<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_27_0154253</id>
	<title>Scientology Attacker Will Be Sentenced To Jail</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1264587300000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>OBG writes <i>"A Nebraska native charged with taking part in a <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/01/26/scientology.hacker/">massive cyber-attack against the Scientology website</a> will be spending the next year behind bars. 20-year-old Brian Thomas Mettenbrink will plead guilty to the charge of unauthorized access of a protected computer for his involvement in the denial of service attack, which was <a href="//yro.slashdot.org/story/08/01/24/1311252/Internet-Group-Declares-War-on-Scientology">orchestrated</a> by the online group 'Anonymous.' Mettenbrink's is the second successful prosecution connected to the 'Anonymous' attacks. Last year, Dmitriy Guzner of Verona, New Jersey, was <a href="//yro.slashdot.org/story/09/11/24/1632228/Prison-Terms-For-Spammer-Ralsky-Scientology-DoS-Attacker">sentenced to a year and a day</a> in federal prison for attacks on Scientology sites."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>OBG writes " A Nebraska native charged with taking part in a massive cyber-attack against the Scientology website will be spending the next year behind bars .
20-year-old Brian Thomas Mettenbrink will plead guilty to the charge of unauthorized access of a protected computer for his involvement in the denial of service attack , which was orchestrated by the online group 'Anonymous .
' Mettenbrink 's is the second successful prosecution connected to the 'Anonymous ' attacks .
Last year , Dmitriy Guzner of Verona , New Jersey , was sentenced to a year and a day in federal prison for attacks on Scientology sites .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OBG writes "A Nebraska native charged with taking part in a massive cyber-attack against the Scientology website will be spending the next year behind bars.
20-year-old Brian Thomas Mettenbrink will plead guilty to the charge of unauthorized access of a protected computer for his involvement in the denial of service attack, which was orchestrated by the online group 'Anonymous.
' Mettenbrink's is the second successful prosecution connected to the 'Anonymous' attacks.
Last year, Dmitriy Guzner of Verona, New Jersey, was sentenced to a year and a day in federal prison for attacks on Scientology sites.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915896</id>
	<title>Martyrs 2.0</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264600380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>All hail our heroes!</htmltext>
<tokenext>All hail our heroes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All hail our heroes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916016</id>
	<title>Re:unauthorized access of a protected computer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264601400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if you give someone the root password to your brain, you cant complain when they haXX0r you...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if you give someone the root password to your brain , you cant complain when they haXX0r you.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you give someone the root password to your brain, you cant complain when they haXX0r you...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920144</id>
	<title>Re:Has anyone jailed the pope yet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264618620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because we have documented proof that the founder made it all up to make money.  No other religion on this planet can make that claim.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because we have documented proof that the founder made it all up to make money .
No other religion on this planet can make that claim .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because we have documented proof that the founder made it all up to make money.
No other religion on this planet can make that claim.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915732</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>pla</author>
	<datestamp>1264599060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>When they do something that truly endangers a child's safety, that's when the state gets involved. Not some unaffiliated pressure group, but a government tasked with protecting the child's fundamental rights.</i> <br>
<br>
You mean, http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2009/1119/1224259105905.htmlLike this? <br>
<br>
<br>
<i>Um, so which religions teach tax cuts for the rich?</i> <br>
<br>
You missed the point.  We get draconian drug policy that <i>only</i> benefits the pharmaceutical industry "for the children".  We get
leaders that eliminate inheritance taxes for <i>less than</i> the top 1\% wealthiest people by appealing to the anti-abortion crowd.  And
let's not leave out the elephant in the room - "Good" religions get federal dollars to fund their proselytizing (oh and some vaguely defined
"charitable works" to justify it), while "bad" religions can't even get tax exempt status (seen a lot of Wiccan 501(c)(3)s, lately?).<br>
<br>
<br>
<i>The largest Christian sect in the world I don't think could really be described as attacking science, anymore.</i> <br>
<br>
Yeah, very kind of them to pardon Galileo only 400 years after he could no longer threaten them anymore.  Good thing they've stopped
worrying about little things like the Go... I mean, Higgs boson, and embraced the scientific progress of the 19th century wholeheartedly.<br>
<br>
<br>
<i>it doesn't mean that the power to harm them is then passed to an unaccountable group.</i> <br>
<br>
When the state won't protect us from an invading enemy, it falls to the people to defend themselves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>When they do something that truly endangers a child 's safety , that 's when the state gets involved .
Not some unaffiliated pressure group , but a government tasked with protecting the child 's fundamental rights .
You mean , http : //www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2009/1119/1224259105905.htmlLike this ?
Um , so which religions teach tax cuts for the rich ?
You missed the point .
We get draconian drug policy that only benefits the pharmaceutical industry " for the children " .
We get leaders that eliminate inheritance taxes for less than the top 1 \ % wealthiest people by appealing to the anti-abortion crowd .
And let 's not leave out the elephant in the room - " Good " religions get federal dollars to fund their proselytizing ( oh and some vaguely defined " charitable works " to justify it ) , while " bad " religions ca n't even get tax exempt status ( seen a lot of Wiccan 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) s , lately ? ) .
The largest Christian sect in the world I do n't think could really be described as attacking science , anymore .
Yeah , very kind of them to pardon Galileo only 400 years after he could no longer threaten them anymore .
Good thing they 've stopped worrying about little things like the Go... I mean , Higgs boson , and embraced the scientific progress of the 19th century wholeheartedly .
it does n't mean that the power to harm them is then passed to an unaccountable group .
When the state wo n't protect us from an invading enemy , it falls to the people to defend themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When they do something that truly endangers a child's safety, that's when the state gets involved.
Not some unaffiliated pressure group, but a government tasked with protecting the child's fundamental rights.
You mean, http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2009/1119/1224259105905.htmlLike this?
Um, so which religions teach tax cuts for the rich?
You missed the point.
We get draconian drug policy that only benefits the pharmaceutical industry "for the children".
We get
leaders that eliminate inheritance taxes for less than the top 1\% wealthiest people by appealing to the anti-abortion crowd.
And
let's not leave out the elephant in the room - "Good" religions get federal dollars to fund their proselytizing (oh and some vaguely defined
"charitable works" to justify it), while "bad" religions can't even get tax exempt status (seen a lot of Wiccan 501(c)(3)s, lately?).
The largest Christian sect in the world I don't think could really be described as attacking science, anymore.
Yeah, very kind of them to pardon Galileo only 400 years after he could no longer threaten them anymore.
Good thing they've stopped
worrying about little things like the Go... I mean, Higgs boson, and embraced the scientific progress of the 19th century wholeheartedly.
it doesn't mean that the power to harm them is then passed to an unaccountable group.
When the state won't protect us from an invading enemy, it falls to the people to defend themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915294</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915764</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>delirium of disorder</author>
	<datestamp>1264599300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>So, taking it to the absurd</i> <br>
Exactly.  Your slippery slope shit is fallacious.<br> <br>
<i>group who think that lima beans are a threat to the world.....using violence against lima bean growers</i> <br>
Lima beans are not a threat to our existence as a species.  They are actually pretty good for your health.  Apocalyptic, dogmatic, irrational faith is a major threat in a age of WMDs.  It is also a barrier to having a participatory democratic society.  If everyday people are going to make important social decisions, they need to not be totally fucking ignorant and crazy.<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>...the state gets involved...</i> <br>
I don't support the existence of the state.  The state is a monopoly on the use of force.  The use of force depends on the ethics of situation.  It should never be reserved to a particular institution to use as they please.<br> <br>
<i>Um, so which religions teach tax cuts for the rich?</i> <br>
Actually there are Evangelical Christian churches that preach that kinda "cross of gold" bullshit.  But...that wasn't my point.  My point is that by focusing on homophobia and etc bigotries, the churches have gotten the working class to ignore their class interest and support a candidate simply for having conservative social values.<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr><i>...Catholics...</i> <br>
Catholics in the USA tend to ignore the bigotry that exists in the church and vote their economic interest.  There are even left wing members of the clergy.  But the USA is mostly protestant, not Catholic.<br> <br>
<i>Social contract theory</i> <br>
I never was given the option to sign any social contract!  I doubt most people would choose the organized oppressive violence of the state, the exploitation of capitalism, and the lies of religion if given a choice.  Most people would choose anarchy: peace, freedom, self organization.</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , taking it to the absurd Exactly .
Your slippery slope shit is fallacious .
group who think that lima beans are a threat to the world.....using violence against lima bean growers Lima beans are not a threat to our existence as a species .
They are actually pretty good for your health .
Apocalyptic , dogmatic , irrational faith is a major threat in a age of WMDs .
It is also a barrier to having a participatory democratic society .
If everyday people are going to make important social decisions , they need to not be totally fucking ignorant and crazy .
...the state gets involved.. . I do n't support the existence of the state .
The state is a monopoly on the use of force .
The use of force depends on the ethics of situation .
It should never be reserved to a particular institution to use as they please .
Um , so which religions teach tax cuts for the rich ?
Actually there are Evangelical Christian churches that preach that kinda " cross of gold " bullshit .
But...that was n't my point .
My point is that by focusing on homophobia and etc bigotries , the churches have gotten the working class to ignore their class interest and support a candidate simply for having conservative social values .
...Catholics.. . Catholics in the USA tend to ignore the bigotry that exists in the church and vote their economic interest .
There are even left wing members of the clergy .
But the USA is mostly protestant , not Catholic .
Social contract theory I never was given the option to sign any social contract !
I doubt most people would choose the organized oppressive violence of the state , the exploitation of capitalism , and the lies of religion if given a choice .
Most people would choose anarchy : peace , freedom , self organization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, taking it to the absurd 
Exactly.
Your slippery slope shit is fallacious.
group who think that lima beans are a threat to the world.....using violence against lima bean growers 
Lima beans are not a threat to our existence as a species.
They are actually pretty good for your health.
Apocalyptic, dogmatic, irrational faith is a major threat in a age of WMDs.
It is also a barrier to having a participatory democratic society.
If everyday people are going to make important social decisions, they need to not be totally fucking ignorant and crazy.
...the state gets involved... 
I don't support the existence of the state.
The state is a monopoly on the use of force.
The use of force depends on the ethics of situation.
It should never be reserved to a particular institution to use as they please.
Um, so which religions teach tax cuts for the rich?
Actually there are Evangelical Christian churches that preach that kinda "cross of gold" bullshit.
But...that wasn't my point.
My point is that by focusing on homophobia and etc bigotries, the churches have gotten the working class to ignore their class interest and support a candidate simply for having conservative social values.
...Catholics... 
Catholics in the USA tend to ignore the bigotry that exists in the church and vote their economic interest.
There are even left wing members of the clergy.
But the USA is mostly protestant, not Catholic.
Social contract theory 
I never was given the option to sign any social contract!
I doubt most people would choose the organized oppressive violence of the state, the exploitation of capitalism, and the lies of religion if given a choice.
Most people would choose anarchy: peace, freedom, self organization.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915294</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915312</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>jandersen</author>
	<datestamp>1264595100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr></p><div class="quote"><p>... ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions</p></div><p>Ah, well, that is where it gets problematic, isn't it? There is no universal, objective standard for "good ethics", and in extreme cases we have people such as the terrorists of all denominations, who feel they have the ethical right to kill innocent bystanders "for a higher truth". Evil is evil, even if you use the excuse of a good cause.</p><p>Of course I understand the sentiment - it is galling to see a large organization like Scientology, that is considered a criminal organization in many countries, get any sort of victory, however small. But we are only as good as our deeds; and a crime is still crime, even if it is committed against criminals. This is the price you pay for being good.</p><p>And anyway - criminals like Scientology are always going to win if you play by their rules and fight them with their own dirty methods; they have much more experience in that game.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>... ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religionsAh , well , that is where it gets problematic , is n't it ?
There is no universal , objective standard for " good ethics " , and in extreme cases we have people such as the terrorists of all denominations , who feel they have the ethical right to kill innocent bystanders " for a higher truth " .
Evil is evil , even if you use the excuse of a good cause.Of course I understand the sentiment - it is galling to see a large organization like Scientology , that is considered a criminal organization in many countries , get any sort of victory , however small .
But we are only as good as our deeds ; and a crime is still crime , even if it is committed against criminals .
This is the price you pay for being good.And anyway - criminals like Scientology are always going to win if you play by their rules and fight them with their own dirty methods ; they have much more experience in that game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> ... ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religionsAh, well, that is where it gets problematic, isn't it?
There is no universal, objective standard for "good ethics", and in extreme cases we have people such as the terrorists of all denominations, who feel they have the ethical right to kill innocent bystanders "for a higher truth".
Evil is evil, even if you use the excuse of a good cause.Of course I understand the sentiment - it is galling to see a large organization like Scientology, that is considered a criminal organization in many countries, get any sort of victory, however small.
But we are only as good as our deeds; and a crime is still crime, even if it is committed against criminals.
This is the price you pay for being good.And anyway - criminals like Scientology are always going to win if you play by their rules and fight them with their own dirty methods; they have much more experience in that game.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30918476</id>
	<title>Open Letter</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264612140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dear Brian Thomas Mettenbrink, Nebraska, and Dmitriy Guzner of Verona, New Jersey,</p><p>Thanks.</p><p>Yours Sincerely,</p><p>The World</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dear Brian Thomas Mettenbrink , Nebraska , and Dmitriy Guzner of Verona , New Jersey,Thanks.Yours Sincerely,The World</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dear Brian Thomas Mettenbrink, Nebraska, and Dmitriy Guzner of Verona, New Jersey,Thanks.Yours Sincerely,The World</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30914996</id>
	<title>We are Anonymous.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We are Anonymous Cowards, all your base are belong to us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We are Anonymous Cowards , all your base are belong to us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We are Anonymous Cowards, all your base are belong to us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917808</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>steelfood</author>
	<datestamp>1264609740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Evil is evil, even if you use the excuse of a good cause.</p></div><p>The road to hell is paved with good intentions.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>criminals like Scientology are always going to win if you play by their rules and fight them with their own dirty methods; they have much more experience in that game.</p></div><p>What happens when their game is the US judicial and legal systems?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Evil is evil , even if you use the excuse of a good cause.The road to hell is paved with good intentions.criminals like Scientology are always going to win if you play by their rules and fight them with their own dirty methods ; they have much more experience in that game.What happens when their game is the US judicial and legal systems ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Evil is evil, even if you use the excuse of a good cause.The road to hell is paved with good intentions.criminals like Scientology are always going to win if you play by their rules and fight them with their own dirty methods; they have much more experience in that game.What happens when their game is the US judicial and legal systems?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30919160</id>
	<title>FREE personality test!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264614720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's what it really takes to join:<br>http://www.oca.scientology.org/perstest.pdf</p><p>Some gems...<br>Do you browse through railway timetables, directories, or dictionaries just for pleasure?<br>Is your voice monotonous, rather than varied in pitch?<br>Does an unexpected action cause your muscles to twitch? <i>(note: that be the thetans!!1)</i><br>Do you ever get a &ldquo;dreamlike&rdquo; feeling toward life when it all seems unreal?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's what it really takes to join : http : //www.oca.scientology.org/perstest.pdfSome gems...Do you browse through railway timetables , directories , or dictionaries just for pleasure ? Is your voice monotonous , rather than varied in pitch ? Does an unexpected action cause your muscles to twitch ?
( note : that be the thetans !
! 1 ) Do you ever get a    dreamlike    feeling toward life when it all seems unreal ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's what it really takes to join:http://www.oca.scientology.org/perstest.pdfSome gems...Do you browse through railway timetables, directories, or dictionaries just for pleasure?Is your voice monotonous, rather than varied in pitch?Does an unexpected action cause your muscles to twitch?
(note: that be the thetans!
!1)Do you ever get a “dreamlike” feeling toward life when it all seems unreal?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920358</id>
	<title>Re:Heroes, not criminals.</title>
	<author>thePowerOfGrayskull</author>
	<datestamp>1264619400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are implying that running a script which presents little to no risk to yourself (How many participated? How many caught?) is somehow heroic?  If every one of them said "Hey, this is who I am, this is where I live, and I am doing this to oppress this bogus religion", *that* would have been a lot closer to heroism.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are implying that running a script which presents little to no risk to yourself ( How many participated ?
How many caught ?
) is somehow heroic ?
If every one of them said " Hey , this is who I am , this is where I live , and I am doing this to oppress this bogus religion " , * that * would have been a lot closer to heroism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are implying that running a script which presents little to no risk to yourself (How many participated?
How many caught?
) is somehow heroic?
If every one of them said "Hey, this is who I am, this is where I live, and I am doing this to oppress this bogus religion", *that* would have been a lot closer to heroism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442</id>
	<title>unauthorized access of a protected computer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264597020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In some ways you can think of a person's brain as a computer.</p><p>When can we expect Scientology types to go to jail for fucking with peoples' heads?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In some ways you can think of a person 's brain as a computer.When can we expect Scientology types to go to jail for fucking with peoples ' heads ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In some ways you can think of a person's brain as a computer.When can we expect Scientology types to go to jail for fucking with peoples' heads?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916454</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264603860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Ah, well, that is where it gets problematic, isn't it? There is no universal, objective standard for "good ethics", and in extreme cases we have people such as the terrorists of all denominations, who feel they have the ethical right to kill innocent bystanders "for a higher truth". Evil is evil, even if you use the excuse of a good cause.</p></div><p>So one cannot grasp the idea of "good ethics", yet one have no problems determining what evil is, is what you say?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , well , that is where it gets problematic , is n't it ?
There is no universal , objective standard for " good ethics " , and in extreme cases we have people such as the terrorists of all denominations , who feel they have the ethical right to kill innocent bystanders " for a higher truth " .
Evil is evil , even if you use the excuse of a good cause.So one can not grasp the idea of " good ethics " , yet one have no problems determining what evil is , is what you say ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, well, that is where it gets problematic, isn't it?
There is no universal, objective standard for "good ethics", and in extreme cases we have people such as the terrorists of all denominations, who feel they have the ethical right to kill innocent bystanders "for a higher truth".
Evil is evil, even if you use the excuse of a good cause.So one cannot grasp the idea of "good ethics", yet one have no problems determining what evil is, is what you say?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915708</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264598940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>As long as parents have the legal "right" to force their (property) offspring into organized religion, ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Ethical people generally are not hyperbolic idiots or religious or anti-religious fanatics, therefore do not assert a right to use force to influence people's religious beliefs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as parents have the legal " right " to force their ( property ) offspring into organized religion , ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions .
Ethical people generally are not hyperbolic idiots or religious or anti-religious fanatics , therefore do not assert a right to use force to influence people 's religious beliefs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as parents have the legal "right" to force their (property) offspring into organized religion, ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions.
Ethical people generally are not hyperbolic idiots or religious or anti-religious fanatics, therefore do not assert a right to use force to influence people's religious beliefs.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915080</id>
	<title>An</title>
	<author>rarez</author>
	<datestamp>1264592100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As the one's who stood up for us all.<br>The one's we can tell our children about.<br>The good guys not the bad guys.<br>They are victims and Scientology is and always will be a cult and more to the point. If Anonymous always needs to hide they're faces it's quite obvious they have reason to be frightened.</p><p>Lest we forget the one's who take them on they are our neighbours, our friends maybe even your family.<br>Keep up the work guys and gals!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As the one 's who stood up for us all.The one 's we can tell our children about.The good guys not the bad guys.They are victims and Scientology is and always will be a cult and more to the point .
If Anonymous always needs to hide they 're faces it 's quite obvious they have reason to be frightened.Lest we forget the one 's who take them on they are our neighbours , our friends maybe even your family.Keep up the work guys and gals !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As the one's who stood up for us all.The one's we can tell our children about.The good guys not the bad guys.They are victims and Scientology is and always will be a cult and more to the point.
If Anonymous always needs to hide they're faces it's quite obvious they have reason to be frightened.Lest we forget the one's who take them on they are our neighbours, our friends maybe even your family.Keep up the work guys and gals!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916466</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Steauengeglase</author>
	<datestamp>1264603980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It isn't that extremist feel ethically bound to kill innocents, it is because they feel morally obligated.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't that extremist feel ethically bound to kill innocents , it is because they feel morally obligated .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't that extremist feel ethically bound to kill innocents, it is because they feel morally obligated.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915294</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>idiotnot</author>
	<datestamp>1264594800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>As long as parents have the legal "right" to force their (property) offspring into organized religion, ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions.</i></p><p>So, taking it to the absurd, let's assume that a parent makes his/her kid eat lima beans.  And then you've got a group who think that lima beans are a threat to the world.....using violence against lima bean growers by the no-lima people is justified?  No, of course it's not.  Parents have the legal power to force their custodial kids to do things.  When they do something that truly endangers a child's safety, that's when the state gets involved.  Not some unaffiliated pressure group, but a government tasked with protecting the child's fundamental rights.</p><p><i>The State and Capital depend on religion to keep people focused on social wedge issues so they don't question the fundamental power structures of our society. Poor Americans vote for tax cuts for the rich, ecological policies that will make the world unlivable for future generations, and imperialistic wars, all because the candidates supporting such insanity also pander to "faith" by attacking science and LGBTQ folk.</i></p><p>Um,  so which religions teach tax cuts for the rich?  I'm really curious about that -- citation needed, as it were.  Refocusing it onto the Xenu nuts.....a lot of them would probably not fall into any of those disjointed categories you lay out.</p><p>And you haven't been paying much attention.  The largest Christian sect in the world I don't think could really be described as attacking science, anymore.  Catholics acknowledge evolution.  The pope talks about the environment, etc. etc.</p><p><i>Unfortunately, the most victimized sectors of the working class are also the most exploited by religion. Each generation passes the meme on to the next. We can only end this vicious cycle of enforced irrationality by attacking the source.</i></p><p>Again, you're just not paying attention.  Religious adherence drops every damn year.  Traditional religions drop, too.  But for many people, there's a fundamental need to have a supernatural answer for questions that can't be easily answered.  I mean, as an atheist, I'd really like to believe that I'll live forever after I die, and be rewarded for being a good person.  There's not.  But it's a fundamental choice that can't be answered by the state, much less another group or individual.</p><p>Your ignorance burns brighter than the Xenu nuts', and hotter than the volcano where their souls live, yet it gets modded a five, interesting.  Somehow, that doesn't surprise me, but it is disappointing.  You have no understanding of why governments exist, and what powers individuals give up to the state in order to have other rights protected.  Social contract theory, etc.  Admittedly, the Scientologists severely abuse those protections in some countries for their own gain, but it doesn't mean the system is fundamentally flawed, and it doesn't mean that the power to harm them is then passed to an unaccountable group.</p><p><i>No Gods!<br>No Masters!</i></p><p>Unless those masters are fighting something you, personally don't like.....then it's all good.</p><p>The stupid, it burns, etc. etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as parents have the legal " right " to force their ( property ) offspring into organized religion , ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions.So , taking it to the absurd , let 's assume that a parent makes his/her kid eat lima beans .
And then you 've got a group who think that lima beans are a threat to the world.....using violence against lima bean growers by the no-lima people is justified ?
No , of course it 's not .
Parents have the legal power to force their custodial kids to do things .
When they do something that truly endangers a child 's safety , that 's when the state gets involved .
Not some unaffiliated pressure group , but a government tasked with protecting the child 's fundamental rights.The State and Capital depend on religion to keep people focused on social wedge issues so they do n't question the fundamental power structures of our society .
Poor Americans vote for tax cuts for the rich , ecological policies that will make the world unlivable for future generations , and imperialistic wars , all because the candidates supporting such insanity also pander to " faith " by attacking science and LGBTQ folk.Um , so which religions teach tax cuts for the rich ?
I 'm really curious about that -- citation needed , as it were .
Refocusing it onto the Xenu nuts.....a lot of them would probably not fall into any of those disjointed categories you lay out.And you have n't been paying much attention .
The largest Christian sect in the world I do n't think could really be described as attacking science , anymore .
Catholics acknowledge evolution .
The pope talks about the environment , etc .
etc.Unfortunately , the most victimized sectors of the working class are also the most exploited by religion .
Each generation passes the meme on to the next .
We can only end this vicious cycle of enforced irrationality by attacking the source.Again , you 're just not paying attention .
Religious adherence drops every damn year .
Traditional religions drop , too .
But for many people , there 's a fundamental need to have a supernatural answer for questions that ca n't be easily answered .
I mean , as an atheist , I 'd really like to believe that I 'll live forever after I die , and be rewarded for being a good person .
There 's not .
But it 's a fundamental choice that ca n't be answered by the state , much less another group or individual.Your ignorance burns brighter than the Xenu nuts ' , and hotter than the volcano where their souls live , yet it gets modded a five , interesting .
Somehow , that does n't surprise me , but it is disappointing .
You have no understanding of why governments exist , and what powers individuals give up to the state in order to have other rights protected .
Social contract theory , etc .
Admittedly , the Scientologists severely abuse those protections in some countries for their own gain , but it does n't mean the system is fundamentally flawed , and it does n't mean that the power to harm them is then passed to an unaccountable group.No Gods ! No Masters ! Unless those masters are fighting something you , personally do n't like.....then it 's all good.The stupid , it burns , etc .
etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as parents have the legal "right" to force their (property) offspring into organized religion, ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions.So, taking it to the absurd, let's assume that a parent makes his/her kid eat lima beans.
And then you've got a group who think that lima beans are a threat to the world.....using violence against lima bean growers by the no-lima people is justified?
No, of course it's not.
Parents have the legal power to force their custodial kids to do things.
When they do something that truly endangers a child's safety, that's when the state gets involved.
Not some unaffiliated pressure group, but a government tasked with protecting the child's fundamental rights.The State and Capital depend on religion to keep people focused on social wedge issues so they don't question the fundamental power structures of our society.
Poor Americans vote for tax cuts for the rich, ecological policies that will make the world unlivable for future generations, and imperialistic wars, all because the candidates supporting such insanity also pander to "faith" by attacking science and LGBTQ folk.Um,  so which religions teach tax cuts for the rich?
I'm really curious about that -- citation needed, as it were.
Refocusing it onto the Xenu nuts.....a lot of them would probably not fall into any of those disjointed categories you lay out.And you haven't been paying much attention.
The largest Christian sect in the world I don't think could really be described as attacking science, anymore.
Catholics acknowledge evolution.
The pope talks about the environment, etc.
etc.Unfortunately, the most victimized sectors of the working class are also the most exploited by religion.
Each generation passes the meme on to the next.
We can only end this vicious cycle of enforced irrationality by attacking the source.Again, you're just not paying attention.
Religious adherence drops every damn year.
Traditional religions drop, too.
But for many people, there's a fundamental need to have a supernatural answer for questions that can't be easily answered.
I mean, as an atheist, I'd really like to believe that I'll live forever after I die, and be rewarded for being a good person.
There's not.
But it's a fundamental choice that can't be answered by the state, much less another group or individual.Your ignorance burns brighter than the Xenu nuts', and hotter than the volcano where their souls live, yet it gets modded a five, interesting.
Somehow, that doesn't surprise me, but it is disappointing.
You have no understanding of why governments exist, and what powers individuals give up to the state in order to have other rights protected.
Social contract theory, etc.
Admittedly, the Scientologists severely abuse those protections in some countries for their own gain, but it doesn't mean the system is fundamentally flawed, and it doesn't mean that the power to harm them is then passed to an unaccountable group.No Gods!No Masters!Unless those masters are fighting something you, personally don't like.....then it's all good.The stupid, it burns, etc.
etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30923844</id>
	<title>Re:unauthorized access of a protected computer</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1264584600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In some ways you can think of a person's brain as a computer.</p><p>When can we expect Scientology types to go to jail for fucking with peoples' heads?</p></div><p>I was going to point out that Scientologists invite the COS in, until I thought about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trojan\_horse\_(computing)" title="wikipedia.org">trojans</a> [wikipedia.org], and realized that you might have a good analogy.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In some ways you can think of a person 's brain as a computer.When can we expect Scientology types to go to jail for fucking with peoples ' heads ? I was going to point out that Scientologists invite the COS in , until I thought about trojans [ wikipedia.org ] , and realized that you might have a good analogy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In some ways you can think of a person's brain as a computer.When can we expect Scientology types to go to jail for fucking with peoples' heads?I was going to point out that Scientologists invite the COS in, until I thought about trojans [wikipedia.org], and realized that you might have a good analogy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915114</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264592640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I find your ideas intriguing. I'd like to sign up for your newsletter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I find your ideas intriguing .
I 'd like to sign up for your newsletter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find your ideas intriguing.
I'd like to sign up for your newsletter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30926886</id>
	<title>Re:Has anyone jailed the pope yet?</title>
	<author>KrugalSausage</author>
	<datestamp>1264593780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sometimes I wonder if people like you ever take a step back and think, 'Oh, maybe it was the millions of rapists that actually caused more misery.'  Whatever floats your boat.  (btw. rapists aren't an institution)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sometimes I wonder if people like you ever take a step back and think , 'Oh , maybe it was the millions of rapists that actually caused more misery .
' Whatever floats your boat .
( btw. rapists are n't an institution )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sometimes I wonder if people like you ever take a step back and think, 'Oh, maybe it was the millions of rapists that actually caused more misery.
'  Whatever floats your boat.
(btw. rapists aren't an institution)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30919066</id>
	<title>No fan of CoS, but...</title>
	<author>Roogna</author>
	<datestamp>1264614420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This just tells me, and no big surprise here, when trying to harm groups that have huge amounts of money you're perhaps best off doing it in more legal ways.  Personally I'd think this sounds petty obvious.  I also know if the site that had been hacked was say, linux.org, or wikipedia, or say, your own personal web sites?  Then everyone would be calling for the guy's head.</p><p>Now CoS is certainly not a good entity on the face of this planet, but breaking laws just to hassle them doesn't do much to prove it.  As many above call them terrorists, which is quite possibly accurate.  But one can not deal with terrorists with acts of terrorism, even minor ones.  As time has shown, that kind of response just simply creates more on the other side.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This just tells me , and no big surprise here , when trying to harm groups that have huge amounts of money you 're perhaps best off doing it in more legal ways .
Personally I 'd think this sounds petty obvious .
I also know if the site that had been hacked was say , linux.org , or wikipedia , or say , your own personal web sites ?
Then everyone would be calling for the guy 's head.Now CoS is certainly not a good entity on the face of this planet , but breaking laws just to hassle them does n't do much to prove it .
As many above call them terrorists , which is quite possibly accurate .
But one can not deal with terrorists with acts of terrorism , even minor ones .
As time has shown , that kind of response just simply creates more on the other side .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This just tells me, and no big surprise here, when trying to harm groups that have huge amounts of money you're perhaps best off doing it in more legal ways.
Personally I'd think this sounds petty obvious.
I also know if the site that had been hacked was say, linux.org, or wikipedia, or say, your own personal web sites?
Then everyone would be calling for the guy's head.Now CoS is certainly not a good entity on the face of this planet, but breaking laws just to hassle them doesn't do much to prove it.
As many above call them terrorists, which is quite possibly accurate.
But one can not deal with terrorists with acts of terrorism, even minor ones.
As time has shown, that kind of response just simply creates more on the other side.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915050</id>
	<title>Heroes, not criminals.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264591740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why do we bother traveling around the world to fight religious extremist terrorists when we can do it right in
our own back yard?  And then to put people in prison for it... Okay, I suppose Anonymous' activities probably
caused some unintended network congestion outside their specific targets, but hey, I'll take "lag" over "DU syndrome".<br>
<br>
"Now, at home they'd hang me, here they'll give me a fucking medal, sir."</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do we bother traveling around the world to fight religious extremist terrorists when we can do it right in our own back yard ?
And then to put people in prison for it... Okay , I suppose Anonymous ' activities probably caused some unintended network congestion outside their specific targets , but hey , I 'll take " lag " over " DU syndrome " .
" Now , at home they 'd hang me , here they 'll give me a fucking medal , sir .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do we bother traveling around the world to fight religious extremist terrorists when we can do it right in
our own back yard?
And then to put people in prison for it... Okay, I suppose Anonymous' activities probably
caused some unintended network congestion outside their specific targets, but hey, I'll take "lag" over "DU syndrome".
"Now, at home they'd hang me, here they'll give me a fucking medal, sir.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30929916</id>
	<title>By Neruos</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264616880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not how many you , it's who you .</p><p>Being the Borg is useless and pointless unless you have some actual power. Anonymous by number is not a power but to the power to limit to what an Anonymous might do. Case in point. If Anonymous is going to use cyber-tatics in its cause to bring light to the evil of the COS, then that is a futile attempt as it does nothing to the COS in ways of loss to its power, which is not limited to wealth. Look at the ultimate goal, say Anonymous wanted to use cyber-tatics and in the very best outcome they get, is the COS websites are down, forever. Does that cause, the "the best cause outcome" gained from cyber-tatics remove or limit the total power of the COS, maybe by a small percentage, maybe not even that. You still have the vocal word, the printed word and the money, connections and estabished footings to contend with.</p><p>At the end of the day, there is nothin Anonymous could do using cyber-tatics that could harm the actual total power that the COS has and even in doing so, you could ultimately help increase that power by those actions. Anonymous would have to move to another tatic, one that could actually disrupt the power in a way to bring about change, failure or total collaspe of the COS.</p><p>Numbers alone do no help. It is best to break a brick wall with 1 large boulder then 10 trillion grains of sand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not how many you , it 's who you .Being the Borg is useless and pointless unless you have some actual power .
Anonymous by number is not a power but to the power to limit to what an Anonymous might do .
Case in point .
If Anonymous is going to use cyber-tatics in its cause to bring light to the evil of the COS , then that is a futile attempt as it does nothing to the COS in ways of loss to its power , which is not limited to wealth .
Look at the ultimate goal , say Anonymous wanted to use cyber-tatics and in the very best outcome they get , is the COS websites are down , forever .
Does that cause , the " the best cause outcome " gained from cyber-tatics remove or limit the total power of the COS , maybe by a small percentage , maybe not even that .
You still have the vocal word , the printed word and the money , connections and estabished footings to contend with.At the end of the day , there is nothin Anonymous could do using cyber-tatics that could harm the actual total power that the COS has and even in doing so , you could ultimately help increase that power by those actions .
Anonymous would have to move to another tatic , one that could actually disrupt the power in a way to bring about change , failure or total collaspe of the COS.Numbers alone do no help .
It is best to break a brick wall with 1 large boulder then 10 trillion grains of sand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not how many you , it's who you .Being the Borg is useless and pointless unless you have some actual power.
Anonymous by number is not a power but to the power to limit to what an Anonymous might do.
Case in point.
If Anonymous is going to use cyber-tatics in its cause to bring light to the evil of the COS, then that is a futile attempt as it does nothing to the COS in ways of loss to its power, which is not limited to wealth.
Look at the ultimate goal, say Anonymous wanted to use cyber-tatics and in the very best outcome they get, is the COS websites are down, forever.
Does that cause, the "the best cause outcome" gained from cyber-tatics remove or limit the total power of the COS, maybe by a small percentage, maybe not even that.
You still have the vocal word, the printed word and the money, connections and estabished footings to contend with.At the end of the day, there is nothin Anonymous could do using cyber-tatics that could harm the actual total power that the COS has and even in doing so, you could ultimately help increase that power by those actions.
Anonymous would have to move to another tatic, one that could actually disrupt the power in a way to bring about change, failure or total collaspe of the COS.Numbers alone do no help.
It is best to break a brick wall with 1 large boulder then 10 trillion grains of sand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915356</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1264595880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>As long as parents have the legal "right" to force their (property) offspring into organized religion, ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions.</p></div><p>[...]</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Poor Americans vote for tax cuts for the rich, ecological policies that will make the world unlivable for future generations, and imperialistic wars,</p></div><p>Sounds like you belong to one of those liberal/environmentalist cults. Since you're trying to oppress (even if legal and morally right) someone, I as an "ethical person" have the RIGHT to use force on you? What's the criteria?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>As long as parents have the legal " right " to force their ( property ) offspring into organized religion , ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions. [ .. .
] Poor Americans vote for tax cuts for the rich , ecological policies that will make the world unlivable for future generations , and imperialistic wars,Sounds like you belong to one of those liberal/environmentalist cults .
Since you 're trying to oppress ( even if legal and morally right ) someone , I as an " ethical person " have the RIGHT to use force on you ?
What 's the criteria ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As long as parents have the legal "right" to force their (property) offspring into organized religion, ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions.[...
]Poor Americans vote for tax cuts for the rich, ecological policies that will make the world unlivable for future generations, and imperialistic wars,Sounds like you belong to one of those liberal/environmentalist cults.
Since you're trying to oppress (even if legal and morally right) someone, I as an "ethical person" have the RIGHT to use force on you?
What's the criteria?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30919450</id>
	<title>Re:Has anyone jailed the pope yet?</title>
	<author>fiendie</author>
	<datestamp>1264615800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think most higher-ups in the catholic church at least believe in their own crap, I'll give 'em that.</p><p>Scientology seems to be more of a concerted effort to extort money from gullible people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think most higher-ups in the catholic church at least believe in their own crap , I 'll give 'em that.Scientology seems to be more of a concerted effort to extort money from gullible people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think most higher-ups in the catholic church at least believe in their own crap, I'll give 'em that.Scientology seems to be more of a concerted effort to extort money from gullible people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920470</id>
	<title>Re:An</title>
	<author>Myopic</author>
	<datestamp>1264619820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The one's we can tell our children about.<br>The good guys not the bad guys.<br>They are victims and Scientology is and always will be a cult</i></p><p>Oops you made a mistake, here let me correct it for you.</p><p>The one's we can tell our children about.<br>The good guy's not the bad guy's.<br>They are victim's and S'cientology is and alway's will be a cul't</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The one 's we can tell our children about.The good guys not the bad guys.They are victims and Scientology is and always will be a cultOops you made a mistake , here let me correct it for you.The one 's we can tell our children about.The good guy 's not the bad guy 's.They are victim 's and S'cientology is and alway 's will be a cul't</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The one's we can tell our children about.The good guys not the bad guys.They are victims and Scientology is and always will be a cultOops you made a mistake, here let me correct it for you.The one's we can tell our children about.The good guy's not the bad guy's.They are victim's and S'cientology is and alway's will be a cul't</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915080</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30919868</id>
	<title>Re:Has anyone jailed the pope yet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264617420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisa\_McPherson" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">I</a> [wikipedia.org] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elli\_Perkins" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">thought</a> [wikipedia.org] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation\_Snow\_White" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">we'd</a> [wikipedia.org] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation\_Freakout" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">settled</a> [wikipedia.org] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientology\_controversies" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">this</a> [wikipedia.org] <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair\_game\_(Scientology)" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">already</a> [wikipedia.org]. <br> <br> "Attack the attacker" isn't a characteristic of the Catholics.  Nor is harmful health care - mental &amp; physical.  Nor are bogus DMCA takedowns, breaking into &amp; wiretapping the IRS, organized fraud, harassing opponents into bankruptcy, require "disconnection" from non-religious family/friends, funnel donations from poor to rich celebrities, or attacking believers in independent organizations.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I [ wikipedia.org ] thought [ wikipedia.org ] we 'd [ wikipedia.org ] settled [ wikipedia.org ] this [ wikipedia.org ] already [ wikipedia.org ] .
" Attack the attacker " is n't a characteristic of the Catholics .
Nor is harmful health care - mental &amp; physical .
Nor are bogus DMCA takedowns , breaking into &amp; wiretapping the IRS , organized fraud , harassing opponents into bankruptcy , require " disconnection " from non-religious family/friends , funnel donations from poor to rich celebrities , or attacking believers in independent organizations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I [wikipedia.org] thought [wikipedia.org] we'd [wikipedia.org] settled [wikipedia.org] this [wikipedia.org] already [wikipedia.org].
"Attack the attacker" isn't a characteristic of the Catholics.
Nor is harmful health care - mental &amp; physical.
Nor are bogus DMCA takedowns, breaking into &amp; wiretapping the IRS, organized fraud, harassing opponents into bankruptcy, require "disconnection" from non-religious family/friends, funnel donations from poor to rich celebrities, or attacking believers in independent organizations.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30918858</id>
	<title>Re:Has anyone jailed the pope yet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264613520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scientology has a set of documents outlining how people will be murdered, threatened, extorted, and harassed. These are real instructions that they follow and adhere to to this very day, and have been used against Americans and Canadians since the 1970s.</p><p>Scientology is a cult. You pay to get ahead. Christianity may suck, but it isn't a cult that murders those that leave the religion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientology has a set of documents outlining how people will be murdered , threatened , extorted , and harassed .
These are real instructions that they follow and adhere to to this very day , and have been used against Americans and Canadians since the 1970s.Scientology is a cult .
You pay to get ahead .
Christianity may suck , but it is n't a cult that murders those that leave the religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientology has a set of documents outlining how people will be murdered, threatened, extorted, and harassed.
These are real instructions that they follow and adhere to to this very day, and have been used against Americans and Canadians since the 1970s.Scientology is a cult.
You pay to get ahead.
Christianity may suck, but it isn't a cult that murders those that leave the religion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916068</id>
	<title>religious extremist terrorists</title>
	<author>wiredog</author>
	<datestamp>1264601760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wasn't aware that Scientologists were hijacking aircraft, setting off bombs, shooting women and children, launching DDoS attacks, and generally behaving like terrorists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was n't aware that Scientologists were hijacking aircraft , setting off bombs , shooting women and children , launching DDoS attacks , and generally behaving like terrorists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wasn't aware that Scientologists were hijacking aircraft, setting off bombs, shooting women and children, launching DDoS attacks, and generally behaving like terrorists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30918270</id>
	<title>But is a DoS actually accessing a system?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264611300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Illegal access to a remote computer system...</p><p>Yet, he never actually accessed it.</p><p>He sent "requests" which were denied..</p><p>It's like knocking on the door to someone's house.</p><p>It's a nuisance yes, but not criminal trespass, or breaking and entering, which the law they are using is akin to.</p><p>Now, just because the scientology (which isn't a  religion, never was - as L. Ron Hubbard stated clearly in earlier revisions of his book before his death) followers aren't smart enough to make their firewalls ignore these packets after a period of time and live through it, isn't  part of the case, as apparently, there's no law on the books to cover this, knock on the door and run tactics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Illegal access to a remote computer system...Yet , he never actually accessed it.He sent " requests " which were denied..It 's like knocking on the door to someone 's house.It 's a nuisance yes , but not criminal trespass , or breaking and entering , which the law they are using is akin to.Now , just because the scientology ( which is n't a religion , never was - as L. Ron Hubbard stated clearly in earlier revisions of his book before his death ) followers are n't smart enough to make their firewalls ignore these packets after a period of time and live through it , is n't part of the case , as apparently , there 's no law on the books to cover this , knock on the door and run tactics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Illegal access to a remote computer system...Yet, he never actually accessed it.He sent "requests" which were denied..It's like knocking on the door to someone's house.It's a nuisance yes, but not criminal trespass, or breaking and entering, which the law they are using is akin to.Now, just because the scientology (which isn't a  religion, never was - as L. Ron Hubbard stated clearly in earlier revisions of his book before his death) followers aren't smart enough to make their firewalls ignore these packets after a period of time and live through it, isn't  part of the case, as apparently, there's no law on the books to cover this, knock on the door and run tactics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916694</id>
	<title>You know what it is for...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264605000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes, ladies and gentlemen, getting people riled up about your fake cause and them going to prison is "the lulz."  And that is what it is all about.  Hope you enjoyed the game.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , ladies and gentlemen , getting people riled up about your fake cause and them going to prison is " the lulz .
" And that is what it is all about .
Hope you enjoyed the game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, ladies and gentlemen, getting people riled up about your fake cause and them going to prison is "the lulz.
"  And that is what it is all about.
Hope you enjoyed the game.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917532</id>
	<title>OT-VII William "Rex" Fowler Murders Software Dev</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264608660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To pre-emptively counter the usual no-worse-than-Catholicism thought-terminating cliche, here is a very fresh anecdote about an OT-VII from a WISE software development house. Dude uncovered a pattern of embezzlement where his boss sent several $200,000 - $250,000 payments to CoS. Boss set dude up with the promise of a check and capped him on his son's birthday. There is a mystery briefcase, too. It may contain Marcellus' soul.</p><p>http://forums.whyweprotest.net/15-media/1st-degree-murder-rev-william-rex-fowler-scientology-minister-charged-60161/</p><p>Adams Co. business owner thought to be victim now charged in death of former co-worker</p><p>The owner of an Adams County software company has been arrested and charged with the murder of his former business partner.</p><p>William Rex Fowler was charged with first-degree murder in the Dec. 30 shooting at Fowler Software Design that killed Tommy Ciancio, 42, the Adams County district attorney and sheriff said today in a news release.</p><p>(...)<br>Employees of the software company, which reportedly had suffered financial difficulties since 2008, related in part to the transfer of as much as $200,000 to a church or charity by Fowler, told investigators that Ciancio arrived around 10 a.m. Dec. 30 to collect his check.</p><p>(...)<br>Investigators say the gun was registered to Andrew Hyung Fowler, 26, who lived at 1413 L. Ron Hubbard Way in Los Angeles, when it was purchased. In interviews with police, Andrew Fowler said he gave the gun to his father for Christmas in 2007.</p><p>Police also found a briefcase and a typed note, dated Dec. 30 and signed by Fowler, that advised there was nothing confidential in the satchel and that it should be given to his wife, Janet.</p><p>When Janet Fowler was interviewed by detectives, she told them she wanted the briefcase returned immediately.</p><p>"It is important to me and my church. It is religious material and I want it now," she said to investigators. "Even if you looked at it, and read it, you would not understand anything in it. Because it is way above a normal person and you would not know what it meant. I want it back right now."</p><p>Janet Fowler also reportedly told investigators that her husband "is a Scientologist and would not have gone without a fight. He would have grabbed a gun in a struggle and would not have let someone shoot him."</p><p>She also told investigators that Ciancio had sent e-mails to Rex Fowler, threatening to hire an attorney and sue over money he said was owed him.</p><p>Adams County officials said Fowler is in custody, but would not say where he is being held. He was last at Denver Health Medical Center, but his name no longer appears on patient rosters.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To pre-emptively counter the usual no-worse-than-Catholicism thought-terminating cliche , here is a very fresh anecdote about an OT-VII from a WISE software development house .
Dude uncovered a pattern of embezzlement where his boss sent several $ 200,000 - $ 250,000 payments to CoS. Boss set dude up with the promise of a check and capped him on his son 's birthday .
There is a mystery briefcase , too .
It may contain Marcellus ' soul.http : //forums.whyweprotest.net/15-media/1st-degree-murder-rev-william-rex-fowler-scientology-minister-charged-60161/Adams Co. business owner thought to be victim now charged in death of former co-workerThe owner of an Adams County software company has been arrested and charged with the murder of his former business partner.William Rex Fowler was charged with first-degree murder in the Dec. 30 shooting at Fowler Software Design that killed Tommy Ciancio , 42 , the Adams County district attorney and sheriff said today in a news release. ( .. .
) Employees of the software company , which reportedly had suffered financial difficulties since 2008 , related in part to the transfer of as much as $ 200,000 to a church or charity by Fowler , told investigators that Ciancio arrived around 10 a.m. Dec. 30 to collect his check. ( .. .
) Investigators say the gun was registered to Andrew Hyung Fowler , 26 , who lived at 1413 L. Ron Hubbard Way in Los Angeles , when it was purchased .
In interviews with police , Andrew Fowler said he gave the gun to his father for Christmas in 2007.Police also found a briefcase and a typed note , dated Dec. 30 and signed by Fowler , that advised there was nothing confidential in the satchel and that it should be given to his wife , Janet.When Janet Fowler was interviewed by detectives , she told them she wanted the briefcase returned immediately .
" It is important to me and my church .
It is religious material and I want it now , " she said to investigators .
" Even if you looked at it , and read it , you would not understand anything in it .
Because it is way above a normal person and you would not know what it meant .
I want it back right now .
" Janet Fowler also reportedly told investigators that her husband " is a Scientologist and would not have gone without a fight .
He would have grabbed a gun in a struggle and would not have let someone shoot him .
" She also told investigators that Ciancio had sent e-mails to Rex Fowler , threatening to hire an attorney and sue over money he said was owed him.Adams County officials said Fowler is in custody , but would not say where he is being held .
He was last at Denver Health Medical Center , but his name no longer appears on patient rosters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To pre-emptively counter the usual no-worse-than-Catholicism thought-terminating cliche, here is a very fresh anecdote about an OT-VII from a WISE software development house.
Dude uncovered a pattern of embezzlement where his boss sent several $200,000 - $250,000 payments to CoS. Boss set dude up with the promise of a check and capped him on his son's birthday.
There is a mystery briefcase, too.
It may contain Marcellus' soul.http://forums.whyweprotest.net/15-media/1st-degree-murder-rev-william-rex-fowler-scientology-minister-charged-60161/Adams Co. business owner thought to be victim now charged in death of former co-workerThe owner of an Adams County software company has been arrested and charged with the murder of his former business partner.William Rex Fowler was charged with first-degree murder in the Dec. 30 shooting at Fowler Software Design that killed Tommy Ciancio, 42, the Adams County district attorney and sheriff said today in a news release.(...
)Employees of the software company, which reportedly had suffered financial difficulties since 2008, related in part to the transfer of as much as $200,000 to a church or charity by Fowler, told investigators that Ciancio arrived around 10 a.m. Dec. 30 to collect his check.(...
)Investigators say the gun was registered to Andrew Hyung Fowler, 26, who lived at 1413 L. Ron Hubbard Way in Los Angeles, when it was purchased.
In interviews with police, Andrew Fowler said he gave the gun to his father for Christmas in 2007.Police also found a briefcase and a typed note, dated Dec. 30 and signed by Fowler, that advised there was nothing confidential in the satchel and that it should be given to his wife, Janet.When Janet Fowler was interviewed by detectives, she told them she wanted the briefcase returned immediately.
"It is important to me and my church.
It is religious material and I want it now," she said to investigators.
"Even if you looked at it, and read it, you would not understand anything in it.
Because it is way above a normal person and you would not know what it meant.
I want it back right now.
"Janet Fowler also reportedly told investigators that her husband "is a Scientologist and would not have gone without a fight.
He would have grabbed a gun in a struggle and would not have let someone shoot him.
"She also told investigators that Ciancio had sent e-mails to Rex Fowler, threatening to hire an attorney and sue over money he said was owed him.Adams County officials said Fowler is in custody, but would not say where he is being held.
He was last at Denver Health Medical Center, but his name no longer appears on patient rosters.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30918064</id>
	<title>Re:Has anyone jailed the pope yet?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264610640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It isn't - it's just that scientology is small enough and openly evil enough to make most people get over their "leave religions alone"-conditioning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't - it 's just that scientology is small enough and openly evil enough to make most people get over their " leave religions alone " -conditioning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't - it's just that scientology is small enough and openly evil enough to make most people get over their "leave religions alone"-conditioning.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915242</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264594080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> We can only end this vicious cycle of enforced irrationality by attacking the source.</p><p>No Gods!<br>No Masters!</p></div><p>OK, but CoS is hardly the main culprit and "the source".  Yes it sucks something fierce but not as much as some other, more widespread, "sources".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We can only end this vicious cycle of enforced irrationality by attacking the source.No Gods ! No Masters ! OK , but CoS is hardly the main culprit and " the source " .
Yes it sucks something fierce but not as much as some other , more widespread , " sources " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> We can only end this vicious cycle of enforced irrationality by attacking the source.No Gods!No Masters!OK, but CoS is hardly the main culprit and "the source".
Yes it sucks something fierce but not as much as some other, more widespread, "sources".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088</id>
	<title>Seriously?</title>
	<author>delirium of disorder</author>
	<datestamp>1264592160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>inb4 should have been behind over 9000 proxies.</p><p>As long as parents have the legal "right" to force their (property) offspring into organized religion, ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions.</p><p>The State and Capital depend on religion to keep people focused on social wedge issues so they don't question the fundamental power structures of our society.  Poor Americans vote for tax cuts for the rich, ecological policies that will make the world unlivable for future generations, and imperialistic wars, all because the candidates supporting such insanity also pander to "faith" by attacking science and LGBTQ folk.  Unfortunately, the most victimized sectors of the working class are also the most exploited by religion.  Each generation passes the meme on to the next.  We can only end this vicious cycle of enforced irrationality by attacking the source.</p><p>No Gods!<br>No Masters!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>inb4 should have been behind over 9000 proxies.As long as parents have the legal " right " to force their ( property ) offspring into organized religion , ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions.The State and Capital depend on religion to keep people focused on social wedge issues so they do n't question the fundamental power structures of our society .
Poor Americans vote for tax cuts for the rich , ecological policies that will make the world unlivable for future generations , and imperialistic wars , all because the candidates supporting such insanity also pander to " faith " by attacking science and LGBTQ folk .
Unfortunately , the most victimized sectors of the working class are also the most exploited by religion .
Each generation passes the meme on to the next .
We can only end this vicious cycle of enforced irrationality by attacking the source.No Gods ! No Masters !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>inb4 should have been behind over 9000 proxies.As long as parents have the legal "right" to force their (property) offspring into organized religion, ethical people have the RIGHT to use force to oppose such religions.The State and Capital depend on religion to keep people focused on social wedge issues so they don't question the fundamental power structures of our society.
Poor Americans vote for tax cuts for the rich, ecological policies that will make the world unlivable for future generations, and imperialistic wars, all because the candidates supporting such insanity also pander to "faith" by attacking science and LGBTQ folk.
Unfortunately, the most victimized sectors of the working class are also the most exploited by religion.
Each generation passes the meme on to the next.
We can only end this vicious cycle of enforced irrationality by attacking the source.No Gods!No Masters!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915404</id>
	<title>movies...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264596720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>are you aware that the US has never banned a movie, until one was released about Scientology?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>are you aware that the US has never banned a movie , until one was released about Scientology ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>are you aware that the US has never banned a movie, until one was released about Scientology?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916428</id>
	<title>so few Anonymous Cowards?</title>
	<author>rkchang</author>
	<datestamp>1264603740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm actually impressed how many of us are brave enough to NOT post a comment to this as Anonymous Coward</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm actually impressed how many of us are brave enough to NOT post a comment to this as Anonymous Coward</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm actually impressed how many of us are brave enough to NOT post a comment to this as Anonymous Coward</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915330</id>
	<title>Re:Heroes, not criminals.</title>
	<author>Kleiba</author>
	<datestamp>1264595280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, but we already have access to the oil in the country of the scientologists.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , but we already have access to the oil in the country of the scientologists .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, but we already have access to the oil in the country of the scientologists.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916252</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Jason Levine</author>
	<datestamp>1264602840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please don't lump all religions into the same group based on the actions of Scientology (not that I'd call that a religion, mind you).  Not everyone who follows a religion is interested in ramming their beliefs down other people's throats.  I'm Jewish and honestly don't feel that the world needs to be converted to Judaism or that everyone needs to give up bacon or anything like that.  I'm happy practicing my religion in peace and teaching it to my children.  If you ask me about my religion, I'd be glad to talk about it, but not only in "I believe this" informational terms, not in "You should do this or you're going to hell" terms.</p><p>The idiots who go around trying to convert everyone to their religion, who want public policy to be based completely on (their) religious beliefs or who try to displace science in the classroom for everyone so that their particular religious values aren't impinged give the rest of us (who just want to practice our religion in peace) a bad name.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please do n't lump all religions into the same group based on the actions of Scientology ( not that I 'd call that a religion , mind you ) .
Not everyone who follows a religion is interested in ramming their beliefs down other people 's throats .
I 'm Jewish and honestly do n't feel that the world needs to be converted to Judaism or that everyone needs to give up bacon or anything like that .
I 'm happy practicing my religion in peace and teaching it to my children .
If you ask me about my religion , I 'd be glad to talk about it , but not only in " I believe this " informational terms , not in " You should do this or you 're going to hell " terms.The idiots who go around trying to convert everyone to their religion , who want public policy to be based completely on ( their ) religious beliefs or who try to displace science in the classroom for everyone so that their particular religious values are n't impinged give the rest of us ( who just want to practice our religion in peace ) a bad name .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please don't lump all religions into the same group based on the actions of Scientology (not that I'd call that a religion, mind you).
Not everyone who follows a religion is interested in ramming their beliefs down other people's throats.
I'm Jewish and honestly don't feel that the world needs to be converted to Judaism or that everyone needs to give up bacon or anything like that.
I'm happy practicing my religion in peace and teaching it to my children.
If you ask me about my religion, I'd be glad to talk about it, but not only in "I believe this" informational terms, not in "You should do this or you're going to hell" terms.The idiots who go around trying to convert everyone to their religion, who want public policy to be based completely on (their) religious beliefs or who try to displace science in the classroom for everyone so that their particular religious values aren't impinged give the rest of us (who just want to practice our religion in peace) a bad name.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916164</id>
	<title>How was he caught or singled out?</title>
	<author>will\_die</author>
	<datestamp>1264602360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the new article he was just one of the masses who downloaded and ran the software.<br>
So how was he caught?  Did he stuff besides using the DoS software?</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the new article he was just one of the masses who downloaded and ran the software .
So how was he caught ?
Did he stuff besides using the DoS software ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the new article he was just one of the masses who downloaded and ran the software.
So how was he caught?
Did he stuff besides using the DoS software?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917530</id>
	<title>BAHAHAHAHA</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264608660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well look at that, they really -are- a bunch of "basement dwelling nerds" after all. And they're going to jail for it.</p><p>Is this what the "protestfags" really consider a \_threat\_ to Scientology? A bunch of poorly coordinated DoS attacks against a couple of websites? "WE ARE LEGION" indeed, a legion of fucking losers who've accomplished nothing work talking about in their lives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well look at that , they really -are- a bunch of " basement dwelling nerds " after all .
And they 're going to jail for it.Is this what the " protestfags " really consider a \ _threat \ _ to Scientology ?
A bunch of poorly coordinated DoS attacks against a couple of websites ?
" WE ARE LEGION " indeed , a legion of fucking losers who 've accomplished nothing work talking about in their lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well look at that, they really -are- a bunch of "basement dwelling nerds" after all.
And they're going to jail for it.Is this what the "protestfags" really consider a \_threat\_ to Scientology?
A bunch of poorly coordinated DoS attacks against a couple of websites?
"WE ARE LEGION" indeed, a legion of fucking losers who've accomplished nothing work talking about in their lives.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30939424</id>
	<title>Pretty good odds.</title>
	<author>mushroom blue</author>
	<datestamp>1264711320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so two Anon were caught, and the other 6,000+ people (many with &gt;30k botnets) collaborating on irc.partyvan.org back in the day went free.

it seems that, on this metric, the internet raids were a resounding success.</htmltext>
<tokenext>so two Anon were caught , and the other 6,000 + people ( many with &gt; 30k botnets ) collaborating on irc.partyvan.org back in the day went free .
it seems that , on this metric , the internet raids were a resounding success .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so two Anon were caught, and the other 6,000+ people (many with &gt;30k botnets) collaborating on irc.partyvan.org back in the day went free.
it seems that, on this metric, the internet raids were a resounding success.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30918384</id>
	<title>Re:Yet again...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264611840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except that this was The People vs. the DoS'er.</p><p>Besides, as pointed out above, this guy committed a crime.  Saying that he went to jail only because someone else had money misses the point.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that this was The People vs. the DoS'er.Besides , as pointed out above , this guy committed a crime .
Saying that he went to jail only because someone else had money misses the point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that this was The People vs. the DoS'er.Besides, as pointed out above, this guy committed a crime.
Saying that he went to jail only because someone else had money misses the point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915888</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915758</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>digitaltraveller</author>
	<datestamp>1264599240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Start a political party or GTFO</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Start a political party or GTFO</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Start a political party or GTFO</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30925510</id>
	<title>Re:unauthorized access of a protected computer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264589580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"In some ways you can think of a person's brain as a computer."</p><p>Indeed:</p><p>"The Mind Has No Firewall" Army article on psychotronic weapons<br>The following article is from the US military publication Parameters, subtitled "US Army War College Quarterly." It describes itself as "The United States Army's Senior Professional Journal."<br><a href="http://www.thememoryhole.org/mil/mind-firewall2.htm" title="thememoryhole.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.thememoryhole.org/mil/mind-firewall2.htm</a> [thememoryhole.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" In some ways you can think of a person 's brain as a computer .
" Indeed : " The Mind Has No Firewall " Army article on psychotronic weaponsThe following article is from the US military publication Parameters , subtitled " US Army War College Quarterly .
" It describes itself as " The United States Army 's Senior Professional Journal .
" http : //www.thememoryhole.org/mil/mind-firewall2.htm [ thememoryhole.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"In some ways you can think of a person's brain as a computer.
"Indeed:"The Mind Has No Firewall" Army article on psychotronic weaponsThe following article is from the US military publication Parameters, subtitled "US Army War College Quarterly.
" It describes itself as "The United States Army's Senior Professional Journal.
"http://www.thememoryhole.org/mil/mind-firewall2.htm [thememoryhole.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30930718</id>
	<title>spooks too?</title>
	<author>twoHats</author>
	<datestamp>1264670040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am sure he will be joined by all the spooks that did the illegal entries in the US over the last 9 years or so...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am sure he will be joined by all the spooks that did the illegal entries in the US over the last 9 years or so.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am sure he will be joined by all the spooks that did the illegal entries in the US over the last 9 years or so...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916328</id>
	<title>Re:Seriously?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264603200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>There is no universal, objective standard for "good ethics"</p></div><p>Sure there is. It's pretty concise, in fact: "don't be a dick". That's all. If you want to, you can derive this as a corollary of the golden rule ("treat others the way you want to be treated") and use the golden rule as your ethics instead, but in the end, this is what matters.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There is no universal , objective standard for " good ethics " Sure there is .
It 's pretty concise , in fact : " do n't be a dick " .
That 's all .
If you want to , you can derive this as a corollary of the golden rule ( " treat others the way you want to be treated " ) and use the golden rule as your ethics instead , but in the end , this is what matters .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is no universal, objective standard for "good ethics"Sure there is.
It's pretty concise, in fact: "don't be a dick".
That's all.
If you want to, you can derive this as a corollary of the golden rule ("treat others the way you want to be treated") and use the golden rule as your ethics instead, but in the end, this is what matters.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915888</id>
	<title>Yet again...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264600320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yet again, in the USA the more money buys the "better justice".</p><p>And the Co$ has gobs of money.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet again , in the USA the more money buys the " better justice " .And the Co $ has gobs of money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet again, in the USA the more money buys the "better justice".And the Co$ has gobs of money.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920428</id>
	<title>Two wrongs don't make a right</title>
	<author>Theovon</author>
	<datestamp>1264619640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've done some analysis of Scientology, and I've come to the opinion that it is indeed a religion.  As long as the whole DC10 thing is taken as a metaphor, then the religion has a mythology not terribly unlike plenty of other respected religions.</p><p>That being said, Scientology is evil and causes a lot of damage.  Big surprise there.  Christianity did that in the middle ages, and Islam is doing it now.  Religion is often an excuse to harm others.  Scientology is only different in that they make more aggressive use of the court system to bury people who criticize them.  Their intolerance of criticism is also not unique among religions.</p><p>All that being said, attacks against scientology may need to remain anonymous, but they should also remain LEGAL and ETHICAL.  By breaking into the scientology computer system, this guy committed a CRIME and should be punished for it.</p><p>Ah, but the "victim" is evil.  Does that make it okay?  Well, tell me, is it okay for a vigilante to go around killing pedophiles?  No.  Pedophiles who molest people are sick, sick people.  And if you believe in capital punishment, perhaps some of them should be sentenced to death for their crimes.  But that isn't the individual's decision to make.  A JURY should make that decision.  The individual, however, is certainly free to FIND pedophiles and report illegal behavior to the police, community organizations, etc.  This is how scientology should be treated -- they should be investigated like criminals and prosecuted by the courts.</p><p>Remember, it's possible that YOU might some day be accused of a crime.  If you're innocent, then you want the system to work in your favor so that you are found not guilty.  However, the risk to being cautious like this is that some guilty people will be treated with too much respect and may not be found guilty of their crimes.  What's better, guilty people free, or innocent people in jail?</p><p>I had positive feelings about Anonymous at the beginning.  Scientologists deserve to be intimidated.  They intimidate everyone else!  But I fear that Anonymous are turning out to be a bunch of disorganized quacks with questionable ethics.</p><p>I keep seeing this on the internet.  Some anti-X group forms, trying to make themselves out to be fighting for the truth.  But anti-X just turned out to be a vocal minority of a bunch of paranoid lunatics.  It doesn't matter if X is good or bad.  If you do bad things to try to TRICK everyone into thinking X is bad (because for some reason, the truth isn't enough?) then you're worse than what you're fighting against.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've done some analysis of Scientology , and I 've come to the opinion that it is indeed a religion .
As long as the whole DC10 thing is taken as a metaphor , then the religion has a mythology not terribly unlike plenty of other respected religions.That being said , Scientology is evil and causes a lot of damage .
Big surprise there .
Christianity did that in the middle ages , and Islam is doing it now .
Religion is often an excuse to harm others .
Scientology is only different in that they make more aggressive use of the court system to bury people who criticize them .
Their intolerance of criticism is also not unique among religions.All that being said , attacks against scientology may need to remain anonymous , but they should also remain LEGAL and ETHICAL .
By breaking into the scientology computer system , this guy committed a CRIME and should be punished for it.Ah , but the " victim " is evil .
Does that make it okay ?
Well , tell me , is it okay for a vigilante to go around killing pedophiles ?
No. Pedophiles who molest people are sick , sick people .
And if you believe in capital punishment , perhaps some of them should be sentenced to death for their crimes .
But that is n't the individual 's decision to make .
A JURY should make that decision .
The individual , however , is certainly free to FIND pedophiles and report illegal behavior to the police , community organizations , etc .
This is how scientology should be treated -- they should be investigated like criminals and prosecuted by the courts.Remember , it 's possible that YOU might some day be accused of a crime .
If you 're innocent , then you want the system to work in your favor so that you are found not guilty .
However , the risk to being cautious like this is that some guilty people will be treated with too much respect and may not be found guilty of their crimes .
What 's better , guilty people free , or innocent people in jail ? I had positive feelings about Anonymous at the beginning .
Scientologists deserve to be intimidated .
They intimidate everyone else !
But I fear that Anonymous are turning out to be a bunch of disorganized quacks with questionable ethics.I keep seeing this on the internet .
Some anti-X group forms , trying to make themselves out to be fighting for the truth .
But anti-X just turned out to be a vocal minority of a bunch of paranoid lunatics .
It does n't matter if X is good or bad .
If you do bad things to try to TRICK everyone into thinking X is bad ( because for some reason , the truth is n't enough ?
) then you 're worse than what you 're fighting against .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've done some analysis of Scientology, and I've come to the opinion that it is indeed a religion.
As long as the whole DC10 thing is taken as a metaphor, then the religion has a mythology not terribly unlike plenty of other respected religions.That being said, Scientology is evil and causes a lot of damage.
Big surprise there.
Christianity did that in the middle ages, and Islam is doing it now.
Religion is often an excuse to harm others.
Scientology is only different in that they make more aggressive use of the court system to bury people who criticize them.
Their intolerance of criticism is also not unique among religions.All that being said, attacks against scientology may need to remain anonymous, but they should also remain LEGAL and ETHICAL.
By breaking into the scientology computer system, this guy committed a CRIME and should be punished for it.Ah, but the "victim" is evil.
Does that make it okay?
Well, tell me, is it okay for a vigilante to go around killing pedophiles?
No.  Pedophiles who molest people are sick, sick people.
And if you believe in capital punishment, perhaps some of them should be sentenced to death for their crimes.
But that isn't the individual's decision to make.
A JURY should make that decision.
The individual, however, is certainly free to FIND pedophiles and report illegal behavior to the police, community organizations, etc.
This is how scientology should be treated -- they should be investigated like criminals and prosecuted by the courts.Remember, it's possible that YOU might some day be accused of a crime.
If you're innocent, then you want the system to work in your favor so that you are found not guilty.
However, the risk to being cautious like this is that some guilty people will be treated with too much respect and may not be found guilty of their crimes.
What's better, guilty people free, or innocent people in jail?I had positive feelings about Anonymous at the beginning.
Scientologists deserve to be intimidated.
They intimidate everyone else!
But I fear that Anonymous are turning out to be a bunch of disorganized quacks with questionable ethics.I keep seeing this on the internet.
Some anti-X group forms, trying to make themselves out to be fighting for the truth.
But anti-X just turned out to be a vocal minority of a bunch of paranoid lunatics.
It doesn't matter if X is good or bad.
If you do bad things to try to TRICK everyone into thinking X is bad (because for some reason, the truth isn't enough?
) then you're worse than what you're fighting against.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915954</id>
	<title>Stupid</title>
	<author>Errtu76</author>
	<datestamp>1264600920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't agree with Scientology at all, but if you('re stupid enough to) get caught DoS'ing their site you deserve to go to jail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't agree with Scientology at all , but if you ( 're stupid enough to ) get caught DoS'ing their site you deserve to go to jail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't agree with Scientology at all, but if you('re stupid enough to) get caught DoS'ing their site you deserve to go to jail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917880</id>
	<title>Re:unauthorized access of a protected computer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264610040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Never, because that's fucking ridiculous.</p><p>Next question protestfag? Or are you just butthurt that one of your little "legion" buddies is going to spend the next little while getting laid more in a prison cell than you ever have on the outside?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Never , because that 's fucking ridiculous.Next question protestfag ?
Or are you just butthurt that one of your little " legion " buddies is going to spend the next little while getting laid more in a prison cell than you ever have on the outside ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Never, because that's fucking ridiculous.Next question protestfag?
Or are you just butthurt that one of your little "legion" buddies is going to spend the next little while getting laid more in a prison cell than you ever have on the outside?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658</id>
	<title>Has anyone jailed the pope yet?</title>
	<author>Viol8</author>
	<datestamp>1264598640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After all, the catholic church is probably responsible for more misery in africa due to its attitude to contraception than any other single institution.</p><p>All religions fuck with gullible and/or insecure peoples heads. How is scientology different?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , the catholic church is probably responsible for more misery in africa due to its attitude to contraception than any other single institution.All religions fuck with gullible and/or insecure peoples heads .
How is scientology different ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, the catholic church is probably responsible for more misery in africa due to its attitude to contraception than any other single institution.All religions fuck with gullible and/or insecure peoples heads.
How is scientology different?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917624</id>
	<title>Re:Has anyone jailed the pope yet?</title>
	<author>Conchobair</author>
	<datestamp>1264609080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I presume you are speaking of the AIDs epidemic in Africa and to blame that on the Catholic church is laughable.  I would say the local superstitions and practices like curing AIDs by raping virgins, and the way bush meat is slaughtered has done much more than a church that preaches of praticing abstinence and only sleeping with people you are married to.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I presume you are speaking of the AIDs epidemic in Africa and to blame that on the Catholic church is laughable .
I would say the local superstitions and practices like curing AIDs by raping virgins , and the way bush meat is slaughtered has done much more than a church that preaches of praticing abstinence and only sleeping with people you are married to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I presume you are speaking of the AIDs epidemic in Africa and to blame that on the Catholic church is laughable.
I would say the local superstitions and practices like curing AIDs by raping virgins, and the way bush meat is slaughtered has done much more than a church that preaches of praticing abstinence and only sleeping with people you are married to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915314</id>
	<title>Re:Heroes, not criminals.</title>
	<author>Fizzl</author>
	<datestamp>1264595160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RAMIREZ, TAKE DOWN ASSTHETANS WITH YOUR KNIFE</p><p>Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like whimpering Lorem ipsum dolor foofaa</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RAMIREZ , TAKE DOWN ASSTHETANS WITH YOUR KNIFEFilter error : Do n't use so many caps .
It 's like whimpering Lorem ipsum dolor foofaa</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RAMIREZ, TAKE DOWN ASSTHETANS WITH YOUR KNIFEFilter error: Don't use so many caps.
It's like whimpering Lorem ipsum dolor foofaa</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915050</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915920</id>
	<title>Unfair?</title>
	<author>therufus</author>
	<datestamp>1264600680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, if I start a cult and force my members to kill people I see as a threat I'm absolved of punishment. But if I make your computer system go haywire for 10 minutes, I'm sentenced to jail time?</p><p>Well, [sarcasm]I can see how that's fair![/sarcasm]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , if I start a cult and force my members to kill people I see as a threat I 'm absolved of punishment .
But if I make your computer system go haywire for 10 minutes , I 'm sentenced to jail time ? Well , [ sarcasm ] I can see how that 's fair !
[ /sarcasm ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, if I start a cult and force my members to kill people I see as a threat I'm absolved of punishment.
But if I make your computer system go haywire for 10 minutes, I'm sentenced to jail time?Well, [sarcasm]I can see how that's fair!
[/sarcasm]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917724</id>
	<title>Re:Oh will you be quiet!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264609380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>if there's no god, there's nothing wrong it</p></div><p>Thats quite the fallacy.  Morals don't require God.  If you think the only reason not to be an asshole is because you will be punished by God, you've got some serious problems, and thats why we don't like people like you.  It's not the religion, it's you.</p><p>I'm not sure why you think you're so great actually.  You're not part of the elite either you're deluding yourself.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>if there 's no god , there 's nothing wrong itThats quite the fallacy .
Morals do n't require God .
If you think the only reason not to be an asshole is because you will be punished by God , you 've got some serious problems , and thats why we do n't like people like you .
It 's not the religion , it 's you.I 'm not sure why you think you 're so great actually .
You 're not part of the elite either you 're deluding yourself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if there's no god, there's nothing wrong itThats quite the fallacy.
Morals don't require God.
If you think the only reason not to be an asshole is because you will be punished by God, you've got some serious problems, and thats why we don't like people like you.
It's not the religion, it's you.I'm not sure why you think you're so great actually.
You're not part of the elite either you're deluding yourself.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915328</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920038</id>
	<title>Touch the untouchable / Break the unbreakable</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264618260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(o hai, caps filter)</p><p>ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH</p><p>(idiot got caught)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( o hai , caps filter ) ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH ( idiot got caught )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(o hai, caps filter)ROW ROW FIGHT THE POWAH(idiot got caught)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915328</id>
	<title>Oh will you be quiet!</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1264595280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>he State and Capital<nobr> <wbr></nobr>....No Gods!<br>No Masters</i></p><p>Oh puhlease!  If you hate us so much, why shouldn't we oppress you? Besides, if there's no god, there's nothing wrong it.  It's just survival of the fittest, and you aren't fit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>he State and Capital ....No Gods ! No MastersOh puhlease !
If you hate us so much , why should n't we oppress you ?
Besides , if there 's no god , there 's nothing wrong it .
It 's just survival of the fittest , and you are n't fit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>he State and Capital ....No Gods!No MastersOh puhlease!
If you hate us so much, why shouldn't we oppress you?
Besides, if there's no god, there's nothing wrong it.
It's just survival of the fittest, and you aren't fit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916082</id>
	<title>He is a Hero.  Support him!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264601880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know he has been jailed for committing this federal crime, but that does not mean he is not a political prisoner in a sense, and is very much deserving our support for taking action against Scientology.</p><p>He's a hero, and we should herald him as one.  Sometimes these things take a little bit of jail time.  I have enormous respect for this man and his courage.  Sure its crazy, and not ideal, but its admirable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know he has been jailed for committing this federal crime , but that does not mean he is not a political prisoner in a sense , and is very much deserving our support for taking action against Scientology.He 's a hero , and we should herald him as one .
Sometimes these things take a little bit of jail time .
I have enormous respect for this man and his courage .
Sure its crazy , and not ideal , but its admirable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know he has been jailed for committing this federal crime, but that does not mean he is not a political prisoner in a sense, and is very much deserving our support for taking action against Scientology.He's a hero, and we should herald him as one.
Sometimes these things take a little bit of jail time.
I have enormous respect for this man and his courage.
Sure its crazy, and not ideal, but its admirable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30919450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917808
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30918064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30918384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915888
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917880
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30926886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30919868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30918858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915312
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915050
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915328
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30925510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915080
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30923844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_27_0154253_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915732
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915954
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915888
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30918384
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916164
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30914996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915050
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916068
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915404
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915442
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30919868
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30918064
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30919450
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30918858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917624
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30926886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30925510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30923844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916016
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915242
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915328
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915312
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30917808
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916454
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916328
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916466
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915708
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30916252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915294
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915732
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915764
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_27_0154253.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30915080
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_27_0154253.30920470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
