<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_24_1922211</id>
	<title>Pope Urges Priests To Go Forth and Blog</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1264323120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"Pope Benedict XV, whose own presence on the Web has grown in recent years, is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/23/AR2010012300796.html">urging priests to use all multimedia tools at their disposal</a> to preach the Gospel and to engage in dialogue with people of other religions and cultures. 'The spread of multimedia communications and its rich "menu of options" might make us think it sufficient simply to be present on the Web,' but priests are 'challenged to proclaim the Gospel by employing the latest generation of audiovisual resources,' says the Pope. The message from the Pope, prepared for the World Day of Communications, suggests such possibilities as <a href="http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Pope:-Internet,-an-instrument-for-the-proclamation-of-Christ-17432.html">images, videos, animated features, blogs, and Web sites</a> and adds that young priests should become familiar with new media while still in seminary, though the Pope stresses that the use of new technologies must reflect theological and spiritual principles. Many priests and top prelates already interact with the faithful online, and one of Benedict's advisers <a href="http://www.facebook.com/people/Cardinale-Crescenzio-Sepe/1519552900?\_fb\_noscript=1">has his own Facebook profile</a>. So does the archbishop of Los Angeles. The Pope adds, 'I renew the invitation to make astute use of the unique possibilities offered by modern communications. May the Lord make all of you enthusiastic heralds of the Gospel in the new "agor&#224;" which the current media are opening up.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " Pope Benedict XV , whose own presence on the Web has grown in recent years , is urging priests to use all multimedia tools at their disposal to preach the Gospel and to engage in dialogue with people of other religions and cultures .
'The spread of multimedia communications and its rich " menu of options " might make us think it sufficient simply to be present on the Web, ' but priests are 'challenged to proclaim the Gospel by employing the latest generation of audiovisual resources, ' says the Pope .
The message from the Pope , prepared for the World Day of Communications , suggests such possibilities as images , videos , animated features , blogs , and Web sites and adds that young priests should become familiar with new media while still in seminary , though the Pope stresses that the use of new technologies must reflect theological and spiritual principles .
Many priests and top prelates already interact with the faithful online , and one of Benedict 's advisers has his own Facebook profile .
So does the archbishop of Los Angeles .
The Pope adds , 'I renew the invitation to make astute use of the unique possibilities offered by modern communications .
May the Lord make all of you enthusiastic heralds of the Gospel in the new " agor   " which the current media are opening up .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "Pope Benedict XV, whose own presence on the Web has grown in recent years, is urging priests to use all multimedia tools at their disposal to preach the Gospel and to engage in dialogue with people of other religions and cultures.
'The spread of multimedia communications and its rich "menu of options" might make us think it sufficient simply to be present on the Web,' but priests are 'challenged to proclaim the Gospel by employing the latest generation of audiovisual resources,' says the Pope.
The message from the Pope, prepared for the World Day of Communications, suggests such possibilities as images, videos, animated features, blogs, and Web sites and adds that young priests should become familiar with new media while still in seminary, though the Pope stresses that the use of new technologies must reflect theological and spiritual principles.
Many priests and top prelates already interact with the faithful online, and one of Benedict's advisers has his own Facebook profile.
So does the archbishop of Los Angeles.
The Pope adds, 'I renew the invitation to make astute use of the unique possibilities offered by modern communications.
May the Lord make all of you enthusiastic heralds of the Gospel in the new "agorà" which the current media are opening up.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882162</id>
	<title>Explode?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264327860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does no one think this is going to explode? Now the whole internet can play the statements of priest A against those of priest B, and those of priest C at t\_0 against those of priest C at t\_1, and so on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does no one think this is going to explode ?
Now the whole internet can play the statements of priest A against those of priest B , and those of priest C at t \ _0 against those of priest C at t \ _1 , and so on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does no one think this is going to explode?
Now the whole internet can play the statements of priest A against those of priest B, and those of priest C at t\_0 against those of priest C at t\_1, and so on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882762</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264331100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>My huge cock in your ass is real. Well, now you know. The Internet: it changes the radius of your anus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>My huge cock in your ass is real .
Well , now you know .
The Internet : it changes the radius of your anus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My huge cock in your ass is real.
Well, now you know.
The Internet: it changes the radius of your anus.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883538</id>
	<title>Re:Bad decision</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264336440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your reaction is much the same as my initial reaction: I was like "yeah lets, so all of the world can witness the birth of a new type of contentless blogger". But I'm going to resist the urge to write a "there's bound to be someone intelligent somewhere" type of comment.</p><p>The Internet is the most open type of communication medium ever. Open in terms of both the audience (anyone can access it) and the performer (anything can be said -- virtually no exceptions). Just that someone bases his attitude towards life on scripture does not disqualify him/her from having a valuable opinion, what matters more is whether the opinion can be defended without resorting to dogma. And the and more diverse and more direct nature of the Internet makes dogma much less powerful. It's wishful thinking of course, but this could force ecclesiasts to find more rational justifications for their convictions.</p><p>So to me, this is not about cannon fodder. At least not automatically. It might become that way anyway, but if it's more of the same then non-followers will get bored with it quickly and won't affect the already-followers.</p><p>Then again, this might also be the birth of a new kind of forum troll: the NCAA (neo-christian...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your reaction is much the same as my initial reaction : I was like " yeah lets , so all of the world can witness the birth of a new type of contentless blogger " .
But I 'm going to resist the urge to write a " there 's bound to be someone intelligent somewhere " type of comment.The Internet is the most open type of communication medium ever .
Open in terms of both the audience ( anyone can access it ) and the performer ( anything can be said -- virtually no exceptions ) .
Just that someone bases his attitude towards life on scripture does not disqualify him/her from having a valuable opinion , what matters more is whether the opinion can be defended without resorting to dogma .
And the and more diverse and more direct nature of the Internet makes dogma much less powerful .
It 's wishful thinking of course , but this could force ecclesiasts to find more rational justifications for their convictions.So to me , this is not about cannon fodder .
At least not automatically .
It might become that way anyway , but if it 's more of the same then non-followers will get bored with it quickly and wo n't affect the already-followers.Then again , this might also be the birth of a new kind of forum troll : the NCAA ( neo-christian... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your reaction is much the same as my initial reaction: I was like "yeah lets, so all of the world can witness the birth of a new type of contentless blogger".
But I'm going to resist the urge to write a "there's bound to be someone intelligent somewhere" type of comment.The Internet is the most open type of communication medium ever.
Open in terms of both the audience (anyone can access it) and the performer (anything can be said -- virtually no exceptions).
Just that someone bases his attitude towards life on scripture does not disqualify him/her from having a valuable opinion, what matters more is whether the opinion can be defended without resorting to dogma.
And the and more diverse and more direct nature of the Internet makes dogma much less powerful.
It's wishful thinking of course, but this could force ecclesiasts to find more rational justifications for their convictions.So to me, this is not about cannon fodder.
At least not automatically.
It might become that way anyway, but if it's more of the same then non-followers will get bored with it quickly and won't affect the already-followers.Then again, this might also be the birth of a new kind of forum troll: the NCAA (neo-christian...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882516</id>
	<title>Re:Just be careful</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1264329720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys."</p><p>With current priestly pedo payoffs worldwide at roughly a (B)illion dollars (hundred of millions in the US alone) he would be wise to do so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys .
" With current priestly pedo payoffs worldwide at roughly a ( B ) illion dollars ( hundred of millions in the US alone ) he would be wise to do so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.
"With current priestly pedo payoffs worldwide at roughly a (B)illion dollars (hundred of millions in the US alone) he would be wise to do so.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882274</id>
	<title>As in:Thou shalt not...foot yourself in the shoot?</title>
	<author>D4C5CE</author>
	<datestamp>1264328580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or wait a minute, probably he didn't mean that kind of Forth:
<a href="http://www.eng.uwaterloo.ca/~comp03a/misc/humour/shootfoot.html" title="uwaterloo.ca">http://www.eng.uwaterloo.ca/~comp03a/misc/humour/shootfoot.html</a> [uwaterloo.ca]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or wait a minute , probably he did n't mean that kind of Forth : http : //www.eng.uwaterloo.ca/ ~ comp03a/misc/humour/shootfoot.html [ uwaterloo.ca ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or wait a minute, probably he didn't mean that kind of Forth:
http://www.eng.uwaterloo.ca/~comp03a/misc/humour/shootfoot.html [uwaterloo.ca]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888708</id>
	<title>GAYS are NINE times more prone to pedophilia...</title>
	<author>viraltus</author>
	<datestamp>1264428360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, will you campaign against homosexual now? Will you monitor homosexuals so that they do not communicate with minors?</p><p>In fact, even the vast majority or pedophiles in the church are gay (they attack boys) and that is why the Pope sentence a few years ago a ban to any homosexual to be able to become a priest.</p><p>Ah, by the way, even considering all gay priests, the likelihood of a priest to commit an act of pedophilia is still slightly lower that the average population, and, again, around 9 times LESS than that those belonging to the gay community.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , will you campaign against homosexual now ?
Will you monitor homosexuals so that they do not communicate with minors ? In fact , even the vast majority or pedophiles in the church are gay ( they attack boys ) and that is why the Pope sentence a few years ago a ban to any homosexual to be able to become a priest.Ah , by the way , even considering all gay priests , the likelihood of a priest to commit an act of pedophilia is still slightly lower that the average population , and , again , around 9 times LESS than that those belonging to the gay community .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, will you campaign against homosexual now?
Will you monitor homosexuals so that they do not communicate with minors?In fact, even the vast majority or pedophiles in the church are gay (they attack boys) and that is why the Pope sentence a few years ago a ban to any homosexual to be able to become a priest.Ah, by the way, even considering all gay priests, the likelihood of a priest to commit an act of pedophilia is still slightly lower that the average population, and, again, around 9 times LESS than that those belonging to the gay community.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882542</id>
	<title>Zardoz...</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1264329840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"The Son is good. The penis is evil. The penis shoots seeds, and makes new life to poison the Earth with a plague of men, as once it was, but the Son defeats death, and purifies Souls of the filth of sin. Go forth . . . and Blog!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Son is good .
The penis is evil .
The penis shoots seeds , and makes new life to poison the Earth with a plague of men , as once it was , but the Son defeats death , and purifies Souls of the filth of sin .
Go forth .
. .
and Blog !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Son is good.
The penis is evil.
The penis shoots seeds, and makes new life to poison the Earth with a plague of men, as once it was, but the Son defeats death, and purifies Souls of the filth of sin.
Go forth .
. .
and Blog!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883476</id>
	<title>Re:Off-by-one error</title>
	<author>peslick</author>
	<datestamp>1264336020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, they did mean Pope Benedict XV. He was a very progressive pope. He was one of the earliest advocates of blogging - the early 20th century in fact.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , they did mean Pope Benedict XV .
He was a very progressive pope .
He was one of the earliest advocates of blogging - the early 20th century in fact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, they did mean Pope Benedict XV.
He was a very progressive pope.
He was one of the earliest advocates of blogging - the early 20th century in fact.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30902242</id>
	<title>Re:sweet virtual confession</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264508700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What gets me is why Catholics have to confess through a priest at all, surely you should be asking God himself for forgiveness instead.</p><p>Well I do know why, it is (or at least was) about poer and control, the same reason why services and the Bible used to always be in Latin, the Church used it as a way to control the common people.  These days, I think it is just tradition more than anything.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What gets me is why Catholics have to confess through a priest at all , surely you should be asking God himself for forgiveness instead.Well I do know why , it is ( or at least was ) about poer and control , the same reason why services and the Bible used to always be in Latin , the Church used it as a way to control the common people .
These days , I think it is just tradition more than anything .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What gets me is why Catholics have to confess through a priest at all, surely you should be asking God himself for forgiveness instead.Well I do know why, it is (or at least was) about poer and control, the same reason why services and the Bible used to always be in Latin, the Church used it as a way to control the common people.
These days, I think it is just tradition more than anything.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882380</id>
	<title>SOAP</title>
	<author>symes</author>
	<datestamp>1264329180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>He gave a sermon on iptables in linux and simple object access protocols. It was call "Pope on a SOAP on a ROPE"... I'll get my coat</htmltext>
<tokenext>He gave a sermon on iptables in linux and simple object access protocols .
It was call " Pope on a SOAP on a ROPE " ... I 'll get my coat</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He gave a sermon on iptables in linux and simple object access protocols.
It was call "Pope on a SOAP on a ROPE"... I'll get my coat</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882726</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>Aurisor</author>
	<datestamp>1264330920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I totally agree!  One minor point, though.  You misspelled 'Zeus.'  From looking at my keyboard, though, it's quite easy to see how those d's and g's got in there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I totally agree !
One minor point , though .
You misspelled 'Zeus .
' From looking at my keyboard , though , it 's quite easy to see how those d 's and g 's got in there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I totally agree!
One minor point, though.
You misspelled 'Zeus.
'  From looking at my keyboard, though, it's quite easy to see how those d's and g's got in there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882734</id>
	<title>All in One Place</title>
	<author>Hittman</author>
	<datestamp>1264330980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like a way all the priests can keep their kiddy porn in one place.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a way all the priests can keep their kiddy porn in one place .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a way all the priests can keep their kiddy porn in one place.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882296</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264328640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If preaching ended up being a disturbing experience, the preachers should had noticed something right at this point...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If preaching ended up being a disturbing experience , the preachers should had noticed something right at this point.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If preaching ended up being a disturbing experience, the preachers should had noticed something right at this point...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882930</id>
	<title>Now lets talk about the "which parish" problem</title>
	<author>RobertLTux</author>
	<datestamp>1264332240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the current Pope is telling priests to go forth and blog<br>how would the situation of a Church in SecondLife be handled??<br>(bonus round question are there any real cross and steeple churches with SL locations??)</p><p>Personally i would challenge churches to extend their reach into this wilderness</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the current Pope is telling priests to go forth and bloghow would the situation of a Church in SecondLife be handled ? ?
( bonus round question are there any real cross and steeple churches with SL locations ? ?
) Personally i would challenge churches to extend their reach into this wilderness</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the current Pope is telling priests to go forth and bloghow would the situation of a Church in SecondLife be handled??
(bonus round question are there any real cross and steeple churches with SL locations??
)Personally i would challenge churches to extend their reach into this wilderness</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887056</id>
	<title>Your last name...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264452000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...Wouldn't happen to be Jones, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...Would n't happen to be Jones , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...Wouldn't happen to be Jones, right?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882468</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264329540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>used in old times to control people</i> </p><p>I cannot think of any type of philosophy that has not been misused in this way.  They have all been used as ways of dealing with, or resisting, that control as well.</p><p>Just because some ideas are used to control people, it does not mean the ideas are bad or untrue.</p><p>In a few hundred years, how do you know that people won't look back on us and feel sorry for us being oppressed?/p?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>used in old times to control people I can not think of any type of philosophy that has not been misused in this way .
They have all been used as ways of dealing with , or resisting , that control as well.Just because some ideas are used to control people , it does not mean the ideas are bad or untrue.In a few hundred years , how do you know that people wo n't look back on us and feel sorry for us being oppressed ? /p ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> used in old times to control people I cannot think of any type of philosophy that has not been misused in this way.
They have all been used as ways of dealing with, or resisting, that control as well.Just because some ideas are used to control people, it does not mean the ideas are bad or untrue.In a few hundred years, how do you know that people won't look back on us and feel sorry for us being oppressed?/p?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887992</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>JAlexoi</author>
	<datestamp>1264420140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A wonderful idea.... You would actually know what you are reading about<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-D</htmltext>
<tokenext>A wonderful idea.... You would actually know what you are reading about : -D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A wonderful idea.... You would actually know what you are reading about :-D</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884856</id>
	<title>Re:Bad decision</title>
	<author>telomerewhythere</author>
	<datestamp>1264345200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reminds me of Matthew 10:27:  What I tell you in the dark, speak in the daylight; what is whispered in your ear, proclaim from the roofs.
</p><p>Or even more interesting, Luke 8:17:  For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open.
</p><p>I am not defending Christendom, but Jesus (both quotes above from JC) was pretty different than what you see from most 'Christians.'</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reminds me of Matthew 10 : 27 : What I tell you in the dark , speak in the daylight ; what is whispered in your ear , proclaim from the roofs .
Or even more interesting , Luke 8 : 17 : For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed , and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open .
I am not defending Christendom , but Jesus ( both quotes above from JC ) was pretty different than what you see from most 'Christians .
'</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reminds me of Matthew 10:27:  What I tell you in the dark, speak in the daylight; what is whispered in your ear, proclaim from the roofs.
Or even more interesting, Luke 8:17:  For there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open.
I am not defending Christendom, but Jesus (both quotes above from JC) was pretty different than what you see from most 'Christians.
'</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882256</id>
	<title>It's a miracle!</title>
	<author>ProfessorDoom</author>
	<datestamp>1264328460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The poster is missing the real miracle here.  Pope Benedict XV died in 1922.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The poster is missing the real miracle here .
Pope Benedict XV died in 1922 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The poster is missing the real miracle here.
Pope Benedict XV died in 1922.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885842</id>
	<title>Re:Things the Church needs with a LAMP server.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264353000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know this won't mean much as I'm an AC, but I can't agree more with your post. +1</p><p>I'm a fairly frequent traveller, and it's an enormous pain to try to figure out church schedules in advance of trips.  Some parishes have lovely websites, some don't.  Some, and these are most annoying of all, have websites they haven't tended to in years, which have incorrect schedules and other outdated information.</p><p>The Church has a nearly-two millenium history of centralisation.  Can't we get this right, please?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know this wo n't mean much as I 'm an AC , but I ca n't agree more with your post .
+ 1I 'm a fairly frequent traveller , and it 's an enormous pain to try to figure out church schedules in advance of trips .
Some parishes have lovely websites , some do n't .
Some , and these are most annoying of all , have websites they have n't tended to in years , which have incorrect schedules and other outdated information.The Church has a nearly-two millenium history of centralisation .
Ca n't we get this right , please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know this won't mean much as I'm an AC, but I can't agree more with your post.
+1I'm a fairly frequent traveller, and it's an enormous pain to try to figure out church schedules in advance of trips.
Some parishes have lovely websites, some don't.
Some, and these are most annoying of all, have websites they haven't tended to in years, which have incorrect schedules and other outdated information.The Church has a nearly-two millenium history of centralisation.
Can't we get this right, please?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882630</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882238</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>DesScorp</author>
	<datestamp>1264328340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.  Before people had to travel to meet people.  The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting.</p></div><p>Ultimately, it's just another line of communication. It's important, but getting priests to blog is not exactly a revolutionary idea. Some are doing it already, and have been for years.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real .
Before people had to travel to meet people .
The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting.Ultimately , it 's just another line of communication .
It 's important , but getting priests to blog is not exactly a revolutionary idea .
Some are doing it already , and have been for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.
Before people had to travel to meet people.
The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting.Ultimately, it's just another line of communication.
It's important, but getting priests to blog is not exactly a revolutionary idea.
Some are doing it already, and have been for years.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887930</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264419300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.</p></div><p>True. Before the Internet, how many people had even heard of <a href="http://www.venganza.org/" title="venganza.org" rel="nofollow">the one true supreme being?</a> [venganza.org] </p></div><p>The internet is a fantastic place to demonstrate that Jesus never existed and that hell and paradise are immaginary places.<br>Most religious psicotics are Blaise Pascal thinking folks. The world would be so much better without various religious bibles advocating antisemitism, homosexuality hate, woman degradation, and the "world is flat" and other absurd theories and beliefs.</p><p>Let's start here:<br>hell is make believe. If you take a look into the gospels you'll find "The Valley of Gehenna"<br>Read up folks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gehenna<br>Its a phisical location near Jeruselemme in which "bad people's" bodies were thrown into (Jeruselemme's burning garbage dump). This place was instrumentalized during midevil era for the fabrication of the immaginary place they now call hell.</p><p>Have a beautiful day,<br>dr. who</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.True .
Before the Internet , how many people had even heard of the one true supreme being ?
[ venganza.org ] The internet is a fantastic place to demonstrate that Jesus never existed and that hell and paradise are immaginary places.Most religious psicotics are Blaise Pascal thinking folks .
The world would be so much better without various religious bibles advocating antisemitism , homosexuality hate , woman degradation , and the " world is flat " and other absurd theories and beliefs.Let 's start here : hell is make believe .
If you take a look into the gospels you 'll find " The Valley of Gehenna " Read up folks : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GehennaIts a phisical location near Jeruselemme in which " bad people 's " bodies were thrown into ( Jeruselemme 's burning garbage dump ) .
This place was instrumentalized during midevil era for the fabrication of the immaginary place they now call hell.Have a beautiful day,dr .
who</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.True.
Before the Internet, how many people had even heard of the one true supreme being?
[venganza.org] The internet is a fantastic place to demonstrate that Jesus never existed and that hell and paradise are immaginary places.Most religious psicotics are Blaise Pascal thinking folks.
The world would be so much better without various religious bibles advocating antisemitism, homosexuality hate, woman degradation, and the "world is flat" and other absurd theories and beliefs.Let's start here:hell is make believe.
If you take a look into the gospels you'll find "The Valley of Gehenna"Read up folks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GehennaIts a phisical location near Jeruselemme in which "bad people's" bodies were thrown into (Jeruselemme's burning garbage dump).
This place was instrumentalized during midevil era for the fabrication of the immaginary place they now call hell.Have a beautiful day,dr.
who
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882724</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1264330920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I object to religion and general, and churches in particular, but I don't think segregating by religiosity (let alone by religion) would be a good think. I disagree with them, but I like knowing WHAT I'm disagreeing with. And sometimes I don't disagree quite as much as other times. Also, there a bunch of stuff/lifestyles that not only don't interest me, but bother or irk me... should we segregate everything and everyone, like those sad people who live in a very small peer group of like-minded people ?</p><p>Also, generally speaking, you don't want segregation:<br>- it breeds intolerance. If we are not regularly exposed to different people, way of thoughts, philosophies, sexualities... we become bigots. Religion is one lifestyle choice, one culture... it's nothing so special that it should be treated differently.<br>- it narrows the mind: some people are fascinated by things I don't care about, in favour of things I dislike, or the converse... occasional exposure to these gives me a chance to update my thoughts/feelings/attitude... or to keep them, but with good reason<br>- segregation works both ways: if those idiots bigoted holier-than-thou religious types start to engage other people, may be THEY will also get something out of the ensuing discussion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I object to religion and general , and churches in particular , but I do n't think segregating by religiosity ( let alone by religion ) would be a good think .
I disagree with them , but I like knowing WHAT I 'm disagreeing with .
And sometimes I do n't disagree quite as much as other times .
Also , there a bunch of stuff/lifestyles that not only do n't interest me , but bother or irk me... should we segregate everything and everyone , like those sad people who live in a very small peer group of like-minded people ? Also , generally speaking , you do n't want segregation : - it breeds intolerance .
If we are not regularly exposed to different people , way of thoughts , philosophies , sexualities... we become bigots .
Religion is one lifestyle choice , one culture... it 's nothing so special that it should be treated differently.- it narrows the mind : some people are fascinated by things I do n't care about , in favour of things I dislike , or the converse... occasional exposure to these gives me a chance to update my thoughts/feelings/attitude... or to keep them , but with good reason- segregation works both ways : if those idiots bigoted holier-than-thou religious types start to engage other people , may be THEY will also get something out of the ensuing discussion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I object to religion and general, and churches in particular, but I don't think segregating by religiosity (let alone by religion) would be a good think.
I disagree with them, but I like knowing WHAT I'm disagreeing with.
And sometimes I don't disagree quite as much as other times.
Also, there a bunch of stuff/lifestyles that not only don't interest me, but bother or irk me... should we segregate everything and everyone, like those sad people who live in a very small peer group of like-minded people ?Also, generally speaking, you don't want segregation:- it breeds intolerance.
If we are not regularly exposed to different people, way of thoughts, philosophies, sexualities... we become bigots.
Religion is one lifestyle choice, one culture... it's nothing so special that it should be treated differently.- it narrows the mind: some people are fascinated by things I don't care about, in favour of things I dislike, or the converse... occasional exposure to these gives me a chance to update my thoughts/feelings/attitude... or to keep them, but with good reason- segregation works both ways: if those idiots bigoted holier-than-thou religious types start to engage other people, may be THEY will also get something out of the ensuing discussion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884454</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>pete-classic</author>
	<datestamp>1264342620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Disturbing?  To the contrary!  I've been trying to corroborate stories of these "gods" most of my life.  A face-to-face meeting would be a most welcome way to finally establish the existence of one or more of them!  Could you make an introduction?</p><p>Thanks,<br>Peter</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Disturbing ?
To the contrary !
I 've been trying to corroborate stories of these " gods " most of my life .
A face-to-face meeting would be a most welcome way to finally establish the existence of one or more of them !
Could you make an introduction ? Thanks,Peter</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Disturbing?
To the contrary!
I've been trying to corroborate stories of these "gods" most of my life.
A face-to-face meeting would be a most welcome way to finally establish the existence of one or more of them!
Could you make an introduction?Thanks,Peter</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882610</id>
	<title>electronic speed may cause sloppy messages</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1264330260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We all know examples where we sent an email or posted a comment quickly and had regrets later.  I encourage any person in a position of influence- minister, politician, teacher, etc. - either have a second pair of eyes review what they have just written, or sit on the post 12-24 hours before pressing the send key.  Haste, emotion of the moment, fatigue can all lead to poor replies.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We all know examples where we sent an email or posted a comment quickly and had regrets later .
I encourage any person in a position of influence- minister , politician , teacher , etc .
- either have a second pair of eyes review what they have just written , or sit on the post 12-24 hours before pressing the send key .
Haste , emotion of the moment , fatigue can all lead to poor replies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We all know examples where we sent an email or posted a comment quickly and had regrets later.
I encourage any person in a position of influence- minister, politician, teacher, etc.
- either have a second pair of eyes review what they have just written, or sit on the post 12-24 hours before pressing the send key.
Haste, emotion of the moment, fatigue can all lead to poor replies.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882112</id>
	<title>sweet virtual confession</title>
	<author>atarione</author>
	<datestamp>1264327560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>virtual confession app</p><p>want to be forgiven for your sins</p><p>there's an app for that</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>virtual confession appwant to be forgiven for your sinsthere 's an app for that</tokentext>
<sentencetext>virtual confession appwant to be forgiven for your sinsthere's an app for that</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887472</id>
	<title>Re:Off-by-one error</title>
	<author>Balibaloodestroyme</author>
	<datestamp>1264413360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It really is Benedict XV, aka The Dancing Zombi Pope, or the Pope of the Living Dead, or the Pope From Outer Space.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It really is Benedict XV , aka The Dancing Zombi Pope , or the Pope of the Living Dead , or the Pope From Outer Space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It really is Benedict XV, aka The Dancing Zombi Pope, or the Pope of the Living Dead, or the Pope From Outer Space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882294</id>
	<title>Re:Just be careful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264328640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.</p></div><p>They should know better than to surf sites like hornypriests.gov</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.They should know better than to surf sites like hornypriests.gov</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.They should know better than to surf sites like hornypriests.gov
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</id>
	<title>Religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264326720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please, just please make it be one domain, like religiousblogs.com. Nothing worse than all the spam and pushed things and messages on the internet is such religious ones.</p><p>I do not think there is any god anyway. It's as likely possibility than that we would be living in a computer simulation. In fact, I suspect the later one is more likely possible.</p><p>Religion is something that was used in old times to control people and have them do "moral" actions (moral here being what the government considered good). It also was used to slay millions of people in crusades to other regions. The real reason most likely even wasn't about believing in god, it was the same power game that there is today. This doesn't apply just to Christians, it applies to every religion. Just see what a freaking mess the middle-east and areas around Israel is. All of that just because you believe in an imaginary person while the other person believes in an another imaginary person.</p><p>But since we are already talking about the god vs. computer simulation, is there any reason <i>why</i> we couldn't be living in someones simulation? Every year our own computer technology goes leaps forwards. It might seem simulating our whole world would be too much for a computer, but who really knows what the limits are? And if we are living in a simulation, how could we know we aren't? The system would prevent us from doing so.</p><p>And I do not mean this as the typical Matrix like system, which would be kind of stupid. I mean it as something where we don't exist at all outside of the simulation, other than maybe as some processes running in a data center (or someones bedroom closet). While I dont spend my days thinking about that, I think its a lot more likely thing than there being some invisible, everything knowing, a man who created everything somewhere in the space who listens to everyones wishes and tricks around with them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , just please make it be one domain , like religiousblogs.com .
Nothing worse than all the spam and pushed things and messages on the internet is such religious ones.I do not think there is any god anyway .
It 's as likely possibility than that we would be living in a computer simulation .
In fact , I suspect the later one is more likely possible.Religion is something that was used in old times to control people and have them do " moral " actions ( moral here being what the government considered good ) .
It also was used to slay millions of people in crusades to other regions .
The real reason most likely even was n't about believing in god , it was the same power game that there is today .
This does n't apply just to Christians , it applies to every religion .
Just see what a freaking mess the middle-east and areas around Israel is .
All of that just because you believe in an imaginary person while the other person believes in an another imaginary person.But since we are already talking about the god vs. computer simulation , is there any reason why we could n't be living in someones simulation ?
Every year our own computer technology goes leaps forwards .
It might seem simulating our whole world would be too much for a computer , but who really knows what the limits are ?
And if we are living in a simulation , how could we know we are n't ?
The system would prevent us from doing so.And I do not mean this as the typical Matrix like system , which would be kind of stupid .
I mean it as something where we do n't exist at all outside of the simulation , other than maybe as some processes running in a data center ( or someones bedroom closet ) .
While I dont spend my days thinking about that , I think its a lot more likely thing than there being some invisible , everything knowing , a man who created everything somewhere in the space who listens to everyones wishes and tricks around with them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, just please make it be one domain, like religiousblogs.com.
Nothing worse than all the spam and pushed things and messages on the internet is such religious ones.I do not think there is any god anyway.
It's as likely possibility than that we would be living in a computer simulation.
In fact, I suspect the later one is more likely possible.Religion is something that was used in old times to control people and have them do "moral" actions (moral here being what the government considered good).
It also was used to slay millions of people in crusades to other regions.
The real reason most likely even wasn't about believing in god, it was the same power game that there is today.
This doesn't apply just to Christians, it applies to every religion.
Just see what a freaking mess the middle-east and areas around Israel is.
All of that just because you believe in an imaginary person while the other person believes in an another imaginary person.But since we are already talking about the god vs. computer simulation, is there any reason why we couldn't be living in someones simulation?
Every year our own computer technology goes leaps forwards.
It might seem simulating our whole world would be too much for a computer, but who really knows what the limits are?
And if we are living in a simulation, how could we know we aren't?
The system would prevent us from doing so.And I do not mean this as the typical Matrix like system, which would be kind of stupid.
I mean it as something where we don't exist at all outside of the simulation, other than maybe as some processes running in a data center (or someones bedroom closet).
While I dont spend my days thinking about that, I think its a lot more likely thing than there being some invisible, everything knowing, a man who created everything somewhere in the space who listens to everyones wishes and tricks around with them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882270</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>MightyMartian</author>
	<datestamp>1264328580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real. Before people had to travel to meet people. The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting.</p></div></blockquote><p>What does God need with a LAMP server?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real .
Before people had to travel to meet people .
The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting.What does God need with a LAMP server ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.
Before people had to travel to meet people.
The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting.What does God need with a LAMP server?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885400</id>
	<title>Re:The pedophile priest problem</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1264349640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The rest of the Church aided and abetted them by shuffling them around, and there is no telling how many escaped being outed.</p><p>When the Church instantly feeds their pedos to the cops, in public, and assists law enforcement personnel in busting pedos then it might<br>not merit the label of pedo farm it currently deserves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The rest of the Church aided and abetted them by shuffling them around , and there is no telling how many escaped being outed.When the Church instantly feeds their pedos to the cops , in public , and assists law enforcement personnel in busting pedos then it mightnot merit the label of pedo farm it currently deserves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The rest of the Church aided and abetted them by shuffling them around, and there is no telling how many escaped being outed.When the Church instantly feeds their pedos to the cops, in public, and assists law enforcement personnel in busting pedos then it mightnot merit the label of pedo farm it currently deserves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883352</id>
	<title>Re:Off-by-one error</title>
	<author>fucket</author>
	<datestamp>1264335300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is the Space Pope reptilian?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the Space Pope reptilian ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the Space Pope reptilian?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882168</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882000</id>
	<title>Bad decision</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264326900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Evens the playing field, makes what they preach much more vulnerable if it's not restricted to small community or closed channel of information.</p><p>I love it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Evens the playing field , makes what they preach much more vulnerable if it 's not restricted to small community or closed channel of information.I love it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Evens the playing field, makes what they preach much more vulnerable if it's not restricted to small community or closed channel of information.I love it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883048</id>
	<title>Matthew 5:37</title>
	<author>klapaucjusz</author>
	<datestamp>1264333140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil."

</p><p>(Saint Matthew about digital media.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" But let your communication be , Yea , yea ; Nay , nay : for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil .
" ( Saint Matthew about digital media .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil.
"

(Saint Matthew about digital media.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888902</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>Thundarr Trollgrim</author>
	<datestamp>1264429920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps they could share details of local choirboys that will 'put out'.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps they could share details of local choirboys that will 'put out' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps they could share details of local choirboys that will 'put out'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882114</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1264327560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>While contemplating how irritating this might be, remember that...they don't really have any other choice but try to shift their methods towards new reality. And it's not so bad; might a bit messy for a time, but ultimately those are convulsions of the old ways - which simply won't fit to that new reality.</p><p>Whether that will result in human consciousness at large being, finally, freed from those ideas (extremely doubtful) or new variant of them taking hold (more likely; and you might try to influence it) - it doesn't matter. Since it should end up, again, more tolerable generally. Until next step...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>While contemplating how irritating this might be , remember that...they do n't really have any other choice but try to shift their methods towards new reality .
And it 's not so bad ; might a bit messy for a time , but ultimately those are convulsions of the old ways - which simply wo n't fit to that new reality.Whether that will result in human consciousness at large being , finally , freed from those ideas ( extremely doubtful ) or new variant of them taking hold ( more likely ; and you might try to influence it ) - it does n't matter .
Since it should end up , again , more tolerable generally .
Until next step.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>While contemplating how irritating this might be, remember that...they don't really have any other choice but try to shift their methods towards new reality.
And it's not so bad; might a bit messy for a time, but ultimately those are convulsions of the old ways - which simply won't fit to that new reality.Whether that will result in human consciousness at large being, finally, freed from those ideas (extremely doubtful) or new variant of them taking hold (more likely; and you might try to influence it) - it doesn't matter.
Since it should end up, again, more tolerable generally.
Until next step...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885996</id>
	<title>Re:The pedophile priest problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264354620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Perhaps we should do the same for teachers.   They more likely to abuse children.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps we should do the same for teachers .
They more likely to abuse children .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps we should do the same for teachers.
They more likely to abuse children.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882354</id>
	<title>Oh, God, Not Again!</title>
	<author>creimer</author>
	<datestamp>1264329000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>If the Pope was serious about using new communication technology, he should make the entire <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican\_Secret\_Archives" title="wikipedia.org">Vatican Secret Archives</a> [wikipedia.org] searchable on the Internet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If the Pope was serious about using new communication technology , he should make the entire Vatican Secret Archives [ wikipedia.org ] searchable on the Internet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the Pope was serious about using new communication technology, he should make the entire Vatican Secret Archives [wikipedia.org] searchable on the Internet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>DesScorp</author>
	<datestamp>1264327620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><b>Please, just please make it be one domain, like religiousblogs.com</b></p><p>What a wonderful time and space saving idea. Hey, while we're at it, lets limit and compact <i>all</i> thought on the Internet. We'll start by forcing all geeks into one domain... something like geekblogs.com, and why stop there? We'll put political people into one domain and... by the way, who do we put in charge of forcing all this to happen?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , just please make it be one domain , like religiousblogs.comWhat a wonderful time and space saving idea .
Hey , while we 're at it , lets limit and compact all thought on the Internet .
We 'll start by forcing all geeks into one domain... something like geekblogs.com , and why stop there ?
We 'll put political people into one domain and... by the way , who do we put in charge of forcing all this to happen ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, just please make it be one domain, like religiousblogs.comWhat a wonderful time and space saving idea.
Hey, while we're at it, lets limit and compact all thought on the Internet.
We'll start by forcing all geeks into one domain... something like geekblogs.com, and why stop there?
We'll put political people into one domain and... by the way, who do we put in charge of forcing all this to happen?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30893410</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>Reziac</author>
	<datestamp>1264447320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting."</p><p>Considering some of the people I've met on the internet, I daresay you're correct.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting .
" Considering some of the people I 've met on the internet , I daresay you 're correct .
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting.
"Considering some of the people I've met on the internet, I daresay you're correct.
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882578</id>
	<title>Youtube Atheist Movement participation?</title>
	<author>Zombie Ryushu</author>
	<datestamp>1264330080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how this will affect the Youtube Atheist movement? I wonder if it will mean that Youtube Atheists can refute the Pope immediately and in real time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how this will affect the Youtube Atheist movement ?
I wonder if it will mean that Youtube Atheists can refute the Pope immediately and in real time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how this will affect the Youtube Atheist movement?
I wonder if it will mean that Youtube Atheists can refute the Pope immediately and in real time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882068</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>Henry V .009</author>
	<datestamp>1264327380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't know. I'm not Catholic, but I read Fr. Z's blog at <a href="http://wdtprs.com/" title="wdtprs.com" rel="nofollow">wdtprs.com</a> [wdtprs.com] fairly frequently. It's not spam by any stretch. It's interesting to peep into another world.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know .
I 'm not Catholic , but I read Fr .
Z 's blog at wdtprs.com [ wdtprs.com ] fairly frequently .
It 's not spam by any stretch .
It 's interesting to peep into another world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know.
I'm not Catholic, but I read Fr.
Z's blog at wdtprs.com [wdtprs.com] fairly frequently.
It's not spam by any stretch.
It's interesting to peep into another world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887322</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264411620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Please, just please make it be one domain, like religiousblogs.com. Nothing worse than all the spam and pushed things and messages on the internet is such religious ones.</p></div><p>Actually, wouldn't this be one instance where a new top-level domain would actually be sensible?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.religion, or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.reli if that's too long... or perhaps the Bahamas could be persuaded to give up<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.bs for the right amount of jink.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>who really knows what the limits are? And if we are living in a simulation, how could we know we aren't? The system would prevent us from doing so.</p></div><p>You do, of course, realize that this is precisely the kind of argument that theists use, too, right? "God is unknowable", "God deliberately doesn't prove he eixsts because he wants to test our faith", and all that...</p><p>I think you might need a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.bs domain, too.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Please , just please make it be one domain , like religiousblogs.com .
Nothing worse than all the spam and pushed things and messages on the internet is such religious ones.Actually , would n't this be one instance where a new top-level domain would actually be sensible ?
.religion , or .reli if that 's too long... or perhaps the Bahamas could be persuaded to give up .bs for the right amount of jink.who really knows what the limits are ?
And if we are living in a simulation , how could we know we are n't ?
The system would prevent us from doing so.You do , of course , realize that this is precisely the kind of argument that theists use , too , right ?
" God is unknowable " , " God deliberately does n't prove he eixsts because he wants to test our faith " , and all that...I think you might need a .bs domain , too .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please, just please make it be one domain, like religiousblogs.com.
Nothing worse than all the spam and pushed things and messages on the internet is such religious ones.Actually, wouldn't this be one instance where a new top-level domain would actually be sensible?
.religion, or .reli if that's too long... or perhaps the Bahamas could be persuaded to give up .bs for the right amount of jink.who really knows what the limits are?
And if we are living in a simulation, how could we know we aren't?
The system would prevent us from doing so.You do, of course, realize that this is precisely the kind of argument that theists use, too, right?
"God is unknowable", "God deliberately doesn't prove he eixsts because he wants to test our faith", and all that...I think you might need a .bs domain, too.
:)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884666</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>Maestro485</author>
	<datestamp>1264344060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was thinking the same thing. Although I was raised Catholic and received the relevant sacraments, I'm not religious and haven't even stepped foot in a church for a number of years. I've considered checking it out again for no real reason, but it feels awkward to me to just show up on Sunday (and I'm not <i>that</i> committed to the idea anyway).
<br> <br>
If I were able to sort of "check it out" by reading the priest's blog or whatever, it would make my decision to show up and participate much easier. Either I'll decide that it's just not my thing, or my somewhat renewed interest leads me to actually go.
<br> <br>
Seems like a good idea to me. And why stop at just Catholicism? There are at least 5 different churches of varying denominations within a few miles of my house and I don't really know the differences between them. I could hit up a few of the sites and see what they're all about. If nothing else, at least I'll learn something. (And to be honest, they might have a web presence right now and I never thought about it. Time for some googling...)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was thinking the same thing .
Although I was raised Catholic and received the relevant sacraments , I 'm not religious and have n't even stepped foot in a church for a number of years .
I 've considered checking it out again for no real reason , but it feels awkward to me to just show up on Sunday ( and I 'm not that committed to the idea anyway ) .
If I were able to sort of " check it out " by reading the priest 's blog or whatever , it would make my decision to show up and participate much easier .
Either I 'll decide that it 's just not my thing , or my somewhat renewed interest leads me to actually go .
Seems like a good idea to me .
And why stop at just Catholicism ?
There are at least 5 different churches of varying denominations within a few miles of my house and I do n't really know the differences between them .
I could hit up a few of the sites and see what they 're all about .
If nothing else , at least I 'll learn something .
( And to be honest , they might have a web presence right now and I never thought about it .
Time for some googling... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was thinking the same thing.
Although I was raised Catholic and received the relevant sacraments, I'm not religious and haven't even stepped foot in a church for a number of years.
I've considered checking it out again for no real reason, but it feels awkward to me to just show up on Sunday (and I'm not that committed to the idea anyway).
If I were able to sort of "check it out" by reading the priest's blog or whatever, it would make my decision to show up and participate much easier.
Either I'll decide that it's just not my thing, or my somewhat renewed interest leads me to actually go.
Seems like a good idea to me.
And why stop at just Catholicism?
There are at least 5 different churches of varying denominations within a few miles of my house and I don't really know the differences between them.
I could hit up a few of the sites and see what they're all about.
If nothing else, at least I'll learn something.
(And to be honest, they might have a web presence right now and I never thought about it.
Time for some googling...)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882144</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264327740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.</p></div><p>
True. Before the Internet, how many people had even heard of <a href="http://www.venganza.org/" title="venganza.org">the one true supreme being?</a> [venganza.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real .
True. Before the Internet , how many people had even heard of the one true supreme being ?
[ venganza.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.
True. Before the Internet, how many people had even heard of the one true supreme being?
[venganza.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882412</id>
	<title>And: who cares?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264329240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what has this to with<nobr> <wbr></nobr>./ precisely?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what has this to with ./ precisely ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what has this to with ./ precisely?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887336</id>
	<title>Re:The pedophile priest problem</title>
	<author>the\_one(2)</author>
	<datestamp>1264411740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude... I seriously hope those numbers are wrong... 2\% of all catholic priests in the US? That sounds way to high.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude... I seriously hope those numbers are wrong... 2 \ % of all catholic priests in the US ?
That sounds way to high .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude... I seriously hope those numbers are wrong... 2\% of all catholic priests in the US?
That sounds way to high.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883984</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883792</id>
	<title>Re:This could be alot of fun, unless your Irish.</title>
	<author>jc42</author>
	<datestamp>1264337760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Its time to properly address the issues and errors of our philosophies..... Imagine open source religion.</i></p><p>It's far too late for that; all the world's religions have been "open source" for centuries.  It's true that as recently as 7 or 8 centuries back, the religious leaders did team up with the political leaders to introduce this new "copyright" concept, whose purpose was to limit the copying (by scribes mostly) of religious texts to a small number of carefully-controlled publishing houses.  But then some interfering tech geeks developed printing presses, and pretty soon it was out of control.</p><p>Some of the first printed texts (and the topic of the first copyright trials and executions) were the major religious texts of the day.  This eventually led to near-universal literacy in several parts of the world, and the leaders found it impossible to keep cheap copies of their religious texts out of the hands of people who could read the scriptures themselves.  Life has been tough for the religious leaders ever since then, as the local monopolies over religious thought were lost.</p><p>Fact is, printed copies of all the world's religious texts have been widely available for going on half a millennium now.  As with open-source software, it has led to both widespread forking of the religions and widespread understanding of how religions work.  Or, more often, how they fail to work. (Just ask a few Catholics about their ban on priestly sex.)  Nowadays, you can rapidly download most of the holy texts for free from somewhere on the Internet.  And it's not hard to find online discussions of many of them.  If not, you can easily start your own discussion (or religion).</p><p>Of course, most religious organizations probably haven't profited from this open publication.  The story with software isn't quite as clear yet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Its time to properly address the issues and errors of our philosophies..... Imagine open source religion.It 's far too late for that ; all the world 's religions have been " open source " for centuries .
It 's true that as recently as 7 or 8 centuries back , the religious leaders did team up with the political leaders to introduce this new " copyright " concept , whose purpose was to limit the copying ( by scribes mostly ) of religious texts to a small number of carefully-controlled publishing houses .
But then some interfering tech geeks developed printing presses , and pretty soon it was out of control.Some of the first printed texts ( and the topic of the first copyright trials and executions ) were the major religious texts of the day .
This eventually led to near-universal literacy in several parts of the world , and the leaders found it impossible to keep cheap copies of their religious texts out of the hands of people who could read the scriptures themselves .
Life has been tough for the religious leaders ever since then , as the local monopolies over religious thought were lost.Fact is , printed copies of all the world 's religious texts have been widely available for going on half a millennium now .
As with open-source software , it has led to both widespread forking of the religions and widespread understanding of how religions work .
Or , more often , how they fail to work .
( Just ask a few Catholics about their ban on priestly sex .
) Nowadays , you can rapidly download most of the holy texts for free from somewhere on the Internet .
And it 's not hard to find online discussions of many of them .
If not , you can easily start your own discussion ( or religion ) .Of course , most religious organizations probably have n't profited from this open publication .
The story with software is n't quite as clear yet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its time to properly address the issues and errors of our philosophies..... Imagine open source religion.It's far too late for that; all the world's religions have been "open source" for centuries.
It's true that as recently as 7 or 8 centuries back, the religious leaders did team up with the political leaders to introduce this new "copyright" concept, whose purpose was to limit the copying (by scribes mostly) of religious texts to a small number of carefully-controlled publishing houses.
But then some interfering tech geeks developed printing presses, and pretty soon it was out of control.Some of the first printed texts (and the topic of the first copyright trials and executions) were the major religious texts of the day.
This eventually led to near-universal literacy in several parts of the world, and the leaders found it impossible to keep cheap copies of their religious texts out of the hands of people who could read the scriptures themselves.
Life has been tough for the religious leaders ever since then, as the local monopolies over religious thought were lost.Fact is, printed copies of all the world's religious texts have been widely available for going on half a millennium now.
As with open-source software, it has led to both widespread forking of the religions and widespread understanding of how religions work.
Or, more often, how they fail to work.
(Just ask a few Catholics about their ban on priestly sex.
)  Nowadays, you can rapidly download most of the holy texts for free from somewhere on the Internet.
And it's not hard to find online discussions of many of them.
If not, you can easily start your own discussion (or religion).Of course, most religious organizations probably haven't profited from this open publication.
The story with software isn't quite as clear yet.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882388</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882022</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>WED Fan</author>
	<datestamp>1264327080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, could bring a new definition to "flame war" when the comments section of the blog turns ugly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , could bring a new definition to " flame war " when the comments section of the blog turns ugly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, could bring a new definition to "flame war" when the comments section of the blog turns ugly.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882560</id>
	<title>Re:Just be careful</title>
	<author>The FBI</author>
	<datestamp>1264329960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.</p></div><p>Hello, there, Tony AKA "Padre" Antonio di Montesilvano @ christianteenforums.com</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.Hello , there , Tony AKA " Padre " Antonio di Montesilvano @ christianteenforums.com</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.Hello, there, Tony AKA "Padre" Antonio di Montesilvano @ christianteenforums.com
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887764</id>
	<title>Catholicism</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264417560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Copyright 32 Simon Peter</p><p>Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this religion except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at</p><p>http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0</p><p>Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, dogmas distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Copyright 32 Simon PeterLicensed under the Apache License , Version 2.0 ( the " License " ) ; you may not use this religion except in compliance with the License .
You may obtain a copy of the License athttp : //www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing , dogmas distributed under the License is distributed on an " AS IS " BASIS , WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND , either express or implied .
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Copyright 32 Simon PeterLicensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this religion except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License athttp://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, dogmas distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883792</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884694</id>
	<title>Re:The pedophile priest problem</title>
	<author>Nazlfrag</author>
	<datestamp>1264344360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You know who else abuses kids? Teachers, doctors and internet users. I guess by your logic none of these people should come in contact with kids, ever, including you. Oh and why is paying compensation to victims of crime a bad thing?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You know who else abuses kids ?
Teachers , doctors and internet users .
I guess by your logic none of these people should come in contact with kids , ever , including you .
Oh and why is paying compensation to victims of crime a bad thing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You know who else abuses kids?
Teachers, doctors and internet users.
I guess by your logic none of these people should come in contact with kids, ever, including you.
Oh and why is paying compensation to victims of crime a bad thing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887042</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>ultranova</author>
	<datestamp>1264451880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>But since we are already talking about the god vs. computer simulation,</p></div> </blockquote><p>We aren't. We are talking about pope urging priests to go forth and blog. You simply went off on a tangent to deliver your anti-religious speech. Or was it a clever demonstration on the necessity of your suggested domain ?-)</p><p>Anyway, I'm all for it, as long as <em>all</em> religious-related rants go there, including atheist ones. Now have fun convincing people who view each other as godless heathens, stone-age fairy tale believers, and various other nasty things to coexist in a single domain. It should be entertaining to watch, at the least<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But since we are already talking about the god vs. computer simulation , We are n't .
We are talking about pope urging priests to go forth and blog .
You simply went off on a tangent to deliver your anti-religious speech .
Or was it a clever demonstration on the necessity of your suggested domain ? - ) Anyway , I 'm all for it , as long as all religious-related rants go there , including atheist ones .
Now have fun convincing people who view each other as godless heathens , stone-age fairy tale believers , and various other nasty things to coexist in a single domain .
It should be entertaining to watch , at the least : ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But since we are already talking about the god vs. computer simulation, We aren't.
We are talking about pope urging priests to go forth and blog.
You simply went off on a tangent to deliver your anti-religious speech.
Or was it a clever demonstration on the necessity of your suggested domain ?-)Anyway, I'm all for it, as long as all religious-related rants go there, including atheist ones.
Now have fun convincing people who view each other as godless heathens, stone-age fairy tale believers, and various other nasty things to coexist in a single domain.
It should be entertaining to watch, at the least :).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882462</id>
	<title>Re:Cant wait for priest to go on /b/...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264329480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>oh crap -<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/ has sprunk a leak and it has trickled into<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.  nerdfags ahoy!</htmltext>
<tokenext>oh crap - /b/ has sprunk a leak and it has trickled into / .
nerdfags ahoy !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>oh crap - /b/ has sprunk a leak and it has trickled into /.
nerdfags ahoy!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882286</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883252</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264334640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be nice though... No porn unless you went to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.pornland.  No spam unless you went to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.spamland/spamblogland - assuming there are those people who want to waste their lives shopping for "V1AGRA". And no stupid conservative fake news unless you went to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.foxmegacorporatenewsland</p><p>It'd be nice, until you realize everyone would just be exposed to their own driple of self-lies, vices, and self-righteousness. But then again, you just get all that these days with all the normal sites unless you make an effort to learn day to day</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be nice though... No porn unless you went to .pornland .
No spam unless you went to .spamland/spamblogland - assuming there are those people who want to waste their lives shopping for " V1AGRA " .
And no stupid conservative fake news unless you went to .foxmegacorporatenewslandIt 'd be nice , until you realize everyone would just be exposed to their own driple of self-lies , vices , and self-righteousness .
But then again , you just get all that these days with all the normal sites unless you make an effort to learn day to day</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be nice though... No porn unless you went to .pornland.
No spam unless you went to .spamland/spamblogland - assuming there are those people who want to waste their lives shopping for "V1AGRA".
And no stupid conservative fake news unless you went to .foxmegacorporatenewslandIt'd be nice, until you realize everyone would just be exposed to their own driple of self-lies, vices, and self-righteousness.
But then again, you just get all that these days with all the normal sites unless you make an effort to learn day to day</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882654</id>
	<title>Re:Hmm...</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1264330440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Roughly a BILLION dollars in pedo payoffs worldwide make that post a candidate for Funny, not Flamebait.</p><p>From rescuing Nazis (not to mention largely ignoring the Holocaust, if THAT wasn't worthy of excommunication what is?) in Operation Ratline after WWII to playing hide-the-pedo across international borders, the Vatican has forfeited any respect except by its own brainwashed flock.</p><p>Enjoy!</p><p><a href="http://www.bishop-accountability.org/" title="bishop-acc...bility.org">http://www.bishop-accountability.org/</a> [bishop-acc...bility.org]</p><p>Justice, courtesy of another inmate:<br><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/specials/geoghan/" title="boston.com">http://www.boston.com/news/specials/geoghan/</a> [boston.com]</p><p>Some fangirl support:<br><a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/11/23/coakley\_details\_her\_role\_in\_1995\_probation\_deal\_for\_geoghan/?page=3" title="boston.com">http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/11/23/coakley\_details\_her\_role\_in\_1995\_probation\_deal\_for\_geoghan/?page=3</a> [boston.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Roughly a BILLION dollars in pedo payoffs worldwide make that post a candidate for Funny , not Flamebait.From rescuing Nazis ( not to mention largely ignoring the Holocaust , if THAT was n't worthy of excommunication what is ?
) in Operation Ratline after WWII to playing hide-the-pedo across international borders , the Vatican has forfeited any respect except by its own brainwashed flock.Enjoy ! http : //www.bishop-accountability.org/ [ bishop-acc...bility.org ] Justice , courtesy of another inmate : http : //www.boston.com/news/specials/geoghan/ [ boston.com ] Some fangirl support : http : //www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/11/23/coakley \ _details \ _her \ _role \ _in \ _1995 \ _probation \ _deal \ _for \ _geoghan/ ? page = 3 [ boston.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Roughly a BILLION dollars in pedo payoffs worldwide make that post a candidate for Funny, not Flamebait.From rescuing Nazis (not to mention largely ignoring the Holocaust, if THAT wasn't worthy of excommunication what is?
) in Operation Ratline after WWII to playing hide-the-pedo across international borders, the Vatican has forfeited any respect except by its own brainwashed flock.Enjoy!http://www.bishop-accountability.org/ [bishop-acc...bility.org]Justice, courtesy of another inmate:http://www.boston.com/news/specials/geoghan/ [boston.com]Some fangirl support:http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/11/23/coakley\_details\_her\_role\_in\_1995\_probation\_deal\_for\_geoghan/?page=3 [boston.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883984</id>
	<title>Re:The pedophile priest problem</title>
	<author>Corporate Drone</author>
	<datestamp>1264339140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>That's a real problem. Catholic priests should be monitored to make sure they're not communicating with minors.  The Catholic Church, after all, is the only organization to have a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlements\_and\_bankruptcies\_in\_Catholic\_sex\_abuse\_cases" title="wikipedia.org">slush fund to pay off victims of their pedophiles.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div><p>Somewhere on the order of 2\% of Catholic priests in the U.S., over the past 50 years, have been proven (or accused) of sexual abuse of minors.  Your call for monitoring a population who, by and large, does not commit crimes, for the sake of an extreme minority who does, is chilling.  I bet you're all for Patriot Act intrusions of privacy, aren't ya?  Or is this simply a straw man -- it's just the Church you don't like, and this is a convenient way to harass its representatives?</p><p>btw -- your summary of the Wiki article is blatantly misleading: if there were such a "slush fund", why are there so many diocesan bankruptcies documented?  "4, Informative", in this case, reads more like "-5, Politically Correct Troll".</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's a real problem .
Catholic priests should be monitored to make sure they 're not communicating with minors .
The Catholic Church , after all , is the only organization to have a slush fund to pay off victims of their pedophiles .
[ wikipedia.org ] Somewhere on the order of 2 \ % of Catholic priests in the U.S. , over the past 50 years , have been proven ( or accused ) of sexual abuse of minors .
Your call for monitoring a population who , by and large , does not commit crimes , for the sake of an extreme minority who does , is chilling .
I bet you 're all for Patriot Act intrusions of privacy , are n't ya ?
Or is this simply a straw man -- it 's just the Church you do n't like , and this is a convenient way to harass its representatives ? btw -- your summary of the Wiki article is blatantly misleading : if there were such a " slush fund " , why are there so many diocesan bankruptcies documented ?
" 4 , Informative " , in this case , reads more like " -5 , Politically Correct Troll " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's a real problem.
Catholic priests should be monitored to make sure they're not communicating with minors.
The Catholic Church, after all, is the only organization to have a slush fund to pay off victims of their pedophiles.
[wikipedia.org]Somewhere on the order of 2\% of Catholic priests in the U.S., over the past 50 years, have been proven (or accused) of sexual abuse of minors.
Your call for monitoring a population who, by and large, does not commit crimes, for the sake of an extreme minority who does, is chilling.
I bet you're all for Patriot Act intrusions of privacy, aren't ya?
Or is this simply a straw man -- it's just the Church you don't like, and this is a convenient way to harass its representatives?btw -- your summary of the Wiki article is blatantly misleading: if there were such a "slush fund", why are there so many diocesan bankruptcies documented?
"4, Informative", in this case, reads more like "-5, Politically Correct Troll".
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882388</id>
	<title>This could be alot of fun, unless your Irish.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264329180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-8928-Philadelphia-Atheism-Examiner~y2009m7d11-Ireland-passes-blasphemy-law" title="examiner.com">Irelands Blasphemy law</a> [examiner.com] will extend to the internet if given a chance.</p><p>I recently started a blog <a href="http://abstract-beliefs.blogspot.com/" title="blogspot.com">Abstract Beliefs</a> [blogspot.com] that some may find interesting.</p><p>Wanna know where god came from? How about what should be obvious contradictions in religion that require as much effort to apply suspension of disbelief as what you use when you see a fictional movie?</p><p>To have religious leaders communicating in the openness of the internet, can be a very good thing, so long as they don't censor what they might oppose (The catholic church exonerated Galileo in the early 1990's - lots of good it did him).</p><p>Its time to properly address the issues and errors of our philosophies..... Imagine open source religion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Irelands Blasphemy law [ examiner.com ] will extend to the internet if given a chance.I recently started a blog Abstract Beliefs [ blogspot.com ] that some may find interesting.Wan na know where god came from ?
How about what should be obvious contradictions in religion that require as much effort to apply suspension of disbelief as what you use when you see a fictional movie ? To have religious leaders communicating in the openness of the internet , can be a very good thing , so long as they do n't censor what they might oppose ( The catholic church exonerated Galileo in the early 1990 's - lots of good it did him ) .Its time to properly address the issues and errors of our philosophies..... Imagine open source religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Irelands Blasphemy law [examiner.com] will extend to the internet if given a chance.I recently started a blog Abstract Beliefs [blogspot.com] that some may find interesting.Wanna know where god came from?
How about what should be obvious contradictions in religion that require as much effort to apply suspension of disbelief as what you use when you see a fictional movie?To have religious leaders communicating in the openness of the internet, can be a very good thing, so long as they don't censor what they might oppose (The catholic church exonerated Galileo in the early 1990's - lots of good it did him).Its time to properly address the issues and errors of our philosophies..... Imagine open source religion.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882630</id>
	<title>Things the Church needs with a LAMP server.</title>
	<author>FooAtWFU</author>
	<datestamp>1264330320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What does God need with a LAMP server?</p></div></blockquote><p>
You know what the Catholic Church needs with a LAMP server (or similar)? It some unified website, administered by regional authorities or the Vatican itself, which will provide a good way to find parish locations and mass times for each and every parish in a first-world country where Internet access is common. Then, when I'm on a trip to White Plains and three hours jet-lagged, I can get some idea of when and where I can attend church on a Sunday. Or when I'm back in Silicon Valley and it's a random Holy Day of Obligation in the middle of the week, I can know where to go after work (or possibly before work or over a lunch break). Right now, it's a crapshoot as to whether the church even has a website.
</p><p>
Calendering. Please. Inter-parish calendaring, ideally; I'd love to know everything going on in the Diocese of San Jose at a glance. Bulletins would be nice too, even if they're just<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.pdfs. Maybe they could coordinate those with what'stheirface, LPI? those liturgical-publishers who seem to put out a lot of those.
If you're looking for gravy, throw in a quick podcast (and computerized transcription) of the homilies. If they can standardize on something, it would be pretty easy to plug into most existing parish sound systems, and reasonably cheap.
</p><p>
Next step out: Get the church behind some sort of free-content/Creative Commons angle with its liturgical music -- not necessarily to the exclusion of all else, mind you, but choir directors shouldn't have to jump through copyright hoops to legally express praise and worship. That, of all things, should be Free.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What does God need with a LAMP server ?
You know what the Catholic Church needs with a LAMP server ( or similar ) ?
It some unified website , administered by regional authorities or the Vatican itself , which will provide a good way to find parish locations and mass times for each and every parish in a first-world country where Internet access is common .
Then , when I 'm on a trip to White Plains and three hours jet-lagged , I can get some idea of when and where I can attend church on a Sunday .
Or when I 'm back in Silicon Valley and it 's a random Holy Day of Obligation in the middle of the week , I can know where to go after work ( or possibly before work or over a lunch break ) .
Right now , it 's a crapshoot as to whether the church even has a website .
Calendering. Please .
Inter-parish calendaring , ideally ; I 'd love to know everything going on in the Diocese of San Jose at a glance .
Bulletins would be nice too , even if they 're just .pdfs .
Maybe they could coordinate those with what'stheirface , LPI ?
those liturgical-publishers who seem to put out a lot of those .
If you 're looking for gravy , throw in a quick podcast ( and computerized transcription ) of the homilies .
If they can standardize on something , it would be pretty easy to plug into most existing parish sound systems , and reasonably cheap .
Next step out : Get the church behind some sort of free-content/Creative Commons angle with its liturgical music -- not necessarily to the exclusion of all else , mind you , but choir directors should n't have to jump through copyright hoops to legally express praise and worship .
That , of all things , should be Free .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does God need with a LAMP server?
You know what the Catholic Church needs with a LAMP server (or similar)?
It some unified website, administered by regional authorities or the Vatican itself, which will provide a good way to find parish locations and mass times for each and every parish in a first-world country where Internet access is common.
Then, when I'm on a trip to White Plains and three hours jet-lagged, I can get some idea of when and where I can attend church on a Sunday.
Or when I'm back in Silicon Valley and it's a random Holy Day of Obligation in the middle of the week, I can know where to go after work (or possibly before work or over a lunch break).
Right now, it's a crapshoot as to whether the church even has a website.
Calendering. Please.
Inter-parish calendaring, ideally; I'd love to know everything going on in the Diocese of San Jose at a glance.
Bulletins would be nice too, even if they're just .pdfs.
Maybe they could coordinate those with what'stheirface, LPI?
those liturgical-publishers who seem to put out a lot of those.
If you're looking for gravy, throw in a quick podcast (and computerized transcription) of the homilies.
If they can standardize on something, it would be pretty easy to plug into most existing parish sound systems, and reasonably cheap.
Next step out: Get the church behind some sort of free-content/Creative Commons angle with its liturgical music -- not necessarily to the exclusion of all else, mind you, but choir directors shouldn't have to jump through copyright hoops to legally express praise and worship.
That, of all things, should be Free.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882178</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>sopssa</author>
	<datestamp>1264327980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>by the way, who do we put in charge of forcing all this to happen?</p></div><p>CowboyNeal. He is our last hope.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>by the way , who do we put in charge of forcing all this to happen ? CowboyNeal .
He is our last hope .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>by the way, who do we put in charge of forcing all this to happen?CowboyNeal.
He is our last hope.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885146</id>
	<title>Re:Oh, God, Not Again!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264347300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://asv.vatican.va/home\_en.htm" title="vatican.va" rel="nofollow">Like this?</a> [vatican.va]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Like this ?
[ vatican.va ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Like this?
[vatican.va]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882354</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30889810</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>hierofalcon</author>
	<datestamp>1264434180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't bother reading a Catholic priest's blog or a Protestant pastor's blog to decide where you should go. If you do that, you will only be attending a place that sounds like it would be good in your opinion based on hopefully carefully chosen words they choose to post.</p><p>Pray. Ask God Himself where he wants you to go and then go. He has a place for you and a plan for your life. You might not be comfortable where He directs you at first, but He has a purpose for you there. Perhaps you'll find your dormant faith awakened and refreshed by the changes that have gone on in the Catholic church since you last attended. Maybe you'll meet a great Christian friend that you would never have considered before if you select a Protestant denomination - and that's just offered as a counterpoint and not to say you might not find a great friend at a Catholic church as well. Perhaps you will help to build a bridge between belief systems that strengthens His church in your local community of churches.</p><p>Find your place of ministry and start participating. There is more that is in common between Christian churches (both Catholic and Protestant) than there is that is different. Both sides have emphasized that which sets us apart for far too long. The lack of identity of His church in today's culture is huge. Instead there are tens or hundreds of churches and denominations in many cities of any size. It is one of Satan's greatest triumphs and greatest weapons against those who would seek to find Christianity. The old worry of "Which is the right one?" and "What if I make a wrong choice?" It is time to emphasize what binds us together in these last days. Step up and get involved.</p><p>Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't bother reading a Catholic priest 's blog or a Protestant pastor 's blog to decide where you should go .
If you do that , you will only be attending a place that sounds like it would be good in your opinion based on hopefully carefully chosen words they choose to post.Pray .
Ask God Himself where he wants you to go and then go .
He has a place for you and a plan for your life .
You might not be comfortable where He directs you at first , but He has a purpose for you there .
Perhaps you 'll find your dormant faith awakened and refreshed by the changes that have gone on in the Catholic church since you last attended .
Maybe you 'll meet a great Christian friend that you would never have considered before if you select a Protestant denomination - and that 's just offered as a counterpoint and not to say you might not find a great friend at a Catholic church as well .
Perhaps you will help to build a bridge between belief systems that strengthens His church in your local community of churches.Find your place of ministry and start participating .
There is more that is in common between Christian churches ( both Catholic and Protestant ) than there is that is different .
Both sides have emphasized that which sets us apart for far too long .
The lack of identity of His church in today 's culture is huge .
Instead there are tens or hundreds of churches and denominations in many cities of any size .
It is one of Satan 's greatest triumphs and greatest weapons against those who would seek to find Christianity .
The old worry of " Which is the right one ?
" and " What if I make a wrong choice ?
" It is time to emphasize what binds us together in these last days .
Step up and get involved.Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together , as the manner of some is ; but exhorting one another : and so much the more , as ye see the day approaching .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't bother reading a Catholic priest's blog or a Protestant pastor's blog to decide where you should go.
If you do that, you will only be attending a place that sounds like it would be good in your opinion based on hopefully carefully chosen words they choose to post.Pray.
Ask God Himself where he wants you to go and then go.
He has a place for you and a plan for your life.
You might not be comfortable where He directs you at first, but He has a purpose for you there.
Perhaps you'll find your dormant faith awakened and refreshed by the changes that have gone on in the Catholic church since you last attended.
Maybe you'll meet a great Christian friend that you would never have considered before if you select a Protestant denomination - and that's just offered as a counterpoint and not to say you might not find a great friend at a Catholic church as well.
Perhaps you will help to build a bridge between belief systems that strengthens His church in your local community of churches.Find your place of ministry and start participating.
There is more that is in common between Christian churches (both Catholic and Protestant) than there is that is different.
Both sides have emphasized that which sets us apart for far too long.
The lack of identity of His church in today's culture is huge.
Instead there are tens or hundreds of churches and denominations in many cities of any size.
It is one of Satan's greatest triumphs and greatest weapons against those who would seek to find Christianity.
The old worry of "Which is the right one?
" and "What if I make a wrong choice?
" It is time to emphasize what binds us together in these last days.
Step up and get involved.Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883950</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264338840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>surrogates mentality - dangerous!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>surrogates mentality - dangerous !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>surrogates mentality - dangerous!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882168</id>
	<title>Off-by-one error</title>
	<author>Old Man Kensey</author>
	<datestamp>1264327860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You guys mean Pope Benedict XVI, right?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You guys mean Pope Benedict XVI , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You guys mean Pope Benedict XVI, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884362</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>telomerewhythere</author>
	<datestamp>1264341960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Religion is something that was used in old times to control people and have them do "moral" actions (moral here being what the government considered good)</p></div><p>
While technically true, I think that a more accurate statement is that governments use religion to control people.  Take Christianity for instance.  Even a secular look at it will tell you that Christians avoided secular power until after Constantine, that's 300 years.  Even then He and those after him were only able to do so much and had to fuse Christianity and paganism (see Christmas and Saturnalia or Sun worship) to get the populace behind him. However after that, the pope was only too glad to get involved in politics.
</p><p>
Religion has power.  That power can be used for evil, or for awesome.  Very little of the latter is found in the wild though.
</p><p><div class="quote"><p>we don't exist at all outside of the simulation, other than maybe as some processes running in a data center (or someones bedroom closet).</p></div><p>
That sounds like the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moirae" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Greek Fates</a> [wikipedia.org].  Please be original.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Religion is something that was used in old times to control people and have them do " moral " actions ( moral here being what the government considered good ) While technically true , I think that a more accurate statement is that governments use religion to control people .
Take Christianity for instance .
Even a secular look at it will tell you that Christians avoided secular power until after Constantine , that 's 300 years .
Even then He and those after him were only able to do so much and had to fuse Christianity and paganism ( see Christmas and Saturnalia or Sun worship ) to get the populace behind him .
However after that , the pope was only too glad to get involved in politics .
Religion has power .
That power can be used for evil , or for awesome .
Very little of the latter is found in the wild though .
we do n't exist at all outside of the simulation , other than maybe as some processes running in a data center ( or someones bedroom closet ) .
That sounds like the Greek Fates [ wikipedia.org ] .
Please be original .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Religion is something that was used in old times to control people and have them do "moral" actions (moral here being what the government considered good)
While technically true, I think that a more accurate statement is that governments use religion to control people.
Take Christianity for instance.
Even a secular look at it will tell you that Christians avoided secular power until after Constantine, that's 300 years.
Even then He and those after him were only able to do so much and had to fuse Christianity and paganism (see Christmas and Saturnalia or Sun worship) to get the populace behind him.
However after that, the pope was only too glad to get involved in politics.
Religion has power.
That power can be used for evil, or for awesome.
Very little of the latter is found in the wild though.
we don't exist at all outside of the simulation, other than maybe as some processes running in a data center (or someones bedroom closet).
That sounds like the Greek Fates [wikipedia.org].
Please be original.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882882</id>
	<title>Spanish Inquisition would be less disturbing?</title>
	<author>VampireByte</author>
	<datestamp>1264331880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting.</i> </p><p>Makes me wonder if the Spanish Inquisition would be less disturbing if it were conducted over the internet. Spanish Inquisition 2.0</p><p>Don't say it couldn't happen. Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting .
Makes me wonder if the Spanish Inquisition would be less disturbing if it were conducted over the internet .
Spanish Inquisition 2.0Do n't say it could n't happen .
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting.
Makes me wonder if the Spanish Inquisition would be less disturbing if it were conducted over the internet.
Spanish Inquisition 2.0Don't say it couldn't happen.
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882994</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>MadFarmAnimalz</author>
	<datestamp>1264332660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>by the way, who do we put in charge of forcing all this to happen</i>
<p>
Al Gore?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>by the way , who do we put in charge of forcing all this to happen Al Gore ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>by the way, who do we put in charge of forcing all this to happen

Al Gore?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882394</id>
	<title>Re:Just be careful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264329240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.</p></div><p>Are you kidding? I hope he <b>doesn't</b> warn them. Let the sick freaks get busted!</p><p>(The captcha for this was "conjugal." LOL!)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.Are you kidding ?
I hope he does n't warn them .
Let the sick freaks get busted !
( The captcha for this was " conjugal .
" LOL !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.Are you kidding?
I hope he doesn't warn them.
Let the sick freaks get busted!
(The captcha for this was "conjugal.
" LOL!
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883372</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>hey!</author>
	<datestamp>1264335420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In order to do this, you have to get people to self-identify their religious thoughts (or what you would consider their religious thoughts) as "religious thoughts".   Likewise with "political thought".</p><p>Good luck doing that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In order to do this , you have to get people to self-identify their religious thoughts ( or what you would consider their religious thoughts ) as " religious thoughts " .
Likewise with " political thought " .Good luck doing that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In order to do this, you have to get people to self-identify their religious thoughts (or what you would consider their religious thoughts) as "religious thoughts".
Likewise with "political thought".Good luck doing that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888208</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>meringuoid</author>
	<datestamp>1264422960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I mean it as something where we don't exist at all outside of the simulation, other than maybe as some processes running in a data center (or someones bedroom closet). While I dont spend my days thinking about that, I think its a lot more likely thing than there being some invisible, everything knowing, a man who created everything somewhere in the space who listens to everyones wishes and tricks around with them.</i>

<p>I don't know about you but if I were running a universe simulation I'd be pretty tempted to fuck with people in it too. I mean, you've played <i>The Sims</i>, right? Doesn't the Old Testament god sound just like some kid who takes away the exit from the swimming pool just to watch the fun?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean it as something where we do n't exist at all outside of the simulation , other than maybe as some processes running in a data center ( or someones bedroom closet ) .
While I dont spend my days thinking about that , I think its a lot more likely thing than there being some invisible , everything knowing , a man who created everything somewhere in the space who listens to everyones wishes and tricks around with them .
I do n't know about you but if I were running a universe simulation I 'd be pretty tempted to fuck with people in it too .
I mean , you 've played The Sims , right ?
Does n't the Old Testament god sound just like some kid who takes away the exit from the swimming pool just to watch the fun ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean it as something where we don't exist at all outside of the simulation, other than maybe as some processes running in a data center (or someones bedroom closet).
While I dont spend my days thinking about that, I think its a lot more likely thing than there being some invisible, everything knowing, a man who created everything somewhere in the space who listens to everyones wishes and tricks around with them.
I don't know about you but if I were running a universe simulation I'd be pretty tempted to fuck with people in it too.
I mean, you've played The Sims, right?
Doesn't the Old Testament god sound just like some kid who takes away the exit from the swimming pool just to watch the fun?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882102</id>
	<title>He also cautioned against file sharing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264327500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He also stated concern for the rampant sharing of unauthorized scripture on file sharing networks and torrent sites that was having a noticeable effect on publishers and that faithful catholics should not share their bibles with friends and neighbors. He also stated that public performances of the stations of the cross and masses without the expressed written permission of the copyright holders was expressly forbidden.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He also stated concern for the rampant sharing of unauthorized scripture on file sharing networks and torrent sites that was having a noticeable effect on publishers and that faithful catholics should not share their bibles with friends and neighbors .
He also stated that public performances of the stations of the cross and masses without the expressed written permission of the copyright holders was expressly forbidden .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He also stated concern for the rampant sharing of unauthorized scripture on file sharing networks and torrent sites that was having a noticeable effect on publishers and that faithful catholics should not share their bibles with friends and neighbors.
He also stated that public performances of the stations of the cross and masses without the expressed written permission of the copyright holders was expressly forbidden.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888002</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>Dan541</author>
	<datestamp>1264420320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone else see the irony of the anti-science and reason mob using technology?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone else see the irony of the anti-science and reason mob using technology ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone else see the irony of the anti-science and reason mob using technology?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484</id>
	<title>The pedophile priest problem</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264329600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
<i>I thought that there had been an effort to keep sex offenders away from social networking technology...</i>
</p><p>
That's a real problem. Catholic priests should be monitored to make sure they're not communicating with minors.  The Catholic Church, after all, is the only organization to have a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlements\_and\_bankruptcies\_in\_Catholic\_sex\_abuse\_cases" title="wikipedia.org">slush fund to pay off victims of their pedophiles.</a> [wikipedia.org]
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that there had been an effort to keep sex offenders away from social networking technology.. . That 's a real problem .
Catholic priests should be monitored to make sure they 're not communicating with minors .
The Catholic Church , after all , is the only organization to have a slush fund to pay off victims of their pedophiles .
[ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
I thought that there had been an effort to keep sex offenders away from social networking technology...

That's a real problem.
Catholic priests should be monitored to make sure they're not communicating with minors.
The Catholic Church, after all, is the only organization to have a slush fund to pay off victims of their pedophiles.
[wikipedia.org]
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885614</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>sumdumass</author>
	<datestamp>1264351380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What makes you think any god needs this? It sounds more like the church (roman catholic church to be more exact) which in no way tells god what to do, is going to need it.</p><p>A lot of people seem to confuse what men do in the name of god with what god wants man to do. In order to believe that, you would have to believe that some of the horrors that come from the churches over the years was justified. Simply not believing in a god would not erase that. But knowing that men (who have free will) do things for their own justifications and sometimes they are deranged enough to believe some god wanted it that way or they at least pretend to make the claim.</p><p>This has nothing to do with what god wants or needs outside of an ancillary connection to the men doing it as well as the message they are attempting to give.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What makes you think any god needs this ?
It sounds more like the church ( roman catholic church to be more exact ) which in no way tells god what to do , is going to need it.A lot of people seem to confuse what men do in the name of god with what god wants man to do .
In order to believe that , you would have to believe that some of the horrors that come from the churches over the years was justified .
Simply not believing in a god would not erase that .
But knowing that men ( who have free will ) do things for their own justifications and sometimes they are deranged enough to believe some god wanted it that way or they at least pretend to make the claim.This has nothing to do with what god wants or needs outside of an ancillary connection to the men doing it as well as the message they are attempting to give .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What makes you think any god needs this?
It sounds more like the church (roman catholic church to be more exact) which in no way tells god what to do, is going to need it.A lot of people seem to confuse what men do in the name of god with what god wants man to do.
In order to believe that, you would have to believe that some of the horrors that come from the churches over the years was justified.
Simply not believing in a god would not erase that.
But knowing that men (who have free will) do things for their own justifications and sometimes they are deranged enough to believe some god wanted it that way or they at least pretend to make the claim.This has nothing to do with what god wants or needs outside of an ancillary connection to the men doing it as well as the message they are attempting to give.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882174</id>
	<title>Once again - copycats</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264327920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is another 'idea' stolen from another religion (namely the Church of FSM, which spreads its message primarily through the tubes)...<br>-RAmen</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is another 'idea ' stolen from another religion ( namely the Church of FSM , which spreads its message primarily through the tubes ) ...-RAmen</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is another 'idea' stolen from another religion (namely the Church of FSM, which spreads its message primarily through the tubes)...-RAmen</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884874</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>Shin-LaC</author>
	<datestamp>1264345320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thanks for the link. I had never heard of Fr. Z, but his blog seems quite interesting. I especially enjoyed his <a href="http://wdtprs.com/blog/2010/01/wdtprs-3rd-sunday-of-ordinary-time-collect-2002mr/" title="wdtprs.com">critique</a> [wdtprs.com] of the translation of a prayer from Latin. I hope that's the correct link to the post, at least: the site isn't loading any more... slashdotted?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for the link .
I had never heard of Fr .
Z , but his blog seems quite interesting .
I especially enjoyed his critique [ wdtprs.com ] of the translation of a prayer from Latin .
I hope that 's the correct link to the post , at least : the site is n't loading any more... slashdotted ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for the link.
I had never heard of Fr.
Z, but his blog seems quite interesting.
I especially enjoyed his critique [wdtprs.com] of the translation of a prayer from Latin.
I hope that's the correct link to the post, at least: the site isn't loading any more... slashdotted?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882188</id>
	<title>Re:Bad decision</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1264327980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, man. The misanthropes on 4chan's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/ are going to have a lot of fun with it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , man .
The misanthropes on 4chan 's /b/ are going to have a lot of fun with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, man.
The misanthropes on 4chan's /b/ are going to have a lot of fun with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882000</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882286</id>
	<title>Cant wait for priest to go on /b/...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264328640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cant wait for priest to go on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b/, a lot of weirdo could use some help there...<br>Wait, i think it might be preists that keep asking for CP.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cant wait for priest to go on /b/ , a lot of weirdo could use some help there...Wait , i think it might be preists that keep asking for CP .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cant wait for priest to go on /b/, a lot of weirdo could use some help there...Wait, i think it might be preists that keep asking for CP.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882368</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>knarf</author>
	<datestamp>1264329120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.</p></div></blockquote><p>Nah, any god worth a capitalised name does not need something as primitive as the internet. They just, you know, appeae out of nothing in burning bushes or goat entrails or burned toast. Internet is for wannabe-gods.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.Nah , any god worth a capitalised name does not need something as primitive as the internet .
They just , you know , appeae out of nothing in burning bushes or goat entrails or burned toast .
Internet is for wannabe-gods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.Nah, any god worth a capitalised name does not need something as primitive as the internet.
They just, you know, appeae out of nothing in burning bushes or goat entrails or burned toast.
Internet is for wannabe-gods.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882822</id>
	<title>Facebook fun</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264331520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Not the Cardinale Crescenzio Sepe you were looking for? Search more</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not the Cardinale Crescenzio Sepe you were looking for ?
Search more</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not the Cardinale Crescenzio Sepe you were looking for?
Search more</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008</id>
	<title>Just be careful</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264326960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30892738</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>Joey Vegetables</author>
	<datestamp>1264444260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh, I don't know . . umm . . maybe anyone with a toddler?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh , I do n't know .
. umm .
. maybe anyone with a toddler ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh, I don't know .
. umm .
. maybe anyone with a toddler?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882430</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1264329360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After all, his first words were: "Let there be light." And a lamp is a light-making device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , his first words were : " Let there be light .
" And a lamp is a light-making device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, his first words were: "Let there be light.
" And a lamp is a light-making device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887004</id>
	<title>Re:Religion</title>
	<author>SoupIsGoodFood\_42</author>
	<datestamp>1264451400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This isn't insightful. It's generalised BS that only looks at one part of a complex topic. But hey, it seems to be fashionable to criticise religion these days, even if you don't have single rational thought about the topic in your head.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is n't insightful .
It 's generalised BS that only looks at one part of a complex topic .
But hey , it seems to be fashionable to criticise religion these days , even if you do n't have single rational thought about the topic in your head .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This isn't insightful.
It's generalised BS that only looks at one part of a complex topic.
But hey, it seems to be fashionable to criticise religion these days, even if you don't have single rational thought about the topic in your head.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882960</id>
	<title>This is a actually a really good idea</title>
	<author>PaganRitual</author>
	<datestamp>1264332480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Posting your crap online makes it that much easier to ignore than if you bother people in the streets or coming knocking on their doors bothering them in the name of your chosen mythology.</p><p>This invitation should extend to all religious institutions and their constituents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Posting your crap online makes it that much easier to ignore than if you bother people in the streets or coming knocking on their doors bothering them in the name of your chosen mythology.This invitation should extend to all religious institutions and their constituents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Posting your crap online makes it that much easier to ignore than if you bother people in the streets or coming knocking on their doors bothering them in the name of your chosen mythology.This invitation should extend to all religious institutions and their constituents.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056</id>
	<title>The Pope is right</title>
	<author>CrazyJim1</author>
	<datestamp>1264327320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.  Before people had to travel to meet people.  The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real .
Before people had to travel to meet people .
The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Internet is a great place to let people know God is real.
Before people had to travel to meet people.
The Internet is less disturbing than a face to face meeting.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30902208</id>
	<title>Re:The Pope is right</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264508220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And why stop at just Catholicism?</p></div><p>Hey, why stop at Christianity, if you've got the whole internet at your fingertips you can check out all the other religions that are around.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And why stop at just Catholicism ? Hey , why stop at Christianity , if you 've got the whole internet at your fingertips you can check out all the other religions that are around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And why stop at just Catholicism?Hey, why stop at Christianity, if you've got the whole internet at your fingertips you can check out all the other religions that are around.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884666</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882648</id>
	<title>Re:Just be careful</title>
	<author>AliasMarlowe</author>
	<datestamp>1264330440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.</p></div><p>No need, and no point. Some priests might be dumb enough to post videos featuring their 13-year-old altarboys performing biblical acts. "But your honor, we were just re-enacting the parable of Sodom and Gomorrah, as it is told in the Book of Genesis..."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.No need , and no point .
Some priests might be dumb enough to post videos featuring their 13-year-old altarboys performing biblical acts .
" But your honor , we were just re-enacting the parable of Sodom and Gomorrah , as it is told in the Book of Genesis... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hope he warns them about FBI posing as 13-year-old choirboys.No need, and no point.
Some priests might be dumb enough to post videos featuring their 13-year-old altarboys performing biblical acts.
"But your honor, we were just re-enacting the parable of Sodom and Gomorrah, as it is told in the Book of Genesis..."
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882032</id>
	<title>Hmm...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264327140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I thought that there had been an effort to keep sex offenders away from social networking technology...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought that there had been an effort to keep sex offenders away from social networking technology.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought that there had been an effort to keep sex offenders away from social networking technology...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882692</id>
	<title>Re:The pedophile priest problem</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1264330740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Accountability is an uphill battle.</p><p><a href="http://www.bishop-accountability.org/" title="bishop-acc...bility.org">http://www.bishop-accountability.org/</a> [bishop-acc...bility.org]</p><p>Religion should be scorned and ridiculed, since the only way to free the world from the oppression of superstition is to weaken it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Accountability is an uphill battle.http : //www.bishop-accountability.org/ [ bishop-acc...bility.org ] Religion should be scorned and ridiculed , since the only way to free the world from the oppression of superstition is to weaken it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Accountability is an uphill battle.http://www.bishop-accountability.org/ [bishop-acc...bility.org]Religion should be scorned and ridiculed, since the only way to free the world from the oppression of superstition is to weaken it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887764
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882388
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882354
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30902208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30889810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882296
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887056
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882114
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882178
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_55</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885842
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_53</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884856
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30892738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882286
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882692
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882724
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884694
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882168
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883538
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882000
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884454
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30893410
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883372
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_54</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882882
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_24_1922211_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30902242
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882484
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885996
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882692
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884694
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883984
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887336
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882168
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30902242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882516
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882388
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883792
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887764
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30881968
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882022
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882724
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884362
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887042
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882128
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883372
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883252
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882178
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882114
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882068
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884874
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882354
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883048
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882882
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887056
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882296
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30892738
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30887930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884666
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30902208
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30889810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30893410
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882270
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882630
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30885842
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882430
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30888902
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882000
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30883538
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30884856
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_24_1922211.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882286
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_24_1922211.30882462
</commentlist>
</conversation>
