<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_02_01_1555206</id>
	<title>Nokia N900 Linux Smartphone Running OS X</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1265046060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Rovaani writes <i>"There is a video floating around of a <a href="http://thenokiablog.com/2010/01/31/mac-os-x-nokia-n900/">Nokia N900 smartphone running the full desktop Mac OS X</a> 10.3. From the author, Tomi Nikkanen: 'I believe this makes the N900 the first smartphone ever to run a full version of Mac OS X (at any speed, slow or otherwise). As you can see from the heavily edited video, it took almost 2 hours to reach the "About my Mac..." window. Keep your eye on the time display as that will give you an impression of just how uselessly slow it is.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Rovaani writes " There is a video floating around of a Nokia N900 smartphone running the full desktop Mac OS X 10.3 .
From the author , Tomi Nikkanen : 'I believe this makes the N900 the first smartphone ever to run a full version of Mac OS X ( at any speed , slow or otherwise ) .
As you can see from the heavily edited video , it took almost 2 hours to reach the " About my Mac... " window .
Keep your eye on the time display as that will give you an impression of just how uselessly slow it is .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rovaani writes "There is a video floating around of a Nokia N900 smartphone running the full desktop Mac OS X 10.3.
From the author, Tomi Nikkanen: 'I believe this makes the N900 the first smartphone ever to run a full version of Mac OS X (at any speed, slow or otherwise).
As you can see from the heavily edited video, it took almost 2 hours to reach the "About my Mac..." window.
Keep your eye on the time display as that will give you an impression of just how uselessly slow it is.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985902</id>
	<title>Re:Mac 2010 is now Vista</title>
	<author>cheftw</author>
	<datestamp>1265015280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>People used to say, "Windows 95 is Mac 84."  The roles have now reversed.</p></div><p>So now "Windows 95 is Mac 84." says people?</p><p>That's deep man.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>People used to say , " Windows 95 is Mac 84 .
" The roles have now reversed.So now " Windows 95 is Mac 84 .
" says people ? That 's deep man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People used to say, "Windows 95 is Mac 84.
"  The roles have now reversed.So now "Windows 95 is Mac 84.
" says people?That's deep man.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30988950</id>
	<title>How can you read slashdot and have an Iphone</title>
	<author>nibbles2004</author>
	<datestamp>1265026800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>i think the Iphone is a toy like speak and spell, fun but a toy, there should be a N900 requirement to have slashdot in your favourites,</htmltext>
<tokenext>i think the Iphone is a toy like speak and spell , fun but a toy , there should be a N900 requirement to have slashdot in your favourites,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i think the Iphone is a toy like speak and spell, fun but a toy, there should be a N900 requirement to have slashdot in your favourites,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30989612</id>
	<title>Re:Love It</title>
	<author>gmhowell</author>
	<datestamp>1265029920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>i have a 32GB iphone. i have only 80GB of music. if i listened to music on my iphone 24x7 it would take me weeks to listen to everything once. who cares about having access to your entire music collection if it's going to take you 5 years to listen to it?</p><p>i don't even listen to full albums anymore. i have a bunch of smart playlists with different conditions and one with only my favorite songs from the entire collection. and my faves playlist is over 1000 songs and if i could i would cut it down to 100 or so to sync to my iphone but maybe in a future version of itunes.</p></div><p>Because if I get a bug up my ass to listen to a particular tune or album, I want that tune or album, not some substitute.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>i have a 32GB iphone .
i have only 80GB of music .
if i listened to music on my iphone 24x7 it would take me weeks to listen to everything once .
who cares about having access to your entire music collection if it 's going to take you 5 years to listen to it ? i do n't even listen to full albums anymore .
i have a bunch of smart playlists with different conditions and one with only my favorite songs from the entire collection .
and my faves playlist is over 1000 songs and if i could i would cut it down to 100 or so to sync to my iphone but maybe in a future version of itunes.Because if I get a bug up my ass to listen to a particular tune or album , I want that tune or album , not some substitute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i have a 32GB iphone.
i have only 80GB of music.
if i listened to music on my iphone 24x7 it would take me weeks to listen to everything once.
who cares about having access to your entire music collection if it's going to take you 5 years to listen to it?i don't even listen to full albums anymore.
i have a bunch of smart playlists with different conditions and one with only my favorite songs from the entire collection.
and my faves playlist is over 1000 songs and if i could i would cut it down to 100 or so to sync to my iphone but maybe in a future version of itunes.Because if I get a bug up my ass to listen to a particular tune or album, I want that tune or album, not some substitute.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987328</id>
	<title>Warning!</title>
	<author>WML MUNSON</author>
	<datestamp>1265020200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>The N900 may jeopardize your marriage.
<br> <br>
--<br>
Sent from my Nokia N900</htmltext>
<tokenext>The N900 may jeopardize your marriage .
-- Sent from my Nokia N900</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The N900 may jeopardize your marriage.
--
Sent from my Nokia N900</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987758</id>
	<title>OSX Bloat Proven!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265021820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We all knew it - OSX is Bloated.<br>Why do you think they need to control everything to get it to boot and run acceptably?</p><p>BTW, FF-mobile 1.0 is also bloated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We all knew it - OSX is Bloated.Why do you think they need to control everything to get it to boot and run acceptably ? BTW , FF-mobile 1.0 is also bloated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We all knew it - OSX is Bloated.Why do you think they need to control everything to get it to boot and run acceptably?BTW, FF-mobile 1.0 is also bloated.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582</id>
	<title>Somewhat unrelated, but</title>
	<author>nightfire-unique</author>
	<datestamp>1265053680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Though this isn't directly related to running OSX on the n900, I just wanted to add that.. I'm not surprised.</p><p>A while back I posted a story that was rejected, asking if any fellow<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.'ers had any experience with the n900 from a Unix admin's perspective.  To me it seemed like a dream-come-true device: high-res screen, fast CPU, lots of ram... and most importantly, running Debian.</p><p>I had to find out, so I bought one about 3 weeks ago.  It really, truly is a dream-come-true device.</p><p>I swear I'm not affiliated with Nokia in any way; I'm a Unix admin for a largish web firm.  But if anyone else is wondering, <b>yes</b> it runs a Debian-derived OS.  Yes, you can SSH into it as root, over 3G/GPRS, even if the phone is "off."  Yes, crond works.  Yes it runs native X11 and you can run your X11 apps (ie. directory manager, xterms, vncviewer, pidgin, openoffice/koffice, etc).  Yes it's stable.  The keyboard is usable, the UI is quick, and task switching is a breeze.  The filesystem layout is mostly sensible, and you can <i>apt-get dist-upgrade to get updates directly from Nokia (and other repositories)!</i> </p><p>That blew me away when I first saw it so let me say it again: Nokia is using <b>apt</b> to send updates OTA to the phone!  Proper version tagging and dependency management, <i>on a phone!</i> </p><p>It doesn't suspend like the crappy Zaurus did... when you hit the power switch, it shuts off the screen and (I believe) encourages the processor to drop to a very slow cycle rate (unless something heavy is running).  So your apps continue to run.  Battery life is ~16-24h with a constant GSM data/wifi connection, so you must charge every night.  But it's so worth it.</p><p>Everything about it is done the way this 15-year Linux/Solaris admin thinks it <i>should</i> be done.</p><p>So, back (slightly) on-topic.. it doesn't surprise me in the least that they got OSX to boot under an emulator.  The n900 is quite literally a pocket Debian workstation that happens to have a GSM radio onboard.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Though this is n't directly related to running OSX on the n900 , I just wanted to add that.. I 'm not surprised.A while back I posted a story that was rejected , asking if any fellow / .
'ers had any experience with the n900 from a Unix admin 's perspective .
To me it seemed like a dream-come-true device : high-res screen , fast CPU , lots of ram... and most importantly , running Debian.I had to find out , so I bought one about 3 weeks ago .
It really , truly is a dream-come-true device.I swear I 'm not affiliated with Nokia in any way ; I 'm a Unix admin for a largish web firm .
But if anyone else is wondering , yes it runs a Debian-derived OS .
Yes , you can SSH into it as root , over 3G/GPRS , even if the phone is " off .
" Yes , crond works .
Yes it runs native X11 and you can run your X11 apps ( ie .
directory manager , xterms , vncviewer , pidgin , openoffice/koffice , etc ) .
Yes it 's stable .
The keyboard is usable , the UI is quick , and task switching is a breeze .
The filesystem layout is mostly sensible , and you can apt-get dist-upgrade to get updates directly from Nokia ( and other repositories ) !
That blew me away when I first saw it so let me say it again : Nokia is using apt to send updates OTA to the phone !
Proper version tagging and dependency management , on a phone !
It does n't suspend like the crappy Zaurus did... when you hit the power switch , it shuts off the screen and ( I believe ) encourages the processor to drop to a very slow cycle rate ( unless something heavy is running ) .
So your apps continue to run .
Battery life is ~ 16-24h with a constant GSM data/wifi connection , so you must charge every night .
But it 's so worth it.Everything about it is done the way this 15-year Linux/Solaris admin thinks it should be done.So , back ( slightly ) on-topic.. it does n't surprise me in the least that they got OSX to boot under an emulator .
The n900 is quite literally a pocket Debian workstation that happens to have a GSM radio onboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though this isn't directly related to running OSX on the n900, I just wanted to add that.. I'm not surprised.A while back I posted a story that was rejected, asking if any fellow /.
'ers had any experience with the n900 from a Unix admin's perspective.
To me it seemed like a dream-come-true device: high-res screen, fast CPU, lots of ram... and most importantly, running Debian.I had to find out, so I bought one about 3 weeks ago.
It really, truly is a dream-come-true device.I swear I'm not affiliated with Nokia in any way; I'm a Unix admin for a largish web firm.
But if anyone else is wondering, yes it runs a Debian-derived OS.
Yes, you can SSH into it as root, over 3G/GPRS, even if the phone is "off.
"  Yes, crond works.
Yes it runs native X11 and you can run your X11 apps (ie.
directory manager, xterms, vncviewer, pidgin, openoffice/koffice, etc).
Yes it's stable.
The keyboard is usable, the UI is quick, and task switching is a breeze.
The filesystem layout is mostly sensible, and you can apt-get dist-upgrade to get updates directly from Nokia (and other repositories)!
That blew me away when I first saw it so let me say it again: Nokia is using apt to send updates OTA to the phone!
Proper version tagging and dependency management, on a phone!
It doesn't suspend like the crappy Zaurus did... when you hit the power switch, it shuts off the screen and (I believe) encourages the processor to drop to a very slow cycle rate (unless something heavy is running).
So your apps continue to run.
Battery life is ~16-24h with a constant GSM data/wifi connection, so you must charge every night.
But it's so worth it.Everything about it is done the way this 15-year Linux/Solaris admin thinks it should be done.So, back (slightly) on-topic.. it doesn't surprise me in the least that they got OSX to boot under an emulator.
The n900 is quite literally a pocket Debian workstation that happens to have a GSM radio onboard.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987120</id>
	<title>AH, what about memory?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265019360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think if anyone would look at the About this Mac screen it will show it as a G4, WITH ONLY 128mg RAM. OSX on a mac gives you a memory warning if you have less than 512 and doesn't install. The fact that it runs with 128mg memory is absolutely astounding. So I'm not surprised at all that it takes 2 hours to get anywhere.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think if anyone would look at the About this Mac screen it will show it as a G4 , WITH ONLY 128mg RAM .
OSX on a mac gives you a memory warning if you have less than 512 and does n't install .
The fact that it runs with 128mg memory is absolutely astounding .
So I 'm not surprised at all that it takes 2 hours to get anywhere .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think if anyone would look at the About this Mac screen it will show it as a G4, WITH ONLY 128mg RAM.
OSX on a mac gives you a memory warning if you have less than 512 and doesn't install.
The fact that it runs with 128mg memory is absolutely astounding.
So I'm not surprised at all that it takes 2 hours to get anywhere.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30989008</id>
	<title>Re:Useless commentary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265027100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is that a serious question?  Of course we would!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that a serious question ?
Of course we would !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that a serious question?
Of course we would!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30993478</id>
	<title>Re:Love It</title>
	<author>mgblst</author>
	<datestamp>1265114940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess ripping to flac really pays off when your playing it over the FM radio.</p><p>But seriously, in which country do you live where you get unlimited 3g data?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess ripping to flac really pays off when your playing it over the FM radio.But seriously , in which country do you live where you get unlimited 3g data ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess ripping to flac really pays off when your playing it over the FM radio.But seriously, in which country do you live where you get unlimited 3g data?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985194</id>
	<title>Re:Somewhat unrelated, but</title>
	<author>CortoMaltese</author>
	<datestamp>1265056260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Everything about it is done the way this 15-year Linux/Solaris admin thinks it <i>should</i> be done.</p></div><p>Ah, I see that you're still on honeymoon with your N900. It's got its wrinkles. Try 'cat<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/etc/sudoers' for a start. But I do agree with most of what you say. It is an amazing device.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Everything about it is done the way this 15-year Linux/Solaris admin thinks it should be done.Ah , I see that you 're still on honeymoon with your N900 .
It 's got its wrinkles .
Try 'cat /etc/sudoers ' for a start .
But I do agree with most of what you say .
It is an amazing device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everything about it is done the way this 15-year Linux/Solaris admin thinks it should be done.Ah, I see that you're still on honeymoon with your N900.
It's got its wrinkles.
Try 'cat /etc/sudoers' for a start.
But I do agree with most of what you say.
It is an amazing device.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30990258</id>
	<title>Re:Love It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265034000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I go. 1.5TB, ripped to flac on a server in my basement, [..]</p><p>Where else would your server stand than in you bedroom?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I go .
1.5TB , ripped to flac on a server in my basement , [ .. ] Where else would your server stand than in you bedroom ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I go.
1.5TB, ripped to flac on a server in my basement, [..]Where else would your server stand than in you bedroom?
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984426</id>
	<title>Re:Useless commentary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265053020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Mac (a Mac Pro with two 2.26GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon "Nehalem" processors and 6GB of RAM) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 20 minutes. At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.</p><p>In addition, during this file transfer, Warcraft will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even Safari is straining to keep up as I type this.</p><p>I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Macs, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Mac that has run faster than its Wintel counterpart, despite the Macs' faster chip architecture. My 486/66 with 8 megs of ram runs faster than this 2x 2.26Ghz 8-core machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the Macintosh is a superior machine.</p><p>Mac addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Mac over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want to start a holy war here , but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics ?
I 've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Mac ( a Mac Pro with two 2.26GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon " Nehalem " processors and 6GB of RAM ) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder .
20 minutes .
At home , on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4 , which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac , the same operation would take about 2 minutes .
If that.In addition , during this file transfer , Warcraft will not work .
And everything else has ground to a halt .
Even Safari is straining to keep up as I type this.I wo n't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I 've encountered while working on various Macs , but suffice it to say there have been many , not the least of which is I 've never seen a Mac that has run faster than its Wintel counterpart , despite the Macs ' faster chip architecture .
My 486/66 with 8 megs of ram runs faster than this 2x 2.26Ghz 8-core machine at times .
From a productivity standpoint , I do n't get how people can claim that the Macintosh is a superior machine.Mac addicts , flame me if you 'd like , but I 'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Mac over other faster , cheaper , more stable systems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics?
I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Mac (a Mac Pro with two 2.26GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon "Nehalem" processors and 6GB of RAM) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder.
20 minutes.
At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac, the same operation would take about 2 minutes.
If that.In addition, during this file transfer, Warcraft will not work.
And everything else has ground to a halt.
Even Safari is straining to keep up as I type this.I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Macs, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Mac that has run faster than its Wintel counterpart, despite the Macs' faster chip architecture.
My 486/66 with 8 megs of ram runs faster than this 2x 2.26Ghz 8-core machine at times.
From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the Macintosh is a superior machine.Mac addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Mac over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987522</id>
	<title>Re:Somewhat unrelated, but</title>
	<author>rgviza</author>
	<datestamp>1265020860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A better idea than an emulator, which will happen by the way, is to simply implement a good copy of the iPhone's interface on this.<br>check out the LG Vu mods to see what I'm talking about... www.lg-vu.com</p><p>GUIs are comparatively simple to copy. Much better than trying to emulate an OS. With the hardware this thing has a gui copy will run just as fast as a native iphone if it's done right and the underlying OS is efficient.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A better idea than an emulator , which will happen by the way , is to simply implement a good copy of the iPhone 's interface on this.check out the LG Vu mods to see what I 'm talking about... www.lg-vu.comGUIs are comparatively simple to copy .
Much better than trying to emulate an OS .
With the hardware this thing has a gui copy will run just as fast as a native iphone if it 's done right and the underlying OS is efficient .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A better idea than an emulator, which will happen by the way, is to simply implement a good copy of the iPhone's interface on this.check out the LG Vu mods to see what I'm talking about... www.lg-vu.comGUIs are comparatively simple to copy.
Much better than trying to emulate an OS.
With the hardware this thing has a gui copy will run just as fast as a native iphone if it's done right and the underlying OS is efficient.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716</id>
	<title>Useless commentary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265050140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>What's with the "uselessly slow" commentary.  The guy did it just to prove it could be done, which is pretty cool.  I don't think he ever made any assertion that it would be a usable OS alternative for the N900...</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's with the " uselessly slow " commentary .
The guy did it just to prove it could be done , which is pretty cool .
I do n't think he ever made any assertion that it would be a usable OS alternative for the N900.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's with the "uselessly slow" commentary.
The guy did it just to prove it could be done, which is pretty cool.
I don't think he ever made any assertion that it would be a usable OS alternative for the N900...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983884</id>
	<title>Re:Useless commentary</title>
	<author>marcansoft</author>
	<datestamp>1265050680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The emulator used is PearPC. I'm not sure if it does JIT/Dynamic Recompilation, but I seriously doubt it has an ARM backend, so chances are it's running in full software emulation mode, which is going to be ridiculously slow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The emulator used is PearPC .
I 'm not sure if it does JIT/Dynamic Recompilation , but I seriously doubt it has an ARM backend , so chances are it 's running in full software emulation mode , which is going to be ridiculously slow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The emulator used is PearPC.
I'm not sure if it does JIT/Dynamic Recompilation, but I seriously doubt it has an ARM backend, so chances are it's running in full software emulation mode, which is going to be ridiculously slow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987788</id>
	<title>Re:Useless commentary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265021940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My cardiac paper computer simulator running on a FORTRAN simulator, running on HP 2000 Basic interpreter on a hp 2100 Mini was slower.<br>Quit your bitching.</p><p>Kids!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My cardiac paper computer simulator running on a FORTRAN simulator , running on HP 2000 Basic interpreter on a hp 2100 Mini was slower.Quit your bitching.Kids !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My cardiac paper computer simulator running on a FORTRAN simulator, running on HP 2000 Basic interpreter on a hp 2100 Mini was slower.Quit your bitching.Kids!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983940</id>
	<title>Re:Useless commentary</title>
	<author>Nursie</author>
	<datestamp>1265050860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not even an OS for the n900, it's on an emulator.</p><p>No lack of kudos for it, but it's not like it's native... I have heard of one dual booting Maemo and Android, which I thought was pretty cool.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not even an OS for the n900 , it 's on an emulator.No lack of kudos for it , but it 's not like it 's native... I have heard of one dual booting Maemo and Android , which I thought was pretty cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not even an OS for the n900, it's on an emulator.No lack of kudos for it, but it's not like it's native... I have heard of one dual booting Maemo and Android, which I thought was pretty cool.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984872</id>
	<title>n900 - port iphone os to it!</title>
	<author>ardiri</author>
	<datestamp>1265055000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>10.3 was powerpc specific - and you can see from the screen shot that they are using pearpc - a powerpc emulation engine.</p><p>what would be much more interesting is to port iphone os to the n900 - it has an ARM cpu and should be able to run about the same speed as the iphone itself - that is more a challenge. putting msdos on symbian, android, iphone os, windows mobile is simply a matter of porting dosbox or so; when will someone take on the true challenge<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) take a recovery image and flash it to an ARM device with similar specs.. should be doable<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>10.3 was powerpc specific - and you can see from the screen shot that they are using pearpc - a powerpc emulation engine.what would be much more interesting is to port iphone os to the n900 - it has an ARM cpu and should be able to run about the same speed as the iphone itself - that is more a challenge .
putting msdos on symbian , android , iphone os , windows mobile is simply a matter of porting dosbox or so ; when will someone take on the true challenge : ) take a recovery image and flash it to an ARM device with similar specs.. should be doable : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>10.3 was powerpc specific - and you can see from the screen shot that they are using pearpc - a powerpc emulation engine.what would be much more interesting is to port iphone os to the n900 - it has an ARM cpu and should be able to run about the same speed as the iphone itself - that is more a challenge.
putting msdos on symbian, android, iphone os, windows mobile is simply a matter of porting dosbox or so; when will someone take on the true challenge :) take a recovery image and flash it to an ARM device with similar specs.. should be doable :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985638</id>
	<title>Yet another crappy summary</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1265057760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not so much running as walking, hobbling or crawling.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not so much running as walking , hobbling or crawling .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not so much running as walking, hobbling or crawling.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984448</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>IDK</author>
	<datestamp>1265053140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But does it run Linux?</htmltext>
<tokenext>But does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30996688</id>
	<title>does anyone know if it runs windows mobile?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265131140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>hello,</p><p>I'm very interested by the nokia n900, but I need an application that only exist for windows mobile.<br>does anyone know if it is possible to run windows mobile on the nokia n900?</p><p>I have searched the web and found nothing... guess that it is not (yet?) possible, or I can't use google properly<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p><p>regards,<br>jepht&#233;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>hello,I 'm very interested by the nokia n900 , but I need an application that only exist for windows mobile.does anyone know if it is possible to run windows mobile on the nokia n900 ? I have searched the web and found nothing... guess that it is not ( yet ?
) possible , or I ca n't use google properly : - ) regards,jepht  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>hello,I'm very interested by the nokia n900, but I need an application that only exist for windows mobile.does anyone know if it is possible to run windows mobile on the nokia n900?I have searched the web and found nothing... guess that it is not (yet?
) possible, or I can't use google properly :-)regards,jephté</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985524</id>
	<title>Re:Useless commentary</title>
	<author>maestro371</author>
	<datestamp>1265057400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're doing something very wrong.  I use an iMac and a Macbook Pro (both far weaker than the machine you're using) and routinely copy around gigabytes of data without the types of delays you're talking about.</p><p>I just did a quick test with dd and copy:</p><p>imac:~ justin$ date<br>Mon Feb  1 11:46:09 PST 2010<br>imac:~ justin$ dd if=/dev/zero of=./test bs=2048k count=20<br>20+0 records in<br>20+0 records out<br>41943040 bytes transferred in 0.562810 secs (74524341 bytes/sec)<br>imac:~ justin$ date<br>Mon Feb  1 11:46:19 PST 2010<br>imac:~ justin$ sudo cp test /<br>Password:<br>imac:~ justin$ date<br>Mon Feb  1 11:46:39 PST 2010<br>imac:~ justin$ ls -lah<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/test<br>-rw-r--r--  1 root  admin    40M Feb  1 11:46<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/test<br>imac:~ justin$</p><p>Even with pausing to think about what I was typing and to enter my sudo password, it took 30 seconds to create a 40MiB file and move it to another folder.  Honestly, it was probably more like 10 seconds, considering that most of that time was me being slow and mis-typing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're doing something very wrong .
I use an iMac and a Macbook Pro ( both far weaker than the machine you 're using ) and routinely copy around gigabytes of data without the types of delays you 're talking about.I just did a quick test with dd and copy : imac : ~ justin $ dateMon Feb 1 11 : 46 : 09 PST 2010imac : ~ justin $ dd if = /dev/zero of = ./test bs = 2048k count = 2020 + 0 records in20 + 0 records out41943040 bytes transferred in 0.562810 secs ( 74524341 bytes/sec ) imac : ~ justin $ dateMon Feb 1 11 : 46 : 19 PST 2010imac : ~ justin $ sudo cp test /Password : imac : ~ justin $ dateMon Feb 1 11 : 46 : 39 PST 2010imac : ~ justin $ ls -lah /test-rw-r--r-- 1 root admin 40M Feb 1 11 : 46 /testimac : ~ justin $ Even with pausing to think about what I was typing and to enter my sudo password , it took 30 seconds to create a 40MiB file and move it to another folder .
Honestly , it was probably more like 10 seconds , considering that most of that time was me being slow and mis-typing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're doing something very wrong.
I use an iMac and a Macbook Pro (both far weaker than the machine you're using) and routinely copy around gigabytes of data without the types of delays you're talking about.I just did a quick test with dd and copy:imac:~ justin$ dateMon Feb  1 11:46:09 PST 2010imac:~ justin$ dd if=/dev/zero of=./test bs=2048k count=2020+0 records in20+0 records out41943040 bytes transferred in 0.562810 secs (74524341 bytes/sec)imac:~ justin$ dateMon Feb  1 11:46:19 PST 2010imac:~ justin$ sudo cp test /Password:imac:~ justin$ dateMon Feb  1 11:46:39 PST 2010imac:~ justin$ ls -lah /test-rw-r--r--  1 root  admin    40M Feb  1 11:46 /testimac:~ justin$Even with pausing to think about what I was typing and to enter my sudo password, it took 30 seconds to create a 40MiB file and move it to another folder.
Honestly, it was probably more like 10 seconds, considering that most of that time was me being slow and mis-typing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30992144</id>
	<title>Definitely an emulator</title>
	<author>Casandro</author>
	<datestamp>1265052720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's definitely an emulator. Otherwise you couldn't run closed source software.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's definitely an emulator .
Otherwise you could n't run closed source software .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's definitely an emulator.
Otherwise you couldn't run closed source software.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983786</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986</id>
	<title>Love It</title>
	<author>LearnToSpell</author>
	<datestamp>1265051040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hate to sound like the eternal nuthugger, but I'm having so much fun with my N900.  Just threw on the cifs-mounting stuff, and that combined (alternated, really) with sshfs means I can take my entire music collection wherever I go.  1.5TB, ripped to flac on a server in my basement, so why would I want to have to choose what albums I take with me to the gym or work or wherever?  Just mount the thing and play.  Plus, there's an FM transmitter built-in, so I can just plunk it down next to (~15 feet) a radio, and fire it up.<br> <br>
The "it's so slow" comments are kind of silly.  This is obviously a POC, and a pretty nice one.  Any phone that can run Asterisk, Apache, nmap and OSX is cool in my book.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate to sound like the eternal nuthugger , but I 'm having so much fun with my N900 .
Just threw on the cifs-mounting stuff , and that combined ( alternated , really ) with sshfs means I can take my entire music collection wherever I go .
1.5TB , ripped to flac on a server in my basement , so why would I want to have to choose what albums I take with me to the gym or work or wherever ?
Just mount the thing and play .
Plus , there 's an FM transmitter built-in , so I can just plunk it down next to ( ~ 15 feet ) a radio , and fire it up .
The " it 's so slow " comments are kind of silly .
This is obviously a POC , and a pretty nice one .
Any phone that can run Asterisk , Apache , nmap and OSX is cool in my book .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate to sound like the eternal nuthugger, but I'm having so much fun with my N900.
Just threw on the cifs-mounting stuff, and that combined (alternated, really) with sshfs means I can take my entire music collection wherever I go.
1.5TB, ripped to flac on a server in my basement, so why would I want to have to choose what albums I take with me to the gym or work or wherever?
Just mount the thing and play.
Plus, there's an FM transmitter built-in, so I can just plunk it down next to (~15 feet) a radio, and fire it up.
The "it's so slow" comments are kind of silly.
This is obviously a POC, and a pretty nice one.
Any phone that can run Asterisk, Apache, nmap and OSX is cool in my book.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983686</id>
	<title>horsecock, sodomy</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265049960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>horsecock, sodomy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>horsecock , sodomy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>horsecock, sodomy</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30986442</id>
	<title>Perfect Slashdot 'Phone</title>
	<author>dunsurfin</author>
	<datestamp>1265017080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree. The N900 is pretty much the ideal 'phone for the Slashdot crowd. I was pretty surprised that there was not more commentary on the N900 here - it is more open than the Nexus One or the Milestone, with more features than you can shake a stick at.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree .
The N900 is pretty much the ideal 'phone for the Slashdot crowd .
I was pretty surprised that there was not more commentary on the N900 here - it is more open than the Nexus One or the Milestone , with more features than you can shake a stick at .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree.
The N900 is pretty much the ideal 'phone for the Slashdot crowd.
I was pretty surprised that there was not more commentary on the N900 here - it is more open than the Nexus One or the Milestone, with more features than you can shake a stick at.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984884</id>
	<title>Linux?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265055060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it's OS X it 'aint Linux. It's Darwin and that's BSD. If it's Debian (apt-get, etc.), then it's Linux. Make up your minds, please!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it 's OS X it 'aint Linux .
It 's Darwin and that 's BSD .
If it 's Debian ( apt-get , etc .
) , then it 's Linux .
Make up your minds , please !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it's OS X it 'aint Linux.
It's Darwin and that's BSD.
If it's Debian (apt-get, etc.
), then it's Linux.
Make up your minds, please!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984230</id>
	<title>Cool, but.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265052060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.....but does it run Linux?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.....but does it run Linux ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.....but does it run Linux?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30995486</id>
	<title>Re:Love It</title>
	<author>muckracer</author>
	<datestamp>1265127120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; means I can take my entire music collection wherever I go. 1.5TB, ripped to flac</p><p>Good thing, you didn't rip it into OGG...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; means I can take my entire music collection wherever I go .
1.5TB , ripped to flacGood thing , you did n't rip it into OGG... : -/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; means I can take my entire music collection wherever I go.
1.5TB, ripped to flacGood thing, you didn't rip it into OGG... :-/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30992142</id>
	<title>Re:Somewhat unrelated, but</title>
	<author>nightfire-unique</author>
	<datestamp>1265052720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ok, I talked it up <i>a little.</i>  But I've gone far past the honeymoon phase... I already rewrote my sudoers (so I can just sudo su - with a password), changed the hostname, set up openvpn, cleaned up the filesystem layout, and recently I've been playing with the sound engine, trying to hack in a more useful equalizer.</p><p>It has some issues, sure... but amazingly few for a device only 2 months old.  I have confidence Nokia will address them in the upcoming updates, and if not... hey<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... more hacking.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ok , I talked it up a little .
But I 've gone far past the honeymoon phase... I already rewrote my sudoers ( so I can just sudo su - with a password ) , changed the hostname , set up openvpn , cleaned up the filesystem layout , and recently I 've been playing with the sound engine , trying to hack in a more useful equalizer.It has some issues , sure... but amazingly few for a device only 2 months old .
I have confidence Nokia will address them in the upcoming updates , and if not... hey ... more hacking .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ok, I talked it up a little.
But I've gone far past the honeymoon phase... I already rewrote my sudoers (so I can just sudo su - with a password), changed the hostname, set up openvpn, cleaned up the filesystem layout, and recently I've been playing with the sound engine, trying to hack in a more useful equalizer.It has some issues, sure... but amazingly few for a device only 2 months old.
I have confidence Nokia will address them in the upcoming updates, and if not... hey ... more hacking.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984342</id>
	<title>Re:Love It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265052600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>1.5TB</p></div><p>Impressive.  Equally impressive is the amount of MONEY you spent on ALL THAT MUSIC!  (Even if it is losslessly compressed).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>1.5TBImpressive .
Equally impressive is the amount of MONEY you spent on ALL THAT MUSIC !
( Even if it is losslessly compressed ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.5TBImpressive.
Equally impressive is the amount of MONEY you spent on ALL THAT MUSIC!
(Even if it is losslessly compressed).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984506</id>
	<title>Re:Useless commentary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265053440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>The guy did it just to prove it could be done, which is pretty cool.</i> <br> If I poop off a 200m cell phone tower would you be impressed to?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The guy did it just to prove it could be done , which is pretty cool .
If I poop off a 200m cell phone tower would you be impressed to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The guy did it just to prove it could be done, which is pretty cool.
If I poop off a 200m cell phone tower would you be impressed to?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984510</id>
	<title>Probably includes ripped DVDs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265053440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And it's easy to get 1.5TB with 80 TV series on DVD.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And it 's easy to get 1.5TB with 80 TV series on DVD .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it's easy to get 1.5TB with 80 TV series on DVD.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987802</id>
	<title>Oh For god's sake.</title>
	<author>thechanklybore</author>
	<datestamp>1265022000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh for god's sake. It's a linux box, of <b>COURSE</b> it runs Pear PC.</p><p>However, it's a total waste of everyone's time. Who cares? Really? This is only interesting for twitter and digg retards. When did this sort of crap become news?! Arghh. Yes I know. I'm not new here. I'll be quiet and go back to rocking back and forth in a corner.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh for god 's sake .
It 's a linux box , of COURSE it runs Pear PC.However , it 's a total waste of everyone 's time .
Who cares ?
Really ? This is only interesting for twitter and digg retards .
When did this sort of crap become news ? !
Arghh. Yes I know .
I 'm not new here .
I 'll be quiet and go back to rocking back and forth in a corner .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh for god's sake.
It's a linux box, of COURSE it runs Pear PC.However, it's a total waste of everyone's time.
Who cares?
Really? This is only interesting for twitter and digg retards.
When did this sort of crap become news?!
Arghh. Yes I know.
I'm not new here.
I'll be quiet and go back to rocking back and forth in a corner.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984856</id>
	<title>Re:Love It</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265054940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hey, by the way, did you know Nokia makes this model of phone, the N900, that runs Linux?  And incidentally, you can use the Nokia N900, which runs Linux, which is better than $CURRENT\_DISCUSSED\_PHONE.  Oh, there's also the N900, a Linux smartphone, which runs Linux, and is Linux and Linux and Linux and Linux and Linux.</p><p>Seriously, I'm pretty well a Linux diehard, I like open systems, I like cool systems, and I like things that use Linux, but when I hear N900 fanatics crowbar their phone into any discussion about any phone, anywhere, at any time, it makes me question my OS of choice.  And now we actually have a Slashdot article involving the N900.  Ye gods, this is going to be an infinite loop unless someone added some check in your hard-wired brain to not start a new evangelizing thread if someone actually mentions the N900 itself.</p><p>do {<br>if($TOPIC eq "Cell Phones") evangelize();<br>} while($slashdot-&gt;getNextArticle());</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hey , by the way , did you know Nokia makes this model of phone , the N900 , that runs Linux ?
And incidentally , you can use the Nokia N900 , which runs Linux , which is better than $ CURRENT \ _DISCUSSED \ _PHONE .
Oh , there 's also the N900 , a Linux smartphone , which runs Linux , and is Linux and Linux and Linux and Linux and Linux.Seriously , I 'm pretty well a Linux diehard , I like open systems , I like cool systems , and I like things that use Linux , but when I hear N900 fanatics crowbar their phone into any discussion about any phone , anywhere , at any time , it makes me question my OS of choice .
And now we actually have a Slashdot article involving the N900 .
Ye gods , this is going to be an infinite loop unless someone added some check in your hard-wired brain to not start a new evangelizing thread if someone actually mentions the N900 itself.do { if ( $ TOPIC eq " Cell Phones " ) evangelize ( ) ; } while ( $ slashdot- &gt; getNextArticle ( ) ) ;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hey, by the way, did you know Nokia makes this model of phone, the N900, that runs Linux?
And incidentally, you can use the Nokia N900, which runs Linux, which is better than $CURRENT\_DISCUSSED\_PHONE.
Oh, there's also the N900, a Linux smartphone, which runs Linux, and is Linux and Linux and Linux and Linux and Linux.Seriously, I'm pretty well a Linux diehard, I like open systems, I like cool systems, and I like things that use Linux, but when I hear N900 fanatics crowbar their phone into any discussion about any phone, anywhere, at any time, it makes me question my OS of choice.
And now we actually have a Slashdot article involving the N900.
Ye gods, this is going to be an infinite loop unless someone added some check in your hard-wired brain to not start a new evangelizing thread if someone actually mentions the N900 itself.do {if($TOPIC eq "Cell Phones") evangelize();} while($slashdot-&gt;getNextArticle());</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30988478</id>
	<title>Obligatory /. meme</title>
	<author>jonaskoelker</author>
	<datestamp>1265025060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but does it run... oh wait, yeah, it <em>does</em> run Linux.</p><p>Awesome(ly)!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but does it run... oh wait , yeah , it does run Linux.Awesome ( ly ) !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but does it run... oh wait, yeah, it does run Linux.Awesome(ly)!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983786</id>
	<title>Re:Useless commentary</title>
	<author>TheRaven64</author>
	<datestamp>1265050440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>OS X 10.3 was PowerPC-only.  The N900 has an ARM CPU.  The 'uselessly slow' commentary comes from the fact that it's running in an emulator (QEMU?  I didn't RTFA), so it's not like the phone is running the OS, the phone is running the emulator and the emulator is running the OS.  Remember the people running PowerPC OS X  emulated on P3/P4 CPUs before the first Intel release?  It's going to be even slower than that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OS X 10.3 was PowerPC-only .
The N900 has an ARM CPU .
The 'uselessly slow ' commentary comes from the fact that it 's running in an emulator ( QEMU ?
I did n't RTFA ) , so it 's not like the phone is running the OS , the phone is running the emulator and the emulator is running the OS .
Remember the people running PowerPC OS X emulated on P3/P4 CPUs before the first Intel release ?
It 's going to be even slower than that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OS X 10.3 was PowerPC-only.
The N900 has an ARM CPU.
The 'uselessly slow' commentary comes from the fact that it's running in an emulator (QEMU?
I didn't RTFA), so it's not like the phone is running the OS, the phone is running the emulator and the emulator is running the OS.
Remember the people running PowerPC OS X  emulated on P3/P4 CPUs before the first Intel release?
It's going to be even slower than that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30991506</id>
	<title>Derp derp</title>
	<author>newtown1100</author>
	<datestamp>1265044740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps you could run your friend's crack of CS3 on that? Go ahead, be Picasso!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps you could run your friend 's crack of CS3 on that ?
Go ahead , be Picasso !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps you could run your friend's crack of CS3 on that?
Go ahead, be Picasso!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984640</id>
	<title>It doesn't run OSX.</title>
	<author>Rufty</author>
	<datestamp>1265054040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It barely even crawls OSX.
(Cool hack, though.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>It barely even crawls OSX .
( Cool hack , though .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It barely even crawls OSX.
(Cool hack, though.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984158</id>
	<title>realistic Mac performance</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265051760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"uselessly show" sounds like pretty realistic Mac performance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" uselessly show " sounds like pretty realistic Mac performance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"uselessly show" sounds like pretty realistic Mac performance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30989714</id>
	<title>Re:Useless commentary</title>
	<author>keeboo</author>
	<datestamp>1265030580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Mac (a Mac Pro with two 2.26GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon "Nehalem" processors and 6GB of RAM) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 20 minutes. At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.</p></div><p>
I'm no Mac fan at all, but there must be something seriously wrong with your Mac, or you forgot to tell us some &quot;little detail&quot;.<br>
Mac OS pre-X was rubbish, I remember that Linux ran faster in a Performa 6360 than its native OS.<br>
<br>
But a Mac Pro with Mac OS X copying a file slower than 1MB/sec? I find it hard to believe. Even a 7MHz Amiga was faster than this.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't want to start a holy war here , but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics ?
I 've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Mac ( a Mac Pro with two 2.26GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon " Nehalem " processors and 6GB of RAM ) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder .
20 minutes .
At home , on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4 , which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac , the same operation would take about 2 minutes .
If that .
I 'm no Mac fan at all , but there must be something seriously wrong with your Mac , or you forgot to tell us some " little detail " .
Mac OS pre-X was rubbish , I remember that Linux ran faster in a Performa 6360 than its native OS .
But a Mac Pro with Mac OS X copying a file slower than 1MB/sec ?
I find it hard to believe .
Even a 7MHz Amiga was faster than this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics?
I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Mac (a Mac Pro with two 2.26GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon "Nehalem" processors and 6GB of RAM) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder.
20 minutes.
At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac, the same operation would take about 2 minutes.
If that.
I'm no Mac fan at all, but there must be something seriously wrong with your Mac, or you forgot to tell us some "little detail".
Mac OS pre-X was rubbish, I remember that Linux ran faster in a Performa 6360 than its native OS.
But a Mac Pro with Mac OS X copying a file slower than 1MB/sec?
I find it hard to believe.
Even a 7MHz Amiga was faster than this.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984050</id>
	<title>I can boot Linux on...</title>
	<author>InsaneProcessor</author>
	<datestamp>1265051340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can boot Linux on my T-mobile G1.  I guess that is.....well.....oops.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can boot Linux on my T-mobile G1 .
I guess that is.....well.....oops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can boot Linux on my T-mobile G1.
I guess that is.....well.....oops.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983912</id>
	<title>Re:Useless commentary</title>
	<author>uhoreg</author>
	<datestamp>1265050740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The "uselessly slow" commentary is straight from the blog of the guy who did it.  <a href="http://www.tuug.fi/~toni/serendipity/index.php?/archives/13-Mac-OS-X-10.3-running-on-the-N900!.html" title="www.tuug.fi">http://www.tuug.fi/~toni/serendipity/index.php?/archives/13-Mac-OS-X-10.3-running-on-the-N900!.html</a> [www.tuug.fi]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The " uselessly slow " commentary is straight from the blog of the guy who did it .
http : //www.tuug.fi/ ~ toni/serendipity/index.php ? /archives/13-Mac-OS-X-10.3-running-on-the-N900 ! .html [ www.tuug.fi ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "uselessly slow" commentary is straight from the blog of the guy who did it.
http://www.tuug.fi/~toni/serendipity/index.php?/archives/13-Mac-OS-X-10.3-running-on-the-N900!.html [www.tuug.fi]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984040</id>
	<title>What the heck!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265051280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just watched that video and I was sucked into a time vortex, I experienced a feeling of time standing still for what must have been over 5 minutes, and poof, according to the video 2 hours had past.<br>*YAAaaawn*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just watched that video and I was sucked into a time vortex , I experienced a feeling of time standing still for what must have been over 5 minutes , and poof , according to the video 2 hours had past .
* YAAaaawn *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just watched that video and I was sucked into a time vortex, I experienced a feeling of time standing still for what must have been over 5 minutes, and poof, according to the video 2 hours had past.
*YAAaaawn*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984470</id>
	<title>Mac 2010 is now Vista</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265053260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>it took almost 2 hours to reach the "About my Mac..." window. Keep your eye on the time display as that will give you an impression of just how uselessly slow it is.</p></div><p>People used to say, "Windows 95 is Mac 84."  The roles have now reversed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it took almost 2 hours to reach the " About my Mac... " window .
Keep your eye on the time display as that will give you an impression of just how uselessly slow it is.People used to say , " Windows 95 is Mac 84 .
" The roles have now reversed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it took almost 2 hours to reach the "About my Mac..." window.
Keep your eye on the time display as that will give you an impression of just how uselessly slow it is.People used to say, "Windows 95 is Mac 84.
"  The roles have now reversed.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985936</id>
	<title>Re:Somewhat unrelated, but</title>
	<author>Bob The Cowboy</author>
	<datestamp>1265015340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds wonderful... if only it would work on Verizon's network<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:o(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds wonderful... if only it would work on Verizon 's network : o (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds wonderful... if only it would work on Verizon's network :o(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984264</id>
	<title>Re:Love It</title>
	<author>alen</author>
	<datestamp>1265052240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i have a 32GB iphone. i have only 80GB of music. if i listened to music on my iphone 24x7 it would take me weeks to listen to everything once. who cares about having access to your entire music collection if it's going to take you 5 years to listen to it?</p><p>i don't even listen to full albums anymore. i have a bunch of smart playlists with different conditions and one with only my favorite songs from the entire collection. and my faves playlist is over 1000 songs and if i could i would cut it down to 100 or so to sync to my iphone but maybe in a future version of itunes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i have a 32GB iphone .
i have only 80GB of music .
if i listened to music on my iphone 24x7 it would take me weeks to listen to everything once .
who cares about having access to your entire music collection if it 's going to take you 5 years to listen to it ? i do n't even listen to full albums anymore .
i have a bunch of smart playlists with different conditions and one with only my favorite songs from the entire collection .
and my faves playlist is over 1000 songs and if i could i would cut it down to 100 or so to sync to my iphone but maybe in a future version of itunes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i have a 32GB iphone.
i have only 80GB of music.
if i listened to music on my iphone 24x7 it would take me weeks to listen to everything once.
who cares about having access to your entire music collection if it's going to take you 5 years to listen to it?i don't even listen to full albums anymore.
i have a bunch of smart playlists with different conditions and one with only my favorite songs from the entire collection.
and my faves playlist is over 1000 songs and if i could i would cut it down to 100 or so to sync to my iphone but maybe in a future version of itunes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30992144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30986442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30993478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984470
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30989714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30988478
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30992142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30989612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30995486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30990258
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_02_01_1555206_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30989008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1555206.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987120
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1555206.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983716
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984426
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985524
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30989714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984506
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30989008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983786
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30992144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987788
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983884
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1555206.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30983986
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984264
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30989612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984856
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984342
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30990258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30993478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30995486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1555206.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30988478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987328
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985194
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30992142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30987522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30986442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1555206.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1555206.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_02_01_1555206.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30984470
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_02_01_1555206.30985902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
