<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_30_2026204</id>
	<title>Boot Camp Finally Supports Windows 7 On Macs</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1264846920000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.cs.unc.edu/~knott" rel="nofollow">Dave Knott</a> writes <i>"After <a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/01/01/2247245/Apple-Fails-To-Deliver-On-Windows-7-Boot-Camp-Promise?art\_pos=1">some delay</a> Apple has <a href="http://www.apple.com/support/bootcamp/">updated Boot Camp to support Windows 7</a> on Macintosh computers.  They have also provided an <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/DL977">upgrade utility</a> that facilitates transition to Windows 7 for Mac owners who have existing Vista installations.  The new version of Boot Camp <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3986">requires OS X 10.6</a> (Snow Leopard)."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dave Knott writes " After some delay Apple has updated Boot Camp to support Windows 7 on Macintosh computers .
They have also provided an upgrade utility that facilitates transition to Windows 7 for Mac owners who have existing Vista installations .
The new version of Boot Camp requires OS X 10.6 ( Snow Leopard ) .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dave Knott writes "After some delay Apple has updated Boot Camp to support Windows 7 on Macintosh computers.
They have also provided an upgrade utility that facilitates transition to Windows 7 for Mac owners who have existing Vista installations.
The new version of Boot Camp requires OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard).
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969654</id>
	<title>Re:In other words</title>
	<author>uglyduckling</author>
	<datestamp>1264945140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it really unreasonable for Apple to require a $30 upgrade to get support for the latest Microsoft operating system?  I guess if you see a Mac as a generic PC that ought to be able to run any operating system, then maybe (although many smaller manufacturers will \_never\_ release Windows 7 drivers for their older hardware).  However, Boot Camp is more than a boot manager, and it's designed to get the two systems running alongside each other with the minimum hassle. Requiring you to use the latest version of their OS to do that isn't really unreasonable at all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it really unreasonable for Apple to require a $ 30 upgrade to get support for the latest Microsoft operating system ?
I guess if you see a Mac as a generic PC that ought to be able to run any operating system , then maybe ( although many smaller manufacturers will \ _never \ _ release Windows 7 drivers for their older hardware ) .
However , Boot Camp is more than a boot manager , and it 's designed to get the two systems running alongside each other with the minimum hassle .
Requiring you to use the latest version of their OS to do that is n't really unreasonable at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it really unreasonable for Apple to require a $30 upgrade to get support for the latest Microsoft operating system?
I guess if you see a Mac as a generic PC that ought to be able to run any operating system, then maybe (although many smaller manufacturers will \_never\_ release Windows 7 drivers for their older hardware).
However, Boot Camp is more than a boot manager, and it's designed to get the two systems running alongside each other with the minimum hassle.
Requiring you to use the latest version of their OS to do that isn't really unreasonable at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966506</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>lukas84</author>
	<datestamp>1264855260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Only in the US, though.</p><p>Everywhere else, you can buy System Builder (not to be confused with OEM licenses, though many people refer to SBE as OEM) licenses. They're pretty reasonable, around 120$ for Home Premium. The license is bound to the hardware with the first installation though (legally - technically, you can still activate other machines by calling up Microsoft).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Only in the US , though.Everywhere else , you can buy System Builder ( not to be confused with OEM licenses , though many people refer to SBE as OEM ) licenses .
They 're pretty reasonable , around 120 $ for Home Premium .
The license is bound to the hardware with the first installation though ( legally - technically , you can still activate other machines by calling up Microsoft ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Only in the US, though.Everywhere else, you can buy System Builder (not to be confused with OEM licenses, though many people refer to SBE as OEM) licenses.
They're pretty reasonable, around 120$ for Home Premium.
The license is bound to the hardware with the first installation though (legally - technically, you can still activate other machines by calling up Microsoft).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966114</id>
	<title>Great news</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264851180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is great news for the gay and lesbian community (not that there's anything wrong with that, BTW).</p><p>I applaud Apple for their unceasing support for rainbow nerds everywhere.</p><p>Regards,<br>Father Paul Flannigan</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is great news for the gay and lesbian community ( not that there 's anything wrong with that , BTW ) .I applaud Apple for their unceasing support for rainbow nerds everywhere.Regards,Father Paul Flannigan</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is great news for the gay and lesbian community (not that there's anything wrong with that, BTW).I applaud Apple for their unceasing support for rainbow nerds everywhere.Regards,Father Paul Flannigan</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966730</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1264857060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And playing games in a VM still isn't as good as native, no matter how hard they try or claim that it is.  Removing 2 layers of indirection (OS X and the Hypervisor) can't hurt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And playing games in a VM still is n't as good as native , no matter how hard they try or claim that it is .
Removing 2 layers of indirection ( OS X and the Hypervisor ) ca n't hurt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And playing games in a VM still isn't as good as native, no matter how hard they try or claim that it is.
Removing 2 layers of indirection (OS X and the Hypervisor) can't hurt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966744</id>
	<title>Re:I'm going to buy a Mac just to run Windows.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264857120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is unclear to me why you would have to spend 3x as much to run Windows. I recently went Mac and I did price comparisons and found the difference to be $100 in favor of comparable Dells. Only then because they were having some kind of fire sale.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is unclear to me why you would have to spend 3x as much to run Windows .
I recently went Mac and I did price comparisons and found the difference to be $ 100 in favor of comparable Dells .
Only then because they were having some kind of fire sale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is unclear to me why you would have to spend 3x as much to run Windows.
I recently went Mac and I did price comparisons and found the difference to be $100 in favor of comparable Dells.
Only then because they were having some kind of fire sale.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1264852800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course, the problem with running Windows on a Mac is Microsoft's pricing structure. Boot Camp or Parallels or VMware or VirtualBox needs a retail copy of Windows. But it turns out that one can actually buy a whole PC running Windows, including a spare keyboard and mouse, for close to the price of a retail copy of Windows.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , the problem with running Windows on a Mac is Microsoft 's pricing structure .
Boot Camp or Parallels or VMware or VirtualBox needs a retail copy of Windows .
But it turns out that one can actually buy a whole PC running Windows , including a spare keyboard and mouse , for close to the price of a retail copy of Windows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, the problem with running Windows on a Mac is Microsoft's pricing structure.
Boot Camp or Parallels or VMware or VirtualBox needs a retail copy of Windows.
But it turns out that one can actually buy a whole PC running Windows, including a spare keyboard and mouse, for close to the price of a retail copy of Windows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966534</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>kjart</author>
	<datestamp>1264855440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Of course, the problem with running Windows on a Mac is Microsoft's pricing structure. Boot Camp or Parallels or VMware or VirtualBox needs a retail copy of Windows. But it turns out that one can actually buy a whole PC running Windows, including a spare keyboard and mouse, for close to the price of a retail copy of Windows.</p></div><p>I agree that the pricing of retail Windows is pretty ridiculous, and it continues to surprise me that people buy Windows that way. That being said, I don't like the fact that you have to upgrade OS X in order to get driver support for a new version of Windows. This isn't unusual in the software vendor world (i.e. buy new version to get new features) but it sure is abnormal in the hardware world, and Apple is the hardware vendor in this case. I really shouldn't have to buy your OS to get functioning drivers for your hardware in someone else's OS.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , the problem with running Windows on a Mac is Microsoft 's pricing structure .
Boot Camp or Parallels or VMware or VirtualBox needs a retail copy of Windows .
But it turns out that one can actually buy a whole PC running Windows , including a spare keyboard and mouse , for close to the price of a retail copy of Windows.I agree that the pricing of retail Windows is pretty ridiculous , and it continues to surprise me that people buy Windows that way .
That being said , I do n't like the fact that you have to upgrade OS X in order to get driver support for a new version of Windows .
This is n't unusual in the software vendor world ( i.e .
buy new version to get new features ) but it sure is abnormal in the hardware world , and Apple is the hardware vendor in this case .
I really should n't have to buy your OS to get functioning drivers for your hardware in someone else 's OS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, the problem with running Windows on a Mac is Microsoft's pricing structure.
Boot Camp or Parallels or VMware or VirtualBox needs a retail copy of Windows.
But it turns out that one can actually buy a whole PC running Windows, including a spare keyboard and mouse, for close to the price of a retail copy of Windows.I agree that the pricing of retail Windows is pretty ridiculous, and it continues to surprise me that people buy Windows that way.
That being said, I don't like the fact that you have to upgrade OS X in order to get driver support for a new version of Windows.
This isn't unusual in the software vendor world (i.e.
buy new version to get new features) but it sure is abnormal in the hardware world, and Apple is the hardware vendor in this case.
I really shouldn't have to buy your OS to get functioning drivers for your hardware in someone else's OS.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966024</id>
	<title>In other words</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264850640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You  won't buy their new operating system untuil you get ours.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You wo n't buy their new operating system untuil you get ours .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You  won't buy their new operating system untuil you get ours.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30978442</id>
	<title>Re:Why do need to buy 10.6 to get this? more ways</title>
	<author>Angostura</author>
	<datestamp>1265016360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, it will run, but knowledgeable people tell me that without the proper bootcamp drivers it is possible to damage the CPU. Apparently conventional PC boards handle all of the power management in firmware. Apple saves a bit of cash by putting some of the functionality in the OS. Bottom line, don't use the proper drivers and your CPU can be getting a bit too much voltage in normal use. This usually isn't a problem, but it can make the machine run hot and may shorten the CPU life.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , it will run , but knowledgeable people tell me that without the proper bootcamp drivers it is possible to damage the CPU .
Apparently conventional PC boards handle all of the power management in firmware .
Apple saves a bit of cash by putting some of the functionality in the OS .
Bottom line , do n't use the proper drivers and your CPU can be getting a bit too much voltage in normal use .
This usually is n't a problem , but it can make the machine run hot and may shorten the CPU life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, it will run, but knowledgeable people tell me that without the proper bootcamp drivers it is possible to damage the CPU.
Apparently conventional PC boards handle all of the power management in firmware.
Apple saves a bit of cash by putting some of the functionality in the OS.
Bottom line, don't use the proper drivers and your CPU can be getting a bit too much voltage in normal use.
This usually isn't a problem, but it can make the machine run hot and may shorten the CPU life.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238</id>
	<title>Good place to ask for help</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1264852380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want to install windows XP on my wife's macbook pro. A ran bootcamp and windows installed okay but my XP install disk is pre service pack 2. The apple drivers for windows on the macbook require SP2. Windows can't use the ethernet or wifi to upgrade itself. Microsoft don't give you a simple executable to download to upgrade to later service packs unless you have a special account with them.</p><p>My brother gave me an executable which supposedly will install SP2 but it failed for a bizarre reason (claims only 3 megabytes free, I have about 80 Gig).</p><p>So I am stuck. Any suggestions? Thanks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to install windows XP on my wife 's macbook pro .
A ran bootcamp and windows installed okay but my XP install disk is pre service pack 2 .
The apple drivers for windows on the macbook require SP2 .
Windows ca n't use the ethernet or wifi to upgrade itself .
Microsoft do n't give you a simple executable to download to upgrade to later service packs unless you have a special account with them.My brother gave me an executable which supposedly will install SP2 but it failed for a bizarre reason ( claims only 3 megabytes free , I have about 80 Gig ) .So I am stuck .
Any suggestions ?
Thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to install windows XP on my wife's macbook pro.
A ran bootcamp and windows installed okay but my XP install disk is pre service pack 2.
The apple drivers for windows on the macbook require SP2.
Windows can't use the ethernet or wifi to upgrade itself.
Microsoft don't give you a simple executable to download to upgrade to later service packs unless you have a special account with them.My brother gave me an executable which supposedly will install SP2 but it failed for a bizarre reason (claims only 3 megabytes free, I have about 80 Gig).So I am stuck.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966826</id>
	<title>Re:Good place to ask for help</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1264857960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe the installer is broken. You could try downloading SP3:</p><p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=5B33B5A8-5E76-401F-BE08-1E1555D4F3D4&amp;displaylang=en" title="microsoft.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=5B33B5A8-5E76-401F-BE08-1E1555D4F3D4&amp;displaylang=en</a> [microsoft.com]</p><p>(or SP2, it is available in a similar package)</p><p>If the installer is intact, you are of into fun fun haha land.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe the installer is broken .
You could try downloading SP3 : http : //www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx ? FamilyId = 5B33B5A8-5E76-401F-BE08-1E1555D4F3D4&amp;displaylang = en [ microsoft.com ] ( or SP2 , it is available in a similar package ) If the installer is intact , you are of into fun fun haha land .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe the installer is broken.
You could try downloading SP3:http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=5B33B5A8-5E76-401F-BE08-1E1555D4F3D4&amp;displaylang=en [microsoft.com](or SP2, it is available in a similar package)If the installer is intact, you are of into fun fun haha land.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969674</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>uglyduckling</author>
	<datestamp>1264945440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've not had any problems getting my OEM copy of Windows XP installed under Parallels.  I can't vouch for news OSs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've not had any problems getting my OEM copy of Windows XP installed under Parallels .
I ca n't vouch for news OSs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've not had any problems getting my OEM copy of Windows XP installed under Parallels.
I can't vouch for news OSs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966050</id>
	<title>I'm going to buy a Mac just to run Windows.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264850820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lately I've been thinking about buying a Mac. It's not because I want to run Mac OS X; I don't. I want it just to run Windows.</p><p>Why would I spend three times as much on a Mac just to run Windows, when I could buy a Dell instead? Well, it's because I want to support Apple as best I can. I love my iPhone, and I will get an iPad as soon as I can. Apple has earned my love, and my support.</p><p>I just wish that iPhone OS ran on their desktop systems. It's the best operating system I've used in a long time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lately I 've been thinking about buying a Mac .
It 's not because I want to run Mac OS X ; I do n't .
I want it just to run Windows.Why would I spend three times as much on a Mac just to run Windows , when I could buy a Dell instead ?
Well , it 's because I want to support Apple as best I can .
I love my iPhone , and I will get an iPad as soon as I can .
Apple has earned my love , and my support.I just wish that iPhone OS ran on their desktop systems .
It 's the best operating system I 've used in a long time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lately I've been thinking about buying a Mac.
It's not because I want to run Mac OS X; I don't.
I want it just to run Windows.Why would I spend three times as much on a Mac just to run Windows, when I could buy a Dell instead?
Well, it's because I want to support Apple as best I can.
I love my iPhone, and I will get an iPad as soon as I can.
Apple has earned my love, and my support.I just wish that iPhone OS ran on their desktop systems.
It's the best operating system I've used in a long time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966162</id>
	<title>Re:I've been running it for months....</title>
	<author>cybermancer</author>
	<datestamp>1264851660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been running Windows 7 (MSDN final) on Snow Leopard bootcamp since it came out.  So not sure what this "update" adds.  One problem I did have was with the mini-dvi to VGA adapter forcing it into 640x480 resolution, but that appeared to also be an issue for Vista.  Hopefully they finally fixed it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been running Windows 7 ( MSDN final ) on Snow Leopard bootcamp since it came out .
So not sure what this " update " adds .
One problem I did have was with the mini-dvi to VGA adapter forcing it into 640x480 resolution , but that appeared to also be an issue for Vista .
Hopefully they finally fixed it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been running Windows 7 (MSDN final) on Snow Leopard bootcamp since it came out.
So not sure what this "update" adds.
One problem I did have was with the mini-dvi to VGA adapter forcing it into 640x480 resolution, but that appeared to also be an issue for Vista.
Hopefully they finally fixed it!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106</id>
	<title>I've been running it for months....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264851060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been running Windows 7 Eval edition since august when OS 10.6 came out.  Even without bootcamp, it dectected my wireless card and intel graphics on my MacBook without any problems.  How is this just now news?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been running Windows 7 Eval edition since august when OS 10.6 came out .
Even without bootcamp , it dectected my wireless card and intel graphics on my MacBook without any problems .
How is this just now news ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been running Windows 7 Eval edition since august when OS 10.6 came out.
Even without bootcamp, it dectected my wireless card and intel graphics on my MacBook without any problems.
How is this just now news?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966522</id>
	<title>Re:In other words</title>
	<author>elsJake</author>
	<datestamp>1264855380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Did i miss something ? Is it really redundant to bring attention to the fact that software required to boot into another operating system shouldn't depend on weather or not you have the latest version of one of the operating systems ?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did i miss something ?
Is it really redundant to bring attention to the fact that software required to boot into another operating system should n't depend on weather or not you have the latest version of one of the operating systems ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did i miss something ?
Is it really redundant to bring attention to the fact that software required to boot into another operating system shouldn't depend on weather or not you have the latest version of one of the operating systems ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966024</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967076</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>the\_humeister</author>
	<datestamp>1264860180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you sure about that? I bought the Windows 7 upgrade and put it on my computer. I didn't have a prior version of Windows. It still runs after all these months.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you sure about that ?
I bought the Windows 7 upgrade and put it on my computer .
I did n't have a prior version of Windows .
It still runs after all these months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you sure about that?
I bought the Windows 7 upgrade and put it on my computer.
I didn't have a prior version of Windows.
It still runs after all these months.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966872</id>
	<title>Re:I'm going to buy a Mac just to run Windows.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264858380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Lately I've been thinking about buying a Mac. It's not because I want to run Mac OS X; I don't. I want it just to run Windows.</p><p>Why would I spend three times as much on a Mac just to run Windows, when I could buy a Dell instead? Well, it's because I want to support Apple as best I can. I love my iPhone, and I will get an iPad as soon as I can. Apple has earned my love, and my support.</p><p>I just wish that iPhone OS ran on their desktop systems. It's the best operating system I've used in a long time.</p></div><p>if you love apple so much, why don't you marry it?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lately I 've been thinking about buying a Mac .
It 's not because I want to run Mac OS X ; I do n't .
I want it just to run Windows.Why would I spend three times as much on a Mac just to run Windows , when I could buy a Dell instead ?
Well , it 's because I want to support Apple as best I can .
I love my iPhone , and I will get an iPad as soon as I can .
Apple has earned my love , and my support.I just wish that iPhone OS ran on their desktop systems .
It 's the best operating system I 've used in a long time.if you love apple so much , why do n't you marry it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lately I've been thinking about buying a Mac.
It's not because I want to run Mac OS X; I don't.
I want it just to run Windows.Why would I spend three times as much on a Mac just to run Windows, when I could buy a Dell instead?
Well, it's because I want to support Apple as best I can.
I love my iPhone, and I will get an iPad as soon as I can.
Apple has earned my love, and my support.I just wish that iPhone OS ran on their desktop systems.
It's the best operating system I've used in a long time.if you love apple so much, why don't you marry it?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966190</id>
	<title>Hint: If you want Win7 64bit on older MBP</title>
	<author>linumax</author>
	<datestamp>1264851960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1846" title="apple.com">These Macs</a> [apple.com] won't have an issue with 64bit Win7 (or Vista). If however, you have an older machine as in my case (2007 Santa Rosa MBP) you might have trouble installing Windows 7 using the DVD. </p><p>

In case it locks at boot up when trying to install you can modify the ISO and burn it to a new DVD. I used <a href="http://www.logicalvue.com/blog/2009/10/installing-window-7-x64-on-a-macbook-pro-using-bootcamp/" title="logicalvue.com">this guide</a> [logicalvue.com] and it worked fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These Macs [ apple.com ] wo n't have an issue with 64bit Win7 ( or Vista ) .
If however , you have an older machine as in my case ( 2007 Santa Rosa MBP ) you might have trouble installing Windows 7 using the DVD .
In case it locks at boot up when trying to install you can modify the ISO and burn it to a new DVD .
I used this guide [ logicalvue.com ] and it worked fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> These Macs [apple.com] won't have an issue with 64bit Win7 (or Vista).
If however, you have an older machine as in my case (2007 Santa Rosa MBP) you might have trouble installing Windows 7 using the DVD.
In case it locks at boot up when trying to install you can modify the ISO and burn it to a new DVD.
I used this guide [logicalvue.com] and it worked fine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966798</id>
	<title>Who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264857720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Macs are for faggots anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Macs are for faggots anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Macs are for faggots anyway.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966090</id>
	<title>Great...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264851000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just one more way the Mac elitists (Read: apple fanboys) can say they are better than every other kind of computer user.  Your still using Foxconn motherboards....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just one more way the Mac elitists ( Read : apple fanboys ) can say they are better than every other kind of computer user .
Your still using Foxconn motherboards... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just one more way the Mac elitists (Read: apple fanboys) can say they are better than every other kind of computer user.
Your still using Foxconn motherboards....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966236</id>
	<title>Re:I'm going to buy a Mac just to run Windows.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264852380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I just wish that iPhone OS ran on their desktop systems. It's the best operating system I've used in a long time.</i>
<br> <br>
Maybe <a href="http://db.tidbits.com/article/10624" title="tidbits.com">single-application mode</a> [tidbits.com] is what you want in Mac OS X?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just wish that iPhone OS ran on their desktop systems .
It 's the best operating system I 've used in a long time .
Maybe single-application mode [ tidbits.com ] is what you want in Mac OS X ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just wish that iPhone OS ran on their desktop systems.
It's the best operating system I've used in a long time.
Maybe single-application mode [tidbits.com] is what you want in Mac OS X?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967266</id>
	<title>Re:Why do need to buy 10.6 to get this? more ways</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1264861680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or I could just install Windows on a non-Apple PC, and save the $29. Just because I spent $100, doesn't mean I feel like throwing an extra $29 away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or I could just install Windows on a non-Apple PC , and save the $ 29 .
Just because I spent $ 100 , does n't mean I feel like throwing an extra $ 29 away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or I could just install Windows on a non-Apple PC, and save the $29.
Just because I spent $100, doesn't mean I feel like throwing an extra $29 away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966324</id>
	<title>Re:Good place to ask for help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264853340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I want to install windows XP on my wife's macbook pro. A ran bootcamp and windows installed okay but my XP install disk is pre service pack 2. The apple drivers for windows on the macbook require SP2. Windows can't use the ethernet or wifi to upgrade itself. Microsoft don't give you a simple executable to download to upgrade to later service packs unless you have a special account with them.</p><p>My brother gave me an executable which supposedly will install SP2 but it failed for a bizarre reason (claims only 3 megabytes free, I have about 80 Gig).</p><p>So I am stuck. Any suggestions? Thanks.</p></div><p>Google. Every single xp userland problem ever has been discussed, if not solved some place. You'll find the answer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to install windows XP on my wife 's macbook pro .
A ran bootcamp and windows installed okay but my XP install disk is pre service pack 2 .
The apple drivers for windows on the macbook require SP2 .
Windows ca n't use the ethernet or wifi to upgrade itself .
Microsoft do n't give you a simple executable to download to upgrade to later service packs unless you have a special account with them.My brother gave me an executable which supposedly will install SP2 but it failed for a bizarre reason ( claims only 3 megabytes free , I have about 80 Gig ) .So I am stuck .
Any suggestions ?
Thanks.Google. Every single xp userland problem ever has been discussed , if not solved some place .
You 'll find the answer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to install windows XP on my wife's macbook pro.
A ran bootcamp and windows installed okay but my XP install disk is pre service pack 2.
The apple drivers for windows on the macbook require SP2.
Windows can't use the ethernet or wifi to upgrade itself.
Microsoft don't give you a simple executable to download to upgrade to later service packs unless you have a special account with them.My brother gave me an executable which supposedly will install SP2 but it failed for a bizarre reason (claims only 3 megabytes free, I have about 80 Gig).So I am stuck.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.Google. Every single xp userland problem ever has been discussed, if not solved some place.
You'll find the answer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968876</id>
	<title>Is this supposed to have just happened?</title>
	<author>cmprsdchse</author>
	<datestamp>1264930560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I've been running Windows 7 x64 and Snow Leopard in dual boot since about a month before Windows 7 was released.  I don't think I had to jump through hoops to get Boot Camp set up either.  Might have involved a single command line operation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been running Windows 7 x64 and Snow Leopard in dual boot since about a month before Windows 7 was released .
I do n't think I had to jump through hoops to get Boot Camp set up either .
Might have involved a single command line operation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been running Windows 7 x64 and Snow Leopard in dual boot since about a month before Windows 7 was released.
I don't think I had to jump through hoops to get Boot Camp set up either.
Might have involved a single command line operation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967926</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264870560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Psst.... Win7 upgrade disc costs $120.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Psst.... Win7 upgrade disc costs $ 120 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Psst.... Win7 upgrade disc costs $120.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966936</id>
	<title>requires snow leopard?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264858920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So to support Microsoft's best and most reliable OS you have to be running Apple's worst and least stable OS (since leaving classic behind). Funny.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So to support Microsoft 's best and most reliable OS you have to be running Apple 's worst and least stable OS ( since leaving classic behind ) .
Funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So to support Microsoft's best and most reliable OS you have to be running Apple's worst and least stable OS (since leaving classic behind).
Funny.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966240</id>
	<title>Re:I've been running it for months....</title>
	<author>selven</author>
	<datestamp>1264852440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boot Camp can run anything. I have a Ubuntu install running alongside Mac OSX with Boot Camp, and some people even got OpenSolaris working (not much harder than Ubuntu or Windows, from what I've heard). It's more about Mac officially supporting Windows and providing all the necessary drivers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boot Camp can run anything .
I have a Ubuntu install running alongside Mac OSX with Boot Camp , and some people even got OpenSolaris working ( not much harder than Ubuntu or Windows , from what I 've heard ) .
It 's more about Mac officially supporting Windows and providing all the necessary drivers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boot Camp can run anything.
I have a Ubuntu install running alongside Mac OSX with Boot Camp, and some people even got OpenSolaris working (not much harder than Ubuntu or Windows, from what I've heard).
It's more about Mac officially supporting Windows and providing all the necessary drivers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969028</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1264933980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not if you can get ahold of an oem or system builder edition<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not if you can get ahold of an oem or system builder edition ; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not if you can get ahold of an oem or system builder edition ;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966220</id>
	<title>After Some Delay...</title>
	<author>macs4all</author>
	<datestamp>1264852200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...Slashdot FINALLY reports this news...<br> <br>
Um, the BootCamp update has been <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/DL977" title="apple.com" rel="nofollow">released almost TEN DAYS AGO</a> [apple.com], ya know.<br> <br>
Old news for nerds, stuff that mattered a week ago.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...Slashdot FINALLY reports this news.. . Um , the BootCamp update has been released almost TEN DAYS AGO [ apple.com ] , ya know .
Old news for nerds , stuff that mattered a week ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Slashdot FINALLY reports this news... 
Um, the BootCamp update has been released almost TEN DAYS AGO [apple.com], ya know.
Old news for nerds, stuff that mattered a week ago.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966356</id>
	<title>Re:I've been running it for months....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264853700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've been running Windows 7 Eval edition since august when OS 10.6 came out.  [snip]  How is this just now news?</p></div><p>Before, it worked. Now it should <i>just work</i> (tm). At least until you get to the bit where Windows takes over<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)

</p><p>Back in the early days of Intel Macs, the beta bootcamp included essential firmware updates (e.g. the EFI BIOS legacy support stuff). Since then, however, you've just been able to slam in a Windows DVD and go, although if you're not careful you'll hose OS X in the process because Windows doesn't understand the OS X partition table.

</p><p>These days, BootCamp is just the point'n'click wizard that holds your hand while you partition your hard drive to hybrid GUID/MBR and set up a dual boot system. Probably recommended, though, unless you have a Mac Pro and are installing windows onto its own hard drive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been running Windows 7 Eval edition since august when OS 10.6 came out .
[ snip ] How is this just now news ? Before , it worked .
Now it should just work ( tm ) .
At least until you get to the bit where Windows takes over : - ) Back in the early days of Intel Macs , the beta bootcamp included essential firmware updates ( e.g .
the EFI BIOS legacy support stuff ) .
Since then , however , you 've just been able to slam in a Windows DVD and go , although if you 're not careful you 'll hose OS X in the process because Windows does n't understand the OS X partition table .
These days , BootCamp is just the point'n'click wizard that holds your hand while you partition your hard drive to hybrid GUID/MBR and set up a dual boot system .
Probably recommended , though , unless you have a Mac Pro and are installing windows onto its own hard drive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been running Windows 7 Eval edition since august when OS 10.6 came out.
[snip]  How is this just now news?Before, it worked.
Now it should just work (tm).
At least until you get to the bit where Windows takes over :-)

Back in the early days of Intel Macs, the beta bootcamp included essential firmware updates (e.g.
the EFI BIOS legacy support stuff).
Since then, however, you've just been able to slam in a Windows DVD and go, although if you're not careful you'll hose OS X in the process because Windows doesn't understand the OS X partition table.
These days, BootCamp is just the point'n'click wizard that holds your hand while you partition your hard drive to hybrid GUID/MBR and set up a dual boot system.
Probably recommended, though, unless you have a Mac Pro and are installing windows onto its own hard drive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967528</id>
	<title>I don't understand the need</title>
	<author>rudy\_wayne</author>
	<datestamp>1264864800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't understand the need for Bootcamp.  If you want to run Windows 7 then buy a PC -- it's considerably cheaper than a Mac.  If there's some software that you *REALLY* need but only runs on Windows, then buy a PC -- it's considerably cheaper than a Mac.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't understand the need for Bootcamp .
If you want to run Windows 7 then buy a PC -- it 's considerably cheaper than a Mac .
If there 's some software that you * REALLY * need but only runs on Windows , then buy a PC -- it 's considerably cheaper than a Mac .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't understand the need for Bootcamp.
If you want to run Windows 7 then buy a PC -- it's considerably cheaper than a Mac.
If there's some software that you *REALLY* need but only runs on Windows, then buy a PC -- it's considerably cheaper than a Mac.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967832</id>
	<title>External Drive</title>
	<author>Midnight Thunder</author>
	<datestamp>1264869180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With bootcamp can windows be made to boot off an external drive?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With bootcamp can windows be made to boot off an external drive ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With bootcamp can windows be made to boot off an external drive?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966332</id>
	<title>A year late...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264853460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heh, I've been running Windows 7 64 bit on my MacBook Pro for just over a year now, having downloaded the first public beta out of curiosity. IIRC, it took just a minor amount of tweaking to the get Vista drivers to work for Windows 7 beta.</p><p>On that note, I'm mildly dismayed to find Win7 ending up good enough to be used as my primary operating system, which as happened mostly because the DirectX World of Warcraft seems to run better than the OpenGL one for me. That and a few other programs. I feel dirty having OS X end up as my third most used OS on this computer. (Triple booting Ubuntu 9.10, Win7-64, OS X 10.6).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heh , I 've been running Windows 7 64 bit on my MacBook Pro for just over a year now , having downloaded the first public beta out of curiosity .
IIRC , it took just a minor amount of tweaking to the get Vista drivers to work for Windows 7 beta.On that note , I 'm mildly dismayed to find Win7 ending up good enough to be used as my primary operating system , which as happened mostly because the DirectX World of Warcraft seems to run better than the OpenGL one for me .
That and a few other programs .
I feel dirty having OS X end up as my third most used OS on this computer .
( Triple booting Ubuntu 9.10 , Win7-64 , OS X 10.6 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heh, I've been running Windows 7 64 bit on my MacBook Pro for just over a year now, having downloaded the first public beta out of curiosity.
IIRC, it took just a minor amount of tweaking to the get Vista drivers to work for Windows 7 beta.On that note, I'm mildly dismayed to find Win7 ending up good enough to be used as my primary operating system, which as happened mostly because the DirectX World of Warcraft seems to run better than the OpenGL one for me.
That and a few other programs.
I feel dirty having OS X end up as my third most used OS on this computer.
(Triple booting Ubuntu 9.10, Win7-64, OS X 10.6).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966132</id>
	<title>Why do need to buy 10.6 to get this? more ways tha</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264851300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do need to buy 10.6 to get this? more ways that apple locks down there hardware and makes you pay more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do need to buy 10.6 to get this ?
more ways that apple locks down there hardware and makes you pay more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do need to buy 10.6 to get this?
more ways that apple locks down there hardware and makes you pay more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969470</id>
	<title>Academic version: $65</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264942320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And it is not a "starter" edition. Please tell me where to buy this magical $65 computer/unicorn/pony, and I'll buy you a legit copy of Windows 7.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And it is not a " starter " edition .
Please tell me where to buy this magical $ 65 computer/unicorn/pony , and I 'll buy you a legit copy of Windows 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it is not a "starter" edition.
Please tell me where to buy this magical $65 computer/unicorn/pony, and I'll buy you a legit copy of Windows 7.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967994</id>
	<title>Re:In other words</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264871400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Did i miss something ? Is it really redundant to bring attention to the fact that software required to boot into another operating system shouldn't depend on weather or not you have the latest version of one of the operating systems?</p></div></blockquote><p>Boot Camp is not required to multiboot a Mac, it just makes it pointy-clicky easy. The OS X partition can be non-destructively and easily resized via the CLI, and you can either hold down the Option key (aka Alt key) for a boot menu or install rEFIt for a nice, graphical boot menu.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did i miss something ?
Is it really redundant to bring attention to the fact that software required to boot into another operating system should n't depend on weather or not you have the latest version of one of the operating systems ? Boot Camp is not required to multiboot a Mac , it just makes it pointy-clicky easy .
The OS X partition can be non-destructively and easily resized via the CLI , and you can either hold down the Option key ( aka Alt key ) for a boot menu or install rEFIt for a nice , graphical boot menu .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did i miss something ?
Is it really redundant to bring attention to the fact that software required to boot into another operating system shouldn't depend on weather or not you have the latest version of one of the operating systems?Boot Camp is not required to multiboot a Mac, it just makes it pointy-clicky easy.
The OS X partition can be non-destructively and easily resized via the CLI, and you can either hold down the Option key (aka Alt key) for a boot menu or install rEFIt for a nice, graphical boot menu.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966762</id>
	<title>Where's the quid pro quo?</title>
	<author>7andrew</author>
	<datestamp>1264857240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Still can't virtualise OSX though, at least not without a lot of difficulty and breaking the license terms.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Still ca n't virtualise OSX though , at least not without a lot of difficulty and breaking the license terms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still can't virtualise OSX though, at least not without a lot of difficulty and breaking the license terms.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968838</id>
	<title>Breaks the already installed Windows 7</title>
	<author>Thanatiel</author>
	<datestamp>1264929840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had Windows 7 installed on my Mac Book Pro/bootcamp for a few months now.<br>After the last bootcamp update Windows 7 crashed and self-destructed ("the installed windows os version does not match blablabla<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...").<br>None of the repair solution worked : I had to re-install it from scratch.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had Windows 7 installed on my Mac Book Pro/bootcamp for a few months now.After the last bootcamp update Windows 7 crashed and self-destructed ( " the installed windows os version does not match blablabla ... " ) .None of the repair solution worked : I had to re-install it from scratch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had Windows 7 installed on my Mac Book Pro/bootcamp for a few months now.After the last bootcamp update Windows 7 crashed and self-destructed ("the installed windows os version does not match blablabla ...").None of the repair solution worked : I had to re-install it from scratch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966486</id>
	<title>Re:Good place to ask for help</title>
	<author>jo\_ham</author>
	<datestamp>1264855020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What version of the bootcamp software do you have on the MBP - the earlier versions had a problem with SP2 that caused the SP2 installer to report only 3mb of space and fail, due to the way it was looking at partitions on the HD and looking at the wrong one.</p><p>If you can get a later copy of bootcamp (the windows part of it that you install with the drivers) then it should cure that issue. There is also a manual registry change you can make that sometimes works.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What version of the bootcamp software do you have on the MBP - the earlier versions had a problem with SP2 that caused the SP2 installer to report only 3mb of space and fail , due to the way it was looking at partitions on the HD and looking at the wrong one.If you can get a later copy of bootcamp ( the windows part of it that you install with the drivers ) then it should cure that issue .
There is also a manual registry change you can make that sometimes works .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What version of the bootcamp software do you have on the MBP - the earlier versions had a problem with SP2 that caused the SP2 installer to report only 3mb of space and fail, due to the way it was looking at partitions on the HD and looking at the wrong one.If you can get a later copy of bootcamp (the windows part of it that you install with the drivers) then it should cure that issue.
There is also a manual registry change you can make that sometimes works.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969054</id>
	<title>Re:I've been running it for months....</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1264934580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is the new machines which had problems, my guess is that bootcamp did not have all drivers in needed to run Win7 on the new machines (or install them that is)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is the new machines which had problems , my guess is that bootcamp did not have all drivers in needed to run Win7 on the new machines ( or install them that is )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is the new machines which had problems, my guess is that bootcamp did not have all drivers in needed to run Win7 on the new machines (or install them that is)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966262</id>
	<title>I've had it installed...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264852680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>since last summer.  Doesn't sound like a new feature to me.</p><p>(will get modded troll, redundant, off topic or flamebait)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>since last summer .
Does n't sound like a new feature to me .
( will get modded troll , redundant , off topic or flamebait )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>since last summer.
Doesn't sound like a new feature to me.
(will get modded troll, redundant, off topic or flamebait)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967414</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1264863180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I'm sure that they would all prefer that it be cheaper, I doubt VMware and company are much worried.<br> <br>

You definitely can get a fully functional, if not very exciting, wintel box for about the cost of a Windows licence. However, that probably won't be of too much use to your average mac user contemplating windows: The bulk of Macs sold are laptops. If you are using a laptop, you are likely carrying it around at least sometimes. Suddenly, your HP box or Asus netbook or whatever it was you purchased for the cost of the OS it runs starts to look annoying.<br> <br>

Even if you have a Mac desktop, you are going to run into issues: iMacs can function as monitors; but only if the input source is Displayport. With a cheap PC, you'll get VGA or DVI, which means that you'll need either another monitor, or an active converter. You'll also need another set of peripherals, and the desk space for them, or a KVM. Standard 2 or 4 port VGA/PS2/USB KVMs are cheap; but DVI/USB KVMs are kind of pricey. I haven't even dared to look at displayport KVMs. Users of Mac Pros are ever so slightly better off; particularly if they are using a third party monitor with multiple switchable inputs(ie. any Dell monitor that somebody with a $3,000 desktop would purchase); but they will run into the problem that, because they are on a Mac Pro, their windows applications would run faster in a VM than they would on a cheap PC(and since cheap PCs rarely have graphics worth anything, even the notoriously virtualization-hostile task of gaming won't work better).</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I 'm sure that they would all prefer that it be cheaper , I doubt VMware and company are much worried .
You definitely can get a fully functional , if not very exciting , wintel box for about the cost of a Windows licence .
However , that probably wo n't be of too much use to your average mac user contemplating windows : The bulk of Macs sold are laptops .
If you are using a laptop , you are likely carrying it around at least sometimes .
Suddenly , your HP box or Asus netbook or whatever it was you purchased for the cost of the OS it runs starts to look annoying .
Even if you have a Mac desktop , you are going to run into issues : iMacs can function as monitors ; but only if the input source is Displayport .
With a cheap PC , you 'll get VGA or DVI , which means that you 'll need either another monitor , or an active converter .
You 'll also need another set of peripherals , and the desk space for them , or a KVM .
Standard 2 or 4 port VGA/PS2/USB KVMs are cheap ; but DVI/USB KVMs are kind of pricey .
I have n't even dared to look at displayport KVMs .
Users of Mac Pros are ever so slightly better off ; particularly if they are using a third party monitor with multiple switchable inputs ( ie .
any Dell monitor that somebody with a $ 3,000 desktop would purchase ) ; but they will run into the problem that , because they are on a Mac Pro , their windows applications would run faster in a VM than they would on a cheap PC ( and since cheap PCs rarely have graphics worth anything , even the notoriously virtualization-hostile task of gaming wo n't work better ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I'm sure that they would all prefer that it be cheaper, I doubt VMware and company are much worried.
You definitely can get a fully functional, if not very exciting, wintel box for about the cost of a Windows licence.
However, that probably won't be of too much use to your average mac user contemplating windows: The bulk of Macs sold are laptops.
If you are using a laptop, you are likely carrying it around at least sometimes.
Suddenly, your HP box or Asus netbook or whatever it was you purchased for the cost of the OS it runs starts to look annoying.
Even if you have a Mac desktop, you are going to run into issues: iMacs can function as monitors; but only if the input source is Displayport.
With a cheap PC, you'll get VGA or DVI, which means that you'll need either another monitor, or an active converter.
You'll also need another set of peripherals, and the desk space for them, or a KVM.
Standard 2 or 4 port VGA/PS2/USB KVMs are cheap; but DVI/USB KVMs are kind of pricey.
I haven't even dared to look at displayport KVMs.
Users of Mac Pros are ever so slightly better off; particularly if they are using a third party monitor with multiple switchable inputs(ie.
any Dell monitor that somebody with a $3,000 desktop would purchase); but they will run into the problem that, because they are on a Mac Pro, their windows applications would run faster in a VM than they would on a cheap PC(and since cheap PCs rarely have graphics worth anything, even the notoriously virtualization-hostile task of gaming won't work better).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30970990</id>
	<title>Re:I've been running it for months....</title>
	<author>Mattsson</author>
	<datestamp>1264959060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When installing 64-bit Win 7, I even had Bootcamp specifically state that I couldn't run a 64-bit system on my (in Apples eyes) old Core 2 Duo Imac.<br>Bypassing the Bootcamp installer and installing all the 64-bit drivers manually instead got everything working though...<br>It irks me when Apple tries to artificially limit what versions of Windows I can run on my machine, when it is both technically and on a driver level compatible with all versions of both XP, Vista and 7. =P</p><p>And the statement that Bootcamp with Windows 7 requires OS X 10.6 is absolutely false.<br>It requires some of the Apple-specific drivers that comes with Bootcamp 3.1, that's all. Running Windows on a Mac doesn't require you to ever have had OS X on it at all...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When installing 64-bit Win 7 , I even had Bootcamp specifically state that I could n't run a 64-bit system on my ( in Apples eyes ) old Core 2 Duo Imac.Bypassing the Bootcamp installer and installing all the 64-bit drivers manually instead got everything working though...It irks me when Apple tries to artificially limit what versions of Windows I can run on my machine , when it is both technically and on a driver level compatible with all versions of both XP , Vista and 7 .
= PAnd the statement that Bootcamp with Windows 7 requires OS X 10.6 is absolutely false.It requires some of the Apple-specific drivers that comes with Bootcamp 3.1 , that 's all .
Running Windows on a Mac does n't require you to ever have had OS X on it at all.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When installing 64-bit Win 7, I even had Bootcamp specifically state that I couldn't run a 64-bit system on my (in Apples eyes) old Core 2 Duo Imac.Bypassing the Bootcamp installer and installing all the 64-bit drivers manually instead got everything working though...It irks me when Apple tries to artificially limit what versions of Windows I can run on my machine, when it is both technically and on a driver level compatible with all versions of both XP, Vista and 7.
=PAnd the statement that Bootcamp with Windows 7 requires OS X 10.6 is absolutely false.It requires some of the Apple-specific drivers that comes with Bootcamp 3.1, that's all.
Running Windows on a Mac doesn't require you to ever have had OS X on it at all...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968940</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264931880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wanna see you run GTA4 or Crysis or Age of Conan "great" on your virtualbox...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wan na see you run GTA4 or Crysis or Age of Conan " great " on your virtualbox.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wanna see you run GTA4 or Crysis or Age of Conan "great" on your virtualbox...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967660</id>
	<title>Re:A year late...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264866720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is that dismay?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is that dismay ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is that dismay?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968430</id>
	<title>Sure OK</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264878300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But when will they let me dual boot OSX on my PC? till then they are just Hypocritical ass hole and I won't spend a dime on any of their products. and what is with their new digital feminine hygiene product the iPad "a pad that tweets when your on the rag" all I can say is CRAP CRAP CRAP.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But when will they let me dual boot OSX on my PC ?
till then they are just Hypocritical ass hole and I wo n't spend a dime on any of their products .
and what is with their new digital feminine hygiene product the iPad " a pad that tweets when your on the rag " all I can say is CRAP CRAP CRAP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But when will they let me dual boot OSX on my PC?
till then they are just Hypocritical ass hole and I won't spend a dime on any of their products.
and what is with their new digital feminine hygiene product the iPad "a pad that tweets when your on the rag" all I can say is CRAP CRAP CRAP.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967596</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>cheekyboy</author>
	<datestamp>1264865640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yep, luck mac bastards, they can buy a cheap ass low end PC for $200 or less to code for windows.</p><p>But us windows people cannot buy a $200 mac to code for the iphone.</p><p>Apple could port its iphone sdk to gcc/windows/linux quite easily.</p><p>But its not in their interest, so even if it cost them say $200,000 to do it, they wouldnt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yep , luck mac bastards , they can buy a cheap ass low end PC for $ 200 or less to code for windows.But us windows people can not buy a $ 200 mac to code for the iphone.Apple could port its iphone sdk to gcc/windows/linux quite easily.But its not in their interest , so even if it cost them say $ 200,000 to do it , they wouldnt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yep, luck mac bastards, they can buy a cheap ass low end PC for $200 or less to code for windows.But us windows people cannot buy a $200 mac to code for the iphone.Apple could port its iphone sdk to gcc/windows/linux quite easily.But its not in their interest, so even if it cost them say $200,000 to do it, they wouldnt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966154</id>
	<title>It's been running fine for me for over a month.</title>
	<author>Brie and gherkins</author>
	<datestamp>1264851600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless there's some optimisation of drivers? I've not had any problems with a fresh install of Windows 7 64-bit on my MacBookPro multibody using Bootcamp 3.0.1 on Snow Leopard.

What problems have people had?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless there 's some optimisation of drivers ?
I 've not had any problems with a fresh install of Windows 7 64-bit on my MacBookPro multibody using Bootcamp 3.0.1 on Snow Leopard .
What problems have people had ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless there's some optimisation of drivers?
I've not had any problems with a fresh install of Windows 7 64-bit on my MacBookPro multibody using Bootcamp 3.0.1 on Snow Leopard.
What problems have people had?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967718</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264867440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>psst....</p><p>The OSX upgrade costs 29 bucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>psst....The OSX upgrade costs 29 bucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>psst....The OSX upgrade costs 29 bucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966168</id>
	<title>Re:Why do need to buy 10.6 to get this? more ways</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264851780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You DON'T NEED this update to run Windows 7 on a Mac in Boot Camp.  This update is more or less targeted at newer Macs that already shipped with Snow Leopard that are experiencing problems installing 7. (see link)</p><p><a href="http://www.mac-forums.com/forums/windows-classic-linux-other-os/174668-windows-7-27-imac-black-screen.html" title="mac-forums.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mac-forums.com/forums/windows-classic-linux-other-os/174668-windows-7-27-imac-black-screen.html</a> [mac-forums.com]</p><p>Windows 7 installed on Boot Camp 2.0 in Leopard also works fine.</p><p>
&nbsp;  <br>
&nbsp; <nobr> <wbr></nobr>...more ways people post crap before doing any research.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You DO N'T NEED this update to run Windows 7 on a Mac in Boot Camp .
This update is more or less targeted at newer Macs that already shipped with Snow Leopard that are experiencing problems installing 7 .
( see link ) http : //www.mac-forums.com/forums/windows-classic-linux-other-os/174668-windows-7-27-imac-black-screen.html [ mac-forums.com ] Windows 7 installed on Boot Camp 2.0 in Leopard also works fine .
    ...more ways people post crap before doing any research .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You DON'T NEED this update to run Windows 7 on a Mac in Boot Camp.
This update is more or less targeted at newer Macs that already shipped with Snow Leopard that are experiencing problems installing 7.
(see link)http://www.mac-forums.com/forums/windows-classic-linux-other-os/174668-windows-7-27-imac-black-screen.html [mac-forums.com]Windows 7 installed on Boot Camp 2.0 in Leopard also works fine.
   
   ...more ways people post crap before doing any research.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968836</id>
	<title>Re:A year late...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264929840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And you don't feel dirty for using World of Warcraft?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And you do n't feel dirty for using World of Warcraft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you don't feel dirty for using World of Warcraft?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966332</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30977860</id>
	<title>Re:Unofficially for a while...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264964760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i did the same thing</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i did the same thing</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i did the same thing</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966152</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966878</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264858500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Retail copy... llulllllll</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Retail copy... llulllllll</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Retail copy... llulllllll</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969188</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264937520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not in Europe. You can buy an OEM copy of Windows here ("bundled" with, say, a $6 USB cable, or a stick of RAM) for a *lot* less than full retail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not in Europe .
You can buy an OEM copy of Windows here ( " bundled " with , say , a $ 6 USB cable , or a stick of RAM ) for a * lot * less than full retail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not in Europe.
You can buy an OEM copy of Windows here ("bundled" with, say, a $6 USB cable, or a stick of RAM) for a *lot* less than full retail.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966722</id>
	<title>Re:I've been running it for months....</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1264856880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are now optimized Win7 drivers, previously you were using generic drivers without acceleration provided by Microsoft or drivers designed for Vista from old versions of Bootcamp.</p><p>Both worked fine, but lacked full acceleration and feature set.</p><p>I've noticed the trackpad is better now, not so overly sensitive to touch or irratic.  I've noticed no change in video performance at all.   I really don't know what the differences are from a user perspective but as a causual gamer, I haven't noticed a difference in Company of Heros or StarTrek Online.  Performance or quality seems the same.</p><p>I have had a bluescreen since updating which I never had before, but that was while playing StarTrek Online which I never played before.  Only happened once and may have been there before the upgrade as well.  It IS Windows after all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are now optimized Win7 drivers , previously you were using generic drivers without acceleration provided by Microsoft or drivers designed for Vista from old versions of Bootcamp.Both worked fine , but lacked full acceleration and feature set.I 've noticed the trackpad is better now , not so overly sensitive to touch or irratic .
I 've noticed no change in video performance at all .
I really do n't know what the differences are from a user perspective but as a causual gamer , I have n't noticed a difference in Company of Heros or StarTrek Online .
Performance or quality seems the same.I have had a bluescreen since updating which I never had before , but that was while playing StarTrek Online which I never played before .
Only happened once and may have been there before the upgrade as well .
It IS Windows after all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are now optimized Win7 drivers, previously you were using generic drivers without acceleration provided by Microsoft or drivers designed for Vista from old versions of Bootcamp.Both worked fine, but lacked full acceleration and feature set.I've noticed the trackpad is better now, not so overly sensitive to touch or irratic.
I've noticed no change in video performance at all.
I really don't know what the differences are from a user perspective but as a causual gamer, I haven't noticed a difference in Company of Heros or StarTrek Online.
Performance or quality seems the same.I have had a bluescreen since updating which I never had before, but that was while playing StarTrek Online which I never played before.
Only happened once and may have been there before the upgrade as well.
It IS Windows after all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966396</id>
	<title>Re:I've been running it for months....</title>
	<author>cheier</author>
	<datestamp>1264854180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I am kinda hoping is that the updates fix some bugs in the drivers.  I've had a number of occasions where the existing drivers caused things like BSOD and crashing.  Most notably, I received a full hardware crash while using the webcam within Skype.  There are some room for improvements in the driver, I just hope this update addresses them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I am kinda hoping is that the updates fix some bugs in the drivers .
I 've had a number of occasions where the existing drivers caused things like BSOD and crashing .
Most notably , I received a full hardware crash while using the webcam within Skype .
There are some room for improvements in the driver , I just hope this update addresses them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I am kinda hoping is that the updates fix some bugs in the drivers.
I've had a number of occasions where the existing drivers caused things like BSOD and crashing.
Most notably, I received a full hardware crash while using the webcam within Skype.
There are some room for improvements in the driver, I just hope this update addresses them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30972748</id>
	<title>Screw windows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264970340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Windows and Mac suck.<br>Get linux its better or the same in almost every aspect. And, best of all its free!</p><p>Since I started using a computer I used windows, however two days ago I switched to ubuntu.<br>Im never going to go back to windows... ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Windows and Mac suck.Get linux its better or the same in almost every aspect .
And , best of all its free ! Since I started using a computer I used windows , however two days ago I switched to ubuntu.Im never going to go back to windows... ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Windows and Mac suck.Get linux its better or the same in almost every aspect.
And, best of all its free!Since I started using a computer I used windows, however two days ago I switched to ubuntu.Im never going to go back to windows... ever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967852</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264869480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But it turns out that one can actually buy a whole PC running Windows, including a spare keyboard and mouse, for close to the price of a retail copy of Windows.</p></div><p>Compaqs and HP systems that I remember in New York at this ~ USD $300 price point, around the price of a windows licence, aren't very useful for the tinkering / upgrading geek to add RAM and PCI devices to; they are in at compact form factor. For a normal mac user who just needs a barebones PC, I do see your point.</p><p>However, you may forget the point why we go through the 'unusual' task of actually paying for a 'license' purchased on a retail CD. Windows users doing this are just looking for a legit, unlocked release that doesn't care about your OEM brand, so you can freely use it to reinstall and  troubleshot PC's.</p><p>Choosing to activate multiple installs with that single license key is a different ballgame, but you have to realize that nobody ever gets an unlocked Windows CD these days without going to the store or pirating it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But it turns out that one can actually buy a whole PC running Windows , including a spare keyboard and mouse , for close to the price of a retail copy of Windows.Compaqs and HP systems that I remember in New York at this ~ USD $ 300 price point , around the price of a windows licence , are n't very useful for the tinkering / upgrading geek to add RAM and PCI devices to ; they are in at compact form factor .
For a normal mac user who just needs a barebones PC , I do see your point.However , you may forget the point why we go through the 'unusual ' task of actually paying for a 'license ' purchased on a retail CD .
Windows users doing this are just looking for a legit , unlocked release that does n't care about your OEM brand , so you can freely use it to reinstall and troubleshot PC 's.Choosing to activate multiple installs with that single license key is a different ballgame , but you have to realize that nobody ever gets an unlocked Windows CD these days without going to the store or pirating it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But it turns out that one can actually buy a whole PC running Windows, including a spare keyboard and mouse, for close to the price of a retail copy of Windows.Compaqs and HP systems that I remember in New York at this ~ USD $300 price point, around the price of a windows licence, aren't very useful for the tinkering / upgrading geek to add RAM and PCI devices to; they are in at compact form factor.
For a normal mac user who just needs a barebones PC, I do see your point.However, you may forget the point why we go through the 'unusual' task of actually paying for a 'license' purchased on a retail CD.
Windows users doing this are just looking for a legit, unlocked release that doesn't care about your OEM brand, so you can freely use it to reinstall and  troubleshot PC's.Choosing to activate multiple installs with that single license key is a different ballgame, but you have to realize that nobody ever gets an unlocked Windows CD these days without going to the store or pirating it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968704</id>
	<title>Funny...</title>
	<author>Wyatt Earp</author>
	<datestamp>1264970160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been running it at work under 10.5 and 10.6 for a couple months with BootCamp with no problems.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been running it at work under 10.5 and 10.6 for a couple months with BootCamp with no problems .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been running it at work under 10.5 and 10.6 for a couple months with BootCamp with no problems.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966152</id>
	<title>Unofficially for a while...</title>
	<author>mederjo</author>
	<datestamp>1264851600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been running Windows 7 RTM without problems on my Nehalem Mac Pro using Bootcamp for months. It was so painless I've forgotten the details but I think I started off with the Leopard Boot Camp and then updated it with the Boot Camp off the Snow Leopard GM. I did a clean install on a new partition. Windows 7 installed more easily than Vista Ultimate 64.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been running Windows 7 RTM without problems on my Nehalem Mac Pro using Bootcamp for months .
It was so painless I 've forgotten the details but I think I started off with the Leopard Boot Camp and then updated it with the Boot Camp off the Snow Leopard GM .
I did a clean install on a new partition .
Windows 7 installed more easily than Vista Ultimate 64 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been running Windows 7 RTM without problems on my Nehalem Mac Pro using Bootcamp for months.
It was so painless I've forgotten the details but I think I started off with the Leopard Boot Camp and then updated it with the Boot Camp off the Snow Leopard GM.
I did a clean install on a new partition.
Windows 7 installed more easily than Vista Ultimate 64.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030</id>
	<title>...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>flydpnkrtn</author>
	<datestamp>1264850700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.....just sayin'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.....just sayin'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.....just sayin'</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30971842</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>Relayman</author>
	<datestamp>1264965600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>But if you want to run your PC with multiple Windows VMs, you're right back to buying the retail version. The disks that come with your cheap machine do not support setting up a virtual machine even though the license allows it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But if you want to run your PC with multiple Windows VMs , you 're right back to buying the retail version .
The disks that come with your cheap machine do not support setting up a virtual machine even though the license allows it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But if you want to run your PC with multiple Windows VMs, you're right back to buying the retail version.
The disks that come with your cheap machine do not support setting up a virtual machine even though the license allows it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30971612</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264963740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Price?  How is it above $0?  Did bittorrent suddenly stop working for you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Price ?
How is it above $ 0 ?
Did bittorrent suddenly stop working for you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Price?
How is it above $0?
Did bittorrent suddenly stop working for you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966166</id>
	<title>Re:Why do need to buy 10.6 to get this? more ways</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1264851780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>$29 upgrade fee send you into bankruptcy? How'd you afford the $100+ for whatever version of Windows you got?</htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 29 upgrade fee send you into bankruptcy ?
How 'd you afford the $ 100 + for whatever version of Windows you got ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$29 upgrade fee send you into bankruptcy?
How'd you afford the $100+ for whatever version of Windows you got?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967028</id>
	<title>Not really</title>
	<author>koan</author>
	<datestamp>1264859820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A clean install of Win 7 and the 3.1 package gave me no audio, a red light from the audio port (the opposite of what it was alleged to do) and no iSight, on further inspection in device manager there is also something called "coprocessor" that is not installed.<br>I got audio to work with drivers from Realtek, but no solution to the iSight issue or what the mysterious "coprocessor" is.</p><p>I don't know for sure but I would guess if you upgrade from Vista this most likely isn't an issue, I just never upgrade Windows OS's, always do a fresh install.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A clean install of Win 7 and the 3.1 package gave me no audio , a red light from the audio port ( the opposite of what it was alleged to do ) and no iSight , on further inspection in device manager there is also something called " coprocessor " that is not installed.I got audio to work with drivers from Realtek , but no solution to the iSight issue or what the mysterious " coprocessor " is.I do n't know for sure but I would guess if you upgrade from Vista this most likely is n't an issue , I just never upgrade Windows OS 's , always do a fresh install .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A clean install of Win 7 and the 3.1 package gave me no audio, a red light from the audio port (the opposite of what it was alleged to do) and no iSight, on further inspection in device manager there is also something called "coprocessor" that is not installed.I got audio to work with drivers from Realtek, but no solution to the iSight issue or what the mysterious "coprocessor" is.I don't know for sure but I would guess if you upgrade from Vista this most likely isn't an issue, I just never upgrade Windows OS's, always do a fresh install.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969680</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>uglyduckling</author>
	<datestamp>1264945500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Boot Camp is not just a boot manager, it includes tools to share files between the two installations.  Those features are supported in Snow Leopard, which is a $30 upgrade from Leopard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Boot Camp is not just a boot manager , it includes tools to share files between the two installations .
Those features are supported in Snow Leopard , which is a $ 30 upgrade from Leopard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boot Camp is not just a boot manager, it includes tools to share files between the two installations.
Those features are supported in Snow Leopard, which is a $30 upgrade from Leopard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966534</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30984926</id>
	<title>Still doesn't even work with XP!</title>
	<author>LoneIgadzra</author>
	<datestamp>1265055240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My favorite boot camp experience was installing the latest version (whatever came with snow leopard) on my parents' iMac and discovering that the realtek audio drivers thought the microphone jack was the headphone jack and the headphone jack was the microphone jack. (This happened in both XP and Vista.) On my MacBook Pro, I had to role back the Sigmatel audio because, when I left the machine on for a while, the audio would become more and more static-y.

It seems like with every iteration of Boot Camp, I need to selectively role back a number of horrendous drivers to get full functionality, then install mobility-modded graphics drivers because the included ones are about a year out of date.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My favorite boot camp experience was installing the latest version ( whatever came with snow leopard ) on my parents ' iMac and discovering that the realtek audio drivers thought the microphone jack was the headphone jack and the headphone jack was the microphone jack .
( This happened in both XP and Vista .
) On my MacBook Pro , I had to role back the Sigmatel audio because , when I left the machine on for a while , the audio would become more and more static-y .
It seems like with every iteration of Boot Camp , I need to selectively role back a number of horrendous drivers to get full functionality , then install mobility-modded graphics drivers because the included ones are about a year out of date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My favorite boot camp experience was installing the latest version (whatever came with snow leopard) on my parents' iMac and discovering that the realtek audio drivers thought the microphone jack was the headphone jack and the headphone jack was the microphone jack.
(This happened in both XP and Vista.
) On my MacBook Pro, I had to role back the Sigmatel audio because, when I left the machine on for a while, the audio would become more and more static-y.
It seems like with every iteration of Boot Camp, I need to selectively role back a number of horrendous drivers to get full functionality, then install mobility-modded graphics drivers because the included ones are about a year out of date.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966282</id>
	<title>Re:I've been running it for months....</title>
	<author>BemoanAndMoan</author>
	<datestamp>1264852860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I've been running Windows 7 Eval edition since august when OS 10.6 came out...</p></div><p>Yea, I installed 64-bit Windows 7 two weeks ago on my MacBook<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... running serious apps and serious games (in terms of processor/support requirements) with no issues. Dual monitors with miniDVI, swapping usb keyboards/mice/external hd's in &amp; out while running and not a single problem.</p><p>Er, thanks Apple?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been running Windows 7 Eval edition since august when OS 10.6 came out...Yea , I installed 64-bit Windows 7 two weeks ago on my MacBook ... running serious apps and serious games ( in terms of processor/support requirements ) with no issues .
Dual monitors with miniDVI , swapping usb keyboards/mice/external hd 's in &amp; out while running and not a single problem.Er , thanks Apple ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been running Windows 7 Eval edition since august when OS 10.6 came out...Yea, I installed 64-bit Windows 7 two weeks ago on my MacBook ... running serious apps and serious games (in terms of processor/support requirements) with no issues.
Dual monitors with miniDVI, swapping usb keyboards/mice/external hd's in &amp; out while running and not a single problem.Er, thanks Apple?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968398</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1264877760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Newegg: <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16832116754&amp;cm\_re=windows\_7\_oem-\_-32-116-754-\_-Product" title="newegg.com">$105</a> [newegg.com]  I'm still a little confused though as to what, exactly it is that you don't get with the system builder edition that you would get with the full retail version.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Newegg : $ 105 [ newegg.com ] I 'm still a little confused though as to what , exactly it is that you do n't get with the system builder edition that you would get with the full retail version .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Newegg: $105 [newegg.com]  I'm still a little confused though as to what, exactly it is that you don't get with the system builder edition that you would get with the full retail version.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966506</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969448</id>
	<title>Re:...Windows 7 runs great on VirtualBox on Mac</title>
	<author>Neoprofin</author>
	<datestamp>1264942080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>An OEM copy of Win7 from Newegg is less than $100.<br> <br>

Please tell me where you can get a computer capable of running it for something near that.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An OEM copy of Win7 from Newegg is less than $ 100 .
Please tell me where you can get a computer capable of running it for something near that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An OEM copy of Win7 from Newegg is less than $100.
Please tell me where you can get a computer capable of running it for something near that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968338</id>
	<title>Re:Good place to ask for help</title>
	<author>guruevi</author>
	<datestamp>1264876800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe it's trying to use your EFI firmware 'partition' as an install base.</p><p>1. Run "regedit"</p><p>2. [HKEY\_LOCAL\_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup]</p><p>3. New - String value</p><p>4. Name it "BootDir" and set its value to "C:\"</p><p>-- funny that Windows needs a (manual) setting to know where it itself is installed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe it 's trying to use your EFI firmware 'partition ' as an install base.1 .
Run " regedit " 2 .
[ HKEY \ _LOCAL \ _MACHINE \ Software \ Microsoft \ Windows \ CurrentVersion \ Setup ] 3. New - String value4 .
Name it " BootDir " and set its value to " C : \ " -- funny that Windows needs a ( manual ) setting to know where it itself is installed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe it's trying to use your EFI firmware 'partition' as an install base.1.
Run "regedit"2.
[HKEY\_LOCAL\_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup]3. New - String value4.
Name it "BootDir" and set its value to "C:\"-- funny that Windows needs a (manual) setting to know where it itself is installed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966436</id>
	<title>Re:Good place to ask for help</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264854540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen this problems before. Theres a registry hack to get the SP2 to install properly. It's got to do with the Mac EFI.</p><p>1. Click Start &ndash; Run &ndash; Type &ldquo;regedit&rdquo; and press enter.</p><p>2. Navigate to</p><p>[HKEY\_LOCAL\_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup]</p><p>HKEY\_LOCAL\_MACHINE<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; \Software<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; \Microsoft<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; \Windows<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; \CurrentVersion<br>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; \Setup</p><p>3. In the right pane, Right-click and select New &ndash; String value</p><p>4. Name it as &ldquo;BootDir&rdquo; and set its value to &ldquo;C:\&rdquo;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen this problems before .
Theres a registry hack to get the SP2 to install properly .
It 's got to do with the Mac EFI.1 .
Click Start    Run    Type    regedit    and press enter.2 .
Navigate to [ HKEY \ _LOCAL \ _MACHINE \ Software \ Microsoft \ Windows \ CurrentVersion \ Setup ] HKEY \ _LOCAL \ _MACHINE         \ Software                   \ Microsoft                             \ Windows                                     \ CurrentVersion                                               \ Setup3 .
In the right pane , Right-click and select New    String value4 .
Name it as    BootDir    and set its value to    C : \   </tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen this problems before.
Theres a registry hack to get the SP2 to install properly.
It's got to do with the Mac EFI.1.
Click Start – Run – Type “regedit” and press enter.2.
Navigate to[HKEY\_LOCAL\_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup]HKEY\_LOCAL\_MACHINE
        \Software
                  \Microsoft
                            \Windows
                                    \CurrentVersion
                                              \Setup3.
In the right pane, Right-click and select New – String value4.
Name it as “BootDir” and set its value to “C:\”</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966272</id>
	<title>Re:Why do need to buy 10.6 to get this? more ways</title>
	<author>jo\_ham</author>
	<datestamp>1264852800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So the $29 cost of Snow Leopard is the crippling factor, not the $100+ cost of the Win7 copy you want to install?</p><p>The straw that broke the camel's back perhaps?</p><p>Oh wait, you torrented Windows and just want a cheap (ha) dig at Apple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the $ 29 cost of Snow Leopard is the crippling factor , not the $ 100 + cost of the Win7 copy you want to install ? The straw that broke the camel 's back perhaps ? Oh wait , you torrented Windows and just want a cheap ( ha ) dig at Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the $29 cost of Snow Leopard is the crippling factor, not the $100+ cost of the Win7 copy you want to install?The straw that broke the camel's back perhaps?Oh wait, you torrented Windows and just want a cheap (ha) dig at Apple.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966132</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966026</id>
	<title>I'd rather leave it in a cow pasture</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264850640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It'd wind up with less crap on it that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 'd wind up with less crap on it that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It'd wind up with less crap on it that way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30971842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30970990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966506
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30971612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966236
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30977860
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966152
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967266
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30978442
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966132
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969054
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966024
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966486
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966436
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_2026204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966332
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966024
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966522
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966090
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966168
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30978442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966166
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966272
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967266
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967528
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966332
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968836
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966262
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966190
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30977860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966486
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966872
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966236
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30970990
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969054
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966396
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_2026204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966730
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966268
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969470
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30971612
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969674
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967852
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966506
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968398
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967596
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967076
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969028
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967414
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969448
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969188
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966878
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30966534
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30969680
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967718
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30967926
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30971842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_2026204.30968940
</commentlist>
</conversation>
