<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_02_167211</id>
	<title>Google Releases Chrome OS Tablet Concept Demo</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1265129220000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hothardware.com/" rel="nofollow">MojoKid</a> writes <i>"With all of the iPad buzz stirring up the tech world over the past couple of weeks, Chrome OS has almost been forgotten.  Though Google has yet to officially release the netbook-centric operating system to the public, the company continues to keep details flowing about their forthcoming lightweight operating system. In their own response to all the recent tablet fanfare, <a href="http://hothardware.com/News/Chrome-OS-Concept-Tablet-Might-Just-Make-The-iPad-Look-Bad/">Google decided to release some teaser shots and a demo video</a> of the Chrome OS running on a concept tablet device.  The Chromium team <a href="http://dev.chromium.org/chromium-os/user-experience/form-factors/tablet">suggests that a screen of 5" to 10" is optimal</a> for enjoying Chrome OS and of course tablets, netbooks and MIDs all fit that size class rather well. Couple a streamlined Google-based OS with NVIDIA's Tegra 2 processor in a design like this and the iPad could have serious competition."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>MojoKid writes " With all of the iPad buzz stirring up the tech world over the past couple of weeks , Chrome OS has almost been forgotten .
Though Google has yet to officially release the netbook-centric operating system to the public , the company continues to keep details flowing about their forthcoming lightweight operating system .
In their own response to all the recent tablet fanfare , Google decided to release some teaser shots and a demo video of the Chrome OS running on a concept tablet device .
The Chromium team suggests that a screen of 5 " to 10 " is optimal for enjoying Chrome OS and of course tablets , netbooks and MIDs all fit that size class rather well .
Couple a streamlined Google-based OS with NVIDIA 's Tegra 2 processor in a design like this and the iPad could have serious competition .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>MojoKid writes "With all of the iPad buzz stirring up the tech world over the past couple of weeks, Chrome OS has almost been forgotten.
Though Google has yet to officially release the netbook-centric operating system to the public, the company continues to keep details flowing about their forthcoming lightweight operating system.
In their own response to all the recent tablet fanfare, Google decided to release some teaser shots and a demo video of the Chrome OS running on a concept tablet device.
The Chromium team suggests that a screen of 5" to 10" is optimal for enjoying Chrome OS and of course tablets, netbooks and MIDs all fit that size class rather well.
Couple a streamlined Google-based OS with NVIDIA's Tegra 2 processor in a design like this and the iPad could have serious competition.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998676</id>
	<title>Re:Monster screen size in the video!</title>
	<author>proxy318</author>
	<datestamp>1265137800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>no, that was a 10" screen, they just had a 2' tall person demonstrating it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>no , that was a 10 " screen , they just had a 2 ' tall person demonstrating it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no, that was a 10" screen, they just had a 2' tall person demonstrating it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001296</id>
	<title>Re:iPad buzz?</title>
	<author>eNygma-x</author>
	<datestamp>1265105760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was underwhelmed... the only thing the ipad did do for me is spark my interest in competing tablets. =) (Future or otherwise)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was underwhelmed... the only thing the ipad did do for me is spark my interest in competing tablets .
= ) ( Future or otherwise )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was underwhelmed... the only thing the ipad did do for me is spark my interest in competing tablets.
=) (Future or otherwise)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001138</id>
	<title>Re:Not sure if I care</title>
	<author>slim</author>
	<datestamp>1265105040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'd rather use a mouse for most of that functionality.</p></div><p>I've seen this a few times. I don't get it. A mouse is way of moving a "finger analogue" around a screen. Surely a real finger is better. Especially when you can use lots of fingers at once -- a mouse can only be one.</p><p>OK, if your screen is in the traditional desktop position, you'll tire your arms out by holding them up. That wouldn't work. But a tablet wouldn't be in that position. It would be ergonomically similar to writing on a pad of paper.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather use a mouse for most of that functionality.I 've seen this a few times .
I do n't get it .
A mouse is way of moving a " finger analogue " around a screen .
Surely a real finger is better .
Especially when you can use lots of fingers at once -- a mouse can only be one.OK , if your screen is in the traditional desktop position , you 'll tire your arms out by holding them up .
That would n't work .
But a tablet would n't be in that position .
It would be ergonomically similar to writing on a pad of paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather use a mouse for most of that functionality.I've seen this a few times.
I don't get it.
A mouse is way of moving a "finger analogue" around a screen.
Surely a real finger is better.
Especially when you can use lots of fingers at once -- a mouse can only be one.OK, if your screen is in the traditional desktop position, you'll tire your arms out by holding them up.
That wouldn't work.
But a tablet wouldn't be in that position.
It would be ergonomically similar to writing on a pad of paper.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002112</id>
	<title>Re:The IPad's going to have competition?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265110140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does no one -1 beat no one?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does no one -1 beat no one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does no one -1 beat no one?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997678</id>
	<title>Re:iPad buzz?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1265134320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, so you're one of those lucky saps that doesn't have any Apple controlled friends.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , so you 're one of those lucky saps that does n't have any Apple controlled friends .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, so you're one of those lucky saps that doesn't have any Apple controlled friends.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001846</id>
	<title>Re:Must have apps.</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1265108700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10s of millions of people play apps that won't work without an internet connection. People still play them.<br>Web apps are fine.</p><p>Chrome OS is going to kick the shit out of Linux in the device market if you keep up that attitude. Year of the portable device is far better then year of the desktop.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10s of millions of people play apps that wo n't work without an internet connection .
People still play them.Web apps are fine.Chrome OS is going to kick the shit out of Linux in the device market if you keep up that attitude .
Year of the portable device is far better then year of the desktop .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10s of millions of people play apps that won't work without an internet connection.
People still play them.Web apps are fine.Chrome OS is going to kick the shit out of Linux in the device market if you keep up that attitude.
Year of the portable device is far better then year of the desktop.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002798</id>
	<title>Re:Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>yelvington</author>
	<datestamp>1265114160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, it's just terrible the way Google locks down ChromeOS<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... no, wait a minute. ctrl-alt-T<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what's this Linux thing? You mean I actually have to type my PASSWORD to get root? Evil bastards!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , it 's just terrible the way Google locks down ChromeOS ... no , wait a minute .
ctrl-alt-T ... what 's this Linux thing ?
You mean I actually have to type my PASSWORD to get root ?
Evil bastards !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, it's just terrible the way Google locks down ChromeOS ... no, wait a minute.
ctrl-alt-T ... what's this Linux thing?
You mean I actually have to type my PASSWORD to get root?
Evil bastards!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001822</id>
	<title>Re:Not sure if I care</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1265108580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it includes a video camera, has the iPad for factror and ties into my Google accounts over wifi, I'll get one.</p><p>Come on, an easily portable video phone that can be operated while carrying it? Shit, all's I need is sliding doors and a Vulcan side kicks and I'll be set!</p><p>And I can get sliding doors. Those windows tablets were over 1000 bucks. That placed them firmly into the cost of niche device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it includes a video camera , has the iPad for factror and ties into my Google accounts over wifi , I 'll get one.Come on , an easily portable video phone that can be operated while carrying it ?
Shit , all 's I need is sliding doors and a Vulcan side kicks and I 'll be set ! And I can get sliding doors .
Those windows tablets were over 1000 bucks .
That placed them firmly into the cost of niche device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it includes a video camera, has the iPad for factror and ties into my Google accounts over wifi, I'll get one.Come on, an easily portable video phone that can be operated while carrying it?
Shit, all's I need is sliding doors and a Vulcan side kicks and I'll be set!And I can get sliding doors.
Those windows tablets were over 1000 bucks.
That placed them firmly into the cost of niche device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997496</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002248</id>
	<title>Re:A Marketing Shark Feeding Frenzy</title>
	<author>VGPowerlord</author>
	<datestamp>1265110980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The whole Apple-Yahoo-MS-Google circle jerk posturing is delirious. If next week Steve Jobs called a press conference and sliced his dick off with a silver scalpel in a room full of stunned reporters, I have no doubt that -- not to be outdone -- Sergey Brin would cut off his with a chainsaw on nation-wide TV seven days later.</p></div></blockquote><p>True, btu at least Sergey could use any Android-compatible chainsaw or bandages, rather than just ones gotten from the Apple Grocery Store.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole Apple-Yahoo-MS-Google circle jerk posturing is delirious .
If next week Steve Jobs called a press conference and sliced his dick off with a silver scalpel in a room full of stunned reporters , I have no doubt that -- not to be outdone -- Sergey Brin would cut off his with a chainsaw on nation-wide TV seven days later.True , btu at least Sergey could use any Android-compatible chainsaw or bandages , rather than just ones gotten from the Apple Grocery Store .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole Apple-Yahoo-MS-Google circle jerk posturing is delirious.
If next week Steve Jobs called a press conference and sliced his dick off with a silver scalpel in a room full of stunned reporters, I have no doubt that -- not to be outdone -- Sergey Brin would cut off his with a chainsaw on nation-wide TV seven days later.True, btu at least Sergey could use any Android-compatible chainsaw or bandages, rather than just ones gotten from the Apple Grocery Store.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997594</id>
	<title>Serious Competition</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1265134140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ok, when they have something more than entirely made up concept stuff, then we might be able to have a discussion about serious competition for a given product. Until then, it's made up shit. I can make a video of someone using a supercomputer the size of a wrist watch, if I want - until it's actually made, however, it's just concept art.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , when they have something more than entirely made up concept stuff , then we might be able to have a discussion about serious competition for a given product .
Until then , it 's made up shit .
I can make a video of someone using a supercomputer the size of a wrist watch , if I want - until it 's actually made , however , it 's just concept art .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, when they have something more than entirely made up concept stuff, then we might be able to have a discussion about serious competition for a given product.
Until then, it's made up shit.
I can make a video of someone using a supercomputer the size of a wrist watch, if I want - until it's actually made, however, it's just concept art.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997848</id>
	<title>Feature wise</title>
	<author>hdd</author>
	<datestamp>1265134860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We know it can ran from a flash drive, but does it actually support FLASH?</htmltext>
<tokenext>We know it can ran from a flash drive , but does it actually support FLASH ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We know it can ran from a flash drive, but does it actually support FLASH?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997394</id>
	<title>multiple windows</title>
	<author>hey</author>
	<datestamp>1265133480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The video shows 2 windows open.  Probably best not to have multiple apps sharing the same screen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The video shows 2 windows open .
Probably best not to have multiple apps sharing the same screen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The video shows 2 windows open.
Probably best not to have multiple apps sharing the same screen.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998816</id>
	<title>it's a TRAP!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265138400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's a well-guarded secret that Jobs has been a nullo since the cancer surgery. Any such public emasculation would obviously a trap to trick others into emulating him. <br> <br> <br> <i>Mac OS X, derived from eunuchs</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a well-guarded secret that Jobs has been a nullo since the cancer surgery .
Any such public emasculation would obviously a trap to trick others into emulating him .
Mac OS X , derived from eunuchs</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a well-guarded secret that Jobs has been a nullo since the cancer surgery.
Any such public emasculation would obviously a trap to trick others into emulating him.
Mac OS X, derived from eunuchs</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258</id>
	<title>Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265133000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not going to buy a device that is so fucking locked down. I'm going to suggest to everyone I know that they not purchase such a locked-down device.</p><p>I don't want any company deciding which applications I can or cannot run on a system that I purchase. I don't care if it's Apple, Google, or some other company.</p><p>Not even Microsoft have been bastardly enough to so blatantly limit the user's freedom like Apple and Google are trying so hard to do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not going to buy a device that is so fucking locked down .
I 'm going to suggest to everyone I know that they not purchase such a locked-down device.I do n't want any company deciding which applications I can or can not run on a system that I purchase .
I do n't care if it 's Apple , Google , or some other company.Not even Microsoft have been bastardly enough to so blatantly limit the user 's freedom like Apple and Google are trying so hard to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not going to buy a device that is so fucking locked down.
I'm going to suggest to everyone I know that they not purchase such a locked-down device.I don't want any company deciding which applications I can or cannot run on a system that I purchase.
I don't care if it's Apple, Google, or some other company.Not even Microsoft have been bastardly enough to so blatantly limit the user's freedom like Apple and Google are trying so hard to do.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997420</id>
	<title>Google has gadget envy... again..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265133600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once again Google is trying to play catch up with Apple.. and if it's anything like the Android it will once again be a total waste of time..  It's interesting to see how badly a company ran for and by technology orientated people does in comparison to a company ran by people orientated people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once again Google is trying to play catch up with Apple.. and if it 's anything like the Android it will once again be a total waste of time.. It 's interesting to see how badly a company ran for and by technology orientated people does in comparison to a company ran by people orientated people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once again Google is trying to play catch up with Apple.. and if it's anything like the Android it will once again be a total waste of time..  It's interesting to see how badly a company ran for and by technology orientated people does in comparison to a company ran by people orientated people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002764</id>
	<title>Re:Must have apps.</title>
	<author>yelvington</author>
	<datestamp>1265113980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It don't know which is more sad: That you have no idea that Web apps can work offline, or that you got modded "interesting."
<a href="http://www.google.com/google-d-s/hpp/offline\_en\_in.html" title="google.com">http://www.google.com/google-d-s/hpp/offline\_en\_in.html</a> [google.com]<blockquote><div><p>No worries, now Google Docs works offline:

Edit your documents and view your presentations
and spreadsheets &ndash; all from your browser.
Changes are saved offline and sync automatically
when you're back online. You don't have to do a thing.
Add a Google Docs shortcut to your desktop
to quickly access your documents.
Learn more or watch a video about Google Docs offline.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>

This is not new.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It do n't know which is more sad : That you have no idea that Web apps can work offline , or that you got modded " interesting .
" http : //www.google.com/google-d-s/hpp/offline \ _en \ _in.html [ google.com ] No worries , now Google Docs works offline : Edit your documents and view your presentations and spreadsheets    all from your browser .
Changes are saved offline and sync automatically when you 're back online .
You do n't have to do a thing .
Add a Google Docs shortcut to your desktop to quickly access your documents .
Learn more or watch a video about Google Docs offline .
This is not new .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It don't know which is more sad: That you have no idea that Web apps can work offline, or that you got modded "interesting.
"
http://www.google.com/google-d-s/hpp/offline\_en\_in.html [google.com]No worries, now Google Docs works offline:

Edit your documents and view your presentations
and spreadsheets – all from your browser.
Changes are saved offline and sync automatically
when you're back online.
You don't have to do a thing.
Add a Google Docs shortcut to your desktop
to quickly access your documents.
Learn more or watch a video about Google Docs offline.
This is not new.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31008990</id>
	<title>Re:A Marketing Shark Feeding Frenzy</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1264949340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is that there are plenty of other titans in the mobile industry (most notably, Nokia), who are completely ignored. There are tablets and other portable devices around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is that there are plenty of other titans in the mobile industry ( most notably , Nokia ) , who are completely ignored .
There are tablets and other portable devices around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is that there are plenty of other titans in the mobile industry (most notably, Nokia), who are completely ignored.
There are tablets and other portable devices around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997896</id>
	<title>Re:Oh boy more marketing!</title>
	<author>Thelasko</author>
	<datestamp>1265135040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm shocked that the ChromeOS shown in the animation has such rich multitasking.  They're really aiming high with this one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm shocked that the ChromeOS shown in the animation has such rich multitasking .
They 're really aiming high with this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm shocked that the ChromeOS shown in the animation has such rich multitasking.
They're really aiming high with this one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997308</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998154</id>
	<title>I can't wait...</title>
	<author>Graham J - XVI</author>
	<datestamp>1265135880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...to see the iPad haters explain why a tablet that only runs a browser is better than one that can run any of thousands of touch-designed apps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...to see the iPad haters explain why a tablet that only runs a browser is better than one that can run any of thousands of touch-designed apps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...to see the iPad haters explain why a tablet that only runs a browser is better than one that can run any of thousands of touch-designed apps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998936</id>
	<title>Re:Must have apps.</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1265138820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In case you haven't heard, Google has deprecated Gears in favor of the HTML5 wunderkind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In case you have n't heard , Google has deprecated Gears in favor of the HTML5 wunderkind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In case you haven't heard, Google has deprecated Gears in favor of the HTML5 wunderkind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998618</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh, another virtual keyboard...</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1265137560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And <em>I</em> hate physical keyboards on devices where the keys are so small my finger covers five at a time.  I hate the wasted real-estate that could've instead been used for a bigger screen, and therefore a bigger screen-keyboard with almost proper-sized key-contact-patches.</p><p>I hate them even more when they waste space making a "full" qwerty keyboard half the size of a deck of cards.  I'm a touch-typist, and such things feel like a cruel joke at my expense.  If you must have a physical keyboard of that size, put some UI research into making one with decent-sized keys, perhaps a chorded setup.  People can learn to play the guitar in a month, they can learn to type on a chorded keyboard, too.</p><p>Touch-typing is about muscle memory, which you can't possibly have transferred from a full-sized keyboard to a phone-sized or book-sized device (and which in my experience actually does transfer pretty well to screen keyboards if they're big enough and not oriented vertically).  If there is a new device that touch typing would make sense on, that doesn't mean that qwerty touch-typing is the answer: there may also be a new layout and style of touch-typing that makes more sense for the form factor, like the aforementioned chorded keyboard.</p><p>So you can take your old-man "I don't want anything different" whining and buy one of the billions of physical key devices that are constantly being excreted onto the market by unimaginative cost-cutters like RIM.  Let there be a few devices that cater to those of us who are willing to try new UI vocabularies and evaluate them on their own merits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And I hate physical keyboards on devices where the keys are so small my finger covers five at a time .
I hate the wasted real-estate that could 've instead been used for a bigger screen , and therefore a bigger screen-keyboard with almost proper-sized key-contact-patches.I hate them even more when they waste space making a " full " qwerty keyboard half the size of a deck of cards .
I 'm a touch-typist , and such things feel like a cruel joke at my expense .
If you must have a physical keyboard of that size , put some UI research into making one with decent-sized keys , perhaps a chorded setup .
People can learn to play the guitar in a month , they can learn to type on a chorded keyboard , too.Touch-typing is about muscle memory , which you ca n't possibly have transferred from a full-sized keyboard to a phone-sized or book-sized device ( and which in my experience actually does transfer pretty well to screen keyboards if they 're big enough and not oriented vertically ) .
If there is a new device that touch typing would make sense on , that does n't mean that qwerty touch-typing is the answer : there may also be a new layout and style of touch-typing that makes more sense for the form factor , like the aforementioned chorded keyboard.So you can take your old-man " I do n't want anything different " whining and buy one of the billions of physical key devices that are constantly being excreted onto the market by unimaginative cost-cutters like RIM .
Let there be a few devices that cater to those of us who are willing to try new UI vocabularies and evaluate them on their own merits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And I hate physical keyboards on devices where the keys are so small my finger covers five at a time.
I hate the wasted real-estate that could've instead been used for a bigger screen, and therefore a bigger screen-keyboard with almost proper-sized key-contact-patches.I hate them even more when they waste space making a "full" qwerty keyboard half the size of a deck of cards.
I'm a touch-typist, and such things feel like a cruel joke at my expense.
If you must have a physical keyboard of that size, put some UI research into making one with decent-sized keys, perhaps a chorded setup.
People can learn to play the guitar in a month, they can learn to type on a chorded keyboard, too.Touch-typing is about muscle memory, which you can't possibly have transferred from a full-sized keyboard to a phone-sized or book-sized device (and which in my experience actually does transfer pretty well to screen keyboards if they're big enough and not oriented vertically).
If there is a new device that touch typing would make sense on, that doesn't mean that qwerty touch-typing is the answer: there may also be a new layout and style of touch-typing that makes more sense for the form factor, like the aforementioned chorded keyboard.So you can take your old-man "I don't want anything different" whining and buy one of the billions of physical key devices that are constantly being excreted onto the market by unimaginative cost-cutters like RIM.
Let there be a few devices that cater to those of us who are willing to try new UI vocabularies and evaluate them on their own merits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001898</id>
	<title>Re:Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>ergo98</author>
	<datestamp>1265109120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Not even Microsoft have been bastardly enough to so blatantly limit the user's freedom like Apple and Google are trying so hard to do.</p></div></blockquote><p>I didn't watch the video, however I'm assuming that your post is of the "take the words about the iPad and turn it against Chrome OS" ilk.</p><p>If so, you are misdirected.</p><p>Here's the thing - from all that I've heard about the ChromeOS platform, it is intended to be usable only as essentially a web appliance. The apps that it uses are no different than the apps that anyone can use on any other modern web device, including, humorously, the iPad.</p><p>Your bank won't gloat about their new "ChromeOS Banking Application", nor will your doctor, etc. The public won't be bifurcated into various walled gardens.</p><p>Now personally I have zero interest in Chrome OS: Give me a real notebook any day. But I can see its purpose, and I don't see the same (gigantic) pitfalls that I see with the iPad.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not even Microsoft have been bastardly enough to so blatantly limit the user 's freedom like Apple and Google are trying so hard to do.I did n't watch the video , however I 'm assuming that your post is of the " take the words about the iPad and turn it against Chrome OS " ilk.If so , you are misdirected.Here 's the thing - from all that I 've heard about the ChromeOS platform , it is intended to be usable only as essentially a web appliance .
The apps that it uses are no different than the apps that anyone can use on any other modern web device , including , humorously , the iPad.Your bank wo n't gloat about their new " ChromeOS Banking Application " , nor will your doctor , etc .
The public wo n't be bifurcated into various walled gardens.Now personally I have zero interest in Chrome OS : Give me a real notebook any day .
But I can see its purpose , and I do n't see the same ( gigantic ) pitfalls that I see with the iPad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not even Microsoft have been bastardly enough to so blatantly limit the user's freedom like Apple and Google are trying so hard to do.I didn't watch the video, however I'm assuming that your post is of the "take the words about the iPad and turn it against Chrome OS" ilk.If so, you are misdirected.Here's the thing - from all that I've heard about the ChromeOS platform, it is intended to be usable only as essentially a web appliance.
The apps that it uses are no different than the apps that anyone can use on any other modern web device, including, humorously, the iPad.Your bank won't gloat about their new "ChromeOS Banking Application", nor will your doctor, etc.
The public won't be bifurcated into various walled gardens.Now personally I have zero interest in Chrome OS: Give me a real notebook any day.
But I can see its purpose, and I don't see the same (gigantic) pitfalls that I see with the iPad.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998158</id>
	<title>Re:Must have apps.</title>
	<author>icebraining</author>
	<datestamp>1265135880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://gears.google.com/" title="google.com">http://gears.google.com/</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //gears.google.com/ [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://gears.google.com/ [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999474</id>
	<title>Small hands demo</title>
	<author>1155</author>
	<datestamp>1265140980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did anyone else notice in the demo video that the hands on the person were freakishly small? I think Google is trying to tell us something:</p><p>ChromeOS is not for manhands.</p><p>That's right folks. Forget your hopes and dreams of manhandling the ChromeOS, this OS isn't for you. It's designed and built for those with small hands. Midgets, small children, and perhaps rodents will be able to use it. But not manhands.</p><p>Draw your own conclusions. I think that googlers are looking for people who have small hands, like women. Then the googlers will have a source of information on available women with which they can actually take on a date. It's quite an ingenious plan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did anyone else notice in the demo video that the hands on the person were freakishly small ?
I think Google is trying to tell us something : ChromeOS is not for manhands.That 's right folks .
Forget your hopes and dreams of manhandling the ChromeOS , this OS is n't for you .
It 's designed and built for those with small hands .
Midgets , small children , and perhaps rodents will be able to use it .
But not manhands.Draw your own conclusions .
I think that googlers are looking for people who have small hands , like women .
Then the googlers will have a source of information on available women with which they can actually take on a date .
It 's quite an ingenious plan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did anyone else notice in the demo video that the hands on the person were freakishly small?
I think Google is trying to tell us something:ChromeOS is not for manhands.That's right folks.
Forget your hopes and dreams of manhandling the ChromeOS, this OS isn't for you.
It's designed and built for those with small hands.
Midgets, small children, and perhaps rodents will be able to use it.
But not manhands.Draw your own conclusions.
I think that googlers are looking for people who have small hands, like women.
Then the googlers will have a source of information on available women with which they can actually take on a date.
It's quite an ingenious plan.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997308</id>
	<title>Oh boy more marketing!</title>
	<author>Bill\_the\_Engineer</author>
	<datestamp>1265133240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In response to Apple's iPad announcement, Google proved that it could draw a tablet and post it on the web.
</p><p>My point being that maybe there is something more interesting than tablets. We already know that we'll see a fresh batch of articles on tablets / iPad in about 60 days.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In response to Apple 's iPad announcement , Google proved that it could draw a tablet and post it on the web .
My point being that maybe there is something more interesting than tablets .
We already know that we 'll see a fresh batch of articles on tablets / iPad in about 60 days .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In response to Apple's iPad announcement, Google proved that it could draw a tablet and post it on the web.
My point being that maybe there is something more interesting than tablets.
We already know that we'll see a fresh batch of articles on tablets / iPad in about 60 days.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999016</id>
	<title>Serious competition?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265139180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A TRS-80 CoCo would be serious competition for the iPad. Seriously, no multitasking, expensive add-ons (keyboard dock, etc.), no camera? What were they thinking?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A TRS-80 CoCo would be serious competition for the iPad .
Seriously , no multitasking , expensive add-ons ( keyboard dock , etc .
) , no camera ?
What were they thinking ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A TRS-80 CoCo would be serious competition for the iPad.
Seriously, no multitasking, expensive add-ons (keyboard dock, etc.
), no camera?
What were they thinking?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002222</id>
	<title>Re:Small hands demo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265110740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel sorry for dudes with sausage fingers. all the tech nowadays have their keyboards and touch uis designed for people with long thin fingers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel sorry for dudes with sausage fingers .
all the tech nowadays have their keyboards and touch uis designed for people with long thin fingers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel sorry for dudes with sausage fingers.
all the tech nowadays have their keyboards and touch uis designed for people with long thin fingers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998304</id>
	<title>Jeff Han</title>
	<author>copponex</author>
	<datestamp>1265136420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jeff Han did this four years ago:<br><a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/jeff\_han\_demos\_his\_breakthrough\_touchscreen.html" title="ted.com">http://www.ted.com/talks/jeff\_han\_demos\_his\_breakthrough\_touchscreen.html</a> [ted.com]</p><p>He now has a company spun off from his research at NYU:<br><a href="http://www.perceptivepixel.com/" title="perceptivepixel.com">http://www.perceptivepixel.com/</a> [perceptivepixel.com]</p><p>I'll use this opportunity to make a larger point: you're not going to get much progress out of the corporate game of developing a product. The difference is in these two questions:</p><p>1. What is possible to sell?</p><p>2. What is possible?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jeff Han did this four years ago : http : //www.ted.com/talks/jeff \ _han \ _demos \ _his \ _breakthrough \ _touchscreen.html [ ted.com ] He now has a company spun off from his research at NYU : http : //www.perceptivepixel.com/ [ perceptivepixel.com ] I 'll use this opportunity to make a larger point : you 're not going to get much progress out of the corporate game of developing a product .
The difference is in these two questions : 1 .
What is possible to sell ? 2 .
What is possible ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jeff Han did this four years ago:http://www.ted.com/talks/jeff\_han\_demos\_his\_breakthrough\_touchscreen.html [ted.com]He now has a company spun off from his research at NYU:http://www.perceptivepixel.com/ [perceptivepixel.com]I'll use this opportunity to make a larger point: you're not going to get much progress out of the corporate game of developing a product.
The difference is in these two questions:1.
What is possible to sell?2.
What is possible?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998696</id>
	<title>Competition would be great</title>
	<author>paimin</author>
	<datestamp>1265137920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here's hoping that BOTH the iPad and the Chromepad are successful.  A little competition here might actually make these devices pretty sweet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's hoping that BOTH the iPad and the Chromepad are successful .
A little competition here might actually make these devices pretty sweet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's hoping that BOTH the iPad and the Chromepad are successful.
A little competition here might actually make these devices pretty sweet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998774</id>
	<title>Google Maps Mobile</title>
	<author>rwa2</author>
	<datestamp>1265138220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been playing with android-x86 on my eeepc.  It's nice, but doesn't seem to have any applications.</p><p>Mostly I'm interested in getting Google Maps Mobile running on it... it's the only thing I really miss from having a Blackberry.  Is there any way of getting Google Maps Mobile on a laptop / netbook?</p><p>I don't really care for an Android / iPhone / Blackberry / Symbian device and accompanying data plan just to get gmm going...  it would be nice to get gmm running on a larger netbook running it and tether it to my existing data plan.</p><p>I've tried using Google Earth Plus in the past, and had it hooked up to a GPS... but it wasn't quite as useful... for one thing the zoom level was fixed to something inconvenient after each 1second GPS marker update<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been playing with android-x86 on my eeepc .
It 's nice , but does n't seem to have any applications.Mostly I 'm interested in getting Google Maps Mobile running on it... it 's the only thing I really miss from having a Blackberry .
Is there any way of getting Google Maps Mobile on a laptop / netbook ? I do n't really care for an Android / iPhone / Blackberry / Symbian device and accompanying data plan just to get gmm going... it would be nice to get gmm running on a larger netbook running it and tether it to my existing data plan.I 've tried using Google Earth Plus in the past , and had it hooked up to a GPS... but it was n't quite as useful... for one thing the zoom level was fixed to something inconvenient after each 1second GPS marker update : -/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been playing with android-x86 on my eeepc.
It's nice, but doesn't seem to have any applications.Mostly I'm interested in getting Google Maps Mobile running on it... it's the only thing I really miss from having a Blackberry.
Is there any way of getting Google Maps Mobile on a laptop / netbook?I don't really care for an Android / iPhone / Blackberry / Symbian device and accompanying data plan just to get gmm going...  it would be nice to get gmm running on a larger netbook running it and tether it to my existing data plan.I've tried using Google Earth Plus in the past, and had it hooked up to a GPS... but it wasn't quite as useful... for one thing the zoom level was fixed to something inconvenient after each 1second GPS marker update :-/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997872</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh, another virtual keyboard...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265134920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You can get a <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/#keyboard-dock" title="apple.com">keyboard dock for the iPad</a> [apple.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>You can get a keyboard dock for the iPad [ apple.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can get a keyboard dock for the iPad [apple.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997432</id>
	<title>Monster screen size in the video!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265133600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>The article says 5"-10" screen size is ideal for Chrome OS, then they go and show a video with what looks like what, a 30" screen?  The reality distortion field has spread, and it stretches rulers now too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>The article says 5 " -10 " screen size is ideal for Chrome OS , then they go and show a video with what looks like what , a 30 " screen ?
The reality distortion field has spread , and it stretches rulers now too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article says 5"-10" screen size is ideal for Chrome OS, then they go and show a video with what looks like what, a 30" screen?
The reality distortion field has spread, and it stretches rulers now too!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999848</id>
	<title>sad, sad, demo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265142540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i have swallowed the google pill for sure, but that demo just makes me sad. for goodness sake, there are already companies with *real* android tablets and many of them were demoed at CES. why did google feel the need to put together shoddy youtube video showing a fake tablet running a mocked up OS?</p><p>why don't they just spend a few more dollars to make people aware of the awesome android tablets that are already announced? for example, the vega tablet,<br><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/vega-tablet-beats-apple-and-crunchpad/" title="wired.com">http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/vega-tablet-beats-apple-and-crunchpad/</a> [wired.com]</p><p>and the MSI tablet,<br><a href="http://phandroid.com/2010/01/29/msi-android-tablet-harmony/" title="phandroid.com">http://phandroid.com/2010/01/29/msi-android-tablet-harmony/</a> [phandroid.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i have swallowed the google pill for sure , but that demo just makes me sad .
for goodness sake , there are already companies with * real * android tablets and many of them were demoed at CES .
why did google feel the need to put together shoddy youtube video showing a fake tablet running a mocked up OS ? why do n't they just spend a few more dollars to make people aware of the awesome android tablets that are already announced ?
for example , the vega tablet,http : //www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/vega-tablet-beats-apple-and-crunchpad/ [ wired.com ] and the MSI tablet,http : //phandroid.com/2010/01/29/msi-android-tablet-harmony/ [ phandroid.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i have swallowed the google pill for sure, but that demo just makes me sad.
for goodness sake, there are already companies with *real* android tablets and many of them were demoed at CES.
why did google feel the need to put together shoddy youtube video showing a fake tablet running a mocked up OS?why don't they just spend a few more dollars to make people aware of the awesome android tablets that are already announced?
for example, the vega tablet,http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/vega-tablet-beats-apple-and-crunchpad/ [wired.com]and the MSI tablet,http://phandroid.com/2010/01/29/msi-android-tablet-harmony/ [phandroid.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998872</id>
	<title>Digging out the old toy box</title>
	<author>kiehlster</author>
	<datestamp>1265138580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I feel like this whole iPad business is just a regurgitation of an product we've seen on the markets for ages with comparatively less power between these new iterations of tablets and today's modern PCs and those tablets of yesterday compared to the modern PCs of that day.  I'd be impressed if they had these new tablets running Crysis at 90fps, but that's impossible.  This news has been like watching Steve Jobs go up to his attic and digging out something from the old toy box, dusting it off, and telling the world, "Hey, I just invented this."  That followed shortly by everyone else doing the same thing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel like this whole iPad business is just a regurgitation of an product we 've seen on the markets for ages with comparatively less power between these new iterations of tablets and today 's modern PCs and those tablets of yesterday compared to the modern PCs of that day .
I 'd be impressed if they had these new tablets running Crysis at 90fps , but that 's impossible .
This news has been like watching Steve Jobs go up to his attic and digging out something from the old toy box , dusting it off , and telling the world , " Hey , I just invented this .
" That followed shortly by everyone else doing the same thing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel like this whole iPad business is just a regurgitation of an product we've seen on the markets for ages with comparatively less power between these new iterations of tablets and today's modern PCs and those tablets of yesterday compared to the modern PCs of that day.
I'd be impressed if they had these new tablets running Crysis at 90fps, but that's impossible.
This news has been like watching Steve Jobs go up to his attic and digging out something from the old toy box, dusting it off, and telling the world, "Hey, I just invented this.
"  That followed shortly by everyone else doing the same thing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999494</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh, another virtual keyboard...</title>
	<author>prockcore</author>
	<datestamp>1265140980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't tell from the photo, but that keyboard doesn't even have an escape key... instead it's a special "home" key that does the same thing as the home button on the iphone.</p><p>That'll hurt us vim-users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't tell from the photo , but that keyboard does n't even have an escape key... instead it 's a special " home " key that does the same thing as the home button on the iphone.That 'll hurt us vim-users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't tell from the photo, but that keyboard doesn't even have an escape key... instead it's a special "home" key that does the same thing as the home button on the iphone.That'll hurt us vim-users.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997872</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998886</id>
	<title>Re:Must have apps.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265138700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is because they never had the brains that Google had to actually make web apps work.<br>More and more Google "Apps" are becoming offline-enabled, either via Google Gears or native HTML5.<br>Offline Applications section of HTML5 is pretty thorough, and incredibly simple to setup.  Even IE has some support for it now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is because they never had the brains that Google had to actually make web apps work.More and more Google " Apps " are becoming offline-enabled , either via Google Gears or native HTML5.Offline Applications section of HTML5 is pretty thorough , and incredibly simple to setup .
Even IE has some support for it now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is because they never had the brains that Google had to actually make web apps work.More and more Google "Apps" are becoming offline-enabled, either via Google Gears or native HTML5.Offline Applications section of HTML5 is pretty thorough, and incredibly simple to setup.
Even IE has some support for it now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280</id>
	<title>iPad buzz?</title>
	<author>sakdoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1265133120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I haven't seen any actual buzz, as in people genuinely talking about it.</p><p>I have see, press releases, astro-turfing, slashvertisements, and spam.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't seen any actual buzz , as in people genuinely talking about it.I have see , press releases , astro-turfing , slashvertisements , and spam .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't seen any actual buzz, as in people genuinely talking about it.I have see, press releases, astro-turfing, slashvertisements, and spam.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999682</id>
	<title>Meh...</title>
	<author>JohnLaibach</author>
	<datestamp>1265141760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>To me it looks like a larger iPad with multi-tasking.<br>If you look at it more, you could conclude that it wouldn&amp;rsquo;t work (multuple windows&amp;#8230;) all that nice on a screen the size of the iPad.<br><br>No really new stuff. But also the iPad doesn&amp;rsquo;t show something revolutionary.<br><br>Nonetheless, it&amp;rsquo;s nice to see different concepts by different people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>To me it looks like a larger iPad with multi-tasking.If you look at it more , you could conclude that it wouldn    t work ( multuple windows    ) all that nice on a screen the size of the iPad.No really new stuff .
But also the iPad doesn    t show something revolutionary.Nonetheless , it    s nice to see different concepts by different people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To me it looks like a larger iPad with multi-tasking.If you look at it more, you could conclude that it wouldn’t work (multuple windows…) all that nice on a screen the size of the iPad.No really new stuff.
But also the iPad doesn’t show something revolutionary.Nonetheless, it’s nice to see different concepts by different people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997674</id>
	<title>Re:Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>MozeeToby</author>
	<datestamp>1265134320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Assuming they follow a similar plan to the Android phones, I don't see a problem.  I can install any software I want on my phone (Settings-&gt;Applications-&gt;Unknown Sources), including overwriting the operating system.  There are certain kinds of programs that I agreed not to run when I signed up with my service provider, but that doesn't have anything to do with the device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Assuming they follow a similar plan to the Android phones , I do n't see a problem .
I can install any software I want on my phone ( Settings- &gt; Applications- &gt; Unknown Sources ) , including overwriting the operating system .
There are certain kinds of programs that I agreed not to run when I signed up with my service provider , but that does n't have anything to do with the device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assuming they follow a similar plan to the Android phones, I don't see a problem.
I can install any software I want on my phone (Settings-&gt;Applications-&gt;Unknown Sources), including overwriting the operating system.
There are certain kinds of programs that I agreed not to run when I signed up with my service provider, but that doesn't have anything to do with the device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218</id>
	<title>Re:Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265136060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What nerds don't get is that most people don't care about "user's freedom."  They're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.</p><p>Do you add and remove components of your car's dashboard?  Do you drive a stick-shift, or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What nerds do n't get is that most people do n't care about " user 's freedom .
" They 're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.Do you add and remove components of your car 's dashboard ?
Do you drive a stick-shift , or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What nerds don't get is that most people don't care about "user's freedom.
"  They're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.Do you add and remove components of your car's dashboard?
Do you drive a stick-shift, or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998442</id>
	<title>Re:A Marketing Shark Feeding Frenzy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265136900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you overestimate how elegant a castration via scalpel would be.  Sure the initial incision would be a bit more subtle, but the time it would take once more gristly bits were reached and the added effort needed to make it through would surely be equally as gruesome.  In fact the idea of it makes me shudder blech...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you overestimate how elegant a castration via scalpel would be .
Sure the initial incision would be a bit more subtle , but the time it would take once more gristly bits were reached and the added effort needed to make it through would surely be equally as gruesome .
In fact the idea of it makes me shudder blech.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you overestimate how elegant a castration via scalpel would be.
Sure the initial incision would be a bit more subtle, but the time it would take once more gristly bits were reached and the added effort needed to make it through would surely be equally as gruesome.
In fact the idea of it makes me shudder blech...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997746</id>
	<title>I've seen buzz</title>
	<author>RelliK</author>
	<datestamp>1265134560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eF0y0IfpPU</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right here : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 8eF0y0IfpPU</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eF0y0IfpPU</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001750</id>
	<title>Re:iPad buzz?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265108220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Over this weekend I met with two different groups of friends. In both groups, the iPad was brought up. People are interested. BTW, none of them were talking with me but amongst themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Over this weekend I met with two different groups of friends .
In both groups , the iPad was brought up .
People are interested .
BTW , none of them were talking with me but amongst themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Over this weekend I met with two different groups of friends.
In both groups, the iPad was brought up.
People are interested.
BTW, none of them were talking with me but amongst themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997490</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh, another virtual keyboard...</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1265133780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree with you, I despise virtual keyboards.  In fact, the lack of a physical keyboard is the primary thing that prevented me from buying an iPhone (I have an HTC Ozone).</p><p>That being said, this is a Tablet...it isn't supposed to have an actual keyboard -\_-;;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with you , I despise virtual keyboards .
In fact , the lack of a physical keyboard is the primary thing that prevented me from buying an iPhone ( I have an HTC Ozone ) .That being said , this is a Tablet...it is n't supposed to have an actual keyboard - \ _- ; ;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with you, I despise virtual keyboards.
In fact, the lack of a physical keyboard is the primary thing that prevented me from buying an iPhone (I have an HTC Ozone).That being said, this is a Tablet...it isn't supposed to have an actual keyboard -\_-;;</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31000304</id>
	<title>real competition</title>
	<author>awb131</author>
	<datestamp>1265101320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been saying since the Apple announcement that the real competition for the iPad will not be the Kindle, or existing netbooks running Windows, but the as-yet-unreleased machines running ChromeOS.</p><p>Both are targeted primarily at "average" consumers who don't want a full-on computer, but rather an appliance that "just works," more like a phone, for certain tasks -- browsing the web, watching movies, reading books, keeping track of their photos.</p><p>That's why geeks like us find both of them to be a bit lackluster; they're not aimed at us.  They're aimed at our parents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been saying since the Apple announcement that the real competition for the iPad will not be the Kindle , or existing netbooks running Windows , but the as-yet-unreleased machines running ChromeOS.Both are targeted primarily at " average " consumers who do n't want a full-on computer , but rather an appliance that " just works , " more like a phone , for certain tasks -- browsing the web , watching movies , reading books , keeping track of their photos.That 's why geeks like us find both of them to be a bit lackluster ; they 're not aimed at us .
They 're aimed at our parents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been saying since the Apple announcement that the real competition for the iPad will not be the Kindle, or existing netbooks running Windows, but the as-yet-unreleased machines running ChromeOS.Both are targeted primarily at "average" consumers who don't want a full-on computer, but rather an appliance that "just works," more like a phone, for certain tasks -- browsing the web, watching movies, reading books, keeping track of their photos.That's why geeks like us find both of them to be a bit lackluster; they're not aimed at us.
They're aimed at our parents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31008334</id>
	<title>Small hands -- for women?  That's stupid</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1264943340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Draw your own conclusions. I think that googlers are looking for people who have small hands, like women.</p></div><p>Yeah, that seems stupid.  Based on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. statistics, they're only like 2\% of the market...</p><p>(Sorry for the teasing, ladies<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Draw your own conclusions .
I think that googlers are looking for people who have small hands , like women.Yeah , that seems stupid .
Based on / .
statistics , they 're only like 2 \ % of the market... ( Sorry for the teasing , ladies : P )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Draw your own conclusions.
I think that googlers are looking for people who have small hands, like women.Yeah, that seems stupid.
Based on /.
statistics, they're only like 2\% of the market...(Sorry for the teasing, ladies :P)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001552</id>
	<title>Re:Small hands demo</title>
	<author>shadowrat</author>
	<datestamp>1265107140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>considering it's a 5" - 10" screen, i'd say the scale of the depicted hands is positively impish. I'm fairly certain those were not drawings of human hands.</htmltext>
<tokenext>considering it 's a 5 " - 10 " screen , i 'd say the scale of the depicted hands is positively impish .
I 'm fairly certain those were not drawings of human hands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>considering it's a 5" - 10" screen, i'd say the scale of the depicted hands is positively impish.
I'm fairly certain those were not drawings of human hands.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999474</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570</id>
	<title>A Marketing Shark Feeding Frenzy</title>
	<author>RobotRunAmok</author>
	<datestamp>1265134020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>the iPad could have serious competition</i></p><p>Once Apple has figured out to whom this is being marketing.</p><p>The whole Apple-Yahoo-MS-Google circle jerk posturing is delirious.  If next week Steve Jobs called a press conference and sliced his dick off with a silver scalpel in a room full of stunned reporters, I have no doubt that -- not to be outdone -- Sergey Brin would cut off his with a chainsaw on nation-wide TV seven days later.</p><p>And no one in the tech punditry -- all happy just to have jobs and something to write about besides the latest PC graphics card -- would question *WHY* these idiots are emasculating themselves, they'd just write tedious "thought" pieces contrasting the metaphors of Job's elegant, shiny castration versus Brin's use of loud horsepower.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the iPad could have serious competitionOnce Apple has figured out to whom this is being marketing.The whole Apple-Yahoo-MS-Google circle jerk posturing is delirious .
If next week Steve Jobs called a press conference and sliced his dick off with a silver scalpel in a room full of stunned reporters , I have no doubt that -- not to be outdone -- Sergey Brin would cut off his with a chainsaw on nation-wide TV seven days later.And no one in the tech punditry -- all happy just to have jobs and something to write about besides the latest PC graphics card -- would question * WHY * these idiots are emasculating themselves , they 'd just write tedious " thought " pieces contrasting the metaphors of Job 's elegant , shiny castration versus Brin 's use of loud horsepower .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the iPad could have serious competitionOnce Apple has figured out to whom this is being marketing.The whole Apple-Yahoo-MS-Google circle jerk posturing is delirious.
If next week Steve Jobs called a press conference and sliced his dick off with a silver scalpel in a room full of stunned reporters, I have no doubt that -- not to be outdone -- Sergey Brin would cut off his with a chainsaw on nation-wide TV seven days later.And no one in the tech punditry -- all happy just to have jobs and something to write about besides the latest PC graphics card -- would question *WHY* these idiots are emasculating themselves, they'd just write tedious "thought" pieces contrasting the metaphors of Job's elegant, shiny castration versus Brin's use of loud horsepower.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002196</id>
	<title>Re:A Marketing Shark Feeding Frenzy</title>
	<author>springbox</author>
	<datestamp>1265110560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>With the right blade, all you need to do is hit it hard enough.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With the right blade , all you need to do is hit it hard enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the right blade, all you need to do is hit it hard enough.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997548</id>
	<title>Re:iPad buzz?</title>
	<author>uncanny</author>
	<datestamp>1265133960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>they were talking about it on Bob&amp;Tom before it was even premiered, and now they talk about it a bunch.  They dont even know anything about it, but it's "shiny object" appeal has already won them over!  Unfortunately they have a nationwide audience.</htmltext>
<tokenext>they were talking about it on Bob&amp;Tom before it was even premiered , and now they talk about it a bunch .
They dont even know anything about it , but it 's " shiny object " appeal has already won them over !
Unfortunately they have a nationwide audience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>they were talking about it on Bob&amp;Tom before it was even premiered, and now they talk about it a bunch.
They dont even know anything about it, but it's "shiny object" appeal has already won them over!
Unfortunately they have a nationwide audience.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31005876</id>
	<title>Serious competition?</title>
	<author>gig</author>
	<datestamp>1265133060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The same $500 hardware with everything stripped out except the browser is "serious competition"?</p><p>This is embarrassing coming from Google. Didn't Nexus One hurt their brand enough? iPad is almost $100 cheaper than Nexus one and with a $30 data only plan and Skype is more like what the Google Phone was rumored to be.</p><p>Apple is bigger than Google and for Apple this is a full-time job, not a hobby.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The same $ 500 hardware with everything stripped out except the browser is " serious competition " ? This is embarrassing coming from Google .
Did n't Nexus One hurt their brand enough ?
iPad is almost $ 100 cheaper than Nexus one and with a $ 30 data only plan and Skype is more like what the Google Phone was rumored to be.Apple is bigger than Google and for Apple this is a full-time job , not a hobby .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The same $500 hardware with everything stripped out except the browser is "serious competition"?This is embarrassing coming from Google.
Didn't Nexus One hurt their brand enough?
iPad is almost $100 cheaper than Nexus one and with a $30 data only plan and Skype is more like what the Google Phone was rumored to be.Apple is bigger than Google and for Apple this is a full-time job, not a hobby.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001746</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh, another virtual keyboard...</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1265108220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you were a good touch keyboardist, it wouldn't bother you. It's not like the keys change position~</p><p>Also, you can get a keyboard for it, although that is besides the point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you were a good touch keyboardist , it would n't bother you .
It 's not like the keys change position ~ Also , you can get a keyboard for it , although that is besides the point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you were a good touch keyboardist, it wouldn't bother you.
It's not like the keys change position~Also, you can get a keyboard for it, although that is besides the point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997496</id>
	<title>Not sure if I care</title>
	<author>93 Escort Wagon</author>
	<datestamp>1265133780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I realize this entire discussion will probably devolve into a GNU/Free versus Closed argument, or a Mac Lovers versus Mac Haters flamefest, but...</p><p>Having watched the demo video, I'm not convinced. This really just seems like another Tablet PC, except it's running Chrome OS instead of Windows XP. The demoed functionality is almost exactly like the application switcher that's available in both PC and Mac (alt+tab cmd+tab), and the resizing functions just use your fingers instead of a mouse pointer. Personally I think that's an issue - I'd rather use a mouse for most of that functionality.</p><p>I know there are some people that mock the iPad because it's not running a tablet-ized version of the full OS X; but when I see demos like this, it just reminds me of why Tablet PCs never escaped their niche. For a lot of typical desktop functionality, it is easier to use a mouse. There's no compelling reason making me wish to be able to do those exact same functions using my fingers. It's not that those Tablet PCs were running Windows - it's because they offered no compelling reason to exist for most of us!</p><p>Now, hopefully Google will have some additional tricks up its sleeve, and there'll be a reason to care beyond "it's running Linux". And I do believe competition is a rising tide that lifts all boats (yup, I'm pulling out the cliches now). But hopefully Google has studied the past and will try to look at <i>why</i> the Tablet PC never really made it, rather than just duplicate the same mistakes Microsoft made.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I realize this entire discussion will probably devolve into a GNU/Free versus Closed argument , or a Mac Lovers versus Mac Haters flamefest , but...Having watched the demo video , I 'm not convinced .
This really just seems like another Tablet PC , except it 's running Chrome OS instead of Windows XP .
The demoed functionality is almost exactly like the application switcher that 's available in both PC and Mac ( alt + tab cmd + tab ) , and the resizing functions just use your fingers instead of a mouse pointer .
Personally I think that 's an issue - I 'd rather use a mouse for most of that functionality.I know there are some people that mock the iPad because it 's not running a tablet-ized version of the full OS X ; but when I see demos like this , it just reminds me of why Tablet PCs never escaped their niche .
For a lot of typical desktop functionality , it is easier to use a mouse .
There 's no compelling reason making me wish to be able to do those exact same functions using my fingers .
It 's not that those Tablet PCs were running Windows - it 's because they offered no compelling reason to exist for most of us ! Now , hopefully Google will have some additional tricks up its sleeve , and there 'll be a reason to care beyond " it 's running Linux " .
And I do believe competition is a rising tide that lifts all boats ( yup , I 'm pulling out the cliches now ) .
But hopefully Google has studied the past and will try to look at why the Tablet PC never really made it , rather than just duplicate the same mistakes Microsoft made .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I realize this entire discussion will probably devolve into a GNU/Free versus Closed argument, or a Mac Lovers versus Mac Haters flamefest, but...Having watched the demo video, I'm not convinced.
This really just seems like another Tablet PC, except it's running Chrome OS instead of Windows XP.
The demoed functionality is almost exactly like the application switcher that's available in both PC and Mac (alt+tab cmd+tab), and the resizing functions just use your fingers instead of a mouse pointer.
Personally I think that's an issue - I'd rather use a mouse for most of that functionality.I know there are some people that mock the iPad because it's not running a tablet-ized version of the full OS X; but when I see demos like this, it just reminds me of why Tablet PCs never escaped their niche.
For a lot of typical desktop functionality, it is easier to use a mouse.
There's no compelling reason making me wish to be able to do those exact same functions using my fingers.
It's not that those Tablet PCs were running Windows - it's because they offered no compelling reason to exist for most of us!Now, hopefully Google will have some additional tricks up its sleeve, and there'll be a reason to care beyond "it's running Linux".
And I do believe competition is a rising tide that lifts all boats (yup, I'm pulling out the cliches now).
But hopefully Google has studied the past and will try to look at why the Tablet PC never really made it, rather than just duplicate the same mistakes Microsoft made.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999136</id>
	<title>Re:A Marketing Shark Feeding Frenzy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265139600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's the best comment on Slashdot that I can remember.  +1546 funny/insightful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's the best comment on Slashdot that I can remember .
+ 1546 funny/insightful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's the best comment on Slashdot that I can remember.
+1546 funny/insightful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001726</id>
	<title>Re:A Marketing Shark Feeding Frenzy</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1265108100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Newsflash:</p><p>"Companies compete is same arena, RobotRunAmok whines."</p><p>This is good for the consumer, what's your beef?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Newsflash : " Companies compete is same arena , RobotRunAmok whines .
" This is good for the consumer , what 's your beef ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newsflash:"Companies compete is same arena, RobotRunAmok whines.
"This is good for the consumer, what's your beef?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999370</id>
	<title>Re:Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>Totenglocke</author>
	<datestamp>1265140500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What nerds don't get is that most people don't care about "user's freedom." They're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.</p></div><p>Except that when they see that for less money they can buy a netbook with the same size screen that lets them do a hell of a lot more then browse the web, a lot of people will stop and think "why the hell should I get this?"  The only people I know planning on buying the iPad (and before the details were released, I was very eager for it as well) are the diehard Macolytes who would buy and eat Steve Job's shit as long as it was called iShit and branded with the Apple logo.  Everyone else has said "the functionality is so limited that it's not worth buying - my netbook and phone already cover all of that and cost less".
</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Do you add and remove components of your car's dashboard?</p></div><p>Actually, even professional modders rarely do <i>that</i>.  I think you don't really know what you're talking about here.  But then again, your lack of a clue when it comes to cars is backed up by your next sentence...</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Do you drive a stick-shift, or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you?</p></div><p>I absolutely drive a manual.  I refuse to own an automatic because they cost more, up until recently they were slower and got worse mpg, and you don't have as much control over the car.  There's a reason why the US is the only country that views manuals as evil - because the US is the only country too lazy to learn how to properly drive a car.  That's why car choices in the US are so limited for me - because most cars don't have the option of a manual and are automatically (no pun intended) disqualified.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What nerds do n't get is that most people do n't care about " user 's freedom .
" They 're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.Except that when they see that for less money they can buy a netbook with the same size screen that lets them do a hell of a lot more then browse the web , a lot of people will stop and think " why the hell should I get this ?
" The only people I know planning on buying the iPad ( and before the details were released , I was very eager for it as well ) are the diehard Macolytes who would buy and eat Steve Job 's shit as long as it was called iShit and branded with the Apple logo .
Everyone else has said " the functionality is so limited that it 's not worth buying - my netbook and phone already cover all of that and cost less " .
Do you add and remove components of your car 's dashboard ? Actually , even professional modders rarely do that .
I think you do n't really know what you 're talking about here .
But then again , your lack of a clue when it comes to cars is backed up by your next sentence...Do you drive a stick-shift , or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you ? I absolutely drive a manual .
I refuse to own an automatic because they cost more , up until recently they were slower and got worse mpg , and you do n't have as much control over the car .
There 's a reason why the US is the only country that views manuals as evil - because the US is the only country too lazy to learn how to properly drive a car .
That 's why car choices in the US are so limited for me - because most cars do n't have the option of a manual and are automatically ( no pun intended ) disqualified .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What nerds don't get is that most people don't care about "user's freedom.
" They're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.Except that when they see that for less money they can buy a netbook with the same size screen that lets them do a hell of a lot more then browse the web, a lot of people will stop and think "why the hell should I get this?
"  The only people I know planning on buying the iPad (and before the details were released, I was very eager for it as well) are the diehard Macolytes who would buy and eat Steve Job's shit as long as it was called iShit and branded with the Apple logo.
Everyone else has said "the functionality is so limited that it's not worth buying - my netbook and phone already cover all of that and cost less".
Do you add and remove components of your car's dashboard?Actually, even professional modders rarely do that.
I think you don't really know what you're talking about here.
But then again, your lack of a clue when it comes to cars is backed up by your next sentence...Do you drive a stick-shift, or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you?I absolutely drive a manual.
I refuse to own an automatic because they cost more, up until recently they were slower and got worse mpg, and you don't have as much control over the car.
There's a reason why the US is the only country that views manuals as evil - because the US is the only country too lazy to learn how to properly drive a car.
That's why car choices in the US are so limited for me - because most cars don't have the option of a manual and are automatically (no pun intended) disqualified.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999766</id>
	<title>Re:Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>drinkypoo</author>
	<datestamp>1265142120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What nerds don't get is that most people don't care about "user's freedom." They're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.</p></div><p>That is not yet clear. Nobody has sold a device limited to web browsing yet. Or if they have, they've not been very successful. Even Apple recognized the need to allow the development of actual applications for the iPhone, which was <strong>not</strong> the original plan.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Do you add and remove components of your car's dashboard?</p></div><p>Yes. All my vehicles have aftermarket stereo systems. I even added a custom in-dash screen to my Impreza. My F250 has an aftermarket pyrometer and boost gauge.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Do you drive a stick-shift, or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you?</p></div><p>Yes. My Subaru has an automatic, but they were kind enough to provide a manual mode in which it will only lug down a gear (and if you put it in third, it will only lug down to second!) if you are attempting to stall the car. In 1st gear manual mode, it locks the center diff to a spool, making it 4WD instead of AWD. My Mercedes has a euro-style shifter which encourages manual shifting, which is very useful even though it has a grade sensor, for preventing unwanted upshifts.</p><p>Don't make car analogies, you suck at it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What nerds do n't get is that most people do n't care about " user 's freedom .
" They 're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.That is not yet clear .
Nobody has sold a device limited to web browsing yet .
Or if they have , they 've not been very successful .
Even Apple recognized the need to allow the development of actual applications for the iPhone , which was not the original plan.Do you add and remove components of your car 's dashboard ? Yes .
All my vehicles have aftermarket stereo systems .
I even added a custom in-dash screen to my Impreza .
My F250 has an aftermarket pyrometer and boost gauge.Do you drive a stick-shift , or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you ? Yes .
My Subaru has an automatic , but they were kind enough to provide a manual mode in which it will only lug down a gear ( and if you put it in third , it will only lug down to second !
) if you are attempting to stall the car .
In 1st gear manual mode , it locks the center diff to a spool , making it 4WD instead of AWD .
My Mercedes has a euro-style shifter which encourages manual shifting , which is very useful even though it has a grade sensor , for preventing unwanted upshifts.Do n't make car analogies , you suck at it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What nerds don't get is that most people don't care about "user's freedom.
" They're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.That is not yet clear.
Nobody has sold a device limited to web browsing yet.
Or if they have, they've not been very successful.
Even Apple recognized the need to allow the development of actual applications for the iPhone, which was not the original plan.Do you add and remove components of your car's dashboard?Yes.
All my vehicles have aftermarket stereo systems.
I even added a custom in-dash screen to my Impreza.
My F250 has an aftermarket pyrometer and boost gauge.Do you drive a stick-shift, or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you?Yes.
My Subaru has an automatic, but they were kind enough to provide a manual mode in which it will only lug down a gear (and if you put it in third, it will only lug down to second!
) if you are attempting to stall the car.
In 1st gear manual mode, it locks the center diff to a spool, making it 4WD instead of AWD.
My Mercedes has a euro-style shifter which encourages manual shifting, which is very useful even though it has a grade sensor, for preventing unwanted upshifts.Don't make car analogies, you suck at it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720</id>
	<title>Must have apps.</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1265134500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Web apps just don't cut it Google. Apple found that out with the iPhone, Palm has learned that with the Pre.  People want to have stuff that runs even when there is no internet even if it is just a game.<br>We also want to carry some media with us so if we are stuck on a plane with no WiFi or anyplace with no WiFi or 3G we can watch or listen to something.<br>Stop working on the Chrome OS and improve Android or just go right to a tablet Linux.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Web apps just do n't cut it Google .
Apple found that out with the iPhone , Palm has learned that with the Pre .
People want to have stuff that runs even when there is no internet even if it is just a game.We also want to carry some media with us so if we are stuck on a plane with no WiFi or anyplace with no WiFi or 3G we can watch or listen to something.Stop working on the Chrome OS and improve Android or just go right to a tablet Linux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Web apps just don't cut it Google.
Apple found that out with the iPhone, Palm has learned that with the Pre.
People want to have stuff that runs even when there is no internet even if it is just a game.We also want to carry some media with us so if we are stuck on a plane with no WiFi or anyplace with no WiFi or 3G we can watch or listen to something.Stop working on the Chrome OS and improve Android or just go right to a tablet Linux.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998928</id>
	<title>What the tablet format needs...</title>
	<author>Geeky</author>
	<datestamp>1265138820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been thinking about this tablet format, and I think it's got a few limitations.</p><p>For a start, you've got to hold it up or prop it against something while you use it. So, how's this for an idea... give it a hinged lid that can be used to protect the screen and as a stand when it's open. Better yet - if you've got the hinged bit at the front, why not put a physical keyboard in there to save screen space and for easier typing.</p><p>Wonder if anyone's come up with any products like that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been thinking about this tablet format , and I think it 's got a few limitations.For a start , you 've got to hold it up or prop it against something while you use it .
So , how 's this for an idea... give it a hinged lid that can be used to protect the screen and as a stand when it 's open .
Better yet - if you 've got the hinged bit at the front , why not put a physical keyboard in there to save screen space and for easier typing.Wonder if anyone 's come up with any products like that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been thinking about this tablet format, and I think it's got a few limitations.For a start, you've got to hold it up or prop it against something while you use it.
So, how's this for an idea... give it a hinged lid that can be used to protect the screen and as a stand when it's open.
Better yet - if you've got the hinged bit at the front, why not put a physical keyboard in there to save screen space and for easier typing.Wonder if anyone's come up with any products like that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999578</id>
	<title>Re:Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1265141340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What nerds don't get is that most people don't care about "user's freedom." They're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.</p></div><p>Many oppressed people aren't aware of it, either.  Example: living in the USA.  Living here, I have far more freedoms than most of the world, but since my government has the capability to spy on just about everything I do, I'm just living in a really big, well furnished cage.  A well furnished cage is still a cage.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Do you add and remove components of your car's dashboard?</p></div><p>Not my current car, because I'm keeping it relatively close to stock, but in the past yes.  I have installed different gauges to read various pressures and display that the stock dash doesn't monitor.  I would LOVE to have a configurable dashboard as a standard option in vehicles, but that's asking a bit much currently.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Do you drive a stick-shift, or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you?</p></div><p>Until the day that I am mentally or physically unable to do so, I will <b>always</b> drive a manual.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What nerds do n't get is that most people do n't care about " user 's freedom .
" They 're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.Many oppressed people are n't aware of it , either .
Example : living in the USA .
Living here , I have far more freedoms than most of the world , but since my government has the capability to spy on just about everything I do , I 'm just living in a really big , well furnished cage .
A well furnished cage is still a cage.Do you add and remove components of your car 's dashboard ? Not my current car , because I 'm keeping it relatively close to stock , but in the past yes .
I have installed different gauges to read various pressures and display that the stock dash does n't monitor .
I would LOVE to have a configurable dashboard as a standard option in vehicles , but that 's asking a bit much currently.Do you drive a stick-shift , or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you ? Until the day that I am mentally or physically unable to do so , I will always drive a manual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What nerds don't get is that most people don't care about "user's freedom.
" They're happy to buy a controlled but stable device that lets them browse the web.Many oppressed people aren't aware of it, either.
Example: living in the USA.
Living here, I have far more freedoms than most of the world, but since my government has the capability to spy on just about everything I do, I'm just living in a really big, well furnished cage.
A well furnished cage is still a cage.Do you add and remove components of your car's dashboard?Not my current car, because I'm keeping it relatively close to stock, but in the past yes.
I have installed different gauges to read various pressures and display that the stock dash doesn't monitor.
I would LOVE to have a configurable dashboard as a standard option in vehicles, but that's asking a bit much currently.Do you drive a stick-shift, or do you let the computer in the car change gears for you?Until the day that I am mentally or physically unable to do so, I will always drive a manual.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998892</id>
	<title>Re:Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>v01d</author>
	<datestamp>1265138700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Do you drive a stick-shift</i> </p><p>Yes.  Why?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you drive a stick-shift Yes .
Why ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you drive a stick-shift Yes.
Why?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001986</id>
	<title>Re:Must have apps.</title>
	<author>nickyj</author>
	<datestamp>1265109480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uh.. with google gears you don't need a constant internet connection, you don't need a connection at all. I use gears on my netbook and I can still read/compose emails, read my google reader, make new and modify docs/spreadsheets all without an internet connection.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh.. with google gears you do n't need a constant internet connection , you do n't need a connection at all .
I use gears on my netbook and I can still read/compose emails , read my google reader , make new and modify docs/spreadsheets all without an internet connection .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh.. with google gears you don't need a constant internet connection, you don't need a connection at all.
I use gears on my netbook and I can still read/compose emails, read my google reader, make new and modify docs/spreadsheets all without an internet connection.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998800</id>
	<title>Apple is doomed!</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1265138280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hah! They're in the middle of their tablet disaster and meltdown and now here come Google. It's gonna' be Godzilla vs that fisherman guy on the beach outside of Tokyo. Or Bambi.</p><p>Stoopid Apple, they should never released a tablet now that Google has theirs out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hah !
They 're in the middle of their tablet disaster and meltdown and now here come Google .
It 's gon na ' be Godzilla vs that fisherman guy on the beach outside of Tokyo .
Or Bambi.Stoopid Apple , they should never released a tablet now that Google has theirs out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hah!
They're in the middle of their tablet disaster and meltdown and now here come Google.
It's gonna' be Godzilla vs that fisherman guy on the beach outside of Tokyo.
Or Bambi.Stoopid Apple, they should never released a tablet now that Google has theirs out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997890</id>
	<title>The IPad's going to have competition?</title>
	<author>eagee</author>
	<datestamp>1265134980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>How could something no one wants to buy have competition?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How could something no one wants to buy have competition ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How could something no one wants to buy have competition?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997798</id>
	<title>Re:iPad buzz?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265134680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOL, just because you don't see talk about the iPad on slashNOT doesn't mean it isn't happening.  This is the same site that denigrated the original iPod as an also ran.  You people are imbeciles when it comes to predicting what technology is good and what technology is popular.  For the love of christ, I still see you losers talking about Linux on the desktop.  ROTFLMAO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL , just because you do n't see talk about the iPad on slashNOT does n't mean it is n't happening .
This is the same site that denigrated the original iPod as an also ran .
You people are imbeciles when it comes to predicting what technology is good and what technology is popular .
For the love of christ , I still see you losers talking about Linux on the desktop .
ROTFLMAO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL, just because you don't see talk about the iPad on slashNOT doesn't mean it isn't happening.
This is the same site that denigrated the original iPod as an also ran.
You people are imbeciles when it comes to predicting what technology is good and what technology is popular.
For the love of christ, I still see you losers talking about Linux on the desktop.
ROTFLMAO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002150</id>
	<title>Variable sized keyboard?</title>
	<author>blitzen</author>
	<datestamp>1265110320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The variable sized / changing position of the virtual keyboard seems like a bad idea to me. I wonder how accurate the demo video is meant to be.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The variable sized / changing position of the virtual keyboard seems like a bad idea to me .
I wonder how accurate the demo video is meant to be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The variable sized / changing position of the virtual keyboard seems like a bad idea to me.
I wonder how accurate the demo video is meant to be.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999774</id>
	<title>Re:A Marketing Shark Feeding Frenzy</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1265142240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, you'd be surprised at how well a scalpel can cut. But even better, one of those <a href="http://www.knifecenter.com/kc\_new/store\_detail.html?s=H34503203" title="knifecenter.com">Japanese style chef knives</a> [knifecenter.com]. I've taken off a turkey leg with one swipe with one of those.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , you 'd be surprised at how well a scalpel can cut .
But even better , one of those Japanese style chef knives [ knifecenter.com ] .
I 've taken off a turkey leg with one swipe with one of those .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, you'd be surprised at how well a scalpel can cut.
But even better, one of those Japanese style chef knives [knifecenter.com].
I've taken off a turkey leg with one swipe with one of those.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997962</id>
	<title>fDros7 pist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265135220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>name on 7he jar of An arduous what they thi8k is mod points and</htmltext>
<tokenext>name on 7he jar of An arduous what they thi8k is mod points and</tokentext>
<sentencetext>name on 7he jar of An arduous what they thi8k is mod points and</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31000956</id>
	<title>this is of more commercial interest to our company</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1265104020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We mainly develop on Linux-Java platforms.  Android is closer to that than the AppleOS-ObjectiveC platform.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We mainly develop on Linux-Java platforms .
Android is closer to that than the AppleOS-ObjectiveC platform .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We mainly develop on Linux-Java platforms.
Android is closer to that than the AppleOS-ObjectiveC platform.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001892</id>
	<title>Re:sad, sad, demo?</title>
	<author>geekoid</author>
	<datestamp>1265109060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would rather break my own fingers then use an MSI product.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would rather break my own fingers then use an MSI product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would rather break my own fingers then use an MSI product.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999848</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997370</id>
	<title>The pictures show a hovering tablet..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265133420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.. top that, Apple!<br>Lenovo already <a href="http://www.metacafe.com/watch/3397763/amazing\_bees\_the\_incredible\_flying\_laptop/" title="metacafe.com" rel="nofollow">has</a> [metacafe.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.. top that , Apple ! Lenovo already has [ metacafe.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.. top that, Apple!Lenovo already has [metacafe.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002228</id>
	<title>Re:Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1265110800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quite a few people do, and I'm sure there are lots of people on the car enthusiast front fighting modern locked-down cars. We're a Linux/copyright/Apple/Google site so we don't exactly hear much from them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quite a few people do , and I 'm sure there are lots of people on the car enthusiast front fighting modern locked-down cars .
We 're a Linux/copyright/Apple/Google site so we do n't exactly hear much from them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quite a few people do, and I'm sure there are lots of people on the car enthusiast front fighting modern locked-down cars.
We're a Linux/copyright/Apple/Google site so we don't exactly hear much from them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997840</id>
	<title>Re:Ugh, another virtual keyboard...</title>
	<author>just\_another\_sean</author>
	<datestamp>1265134860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's better then a stylus though. I have an HP tc1100 and while it has a detachable keyboard I<br>tend to use it without that. Almost everything I need to do is fine because I generally just<br>use it for reading but at those odd times when I want to do something on it that requires<br>typing, and I'm too lazy to get up and find the keyboard, I would rather use something like the<br>v-keyboard in the video then the tiny on screen keyboard and stylus combo.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's better then a stylus though .
I have an HP tc1100 and while it has a detachable keyboard Itend to use it without that .
Almost everything I need to do is fine because I generally justuse it for reading but at those odd times when I want to do something on it that requirestyping , and I 'm too lazy to get up and find the keyboard , I would rather use something like thev-keyboard in the video then the tiny on screen keyboard and stylus combo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's better then a stylus though.
I have an HP tc1100 and while it has a detachable keyboard Itend to use it without that.
Almost everything I need to do is fine because I generally justuse it for reading but at those odd times when I want to do something on it that requirestyping, and I'm too lazy to get up and find the keyboard, I would rather use something like thev-keyboard in the video then the tiny on screen keyboard and stylus combo.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999172</id>
	<title>Re:multiple windows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265139720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why? Just because people can do something doesn't mean they will, sure on a small device i want 1 fullscreen app 90\% of the time, but putting out an os  that can't handle the other 10\% in 2010 is retarded. Say I'm having an IM conversation with somebody, chances are I want to be browsing the web at the same time, drag/drop links , etc, I could easily do this on a 7-10" device, hell the browser will be about the same size as an iphone browser. Then again i think when not using the OSK an iphone would easily be big enough to do something similar 2/3 IMs at the bottom of the screen and inbox listings up top.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
Just because people can do something does n't mean they will , sure on a small device i want 1 fullscreen app 90 \ % of the time , but putting out an os that ca n't handle the other 10 \ % in 2010 is retarded .
Say I 'm having an IM conversation with somebody , chances are I want to be browsing the web at the same time , drag/drop links , etc , I could easily do this on a 7-10 " device , hell the browser will be about the same size as an iphone browser .
Then again i think when not using the OSK an iphone would easily be big enough to do something similar 2/3 IMs at the bottom of the screen and inbox listings up top .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
Just because people can do something doesn't mean they will, sure on a small device i want 1 fullscreen app 90\% of the time, but putting out an os  that can't handle the other 10\% in 2010 is retarded.
Say I'm having an IM conversation with somebody, chances are I want to be browsing the web at the same time, drag/drop links , etc, I could easily do this on a 7-10" device, hell the browser will be about the same size as an iphone browser.
Then again i think when not using the OSK an iphone would easily be big enough to do something similar 2/3 IMs at the bottom of the screen and inbox listings up top.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998336</id>
	<title>Re:Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>glebovitz</author>
	<datestamp>1265136540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>At least in the locked down device market there is going to be some competition.</p><p>Steve Jobs may call the Google "Don't be Evil" mantra bullshit, but I don't see anything evil in a little market competition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>At least in the locked down device market there is going to be some competition.Steve Jobs may call the Google " Do n't be Evil " mantra bullshit , but I do n't see anything evil in a little market competition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least in the locked down device market there is going to be some competition.Steve Jobs may call the Google "Don't be Evil" mantra bullshit, but I don't see anything evil in a little market competition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997568</id>
	<title>Re:Too much lockdown!</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1265134020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe it's because it is in the video (which I can't view at work)...but where are you seeing lockdown with this device?  From what I read in TFA, I didn't see anything that implied you would be restricted to Google-approved programs...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 's because it is in the video ( which I ca n't view at work ) ...but where are you seeing lockdown with this device ?
From what I read in TFA , I did n't see anything that implied you would be restricted to Google-approved programs.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it's because it is in the video (which I can't view at work)...but where are you seeing lockdown with this device?
From what I read in TFA, I didn't see anything that implied you would be restricted to Google-approved programs...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999606</id>
	<title>Re:A Marketing Shark Feeding Frenzy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265141400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The whole Apple-Yahoo-MS-Google circle jerk posturing is delirious.</p> </div><p>The only circle jerk is Slashdot where only submissions linking two or more of the above named companies are posted.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>And no one in the tech punditry -- all happy just to have jobs and something to write about besides the latest PC graphics card -- would question *WHY* these idiots are emasculating themselves, they'd just write tedious "thought" pieces contrasting the metaphors of Job's elegant, shiny castration versus Brin's use of loud horsepower.</p></div><p>You don't remember the tablet PC and how radical they were?  Well, they flopped.  Here comes Apple, a monster in the CE industry with it's take on the tablet years later.  Why wouldn't tech pundits be all over this?  Whether you like it or not, Apple, Yahoo, MS, and Google are titans in the tech industry at the moment.  Slashdot is the one staging imaginary fights between them encouraging spectators to fight in the stands.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The whole Apple-Yahoo-MS-Google circle jerk posturing is delirious .
The only circle jerk is Slashdot where only submissions linking two or more of the above named companies are posted.And no one in the tech punditry -- all happy just to have jobs and something to write about besides the latest PC graphics card -- would question * WHY * these idiots are emasculating themselves , they 'd just write tedious " thought " pieces contrasting the metaphors of Job 's elegant , shiny castration versus Brin 's use of loud horsepower.You do n't remember the tablet PC and how radical they were ?
Well , they flopped .
Here comes Apple , a monster in the CE industry with it 's take on the tablet years later .
Why would n't tech pundits be all over this ?
Whether you like it or not , Apple , Yahoo , MS , and Google are titans in the tech industry at the moment .
Slashdot is the one staging imaginary fights between them encouraging spectators to fight in the stands .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The whole Apple-Yahoo-MS-Google circle jerk posturing is delirious.
The only circle jerk is Slashdot where only submissions linking two or more of the above named companies are posted.And no one in the tech punditry -- all happy just to have jobs and something to write about besides the latest PC graphics card -- would question *WHY* these idiots are emasculating themselves, they'd just write tedious "thought" pieces contrasting the metaphors of Job's elegant, shiny castration versus Brin's use of loud horsepower.You don't remember the tablet PC and how radical they were?
Well, they flopped.
Here comes Apple, a monster in the CE industry with it's take on the tablet years later.
Why wouldn't tech pundits be all over this?
Whether you like it or not, Apple, Yahoo, MS, and Google are titans in the tech industry at the moment.
Slashdot is the one staging imaginary fights between them encouraging spectators to fight in the stands.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998902</id>
	<title>Re:iPad buzz?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265138700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>oooooh, Apple has a product and Google has a 3D rendering...oooohhhh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>oooooh , Apple has a product and Google has a 3D rendering...oooohhhh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oooooh, Apple has a product and Google has a 3D rendering...oooohhhh</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997368</id>
	<title>Thanks Marketing!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265133420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can suggest that a 10" screen is optimal all you want, a tablet that is 8.5x11 inches is optimal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can suggest that a 10 " screen is optimal all you want , a tablet that is 8.5x11 inches is optimal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can suggest that a 10" screen is optimal all you want, a tablet that is 8.5x11 inches is optimal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002446</id>
	<title>Re:What the tablet format needs...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265112000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I plan on propping it up against the massive hardon I have after purchasing all this \/1@6R@ that's been advertised to me over the years. You can keep your keyboard AND your hinge!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I plan on propping it up against the massive hardon I have after purchasing all this \ /1 @ 6R @ that 's been advertised to me over the years .
You can keep your keyboard AND your hinge !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I plan on propping it up against the massive hardon I have after purchasing all this \/1@6R@ that's been advertised to me over the years.
You can keep your keyboard AND your hinge!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998928</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344</id>
	<title>Ugh, another virtual keyboard...</title>
	<author>fatherjoecode</author>
	<datestamp>1265133300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate virtual keyboards. The other touch sensitive concepts are cool, but I'm a touch typist and to have to use a virtual keyboard is the pits.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate virtual keyboards .
The other touch sensitive concepts are cool , but I 'm a touch typist and to have to use a virtual keyboard is the pits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate virtual keyboards.
The other touch sensitive concepts are cool, but I'm a touch typist and to have to use a virtual keyboard is the pits.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997456</id>
	<title>Older Systems</title>
	<author>MonsterTrimble</author>
	<datestamp>1265133660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only one that is chomping at the bit to play with Chrome OS on an older (5-10+ years) system? I have Lubuntu on my old P3 and it flies - relatively speaking.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only one that is chomping at the bit to play with Chrome OS on an older ( 5-10 + years ) system ?
I have Lubuntu on my old P3 and it flies - relatively speaking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only one that is chomping at the bit to play with Chrome OS on an older (5-10+ years) system?
I have Lubuntu on my old P3 and it flies - relatively speaking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998088</id>
	<title>Yawn</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1265135640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Five to ten inches? Thanks, but I'll pass.</p><p>Is it just me, or is there anyone else out there who wants a <i>big</i> tablet instead of some small, sleek, fashionable, and largely useless piece of overpriced tech trinketry? At this point, I'm about to pick up an old Thinkpad on eBay and make one myself -- and still probably come out cheaper than the latest and greatest. And no, I don't need a touch screen. I'd be perfectly content to mount a few programmable keys down one side and the Trackpoint hardware on the other. All I want to do is be able to read PDFs in color and at a reasonable scale.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Five to ten inches ?
Thanks , but I 'll pass.Is it just me , or is there anyone else out there who wants a big tablet instead of some small , sleek , fashionable , and largely useless piece of overpriced tech trinketry ?
At this point , I 'm about to pick up an old Thinkpad on eBay and make one myself -- and still probably come out cheaper than the latest and greatest .
And no , I do n't need a touch screen .
I 'd be perfectly content to mount a few programmable keys down one side and the Trackpoint hardware on the other .
All I want to do is be able to read PDFs in color and at a reasonable scale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Five to ten inches?
Thanks, but I'll pass.Is it just me, or is there anyone else out there who wants a big tablet instead of some small, sleek, fashionable, and largely useless piece of overpriced tech trinketry?
At this point, I'm about to pick up an old Thinkpad on eBay and make one myself -- and still probably come out cheaper than the latest and greatest.
And no, I don't need a touch screen.
I'd be perfectly content to mount a few programmable keys down one side and the Trackpoint hardware on the other.
All I want to do is be able to read PDFs in color and at a reasonable scale.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31000836</id>
	<title>me too?</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1265103600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't see why this got the "me too" tag.  People have been working on Chrome OS and Android-based tables for as long as those operating systems have been out.    The first Android tablets probably will ship before iPad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't see why this got the " me too " tag .
People have been working on Chrome OS and Android-based tables for as long as those operating systems have been out .
The first Android tablets probably will ship before iPad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't see why this got the "me too" tag.
People have been working on Chrome OS and Android-based tables for as long as those operating systems have been out.
The first Android tablets probably will ship before iPad.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998740</id>
	<title>Re:iPad buzz?</title>
	<author>severoon</author>
	<datestamp>1265138100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The buzz is: that's buzz. (The economy's not doing so hot, so marketing folks will take what they can get.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The buzz is : that 's buzz .
( The economy 's not doing so hot , so marketing folks will take what they can get .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The buzz is: that's buzz.
(The economy's not doing so hot, so marketing folks will take what they can get.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997394
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998928
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001846
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997496
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998740
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999370
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999848
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31008990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31008334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999474
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997308
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_02_167211_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998218
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998892
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002228
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999578
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999370
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997568
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998336
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999848
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001892
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997308
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997280
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998902
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001750
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998740
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997570
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001726
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999136
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998442
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002196
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999774
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002248
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998816
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999606
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31008990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001296
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998676
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997496
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998618
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997872
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001746
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998928
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002446
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002222
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31008334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001552
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997594
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997456
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30999682
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30997720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31002764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998158
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998936
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.30998886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31001846
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_02_167211.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_02_167211.31000304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
