<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_21_1537233</id>
	<title><em>Final Fantasy I</em> and <em>II</em> Are Coming To the iPhone and iPod Touch</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1264089420000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>jonasvdc tips an <a href="http://www.facebook.com/notes/square-enix-dlg/final-fantasy-and-final-fantasy-ii-for-iphoneipod-touch/267546696300">announcement by Square Enix</a> that <em>Final Fantasy I</em> and <em>Final Fantasy II</em> are <a href="http://chillze.com/2010/01/final-fantasy-i-ii-are-comint-to-the-iphone/">being developed for the iPhone and the iPod touch</a>. The graphics and UI have been modified to look and run better on the touchscreen devices, but everything from Cecil to the classic Black Mage is clearly recognizable. The announcement did not include any information on a price or release date.</htmltext>
<tokenext>jonasvdc tips an announcement by Square Enix that Final Fantasy I and Final Fantasy II are being developed for the iPhone and the iPod touch .
The graphics and UI have been modified to look and run better on the touchscreen devices , but everything from Cecil to the classic Black Mage is clearly recognizable .
The announcement did not include any information on a price or release date .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>jonasvdc tips an announcement by Square Enix that Final Fantasy I and Final Fantasy II are being developed for the iPhone and the iPod touch.
The graphics and UI have been modified to look and run better on the touchscreen devices, but everything from Cecil to the classic Black Mage is clearly recognizable.
The announcement did not include any information on a price or release date.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846890</id>
	<title>Gonna have to get an IPhone</title>
	<author>Hawkeye477</author>
	<datestamp>1264093980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After all these years I still think the original Final Fantasy is still my favorite video game of all time.  Two Fighters, a Black Mage and a White Mage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After all these years I still think the original Final Fantasy is still my favorite video game of all time .
Two Fighters , a Black Mage and a White Mage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all these years I still think the original Final Fantasy is still my favorite video game of all time.
Two Fighters, a Black Mage and a White Mage.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848750</id>
	<title>Too late</title>
	<author>dandart</author>
	<datestamp>1264101600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ermm, FF 1&amp;2 have been available for iPhone for ages. Through NES, SNES, GBA, etc emulators.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ermm , FF 1&amp;2 have been available for iPhone for ages .
Through NES , SNES , GBA , etc emulators .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ermm, FF 1&amp;2 have been available for iPhone for ages.
Through NES, SNES, GBA, etc emulators.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847532</id>
	<title>That IS Cecil</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264096500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The dude at the top IS Cecil.  It's him after becoming the Holy Knight.  That is in fact Final Fantasy IV, which as you've already said was FF2 in the US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The dude at the top IS Cecil .
It 's him after becoming the Holy Knight .
That is in fact Final Fantasy IV , which as you 've already said was FF2 in the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dude at the top IS Cecil.
It's him after becoming the Holy Knight.
That is in fact Final Fantasy IV, which as you've already said was FF2 in the US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847696</id>
	<title>Re:Come ON Nintendo, Square</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Tunnels of Doom and the Ultima series are what got me into the RPG scene (circa 1980 or so).</p><p>I have never played any game in the Final Fantasy series, are they any good?  A lot of Nintendo-style RPG seem to lack depth to me.  Too arcade-y.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Tunnels of Doom and the Ultima series are what got me into the RPG scene ( circa 1980 or so ) .I have never played any game in the Final Fantasy series , are they any good ?
A lot of Nintendo-style RPG seem to lack depth to me .
Too arcade-y .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Tunnels of Doom and the Ultima series are what got me into the RPG scene (circa 1980 or so).I have never played any game in the Final Fantasy series, are they any good?
A lot of Nintendo-style RPG seem to lack depth to me.
Too arcade-y.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848180</id>
	<title>Just what I needed!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264099080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yet another port of a game I've already purchased 3 times!  And for a system I don't own/can't afford!  And the greatest foreseeable benefit?  Now I can fat-finger my way to accidentally using my last megalixir instead of the Hi-Potion 2 items up in the item list!  The joy!<p>that said, I'll probably still end up buying this version, too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yet another port of a game I 've already purchased 3 times !
And for a system I do n't own/ca n't afford !
And the greatest foreseeable benefit ?
Now I can fat-finger my way to accidentally using my last megalixir instead of the Hi-Potion 2 items up in the item list !
The joy ! that said , I 'll probably still end up buying this version , too : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yet another port of a game I've already purchased 3 times!
And for a system I don't own/can't afford!
And the greatest foreseeable benefit?
Now I can fat-finger my way to accidentally using my last megalixir instead of the Hi-Potion 2 items up in the item list!
The joy!that said, I'll probably still end up buying this version, too :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847210</id>
	<title>Matt</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264095300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who cares I have it on my palm pre using Visual boy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who cares I have it on my palm pre using Visual boy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who cares I have it on my palm pre using Visual boy</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848194</id>
	<title>Re:Come ON Nintendo, Square</title>
	<author>damien\_kane</author>
	<datestamp>1264099140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>We'd like a way to play this game on a console with bloodlines to the original, without having to resort to emulators to do so.</p></div><p>FF I+II GBA Cart on a NDS or DS-Lite (just not the DSi where they took out the GBA slot)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 'd like a way to play this game on a console with bloodlines to the original , without having to resort to emulators to do so.FF I + II GBA Cart on a NDS or DS-Lite ( just not the DSi where they took out the GBA slot )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We'd like a way to play this game on a console with bloodlines to the original, without having to resort to emulators to do so.FF I+II GBA Cart on a NDS or DS-Lite (just not the DSi where they took out the GBA slot)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847284</id>
	<title>Re:Looks better?</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1264095540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't always mean better when graphics are a substitute for gameplay, but the exact same FF gameplay with updated graphics?  Yes that's better!  It's not like the original developers went with a 16-color palette and pixelated graphics as a stylistic choice.  They made it as pretty as they could, and did a good job, but would they rather have had SNES graphics capabilities or more?  Do the screenshots look like what they would have gone for, had they been able?  Yes and yes.</p><p>Other games that were better after a graphical update include Kings Quest I and Heroes Quest (I mean Quest for Glory) when they were updated for VGA from EGA.  Super Mario Brothers was improved by its release as part of Super Mario All Stars.  Quake was vastly improved by the switch to OpenGL (oh god and how!), and today open-source mods improve it further just by adding shader effects.  Star Control II is improved in its Ur Quan Masters form by the simple expedient of anti-aliasing the rotated sprites.</p><p>In summary:  Same game play, with better graphics that are in the same spirit as the original?  Yes please!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't always mean better when graphics are a substitute for gameplay , but the exact same FF gameplay with updated graphics ?
Yes that 's better !
It 's not like the original developers went with a 16-color palette and pixelated graphics as a stylistic choice .
They made it as pretty as they could , and did a good job , but would they rather have had SNES graphics capabilities or more ?
Do the screenshots look like what they would have gone for , had they been able ?
Yes and yes.Other games that were better after a graphical update include Kings Quest I and Heroes Quest ( I mean Quest for Glory ) when they were updated for VGA from EGA .
Super Mario Brothers was improved by its release as part of Super Mario All Stars .
Quake was vastly improved by the switch to OpenGL ( oh god and how !
) , and today open-source mods improve it further just by adding shader effects .
Star Control II is improved in its Ur Quan Masters form by the simple expedient of anti-aliasing the rotated sprites.In summary : Same game play , with better graphics that are in the same spirit as the original ?
Yes please !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't always mean better when graphics are a substitute for gameplay, but the exact same FF gameplay with updated graphics?
Yes that's better!
It's not like the original developers went with a 16-color palette and pixelated graphics as a stylistic choice.
They made it as pretty as they could, and did a good job, but would they rather have had SNES graphics capabilities or more?
Do the screenshots look like what they would have gone for, had they been able?
Yes and yes.Other games that were better after a graphical update include Kings Quest I and Heroes Quest (I mean Quest for Glory) when they were updated for VGA from EGA.
Super Mario Brothers was improved by its release as part of Super Mario All Stars.
Quake was vastly improved by the switch to OpenGL (oh god and how!
), and today open-source mods improve it further just by adding shader effects.
Star Control II is improved in its Ur Quan Masters form by the simple expedient of anti-aliasing the rotated sprites.In summary:  Same game play, with better graphics that are in the same spirit as the original?
Yes please!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772</id>
	<title>Um, Cecil?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264093440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cecil isn't in any of the screenshots...because he isn't in either of the games mentioned.  That's Final Fantasy IV, which has been known by that name in every release except for the US SNES version.</p><p>I can see being confused by the renaming, but how do you see a character in the screenshots who just isn't there?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cecil is n't in any of the screenshots...because he is n't in either of the games mentioned .
That 's Final Fantasy IV , which has been known by that name in every release except for the US SNES version.I can see being confused by the renaming , but how do you see a character in the screenshots who just is n't there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cecil isn't in any of the screenshots...because he isn't in either of the games mentioned.
That's Final Fantasy IV, which has been known by that name in every release except for the US SNES version.I can see being confused by the renaming, but how do you see a character in the screenshots who just isn't there?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847476</id>
	<title>Re:Question for anyone with an iPod Touch</title>
	<author>Pojut</author>
	<datestamp>1264096320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks to everyone who answered...I already have a Game Gear, GBA, DS, and a PSP, was just curious if the Touch was worth adding to the portable gaming collection.  Sounds like it isn't.</p><p>Thanks again, all!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks to everyone who answered...I already have a Game Gear , GBA , DS , and a PSP , was just curious if the Touch was worth adding to the portable gaming collection .
Sounds like it is n't.Thanks again , all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks to everyone who answered...I already have a Game Gear, GBA, DS, and a PSP, was just curious if the Touch was worth adding to the portable gaming collection.
Sounds like it isn't.Thanks again, all!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847750</id>
	<title>Re:That IS Cecil</title>
	<author>HunterZ</author>
	<datestamp>1264097280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Huh? That facebook/chillze picture clearly shows the characters from FF2j.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Huh ?
That facebook/chillze picture clearly shows the characters from FF2j .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Huh?
That facebook/chillze picture clearly shows the characters from FF2j.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848714</id>
	<title>Re:Question for anyone with an iPod Touch</title>
	<author>XxtraLarGe</author>
	<datestamp>1264101420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>is the iPod Touch worth buying just for games available on the platform?</p></div><p>I wouldn't say it's worth buying as a gaming platform alone, but it is definitely an added incentive. In my opinion, an iPod Touch is worth buying since it's a music player, web browser, email client, address book, calendar, calculator, note pad, photo album AND you can play lots of cool games. I've sold my DS since I got my iPod touch, because several of the games I owned on the DS are available on the iPod Touch for a fraction of the price. For instance, there's <a href="http://tr.im/L8dc" title="tr.im">Civilization Revolution</a> [tr.im] for $6.99 or <a href="http://tr.im/L8eq" title="tr.im">Puzzle Quest</a> [tr.im] for $4.99 (<b>Warning:</b> Links launch iTunes). Both of these are a fraction of the cost of the DS versions, and the graphics are as good, if not better, and the game play is about the same, though you don't get multi-player with Civ Rev or the game of the week. I also like not having to carry around game cards, so that's an added bonus.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>is the iPod Touch worth buying just for games available on the platform ? I would n't say it 's worth buying as a gaming platform alone , but it is definitely an added incentive .
In my opinion , an iPod Touch is worth buying since it 's a music player , web browser , email client , address book , calendar , calculator , note pad , photo album AND you can play lots of cool games .
I 've sold my DS since I got my iPod touch , because several of the games I owned on the DS are available on the iPod Touch for a fraction of the price .
For instance , there 's Civilization Revolution [ tr.im ] for $ 6.99 or Puzzle Quest [ tr.im ] for $ 4.99 ( Warning : Links launch iTunes ) .
Both of these are a fraction of the cost of the DS versions , and the graphics are as good , if not better , and the game play is about the same , though you do n't get multi-player with Civ Rev or the game of the week .
I also like not having to carry around game cards , so that 's an added bonus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is the iPod Touch worth buying just for games available on the platform?I wouldn't say it's worth buying as a gaming platform alone, but it is definitely an added incentive.
In my opinion, an iPod Touch is worth buying since it's a music player, web browser, email client, address book, calendar, calculator, note pad, photo album AND you can play lots of cool games.
I've sold my DS since I got my iPod touch, because several of the games I owned on the DS are available on the iPod Touch for a fraction of the price.
For instance, there's Civilization Revolution [tr.im] for $6.99 or Puzzle Quest [tr.im] for $4.99 (Warning: Links launch iTunes).
Both of these are a fraction of the cost of the DS versions, and the graphics are as good, if not better, and the game play is about the same, though you don't get multi-player with Civ Rev or the game of the week.
I also like not having to carry around game cards, so that's an added bonus.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847880</id>
	<title>This is not a repeat of ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><ul>
<li>1987 - Final Fantasy 1 (NES)</li><li>1988 - Final Fantasy 2 (NES)</li><li>1989 - Final Fantasy 1 (MSX2)</li><li>2000 - Final Fantasy 1 (WSC)</li><li>2001 - Final Fantasy 2 (WSC)</li><li>2004 - Final Fantasy 1 + 2 (GBA)</li><li>2007 - Final Fantasy 1 (PSP)</li><li>2007 - Final Fantasy 2 (PSP)</li></ul><p>
The sad part is that I have been alive for all of these and have purchased over 50\% of them!
</p><p>
<i>Source: <a href="http://www.ffcompendium.com/h/release.shtml" title="ffcompendium.com" rel="nofollow">Final Fantasy Release Info</a> [ffcompendium.com] </i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1987 - Final Fantasy 1 ( NES ) 1988 - Final Fantasy 2 ( NES ) 1989 - Final Fantasy 1 ( MSX2 ) 2000 - Final Fantasy 1 ( WSC ) 2001 - Final Fantasy 2 ( WSC ) 2004 - Final Fantasy 1 + 2 ( GBA ) 2007 - Final Fantasy 1 ( PSP ) 2007 - Final Fantasy 2 ( PSP ) The sad part is that I have been alive for all of these and have purchased over 50 \ % of them !
Source : Final Fantasy Release Info [ ffcompendium.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
1987 - Final Fantasy 1 (NES)1988 - Final Fantasy 2 (NES)1989 - Final Fantasy 1 (MSX2)2000 - Final Fantasy 1 (WSC)2001 - Final Fantasy 2 (WSC)2004 - Final Fantasy 1 + 2 (GBA)2007 - Final Fantasy 1 (PSP)2007 - Final Fantasy 2 (PSP)
The sad part is that I have been alive for all of these and have purchased over 50\% of them!
Source: Final Fantasy Release Info [ffcompendium.com] </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847232</id>
	<title>Re:Question for anyone with an iPod Touch</title>
	<author>classic773</author>
	<datestamp>1264095420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't use it for much gaming, other than occasional time wasting (in flight, waiting for an appointment), but even then not so much. I use it mostly for browsing from the living room, email, and a media player while traveling. I also find it handy for when I want to check email or a webpage while gaming on the PC (especially games that don't alt-tab well)</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't use it for much gaming , other than occasional time wasting ( in flight , waiting for an appointment ) , but even then not so much .
I use it mostly for browsing from the living room , email , and a media player while traveling .
I also find it handy for when I want to check email or a webpage while gaming on the PC ( especially games that do n't alt-tab well )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't use it for much gaming, other than occasional time wasting (in flight, waiting for an appointment), but even then not so much.
I use it mostly for browsing from the living room, email, and a media player while traveling.
I also find it handy for when I want to check email or a webpage while gaming on the PC (especially games that don't alt-tab well)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30851858</id>
	<title>Re:Um, Cecil?</title>
	<author>noidentity</author>
	<datestamp>1264069980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I can see being confused by the renaming, but how do you see a character in the screenshots who just isn't there?</p></div>
</blockquote><p>You must be new here. Nobody reads TFA, not even the person writing the summary! They all just read the summary.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see being confused by the renaming , but how do you see a character in the screenshots who just is n't there ?
You must be new here .
Nobody reads TFA , not even the person writing the summary !
They all just read the summary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see being confused by the renaming, but how do you see a character in the screenshots who just isn't there?
You must be new here.
Nobody reads TFA, not even the person writing the summary!
They all just read the summary.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847240</id>
	<title>Great, but...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264095420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>haven't we seen final fantasy 1/2 on pretty much every platform ever? I'm fine with remakes in general, but I think that Square is milking FF1 for what is by <i>current standards</i>, a pretty bad game.</p><p>Don't get me wrong though. I'd love to see other nes era games up on the iPhone.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>have n't we seen final fantasy 1/2 on pretty much every platform ever ?
I 'm fine with remakes in general , but I think that Square is milking FF1 for what is by current standards , a pretty bad game.Do n't get me wrong though .
I 'd love to see other nes era games up on the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>haven't we seen final fantasy 1/2 on pretty much every platform ever?
I'm fine with remakes in general, but I think that Square is milking FF1 for what is by current standards, a pretty bad game.Don't get me wrong though.
I'd love to see other nes era games up on the iPhone.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857314</id>
	<title>Re:Great, but...</title>
	<author>geminidomino</author>
	<datestamp>1264151280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm fine with remakes in general, but I think that Square is milking FF1 for what is by <i>current standards</i>, a pretty bad game.</p></div><p>No. I don't care if they want to port FF 1/2 to a goddamn roll of toilet paper, as long as it stops them from making any more godsforsaken FF VII spinoffs and Acid-Trippy Kingdom Hearts games (NB: the first one was great, if cutesy.)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm fine with remakes in general , but I think that Square is milking FF1 for what is by current standards , a pretty bad game.No .
I do n't care if they want to port FF 1/2 to a goddamn roll of toilet paper , as long as it stops them from making any more godsforsaken FF VII spinoffs and Acid-Trippy Kingdom Hearts games ( NB : the first one was great , if cutesy .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm fine with remakes in general, but I think that Square is milking FF1 for what is by current standards, a pretty bad game.No.
I don't care if they want to port FF 1/2 to a goddamn roll of toilet paper, as long as it stops them from making any more godsforsaken FF VII spinoffs and Acid-Trippy Kingdom Hearts games (NB: the first one was great, if cutesy.
)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847240</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847088</id>
	<title>Re:Gonna have to get an IPhone</title>
	<author>compro01</author>
	<datestamp>1264094820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I prefer to replace one of the fighters with a blackbelt.  Not as powerful at the low levels, but he gets some incredible damage later in the game.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I prefer to replace one of the fighters with a blackbelt .
Not as powerful at the low levels , but he gets some incredible damage later in the game .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I prefer to replace one of the fighters with a blackbelt.
Not as powerful at the low levels, but he gets some incredible damage later in the game.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846890</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857948</id>
	<title>Re:Looks better?</title>
	<author>Zixia</author>
	<datestamp>1264161900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Super Mario Brothers was improved by its release as part of Super Mario All Stars.</i></p><p>No it wasn't.  The graphics were better, I'll admit that, but the control system was also tweaked, resulting in lower inertia for Mario and making a lot of the fluid gameplay either less challenging or too difficult to replicate from the original.  Changing direction in mid-jump was less challenging, giving greater options to avoid enemies.  But the timings of jumps and turns relied on the higher-inertia Mario, and changing this made the classic tactics obsolete.</p><p>Even the improved graphics affected gameplay.  The parallax introduced between the foreground and background may have been a cosmetic improvement, but it inadvertently revealed blocks in the later worlds that were originally hidden by the similar-looking background palette.  Those hidden blocks could foil jumps if you didn't know they were there, but by being obvious in the remake they were made redundant.</p><p>Super Mario All-stars was a good idea, but it shows that making a prettier game doesn't translate in to a better game, nor indeed a faithful reproduction of the earlier game.  I'll always return to the original for my SMB fix.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Super Mario Brothers was improved by its release as part of Super Mario All Stars.No it was n't .
The graphics were better , I 'll admit that , but the control system was also tweaked , resulting in lower inertia for Mario and making a lot of the fluid gameplay either less challenging or too difficult to replicate from the original .
Changing direction in mid-jump was less challenging , giving greater options to avoid enemies .
But the timings of jumps and turns relied on the higher-inertia Mario , and changing this made the classic tactics obsolete.Even the improved graphics affected gameplay .
The parallax introduced between the foreground and background may have been a cosmetic improvement , but it inadvertently revealed blocks in the later worlds that were originally hidden by the similar-looking background palette .
Those hidden blocks could foil jumps if you did n't know they were there , but by being obvious in the remake they were made redundant.Super Mario All-stars was a good idea , but it shows that making a prettier game does n't translate in to a better game , nor indeed a faithful reproduction of the earlier game .
I 'll always return to the original for my SMB fix .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Super Mario Brothers was improved by its release as part of Super Mario All Stars.No it wasn't.
The graphics were better, I'll admit that, but the control system was also tweaked, resulting in lower inertia for Mario and making a lot of the fluid gameplay either less challenging or too difficult to replicate from the original.
Changing direction in mid-jump was less challenging, giving greater options to avoid enemies.
But the timings of jumps and turns relied on the higher-inertia Mario, and changing this made the classic tactics obsolete.Even the improved graphics affected gameplay.
The parallax introduced between the foreground and background may have been a cosmetic improvement, but it inadvertently revealed blocks in the later worlds that were originally hidden by the similar-looking background palette.
Those hidden blocks could foil jumps if you didn't know they were there, but by being obvious in the remake they were made redundant.Super Mario All-stars was a good idea, but it shows that making a prettier game doesn't translate in to a better game, nor indeed a faithful reproduction of the earlier game.
I'll always return to the original for my SMB fix.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849822</id>
	<title>Re:Um, Cecil?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264106280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the one at the bottom is cecil as a dark knight</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the one at the bottom is cecil as a dark knight</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the one at the bottom is cecil as a dark knight</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30850634</id>
	<title>Re:Question for anyone with an iPod Touch</title>
	<author>brkello</author>
	<datestamp>1264066320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I enjoy my iPod touch for gaming.  The only drawback is it has very very poor battery life.  Other than that, I have found a lot of fun games to play on it.  Catan and GeoDefense are good for hours and hours of fun alone.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I enjoy my iPod touch for gaming .
The only drawback is it has very very poor battery life .
Other than that , I have found a lot of fun games to play on it .
Catan and GeoDefense are good for hours and hours of fun alone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I enjoy my iPod touch for gaming.
The only drawback is it has very very poor battery life.
Other than that, I have found a lot of fun games to play on it.
Catan and GeoDefense are good for hours and hours of fun alone.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30854352</id>
	<title>Re:Come ON Nintendo, Square</title>
	<author>aztektum</author>
	<datestamp>1264079280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/electronics/retro-gaming/bd6f/" title="thinkgeek.com">Someone buy this and tell me if it's any good</a> [thinkgeek.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone buy this and tell me if it 's any good [ thinkgeek.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone buy this and tell me if it's any good [thinkgeek.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847514</id>
	<title>Re:Um, Cecil?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264096500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Confirmed, no Cecil.  They are releasing FFII for the NES.  This is NOT FFIV that was released as "FFII" in the U.S.</p><p>In the screen shots, a princess is telling you a password of "wild rose".  In the fight, two characters have names of Maria and Guy, default names in the REAL FFII.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Confirmed , no Cecil .
They are releasing FFII for the NES .
This is NOT FFIV that was released as " FFII " in the U.S.In the screen shots , a princess is telling you a password of " wild rose " .
In the fight , two characters have names of Maria and Guy , default names in the REAL FFII .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Confirmed, no Cecil.
They are releasing FFII for the NES.
This is NOT FFIV that was released as "FFII" in the U.S.In the screen shots, a princess is telling you a password of "wild rose".
In the fight, two characters have names of Maria and Guy, default names in the REAL FFII.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847282</id>
	<title>Am I the only one that saves their games?</title>
	<author>novakom</author>
	<datestamp>1264095540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Now look, I understand that Square Enix republishing games for new platforms is both financially savvy and also a boon for those of us that may have lost our old games, but really?  FF1 has been published for no less than 3 platforms already (NES, GBA, PS-nevermind emulators), and I still have copies 2 of them (NES and GBA, though to be fair the GBA version was to get the first official US version of FF2).</p><p>I have nothing against exploiting existing intellectual property if it'll make you money, especially when it'll make people happy, but you'd think-at least on a place like slashdot-that there would be a significant percentage of people that boxes up their old games the same way "normal" people box up old pictures and such (like me).  If you do that, and you have the urge, then you don't have to pay for the new version.  Of course, then you have cases like Chrono Trigger for the DS which has a new ending; of course you have to give in then.  (That said, I still have my original SNES CT cartridge in my closet.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Now look , I understand that Square Enix republishing games for new platforms is both financially savvy and also a boon for those of us that may have lost our old games , but really ?
FF1 has been published for no less than 3 platforms already ( NES , GBA , PS-nevermind emulators ) , and I still have copies 2 of them ( NES and GBA , though to be fair the GBA version was to get the first official US version of FF2 ) .I have nothing against exploiting existing intellectual property if it 'll make you money , especially when it 'll make people happy , but you 'd think-at least on a place like slashdot-that there would be a significant percentage of people that boxes up their old games the same way " normal " people box up old pictures and such ( like me ) .
If you do that , and you have the urge , then you do n't have to pay for the new version .
Of course , then you have cases like Chrono Trigger for the DS which has a new ending ; of course you have to give in then .
( That said , I still have my original SNES CT cartridge in my closet .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now look, I understand that Square Enix republishing games for new platforms is both financially savvy and also a boon for those of us that may have lost our old games, but really?
FF1 has been published for no less than 3 platforms already (NES, GBA, PS-nevermind emulators), and I still have copies 2 of them (NES and GBA, though to be fair the GBA version was to get the first official US version of FF2).I have nothing against exploiting existing intellectual property if it'll make you money, especially when it'll make people happy, but you'd think-at least on a place like slashdot-that there would be a significant percentage of people that boxes up their old games the same way "normal" people box up old pictures and such (like me).
If you do that, and you have the urge, then you don't have to pay for the new version.
Of course, then you have cases like Chrono Trigger for the DS which has a new ending; of course you have to give in then.
(That said, I still have my original SNES CT cartridge in my closet.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846998</id>
	<title>Epidemic</title>
	<author>drummerboybac</author>
	<datestamp>1264094460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>This will surely cause an epidemic of people's legs falling asleep as they have a much more in depth game to play on the toilet at work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This will surely cause an epidemic of people 's legs falling asleep as they have a much more in depth game to play on the toilet at work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will surely cause an epidemic of people's legs falling asleep as they have a much more in depth game to play on the toilet at work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846788</id>
	<title>Come ON Nintendo, Square</title>
	<author>oloron</author>
	<datestamp>1264093500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Final Fantasy 1 was THE game that got me into the RPG genre, and solidified my Nintendo Fan-boi-ism for many,many years to come, but now having seen my favorite game ported to Sony PSP and now iPhone/iPod without seeing an NDS remake is just boiling my oil. and also to Square/Enix, don't forget about those of us who saved your now-wretched company back then when Final Fantasy was almost your swan-song, We'd like a way to play this game on a console with bloodlines to the original, without having to resort to emulators to do so.

I've been waiting since i heard of the PSP version for a DS port/remake to come out, looks like I still have to keep waiting<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:\

Olo</htmltext>
<tokenext>Final Fantasy 1 was THE game that got me into the RPG genre , and solidified my Nintendo Fan-boi-ism for many,many years to come , but now having seen my favorite game ported to Sony PSP and now iPhone/iPod without seeing an NDS remake is just boiling my oil .
and also to Square/Enix , do n't forget about those of us who saved your now-wretched company back then when Final Fantasy was almost your swan-song , We 'd like a way to play this game on a console with bloodlines to the original , without having to resort to emulators to do so .
I 've been waiting since i heard of the PSP version for a DS port/remake to come out , looks like I still have to keep waiting : \ Olo</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Final Fantasy 1 was THE game that got me into the RPG genre, and solidified my Nintendo Fan-boi-ism for many,many years to come, but now having seen my favorite game ported to Sony PSP and now iPhone/iPod without seeing an NDS remake is just boiling my oil.
and also to Square/Enix, don't forget about those of us who saved your now-wretched company back then when Final Fantasy was almost your swan-song, We'd like a way to play this game on a console with bloodlines to the original, without having to resort to emulators to do so.
I've been waiting since i heard of the PSP version for a DS port/remake to come out, looks like I still have to keep waiting :\

Olo</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846850</id>
	<title>Re:Um, Cecil?</title>
	<author>Draek</author>
	<datestamp>1264093800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe the submitter got confused between Cecil and Kain (y'know, the good/bad/good/whatever guy from FFIV), and further confused the Dragoon in the screenshot with him, leading to his statement in TFS.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe the submitter got confused between Cecil and Kain ( y'know , the good/bad/good/whatever guy from FFIV ) , and further confused the Dragoon in the screenshot with him , leading to his statement in TFS .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe the submitter got confused between Cecil and Kain (y'know, the good/bad/good/whatever guy from FFIV), and further confused the Dragoon in the screenshot with him, leading to his statement in TFS.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847426</id>
	<title>I've had them on my Droid for months!</title>
	<author>2obvious4u</author>
	<datestamp>1264096140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Boy Apple is behind the times.  I've had them on my Droid for months.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Boy Apple is behind the times .
I 've had them on my Droid for months .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boy Apple is behind the times.
I've had them on my Droid for months.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847272</id>
	<title>Re:Um, Cecil?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264095540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Also, compare the characters from this <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Final\_Fantasy\_II\_JAP\_Battle.png" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">wikipedia entry</a> [wikipedia.org] to what I presume is a screenshot from <a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=4522682&amp;op=1&amp;view=all&amp;subj=267546696300&amp;aid=-1&amp;auser=0&amp;oid=267546696300&amp;id=167831379364" title="facebook.com" rel="nofollow">Final Fantasy 2</a> [facebook.com]. You can see the similarities to several of the character designs, namely the top guy in red and the 3rd slot guy in blue.</p><p>This definitely is not Final Fantasy 4j/2us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , compare the characters from this wikipedia entry [ wikipedia.org ] to what I presume is a screenshot from Final Fantasy 2 [ facebook.com ] .
You can see the similarities to several of the character designs , namely the top guy in red and the 3rd slot guy in blue.This definitely is not Final Fantasy 4j/2us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, compare the characters from this wikipedia entry [wikipedia.org] to what I presume is a screenshot from Final Fantasy 2 [facebook.com].
You can see the similarities to several of the character designs, namely the top guy in red and the 3rd slot guy in blue.This definitely is not Final Fantasy 4j/2us.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847230</id>
	<title>NESoid</title>
	<author>Daetrin</author>
	<datestamp>1264095420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"So how long till it makes its way to Droid - if ever at all?"</i> <br>
<br>
I assume you mean aside from playing it through <a href="http://nesoid.com/" title="nesoid.com">NESoid?</a> [nesoid.com] I'm currently in the middle of a game of Nobunaga's Ambition on my Nexus One. (I might have started up a game of FF1 instead, except i was already playing that on the Wii Virtual Console =) Even if you want to be entirely ethical (since you apparently don't already have an old copy lying around) i personally wouldn't feel any qualms about buying a copy for some other system (even an old used copy) and then d/ling the rom.<br>
<br>
<i>"I personally never played any of the FF series, only because I hadn't heard of it until like 7 or 8 came out, and I thought I'd have a lot of backstory to catch up with (though people have reassured me that I really don't)."</i> <br>
<br>
I wouldn't suggest playing FF1 for the first time now unless you're already very familiar with how clunky those old NES games could get. FF1, along with Dragon Quest 1, were both exploring how to do RPGs on the console format, and there's a lot of UI issues that got resolved in later versions. (In particular, having to buy each item one at a time, no descriptions for any items, no way to view stats without equipping an item and switching to the status screen.) And even aside from the difficulties the UI imposes it's probably the most challenging game in the FF series. (It's hard to say if the fact that attacks targeted on enemies that die before that character's turn don't get re-targeted to another enemy is a UI bug or just an unneeded increase to the difficulty, but in either case they got rid of it in later games.)<br>
<br>
I still think it's a great game despite all that, but i admit that i come pre-equipped with a pair of rose-tinted glasses which you would be lacking<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>" So how long till it makes its way to Droid - if ever at all ?
" I assume you mean aside from playing it through NESoid ?
[ nesoid.com ] I 'm currently in the middle of a game of Nobunaga 's Ambition on my Nexus One .
( I might have started up a game of FF1 instead , except i was already playing that on the Wii Virtual Console = ) Even if you want to be entirely ethical ( since you apparently do n't already have an old copy lying around ) i personally would n't feel any qualms about buying a copy for some other system ( even an old used copy ) and then d/ling the rom .
" I personally never played any of the FF series , only because I had n't heard of it until like 7 or 8 came out , and I thought I 'd have a lot of backstory to catch up with ( though people have reassured me that I really do n't ) .
" I would n't suggest playing FF1 for the first time now unless you 're already very familiar with how clunky those old NES games could get .
FF1 , along with Dragon Quest 1 , were both exploring how to do RPGs on the console format , and there 's a lot of UI issues that got resolved in later versions .
( In particular , having to buy each item one at a time , no descriptions for any items , no way to view stats without equipping an item and switching to the status screen .
) And even aside from the difficulties the UI imposes it 's probably the most challenging game in the FF series .
( It 's hard to say if the fact that attacks targeted on enemies that die before that character 's turn do n't get re-targeted to another enemy is a UI bug or just an unneeded increase to the difficulty , but in either case they got rid of it in later games .
) I still think it 's a great game despite all that , but i admit that i come pre-equipped with a pair of rose-tinted glasses which you would be lacking : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"So how long till it makes its way to Droid - if ever at all?
" 

I assume you mean aside from playing it through NESoid?
[nesoid.com] I'm currently in the middle of a game of Nobunaga's Ambition on my Nexus One.
(I might have started up a game of FF1 instead, except i was already playing that on the Wii Virtual Console =) Even if you want to be entirely ethical (since you apparently don't already have an old copy lying around) i personally wouldn't feel any qualms about buying a copy for some other system (even an old used copy) and then d/ling the rom.
"I personally never played any of the FF series, only because I hadn't heard of it until like 7 or 8 came out, and I thought I'd have a lot of backstory to catch up with (though people have reassured me that I really don't).
" 

I wouldn't suggest playing FF1 for the first time now unless you're already very familiar with how clunky those old NES games could get.
FF1, along with Dragon Quest 1, were both exploring how to do RPGs on the console format, and there's a lot of UI issues that got resolved in later versions.
(In particular, having to buy each item one at a time, no descriptions for any items, no way to view stats without equipping an item and switching to the status screen.
) And even aside from the difficulties the UI imposes it's probably the most challenging game in the FF series.
(It's hard to say if the fact that attacks targeted on enemies that die before that character's turn don't get re-targeted to another enemy is a UI bug or just an unneeded increase to the difficulty, but in either case they got rid of it in later games.
)

I still think it's a great game despite all that, but i admit that i come pre-equipped with a pair of rose-tinted glasses which you would be lacking :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857336</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one that saves their games?</title>
	<author>DrScotsman</author>
	<datestamp>1264151820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I still have copies 2 of them (NES and GBA, though to be fair the GBA version was to get the first official US version of FF2).</p></div><p>First official US relese of FF2?  Origins for PS1?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I still have copies 2 of them ( NES and GBA , though to be fair the GBA version was to get the first official US version of FF2 ) .First official US relese of FF2 ?
Origins for PS1 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still have copies 2 of them (NES and GBA, though to be fair the GBA version was to get the first official US version of FF2).First official US relese of FF2?
Origins for PS1?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846902</id>
	<title>Re:Exclusive?</title>
	<author>hansamurai</author>
	<datestamp>1264094040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People assure you that there's not backstory to catch up on because the games are entirely unrelated from each other.  Except for FFX-2 and FFXII Revenant Wings, the main series has no direct sequels.</p><p>Square is starting to go back to the world of Ivalice more, but FFXII is the only main series game that takes place there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People assure you that there 's not backstory to catch up on because the games are entirely unrelated from each other .
Except for FFX-2 and FFXII Revenant Wings , the main series has no direct sequels.Square is starting to go back to the world of Ivalice more , but FFXII is the only main series game that takes place there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People assure you that there's not backstory to catch up on because the games are entirely unrelated from each other.
Except for FFX-2 and FFXII Revenant Wings, the main series has no direct sequels.Square is starting to go back to the world of Ivalice more, but FFXII is the only main series game that takes place there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847342</id>
	<title>Re:Come ON Nintendo, Square</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264095780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do know there's a version on the Game Boy Advance? Search for Dawn of Souls and stop being a moron.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do know there 's a version on the Game Boy Advance ?
Search for Dawn of Souls and stop being a moron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do know there's a version on the Game Boy Advance?
Search for Dawn of Souls and stop being a moron.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846788</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866</id>
	<title>Question for anyone with an iPod Touch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264093860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These seems like as good a time as any to ask...is the iPod Touch worth buying just for games available on the platform?  It seems like there are a ton of cool games out there for it, but I don't really want to plunk down the cash if it isn't worth it from a gaming point of view...</p><p>Opinions?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These seems like as good a time as any to ask...is the iPod Touch worth buying just for games available on the platform ?
It seems like there are a ton of cool games out there for it , but I do n't really want to plunk down the cash if it is n't worth it from a gaming point of view...Opinions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These seems like as good a time as any to ask...is the iPod Touch worth buying just for games available on the platform?
It seems like there are a ton of cool games out there for it, but I don't really want to plunk down the cash if it isn't worth it from a gaming point of view...Opinions?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849844</id>
	<title>Re:Exclusive?</title>
	<author>Darinbob</author>
	<datestamp>1264106340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Get in line.  People are still waiting for it to get to a PC...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Get in line .
People are still waiting for it to get to a PC.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Get in line.
People are still waiting for it to get to a PC...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848434</id>
	<title>Re:That IS Cecil</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264100220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The dude at the top IS Cecil.  It's him after becoming the Holy Knight.  That is in fact Final Fantasy IV, which as you've already said was FF2 in the US.</p></div><p>"The graphics and UI have been modified to look and run better on the touchscreen devices"  That is not Cecil, just a graphically altered Frioniel.</p><p>http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/nes/file/563414/10175 - FFII for NES walkthrough.  Wild rose is what the princess says the password is near the beginning of the game.  The main characters are Frioniel, Maria and Guy.  The names of the party members in the screen shot are Firion, Maria, Guy and Ricard.  Richard is a Dragoon that comes to help you late in the game.</p><p>http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/snes/file/522596/21617 - "FFII" for SNES, what was FFIV in Japan walkthrough.  Search through this or any other walkthrough.  No mention of wild rose at all, but all the Cecil you want.</p><p>They are releasing FFI which we all agree is FFI and the original FFII as it was named in Japan.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The dude at the top IS Cecil .
It 's him after becoming the Holy Knight .
That is in fact Final Fantasy IV , which as you 've already said was FF2 in the US .
" The graphics and UI have been modified to look and run better on the touchscreen devices " That is not Cecil , just a graphically altered Frioniel.http : //www.gamefaqs.com/console/nes/file/563414/10175 - FFII for NES walkthrough .
Wild rose is what the princess says the password is near the beginning of the game .
The main characters are Frioniel , Maria and Guy .
The names of the party members in the screen shot are Firion , Maria , Guy and Ricard .
Richard is a Dragoon that comes to help you late in the game.http : //www.gamefaqs.com/console/snes/file/522596/21617 - " FFII " for SNES , what was FFIV in Japan walkthrough .
Search through this or any other walkthrough .
No mention of wild rose at all , but all the Cecil you want.They are releasing FFI which we all agree is FFI and the original FFII as it was named in Japan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The dude at the top IS Cecil.
It's him after becoming the Holy Knight.
That is in fact Final Fantasy IV, which as you've already said was FF2 in the US.
"The graphics and UI have been modified to look and run better on the touchscreen devices"  That is not Cecil, just a graphically altered Frioniel.http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/nes/file/563414/10175 - FFII for NES walkthrough.
Wild rose is what the princess says the password is near the beginning of the game.
The main characters are Frioniel, Maria and Guy.
The names of the party members in the screen shot are Firion, Maria, Guy and Ricard.
Richard is a Dragoon that comes to help you late in the game.http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/snes/file/522596/21617 - "FFII" for SNES, what was FFIV in Japan walkthrough.
Search through this or any other walkthrough.
No mention of wild rose at all, but all the Cecil you want.They are releasing FFI which we all agree is FFI and the original FFII as it was named in Japan.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847532</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849042</id>
	<title>Re:Come ON Nintendo, Square</title>
	<author>Nathrael</author>
	<datestamp>1264103040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Give Final Fantasy IV, V and VI on the SNES a try - they're well worth it (especially VI). The PSX titles...well, let's say they are a matter of taste (many people love them - except for 9, which sucks - but I found them lacking). Can't comment on the PS2/PS3 titles, never really got to play them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Give Final Fantasy IV , V and VI on the SNES a try - they 're well worth it ( especially VI ) .
The PSX titles...well , let 's say they are a matter of taste ( many people love them - except for 9 , which sucks - but I found them lacking ) .
Ca n't comment on the PS2/PS3 titles , never really got to play them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Give Final Fantasy IV, V and VI on the SNES a try - they're well worth it (especially VI).
The PSX titles...well, let's say they are a matter of taste (many people love them - except for 9, which sucks - but I found them lacking).
Can't comment on the PS2/PS3 titles, never really got to play them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849762</id>
	<title>Re:This is not a repeat of ...</title>
	<author>bziman</author>
	<datestamp>1264106040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is that sad?  When someone says Final Fantasy, I can only assume they mean the original NES version from 1987, which I bought then, and still play now. I'm afraid I never upgraded to any of these newer fancy-pants systems. I miss the class NES games, and I wish they'd make new games with new stories with the original engine and style of game play. Newer games are too busy and their graphics just give me a headache.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is that sad ?
When someone says Final Fantasy , I can only assume they mean the original NES version from 1987 , which I bought then , and still play now .
I 'm afraid I never upgraded to any of these newer fancy-pants systems .
I miss the class NES games , and I wish they 'd make new games with new stories with the original engine and style of game play .
Newer games are too busy and their graphics just give me a headache .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is that sad?
When someone says Final Fantasy, I can only assume they mean the original NES version from 1987, which I bought then, and still play now.
I'm afraid I never upgraded to any of these newer fancy-pants systems.
I miss the class NES games, and I wish they'd make new games with new stories with the original engine and style of game play.
Newer games are too busy and their graphics just give me a headache.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30868714</id>
	<title>Parent is lying, the figure includes ipods</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1264251900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>As of Dec 2009 the iPhone has had 78 million sales, and this number does not include millions of iPod Touch out there. </i></p><p>Er, yes it does. If you RTFA: <b>Apple (AAPL) will have sold nearly 78 million iPhones and iPod touches worldwide.</b></p><p>On top of that, wow, you're comparing all of Apple's phones in total, to a single Motorola phone (their RAZR alone sold 110 million!) Motorola have far more of a market share than Apple. Or if you're looking at it from a platform point of view, you need to compare to all Android phones.</p><p>Anyhow, Nokia shipped <i>100 million</i> Symbian phones by 2006, before the first Iphone was even released ( <a href="http://www.thesmartpda.com/50226711/six\_years\_of\_symbian\_produces\_100\_models\_and\_100\_million\_shipments.php" title="thesmartpda.com">http://www.thesmartpda.com/50226711/six\_years\_of\_symbian\_produces\_100\_models\_and\_100\_million\_shipments.php</a> [thesmartpda.com] ), and by early 2009, they had sold <i>250 million</i> Symbian phones ( <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Symbian-Foundation-Adds-New-Member-Nuance-117209.shtml" title="softpedia.com">http://news.softpedia.com/news/Symbian-Foundation-Adds-New-Member-Nuance-117209.shtml</a> [softpedia.com] ).</p><p>The Iphone is a niche player (as is Android too currently, in fact). That's a fact. Even if we did add in the Ipod Touch numbers, which doesn't really improve matters, by that argument we should now throw in netbooks, since the market is now "handheld devices" not "phones", and there's a big market of Windows netbooks (of the order of tens of millions).</p><p><i>Would you make a program for 1\% of the platforms, or 99\%?</i></p><p>Are you seriously suggesting that Droid and Iphones are the only two phones in existence, and that Apple have 99\% of the market? You need to step out of your RDF and check out some actual market data.</p><p><i>but when you see everyone and their 1 yr old baby with an iPhone</i></p><p>I don't see everyone, or many at all, with an Iphone. So there's one person with an Iphone, according to your link - wow! Now show me some actual market figures.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As of Dec 2009 the iPhone has had 78 million sales , and this number does not include millions of iPod Touch out there .
Er , yes it does .
If you RTFA : Apple ( AAPL ) will have sold nearly 78 million iPhones and iPod touches worldwide.On top of that , wow , you 're comparing all of Apple 's phones in total , to a single Motorola phone ( their RAZR alone sold 110 million !
) Motorola have far more of a market share than Apple .
Or if you 're looking at it from a platform point of view , you need to compare to all Android phones.Anyhow , Nokia shipped 100 million Symbian phones by 2006 , before the first Iphone was even released ( http : //www.thesmartpda.com/50226711/six \ _years \ _of \ _symbian \ _produces \ _100 \ _models \ _and \ _100 \ _million \ _shipments.php [ thesmartpda.com ] ) , and by early 2009 , they had sold 250 million Symbian phones ( http : //news.softpedia.com/news/Symbian-Foundation-Adds-New-Member-Nuance-117209.shtml [ softpedia.com ] ) .The Iphone is a niche player ( as is Android too currently , in fact ) .
That 's a fact .
Even if we did add in the Ipod Touch numbers , which does n't really improve matters , by that argument we should now throw in netbooks , since the market is now " handheld devices " not " phones " , and there 's a big market of Windows netbooks ( of the order of tens of millions ) .Would you make a program for 1 \ % of the platforms , or 99 \ % ? Are you seriously suggesting that Droid and Iphones are the only two phones in existence , and that Apple have 99 \ % of the market ?
You need to step out of your RDF and check out some actual market data.but when you see everyone and their 1 yr old baby with an iPhoneI do n't see everyone , or many at all , with an Iphone .
So there 's one person with an Iphone , according to your link - wow !
Now show me some actual market figures .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As of Dec 2009 the iPhone has had 78 million sales, and this number does not include millions of iPod Touch out there.
Er, yes it does.
If you RTFA: Apple (AAPL) will have sold nearly 78 million iPhones and iPod touches worldwide.On top of that, wow, you're comparing all of Apple's phones in total, to a single Motorola phone (their RAZR alone sold 110 million!
) Motorola have far more of a market share than Apple.
Or if you're looking at it from a platform point of view, you need to compare to all Android phones.Anyhow, Nokia shipped 100 million Symbian phones by 2006, before the first Iphone was even released ( http://www.thesmartpda.com/50226711/six\_years\_of\_symbian\_produces\_100\_models\_and\_100\_million\_shipments.php [thesmartpda.com] ), and by early 2009, they had sold 250 million Symbian phones ( http://news.softpedia.com/news/Symbian-Foundation-Adds-New-Member-Nuance-117209.shtml [softpedia.com] ).The Iphone is a niche player (as is Android too currently, in fact).
That's a fact.
Even if we did add in the Ipod Touch numbers, which doesn't really improve matters, by that argument we should now throw in netbooks, since the market is now "handheld devices" not "phones", and there's a big market of Windows netbooks (of the order of tens of millions).Would you make a program for 1\% of the platforms, or 99\%?Are you seriously suggesting that Droid and Iphones are the only two phones in existence, and that Apple have 99\% of the market?
You need to step out of your RDF and check out some actual market data.but when you see everyone and their 1 yr old baby with an iPhoneI don't see everyone, or many at all, with an Iphone.
So there's one person with an Iphone, according to your link - wow!
Now show me some actual market figures.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30850060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848370</id>
	<title>Woohoo!</title>
	<author>garg0yle</author>
	<datestamp>1264099860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We can party like it's 1987!  Everyone get out their pastel clothes!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We can party like it 's 1987 !
Everyone get out their pastel clothes !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We can party like it's 1987!
Everyone get out their pastel clothes!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849616</id>
	<title>Re:Um, Cecil?</title>
	<author>\_KiTA\_</author>
	<datestamp>1264105380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Cecil isn't in any of the screenshots...because he isn't in either of the games mentioned.  That's Final Fantasy IV, which has been known by that name in every release except for the US SNES version.</p><p>I can see being confused by the renaming, but how do you see a character in the screenshots who just isn't there?</p></div><p>If you look at the first screenshot, Richard is dressed up almost the exact same as dark Knight Cecil.  This is because Richard is also a dark knight -- of sorts.  It's not an inexcusable mistake.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Cecil is n't in any of the screenshots...because he is n't in either of the games mentioned .
That 's Final Fantasy IV , which has been known by that name in every release except for the US SNES version.I can see being confused by the renaming , but how do you see a character in the screenshots who just is n't there ? If you look at the first screenshot , Richard is dressed up almost the exact same as dark Knight Cecil .
This is because Richard is also a dark knight -- of sorts .
It 's not an inexcusable mistake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cecil isn't in any of the screenshots...because he isn't in either of the games mentioned.
That's Final Fantasy IV, which has been known by that name in every release except for the US SNES version.I can see being confused by the renaming, but how do you see a character in the screenshots who just isn't there?If you look at the first screenshot, Richard is dressed up almost the exact same as dark Knight Cecil.
This is because Richard is also a dark knight -- of sorts.
It's not an inexcusable mistake.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847920</id>
	<title>Re:Looks better?</title>
	<author>Enderandrew</author>
	<datestamp>1264098000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I believe the GBA version of FFI also had 4 new lengthy bonus dungeons. I assume this content might also go into the iPhone versions.</p><p>Square has also done updated cut-scenes for many of their remakes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe the GBA version of FFI also had 4 new lengthy bonus dungeons .
I assume this content might also go into the iPhone versions.Square has also done updated cut-scenes for many of their remakes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe the GBA version of FFI also had 4 new lengthy bonus dungeons.
I assume this content might also go into the iPhone versions.Square has also done updated cut-scenes for many of their remakes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857282</id>
	<title>Re:Exclusive?</title>
	<author>geminidomino</author>
	<datestamp>1264150800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p> Except for FFX-2 and FFXII Revenant Wings, the main series has no direct sequels.</p></div><p>You missed one.</p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final\_Fantasy\_IV:\_The\_After\_Years" title="wikipedia.org">A direct sequel to FF IV</a> [wikipedia.org] albeit in episodic form.</p><p>It was surprisingly faithful, too, other than that controller-chucking stupidity that is the moon phases.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Except for FFX-2 and FFXII Revenant Wings , the main series has no direct sequels.You missed one.A direct sequel to FF IV [ wikipedia.org ] albeit in episodic form.It was surprisingly faithful , too , other than that controller-chucking stupidity that is the moon phases .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Except for FFX-2 and FFXII Revenant Wings, the main series has no direct sequels.You missed one.A direct sequel to FF IV [wikipedia.org] albeit in episodic form.It was surprisingly faithful, too, other than that controller-chucking stupidity that is the moon phases.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846902</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848016</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one that saves their games?</title>
	<author>drummerboybac</author>
	<datestamp>1264098420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its actually on both PSP and PS1, as well as on the Wii virtual console so make that 4 or 5 platforms before the iphone, depending on how you view the virtual console.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its actually on both PSP and PS1 , as well as on the Wii virtual console so make that 4 or 5 platforms before the iphone , depending on how you view the virtual console .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its actually on both PSP and PS1, as well as on the Wii virtual console so make that 4 or 5 platforms before the iphone, depending on how you view the virtual console.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857488</id>
	<title>In the mean time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264154580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Nokia N900 has emulators to let you play these games right now. No hacks required.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Nokia N900 has emulators to let you play these games right now .
No hacks required .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Nokia N900 has emulators to let you play these games right now.
No hacks required.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30856260</id>
	<title>Re:This is not a repeat of ...</title>
	<author>Eil</author>
	<datestamp>1264094340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot:</p><ul> <li>2002 - Final Fantasy 1 + 2 (PSX)</li><li>2009 - Final Fantasy 1 + 2 (Wii)</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot : 2002 - Final Fantasy 1 + 2 ( PSX ) 2009 - Final Fantasy 1 + 2 ( Wii )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot: 2002 - Final Fantasy 1 + 2 (PSX)2009 - Final Fantasy 1 + 2 (Wii)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30858468</id>
	<title>Re:Exclusive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264169040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And let's not forget hardware failures like the Droid only having 256mb for apps</p></div><p>Didn't you read your own link?  It clearly states on the page that the executable is the only thing that has to live in the 256MB of internal space.  The game then can download the graphics and sounds to the 16GB SD card, which is included.</p><p>I notice the other poster brought this up too, but you ignored it.  I wonder why you would not have a response when someone refutes points in your anti-Droid rant?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And let 's not forget hardware failures like the Droid only having 256mb for appsDid n't you read your own link ?
It clearly states on the page that the executable is the only thing that has to live in the 256MB of internal space .
The game then can download the graphics and sounds to the 16GB SD card , which is included.I notice the other poster brought this up too , but you ignored it .
I wonder why you would not have a response when someone refutes points in your anti-Droid rant ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And let's not forget hardware failures like the Droid only having 256mb for appsDidn't you read your own link?
It clearly states on the page that the executable is the only thing that has to live in the 256MB of internal space.
The game then can download the graphics and sounds to the 16GB SD card, which is included.I notice the other poster brought this up too, but you ignored it.
I wonder why you would not have a response when someone refutes points in your anti-Droid rant?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30850060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848790</id>
	<title>Re:Um, Cecil?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264101840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>how do you see a character in the screenshots who just isn't there?</p></div></blockquote><p>It's due to the higher resolution of the iPhone.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>how do you see a character in the screenshots who just is n't there ? It 's due to the higher resolution of the iPhone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>how do you see a character in the screenshots who just isn't there?It's due to the higher resolution of the iPhone.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847642</id>
	<title>Re:Am I the only one that saves their games?</title>
	<author>WilyCoder</author>
	<datestamp>1264096800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I feel sorry for you, lugging that NES around on mass transit. I bet you piss off your fellow passengers with that generator as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I feel sorry for you , lugging that NES around on mass transit .
I bet you piss off your fellow passengers with that generator as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I feel sorry for you, lugging that NES around on mass transit.
I bet you piss off your fellow passengers with that generator as well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846834</id>
	<title>Looks better?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1264093740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Higher res and more colors doesn't always mean better.  I'd still rather play the NES original on an emulator.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Higher res and more colors does n't always mean better .
I 'd still rather play the NES original on an emulator .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Higher res and more colors doesn't always mean better.
I'd still rather play the NES original on an emulator.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810</id>
	<title>Exclusive?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1264093680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So how long till it makes its way to Droid - if ever at all? I don't mind exclusive deals, but it'd be nice if they wore off after a few months.</p><p>I personally never played any of the FF series, only because I hadn't heard of it until like 7 or 8 came out, and I thought I'd have a lot of backstory to catch up with (though people have reassured me that I really don't). So, if these become available at an affordable price on a device I already have - then I'd probably purchase.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So how long till it makes its way to Droid - if ever at all ?
I do n't mind exclusive deals , but it 'd be nice if they wore off after a few months.I personally never played any of the FF series , only because I had n't heard of it until like 7 or 8 came out , and I thought I 'd have a lot of backstory to catch up with ( though people have reassured me that I really do n't ) .
So , if these become available at an affordable price on a device I already have - then I 'd probably purchase .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So how long till it makes its way to Droid - if ever at all?
I don't mind exclusive deals, but it'd be nice if they wore off after a few months.I personally never played any of the FF series, only because I hadn't heard of it until like 7 or 8 came out, and I thought I'd have a lot of backstory to catch up with (though people have reassured me that I really don't).
So, if these become available at an affordable price on a device I already have - then I'd probably purchase.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848028</id>
	<title>Re:Question for anyone with an iPod Touch</title>
	<author>igadget78</author>
	<datestamp>1264098480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>These seems like as good a time as any to ask...is the iPod Touch worth buying just for games available on the platform?  It seems like there are a ton of cool games out there for it, but I don't really want to plunk down the cash if it isn't worth it from a gaming point of view...</p><p>Opinions?</p></div><p>It's a great buy if you win one in a contest like me.

<br> <br>
I would love to actually write games for it but don't want to go buy a Mac. Still working on getting my VM OS X image up and running.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>These seems like as good a time as any to ask...is the iPod Touch worth buying just for games available on the platform ?
It seems like there are a ton of cool games out there for it , but I do n't really want to plunk down the cash if it is n't worth it from a gaming point of view...Opinions ? It 's a great buy if you win one in a contest like me .
I would love to actually write games for it but do n't want to go buy a Mac .
Still working on getting my VM OS X image up and running .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These seems like as good a time as any to ask...is the iPod Touch worth buying just for games available on the platform?
It seems like there are a ton of cool games out there for it, but I don't really want to plunk down the cash if it isn't worth it from a gaming point of view...Opinions?It's a great buy if you win one in a contest like me.
I would love to actually write games for it but don't want to go buy a Mac.
Still working on getting my VM OS X image up and running.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30851744</id>
	<title>Re:Exclusive?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264069620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>a few points:
<br> <br>
your numbers are jacked up: you do realize that the Droid is just one of the many devices that runs the Android OS, right?  A developer would not just be selling to the 800K Droids that are out there, but all of the devices.
<br> <br>
also: you are ignoring a lot of other smartphone sales when you assign 99\% to Apple.   Apple is only selling around 14\% (Q2 2009) of the smartphones, worldwide. Android is around 3\% in the same time period  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Smartphone\_2009.svg" title="wikipedia.org">source</a> [wikipedia.org]
<br> <br>
you are either trolling or ignorant about the Droid, but the app space is limited to the 256mb internal memory but apps can write to the 16GB card that is included with the phone.  in my experience nothing else uses the internal memory and most apps are tiny...i have a ton of apps installed and close to 200mb left.</htmltext>
<tokenext>a few points : your numbers are jacked up : you do realize that the Droid is just one of the many devices that runs the Android OS , right ?
A developer would not just be selling to the 800K Droids that are out there , but all of the devices .
also : you are ignoring a lot of other smartphone sales when you assign 99 \ % to Apple .
Apple is only selling around 14 \ % ( Q2 2009 ) of the smartphones , worldwide .
Android is around 3 \ % in the same time period source [ wikipedia.org ] you are either trolling or ignorant about the Droid , but the app space is limited to the 256mb internal memory but apps can write to the 16GB card that is included with the phone .
in my experience nothing else uses the internal memory and most apps are tiny...i have a ton of apps installed and close to 200mb left .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a few points:
 
your numbers are jacked up: you do realize that the Droid is just one of the many devices that runs the Android OS, right?
A developer would not just be selling to the 800K Droids that are out there, but all of the devices.
also: you are ignoring a lot of other smartphone sales when you assign 99\% to Apple.
Apple is only selling around 14\% (Q2 2009) of the smartphones, worldwide.
Android is around 3\% in the same time period  source [wikipedia.org]
 
you are either trolling or ignorant about the Droid, but the app space is limited to the 256mb internal memory but apps can write to the 16GB card that is included with the phone.
in my experience nothing else uses the internal memory and most apps are tiny...i have a ton of apps installed and close to 200mb left.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30850060</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848816</id>
	<title>Re:This is not a repeat of ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264101960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You forgot the Wii Virtual Console (2009) for FF1</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You forgot the Wii Virtual Console ( 2009 ) for FF1</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You forgot the Wii Virtual Console (2009) for FF1</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849966</id>
	<title>Re:This is not a repeat of ...</title>
	<author>aaaantoine</author>
	<datestamp>1264106880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>You missed "Final Fantasy Origins", released on the PlayStation in 2003.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You missed " Final Fantasy Origins " , released on the PlayStation in 2003 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You missed "Final Fantasy Origins", released on the PlayStation in 2003.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847860</id>
	<title>After the Final Fantasy Games on the DS and Wii...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After playing the Final Fantasy Games on the DS and Wii and after replaying the originals in emulation, I've found that even though I have pleasant memories of those games from my childhood, everything in that franchise before FFVII -- with the notable exception of Final Fantasy Tactics -- is very very VERY (and did I say "very") boring and usually annoying.</p><p>So, this time, I think I'll just pass.</p><p>(Please don't kill me for saying that.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After playing the Final Fantasy Games on the DS and Wii and after replaying the originals in emulation , I 've found that even though I have pleasant memories of those games from my childhood , everything in that franchise before FFVII -- with the notable exception of Final Fantasy Tactics -- is very very VERY ( and did I say " very " ) boring and usually annoying.So , this time , I think I 'll just pass .
( Please do n't kill me for saying that .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After playing the Final Fantasy Games on the DS and Wii and after replaying the originals in emulation, I've found that even though I have pleasant memories of those games from my childhood, everything in that franchise before FFVII -- with the notable exception of Final Fantasy Tactics -- is very very VERY (and did I say "very") boring and usually annoying.So, this time, I think I'll just pass.
(Please don't kill me for saying that.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847310</id>
	<title>Re:Question for anyone with an iPod Touch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264095660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In my personal opinion, it is. The iPhone/iPod almost takes me back to the days of the C64 and coders making games in their garages. Alot of it is crap but there are some real innovative gems and you can spend hours and hours just trying different games from the app-store. And it's all cheap aswell.</p><p>And now we also have GTA: Chinatown Wars, Final Fantasy 1 &amp; 2, Mirror's Edge, Assassins Creed II, Settlers, Simon the Sorceror 1 &amp; 2, Monkey Island Remake, Beneath a Steel Sky... some high quality games from well known developers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In my personal opinion , it is .
The iPhone/iPod almost takes me back to the days of the C64 and coders making games in their garages .
Alot of it is crap but there are some real innovative gems and you can spend hours and hours just trying different games from the app-store .
And it 's all cheap aswell.And now we also have GTA : Chinatown Wars , Final Fantasy 1 &amp; 2 , Mirror 's Edge , Assassins Creed II , Settlers , Simon the Sorceror 1 &amp; 2 , Monkey Island Remake , Beneath a Steel Sky... some high quality games from well known developers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In my personal opinion, it is.
The iPhone/iPod almost takes me back to the days of the C64 and coders making games in their garages.
Alot of it is crap but there are some real innovative gems and you can spend hours and hours just trying different games from the app-store.
And it's all cheap aswell.And now we also have GTA: Chinatown Wars, Final Fantasy 1 &amp; 2, Mirror's Edge, Assassins Creed II, Settlers, Simon the Sorceror 1 &amp; 2, Monkey Island Remake, Beneath a Steel Sky... some high quality games from well known developers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848368</id>
	<title>Re:Looks better?</title>
	<author>antifoidulus</author>
	<datestamp>1264099860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The remakes are also MUCH easier than the original.  Some of them even go so far as to get rid of the x # of magic points per level and go with the now-standard "each spell costs x mp" system.  Some also modify combat so that if you assign your character to attack an enemy that is now dead they will attack another enemy instead of just attacking the air.  They also toned down the difficulty level in general, I played a few of the remakes and I don't think I can recall getting a game over once.  For starters, 9 ghouls/ghasts/whatevers can no longer take down a healthy party if they surprise you, they seemed to have lowered the probability of getting paralyzed significantly.... I beat the original once and have never even attempted to do so again, even beating it once was just plain luck(managed to have a thief run away from the zombie dragon with 10 hp, Chaos never cast cure4 etc)... you have to be pretty hardcore to replay it without save states or game genie.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The remakes are also MUCH easier than the original .
Some of them even go so far as to get rid of the x # of magic points per level and go with the now-standard " each spell costs x mp " system .
Some also modify combat so that if you assign your character to attack an enemy that is now dead they will attack another enemy instead of just attacking the air .
They also toned down the difficulty level in general , I played a few of the remakes and I do n't think I can recall getting a game over once .
For starters , 9 ghouls/ghasts/whatevers can no longer take down a healthy party if they surprise you , they seemed to have lowered the probability of getting paralyzed significantly.... I beat the original once and have never even attempted to do so again , even beating it once was just plain luck ( managed to have a thief run away from the zombie dragon with 10 hp , Chaos never cast cure4 etc ) ... you have to be pretty hardcore to replay it without save states or game genie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The remakes are also MUCH easier than the original.
Some of them even go so far as to get rid of the x # of magic points per level and go with the now-standard "each spell costs x mp" system.
Some also modify combat so that if you assign your character to attack an enemy that is now dead they will attack another enemy instead of just attacking the air.
They also toned down the difficulty level in general, I played a few of the remakes and I don't think I can recall getting a game over once.
For starters, 9 ghouls/ghasts/whatevers can no longer take down a healthy party if they surprise you, they seemed to have lowered the probability of getting paralyzed significantly.... I beat the original once and have never even attempted to do so again, even beating it once was just plain luck(managed to have a thief run away from the zombie dragon with 10 hp, Chaos never cast cure4 etc)... you have to be pretty hardcore to replay it without save states or game genie.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846834</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846784</id>
	<title>To be clear...</title>
	<author>Palshife</author>
	<datestamp>1264093500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are we talking about I and II, or I and IV?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are we talking about I and II , or I and IV ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are we talking about I and II, or I and IV?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30850060</id>
	<title>Re:Exclusive?</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1264107300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"So how long till it makes its way to Droid - if ever at all? I don't mind exclusive deals, but it'd be nice if they wore off after a few months."</i>
<br> <br>
Exclusive deals?  Where in the article did it say they signed an exclusive contract with Apple?
<br> <br>
The reason you won't find this on the Droid now or ever is number of devices and number of people paying for software.  <a href="http://brainstormtech.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2009/12/18/where-in-the-world-are-apples-78-million-handsets/" title="cnn.com">As of Dec 2009 the iPhone has had 78 million sales</a> [cnn.com], and this number does not include millions of iPod Touch out there.  <a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/30/analyst.says.droid.in.strong.demand/" title="electronista.com">Compare that to 800,000 Droids sold</a> [electronista.com] and it's obvious why it's unlikely any company would put any effort into developing software for Droids, it's a 100-to-1 ratio, 1\%.
<br> <br>
Would you make a program for 1\% of the platforms, or 99\%?
<br> <br>
And that's why Droid has failed.  Developers see $$$$ in iPhone and Touch, so they make the software, and the consumers see all the software on the iPhone so they buy iPhones.
<br> <br>
It's a repeat of the 90s with Gameboy vs Sega Game Gear.
<br> <br>
And let's not forget hardware failures like <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2009/11/09/droid-does-only-have-256mb-of-storage-for-apps/" title="downloadsquad.com">the Droid only having 256mb for apps</a> [downloadsquad.com].  1999 called, they want their storage size back.  iPhone started with a minium of 4gb, and the latest 3GS is only offered in 16 or 32gb varieties, which is needed when games like <a href="http://www.pocketgamer.co.uk/r/iPhone/The+Settlers+(iPhone)/news.asp?c=16583" title="pocketgamer.co.uk">The Settlers</a> [pocketgamer.co.uk] want 300+ mb.
<br> <br>
I'm sorry I didn't mean to turn this into a anti-Droid rant, but when you see everyone and their <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrVt2ZcrWUY" title="youtube.com">1 yr old baby with an iPhone</a> [youtube.com] and you stubbornly turn around and buy the opposite, don't be surprised when the developers create software for the phone that everyone and their baby bought.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" So how long till it makes its way to Droid - if ever at all ?
I do n't mind exclusive deals , but it 'd be nice if they wore off after a few months .
" Exclusive deals ?
Where in the article did it say they signed an exclusive contract with Apple ?
The reason you wo n't find this on the Droid now or ever is number of devices and number of people paying for software .
As of Dec 2009 the iPhone has had 78 million sales [ cnn.com ] , and this number does not include millions of iPod Touch out there .
Compare that to 800,000 Droids sold [ electronista.com ] and it 's obvious why it 's unlikely any company would put any effort into developing software for Droids , it 's a 100-to-1 ratio , 1 \ % .
Would you make a program for 1 \ % of the platforms , or 99 \ % ?
And that 's why Droid has failed .
Developers see $ $ $ $ in iPhone and Touch , so they make the software , and the consumers see all the software on the iPhone so they buy iPhones .
It 's a repeat of the 90s with Gameboy vs Sega Game Gear .
And let 's not forget hardware failures like the Droid only having 256mb for apps [ downloadsquad.com ] .
1999 called , they want their storage size back .
iPhone started with a minium of 4gb , and the latest 3GS is only offered in 16 or 32gb varieties , which is needed when games like The Settlers [ pocketgamer.co.uk ] want 300 + mb .
I 'm sorry I did n't mean to turn this into a anti-Droid rant , but when you see everyone and their 1 yr old baby with an iPhone [ youtube.com ] and you stubbornly turn around and buy the opposite , do n't be surprised when the developers create software for the phone that everyone and their baby bought .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"So how long till it makes its way to Droid - if ever at all?
I don't mind exclusive deals, but it'd be nice if they wore off after a few months.
"
 
Exclusive deals?
Where in the article did it say they signed an exclusive contract with Apple?
The reason you won't find this on the Droid now or ever is number of devices and number of people paying for software.
As of Dec 2009 the iPhone has had 78 million sales [cnn.com], and this number does not include millions of iPod Touch out there.
Compare that to 800,000 Droids sold [electronista.com] and it's obvious why it's unlikely any company would put any effort into developing software for Droids, it's a 100-to-1 ratio, 1\%.
Would you make a program for 1\% of the platforms, or 99\%?
And that's why Droid has failed.
Developers see $$$$ in iPhone and Touch, so they make the software, and the consumers see all the software on the iPhone so they buy iPhones.
It's a repeat of the 90s with Gameboy vs Sega Game Gear.
And let's not forget hardware failures like the Droid only having 256mb for apps [downloadsquad.com].
1999 called, they want their storage size back.
iPhone started with a minium of 4gb, and the latest 3GS is only offered in 16 or 32gb varieties, which is needed when games like The Settlers [pocketgamer.co.uk] want 300+ mb.
I'm sorry I didn't mean to turn this into a anti-Droid rant, but when you see everyone and their 1 yr old baby with an iPhone [youtube.com] and you stubbornly turn around and buy the opposite, don't be surprised when the developers create software for the phone that everyone and their baby bought.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846890
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847750
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849966
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30850634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30868714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30850060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847642
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847282
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847240
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849616
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30856260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848790
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30851858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847920
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846902
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30851744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30850060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30858468
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30850060
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848368
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846834
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30854352
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846788
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1537233_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848434
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846788
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848194
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30854352
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847342
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847642
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846890
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847088
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848816
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30856260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849966
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849762
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846784
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846902
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849844
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30850060
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30858468
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30851744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30868714
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847426
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857314
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847860
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848180
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847476
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847232
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30850634
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846772
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846850
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30851858
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848790
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849616
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847532
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847750
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848434
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30849822
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1537233.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30846834
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847284
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30857948
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30848368
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1537233.30847920
</commentlist>
</conversation>
