<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_30_1655239</id>
	<title>"Perpetual Motion DeLorean" Scammers Face $26M Judgment</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1264875480000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Back in 2002, we discussed a story about the so-called '<a href="http://slashdot.org/story/02/09/07/1952252/Perpetual-Motion-Delorean">Perpetual Motion DeLorean</a>,' which could 'supposedly go "hundreds of miles" at speeds over 100MPH without stopping to recharge.' More than seven years later, the final shoe has dropped on this saga, with <a href="http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-8199-Breakthrough-Energy-Examiner~y2010m1d29-Investors-win-26M-award-against-Tilleys">a $26 million judgment against Carl Tilley and his wife</a>, who propagated this scam that ran for several years.  Probably the height of its audacity was when Tilley told his shareholders in May of 2002 that GE had offered $2 billion 'sight unseen' to buy out the technology."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Back in 2002 , we discussed a story about the so-called 'Perpetual Motion DeLorean, ' which could 'supposedly go " hundreds of miles " at speeds over 100MPH without stopping to recharge .
' More than seven years later , the final shoe has dropped on this saga , with a $ 26 million judgment against Carl Tilley and his wife , who propagated this scam that ran for several years .
Probably the height of its audacity was when Tilley told his shareholders in May of 2002 that GE had offered $ 2 billion 'sight unseen ' to buy out the technology .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Back in 2002, we discussed a story about the so-called 'Perpetual Motion DeLorean,' which could 'supposedly go "hundreds of miles" at speeds over 100MPH without stopping to recharge.
' More than seven years later, the final shoe has dropped on this saga, with a $26 million judgment against Carl Tilley and his wife, who propagated this scam that ran for several years.
Probably the height of its audacity was when Tilley told his shareholders in May of 2002 that GE had offered $2 billion 'sight unseen' to buy out the technology.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964762</id>
	<title>Re:They should be given medals, not prison sentenc</title>
	<author>cjcela</author>
	<datestamp>1264884180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>While I can see where you come from, this is still deception and should not be rewarded. Neither should the greed of the 'investors'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While I can see where you come from , this is still deception and should not be rewarded .
Neither should the greed of the 'investors' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While I can see where you come from, this is still deception and should not be rewarded.
Neither should the greed of the 'investors'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964374</id>
	<title>Re:They should be given medals, not prison sentenc</title>
	<author>ScrewMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1264881240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They're doing the human race a favour. Really.</p></div><p>Evolution in action, baby. Anyone who is willing to not only believe in perpetual motion but <i>invest money in it</i> deserves whatever it is he or she gets from their particular brand of ignorance. A basic grade-school science curriculum should be sufficient armor against a scam of this type (well, at least in my day it was.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're doing the human race a favour .
Really.Evolution in action , baby .
Anyone who is willing to not only believe in perpetual motion but invest money in it deserves whatever it is he or she gets from their particular brand of ignorance .
A basic grade-school science curriculum should be sufficient armor against a scam of this type ( well , at least in my day it was .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're doing the human race a favour.
Really.Evolution in action, baby.
Anyone who is willing to not only believe in perpetual motion but invest money in it deserves whatever it is he or she gets from their particular brand of ignorance.
A basic grade-school science curriculum should be sufficient armor against a scam of this type (well, at least in my day it was.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30967010</id>
	<title>Re:Perpetual Scam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264859640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>energy can be neither created nor destroyed.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
You've never been to one of those meetings where someone just sucked all the energy out of the room, have you<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...
</p><p>
And you're wrong<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... energy can be created - E=MC squared is the formula for creating energy out of matter (or matter out of energy).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>energy can be neither created nor destroyed .
You 've never been to one of those meetings where someone just sucked all the energy out of the room , have you .. . And you 're wrong ... energy can be created - E = MC squared is the formula for creating energy out of matter ( or matter out of energy ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>energy can be neither created nor destroyed.
You've never been to one of those meetings where someone just sucked all the energy out of the room, have you ...

And you're wrong ... energy can be created - E=MC squared is the formula for creating energy out of matter (or matter out of energy).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968762</id>
	<title>I won the one working prototype in a bet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264971420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I won the one working prototype in a bet and was playing with it one day via remote control. Unfortunately prior to the test the designer never told me I should not exceed 87 mph. As soon as the prototype hit 88mph, it vanished - I questioned the designer and he said the prototype had a time circuit which causes the vehicle to act as a time machine (in fact time travel was the primary purpose for the machine; overunity from what he termed the "flux capacitor" is just an accidental discovery) and it jumped through time; presumably into the future.  So, please believe me, this technology works. We had a user error which caused the proof to vanish. I'd love to help these poor crackpots^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hvisionaries out but because they didn't warn me about the flux capacitor's primary function.  Just wait a while;  the prototype will turn up. Honest!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I won the one working prototype in a bet and was playing with it one day via remote control .
Unfortunately prior to the test the designer never told me I should not exceed 87 mph .
As soon as the prototype hit 88mph , it vanished - I questioned the designer and he said the prototype had a time circuit which causes the vehicle to act as a time machine ( in fact time travel was the primary purpose for the machine ; overunity from what he termed the " flux capacitor " is just an accidental discovery ) and it jumped through time ; presumably into the future .
So , please believe me , this technology works .
We had a user error which caused the proof to vanish .
I 'd love to help these poor crackpots ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ H ^ Hvisionaries out but because they did n't warn me about the flux capacitor 's primary function .
Just wait a while ; the prototype will turn up .
Honest !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I won the one working prototype in a bet and was playing with it one day via remote control.
Unfortunately prior to the test the designer never told me I should not exceed 87 mph.
As soon as the prototype hit 88mph, it vanished - I questioned the designer and he said the prototype had a time circuit which causes the vehicle to act as a time machine (in fact time travel was the primary purpose for the machine; overunity from what he termed the "flux capacitor" is just an accidental discovery) and it jumped through time; presumably into the future.
So, please believe me, this technology works.
We had a user error which caused the proof to vanish.
I'd love to help these poor crackpots^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hvisionaries out but because they didn't warn me about the flux capacitor's primary function.
Just wait a while;  the prototype will turn up.
Honest!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964418</id>
	<title>Re:Admirable traits for a respectable CEO</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264881660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And then there was Rambus.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And then there was Rambus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then there was Rambus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965268</id>
	<title>Re:It wasn't a scam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264844520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or, a tax on people who understand them, but are "hopeful" anyway. aka, "greedy people".</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , a tax on people who understand them , but are " hopeful " anyway .
aka , " greedy people " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, a tax on people who understand them, but are "hopeful" anyway.
aka, "greedy people".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130</id>
	<title>They should be given medals, not prison sentences</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264879380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They're doing the human race a favour. Really.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're doing the human race a favour .
Really .  </tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're doing the human race a favour.
Really.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964780</id>
	<title>100's of miles at 100 mph? strange example to use.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264884300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My plain-old-ordinary car can go 100's of miles at 100 mph without stopping to refuel.  What's exceptional about that?  In fact, it'll probably go well over 100 miles at 175 MPH, although I've never tried that for obvious reasons.</p><p>Maybe they're spouting some BS perpetual motion nonsense, but a range of 300+ miles at 100 MPH is well within the range of modern automobiles, so that seems like an odd thing to say if you're trying to pretend you have invented perpetual motion.  "I've invented infinite power, bwaaahahaha!  I will now power this laptop for the next 3 hours without recharging it!!!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My plain-old-ordinary car can go 100 's of miles at 100 mph without stopping to refuel .
What 's exceptional about that ?
In fact , it 'll probably go well over 100 miles at 175 MPH , although I 've never tried that for obvious reasons.Maybe they 're spouting some BS perpetual motion nonsense , but a range of 300 + miles at 100 MPH is well within the range of modern automobiles , so that seems like an odd thing to say if you 're trying to pretend you have invented perpetual motion .
" I 've invented infinite power , bwaaahahaha !
I will now power this laptop for the next 3 hours without recharging it ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My plain-old-ordinary car can go 100's of miles at 100 mph without stopping to refuel.
What's exceptional about that?
In fact, it'll probably go well over 100 miles at 175 MPH, although I've never tried that for obvious reasons.Maybe they're spouting some BS perpetual motion nonsense, but a range of 300+ miles at 100 MPH is well within the range of modern automobiles, so that seems like an odd thing to say if you're trying to pretend you have invented perpetual motion.
"I've invented infinite power, bwaaahahaha!
I will now power this laptop for the next 3 hours without recharging it!!!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965448</id>
	<title>Ob</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1264845780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>[mode = evangelical german christian with 98 kids] Who are we to say that perpetual motion is impossible?  Thermodynamic laws are just theories, like evolution and gravity.[/]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>[ mode = evangelical german christian with 98 kids ] Who are we to say that perpetual motion is impossible ?
Thermodynamic laws are just theories , like evolution and gravity .
[ / ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>[mode = evangelical german christian with 98 kids] Who are we to say that perpetual motion is impossible?
Thermodynamic laws are just theories, like evolution and gravity.
[/]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270</id>
	<title>Re:Admirable traits for a respectable CEO</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264880400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Serious?  Really?  How are most technology CEO's scammers on a level that this guy is on?  Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level'?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Serious ?
Really ? How are most technology CEO 's scammers on a level that this guy is on ?
Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level ' ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Serious?
Really?  How are most technology CEO's scammers on a level that this guy is on?
Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level'?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964148</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964942</id>
	<title>Re:It wasn't a scam</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1264842120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you could tap into non traditional energy sources on board ( like heat, sunlight, cosmic rays, etc ) the car would be for all practical purposes perpetual ( until physical entropy took over and the wheels fell off. ).</p><p>And while i agree NOTHING last forever, in this game its all relative. If you can outlast mankind ( like our sun will ), might as well call it perpetual.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you could tap into non traditional energy sources on board ( like heat , sunlight , cosmic rays , etc ) the car would be for all practical purposes perpetual ( until physical entropy took over and the wheels fell off .
) .And while i agree NOTHING last forever , in this game its all relative .
If you can outlast mankind ( like our sun will ) , might as well call it perpetual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you could tap into non traditional energy sources on board ( like heat, sunlight, cosmic rays, etc ) the car would be for all practical purposes perpetual ( until physical entropy took over and the wheels fell off.
).And while i agree NOTHING last forever, in this game its all relative.
If you can outlast mankind ( like our sun will ), might as well call it perpetual.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30967074</id>
	<title>Re:It wasn't a scam</title>
	<author>KneelBeforeZod</author>
	<datestamp>1264860180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"In this house we follow the laws of thermodynamics!" ~Homer Simpson~</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" In this house we follow the laws of thermodynamics !
" ~ Homer Simpson ~</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"In this house we follow the laws of thermodynamics!
" ~Homer Simpson~</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968468</id>
	<title>Subject</title>
	<author>Legion303</author>
	<datestamp>1264879020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Probably the height of its audacity was when Tilley told his shareholders in May of 2002 that GE had offered $2 billion 'sight unseen' to buy out the technology."</p><p>And the height of stupidity came from those shareholders who took his word for it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Probably the height of its audacity was when Tilley told his shareholders in May of 2002 that GE had offered $ 2 billion 'sight unseen ' to buy out the technology .
" And the height of stupidity came from those shareholders who took his word for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Probably the height of its audacity was when Tilley told his shareholders in May of 2002 that GE had offered $2 billion 'sight unseen' to buy out the technology.
"And the height of stupidity came from those shareholders who took his word for it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30971010</id>
	<title>Free energy scam , there are dozen a penny</title>
	<author>aepervius</author>
	<datestamp>1264959180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I mean, just look at steorn.com ! Those guy preetnd to have 3 time OU. They are also pretending to demonstrate since 1/2 december. You think they would have a comprehensive evidence by now ?  Think again. And look at the freaking FOLLOWING like a cult they got. Remmember Dennis lee ? Remmember the other scammer like Lutec ? Scam there are a dozen out there. Start by the billion dollard homeopathy industry (motto: selling sugar pills to the gullible since 1886).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , just look at steorn.com !
Those guy preetnd to have 3 time OU .
They are also pretending to demonstrate since 1/2 december .
You think they would have a comprehensive evidence by now ?
Think again .
And look at the freaking FOLLOWING like a cult they got .
Remmember Dennis lee ?
Remmember the other scammer like Lutec ?
Scam there are a dozen out there .
Start by the billion dollard homeopathy industry ( motto : selling sugar pills to the gullible since 1886 ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, just look at steorn.com !
Those guy preetnd to have 3 time OU.
They are also pretending to demonstrate since 1/2 december.
You think they would have a comprehensive evidence by now ?
Think again.
And look at the freaking FOLLOWING like a cult they got.
Remmember Dennis lee ?
Remmember the other scammer like Lutec ?
Scam there are a dozen out there.
Start by the billion dollard homeopathy industry (motto: selling sugar pills to the gullible since 1886).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.31036758</id>
	<title>windmill</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1265395980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>i'll just set up my windmill over here, may not be "perpetual", but it's good enough.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>i 'll just set up my windmill over here , may not be " perpetual " , but it 's good enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i'll just set up my windmill over here, may not be "perpetual", but it's good enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30967766</id>
	<title>Re:Ob</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264868220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thermodynamic laws are real BUT they are called THERMOdynamic for a reason. They only apply to HEAT-producing engines. Therefore an engine that does not produce excess heat does in fact skip the thermodynamic laws. Yeah, I made several. No one can understand it but they all agree it won't work, so you never get it. Too bad for you eh? Just when somebody breaks the laws into dust the level of science comprehension drops.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thermodynamic laws are real BUT they are called THERMOdynamic for a reason .
They only apply to HEAT-producing engines .
Therefore an engine that does not produce excess heat does in fact skip the thermodynamic laws .
Yeah , I made several .
No one can understand it but they all agree it wo n't work , so you never get it .
Too bad for you eh ?
Just when somebody breaks the laws into dust the level of science comprehension drops .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thermodynamic laws are real BUT they are called THERMOdynamic for a reason.
They only apply to HEAT-producing engines.
Therefore an engine that does not produce excess heat does in fact skip the thermodynamic laws.
Yeah, I made several.
No one can understand it but they all agree it won't work, so you never get it.
Too bad for you eh?
Just when somebody breaks the laws into dust the level of science comprehension drops.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968210</id>
	<title>Re:2002? Delorean?</title>
	<author>KaoticEvil</author>
	<datestamp>1264874700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I really wanna know is if he thought of this after he hit his head on the toilet...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I really wan na know is if he thought of this after he hit his head on the toilet.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I really wanna know is if he thought of this after he hit his head on the toilet...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964162</id>
	<title>Almost forgot</title>
	<author>Jon Abbott</author>
	<datestamp>1264879620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So that reminds me, we all need to start wearing our <a href="http://bttf.wikia.com/wiki/Multiple\_ties" title="wikia.com">multiple ties</a> [wikia.com] and <a href="http://static.reelmovienews.com/images/gallery/marty-doc-in-2015.jpg" title="reelmovienews.com">chrome sunglasses</a> [reelmovienews.com] so that they are in fashion by the time <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Back\_to\_the\_Future\_Part\_II" title="wikipedia.org">2015</a> [wikipedia.org] is here.  And Nike, where are my power shoelaces?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So that reminds me , we all need to start wearing our multiple ties [ wikia.com ] and chrome sunglasses [ reelmovienews.com ] so that they are in fashion by the time 2015 [ wikipedia.org ] is here .
And Nike , where are my power shoelaces ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So that reminds me, we all need to start wearing our multiple ties [wikia.com] and chrome sunglasses [reelmovienews.com] so that they are in fashion by the time 2015 [wikipedia.org] is here.
And Nike, where are my power shoelaces?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965562</id>
	<title>Re:They should be given medals, not prison sentenc</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1264846680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>everyone knows that if you run a specific frequency of AC current through water, you get be more hydrogen out of the water than what you are putting in current wise.</p></div></blockquote><p>It's nothing to do with the frequency.  You just need the right catalyst.  It's 68\% unicorn horn, 29\% santa claus whiskers and 3\% JWSmythe brain.</p><p>Ironically, the minor component is proving the most difficult to find.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>everyone knows that if you run a specific frequency of AC current through water , you get be more hydrogen out of the water than what you are putting in current wise.It 's nothing to do with the frequency .
You just need the right catalyst .
It 's 68 \ % unicorn horn , 29 \ % santa claus whiskers and 3 \ % JWSmythe brain.Ironically , the minor component is proving the most difficult to find .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>everyone knows that if you run a specific frequency of AC current through water, you get be more hydrogen out of the water than what you are putting in current wise.It's nothing to do with the frequency.
You just need the right catalyst.
It's 68\% unicorn horn, 29\% santa claus whiskers and 3\% JWSmythe brain.Ironically, the minor component is proving the most difficult to find.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968246</id>
	<title>Re:Admirable traits for a respectable CEO</title>
	<author>Anonymous Psychopath</author>
	<datestamp>1264875540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Serious?  Really?  How are most technology CEO's scammers on a level that this guy is on?  Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level'?</p></div><p>Kenneth Lay, former CEO of now-defunct Enron. Although good old Ken was at a much higher level than this guy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Serious ?
Really ? How are most technology CEO 's scammers on a level that this guy is on ?
Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level ' ? Kenneth Lay , former CEO of now-defunct Enron .
Although good old Ken was at a much higher level than this guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Serious?
Really?  How are most technology CEO's scammers on a level that this guy is on?
Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level'?Kenneth Lay, former CEO of now-defunct Enron.
Although good old Ken was at a much higher level than this guy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965542</id>
	<title>Can we include Moller on this?</title>
	<author>YrWrstNtmr</author>
	<datestamp>1264846500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>His long running scam is no less criminal.</htmltext>
<tokenext>His long running scam is no less criminal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His long running scam is no less criminal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965346</id>
	<title>Give the man a break</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1264845060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>when Tilley told his shareholders in May of 2002 that GE had offered $2 billion 'sight unseen' to buy out the technology.</i></p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; The man was clearly a visionary. After all, the US government has handed out billions of dollars to SOME companies (cough GM, AIG, Citi, Fannie and Freddie) "sight unseen"... so it DOES happen!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>when Tilley told his shareholders in May of 2002 that GE had offered $ 2 billion 'sight unseen ' to buy out the technology .
      The man was clearly a visionary .
After all , the US government has handed out billions of dollars to SOME companies ( cough GM , AIG , Citi , Fannie and Freddie ) " sight unseen " ... so it DOES happen !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>when Tilley told his shareholders in May of 2002 that GE had offered $2 billion 'sight unseen' to buy out the technology.
      The man was clearly a visionary.
After all, the US government has handed out billions of dollars to SOME companies (cough GM, AIG, Citi, Fannie and Freddie) "sight unseen"... so it DOES happen!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966446</id>
	<title>Re:It wasn't a scam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264854720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The sun is older, I say it dies first.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The sun is older , I say it dies first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sun is older, I say it dies first.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964942</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30969098</id>
	<title>Re:Admirable traits for a respectable CEO</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264935600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Serious?  Really?  How are most technology CEO's scammers on a level that this guy is on?  Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level'?</p></div><p>Darl McBride</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Serious ?
Really ? How are most technology CEO 's scammers on a level that this guy is on ?
Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level ' ? Darl McBride</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Serious?
Really?  How are most technology CEO's scammers on a level that this guy is on?
Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level'?Darl McBride
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964094</id>
	<title>2002? Delorean?</title>
	<author>fredklein</author>
	<datestamp>1264879140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Did it go 88mph?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did it go 88mph ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Did it go 88mph?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964148</id>
	<title>Admirable traits for a respectable CEO</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264879500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Without doubt that guy could be on the board or be CEO of a big company...</p><p>(I'm being serious!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Without doubt that guy could be on the board or be CEO of a big company... ( I 'm being serious !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without doubt that guy could be on the board or be CEO of a big company...(I'm being serious!
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964948</id>
	<title>Re:2002? Delorean?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264842120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>whoosh</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>whoosh</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whoosh</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964150</id>
	<title>Extraordinary claims...</title>
	<author>Null Nihils</author>
	<datestamp>1264879500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...require extraordinary evidence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...require extraordinary evidence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...require extraordinary evidence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966118</id>
	<title>Re:2002? Delorean?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264851180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whoosh!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoosh !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoosh!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30986868</id>
	<title>Re:Almost forgot</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1265018580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We had to give up the flyi9ng cars, hoverboards, and Mr. Fusion in exchange for the internet. Still using fax machines in 2015 would have just been embarrassing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We had to give up the flyi9ng cars , hoverboards , and Mr. Fusion in exchange for the internet .
Still using fax machines in 2015 would have just been embarrassing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We had to give up the flyi9ng cars, hoverboards, and Mr. Fusion in exchange for the internet.
Still using fax machines in 2015 would have just been embarrassing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966822</id>
	<title>Re:They should be given medals, not prison sentenc</title>
	<author>ScrewMaster</author>
	<datestamp>1264857960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>This is not true, everyone knows that if you run a specific frequency of AC current through water, you get be more hydrogen out of the water than what you are putting in current wise.</p></div><p> <i>&ldquo;If &lsquo;everybody knows&rsquo; such &ndash;and-such, then it ain&rsquo;t so, by at least ten thousand to one.&rdquo;</i>
<br> <br>
-- Robert A. Heinlein
<br> <br>
In the meantime, while you're digesting Heinlein's wisdom, you might wish to review some <a href="http://www.scienceagainstevolution.org/v7i1f.htm" title="scienceaga...lution.org">basics</a> [scienceaga...lution.org].</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not true , everyone knows that if you run a specific frequency of AC current through water , you get be more hydrogen out of the water than what you are putting in current wise .
   If    everybody knows    such    and-such , then it ain    t so , by at least ten thousand to one.    -- Robert A. Heinlein In the meantime , while you 're digesting Heinlein 's wisdom , you might wish to review some basics [ scienceaga...lution.org ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not true, everyone knows that if you run a specific frequency of AC current through water, you get be more hydrogen out of the water than what you are putting in current wise.
“If ‘everybody knows’ such –and-such, then it ain’t so, by at least ten thousand to one.”
 
-- Robert A. Heinlein
 
In the meantime, while you're digesting Heinlein's wisdom, you might wish to review some basics [scienceaga...lution.org].
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965058</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965344</id>
	<title>Investors rarely know what they invest in</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1264845060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ever tried to get funding for something? You'd be amazed how little investors know about your project. How little they actually <i>want</i> to know. Confront them with the technical side and their eyes will glaze over before you're halfway through. They don't care.</p><p>Make wild promises and call it revolutionary technology, then break directly to investment plan and projected revenue, and you're set. I'm not kidding here. They'd invest in a machine that turns shit into meat if you make it sound halfway scientific (use cyanobacteria you genetically engineered with a retrovirus, that's 3 hard to spell words that kinda sound like they could sorta do the trick), but don't spend more than 5 minutes with the technical side, then go immediately to the part where you promise them lots of riches.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ever tried to get funding for something ?
You 'd be amazed how little investors know about your project .
How little they actually want to know .
Confront them with the technical side and their eyes will glaze over before you 're halfway through .
They do n't care.Make wild promises and call it revolutionary technology , then break directly to investment plan and projected revenue , and you 're set .
I 'm not kidding here .
They 'd invest in a machine that turns shit into meat if you make it sound halfway scientific ( use cyanobacteria you genetically engineered with a retrovirus , that 's 3 hard to spell words that kinda sound like they could sorta do the trick ) , but do n't spend more than 5 minutes with the technical side , then go immediately to the part where you promise them lots of riches .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ever tried to get funding for something?
You'd be amazed how little investors know about your project.
How little they actually want to know.
Confront them with the technical side and their eyes will glaze over before you're halfway through.
They don't care.Make wild promises and call it revolutionary technology, then break directly to investment plan and projected revenue, and you're set.
I'm not kidding here.
They'd invest in a machine that turns shit into meat if you make it sound halfway scientific (use cyanobacteria you genetically engineered with a retrovirus, that's 3 hard to spell words that kinda sound like they could sorta do the trick), but don't spend more than 5 minutes with the technical side, then go immediately to the part where you promise them lots of riches.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964952</id>
	<title>Re:2002? Delorean?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264842120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>WHOOSH!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>WHOOSH !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WHOOSH!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964906</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965058</id>
	<title>Re:They should be given medals, not prison sentenc</title>
	<author>Sam36</author>
	<datestamp>1264842900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is not true, everyone knows that if you run a specific frequency of AC current through water, you get be more hydrogen out of the water than what you are putting in current wise.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is not true , everyone knows that if you run a specific frequency of AC current through water , you get be more hydrogen out of the water than what you are putting in current wise .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is not true, everyone knows that if you run a specific frequency of AC current through water, you get be more hydrogen out of the water than what you are putting in current wise.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964374</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964946</id>
	<title>a favour?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264842120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...just like muggers and other thugs who help to weed out the weak and elderly?</htmltext>
<tokenext>...just like muggers and other thugs who help to weed out the weak and elderly ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...just like muggers and other thugs who help to weed out the weak and elderly?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968306</id>
	<title>Re:Ob</title>
	<author>evilviper</author>
	<datestamp>1264876380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To the average person, there's no obvious difference between perpetual motion devices, and solar panels...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To the average person , there 's no obvious difference between perpetual motion devices , and solar panels.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To the average person, there's no obvious difference between perpetual motion devices, and solar panels...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964650</id>
	<title>Re:It wasn't a scam</title>
	<author>ionix5891</author>
	<datestamp>1264883400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the "Steorn" guys/scammers here in Ireland are still at it</p><p><a href="http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055768261" title="boards.ie">http://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055768261</a> [boards.ie]</p><p>with their machine that creates energy out of nothing<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the " Steorn " guys/scammers here in Ireland are still at ithttp : //boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php ? t = 2055768261 [ boards.ie ] with their machine that creates energy out of nothing : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the "Steorn" guys/scammers here in Ireland are still at ithttp://boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055768261 [boards.ie]with their machine that creates energy out of nothing :D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964312</id>
	<title>Free energy community?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264880820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article keeps referring to this Free Energy community and that the "reporter" is a sincere member in it.  Then somehow, shockingly, turns out that the "businessman" claiming to have broken all the laws of physics was somehow being less than truthful about the perpetual motion machine.</p><p>In other news: gullible people with no understanding of basic science get conned.  Shocking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article keeps referring to this Free Energy community and that the " reporter " is a sincere member in it .
Then somehow , shockingly , turns out that the " businessman " claiming to have broken all the laws of physics was somehow being less than truthful about the perpetual motion machine.In other news : gullible people with no understanding of basic science get conned .
Shocking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article keeps referring to this Free Energy community and that the "reporter" is a sincere member in it.
Then somehow, shockingly, turns out that the "businessman" claiming to have broken all the laws of physics was somehow being less than truthful about the perpetual motion machine.In other news: gullible people with no understanding of basic science get conned.
Shocking.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964718</id>
	<title>Re:They should be given medals, not prison sentenc</title>
	<author>torgosan</author>
	<datestamp>1264883880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps in your world-view but I have to say that, before being modded to +5 Interesting, being at the Flamebait level had it straight-up right.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps in your world-view but I have to say that , before being modded to + 5 Interesting , being at the Flamebait level had it straight-up right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps in your world-view but I have to say that, before being modded to +5 Interesting, being at the Flamebait level had it straight-up right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965366</id>
	<title>GM, not GE</title>
	<author>jte</author>
	<datestamp>1264845180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The story was that GM, and not GE, supposedly offered $2 billion.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The story was that GM , and not GE , supposedly offered $ 2 billion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The story was that GM, and not GE, supposedly offered $2 billion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965094</id>
	<title>iPad is almost as good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264843200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I hear that amazing iPad has a near-perpetual 10 hour battery too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear that amazing iPad has a near-perpetual 10 hour battery too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear that amazing iPad has a near-perpetual 10 hour battery too!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30969732</id>
	<title>Re:Ob</title>
	<author>JamesP</author>
	<datestamp>1264946220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I actually do think that thermodynamics is one of the most, erm, 'prone to improvement' areas of science.</p><p>I'm not saying that they're wrong, I'm saying that they're taking a system with lots of particles and transforming that into a number. That really doesn't seem right.</p><p>Also, is there any scientific proof of the 2nd law? You know, an actual proof, deep testing like in QM and relativity?</p><p>(If you copy-paste the 'proof' in wikipedia I'm going to point that that's a math deduction, based on a postulate)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually do think that thermodynamics is one of the most , erm , 'prone to improvement ' areas of science.I 'm not saying that they 're wrong , I 'm saying that they 're taking a system with lots of particles and transforming that into a number .
That really does n't seem right.Also , is there any scientific proof of the 2nd law ?
You know , an actual proof , deep testing like in QM and relativity ?
( If you copy-paste the 'proof ' in wikipedia I 'm going to point that that 's a math deduction , based on a postulate )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually do think that thermodynamics is one of the most, erm, 'prone to improvement' areas of science.I'm not saying that they're wrong, I'm saying that they're taking a system with lots of particles and transforming that into a number.
That really doesn't seem right.Also, is there any scientific proof of the 2nd law?
You know, an actual proof, deep testing like in QM and relativity?
(If you copy-paste the 'proof' in wikipedia I'm going to point that that's a math deduction, based on a postulate)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965448</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966004</id>
	<title>Great Scott!</title>
	<author>morsmortis</author>
	<datestamp>1264850520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Do you know what this means? It means, that this damn thing doesn't work at all!


---
I know it's overdone, but I had to.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you know what this means ?
It means , that this damn thing does n't work at all !
--- I know it 's overdone , but I had to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you know what this means?
It means, that this damn thing doesn't work at all!
---
I know it's overdone, but I had to.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968814</id>
	<title>I have my own car.</title>
	<author>91degrees</author>
	<datestamp>1264929540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's powered by human gullibility.  A substance with an inexhaustible supply.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's powered by human gullibility .
A substance with an inexhaustible supply .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's powered by human gullibility.
A substance with an inexhaustible supply.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966358</id>
	<title>Re:Perpetual Scam</title>
	<author>master\_p</author>
	<datestamp>1264853700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the thing keeps going on and on...today Steorn was supposed to showcase their overunity device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the thing keeps going on and on...today Steorn was supposed to showcase their overunity device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the thing keeps going on and on...today Steorn was supposed to showcase their overunity device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968462</id>
	<title>NO NO NO!</title>
	<author>DrBuzzo</author>
	<datestamp>1264878780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Mr. Fusion powers the time circuits and the flux capacitor. The engine runs on ordinary gasoline. It always has!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. Fusion powers the time circuits and the flux capacitor .
The engine runs on ordinary gasoline .
It always has !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. Fusion powers the time circuits and the flux capacitor.
The engine runs on ordinary gasoline.
It always has!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966176</id>
	<title>hahaha</title>
	<author>luther349</author>
	<datestamp>1264851780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i wouldn't call it imposable but other things have to improve alot before its even possible. battery's have to me alot lighter and alot more efficient electric engines need to put out more hp and use less power. once we have those 2 things then it might be possable for something moving to generate its own power at that point you would get big distances without a charge.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i would n't call it imposable but other things have to improve alot before its even possible .
battery 's have to me alot lighter and alot more efficient electric engines need to put out more hp and use less power .
once we have those 2 things then it might be possable for something moving to generate its own power at that point you would get big distances without a charge .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i wouldn't call it imposable but other things have to improve alot before its even possible.
battery's have to me alot lighter and alot more efficient electric engines need to put out more hp and use less power.
once we have those 2 things then it might be possable for something moving to generate its own power at that point you would get big distances without a charge.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968918</id>
	<title>Re:It wasn't a scam</title>
	<author>IorDMUX</author>
	<datestamp>1264931460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You should have seen their "detailed" psuedoscientific claims referring to their revolutionary lead-acid batteries... I offer a few quotes:<p><div class="quote"><p>the proper use of the overpotentials in these double surfaces can produce <b>current that moves against the voltage.</b> <br> <br>in addition to the external charges of molecules and atoms that they normally consider, there are also ongoing a <b>huge variety of nuclear currents </b>and charging that presently do not appear in any book on batteries<br> <br>Again, we leave further analysis along that line to the experts, only appealing to them that <b>time-reversal effects</b> must also be considered.</p> </div><p>[Emphasis mine]<br> <br> And that is just scratching the surface, here:  <a href="http://www.greaterthings.com/News/Tilley/how/bob\_colvin\_bearden.htm" title="greaterthings.com">http://www.greaterthings.com/News/Tilley/how/bob\_colvin\_bearden.htm</a> [greaterthings.com]<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... that is, before the author gets into the whole "Big Energy is going to buy us and silence us or kill us!"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You should have seen their " detailed " psuedoscientific claims referring to their revolutionary lead-acid batteries... I offer a few quotes : the proper use of the overpotentials in these double surfaces can produce current that moves against the voltage .
in addition to the external charges of molecules and atoms that they normally consider , there are also ongoing a huge variety of nuclear currents and charging that presently do not appear in any book on batteries Again , we leave further analysis along that line to the experts , only appealing to them that time-reversal effects must also be considered .
[ Emphasis mine ] And that is just scratching the surface , here : http : //www.greaterthings.com/News/Tilley/how/bob \ _colvin \ _bearden.htm [ greaterthings.com ] ... that is , before the author gets into the whole " Big Energy is going to buy us and silence us or kill us !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You should have seen their "detailed" psuedoscientific claims referring to their revolutionary lead-acid batteries... I offer a few quotes:the proper use of the overpotentials in these double surfaces can produce current that moves against the voltage.
in addition to the external charges of molecules and atoms that they normally consider, there are also ongoing a huge variety of nuclear currents and charging that presently do not appear in any book on batteries Again, we leave further analysis along that line to the experts, only appealing to them that time-reversal effects must also be considered.
[Emphasis mine]  And that is just scratching the surface, here:  http://www.greaterthings.com/News/Tilley/how/bob\_colvin\_bearden.htm [greaterthings.com] ... that is, before the author gets into the whole "Big Energy is going to buy us and silence us or kill us!
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964338</id>
	<title>Re:Admirable traits for a respectable CEO</title>
	<author>Gorobei</author>
	<datestamp>1264881000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Darl McBride, ex-CEO of SCO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Darl McBride , ex-CEO of SCO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Darl McBride, ex-CEO of SCO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30969244</id>
	<title>Darl McBride?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264939140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Serious?  Really?  How are most technology CEO's scammers on a level that this guy is on?  Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level'?</p></div><p>Darl McBride?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Serious ?
Really ? How are most technology CEO 's scammers on a level that this guy is on ?
Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level ' ? Darl McBride ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Serious?
Really?  How are most technology CEO's scammers on a level that this guy is on?
Can you name a legit technology CEO that you think is at that same 'scam level'?Darl McBride?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964796</id>
	<title>Captured by the Long Arm of the Law...</title>
	<author>bobdotorg</author>
	<datestamp>1264884420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Captured by the Long Arm of the Law...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... of Thermodynamics.</p><p>I'm still trying to think of the equivalent voice over that's at the beginning of each episode of COPS, "COPS is filmed on location with the men and women of law enforcement.  All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Captured by the Long Arm of the Law... ... of Thermodynamics.I 'm still trying to think of the equivalent voice over that 's at the beginning of each episode of COPS , " COPS is filmed on location with the men and women of law enforcement .
All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Captured by the Long Arm of the Law... ... of Thermodynamics.I'm still trying to think of the equivalent voice over that's at the beginning of each episode of COPS, "COPS is filmed on location with the men and women of law enforcement.
All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965776</id>
	<title>Re:2002? Delorean?</title>
	<author>Greyfox</author>
	<datestamp>1264848540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I used to know a mechanic who worked on every DeLorean in town (He often had 2 or 3 in his shop at any one time) and he told me they picked that number for the movie because the car's not actually capable of attaining such speeds. He didn't go into details and may have been joking, but I always found it to be rather amusing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to know a mechanic who worked on every DeLorean in town ( He often had 2 or 3 in his shop at any one time ) and he told me they picked that number for the movie because the car 's not actually capable of attaining such speeds .
He did n't go into details and may have been joking , but I always found it to be rather amusing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to know a mechanic who worked on every DeLorean in town (He often had 2 or 3 in his shop at any one time) and he told me they picked that number for the movie because the car's not actually capable of attaining such speeds.
He didn't go into details and may have been joking, but I always found it to be rather amusing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376</id>
	<title>It wasn't a scam</title>
	<author>gyrogeerloose</author>
	<datestamp>1264881240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was a tax on people who don't understand the basic laws of thermodynamics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was a tax on people who do n't understand the basic laws of thermodynamics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was a tax on people who don't understand the basic laws of thermodynamics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965308</id>
	<title>Re:They should be given medals, not prison sentenc</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264844820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your thinking is the broken window fallacy.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable\_of\_the\_broken\_window" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable\_of\_the\_broken\_window</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Your thinking is the same thinking as 'tax the rich more'.  Which is a fallacy too as the 'rich' do not keep their money in big stacks sitting around their house.  They keep it in stocks, bonds, bank balances, etc.  They basically loan the money out to others to use for a fee.  So people can have newer things now.  With a tax the rich that money can not be reloaned out (thus helping build more things).  It is spent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your thinking is the broken window fallacy.http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable \ _of \ _the \ _broken \ _window [ wikipedia.org ] Your thinking is the same thinking as 'tax the rich more' .
Which is a fallacy too as the 'rich ' do not keep their money in big stacks sitting around their house .
They keep it in stocks , bonds , bank balances , etc .
They basically loan the money out to others to use for a fee .
So people can have newer things now .
With a tax the rich that money can not be reloaned out ( thus helping build more things ) .
It is spent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your thinking is the broken window fallacy.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable\_of\_the\_broken\_window [wikipedia.org]Your thinking is the same thinking as 'tax the rich more'.
Which is a fallacy too as the 'rich' do not keep their money in big stacks sitting around their house.
They keep it in stocks, bonds, bank balances, etc.
They basically loan the money out to others to use for a fee.
So people can have newer things now.
With a tax the rich that money can not be reloaned out (thus helping build more things).
It is spent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964906</id>
	<title>Re:2002? Delorean?</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1264885080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>..."hundreds of miles" at speeds over 100MPH without stopping to recharge.'...</p></div><p>I guess you went to a public school.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... " hundreds of miles " at speeds over 100MPH without stopping to recharge .
'...I guess you went to a public school .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ..."hundreds of miles" at speeds over 100MPH without stopping to recharge.
'...I guess you went to a public school.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964094</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964156</id>
	<title>Marty, get in the car!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264879560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Vaseline? Where we're going, we don't need Vaseline.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Vaseline ?
Where we 're going , we do n't need Vaseline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vaseline?
Where we're going, we don't need Vaseline.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965850</id>
	<title>There was supposed to be an electric bike</title>
	<author>cvtan</author>
	<datestamp>1264849200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Tilley Foundation was supposed to go into production with an electric bike on July 4, 2004, but it did not materialize.  I'm shocked.
The Aptera 2e is going to be available in 2009.  No, wait...
The Corbin Sparrow went into production (sold 285 and went out of business).
The Solus International KD08E COCO is available (it can only go 25mph).
My liege, the list is long and the batteries still sucketh.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Tilley Foundation was supposed to go into production with an electric bike on July 4 , 2004 , but it did not materialize .
I 'm shocked .
The Aptera 2e is going to be available in 2009 .
No , wait.. . The Corbin Sparrow went into production ( sold 285 and went out of business ) .
The Solus International KD08E COCO is available ( it can only go 25mph ) .
My liege , the list is long and the batteries still sucketh .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Tilley Foundation was supposed to go into production with an electric bike on July 4, 2004, but it did not materialize.
I'm shocked.
The Aptera 2e is going to be available in 2009.
No, wait...
The Corbin Sparrow went into production (sold 285 and went out of business).
The Solus International KD08E COCO is available (it can only go 25mph).
My liege, the list is long and the batteries still sucketh.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965536</id>
	<title>Perpetual Scam</title>
	<author>edibobb</author>
	<datestamp>1264846440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It makes you wonder how many times over the past 150 years people have been suckered into investing in machines that (allegedly) violate the law: energy can be neither created nor destroyed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It makes you wonder how many times over the past 150 years people have been suckered into investing in machines that ( allegedly ) violate the law : energy can be neither created nor destroyed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It makes you wonder how many times over the past 150 years people have been suckered into investing in machines that (allegedly) violate the law: energy can be neither created nor destroyed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964836</id>
	<title>1,21 Gigawatts!?!?!?!</title>
	<author>Lucky75</author>
	<datestamp>1264884660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does it need 1.21 gigawatts to get up to speed? Aaah, Christopher Lloyd. <br> <br>

<b>1.21 Gigawatts?!?! </b>1.21 Gigawatts! What the hell is a gigawatt?<br> <br>

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5cYgRnfFDA" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5cYgRnfFDA</a> [youtube.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it need 1.21 gigawatts to get up to speed ?
Aaah , Christopher Lloyd .
1.21 Gigawatts ? ! ? !
1.21 Gigawatts !
What the hell is a gigawatt ?
http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = I5cYgRnfFDA [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it need 1.21 gigawatts to get up to speed?
Aaah, Christopher Lloyd.
1.21 Gigawatts?!?!
1.21 Gigawatts!
What the hell is a gigawatt?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5cYgRnfFDA [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30967008</id>
	<title>Who the hell invested in this?!?</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1264859580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, really -- I want a list of everyone who actually invested in this scheme! I've got some great technology I'd like to sell them! I wonder if any of them would be interested in owning their own bridge...</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , really -- I want a list of everyone who actually invested in this scheme !
I 've got some great technology I 'd like to sell them !
I wonder if any of them would be interested in owning their own bridge.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, really -- I want a list of everyone who actually invested in this scheme!
I've got some great technology I'd like to sell them!
I wonder if any of them would be interested in owning their own bridge...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965676</id>
	<title>scammers vs music download</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264847700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>lucky he hadnt downloaded music, otherwise he would to face double that judgment<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>lucky he hadnt downloaded music , otherwise he would to face double that judgment : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lucky he hadnt downloaded music, otherwise he would to face double that judgment :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30969244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968210
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30986868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965308
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30969098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30969732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30967010
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965536
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964148
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964374
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964906
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964094
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30967766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965448
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_30_1655239_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30967074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30971010
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964270
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968246
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964338
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964418
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30969098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30969244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964150
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964312
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964130
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964374
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965058
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966822
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965308
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966176
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964906
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964952
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965776
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965536
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30967010
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30969732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30967766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30986868
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964780
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30966446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30964650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30967074
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965268
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30968918
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_30_1655239.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_30_1655239.30965542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
