<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_27_2322220</id>
	<title>Twitter Developing Technology To Thwart Censorship</title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1264600200000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>SHMG writes <i>"Micro-blogging site Twitter is <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100127/twitter-working-thwart-censorship.htm">developing technology that will prevent government censorship,</a> after Iran and China moved to censor its users. Speaking at the World Economic Forum, Twitter CEO and co-founder Evan Williams said the company was working on 'hacks' to stop any blocking by foreign governments. 'We are partially blocked in China and other places and we were in Iran as well,' he said. 'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>SHMG writes " Micro-blogging site Twitter is developing technology that will prevent government censorship , after Iran and China moved to censor its users .
Speaking at the World Economic Forum , Twitter CEO and co-founder Evan Williams said the company was working on 'hacks ' to stop any blocking by foreign governments .
'We are partially blocked in China and other places and we were in Iran as well, ' he said .
'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>SHMG writes "Micro-blogging site Twitter is developing technology that will prevent government censorship, after Iran and China moved to censor its users.
Speaking at the World Economic Forum, Twitter CEO and co-founder Evan Williams said the company was working on 'hacks' to stop any blocking by foreign governments.
'We are partially blocked in China and other places and we were in Iran as well,' he said.
'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929340</id>
	<title>Re:How far should social responsibility reach?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264610520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The entire point of having more than one government, of having national rather than global governments, is so that governments and citizens of other nations can step in when a national government has oppressed its bounds. We can argue about where the appropriate boundary is (for example, if it came to violence, I certainly wouldn't approve of a corporation like Twitter arming revolutionaries or lending its support to dissident groups), but I would argue that a group of people working to make means of communication available among repressed people is clearly within its bounds, regardless of whether the repressive government in question approves of this communication.
<br> <br>
This is, of course, leaving aside the possibility (if not likelihood) that for Twitter this is as much about image and self-promotion as activism. But if it is, so what? No one does anything for just one reason, and I approve of their action whatever the reasoning behind it may be.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The entire point of having more than one government , of having national rather than global governments , is so that governments and citizens of other nations can step in when a national government has oppressed its bounds .
We can argue about where the appropriate boundary is ( for example , if it came to violence , I certainly would n't approve of a corporation like Twitter arming revolutionaries or lending its support to dissident groups ) , but I would argue that a group of people working to make means of communication available among repressed people is clearly within its bounds , regardless of whether the repressive government in question approves of this communication .
This is , of course , leaving aside the possibility ( if not likelihood ) that for Twitter this is as much about image and self-promotion as activism .
But if it is , so what ?
No one does anything for just one reason , and I approve of their action whatever the reasoning behind it may be .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The entire point of having more than one government, of having national rather than global governments, is so that governments and citizens of other nations can step in when a national government has oppressed its bounds.
We can argue about where the appropriate boundary is (for example, if it came to violence, I certainly wouldn't approve of a corporation like Twitter arming revolutionaries or lending its support to dissident groups), but I would argue that a group of people working to make means of communication available among repressed people is clearly within its bounds, regardless of whether the repressive government in question approves of this communication.
This is, of course, leaving aside the possibility (if not likelihood) that for Twitter this is as much about image and self-promotion as activism.
But if it is, so what?
No one does anything for just one reason, and I approve of their action whatever the reasoning behind it may be.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30932688</id>
	<title>Re:Other companies should follow suit.</title>
	<author>assertation</author>
	<datestamp>1264691160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is because Twitter is still new.  When they get more established, have more money on the line and employ the types of people/professionals a company gets when it is established they will act the same.</p><p>Those other 3 companies were cool when they were new and small.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is because Twitter is still new .
When they get more established , have more money on the line and employ the types of people/professionals a company gets when it is established they will act the same.Those other 3 companies were cool when they were new and small .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is because Twitter is still new.
When they get more established, have more money on the line and employ the types of people/professionals a company gets when it is established they will act the same.Those other 3 companies were cool when they were new and small.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930516</id>
	<title>Don't be evil</title>
	<author>legio\_noctis</author>
	<datestamp>1264710960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least somebody's picking up Google's old motto.

There's only one teeensy problem: they have no income.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least somebody 's picking up Google 's old motto .
There 's only one teeensy problem : they have no income .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least somebody's picking up Google's old motto.
There's only one teeensy problem: they have no income.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928660</id>
	<title>Other companies should follow suit.</title>
	<author>Ralph Spoilsport</author>
	<datestamp>1264604280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about.'"</i>
<p>
That Google / Apple / Microsoft / etc. would ever make such a statement...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about .
' " That Google / Apple / Microsoft / etc .
would ever make such a statement.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about.
'"

That Google / Apple / Microsoft / etc.
would ever make such a statement...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929790</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1264615500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"War on terror" followed 9/11 in a time when everybody, media included, trusted the government much more than usual or that they should. Basically, NATO was ready to attack any nation we pointed at. However, Bush waited too long before pointing at Iraq, and the weakness and unsoundness of the reasons why destroyed that trust.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" War on terror " followed 9/11 in a time when everybody , media included , trusted the government much more than usual or that they should .
Basically , NATO was ready to attack any nation we pointed at .
However , Bush waited too long before pointing at Iraq , and the weakness and unsoundness of the reasons why destroyed that trust .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"War on terror" followed 9/11 in a time when everybody, media included, trusted the government much more than usual or that they should.
Basically, NATO was ready to attack any nation we pointed at.
However, Bush waited too long before pointing at Iraq, and the weakness and unsoundness of the reasons why destroyed that trust.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929626</id>
	<title>Re:How far should social responsibility reach?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264613820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sea shepeard do great work, your terrorism spin is plain ludicrous.</p><p>In fact the Japanese whalers are the people breaking the law, as their blatant deliberate ramming and sinking of a sea shepard boat recently attests.</p><p>The rape of the seas thru bottom scraping overfishing is an upcoming disaster of epic proportions, and personally, I support Sea shepard 100\%.</p><p>What drives your irrational dislike of them I wonder? I smell a financial incentive.</p></div><p>
Even Greenpeace refers to Watson as "a violent extremist and an eco-terrorist". ( <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/5166346/Paul-Watson-Sea-Shepherd-eco-warrior-fighting-to-stop-whaling-and-seal-hunts.html" title="telegraph.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/5166346/Paul-Watson-Sea-Shepherd-eco-warrior-fighting-to-stop-whaling-and-seal-hunts.html</a> [telegraph.co.uk] )
</p><p>
I don't support whaling but I would also like to see Sea Shepherd blown out of the water (non-violently...)
</p><p>
I'll have my financial incentive now please.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sea shepeard do great work , your terrorism spin is plain ludicrous.In fact the Japanese whalers are the people breaking the law , as their blatant deliberate ramming and sinking of a sea shepard boat recently attests.The rape of the seas thru bottom scraping overfishing is an upcoming disaster of epic proportions , and personally , I support Sea shepard 100 \ % .What drives your irrational dislike of them I wonder ?
I smell a financial incentive .
Even Greenpeace refers to Watson as " a violent extremist and an eco-terrorist " .
( http : //www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/5166346/Paul-Watson-Sea-Shepherd-eco-warrior-fighting-to-stop-whaling-and-seal-hunts.html [ telegraph.co.uk ] ) I do n't support whaling but I would also like to see Sea Shepherd blown out of the water ( non-violently... ) I 'll have my financial incentive now please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sea shepeard do great work, your terrorism spin is plain ludicrous.In fact the Japanese whalers are the people breaking the law, as their blatant deliberate ramming and sinking of a sea shepard boat recently attests.The rape of the seas thru bottom scraping overfishing is an upcoming disaster of epic proportions, and personally, I support Sea shepard 100\%.What drives your irrational dislike of them I wonder?
I smell a financial incentive.
Even Greenpeace refers to Watson as "a violent extremist and an eco-terrorist".
( http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/5166346/Paul-Watson-Sea-Shepherd-eco-warrior-fighting-to-stop-whaling-and-seal-hunts.html [telegraph.co.uk] )

I don't support whaling but I would also like to see Sea Shepherd blown out of the water (non-violently...)

I'll have my financial incentive now please.

	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929836</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264615920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just hate this line of argument, which is unfortunately too common.</p><p><i>Article on how HIV/Aids is a big problem in Africa.</i><br>HIV is a big problem in the US too.</p><p>1. -- Insert significantly affected country here. --<br>2. Insert \_relatively\_ marginally affected country here.<br>3. Claim the situation is very similar, and hence the article to be moot.<br>4. Profit!!</p><p>In China, every day broadcasters are summoned by a Govt. agency to tell them what can be published, or should be taken off. This includes even cultural news, entertainment and other seemingly innocuous news - because they prefer such control being absolute.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just hate this line of argument , which is unfortunately too common.Article on how HIV/Aids is a big problem in Africa.HIV is a big problem in the US too.1 .
-- Insert significantly affected country here .
--2. Insert \ _relatively \ _ marginally affected country here.3 .
Claim the situation is very similar , and hence the article to be moot.4 .
Profit ! ! In China , every day broadcasters are summoned by a Govt .
agency to tell them what can be published , or should be taken off .
This includes even cultural news , entertainment and other seemingly innocuous news - because they prefer such control being absolute .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just hate this line of argument, which is unfortunately too common.Article on how HIV/Aids is a big problem in Africa.HIV is a big problem in the US too.1.
-- Insert significantly affected country here.
--2. Insert \_relatively\_ marginally affected country here.3.
Claim the situation is very similar, and hence the article to be moot.4.
Profit!!In China, every day broadcasters are summoned by a Govt.
agency to tell them what can be published, or should be taken off.
This includes even cultural news, entertainment and other seemingly innocuous news - because they prefer such control being absolute.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930588</id>
	<title>Thank God for China...</title>
	<author>dragisha</author>
	<datestamp>1264711980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because US (and of course many other) developers can work on anti-censor tools in stealth mode!</p><p>If for not such a noble reason, such technologies would never be allowed to be even talked about.... But I doubt if noble reason is protection enough - secret orders for implementing backdoors are normal thing to expect.</p><p>Probably some people in Iran and China are making tools to counter censorship in US as we speak.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because US ( and of course many other ) developers can work on anti-censor tools in stealth mode ! If for not such a noble reason , such technologies would never be allowed to be even talked about.... But I doubt if noble reason is protection enough - secret orders for implementing backdoors are normal thing to expect.Probably some people in Iran and China are making tools to counter censorship in US as we speak .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because US (and of course many other) developers can work on anti-censor tools in stealth mode!If for not such a noble reason, such technologies would never be allowed to be even talked about.... But I doubt if noble reason is protection enough - secret orders for implementing backdoors are normal thing to expect.Probably some people in Iran and China are making tools to counter censorship in US as we speak.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929314</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264610280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hypothetically speaking, if there is a way to freely share copyrighted content on twitter, will the US government tries to censor this information? Or more likely, will the US government pressure Twitter CEO and co-founder Evan Williams to censor these postings and would Evan give in? Just to point out that hypocrisy works both ways.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hypothetically speaking , if there is a way to freely share copyrighted content on twitter , will the US government tries to censor this information ?
Or more likely , will the US government pressure Twitter CEO and co-founder Evan Williams to censor these postings and would Evan give in ?
Just to point out that hypocrisy works both ways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hypothetically speaking, if there is a way to freely share copyrighted content on twitter, will the US government tries to censor this information?
Or more likely, will the US government pressure Twitter CEO and co-founder Evan Williams to censor these postings and would Evan give in?
Just to point out that hypocrisy works both ways.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30945270</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>electrons\_are\_brave</author>
	<datestamp>1264695300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can recall one apart from 1905 &amp; 1917 - the attempted coup in 1991 (the August Coup). It was extensively reported in Australia.<p>

How many others there were I don't know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can recall one apart from 1905 &amp; 1917 - the attempted coup in 1991 ( the August Coup ) .
It was extensively reported in Australia .
How many others there were I do n't know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can recall one apart from 1905 &amp; 1917 - the attempted coup in 1991 (the August Coup).
It was extensively reported in Australia.
How many others there were I don't know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928946</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264606380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Apparently the coupsters did not succeed at taking the news media...</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently the coupsters did not succeed at taking the news media.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently the coupsters did not succeed at taking the news media...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929318</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter technology to fight censorship...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264610280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah awesome we'll drown out all the cries of millions dying and being oppressed by flooding the world with information about what i'm eating for breakfast and when took my last bow movement.</p><p>It's the <i>peoples</i> form of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers\_station" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Numbers station</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Fight the powers that B.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah awesome we 'll drown out all the cries of millions dying and being oppressed by flooding the world with information about what i 'm eating for breakfast and when took my last bow movement.It 's the peoples form of a Numbers station [ wikipedia.org ] Fight the powers that B .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah awesome we'll drown out all the cries of millions dying and being oppressed by flooding the world with information about what i'm eating for breakfast and when took my last bow movement.It's the peoples form of a Numbers station [wikipedia.org]Fight the powers that B.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930620</id>
	<title>Twitter is developing technology?</title>
	<author>melted</author>
	<datestamp>1264712220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's something new for them. Up to now they've only been developing new ways to milk the gullible VCs.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's something new for them .
Up to now they 've only been developing new ways to milk the gullible VCs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's something new for them.
Up to now they've only been developing new ways to milk the gullible VCs.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929222</id>
	<title>Re:How far should social responsibility reach?</title>
	<author>Falconhell</author>
	<datestamp>1264609380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sea shepeard do great work, your terrorism spin is plain ludicrous.</p><p>In fact the Japanese whalers are the people breaking the law, as their blatant deliberate ramming and sinking of a sea shepard boat recently attests.</p><p>The rape of the seas thru bottom scraping overfishing is an upcoming disaster of epic proportions, and personally, I support Sea shepard 100\%.</p><p>What drives your irrational dislike of them I wonder? I smell a financial incentive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sea shepeard do great work , your terrorism spin is plain ludicrous.In fact the Japanese whalers are the people breaking the law , as their blatant deliberate ramming and sinking of a sea shepard boat recently attests.The rape of the seas thru bottom scraping overfishing is an upcoming disaster of epic proportions , and personally , I support Sea shepard 100 \ % .What drives your irrational dislike of them I wonder ?
I smell a financial incentive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sea shepeard do great work, your terrorism spin is plain ludicrous.In fact the Japanese whalers are the people breaking the law, as their blatant deliberate ramming and sinking of a sea shepard boat recently attests.The rape of the seas thru bottom scraping overfishing is an upcoming disaster of epic proportions, and personally, I support Sea shepard 100\%.What drives your irrational dislike of them I wonder?
I smell a financial incentive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928780</id>
	<title>Keep Reinventing the Wheel</title>
	<author>PurpleCarrot</author>
	<datestamp>1264605240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are many users of Twitter, Facebook, and LiveJournal that use Tor and other anonymizing proxies to get around constricting and censoring firewalls. If Twitter thinks they can do it better, by all means, but have they even reached out to some of the existing communities working on this problem before diving headlong into it themselves?</p><p>I know for a fact that LiveJournal has a cordial relationship with the Tor project, and, when abuse from Tor spikes, has always worked with the project to ensure access from Tor users is quickly restored. I would be surprised if Twitter didn't have similar issues and that they wouldn't know about Tor, what with the Iran dissidents and Chinese users.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are many users of Twitter , Facebook , and LiveJournal that use Tor and other anonymizing proxies to get around constricting and censoring firewalls .
If Twitter thinks they can do it better , by all means , but have they even reached out to some of the existing communities working on this problem before diving headlong into it themselves ? I know for a fact that LiveJournal has a cordial relationship with the Tor project , and , when abuse from Tor spikes , has always worked with the project to ensure access from Tor users is quickly restored .
I would be surprised if Twitter did n't have similar issues and that they would n't know about Tor , what with the Iran dissidents and Chinese users .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are many users of Twitter, Facebook, and LiveJournal that use Tor and other anonymizing proxies to get around constricting and censoring firewalls.
If Twitter thinks they can do it better, by all means, but have they even reached out to some of the existing communities working on this problem before diving headlong into it themselves?I know for a fact that LiveJournal has a cordial relationship with the Tor project, and, when abuse from Tor spikes, has always worked with the project to ensure access from Tor users is quickly restored.
I would be surprised if Twitter didn't have similar issues and that they wouldn't know about Tor, what with the Iran dissidents and Chinese users.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928726</id>
	<title>Re:Other companies should follow suit.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264604820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Twitter has no real incentive to make a profit, as contrasted to the others. Keep in mind they have some weird setup with long term VC funding or something and a "worry about it later" attitude to profits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Twitter has no real incentive to make a profit , as contrasted to the others .
Keep in mind they have some weird setup with long term VC funding or something and a " worry about it later " attitude to profits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Twitter has no real incentive to make a profit, as contrasted to the others.
Keep in mind they have some weird setup with long term VC funding or something and a "worry about it later" attitude to profits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929858</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>sp3d2orbit</author>
	<datestamp>1264616220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is no comparison between US censorship and Chinese or Iranian. If there was Jon Stewart would be dead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no comparison between US censorship and Chinese or Iranian .
If there was Jon Stewart would be dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no comparison between US censorship and Chinese or Iranian.
If there was Jon Stewart would be dead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929220</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929638</id>
	<title>Re:How far should social responsibility reach?</title>
	<author>Aliotroph</author>
	<datestamp>1264613940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know about him, but I was sitting around a campfire with a Sea Shepherd guy and he told me they sink ships.  Sure, the commercial guys are doing things that are obviously wrong, but sinking ships sounds like terrorism to me.  They're not considering the motivations and knowledge of everyone involved; they're just attacking the ships involved, effectively using intimidation to get what they want.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know about him , but I was sitting around a campfire with a Sea Shepherd guy and he told me they sink ships .
Sure , the commercial guys are doing things that are obviously wrong , but sinking ships sounds like terrorism to me .
They 're not considering the motivations and knowledge of everyone involved ; they 're just attacking the ships involved , effectively using intimidation to get what they want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know about him, but I was sitting around a campfire with a Sea Shepherd guy and he told me they sink ships.
Sure, the commercial guys are doing things that are obviously wrong, but sinking ships sounds like terrorism to me.
They're not considering the motivations and knowledge of everyone involved; they're just attacking the ships involved, effectively using intimidation to get what they want.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928798</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264605300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could have just said "In Soviet Russia, government selects you."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could have just said " In Soviet Russia , government selects you .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could have just said "In Soviet Russia, government selects you.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30932758</id>
	<title>That quote comes to mind</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1264691640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about.'</p></div></blockquote><p>
So... don't find a LAN war in Asia?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about .
' So... do n't find a LAN war in Asia ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about.
'
So... don't find a LAN war in Asia?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929220</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1264609380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Governments like Iran and China aren't the only ones who want to control all forms of communications. The US Government squashed numerous stories relating to the War on Terror by either asking news organizations not to publish or by claiming national security and <i>telling</i> them not to publish. The telecom spying scandal is the first example that comes to mind.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Governments like Iran and China are n't the only ones who want to control all forms of communications .
The US Government squashed numerous stories relating to the War on Terror by either asking news organizations not to publish or by claiming national security and telling them not to publish .
The telecom spying scandal is the first example that comes to mind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Governments like Iran and China aren't the only ones who want to control all forms of communications.
The US Government squashed numerous stories relating to the War on Terror by either asking news organizations not to publish or by claiming national security and telling them not to publish.
The telecom spying scandal is the first example that comes to mind.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680</id>
	<title>How far should social responsibility reach?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264604460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think we can all agree that censorship is a bad thing, but how far should such social responsibility reach? Should companies be concerned about social responsibility in countries which are not their own? Should they help criminals violate the laws of their own countries? Is aiding and abetting in the name of freedom something that companies should really be doing?</p><p>Take for example Bob Barker, a major donor to the Sea Shepherds. The Sea Shepherds practice terrorism on the high seas in an effort to eliminate practices which they see as abhorrent, namely whaling and drag net trawling. Barker, with his name and money, support these actions which are in violation of international law. Likewise, New Zealand and Australia also provide shelter for the group by refusing to prosecute them for illegal actions taken in their waters. These supporters and harborers of the terrorist organization are just as responsible as the terrorist organization itself.</p><p>However, it would be somewhat odd if a completely unrelated country like, say, Armenia got involved and tried to sink the Sea Shepherd's ships or arrested Bob Barker for international terrorism. It's just not their problem.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we can all agree that censorship is a bad thing , but how far should such social responsibility reach ?
Should companies be concerned about social responsibility in countries which are not their own ?
Should they help criminals violate the laws of their own countries ?
Is aiding and abetting in the name of freedom something that companies should really be doing ? Take for example Bob Barker , a major donor to the Sea Shepherds .
The Sea Shepherds practice terrorism on the high seas in an effort to eliminate practices which they see as abhorrent , namely whaling and drag net trawling .
Barker , with his name and money , support these actions which are in violation of international law .
Likewise , New Zealand and Australia also provide shelter for the group by refusing to prosecute them for illegal actions taken in their waters .
These supporters and harborers of the terrorist organization are just as responsible as the terrorist organization itself.However , it would be somewhat odd if a completely unrelated country like , say , Armenia got involved and tried to sink the Sea Shepherd 's ships or arrested Bob Barker for international terrorism .
It 's just not their problem .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we can all agree that censorship is a bad thing, but how far should such social responsibility reach?
Should companies be concerned about social responsibility in countries which are not their own?
Should they help criminals violate the laws of their own countries?
Is aiding and abetting in the name of freedom something that companies should really be doing?Take for example Bob Barker, a major donor to the Sea Shepherds.
The Sea Shepherds practice terrorism on the high seas in an effort to eliminate practices which they see as abhorrent, namely whaling and drag net trawling.
Barker, with his name and money, support these actions which are in violation of international law.
Likewise, New Zealand and Australia also provide shelter for the group by refusing to prosecute them for illegal actions taken in their waters.
These supporters and harborers of the terrorist organization are just as responsible as the terrorist organization itself.However, it would be somewhat odd if a completely unrelated country like, say, Armenia got involved and tried to sink the Sea Shepherd's ships or arrested Bob Barker for international terrorism.
It's just not their problem.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30933582</id>
	<title>Re:How far should social responsibility reach?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264695900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't you understand? One man's terrorist is another man's hero. All these grand distinctions of right and wrong are entirely based off perspective.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't you understand ?
One man 's terrorist is another man 's hero .
All these grand distinctions of right and wrong are entirely based off perspective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't you understand?
One man's terrorist is another man's hero.
All these grand distinctions of right and wrong are entirely based off perspective.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929622</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>asaz989</author>
	<datestamp>1264613820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Citation needed (for these supposed coup attempts). Only one I recall is the '91 one, and one case (a rather uncharacteristic one, seeing as it was the death knell of the Soviet state) doesn't give someone license to go ranting about "every time a coup was attempted in the USSR..."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Citation needed ( for these supposed coup attempts ) .
Only one I recall is the '91 one , and one case ( a rather uncharacteristic one , seeing as it was the death knell of the Soviet state ) does n't give someone license to go ranting about " every time a coup was attempted in the USSR... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Citation needed (for these supposed coup attempts).
Only one I recall is the '91 one, and one case (a rather uncharacteristic one, seeing as it was the death knell of the Soviet state) doesn't give someone license to go ranting about "every time a coup was attempted in the USSR..."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929136</id>
	<title>Well okay.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264608480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone standing up against censorship? I just might sign up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone standing up against censorship ?
I just might sign up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone standing up against censorship?
I just might sign up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30937284</id>
	<title>Re:How far should social responsibility reach?</title>
	<author>Khashishi</author>
	<datestamp>1264706160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man, have you watched Whale Wars at all? All they do is throw stink bombs, and occasionally throw a rope into the water to foul up a propeller.</p><p>If they were real bombs, maybe, you could call them terrorists. But IMHO, vigilantism is different from terrorism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man , have you watched Whale Wars at all ?
All they do is throw stink bombs , and occasionally throw a rope into the water to foul up a propeller.If they were real bombs , maybe , you could call them terrorists .
But IMHO , vigilantism is different from terrorism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man, have you watched Whale Wars at all?
All they do is throw stink bombs, and occasionally throw a rope into the water to foul up a propeller.If they were real bombs, maybe, you could call them terrorists.
But IMHO, vigilantism is different from terrorism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30933218</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>oreaq</author>
	<datestamp>1264694160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The existence of Jon Stewart only show that the methods of controlling the unwashed masses are far more sophisticated in the free world than they are in these backwards communist countries. Political satire is just a valve for all the frustration and anger that oppressive and lying governments cause thus keeping the system stable. Why do you think the king's jester was aloud to make jokes about the king?</htmltext>
<tokenext>The existence of Jon Stewart only show that the methods of controlling the unwashed masses are far more sophisticated in the free world than they are in these backwards communist countries .
Political satire is just a valve for all the frustration and anger that oppressive and lying governments cause thus keeping the system stable .
Why do you think the king 's jester was aloud to make jokes about the king ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The existence of Jon Stewart only show that the methods of controlling the unwashed masses are far more sophisticated in the free world than they are in these backwards communist countries.
Political satire is just a valve for all the frustration and anger that oppressive and lying governments cause thus keeping the system stable.
Why do you think the king's jester was aloud to make jokes about the king?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929858</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929510</id>
	<title>Re:How far should social responsibility reach?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264612680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or a "BadAnalogy".  (The rest of us are used to him.  Please try to keep up.)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or a " BadAnalogy " .
( The rest of us are used to him .
Please try to keep up .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or a "BadAnalogy".
(The rest of us are used to him.
Please try to keep up.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930044</id>
	<title>Re:How far should social responsibility reach?</title>
	<author>sp3d2orbit</author>
	<datestamp>1264618380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i> The Sea Shepherds practice terrorism</i></p><p>If the Sea Shepherds used terrorism they would be a lot more effective. One RPG would put an end to the whaling for at least a season. In words of South Park, they are a bunch of vegan pussies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Sea Shepherds practice terrorismIf the Sea Shepherds used terrorism they would be a lot more effective .
One RPG would put an end to the whaling for at least a season .
In words of South Park , they are a bunch of vegan pussies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> The Sea Shepherds practice terrorismIf the Sea Shepherds used terrorism they would be a lot more effective.
One RPG would put an end to the whaling for at least a season.
In words of South Park, they are a bunch of vegan pussies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929102</id>
	<title>No such thing as censorship</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264608240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>There's no such thing as censorship. After all, everybody who was able to say he/she got censored, didn't get censored saying that; how else would such person say such thing?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)

Srsly; brave effort from Twitter.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's no such thing as censorship .
After all , everybody who was able to say he/she got censored , did n't get censored saying that ; how else would such person say such thing ?
; ) Srsly ; brave effort from Twitter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's no such thing as censorship.
After all, everybody who was able to say he/she got censored, didn't get censored saying that; how else would such person say such thing?
;)

Srsly; brave effort from Twitter.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929324</id>
	<title>People are still using twitter?</title>
	<author>BitZtream</author>
	<datestamp>1264610340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously?  The fad hasn't passed yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ?
The fad has n't passed yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?
The fad hasn't passed yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30938422</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1264708800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That reminds me of a revolution that one of my exgirlfriend's used to always reference to make a point. She always used to tell me about a government in South America (I don't recall what country or the details or anything really) that was effectively toppled by nothing more than a misinformation campaign. Apparently, some sort of freedom fighter movement was convinced not to fight at all by mass published media that spread the information that the opposing forces were glorious and had massive amounts of arms and planes and what not. The sad truth was that the powers that existed actually had a very small defense force that could have easily been toppled by the freedom fighters. However, the misinformation campaign was so successful that it discouraged any type of revolutionary action and, thus, helped create and maintain a regime that really couldn't have existed otherwise. Let's see, some quick googling turns up...
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.ied.info/books/economic-democracy/suppressing" title="ied.info">This.</a> [ied.info]
<br> <br>
It appears I had it completely ass backwards. The CIA and USIA used a confusion and misinformation campaign to make it seem as if multiple groups of Guatemalan freedom fighters were making successful assaults on various cities and military resources, when, in fact, no such military blitz was occurring. The misinformation broadcast on the radio was enough to confuse the populace and overthrow the Arbenz regime.
<br> <br>
So, there you go. I don't know how credible the source is or how biased it is or anything, but it serves, at least, as an interesting parable relating to the power of information. Information brokers really are worth quite a pretty penny. =)</htmltext>
<tokenext>That reminds me of a revolution that one of my exgirlfriend 's used to always reference to make a point .
She always used to tell me about a government in South America ( I do n't recall what country or the details or anything really ) that was effectively toppled by nothing more than a misinformation campaign .
Apparently , some sort of freedom fighter movement was convinced not to fight at all by mass published media that spread the information that the opposing forces were glorious and had massive amounts of arms and planes and what not .
The sad truth was that the powers that existed actually had a very small defense force that could have easily been toppled by the freedom fighters .
However , the misinformation campaign was so successful that it discouraged any type of revolutionary action and , thus , helped create and maintain a regime that really could n't have existed otherwise .
Let 's see , some quick googling turns up.. . This. [ ied.info ] It appears I had it completely ass backwards .
The CIA and USIA used a confusion and misinformation campaign to make it seem as if multiple groups of Guatemalan freedom fighters were making successful assaults on various cities and military resources , when , in fact , no such military blitz was occurring .
The misinformation broadcast on the radio was enough to confuse the populace and overthrow the Arbenz regime .
So , there you go .
I do n't know how credible the source is or how biased it is or anything , but it serves , at least , as an interesting parable relating to the power of information .
Information brokers really are worth quite a pretty penny .
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That reminds me of a revolution that one of my exgirlfriend's used to always reference to make a point.
She always used to tell me about a government in South America (I don't recall what country or the details or anything really) that was effectively toppled by nothing more than a misinformation campaign.
Apparently, some sort of freedom fighter movement was convinced not to fight at all by mass published media that spread the information that the opposing forces were glorious and had massive amounts of arms and planes and what not.
The sad truth was that the powers that existed actually had a very small defense force that could have easily been toppled by the freedom fighters.
However, the misinformation campaign was so successful that it discouraged any type of revolutionary action and, thus, helped create and maintain a regime that really couldn't have existed otherwise.
Let's see, some quick googling turns up...
 
This. [ied.info]
 
It appears I had it completely ass backwards.
The CIA and USIA used a confusion and misinformation campaign to make it seem as if multiple groups of Guatemalan freedom fighters were making successful assaults on various cities and military resources, when, in fact, no such military blitz was occurring.
The misinformation broadcast on the radio was enough to confuse the populace and overthrow the Arbenz regime.
So, there you go.
I don't know how credible the source is or how biased it is or anything, but it serves, at least, as an interesting parable relating to the power of information.
Information brokers really are worth quite a pretty penny.
=)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928652</id>
	<title>...What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264604160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How can one censor censorship? Prevent something from happening before you know what said 'something' will be? This will not work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How can one censor censorship ?
Prevent something from happening before you know what said 'something ' will be ?
This will not work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How can one censor censorship?
Prevent something from happening before you know what said 'something' will be?
This will not work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929242</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264609560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not fail, go out of power. If the people want to put it out of power, it's already failed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not fail , go out of power .
If the people want to put it out of power , it 's already failed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not fail, go out of power.
If the people want to put it out of power, it's already failed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588</id>
	<title>In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264603800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whenever there was a coup attempt going on in the USSR, the first place to get invaded by supporters of the coup the was the broadcasters, and then they had to get to the newspaper before it published the next issue. If they win over the media, they were effectively in power. If the media reports there's a coup in progress, then that would scramble the defenders of the existing rulers and it would fail. If the media reports the coup was successful, then whoever was reported to be the leader effectively had power.</p><p>This is why governments like Iran and China want to control all forms of communications. If people can organize in a way the government can't easily listen in on or censor, then the government is going to fail. As we have seen, a government doesn't need to be good at helping its people as long as its good at controlling them. Squash your opposing people, and you've got an easy time governing the rest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever there was a coup attempt going on in the USSR , the first place to get invaded by supporters of the coup the was the broadcasters , and then they had to get to the newspaper before it published the next issue .
If they win over the media , they were effectively in power .
If the media reports there 's a coup in progress , then that would scramble the defenders of the existing rulers and it would fail .
If the media reports the coup was successful , then whoever was reported to be the leader effectively had power.This is why governments like Iran and China want to control all forms of communications .
If people can organize in a way the government ca n't easily listen in on or censor , then the government is going to fail .
As we have seen , a government does n't need to be good at helping its people as long as its good at controlling them .
Squash your opposing people , and you 've got an easy time governing the rest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever there was a coup attempt going on in the USSR, the first place to get invaded by supporters of the coup the was the broadcasters, and then they had to get to the newspaper before it published the next issue.
If they win over the media, they were effectively in power.
If the media reports there's a coup in progress, then that would scramble the defenders of the existing rulers and it would fail.
If the media reports the coup was successful, then whoever was reported to be the leader effectively had power.This is why governments like Iran and China want to control all forms of communications.
If people can organize in a way the government can't easily listen in on or censor, then the government is going to fail.
As we have seen, a government doesn't need to be good at helping its people as long as its good at controlling them.
Squash your opposing people, and you've got an easy time governing the rest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30947958</id>
	<title>hurrah</title>
	<author>cornflakes4brains</author>
	<datestamp>1264771140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Much as I have no use for twitter, I applaud any entity willing to stand up for the freedoms we claimed to have defended...until it came down to appeasing a police state. Since the only use the Chinese gov seems to have for the internet is attacking everybody else's networks and spreading their propaganda, why not just cut them off entirely from the rest of the internet until they agree to change...and since it's cyberwar they're waging, make it verifiable, like any other arms treaty. Let Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and all the rest who sold out pay the cost of the effort.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Much as I have no use for twitter , I applaud any entity willing to stand up for the freedoms we claimed to have defended...until it came down to appeasing a police state .
Since the only use the Chinese gov seems to have for the internet is attacking everybody else 's networks and spreading their propaganda , why not just cut them off entirely from the rest of the internet until they agree to change...and since it 's cyberwar they 're waging , make it verifiable , like any other arms treaty .
Let Google , Microsoft , Yahoo and all the rest who sold out pay the cost of the effort .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Much as I have no use for twitter, I applaud any entity willing to stand up for the freedoms we claimed to have defended...until it came down to appeasing a police state.
Since the only use the Chinese gov seems to have for the internet is attacking everybody else's networks and spreading their propaganda, why not just cut them off entirely from the rest of the internet until they agree to change...and since it's cyberwar they're waging, make it verifiable, like any other arms treaty.
Let Google, Microsoft, Yahoo and all the rest who sold out pay the cost of the effort.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929232</id>
	<title>I Like Iran</title>
	<author>NSN A392-99-964-5927</author>
	<datestamp>1264609500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh yes, I do and If the USA and other countries started to be more compassionate. We can quit this nonsense regarding Iran being part of an axis of Evil. That fucking money Oil grabber Bourne again Christian "George W Bush".  Moron monkey.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yes , I do and If the USA and other countries started to be more compassionate .
We can quit this nonsense regarding Iran being part of an axis of Evil .
That fucking money Oil grabber Bourne again Christian " George W Bush " .
Moron monkey .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yes, I do and If the USA and other countries started to be more compassionate.
We can quit this nonsense regarding Iran being part of an axis of Evil.
That fucking money Oil grabber Bourne again Christian "George W Bush".
Moron monkey.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30935420</id>
	<title>Re:How far should social responsibility reach?</title>
	<author>jayme0227</author>
	<datestamp>1264701060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From the Princeton Wordnet, Terrorism is:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature.</p></div><p>I believe that Sea Shepherd meets all of these criteria.</p><p>The only part that may be questionable is the "violence" aspect, but in the TV show they've used several tactics that should constitute violence. Just off the top of my head, they've used chemical weapons that caused vomiting. They've boarded an "enemy" ship. They've intentionally destroyed property. I think at least one of these has to constitute violence, even if they are attempting to stay within the technical limits of the law.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the Princeton Wordnet , Terrorism is : The calculated use of violence ( or the threat of violence ) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature.I believe that Sea Shepherd meets all of these criteria.The only part that may be questionable is the " violence " aspect , but in the TV show they 've used several tactics that should constitute violence .
Just off the top of my head , they 've used chemical weapons that caused vomiting .
They 've boarded an " enemy " ship .
They 've intentionally destroyed property .
I think at least one of these has to constitute violence , even if they are attempting to stay within the technical limits of the law .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the Princeton Wordnet, Terrorism is:The calculated use of violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that are political or religious or ideological in nature.I believe that Sea Shepherd meets all of these criteria.The only part that may be questionable is the "violence" aspect, but in the TV show they've used several tactics that should constitute violence.
Just off the top of my head, they've used chemical weapons that caused vomiting.
They've boarded an "enemy" ship.
They've intentionally destroyed property.
I think at least one of these has to constitute violence, even if they are attempting to stay within the technical limits of the law.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930044</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30931242</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>Tim C</author>
	<datestamp>1264676640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unlike in the West, where the media controls the government. (Just think how many laws have been passed or other political decisions made because of media pressure, or how it would have been portrayed in the media...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unlike in the West , where the media controls the government .
( Just think how many laws have been passed or other political decisions made because of media pressure , or how it would have been portrayed in the media... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unlike in the West, where the media controls the government.
(Just think how many laws have been passed or other political decisions made because of media pressure, or how it would have been portrayed in the media...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928876</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264605840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You watched the censored media in the USSR. There were frequent reports of coup attempts in the 80s/90s in the form of attacks in attempt to take over the broadcasters reported on by the American media... you wouldn't have heard about it there, because the government controlled the media.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You watched the censored media in the USSR .
There were frequent reports of coup attempts in the 80s/90s in the form of attacks in attempt to take over the broadcasters reported on by the American media... you would n't have heard about it there , because the government controlled the media .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You watched the censored media in the USSR.
There were frequent reports of coup attempts in the 80s/90s in the form of attacks in attempt to take over the broadcasters reported on by the American media... you wouldn't have heard about it there, because the government controlled the media.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928836</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929162</id>
	<title>problem is twitter users have comfortable life</title>
	<author>jkajala</author>
	<datestamp>1264608780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I seriously doubt it's the Twitter users who will start revolution, at least in China. The revolution is still alive in the masses of countryside, like before. Just look at the incidents which have sparked there recently. For example, in one province a slight rise of bus ticket prices resulted in violent demonstrations. I'm 100\% sure none of them had ever heard about Twitter. Twitter has maybe ~0.3\% reach in China compared to population, that's about less people than Beijing pisses off routinely at once by moving a whole city because of one more dam or railroad every few months.

Still, I have to give credit to Beijing as well. China's growth and drive has been nothing but unbelievable. It would not have been possible without making strong and fast decisions without asking much from the people. It's very easy to build a railroad if you just relocate the people by sending them a letter with two weeks notice time. China is run more like a company than western countries, and western companies generally love it. At least as long as it doesn't cross their interests.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I seriously doubt it 's the Twitter users who will start revolution , at least in China .
The revolution is still alive in the masses of countryside , like before .
Just look at the incidents which have sparked there recently .
For example , in one province a slight rise of bus ticket prices resulted in violent demonstrations .
I 'm 100 \ % sure none of them had ever heard about Twitter .
Twitter has maybe ~ 0.3 \ % reach in China compared to population , that 's about less people than Beijing pisses off routinely at once by moving a whole city because of one more dam or railroad every few months .
Still , I have to give credit to Beijing as well .
China 's growth and drive has been nothing but unbelievable .
It would not have been possible without making strong and fast decisions without asking much from the people .
It 's very easy to build a railroad if you just relocate the people by sending them a letter with two weeks notice time .
China is run more like a company than western countries , and western companies generally love it .
At least as long as it does n't cross their interests .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seriously doubt it's the Twitter users who will start revolution, at least in China.
The revolution is still alive in the masses of countryside, like before.
Just look at the incidents which have sparked there recently.
For example, in one province a slight rise of bus ticket prices resulted in violent demonstrations.
I'm 100\% sure none of them had ever heard about Twitter.
Twitter has maybe ~0.3\% reach in China compared to population, that's about less people than Beijing pisses off routinely at once by moving a whole city because of one more dam or railroad every few months.
Still, I have to give credit to Beijing as well.
China's growth and drive has been nothing but unbelievable.
It would not have been possible without making strong and fast decisions without asking much from the people.
It's very easy to build a railroad if you just relocate the people by sending them a letter with two weeks notice time.
China is run more like a company than western countries, and western companies generally love it.
At least as long as it doesn't cross their interests.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929378</id>
	<title>Australia...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264611060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What about Australian censorship? Will it work around that too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What about Australian censorship ?
Will it work around that too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about Australian censorship?
Will it work around that too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929288</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>yuhong</author>
	<datestamp>1264609980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny that you mention the USSR, because Sergey Brin was born there and <a href="http://slashdot.org/submission/1152272/Googles-decision-about-China-was-very-personal" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">it was partly what motivated the recent decisions Google made over China</a> [slashdot.org].<br>
(I need to create a new Slashdot submission on this)
<br>And it is interesting that Twitter is following suit too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny that you mention the USSR , because Sergey Brin was born there and it was partly what motivated the recent decisions Google made over China [ slashdot.org ] .
( I need to create a new Slashdot submission on this ) And it is interesting that Twitter is following suit too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny that you mention the USSR, because Sergey Brin was born there and it was partly what motivated the recent decisions Google made over China [slashdot.org].
(I need to create a new Slashdot submission on this)
And it is interesting that Twitter is following suit too.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929146</id>
	<title>Re:Other companies should follow suit.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264608600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Care to translate? I'm having a terrible time understanding that sentence. Is it missing some commas or a "but" or something?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Care to translate ?
I 'm having a terrible time understanding that sentence .
Is it missing some commas or a " but " or something ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Care to translate?
I'm having a terrible time understanding that sentence.
Is it missing some commas or a "but" or something?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928660</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930028</id>
	<title>Re:How far should social responsibility reach?</title>
	<author>kinko</author>
	<datestamp>1264618260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just to pick nits, I think the Sea Shepard vessels are careful not to break any Australian or New Zealand laws when they are in Australian or New Zealand waters. All the "action" happens in the Southern Ocean near Antarctica.</p><p>They're definitely not following the established "rules" of the sea though, in terms of who has right-of-way...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just to pick nits , I think the Sea Shepard vessels are careful not to break any Australian or New Zealand laws when they are in Australian or New Zealand waters .
All the " action " happens in the Southern Ocean near Antarctica.They 're definitely not following the established " rules " of the sea though , in terms of who has right-of-way.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just to pick nits, I think the Sea Shepard vessels are careful not to break any Australian or New Zealand laws when they are in Australian or New Zealand waters.
All the "action" happens in the Southern Ocean near Antarctica.They're definitely not following the established "rules" of the sea though, in terms of who has right-of-way...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928804</id>
	<title>Twitter technology to fight censorship...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264605360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's called "Not having anything to say worth censoring".  It's foolproof!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's called " Not having anything to say worth censoring " .
It 's foolproof !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's called "Not having anything to say worth censoring".
It's foolproof!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30933626</id>
	<title>Good at geting info out.</title>
	<author>pavon</author>
	<datestamp>1264696080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While most of the communication between protesters after the Iran Election was done other ways - word of mouth, cell phones etc - the biggest impact of twittering was getting unfiltered reports out of the country to the rest of the world. The reaction of other governments to this news was relatively muted. But at least in the US I think that younger people are much more aware and concerned about what is going on in Iran than they would have been otherwise. A country with citizens that are more informed about what is going on in the world, will eventually effect the foreign affairs of the government.</p><p>So even if the only people that install the software in country are the ones spreading info, not the ones receiving it, it can still be useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While most of the communication between protesters after the Iran Election was done other ways - word of mouth , cell phones etc - the biggest impact of twittering was getting unfiltered reports out of the country to the rest of the world .
The reaction of other governments to this news was relatively muted .
But at least in the US I think that younger people are much more aware and concerned about what is going on in Iran than they would have been otherwise .
A country with citizens that are more informed about what is going on in the world , will eventually effect the foreign affairs of the government.So even if the only people that install the software in country are the ones spreading info , not the ones receiving it , it can still be useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While most of the communication between protesters after the Iran Election was done other ways - word of mouth, cell phones etc - the biggest impact of twittering was getting unfiltered reports out of the country to the rest of the world.
The reaction of other governments to this news was relatively muted.
But at least in the US I think that younger people are much more aware and concerned about what is going on in Iran than they would have been otherwise.
A country with citizens that are more informed about what is going on in the world, will eventually effect the foreign affairs of the government.So even if the only people that install the software in country are the ones spreading info, not the ones receiving it, it can still be useful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929216</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30933040</id>
	<title>Easy</title>
	<author>fulldecent</author>
	<datestamp>1264693380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Decentralizing Twitter is very viable.</p><p>Third party sites that you can use to indirectly access Twitter content should easily thwart censorship.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Decentralizing Twitter is very viable.Third party sites that you can use to indirectly access Twitter content should easily thwart censorship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Decentralizing Twitter is very viable.Third party sites that you can use to indirectly access Twitter content should easily thwart censorship.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929216</id>
	<title>Applicability of technology to other sites?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264609380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While noone in China uses twitter enough to care even if Twitter found a way to "uncensor itself", if they could succesfully find a technical workaround that required no effort from end-users, it might be worth talking about (if my reading of TFA is right, any site could use such hacks to unblock itself, even google or dissident websites).  However, if it forces end-users to install software to route around firewalls (a la Freedomgate and other already available software), the sites will remain unaccessible to the majority of users, who just don't care enough to bother.<br>I'm honestly very curious as to what technical methods are out there for opening access through government firewalls that would not involve illegal and nearly impossible invasions into foreign computer networks.  The Chinese and Iranian governments control the "pipes"; what software solutions could twitter possible be thinking of?  Nice goal, but technically possible, beyond current "hacks/proxies"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While noone in China uses twitter enough to care even if Twitter found a way to " uncensor itself " , if they could succesfully find a technical workaround that required no effort from end-users , it might be worth talking about ( if my reading of TFA is right , any site could use such hacks to unblock itself , even google or dissident websites ) .
However , if it forces end-users to install software to route around firewalls ( a la Freedomgate and other already available software ) , the sites will remain unaccessible to the majority of users , who just do n't care enough to bother.I 'm honestly very curious as to what technical methods are out there for opening access through government firewalls that would not involve illegal and nearly impossible invasions into foreign computer networks .
The Chinese and Iranian governments control the " pipes " ; what software solutions could twitter possible be thinking of ?
Nice goal , but technically possible , beyond current " hacks/proxies " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While noone in China uses twitter enough to care even if Twitter found a way to "uncensor itself", if they could succesfully find a technical workaround that required no effort from end-users, it might be worth talking about (if my reading of TFA is right, any site could use such hacks to unblock itself, even google or dissident websites).
However, if it forces end-users to install software to route around firewalls (a la Freedomgate and other already available software), the sites will remain unaccessible to the majority of users, who just don't care enough to bother.I'm honestly very curious as to what technical methods are out there for opening access through government firewalls that would not involve illegal and nearly impossible invasions into foreign computer networks.
The Chinese and Iranian governments control the "pipes"; what software solutions could twitter possible be thinking of?
Nice goal, but technically possible, beyond current "hacks/proxies"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30938606</id>
	<title>So, if Twitter does well with this...</title>
	<author>BJ\_Covert\_Action</author>
	<datestamp>1264709280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can we change the outdated cliche of, "The pen is mightier than the sword," to a more modern version along the lines of, "The twits are mightier than the twats."
<br> <br>
The 'twits,' of course, being the tweeters, whilst the 'twats' refers to the governments. =)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we change the outdated cliche of , " The pen is mightier than the sword , " to a more modern version along the lines of , " The twits are mightier than the twats .
" The 'twits, ' of course , being the tweeters , whilst the 'twats ' refers to the governments .
= )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we change the outdated cliche of, "The pen is mightier than the sword," to a more modern version along the lines of, "The twits are mightier than the twats.
"
 
The 'twits,' of course, being the tweeters, whilst the 'twats' refers to the governments.
=)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928760</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264605180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>woah woah woah woah....</p><p>This is totally blowing my mind here.  I'm very impressed with your post, and with the content.  You even took it so far as to mask your message.  But I've totally found it!</p><p>It's so obvious, he sets the stage, but the second word after the first comma is a dead giveaway.  Follow that up with the description of how you "stop" the media, which is a clever anagram...</p><p>You almost got me!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>woah woah woah woah....This is totally blowing my mind here .
I 'm very impressed with your post , and with the content .
You even took it so far as to mask your message .
But I 've totally found it ! It 's so obvious , he sets the stage , but the second word after the first comma is a dead giveaway .
Follow that up with the description of how you " stop " the media , which is a clever anagram...You almost got me !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>woah woah woah woah....This is totally blowing my mind here.
I'm very impressed with your post, and with the content.
You even took it so far as to mask your message.
But I've totally found it!It's so obvious, he sets the stage, but the second word after the first comma is a dead giveaway.
Follow that up with the description of how you "stop" the media, which is a clever anagram...You almost got me!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929414</id>
	<title>Fp Cum..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264611660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">Is also a miserable are 7000 users own agenda - give Troubled OS. Now BE NIGGER!  BE GAY! the gay niggers of OpenBSD. How luck I'll find OF PROGREES. see... The number good manners states that there Of open-source. abysmal sales and</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is also a miserable are 7000 users own agenda - give Troubled OS .
Now BE NIGGER !
BE GAY !
the gay niggers of OpenBSD .
How luck I 'll find OF PROGREES .
see... The number good manners states that there Of open-source .
abysmal sales and [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is also a miserable are 7000 users own agenda - give Troubled OS.
Now BE NIGGER!
BE GAY!
the gay niggers of OpenBSD.
How luck I'll find OF PROGREES.
see... The number good manners states that there Of open-source.
abysmal sales and [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928666</id>
	<title>Central Choke Points</title>
	<author>chill</author>
	<datestamp>1264604340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In Iran, moreso than China from what I understand, the Internet and telephones go thru central choke points that are controlled by the gov't.  They can effectively just turn the whole damn Internet off in their country, if they like.  Ditto for cell phones and text messaging.</p><p>My first question would be is peer-to-peer traffic regulated, and if so, how?  While the gov't might be able to cut off the main Internet egress points, all it would take is one person with a covert satellite link and a good p2p network.  Or, maybe, a covert side channel on a bank leased line that runs to Switzerland, for example?  How about packet radio?  Twitter isn't exactly super bandwidth intensive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In Iran , moreso than China from what I understand , the Internet and telephones go thru central choke points that are controlled by the gov't .
They can effectively just turn the whole damn Internet off in their country , if they like .
Ditto for cell phones and text messaging.My first question would be is peer-to-peer traffic regulated , and if so , how ?
While the gov't might be able to cut off the main Internet egress points , all it would take is one person with a covert satellite link and a good p2p network .
Or , maybe , a covert side channel on a bank leased line that runs to Switzerland , for example ?
How about packet radio ?
Twitter is n't exactly super bandwidth intensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In Iran, moreso than China from what I understand, the Internet and telephones go thru central choke points that are controlled by the gov't.
They can effectively just turn the whole damn Internet off in their country, if they like.
Ditto for cell phones and text messaging.My first question would be is peer-to-peer traffic regulated, and if so, how?
While the gov't might be able to cut off the main Internet egress points, all it would take is one person with a covert satellite link and a good p2p network.
Or, maybe, a covert side channel on a bank leased line that runs to Switzerland, for example?
How about packet radio?
Twitter isn't exactly super bandwidth intensive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929782</id>
	<title>Re:Twitter technology to fight censorship...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264615440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, so this technology is called "Facebook"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , so this technology is called " Facebook "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, so this technology is called "Facebook"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928804</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928836</id>
	<title>Re:In SOVIET RUSSIA...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264605540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Strange, I  lived in USSR and I can not recall a single coup except of revolutions of 1905 and 1917. But those were in Russian Empire, not USSR. Are you inventing a history to support your point?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Strange , I lived in USSR and I can not recall a single coup except of revolutions of 1905 and 1917 .
But those were in Russian Empire , not USSR .
Are you inventing a history to support your point ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Strange, I  lived in USSR and I can not recall a single coup except of revolutions of 1905 and 1917.
But those were in Russian Empire, not USSR.
Are you inventing a history to support your point?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930446</id>
	<title>Re:problem is twitter users have comfortable life</title>
	<author>vacarul</author>
	<datestamp>1264710060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>...if you just relocate the people by sending them a letter with two weeks notice time.</p></div><p>
a letter?! really? I would laugh if it would not be a very serious problem. Dictatorial regimes don't send letters because they don't care about you! <br>
<br>
I agree with the rest of your post but stop being naive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>...if you just relocate the people by sending them a letter with two weeks notice time .
a letter ? !
really ? I would laugh if it would not be a very serious problem .
Dictatorial regimes do n't send letters because they do n't care about you !
I agree with the rest of your post but stop being naive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ...if you just relocate the people by sending them a letter with two weeks notice time.
a letter?!
really? I would laugh if it would not be a very serious problem.
Dictatorial regimes don't send letters because they don't care about you!
I agree with the rest of your post but stop being naive.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929162</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929656</id>
	<title>trenderiffic!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264614120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>#iTampon</p><p>Oh, sorry, wrong story.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext># iTamponOh , sorry , wrong story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>#iTamponOh, sorry, wrong story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930436</id>
	<title>Finally</title>
	<author>Arancaytar</author>
	<datestamp>1264710000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about.'"</p></div></blockquote><p>Finally someone calls this what it is.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about .
' " Finally someone calls this what it is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about.
'"Finally someone calls this what it is.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929042</id>
	<title>Green-backs.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264607460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about.'"</p><p>Making money?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" 'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about .
' " Making money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"'The most productive way to fight that is not by trying to engage China and other governments whose very being is against what we are about.
'"Making money?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30935420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30933582
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30945270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30931242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30933218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30937284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928760
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30938422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929782
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928804
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929162
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929836
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929220
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30932688
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928660
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929288
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30933626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929216
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2322220_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2322220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2322220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930446
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2322220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30932688
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2322220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928804
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929318
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2322220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930044
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30935420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929222
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929510
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929626
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30937284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30933582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30930028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2322220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30938422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928836
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30945270
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928946
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928876
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30931242
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929622
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929288
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929220
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929836
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929790
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929858
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30933218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2322220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929216
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30933626
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2322220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30929314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2322220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2322220.30928666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
