<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_29_1551257</id>
	<title>AT&amp;T Admits New York City iPhone Service Sucks</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1264784520000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>RevWaldo notes a post up at The Gothamist on <a href="http://gothamist.com/2010/01/28/att\_admits\_new\_york\_city\_3g\_service.php">AT&amp;T's admission of its poor cell service in New York</a>. <i>"AT&amp;T has realized that the first step towards recovery is admitting it has a problem. The phone giant has confessed that its New York City iPhone service is not up to par, according to a <a href="http://www.tomsguide.com/us/att-3g-iphone-nyc-sf,news-5668.html">presentation slide</a> published on Tom's Guide noting that the company's 3G Voice Composite Quality in the New York metro area &mdash; particularly in Manhattan &mdash; is below its performance objective. ... The slide does contain some good news for AT&amp;T subscribers. Apparently, AT&amp;T has had '[t]hree consecutive months of improvement'..."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>RevWaldo notes a post up at The Gothamist on AT&amp;T 's admission of its poor cell service in New York .
" AT&amp;T has realized that the first step towards recovery is admitting it has a problem .
The phone giant has confessed that its New York City iPhone service is not up to par , according to a presentation slide published on Tom 's Guide noting that the company 's 3G Voice Composite Quality in the New York metro area    particularly in Manhattan    is below its performance objective .
... The slide does contain some good news for AT&amp;T subscribers .
Apparently , AT&amp;T has had ' [ t ] hree consecutive months of improvement'... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RevWaldo notes a post up at The Gothamist on AT&amp;T's admission of its poor cell service in New York.
"AT&amp;T has realized that the first step towards recovery is admitting it has a problem.
The phone giant has confessed that its New York City iPhone service is not up to par, according to a presentation slide published on Tom's Guide noting that the company's 3G Voice Composite Quality in the New York metro area — particularly in Manhattan — is below its performance objective.
... The slide does contain some good news for AT&amp;T subscribers.
Apparently, AT&amp;T has had '[t]hree consecutive months of improvement'..."</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951486</id>
	<title>Chicago isn't any better</title>
	<author>frinkster</author>
	<datestamp>1264788540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I rarely get 3G data service during the week.  Usually it's EDGE and not very fast EDGE at that.</p><p>Weekends are much better.</p><p>Anyone thinking of getting an iPad should really think about the real value of the 3G option - will it be worth anything in your area?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I rarely get 3G data service during the week .
Usually it 's EDGE and not very fast EDGE at that.Weekends are much better.Anyone thinking of getting an iPad should really think about the real value of the 3G option - will it be worth anything in your area ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I rarely get 3G data service during the week.
Usually it's EDGE and not very fast EDGE at that.Weekends are much better.Anyone thinking of getting an iPad should really think about the real value of the 3G option - will it be worth anything in your area?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951426</id>
	<title>Real Improvement?</title>
	<author>ivogan</author>
	<datestamp>1264788420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am left wondering if the improvement stated is a result of consumers switching carriers from AT&amp;T.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am left wondering if the improvement stated is a result of consumers switching carriers from AT&amp;T .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am left wondering if the improvement stated is a result of consumers switching carriers from AT&amp;T.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951522</id>
	<title>Good -- maybe they will start to improve</title>
	<author>soren100</author>
	<datestamp>1264788720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now if they can just admit their service sucks everywhere else too, then they can take some of all that iPhone money and actually improve the service.</p><p>What's really amazing about AT&amp;T and the iPhone is that if you are in a large crowd of people (such as a festival), the service becomes overwhelmed and you can't even make or receive a call.</p><p>Even just going to LA can make the phone get pretty unresponsive as it waits for a signal from the overloaded tower, so you can't really use it for much.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if they can just admit their service sucks everywhere else too , then they can take some of all that iPhone money and actually improve the service.What 's really amazing about AT&amp;T and the iPhone is that if you are in a large crowd of people ( such as a festival ) , the service becomes overwhelmed and you ca n't even make or receive a call.Even just going to LA can make the phone get pretty unresponsive as it waits for a signal from the overloaded tower , so you ca n't really use it for much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if they can just admit their service sucks everywhere else too, then they can take some of all that iPhone money and actually improve the service.What's really amazing about AT&amp;T and the iPhone is that if you are in a large crowd of people (such as a festival), the service becomes overwhelmed and you can't even make or receive a call.Even just going to LA can make the phone get pretty unresponsive as it waits for a signal from the overloaded tower, so you can't really use it for much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952012</id>
	<title>No, there actually has been no improvement</title>
	<author>yttrstein</author>
	<datestamp>1264790340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>As I still cannot get a 3G nor an Edge signal to sustain itself for more than literally 10 seconds...<br><br>Right in front of City Hall in Downtown Manhattan.  They *say* they've upgraded their NYC network and added capacity, but my signal strength (as noted by decibel, not bars) has remained absolutely consistently horrible everywhere in the Financial District, Gramercy Park, all of the Village, and both the Upper East and Upper West Sides.<br><br>Lies and more goddamn lies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>As I still can not get a 3G nor an Edge signal to sustain itself for more than literally 10 seconds...Right in front of City Hall in Downtown Manhattan .
They * say * they 've upgraded their NYC network and added capacity , but my signal strength ( as noted by decibel , not bars ) has remained absolutely consistently horrible everywhere in the Financial District , Gramercy Park , all of the Village , and both the Upper East and Upper West Sides.Lies and more goddamn lies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I still cannot get a 3G nor an Edge signal to sustain itself for more than literally 10 seconds...Right in front of City Hall in Downtown Manhattan.
They *say* they've upgraded their NYC network and added capacity, but my signal strength (as noted by decibel, not bars) has remained absolutely consistently horrible everywhere in the Financial District, Gramercy Park, all of the Village, and both the Upper East and Upper West Sides.Lies and more goddamn lies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951980</id>
	<title>Luke Wilson lied to me.  Again.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264790160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Fastest 3G network in the country...  Sure, as long as you don't count major metro areas or any of those other peskly 3G networks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fastest 3G network in the country... Sure , as long as you do n't count major metro areas or any of those other peskly 3G networks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fastest 3G network in the country...  Sure, as long as you don't count major metro areas or any of those other peskly 3G networks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30955182</id>
	<title>Re:Y axis?</title>
	<author>treeves</author>
	<datestamp>1264760100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Whatever "that" is,.... </i></p><p>The "that" is crucial. What is "that"? How many subscribers who don't call to complain about the coverage, signal strength in mW, # of city blocks w/ coverage?<br>Also,<br>Is it a linear axis or log, or some other scale? Does it start at zero at the bottom, or some other number?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whatever " that " is,.... The " that " is crucial .
What is " that " ?
How many subscribers who do n't call to complain about the coverage , signal strength in mW , # of city blocks w/ coverage ? Also,Is it a linear axis or log , or some other scale ?
Does it start at zero at the bottom , or some other number ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whatever "that" is,.... The "that" is crucial.
What is "that"?
How many subscribers who don't call to complain about the coverage, signal strength in mW, # of city blocks w/ coverage?Also,Is it a linear axis or log, or some other scale?
Does it start at zero at the bottom, or some other number?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952770</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30962084</id>
	<title>Maybe it's not the iPhone</title>
	<author>punka</author>
	<datestamp>1264866060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps it's not the iPhone that is causing all of these problems. Maybe it's all the people who haven't upgraded their phones in years. When they hit a cell with old-school GSM/GPRS, that means there's less capacity for UMTS/HSDPA phones.</p><p>Why not make at least one band (1900mHz) UMTS/HSDPA only, so that way one or two customers can't kill the bandwidth for 50.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps it 's not the iPhone that is causing all of these problems .
Maybe it 's all the people who have n't upgraded their phones in years .
When they hit a cell with old-school GSM/GPRS , that means there 's less capacity for UMTS/HSDPA phones.Why not make at least one band ( 1900mHz ) UMTS/HSDPA only , so that way one or two customers ca n't kill the bandwidth for 50 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps it's not the iPhone that is causing all of these problems.
Maybe it's all the people who haven't upgraded their phones in years.
When they hit a cell with old-school GSM/GPRS, that means there's less capacity for UMTS/HSDPA phones.Why not make at least one band (1900mHz) UMTS/HSDPA only, so that way one or two customers can't kill the bandwidth for 50.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952002</id>
	<title>Not just Manhattan, all of NY</title>
	<author>RiddleofSteel</author>
	<datestamp>1264790280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It sucks out on Long Island too! Hope they don't just focus on Manhattan. I mean it's ridiculous how bad AT&amp;T service is in all facets. Sorely tempted to trade my beloved Iphone for a Nexus. I get so mad everytime I see what's his face from Old School talking about how fast their network is. Also so what if it's faster, you don't get any coverage anywhere! I mean really, I could have the fastest race car in the world, but if I can only drive it up and down my drive way it's pointless!</htmltext>
<tokenext>It sucks out on Long Island too !
Hope they do n't just focus on Manhattan .
I mean it 's ridiculous how bad AT&amp;T service is in all facets .
Sorely tempted to trade my beloved Iphone for a Nexus .
I get so mad everytime I see what 's his face from Old School talking about how fast their network is .
Also so what if it 's faster , you do n't get any coverage anywhere !
I mean really , I could have the fastest race car in the world , but if I can only drive it up and down my drive way it 's pointless !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It sucks out on Long Island too!
Hope they don't just focus on Manhattan.
I mean it's ridiculous how bad AT&amp;T service is in all facets.
Sorely tempted to trade my beloved Iphone for a Nexus.
I get so mad everytime I see what's his face from Old School talking about how fast their network is.
Also so what if it's faster, you don't get any coverage anywhere!
I mean really, I could have the fastest race car in the world, but if I can only drive it up and down my drive way it's pointless!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30954508</id>
	<title>Same experience in Minneapolis</title>
	<author>swb</author>
	<datestamp>1264757760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had Verizon forever, since they were AirTouch.</p><p>I finally made the leap (of faith) to the iPhone last year after getting sick of the crappy crippled phones from Verizon.  I was dreading the carrier change but its actually been great.</p><p>No dead spots yet -- Highland Park in St. Paul was a black hole for Verizon.  Data seems faster, but the hardware comparison isnt really the same (Motorola Q Black vs. iPhone 3G &amp; 3GS).  Voice quality/availability as good or better than Verizon, AFAICT.</p><p>Really overall it's been a great transition.  About the only gripe I have is rural North Dakota and extreme Northwestern Minnesota -- coverage there for voice is thin and data is low speed only, but AFAIK everyone up in that neck of the woods (all 300,000 of them over both states...) are some weird rural carrier (AlTel?) that is also CDMA.  I'm only there a couple of times a year and all the places I stay have 802.11 so I can live without 3G for the most part 8 days a year.</p><p>My opinion, at least here, is that the anti-AT&amp;T griping AND pro-Verizon is way overrated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had Verizon forever , since they were AirTouch.I finally made the leap ( of faith ) to the iPhone last year after getting sick of the crappy crippled phones from Verizon .
I was dreading the carrier change but its actually been great.No dead spots yet -- Highland Park in St. Paul was a black hole for Verizon .
Data seems faster , but the hardware comparison isnt really the same ( Motorola Q Black vs. iPhone 3G &amp; 3GS ) .
Voice quality/availability as good or better than Verizon , AFAICT.Really overall it 's been a great transition .
About the only gripe I have is rural North Dakota and extreme Northwestern Minnesota -- coverage there for voice is thin and data is low speed only , but AFAIK everyone up in that neck of the woods ( all 300,000 of them over both states... ) are some weird rural carrier ( AlTel ?
) that is also CDMA .
I 'm only there a couple of times a year and all the places I stay have 802.11 so I can live without 3G for the most part 8 days a year.My opinion , at least here , is that the anti-AT&amp;T griping AND pro-Verizon is way overrated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had Verizon forever, since they were AirTouch.I finally made the leap (of faith) to the iPhone last year after getting sick of the crappy crippled phones from Verizon.
I was dreading the carrier change but its actually been great.No dead spots yet -- Highland Park in St. Paul was a black hole for Verizon.
Data seems faster, but the hardware comparison isnt really the same (Motorola Q Black vs. iPhone 3G &amp; 3GS).
Voice quality/availability as good or better than Verizon, AFAICT.Really overall it's been a great transition.
About the only gripe I have is rural North Dakota and extreme Northwestern Minnesota -- coverage there for voice is thin and data is low speed only, but AFAIK everyone up in that neck of the woods (all 300,000 of them over both states...) are some weird rural carrier (AlTel?
) that is also CDMA.
I'm only there a couple of times a year and all the places I stay have 802.11 so I can live without 3G for the most part 8 days a year.My opinion, at least here, is that the anti-AT&amp;T griping AND pro-Verizon is way overrated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30954704</id>
	<title>Re:Stop bashing AT&amp;T for this!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264758420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, what a refreshing post.  There's so much hate slung around slashdot from people who do not have a fucking clue how modern telecom networks are built and how much capital it takes, especially in densely-populated areas, to achieve a quality service level.  Nor is there any patience anymore.  What the fuck happened to patience in this world? If I had mod points, I'd give them all to the parent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , what a refreshing post .
There 's so much hate slung around slashdot from people who do not have a fucking clue how modern telecom networks are built and how much capital it takes , especially in densely-populated areas , to achieve a quality service level .
Nor is there any patience anymore .
What the fuck happened to patience in this world ?
If I had mod points , I 'd give them all to the parent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, what a refreshing post.
There's so much hate slung around slashdot from people who do not have a fucking clue how modern telecom networks are built and how much capital it takes, especially in densely-populated areas, to achieve a quality service level.
Nor is there any patience anymore.
What the fuck happened to patience in this world?
If I had mod points, I'd give them all to the parent.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952156</id>
	<title>Woo boy, get out your iPads.</title>
	<author>Globally Mobile</author>
	<datestamp>1264790820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wonder how well the iPad 3G will do in NYC when released.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder how well the iPad 3G will do in NYC when released .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder how well the iPad 3G will do in NYC when released.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951400</id>
	<title>In other news: water is wet</title>
	<author>Finallyjoined!!!</author>
	<datestamp>1264788360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Pope is Catholic.<br>
Goldfish like water</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Pope is Catholic .
Goldfish like water</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Pope is Catholic.
Goldfish like water</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30956808</id>
	<title>Re:Chicago isn't any better</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264767180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From what I saw presented, the iPad will let you insert any microSIM, which means you can use it on another network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From what I saw presented , the iPad will let you insert any microSIM , which means you can use it on another network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From what I saw presented, the iPad will let you insert any microSIM, which means you can use it on another network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953350</id>
	<title>That's funny...I don't have any problems with ATT</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264795680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I live in the Upper West Side of Manhattan and have never had any problems with my iPhone or ATT.  I wonder if there are specific areas of Manhattan which get worse service from ATT. I'm guessing that downtown Manhattan may have more problems because that's where most people are during a work day (and are more likely to be using their phones).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in the Upper West Side of Manhattan and have never had any problems with my iPhone or ATT .
I wonder if there are specific areas of Manhattan which get worse service from ATT .
I 'm guessing that downtown Manhattan may have more problems because that 's where most people are during a work day ( and are more likely to be using their phones ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in the Upper West Side of Manhattan and have never had any problems with my iPhone or ATT.
I wonder if there are specific areas of Manhattan which get worse service from ATT.
I'm guessing that downtown Manhattan may have more problems because that's where most people are during a work day (and are more likely to be using their phones).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951804</id>
	<title>Just iPhone service?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264789620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because of course the iPhone is the only phone to use 3G voice. and of course non-iPhone type phones (those still exist!) are obsolete, old world and non-multitouch and therefore not worth acknowledging</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because of course the iPhone is the only phone to use 3G voice .
and of course non-iPhone type phones ( those still exist !
) are obsolete , old world and non-multitouch and therefore not worth acknowledging</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because of course the iPhone is the only phone to use 3G voice.
and of course non-iPhone type phones (those still exist!
) are obsolete, old world and non-multitouch and therefore not worth acknowledging</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953328</id>
	<title>AT&amp;T Corporate Culture</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264795620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
More than their network and pricing, their corporate culture is rotten.
</p><p>
I was using instant chat to ask question about getting a land line, and the douchebag on the other side was repeatedly urging me to press "submit order" button instead of answering questions.
</p><p>
Don't do business with this scumbag outfit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>More than their network and pricing , their corporate culture is rotten .
I was using instant chat to ask question about getting a land line , and the douchebag on the other side was repeatedly urging me to press " submit order " button instead of answering questions .
Do n't do business with this scumbag outfit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
More than their network and pricing, their corporate culture is rotten.
I was using instant chat to ask question about getting a land line, and the douchebag on the other side was repeatedly urging me to press "submit order" button instead of answering questions.
Don't do business with this scumbag outfit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953462</id>
	<title>Re:Real Improvement?</title>
	<author>saterdaies</author>
	<datestamp>1264796280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It isn't an improvement from customers switching away.  AT&amp;T added more customers than Verizon last quarter and had a similar churn rate of 1.4\%.  So, no, AT&amp;T has more customers than ever and customers are staying with AT&amp;T at the same rate as Verizon and more customers are signing up for AT&amp;T than Verizon.</p><p>It's a real improvement.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't an improvement from customers switching away .
AT&amp;T added more customers than Verizon last quarter and had a similar churn rate of 1.4 \ % .
So , no , AT&amp;T has more customers than ever and customers are staying with AT&amp;T at the same rate as Verizon and more customers are signing up for AT&amp;T than Verizon.It 's a real improvement .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't an improvement from customers switching away.
AT&amp;T added more customers than Verizon last quarter and had a similar churn rate of 1.4\%.
So, no, AT&amp;T has more customers than ever and customers are staying with AT&amp;T at the same rate as Verizon and more customers are signing up for AT&amp;T than Verizon.It's a real improvement.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952560</id>
	<title>Blackberry in NYC</title>
	<author>Vamman</author>
	<datestamp>1264792320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My BlackBerry is on the Teleus carrier here in Canada. When I went down to NYC last summer my BlackBerry was a worthless POS. Just bringing up my email and replying was a challenge. Everywhere we went the signal was great but the service was horrid. The two places I noticed the biggest drops was at the MET on a Saturday afternoon and at a Yankee's game in the evening on the weekend. There was literally no service and I felt like when I used to try and dial into a busy ISP in the 90s. Even when you connect to a busy ISP you might not have any service. I paid alot of money to MY carrier so I could have bandwidth access in NYC and it was a waste of money. I wanted my money back but they refused. What a waste.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My BlackBerry is on the Teleus carrier here in Canada .
When I went down to NYC last summer my BlackBerry was a worthless POS .
Just bringing up my email and replying was a challenge .
Everywhere we went the signal was great but the service was horrid .
The two places I noticed the biggest drops was at the MET on a Saturday afternoon and at a Yankee 's game in the evening on the weekend .
There was literally no service and I felt like when I used to try and dial into a busy ISP in the 90s .
Even when you connect to a busy ISP you might not have any service .
I paid alot of money to MY carrier so I could have bandwidth access in NYC and it was a waste of money .
I wanted my money back but they refused .
What a waste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My BlackBerry is on the Teleus carrier here in Canada.
When I went down to NYC last summer my BlackBerry was a worthless POS.
Just bringing up my email and replying was a challenge.
Everywhere we went the signal was great but the service was horrid.
The two places I noticed the biggest drops was at the MET on a Saturday afternoon and at a Yankee's game in the evening on the weekend.
There was literally no service and I felt like when I used to try and dial into a busy ISP in the 90s.
Even when you connect to a busy ISP you might not have any service.
I paid alot of money to MY carrier so I could have bandwidth access in NYC and it was a waste of money.
I wanted my money back but they refused.
What a waste.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952920</id>
	<title>Re:Unpaid bribes or union patronage?</title>
	<author>Bemopolis</author>
	<datestamp>1264793820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if you are just another right-leaning jagoff who will use the summary of any story to blame something lefty like "unions" without regard to the necessity of proof to level yet another of your accusations.
<br> <br>(checks Kohath's comment history)
<br> <br>Reasonable hypothesis.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if you are just another right-leaning jagoff who will use the summary of any story to blame something lefty like " unions " without regard to the necessity of proof to level yet another of your accusations .
( checks Kohath 's comment history ) Reasonable hypothesis .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if you are just another right-leaning jagoff who will use the summary of any story to blame something lefty like "unions" without regard to the necessity of proof to level yet another of your accusations.
(checks Kohath's comment history)
 Reasonable hypothesis.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951644</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953242</id>
	<title>Deploy Ethernet?!?</title>
	<author>AllInOne</author>
	<datestamp>1264795200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you look at the full version of the slide, here:</p><p><a href="http://media.bestofmicro.com/6/C/237396/original/att-q409-slide-1.jpg" title="bestofmicro.com">http://media.bestofmicro.com/6/C/237396/original/att-q409-slide-1.jpg</a> [bestofmicro.com]</p><p>One of the next 90 day fixes is "Deploy Ethernet to Cell sites to improve network backhaul".</p><p>As an NYC iphone customer I can almost forgive them for bad reception in the canyons of the city.   So many tall buildings etc...</p><p>But come on, the bottleneck is <b>also</b> that they don't have enough bandwidth from the towers to the network?? WTF?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you look at the full version of the slide , here : http : //media.bestofmicro.com/6/C/237396/original/att-q409-slide-1.jpg [ bestofmicro.com ] One of the next 90 day fixes is " Deploy Ethernet to Cell sites to improve network backhaul " .As an NYC iphone customer I can almost forgive them for bad reception in the canyons of the city .
So many tall buildings etc...But come on , the bottleneck is also that they do n't have enough bandwidth from the towers to the network ? ?
WTF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you look at the full version of the slide, here:http://media.bestofmicro.com/6/C/237396/original/att-q409-slide-1.jpg [bestofmicro.com]One of the next 90 day fixes is "Deploy Ethernet to Cell sites to improve network backhaul".As an NYC iphone customer I can almost forgive them for bad reception in the canyons of the city.
So many tall buildings etc...But come on, the bottleneck is also that they don't have enough bandwidth from the towers to the network??
WTF?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951424</id>
	<title>Niggers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264788420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's all them niggers fault!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all them niggers fault !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's all them niggers fault!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951792</id>
	<title>Re:That's why we roll with 4G ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264789620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Shoot, why do you need 4G connectivity in a silly "large iPod Touch" device that can only run one application at a time? What will you download with that 4G - some DRM app from the apple app store or a DRM book?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Shoot , why do you need 4G connectivity in a silly " large iPod Touch " device that can only run one application at a time ?
What will you download with that 4G - some DRM app from the apple app store or a DRM book ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shoot, why do you need 4G connectivity in a silly "large iPod Touch" device that can only run one application at a time?
What will you download with that 4G - some DRM app from the apple app store or a DRM book?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951736</id>
	<title>that's a shame</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264789380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's just New York, so who cares? Frankly if you live in NYC I figure you'd be used to your life sucking by now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's just New York , so who cares ?
Frankly if you live in NYC I figure you 'd be used to your life sucking by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's just New York, so who cares?
Frankly if you live in NYC I figure you'd be used to your life sucking by now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953058</id>
	<title>Re:Stop bashing AT&amp;T for this!</title>
	<author>ThrowAwaySociety</author>
	<datestamp>1264794420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I live in Manhattan, and I own an iPhone.  Believe me, I know about all the problems.  I complain a lot to my friends.</p><p>But they're clearly trying to climb on top of this.  They're opening up about the problems, and they had that incident a month ago or so when they stopped selling iPhones.  They're trying to figure it out.</p><p>I ran a dial-up ISP in the 90's.  Tons of people came on to the net, and everyone in the business was trying like crazy to grow their phone banks and their networks to handle the new people.  Back then everyone complained about their ISP -- it was hard to keep up.</p><p>That's what's happening now with wireless.  Everyone is starting to use lots of data.  Three years ago, almost no one used wireless net access.  Three years from now, almost everyone in the city will want to be able to stream video to their phones at the same time.  All of that infrastructure has to be built, and all of it has to be financed.  Imagine if some other major chunk of infrastructure had to be built from the ground up -- electrical wiring, or roads, or whatever.  It's a big job.</p><p>The transition is inevitably going to be bloody.  We just need AT&amp;T to be open about it, and to really step up and try to keep up with the growth.  When they come clean like this, it's a very positive sign.  And once everyone's online, and the growth stabilizes, things will get a lot better.</p><p>(I realize that no one will buy this.  But I figured I'd put it out there anyway.)</p></div><p>If ATT had been honest about this of if they'd even shut up and not commented, nobody would be bashing anything. Everybody knows that building out a network takes time. But ATT has consistently been denying any issues whatsoever, claiming that its network was the fastest, most reliable, largest, most advanced, shiniest network on Earth, and that any customer who claimed otherwise was a lying, mentally retarded psychopath for suggesting so. Even to the point where its PR people were arguing openly with bloggers who had collected hundreds of reports from angry customers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Manhattan , and I own an iPhone .
Believe me , I know about all the problems .
I complain a lot to my friends.But they 're clearly trying to climb on top of this .
They 're opening up about the problems , and they had that incident a month ago or so when they stopped selling iPhones .
They 're trying to figure it out.I ran a dial-up ISP in the 90 's .
Tons of people came on to the net , and everyone in the business was trying like crazy to grow their phone banks and their networks to handle the new people .
Back then everyone complained about their ISP -- it was hard to keep up.That 's what 's happening now with wireless .
Everyone is starting to use lots of data .
Three years ago , almost no one used wireless net access .
Three years from now , almost everyone in the city will want to be able to stream video to their phones at the same time .
All of that infrastructure has to be built , and all of it has to be financed .
Imagine if some other major chunk of infrastructure had to be built from the ground up -- electrical wiring , or roads , or whatever .
It 's a big job.The transition is inevitably going to be bloody .
We just need AT&amp;T to be open about it , and to really step up and try to keep up with the growth .
When they come clean like this , it 's a very positive sign .
And once everyone 's online , and the growth stabilizes , things will get a lot better .
( I realize that no one will buy this .
But I figured I 'd put it out there anyway .
) If ATT had been honest about this of if they 'd even shut up and not commented , nobody would be bashing anything .
Everybody knows that building out a network takes time .
But ATT has consistently been denying any issues whatsoever , claiming that its network was the fastest , most reliable , largest , most advanced , shiniest network on Earth , and that any customer who claimed otherwise was a lying , mentally retarded psychopath for suggesting so .
Even to the point where its PR people were arguing openly with bloggers who had collected hundreds of reports from angry customers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Manhattan, and I own an iPhone.
Believe me, I know about all the problems.
I complain a lot to my friends.But they're clearly trying to climb on top of this.
They're opening up about the problems, and they had that incident a month ago or so when they stopped selling iPhones.
They're trying to figure it out.I ran a dial-up ISP in the 90's.
Tons of people came on to the net, and everyone in the business was trying like crazy to grow their phone banks and their networks to handle the new people.
Back then everyone complained about their ISP -- it was hard to keep up.That's what's happening now with wireless.
Everyone is starting to use lots of data.
Three years ago, almost no one used wireless net access.
Three years from now, almost everyone in the city will want to be able to stream video to their phones at the same time.
All of that infrastructure has to be built, and all of it has to be financed.
Imagine if some other major chunk of infrastructure had to be built from the ground up -- electrical wiring, or roads, or whatever.
It's a big job.The transition is inevitably going to be bloody.
We just need AT&amp;T to be open about it, and to really step up and try to keep up with the growth.
When they come clean like this, it's a very positive sign.
And once everyone's online, and the growth stabilizes, things will get a lot better.
(I realize that no one will buy this.
But I figured I'd put it out there anyway.
)If ATT had been honest about this of if they'd even shut up and not commented, nobody would be bashing anything.
Everybody knows that building out a network takes time.
But ATT has consistently been denying any issues whatsoever, claiming that its network was the fastest, most reliable, largest, most advanced, shiniest network on Earth, and that any customer who claimed otherwise was a lying, mentally retarded psychopath for suggesting so.
Even to the point where its PR people were arguing openly with bloggers who had collected hundreds of reports from angry customers.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953684</id>
	<title>Verizon to join them soon.....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264797300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once Verizon starts selling IPhone and other high bandwidth phones you'll see their network slow there after.  That's IF they catch the number of true smart phones AT&amp;T is servicing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once Verizon starts selling IPhone and other high bandwidth phones you 'll see their network slow there after .
That 's IF they catch the number of true smart phones AT&amp;T is servicing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once Verizon starts selling IPhone and other high bandwidth phones you'll see their network slow there after.
That's IF they catch the number of true smart phones AT&amp;T is servicing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952744</id>
	<title>Are they sure it isn't the phone?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264793100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My HTC phone has fantastic service on AT&amp;T. I have never had an issue, while iPhone users less than 10 feet away from me can't get a signal. Are they really so certain its the network?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My HTC phone has fantastic service on AT&amp;T .
I have never had an issue , while iPhone users less than 10 feet away from me ca n't get a signal .
Are they really so certain its the network ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My HTC phone has fantastic service on AT&amp;T.
I have never had an issue, while iPhone users less than 10 feet away from me can't get a signal.
Are they really so certain its the network?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30954364</id>
	<title>So when will they admit this about Los Angeles?</title>
	<author>mrshermanoaks</author>
	<datestamp>1264757100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Very few days go by when I don't have a call dropped on my iPhone, just sitting here in my home office. And forget about when driving. Everyone I know in LA who has an iPhone complains about the very same thing. If you want to listen to a funny conversation, eavesdrop on a conversation between two iPhones. "Yeah, it's me again. The iPhone dropped the call again. Yeah, well.... hello? Hello?"</p><p>So far their answer? "Mark The Spot", an iPhone app that they want you to switch to and register a complaint about dropped calls instead of trying to call back the person whose call just dropped off. Why don't they look at their records and see the number of times I redialed a number within 30 seconds that I was just connected to?</p><p>I've been an Apple guy since the II, and make my living on the Mac platform. But another couple of months to shake out the Nexus and I'm moving. I like Apple but not willing to continue being punked by this Apple/AT&amp;T alliance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Very few days go by when I do n't have a call dropped on my iPhone , just sitting here in my home office .
And forget about when driving .
Everyone I know in LA who has an iPhone complains about the very same thing .
If you want to listen to a funny conversation , eavesdrop on a conversation between two iPhones .
" Yeah , it 's me again .
The iPhone dropped the call again .
Yeah , well.... hello ? Hello ?
" So far their answer ?
" Mark The Spot " , an iPhone app that they want you to switch to and register a complaint about dropped calls instead of trying to call back the person whose call just dropped off .
Why do n't they look at their records and see the number of times I redialed a number within 30 seconds that I was just connected to ? I 've been an Apple guy since the II , and make my living on the Mac platform .
But another couple of months to shake out the Nexus and I 'm moving .
I like Apple but not willing to continue being punked by this Apple/AT&amp;T alliance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Very few days go by when I don't have a call dropped on my iPhone, just sitting here in my home office.
And forget about when driving.
Everyone I know in LA who has an iPhone complains about the very same thing.
If you want to listen to a funny conversation, eavesdrop on a conversation between two iPhones.
"Yeah, it's me again.
The iPhone dropped the call again.
Yeah, well.... hello? Hello?
"So far their answer?
"Mark The Spot", an iPhone app that they want you to switch to and register a complaint about dropped calls instead of trying to call back the person whose call just dropped off.
Why don't they look at their records and see the number of times I redialed a number within 30 seconds that I was just connected to?I've been an Apple guy since the II, and make my living on the Mac platform.
But another couple of months to shake out the Nexus and I'm moving.
I like Apple but not willing to continue being punked by this Apple/AT&amp;T alliance.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952770</id>
	<title>Re:Y axis?</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1264793160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It <em>has</em> a y-axis. Don&rsquo;t you see &ldquo;Performance Objective&rdquo;?</p><p>Whatever that is, the y-axis is the percentage of it achieved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It has a y-axis .
Don    t you see    Performance Objective    ? Whatever that is , the y-axis is the percentage of it achieved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It has a y-axis.
Don’t you see “Performance Objective”?Whatever that is, the y-axis is the percentage of it achieved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952596</id>
	<title>Re:Good -- maybe they will start to improve</title>
	<author>corbettw</author>
	<datestamp>1264792440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like one more reason not to go to LA. Not that anyone needed any more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like one more reason not to go to LA .
Not that anyone needed any more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like one more reason not to go to LA.
Not that anyone needed any more.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952326</id>
	<title>Stop bashing AT&amp;T for this!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264791420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in Manhattan, and I own an iPhone.  Believe me, I know about all the problems.  I complain a lot to my friends.</p><p>But they're clearly trying to climb on top of this.  They're opening up about the problems, and they had that incident a month ago or so when they stopped selling iPhones.  They're trying to figure it out.</p><p>I ran a dial-up ISP in the 90's.  Tons of people came on to the net, and everyone in the business was trying like crazy to grow their phone banks and their networks to handle the new people.  Back then everyone complained about their ISP -- it was hard to keep up.</p><p>That's what's happening now with wireless.  Everyone is starting to use lots of data.  Three years ago, almost no one used wireless net access.  Three years from now, almost everyone in the city will want to be able to stream video to their phones at the same time.  All of that infrastructure has to be built, and all of it has to be financed.  Imagine if some other major chunk of infrastructure had to be built from the ground up -- electrical wiring, or roads, or whatever.  It's a big job.</p><p>The transition is inevitably going to be bloody.  We just need AT&amp;T to be open about it, and to really step up and try to keep up with the growth.  When they come clean like this, it's a very positive sign.  And once everyone's online, and the growth stabilizes, things will get a lot better.</p><p>(I realize that no one will buy this.  But I figured I'd put it out there anyway.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in Manhattan , and I own an iPhone .
Believe me , I know about all the problems .
I complain a lot to my friends.But they 're clearly trying to climb on top of this .
They 're opening up about the problems , and they had that incident a month ago or so when they stopped selling iPhones .
They 're trying to figure it out.I ran a dial-up ISP in the 90 's .
Tons of people came on to the net , and everyone in the business was trying like crazy to grow their phone banks and their networks to handle the new people .
Back then everyone complained about their ISP -- it was hard to keep up.That 's what 's happening now with wireless .
Everyone is starting to use lots of data .
Three years ago , almost no one used wireless net access .
Three years from now , almost everyone in the city will want to be able to stream video to their phones at the same time .
All of that infrastructure has to be built , and all of it has to be financed .
Imagine if some other major chunk of infrastructure had to be built from the ground up -- electrical wiring , or roads , or whatever .
It 's a big job.The transition is inevitably going to be bloody .
We just need AT&amp;T to be open about it , and to really step up and try to keep up with the growth .
When they come clean like this , it 's a very positive sign .
And once everyone 's online , and the growth stabilizes , things will get a lot better .
( I realize that no one will buy this .
But I figured I 'd put it out there anyway .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in Manhattan, and I own an iPhone.
Believe me, I know about all the problems.
I complain a lot to my friends.But they're clearly trying to climb on top of this.
They're opening up about the problems, and they had that incident a month ago or so when they stopped selling iPhones.
They're trying to figure it out.I ran a dial-up ISP in the 90's.
Tons of people came on to the net, and everyone in the business was trying like crazy to grow their phone banks and their networks to handle the new people.
Back then everyone complained about their ISP -- it was hard to keep up.That's what's happening now with wireless.
Everyone is starting to use lots of data.
Three years ago, almost no one used wireless net access.
Three years from now, almost everyone in the city will want to be able to stream video to their phones at the same time.
All of that infrastructure has to be built, and all of it has to be financed.
Imagine if some other major chunk of infrastructure had to be built from the ground up -- electrical wiring, or roads, or whatever.
It's a big job.The transition is inevitably going to be bloody.
We just need AT&amp;T to be open about it, and to really step up and try to keep up with the growth.
When they come clean like this, it's a very positive sign.
And once everyone's online, and the growth stabilizes, things will get a lot better.
(I realize that no one will buy this.
But I figured I'd put it out there anyway.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952298</id>
	<title>Re:As an ATT customer in manhattan....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264791300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>LOL.  Every carrier of any service has those excuses.  My neighbors and I lost Comcast internet for about a day before.  We were told there is nothing wrong in our area and he even claimed to have run some local diagnostic to verify that.  The suggestion was to schedule a tech to come to my house which I declined.  Coincidently, we all started working again after a Comcast dude was working up on a nearby telephone pole.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>LOL .
Every carrier of any service has those excuses .
My neighbors and I lost Comcast internet for about a day before .
We were told there is nothing wrong in our area and he even claimed to have run some local diagnostic to verify that .
The suggestion was to schedule a tech to come to my house which I declined .
Coincidently , we all started working again after a Comcast dude was working up on a nearby telephone pole .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>LOL.
Every carrier of any service has those excuses.
My neighbors and I lost Comcast internet for about a day before.
We were told there is nothing wrong in our area and he even claimed to have run some local diagnostic to verify that.
The suggestion was to schedule a tech to come to my house which I declined.
Coincidently, we all started working again after a Comcast dude was working up on a nearby telephone pole.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952316</id>
	<title>2 billion in announced capex increases</title>
	<author>MikeURL</author>
	<datestamp>1264791360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If anyone was listening to the ATT earnings release you'd know that T has announced a 2 billion dollar increase in their capex for 2010.  This will still leave them below 2008 capex levels but will but them significantly above 2009 levels (which were absurdly low given that it was the year of the iPhone).  2 billion may not be enough to really fix every problem but neither is it a trivial increase.
<br> <br>
In short, they know there is a problem and have devoted all of their FCF from 2009 to try to address the problem.  They aren't standing still hoping the problem will fix itself.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If anyone was listening to the ATT earnings release you 'd know that T has announced a 2 billion dollar increase in their capex for 2010 .
This will still leave them below 2008 capex levels but will but them significantly above 2009 levels ( which were absurdly low given that it was the year of the iPhone ) .
2 billion may not be enough to really fix every problem but neither is it a trivial increase .
In short , they know there is a problem and have devoted all of their FCF from 2009 to try to address the problem .
They are n't standing still hoping the problem will fix itself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If anyone was listening to the ATT earnings release you'd know that T has announced a 2 billion dollar increase in their capex for 2010.
This will still leave them below 2008 capex levels but will but them significantly above 2009 levels (which were absurdly low given that it was the year of the iPhone).
2 billion may not be enough to really fix every problem but neither is it a trivial increase.
In short, they know there is a problem and have devoted all of their FCF from 2009 to try to address the problem.
They aren't standing still hoping the problem will fix itself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952274</id>
	<title>Re:Y axis?</title>
	<author>tepples</author>
	<datestamp>1264791240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Voice Composite Quality" is correlated with the bandwidth available for voice calls. Voice in recent GSM takes 4.5 to 12.2 kbps; the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptive\_Multi-Rate\_audio\_codec" title="wikipedia.org">AMR codec</a> [wikipedia.org] can drop down to lower bitrates if the tower is congested.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Voice Composite Quality " is correlated with the bandwidth available for voice calls .
Voice in recent GSM takes 4.5 to 12.2 kbps ; the AMR codec [ wikipedia.org ] can drop down to lower bitrates if the tower is congested .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Voice Composite Quality" is correlated with the bandwidth available for voice calls.
Voice in recent GSM takes 4.5 to 12.2 kbps; the AMR codec [wikipedia.org] can drop down to lower bitrates if the tower is congested.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951566</id>
	<title>When questioned why it's iPhone service sucked....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264788840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They responded M-o-n-o-p-o-l-y</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They responded M-o-n-o-p-o-l-y</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They responded M-o-n-o-p-o-l-y</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30955234</id>
	<title>Re:Y axis?</title>
	<author>cyberjock1980</author>
	<datestamp>1264760340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are joking, right?  If AT&amp;T came out and their Y-Axis shows that AT&amp;T's target speed was 128k, everyone on this forum would go apeshit.</p><p>AT&amp;T was smart in not letting anyone know how low they are going to go and call it "acceptable" performance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are joking , right ?
If AT&amp;T came out and their Y-Axis shows that AT&amp;T 's target speed was 128k , everyone on this forum would go apeshit.AT&amp;T was smart in not letting anyone know how low they are going to go and call it " acceptable " performance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are joking, right?
If AT&amp;T came out and their Y-Axis shows that AT&amp;T's target speed was 128k, everyone on this forum would go apeshit.AT&amp;T was smart in not letting anyone know how low they are going to go and call it "acceptable" performance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951968</id>
	<title>Re:Y axis?</title>
	<author>crankyspice</author>
	<datestamp>1264790160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As long as we're using AA doublespeak here ("first step . . . admitting . .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>."), might as well continue in that vein.  "Progress, not perfection."  The line just shows progress.  And that's all that matters.  Oh, yeah, and "fake it 'till you make it."</p><p>(No, I've never been in AA, but I was (am?) in recovery from anorexia, and eating disorders and the various addictions have a high degree of population overlap.)</p><p>(As an anorexic, I already know that I'm not *worthy* of good service, and so I never complained about AT&amp;T's iPhone coverage . .<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as we 're using AA doublespeak here ( " first step .
. .
admitting .
. .
" ) , might as well continue in that vein .
" Progress , not perfection .
" The line just shows progress .
And that 's all that matters .
Oh , yeah , and " fake it 'till you make it .
" ( No , I 've never been in AA , but I was ( am ?
) in recovery from anorexia , and eating disorders and the various addictions have a high degree of population overlap .
) ( As an anorexic , I already know that I 'm not * worthy * of good service , and so I never complained about AT&amp;T 's iPhone coverage .
. .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as we're using AA doublespeak here ("first step .
. .
admitting .
. .
"), might as well continue in that vein.
"Progress, not perfection.
"  The line just shows progress.
And that's all that matters.
Oh, yeah, and "fake it 'till you make it.
"(No, I've never been in AA, but I was (am?
) in recovery from anorexia, and eating disorders and the various addictions have a high degree of population overlap.
)(As an anorexic, I already know that I'm not *worthy* of good service, and so I never complained about AT&amp;T's iPhone coverage .
. .
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602</id>
	<title>Y axis?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264788900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's that graph supposed to represent without an y axis?</p><p>This is marketing disguised as an objective quality metric. Without showing the numbers, they've admitted to nothing, and promised nothing.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's that graph supposed to represent without an y axis ? This is marketing disguised as an objective quality metric .
Without showing the numbers , they 've admitted to nothing , and promised nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's that graph supposed to represent without an y axis?This is marketing disguised as an objective quality metric.
Without showing the numbers, they've admitted to nothing, and promised nothing.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30958612</id>
	<title>It always has...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264779180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iPhone service sucks everywhere as it always has...because the iPhone sucks AIDS infected donkey balls!  It always has and always will.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iPhone service sucks everywhere as it always has...because the iPhone sucks AIDS infected donkey balls !
It always has and always will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPhone service sucks everywhere as it always has...because the iPhone sucks AIDS infected donkey balls!
It always has and always will.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952852</id>
	<title>Re:Good -- maybe they will start to improve</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264793520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't suck everywhere... my house out in BFE for example has no trouble with AT my parents who are with Verizon keep dropping calls whenever they visit or just flat out lose signal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't suck everywhere... my house out in BFE for example has no trouble with AT my parents who are with Verizon keep dropping calls whenever they visit or just flat out lose signal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't suck everywhere... my house out in BFE for example has no trouble with AT my parents who are with Verizon keep dropping calls whenever they visit or just flat out lose signal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952634</id>
	<title>Re:Y axis?</title>
	<author>garcia</author>
	<datestamp>1264792560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Without showing the numbers, they've admitted to nothing, and promised nothing.</i></p><p>Even if they gave us the numbers it wouldn't tell us jack. Numbers mean nothing w/o context of how they are getting the data they are charting. Is this a customer survey? If so, how is it administered and who is the population (people who call in to AT&amp;T CSRs, random sampling via e-mail, what?)</p><p>I'm willing to bet that this is some sort of valid survey conducted on a regular basis by AT&amp;T but the marketing team took it, stripped everything important, and threw it up there to say, "look at us we're trying," even though they've been trying to possibly years already and failing all the while.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Without showing the numbers , they 've admitted to nothing , and promised nothing.Even if they gave us the numbers it would n't tell us jack .
Numbers mean nothing w/o context of how they are getting the data they are charting .
Is this a customer survey ?
If so , how is it administered and who is the population ( people who call in to AT&amp;T CSRs , random sampling via e-mail , what ?
) I 'm willing to bet that this is some sort of valid survey conducted on a regular basis by AT&amp;T but the marketing team took it , stripped everything important , and threw it up there to say , " look at us we 're trying , " even though they 've been trying to possibly years already and failing all the while .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without showing the numbers, they've admitted to nothing, and promised nothing.Even if they gave us the numbers it wouldn't tell us jack.
Numbers mean nothing w/o context of how they are getting the data they are charting.
Is this a customer survey?
If so, how is it administered and who is the population (people who call in to AT&amp;T CSRs, random sampling via e-mail, what?
)I'm willing to bet that this is some sort of valid survey conducted on a regular basis by AT&amp;T but the marketing team took it, stripped everything important, and threw it up there to say, "look at us we're trying," even though they've been trying to possibly years already and failing all the while.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30980904</id>
	<title>Re:In other news: water is wet</title>
	<author>gpronger</author>
	<datestamp>1265038860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Liked it.<br> <br>

I guess your wronging (mod points) is pointing out the obvious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Liked it .
I guess your wronging ( mod points ) is pointing out the obvious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Liked it.
I guess your wronging (mod points) is pointing out the obvious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30959914</id>
	<title>Re:Stop bashing AT&amp;T for this!</title>
	<author>yottabit42</author>
	<datestamp>1264793400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The difference is that VZW proactively spends money preparing and upgrading their network. ATT spends money on their wireless network only as a reactionary measure, and then only when threatened with lawsuits and investigations by governments agencies... Shame on ATT for being so stupid to take on the iPhone without the facilities to properly execute.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The difference is that VZW proactively spends money preparing and upgrading their network .
ATT spends money on their wireless network only as a reactionary measure , and then only when threatened with lawsuits and investigations by governments agencies... Shame on ATT for being so stupid to take on the iPhone without the facilities to properly execute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The difference is that VZW proactively spends money preparing and upgrading their network.
ATT spends money on their wireless network only as a reactionary measure, and then only when threatened with lawsuits and investigations by governments agencies... Shame on ATT for being so stupid to take on the iPhone without the facilities to properly execute.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952982</id>
	<title>Re:Stop bashing AT&amp;T for this!</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1264794120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>it was hard to keep up.</p></div></blockquote><p>Only if you over sell and never say 'we are at capacity and can not take any more subscribers at this time'</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>it was hard to keep up.Only if you over sell and never say 'we are at capacity and can not take any more subscribers at this time '</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it was hard to keep up.Only if you over sell and never say 'we are at capacity and can not take any more subscribers at this time'
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952286</id>
	<title>Re:As an ATT customer in manhattan....</title>
	<author>sconeu</author>
	<datestamp>1264791300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When your lawyer threatens to sue them over it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When your lawyer threatens to sue them over it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When your lawyer threatens to sue them over it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951644</id>
	<title>Unpaid bribes or union patronage?</title>
	<author>Kohath</author>
	<datestamp>1264789080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder if AT&amp;T is having problems in New York and Chicago and some other large cities because they don't know who to bribe or what local bosses control what happens.  There are fewer people standing in the way of upgrades like this in some places than in others.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if AT&amp;T is having problems in New York and Chicago and some other large cities because they do n't know who to bribe or what local bosses control what happens .
There are fewer people standing in the way of upgrades like this in some places than in others .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if AT&amp;T is having problems in New York and Chicago and some other large cities because they don't know who to bribe or what local bosses control what happens.
There are fewer people standing in the way of upgrades like this in some places than in others.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953382</id>
	<title>Re:In other news: water is wet</title>
	<author>the\_fat\_kid</author>
	<datestamp>1264795860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bear shits in woods.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bear shits in woods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bear shits in woods.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951890</id>
	<title>AT&amp;T NYC service</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264789920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I was in Downtown Manhattan<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/w AT&amp;T service a few months ago - 3G service in general (Not just IPhone) wasn't just slow it was so slow that the effective result was it didn't work at all - don't waste your time trying slow.  The experience was comparable to GSM data service (14.4k) of decades past.  In contrast call quality was quite good and I never had any problems there.</p><p>Thankfully outside of the Metro area all was well in 3G land.  At the time I suspected all of those massive Sprint displays in times square had some sort of magical influence over my data connection<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was in Downtown Manhattan /w AT&amp;T service a few months ago - 3G service in general ( Not just IPhone ) was n't just slow it was so slow that the effective result was it did n't work at all - do n't waste your time trying slow .
The experience was comparable to GSM data service ( 14.4k ) of decades past .
In contrast call quality was quite good and I never had any problems there.Thankfully outside of the Metro area all was well in 3G land .
At the time I suspected all of those massive Sprint displays in times square had some sort of magical influence over my data connection : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was in Downtown Manhattan /w AT&amp;T service a few months ago - 3G service in general (Not just IPhone) wasn't just slow it was so slow that the effective result was it didn't work at all - don't waste your time trying slow.
The experience was comparable to GSM data service (14.4k) of decades past.
In contrast call quality was quite good and I never had any problems there.Thankfully outside of the Metro area all was well in 3G land.
At the time I suspected all of those massive Sprint displays in times square had some sort of magical influence over my data connection :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951620</id>
	<title>3 Months of Improvement</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264788960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...is easy when you have 3 months of subscribers canceling their contracts.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...is easy when you have 3 months of subscribers canceling their contracts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...is easy when you have 3 months of subscribers canceling their contracts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951984</id>
	<title>In Other News</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1264790220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>In other news, AT&amp;T admits the sky is blue.<br> <br>
Uh. Yeah. We knew that already...</htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , AT&amp;T admits the sky is blue .
Uh. Yeah .
We knew that already.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, AT&amp;T admits the sky is blue.
Uh. Yeah.
We knew that already...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951490</id>
	<title>Re:In other news: water is wet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264788540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Macs are for fags especially the artsy-fartsy type with lame French accents.
<br>
Windoze is for luzers.
<br>
Your sig is dumb.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Macs are for fags especially the artsy-fartsy type with lame French accents .
Windoze is for luzers .
Your sig is dumb .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Macs are for fags especially the artsy-fartsy type with lame French accents.
Windoze is for luzers.
Your sig is dumb.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951866</id>
	<title>They are only copping to Voice issues</title>
	<author>asteinmetz</author>
	<datestamp>1264789860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>...while it's data that is giving people fits.  When I say "people" I mean "me."</htmltext>
<tokenext>...while it 's data that is giving people fits .
When I say " people " I mean " me .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...while it's data that is giving people fits.
When I say "people" I mean "me.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952948</id>
	<title>Works great up in the Boston area</title>
	<author>PDG</author>
	<datestamp>1264793940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hear NYC and SanFran AT&amp;T horror stories all the time, and then people jump on the bandwagon and say it sucks everywhere else too.</p><p>Well, works beautifully in Boston.  Recent reports show that its faster and more reliable in Boston than Verizon as well.  Believe me, I was a 12 year Verizon veteran and shied away from AT&amp;T because of the 'stories' I heard.  One day, work gave me an AT&amp;T serviced BlackBerry and I swapped the sim card into an iPhone off EBay and was astounded that I got better and faster service than my Verizon account gave me.</p><p>Dropped Verizon and went AT&amp;T within a week.  Nary a problem since.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hear NYC and SanFran AT&amp;T horror stories all the time , and then people jump on the bandwagon and say it sucks everywhere else too.Well , works beautifully in Boston .
Recent reports show that its faster and more reliable in Boston than Verizon as well .
Believe me , I was a 12 year Verizon veteran and shied away from AT&amp;T because of the 'stories ' I heard .
One day , work gave me an AT&amp;T serviced BlackBerry and I swapped the sim card into an iPhone off EBay and was astounded that I got better and faster service than my Verizon account gave me.Dropped Verizon and went AT&amp;T within a week .
Nary a problem since .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hear NYC and SanFran AT&amp;T horror stories all the time, and then people jump on the bandwagon and say it sucks everywhere else too.Well, works beautifully in Boston.
Recent reports show that its faster and more reliable in Boston than Verizon as well.
Believe me, I was a 12 year Verizon veteran and shied away from AT&amp;T because of the 'stories' I heard.
One day, work gave me an AT&amp;T serviced BlackBerry and I swapped the sim card into an iPhone off EBay and was astounded that I got better and faster service than my Verizon account gave me.Dropped Verizon and went AT&amp;T within a week.
Nary a problem since.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951398</id>
	<title>Priorities</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264788360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now if only they had some of that Luke Wilson money to invest in infrastructure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now if only they had some of that Luke Wilson money to invest in infrastructure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now if only they had some of that Luke Wilson money to invest in infrastructure.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951992</id>
	<title>Did anyone else read this as...</title>
	<author>jd2112</author>
	<datestamp>1264790220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For the past three months more people in NYC are leaving AT&amp;T than they are picking up as new subscribers?</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the past three months more people in NYC are leaving AT&amp;T than they are picking up as new subscribers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the past three months more people in NYC are leaving AT&amp;T than they are picking up as new subscribers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952556</id>
	<title>Re:Priorities</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264792260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Trent Reznor called, he wants his face back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Trent Reznor called , he wants his face back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trent Reznor called, he wants his face back.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.31032580</id>
	<title>parastar</title>
	<author>parastar</author>
	<datestamp>1265365320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>about time these guys accepted the facts.</htmltext>
<tokenext>about time these guys accepted the facts .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>about time these guys accepted the facts.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953080</id>
	<title>Re:Good -- maybe they will start to improve</title>
	<author>DanTheManMS</author>
	<datestamp>1264794540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>GSM works through what's called "time-division multiplexing" over various fixed frequencies.  What this means is that a set carrier frequency (let's just make up a number and say 403.123 MHz) can carry a certain number of callers at once, let's say 16.  This means it splits time into 16 chunks, and then for a split second customer 1 can transmit and recieve whatever it wants, then the next split second customer 2 can transmit and receive whatever it wants, and so on until all 16 have gotten their split second of time, and this is repeated thousands of times per second.  Once all 16 time slots are full, another carrier frequency is selected for more customers, and these frequencies are as finely split as can be without causing too much interference.
<br> <br>
The point is that you've only got so many slots per frequency, and only so many distinct frequencies available in your FCC-allotted bandwidth.  It makes perfect sense for a large gathering of people to use up all available slots, even if signal strength is excellent.
<br> <br>
For comparison, CDMA works in such a way that everyone transmits and receives all the time, and your phone sees everyone else's signals as pure noise.  Thus, the more phones connected at once, the more noise everyone has to contend with, and so the tower will artificially limit the number of phones connected to it at any given time to avoid this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>GSM works through what 's called " time-division multiplexing " over various fixed frequencies .
What this means is that a set carrier frequency ( let 's just make up a number and say 403.123 MHz ) can carry a certain number of callers at once , let 's say 16 .
This means it splits time into 16 chunks , and then for a split second customer 1 can transmit and recieve whatever it wants , then the next split second customer 2 can transmit and receive whatever it wants , and so on until all 16 have gotten their split second of time , and this is repeated thousands of times per second .
Once all 16 time slots are full , another carrier frequency is selected for more customers , and these frequencies are as finely split as can be without causing too much interference .
The point is that you 've only got so many slots per frequency , and only so many distinct frequencies available in your FCC-allotted bandwidth .
It makes perfect sense for a large gathering of people to use up all available slots , even if signal strength is excellent .
For comparison , CDMA works in such a way that everyone transmits and receives all the time , and your phone sees everyone else 's signals as pure noise .
Thus , the more phones connected at once , the more noise everyone has to contend with , and so the tower will artificially limit the number of phones connected to it at any given time to avoid this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>GSM works through what's called "time-division multiplexing" over various fixed frequencies.
What this means is that a set carrier frequency (let's just make up a number and say 403.123 MHz) can carry a certain number of callers at once, let's say 16.
This means it splits time into 16 chunks, and then for a split second customer 1 can transmit and recieve whatever it wants, then the next split second customer 2 can transmit and receive whatever it wants, and so on until all 16 have gotten their split second of time, and this is repeated thousands of times per second.
Once all 16 time slots are full, another carrier frequency is selected for more customers, and these frequencies are as finely split as can be without causing too much interference.
The point is that you've only got so many slots per frequency, and only so many distinct frequencies available in your FCC-allotted bandwidth.
It makes perfect sense for a large gathering of people to use up all available slots, even if signal strength is excellent.
For comparison, CDMA works in such a way that everyone transmits and receives all the time, and your phone sees everyone else's signals as pure noise.
Thus, the more phones connected at once, the more noise everyone has to contend with, and so the tower will artificially limit the number of phones connected to it at any given time to avoid this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30956742</id>
	<title>Re:Real Improvement?</title>
	<author>ascari</author>
	<datestamp>1264766760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nope. AT &amp; T installed pay phones all over Manhattan.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nope .
AT &amp; T installed pay phones all over Manhattan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nope.
AT &amp; T installed pay phones all over Manhattan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951426</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952158</id>
	<title>Only a matter of time...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264790880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It can only be a matter of time until AT&amp;T admits that their service everywhere sucks.  Right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It can only be a matter of time until AT&amp;T admits that their service everywhere sucks .
Right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It can only be a matter of time until AT&amp;T admits that their service everywhere sucks.
Right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951558</id>
	<title>As an ATT customer in manhattan....</title>
	<author>Chineseyes</author>
	<datestamp>1264788780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks for finally fucking noticing.  I've called to complain to ATT numerous times over the years and every single time i was given the following bullshit excuses:
<br>
- You need a new sim card<br>
- Your phone might be damaged<br>
- We don't see any problems in the area<br>
<br>
So when is ATT going to give me my money back for diminished service?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for finally fucking noticing .
I 've called to complain to ATT numerous times over the years and every single time i was given the following bullshit excuses : - You need a new sim card - Your phone might be damaged - We do n't see any problems in the area So when is ATT going to give me my money back for diminished service ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for finally fucking noticing.
I've called to complain to ATT numerous times over the years and every single time i was given the following bullshit excuses:

- You need a new sim card
- Your phone might be damaged
- We don't see any problems in the area

So when is ATT going to give me my money back for diminished service?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952718</id>
	<title>Re:Y axis?</title>
	<author>mewsenews</author>
	<datestamp>1264792980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What's that graph supposed to represent without an y axis?</p></div></blockquote><p>The Y axis represents "3G Voice Composite Quality Index", duh! Don't you speak marketing robot? High fives all around, everyone, team meeting at the Sizzler!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's that graph supposed to represent without an y axis ? The Y axis represents " 3G Voice Composite Quality Index " , duh !
Do n't you speak marketing robot ?
High fives all around , everyone , team meeting at the Sizzler !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's that graph supposed to represent without an y axis?The Y axis represents "3G Voice Composite Quality Index", duh!
Don't you speak marketing robot?
High fives all around, everyone, team meeting at the Sizzler!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951402</id>
	<title>Twitter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264788360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why won't anyone admit that the emperors new micro blogging site is absolutely pointless.</p><p>Get those muthafucking buttons of this muthafucking slashdot.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why wo n't anyone admit that the emperors new micro blogging site is absolutely pointless.Get those muthafucking buttons of this muthafucking slashdot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why won't anyone admit that the emperors new micro blogging site is absolutely pointless.Get those muthafucking buttons of this muthafucking slashdot.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952410</id>
	<title>Re:That's why we roll with 4G ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264791720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>America stays behind so you Eurotypes have a reason to feel superior on the internet.  We had to clean up the massive destructions and genocides you guys get up to when you start feeling inferior, so we do our best to let you feel like you're just peachy fucking keen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>America stays behind so you Eurotypes have a reason to feel superior on the internet .
We had to clean up the massive destructions and genocides you guys get up to when you start feeling inferior , so we do our best to let you feel like you 're just peachy fucking keen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>America stays behind so you Eurotypes have a reason to feel superior on the internet.
We had to clean up the massive destructions and genocides you guys get up to when you start feeling inferior, so we do our best to let you feel like you're just peachy fucking keen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953946</id>
	<title>Don't say it in a commercial</title>
	<author>Deadstick</author>
	<datestamp>1264798680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...or Domino's will sue you for copyright infringement.</p><p>rj</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...or Domino 's will sue you for copyright infringement.rj</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...or Domino's will sue you for copyright infringement.rj</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951664</id>
	<title>That's why we roll with 4G ...</title>
	<author>acidfast7</author>
	<datestamp>1264789140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>why is the service in NYC so horrible<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:( and why is America so far behind in telecommunications<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(
<p>
as an aside, I have no interest in the iPad until it has 4G connectivity. What is up with that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>why is the service in NYC so horrible : ( and why is America so far behind in telecommunications : ( as an aside , I have no interest in the iPad until it has 4G connectivity .
What is up with that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>why is the service in NYC so horrible :( and why is America so far behind in telecommunications :(

as an aside, I have no interest in the iPad until it has 4G connectivity.
What is up with that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952446</id>
	<title>Didn't this basically happen last month?</title>
	<author>rm999</author>
	<datestamp>1264791900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I remember reading in the consumerist that an AT&amp;T consumer representative said "the phone is not offered to you because New York is not ready for the iPhone." They (temporarily) stopped selling one of the best selling phones in the country's biggest market! Isn't this already an admission that their service sucks? I guess it could be interpreted as AT&amp;T blaming the iPhone and New Yorkers instead of their own network, but I think we all saw through the rep's thinly veiled admission.</p><p><a href="http://consumerist.com/2009/12/att-customer-service-new-york-city-is-not-ready-for-the-iphone.html" title="consumerist.com">http://consumerist.com/2009/12/att-customer-service-new-york-city-is-not-ready-for-the-iphone.html</a> [consumerist.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember reading in the consumerist that an AT&amp;T consumer representative said " the phone is not offered to you because New York is not ready for the iPhone .
" They ( temporarily ) stopped selling one of the best selling phones in the country 's biggest market !
Is n't this already an admission that their service sucks ?
I guess it could be interpreted as AT&amp;T blaming the iPhone and New Yorkers instead of their own network , but I think we all saw through the rep 's thinly veiled admission.http : //consumerist.com/2009/12/att-customer-service-new-york-city-is-not-ready-for-the-iphone.html [ consumerist.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember reading in the consumerist that an AT&amp;T consumer representative said "the phone is not offered to you because New York is not ready for the iPhone.
" They (temporarily) stopped selling one of the best selling phones in the country's biggest market!
Isn't this already an admission that their service sucks?
I guess it could be interpreted as AT&amp;T blaming the iPhone and New Yorkers instead of their own network, but I think we all saw through the rep's thinly veiled admission.http://consumerist.com/2009/12/att-customer-service-new-york-city-is-not-ready-for-the-iphone.html [consumerist.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952760</id>
	<title>Acceptance...</title>
	<author>jitterman</author>
	<datestamp>1264793100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the first step on the road to recovery.</htmltext>
<tokenext>the first step on the road to recovery .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the first step on the road to recovery.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30955234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952556
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951398
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30956808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30955182
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30980904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30956742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951426
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30954704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951664
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951644
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951400
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30954508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952948
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_29_1551257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30959914
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952446
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952156
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952410
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30959914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30954704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952982
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30956808
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951804
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952852
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952596
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951736
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951398
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952556
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30954508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30956742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30953382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30980904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952002
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_29_1551257.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952770
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30955182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30951968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30955234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952634
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_29_1551257.30952274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
