<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_29_160203</id>
	<title>Old Stems Cells Young Again &mdash; Via Vampirism</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1264792320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>pdragon04 writes to tell us that in recent tests a Howard Hughes Medical Institute team has found that through exposure to "young" blood cells, bone marrow stem cells <a href="http://www.hhmi.org/news/wagers20100128.html">start to act young again</a> as well.  <i>"The researchers have not yet isolated the blood-borne factors that can switch old stem cells back to a more youthful state, but their results are consistent with other recent studies that show stem-cell aging may be reversible. Together those results suggest that it might one day be possible to boost the practical lifespan of stem cells, and thereby increase the body&rsquo;s resistance to disease and age-related degeneration."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>pdragon04 writes to tell us that in recent tests a Howard Hughes Medical Institute team has found that through exposure to " young " blood cells , bone marrow stem cells start to act young again as well .
" The researchers have not yet isolated the blood-borne factors that can switch old stem cells back to a more youthful state , but their results are consistent with other recent studies that show stem-cell aging may be reversible .
Together those results suggest that it might one day be possible to boost the practical lifespan of stem cells , and thereby increase the body    s resistance to disease and age-related degeneration .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>pdragon04 writes to tell us that in recent tests a Howard Hughes Medical Institute team has found that through exposure to "young" blood cells, bone marrow stem cells start to act young again as well.
"The researchers have not yet isolated the blood-borne factors that can switch old stem cells back to a more youthful state, but their results are consistent with other recent studies that show stem-cell aging may be reversible.
Together those results suggest that it might one day be possible to boost the practical lifespan of stem cells, and thereby increase the body’s resistance to disease and age-related degeneration.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953576</id>
	<title>Looking forward to Eternal Youth</title>
	<author>physburn</author>
	<datestamp>1264796820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Except acting young again, does mean they stem cells
will have lost any genetic damage, that occurred though
aging. Perphaps some day though medicine will be
able to produce truely young stem cells, but that would
require checking that the DNA hasn't mutated from the
orignal young cell line.
<p>
---
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/blogs/Stem\%20cells/feed.html" title="feeddistiller.com">Stell Cells</a> [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ <a href="http://www.feeddistiller.com/" title="feeddistiller.com">Feed Distiller</a> [feeddistiller.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except acting young again , does mean they stem cells will have lost any genetic damage , that occurred though aging .
Perphaps some day though medicine will be able to produce truely young stem cells , but that would require checking that the DNA has n't mutated from the orignal young cell line .
--- Stell Cells [ feeddistiller.com ] Feed @ Feed Distiller [ feeddistiller.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except acting young again, does mean they stem cells
will have lost any genetic damage, that occurred though
aging.
Perphaps some day though medicine will be
able to produce truely young stem cells, but that would
require checking that the DNA hasn't mutated from the
orignal young cell line.
---

Stell Cells [feeddistiller.com] Feed @ Feed Distiller [feeddistiller.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953540</id>
	<title>O Lord. What will Fox news say...</title>
	<author>valadaar</author>
	<datestamp>1264796640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ye gods this is going to be interesting...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ye gods this is going to be interesting.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ye gods this is going to be interesting...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953454</id>
	<title>There Is Nothing About Vampirism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264796220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>in TFA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>in TFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>in TFA.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954032</id>
	<title>Could be the basis for a good sci-fi...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264755840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is the year 22XX.  World leaders and major executives stopped aging over a hundred years ago.  With each passing year, contamination claims more and more stockpiles of precious infant vitae.  Armies are raised and butchered in the names of aristocrats elevated beyond mortality's grasp.  That from above man may, instead of fleeing its footsteps, behold death's visage shall turn son against father lest the cruelties of time remind days of ephemerality.</p><p>It will bring new meaning to 'blood money'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is the year 22XX .
World leaders and major executives stopped aging over a hundred years ago .
With each passing year , contamination claims more and more stockpiles of precious infant vitae .
Armies are raised and butchered in the names of aristocrats elevated beyond mortality 's grasp .
That from above man may , instead of fleeing its footsteps , behold death 's visage shall turn son against father lest the cruelties of time remind days of ephemerality.It will bring new meaning to 'blood money' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is the year 22XX.
World leaders and major executives stopped aging over a hundred years ago.
With each passing year, contamination claims more and more stockpiles of precious infant vitae.
Armies are raised and butchered in the names of aristocrats elevated beyond mortality's grasp.
That from above man may, instead of fleeing its footsteps, behold death's visage shall turn son against father lest the cruelties of time remind days of ephemerality.It will bring new meaning to 'blood money'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30956958</id>
	<title>Re:A serious discussion, maybe?</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1264768080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Postulate: no greater crimes will be committed against humanity than when we discover the secrets to clinical immortality.</p></div><p>Okay, but it's going to be a while before that's anything other than academic, and it isn't sped up by the results here.  The present study has preliminary results on signaling needed to make mouse blood stem cells divide more as they did when they were younger.  One day we may be able to use this knowledge to improve immune function in seniors.  Cell signaling tends to be very specific to the cell type, the context.  We are most likely not going to find that these same signals make all other stem cells act new, like say the stem cells in your gut or the stem cells which would repair your heart.</p><p>This line of research is not going to make your body immortal, it's probably at best going to make you less susceptible to infection as a senior citizen.  Which is good, it's just not the sci-fi you're thinking of.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Postulate : no greater crimes will be committed against humanity than when we discover the secrets to clinical immortality.Okay , but it 's going to be a while before that 's anything other than academic , and it is n't sped up by the results here .
The present study has preliminary results on signaling needed to make mouse blood stem cells divide more as they did when they were younger .
One day we may be able to use this knowledge to improve immune function in seniors .
Cell signaling tends to be very specific to the cell type , the context .
We are most likely not going to find that these same signals make all other stem cells act new , like say the stem cells in your gut or the stem cells which would repair your heart.This line of research is not going to make your body immortal , it 's probably at best going to make you less susceptible to infection as a senior citizen .
Which is good , it 's just not the sci-fi you 're thinking of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Postulate: no greater crimes will be committed against humanity than when we discover the secrets to clinical immortality.Okay, but it's going to be a while before that's anything other than academic, and it isn't sped up by the results here.
The present study has preliminary results on signaling needed to make mouse blood stem cells divide more as they did when they were younger.
One day we may be able to use this knowledge to improve immune function in seniors.
Cell signaling tends to be very specific to the cell type, the context.
We are most likely not going to find that these same signals make all other stem cells act new, like say the stem cells in your gut or the stem cells which would repair your heart.This line of research is not going to make your body immortal, it's probably at best going to make you less susceptible to infection as a senior citizen.
Which is good, it's just not the sci-fi you're thinking of.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953604</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>fyoder</author>
	<datestamp>1264796940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'll live forever if I eat babies?</p></div><p>It's a little more complicated than that.  From the article:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>To see if younger blood could reverse the sluggishness of aging blood cells, the researchers began by surgically joining the bloodstreams of pairs of mice that were of different ages, but nearly clones of one another.</p></div><p>So not eat, but perhaps get transfusions from a much younger sibling.  It would probably have to be the same blood type.  Simply sucking the blood of random babies is unlikely to be effective and won't be appreciated by their parents or society, so probably best not to.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll live forever if I eat babies ? It 's a little more complicated than that .
From the article : To see if younger blood could reverse the sluggishness of aging blood cells , the researchers began by surgically joining the bloodstreams of pairs of mice that were of different ages , but nearly clones of one another.So not eat , but perhaps get transfusions from a much younger sibling .
It would probably have to be the same blood type .
Simply sucking the blood of random babies is unlikely to be effective and wo n't be appreciated by their parents or society , so probably best not to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll live forever if I eat babies?It's a little more complicated than that.
From the article:To see if younger blood could reverse the sluggishness of aging blood cells, the researchers began by surgically joining the bloodstreams of pairs of mice that were of different ages, but nearly clones of one another.So not eat, but perhaps get transfusions from a much younger sibling.
It would probably have to be the same blood type.
Simply sucking the blood of random babies is unlikely to be effective and won't be appreciated by their parents or society, so probably best not to.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953838</id>
	<title>Re:A serious discussion, maybe?</title>
	<author>tonyreadsnews</author>
	<datestamp>1264798200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Postulate: no greater crimes</p></div><p>Such as growing clones of yourself for the purpose of transfusing their blood to prolong your own life.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Postulate : no greater crimesSuch as growing clones of yourself for the purpose of transfusing their blood to prolong your own life .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Postulate: no greater crimesSuch as growing clones of yourself for the purpose of transfusing their blood to prolong your own life.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953762</id>
	<title>Money for the young</title>
	<author>EvilRyry</author>
	<datestamp>1264797780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Screw the Red Cross, I'm going to start selling my blood to rich old people!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Screw the Red Cross , I 'm going to start selling my blood to rich old people !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Screw the Red Cross, I'm going to start selling my blood to rich old people!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30957016</id>
	<title>It's not vampirism- it's forced siamese twin-ism!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264768440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I saw Dr. Wager's presentation at the American Society for Cell Biology meeting this past December. They surgically attached an old mouse to a young mouse, and allowed cross-circulation to occur. They took blood samples, then later separated the mice and re-measured. It is a brilliantly simple idea (though I imagine the surgery must have been difficult). I think it's amazing! Oh, and according  to the researcher apparently the mice didn't care that they were sewn together!! not sure how they determined that part...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I saw Dr. Wager 's presentation at the American Society for Cell Biology meeting this past December .
They surgically attached an old mouse to a young mouse , and allowed cross-circulation to occur .
They took blood samples , then later separated the mice and re-measured .
It is a brilliantly simple idea ( though I imagine the surgery must have been difficult ) .
I think it 's amazing !
Oh , and according to the researcher apparently the mice did n't care that they were sewn together ! !
not sure how they determined that part.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I saw Dr. Wager's presentation at the American Society for Cell Biology meeting this past December.
They surgically attached an old mouse to a young mouse, and allowed cross-circulation to occur.
They took blood samples, then later separated the mice and re-measured.
It is a brilliantly simple idea (though I imagine the surgery must have been difficult).
I think it's amazing!
Oh, and according  to the researcher apparently the mice didn't care that they were sewn together!!
not sure how they determined that part...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953660</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>frank\_adrian314159</author>
	<datestamp>1264797240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'll live forever if I eat babies?</i> </p><p>That's how Dick Cheney does it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll live forever if I eat babies ?
That 's how Dick Cheney does it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll live forever if I eat babies?
That's how Dick Cheney does it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953474</id>
	<title>Paging Dr. Bathory...</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1264796340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth\_B\%C3\%A1thory" title="wikipedia.org">Elizabeth Bathory</a> [wikipedia.org] could have told them all about it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Elizabeth Bathory [ wikipedia.org ] could have told them all about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Elizabeth Bathory [wikipedia.org] could have told them all about it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30965544</id>
	<title>Re:Side effects include:</title>
	<author>badkarmadayaccount</author>
	<datestamp>1264846500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds good to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds good to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds good to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30958092</id>
	<title>Re:Looking forward to Eternal Youth</title>
	<author>intrazer</author>
	<datestamp>1264774680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is right on the money. There is a reason that stem cells become old, they become senescent and decrease or stop their division to protect against cancer. Cellular senescence can be induced by oncogenes, or bypassed by introducing the factors found in this study.</p><p>Knocking out tumor-suppressing genes has been shown to decrease aging while at the same time increase tumor incidence.</p><p>Call me the day cancer is cured, that's the day these discoveries can be beneficial against aging.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is right on the money .
There is a reason that stem cells become old , they become senescent and decrease or stop their division to protect against cancer .
Cellular senescence can be induced by oncogenes , or bypassed by introducing the factors found in this study.Knocking out tumor-suppressing genes has been shown to decrease aging while at the same time increase tumor incidence.Call me the day cancer is cured , that 's the day these discoveries can be beneficial against aging .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is right on the money.
There is a reason that stem cells become old, they become senescent and decrease or stop their division to protect against cancer.
Cellular senescence can be induced by oncogenes, or bypassed by introducing the factors found in this study.Knocking out tumor-suppressing genes has been shown to decrease aging while at the same time increase tumor incidence.Call me the day cancer is cured, that's the day these discoveries can be beneficial against aging.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953576</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953518</id>
	<title>Sorry, Buffy....</title>
	<author>X'16435934</author>
	<datestamp>1264796520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'd love to go out with you tonight,  but something just came up- <br>
 now I have to read this big research paper...<br>
<br>
  -</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd love to go out with you tonight , but something just came up- now I have to read this big research paper.. . -</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd love to go out with you tonight,  but something just came up- 
 now I have to read this big research paper...

  -</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953622</id>
	<title>A serious discussion, maybe?</title>
	<author>Bovius</author>
	<datestamp>1264797060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right now the comments on this topic are 85\% jokes. Fun.</p><p>So, how about a serious (read: overwraught) discussion. Postulate: no greater crimes will be committed against humanity than when we discover the secrets to clinical immortality.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right now the comments on this topic are 85 \ % jokes .
Fun.So , how about a serious ( read : overwraught ) discussion .
Postulate : no greater crimes will be committed against humanity than when we discover the secrets to clinical immortality .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right now the comments on this topic are 85\% jokes.
Fun.So, how about a serious (read: overwraught) discussion.
Postulate: no greater crimes will be committed against humanity than when we discover the secrets to clinical immortality.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953626</id>
	<title>Lots of dirty old men . . .</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1264797060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>. . . start to act young again . . . through exposure to "young" blood cells . .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.</p></div><p> . . . especially if those "young" blood cells are packaged in an actractive young woman.
</p><p> . . . if they want to conduct a study on that, I'll be available in about 50 years . . .</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>.
. .
start to act young again .
. .
through exposure to " young " blood cells .
. .
. .
. especially if those " young " blood cells are packaged in an actractive young woman .
. .
. if they want to conduct a study on that , I 'll be available in about 50 years .
. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
. .
start to act young again .
. .
through exposure to "young" blood cells .
. .
. .
. especially if those "young" blood cells are packaged in an actractive young woman.
. .
. if they want to conduct a study on that, I'll be available in about 50 years .
. .
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953448</id>
	<title>Shades of 'Blindsight'</title>
	<author>Krishnoid</author>
	<datestamp>1264796220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It almost sounds like <a href="http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/12/12/0037206" title="slashdot.org">Peter Watts'</a> [slashdot.org] concepts are moving from his fiction into mainstream science.  Well, I for one<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It almost sounds like Peter Watts ' [ slashdot.org ] concepts are moving from his fiction into mainstream science .
Well , I for one .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It almost sounds like Peter Watts' [slashdot.org] concepts are moving from his fiction into mainstream science.
Well, I for one ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953602</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>starbugs</author>
	<datestamp>1264796940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Silly, It's 'EXPOSURE' (not 'PHAGOCYTOSIS') to Young blood cells.</p><p>Think Hugh Hefner, not Silence of the Lambs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Silly , It 's 'EXPOSURE ' ( not 'PHAGOCYTOSIS ' ) to Young blood cells.Think Hugh Hefner , not Silence of the Lambs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silly, It's 'EXPOSURE' (not 'PHAGOCYTOSIS') to Young blood cells.Think Hugh Hefner, not Silence of the Lambs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953570</id>
	<title>Simpsons did it!</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1264796820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mr. Burns is well known to have lived beyond his years due to infusions of blood from young boys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr. Burns is well known to have lived beyond his years due to infusions of blood from young boys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr. Burns is well known to have lived beyond his years due to infusions of blood from young boys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954160</id>
	<title>Gentlemen, know we know *ALL* the steps!</title>
	<author>ae1294</author>
	<datestamp>1264756440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Step 1. Abduct teenage girls with proper blood type.<br>Step 2. Drain them of said blood, Discard remaining husk.<br>Step 3. Drain your tainted blood while infusing theirs.<br><b>Step 4. Hire Amazing P.R. firm to make teenage girls love you.</b><br>Step 5. Immortal Profit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Step 1 .
Abduct teenage girls with proper blood type.Step 2 .
Drain them of said blood , Discard remaining husk.Step 3 .
Drain your tainted blood while infusing theirs.Step 4 .
Hire Amazing P.R .
firm to make teenage girls love you.Step 5 .
Immortal Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Step 1.
Abduct teenage girls with proper blood type.Step 2.
Drain them of said blood, Discard remaining husk.Step 3.
Drain your tainted blood while infusing theirs.Step 4.
Hire Amazing P.R.
firm to make teenage girls love you.Step 5.
Immortal Profit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30963838</id>
	<title>Heinlein predicted this decades ago</title>
	<author>haapi</author>
	<datestamp>1264877760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Couldn't help being reminded of the rejuvenation method invented for humans that didn't have the "Lazarus Gene" in Heinlein's "Time Enough for Love".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could n't help being reminded of the rejuvenation method invented for humans that did n't have the " Lazarus Gene " in Heinlein 's " Time Enough for Love " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Couldn't help being reminded of the rejuvenation method invented for humans that didn't have the "Lazarus Gene" in Heinlein's "Time Enough for Love".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953682</id>
	<title>is there a similar effect in organ donations?</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1264797300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Although they try to match size, then relative age, sometimes out of expediency a recipient must accept a donor a decade, two, or even three decades older than themselves. Would these organs age at the donor's rate or recipient's rate?  I'm guessing the answer is "in between".  Depending on the tissue, the donor cells may be slowly replaced by host stem cells over the decades and become more host-like. Heart and muscle has a slow turnover rate of one percent a year.  So hearts are never fully converted. Some of the earliest organs recipients have lived 3 or 4 decades.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although they try to match size , then relative age , sometimes out of expediency a recipient must accept a donor a decade , two , or even three decades older than themselves .
Would these organs age at the donor 's rate or recipient 's rate ?
I 'm guessing the answer is " in between " .
Depending on the tissue , the donor cells may be slowly replaced by host stem cells over the decades and become more host-like .
Heart and muscle has a slow turnover rate of one percent a year .
So hearts are never fully converted .
Some of the earliest organs recipients have lived 3 or 4 decades .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although they try to match size, then relative age, sometimes out of expediency a recipient must accept a donor a decade, two, or even three decades older than themselves.
Would these organs age at the donor's rate or recipient's rate?
I'm guessing the answer is "in between".
Depending on the tissue, the donor cells may be slowly replaced by host stem cells over the decades and become more host-like.
Heart and muscle has a slow turnover rate of one percent a year.
So hearts are never fully converted.
Some of the earliest organs recipients have lived 3 or 4 decades.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954300</id>
	<title>Umbilical Cord Blood</title>
	<author>tresho</author>
	<datestamp>1264756860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>  One painless, uncontroversial source of both young blood and stem cells is (or was) your umbilical cord blood.  This is usually thrown away.  Collecting it after a baby is born is trivially easy.  The material is easy to preserve for decades.  Costs are mostly related to storage &amp; record-keeping.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One painless , uncontroversial source of both young blood and stem cells is ( or was ) your umbilical cord blood .
This is usually thrown away .
Collecting it after a baby is born is trivially easy .
The material is easy to preserve for decades .
Costs are mostly related to storage &amp; record-keeping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  One painless, uncontroversial source of both young blood and stem cells is (or was) your umbilical cord blood.
This is usually thrown away.
Collecting it after a baby is born is trivially easy.
The material is easy to preserve for decades.
Costs are mostly related to storage &amp; record-keeping.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30958946</id>
	<title>Re:is there a similar effect in organ donations?</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1264781940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd imagine that the risks of taking poison every day to prevent tissue rejection far outweigh the "organ age" issue for most patients.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd imagine that the risks of taking poison every day to prevent tissue rejection far outweigh the " organ age " issue for most patients .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd imagine that the risks of taking poison every day to prevent tissue rejection far outweigh the "organ age" issue for most patients.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953682</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30962246</id>
	<title>Hungarian scientists already knew that</title>
	<author>sourcerror</author>
	<datestamp>1264867320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth\_B\%C3\%A1thory" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Hungarian scientists</a> [wikipedia.org] already knew that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hungarian scientists [ wikipedia.org ] already knew that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hungarian scientists [wikipedia.org] already knew that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953526</id>
	<title>They Always Say...</title>
	<author>Nom du Keyboard</author>
	<datestamp>1264796520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They always say that Science is catching up to Science Fiction.<br> <br>
Now it appears that Science is catching up to Paranormal as well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They always say that Science is catching up to Science Fiction .
Now it appears that Science is catching up to Paranormal as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They always say that Science is catching up to Science Fiction.
Now it appears that Science is catching up to Paranormal as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953868</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1264798320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget to bathe in the blood of virgins regularly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget to bathe in the blood of virgins regularly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget to bathe in the blood of virgins regularly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954644</id>
	<title>Re:Side effects include:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264758240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and hanging out with shirtless underage guys.</p></div><p>
That's a side effect? I thought that was a feature!
<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>/shudder</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and hanging out with shirtless underage guys .
That 's a side effect ?
I thought that was a feature !
/shudder</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and hanging out with shirtless underage guys.
That's a side effect?
I thought that was a feature!
/shudder
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954556</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1264757940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Gee, I was thinking Michael Jackson....<br>
<br>
<br>
to soon?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Gee , I was thinking Michael Jackson... . to soon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Gee, I was thinking Michael Jackson....


to soon?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953834</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1264798200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So Jeffrey Dahmer was really in the forefront of anti-aging research, then?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So Jeffrey Dahmer was really in the forefront of anti-aging research , then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So Jeffrey Dahmer was really in the forefront of anti-aging research, then?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30956654</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1264766400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Crap! I'm the youngest sibling. Destined for exploitation evidently.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Crap !
I 'm the youngest sibling .
Destined for exploitation evidently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Crap!
I'm the youngest sibling.
Destined for exploitation evidently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954026</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1264755840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>through exposure to "young" blood cells, bone marrow stem cells start to act young again as well</p></div></blockquote><p>How do you think Demi Moore managed to keep it together so long?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>through exposure to " young " blood cells , bone marrow stem cells start to act young again as wellHow do you think Demi Moore managed to keep it together so long ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>through exposure to "young" blood cells, bone marrow stem cells start to act young again as wellHow do you think Demi Moore managed to keep it together so long?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953470</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>KarrdeSW</author>
	<datestamp>1264796340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'll live forever if I eat babies?</p></div><p>Are you sure you want to be <i>that</i> young? I'll stick to eating 18-year-old blond women.</p><p>If this line of reasoning continues it's only going to get creepier.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll live forever if I eat babies ? Are you sure you want to be that young ?
I 'll stick to eating 18-year-old blond women.If this line of reasoning continues it 's only going to get creepier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll live forever if I eat babies?Are you sure you want to be that young?
I'll stick to eating 18-year-old blond women.If this line of reasoning continues it's only going to get creepier.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953460</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264796280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and maybe you'll sparkle too!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and maybe you 'll sparkle too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and maybe you'll sparkle too!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954910</id>
	<title>Re:Diabetes was mentioned, so...</title>
	<author>Wiarumas</author>
	<datestamp>1264759140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, it is uncertain if our future overlords will be immortal diabetics.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , it is uncertain if our future overlords will be immortal diabetics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, it is uncertain if our future overlords will be immortal diabetics.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953488</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264796400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, going just by the summary, the marrow has to be exposed to the young blood cells. Now I doubt they would survive the digestion process very well, so you probably have to drain their blood and IV it like a heroin junkie while it's still fresh. Or even worse drill or punch a hole in your bone to shoot it directly into the marrow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , going just by the summary , the marrow has to be exposed to the young blood cells .
Now I doubt they would survive the digestion process very well , so you probably have to drain their blood and IV it like a heroin junkie while it 's still fresh .
Or even worse drill or punch a hole in your bone to shoot it directly into the marrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, going just by the summary, the marrow has to be exposed to the young blood cells.
Now I doubt they would survive the digestion process very well, so you probably have to drain their blood and IV it like a heroin junkie while it's still fresh.
Or even worse drill or punch a hole in your bone to shoot it directly into the marrow.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953524</id>
	<title>Meh</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264796520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll stay young the old-fashioned way:  eat sensibly, exercise, and suck the life force from teenage virgins.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll stay young the old-fashioned way : eat sensibly , exercise , and suck the life force from teenage virgins .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll stay young the old-fashioned way:  eat sensibly, exercise, and suck the life force from teenage virgins.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953458</id>
	<title>Well duh!</title>
	<author>KiwiCanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1264796280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Didn't they see the Dark Angel episode where Logan got a blood transfusion from Max, and was the able to walk a couple of eps later. Clearly researcher don't watch enough scifi. ~:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't they see the Dark Angel episode where Logan got a blood transfusion from Max , and was the able to walk a couple of eps later .
Clearly researcher do n't watch enough scifi .
~ : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't they see the Dark Angel episode where Logan got a blood transfusion from Max, and was the able to walk a couple of eps later.
Clearly researcher don't watch enough scifi.
~:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30959736</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>mdielmann</author>
	<datestamp>1264790760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"And to think, all I needed was the blood of a young boy."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" And to think , all I needed was the blood of a young boy .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"And to think, all I needed was the blood of a young boy.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953604</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954956</id>
	<title>Re:Let's keep this one to ourselves...</title>
	<author>Arthur Grumbine</author>
	<datestamp>1264759320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>To see if younger blood could reverse the sluggishness of aging blood cells, the researchers began by surgically joining the bloodstreams of pairs of mice that were of different ages, but nearly clones of one another.</p></div><p>
PETA is going to go ape-shit.</p></div><p>Not to mention what <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton\_pack#Crossing\_the\_Streams" title="wikipedia.org">Dr. Egon Spengler's</a> [wikipedia.org] reaction will be.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>To see if younger blood could reverse the sluggishness of aging blood cells , the researchers began by surgically joining the bloodstreams of pairs of mice that were of different ages , but nearly clones of one another .
PETA is going to go ape-shit.Not to mention what Dr. Egon Spengler 's [ wikipedia.org ] reaction will be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To see if younger blood could reverse the sluggishness of aging blood cells, the researchers began by surgically joining the bloodstreams of pairs of mice that were of different ages, but nearly clones of one another.
PETA is going to go ape-shit.Not to mention what Dr. Egon Spengler's [wikipedia.org] reaction will be.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954050</id>
	<title>B5</title>
	<author>jgtg32a</author>
	<datestamp>1264755960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't this an episode of Babylon 5?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't this an episode of Babylon 5 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't this an episode of Babylon 5?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30958930</id>
	<title>Just another piece of evidence</title>
	<author>zippthorne</author>
	<datestamp>1264781760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Supporting a hypothesis of "Quantum Immortality" an obvious alternative to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation\_hypothesis#Bostrom.27s\_hypothesis" title="wikipedia.org">simulation hypothesis</a> [wikipedia.org], with references to the anthropic principle.</p><p>If every possible universe exists in quantum superposition, then I am experiencing <em>this</em> one because it is the one in which I live the longest, or the one in which I never cease to exist.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Supporting a hypothesis of " Quantum Immortality " an obvious alternative to the simulation hypothesis [ wikipedia.org ] , with references to the anthropic principle.If every possible universe exists in quantum superposition , then I am experiencing this one because it is the one in which I live the longest , or the one in which I never cease to exist .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Supporting a hypothesis of "Quantum Immortality" an obvious alternative to the simulation hypothesis [wikipedia.org], with references to the anthropic principle.If every possible universe exists in quantum superposition, then I am experiencing this one because it is the one in which I live the longest, or the one in which I never cease to exist.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954200</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>Lithdren</author>
	<datestamp>1264756500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> I'll live forever if I eat babies?</p> </div><p>

Only if you bathe in their blood.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll live forever if I eat babies ?
Only if you bathe in their blood .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> I'll live forever if I eat babies?
Only if you bathe in their blood.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953492</id>
	<title>Side effects include:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264796400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Side effects include:</p><p>Wearing pasty white makeup<br>Being especially emo and whiney<br>Changing username to MrsCullen4Ever3<br>Wearing black nail polish<br>and hanging out with shirtless underage guys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Side effects include : Wearing pasty white makeupBeing especially emo and whineyChanging username to MrsCullen4Ever3Wearing black nail polishand hanging out with shirtless underage guys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Side effects include:Wearing pasty white makeupBeing especially emo and whineyChanging username to MrsCullen4Ever3Wearing black nail polishand hanging out with shirtless underage guys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954628</id>
	<title>Re:Diabetes was mentioned, so...</title>
	<author>compro01</author>
	<datestamp>1264758240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>For diabetics who still have some pancreatic function, and aren't wholly dependent on pills, maybe the results found from this research could help them.</p></div><p>I think you meant dependent on injections.  The pills in question would be to either boost insulin sensitivity (Useful for type 1 (no pancreatic function) and 2 (insufficient pancreatic function)) or boost pancreatic function (only useful for type 2).  Injections provide insulin directly (required in type 1, used in type 2 if other options are insufficient or can't be used for other reasons).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For diabetics who still have some pancreatic function , and are n't wholly dependent on pills , maybe the results found from this research could help them.I think you meant dependent on injections .
The pills in question would be to either boost insulin sensitivity ( Useful for type 1 ( no pancreatic function ) and 2 ( insufficient pancreatic function ) ) or boost pancreatic function ( only useful for type 2 ) .
Injections provide insulin directly ( required in type 1 , used in type 2 if other options are insufficient or ca n't be used for other reasons ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For diabetics who still have some pancreatic function, and aren't wholly dependent on pills, maybe the results found from this research could help them.I think you meant dependent on injections.
The pills in question would be to either boost insulin sensitivity (Useful for type 1 (no pancreatic function) and 2 (insufficient pancreatic function)) or boost pancreatic function (only useful for type 2).
Injections provide insulin directly (required in type 1, used in type 2 if other options are insufficient or can't be used for other reasons).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953972</id>
	<title>Chalk another one up...</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1264755600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...in the Kurzweil might not be completely full of shit even if he is crazy column.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...in the Kurzweil might not be completely full of shit even if he is crazy column .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...in the Kurzweil might not be completely full of shit even if he is crazy column.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954058</id>
	<title>Re:Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>PopeRatzo</author>
	<datestamp>1264755960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I'll stick to eating 18-year-old blond women.</p></div></blockquote><p>Whatever works for you, but most of us prefer <i>live</i> women.  How do you get the taste of formaldehyde out of your mouth?</p><p>And does your employer at the funeral home know what you're up to?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll stick to eating 18-year-old blond women.Whatever works for you , but most of us prefer live women .
How do you get the taste of formaldehyde out of your mouth ? And does your employer at the funeral home know what you 're up to ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll stick to eating 18-year-old blond women.Whatever works for you, but most of us prefer live women.
How do you get the taste of formaldehyde out of your mouth?And does your employer at the funeral home know what you're up to?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953766</id>
	<title>Re:A serious discussion, maybe?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264797780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jokes about Howard Hughes and blood sucking seem perfectly reasonable.</p><p>Okay for the serious discussion. Obviously there's some chemical trigger involved to so the cells are responding more like young cells. It seems likely a drug could be developed that could delay age related disease. Immortality is likely an impossibility but delaying aging another decade or two would be massive. I'm starting to feel the effects of aging so getting ten years back even if it didn't extend life would be huge to me personally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jokes about Howard Hughes and blood sucking seem perfectly reasonable.Okay for the serious discussion .
Obviously there 's some chemical trigger involved to so the cells are responding more like young cells .
It seems likely a drug could be developed that could delay age related disease .
Immortality is likely an impossibility but delaying aging another decade or two would be massive .
I 'm starting to feel the effects of aging so getting ten years back even if it did n't extend life would be huge to me personally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jokes about Howard Hughes and blood sucking seem perfectly reasonable.Okay for the serious discussion.
Obviously there's some chemical trigger involved to so the cells are responding more like young cells.
It seems likely a drug could be developed that could delay age related disease.
Immortality is likely an impossibility but delaying aging another decade or two would be massive.
I'm starting to feel the effects of aging so getting ten years back even if it didn't extend life would be huge to me personally.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953622</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954608</id>
	<title>Re:There Is Nothing About Vampirism</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1264758180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Lack of substance in a particular article has never stopped some, "creative editing," on slashdot before<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lack of substance in a particular article has never stopped some , " creative editing , " on slashdot before ; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lack of substance in a particular article has never stopped some, "creative editing," on slashdot before ;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953406</id>
	<title>But can you walk out in sunlight afterwards?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264795980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And do you respect yourself in the morning, um, er evening? Whenever....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And do you respect yourself in the morning , um , er evening ?
Whenever... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And do you respect yourself in the morning, um, er evening?
Whenever....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953742</id>
	<title>Twilight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264797660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do the cells sparkle after this procedure?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do the cells sparkle after this procedure ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do the cells sparkle after this procedure?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953490</id>
	<title>Let's keep this one to ourselves...</title>
	<author>swanzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1264796400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTA:<p><div class="quote"><p>To see if younger blood could reverse the sluggishness of aging blood cells, the researchers began by surgically joining the bloodstreams of pairs of mice that were of different ages, but nearly clones of one another.</p></div><p>
PETA is going to go ape-shit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : To see if younger blood could reverse the sluggishness of aging blood cells , the researchers began by surgically joining the bloodstreams of pairs of mice that were of different ages , but nearly clones of one another .
PETA is going to go ape-shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA:To see if younger blood could reverse the sluggishness of aging blood cells, the researchers began by surgically joining the bloodstreams of pairs of mice that were of different ages, but nearly clones of one another.
PETA is going to go ape-shit.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30956102</id>
	<title>hurry up dammit!!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264764120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm 55. With my luck I'll be 70 by the time they figure this out, and of course that will be the point of no return......</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm 55 .
With my luck I 'll be 70 by the time they figure this out , and of course that will be the point of no return..... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm 55.
With my luck I'll be 70 by the time they figure this out, and of course that will be the point of no return......</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953520</id>
	<title>Diabetes was mentioned, so...</title>
	<author>Orbijx</author>
	<datestamp>1264796520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read TFA (gasp! rare!)</p><p>They were using older and diabetic mice for their tests.</p><p>I can't help but wonder if this discovery may have some effect on diabetes treatments in the future. For diabetics who still have some pancreatic function, and aren't wholly dependent on pills, maybe the results found from this research could help them.</p><p>As for those who are dependent on pills, needles, and the like, I could wonder what it would do for them.</p><p>The article didn't really clarify what happened with the diabetes in the affected test subjects, though, so I lack that answer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read TFA ( gasp !
rare ! ) They were using older and diabetic mice for their tests.I ca n't help but wonder if this discovery may have some effect on diabetes treatments in the future .
For diabetics who still have some pancreatic function , and are n't wholly dependent on pills , maybe the results found from this research could help them.As for those who are dependent on pills , needles , and the like , I could wonder what it would do for them.The article did n't really clarify what happened with the diabetes in the affected test subjects , though , so I lack that answer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read TFA (gasp!
rare!)They were using older and diabetic mice for their tests.I can't help but wonder if this discovery may have some effect on diabetes treatments in the future.
For diabetics who still have some pancreatic function, and aren't wholly dependent on pills, maybe the results found from this research could help them.As for those who are dependent on pills, needles, and the like, I could wonder what it would do for them.The article didn't really clarify what happened with the diabetes in the affected test subjects, though, so I lack that answer.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30956614</id>
	<title>Re:Let's keep this one to ourselves...</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1264766220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>PETA is going to go ape-shit.</p></div><p>True, but off-topic.  They're probably going to go ape-shit over someone wearing fake leather.  I doubt they are going to be reading the methods sections of scientific papers, they'd probably get upset over the non-cruelty-free ink the paper was printed on first.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>PETA is going to go ape-shit.True , but off-topic .
They 're probably going to go ape-shit over someone wearing fake leather .
I doubt they are going to be reading the methods sections of scientific papers , they 'd probably get upset over the non-cruelty-free ink the paper was printed on first .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PETA is going to go ape-shit.True, but off-topic.
They're probably going to go ape-shit over someone wearing fake leather.
I doubt they are going to be reading the methods sections of scientific papers, they'd probably get upset over the non-cruelty-free ink the paper was printed on first.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428</id>
	<title>Let me get this straight...</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1264796100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll live forever if I eat babies?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll live forever if I eat babies ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll live forever if I eat babies?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953718</id>
	<title>Old stems cells</title>
	<author>roman\_mir</author>
	<datestamp>1264797540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Old stems those cells, ha?  Is that what they call it now?   Since I have gone this way already let's continue with that.  He, Old, stems them wicked, stems them good!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Old stems those cells , ha ?
Is that what they call it now ?
Since I have gone this way already let 's continue with that .
He , Old , stems them wicked , stems them good !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Old stems those cells, ha?
Is that what they call it now?
Since I have gone this way already let's continue with that.
He, Old, stems them wicked, stems them good!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954200
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30956654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30959736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30958930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30956614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30965544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30956958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30958946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953682
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953460
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30958092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953576
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953838
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953622
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_160203_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954628
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30957016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953460
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30956654
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30959736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953602
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953470
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954058
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30956958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953838
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953766
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954300
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954628
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954910
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30965544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954644
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30958930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30958092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954160
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30956614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30954956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953524
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30958946
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_160203.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_160203.30953458
</commentlist>
</conversation>
