<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_23_160226</id>
	<title>Motorola Asks ITC To Ban BlackBerry Imports</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1264266600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>alphadogg writes <i>"Patent litigation between Motorola and Research In Motion is heating up, with Motorola filing a complaint with the US International Trade Commission. In the complaint, Motorola alleges that <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/012210-motorola-asks-itc-to-ban.html?hpg1=bn">RIM engages in unfair trade practices</a> by importing and selling products that infringe five Motorola patents. The patents cover technologies related to Wi-Fi access, application management, user interface, and power management, Motorola said. Motorola is asking <a href="http://mediacenter.motorola.com/content/detail.aspx?ReleaseID=12334&amp;NewsAreaID=2">the ITC to investigate RIM</a> and bar the company from importing, marketing, and selling products in the US that use the technologies."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>alphadogg writes " Patent litigation between Motorola and Research In Motion is heating up , with Motorola filing a complaint with the US International Trade Commission .
In the complaint , Motorola alleges that RIM engages in unfair trade practices by importing and selling products that infringe five Motorola patents .
The patents cover technologies related to Wi-Fi access , application management , user interface , and power management , Motorola said .
Motorola is asking the ITC to investigate RIM and bar the company from importing , marketing , and selling products in the US that use the technologies .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>alphadogg writes "Patent litigation between Motorola and Research In Motion is heating up, with Motorola filing a complaint with the US International Trade Commission.
In the complaint, Motorola alleges that RIM engages in unfair trade practices by importing and selling products that infringe five Motorola patents.
The patents cover technologies related to Wi-Fi access, application management, user interface, and power management, Motorola said.
Motorola is asking the ITC to investigate RIM and bar the company from importing, marketing, and selling products in the US that use the technologies.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870842</id>
	<title>Cellphone Tournament?</title>
	<author>smd75</author>
	<datestamp>1264272900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Winner of Apple V Nokia faces the winner of Motorola V RIM. Winner takes all.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Winner of Apple V Nokia faces the winner of Motorola V RIM .
Winner takes all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Winner of Apple V Nokia faces the winner of Motorola V RIM.
Winner takes all.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871778</id>
	<title>This is totally MAD (Mutually assured destruction)</title>
	<author>RotateLeftByte</author>
	<datestamp>1264279140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Motorolla sues RIM<br>Nokia sues Apple<br>Apple Sues Nokia</p><p>Soon, RIM will countersue Motorolla.<br>All asking to have their competitiors import of new phones banned.<br>All we need is for Sony/Erricson, HTC &amp; Google to start participating in this legal suitfest.</p><p>Very soon, the price of phones in the US will rocket due to limited supply.<br>Then after a while, all the companies concerned stop selling phones due to rocketing legal costs. The US mobile phone system starts to inwardly implode under the weight of the collective law suits.<br>The only winners here will be (As usual) the lawyers.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Motorolla sues RIMNokia sues AppleApple Sues NokiaSoon , RIM will countersue Motorolla.All asking to have their competitiors import of new phones banned.All we need is for Sony/Erricson , HTC &amp; Google to start participating in this legal suitfest.Very soon , the price of phones in the US will rocket due to limited supply.Then after a while , all the companies concerned stop selling phones due to rocketing legal costs .
The US mobile phone system starts to inwardly implode under the weight of the collective law suits.The only winners here will be ( As usual ) the lawyers .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Motorolla sues RIMNokia sues AppleApple Sues NokiaSoon, RIM will countersue Motorolla.All asking to have their competitiors import of new phones banned.All we need is for Sony/Erricson, HTC &amp; Google to start participating in this legal suitfest.Very soon, the price of phones in the US will rocket due to limited supply.Then after a while, all the companies concerned stop selling phones due to rocketing legal costs.
The US mobile phone system starts to inwardly implode under the weight of the collective law suits.The only winners here will be (As usual) the lawyers.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30874270</id>
	<title>Re:Bribe Your Congressman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264255260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As much as I hate the damn corporate lobbying pushing citizen's representation into oblivion (or so it really seems, especially with some of the shit that gets passed in legislation here), we have a problem.</p><p>You see, one day I decided to bitch about the lobbying in public, and say that I wish we could/would just outlaw the damn lobbying from the corporate sector. All was great, until I realized I was bitching to someone who knew their history damn well. Fact of the matter is, a good amount of our forefathers had the equivalent of corporate interests in mind during the creation of this country. I worry it'll screw us over in the end, in one way or another, but it's been there from the beginning and I'm more likely to believe anyone in our government will only support it continuing to at least some degree. Some kind of limits would be great, but our country has always had some of corporate interest in mind. I'd say it's most likely that such bullshit will continue forever.</p><p>In my arrogant opinion, people of the US need to get together and make lobbying groups with the whole thought of lobbying for the peoples' interests instead of corporate interests. Though, people are behind corporations, and so you're gonna be fighting other people using the weight of their corporations to push their corporate interests back. I don't think that's all bad, though. What's bad is that we don't have any real balance left between corporate and everyone else, so everyone else just gets screwed left and right. Hence, we need a lobbying group that pushes that balance.</p><p>As if that'll ever happen...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As much as I hate the damn corporate lobbying pushing citizen 's representation into oblivion ( or so it really seems , especially with some of the shit that gets passed in legislation here ) , we have a problem.You see , one day I decided to bitch about the lobbying in public , and say that I wish we could/would just outlaw the damn lobbying from the corporate sector .
All was great , until I realized I was bitching to someone who knew their history damn well .
Fact of the matter is , a good amount of our forefathers had the equivalent of corporate interests in mind during the creation of this country .
I worry it 'll screw us over in the end , in one way or another , but it 's been there from the beginning and I 'm more likely to believe anyone in our government will only support it continuing to at least some degree .
Some kind of limits would be great , but our country has always had some of corporate interest in mind .
I 'd say it 's most likely that such bullshit will continue forever.In my arrogant opinion , people of the US need to get together and make lobbying groups with the whole thought of lobbying for the peoples ' interests instead of corporate interests .
Though , people are behind corporations , and so you 're gon na be fighting other people using the weight of their corporations to push their corporate interests back .
I do n't think that 's all bad , though .
What 's bad is that we do n't have any real balance left between corporate and everyone else , so everyone else just gets screwed left and right .
Hence , we need a lobbying group that pushes that balance.As if that 'll ever happen.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As much as I hate the damn corporate lobbying pushing citizen's representation into oblivion (or so it really seems, especially with some of the shit that gets passed in legislation here), we have a problem.You see, one day I decided to bitch about the lobbying in public, and say that I wish we could/would just outlaw the damn lobbying from the corporate sector.
All was great, until I realized I was bitching to someone who knew their history damn well.
Fact of the matter is, a good amount of our forefathers had the equivalent of corporate interests in mind during the creation of this country.
I worry it'll screw us over in the end, in one way or another, but it's been there from the beginning and I'm more likely to believe anyone in our government will only support it continuing to at least some degree.
Some kind of limits would be great, but our country has always had some of corporate interest in mind.
I'd say it's most likely that such bullshit will continue forever.In my arrogant opinion, people of the US need to get together and make lobbying groups with the whole thought of lobbying for the peoples' interests instead of corporate interests.
Though, people are behind corporations, and so you're gonna be fighting other people using the weight of their corporations to push their corporate interests back.
I don't think that's all bad, though.
What's bad is that we don't have any real balance left between corporate and everyone else, so everyone else just gets screwed left and right.
Hence, we need a lobbying group that pushes that balance.As if that'll ever happen...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870582</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871322</id>
	<title>Re:Americans. explain how this is 'free market'.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264276380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"monopolizing . . . through the usage of patents" is exactly the point of patents. Patents ARE a government license to a brief monopoly. That IS the point, it doesn't defy it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" monopolizing .
. .
through the usage of patents " is exactly the point of patents .
Patents ARE a government license to a brief monopoly .
That IS the point , it does n't defy it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"monopolizing .
. .
through the usage of patents" is exactly the point of patents.
Patents ARE a government license to a brief monopoly.
That IS the point, it doesn't defy it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870590</id>
	<title>And the service provided too?</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1264270560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>YAY! Kill off every annoying bb in the country in one swoop..  Ill kick in 10 bucks to help!</p><p>All kidding aside, so a huge corporation is suing another huge corporation and wants to get an injunction.. and we get to pay the bill.. nothing new here..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>YAY !
Kill off every annoying bb in the country in one swoop.. Ill kick in 10 bucks to help ! All kidding aside , so a huge corporation is suing another huge corporation and wants to get an injunction.. and we get to pay the bill.. nothing new here. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>YAY!
Kill off every annoying bb in the country in one swoop..  Ill kick in 10 bucks to help!All kidding aside, so a huge corporation is suing another huge corporation and wants to get an injunction.. and we get to pay the bill.. nothing new here..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872112</id>
	<title>Re:hmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264238280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That would be banning everyone with standards.</p><p>Posted via BlackBerry on AT&amp;T.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be banning everyone with standards.Posted via BlackBerry on AT&amp;T .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be banning everyone with standards.Posted via BlackBerry on AT&amp;T.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30931312</id>
	<title>Another once great American company</title>
	<author>jhylkema</author>
	<datestamp>1264677480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>has been reduced to a shadow of its former self.</p><p>HP used to be a great innovator, doubly so with subsidiary Agilent Technologies.  Now it's reduced to selling printer ink that, mL for mL, costs more than vintage Dom.</p><p>Worse, Motorola has gone from tech innovator to maker of consumer cell handsets.  Now, well behind Apple, Blackberry and even Nokia, it has been reduced to a patent troll.</p><p>It's sad.  It really is.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>has been reduced to a shadow of its former self.HP used to be a great innovator , doubly so with subsidiary Agilent Technologies .
Now it 's reduced to selling printer ink that , mL for mL , costs more than vintage Dom.Worse , Motorola has gone from tech innovator to maker of consumer cell handsets .
Now , well behind Apple , Blackberry and even Nokia , it has been reduced to a patent troll.It 's sad .
It really is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>has been reduced to a shadow of its former self.HP used to be a great innovator, doubly so with subsidiary Agilent Technologies.
Now it's reduced to selling printer ink that, mL for mL, costs more than vintage Dom.Worse, Motorola has gone from tech innovator to maker of consumer cell handsets.
Now, well behind Apple, Blackberry and even Nokia, it has been reduced to a patent troll.It's sad.
It really is.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871478</id>
	<title>documenting it on http://en.swpat.org</title>
	<author>H4x0r Jim Duggan</author>
	<datestamp>1264277340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since patents aren't specific to any company, this means Motorola thinks all imports incorporating "<i>Wi-Fi access, application management, user interface, or power management</i>" should be subject to a veto by them.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; This demonstrates again why patents don't work with software:</p><ul><li> <a href="http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Used\_for\_sabotage\_rather\_than\_competition" title="swpat.org">Used for sabotage rather than competition</a> [swpat.org] </li><li> <a href="http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Infringement\_is\_unavoidable" title="swpat.org">Infringement is unavoidable</a> [swpat.org] - imagine telling your customers you've decided to leave out Wi-Fi and power management!</li><li> <a href="http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Harm\_to\_standards" title="swpat.org">Harm to standards</a> [swpat.org] - software just *has* to use existing ideas, compatibility with other software and with usage paterns is essential</li></ul><p>There's no page yet on <a href="http://en.swpat.org/" title="swpat.org">swpat.org</a> [swpat.org] for Motorola or for RIM or for their litigation(s).  If someone could start pages for any of those, that would be welcome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since patents are n't specific to any company , this means Motorola thinks all imports incorporating " Wi-Fi access , application management , user interface , or power management " should be subject to a veto by them .
    This demonstrates again why patents do n't work with software : Used for sabotage rather than competition [ swpat.org ] Infringement is unavoidable [ swpat.org ] - imagine telling your customers you 've decided to leave out Wi-Fi and power management !
Harm to standards [ swpat.org ] - software just * has * to use existing ideas , compatibility with other software and with usage paterns is essentialThere 's no page yet on swpat.org [ swpat.org ] for Motorola or for RIM or for their litigation ( s ) .
If someone could start pages for any of those , that would be welcome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since patents aren't specific to any company, this means Motorola thinks all imports incorporating "Wi-Fi access, application management, user interface, or power management" should be subject to a veto by them.
    This demonstrates again why patents don't work with software: Used for sabotage rather than competition [swpat.org]  Infringement is unavoidable [swpat.org] - imagine telling your customers you've decided to leave out Wi-Fi and power management!
Harm to standards [swpat.org] - software just *has* to use existing ideas, compatibility with other software and with usage paterns is essentialThere's no page yet on swpat.org [swpat.org] for Motorola or for RIM or for their litigation(s).
If someone could start pages for any of those, that would be welcome.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872378</id>
	<title>'Free market' is political advertising.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264239960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The US economic system isn't purely a free market, and neither is the US political system purely a democracy (some call it a representative democracy). Of course, there isn't a nation on the planet that has a 'free market' in the purest sense (or pure democracy). Patents are a part of law intended to reward inventors and inovators - it grants a TEMPORARY monopoly so that the patent holder has time to capitalize his/her creation. Patents have been historically useful in promoting research, because PEOPLE WANT TO GET PAID FOR THEIR RESEARCH EFFORTS (in capitalistic society, money is the defacto compensation for work - not a measure of how benevolent you are).</p><p>One person who received substantial reward for patented research is Thomas Edison. The foundational science for what he made was mostly created in other parts of the world (mainly Europe), however, he was successful because he fabricated the actual components necessary to build real infrastructure. He created techniques for manufacturing light bulbs, wires, power distribution, power generation, etc. He was awarded many patents for his effort, and made a lot of money doing it. What if Edison did not have patents? In that case, the competition would be allowed to use Edison's research and creations for THEIR gain, not Edison's. Is that fair? No. Patents in the US are basically a type of temporary ownership, which is supposed to be an instrument for enriching the lives of EVERYBODY by encouraging smart people to make ingenious stuff. When the patent expires, the monopoly is supposed to be extinguished; but today's USPTO is a whore for patent fees - they repeatedly grant patents for re-inventions and brain farts. This is why so many patent fights / lawsuits break out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The US economic system is n't purely a free market , and neither is the US political system purely a democracy ( some call it a representative democracy ) .
Of course , there is n't a nation on the planet that has a 'free market ' in the purest sense ( or pure democracy ) .
Patents are a part of law intended to reward inventors and inovators - it grants a TEMPORARY monopoly so that the patent holder has time to capitalize his/her creation .
Patents have been historically useful in promoting research , because PEOPLE WANT TO GET PAID FOR THEIR RESEARCH EFFORTS ( in capitalistic society , money is the defacto compensation for work - not a measure of how benevolent you are ) .One person who received substantial reward for patented research is Thomas Edison .
The foundational science for what he made was mostly created in other parts of the world ( mainly Europe ) , however , he was successful because he fabricated the actual components necessary to build real infrastructure .
He created techniques for manufacturing light bulbs , wires , power distribution , power generation , etc .
He was awarded many patents for his effort , and made a lot of money doing it .
What if Edison did not have patents ?
In that case , the competition would be allowed to use Edison 's research and creations for THEIR gain , not Edison 's .
Is that fair ?
No. Patents in the US are basically a type of temporary ownership , which is supposed to be an instrument for enriching the lives of EVERYBODY by encouraging smart people to make ingenious stuff .
When the patent expires , the monopoly is supposed to be extinguished ; but today 's USPTO is a whore for patent fees - they repeatedly grant patents for re-inventions and brain farts .
This is why so many patent fights / lawsuits break out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The US economic system isn't purely a free market, and neither is the US political system purely a democracy (some call it a representative democracy).
Of course, there isn't a nation on the planet that has a 'free market' in the purest sense (or pure democracy).
Patents are a part of law intended to reward inventors and inovators - it grants a TEMPORARY monopoly so that the patent holder has time to capitalize his/her creation.
Patents have been historically useful in promoting research, because PEOPLE WANT TO GET PAID FOR THEIR RESEARCH EFFORTS (in capitalistic society, money is the defacto compensation for work - not a measure of how benevolent you are).One person who received substantial reward for patented research is Thomas Edison.
The foundational science for what he made was mostly created in other parts of the world (mainly Europe), however, he was successful because he fabricated the actual components necessary to build real infrastructure.
He created techniques for manufacturing light bulbs, wires, power distribution, power generation, etc.
He was awarded many patents for his effort, and made a lot of money doing it.
What if Edison did not have patents?
In that case, the competition would be allowed to use Edison's research and creations for THEIR gain, not Edison's.
Is that fair?
No. Patents in the US are basically a type of temporary ownership, which is supposed to be an instrument for enriching the lives of EVERYBODY by encouraging smart people to make ingenious stuff.
When the patent expires, the monopoly is supposed to be extinguished; but today's USPTO is a whore for patent fees - they repeatedly grant patents for re-inventions and brain farts.
This is why so many patent fights / lawsuits break out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872062</id>
	<title>Re:Well, if you can't compete...</title>
	<author>obarthelemy</author>
	<datestamp>1264237860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Once upon a time, the "service economy" was portrayed as flipping each other's burgers. Now that it's getting closer, it seems indeed to be about suing each other's asses off.</p><p>I'm wondering which is less greasy ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Once upon a time , the " service economy " was portrayed as flipping each other 's burgers .
Now that it 's getting closer , it seems indeed to be about suing each other 's asses off.I 'm wondering which is less greasy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once upon a time, the "service economy" was portrayed as flipping each other's burgers.
Now that it's getting closer, it seems indeed to be about suing each other's asses off.I'm wondering which is less greasy ?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871992</id>
	<title>hmmm</title>
	<author>Charliemopps</author>
	<datestamp>1264237260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Can we just ban Blackberry users? Because that's who we really want to get rid of.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we just ban Blackberry users ?
Because that 's who we really want to get rid of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we just ban Blackberry users?
Because that's who we really want to get rid of.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870728</id>
	<title>Completely Obvious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264271640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>RIM accused Motorola of charging exorbitant fees to license patents that are essential to implementing standard technologies.</p></div><p>So, Motorola has patented the only way to do it. They have a monopoly on the most logical (and only) way to solve a problem. If there is only one way to solve the problem, how can it NOT be obvious?</p><p>Although, I haven't seen any of the patents, because the article doesn't mention which ones are in question. Not like it matters - patents are written in a language that can't be understood by most experts in the field of the patent.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>RIM accused Motorola of charging exorbitant fees to license patents that are essential to implementing standard technologies.So , Motorola has patented the only way to do it .
They have a monopoly on the most logical ( and only ) way to solve a problem .
If there is only one way to solve the problem , how can it NOT be obvious ? Although , I have n't seen any of the patents , because the article does n't mention which ones are in question .
Not like it matters - patents are written in a language that ca n't be understood by most experts in the field of the patent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RIM accused Motorola of charging exorbitant fees to license patents that are essential to implementing standard technologies.So, Motorola has patented the only way to do it.
They have a monopoly on the most logical (and only) way to solve a problem.
If there is only one way to solve the problem, how can it NOT be obvious?Although, I haven't seen any of the patents, because the article doesn't mention which ones are in question.
Not like it matters - patents are written in a language that can't be understood by most experts in the field of the patent.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30873168</id>
	<title>Motorola, please just give it up!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264246200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well of COURSE Motorola wants RIM to be forced to stop selling BlackBerry phones in the US! BlackBerry's actually WORK, unlike, oh, the Moto Q9 series? Or almost any other Motorola phone that tries to be "smart".</p><p>Motorola really should just give up. RIM, HTC, and a myriad of other companies have been producing far greater quality phones for years now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well of COURSE Motorola wants RIM to be forced to stop selling BlackBerry phones in the US !
BlackBerry 's actually WORK , unlike , oh , the Moto Q9 series ?
Or almost any other Motorola phone that tries to be " smart " .Motorola really should just give up .
RIM , HTC , and a myriad of other companies have been producing far greater quality phones for years now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well of COURSE Motorola wants RIM to be forced to stop selling BlackBerry phones in the US!
BlackBerry's actually WORK, unlike, oh, the Moto Q9 series?
Or almost any other Motorola phone that tries to be "smart".Motorola really should just give up.
RIM, HTC, and a myriad of other companies have been producing far greater quality phones for years now.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30889226</id>
	<title>Re:The logical result of all the IP madness</title>
	<author>Calinous</author>
	<datestamp>1264431840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The parent isn't troll (except that it's not explicit protectionism by the government, but implicit based on the IP rights)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The parent is n't troll ( except that it 's not explicit protectionism by the government , but implicit based on the IP rights )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The parent isn't troll (except that it's not explicit protectionism by the government, but implicit based on the IP rights)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870854</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30876214</id>
	<title>Re:Americans. explain how this is 'free market'.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1264273860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, this is a good example of the definition of &ldquo;free market&rdquo;.</p><p>Complete freedom is essentially the law of the jungle. Or no laws for the strongest one, and the laws of the strongest one, for everybody else.<br>Which<br>1. is exactly what this is.<br>2. is the opposite of democracy and a fair society.</p><p>Yeah, conservatives:<br>a) free market<br>b) democracy<br><strong>CHOOSE ONE!</strong><nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , this is a good example of the definition of    free market    .Complete freedom is essentially the law of the jungle .
Or no laws for the strongest one , and the laws of the strongest one , for everybody else.Which1 .
is exactly what this is.2 .
is the opposite of democracy and a fair society.Yeah , conservatives : a ) free marketb ) democracyCHOOSE ONE !
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, this is a good example of the definition of “free market”.Complete freedom is essentially the law of the jungle.
Or no laws for the strongest one, and the laws of the strongest one, for everybody else.Which1.
is exactly what this is.2.
is the opposite of democracy and a fair society.Yeah, conservatives:a) free marketb) democracyCHOOSE ONE!
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872756</id>
	<title>Two issues</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264243080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>(1) RIM is Canadian, not particularly foreign, plus they're heavily oriented towards the American business market.  Business people abroad prefer Nokia phones running Symbian.  Motorola is actually American but heavily oriented toward the Asian market.  So we're not exactly seeing "American tech giant squashes upstart foreign competitor."  I'll grant you that mobile phone innovation generally occurs abroad though; well we know Finland's Nokia has been responsible for most innovation in the mobile phone world.</p><p>(2) WTO treaties permit countries to demand balanced trade when facing internal economic strife.  If the president and congress agree trade balances are necessary, then imports from seriously protectionist countries like China would simply halt.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>( 1 ) RIM is Canadian , not particularly foreign , plus they 're heavily oriented towards the American business market .
Business people abroad prefer Nokia phones running Symbian .
Motorola is actually American but heavily oriented toward the Asian market .
So we 're not exactly seeing " American tech giant squashes upstart foreign competitor .
" I 'll grant you that mobile phone innovation generally occurs abroad though ; well we know Finland 's Nokia has been responsible for most innovation in the mobile phone world .
( 2 ) WTO treaties permit countries to demand balanced trade when facing internal economic strife .
If the president and congress agree trade balances are necessary , then imports from seriously protectionist countries like China would simply halt .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(1) RIM is Canadian, not particularly foreign, plus they're heavily oriented towards the American business market.
Business people abroad prefer Nokia phones running Symbian.
Motorola is actually American but heavily oriented toward the Asian market.
So we're not exactly seeing "American tech giant squashes upstart foreign competitor.
"  I'll grant you that mobile phone innovation generally occurs abroad though; well we know Finland's Nokia has been responsible for most innovation in the mobile phone world.
(2) WTO treaties permit countries to demand balanced trade when facing internal economic strife.
If the president and congress agree trade balances are necessary, then imports from seriously protectionist countries like China would simply halt.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870582</id>
	<title>Bribe Your Congressman</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264270500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Freshly stacked with Republicans, the Supreme Court has just legalized bribery.</p><p>As you can see from our patent system, bribery has been corrupting our elected officials for a long time.</p><p>So bribe your congressman. What? You can't afford to?!?</p><p>Then go fuck yourself. America is for soulless corporations tearing through the world like a real life Sky-Net.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Freshly stacked with Republicans , the Supreme Court has just legalized bribery.As you can see from our patent system , bribery has been corrupting our elected officials for a long time.So bribe your congressman .
What ? You ca n't afford to ? !
? Then go fuck yourself .
America is for soulless corporations tearing through the world like a real life Sky-Net .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Freshly stacked with Republicans, the Supreme Court has just legalized bribery.As you can see from our patent system, bribery has been corrupting our elected officials for a long time.So bribe your congressman.
What? You can't afford to?!
?Then go fuck yourself.
America is for soulless corporations tearing through the world like a real life Sky-Net.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870782</id>
	<title>Americans. explain how this is 'free market'.</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1264272060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>doesnt monopolizing entire national market through usage of patents and copyrights or cartel practice kinda defy the point of having one ?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>doesnt monopolizing entire national market through usage of patents and copyrights or cartel practice kinda defy the point of having one ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>doesnt monopolizing entire national market through usage of patents and copyrights or cartel practice kinda defy the point of having one ?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871042</id>
	<title>Re:Cellphone Tournament?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264274580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And with all imports banned there will be no mobile phones in US at all. Take care of your current phone because you won't get new one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And with all imports banned there will be no mobile phones in US at all .
Take care of your current phone because you wo n't get new one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And with all imports banned there will be no mobile phones in US at all.
Take care of your current phone because you won't get new one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870842</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871324</id>
	<title>Re:Well, if you can't compete...</title>
	<author>Big Smirk</author>
	<datestamp>1264276440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is just a patent battle.  RIM fired the first shot by accusing Motorola of violating its patents.  Motorola is countering by saying "Oh, yeah, not only are you violating our patents, but you shouldn't be allowed to import your stuff until all this gets resolved".</p><p>Bottom line, they are both just posturing.  In the end they will sign some sort of cross licensing agreement that will allow each other to user each other's patents and more importantly, cut everyone else out (its the startups that aren't part of this that will loose in the end).</p><p>All this over patents that are probably little more than: "A phone, that can display information on a screen".</p><p><a href="http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/motorola-vs.-rim-patent-war-begins/2008-02-19" title="fiercewireless.com">http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/motorola-vs.-rim-patent-war-begins/2008-02-19</a> [fiercewireless.com]</p><p>BTW, Last time I used 'Good Technologies" push software it totally screwed up my phone.  If an email came through while you were on the phone, you got disconnected.   Yes, they are fighting over that piece of crap.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is just a patent battle .
RIM fired the first shot by accusing Motorola of violating its patents .
Motorola is countering by saying " Oh , yeah , not only are you violating our patents , but you should n't be allowed to import your stuff until all this gets resolved " .Bottom line , they are both just posturing .
In the end they will sign some sort of cross licensing agreement that will allow each other to user each other 's patents and more importantly , cut everyone else out ( its the startups that are n't part of this that will loose in the end ) .All this over patents that are probably little more than : " A phone , that can display information on a screen " .http : //www.fiercewireless.com/story/motorola-vs.-rim-patent-war-begins/2008-02-19 [ fiercewireless.com ] BTW , Last time I used 'Good Technologies " push software it totally screwed up my phone .
If an email came through while you were on the phone , you got disconnected .
Yes , they are fighting over that piece of crap .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is just a patent battle.
RIM fired the first shot by accusing Motorola of violating its patents.
Motorola is countering by saying "Oh, yeah, not only are you violating our patents, but you shouldn't be allowed to import your stuff until all this gets resolved".Bottom line, they are both just posturing.
In the end they will sign some sort of cross licensing agreement that will allow each other to user each other's patents and more importantly, cut everyone else out (its the startups that aren't part of this that will loose in the end).All this over patents that are probably little more than: "A phone, that can display information on a screen".http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/motorola-vs.-rim-patent-war-begins/2008-02-19 [fiercewireless.com]BTW, Last time I used 'Good Technologies" push software it totally screwed up my phone.
If an email came through while you were on the phone, you got disconnected.
Yes, they are fighting over that piece of crap.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30876280</id>
	<title>Re:Well, if you can't compete...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264274820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2nd post!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2nd post !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2nd post!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30876612</id>
	<title>Re:Americans. explain how this is 'free market'.</title>
	<author>mahadiga</author>
	<datestamp>1264365840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p> <tt>Socialism is preventing race to the bottom.<br>Capitalism is promoting race to the top.<br>We need both (implicitly or indirectly) to build and sustain a Great Nation.</tt></p></div> </blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Socialism is preventing race to the bottom.Capitalism is promoting race to the top.We need both ( implicitly or indirectly ) to build and sustain a Great Nation .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Socialism is preventing race to the bottom.Capitalism is promoting race to the top.We need both (implicitly or indirectly) to build and sustain a Great Nation. 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870782</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872354</id>
	<title>Re:Well, if you can't compete...</title>
	<author>coolgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1264239840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Let's not forget that Nokia started this little game of ring around the rosies.  Motorola just sort of woke up and went "oh, me too me too"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's not forget that Nokia started this little game of ring around the rosies .
Motorola just sort of woke up and went " oh , me too me too "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's not forget that Nokia started this little game of ring around the rosies.
Motorola just sort of woke up and went "oh, me too me too"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570</id>
	<title>Well, if you can't compete...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264270440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>then the only option is protectionism.</htmltext>
<tokenext>then the only option is protectionism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>then the only option is protectionism.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870700</id>
	<title>This is going patently insane.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264271460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I welcome all these litigations, these are the last tremors of a dying patent industry.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I welcome all these litigations , these are the last tremors of a dying patent industry .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I welcome all these litigations, these are the last tremors of a dying patent industry.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870854</id>
	<title>The logical result of all the IP madness</title>
	<author>imarsman</author>
	<datestamp>1264272900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Instead of spurring new ideas and having them spread around and serve the public good the skewed IP landscape has moved us in the opposite direction towards protectionism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Instead of spurring new ideas and having them spread around and serve the public good the skewed IP landscape has moved us in the opposite direction towards protectionism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Instead of spurring new ideas and having them spread around and serve the public good the skewed IP landscape has moved us in the opposite direction towards protectionism.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871184</id>
	<title>Red-Blooded American Here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264275420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First, let me say I'm probably the most jingoistic dyed in the wool American you will ever come across.  I'm so bad, I get a surge of adrenalin when I see a Canadian plate on one of the highways I pay taxes to help fund.</p><p>
That having been said, <i>please</i>, I beg you, deliver us from the clutches of our abusive monopolistic companies before it's too late.  Using patent litigation to lock down a market is doing nothing but damage to what little is left of the great legacy of innovation we once had.  </p><p>
If I haven't been clear, allow me to offer a suggestion.  What this world <i>seriously</i> needs is a real competitor to Windows.  ChromeOS isn't it.  Personally, I think Linux is up to the job (I'm typing this on Ubuntu).  But, somebody has to put the marketing and polish dollars behind it to really make it happen.  You have to make it work in a corporate environment, that means Active Directory, Exchange, Office has to have functional counterparts.  RedHat, an American company if there ever was one, has given up on the desktop.  </p><p>
Seriously people, I am not mad at you, but you have to do better.  Apple, Microsoft, RedHat, Google, Oracle, Sun, IBM, Novell, all American companies.  The only European OS vendors I can think of are Nokia and Canonical.  Canonical doesn't have the money even with Shuttleworth's billions.  And Nokia isn't known for its Operating Systems for good reason.  Neither Maemo nor Symbian are going to dethrone MS.  Seriously, I'm rambling but, I'll just pull out all of the stops here, are you really happy that your personal and governmental software dollars are going straight into the coffers of us Yankee imperialists?  I thought not.  Get mad.  Do us all a favor.  We're counting on you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , let me say I 'm probably the most jingoistic dyed in the wool American you will ever come across .
I 'm so bad , I get a surge of adrenalin when I see a Canadian plate on one of the highways I pay taxes to help fund .
That having been said , please , I beg you , deliver us from the clutches of our abusive monopolistic companies before it 's too late .
Using patent litigation to lock down a market is doing nothing but damage to what little is left of the great legacy of innovation we once had .
If I have n't been clear , allow me to offer a suggestion .
What this world seriously needs is a real competitor to Windows .
ChromeOS is n't it .
Personally , I think Linux is up to the job ( I 'm typing this on Ubuntu ) .
But , somebody has to put the marketing and polish dollars behind it to really make it happen .
You have to make it work in a corporate environment , that means Active Directory , Exchange , Office has to have functional counterparts .
RedHat , an American company if there ever was one , has given up on the desktop .
Seriously people , I am not mad at you , but you have to do better .
Apple , Microsoft , RedHat , Google , Oracle , Sun , IBM , Novell , all American companies .
The only European OS vendors I can think of are Nokia and Canonical .
Canonical does n't have the money even with Shuttleworth 's billions .
And Nokia is n't known for its Operating Systems for good reason .
Neither Maemo nor Symbian are going to dethrone MS. Seriously , I 'm rambling but , I 'll just pull out all of the stops here , are you really happy that your personal and governmental software dollars are going straight into the coffers of us Yankee imperialists ?
I thought not .
Get mad .
Do us all a favor .
We 're counting on you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, let me say I'm probably the most jingoistic dyed in the wool American you will ever come across.
I'm so bad, I get a surge of adrenalin when I see a Canadian plate on one of the highways I pay taxes to help fund.
That having been said, please, I beg you, deliver us from the clutches of our abusive monopolistic companies before it's too late.
Using patent litigation to lock down a market is doing nothing but damage to what little is left of the great legacy of innovation we once had.
If I haven't been clear, allow me to offer a suggestion.
What this world seriously needs is a real competitor to Windows.
ChromeOS isn't it.
Personally, I think Linux is up to the job (I'm typing this on Ubuntu).
But, somebody has to put the marketing and polish dollars behind it to really make it happen.
You have to make it work in a corporate environment, that means Active Directory, Exchange, Office has to have functional counterparts.
RedHat, an American company if there ever was one, has given up on the desktop.
Seriously people, I am not mad at you, but you have to do better.
Apple, Microsoft, RedHat, Google, Oracle, Sun, IBM, Novell, all American companies.
The only European OS vendors I can think of are Nokia and Canonical.
Canonical doesn't have the money even with Shuttleworth's billions.
And Nokia isn't known for its Operating Systems for good reason.
Neither Maemo nor Symbian are going to dethrone MS.  Seriously, I'm rambling but, I'll just pull out all of the stops here, are you really happy that your personal and governmental software dollars are going straight into the coffers of us Yankee imperialists?
I thought not.
Get mad.
Do us all a favor.
We're counting on you.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872216</id>
	<title>Re:Well, if you can't compete...</title>
	<author>brainfsck</author>
	<datestamp>1264238820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The United States continues to lead in <a href="http://www.photius.com/rankings/nobel\_prizes\_by\_country\_cummulative\_1901\_2009.html" title="photius.com" rel="nofollow">nobel prizes</a> [photius.com] and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic\_Ranking\_of\_World\_Universities#Rankings" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">university-level education and research</a> [wikipedia.org] as well as these measures of <a href="http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco\_inn-economy-innovation" title="nationmaster.com" rel="nofollow">innovation</a> [nationmaster.com] and <a href="http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/eco\_tec\_ach-economy-technological-achievement" title="nationmaster.com" rel="nofollow">technological achievement</a> [nationmaster.com].</p><p>I'm curious which metrics you used to come to your conclusion that "[a]ll innovation will take place elsewhere, as it largely is already."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The United States continues to lead in nobel prizes [ photius.com ] and university-level education and research [ wikipedia.org ] as well as these measures of innovation [ nationmaster.com ] and technological achievement [ nationmaster.com ] .I 'm curious which metrics you used to come to your conclusion that " [ a ] ll innovation will take place elsewhere , as it largely is already .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The United States continues to lead in nobel prizes [photius.com] and university-level education and research [wikipedia.org] as well as these measures of innovation [nationmaster.com] and technological achievement [nationmaster.com].I'm curious which metrics you used to come to your conclusion that "[a]ll innovation will take place elsewhere, as it largely is already.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870820</id>
	<title>Re:Well, if you can't compete...</title>
	<author>BESTouff</author>
	<datestamp>1264272600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Arrrgh<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. no mod points !</htmltext>
<tokenext>Arrrgh .. no mod points !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arrrgh .. no mod points !</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624</id>
	<title>Re:Well, if you can't compete...</title>
	<author>pete6677</author>
	<datestamp>1264270860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Within about 10 years or less, patent litigation will be the ONLY line of business left for former U.S. tech giants. All innovation will take place elsewhere, as it largely is already. You'll know this time is near once Microsoft loses their monopoly on the PC desktop, which they inevitably will.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Within about 10 years or less , patent litigation will be the ONLY line of business left for former U.S. tech giants .
All innovation will take place elsewhere , as it largely is already .
You 'll know this time is near once Microsoft loses their monopoly on the PC desktop , which they inevitably will .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Within about 10 years or less, patent litigation will be the ONLY line of business left for former U.S. tech giants.
All innovation will take place elsewhere, as it largely is already.
You'll know this time is near once Microsoft loses their monopoly on the PC desktop, which they inevitably will.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871308</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264276320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>maybe they can investigate Motorola for human rights violations too..</p><p>http://adalahny.org/index.php/boycott-divestment-a-sanction/consumer-boycotts-against-israel</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>maybe they can investigate Motorola for human rights violations too..http : //adalahny.org/index.php/boycott-divestment-a-sanction/consumer-boycotts-against-israel</tokentext>
<sentencetext>maybe they can investigate Motorola for human rights violations too..http://adalahny.org/index.php/boycott-divestment-a-sanction/consumer-boycotts-against-israel</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30876214
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870842
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872756
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30876280
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871992
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872354
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30876612
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870782
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30874270
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870582
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30889226
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870854
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872062
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_23_160226_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870820
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_23_160226.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870582
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30874270
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_23_160226.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870782
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872378
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30876612
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30876214
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_23_160226.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871992
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_23_160226.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870842
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_23_160226.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870854
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30889226
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_23_160226.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871184
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_23_160226.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870570
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30871324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870624
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872354
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30870820
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872216
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872756
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30872062
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_23_160226.30876280
</commentlist>
</conversation>
