<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_27_1931202</id>
	<title>India Moves To Put Its First Man In Space By 2016</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1264620780000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes with this snippet from the International Business Times: <i>"India plans to launch its <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20100127/india-moves-put-man-space.htm">first manned space mission in 2016</a>, moving to become the fourth nation to put a man in space. Space scientists and senior officials of the state-run ISRO are preparing a pre-project report to build the infrastructure and facilities for the mission, estimated to cost a $2.76 billion. 'We are planning a human space flight in 2016, with two astronauts who will spend seven days in the Earth's lower orbit,' Radhakrishnan told reporters at ISRO headquarters in Bangalore. In September, India's <a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/20090830/contact-lost-india-terminates-first-moon-mission.htm">Chandrayaan-1</a> satellite discovered water on the moon, boosting India's credibility among established space-faring nations"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes with this snippet from the International Business Times : " India plans to launch its first manned space mission in 2016 , moving to become the fourth nation to put a man in space .
Space scientists and senior officials of the state-run ISRO are preparing a pre-project report to build the infrastructure and facilities for the mission , estimated to cost a $ 2.76 billion .
'We are planning a human space flight in 2016 , with two astronauts who will spend seven days in the Earth 's lower orbit, ' Radhakrishnan told reporters at ISRO headquarters in Bangalore .
In September , India 's Chandrayaan-1 satellite discovered water on the moon , boosting India 's credibility among established space-faring nations "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes with this snippet from the International Business Times: "India plans to launch its first manned space mission in 2016, moving to become the fourth nation to put a man in space.
Space scientists and senior officials of the state-run ISRO are preparing a pre-project report to build the infrastructure and facilities for the mission, estimated to cost a $2.76 billion.
'We are planning a human space flight in 2016, with two astronauts who will spend seven days in the Earth's lower orbit,' Radhakrishnan told reporters at ISRO headquarters in Bangalore.
In September, India's Chandrayaan-1 satellite discovered water on the moon, boosting India's credibility among established space-faring nations"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923950</id>
	<title>Re:Terrific news!</title>
	<author>ObsessiveMathsFreak</author>
	<datestamp>1264584840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Especially for the many millions of Indians without a basic education and sanitation. They'll remain illiterate and crapping in the streets, but they will feel extatic about their fellow Indian in space.</p></div></blockquote><p>They will! But that's not the whole story.</p><p>While it is true that the Indian Government could be said to have more immediate concerns, a space program for a country of its size is not entirely without merit. The Apollo program employed over 400,000 people. People working in high tech jobs, all related to science, technology and mathematics. The technologies developed for that program and the experience of the people who worked on it stood to the economy and society of the US for many years during and after. There's also an effect on even primary education as interest in science and technology is sparked in younger minds. If nothing else, the Indian space program might help persuade their best educated graduates to stay in their home country and improve it rather than emigrate for better paying jobs.</p><p>But whatever you might have to say about such a space program, at least the Indians aren't wasting trillions on unproductive foreign campaigns. When you ask yourself why the US has no decent space program anymore, you need look no farther than the money wasted over the last eight years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially for the many millions of Indians without a basic education and sanitation .
They 'll remain illiterate and crapping in the streets , but they will feel extatic about their fellow Indian in space.They will !
But that 's not the whole story.While it is true that the Indian Government could be said to have more immediate concerns , a space program for a country of its size is not entirely without merit .
The Apollo program employed over 400,000 people .
People working in high tech jobs , all related to science , technology and mathematics .
The technologies developed for that program and the experience of the people who worked on it stood to the economy and society of the US for many years during and after .
There 's also an effect on even primary education as interest in science and technology is sparked in younger minds .
If nothing else , the Indian space program might help persuade their best educated graduates to stay in their home country and improve it rather than emigrate for better paying jobs.But whatever you might have to say about such a space program , at least the Indians are n't wasting trillions on unproductive foreign campaigns .
When you ask yourself why the US has no decent space program anymore , you need look no farther than the money wasted over the last eight years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially for the many millions of Indians without a basic education and sanitation.
They'll remain illiterate and crapping in the streets, but they will feel extatic about their fellow Indian in space.They will!
But that's not the whole story.While it is true that the Indian Government could be said to have more immediate concerns, a space program for a country of its size is not entirely without merit.
The Apollo program employed over 400,000 people.
People working in high tech jobs, all related to science, technology and mathematics.
The technologies developed for that program and the experience of the people who worked on it stood to the economy and society of the US for many years during and after.
There's also an effect on even primary education as interest in science and technology is sparked in younger minds.
If nothing else, the Indian space program might help persuade their best educated graduates to stay in their home country and improve it rather than emigrate for better paying jobs.But whatever you might have to say about such a space program, at least the Indians aren't wasting trillions on unproductive foreign campaigns.
When you ask yourself why the US has no decent space program anymore, you need look no farther than the money wasted over the last eight years.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926206</id>
	<title>Re:2016 is a long way off ...</title>
	<author>DerekLyons</author>
	<datestamp>1264591620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>But I am not doubting the intent. In fact, it is refreshing to see a nation not simply looking at short term but thinking in terms of long term goals but in a concrete way.</p></div></blockquote><p>Are they looking at concrete goals in a long term way - or is this just India's latest entry in the regional and global dick size contest they been pursuing so intensely?  I see no reason to assume they they are, unlike any other spacefaring nation, pursuing the former rather than, like every other spacefaring nation, the latter.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I am not doubting the intent .
In fact , it is refreshing to see a nation not simply looking at short term but thinking in terms of long term goals but in a concrete way.Are they looking at concrete goals in a long term way - or is this just India 's latest entry in the regional and global dick size contest they been pursuing so intensely ?
I see no reason to assume they they are , unlike any other spacefaring nation , pursuing the former rather than , like every other spacefaring nation , the latter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I am not doubting the intent.
In fact, it is refreshing to see a nation not simply looking at short term but thinking in terms of long term goals but in a concrete way.Are they looking at concrete goals in a long term way - or is this just India's latest entry in the regional and global dick size contest they been pursuing so intensely?
I see no reason to assume they they are, unlike any other spacefaring nation, pursuing the former rather than, like every other spacefaring nation, the latter.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923202</id>
	<title>Re:I hate Indians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>... the "dot" Indians... not the "wooo wooo wooo" Indians....</p></div><p>No! No! No! Indians are either "feather, not dot" or "dot, not feather". Not "wooo wooo wooo"!</p><p>Get the nomenclature right! Please!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... the " dot " Indians... not the " wooo wooo wooo " Indians....No !
No ! No !
Indians are either " feather , not dot " or " dot , not feather " .
Not " wooo wooo wooo " ! Get the nomenclature right !
Please !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the "dot" Indians... not the "wooo wooo wooo" Indians....No!
No! No!
Indians are either "feather, not dot" or "dot, not feather".
Not "wooo wooo wooo"!Get the nomenclature right!
Please!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923954</id>
	<title>Re:mod parent up</title>
	<author>cayenne8</author>
	<datestamp>1264584900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"agreed!!! dala nbi tijaskanumori vika tumala keema naan"</i> <p>
Roughly translated:   "..And first <b>Quickie Mart</b> on the Moon in 2019!!!!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" agreed ! ! !
dala nbi tijaskanumori vika tumala keema naan " Roughly translated : " ..And first Quickie Mart on the Moon in 2019 ! ! ! !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"agreed!!!
dala nbi tijaskanumori vika tumala keema naan" 
Roughly translated:   "..And first Quickie Mart on the Moon in 2019!!!!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30928380</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264601940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First kirpan in space. A worthy goal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First kirpan in space .
A worthy goal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First kirpan in space.
A worthy goal.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923730</id>
	<title>moving reservations into space?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264584300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Americans break their treaties with Indians again and moving their reservations into space? Greedy oil and mineral companies want all land.  Oops, wrong Indians!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Americans break their treaties with Indians again and moving their reservations into space ?
Greedy oil and mineral companies want all land .
Oops , wrong Indians !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Americans break their treaties with Indians again and moving their reservations into space?
Greedy oil and mineral companies want all land.
Oops, wrong Indians!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924320</id>
	<title>3 cheers for India!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's hope they can make something sustainable and profitable (Hint: Manned space-based low earth orbit solar power stations are where the money is going to be guys).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's hope they can make something sustainable and profitable ( Hint : Manned space-based low earth orbit solar power stations are where the money is going to be guys ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's hope they can make something sustainable and profitable (Hint: Manned space-based low earth orbit solar power stations are where the money is going to be guys).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925704</id>
	<title>I am surprised</title>
	<author>anand78</author>
	<datestamp>1264590060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Rao Yi, a 47-year-old biologist who left Northwestern University in 2007 to become dean of the School of Life Sciences at Peking University in Beijing, contrasts China&rsquo;s &ldquo;soul-searching&rdquo; with America&rsquo;s self-satisfaction. When the United States Embassy in Beijing asked him to explain why he wanted to renounce his American citizenship, he wrote that the United States had lost its moral leadership after the 9/11 attacks. But &ldquo;the American people are still reveling in the greatness of the country and themselves,&rdquo; he said in a draft letter.

<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/world/asia/07scholar.html?pagewanted=all" title="nytimes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/world/asia/07scholar.html?pagewanted=all</a> [nytimes.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Rao Yi , a 47-year-old biologist who left Northwestern University in 2007 to become dean of the School of Life Sciences at Peking University in Beijing , contrasts China    s    soul-searching    with America    s self-satisfaction .
When the United States Embassy in Beijing asked him to explain why he wanted to renounce his American citizenship , he wrote that the United States had lost its moral leadership after the 9/11 attacks .
But    the American people are still reveling in the greatness of the country and themselves ,    he said in a draft letter .
http : //www.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/world/asia/07scholar.html ? pagewanted = all [ nytimes.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Rao Yi, a 47-year-old biologist who left Northwestern University in 2007 to become dean of the School of Life Sciences at Peking University in Beijing, contrasts China’s “soul-searching” with America’s self-satisfaction.
When the United States Embassy in Beijing asked him to explain why he wanted to renounce his American citizenship, he wrote that the United States had lost its moral leadership after the 9/11 attacks.
But “the American people are still reveling in the greatness of the country and themselves,” he said in a draft letter.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/07/world/asia/07scholar.html?pagewanted=all [nytimes.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924018</id>
	<title>Re:First call center in space scheduled for 2021</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With Beatles music playing while you're on hold: "... into a paper cup, across the universe. Jai gurudeva, Ommmmm...."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With Beatles music playing while you 're on hold : " ... into a paper cup , across the universe .
Jai gurudeva , Ommmmm.... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With Beatles music playing while you're on hold: "... into a paper cup, across the universe.
Jai gurudeva, Ommmmm...."</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30927272</id>
	<title>Re:Outsourcing?</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1264595400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And the thousands of Nasa engineers will have a place to work... in India. See? It all works out for the best.</htmltext>
<tokenext>And the thousands of Nasa engineers will have a place to work... in India .
See ? It all works out for the best .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the thousands of Nasa engineers will have a place to work... in India.
See? It all works out for the best.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923846</id>
	<title>Backoffice in space</title>
	<author>oxide7</author>
	<datestamp>1264584600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once they get this technology up and running we can outsource our space science to them too.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once they get this technology up and running we can outsource our space science to them too .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once they get this technology up and running we can outsource our space science to them too.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924390</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>vbraga</author>
	<datestamp>1264586160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut#Other\_terms" title="wikipedia.org">wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org]:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The Indian Space Research Organisation plans its first manned space flight for 2015 and is looking to recruit vyomanauts (pronounced veeohma).</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ] : The Indian Space Research Organisation plans its first manned space flight for 2015 and is looking to recruit vyomanauts ( pronounced veeohma ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From wikipedia [wikipedia.org]:The Indian Space Research Organisation plans its first manned space flight for 2015 and is looking to recruit vyomanauts (pronounced veeohma).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923898</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>tibman</author>
	<datestamp>1264584720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah but i think even if an American Civilian built his own space ship and orbited the earth several times from space.. he could not be called an 'Astronaut'.  That is a titled bestowed by NASA like knighthood and the Queen or something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah but i think even if an American Civilian built his own space ship and orbited the earth several times from space.. he could not be called an 'Astronaut' .
That is a titled bestowed by NASA like knighthood and the Queen or something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah but i think even if an American Civilian built his own space ship and orbited the earth several times from space.. he could not be called an 'Astronaut'.
That is a titled bestowed by NASA like knighthood and the Queen or something.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926450</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264592460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>US: Astronauts; Russia: Cosmonauts; China: Taikonauts; India: ?</p><p>--Greg</p></div><p>Vyomanauts<br>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut#Other\_terms</p><p>In Sanskrit language, the term 'Vyom' can refer to Ether / Sky / Heaven</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>US : Astronauts ; Russia : Cosmonauts ; China : Taikonauts ; India : ? --GregVyomanautshttp : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut # Other \ _termsIn Sanskrit language , the term 'Vyom ' can refer to Ether / Sky / Heaven</tokentext>
<sentencetext>US: Astronauts; Russia: Cosmonauts; China: Taikonauts; India: ?--GregVyomanautshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astronaut#Other\_termsIn Sanskrit language, the term 'Vyom' can refer to Ether / Sky / Heaven
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30929074</id>
	<title>The American Mid-Life crisis</title>
	<author>Guppy</author>
	<datestamp>1264607820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is a common error to delude oneself into believing the trappings of power and strength are power and strength themselves.  You see it all the time, when folks fritter away their home equity loans on big-vroom SUVs and fancy appliances, allowing ourselves the delusion (for a temporary while) that we've still "got it made", as long as they have these things around them.  In truth, had we the wisdom to forgo these external symbols of a comfortable existence, the American Dream would be much more alive today.</p><p>I perceive the response to the U.S. withdrawl from manned space exploration in much the same way.  "Asia is taking the lead because they're still launching Spam-in-a-Can into space!  Therefore, we need to launch more Spam-in-a-Can, and it will make us stronger!"  I find there's a certain cargo-cult mistaking of which was cause, and which was effect.  In the past, we have had a great deal of technological innovations associated with the space exploration program -- but it is a mistake to think because we're launching rockets we're driving innovation.  It is was exactly the other way around; because we had a such strong base in engineering and science we were able to create the technologies to launch those rockets.</p><p>China and India's increasing economic and technological competence are what have allowed them to take the lead now, and it's a mistake to think that we can stay ahead if we just keep up with appearances.  We can play mid-life crisis and blow our remaining resources on the equivalent of a fancy sports car, and make-believe we're still a studly, vigorous nation.  But to the rest of the world, we just look increasingly ridiculous.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a common error to delude oneself into believing the trappings of power and strength are power and strength themselves .
You see it all the time , when folks fritter away their home equity loans on big-vroom SUVs and fancy appliances , allowing ourselves the delusion ( for a temporary while ) that we 've still " got it made " , as long as they have these things around them .
In truth , had we the wisdom to forgo these external symbols of a comfortable existence , the American Dream would be much more alive today.I perceive the response to the U.S. withdrawl from manned space exploration in much the same way .
" Asia is taking the lead because they 're still launching Spam-in-a-Can into space !
Therefore , we need to launch more Spam-in-a-Can , and it will make us stronger !
" I find there 's a certain cargo-cult mistaking of which was cause , and which was effect .
In the past , we have had a great deal of technological innovations associated with the space exploration program -- but it is a mistake to think because we 're launching rockets we 're driving innovation .
It is was exactly the other way around ; because we had a such strong base in engineering and science we were able to create the technologies to launch those rockets.China and India 's increasing economic and technological competence are what have allowed them to take the lead now , and it 's a mistake to think that we can stay ahead if we just keep up with appearances .
We can play mid-life crisis and blow our remaining resources on the equivalent of a fancy sports car , and make-believe we 're still a studly , vigorous nation .
But to the rest of the world , we just look increasingly ridiculous .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a common error to delude oneself into believing the trappings of power and strength are power and strength themselves.
You see it all the time, when folks fritter away their home equity loans on big-vroom SUVs and fancy appliances, allowing ourselves the delusion (for a temporary while) that we've still "got it made", as long as they have these things around them.
In truth, had we the wisdom to forgo these external symbols of a comfortable existence, the American Dream would be much more alive today.I perceive the response to the U.S. withdrawl from manned space exploration in much the same way.
"Asia is taking the lead because they're still launching Spam-in-a-Can into space!
Therefore, we need to launch more Spam-in-a-Can, and it will make us stronger!
"  I find there's a certain cargo-cult mistaking of which was cause, and which was effect.
In the past, we have had a great deal of technological innovations associated with the space exploration program -- but it is a mistake to think because we're launching rockets we're driving innovation.
It is was exactly the other way around; because we had a such strong base in engineering and science we were able to create the technologies to launch those rockets.China and India's increasing economic and technological competence are what have allowed them to take the lead now, and it's a mistake to think that we can stay ahead if we just keep up with appearances.
We can play mid-life crisis and blow our remaining resources on the equivalent of a fancy sports car, and make-believe we're still a studly, vigorous nation.
But to the rest of the world, we just look increasingly ridiculous.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923098</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264582800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>easy - punjabinauts</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>easy - punjabinauts</tokentext>
<sentencetext>easy - punjabinauts</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923260</id>
	<title>mod parent up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>agreed!!! dala nbi tijaskanumori vika tumala keema naan</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>agreed ! ! !
dala nbi tijaskanumori vika tumala keema naan</tokentext>
<sentencetext>agreed!!!
dala nbi tijaskanumori vika tumala keema naan</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923874</id>
	<title>Curry Propellant?</title>
	<author>citab</author>
	<datestamp>1264584660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think I could be helpful in producing the needed processed materials.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think I could be helpful in producing the needed processed materials .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think I could be helpful in producing the needed processed materials.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924306</id>
	<title>Re:2016 is a long way off ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From an industry point of view, 2016 is not a long way off. There is a huge amount of necessary infrastructure -- not as much as we use, but a lot nevertheless. They already have the launcher and the launch site. But they will need a capsule, reentry technology, training for engineers and (*)nauts. It's not as easy as it looks<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) And the ISRO installation I visited was very middle-aged dominated; apparently not a lot of younger people are interested in space with the tech boom there.

Chandraya'an-1 was a limited success due to political pressure to launch which impacted their testing schedule. Hopefully they have learned that lesson from us. But I would not be surprised if some of their tasks were outsourced to Europe or the US.</htmltext>
<tokenext>From an industry point of view , 2016 is not a long way off .
There is a huge amount of necessary infrastructure -- not as much as we use , but a lot nevertheless .
They already have the launcher and the launch site .
But they will need a capsule , reentry technology , training for engineers and ( * ) nauts .
It 's not as easy as it looks ; ) And the ISRO installation I visited was very middle-aged dominated ; apparently not a lot of younger people are interested in space with the tech boom there .
Chandraya'an-1 was a limited success due to political pressure to launch which impacted their testing schedule .
Hopefully they have learned that lesson from us .
But I would not be surprised if some of their tasks were outsourced to Europe or the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From an industry point of view, 2016 is not a long way off.
There is a huge amount of necessary infrastructure -- not as much as we use, but a lot nevertheless.
They already have the launcher and the launch site.
But they will need a capsule, reentry technology, training for engineers and (*)nauts.
It's not as easy as it looks ;) And the ISRO installation I visited was very middle-aged dominated; apparently not a lot of younger people are interested in space with the tech boom there.
Chandraya'an-1 was a limited success due to political pressure to launch which impacted their testing schedule.
Hopefully they have learned that lesson from us.
But I would not be surprised if some of their tasks were outsourced to Europe or the US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923752</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>Jeng</author>
	<datestamp>1264584360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Today it just tells us that if people are doing it they believe that the exploration of space is still nothing but a nationalist pissing contest, of no practical value at all.</i></p><p>One should remember that the nationalism is part of the propaganda regarding space exploration so of course they will do stupid stuff like have their own name for those who crew space vehicles.</p><p>It's propaganda which is of course nothing more than a nationalist pissing contest of no practical value at all.  Science is of course going on, but we are reading press releases here, not the scientific papers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Today it just tells us that if people are doing it they believe that the exploration of space is still nothing but a nationalist pissing contest , of no practical value at all.One should remember that the nationalism is part of the propaganda regarding space exploration so of course they will do stupid stuff like have their own name for those who crew space vehicles.It 's propaganda which is of course nothing more than a nationalist pissing contest of no practical value at all .
Science is of course going on , but we are reading press releases here , not the scientific papers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Today it just tells us that if people are doing it they believe that the exploration of space is still nothing but a nationalist pissing contest, of no practical value at all.One should remember that the nationalism is part of the propaganda regarding space exploration so of course they will do stupid stuff like have their own name for those who crew space vehicles.It's propaganda which is of course nothing more than a nationalist pissing contest of no practical value at all.
Science is of course going on, but we are reading press releases here, not the scientific papers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30938000</id>
	<title>poverty vs technology</title>
	<author>rcleme05</author>
	<datestamp>1264707840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From Wikipedia:
<p>
<i> "Poverty in India is widespread with the nation estimated to have a third of the world's poor. According to the criterion used by the Planning Commission of India 27.5\% of the population was living below the poverty line in 2004-2005" </i>
</p><p>
Perhaps those funds earmarked for space exploration might be better spent on helping people not starve ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>From Wikipedia : " Poverty in India is widespread with the nation estimated to have a third of the world 's poor .
According to the criterion used by the Planning Commission of India 27.5 \ % of the population was living below the poverty line in 2004-2005 " Perhaps those funds earmarked for space exploration might be better spent on helping people not starve ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From Wikipedia:

 "Poverty in India is widespread with the nation estimated to have a third of the world's poor.
According to the criterion used by the Planning Commission of India 27.5\% of the population was living below the poverty line in 2004-2005" 

Perhaps those funds earmarked for space exploration might be better spent on helping people not starve ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924376</id>
	<title>Re:First call center in space scheduled for 2021</title>
	<author>nookalan</author>
	<datestamp>1264586160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When somebody says "Houston we have a problem". The answer will come from there.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When somebody says " Houston we have a problem " .
The answer will come from there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When somebody says "Houston we have a problem".
The answer will come from there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922558</id>
	<title>2016 is a long way off ...</title>
	<author>ACK!!</author>
	<datestamp>1264624680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>But I am not doubting the intent.  In fact, it is refreshing to see a nation not simply looking at short term but thinking in terms of long term goals but in a concrete way.  Its a great thing to have the community of nations dedicated to space exploration expanding in any case.</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I am not doubting the intent .
In fact , it is refreshing to see a nation not simply looking at short term but thinking in terms of long term goals but in a concrete way .
Its a great thing to have the community of nations dedicated to space exploration expanding in any case .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I am not doubting the intent.
In fact, it is refreshing to see a nation not simply looking at short term but thinking in terms of long term goals but in a concrete way.
Its a great thing to have the community of nations dedicated to space exploration expanding in any case.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923994</id>
	<title>More like 2022</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If an Indian gives you a time estimate, you need to double it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If an Indian gives you a time estimate , you need to double it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If an Indian gives you a time estimate, you need to double it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30929400</id>
	<title>When did 5 years become long term???</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1264611480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Talk about your playstation generation. 5 years is not long term, except in political circles where it's past the next election.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Talk about your playstation generation .
5 years is not long term , except in political circles where it 's past the next election .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Talk about your playstation generation.
5 years is not long term, except in political circles where it's past the next election.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30927924</id>
	<title>Re:Terrific news!</title>
	<author>fiannaFailMan</author>
	<datestamp>1264599120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Especially for the many millions of Indians without a basic education and sanitation. They'll remain illiterate and crapping in the streets, but they will feel extatic about their fellow Indian in space.</p></div><p>For fuck's sake! Why does this garbage still manage to evade the Troll mod?  Read my lips, idiot. Money spent ON space is not spent IN space. It's spent on the ground creating jobs and driving innovation and education, all of which helps to generate wealth and raise people out of poverty.  Speaking of education, when, pray tell, are you planning on getting one? Hmmm?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially for the many millions of Indians without a basic education and sanitation .
They 'll remain illiterate and crapping in the streets , but they will feel extatic about their fellow Indian in space.For fuck 's sake !
Why does this garbage still manage to evade the Troll mod ?
Read my lips , idiot .
Money spent ON space is not spent IN space .
It 's spent on the ground creating jobs and driving innovation and education , all of which helps to generate wealth and raise people out of poverty .
Speaking of education , when , pray tell , are you planning on getting one ?
Hmmm ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially for the many millions of Indians without a basic education and sanitation.
They'll remain illiterate and crapping in the streets, but they will feel extatic about their fellow Indian in space.For fuck's sake!
Why does this garbage still manage to evade the Troll mod?
Read my lips, idiot.
Money spent ON space is not spent IN space.
It's spent on the ground creating jobs and driving innovation and education, all of which helps to generate wealth and raise people out of poverty.
Speaking of education, when, pray tell, are you planning on getting one?
Hmmm?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30928238</id>
	<title>Re:looks like the US</title>
	<author>KeensMustard</author>
	<datestamp>1264600920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>NASA is not being canned. Only the useless, unscientific boondoggle that is Constellation. The interesting part of NASAs output (the robotic missions) aren't being defunded.</htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA is not being canned .
Only the useless , unscientific boondoggle that is Constellation .
The interesting part of NASAs output ( the robotic missions ) are n't being defunded .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA is not being canned.
Only the useless, unscientific boondoggle that is Constellation.
The interesting part of NASAs output (the robotic missions) aren't being defunded.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923550</id>
	<title>one astronaut inside the spacecraft...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and thirty more clinging to its exterior, along with all their baggage, and dozens of live chickens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and thirty more clinging to its exterior , along with all their baggage , and dozens of live chickens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and thirty more clinging to its exterior, along with all their baggage, and dozens of live chickens.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922482</id>
	<title>First</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Man in space. I eat saag paneer to celebrate! I love ravi.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Man in space .
I eat saag paneer to celebrate !
I love ravi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Man in space.
I eat saag paneer to celebrate!
I love ravi.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925292</id>
	<title>Re:First</title>
	<author>xonicx</author>
	<datestamp>1264588920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its palak paneer</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its palak paneer</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its palak paneer</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923704</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>citab</author>
	<datestamp>1264584240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Currinauts<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... I'm hungry already!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Currinauts ... I 'm hungry already !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Currinauts ... I'm hungry already!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925020</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264588080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Allfornaught<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Allfornaught .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Allfornaught ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746</id>
	<title>What will they be called?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264625100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>US: Astronauts; Russia: Cosmonauts; China: Taikonauts; India: ?

<p>
--Greg</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>US : Astronauts ; Russia : Cosmonauts ; China : Taikonauts ; India : ?
--Greg</tokentext>
<sentencetext>US: Astronauts; Russia: Cosmonauts; China: Taikonauts; India: ?
--Greg</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924350</id>
	<title>H1B</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264586100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The moon's first H1B.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The moon 's first H1B .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The moon's first H1B.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923792</id>
	<title>Money saving costs...</title>
	<author>TiggertheMad</author>
	<datestamp>1264584420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>NASA isn't completely shutting down it's manned space program with the cancellations, they are just 'off-shoring' it to India...</htmltext>
<tokenext>NASA is n't completely shutting down it 's manned space program with the cancellations , they are just 'off-shoring ' it to India.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NASA isn't completely shutting down it's manned space program with the cancellations, they are just 'off-shoring' it to India...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30927728</id>
	<title>I got a feeling this i not going to go well</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264597920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Commonwealth games (yeah, I know you never heard of it) are supposed to happen ~Oct/10 in New Delhi.<br>Words are that the preparations aren't going well.<br>If you cannot even host a sporting competition, it doesn't augur well in a space program.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Commonwealth games ( yeah , I know you never heard of it ) are supposed to happen ~ Oct/10 in New Delhi.Words are that the preparations are n't going well.If you can not even host a sporting competition , it does n't augur well in a space program .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Commonwealth games (yeah, I know you never heard of it) are supposed to happen ~Oct/10 in New Delhi.Words are that the preparations aren't going well.If you cannot even host a sporting competition, it doesn't augur well in a space program.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923594</id>
	<title>Good for them!</title>
	<author>Timewasted</author>
	<datestamp>1264584060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It is a good thing (IMHO) to see more countries developing their own space programs to send their own astronauts to space.  To my knowledge, only Russia, U.S. and China have programs that have done so.
<br> <br>

Competition always fosters excellence in all areas of academics &amp; sciences.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a good thing ( IMHO ) to see more countries developing their own space programs to send their own astronauts to space .
To my knowledge , only Russia , U.S. and China have programs that have done so .
Competition always fosters excellence in all areas of academics &amp; sciences .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a good thing (IMHO) to see more countries developing their own space programs to send their own astronauts to space.
To my knowledge, only Russia, U.S. and China have programs that have done so.
Competition always fosters excellence in all areas of academics &amp; sciences.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926130</id>
	<title>Connecting The Dots</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1264591380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One datum to connect the report from TFA (and sadly but in fact detracting from it) and that elsewhere that the Obama budget contains no funding for Constellation:</p><p>If India launches people into space in 2016 it'll be the 4th nation but the 5th organization to do so. After China's manned orbital flights but before India's planned missions, two pilots earned their astronaut wings flying SpaceShipOne. TFA says they plan to stay a week, but the title does just say 'space'. After the Rutan Clan, every nation the sends up a space mission will be 'after a private company'.</p><p>True, there's an attempt to leave Constellation off the budget (but wait until after ASAP/BigAero has their say). But there's still ongoing support for private programs developing lunar oriented hardware as well as lift vehicles being developed that could make the attempt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One datum to connect the report from TFA ( and sadly but in fact detracting from it ) and that elsewhere that the Obama budget contains no funding for Constellation : If India launches people into space in 2016 it 'll be the 4th nation but the 5th organization to do so .
After China 's manned orbital flights but before India 's planned missions , two pilots earned their astronaut wings flying SpaceShipOne .
TFA says they plan to stay a week , but the title does just say 'space' .
After the Rutan Clan , every nation the sends up a space mission will be 'after a private company'.True , there 's an attempt to leave Constellation off the budget ( but wait until after ASAP/BigAero has their say ) .
But there 's still ongoing support for private programs developing lunar oriented hardware as well as lift vehicles being developed that could make the attempt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One datum to connect the report from TFA (and sadly but in fact detracting from it) and that elsewhere that the Obama budget contains no funding for Constellation:If India launches people into space in 2016 it'll be the 4th nation but the 5th organization to do so.
After China's manned orbital flights but before India's planned missions, two pilots earned their astronaut wings flying SpaceShipOne.
TFA says they plan to stay a week, but the title does just say 'space'.
After the Rutan Clan, every nation the sends up a space mission will be 'after a private company'.True, there's an attempt to leave Constellation off the budget (but wait until after ASAP/BigAero has their say).
But there's still ongoing support for private programs developing lunar oriented hardware as well as lift vehicles being developed that could make the attempt.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926354</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264592100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>India already had a "cosmonaut" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakesh\_Sharma )</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>India already had a " cosmonaut " ( http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakesh \ _Sharma )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>India already had a "cosmonaut" ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakesh\_Sharma )</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922754</id>
	<title>I hate Indians</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264625160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... the "dot" Indians... not the "wooo wooo wooo" Indians....</p><p>I've been around (the world) because of my work as a stewardess. A lot of the people I've met who've encountered an Indian dislike them. They do not say it openly as to avoid being accused of racist. But a lot of them really do hate that race.</p><p>As for me, I've tried to stay away from judging others by their race. But it can't be helped when all of the Indians I've met are rude and conceited. I always had Indian passengers and they are really abusive and arrogant. Most of my passengers regardless of race, were reasonably demanding with the kind of customer service we give them- I say it is only right.</p><p>But Indians are different, they demand like they have never been served before! They always think they deserve more! Lets say I have an Australian passenger, she will ask for normal things such as a drink, and then she's happy. But with an Indian, they ask it repeatedly and always demand for more- and still they are not satisfied nor happy. They bought a ticket and they think that they own the plane. Even other passengers are annoyed with them. They are very noisy. Even if, lets say they stay in economy, they are even more arrogant and demanding than our first class passengers who are mostly just quiet and refined.</p><p>What I really don't like about them is they COMPLAIN a lot! Complaining is normal when our services come short. But to complain for unreasonable things (such as asking for the kind of services we provide in 1st class even if they are only in economy) are really irritating.</p><p>Oh, and I've never met an Indian who was humble. They are always bragging about anything they'd achieve. Like how he'd studied in this college or how he'd gone to America, or how he'd work for this company. They are always conceited.</p><p>An Indian co-worker is just as bad! I admit that they are really good with "communication" despite their heavy accents, however I somehow dislike their know-it-all attitude. I think it would be too much to write when I begin ranting about this. So let it be.</p><p>Now I'm not saying they are all like this. There is no perfect race. But I am still yet to find a very nice and quiet Indian, because for now, all i have are bad memories with this race.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... the " dot " Indians... not the " wooo wooo wooo " Indians....I 've been around ( the world ) because of my work as a stewardess .
A lot of the people I 've met who 've encountered an Indian dislike them .
They do not say it openly as to avoid being accused of racist .
But a lot of them really do hate that race.As for me , I 've tried to stay away from judging others by their race .
But it ca n't be helped when all of the Indians I 've met are rude and conceited .
I always had Indian passengers and they are really abusive and arrogant .
Most of my passengers regardless of race , were reasonably demanding with the kind of customer service we give them- I say it is only right.But Indians are different , they demand like they have never been served before !
They always think they deserve more !
Lets say I have an Australian passenger , she will ask for normal things such as a drink , and then she 's happy .
But with an Indian , they ask it repeatedly and always demand for more- and still they are not satisfied nor happy .
They bought a ticket and they think that they own the plane .
Even other passengers are annoyed with them .
They are very noisy .
Even if , lets say they stay in economy , they are even more arrogant and demanding than our first class passengers who are mostly just quiet and refined.What I really do n't like about them is they COMPLAIN a lot !
Complaining is normal when our services come short .
But to complain for unreasonable things ( such as asking for the kind of services we provide in 1st class even if they are only in economy ) are really irritating.Oh , and I 've never met an Indian who was humble .
They are always bragging about anything they 'd achieve .
Like how he 'd studied in this college or how he 'd gone to America , or how he 'd work for this company .
They are always conceited.An Indian co-worker is just as bad !
I admit that they are really good with " communication " despite their heavy accents , however I somehow dislike their know-it-all attitude .
I think it would be too much to write when I begin ranting about this .
So let it be.Now I 'm not saying they are all like this .
There is no perfect race .
But I am still yet to find a very nice and quiet Indian , because for now , all i have are bad memories with this race .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... the "dot" Indians... not the "wooo wooo wooo" Indians....I've been around (the world) because of my work as a stewardess.
A lot of the people I've met who've encountered an Indian dislike them.
They do not say it openly as to avoid being accused of racist.
But a lot of them really do hate that race.As for me, I've tried to stay away from judging others by their race.
But it can't be helped when all of the Indians I've met are rude and conceited.
I always had Indian passengers and they are really abusive and arrogant.
Most of my passengers regardless of race, were reasonably demanding with the kind of customer service we give them- I say it is only right.But Indians are different, they demand like they have never been served before!
They always think they deserve more!
Lets say I have an Australian passenger, she will ask for normal things such as a drink, and then she's happy.
But with an Indian, they ask it repeatedly and always demand for more- and still they are not satisfied nor happy.
They bought a ticket and they think that they own the plane.
Even other passengers are annoyed with them.
They are very noisy.
Even if, lets say they stay in economy, they are even more arrogant and demanding than our first class passengers who are mostly just quiet and refined.What I really don't like about them is they COMPLAIN a lot!
Complaining is normal when our services come short.
But to complain for unreasonable things (such as asking for the kind of services we provide in 1st class even if they are only in economy) are really irritating.Oh, and I've never met an Indian who was humble.
They are always bragging about anything they'd achieve.
Like how he'd studied in this college or how he'd gone to America, or how he'd work for this company.
They are always conceited.An Indian co-worker is just as bad!
I admit that they are really good with "communication" despite their heavy accents, however I somehow dislike their know-it-all attitude.
I think it would be too much to write when I begin ranting about this.
So let it be.Now I'm not saying they are all like this.
There is no perfect race.
But I am still yet to find a very nice and quiet Indian, because for now, all i have are bad memories with this race.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164</id>
	<title>Terrific news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264582980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Especially for the many millions of Indians without a basic education and sanitation. They'll remain illiterate and crapping in the streets, but they will feel extatic about their fellow Indian in space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially for the many millions of Indians without a basic education and sanitation .
They 'll remain illiterate and crapping in the streets , but they will feel extatic about their fellow Indian in space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially for the many millions of Indians without a basic education and sanitation.
They'll remain illiterate and crapping in the streets, but they will feel extatic about their fellow Indian in space.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924152</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264585500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So starting in 2017, technical support calls for Hewlett Packard will be routed to space?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So starting in 2017 , technical support calls for Hewlett Packard will be routed to space ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So starting in 2017, technical support calls for Hewlett Packard will be routed to space?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923102</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1264582860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Vizvanauts?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Vizvanauts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vizvanauts?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30931316</id>
	<title>Re:First call center in space scheduled for 2021</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1264677540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>While in geo-synchronise orbit over every major continent, call center employees will be available to answer your computer questions both day and night.</p></div></blockquote><p>For suitably small values of "answer".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>While in geo-synchronise orbit over every major continent , call center employees will be available to answer your computer questions both day and night.For suitably small values of " answer " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While in geo-synchronise orbit over every major continent, call center employees will be available to answer your computer questions both day and night.For suitably small values of "answer".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922492</id>
	<title>looks like the US</title>
	<author>ionix5891</author>
	<datestamp>1264624560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>would be putting its last man in space well before that, with NASA being "canned"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>would be putting its last man in space well before that , with NASA being " canned "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>would be putting its last man in space well before that, with NASA being "canned"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30929154</id>
	<title>Whitey on the moon</title>
	<author>ZeroPly</author>
	<datestamp>1264608720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's sad when someone is this unaware of history.</p><p>The same criticisms were brought up in the U.S. during the Apollo project. Why send a man to the moon when people in Harlem didn't have basic health services? You might want to check out "Whitey on the Moon" by Gil Scott-Heron. Opening lines:</p><p><i>A rat done bit my sister Nell.<br>(with Whitey on the moon)<br>Her face and arms began to swell.<br>(and Whitey's on the moon)<br>I can't pay no doctor bill.<br>(but Whitey's on the moon)<br>Ten years from now I'll be payin' still.<br>(while Whitey's on the moon) </i></p><p>In hindsight, I think you'd agree that the whole manned space thing was probably worth it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's sad when someone is this unaware of history.The same criticisms were brought up in the U.S. during the Apollo project .
Why send a man to the moon when people in Harlem did n't have basic health services ?
You might want to check out " Whitey on the Moon " by Gil Scott-Heron .
Opening lines : A rat done bit my sister Nell .
( with Whitey on the moon ) Her face and arms began to swell .
( and Whitey 's on the moon ) I ca n't pay no doctor bill .
( but Whitey 's on the moon ) Ten years from now I 'll be payin ' still .
( while Whitey 's on the moon ) In hindsight , I think you 'd agree that the whole manned space thing was probably worth it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's sad when someone is this unaware of history.The same criticisms were brought up in the U.S. during the Apollo project.
Why send a man to the moon when people in Harlem didn't have basic health services?
You might want to check out "Whitey on the Moon" by Gil Scott-Heron.
Opening lines:A rat done bit my sister Nell.
(with Whitey on the moon)Her face and arms began to swell.
(and Whitey's on the moon)I can't pay no doctor bill.
(but Whitey's on the moon)Ten years from now I'll be payin' still.
(while Whitey's on the moon) In hindsight, I think you'd agree that the whole manned space thing was probably worth it...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923494</id>
	<title>India puts its first people in space...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264583700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...four years after the US gives up that capability.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...four years after the US gives up that capability .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...four years after the US gives up that capability.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30928118</id>
	<title>Space Appendage</title>
	<author>KeensMustard</author>
	<datestamp>1264600260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it certain that they have selected a man, rather than a woman - and if so, why? Is it advantageous to have a penis in space?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it certain that they have selected a man , rather than a woman - and if so , why ?
Is it advantageous to have a penis in space ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it certain that they have selected a man, rather than a woman - and if so, why?
Is it advantageous to have a penis in space?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922572</id>
	<title>First call center in space scheduled for 2021</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>While in geo-synchronise orbit over every major continent, call center employees will be available to answer your computer questions both day and night.</htmltext>
<tokenext>While in geo-synchronise orbit over every major continent , call center employees will be available to answer your computer questions both day and night .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While in geo-synchronise orbit over every major continent, call center employees will be available to answer your computer questions both day and night.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30930716</id>
	<title>they took our jobs!</title>
	<author>sharp3</author>
	<datestamp>1264669980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I foresee the  powerful astronaut union becoming upset by the outsourcing of jobs here.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I foresee the powerful astronaut union becoming upset by the outsourcing of jobs here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I foresee the  powerful astronaut union becoming upset by the outsourcing of jobs here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924834</id>
	<title>Imagine the smell</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264587480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Imagine the smell in the cramped space module.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Imagine the smell in the cramped space module .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Imagine the smell in the cramped space module.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30929344</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264610580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Cashewnauts?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cashewnauts ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cashewnauts?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922542</id>
	<title>Let's hope it goes better than their software.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the sake of whoever is getting sent up, I hope that they build spacecraft better than they build software, because all of the software I've seen written over there has been pretty damn awful. It's far below the quality I'd ever seen in America and Europe.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the sake of whoever is getting sent up , I hope that they build spacecraft better than they build software , because all of the software I 've seen written over there has been pretty damn awful .
It 's far below the quality I 'd ever seen in America and Europe .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the sake of whoever is getting sent up, I hope that they build spacecraft better than they build software, because all of the software I've seen written over there has been pretty damn awful.
It's far below the quality I'd ever seen in America and Europe.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925376</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>elrous0</author>
	<datestamp>1264589220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, what's with all these countries speaking different languages? Can't we just agree on one?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , what 's with all these countries speaking different languages ?
Ca n't we just agree on one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, what's with all these countries speaking different languages?
Can't we just agree on one?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923114</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926674</id>
	<title>Rakesh Sharma?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264593120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What do you mean, "moving to become the fourth nation to put a man in space"?  He was already in space in 1984.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakesh\_Sharma</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What do you mean , " moving to become the fourth nation to put a man in space " ?
He was already in space in 1984. http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakesh \ _Sharma</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What do you mean, "moving to become the fourth nation to put a man in space"?
He was already in space in 1984.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rakesh\_Sharma</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924084</id>
	<title>A question</title>
	<author>gmb61</author>
	<datestamp>1264585320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How do they get their spacesuit helmets to fit over their turbans????</htmltext>
<tokenext>How do they get their spacesuit helmets to fit over their turbans ? ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do they get their spacesuit helmets to fit over their turbans???
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923746</id>
	<title>Re:First call center in space scheduled for 2021</title>
	<author>Psyberian</author>
	<datestamp>1264584360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>7/11 franchises to follow shortly on the space station.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>7/11 franchises to follow shortly on the space station .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>7/11 franchises to follow shortly on the space station.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922572</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923114</id>
	<title>Re:What will they be called?</title>
	<author>radtea</author>
	<datestamp>1264582860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Americans, Britons, Canadians, Russians, Chinese, Japanese, Sri Lankan, Egyptian, Indian... etc... people who crew boats are called "sailors".  Likewise, people from all nations who fly planes are called "pilots" or "aircrew".</p><p>Why anyone thinks the nationality of a human being in space is so important that we ought to have 200 different words for "human being in space" is beyond me.  This kind of petty nationalism may have served a purpose during the Cold War.  Today it just tells us that if people are doing it they believe that the exploration of space is still nothing but a nationalist pissing contest, of no practical value at all.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Americans , Britons , Canadians , Russians , Chinese , Japanese , Sri Lankan , Egyptian , Indian... etc... people who crew boats are called " sailors " .
Likewise , people from all nations who fly planes are called " pilots " or " aircrew " .Why anyone thinks the nationality of a human being in space is so important that we ought to have 200 different words for " human being in space " is beyond me .
This kind of petty nationalism may have served a purpose during the Cold War .
Today it just tells us that if people are doing it they believe that the exploration of space is still nothing but a nationalist pissing contest , of no practical value at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Americans, Britons, Canadians, Russians, Chinese, Japanese, Sri Lankan, Egyptian, Indian... etc... people who crew boats are called "sailors".
Likewise, people from all nations who fly planes are called "pilots" or "aircrew".Why anyone thinks the nationality of a human being in space is so important that we ought to have 200 different words for "human being in space" is beyond me.
This kind of petty nationalism may have served a purpose during the Cold War.
Today it just tells us that if people are doing it they believe that the exploration of space is still nothing but a nationalist pissing contest, of no practical value at all.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922690</id>
	<title>Outsourcing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264624980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The US will be able to outsource space exploration overseas!!!

Oh goody.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The US will be able to outsource space exploration overseas ! ! !
Oh goody .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US will be able to outsource space exploration overseas!!!
Oh goody.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30928206</id>
	<title>Re:Outsourcing?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264600740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, after all, why not? It's not like we're going to actually have any domestic technology capabilities by then. Flintstones redux.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , after all , why not ?
It 's not like we 're going to actually have any domestic technology capabilities by then .
Flintstones redux .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, after all, why not?
It's not like we're going to actually have any domestic technology capabilities by then.
Flintstones redux.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922690</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924032</id>
	<title>Juggernauts . . .</title>
	<author>PolygamousRanchKid </author>
	<datestamp>1264585140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The word is derived from the Sanskrit  Jaganntha[1] (meaning "Lord of the Universe") which is one of the many names of Krishna from the ancient Vedic scriptures of India." <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juggernaut" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juggernaut</a> [wikipedia.org]
</p><p>Seems like a perfect fit to me.
</p><p>In other news, Greece has reconfirmed its plans to send men into space, choosing to call them Argonauts.  However, critics cite that their plans are "a few thousand years" behind schedule, and technical experts are skeptical of the viability of sheep skin space suits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The word is derived from the Sanskrit Jaganntha [ 1 ] ( meaning " Lord of the Universe " ) which is one of the many names of Krishna from the ancient Vedic scriptures of India .
" http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juggernaut [ wikipedia.org ] Seems like a perfect fit to me .
In other news , Greece has reconfirmed its plans to send men into space , choosing to call them Argonauts .
However , critics cite that their plans are " a few thousand years " behind schedule , and technical experts are skeptical of the viability of sheep skin space suits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The word is derived from the Sanskrit  Jaganntha[1] (meaning "Lord of the Universe") which is one of the many names of Krishna from the ancient Vedic scriptures of India.
" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juggernaut [wikipedia.org]
Seems like a perfect fit to me.
In other news, Greece has reconfirmed its plans to send men into space, choosing to call them Argonauts.
However, critics cite that their plans are "a few thousand years" behind schedule, and technical experts are skeptical of the viability of sheep skin space suits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924392</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264586160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So beginning in 2017, all support calls to Hewlett Packard will be routed to space?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So beginning in 2017 , all support calls to Hewlett Packard will be routed to space ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So beginning in 2017, all support calls to Hewlett Packard will be routed to space?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925132</id>
	<title>Re:2016 is a long way off ...</title>
	<author>FleaPlus</author>
	<datestamp>1264588440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2016 for India (at a cost of $2.76 billion) seems like a long way off, but it should be noted that NASA's similarly-capable Ares I isn't expected to be ready to launch people until 2017-2019 at a cost of ~$40 billion. The Ares I has also been under development since 2005, while the Indian launch plans have just been announced.</p><p>Then again, fixed-price commercial capsules from the United Launch Alliance or SpaceX (on their <a href="http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news\_space\_thewritestuff/2009/04/report-says-eelvs-could-carry-americas-lunar-ambitions.html" title="orlandosentinel.com">already-proven rockets</a> [orlandosentinel.com] like the Atlas V) would be ready 2013-2015 if they received a few billion in funding, which would beat both India and NASA on schedule and be competitive with India (and be an order of magnitude less than NASA) on price.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2016 for India ( at a cost of $ 2.76 billion ) seems like a long way off , but it should be noted that NASA 's similarly-capable Ares I is n't expected to be ready to launch people until 2017-2019 at a cost of ~ $ 40 billion .
The Ares I has also been under development since 2005 , while the Indian launch plans have just been announced.Then again , fixed-price commercial capsules from the United Launch Alliance or SpaceX ( on their already-proven rockets [ orlandosentinel.com ] like the Atlas V ) would be ready 2013-2015 if they received a few billion in funding , which would beat both India and NASA on schedule and be competitive with India ( and be an order of magnitude less than NASA ) on price .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2016 for India (at a cost of $2.76 billion) seems like a long way off, but it should be noted that NASA's similarly-capable Ares I isn't expected to be ready to launch people until 2017-2019 at a cost of ~$40 billion.
The Ares I has also been under development since 2005, while the Indian launch plans have just been announced.Then again, fixed-price commercial capsules from the United Launch Alliance or SpaceX (on their already-proven rockets [orlandosentinel.com] like the Atlas V) would be ready 2013-2015 if they received a few billion in funding, which would beat both India and NASA on schedule and be competitive with India (and be an order of magnitude less than NASA) on price.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922558</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30931522</id>
	<title>Re:3 cheers for India!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264679820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Let's hope they can make something sustainable and profitable (Hint: Manned space-based low earth orbit solar power stations are where the money is going to be guys).</p></div><p>With 400 million in India still without electricity, space based solar laser power projected to earth which is supplied by a USA corp. working on same, wherein India simply builds the solar on-ground receiving stations connected to the grid is the way to go.  With India saving tens of $billions in satellite build, launch &amp; maintenance costs and needed technology development.  Why should they reinvent the wheel?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's hope they can make something sustainable and profitable ( Hint : Manned space-based low earth orbit solar power stations are where the money is going to be guys ) .With 400 million in India still without electricity , space based solar laser power projected to earth which is supplied by a USA corp. working on same , wherein India simply builds the solar on-ground receiving stations connected to the grid is the way to go .
With India saving tens of $ billions in satellite build , launch &amp; maintenance costs and needed technology development .
Why should they reinvent the wheel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's hope they can make something sustainable and profitable (Hint: Manned space-based low earth orbit solar power stations are where the money is going to be guys).With 400 million in India still without electricity, space based solar laser power projected to earth which is supplied by a USA corp. working on same, wherein India simply builds the solar on-ground receiving stations connected to the grid is the way to go.
With India saving tens of $billions in satellite build, launch &amp; maintenance costs and needed technology development.
Why should they reinvent the wheel?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923974</id>
	<title>Re:Terrific news!</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1264584960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A little bit of perspective is called for here.</p><p>Yes, vast numbers of people living in crushing poverty are a drain on the Indian economy and a potentially destabilizing influence on its government.  But India is huge, period. There are more people living in middle class conditions in India than there are Americans <em>total</em>.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A little bit of perspective is called for here.Yes , vast numbers of people living in crushing poverty are a drain on the Indian economy and a potentially destabilizing influence on its government .
But India is huge , period .
There are more people living in middle class conditions in India than there are Americans total .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A little bit of perspective is called for here.Yes, vast numbers of people living in crushing poverty are a drain on the Indian economy and a potentially destabilizing influence on its government.
But India is huge, period.
There are more people living in middle class conditions in India than there are Americans total.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926276</id>
	<title>Re:Terrific news!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>shut up cunt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>shut up cunt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>shut up cunt</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926476</id>
	<title>What will their food rations include?</title>
	<author>guacamole</author>
	<datestamp>1264592460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Being a big fan of Indian cuisine I can't but start wondering what kind of meals the Indian space agency will package and send with cosmonauts. Has there any research been done on how to package naan and curries for extended periods of time?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Being a big fan of Indian cuisine I ca n't but start wondering what kind of meals the Indian space agency will package and send with cosmonauts .
Has there any research been done on how to package naan and curries for extended periods of time ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Being a big fan of Indian cuisine I can't but start wondering what kind of meals the Indian space agency will package and send with cosmonauts.
Has there any research been done on how to package naan and curries for extended periods of time?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925020
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923954
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922482
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30928380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30927924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924306
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924032
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30931316
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30929154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30928238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922492
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30929400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30927272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30931522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30928206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922690
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924376
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922572
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30929344
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_1931202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923752
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925132
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30929400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924306
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30931522
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922542
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923994
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923550
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922492
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30928238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922482
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923260
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30927924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30929154
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924018
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924376
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30931316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923746
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926674
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923202
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30927272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30928206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30922746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925020
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30929344
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30928380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923114
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923898
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30925376
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30923752
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30924390
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_1931202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_1931202.30926130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
