<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_30_175230</id>
	<title>Astronomers Discover the Coolest Known Sub-Stellar Body</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1264873560000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"Science Daily reports that using the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) in Hawaii, astronomers have <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100129092631.htm">discovered what may be the coolest sub-stellar body ever found</a> outside our own solar system. Too small to be stars and with insufficient mass to maintain hydrogen-burning nuclear fusion reactions in their cores, '<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown\_dwarf">brown dwarfs</a>' have masses smaller than stars but larger than gas giant planets like Jupiter, with an upper limit in between 75 and 80 Jupiter masses.  'This looks like the fourth time in three years that the <a href="http://www.jach.hawaii.edu/UKIRT/">UKIRT</a> has made a record breaking discovery of the coolest known brown dwarf, with an estimated temperature not far above 200 degrees Celsius,' says Dr. Philip Lucas at the University of Hertfordshire. Due to their low temperature these objects are very faint in visible light, and are detected by their glow at infrared wavelengths. The object known as SDSS1416+13B is in a wide orbit around a somewhat brighter and warmer brown dwarf, SDSS1416+13A, and the pair is located between 15 and 50 light years from the solar system, which is quite close in astronomical terms."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " Science Daily reports that using the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope ( UKIRT ) in Hawaii , astronomers have discovered what may be the coolest sub-stellar body ever found outside our own solar system .
Too small to be stars and with insufficient mass to maintain hydrogen-burning nuclear fusion reactions in their cores , 'brown dwarfs ' have masses smaller than stars but larger than gas giant planets like Jupiter , with an upper limit in between 75 and 80 Jupiter masses .
'This looks like the fourth time in three years that the UKIRT has made a record breaking discovery of the coolest known brown dwarf , with an estimated temperature not far above 200 degrees Celsius, ' says Dr. Philip Lucas at the University of Hertfordshire .
Due to their low temperature these objects are very faint in visible light , and are detected by their glow at infrared wavelengths .
The object known as SDSS1416 + 13B is in a wide orbit around a somewhat brighter and warmer brown dwarf , SDSS1416 + 13A , and the pair is located between 15 and 50 light years from the solar system , which is quite close in astronomical terms .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "Science Daily reports that using the United Kingdom Infrared Telescope (UKIRT) in Hawaii, astronomers have discovered what may be the coolest sub-stellar body ever found outside our own solar system.
Too small to be stars and with insufficient mass to maintain hydrogen-burning nuclear fusion reactions in their cores, 'brown dwarfs' have masses smaller than stars but larger than gas giant planets like Jupiter, with an upper limit in between 75 and 80 Jupiter masses.
'This looks like the fourth time in three years that the UKIRT has made a record breaking discovery of the coolest known brown dwarf, with an estimated temperature not far above 200 degrees Celsius,' says Dr. Philip Lucas at the University of Hertfordshire.
Due to their low temperature these objects are very faint in visible light, and are detected by their glow at infrared wavelengths.
The object known as SDSS1416+13B is in a wide orbit around a somewhat brighter and warmer brown dwarf, SDSS1416+13A, and the pair is located between 15 and 50 light years from the solar system, which is quite close in astronomical terms.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963882</id>
	<title>It's the new coolest sub-stellar body</title>
	<author>The Archon V2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1264878000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>But I'm still the awesomest sub-stellar body.<p>

(Puts on shades.)</p><p>

Yeah.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But I 'm still the awesomest sub-stellar body .
( Puts on shades .
) Yeah .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I'm still the awesomest sub-stellar body.
(Puts on shades.
)

Yeah.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963784</id>
	<title>first piss</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264877580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i bot</htmltext>
<tokenext>i bot</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i bot</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965472</id>
	<title>Re:Isn't Jupiter cooler?</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1264845960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah but all of those object are not "outside our own solar system". If they were, they would be very hard to detect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah but all of those object are not " outside our own solar system " .
If they were , they would be very hard to detect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah but all of those object are not "outside our own solar system".
If they were, they would be very hard to detect.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964394</id>
	<title>So...</title>
	<author>drej</author>
	<datestamp>1264881360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>So Fonzie is now a body in outer space?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So Fonzie is now a body in outer space ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Fonzie is now a body in outer space?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965140</id>
	<title>Re:These should be common</title>
	<author>Eudial</author>
	<datestamp>1264843500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I know we can't make too many assumptions, but I think common sense would indicate there's trillions of these things floating out there.  I would think there's more of these in the galaxy than stars, if you just continue the mass/frequency curve past the point that fusion ignites.</p></div><p>That's a pretty common astrophysical assumption though, that the universe is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological\_principle" title="wikipedia.org">homogenous and isotropic</a> [wikipedia.org]. Or in simpler words, our corner of space is not significantly different from any other corner of space. So if we find these guys floating around in space, similar objects will likely float around elsewhere as well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know we ca n't make too many assumptions , but I think common sense would indicate there 's trillions of these things floating out there .
I would think there 's more of these in the galaxy than stars , if you just continue the mass/frequency curve past the point that fusion ignites.That 's a pretty common astrophysical assumption though , that the universe is homogenous and isotropic [ wikipedia.org ] .
Or in simpler words , our corner of space is not significantly different from any other corner of space .
So if we find these guys floating around in space , similar objects will likely float around elsewhere as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know we can't make too many assumptions, but I think common sense would indicate there's trillions of these things floating out there.
I would think there's more of these in the galaxy than stars, if you just continue the mass/frequency curve past the point that fusion ignites.That's a pretty common astrophysical assumption though, that the universe is homogenous and isotropic [wikipedia.org].
Or in simpler words, our corner of space is not significantly different from any other corner of space.
So if we find these guys floating around in space, similar objects will likely float around elsewhere as well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964164</id>
	<title>y'know...</title>
	<author>kaini</author>
	<datestamp>1264879620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>that *is* pretty cool.</htmltext>
<tokenext>that * is * pretty cool .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>that *is* pretty cool.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964458</id>
	<title>So?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264881900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shouldn't they be looking for the hottest stellar body, if you know what I mean?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Should n't they be looking for the hottest stellar body , if you know what I mean ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shouldn't they be looking for the hottest stellar body, if you know what I mean?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963912</id>
	<title>Scientists confirming what everybody already knows</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264878180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's Fonzi, right?</p><p>(pre-shark, of course)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Fonzi , right ?
( pre-shark , of course )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Fonzi, right?
(pre-shark, of course)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30967720</id>
	<title>Funny they don't know far it is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264867500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>  Actually there are suspected to be more brown drawfs, failed
stars with not enough gas for fusion , in the galaxy than there
will be normal stars. If thats so they should be many (tens) brown
drawfs within ten light years of us. Brown drawfs of course are
so very dim, that its very difficult to spot them at all. But
UKIRT is any all sky survey that will take years to complete, and
we can expect them to find a lot more brown drawfs.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Astronomy/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Astronomy</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually there are suspected to be more brown drawfs , failed stars with not enough gas for fusion , in the galaxy than there will be normal stars .
If thats so they should be many ( tens ) brown drawfs within ten light years of us .
Brown drawfs of course are so very dim , that its very difficult to spot them at all .
But UKIRT is any all sky survey that will take years to complete , and we can expect them to find a lot more brown drawfs .
--- Astronomy [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  Actually there are suspected to be more brown drawfs, failed
stars with not enough gas for fusion , in the galaxy than there
will be normal stars.
If thats so they should be many (tens) brown
drawfs within ten light years of us.
Brown drawfs of course are
so very dim, that its very difficult to spot them at all.
But
UKIRT is any all sky survey that will take years to complete, and
we can expect them to find a lot more brown drawfs.
---

Astronomy [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30966368</id>
	<title>Re:Scientists confirming what everybody already kn</title>
	<author>ChrisMaple</author>
	<datestamp>1264853820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's Gary Coleman</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Gary Coleman</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Gary Coleman</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963912</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964866</id>
	<title>Too Hot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264884840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>200 celcius? Thats way too hot to be called cool.</p><p>Aren't some of the further out gas giants in this solar system Like Neptune more like 200 Kelvin.</p><p>What about Uranus? I know mine is about 310 kelvin<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>200 celcius ?
Thats way too hot to be called cool.Are n't some of the further out gas giants in this solar system Like Neptune more like 200 Kelvin.What about Uranus ?
I know mine is about 310 kelvin : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>200 celcius?
Thats way too hot to be called cool.Aren't some of the further out gas giants in this solar system Like Neptune more like 200 Kelvin.What about Uranus?
I know mine is about 310 kelvin :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30967880</id>
	<title>Cool!</title>
	<author>ianalis</author>
	<datestamp>1264869780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30970086</id>
	<title>What a sight...</title>
	<author>MattBD</author>
	<datestamp>1264950720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A system of brown dwarfs (dwarves?) like this must be an awesome sight, although I expect this one is probably too widely separated to be all that spectacular. But the idea of a gas giant/brown dwarf so large it has planets the size of Jupiter as moons is pretty staggering.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A system of brown dwarfs ( dwarves ?
) like this must be an awesome sight , although I expect this one is probably too widely separated to be all that spectacular .
But the idea of a gas giant/brown dwarf so large it has planets the size of Jupiter as moons is pretty staggering .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A system of brown dwarfs (dwarves?
) like this must be an awesome sight, although I expect this one is probably too widely separated to be all that spectacular.
But the idea of a gas giant/brown dwarf so large it has planets the size of Jupiter as moons is pretty staggering.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964956</id>
	<title>Unimpressed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264842120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Us<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ers have known about Chuck Norris for years!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Us /.ers have known about Chuck Norris for years !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Us /.ers have known about Chuck Norris for years!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964260</id>
	<title>Hm?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264880340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't know my bowel movements were considered sub-stellar bodies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't know my bowel movements were considered sub-stellar bodies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't know my bowel movements were considered sub-stellar bodies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963874</id>
	<title>I'm sure</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264878000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sure there is a joke in here somewhere involving aliens and mood lighting...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sure there is a joke in here somewhere involving aliens and mood lighting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sure there is a joke in here somewhere involving aliens and mood lighting...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964194</id>
	<title>What's the bigger news here?</title>
	<author>T Murphy</author>
	<datestamp>1264879800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Given brown dwarfs generally have no heat source, they cool quickly and we expect there to be cold ones out there. Is the bigger news the fact that we could detect this cool object, or the information gained by finding this brown dwarf?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Given brown dwarfs generally have no heat source , they cool quickly and we expect there to be cold ones out there .
Is the bigger news the fact that we could detect this cool object , or the information gained by finding this brown dwarf ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given brown dwarfs generally have no heat source, they cool quickly and we expect there to be cold ones out there.
Is the bigger news the fact that we could detect this cool object, or the information gained by finding this brown dwarf?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964464</id>
	<title>These should be common</title>
	<author>Toonol</author>
	<datestamp>1264881960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I know we can't make too many assumptions, but I think common sense would indicate there's trillions of these things floating out there.  I would think there's more of these in the galaxy than stars, if you just continue the mass/frequency curve past the point that fusion ignites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I know we ca n't make too many assumptions , but I think common sense would indicate there 's trillions of these things floating out there .
I would think there 's more of these in the galaxy than stars , if you just continue the mass/frequency curve past the point that fusion ignites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know we can't make too many assumptions, but I think common sense would indicate there's trillions of these things floating out there.
I would think there's more of these in the galaxy than stars, if you just continue the mass/frequency curve past the point that fusion ignites.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30967458</id>
	<title>The coolest!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264863840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I went to highschool with this guy. He actually used to be a total nerd.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I went to highschool with this guy .
He actually used to be a total nerd .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I went to highschool with this guy.
He actually used to be a total nerd.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964504</id>
	<title>This calls for a facepalm.</title>
	<author>SilverHatHacker</author>
	<datestamp>1264882260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://blurredproductions.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/picard-facepalm2.jpg" title="wordpress.com">For everyone who read this thinking it meant "cool" as in "awesome".</a> [wordpress.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>For everyone who read this thinking it meant " cool " as in " awesome " .
[ wordpress.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For everyone who read this thinking it meant "cool" as in "awesome".
[wordpress.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30968088</id>
	<title>Off-topic</title>
	<author>Petrushka</author>
	<datestamp>1264872780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Posting to remove an erroneous moderation.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting to remove an erroneous moderation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting to remove an erroneous moderation.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965876</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1264849380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>What would a brown dwarf do if it passed close by to earth... since they are hard to detect I can assume we wouldn't see it coming.</p></div><p>Um, it would be a lot easier to see coming than the planet Jupiter.  What makes a brown dwarf hard to detect is that it's not close to a star (if it was, it would be a large exoplanet instead).  Obviously it one was passing close by Earth, it would be close to a star (the Sun) and would be extremely easy to detect.  "Impossible to miss" would be a better description.  Depending on how close, it would likely be the brightest object in the sky, visible in broad daylight, for a few centuries before it got too close.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would a brown dwarf do if it passed close by to earth... since they are hard to detect I can assume we would n't see it coming.Um , it would be a lot easier to see coming than the planet Jupiter .
What makes a brown dwarf hard to detect is that it 's not close to a star ( if it was , it would be a large exoplanet instead ) .
Obviously it one was passing close by Earth , it would be close to a star ( the Sun ) and would be extremely easy to detect .
" Impossible to miss " would be a better description .
Depending on how close , it would likely be the brightest object in the sky , visible in broad daylight , for a few centuries before it got too close .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would a brown dwarf do if it passed close by to earth... since they are hard to detect I can assume we wouldn't see it coming.Um, it would be a lot easier to see coming than the planet Jupiter.
What makes a brown dwarf hard to detect is that it's not close to a star (if it was, it would be a large exoplanet instead).
Obviously it one was passing close by Earth, it would be close to a star (the Sun) and would be extremely easy to detect.
"Impossible to miss" would be a better description.
Depending on how close, it would likely be the brightest object in the sky, visible in broad daylight, for a few centuries before it got too close.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965218</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264844160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I understand it, the Moon was formed when a Mars-sized body collided with proto-Earth, dumping its iron core and some matter into our own planet. The rest bounced back into space and settled in an orbit around the Earth.</p><p>If a brown dwarf were to collide with the Earth it would be completely destroyed. It would be as if Earth fell into Jupiter or the Sun.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I understand it , the Moon was formed when a Mars-sized body collided with proto-Earth , dumping its iron core and some matter into our own planet .
The rest bounced back into space and settled in an orbit around the Earth.If a brown dwarf were to collide with the Earth it would be completely destroyed .
It would be as if Earth fell into Jupiter or the Sun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I understand it, the Moon was formed when a Mars-sized body collided with proto-Earth, dumping its iron core and some matter into our own planet.
The rest bounced back into space and settled in an orbit around the Earth.If a brown dwarf were to collide with the Earth it would be completely destroyed.
It would be as if Earth fell into Jupiter or the Sun.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964840</id>
	<title>Fonz</title>
	<author>Junior J. Junior III</author>
	<datestamp>1264884660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since it's the coolest known, if Fonzie doesn't already have a sub-stellar body named after him, this one should be it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since it 's the coolest known , if Fonzie does n't already have a sub-stellar body named after him , this one should be it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since it's the coolest known, if Fonzie doesn't already have a sub-stellar body named after him, this one should be it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964046</id>
	<title>Re:I wonder</title>
	<author>mister\_playboy</author>
	<datestamp>1264878960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>An object with 75 to 80 times the mass of Jupiter passing through the Solar System would cause way more chaos than that.  Trust me, you'd be well aware of its presence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>An object with 75 to 80 times the mass of Jupiter passing through the Solar System would cause way more chaos than that .
Trust me , you 'd be well aware of its presence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An object with 75 to 80 times the mass of Jupiter passing through the Solar System would cause way more chaos than that.
Trust me, you'd be well aware of its presence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963918</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963918</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>EgNagRah</author>
	<datestamp>1264878180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What would a brown dwarf do if it passed close by to earth... since they are hard to detect I can assume we wouldn't see it coming.

Would it possible be able to cause the earth to spew out a moon?
<a href="http://www.physorg.com/news183884450.html?xid=rss-fullcontent" title="physorg.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.physorg.com/news183884450.html?xid=rss-fullcontent</a> [physorg.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>What would a brown dwarf do if it passed close by to earth... since they are hard to detect I can assume we would n't see it coming .
Would it possible be able to cause the earth to spew out a moon ?
http : //www.physorg.com/news183884450.html ? xid = rss-fullcontent [ physorg.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What would a brown dwarf do if it passed close by to earth... since they are hard to detect I can assume we wouldn't see it coming.
Would it possible be able to cause the earth to spew out a moon?
http://www.physorg.com/news183884450.html?xid=rss-fullcontent [physorg.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963930</id>
	<title>Not "brown dwarf"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264878240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's "African-American little person".</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's " African-American little person " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's "African-American little person".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965982</id>
	<title>Re:Isn't Jupiter cooler?</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1264850340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I mean if Jupiter&rsquo;s surface temperature is below 200 degrees Celsius (and i bet it is), and since it&rsquo;s also a brown dwarf...</p></div><p>Jupiter is not a brown dwarf.  It orbits the Sun.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Also, what about Saturn, Neptune and Uranus, who just as much count as brown dwarfs,</p></div><p>Correct, insofar as "just as much count" correctly notes that none of these bodies are brown dwarves.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>... since they are mainly built like a star.</p></div><p>How something is built does not alone define its astronomical classification.  If the Earth orbited a gas giant, it would be a moon rather than a planet.  If Titan did not orbit Saturn but orbited the Sun, it would be a planet, not a moon.  If Jupiter would flying free through interstellar space with no star to orbit, it would be a brown dwarf.  But in fact, it is not.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean if Jupiter    s surface temperature is below 200 degrees Celsius ( and i bet it is ) , and since it    s also a brown dwarf...Jupiter is not a brown dwarf .
It orbits the Sun.Also , what about Saturn , Neptune and Uranus , who just as much count as brown dwarfs,Correct , insofar as " just as much count " correctly notes that none of these bodies are brown dwarves.... since they are mainly built like a star.How something is built does not alone define its astronomical classification .
If the Earth orbited a gas giant , it would be a moon rather than a planet .
If Titan did not orbit Saturn but orbited the Sun , it would be a planet , not a moon .
If Jupiter would flying free through interstellar space with no star to orbit , it would be a brown dwarf .
But in fact , it is not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean if Jupiter’s surface temperature is below 200 degrees Celsius (and i bet it is), and since it’s also a brown dwarf...Jupiter is not a brown dwarf.
It orbits the Sun.Also, what about Saturn, Neptune and Uranus, who just as much count as brown dwarfs,Correct, insofar as "just as much count" correctly notes that none of these bodies are brown dwarves.... since they are mainly built like a star.How something is built does not alone define its astronomical classification.
If the Earth orbited a gas giant, it would be a moon rather than a planet.
If Titan did not orbit Saturn but orbited the Sun, it would be a planet, not a moon.
If Jupiter would flying free through interstellar space with no star to orbit, it would be a brown dwarf.
But in fact, it is not.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964826</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964826</id>
	<title>Isn't Jupiter cooler?</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1264884600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean if Jupiter&rsquo;s surface temperature is below 200 degrees Celsius (and i bet it is), and since it&rsquo;s also a brown dwarf (even with nuclear reactions going on in its core), shouldn&rsquo;t it be even cooler?<br>Also, what about Saturn, Neptune and Uranus, who just as much count as brown dwarfs, since they are mainly built like a star.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean if Jupiter    s surface temperature is below 200 degrees Celsius ( and i bet it is ) , and since it    s also a brown dwarf ( even with nuclear reactions going on in its core ) , shouldn    t it be even cooler ? Also , what about Saturn , Neptune and Uranus , who just as much count as brown dwarfs , since they are mainly built like a star .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean if Jupiter’s surface temperature is below 200 degrees Celsius (and i bet it is), and since it’s also a brown dwarf (even with nuclear reactions going on in its core), shouldn’t it be even cooler?Also, what about Saturn, Neptune and Uranus, who just as much count as brown dwarfs, since they are mainly built like a star.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963902</id>
	<title>Coolest?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264878120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Brown dwarfs stars are cooler than some of the (exo)planets found already?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Brown dwarfs stars are cooler than some of the ( exo ) planets found already ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Brown dwarfs stars are cooler than some of the (exo)planets found already?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965656</id>
	<title>update WP</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1264847460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like it's time for someone with the relevant expertise to update this: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown\_dwarf#Spectral\_class\_Y" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown\_dwarf#Spectral\_class\_Y</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like it 's time for someone with the relevant expertise to update this : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown \ _dwarf # Spectral \ _class \ _Y [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like it's time for someone with the relevant expertise to update this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown\_dwarf#Spectral\_class\_Y [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_175230_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964464
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_175230_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_175230_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_175230_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_175230_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964826
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_175230_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30966368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963912
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_175230_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963918
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_175230.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_175230.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30967720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_175230.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30966368
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_175230.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964394
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_175230.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_175230.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965218
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_175230.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964464
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30965140
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_175230.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_175230.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30964504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_175230.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_175230.30963930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
