course )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to my 62" QuadHD monitor with input so I can mark up architectural prints, full size, on my screen (placed flat /sloped like a drafting table, of course)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009962</id>
	<title>Why not....</title>
	<author>Gen. Malaise</author>
	<datestamp>1264954080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It puts the polymer on its skin or it gets the hose again!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It puts the polymer on its skin or it gets the hose again !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It puts the polymer on its skin or it gets the hose again!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011750</id>
	<title>Re:16 contact points</title>
	<author>xupere</author>
	<datestamp>1264961220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>16 contact points ought to be enough for anybody. No one will need more than 16 contact points for multi-touch input.</htmltext>
<tokenext>16 contact points ought to be enough for anybody .
No one will need more than 16 contact points for multi-touch input .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>16 contact points ought to be enough for anybody.
No one will need more than 16 contact points for multi-touch input.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009086</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009242</id>
	<title>Touchscreen now means any tactile interface?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264950780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean really, this doesn't produce any image at all. Yes, you can put it over a monitor of some kind, but if you stick it on any other surface, it's not a touch<i>screen</i> but a touch<i>pad</i>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean really , this does n't produce any image at all .
Yes , you can put it over a monitor of some kind , but if you stick it on any other surface , it 's not a touchscreen but a touchpad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean really, this doesn't produce any image at all.
Yes, you can put it over a monitor of some kind, but if you stick it on any other surface, it's not a touchscreen but a touchpad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31013262</id>
	<title>Re:Touchscreen now means any tactile interface?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264967640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is weasel-word bollocks.  Touchscreen means a visual display with touch input.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. summary implies this polymer carries both input and display feature, when in fact it only offers input feature.  OP is right, and<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. moderators are morons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is weasel-word bollocks .
Touchscreen means a visual display with touch input .
/. summary implies this polymer carries both input and display feature , when in fact it only offers input feature .
OP is right , and / .
moderators are morons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is weasel-word bollocks.
Touchscreen means a visual display with touch input.
/. summary implies this polymer carries both input and display feature, when in fact it only offers input feature.
OP is right, and /.
moderators are morons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010562</id>
	<title>Re:MC Hammer</title>
	<author>kungfugleek</author>
	<datestamp>1264956840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The fools!  They'll undo all creation!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The fools !
They 'll undo all creation !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fools!
They'll undo all creation!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009052</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009816</id>
	<title>Applications</title>
	<author>LaminatorX</author>
	<datestamp>1264953600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it good or bad that my first thought was to make a multi-touch battle mat for wargaming?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it good or bad that my first thought was to make a multi-touch battle mat for wargaming ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it good or bad that my first thought was to make a multi-touch battle mat for wargaming?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011924</id>
	<title>Re:Touchscreen now means any tactile interface?</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1264961940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I mean really, this doesn't produce any image at all. Yes, you can put it over a monitor of some kind</i></p><p>Uh yeah, that's kinda how "touchscreens" work.</p><p>I'm not aware of any kind of touch screen technology where the part that displays the image is also the part that is pressure sensitive.  I could be wrong though.  But I'm pretty sure that it's not the phosphors in a CRT are not used to detect contact, but we still call em 'touch screens'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean really , this does n't produce any image at all .
Yes , you can put it over a monitor of some kindUh yeah , that 's kinda how " touchscreens " work.I 'm not aware of any kind of touch screen technology where the part that displays the image is also the part that is pressure sensitive .
I could be wrong though .
But I 'm pretty sure that it 's not the phosphors in a CRT are not used to detect contact , but we still call em 'touch screens' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean really, this doesn't produce any image at all.
Yes, you can put it over a monitor of some kindUh yeah, that's kinda how "touchscreens" work.I'm not aware of any kind of touch screen technology where the part that displays the image is also the part that is pressure sensitive.
I could be wrong though.
But I'm pretty sure that it's not the phosphors in a CRT are not used to detect contact, but we still call em 'touch screens'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009242</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31018438
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31013262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31012802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31012252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31017172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009816
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31012878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010598
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009242
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31013284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011630
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009086
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31015452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31021674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009052
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009116
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31019784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010284
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31029744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_03_1339246_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31022828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31012802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31015452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31029744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010598
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009786
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31013262
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009460
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31018438
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010408
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014612
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009086
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31012252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31022828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31014518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009174
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31013284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31011552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31017172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31012878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31019784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31021674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31010330
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_03_1339246.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_03_1339246.31009184
</commentlist>
</conversation>
