<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_27_2125238</id>
	<title>Dinosaur Feather Color Discovered</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1264584480000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>anzha writes <i>"Do you remember being a kid and told we'd never know what colors the dinosaurs were?  For at least some, that's no longer true.  Scientists working in the UK and China have closely examined the fossils of multiple theropods and actually <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2010/01/what\_colours\_were\_dinosaur\_feathers.php">found the colors and patterns that were present in the fossilized proto-feathers</a>.  So far, the answer is orange, black and white in banded and other patterns.  The work also thoroughly thrashes the idea that fossils might not be feathers, but collagen fibers instead.  If this holds up, Birds Are Dinosaurs.  Period.  And colorful!"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>anzha writes " Do you remember being a kid and told we 'd never know what colors the dinosaurs were ?
For at least some , that 's no longer true .
Scientists working in the UK and China have closely examined the fossils of multiple theropods and actually found the colors and patterns that were present in the fossilized proto-feathers .
So far , the answer is orange , black and white in banded and other patterns .
The work also thoroughly thrashes the idea that fossils might not be feathers , but collagen fibers instead .
If this holds up , Birds Are Dinosaurs .
Period. And colorful !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>anzha writes "Do you remember being a kid and told we'd never know what colors the dinosaurs were?
For at least some, that's no longer true.
Scientists working in the UK and China have closely examined the fossils of multiple theropods and actually found the colors and patterns that were present in the fossilized proto-feathers.
So far, the answer is orange, black and white in banded and other patterns.
The work also thoroughly thrashes the idea that fossils might not be feathers, but collagen fibers instead.
If this holds up, Birds Are Dinosaurs.
Period.  And colorful!
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925952</id>
	<title>Re:Summary hilariously wrong</title>
	<author>ArbitraryDescriptor</author>
	<datestamp>1264590840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The summary may have jumped the gun a little, but the article does present some interesting evidence with regard to theoretical color:<p><div class="quote"><p>The microscopes revealed a number of small structures all less than a micrometre long. In shape and size, they are identical to the melanosomes of modern birds. There include two broad categories. <strong>The phaemelanosomes are rod-like and produce phaeomelanin, a reddish-brown or yellow pigment, while the eumelanosomes are more spherical in shape and produce black-grey eumelanin.</strong></p> </div><p>Variations of that color:</p><p><div class="quote"><p> In some cases, the fossil feathers are clearly striped by bands of pigment and the alleged eumelanosomes only turn up in the dark ones, just as you'd expect.</p></div><p>Just not absolute proof of specific color:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>We don't even know how melanosome distributions in modern birds lead to specific colours.</p></div><p>My interpretation of the first and 3rd quote is that, perhaps, on a microscopic level we see the cell structures that produce variations of X and Y color, but like pixels on a screen, the overall color may be quite different.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary may have jumped the gun a little , but the article does present some interesting evidence with regard to theoretical color : The microscopes revealed a number of small structures all less than a micrometre long .
In shape and size , they are identical to the melanosomes of modern birds .
There include two broad categories .
The phaemelanosomes are rod-like and produce phaeomelanin , a reddish-brown or yellow pigment , while the eumelanosomes are more spherical in shape and produce black-grey eumelanin .
Variations of that color : In some cases , the fossil feathers are clearly striped by bands of pigment and the alleged eumelanosomes only turn up in the dark ones , just as you 'd expect.Just not absolute proof of specific color : We do n't even know how melanosome distributions in modern birds lead to specific colours.My interpretation of the first and 3rd quote is that , perhaps , on a microscopic level we see the cell structures that produce variations of X and Y color , but like pixels on a screen , the overall color may be quite different .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary may have jumped the gun a little, but the article does present some interesting evidence with regard to theoretical color:The microscopes revealed a number of small structures all less than a micrometre long.
In shape and size, they are identical to the melanosomes of modern birds.
There include two broad categories.
The phaemelanosomes are rod-like and produce phaeomelanin, a reddish-brown or yellow pigment, while the eumelanosomes are more spherical in shape and produce black-grey eumelanin.
Variations of that color: In some cases, the fossil feathers are clearly striped by bands of pigment and the alleged eumelanosomes only turn up in the dark ones, just as you'd expect.Just not absolute proof of specific color:We don't even know how melanosome distributions in modern birds lead to specific colours.My interpretation of the first and 3rd quote is that, perhaps, on a microscopic level we see the cell structures that produce variations of X and Y color, but like pixels on a screen, the overall color may be quite different.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926592</id>
	<title>Re:Summary hilariously wrong</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1264592820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Meanwhile, the early bird Confuciusornis had a variety of black, grey, red and brown hues, even within a single feather.</p></div></blockquote><p>Confuciusornis say, man who guess dinosaur feather color knows dinosaurs ex-tint.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Meanwhile , the early bird Confuciusornis had a variety of black , grey , red and brown hues , even within a single feather.Confuciusornis say , man who guess dinosaur feather color knows dinosaurs ex-tint .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Meanwhile, the early bird Confuciusornis had a variety of black, grey, red and brown hues, even within a single feather.Confuciusornis say, man who guess dinosaur feather color knows dinosaurs ex-tint.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925788</id>
	<title>And the story continues...</title>
	<author>palmerj3</author>
	<datestamp>1264590300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>... and since Microsoft owns the patent to the color they've since filed a motion to sue the Jurassic Age.</htmltext>
<tokenext>... and since Microsoft owns the patent to the color they 've since filed a motion to sue the Jurassic Age .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and since Microsoft owns the patent to the color they've since filed a motion to sue the Jurassic Age.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929224</id>
	<title>Re:CHICKEN DANCE!</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1264609440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now thanks to genetic modification we can not only bring back T-rex , but also give him flight.<br>This will certainly call for larger automatic weapons for hunting and some real sport.<br>You hunt prey, prey hunts you.<br>At the other end of the stick<nobr> <wbr></nobr>,Kentucky Fried Lizard has drumsticks that will feed a family reunion.<br>It's a win/win scenario as far as I can see. Lets give him peacock colors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now thanks to genetic modification we can not only bring back T-rex , but also give him flight.This will certainly call for larger automatic weapons for hunting and some real sport.You hunt prey , prey hunts you.At the other end of the stick ,Kentucky Fried Lizard has drumsticks that will feed a family reunion.It 's a win/win scenario as far as I can see .
Lets give him peacock colors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now thanks to genetic modification we can not only bring back T-rex , but also give him flight.This will certainly call for larger automatic weapons for hunting and some real sport.You hunt prey, prey hunts you.At the other end of the stick ,Kentucky Fried Lizard has drumsticks that will feed a family reunion.It's a win/win scenario as far as I can see.
Lets give him peacock colors.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30950918</id>
	<title>Re:Yea right</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1264786560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are people out there that believe that we live INSIDE the hollow Earth. If you cannot change their minds, do you really expect to be able to change everyone mind on this?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are people out there that believe that we live INSIDE the hollow Earth .
If you can not change their minds , do you really expect to be able to change everyone mind on this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are people out there that believe that we live INSIDE the hollow Earth.
If you cannot change their minds, do you really expect to be able to change everyone mind on this?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30928814</id>
	<title>"Are" does not equal "are descended from"</title>
	<author>bigrespect</author>
	<datestamp>1264605420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Saying "birds are dinosaurs" (or even "Birds Are Dinosaurs") is rather like saying "French is Latin" or "English is Proto-Indo-European."  The lineage is unmistakable, but the one is not synonymous with the other.  I am not sure why this conflation seems to be acceptable for birds and dinosaurs, when you never hear, for example, "homo sapiens is homo erectus" or "South America is Gondwanaland" or "Intel is Fairchild Semiconductor."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Saying " birds are dinosaurs " ( or even " Birds Are Dinosaurs " ) is rather like saying " French is Latin " or " English is Proto-Indo-European .
" The lineage is unmistakable , but the one is not synonymous with the other .
I am not sure why this conflation seems to be acceptable for birds and dinosaurs , when you never hear , for example , " homo sapiens is homo erectus " or " South America is Gondwanaland " or " Intel is Fairchild Semiconductor .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Saying "birds are dinosaurs" (or even "Birds Are Dinosaurs") is rather like saying "French is Latin" or "English is Proto-Indo-European.
"  The lineage is unmistakable, but the one is not synonymous with the other.
I am not sure why this conflation seems to be acceptable for birds and dinosaurs, when you never hear, for example, "homo sapiens is homo erectus" or "South America is Gondwanaland" or "Intel is Fairchild Semiconductor.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258</id>
	<title>Yea right</title>
	<author>PieSquared</author>
	<datestamp>1264588860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"If this holds up, Birds Are Dinosaurs. Period."<br>
<br>
Nobody out there not convinced by the existing lines of evidence proving birds are dinosaurs is going to be convinced by this. And don't kid yourself, there are lots of such people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" If this holds up , Birds Are Dinosaurs .
Period. " Nobody out there not convinced by the existing lines of evidence proving birds are dinosaurs is going to be convinced by this .
And do n't kid yourself , there are lots of such people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If this holds up, Birds Are Dinosaurs.
Period."

Nobody out there not convinced by the existing lines of evidence proving birds are dinosaurs is going to be convinced by this.
And don't kid yourself, there are lots of such people.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30933026</id>
	<title>Sigh....</title>
	<author>ewenix</author>
	<datestamp>1264693260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>thought to be the precursors of feathers.</p></div><p>Can we <b>please</b> stop passing off wild ass speculation as actual news?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>thought to be the precursors of feathers.Can we please stop passing off wild ass speculation as actual news ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thought to be the precursors of feathers.Can we please stop passing off wild ass speculation as actual news?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30927362</id>
	<title>No solid profit just interesting</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264595880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's been strong evidence of patterns in dinosaur skin for years, clusters of smaller sized scale which in modern reptiles always indicates color patterns. The evidence is interesting for color patterns in feathers but it's not conclusive. We may never know. Also this case closed on the dinosaur bird link is far from true. The problem is birds are potentially traceable to pre dinosaur tree climbing reptiles. Birds likely came from a tree climbing ancestor yet there aren't any fossils of tree climbing dinosaurs. It seems to be a case of parallel development. Dinosaurs are closely related to birds but there is zero evidence of a raptor turning into a bird. One massive problem is there is no significant surviving DNA evidence. Even today it's impossible to tell what group an animal belongs to without DNA. Completely unrelated animals can evolve to look the same to eye. If we can't tell where the split between dinosaurs and birds happened it's also tough to tell if some of the proto birds weren't dinosaurs at all but birds that lost the ability to fly. Also it's possible that some dinosaur due to parallel development ended up looking a lot like birds but never flew. Some rather large dinosaurs had well developed feather but all early birds were small. Their ancestors weren't Utah Raptors they were small tree climbing animals. The whole point is without much more evidence the verdict will continue to be out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's been strong evidence of patterns in dinosaur skin for years , clusters of smaller sized scale which in modern reptiles always indicates color patterns .
The evidence is interesting for color patterns in feathers but it 's not conclusive .
We may never know .
Also this case closed on the dinosaur bird link is far from true .
The problem is birds are potentially traceable to pre dinosaur tree climbing reptiles .
Birds likely came from a tree climbing ancestor yet there are n't any fossils of tree climbing dinosaurs .
It seems to be a case of parallel development .
Dinosaurs are closely related to birds but there is zero evidence of a raptor turning into a bird .
One massive problem is there is no significant surviving DNA evidence .
Even today it 's impossible to tell what group an animal belongs to without DNA .
Completely unrelated animals can evolve to look the same to eye .
If we ca n't tell where the split between dinosaurs and birds happened it 's also tough to tell if some of the proto birds were n't dinosaurs at all but birds that lost the ability to fly .
Also it 's possible that some dinosaur due to parallel development ended up looking a lot like birds but never flew .
Some rather large dinosaurs had well developed feather but all early birds were small .
Their ancestors were n't Utah Raptors they were small tree climbing animals .
The whole point is without much more evidence the verdict will continue to be out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's been strong evidence of patterns in dinosaur skin for years, clusters of smaller sized scale which in modern reptiles always indicates color patterns.
The evidence is interesting for color patterns in feathers but it's not conclusive.
We may never know.
Also this case closed on the dinosaur bird link is far from true.
The problem is birds are potentially traceable to pre dinosaur tree climbing reptiles.
Birds likely came from a tree climbing ancestor yet there aren't any fossils of tree climbing dinosaurs.
It seems to be a case of parallel development.
Dinosaurs are closely related to birds but there is zero evidence of a raptor turning into a bird.
One massive problem is there is no significant surviving DNA evidence.
Even today it's impossible to tell what group an animal belongs to without DNA.
Completely unrelated animals can evolve to look the same to eye.
If we can't tell where the split between dinosaurs and birds happened it's also tough to tell if some of the proto birds weren't dinosaurs at all but birds that lost the ability to fly.
Also it's possible that some dinosaur due to parallel development ended up looking a lot like birds but never flew.
Some rather large dinosaurs had well developed feather but all early birds were small.
Their ancestors weren't Utah Raptors they were small tree climbing animals.
The whole point is without much more evidence the verdict will continue to be out.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929246</id>
	<title>Re:CHICKEN DANCE!</title>
	<author>flyneye</author>
	<datestamp>1264609560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Quit thinking single shot.<br>A nice automatic<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.50 w/ grenade launcher will be available at Sears.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Quit thinking single shot.A nice automatic .50 w/ grenade launcher will be available at Sears .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Quit thinking single shot.A nice automatic .50 w/ grenade launcher will be available at Sears.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926750</id>
	<title>Re:CHICKEN DANCE!</title>
	<author>harry666t</author>
	<datestamp>1264593300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You seem to be the dinosaur here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You seem to be the dinosaur here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You seem to be the dinosaur here.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926256</id>
	<title>Begs the question</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrot\_Top" title="wikipedia.org">Carrot Top</a> [wikipedia.org] be evolved from the "Carrot Bottom" dinosaur??</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could Carrot Top [ wikipedia.org ] be evolved from the " Carrot Bottom " dinosaur ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could Carrot Top [wikipedia.org] be evolved from the "Carrot Bottom" dinosaur?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926036</id>
	<title>Re:Yea right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apparently, there is also a lot of people out there that can't spell a simple four letter word like "yeah."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently , there is also a lot of people out there that ca n't spell a simple four letter word like " yeah .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently, there is also a lot of people out there that can't spell a simple four letter word like "yeah.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30927532</id>
	<title>Re:Yea right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264596840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, I actually didn't like that line in the summary.</p><p>Birds, strictly speaking, are not dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are extinct. Also, they are classified under Reptilia, while birds belong to Aves. (Now, Reptilia happens to be a contentious class in that Aves is specifically excluded from it. Cladists like to speak of the birds and reptiles together because of their shared evolutionary history.)</p><p>Also, birds probably evolved from members of Theropoda, and Theropoda does not represent all of the dinosaurs. So for various reasons "birds are dinosaurs" does not tell the whole story and you're not likely to find that sentence in a science textbook without further qualification. I'd prefer it if people said "birds most likely have an ancestor in a specific group of dinosaurs."</p><p>Maybe I'm nit-picking, but isn't that the whole essence of taxonomy?</p><p>As for the creationists, send them one of these: http://controversy.wearscience.com/design/devil/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I actually did n't like that line in the summary.Birds , strictly speaking , are not dinosaurs .
Dinosaurs are extinct .
Also , they are classified under Reptilia , while birds belong to Aves .
( Now , Reptilia happens to be a contentious class in that Aves is specifically excluded from it .
Cladists like to speak of the birds and reptiles together because of their shared evolutionary history .
) Also , birds probably evolved from members of Theropoda , and Theropoda does not represent all of the dinosaurs .
So for various reasons " birds are dinosaurs " does not tell the whole story and you 're not likely to find that sentence in a science textbook without further qualification .
I 'd prefer it if people said " birds most likely have an ancestor in a specific group of dinosaurs .
" Maybe I 'm nit-picking , but is n't that the whole essence of taxonomy ? As for the creationists , send them one of these : http : //controversy.wearscience.com/design/devil/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I actually didn't like that line in the summary.Birds, strictly speaking, are not dinosaurs.
Dinosaurs are extinct.
Also, they are classified under Reptilia, while birds belong to Aves.
(Now, Reptilia happens to be a contentious class in that Aves is specifically excluded from it.
Cladists like to speak of the birds and reptiles together because of their shared evolutionary history.
)Also, birds probably evolved from members of Theropoda, and Theropoda does not represent all of the dinosaurs.
So for various reasons "birds are dinosaurs" does not tell the whole story and you're not likely to find that sentence in a science textbook without further qualification.
I'd prefer it if people said "birds most likely have an ancestor in a specific group of dinosaurs.
"Maybe I'm nit-picking, but isn't that the whole essence of taxonomy?As for the creationists, send them one of these: http://controversy.wearscience.com/design/devil/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30951562</id>
	<title>Re:CHICKEN DANCE!</title>
	<author>Jeremiah Cornelius</author>
	<datestamp>1264788780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sig is from "Yes, Prime Minister", episode 1:</p><p><tt>Sir Humphrey: "With Trident we could obliterate the whole of Eastern Europe."</tt></p><p><tt>Jim Hacker: "I don't want to obliterate the whole of Eastern Europe."</tt></p><p><tt>Sir Humphrey: "It's a deterrent."</tt></p><p><tt>Jim Hacker: "It's a bluff. I probably wouldn't use it."</tt></p><p><tt>Sir Humphrey: "Yes, but they don't know that you probably wouldn't."</tt></p><p><tt>Jim Hacker: "They probably do."</tt></p><p><tt>Sir Humphrey: "Yes, they probably know that you probably wouldn't. But they can't certainly know."</tt></p><p><tt>Jim Hacker: "They probably certainly know that I probably wouldn't."</tt></p><p><tt>Sir Humphrey: "Yes, but even though they probably certainly know that you probably wouldn't, they don't certainly know that, although you probably wouldn't, there is no probability that you certainly would."</tt><br><a href="http://www.yes-minister.com/ypmseas1a.htm" title="yes-minister.com">http://www.yes-minister.com/ypmseas1a.htm</a> [yes-minister.com]</p><p>All on Netflix streaming, nowerdays.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sig is from " Yes , Prime Minister " , episode 1 : Sir Humphrey : " With Trident we could obliterate the whole of Eastern Europe .
" Jim Hacker : " I do n't want to obliterate the whole of Eastern Europe .
" Sir Humphrey : " It 's a deterrent .
" Jim Hacker : " It 's a bluff .
I probably would n't use it .
" Sir Humphrey : " Yes , but they do n't know that you probably would n't .
" Jim Hacker : " They probably do .
" Sir Humphrey : " Yes , they probably know that you probably would n't .
But they ca n't certainly know .
" Jim Hacker : " They probably certainly know that I probably would n't .
" Sir Humphrey : " Yes , but even though they probably certainly know that you probably would n't , they do n't certainly know that , although you probably would n't , there is no probability that you certainly would .
" http : //www.yes-minister.com/ypmseas1a.htm [ yes-minister.com ] All on Netflix streaming , nowerdays .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sig is from "Yes, Prime Minister", episode 1:Sir Humphrey: "With Trident we could obliterate the whole of Eastern Europe.
"Jim Hacker: "I don't want to obliterate the whole of Eastern Europe.
"Sir Humphrey: "It's a deterrent.
"Jim Hacker: "It's a bluff.
I probably wouldn't use it.
"Sir Humphrey: "Yes, but they don't know that you probably wouldn't.
"Jim Hacker: "They probably do.
"Sir Humphrey: "Yes, they probably know that you probably wouldn't.
But they can't certainly know.
"Jim Hacker: "They probably certainly know that I probably wouldn't.
"Sir Humphrey: "Yes, but even though they probably certainly know that you probably wouldn't, they don't certainly know that, although you probably wouldn't, there is no probability that you certainly would.
"http://www.yes-minister.com/ypmseas1a.htm [yes-minister.com]All on Netflix streaming, nowerdays.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30935278</id>
	<title>Hillbilly Logic</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264700760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What good is a shotgun going to do?  They're already dead.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What good is a shotgun going to do ?
They 're already dead .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What good is a shotgun going to do?
They're already dead.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30943290</id>
	<title>Do you trust the Germans?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264681080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is the article saying that the dinosaurs colors are somewhat like this: <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/German\_flag\_Reichstag\_6376.JPG" title="wikimedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/German\_flag\_Reichstag\_6376.JPG</a> [wikimedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the article saying that the dinosaurs colors are somewhat like this : http : //upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/German \ _flag \ _Reichstag \ _6376.JPG [ wikimedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the article saying that the dinosaurs colors are somewhat like this: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/30/German\_flag\_Reichstag\_6376.JPG [wikimedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926936</id>
	<title>Re:Summary hilariously wrong</title>
	<author>Red Flayer</author>
	<datestamp>1264593960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>    Meanwhile, the <b>early bird Confuciusornis</b> had a variety of black, grey, red and brown hues, even within a single feather.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Ah ha!  Now we know for sure which dinosaur got the worm.<br> <br>OK, I think I'm done now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Meanwhile , the early bird Confuciusornis had a variety of black , grey , red and brown hues , even within a single feather .
Ah ha !
Now we know for sure which dinosaur got the worm .
OK , I think I 'm done now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>    Meanwhile, the early bird Confuciusornis had a variety of black, grey, red and brown hues, even within a single feather.
Ah ha!
Now we know for sure which dinosaur got the worm.
OK, I think I'm done now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926250</id>
	<title>No such thing as dinosaurs</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If dinosaurs are birds, I guess that means there's no such thing as dinosaurs then.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If dinosaurs are birds , I guess that means there 's no such thing as dinosaurs then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If dinosaurs are birds, I guess that means there's no such thing as dinosaurs then.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30940912</id>
	<title>Re:Earl Sinclair</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1264672500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Finally got a girlfriend, eh, Bud? ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Finally got a girlfriend , eh , Bud ?
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Finally got a girlfriend, eh, Bud?
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30931542</id>
	<title>Re:CHICKEN DANCE!</title>
	<author>dimeglio</author>
	<datestamp>1264680060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Birds Are Dinosaurs. Period. And colorful!</p></div><p>So it's going to be dinosaur Tuesday from now on?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Birds Are Dinosaurs .
Period. And colorful ! So it 's going to be dinosaur Tuesday from now on ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Birds Are Dinosaurs.
Period. And colorful!So it's going to be dinosaur Tuesday from now on?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925342</id>
	<title>Re:CHICKEN DANCE!</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1264589100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think that for many dinasaurs, even an elephant gun wouldn't be big enough. At least we now know what dinasaurs tasted like.</p><p>BTW and OT, your new sig hurts my brain... well done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think that for many dinasaurs , even an elephant gun would n't be big enough .
At least we now know what dinasaurs tasted like.BTW and OT , your new sig hurts my brain... well done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think that for many dinasaurs, even an elephant gun wouldn't be big enough.
At least we now know what dinasaurs tasted like.BTW and OT, your new sig hurts my brain... well done.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925296</id>
	<title>Earl Sinclair</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1264588920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Do you remember being a kid and told we'd never know what colors the dinosaurs were? </i></p><p>I remember being a kid and told a lot of things would never come to pass that did in fact come to pass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do you remember being a kid and told we 'd never know what colors the dinosaurs were ?
I remember being a kid and told a lot of things would never come to pass that did in fact come to pass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do you remember being a kid and told we'd never know what colors the dinosaurs were?
I remember being a kid and told a lot of things would never come to pass that did in fact come to pass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30927044</id>
	<title>Re:very heavy feathers</title>
	<author>the biologist</author>
	<datestamp>1264594380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It really depends on the nature of the fossils in question.   If actual keratin is retained, rather than just the shape of the presumed keratin, then there is good reason to say the fossils <b>are</b> feathers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It really depends on the nature of the fossils in question .
If actual keratin is retained , rather than just the shape of the presumed keratin , then there is good reason to say the fossils are feathers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It really depends on the nature of the fossils in question.
If actual keratin is retained, rather than just the shape of the presumed keratin, then there is good reason to say the fossils are feathers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925790</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30931424</id>
	<title>Re:Evolution...</title>
	<author>Randle\_Revar</author>
	<datestamp>1264678620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;What my ancestors were may not be what I am now.</p><p>Not at all. You are an Ape, a primate, a mammal, a synapsid, and a vertebrate.<br>Similarly, a sparrow is a type of theropod dinosaur.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; What my ancestors were may not be what I am now.Not at all .
You are an Ape , a primate , a mammal , a synapsid , and a vertebrate.Similarly , a sparrow is a type of theropod dinosaur .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;What my ancestors were may not be what I am now.Not at all.
You are an Ape, a primate, a mammal, a synapsid, and a vertebrate.Similarly, a sparrow is a type of theropod dinosaur.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925772</id>
	<title>Re:Summary hilariously wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264590240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You cut that WAY too short:</p><p><div class="quote"><p> But while Vinther is convinced by the melanosomes that Zhang has found, he's more skeptical about the inferences about colour. "Saying that Sinosauropteryx was rufous-red, based on one sample is a stretch," he says. We don't even know how melanosome distributions in modern birds lead to specific colours. "Without this knowledge quantified, we cannot predict specific colors in fossils, maybe except black. So we are still far from putting colors on dinosaurs."</p></div><p>Zhang feels we can, whereas Vinther is "more skeptical".  So unless Zhang is a 'sensationalist submitter', your reading comprehension isn't so hot.</p><p>This part was further up:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Melanosomes are packed with melanins, pigments that range from drab blacks and greys to reddish-brown and yellow hues. Their presence in dinosaur filaments has allowed Fucheng Zhang to start piecing together the colours of these animals, millions of years after their extinction. For example, Zhang thinks that the small predator Sinosauropteryx had "chestnut to reddish-brown" stripes running down its tail and probably a similarly coloured crest down its back. Meanwhile, the early bird Confuciusornis had a variety of black, grey, red and brown hues, even within a single feather.</p></div><p>Its a good article.  You should read it again.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You cut that WAY too short : But while Vinther is convinced by the melanosomes that Zhang has found , he 's more skeptical about the inferences about colour .
" Saying that Sinosauropteryx was rufous-red , based on one sample is a stretch , " he says .
We do n't even know how melanosome distributions in modern birds lead to specific colours .
" Without this knowledge quantified , we can not predict specific colors in fossils , maybe except black .
So we are still far from putting colors on dinosaurs .
" Zhang feels we can , whereas Vinther is " more skeptical " .
So unless Zhang is a 'sensationalist submitter ' , your reading comprehension is n't so hot.This part was further up : Melanosomes are packed with melanins , pigments that range from drab blacks and greys to reddish-brown and yellow hues .
Their presence in dinosaur filaments has allowed Fucheng Zhang to start piecing together the colours of these animals , millions of years after their extinction .
For example , Zhang thinks that the small predator Sinosauropteryx had " chestnut to reddish-brown " stripes running down its tail and probably a similarly coloured crest down its back .
Meanwhile , the early bird Confuciusornis had a variety of black , grey , red and brown hues , even within a single feather.Its a good article .
You should read it again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You cut that WAY too short: But while Vinther is convinced by the melanosomes that Zhang has found, he's more skeptical about the inferences about colour.
"Saying that Sinosauropteryx was rufous-red, based on one sample is a stretch," he says.
We don't even know how melanosome distributions in modern birds lead to specific colours.
"Without this knowledge quantified, we cannot predict specific colors in fossils, maybe except black.
So we are still far from putting colors on dinosaurs.
"Zhang feels we can, whereas Vinther is "more skeptical".
So unless Zhang is a 'sensationalist submitter', your reading comprehension isn't so hot.This part was further up:Melanosomes are packed with melanins, pigments that range from drab blacks and greys to reddish-brown and yellow hues.
Their presence in dinosaur filaments has allowed Fucheng Zhang to start piecing together the colours of these animals, millions of years after their extinction.
For example, Zhang thinks that the small predator Sinosauropteryx had "chestnut to reddish-brown" stripes running down its tail and probably a similarly coloured crest down its back.
Meanwhile, the early bird Confuciusornis had a variety of black, grey, red and brown hues, even within a single feather.Its a good article.
You should read it again.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925516</id>
	<title>Re:Still don't know the real colors unfortunately.</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1264589580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Plus the color blue in birds isn't the result of pigment at all, but light refraction.  Though that is due to the microscopic structure of the feathers, so maybe we could find fossil evidence for it, I don't know.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Plus the color blue in birds is n't the result of pigment at all , but light refraction .
Though that is due to the microscopic structure of the feathers , so maybe we could find fossil evidence for it , I do n't know .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Plus the color blue in birds isn't the result of pigment at all, but light refraction.
Though that is due to the microscopic structure of the feathers, so maybe we could find fossil evidence for it, I don't know.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925306</id>
	<title>Still don't know the real colors unfortunately.</title>
	<author>nloop</author>
	<datestamp>1264588980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Flamingo pink, canary yellow, "red factor" coloring.  Lots of the brighter colors like those are diet based.  That dinosaurs whites could be neon pink if it has the right diet!<br> <br>Also, some of those melanosomes degrade chemically fairly quick and will never show in a fossil record.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Flamingo pink , canary yellow , " red factor " coloring .
Lots of the brighter colors like those are diet based .
That dinosaurs whites could be neon pink if it has the right diet !
Also , some of those melanosomes degrade chemically fairly quick and will never show in a fossil record .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flamingo pink, canary yellow, "red factor" coloring.
Lots of the brighter colors like those are diet based.
That dinosaurs whites could be neon pink if it has the right diet!
Also, some of those melanosomes degrade chemically fairly quick and will never show in a fossil record.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30930262</id>
	<title>Re:Yea right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264621680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mammals are dinosaurs, too, if you buy into that. And really, we're all just grand-standing bacteria.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mammals are dinosaurs , too , if you buy into that .
And really , we 're all just grand-standing bacteria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mammals are dinosaurs, too, if you buy into that.
And really, we're all just grand-standing bacteria.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30930734</id>
	<title>Re:Yea right</title>
	<author>Urkki</author>
	<datestamp>1264670160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Nobody out there not convinced by the existing lines of evidence proving birds are dinosaurs is going to be convinced by this. And don't kid yourself, there are lots of such people.</p></div><p>But what if dinosaurs are birds, while modern birds (and as well as theropods, currently classified as dinosaurs) are <i>not</i> dinosaurs? Has that been conclusively proven to not be the case?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobody out there not convinced by the existing lines of evidence proving birds are dinosaurs is going to be convinced by this .
And do n't kid yourself , there are lots of such people.But what if dinosaurs are birds , while modern birds ( and as well as theropods , currently classified as dinosaurs ) are not dinosaurs ?
Has that been conclusively proven to not be the case ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobody out there not convinced by the existing lines of evidence proving birds are dinosaurs is going to be convinced by this.
And don't kid yourself, there are lots of such people.But what if dinosaurs are birds, while modern birds (and as well as theropods, currently classified as dinosaurs) are not dinosaurs?
Has that been conclusively proven to not be the case?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30927516</id>
	<title>Birds Are Dinosaurs. Period.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264596780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, yeah?</p><p>Didn't the research uncovered they were  orange?</p><p>Well, the Dutch are orange, so I posit Dutch are Dinosaurs, period and all, smartyboy.</p><p>Unless you prove Dutch are birds... which live underwater... but then, they might be fish... error! error! error! aaaargh!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , yeah ? Did n't the research uncovered they were orange ? Well , the Dutch are orange , so I posit Dutch are Dinosaurs , period and all , smartyboy.Unless you prove Dutch are birds... which live underwater... but then , they might be fish... error ! error !
error ! aaaargh !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, yeah?Didn't the research uncovered they were  orange?Well, the Dutch are orange, so I posit Dutch are Dinosaurs, period and all, smartyboy.Unless you prove Dutch are birds... which live underwater... but then, they might be fish... error! error!
error! aaaargh!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925790</id>
	<title>very heavy feathers</title>
	<author>macbeth66</author>
	<datestamp>1264590300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
&nbsp; </p><p><div class="quote"><p> The work also thoroughly thrashes the idea that fossils might not be feathers, but collagen fibers instead.</p></div><p>ah, no.  Fossils are not feathers.  Ever.  In any way, shape or form.  However, these fossils might be <i> <b> of </b> </i> feathers.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>  The work also thoroughly thrashes the idea that fossils might not be feathers , but collagen fibers instead.ah , no .
Fossils are not feathers .
Ever. In any way , shape or form .
However , these fossils might be of feathers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
   The work also thoroughly thrashes the idea that fossils might not be feathers, but collagen fibers instead.ah, no.
Fossils are not feathers.
Ever.  In any way, shape or form.
However, these fossils might be   of   feathers.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929660</id>
	<title>Re:Still don't know the real colors unfortunately.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264614120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Flamingo pink, canary yellow, "red factor" coloring. Lots of the brighter colors like those are diet based. That dinosaurs whites could be neon pink if it has the right diet!</p></div><p>Yes, in fact some dinosaurs believed ingesting colloidal silver was good for you, these ones were blue.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Flamingo pink , canary yellow , " red factor " coloring .
Lots of the brighter colors like those are diet based .
That dinosaurs whites could be neon pink if it has the right diet ! Yes , in fact some dinosaurs believed ingesting colloidal silver was good for you , these ones were blue .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Flamingo pink, canary yellow, "red factor" coloring.
Lots of the brighter colors like those are diet based.
That dinosaurs whites could be neon pink if it has the right diet!Yes, in fact some dinosaurs believed ingesting colloidal silver was good for you, these ones were blue.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925306</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30928504</id>
	<title>Re:Earl Sinclair</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1264603080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I remember being a kid and told a lot of things would never come to pass that did in fact come to pass.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Would these happen to be:<br>
Man will never fly.<br>
No Galileo, the Sun revolves around the Earth.<br>
The Normans will never be able to invade Briton.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember being a kid and told a lot of things would never come to pass that did in fact come to pass .
Would these happen to be : Man will never fly .
No Galileo , the Sun revolves around the Earth .
The Normans will never be able to invade Briton .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember being a kid and told a lot of things would never come to pass that did in fact come to pass.
Would these happen to be:
Man will never fly.
No Galileo, the Sun revolves around the Earth.
The Normans will never be able to invade Briton.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925296</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929678</id>
	<title>Re:Yea right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264614300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The thing is, modern paleontology would suggest the primordial bird and dinosaur split prior the great extinction events which yield us modern birds.  Birds might be related to dinosaurs, but that a dinosaur of note evolved into the humble pigeon is not likely nor correct anymore so than saying humans are marsupials, though we may share a common ancestor.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The thing is , modern paleontology would suggest the primordial bird and dinosaur split prior the great extinction events which yield us modern birds .
Birds might be related to dinosaurs , but that a dinosaur of note evolved into the humble pigeon is not likely nor correct anymore so than saying humans are marsupials , though we may share a common ancestor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The thing is, modern paleontology would suggest the primordial bird and dinosaur split prior the great extinction events which yield us modern birds.
Birds might be related to dinosaurs, but that a dinosaur of note evolved into the humble pigeon is not likely nor correct anymore so than saying humans are marsupials, though we may share a common ancestor.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30927230</id>
	<title>Re:CHICKEN DANCE!</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1264595160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Oh, why stop at elephant gun. Here's what I'd take hunting: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boys\_anti-tank\_rifle" title="wikipedia.org">Boys Anti-Tank Rifle</a> [wikipedia.org], re-chambered for<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.50 BMG. Also known as Charlie the Bastard for it's kick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , why stop at elephant gun .
Here 's what I 'd take hunting : Boys Anti-Tank Rifle [ wikipedia.org ] , re-chambered for .50 BMG .
Also known as Charlie the Bastard for it 's kick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, why stop at elephant gun.
Here's what I'd take hunting: Boys Anti-Tank Rifle [wikipedia.org], re-chambered for .50 BMG.
Also known as Charlie the Bastard for it's kick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925250</id>
	<title>Summary hilariously wrong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264588800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>TFA explicitly states that:</p><p>
&nbsp; </p><p><div class="quote"><p>"... we cannot predict specific colors in fossils, maybe except black. So we are still far from putting colors on dinosaurs."</p></div><p>The "orange, white and black" colours are from an illustration at the top of an article, and a theory about a different dinosaur that definitely had stripes (possibly white and black ones.)</p><p>Is it only the sensationalist submissions that get through, or only the sensationalists who submit?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA explicitly states that :   " ... we can not predict specific colors in fossils , maybe except black .
So we are still far from putting colors on dinosaurs .
" The " orange , white and black " colours are from an illustration at the top of an article , and a theory about a different dinosaur that definitely had stripes ( possibly white and black ones .
) Is it only the sensationalist submissions that get through , or only the sensationalists who submit ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA explicitly states that:
  "... we cannot predict specific colors in fossils, maybe except black.
So we are still far from putting colors on dinosaurs.
"The "orange, white and black" colours are from an illustration at the top of an article, and a theory about a different dinosaur that definitely had stripes (possibly white and black ones.
)Is it only the sensationalist submissions that get through, or only the sensationalists who submit?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925700</id>
	<title>New perspective at the dinner table</title>
	<author>Old Flatulent 1</author>
	<datestamp>1264590060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OH God I had a Dinosaur/Chicken dinner last night, no wonder... I have been having Jurassic Park like nightmares.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OH God I had a Dinosaur/Chicken dinner last night , no wonder... I have been having Jurassic Park like nightmares .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OH God I had a Dinosaur/Chicken dinner last night, no wonder... I have been having Jurassic Park like nightmares.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925678</id>
	<title>Evolution...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264590000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about "Birds were dinosaurs. Period."? There's this little thing called evolution... What my ancestors were may not be what I am now. Where you draw the distinguishing line is non-trivial.</p><p>~D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about " Birds were dinosaurs .
Period. " ? There 's this little thing called evolution... What my ancestors were may not be what I am now .
Where you draw the distinguishing line is non-trivial. ~ D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about "Birds were dinosaurs.
Period."? There's this little thing called evolution... What my ancestors were may not be what I am now.
Where you draw the distinguishing line is non-trivial.~D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30950242</id>
	<title>Re:Yea right</title>
	<author>AlteredEgg</author>
	<datestamp>1264784160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Following the same line of reasoning, if dinosaurs have eyes and octopi have eyes, then an octopus is a dinosaur. You need to do better than that, people.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Following the same line of reasoning , if dinosaurs have eyes and octopi have eyes , then an octopus is a dinosaur .
You need to do better than that , people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Following the same line of reasoning, if dinosaurs have eyes and octopi have eyes, then an octopus is a dinosaur.
You need to do better than that, people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926688</id>
	<title>Ginger Dinosaurs?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264593120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is that why they went extinct?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is that why they went extinct ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is that why they went extinct?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926570</id>
	<title>Re:Evolution...</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1264592760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Though from what I see there's lately some trend of assigning groups of animals to "upstream" taxa...doesn't look so weird though with latin names.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Though from what I see there 's lately some trend of assigning groups of animals to " upstream " taxa...does n't look so weird though with latin names .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though from what I see there's lately some trend of assigning groups of animals to "upstream" taxa...doesn't look so weird though with latin names.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925678</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926380</id>
	<title>Re:CHICKEN DANCE!</title>
	<author>Sulphur</author>
	<datestamp>1264592160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Considering the closeness of the relationship, dinosaurs probably tasted like chicken.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Considering the closeness of the relationship , dinosaurs probably tasted like chicken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Considering the closeness of the relationship, dinosaurs probably tasted like chicken.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050</id>
	<title>CHICKEN DANCE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264588200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These Dinos are the world's biggest Pheasants!  What I wouldn't do for my shotgun!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These Dinos are the world 's biggest Pheasants !
What I would n't do for my shotgun !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These Dinos are the world's biggest Pheasants!
What I wouldn't do for my shotgun!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30938808</id>
	<title>Re:Yea right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264709700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>the existing lines of evidence proving birds are dinosaurs</p></div><p>What definition of "dinosaur" are you using that doesn't explicitly state that it's a subset of the reptiles?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>the existing lines of evidence proving birds are dinosaursWhat definition of " dinosaur " are you using that does n't explicitly state that it 's a subset of the reptiles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the existing lines of evidence proving birds are dinosaursWhat definition of "dinosaur" are you using that doesn't explicitly state that it's a subset of the reptiles?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926430</id>
	<title>Re:Yea right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264592340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Apparently, there [b]are[/b] also a lot of people out there that can't keep their grammar straight when pointing out spelling mistakes.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Apparently , there [ b ] are [ /b ] also a lot of people out there that ca n't keep their grammar straight when pointing out spelling mistakes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Apparently, there [b]are[/b] also a lot of people out there that can't keep their grammar straight when pointing out spelling mistakes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926036</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30927532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30928504
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30927044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925790
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30927230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30930262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925772
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30938808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30930734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30931424
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30950918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926036
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30940912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925296
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30931542
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30951562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925678
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30950242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30935278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_2125238_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925306
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2125238.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30928814
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2125238.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925258
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30950918
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30930262
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30950242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926036
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30938808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30927532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30930734
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2125238.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926256
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2125238.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929224
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925342
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926380
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30951562
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929246
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30927230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30931542
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30935278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926750
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2125238.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30928504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30940912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2125238.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30927044
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2125238.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925306
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30929660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925516
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2125238.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925952
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925772
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926592
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_2125238.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30925678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30931424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_2125238.30926570
</commentlist>
</conversation>
