<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_28_2055209</id>
	<title>Fujitsu Readies Lawsuit Over "iPad" Name</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1264669320000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>gyrogeerloose writes <i>"In an event eerily reminiscent of Cisco's suit over Apple's use of the 'iPhone' name, Japanese firm Fujitsu is consulting its attorneys in  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/technology/companies/29name.html">preparation for going to court over Apple's use of 'iPad'</a> for its latest computing device. Quoted in a New York Times story, Masahiro Yamane, director of Fujitsu's public relations division, said 'It's our understanding that the name is ours.' Fujitsu's application to trademark the iPad name stalled because of an earlier filing by another company and the US Patent and Trademark Office listed Fujitsu's application as abandoned in early 2009, but the company revived its application in June. Apple, which has applied for an international trademark on 'iPad' through a proxy company, has filed a number of requests with the US Patent Office for more time to oppose Fujitsu's application."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>gyrogeerloose writes " In an event eerily reminiscent of Cisco 's suit over Apple 's use of the 'iPhone ' name , Japanese firm Fujitsu is consulting its attorneys in preparation for going to court over Apple 's use of 'iPad ' for its latest computing device .
Quoted in a New York Times story , Masahiro Yamane , director of Fujitsu 's public relations division , said 'It 's our understanding that the name is ours .
' Fujitsu 's application to trademark the iPad name stalled because of an earlier filing by another company and the US Patent and Trademark Office listed Fujitsu 's application as abandoned in early 2009 , but the company revived its application in June .
Apple , which has applied for an international trademark on 'iPad ' through a proxy company , has filed a number of requests with the US Patent Office for more time to oppose Fujitsu 's application .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>gyrogeerloose writes "In an event eerily reminiscent of Cisco's suit over Apple's use of the 'iPhone' name, Japanese firm Fujitsu is consulting its attorneys in  preparation for going to court over Apple's use of 'iPad' for its latest computing device.
Quoted in a New York Times story, Masahiro Yamane, director of Fujitsu's public relations division, said 'It's our understanding that the name is ours.
' Fujitsu's application to trademark the iPad name stalled because of an earlier filing by another company and the US Patent and Trademark Office listed Fujitsu's application as abandoned in early 2009, but the company revived its application in June.
Apple, which has applied for an international trademark on 'iPad' through a proxy company, has filed a number of requests with the US Patent Office for more time to oppose Fujitsu's application.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943030</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1264679700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, they could have called it "iPod embiggen", another perfectly cromulent word.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , they could have called it " iPod embiggen " , another perfectly cromulent word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, they could have called it "iPod embiggen", another perfectly cromulent word.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30945378</id>
	<title>Re:iFlatThingWithoutAKeyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264696740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>iDiot should be too available</htmltext>
<tokenext>iDiot should be too available</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iDiot should be too available</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942170</id>
	<title>THESE LAWSUITS ARE STOOPID</title>
	<author>jekewa</author>
	<datestamp>1264676460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can understand it if there's a chance that someone might be confused between the Apple iPad or the Fujitsu iPad, but that's not likely to happen. Yeah, they're both portable, use batteries, and have plastic cases and digital screens, but there's pretty much where the similarities end. Oh, and one is so like ten years ago that most people wouldn't have even thought of it much less confused it.</p><p>Can we stop the stoopid litigations so that people can focus on doing things to make money, instead of suing each other for it. Oh, wait...first we must get rid of all of the lawyers...insert favorite lawyer joke here...</p><p>And Apple should have just done us a favor and called it the "iPod Jumbo" and been done with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can understand it if there 's a chance that someone might be confused between the Apple iPad or the Fujitsu iPad , but that 's not likely to happen .
Yeah , they 're both portable , use batteries , and have plastic cases and digital screens , but there 's pretty much where the similarities end .
Oh , and one is so like ten years ago that most people would n't have even thought of it much less confused it.Can we stop the stoopid litigations so that people can focus on doing things to make money , instead of suing each other for it .
Oh , wait...first we must get rid of all of the lawyers...insert favorite lawyer joke here...And Apple should have just done us a favor and called it the " iPod Jumbo " and been done with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can understand it if there's a chance that someone might be confused between the Apple iPad or the Fujitsu iPad, but that's not likely to happen.
Yeah, they're both portable, use batteries, and have plastic cases and digital screens, but there's pretty much where the similarities end.
Oh, and one is so like ten years ago that most people wouldn't have even thought of it much less confused it.Can we stop the stoopid litigations so that people can focus on doing things to make money, instead of suing each other for it.
Oh, wait...first we must get rid of all of the lawyers...insert favorite lawyer joke here...And Apple should have just done us a favor and called it the "iPod Jumbo" and been done with it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941256</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>negRo\_slim</author>
	<datestamp>1264673460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think Fujitsu sees a way to make a little scratch and stick it to Apple, as lord knows the name is awful... Just awful...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think Fujitsu sees a way to make a little scratch and stick it to Apple , as lord knows the name is awful... Just awful.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think Fujitsu sees a way to make a little scratch and stick it to Apple, as lord knows the name is awful... Just awful...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947512</id>
	<title>Re:Apple please change the name...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264764600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If there's one thing I've learnt in the last couple of days, it's that many nerds must have some strange obsession with female hygiene products. When I think of the word "pad", I think of something to write or draw on, something a helicopter lands on, or what I keep my computer mouse on. But each to his own, I guess.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If there 's one thing I 've learnt in the last couple of days , it 's that many nerds must have some strange obsession with female hygiene products .
When I think of the word " pad " , I think of something to write or draw on , something a helicopter lands on , or what I keep my computer mouse on .
But each to his own , I guess .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If there's one thing I've learnt in the last couple of days, it's that many nerds must have some strange obsession with female hygiene products.
When I think of the word "pad", I think of something to write or draw on, something a helicopter lands on, or what I keep my computer mouse on.
But each to his own, I guess.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232</id>
	<title>Double trademark trolls!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264673400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>earlier filing by another company</p></div><p>So what we have is ACME Inc that isnt even named files a trademark on "iPad" knowing full well that Apple prefixes all their products with an i. They do this on the off chance that Apple ever comes out with an "iPad" and they would be able to sue for big bucks. Fujitsu realizes the same thing and tries to put their own trademark on "iPad", but is blocked because someone else already owns it. Now Apple announces a real iPad and Fujitsu is pissed because they don't really own the trademark yet but want sue someone, and ACME Inc hasn't said anything about the trademark that they already own.<br>gotta love patent/trademark squatters.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>earlier filing by another companySo what we have is ACME Inc that isnt even named files a trademark on " iPad " knowing full well that Apple prefixes all their products with an i. They do this on the off chance that Apple ever comes out with an " iPad " and they would be able to sue for big bucks .
Fujitsu realizes the same thing and tries to put their own trademark on " iPad " , but is blocked because someone else already owns it .
Now Apple announces a real iPad and Fujitsu is pissed because they do n't really own the trademark yet but want sue someone , and ACME Inc has n't said anything about the trademark that they already own.got ta love patent/trademark squatters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>earlier filing by another companySo what we have is ACME Inc that isnt even named files a trademark on "iPad" knowing full well that Apple prefixes all their products with an i. They do this on the off chance that Apple ever comes out with an "iPad" and they would be able to sue for big bucks.
Fujitsu realizes the same thing and tries to put their own trademark on "iPad", but is blocked because someone else already owns it.
Now Apple announces a real iPad and Fujitsu is pissed because they don't really own the trademark yet but want sue someone, and ACME Inc hasn't said anything about the trademark that they already own.gotta love patent/trademark squatters.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30945598</id>
	<title>Hysteria 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264699380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bachelor pad, keypad, notepad, we use the suffix all the time, certainly in my experience phrases like "I'm just going to grab a pad so I cad write this down", or "I'm going to check out his new pad" aren't met with sniggers. Crazy retweeting overreaction me thinks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bachelor pad , keypad , notepad , we use the suffix all the time , certainly in my experience phrases like " I 'm just going to grab a pad so I cad write this down " , or " I 'm going to check out his new pad " are n't met with sniggers .
Crazy retweeting overreaction me thinks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bachelor pad, keypad, notepad, we use the suffix all the time, certainly in my experience phrases like "I'm just going to grab a pad so I cad write this down", or "I'm going to check out his new pad" aren't met with sniggers.
Crazy retweeting overreaction me thinks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942282</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264676820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't get all worked up. Remember all the immaturity with the Nintendo Wii, yet it's a household name now.</p><p>Think of the word "pod"... what the hell does a pod have to do with music?</p><p>Bah, save a headache or two and move on... it's the internet, an infinite bitch forum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't get all worked up .
Remember all the immaturity with the Nintendo Wii , yet it 's a household name now.Think of the word " pod " ... what the hell does a pod have to do with music ? Bah , save a headache or two and move on... it 's the internet , an infinite bitch forum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't get all worked up.
Remember all the immaturity with the Nintendo Wii, yet it's a household name now.Think of the word "pod"... what the hell does a pod have to do with music?Bah, save a headache or two and move on... it's the internet, an infinite bitch forum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941482</id>
	<title>Cut their losses</title>
	<author>TwiztidK</author>
	<datestamp>1264674180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple should just drop the iPad, start doing some mad R&amp;D, and come up with a product people actually want with a respectable name like iSlate or iTablet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple should just drop the iPad , start doing some mad R&amp;D , and come up with a product people actually want with a respectable name like iSlate or iTablet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple should just drop the iPad, start doing some mad R&amp;D, and come up with a product people actually want with a respectable name like iSlate or iTablet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941422</id>
	<title>Re:Apple please change the name...</title>
	<author>Kral\_Blbec</author>
	<datestamp>1264673940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>You are really worried about appearing manly while using an Apple product? Kind of a lost cause at that point anyway.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You are really worried about appearing manly while using an Apple product ?
Kind of a lost cause at that point anyway .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are really worried about appearing manly while using an Apple product?
Kind of a lost cause at that point anyway.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30944842</id>
	<title>worst. name. ever.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264691400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fujitsu would be doing Apple a favour if they won. Worst product name ever.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fujitsu would be doing Apple a favour if they won .
Worst product name ever .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fujitsu would be doing Apple a favour if they won.
Worst product name ever.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30944056</id>
	<title>LIES!</title>
	<author>maliqua</author>
	<datestamp>1264685580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>apple would never infringe on someone else's patent</htmltext>
<tokenext>apple would never infringe on someone else 's patent</tokentext>
<sentencetext>apple would never infringe on someone else's patent</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30944646</id>
	<title>MadTV used iPad two years ago</title>
	<author>data2</author>
	<datestamp>1264689720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsjU0K8QPhs&amp;feature=player\_embedded" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsjU0K8QPhs&amp;feature=player\_embedded</a> [youtube.com]<br>Seems like Steve Jobs got the idea from there<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>(A tribute to all of those having to thing of maxipads everytime you read iPad)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = lsjU0K8QPhs&amp;feature = player \ _embedded [ youtube.com ] Seems like Steve Jobs got the idea from there : ) ( A tribute to all of those having to thing of maxipads everytime you read iPad )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsjU0K8QPhs&amp;feature=player\_embedded [youtube.com]Seems like Steve Jobs got the idea from there :)(A tribute to all of those having to thing of maxipads everytime you read iPad)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941984</id>
	<title>Name Change &lsquo;Not That Big of a Deal&rsquo; S</title>
	<author>amasiancrasian</author>
	<datestamp>1264675920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Change your apps name. Not that big of a deal.<br>
<br>
Steve<br>
<br>
Sent from my iPhone</p></div></blockquote><p>From
<a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/steve-jobs-to-developer-name-change-not-that-big-of-a-deal/" title="wired.com" rel="nofollow">Wired</a> [wired.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Change your apps name .
Not that big of a deal .
Steve Sent from my iPhoneFrom Wired [ wired.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change your apps name.
Not that big of a deal.
Steve

Sent from my iPhoneFrom
Wired [wired.com]
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947190</id>
	<title>Re:Crowdsourcing new name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264759740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iCantBelieveItsNotButter?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iCantBelieveItsNotButter ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iCantBelieveItsNotButter?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942192</id>
	<title>Canadian Apple Stores use the Fujitsu iPad</title>
	<author>Steve Newall</author>
	<datestamp>1264676520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's interesting that in the Canadian Apple Stores, the sales assistants use the Fujitsu iPad <a href="http://solutions.us.fujitsu.com/downloads/retail/DS\_IPAD.pdf" title="fujitsu.com" rel="nofollow">http://solutions.us.fujitsu.com/downloads/retail/DS\_IPAD.pdf</a> [fujitsu.com] if you wish to pay by credit card and have your receipt e-mailed to you (you don't need to line up at a cashier)</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's interesting that in the Canadian Apple Stores , the sales assistants use the Fujitsu iPad http : //solutions.us.fujitsu.com/downloads/retail/DS \ _IPAD.pdf [ fujitsu.com ] if you wish to pay by credit card and have your receipt e-mailed to you ( you do n't need to line up at a cashier )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's interesting that in the Canadian Apple Stores, the sales assistants use the Fujitsu iPad http://solutions.us.fujitsu.com/downloads/retail/DS\_IPAD.pdf [fujitsu.com] if you wish to pay by credit card and have your receipt e-mailed to you (you don't need to line up at a cashier)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942434</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>Duradin</author>
	<datestamp>1264677420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I suggest you inform your local professional football team's linebackers that they are all using feminine hygiene products.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest you inform your local professional football team 's linebackers that they are all using feminine hygiene products .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest you inform your local professional football team's linebackers that they are all using feminine hygiene products.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941210</id>
	<title>Apple please change the name...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264673340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think I'm manly enough to appear in public with the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eF0y0IfpPU" title="youtube.com">iPad for Women</a> [youtube.com]. In fact, I might sue Apple for reminding me of my childhood trauma of being dragged into that particular aisle of the grocery store by my mother.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think I 'm manly enough to appear in public with the iPad for Women [ youtube.com ] .
In fact , I might sue Apple for reminding me of my childhood trauma of being dragged into that particular aisle of the grocery store by my mother .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think I'm manly enough to appear in public with the iPad for Women [youtube.com].
In fact, I might sue Apple for reminding me of my childhood trauma of being dragged into that particular aisle of the grocery store by my mother.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941454</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>Translation Error</author>
	<datestamp>1264674060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Am I the only person who sees this as an excellent opportunity for Apple to ditch the unfortunate moniker and go with something like iSlate?</p></div></blockquote><p>
Yes, no one could ever come up with jokes for that name.  Especially not if something related to the product is delayed.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only person who sees this as an excellent opportunity for Apple to ditch the unfortunate moniker and go with something like iSlate ?
Yes , no one could ever come up with jokes for that name .
Especially not if something related to the product is delayed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only person who sees this as an excellent opportunity for Apple to ditch the unfortunate moniker and go with something like iSlate?
Yes, no one could ever come up with jokes for that name.
Especially not if something related to the product is delayed.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943118</id>
	<title>Re:Double trademark trolls!</title>
	<author>CompMD</author>
	<datestamp>1264680180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and Fujitsu has had serious business making and selling tablet computers for almost 20 years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and Fujitsu has had serious business making and selling tablet computers for almost 20 years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and Fujitsu has had serious business making and selling tablet computers for almost 20 years.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947472</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>macslut</author>
	<datestamp>1264763940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"fine and useful English" <br>
I think the word you're looking for is "cromulent".</htmltext>
<tokenext>" fine and useful English " I think the word you 're looking for is " cromulent " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"fine and useful English" 
I think the word you're looking for is "cromulent".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942002</id>
	<title>Fir5t</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264675980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">whole has lost it has to be fun sanctions, and to work I'm doing, ink splashes acroos Is mired in an 'first post' I burnt out. I List of other</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>whole has lost it has to be fun sanctions , and to work I 'm doing , ink splashes acroos Is mired in an 'first post ' I burnt out .
I List of other [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>whole has lost it has to be fun sanctions, and to work I'm doing, ink splashes acroos Is mired in an 'first post' I burnt out.
I List of other [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942948</id>
	<title>Dan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264679340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here we go again! Apple will somehow win their way out of this one like they always do.<br>http://www.novoparatus.com</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here we go again !
Apple will somehow win their way out of this one like they always do.http : //www.novoparatus.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here we go again!
Apple will somehow win their way out of this one like they always do.http://www.novoparatus.com</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30946618</id>
	<title>WoP</title>
	<author>nikanth</author>
	<datestamp>1264796160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And there is World of Padman
<a href="http://www.worldofpadman.com/" title="worldofpadman.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.worldofpadman.com/</a> [worldofpadman.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>And there is World of Padman http : //www.worldofpadman.com/ [ worldofpadman.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And there is World of Padman
http://www.worldofpadman.com/ [worldofpadman.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30944240</id>
	<title>Already been iDone</title>
	<author>Dogbertius</author>
	<datestamp>1264686900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seriously? Has no one out here heard/felt the iGasm yet? More or less the same thing. Gotta love rebranding an old idea.

<a href="http://ownedirl.com/misc/iGasm.jpg" title="ownedirl.com" rel="nofollow">http://ownedirl.com/misc/iGasm.jpg</a> [ownedirl.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ?
Has no one out here heard/felt the iGasm yet ?
More or less the same thing .
Got ta love rebranding an old idea .
http : //ownedirl.com/misc/iGasm.jpg [ ownedirl.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?
Has no one out here heard/felt the iGasm yet?
More or less the same thing.
Gotta love rebranding an old idea.
http://ownedirl.com/misc/iGasm.jpg [ownedirl.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30946106</id>
	<title>Rename it "Maxi-pod"</title>
	<author>shking</author>
	<datestamp>1264704540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What could be wrong with <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L68aKVAzwQ4" title="youtube.com">THAT</a> [youtube.com]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What could be wrong with THAT [ youtube.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What could be wrong with THAT [youtube.com]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943650</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>jcoy42</author>
	<datestamp>1264683120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, that explains it.  For a while there, I thought they actually made that crappy product!  I just don't see why they didn't wait until April 1st..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , that explains it .
For a while there , I thought they actually made that crappy product !
I just do n't see why they did n't wait until April 1st. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, that explains it.
For a while there, I thought they actually made that crappy product!
I just don't see why they didn't wait until April 1st..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943064</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1264679940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>as lord knows the name is awful... Just awful...</i></p><p>I agree - although I guess they couldn't go with the "istale" (or given its vaporware status, the "IsLate").</p><p>But I say good luck to Fujitsu. I think it's a justified use of trademark law if they're products in the same or similar market (which is what trademark law is meant to protect).</p><p>I mean, if I started releasing "Mac" computers, how soon would it be before I got a call from Apple's lawyers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>as lord knows the name is awful... Just awful...I agree - although I guess they could n't go with the " istale " ( or given its vaporware status , the " IsLate " ) .But I say good luck to Fujitsu .
I think it 's a justified use of trademark law if they 're products in the same or similar market ( which is what trademark law is meant to protect ) .I mean , if I started releasing " Mac " computers , how soon would it be before I got a call from Apple 's lawyers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>as lord knows the name is awful... Just awful...I agree - although I guess they couldn't go with the "istale" (or given its vaporware status, the "IsLate").But I say good luck to Fujitsu.
I think it's a justified use of trademark law if they're products in the same or similar market (which is what trademark law is meant to protect).I mean, if I started releasing "Mac" computers, how soon would it be before I got a call from Apple's lawyers?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30948384</id>
	<title>I'll wait</title>
	<author>flyingfsck</author>
	<datestamp>1264775160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'll wait for the miniature version.  I heard a rumour that it will have a phone and camera built in, so it will actually be more than just a picture frame.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll wait for the miniature version .
I heard a rumour that it will have a phone and camera built in , so it will actually be more than just a picture frame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll wait for the miniature version.
I heard a rumour that it will have a phone and camera built in, so it will actually be more than just a picture frame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108</id>
	<title>welp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264673040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ipad as a name is about as bad as it can get for apple, due to all the jokes and the SNL skit. Is itablet also trademarked?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ipad as a name is about as bad as it can get for apple , due to all the jokes and the SNL skit .
Is itablet also trademarked ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ipad as a name is about as bad as it can get for apple, due to all the jokes and the SNL skit.
Is itablet also trademarked?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941408</id>
	<title>Mom?!  Is That You??</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264673940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many times has dad told you that you mustn't drink and post on slashdot...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many times has dad told you that you must n't drink and post on slashdot... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many times has dad told you that you mustn't drink and post on slashdot...?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941836</id>
	<title>What this really says..</title>
	<author>macinit</author>
	<datestamp>1264675440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read it as, Fujitsu, we're green with envy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read it as , Fujitsu , we 're green with envy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read it as, Fujitsu, we're green with envy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30949040</id>
	<title>Re:Dear Steve Jobs,</title>
	<author>dargaud</author>
	<datestamp>1264779180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Tell me about it. When I moved to the US my friends made fun of me because I thought Velveeta was a feminine higiene product... <a href="http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h129/medboyIL/velveeta.jpg" title="photobucket.com">Actually</a> [photobucket.com]...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Tell me about it .
When I moved to the US my friends made fun of me because I thought Velveeta was a feminine higiene product... Actually [ photobucket.com ] .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tell me about it.
When I moved to the US my friends made fun of me because I thought Velveeta was a feminine higiene product... Actually [photobucket.com]...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942876</id>
	<title>Conspiracy theory</title>
	<author>safecheck</author>
	<datestamp>1264679100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmm.  After seeing what a joke everyone thinks the name is - they might just "settle" with Fujitsu and change the name...  Hmm...  I know relabeling the units (if they're finished) would cost some cash - but might get them out of this PR nightmare.  Nobody likes the name.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm .
After seeing what a joke everyone thinks the name is - they might just " settle " with Fujitsu and change the name... Hmm... I know relabeling the units ( if they 're finished ) would cost some cash - but might get them out of this PR nightmare .
Nobody likes the name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm.
After seeing what a joke everyone thinks the name is - they might just "settle" with Fujitsu and change the name...  Hmm...  I know relabeling the units (if they're finished) would cost some cash - but might get them out of this PR nightmare.
Nobody likes the name.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941812</id>
	<title>How about the...</title>
	<author>pandrijeczko</author>
	<datestamp>1264675380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... iThink500DollarsIsFarTooExpensiveForSomethingSoLockedDown.</p><p>Or are we using that one for Apple's mobile telephone thingy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... iThink500DollarsIsFarTooExpensiveForSomethingSoLockedDown.Or are we using that one for Apple 's mobile telephone thingy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... iThink500DollarsIsFarTooExpensiveForSomethingSoLockedDown.Or are we using that one for Apple's mobile telephone thingy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947572</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264765680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's wrong with iPad?</p><p>And please, no more maxiPad jokes. Those got old pretty quickly. Most people aren't obsessed with female hygiene products, you know. So that isn't the first thing that comes into most people's head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's wrong with iPad ? And please , no more maxiPad jokes .
Those got old pretty quickly .
Most people are n't obsessed with female hygiene products , you know .
So that is n't the first thing that comes into most people 's head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's wrong with iPad?And please, no more maxiPad jokes.
Those got old pretty quickly.
Most people aren't obsessed with female hygiene products, you know.
So that isn't the first thing that comes into most people's head.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941948</id>
	<title>Re:iFlatThingWithoutAKeyboard</title>
	<author>wdavies</author>
	<datestamp>1264675800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd go for "iPhatPhonelessPhone"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd go for " iPhatPhonelessPhone "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd go for "iPhatPhonelessPhone"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942334</id>
	<title>Re:Cut their losses</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264677060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Its been said before, but iSlate is reserved for Duke Nukem Forever, because it is... late.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its been said before , but iSlate is reserved for Duke Nukem Forever , because it is... late .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its been said before, but iSlate is reserved for Duke Nukem Forever, because it is... late.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941466</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>adisakp</author>
	<datestamp>1264674120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ipad as a name is about as bad as it can get for apple, due to all the jokes and the SNL skit. Is itablet also trademarked?</p></div><p>
It's actually a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFNQE\_TzQNI" title="youtube.com">MAD TV Skit</a> [youtube.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ipad as a name is about as bad as it can get for apple , due to all the jokes and the SNL skit .
Is itablet also trademarked ?
It 's actually a MAD TV Skit [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ipad as a name is about as bad as it can get for apple, due to all the jokes and the SNL skit.
Is itablet also trademarked?
It's actually a MAD TV Skit [youtube.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30945028</id>
	<title>Re:iFlatThingWithoutAKeyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264692960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about the iTouch Venti.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about the iTouch Venti .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about the iTouch Venti.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942114</id>
	<title>Star Trek</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264676280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fujitsu? Heck, I'm still waiting for the lawsuit from <a href="http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Padd" title="memory-alpha.org" rel="nofollow"> Paramount/CBS.</a> [memory-alpha.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fujitsu ?
Heck , I 'm still waiting for the lawsuit from Paramount/CBS .
[ memory-alpha.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fujitsu?
Heck, I'm still waiting for the lawsuit from  Paramount/CBS.
[memory-alpha.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942732</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>sdpuppy</author>
	<datestamp>1264678500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I suggest you inform your local professional football team's linebackers that they are all using feminine hygiene products.</p></div><p>Which side?
</p><p>
The kisses X or the hugs O ?

</p><p>thxby</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest you inform your local professional football team 's linebackers that they are all using feminine hygiene products.Which side ?
The kisses X or the hugs O ?
thxby</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest you inform your local professional football team's linebackers that they are all using feminine hygiene products.Which side?
The kisses X or the hugs O ?
thxby
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942434</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943756</id>
	<title>Apple iOS</title>
	<author>200\_success</author>
	<datestamp>1264683660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apple also needs a better name for their iPhone / iPod Touch / iPad operating system, since "iPhone / iPod Touch / iPad operating system" is too cumbersome.  I suggest that they name it Apple iOS.  =)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple also needs a better name for their iPhone / iPod Touch / iPad operating system , since " iPhone / iPod Touch / iPad operating system " is too cumbersome .
I suggest that they name it Apple iOS .
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple also needs a better name for their iPhone / iPod Touch / iPad operating system, since "iPhone / iPod Touch / iPad operating system" is too cumbersome.
I suggest that they name it Apple iOS.
=)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30945548</id>
	<title>Why not iBook?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264698780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After all, they themselves already had a product of that name...  iPad, nutty. (sigh) I was hoping for a Mac Tablet, not this stupid blown-up iPod Touch. Blech.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , they themselves already had a product of that name... iPad , nutty .
( sigh ) I was hoping for a Mac Tablet , not this stupid blown-up iPod Touch .
Blech .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, they themselves already had a product of that name...  iPad, nutty.
(sigh) I was hoping for a Mac Tablet, not this stupid blown-up iPod Touch.
Blech.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942000</id>
	<title>Re:iFlatThingWithoutAKeyboard</title>
	<author>rev\_sanchez</author>
	<datestamp>1264675980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the little iPod is the nano (1 billionth) then this new big one should be: iPod Giga.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the little iPod is the nano ( 1 billionth ) then this new big one should be : iPod Giga .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the little iPod is the nano (1 billionth) then this new big one should be: iPod Giga.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941578</id>
	<title>The distance some go to defend Apple</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264674540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bullshit! MagTek has an <a href="http://www.magtek.com/V2/products/pin-entry-and-management/ipad.asp" title="magtek.com">IPAD product</a> [magtek.com], and has filed the <a href="http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&amp;entry=76162761" title="uspto.gov">trademark in 2000</a> [uspto.gov] which was later granted and then extended several times. Even Fujitus was and is after the name for their product much longer than Apple.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>knowing full well that Apple prefixes all their products with an i</p></div><p>Apple doesn't <i>own</i> "iX" and it shouldn't get any special treatment. If it wants a trademark then should apply for it like everyone else. In this case it's late to the game, in fact too late.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Bullshit !
MagTek has an IPAD product [ magtek.com ] , and has filed the trademark in 2000 [ uspto.gov ] which was later granted and then extended several times .
Even Fujitus was and is after the name for their product much longer than Apple.knowing full well that Apple prefixes all their products with an iApple does n't own " iX " and it should n't get any special treatment .
If it wants a trademark then should apply for it like everyone else .
In this case it 's late to the game , in fact too late .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bullshit!
MagTek has an IPAD product [magtek.com], and has filed the trademark in 2000 [uspto.gov] which was later granted and then extended several times.
Even Fujitus was and is after the name for their product much longer than Apple.knowing full well that Apple prefixes all their products with an iApple doesn't own "iX" and it shouldn't get any special treatment.
If it wants a trademark then should apply for it like everyone else.
In this case it's late to the game, in fact too late.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942292</id>
	<title>Any Trademark Here?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264676880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iPityTheFool</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iPityTheFool</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iPityTheFool</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942754</id>
	<title>On Lawsuits</title>
	<author>ALeader71</author>
	<datestamp>1264678560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can always tell a company's relevance by the lawsuits they file.</p><p>There's this one.<br>
Microsoft vs TomTom over FAT<br>
Apple vs Microsoft over the use of a GUI.  Not their finest moment, foretold years of problems for Apple.</p><p>
I could go on, but slashdot readers know the score.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You can always tell a company 's relevance by the lawsuits they file.There 's this one .
Microsoft vs TomTom over FAT Apple vs Microsoft over the use of a GUI .
Not their finest moment , foretold years of problems for Apple .
I could go on , but slashdot readers know the score .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can always tell a company's relevance by the lawsuits they file.There's this one.
Microsoft vs TomTom over FAT
Apple vs Microsoft over the use of a GUI.
Not their finest moment, foretold years of problems for Apple.
I could go on, but slashdot readers know the score.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30946956</id>
	<title>This Is Convenient...</title>
	<author>MacDaffy</author>
	<datestamp>1264756620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Fujitsu is doing Apple a great big favor. Losing this suit would be the best thing to happen to the company in this historic product stumble:</p><p>There's a five year-old MadTV skit touting a mythical cross between an iPod and a feminine sanitary product--and it's called iPad. The Colbert Report just joked about calling it the "TamPod." The obligatory <i>Downfall/Hitler</i> mash-up is as devastating a critique of the product's capabilities as you could find in an industry magazine.</p><p>Word of warning, though. Apple is at its best when it's fallen flat on its face. The Apple<nobr> <wbr></nobr>///c was followed by the Mac. iTools was followed by<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.Mac. The Mac Portable was followed by the PowerBook 100. The Cube was followed by the Power Macintosh G4 (Quicksilver).</p><p>Wait a year...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fujitsu is doing Apple a great big favor .
Losing this suit would be the best thing to happen to the company in this historic product stumble : There 's a five year-old MadTV skit touting a mythical cross between an iPod and a feminine sanitary product--and it 's called iPad .
The Colbert Report just joked about calling it the " TamPod .
" The obligatory Downfall/Hitler mash-up is as devastating a critique of the product 's capabilities as you could find in an industry magazine.Word of warning , though .
Apple is at its best when it 's fallen flat on its face .
The Apple ///c was followed by the Mac .
iTools was followed by .Mac .
The Mac Portable was followed by the PowerBook 100 .
The Cube was followed by the Power Macintosh G4 ( Quicksilver ) .Wait a year.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fujitsu is doing Apple a great big favor.
Losing this suit would be the best thing to happen to the company in this historic product stumble:There's a five year-old MadTV skit touting a mythical cross between an iPod and a feminine sanitary product--and it's called iPad.
The Colbert Report just joked about calling it the "TamPod.
" The obligatory Downfall/Hitler mash-up is as devastating a critique of the product's capabilities as you could find in an industry magazine.Word of warning, though.
Apple is at its best when it's fallen flat on its face.
The Apple ///c was followed by the Mac.
iTools was followed by .Mac.
The Mac Portable was followed by the PowerBook 100.
The Cube was followed by the Power Macintosh G4 (Quicksilver).Wait a year...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942722</id>
	<title>Re:Double trademark trolls!</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1264678500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Or Apple has someone inside the USPTO who sidetracks any applications for names beginning with 'i'. Mystery applications pop up, original applications get put on hold, or the folder falls behind a filing cabinet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Or Apple has someone inside the USPTO who sidetracks any applications for names beginning with 'i' .
Mystery applications pop up , original applications get put on hold , or the folder falls behind a filing cabinet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or Apple has someone inside the USPTO who sidetracks any applications for names beginning with 'i'.
Mystery applications pop up, original applications get put on hold, or the folder falls behind a filing cabinet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941914</id>
	<title>iTampon</title>
	<author>SQLz</author>
	<datestamp>1264675680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>That name is garbage compared to Microsoft's new iTampon.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That name is garbage compared to Microsoft 's new iTampon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That name is garbage compared to Microsoft's new iTampon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942300</id>
	<title>Re:Cut their losses</title>
	<author>Firedog</author>
	<datestamp>1264676940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I liked the iSlate name. You could have done some pretty cool graphics on the case to go along with it, too. I guess that "iSlate" could be rephrased as "Is Late," but compared to iPad...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I liked the iSlate name .
You could have done some pretty cool graphics on the case to go along with it , too .
I guess that " iSlate " could be rephrased as " Is Late , " but compared to iPad.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I liked the iSlate name.
You could have done some pretty cool graphics on the case to go along with it, too.
I guess that "iSlate" could be rephrased as "Is Late," but compared to iPad...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943872</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>adisakp</author>
	<datestamp>1264684380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Making fun of it involves telling people about it.</p><p>The number of people who wouldn't buy one because of the name is vanishingly small.</p></div><p>
Naw, that didn't <a href="http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHMB\_enUS362US362&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=wii+number+one+selling+console" title="google.com">work for the Wii</a> [google.com] at all<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Making fun of it involves telling people about it.The number of people who would n't buy one because of the name is vanishingly small .
Naw , that did n't work for the Wii [ google.com ] at all : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Making fun of it involves telling people about it.The number of people who wouldn't buy one because of the name is vanishingly small.
Naw, that didn't work for the Wii [google.com] at all :-)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943926</id>
	<title>Re:iFlatThingWithoutAKeyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264684620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about buy the CrunchPad name, I hear it is available for cheap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about buy the CrunchPad name , I hear it is available for cheap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about buy the CrunchPad name, I hear it is available for cheap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942618</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264678200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Case in point: The Nintendo Wii.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Case in point : The Nintendo Wii .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Case in point: The Nintendo Wii.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942576</id>
	<title>Very appropriate name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264678080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ipad is a very appropriate name - like the other pad it's going to be used by irritating c*nts</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ipad is a very appropriate name - like the other pad it 's going to be used by irritating c * nts</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ipad is a very appropriate name - like the other pad it's going to be used by irritating c*nts</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942208</id>
	<title>Crowdsourcing new name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264676580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>iScry<br>
iPon<br>
iBigger<br>
iViddy<br>
iDiddy<br>
iWantOne<br>
iCantBelieveItsNotActuallyUsefulForAnything<br>
iDroppedItLikeTwoDaysAfterIBoughtIt<br>
iThinkItLooksGreatOnMyCoffeeTable<br>
iBoughtANewCoffeeTableJustForIt</htmltext>
<tokenext>iScry iPon iBigger iViddy iDiddy iWantOne iCantBelieveItsNotActuallyUsefulForAnything iDroppedItLikeTwoDaysAfterIBoughtIt iThinkItLooksGreatOnMyCoffeeTable iBoughtANewCoffeeTableJustForIt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iScry
iPon
iBigger
iViddy
iDiddy
iWantOne
iCantBelieveItsNotActuallyUsefulForAnything
iDroppedItLikeTwoDaysAfterIBoughtIt
iThinkItLooksGreatOnMyCoffeeTable
iBoughtANewCoffeeTableJustForIt</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941994</id>
	<title>Re:iFlatThingWithoutAKeyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264675920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Without the RDF and marketing spin, it really is just an iPod Touch Grande.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Without the RDF and marketing spin , it really is just an iPod Touch Grande .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Without the RDF and marketing spin, it really is just an iPod Touch Grande.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941748</id>
	<title>iCandy</title>
	<author>macintard</author>
	<datestamp>1264675140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about they just label all of their products iCandy?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about they just label all of their products iCandy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about they just label all of their products iCandy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943974</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1264684920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iI iDon't iKnow iWhy iIt's iWorse. iSeriously. iCan iSomeone iTell iMe iWhy iPad iIs iA iStupid iName?</p><p>

iI iKnow iThis iIs iRendundant, iJust iSayin'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iI iDo n't iKnow iWhy iIt 's iWorse .
iSeriously. iCan iSomeone iTell iMe iWhy iPad iIs iA iStupid iName ?
iI iKnow iThis iIs iRendundant , iJust iSayin' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iI iDon't iKnow iWhy iIt's iWorse.
iSeriously. iCan iSomeone iTell iMe iWhy iPad iIs iA iStupid iName?
iI iKnow iThis iIs iRendundant, iJust iSayin'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941250</id>
	<title>New ipad's pictures in high resolution</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264673460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>New ipad's pictures in high resolution http://migre.me/hUqI</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>New ipad 's pictures in high resolution http : //migre.me/hUqI</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New ipad's pictures in high resolution http://migre.me/hUqI</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941450</id>
	<title>Dear Steve Jobs,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264674060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let them have it.  Seriously.  You don't want to be remembered forever for the creation of the most annoying feminine hygiene meme in the universe.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let them have it .
Seriously. You do n't want to be remembered forever for the creation of the most annoying feminine hygiene meme in the universe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let them have it.
Seriously.  You don't want to be remembered forever for the creation of the most annoying feminine hygiene meme in the universe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942964</id>
	<title>Re:iFlatThingWithoutAKeyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264679400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iScreen. (you screen, we all screen, for iScreen!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iScreen .
( you screen , we all screen , for iScreen !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iScreen.
(you screen, we all screen, for iScreen!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947748</id>
	<title>This is...</title>
	<author>kobiashi maru</author>
	<datestamp>1264768260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>the fifth slashdot post about the iPad. When will we get over it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>the fifth slashdot post about the iPad .
When will we get over it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the fifth slashdot post about the iPad.
When will we get over it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30948978</id>
	<title>Re:Crowdsourcing new name</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264778700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The winner is just going to be either the iMoot or the iStephenColbert</htmltext>
<tokenext>The winner is just going to be either the iMoot or the iStephenColbert</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The winner is just going to be either the iMoot or the iStephenColbert</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942208</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30946892</id>
	<title>Another option for the name</title>
	<author>MemoryDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1264755840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>iTampon...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>iTampon.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>iTampon...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941440</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264674000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Making fun of it involves telling people about it.</p><p>The number of people who wouldn't buy one because of the name is vanishingly small.</p><p>So benefits far outweigh costs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Making fun of it involves telling people about it.The number of people who would n't buy one because of the name is vanishingly small.So benefits far outweigh costs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Making fun of it involves telling people about it.The number of people who wouldn't buy one because of the name is vanishingly small.So benefits far outweigh costs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942036</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>Tetsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1264676100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Am I the only person who sees this as an excellent opportunity for Apple to ditch the unfortunate moniker and go with something like iSlate?</p></div><p>Didn't iFred iFlintstone have one of those?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only person who sees this as an excellent opportunity for Apple to ditch the unfortunate moniker and go with something like iSlate ? Did n't iFred iFlintstone have one of those ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only person who sees this as an excellent opportunity for Apple to ditch the unfortunate moniker and go with something like iSlate?Didn't iFred iFlintstone have one of those?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941936</id>
	<title>Steve Jobs Says Not That Big of a Deal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264675740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Change your apps name. Not that big of a deal.</p><p>Steve</p><p>Sent from my iPhone<br><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/steve-jobs-to-developer-name-change-not-that-big-of-a-deal/" title="wired.com" rel="nofollow">Steve Jobs to Developer: Name Change &lsquo;Not That Big of a Deal&rsquo;</a> [wired.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Change your apps name .
Not that big of a deal.SteveSent from my iPhoneSteve Jobs to Developer : Name Change    Not That Big of a Deal    [ wired.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Change your apps name.
Not that big of a deal.SteveSent from my iPhoneSteve Jobs to Developer: Name Change ‘Not That Big of a Deal’ [wired.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943070</id>
	<title>They can use my name for free</title>
	<author>thetoadwarrior</author>
	<datestamp>1264679940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I still think Big Ass iPod Touch is the name to use.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still think Big Ass iPod Touch is the name to use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still think Big Ass iPod Touch is the name to use.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943310</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264681140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, and to be fair, they've been selling these things since 2002, when Apple was still making (just) computers<br><a href="http://www.dealtime.com/xPF-Fujitsu-Fujitsu-IPAD-100-10" title="dealtime.com">http://www.dealtime.com/xPF-Fujitsu-Fujitsu-IPAD-100-10</a> [dealtime.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , and to be fair , they 've been selling these things since 2002 , when Apple was still making ( just ) computershttp : //www.dealtime.com/xPF-Fujitsu-Fujitsu-IPAD-100-10 [ dealtime.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, and to be fair, they've been selling these things since 2002, when Apple was still making (just) computershttp://www.dealtime.com/xPF-Fujitsu-Fujitsu-IPAD-100-10 [dealtime.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941256</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941216</id>
	<title>Good</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264673340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Maybe it'll get them to pick a name that doesn't suck as much shit.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe it 'll get them to pick a name that does n't suck as much shit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe it'll get them to pick a name that doesn't suck as much shit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943684</id>
	<title>Re:THESE LAWSUITS ARE STOOPID</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264683300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...insert favorite lawyer joke here...</p></div><p>Q: How many lawyers does it take to shingle a roof?</p><p>A:  Twenty.   If you slice them real thin.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...insert favorite lawyer joke here...Q : How many lawyers does it take to shingle a roof ? A : Twenty .
If you slice them real thin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...insert favorite lawyer joke here...Q: How many lawyers does it take to shingle a roof?A:  Twenty.
If you slice them real thin.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942170</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941842</id>
	<title>Re:iFlatThingWithoutAKeyboard</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264675440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>... or "iBigPhone".  Add phone capabilities, use big numbers and market it to the elderly and vision-impaired...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>... or " iBigPhone " .
Add phone capabilities , use big numbers and market it to the elderly and vision-impaired... : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... or "iBigPhone".
Add phone capabilities, use big numbers and market it to the elderly and vision-impaired... :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942264</id>
	<title>fought 30 years with Beatles over "Apple" name</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1264676760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Trademarks conflicts are nothing new to Apple Inc.  They and the Beatle music company Apple Corp <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple\_Corps\_v.\_Apple\_Computer" title="wikipedia.org"> fought </a> [wikipedia.org] over the Apple name and business model since 1978.  Apple Computer was supposed to stick to computers and Apple Corp to music, but the lines were blurred several times.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Trademarks conflicts are nothing new to Apple Inc. They and the Beatle music company Apple Corp fought [ wikipedia.org ] over the Apple name and business model since 1978 .
Apple Computer was supposed to stick to computers and Apple Corp to music , but the lines were blurred several times .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trademarks conflicts are nothing new to Apple Inc.  They and the Beatle music company Apple Corp  fought  [wikipedia.org] over the Apple name and business model since 1978.
Apple Computer was supposed to stick to computers and Apple Corp to music, but the lines were blurred several times.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30944326</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>dakameleon</author>
	<datestamp>1264687500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Uh, the iPod went on sale in 2001, so Apple had at least established a beachhead on the iP* portable devices claim...</p><p>(which is not to say that that this trademark infringement is justified, or iPad a particularly good name)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Uh , the iPod went on sale in 2001 , so Apple had at least established a beachhead on the iP * portable devices claim... ( which is not to say that that this trademark infringement is justified , or iPad a particularly good name )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Uh, the iPod went on sale in 2001, so Apple had at least established a beachhead on the iP* portable devices claim...(which is not to say that that this trademark infringement is justified, or iPad a particularly good name)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942008</id>
	<title>Re:Double trademark trolls!</title>
	<author>Firedog</author>
	<datestamp>1264675980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The iPod came out in late 2001. The iPad (Fujitsu version) came out in 2002. It was <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/10/01/28/fujitsu.mulling.whether.to.fight.apple.on.ipad/" title="electronista.com" rel="nofollow">a real product</a> [electronista.com]. I don't think you can call Fujitsu a trademark troll here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The iPod came out in late 2001 .
The iPad ( Fujitsu version ) came out in 2002 .
It was a real product [ electronista.com ] .
I do n't think you can call Fujitsu a trademark troll here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The iPod came out in late 2001.
The iPad (Fujitsu version) came out in 2002.
It was a real product [electronista.com].
I don't think you can call Fujitsu a trademark troll here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942872</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>dmneoblade</author>
	<datestamp>1264679040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because "iSlate" sounded a heck of a lot better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because " iSlate " sounded a heck of a lot better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because "iSlate" sounded a heck of a lot better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943136</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1264680300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The "i" is a lot more trivial and insignificant than "Think" or "Note" - not to mention that notepad is a pre-existing word, so people are less likely to think of the association.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The " i " is a lot more trivial and insignificant than " Think " or " Note " - not to mention that notepad is a pre-existing word , so people are less likely to think of the association .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The "i" is a lot more trivial and insignificant than "Think" or "Note" - not to mention that notepad is a pre-existing word, so people are less likely to think of the association.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942962</id>
	<title>Re:iFlatThingWithoutAKeyboard</title>
	<author>mwvdlee</author>
	<datestamp>1264679400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the looks of it, it's just an iPhone with a big screen, no phone capabilities and too little resources for professional work.<br>Just call it the iMediaPlayer; seems pretty close to what it will actually be used for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From the looks of it , it 's just an iPhone with a big screen , no phone capabilities and too little resources for professional work.Just call it the iMediaPlayer ; seems pretty close to what it will actually be used for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the looks of it, it's just an iPhone with a big screen, no phone capabilities and too little resources for professional work.Just call it the iMediaPlayer; seems pretty close to what it will actually be used for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942058</id>
	<title>Barratt Homes used it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264676100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Barratt homes (a housing company in the UK) <a href="http://www.yournewhome.co.uk/Barratt-iPad-homes\_2" title="yournewhome.co.uk" rel="nofollow">built apartments known as iPads</a> [yournewhome.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Barratt homes ( a housing company in the UK ) built apartments known as iPads [ yournewhome.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Barratt homes (a housing company in the UK) built apartments known as iPads [yournewhome.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941988</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264675920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Why is iPad worse than Thinkpad? Or notepad.exe. Grow up people, pad is a perfectly fine and useful English word.</p></div><p>There's nothing 'un-fine' or 'un-useful' about the word, but around these parts a 'pad' is a usually a feminine hygiene product.  iTampon would be equally useful and fine.  It would also be equally unfortunate.</p><p>Other types of 'pad' exist, but those terms seem to be falling out of use due to the feminine hygiene industry and their relentless advertising.  Successful advertising, too, since this is the first thing I personally thought of when reading that new product name - some kind of electronic feminine hygiene offering...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is iPad worse than Thinkpad ?
Or notepad.exe .
Grow up people , pad is a perfectly fine and useful English word.There 's nothing 'un-fine ' or 'un-useful ' about the word , but around these parts a 'pad ' is a usually a feminine hygiene product .
iTampon would be equally useful and fine .
It would also be equally unfortunate.Other types of 'pad ' exist , but those terms seem to be falling out of use due to the feminine hygiene industry and their relentless advertising .
Successful advertising , too , since this is the first thing I personally thought of when reading that new product name - some kind of electronic feminine hygiene offering.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is iPad worse than Thinkpad?
Or notepad.exe.
Grow up people, pad is a perfectly fine and useful English word.There's nothing 'un-fine' or 'un-useful' about the word, but around these parts a 'pad' is a usually a feminine hygiene product.
iTampon would be equally useful and fine.
It would also be equally unfortunate.Other types of 'pad' exist, but those terms seem to be falling out of use due to the feminine hygiene industry and their relentless advertising.
Successful advertising, too, since this is the first thing I personally thought of when reading that new product name - some kind of electronic feminine hygiene offering...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947194</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>Lars T.</author>
	<datestamp>1264759800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
Ahh I see, so you're a "pull my finger" type of guy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ahh I see , so you 're a " pull my finger " type of guy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Ahh I see, so you're a "pull my finger" type of guy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941874</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264673640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is iPad worse than Thinkpad? Or notepad.exe. Grow up people, pad is a perfectly fine and useful English word.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is iPad worse than Thinkpad ?
Or notepad.exe .
Grow up people , pad is a perfectly fine and useful English word .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is iPad worse than Thinkpad?
Or notepad.exe.
Grow up people, pad is a perfectly fine and useful English word.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30946748</id>
	<title>But they can use other names!</title>
	<author>WWWWolf</author>
	<datestamp>1264797600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They can use other names! If there's "iBook" and "PowerBook", maybe they could use, I don't know - PowerPad?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...wait, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power\_Pad" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">that has been done before</a> [wikipedia.org]. Hmmmmmm... If there's "MacBooks", maybe "MacPad"? Wait, iPad isn't a Mac. *sigh* They're really dug their own grave now, haven't they?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They can use other names !
If there 's " iBook " and " PowerBook " , maybe they could use , I do n't know - PowerPad ?
...wait , that has been done before [ wikipedia.org ] .
Hmmmmmm... If there 's " MacBooks " , maybe " MacPad " ?
Wait , iPad is n't a Mac .
* sigh * They 're really dug their own grave now , have n't they ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can use other names!
If there's "iBook" and "PowerBook", maybe they could use, I don't know - PowerPad?
...wait, that has been done before [wikipedia.org].
Hmmmmmm... If there's "MacBooks", maybe "MacPad"?
Wait, iPad isn't a Mac.
*sigh* They're really dug their own grave now, haven't they?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30945834</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>grouchomarxist</author>
	<datestamp>1264702140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Apple started shipping the iPod in 2001.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Apple started shipping the iPod in 2001 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apple started shipping the iPod in 2001.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943310</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30946664</id>
	<title>By proxy?</title>
	<author>cbope</author>
	<datestamp>1264796700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have to wonder why a company like Apple has to apply for trademark protection, hiding behind a proxy? Smells fishy....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have to wonder why a company like Apple has to apply for trademark protection , hiding behind a proxy ?
Smells fishy... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have to wonder why a company like Apple has to apply for trademark protection, hiding behind a proxy?
Smells fishy....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942162</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1264676460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>IBM&rsquo;s Thinkpad sounds like an intelligent choice and a good product. Mac&rsquo;s iPad sounds like...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>IBM    s Thinkpad sounds like an intelligent choice and a good product .
Mac    s iPad sounds like.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IBM’s Thinkpad sounds like an intelligent choice and a good product.
Mac’s iPad sounds like...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942586</id>
	<title>Re:Apple please change the name...</title>
	<author>bill\_mcgonigle</author>
	<datestamp>1264678140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So I take it you're not going to buy the (Product) RED special edition iPad?</p><p>It'll only be available for purchase during the gibbous moon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So I take it you 're not going to buy the ( Product ) RED special edition iPad ? It 'll only be available for purchase during the gibbous moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So I take it you're not going to buy the (Product) RED special edition iPad?It'll only be available for purchase during the gibbous moon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941210</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30957314</id>
	<title>iTab?</title>
	<author>raorajesh</author>
	<datestamp>1264769880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I always thought iTab would be nice..</htmltext>
<tokenext>I always thought iTab would be nice. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I always thought iTab would be nice..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942316</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>je ne sais quoi</author>
	<datestamp>1264677000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's true, but I think a good name can get people to talk about it just as much as a making fun of a bad name.  Remember squirting songs at each other using your Zune?  Arguably, people who failed to see the benefits of squirting at each other did so not because of the name, but because the feature itself was pretty much crippled and you had a hard time finding other zune owners to with which to squirt.  I don't think it helped their case to build mind-share however that doing a google search for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&amp;rls=en&amp;q=squirting&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8" title="google.com">squirting</a> [google.com] reveals some results that aren't completely safe for work.  It crossed the line between making fun of it over to something you wouldn't really feel comfortable describing to your mother.  I think a better name would have done just as well, e.g. people talked quite a bit about the kindle but weren't making fun of it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's true , but I think a good name can get people to talk about it just as much as a making fun of a bad name .
Remember squirting songs at each other using your Zune ?
Arguably , people who failed to see the benefits of squirting at each other did so not because of the name , but because the feature itself was pretty much crippled and you had a hard time finding other zune owners to with which to squirt .
I do n't think it helped their case to build mind-share however that doing a google search for squirting [ google.com ] reveals some results that are n't completely safe for work .
It crossed the line between making fun of it over to something you would n't really feel comfortable describing to your mother .
I think a better name would have done just as well , e.g .
people talked quite a bit about the kindle but were n't making fun of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's true, but I think a good name can get people to talk about it just as much as a making fun of a bad name.
Remember squirting songs at each other using your Zune?
Arguably, people who failed to see the benefits of squirting at each other did so not because of the name, but because the feature itself was pretty much crippled and you had a hard time finding other zune owners to with which to squirt.
I don't think it helped their case to build mind-share however that doing a google search for squirting [google.com] reveals some results that aren't completely safe for work.
It crossed the line between making fun of it over to something you wouldn't really feel comfortable describing to your mother.
I think a better name would have done just as well, e.g.
people talked quite a bit about the kindle but weren't making fun of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248</id>
	<title>Am I the only one?</title>
	<author>javelinco</author>
	<datestamp>1264673460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I the only person who sees this as an excellent opportunity for Apple to ditch the unfortunate moniker and go with something like iSlate?  I mean, they can even deliver a bunch of moralizing over the thing.  And yes, it'll cost them - but it's going to cost them to keep the iPad too - people are making more fun of the name then they are paying attention to the shiny lights of the product.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I the only person who sees this as an excellent opportunity for Apple to ditch the unfortunate moniker and go with something like iSlate ?
I mean , they can even deliver a bunch of moralizing over the thing .
And yes , it 'll cost them - but it 's going to cost them to keep the iPad too - people are making more fun of the name then they are paying attention to the shiny lights of the product .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I the only person who sees this as an excellent opportunity for Apple to ditch the unfortunate moniker and go with something like iSlate?
I mean, they can even deliver a bunch of moralizing over the thing.
And yes, it'll cost them - but it's going to cost them to keep the iPad too - people are making more fun of the name then they are paying attention to the shiny lights of the product.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941500</id>
	<title>Re:Double trademark trolls!</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1264674240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well - I found <a href="http://www.currentdirections.com/hardware/fujitsu/ipad100.html" title="currentdirections.com">THIS</a> [currentdirections.com] with a quick google search.</p><p>The article doesn't have a date attached but it totes</p><p>"It houses a powerful Intel processor and can support any 802.11b wireless LAN infrastructure"</p><p>802.11b? B?</p><p>This thing was probably made last decade, and Fujitsu wanted to patent the name THEN. And - like you said, some random Acme Inc probably already had the name patented so that BOTH of them don't have it.</p><p>Unless of course this Acme Inc is the proxy company that Apple uses. In which case, sorry Fujitsu, welcome to the American USPTO,</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well - I found THIS [ currentdirections.com ] with a quick google search.The article does n't have a date attached but it totes " It houses a powerful Intel processor and can support any 802.11b wireless LAN infrastructure " 802.11b ?
B ? This thing was probably made last decade , and Fujitsu wanted to patent the name THEN .
And - like you said , some random Acme Inc probably already had the name patented so that BOTH of them do n't have it.Unless of course this Acme Inc is the proxy company that Apple uses .
In which case , sorry Fujitsu , welcome to the American USPTO,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well - I found THIS [currentdirections.com] with a quick google search.The article doesn't have a date attached but it totes"It houses a powerful Intel processor and can support any 802.11b wireless LAN infrastructure"802.11b?
B?This thing was probably made last decade, and Fujitsu wanted to patent the name THEN.
And - like you said, some random Acme Inc probably already had the name patented so that BOTH of them don't have it.Unless of course this Acme Inc is the proxy company that Apple uses.
In which case, sorry Fujitsu, welcome to the American USPTO,</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484</id>
	<title>iFlatThingWithoutAKeyboard</title>
	<author>jgagnon</author>
	<datestamp>1264674180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm pretty sure that name is available.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure that name is available .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure that name is available.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943134</id>
	<title>Re:iFlatThingWithoutAKeyboard</title>
	<author>ELitwin</author>
	<datestamp>1264680240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think "iPaidTooMuch" would be available also.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think " iPaidTooMuch " would be available also .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think "iPaidTooMuch" would be available also.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941874</id>
	<title>Re:welp</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264675560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Humor does not always make sense, and trying to apply logic to it is a fool's errand.</p><p>Why is iPad funny while notpad.exe and thinkpad are not?  <i>Because it is.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Humor does not always make sense , and trying to apply logic to it is a fool 's errand.Why is iPad funny while notpad.exe and thinkpad are not ?
Because it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Humor does not always make sense, and trying to apply logic to it is a fool's errand.Why is iPad funny while notpad.exe and thinkpad are not?
Because it is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943326</id>
	<title>Whats wrong with</title>
	<author>Stan92057</author>
	<datestamp>1264681200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whats wrong with "applepad" Thats who makes is anyways. Who is this icompany i keep hearing about.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whats wrong with " applepad " Thats who makes is anyways .
Who is this icompany i keep hearing about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whats wrong with "applepad" Thats who makes is anyways.
Who is this icompany i keep hearing about.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30944576</id>
	<title>Re:Double trademark trolls!</title>
	<author>ClosedSource</author>
	<datestamp>1264689240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"So what we have is ACME Inc that isnt even named files a trademark on "iPad" knowing full well that Apple prefixes all their products with an i."</p><p>Yes, I'm writing this on my iMac iMini. BTW, I don't want to give anybody the wrong impression - a client gave me it for a project (not that there's anything wrong with being gay).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" So what we have is ACME Inc that isnt even named files a trademark on " iPad " knowing full well that Apple prefixes all their products with an i .
" Yes , I 'm writing this on my iMac iMini .
BTW , I do n't want to give anybody the wrong impression - a client gave me it for a project ( not that there 's anything wrong with being gay ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"So what we have is ACME Inc that isnt even named files a trademark on "iPad" knowing full well that Apple prefixes all their products with an i.
"Yes, I'm writing this on my iMac iMini.
BTW, I don't want to give anybody the wrong impression - a client gave me it for a project (not that there's anything wrong with being gay).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30944576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30949040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942334
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30945378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942964
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943118
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30948978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942170
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941210
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30945834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30944326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942962
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30945028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_2055209_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943872
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_2055209.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30949040
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_2055209.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_2055209.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941210
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942586
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_2055209.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941304
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941408
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943136
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947472
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942872
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941874
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947194
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943974
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941988
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942434
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942732
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941256
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943310
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30944326
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30945834
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943650
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_2055209.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30944576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943118
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941578
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_2055209.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941484
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942208
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947190
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30948978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942000
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30945028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30945378
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_2055209.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942170
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943684
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_2055209.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942036
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30947572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941440
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943872
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942618
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942316
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_2055209.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30942264
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_2055209.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30943756
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_2055209.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_2055209.30941216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
