<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_28_1624211</id>
	<title>Interview With a Convicted 419 Scammer</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1264699380000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"Scam awareness website www.scam-detectives.co.uk has published a two part interview with <a href="http://www.scam-detectives.co.uk/blog/2010/01/22/interview-with-a-scammer-part-one/">convicted Nigerian 419 scammer</a>, 'John.' 'John' talks about his experiences of scam victims, how he gains their trust and convinces them to part with their money, and how he would go back for another 'bite' after the original scam, posing as a law enforcement official who has apprehended the scammer and recovered the funds ... for a fee, of course."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " Scam awareness website www.scam-detectives.co.uk has published a two part interview with convicted Nigerian 419 scammer , 'John .
' 'John ' talks about his experiences of scam victims , how he gains their trust and convinces them to part with their money , and how he would go back for another 'bite ' after the original scam , posing as a law enforcement official who has apprehended the scammer and recovered the funds ... for a fee , of course .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "Scam awareness website www.scam-detectives.co.uk has published a two part interview with convicted Nigerian 419 scammer, 'John.
' 'John' talks about his experiences of scam victims, how he gains their trust and convinces them to part with their money, and how he would go back for another 'bite' after the original scam, posing as a law enforcement official who has apprehended the scammer and recovered the funds ... for a fee, of course.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937356</id>
	<title>Re:Perspective anyone?</title>
	<author>Bluey</author>
	<datestamp>1264706400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The story felt less credible to me.  The interview read more like one guy asking questions and then answering them in guise, rather than two people going back and forth.  It lacked authenticity and felt more like manufactured drama.  I'm sure the overall information about how scams work is based on fact, but the relating of it just felt off.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The story felt less credible to me .
The interview read more like one guy asking questions and then answering them in guise , rather than two people going back and forth .
It lacked authenticity and felt more like manufactured drama .
I 'm sure the overall information about how scams work is based on fact , but the relating of it just felt off .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The story felt less credible to me.
The interview read more like one guy asking questions and then answering them in guise, rather than two people going back and forth.
It lacked authenticity and felt more like manufactured drama.
I'm sure the overall information about how scams work is based on fact, but the relating of it just felt off.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30941116</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264673040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had a motorcycle stolen from me.  The cops recovered it and called my home friday afternoon to tell me so.  I wasn't there, and that department wasn't open on the weekend.  I called first thing on Monday.  They informed me that I had to pay the towing charge, AND a daily fee at the impound lot in order to get my motorcycle.  This was an old 90cc honda worth around $150.  The fees to get it back would have cost me nearly $300 even though I got in touch with them at the earliest opportunity.  Ridiculous?  Yes, but also true.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had a motorcycle stolen from me .
The cops recovered it and called my home friday afternoon to tell me so .
I was n't there , and that department was n't open on the weekend .
I called first thing on Monday .
They informed me that I had to pay the towing charge , AND a daily fee at the impound lot in order to get my motorcycle .
This was an old 90cc honda worth around $ 150 .
The fees to get it back would have cost me nearly $ 300 even though I got in touch with them at the earliest opportunity .
Ridiculous ? Yes , but also true .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had a motorcycle stolen from me.
The cops recovered it and called my home friday afternoon to tell me so.
I wasn't there, and that department wasn't open on the weekend.
I called first thing on Monday.
They informed me that I had to pay the towing charge, AND a daily fee at the impound lot in order to get my motorcycle.
This was an old 90cc honda worth around $150.
The fees to get it back would have cost me nearly $300 even though I got in touch with them at the earliest opportunity.
Ridiculous?  Yes, but also true.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936674</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264704600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>punt?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>punt ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>punt?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938002</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264707840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The causal relationship you imply here doesn't exist. It isn't inequality that's at fault, its these lads' greed coupled with lack of morals. I'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks.</i></p><p>If you were starving or had family in need of basic medical needs, you'll turn criminal really quick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The causal relationship you imply here does n't exist .
It is n't inequality that 's at fault , its these lads ' greed coupled with lack of morals .
I 'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks.If you were starving or had family in need of basic medical needs , you 'll turn criminal really quick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The causal relationship you imply here doesn't exist.
It isn't inequality that's at fault, its these lads' greed coupled with lack of morals.
I'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks.If you were starving or had family in need of basic medical needs, you'll turn criminal really quick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939614</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds credible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264711920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Are you a convicted criminal in your native country and unable to get a job there?  Well, come to the UK, where we'll let in anyone with a sob story on a student visa, not check your background, pay you benefits for as long as you want, then if your sordid past is eventually uncovered after you seemingly inevitably revert to your criminal ways while over here, we'll pay one lot of government employees to try and kick you out <em>while at the same time</em> funding your legal defence to prevent them from doing their jobs.</p><p>Oh, would you like some free healthcare while you're here? No problem, all you can eat!  Feel free to fly your family in as well - we wouldn't want them missing out.  The White Guilt - <em>it burnssss usssss</em>.</p></div><p>Sounds like paradise!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you a convicted criminal in your native country and unable to get a job there ?
Well , come to the UK , where we 'll let in anyone with a sob story on a student visa , not check your background , pay you benefits for as long as you want , then if your sordid past is eventually uncovered after you seemingly inevitably revert to your criminal ways while over here , we 'll pay one lot of government employees to try and kick you out while at the same time funding your legal defence to prevent them from doing their jobs.Oh , would you like some free healthcare while you 're here ?
No problem , all you can eat !
Feel free to fly your family in as well - we would n't want them missing out .
The White Guilt - it burnssss usssss.Sounds like paradise !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you a convicted criminal in your native country and unable to get a job there?
Well, come to the UK, where we'll let in anyone with a sob story on a student visa, not check your background, pay you benefits for as long as you want, then if your sordid past is eventually uncovered after you seemingly inevitably revert to your criminal ways while over here, we'll pay one lot of government employees to try and kick you out while at the same time funding your legal defence to prevent them from doing their jobs.Oh, would you like some free healthcare while you're here?
No problem, all you can eat!
Feel free to fly your family in as well - we wouldn't want them missing out.
The White Guilt - it burnssss usssss.Sounds like paradise!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936700</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Scragglykat</author>
	<datestamp>1264704720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>did you say $4000 a month? where do I sign up?</htmltext>
<tokenext>did you say $ 4000 a month ?
where do I sign up ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>did you say $4000 a month?
where do I sign up?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944480</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Zero\_Independent</author>
	<datestamp>1264688520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kill all the niggers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kill all the niggers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kill all the niggers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938736</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>PrepaidReviews</author>
	<datestamp>1264709520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is social engineering at its finest - preying on the weakness of the human condition.  We are not all stupid but a large percentage of us could stand to think things through a little better.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is social engineering at its finest - preying on the weakness of the human condition .
We are not all stupid but a large percentage of us could stand to think things through a little better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is social engineering at its finest - preying on the weakness of the human condition.
We are not all stupid but a large percentage of us could stand to think things through a little better.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944694</id>
	<title>Re:No victim-free ways to catch potential fraud</title>
	<author>bmxeroh</author>
	<datestamp>1264690020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No Joke, that seems odd. I always thought just the passing of bad checks(while knowing they were bad, with an intent to deceive) was illegal. Perhaps not.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No Joke , that seems odd .
I always thought just the passing of bad checks ( while knowing they were bad , with an intent to deceive ) was illegal .
Perhaps not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Joke, that seems odd.
I always thought just the passing of bad checks(while knowing they were bad, with an intent to deceive) was illegal.
Perhaps not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938326</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>Potor</author>
	<datestamp>1264708560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have some experience with stolen bikes in Belgium. If the cops find it, they will give it back. They invite you to their warehouse of found bikes, and give you all the time in the world to look for it. And people who report stolen bikes are invited to special auctions to buy bikes that have not been claimed after some time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have some experience with stolen bikes in Belgium .
If the cops find it , they will give it back .
They invite you to their warehouse of found bikes , and give you all the time in the world to look for it .
And people who report stolen bikes are invited to special auctions to buy bikes that have not been claimed after some time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have some experience with stolen bikes in Belgium.
If the cops find it, they will give it back.
They invite you to their warehouse of found bikes, and give you all the time in the world to look for it.
And people who report stolen bikes are invited to special auctions to buy bikes that have not been claimed after some time.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936702</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943500</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds credible</title>
	<author>mustafap</author>
	<datestamp>1264682220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>+1 insightful</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>+ 1 insightful</tokentext>
<sentencetext>+1 insightful</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30940930</id>
	<title>Re:what a crappy journalist</title>
	<author>quintin3265</author>
	<datestamp>1264672560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree, but not just because the interviewer got angry.  It's not his job to decide whether John deserves sympathy or condemnation.  The interviewer's job is to state the facts, and that's all.  He should have continued to ask questions and simply published the answers to allow people to comment fairly on the article.

This article is a piece of garbage, and it was a waste of time reading it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree , but not just because the interviewer got angry .
It 's not his job to decide whether John deserves sympathy or condemnation .
The interviewer 's job is to state the facts , and that 's all .
He should have continued to ask questions and simply published the answers to allow people to comment fairly on the article .
This article is a piece of garbage , and it was a waste of time reading it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree, but not just because the interviewer got angry.
It's not his job to decide whether John deserves sympathy or condemnation.
The interviewer's job is to state the facts, and that's all.
He should have continued to ask questions and simply published the answers to allow people to comment fairly on the article.
This article is a piece of garbage, and it was a waste of time reading it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937214</id>
	<title>Horrible interview</title>
	<author>deft</author>
	<datestamp>1264706100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you read the entire article you'd see he eventually just gets upset and cuts it off. No good prepared questions, just amateur personal anger. Really a fail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read the entire article you 'd see he eventually just gets upset and cuts it off .
No good prepared questions , just amateur personal anger .
Really a fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read the entire article you'd see he eventually just gets upset and cuts it off.
No good prepared questions, just amateur personal anger.
Really a fail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937004</id>
	<title>Funny you should ask</title>
	<author>Comboman</author>
	<datestamp>1264705560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?</p></div></blockquote><p>
There's actually a very interesting answer to that question.  If you send me a small shipping and handling fee (cash only please), I'll mail you the answer.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you ?
There 's actually a very interesting answer to that question .
If you send me a small shipping and handling fee ( cash only please ) , I 'll mail you the answer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?
There's actually a very interesting answer to that question.
If you send me a small shipping and handling fee (cash only please), I'll mail you the answer.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30941114</id>
	<title>Re:NEVER trust ANYONE on the Internet</title>
	<author>elocinanna</author>
	<datestamp>1264673040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All netizens are liars. <br>
-E-pimenides</htmltext>
<tokenext>All netizens are liars .
-E-pimenides</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All netizens are liars.
-E-pimenides</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936732</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937076</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Xtravar</author>
	<datestamp>1264705740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street</p></div><p>You don't play enough GTA.  Man, sometimes I just want to hop in that Ferrari and find the nearest ramp so I can get a stunt bonus!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the streetYou do n't play enough GTA .
Man , sometimes I just want to hop in that Ferrari and find the nearest ramp so I can get a stunt bonus !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the streetYou don't play enough GTA.
Man, sometimes I just want to hop in that Ferrari and find the nearest ramp so I can get a stunt bonus!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938534</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1264709100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, "fool me twice... you can't get fooled again."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , " fool me twice... you ca n't get fooled again .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, "fool me twice... you can't get fooled again.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939256</id>
	<title>I would take your advice</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1264710900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But how do I know I can trust you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But how do I know I can trust you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But how do I know I can trust you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936732</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937192</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264706040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what's the solution?</p></div><p>Send them $100B as compensation for the US burning coal to generate electricity. No scamming involved in that.</p><p>/end sarcasm</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the solution ? Send them $ 100B as compensation for the US burning coal to generate electricity .
No scamming involved in that./end sarcasm</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the solution?Send them $100B as compensation for the US burning coal to generate electricity.
No scamming involved in that./end sarcasm
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939766</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Dishevel</author>
	<datestamp>1264669200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what's the solution?</p></div><p>Nuke Nigeria from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the solution ? Nuke Nigeria from orbit .
It 's the only way to be sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the solution?Nuke Nigeria from orbit.
It's the only way to be sure.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30951068</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264787160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I take issues with this.<br>Rather than modding this down into oblivion, let's poke it with a stick.</p><p>I have been that guy sleeping in a homeless shelter, head resting on a suitcase, curled up in a miserable little ball, barely able to afford a $4 one-day bus pass to go look for work.</p><p>What did I do?</p><p>I looked for work, even when there wasn't anything hiring that I could do.<br>I never shoplifted, scammed, or otherwise removed from possesion something that was not given to me under honest auspices.<br>I was the guy who asked if I could leave my bags at the front of the store with the clerk, so they would let me shop in peace, and not tail me through the store.<br>Even when you're down and out, and nowhere near the Magic Kingdom, there are people who go above and beyond to support people that aren't even family, just because that person is making genuine effort to get back on their feet.</p><p>I wouldn't say I was the best person, but I know that even when I was down and out, I held myself to what I felt were good standards.</p><p>It is, perhaps, because of this, I found a source of employment that is now responsible for me having a place other than a shelter to stay.</p><p>I am posting on slashdot, and I have an idea of what it's like to live in poverty.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... you insensitive clod.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I take issues with this.Rather than modding this down into oblivion , let 's poke it with a stick.I have been that guy sleeping in a homeless shelter , head resting on a suitcase , curled up in a miserable little ball , barely able to afford a $ 4 one-day bus pass to go look for work.What did I do ? I looked for work , even when there was n't anything hiring that I could do.I never shoplifted , scammed , or otherwise removed from possesion something that was not given to me under honest auspices.I was the guy who asked if I could leave my bags at the front of the store with the clerk , so they would let me shop in peace , and not tail me through the store.Even when you 're down and out , and nowhere near the Magic Kingdom , there are people who go above and beyond to support people that are n't even family , just because that person is making genuine effort to get back on their feet.I would n't say I was the best person , but I know that even when I was down and out , I held myself to what I felt were good standards.It is , perhaps , because of this , I found a source of employment that is now responsible for me having a place other than a shelter to stay.I am posting on slashdot , and I have an idea of what it 's like to live in poverty .
... you insensitive clod .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I take issues with this.Rather than modding this down into oblivion, let's poke it with a stick.I have been that guy sleeping in a homeless shelter, head resting on a suitcase, curled up in a miserable little ball, barely able to afford a $4 one-day bus pass to go look for work.What did I do?I looked for work, even when there wasn't anything hiring that I could do.I never shoplifted, scammed, or otherwise removed from possesion something that was not given to me under honest auspices.I was the guy who asked if I could leave my bags at the front of the store with the clerk, so they would let me shop in peace, and not tail me through the store.Even when you're down and out, and nowhere near the Magic Kingdom, there are people who go above and beyond to support people that aren't even family, just because that person is making genuine effort to get back on their feet.I wouldn't say I was the best person, but I know that even when I was down and out, I held myself to what I felt were good standards.It is, perhaps, because of this, I found a source of employment that is now responsible for me having a place other than a shelter to stay.I am posting on slashdot, and I have an idea of what it's like to live in poverty.
... you insensitive clod.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944790</id>
	<title>Re:No victim-free ways to catch potential fraud</title>
	<author>ajlisows</author>
	<datestamp>1264690980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I am contacted about those "Emplomant oppertunitys" by some guy running the fake money order scam, I always go along with it.  I think these guys pretty much know it, but they need to be attempting to counterfeit a certain amount of money (It is somewhere around $5500.  I have not checked in awhile) before they are seriously pursued by the authorities.  I just figure if they happen to screw up one time and send enough, I might get one put away.  At the very least, they send the money orders UPS Red Overnight.  That has to take a small chunk out of their scam fund.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I am contacted about those " Emplomant oppertunitys " by some guy running the fake money order scam , I always go along with it .
I think these guys pretty much know it , but they need to be attempting to counterfeit a certain amount of money ( It is somewhere around $ 5500 .
I have not checked in awhile ) before they are seriously pursued by the authorities .
I just figure if they happen to screw up one time and send enough , I might get one put away .
At the very least , they send the money orders UPS Red Overnight .
That has to take a small chunk out of their scam fund .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I am contacted about those "Emplomant oppertunitys" by some guy running the fake money order scam, I always go along with it.
I think these guys pretty much know it, but they need to be attempting to counterfeit a certain amount of money (It is somewhere around $5500.
I have not checked in awhile) before they are seriously pursued by the authorities.
I just figure if they happen to screw up one time and send enough, I might get one put away.
At the very least, they send the money orders UPS Red Overnight.
That has to take a small chunk out of their scam fund.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30942654</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds credible</title>
	<author>dow^</author>
	<datestamp>1264678320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A convicted fraudster, in the uk, becoming educated in business studies. What could possibly go wrong?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A convicted fraudster , in the uk , becoming educated in business studies .
What could possibly go wrong ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A convicted fraudster, in the uk, becoming educated in business studies.
What could possibly go wrong?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938396</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264708740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And for a small shipping or handling fee, your ISP can block these e-mails from coming into your mailbox at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And for a small shipping or handling fee , your ISP can block these e-mails from coming into your mailbox at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And for a small shipping or handling fee, your ISP can block these e-mails from coming into your mailbox at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939152</id>
	<title>if he were a real pro ...</title>
	<author>porky\_pig\_jr</author>
	<datestamp>1264710600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>he would have offered him a help with having his conviction voided. for a moderate fee, of course.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>he would have offered him a help with having his conviction voided .
for a moderate fee , of course .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he would have offered him a help with having his conviction voided.
for a moderate fee, of course.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937488</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264706700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I had to pay an impound fee to recover my stolen motorcycle, despite the fact that I picked it up the day it was recovered. If I didn't I was told it would be auctioned off to cover the costs. Some serious bullshit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I had to pay an impound fee to recover my stolen motorcycle , despite the fact that I picked it up the day it was recovered .
If I did n't I was told it would be auctioned off to cover the costs .
Some serious bullshit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I had to pay an impound fee to recover my stolen motorcycle, despite the fact that I picked it up the day it was recovered.
If I didn't I was told it would be auctioned off to cover the costs.
Some serious bullshit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937244</id>
	<title>Re:Perspective anyone?</title>
	<author>conureman</author>
	<datestamp>1264706100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I am not now, nor have I ever been, a trained journalist. "John" contacted me out of the blue and the first part of the interview was conducted with no preparation whatsoever, and I had no idea when (if) he would call again. I was, frankly, winging it."<br>The author responded to a similar comment in TFA.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I am not now , nor have I ever been , a trained journalist .
" John " contacted me out of the blue and the first part of the interview was conducted with no preparation whatsoever , and I had no idea when ( if ) he would call again .
I was , frankly , winging it .
" The author responded to a similar comment in TFA .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I am not now, nor have I ever been, a trained journalist.
"John" contacted me out of the blue and the first part of the interview was conducted with no preparation whatsoever, and I had no idea when (if) he would call again.
I was, frankly, winging it.
"The author responded to a similar comment in TFA.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30948000</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>Dan541</author>
	<datestamp>1264771680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?</p></div><p>You have clearly never been to Indonesia.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you ? You have clearly never been to Indonesia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?You have clearly never been to Indonesia.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944930</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds credible</title>
	<author>GNUALMAFUERTE</author>
	<datestamp>1264692060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, considered the UK colonized most of this countries, took their man and sold them as slaves, and mostly just stole everything they had for centuries, and we are not talking long long ago, you released some countries (Like Nigeria) as late as the 1960's, it sounds at least fair that you somehow repaired all that damage. I'm not saying you have to write checks, but letting them enjoy the country you built using THEIR MONEY, WORK AND RESOURCES sounds like the least you could do.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , considered the UK colonized most of this countries , took their man and sold them as slaves , and mostly just stole everything they had for centuries , and we are not talking long long ago , you released some countries ( Like Nigeria ) as late as the 1960 's , it sounds at least fair that you somehow repaired all that damage .
I 'm not saying you have to write checks , but letting them enjoy the country you built using THEIR MONEY , WORK AND RESOURCES sounds like the least you could do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, considered the UK colonized most of this countries, took their man and sold them as slaves, and mostly just stole everything they had for centuries, and we are not talking long long ago, you released some countries (Like Nigeria) as late as the 1960's, it sounds at least fair that you somehow repaired all that damage.
I'm not saying you have to write checks, but letting them enjoy the country you built using THEIR MONEY, WORK AND RESOURCES sounds like the least you could do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30942580</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264678140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A couple of solutions are publid awareness and scambaiting, a popular sport in the USA and UK.</p><p>Just as scammers know most mail will go unanswered and of the few that are answered, only a few of those are successful, Scambaiters take the bait to tie up the scammer's time and resources.  They document the communications online.  This shows the endless requests for fees.  To give the scammer a return of the feeling of dangling on the hook with the endless fees, many baiters have the scammers send letters, checks, pay for shipped trash, make them do time wasting activities and such so they can be "trusted"</p><p>One baiter got a scammer to act out the dead parrot sketch.  The video is online and has gone viral.  Another baiter replied that they didn't have time or money to invest in dealing with getting the consignment delivered, but was getting books translated into local dialects as voice books.  They managed to get a scammer to read the entire Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galixy and submitt it.  Needless to say there were some problems when the scammer tried to collect the payment.</p><p>http://www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2007/dead-parrot-scam-p1.php<br>The entire book is here in MP3 format about 3/4 the way down the page.  Not bad if you need a copy of the book in African accent.</p><p>The best part with the book reading is after the reverse scam, the attempt was made to scam him again, a double reverse scam attempt.<br>It's a great example of how to show those guys how it feels to be scammed.</p><p>If you would like to return some pain to these low life, there are great resources online.  Don't ever use your real identity.  Never use your real address.  Never send money.  Tie up their time to reduce the time they have to work a real mark, and if possible find and warn real victims.</p><p>Some great stories abound on The Scambaiter, The Scameater, 419hell and other great sites.  www.419hell.com has some great insight into how some of these lads work as he was successfull in convincing a scammer that he was a scammer and offerd to send victims fake checks.  He didn't of course and warned them instead.  It is a great read.<br>http://www.419hell.com/Victim\_Warnings/index.html</p><p>One final note on baiting scammers, Learn your local law regarding recording phone calls.  Some states require that both parties require notification that the call is being recorded,  Some states only require that only one party needs to know.  I unfortunately am in one of the state that requires notification of all parties so recording my calls is not legal without telling the other party.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A couple of solutions are publid awareness and scambaiting , a popular sport in the USA and UK.Just as scammers know most mail will go unanswered and of the few that are answered , only a few of those are successful , Scambaiters take the bait to tie up the scammer 's time and resources .
They document the communications online .
This shows the endless requests for fees .
To give the scammer a return of the feeling of dangling on the hook with the endless fees , many baiters have the scammers send letters , checks , pay for shipped trash , make them do time wasting activities and such so they can be " trusted " One baiter got a scammer to act out the dead parrot sketch .
The video is online and has gone viral .
Another baiter replied that they did n't have time or money to invest in dealing with getting the consignment delivered , but was getting books translated into local dialects as voice books .
They managed to get a scammer to read the entire Hitchhiker 's Guide to the Galixy and submitt it .
Needless to say there were some problems when the scammer tried to collect the payment.http : //www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2007/dead-parrot-scam-p1.phpThe entire book is here in MP3 format about 3/4 the way down the page .
Not bad if you need a copy of the book in African accent.The best part with the book reading is after the reverse scam , the attempt was made to scam him again , a double reverse scam attempt.It 's a great example of how to show those guys how it feels to be scammed.If you would like to return some pain to these low life , there are great resources online .
Do n't ever use your real identity .
Never use your real address .
Never send money .
Tie up their time to reduce the time they have to work a real mark , and if possible find and warn real victims.Some great stories abound on The Scambaiter , The Scameater , 419hell and other great sites .
www.419hell.com has some great insight into how some of these lads work as he was successfull in convincing a scammer that he was a scammer and offerd to send victims fake checks .
He did n't of course and warned them instead .
It is a great read.http : //www.419hell.com/Victim \ _Warnings/index.htmlOne final note on baiting scammers , Learn your local law regarding recording phone calls .
Some states require that both parties require notification that the call is being recorded , Some states only require that only one party needs to know .
I unfortunately am in one of the state that requires notification of all parties so recording my calls is not legal without telling the other party .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A couple of solutions are publid awareness and scambaiting, a popular sport in the USA and UK.Just as scammers know most mail will go unanswered and of the few that are answered, only a few of those are successful, Scambaiters take the bait to tie up the scammer's time and resources.
They document the communications online.
This shows the endless requests for fees.
To give the scammer a return of the feeling of dangling on the hook with the endless fees, many baiters have the scammers send letters, checks, pay for shipped trash, make them do time wasting activities and such so they can be "trusted"One baiter got a scammer to act out the dead parrot sketch.
The video is online and has gone viral.
Another baiter replied that they didn't have time or money to invest in dealing with getting the consignment delivered, but was getting books translated into local dialects as voice books.
They managed to get a scammer to read the entire Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galixy and submitt it.
Needless to say there were some problems when the scammer tried to collect the payment.http://www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2007/dead-parrot-scam-p1.phpThe entire book is here in MP3 format about 3/4 the way down the page.
Not bad if you need a copy of the book in African accent.The best part with the book reading is after the reverse scam, the attempt was made to scam him again, a double reverse scam attempt.It's a great example of how to show those guys how it feels to be scammed.If you would like to return some pain to these low life, there are great resources online.
Don't ever use your real identity.
Never use your real address.
Never send money.
Tie up their time to reduce the time they have to work a real mark, and if possible find and warn real victims.Some great stories abound on The Scambaiter, The Scameater, 419hell and other great sites.
www.419hell.com has some great insight into how some of these lads work as he was successfull in convincing a scammer that he was a scammer and offerd to send victims fake checks.
He didn't of course and warned them instead.
It is a great read.http://www.419hell.com/Victim\_Warnings/index.htmlOne final note on baiting scammers, Learn your local law regarding recording phone calls.
Some states require that both parties require notification that the call is being recorded,  Some states only require that only one party needs to know.
I unfortunately am in one of the state that requires notification of all parties so recording my calls is not legal without telling the other party.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937144</id>
	<title>Re:what a crappy journalist</title>
	<author>EricWright</author>
	<datestamp>1264705920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you read the comments after part 2, the interviewer freely admits he is not a trained journalist.  Blogger != journalist, no matter how many people tweet to the contrary.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read the comments after part 2 , the interviewer freely admits he is not a trained journalist .
Blogger ! = journalist , no matter how many people tweet to the contrary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read the comments after part 2, the interviewer freely admits he is not a trained journalist.
Blogger != journalist, no matter how many people tweet to the contrary.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936790</id>
	<title>"it's not crime" - it's informal parallel tax</title>
	<author>h00manist</author>
	<datestamp>1264704900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>i once went to three police stations to denounce a fraudster, who i had phone, name, address and several victims for.  all three police stations turned me away.  one told me it's not crime, as people handed their money voluntarily, so it's actually just a civil case.  he was later in the news for being arrested.  <a href="http://manhattanda.org/whatsnew/press/2003-04-23.shtml" title="manhattanda.org">http://manhattanda.org/whatsnew/press/2003-04-23.shtml</a> [manhattanda.org] -- i don't really know what's the deal, but i did notice these cases are hard to prosecute.  i'll never forget hanging out with sultan al-sabah as he trailed japanese girls, and later trying to get money back from the royal fraudster.</htmltext>
<tokenext>i once went to three police stations to denounce a fraudster , who i had phone , name , address and several victims for .
all three police stations turned me away .
one told me it 's not crime , as people handed their money voluntarily , so it 's actually just a civil case .
he was later in the news for being arrested .
http : //manhattanda.org/whatsnew/press/2003-04-23.shtml [ manhattanda.org ] -- i do n't really know what 's the deal , but i did notice these cases are hard to prosecute .
i 'll never forget hanging out with sultan al-sabah as he trailed japanese girls , and later trying to get money back from the royal fraudster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i once went to three police stations to denounce a fraudster, who i had phone, name, address and several victims for.
all three police stations turned me away.
one told me it's not crime, as people handed their money voluntarily, so it's actually just a civil case.
he was later in the news for being arrested.
http://manhattanda.org/whatsnew/press/2003-04-23.shtml [manhattanda.org] -- i don't really know what's the deal, but i did notice these cases are hard to prosecute.
i'll never forget hanging out with sultan al-sabah as he trailed japanese girls, and later trying to get money back from the royal fraudster.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936758</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds credible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264704840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hardly flamebait. 'John' has a criminal background and we let him into the country? huh?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hardly flamebait .
'John ' has a criminal background and we let him into the country ?
huh ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hardly flamebait.
'John' has a criminal background and we let him into the country?
huh?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939128</id>
	<title>Eh, just last week? They promised it was in the ma</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1264710540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eh, just last week, I lost my wallet? They promised it was in the mail and all they needed was my address and social security and bank details... mail is a bit slow but I am sure I will get my wallet back any day now.
</p><p>What?
</p><p>Come on, once a sucker, always a sucker.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eh , just last week , I lost my wallet ?
They promised it was in the mail and all they needed was my address and social security and bank details... mail is a bit slow but I am sure I will get my wallet back any day now .
What ? Come on , once a sucker , always a sucker .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eh, just last week, I lost my wallet?
They promised it was in the mail and all they needed was my address and social security and bank details... mail is a bit slow but I am sure I will get my wallet back any day now.
What?
Come on, once a sucker, always a sucker.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937982</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>DrgnDancer</author>
	<datestamp>1264707840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The causal relationship you imply here doesn't exist. It isn't inequality that's at fault, its these lads' greed coupled with lack of morals. I'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks.</p></div><p>I'm not either.  Then again I drive a fairly nice, 5 year old VW, live in a multi-bedroom apartment, and have not wondered how I was going to afford three meals a day in a very long time.  It's easy enough, when you are middle class, or even working class, to see these people and feel no sympathy.  Hell, you'd even be right, they are criminals, and they are victimizing people. On the other hand, starving sucks.  Is the criminal who steals a loaf of bread so he (or his family) can eat the same as the criminal who steals a car because he can, or the one who steals money so he can be rich? At best, poverty is a mitigating factor, not an excuse, but depending on the level of poverty it can be a pretty strong mitigating factor.</p><p>It's hard to quantify any of this, but there is a clear differentiation between stealing to take your basically good life and make it better, and stealing simply to eat.  At what point the scale tips, and how much of a mitigating factor it will be varies from person to person, and situation to situation (I can't imagine this guy was *that* poor since he could attend school, but he may have still been quite poor), but it is a factor.  There is also the question of: if you need to steal to eat, but then you steal much more than you actually needed, are you more or less guilt?  Nothing is ever simple, but just boiling it down to a starving man stealing bread being the same as you stealing a Ferrari is overly simplistic in the extreme.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The causal relationship you imply here does n't exist .
It is n't inequality that 's at fault , its these lads ' greed coupled with lack of morals .
I 'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks.I 'm not either .
Then again I drive a fairly nice , 5 year old VW , live in a multi-bedroom apartment , and have not wondered how I was going to afford three meals a day in a very long time .
It 's easy enough , when you are middle class , or even working class , to see these people and feel no sympathy .
Hell , you 'd even be right , they are criminals , and they are victimizing people .
On the other hand , starving sucks .
Is the criminal who steals a loaf of bread so he ( or his family ) can eat the same as the criminal who steals a car because he can , or the one who steals money so he can be rich ?
At best , poverty is a mitigating factor , not an excuse , but depending on the level of poverty it can be a pretty strong mitigating factor.It 's hard to quantify any of this , but there is a clear differentiation between stealing to take your basically good life and make it better , and stealing simply to eat .
At what point the scale tips , and how much of a mitigating factor it will be varies from person to person , and situation to situation ( I ca n't imagine this guy was * that * poor since he could attend school , but he may have still been quite poor ) , but it is a factor .
There is also the question of : if you need to steal to eat , but then you steal much more than you actually needed , are you more or less guilt ?
Nothing is ever simple , but just boiling it down to a starving man stealing bread being the same as you stealing a Ferrari is overly simplistic in the extreme .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The causal relationship you imply here doesn't exist.
It isn't inequality that's at fault, its these lads' greed coupled with lack of morals.
I'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks.I'm not either.
Then again I drive a fairly nice, 5 year old VW, live in a multi-bedroom apartment, and have not wondered how I was going to afford three meals a day in a very long time.
It's easy enough, when you are middle class, or even working class, to see these people and feel no sympathy.
Hell, you'd even be right, they are criminals, and they are victimizing people.
On the other hand, starving sucks.
Is the criminal who steals a loaf of bread so he (or his family) can eat the same as the criminal who steals a car because he can, or the one who steals money so he can be rich?
At best, poverty is a mitigating factor, not an excuse, but depending on the level of poverty it can be a pretty strong mitigating factor.It's hard to quantify any of this, but there is a clear differentiation between stealing to take your basically good life and make it better, and stealing simply to eat.
At what point the scale tips, and how much of a mitigating factor it will be varies from person to person, and situation to situation (I can't imagine this guy was *that* poor since he could attend school, but he may have still been quite poor), but it is a factor.
There is also the question of: if you need to steal to eat, but then you steal much more than you actually needed, are you more or less guilt?
Nothing is ever simple, but just boiling it down to a starving man stealing bread being the same as you stealing a Ferrari is overly simplistic in the extreme.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30950644</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264785720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Comment from Admin on the Scam Detectives site:</p><p>Dear readers.</p><p>This post featured on popular website Slashdot.org yesterday, which drove a considerable amount of new readers, and subsequently over 1,000 comments, to the site.</p><p>Obviously I am unable to moderate all of them, so have taken the difficult decision not to post any of them, and for equality&rsquo;s sake, to remove existing comments and close commenting. I would like to thank each and every person who took the time to comment.</p><p>I have faced quite some criticism over my handling of the interview with &ldquo;John&rdquo;, particularly of the fact that I became angry during the second part and cut the interview short. There has also been doubt expressed as to the legitimacy of the interview, with some readers questioning whether it took place at all.</p><p>I would like to address some of those comments here.</p><p>1) The interview took place as I reported it, although not verbatim. &ldquo;John&rdquo; is from Nigeria and his grasp of English is not great. I took copious notes throughout both (lengthy) conversations and had to construct the interview as it appears, substituting slang phrases such as &ldquo;Mugu&rdquo; (Big Fool) for &ldquo;Victim&rdquo;, and &ldquo;Oga&rdquo; for &ldquo;gang-master&rdquo;. This was done for the purposes of clarity and to get across &ldquo;John&rsquo;s&rdquo; responses in an easy to understand manner, without bogging down the interview with translations and explanations of Pidgin English or Igbo phrases. This may have given the overall impression of a &ldquo;scripted&rdquo; interview, but it was anything but. You&rsquo;ll either take my word for that, or not. The decision is yours.</p><p>2) I am not a trained journalist, just a guy who wants to help people not get scammed. During my research of online fraud I spoke to a number of victims who had lost everything as a result of being taken in by scammers just like &ldquo;John&rdquo;. &ldquo;John&rdquo; showed a palpable lack of empathy for the situations of these people, blaming them for their greed and when he spoke about &ldquo;recovery scams&rdquo;, hitting these people for a second time by building up their hopes of recovering at least some of their money and rebuilding their lives following their disastrous losses then yes, I became angry and this coloured the rest of the interview. I fully admit that I should not have allowed my emotions to get the better of me, but I did, and took the decision to terminate the interview at that point. If &ldquo;John&rdquo; calls again then I will attempt to continue the interview with a more detached outlook. If my early termination of the conversation has disappointed you, or made you feel that I was unprofessional, then I empathise.</p><p>On reflection, I hope that &ldquo;John&rdquo; does contact me again. If he does, I will try to do better.</p><p>Thanks for reading,</p><p>Scam-Detective</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Comment from Admin on the Scam Detectives site : Dear readers.This post featured on popular website Slashdot.org yesterday , which drove a considerable amount of new readers , and subsequently over 1,000 comments , to the site.Obviously I am unable to moderate all of them , so have taken the difficult decision not to post any of them , and for equality    s sake , to remove existing comments and close commenting .
I would like to thank each and every person who took the time to comment.I have faced quite some criticism over my handling of the interview with    John    , particularly of the fact that I became angry during the second part and cut the interview short .
There has also been doubt expressed as to the legitimacy of the interview , with some readers questioning whether it took place at all.I would like to address some of those comments here.1 ) The interview took place as I reported it , although not verbatim .
   John    is from Nigeria and his grasp of English is not great .
I took copious notes throughout both ( lengthy ) conversations and had to construct the interview as it appears , substituting slang phrases such as    Mugu    ( Big Fool ) for    Victim    , and    Oga    for    gang-master    .
This was done for the purposes of clarity and to get across    John    s    responses in an easy to understand manner , without bogging down the interview with translations and explanations of Pidgin English or Igbo phrases .
This may have given the overall impression of a    scripted    interview , but it was anything but .
You    ll either take my word for that , or not .
The decision is yours.2 ) I am not a trained journalist , just a guy who wants to help people not get scammed .
During my research of online fraud I spoke to a number of victims who had lost everything as a result of being taken in by scammers just like    John    .
   John    showed a palpable lack of empathy for the situations of these people , blaming them for their greed and when he spoke about    recovery scams    , hitting these people for a second time by building up their hopes of recovering at least some of their money and rebuilding their lives following their disastrous losses then yes , I became angry and this coloured the rest of the interview .
I fully admit that I should not have allowed my emotions to get the better of me , but I did , and took the decision to terminate the interview at that point .
If    John    calls again then I will attempt to continue the interview with a more detached outlook .
If my early termination of the conversation has disappointed you , or made you feel that I was unprofessional , then I empathise.On reflection , I hope that    John    does contact me again .
If he does , I will try to do better.Thanks for reading,Scam-Detective</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Comment from Admin on the Scam Detectives site:Dear readers.This post featured on popular website Slashdot.org yesterday, which drove a considerable amount of new readers, and subsequently over 1,000 comments, to the site.Obviously I am unable to moderate all of them, so have taken the difficult decision not to post any of them, and for equality’s sake, to remove existing comments and close commenting.
I would like to thank each and every person who took the time to comment.I have faced quite some criticism over my handling of the interview with “John”, particularly of the fact that I became angry during the second part and cut the interview short.
There has also been doubt expressed as to the legitimacy of the interview, with some readers questioning whether it took place at all.I would like to address some of those comments here.1) The interview took place as I reported it, although not verbatim.
“John” is from Nigeria and his grasp of English is not great.
I took copious notes throughout both (lengthy) conversations and had to construct the interview as it appears, substituting slang phrases such as “Mugu” (Big Fool) for “Victim”, and “Oga” for “gang-master”.
This was done for the purposes of clarity and to get across “John’s” responses in an easy to understand manner, without bogging down the interview with translations and explanations of Pidgin English or Igbo phrases.
This may have given the overall impression of a “scripted” interview, but it was anything but.
You’ll either take my word for that, or not.
The decision is yours.2) I am not a trained journalist, just a guy who wants to help people not get scammed.
During my research of online fraud I spoke to a number of victims who had lost everything as a result of being taken in by scammers just like “John”.
“John” showed a palpable lack of empathy for the situations of these people, blaming them for their greed and when he spoke about “recovery scams”, hitting these people for a second time by building up their hopes of recovering at least some of their money and rebuilding their lives following their disastrous losses then yes, I became angry and this coloured the rest of the interview.
I fully admit that I should not have allowed my emotions to get the better of me, but I did, and took the decision to terminate the interview at that point.
If “John” calls again then I will attempt to continue the interview with a more detached outlook.
If my early termination of the conversation has disappointed you, or made you feel that I was unprofessional, then I empathise.On reflection, I hope that “John” does contact me again.
If he does, I will try to do better.Thanks for reading,Scam-Detective</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937686</id>
	<title>No victim-free ways to catch potential fraud</title>
	<author>crazybilly</author>
	<datestamp>1264707120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The last (and first) time I got a fake cashier's check I called the police both locally and in the town where I was supposed to send the money. Their response was that they couldn't do anything because until I cashed the check (for which I was liable), no crime had been committed.
<p>
Long story short, there's no way to catch potential fraud without the victim risking going to jail as well.
</p><p>
Ridiculous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The last ( and first ) time I got a fake cashier 's check I called the police both locally and in the town where I was supposed to send the money .
Their response was that they could n't do anything because until I cashed the check ( for which I was liable ) , no crime had been committed .
Long story short , there 's no way to catch potential fraud without the victim risking going to jail as well .
Ridiculous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The last (and first) time I got a fake cashier's check I called the police both locally and in the town where I was supposed to send the money.
Their response was that they couldn't do anything because until I cashed the check (for which I was liable), no crime had been committed.
Long story short, there's no way to catch potential fraud without the victim risking going to jail as well.
Ridiculous.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937564</id>
	<title>Re:"it's not crime" - it's informal parallel tax</title>
	<author>Bigjeff5</author>
	<datestamp>1264706880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except for something like murder or something that affects enough people for the state to bring charges up, it's up to the victim to bring charges against someone.  You can't just say "I know this guy is defrauding these people, and here's my evidence", the victim has to bring charges for the police to do anything.  For example, if a woman is raped and you see it happen, no matter what you say the rapist will never be charged if the victim does not want to file charges.</p><p>It's just the way it works.</p><p>It's doubly bad for scammers based in countries like Nigeria, who won't extradite.  Then there is absolutely no recourse.  I remember a story about a woman who kept giving money to a scammer, over and over again, and everybody knew about it but she wouldn't stop.  Her family even tried to get the sherrif to step in, but all he could do was tell her she was being scammed, and she wouldn't listen.  She pissed away a $250,000 retirement account that way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except for something like murder or something that affects enough people for the state to bring charges up , it 's up to the victim to bring charges against someone .
You ca n't just say " I know this guy is defrauding these people , and here 's my evidence " , the victim has to bring charges for the police to do anything .
For example , if a woman is raped and you see it happen , no matter what you say the rapist will never be charged if the victim does not want to file charges.It 's just the way it works.It 's doubly bad for scammers based in countries like Nigeria , who wo n't extradite .
Then there is absolutely no recourse .
I remember a story about a woman who kept giving money to a scammer , over and over again , and everybody knew about it but she would n't stop .
Her family even tried to get the sherrif to step in , but all he could do was tell her she was being scammed , and she would n't listen .
She pissed away a $ 250,000 retirement account that way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except for something like murder or something that affects enough people for the state to bring charges up, it's up to the victim to bring charges against someone.
You can't just say "I know this guy is defrauding these people, and here's my evidence", the victim has to bring charges for the police to do anything.
For example, if a woman is raped and you see it happen, no matter what you say the rapist will never be charged if the victim does not want to file charges.It's just the way it works.It's doubly bad for scammers based in countries like Nigeria, who won't extradite.
Then there is absolutely no recourse.
I remember a story about a woman who kept giving money to a scammer, over and over again, and everybody knew about it but she wouldn't stop.
Her family even tried to get the sherrif to step in, but all he could do was tell her she was being scammed, and she wouldn't listen.
She pissed away a $250,000 retirement account that way.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</id>
	<title>Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264703880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Shock news. In a country where $100 a month is considered a reasonable salary and there's a lot of wealth inequality and corruption, some folk are tempted into crime when they see their friends earning $4000 a month...</p><p>So what's the solution?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Shock news .
In a country where $ 100 a month is considered a reasonable salary and there 's a lot of wealth inequality and corruption , some folk are tempted into crime when they see their friends earning $ 4000 a month...So what 's the solution ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Shock news.
In a country where $100 a month is considered a reasonable salary and there's a lot of wealth inequality and corruption, some folk are tempted into crime when they see their friends earning $4000 a month...So what's the solution?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938150</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264708140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No sorry, as much as I would like to believe that you are correct. Your not. Yes I have been there and yes it is a cultural thing and the poster below stated to a large degree but you also mostly struggle to understand it because you don't understand poverty and deprivation that kills that they do. People die of starvation, not because there is no food, but because they can't afford it. There is no welfare system what so ever. If you are sick you must pay or die (kinda like the USA). And its not cheap. If you do actually succeed in getting a good education, well, there are no jobs so it don't matter. So get this right, you have a country with actually a lot of graduates and talent, but without jobs or a real outlet. What do you get - white collar crime.</p><p>Before you say something silly like, well if they were that smart then they would just make work.</p><p>Just stop. They live in a nation with so much wide spread corruption, at every stop someone is looking to charge you for something, they often have no real business charging. No stable electricity supply, it goes on and off several times a day(if you are lucky) the nation essentially runs off of generators. You can't have heavy industry without a decent supply. Things cost so much money because of the amount of hands you continually have to grease. The level of frustration for the average poor man is breathtaking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No sorry , as much as I would like to believe that you are correct .
Your not .
Yes I have been there and yes it is a cultural thing and the poster below stated to a large degree but you also mostly struggle to understand it because you do n't understand poverty and deprivation that kills that they do .
People die of starvation , not because there is no food , but because they ca n't afford it .
There is no welfare system what so ever .
If you are sick you must pay or die ( kinda like the USA ) .
And its not cheap .
If you do actually succeed in getting a good education , well , there are no jobs so it do n't matter .
So get this right , you have a country with actually a lot of graduates and talent , but without jobs or a real outlet .
What do you get - white collar crime.Before you say something silly like , well if they were that smart then they would just make work.Just stop .
They live in a nation with so much wide spread corruption , at every stop someone is looking to charge you for something , they often have no real business charging .
No stable electricity supply , it goes on and off several times a day ( if you are lucky ) the nation essentially runs off of generators .
You ca n't have heavy industry without a decent supply .
Things cost so much money because of the amount of hands you continually have to grease .
The level of frustration for the average poor man is breathtaking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No sorry, as much as I would like to believe that you are correct.
Your not.
Yes I have been there and yes it is a cultural thing and the poster below stated to a large degree but you also mostly struggle to understand it because you don't understand poverty and deprivation that kills that they do.
People die of starvation, not because there is no food, but because they can't afford it.
There is no welfare system what so ever.
If you are sick you must pay or die (kinda like the USA).
And its not cheap.
If you do actually succeed in getting a good education, well, there are no jobs so it don't matter.
So get this right, you have a country with actually a lot of graduates and talent, but without jobs or a real outlet.
What do you get - white collar crime.Before you say something silly like, well if they were that smart then they would just make work.Just stop.
They live in a nation with so much wide spread corruption, at every stop someone is looking to charge you for something, they often have no real business charging.
No stable electricity supply, it goes on and off several times a day(if you are lucky) the nation essentially runs off of generators.
You can't have heavy industry without a decent supply.
Things cost so much money because of the amount of hands you continually have to grease.
The level of frustration for the average poor man is breathtaking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936612</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264704420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Increase wealth inequality and corruption in the west so we can be more like them?  Oh wait, that's already happening.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Increase wealth inequality and corruption in the west so we can be more like them ?
Oh wait , that 's already happening .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Increase wealth inequality and corruption in the west so we can be more like them?
Oh wait, that's already happening.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937854</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>billy8988</author>
	<datestamp>1264707480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?</p></div><p>It happens all the time in India. You have to bribe the police to lodge your robbery case, bribe more to recover the stolen goods.<br>Here is a link to a popular newspaper in India which lists all such cases.</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla\%3Aen-US\%3Aofficial&amp;q=site\%3Awww.thehindu.com+police+inspector+suspended+for+accepting+bribe&amp;aq=f&amp;aql=&amp;aqi=&amp;oq=" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla\%3Aen-US\%3Aofficial&amp;q=site\%3Awww.thehindu.com+police+inspector+suspended+for+accepting+bribe&amp;aq=f&amp;aql=&amp;aqi=&amp;oq=</a> [google.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you ? It happens all the time in India .
You have to bribe the police to lodge your robbery case , bribe more to recover the stolen goods.Here is a link to a popular newspaper in India which lists all such cases.http : //www.google.com/search ? hl = en&amp;client = firefox-a&amp;rls = org.mozilla \ % 3Aen-US \ % 3Aofficial&amp;q = site \ % 3Awww.thehindu.com + police + inspector + suspended + for + accepting + bribe&amp;aq = f&amp;aql = &amp;aqi = &amp;oq = [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?It happens all the time in India.
You have to bribe the police to lodge your robbery case, bribe more to recover the stolen goods.Here is a link to a popular newspaper in India which lists all such cases.http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla\%3Aen-US\%3Aofficial&amp;q=site\%3Awww.thehindu.com+police+inspector+suspended+for+accepting+bribe&amp;aq=f&amp;aql=&amp;aqi=&amp;oq= [google.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939006</id>
	<title>Re:Perspective anyone?</title>
	<author>mewsenews</author>
	<datestamp>1264710180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What if the 'scammer' can feel better about himself after spreading information? I mean shouldn't people who have done bad things be allowed to make remorse and NOT have to feel guilty their whole lives???? I mean <i>Jesus Christ</i>.....</p></div></blockquote><p>Funnily enough, forgiveness was one of Christ's greatest teachings. The article left a bad taste in my mouth also.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What if the 'scammer ' can feel better about himself after spreading information ?
I mean should n't people who have done bad things be allowed to make remorse and NOT have to feel guilty their whole lives ? ? ? ?
I mean Jesus Christ.....Funnily enough , forgiveness was one of Christ 's greatest teachings .
The article left a bad taste in my mouth also .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What if the 'scammer' can feel better about himself after spreading information?
I mean shouldn't people who have done bad things be allowed to make remorse and NOT have to feel guilty their whole lives????
I mean Jesus Christ.....Funnily enough, forgiveness was one of Christ's greatest teachings.
The article left a bad taste in my mouth also.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937476</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264706700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Frankly, I find your "lack of morals" comment appallingly ignorant: the fact that you are posting on slashdot means you have no idea what it's like to live in poverty. Let's  throw out the Ferraris completely, and pretend you saw a loaf of bread on the street. Now imagine you and your family had no bread. Would you then be tempted to take the bread? Would this be solely driven by greed and a lack of morals?</p><p>Let me guess, you would "get a job" and "work hard" to support your family, not steal. Well, what if there were no jobs? What if the only job was to work for a scammer? You work for the scammer, and you start earning money and then you get sucked in by greed and corruption. But it doesn't start out like that. It's time people started looking at the deeper roots of poverty and its consequences (Nigerian scammers). Are you willing to say its greed and immorality? Because I'm not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankly , I find your " lack of morals " comment appallingly ignorant : the fact that you are posting on slashdot means you have no idea what it 's like to live in poverty .
Let 's throw out the Ferraris completely , and pretend you saw a loaf of bread on the street .
Now imagine you and your family had no bread .
Would you then be tempted to take the bread ?
Would this be solely driven by greed and a lack of morals ? Let me guess , you would " get a job " and " work hard " to support your family , not steal .
Well , what if there were no jobs ?
What if the only job was to work for a scammer ?
You work for the scammer , and you start earning money and then you get sucked in by greed and corruption .
But it does n't start out like that .
It 's time people started looking at the deeper roots of poverty and its consequences ( Nigerian scammers ) .
Are you willing to say its greed and immorality ?
Because I 'm not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankly, I find your "lack of morals" comment appallingly ignorant: the fact that you are posting on slashdot means you have no idea what it's like to live in poverty.
Let's  throw out the Ferraris completely, and pretend you saw a loaf of bread on the street.
Now imagine you and your family had no bread.
Would you then be tempted to take the bread?
Would this be solely driven by greed and a lack of morals?Let me guess, you would "get a job" and "work hard" to support your family, not steal.
Well, what if there were no jobs?
What if the only job was to work for a scammer?
You work for the scammer, and you start earning money and then you get sucked in by greed and corruption.
But it doesn't start out like that.
It's time people started looking at the deeper roots of poverty and its consequences (Nigerian scammers).
Are you willing to say its greed and immorality?
Because I'm not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626</id>
	<title>Perspective anyone?</title>
	<author>dorre</author>
	<datestamp>1264704480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I really think that the 'journalist' failed miserably.<br>
 <br>
Although the story felt credible and added some insight into the scammers everyday life the story didn't provide any information. And in the end  when the 'scammer' starts providing new information the 'journalist' get's angry and starts accusing him like a child.<br>
<br>
What if the 'scammer' can feel better about himself after spreading information? I mean shouldn't people who have done bad things be allowed to make remorse and NOT have to feel guilty their whole lives???? I mean Jesus Christ.....</htmltext>
<tokenext>I really think that the 'journalist ' failed miserably .
Although the story felt credible and added some insight into the scammers everyday life the story did n't provide any information .
And in the end when the 'scammer ' starts providing new information the 'journalist ' get 's angry and starts accusing him like a child .
What if the 'scammer ' can feel better about himself after spreading information ?
I mean should n't people who have done bad things be allowed to make remorse and NOT have to feel guilty their whole lives ? ? ? ?
I mean Jesus Christ.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really think that the 'journalist' failed miserably.
Although the story felt credible and added some insight into the scammers everyday life the story didn't provide any information.
And in the end  when the 'scammer' starts providing new information the 'journalist' get's angry and starts accusing him like a child.
What if the 'scammer' can feel better about himself after spreading information?
I mean shouldn't people who have done bad things be allowed to make remorse and NOT have to feel guilty their whole lives????
I mean Jesus Christ.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</id>
	<title>Haha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264703280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?</p><p>Very clever. I mean only those foolish enough to fall for the first scam could possibly be foolish enough to fall for that line. "John" clearly knows his target audience.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you ? Very clever .
I mean only those foolish enough to fall for the first scam could possibly be foolish enough to fall for that line .
" John " clearly knows his target audience .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?Very clever.
I mean only those foolish enough to fall for the first scam could possibly be foolish enough to fall for that line.
"John" clearly knows his target audience.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944852</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264691460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can you explain that in terms of automobiles? or beer please?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can you explain that in terms of automobiles ?
or beer please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can you explain that in terms of automobiles?
or beer please?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936912</id>
	<title>Re:Perspective anyone?</title>
	<author>Nursie</author>
	<datestamp>1264705260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"I mean shouldn't people who have done bad things be allowed to make remorse and NOT have to feel guilty their whole lives????"</i></p><p>That depends on what you mean about not having to feel guilty. Coming to terms with what put them in that situation, why they did what they did and how they can live a good life afterwards? hell yes.</p><p>Blaming the victim andmaking excuses about why it wasn't so bad and wasn't your fault? Less so. Those are excuses.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I mean should n't people who have done bad things be allowed to make remorse and NOT have to feel guilty their whole lives ? ? ? ?
" That depends on what you mean about not having to feel guilty .
Coming to terms with what put them in that situation , why they did what they did and how they can live a good life afterwards ?
hell yes.Blaming the victim andmaking excuses about why it was n't so bad and was n't your fault ?
Less so .
Those are excuses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I mean shouldn't people who have done bad things be allowed to make remorse and NOT have to feel guilty their whole lives????
"That depends on what you mean about not having to feel guilty.
Coming to terms with what put them in that situation, why they did what they did and how they can live a good life afterwards?
hell yes.Blaming the victim andmaking excuses about why it wasn't so bad and wasn't your fault?
Less so.
Those are excuses.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937142</id>
	<title>This looks made-up to me</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264705920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't believe this is real. There are a number of indicators such the language/wording/phrasing being extremely similar between both the interviewer and interviewee. Why would someone fake this? To get more traffic on their site? A con about a con...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't believe this is real .
There are a number of indicators such the language/wording/phrasing being extremely similar between both the interviewer and interviewee .
Why would someone fake this ?
To get more traffic on their site ?
A con about a con.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't believe this is real.
There are a number of indicators such the language/wording/phrasing being extremely similar between both the interviewer and interviewee.
Why would someone fake this?
To get more traffic on their site?
A con about a con...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938782</id>
	<title>Re:Perspective anyone?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1264709640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, the journalist is letting his personal issues get in the way of his work. To me one of the worst things a person can do is try to block another from healing. Damaged people don't do anyone good.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , the journalist is letting his personal issues get in the way of his work .
To me one of the worst things a person can do is try to block another from healing .
Damaged people do n't do anyone good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, the journalist is letting his personal issues get in the way of his work.
To me one of the worst things a person can do is try to block another from healing.
Damaged people don't do anyone good.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943980</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Mike Van Pelt</author>
	<datestamp>1264684980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not clear to me how this poor, abused, downtrodden, starving 419er's BMW contributed to feeding his starving family.
</p><p>
On the other hand, maybe he's just a crook.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not clear to me how this poor , abused , downtrodden , starving 419er 's BMW contributed to feeding his starving family .
On the other hand , maybe he 's just a crook .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not clear to me how this poor, abused, downtrodden, starving 419er's BMW contributed to feeding his starving family.
On the other hand, maybe he's just a crook.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937476</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937096</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>CuriHP</author>
	<datestamp>1264705800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It cost me $10 to get a copy of my accident report.  A photocopy of one sheet of paper.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It cost me $ 10 to get a copy of my accident report .
A photocopy of one sheet of paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It cost me $10 to get a copy of my accident report.
A photocopy of one sheet of paper.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30952136</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>Technician</author>
	<datestamp>1264790760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually having to pay for storage and such for having my car stolen is pretty much the norm, even in the USA.  They steal it and then charge you for the towing and storage.  They never read the note in the window stating it is a breakdown, do not tow, call me with a phone number.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually having to pay for storage and such for having my car stolen is pretty much the norm , even in the USA .
They steal it and then charge you for the towing and storage .
They never read the note in the window stating it is a breakdown , do not tow , call me with a phone number .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually having to pay for storage and such for having my car stolen is pretty much the norm, even in the USA.
They steal it and then charge you for the towing and storage.
They never read the note in the window stating it is a breakdown, do not tow, call me with a phone number.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936732</id>
	<title>NEVER trust ANYONE on the Internet</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264704780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know I'm preaching to the choir, but it just goes to show you.  <i>NEVER</i> trust <i>ANYONE</i> on the Ineternet.  <a href="http://redtape.msnbc.com/2009/01/post-1.html" title="msnbc.com">Not even your friends</a> [msnbc.com].</p><p>Throw in some old adages about "too good to be true," "fool and his money," etc., and it ain't rocket science.  Yes, I blame "John" for the evils of these scams.  But you know what?  There's plenty of blame to go around.  I also blame the victims, too, for being so greedy and/or naive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know I 'm preaching to the choir , but it just goes to show you .
NEVER trust ANYONE on the Ineternet .
Not even your friends [ msnbc.com ] .Throw in some old adages about " too good to be true , " " fool and his money , " etc. , and it ai n't rocket science .
Yes , I blame " John " for the evils of these scams .
But you know what ?
There 's plenty of blame to go around .
I also blame the victims , too , for being so greedy and/or naive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know I'm preaching to the choir, but it just goes to show you.
NEVER trust ANYONE on the Ineternet.
Not even your friends [msnbc.com].Throw in some old adages about "too good to be true," "fool and his money," etc., and it ain't rocket science.
Yes, I blame "John" for the evils of these scams.
But you know what?
There's plenty of blame to go around.
I also blame the victims, too, for being so greedy and/or naive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936704</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1264704720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You posed the problem, what is your solution?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You posed the problem , what is your solution ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You posed the problem, what is your solution?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937582</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1264706880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks.</i></p><p>Which is why most folks don't own Ferraris, and most Ferrari owners have some pretty questionable behaviour in their past.  You don't get that kind of money without doing something pretty slimey for a living, like being a bank executive or otherwise participating in the amoral circus that is the American financial system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks.Which is why most folks do n't own Ferraris , and most Ferrari owners have some pretty questionable behaviour in their past .
You do n't get that kind of money without doing something pretty slimey for a living , like being a bank executive or otherwise participating in the amoral circus that is the American financial system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks.Which is why most folks don't own Ferraris, and most Ferrari owners have some pretty questionable behaviour in their past.
You don't get that kind of money without doing something pretty slimey for a living, like being a bank executive or otherwise participating in the amoral circus that is the American financial system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944198</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264686600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?</i> <br>
&nbsp; <br>DC, 1997. Commonly referred to my friends as RBP (Robbery by Police). Didn't matter if you were black, white, etc.... Though even more common then the "processing fee", was "confiscations of cash suspected of being from ill gotten gains", where the cop simply demanded the contents of you wallet for "evidence", and gave you a slip. You could, in theory, try and get your money back.... But by and large it was a painful process for any amount under a couple hundred, and was simple a world of hurt....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you ?
  DC , 1997 .
Commonly referred to my friends as RBP ( Robbery by Police ) .
Did n't matter if you were black , white , etc.... Though even more common then the " processing fee " , was " confiscations of cash suspected of being from ill gotten gains " , where the cop simply demanded the contents of you wallet for " evidence " , and gave you a slip .
You could , in theory , try and get your money back.... But by and large it was a painful process for any amount under a couple hundred , and was simple a world of hurt... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?
  DC, 1997.
Commonly referred to my friends as RBP (Robbery by Police).
Didn't matter if you were black, white, etc.... Though even more common then the "processing fee", was "confiscations of cash suspected of being from ill gotten gains", where the cop simply demanded the contents of you wallet for "evidence", and gave you a slip.
You could, in theory, try and get your money back.... But by and large it was a painful process for any amount under a couple hundred, and was simple a world of hurt....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937958</id>
	<title>Re:Perspective anyone?</title>
	<author>steve-o-yeah</author>
	<datestamp>1264707780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read both parts one and two and both (though two moreso than one) had the stink of bullshit all over it. The interview reads more like poorly constructed movie or television dialogue (George Lucas may be responsible here), the second part of the interview is full of very leading questions (possibly indicating an anticipated answer). Add on the fact that the interviewee doesn't really offer any insight into the world of 419 scams, and this adds up to a concocted interview. The intent of the publisher may have been to educate the innocent, but I feel friends that we ourselves have been 'scammed'.
<br> <br>
My favourite part: "Do you think that your teachers at school had reported your talents to the gang master?". Yeaaaaahhhhh Right.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read both parts one and two and both ( though two moreso than one ) had the stink of bullshit all over it .
The interview reads more like poorly constructed movie or television dialogue ( George Lucas may be responsible here ) , the second part of the interview is full of very leading questions ( possibly indicating an anticipated answer ) .
Add on the fact that the interviewee does n't really offer any insight into the world of 419 scams , and this adds up to a concocted interview .
The intent of the publisher may have been to educate the innocent , but I feel friends that we ourselves have been 'scammed' .
My favourite part : " Do you think that your teachers at school had reported your talents to the gang master ? " .
Yeaaaaahhhhh Right .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read both parts one and two and both (though two moreso than one) had the stink of bullshit all over it.
The interview reads more like poorly constructed movie or television dialogue (George Lucas may be responsible here), the second part of the interview is full of very leading questions (possibly indicating an anticipated answer).
Add on the fact that the interviewee doesn't really offer any insight into the world of 419 scams, and this adds up to a concocted interview.
The intent of the publisher may have been to educate the innocent, but I feel friends that we ourselves have been 'scammed'.
My favourite part: "Do you think that your teachers at school had reported your talents to the gang master?".
Yeaaaaahhhhh Right.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939808</id>
	<title>Re:Perspective anyone?</title>
	<author>BradleyAndersen</author>
	<datestamp>1264669380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>What country do you live in? It is certainly not the USA, where, for every thing you ever do, a little mark is made on a credit report or a criminal report, and forever thereafter scrutinized by anyone you might want a loan from, a house from, a job from, etc.  TANSTA protection from effective double-jeopardy here, friend.  You pay, and you pay some more, and you keep paying, until you die.  Then your children pay.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What country do you live in ?
It is certainly not the USA , where , for every thing you ever do , a little mark is made on a credit report or a criminal report , and forever thereafter scrutinized by anyone you might want a loan from , a house from , a job from , etc .
TANSTA protection from effective double-jeopardy here , friend .
You pay , and you pay some more , and you keep paying , until you die .
Then your children pay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What country do you live in?
It is certainly not the USA, where, for every thing you ever do, a little mark is made on a credit report or a criminal report, and forever thereafter scrutinized by anyone you might want a loan from, a house from, a job from, etc.
TANSTA protection from effective double-jeopardy here, friend.
You pay, and you pay some more, and you keep paying, until you die.
Then your children pay.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936868</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264705140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nuke them from orbit.  It is the only way to be sure.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nuke them from orbit .
It is the only way to be sure .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nuke them from orbit.
It is the only way to be sure.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282</id>
	<title>Sounds credible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264703400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you a convicted criminal in your native country and unable to get a job there?  Well, come to the UK, where we'll let in anyone with a sob story on a student visa, not check your background, pay you benefits for as long as you want, then if your sordid past is eventually uncovered after you seemingly inevitably revert to your criminal ways while over here, we'll pay one lot of government employees to try and kick you out <em>while at the same time</em> funding your legal defence to prevent them from doing their jobs.

</p><p>Oh, would you like some free healthcare while you're here? No problem, all you can eat!  Feel free to fly your family in as well - we wouldn't want them missing out.  The White Guilt - <em>it burnssss usssss</em>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you a convicted criminal in your native country and unable to get a job there ?
Well , come to the UK , where we 'll let in anyone with a sob story on a student visa , not check your background , pay you benefits for as long as you want , then if your sordid past is eventually uncovered after you seemingly inevitably revert to your criminal ways while over here , we 'll pay one lot of government employees to try and kick you out while at the same time funding your legal defence to prevent them from doing their jobs .
Oh , would you like some free healthcare while you 're here ?
No problem , all you can eat !
Feel free to fly your family in as well - we would n't want them missing out .
The White Guilt - it burnssss usssss .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you a convicted criminal in your native country and unable to get a job there?
Well, come to the UK, where we'll let in anyone with a sob story on a student visa, not check your background, pay you benefits for as long as you want, then if your sordid past is eventually uncovered after you seemingly inevitably revert to your criminal ways while over here, we'll pay one lot of government employees to try and kick you out while at the same time funding your legal defence to prevent them from doing their jobs.
Oh, would you like some free healthcare while you're here?
No problem, all you can eat!
Feel free to fly your family in as well - we wouldn't want them missing out.
The White Guilt - it burnssss usssss.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936784</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1264704900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?</i>
<br>
<br>
It's possible asking that question in Nigeria would get you a different answer than asking it in the US.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you ?
It 's possible asking that question in Nigeria would get you a different answer than asking it in the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?
It's possible asking that question in Nigeria would get you a different answer than asking it in the US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Skadet</author>
	<datestamp>1264704480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>some folk are tempted into crime when they see their friends earning $4000 a month...</p></div><p>The causal relationship you imply here doesn't exist. It isn't inequality that's at fault, its these lads' greed coupled with lack of morals. I'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>some folk are tempted into crime when they see their friends earning $ 4000 a month...The causal relationship you imply here does n't exist .
It is n't inequality that 's at fault , its these lads ' greed coupled with lack of morals .
I 'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>some folk are tempted into crime when they see their friends earning $4000 a month...The causal relationship you imply here doesn't exist.
It isn't inequality that's at fault, its these lads' greed coupled with lack of morals.
I'm not tempted into crime where I see a Ferrari on the street -- and I would guess that the same is true for most folks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939748</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>wurble</author>
	<datestamp>1264712340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cops charge you big money when you're car is stolen.  They put it in an impound lot and you have to pay to get your own car back after someone else stole it.<br>
<br>
People familiar with impound procedure but never had any dealings with theft for fraud before, and are ignorant of the law, may simply think it's similar.  The legal system is rife with fees.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cops charge you big money when you 're car is stolen .
They put it in an impound lot and you have to pay to get your own car back after someone else stole it .
People familiar with impound procedure but never had any dealings with theft for fraud before , and are ignorant of the law , may simply think it 's similar .
The legal system is rife with fees .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cops charge you big money when you're car is stolen.
They put it in an impound lot and you have to pay to get your own car back after someone else stole it.
People familiar with impound procedure but never had any dealings with theft for fraud before, and are ignorant of the law, may simply think it's similar.
The legal system is rife with fees.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936648</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds credible</title>
	<author>Abcd1234</author>
	<datestamp>1264704480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just a few words for you:  Fuck off you xenophobic, racist prick.</p><p>Thanks, have a good day.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a few words for you : Fuck off you xenophobic , racist prick.Thanks , have a good day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a few words for you:  Fuck off you xenophobic, racist prick.Thanks, have a good day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943450</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>mustafap</author>
	<datestamp>1264681860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?</p><p>I'm guessing you've never worked or lived in Nigeria</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you ? I 'm guessing you 've never worked or lived in Nigeria</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?I'm guessing you've never worked or lived in Nigeria</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944418</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Ihmhi</author>
	<datestamp>1264688220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try living on a $100/month salary and we'll see how tempted you are to steal that Ferrari (which you could sell, at the minimum, for $500 to a chop shop).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try living on a $ 100/month salary and we 'll see how tempted you are to steal that Ferrari ( which you could sell , at the minimum , for $ 500 to a chop shop ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try living on a $100/month salary and we'll see how tempted you are to steal that Ferrari (which you could sell, at the minimum, for $500 to a chop shop).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936600</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>mr\_stinky\_britches</author>
	<datestamp>1264704420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?</p><p>Very clever. I mean only those foolish enough to fall for the first scam could possibly be foolish enough to fall for that line. "John" clearly knows his target audience.</p></div><p>There is nothing clever about it.  How can you be surprised that they keep coming back for more?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you ? Very clever .
I mean only those foolish enough to fall for the first scam could possibly be foolish enough to fall for that line .
" John " clearly knows his target audience.There is nothing clever about it .
How can you be surprised that they keep coming back for more ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?Very clever.
I mean only those foolish enough to fall for the first scam could possibly be foolish enough to fall for that line.
"John" clearly knows his target audience.There is nothing clever about it.
How can you be surprised that they keep coming back for more?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936586</id>
	<title>Re:Sounds credible</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264704360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>a student visa, not check your background, pay you benefits for as long as you want</p></div></blockquote><p>
When did Slashdot become The Daily Mail? Getting a student visa isn't as easy you think (they do check your background. You know, to make sure you're a student, for a start) and you can't claim benefits if you're here on a student visa.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a student visa , not check your background , pay you benefits for as long as you want When did Slashdot become The Daily Mail ?
Getting a student visa is n't as easy you think ( they do check your background .
You know , to make sure you 're a student , for a start ) and you ca n't claim benefits if you 're here on a student visa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a student visa, not check your background, pay you benefits for as long as you want
When did Slashdot become The Daily Mail?
Getting a student visa isn't as easy you think (they do check your background.
You know, to make sure you're a student, for a start) and you can't claim benefits if you're here on a student visa.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936676</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264704600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Throwing good money after bad is hardly limited to 419 victims. It's like an IT project that you've invested a ton of money in and isn't performing and you've thrown out your Indian outsourcing team but this new team claims they can salvage most of it for a little more money. And they end up paying and ultimately still scrapping the whole system because it's hopeless but nobody wanted to admit the money is really gone. That part is really just human.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Throwing good money after bad is hardly limited to 419 victims .
It 's like an IT project that you 've invested a ton of money in and is n't performing and you 've thrown out your Indian outsourcing team but this new team claims they can salvage most of it for a little more money .
And they end up paying and ultimately still scrapping the whole system because it 's hopeless but nobody wanted to admit the money is really gone .
That part is really just human .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Throwing good money after bad is hardly limited to 419 victims.
It's like an IT project that you've invested a ton of money in and isn't performing and you've thrown out your Indian outsourcing team but this new team claims they can salvage most of it for a little more money.
And they end up paying and ultimately still scrapping the whole system because it's hopeless but nobody wanted to admit the money is really gone.
That part is really just human.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936702</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264704720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?</p></div></blockquote><p>Yeah, that part made me laugh.  I've never heard of the cops returning anyone's stolen property.  Including the one case I know of where they caught the crooks with the property.  The cops wanted my uncle to ID his property to help convict them.  They never returned it to him.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you ? Yeah , that part made me laugh .
I 've never heard of the cops returning anyone 's stolen property .
Including the one case I know of where they caught the crooks with the property .
The cops wanted my uncle to ID his property to help convict them .
They never returned it to him .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When was the last time you had to pay the cops for a stolen wallet or purse that belonged to you?Yeah, that part made me laugh.
I've never heard of the cops returning anyone's stolen property.
Including the one case I know of where they caught the crooks with the property.
The cops wanted my uncle to ID his property to help convict them.
They never returned it to him.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936666</id>
	<title>what a crappy journalist</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264704600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The interviewer got angry at the interviewee and hung up on them.  Way to be professional.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The interviewer got angry at the interviewee and hung up on them .
Way to be professional .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The interviewer got angry at the interviewee and hung up on them.
Way to be professional.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939674</id>
	<title>Good papers about 419 fraud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264712100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article told us nothing new. If you want good background information about Advance fee frauds, read these:</p><ul><li>Harvey Glickman: <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.haverford.edu/pols/faculty/glickman/Articles/CJAS\_Text\_final\_1-35.pdf" title="archive.org" rel="nofollow">The Nigerian &ldquo;419&rdquo; Advance Fee Scams: Prank or Peril?</a> [archive.org] (117 kB PDF)</li><li> <a href="http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/research/africa/papers/view/-/id/410/" title="chathamhouse.org.uk" rel="nofollow">Nigeria-Related Financial Crime and its links with Britain</a> [chathamhouse.org.uk] (280 kB PDF)</li><li>Pauline Reich: <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.aic.gov.au/conferences/2004/reich.pdf" title="archive.org" rel="nofollow">Advance Fee Scams In-Country and Across Borders</a> [archive.org] (490 kB PDF)</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article told us nothing new .
If you want good background information about Advance fee frauds , read these : Harvey Glickman : The Nigerian    419    Advance Fee Scams : Prank or Peril ?
[ archive.org ] ( 117 kB PDF ) Nigeria-Related Financial Crime and its links with Britain [ chathamhouse.org.uk ] ( 280 kB PDF ) Pauline Reich : Advance Fee Scams In-Country and Across Borders [ archive.org ] ( 490 kB PDF )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article told us nothing new.
If you want good background information about Advance fee frauds, read these:Harvey Glickman: The Nigerian “419” Advance Fee Scams: Prank or Peril?
[archive.org] (117 kB PDF) Nigeria-Related Financial Crime and its links with Britain [chathamhouse.org.uk] (280 kB PDF)Pauline Reich: Advance Fee Scams In-Country and Across Borders [archive.org] (490 kB PDF)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936942</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>sjames</author>
	<datestamp>1264705380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're not tempted by the Ferrari because odds are, you can afford the transportation you need. OTOH, if you were living in the alley across from work because you couldn't afford a car or an apartment within reasonable transportation to work, you'd be a LOT more tempted, especially if the odds of being caught were next to nil. I'm not saying you'd take it, but you WOULD be more tempted.</p><p>If you grew up and lived in a society where the only people you ever knew who actually had their physical needs met were corrupt, you might never develop a proper sense of morals at all. Every life lesson would be that morals make you starve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're not tempted by the Ferrari because odds are , you can afford the transportation you need .
OTOH , if you were living in the alley across from work because you could n't afford a car or an apartment within reasonable transportation to work , you 'd be a LOT more tempted , especially if the odds of being caught were next to nil .
I 'm not saying you 'd take it , but you WOULD be more tempted.If you grew up and lived in a society where the only people you ever knew who actually had their physical needs met were corrupt , you might never develop a proper sense of morals at all .
Every life lesson would be that morals make you starve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're not tempted by the Ferrari because odds are, you can afford the transportation you need.
OTOH, if you were living in the alley across from work because you couldn't afford a car or an apartment within reasonable transportation to work, you'd be a LOT more tempted, especially if the odds of being caught were next to nil.
I'm not saying you'd take it, but you WOULD be more tempted.If you grew up and lived in a society where the only people you ever knew who actually had their physical needs met were corrupt, you might never develop a proper sense of morals at all.
Every life lesson would be that morals make you starve.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936632</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264704480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So what's the solution?</p></div><ol>
<li>Close Western Union offices in Nigeria.</li>
<li>Inform the public about those scams. I think the ISPs and Email service providers should send regular reminders by Email about those scams AND new variants that appear.</li>
</ol><p>
This way, there are fewer possibilities to send money to Nigeria, and we keep users informed about latest tricks.
<br> <br>
And after that, if you get caught, you deserved it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So what 's the solution ?
Close Western Union offices in Nigeria .
Inform the public about those scams .
I think the ISPs and Email service providers should send regular reminders by Email about those scams AND new variants that appear .
This way , there are fewer possibilities to send money to Nigeria , and we keep users informed about latest tricks .
And after that , if you get caught , you deserved it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what's the solution?
Close Western Union offices in Nigeria.
Inform the public about those scams.
I think the ISPs and Email service providers should send regular reminders by Email about those scams AND new variants that appear.
This way, there are fewer possibilities to send money to Nigeria, and we keep users informed about latest tricks.
And after that, if you get caught, you deserved it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943646</id>
	<title>Re:Haha!</title>
	<author>taucross</author>
	<datestamp>1264683120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any sufficiently advanced scam is indistinguishable from business.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any sufficiently advanced scam is indistinguishable from business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any sufficiently advanced scam is indistinguishable from business.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936676</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943682</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>bigbird</author>
	<datestamp>1264683240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Which is why most folks don't own Ferraris, and most Ferrari owners have some pretty questionable behaviour in their past. You don't get that kind of money without doing something pretty slimey for a living, like being a bank executive or otherwise participating in the amoral circus that is the American financial system.</i> </p><p>Or you could be a successful athlete, business owner, doctor, dentist,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... and not all bankers are immoral y'know.</p><p>Sounds like envy to me. In my experience of knowing quite a few rich people, they are no different to anyone else in their morals. Perhaps you're thinking of Russian oligarchs or the mafia.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which is why most folks do n't own Ferraris , and most Ferrari owners have some pretty questionable behaviour in their past .
You do n't get that kind of money without doing something pretty slimey for a living , like being a bank executive or otherwise participating in the amoral circus that is the American financial system .
Or you could be a successful athlete , business owner , doctor , dentist , .... and not all bankers are immoral y'know.Sounds like envy to me .
In my experience of knowing quite a few rich people , they are no different to anyone else in their morals .
Perhaps you 're thinking of Russian oligarchs or the mafia .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Which is why most folks don't own Ferraris, and most Ferrari owners have some pretty questionable behaviour in their past.
You don't get that kind of money without doing something pretty slimey for a living, like being a bank executive or otherwise participating in the amoral circus that is the American financial system.
Or you could be a successful athlete, business owner, doctor, dentist, .... and not all bankers are immoral y'know.Sounds like envy to me.
In my experience of knowing quite a few rich people, they are no different to anyone else in their morals.
Perhaps you're thinking of Russian oligarchs or the mafia.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944494</id>
	<title>Re:Shock news! high income tempts youth into crime</title>
	<author>ajlisows</author>
	<datestamp>1264688700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I send money to other countries Western Union quite frequently to purchase certain goods like Medication (Not Narcotics, stuff for my grandparents, stuff that insurance doesn't want to touch like Provigil that is expensive here) and the occasional lot of stuff that I have a market to resell.  For the record I've probably done business with 20 different people in other countries and never gotten burned.</p><p>Every single time I send money....even if I've sent it to the same receiver a dozen times....I get asked a bunch of questions by the Western Union or Moneygram rep.  "Are you sure you aren't responding to an EMAIL about a business proposition?  Are you sure that you know and trust this person?  Are you familiar with 419 scams?  You do realize we can't help you get your money back?"</p><p>I hate to say it, but I can't even begin to imagine the degree of stupid that someone must be to still go through with it when the Western Union rep is word for word describing their situation.  These people HAVE been warned, they just don't care.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I send money to other countries Western Union quite frequently to purchase certain goods like Medication ( Not Narcotics , stuff for my grandparents , stuff that insurance does n't want to touch like Provigil that is expensive here ) and the occasional lot of stuff that I have a market to resell .
For the record I 've probably done business with 20 different people in other countries and never gotten burned.Every single time I send money....even if I 've sent it to the same receiver a dozen times....I get asked a bunch of questions by the Western Union or Moneygram rep. " Are you sure you are n't responding to an EMAIL about a business proposition ?
Are you sure that you know and trust this person ?
Are you familiar with 419 scams ?
You do realize we ca n't help you get your money back ?
" I hate to say it , but I ca n't even begin to imagine the degree of stupid that someone must be to still go through with it when the Western Union rep is word for word describing their situation .
These people HAVE been warned , they just do n't care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I send money to other countries Western Union quite frequently to purchase certain goods like Medication (Not Narcotics, stuff for my grandparents, stuff that insurance doesn't want to touch like Provigil that is expensive here) and the occasional lot of stuff that I have a market to resell.
For the record I've probably done business with 20 different people in other countries and never gotten burned.Every single time I send money....even if I've sent it to the same receiver a dozen times....I get asked a bunch of questions by the Western Union or Moneygram rep.  "Are you sure you aren't responding to an EMAIL about a business proposition?
Are you sure that you know and trust this person?
Are you familiar with 419 scams?
You do realize we can't help you get your money back?
"I hate to say it, but I can't even begin to imagine the degree of stupid that someone must be to still go through with it when the Western Union rep is word for word describing their situation.
These people HAVE been warned, they just don't care.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936632</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30948000
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938736
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939006
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944852
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939152
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30951068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30940930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937982
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_56</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_59</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30942580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30941114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939256
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936732
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936666
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936784
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937958
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_57</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938150
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30950644
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936600
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_60</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938326
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30941116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30952136
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_58</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30942654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_28_1624211_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_1624211.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937244
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937958
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936912
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938782
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_1624211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937142
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_1624211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936428
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936634
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938002
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937076
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938150
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944418
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937476
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943980
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30951068
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936942
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937982
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937582
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30942580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936632
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937192
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_1624211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936666
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939152
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937144
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30940930
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_1624211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936732
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939256
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30941114
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_1624211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937686
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944694
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944790
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_1624211.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30942654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936648
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_28_1624211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30952136
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30948000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30950644
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939748
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936676
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944852
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30939128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30943450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30941116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938736
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937488
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936600
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30936702
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30938326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30944198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_28_1624211.30937004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
