<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_21_1331223</id>
	<title>Amazon Kindle To Get Apps and EA Games</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1264083600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Lanxon writes <i>"Amazon currently encourages publishers and authors to sell their books and magazines digitally, but the upcoming Kindle Development Kit (KDK), <a href="http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2010-01/21/amazon-kindle-to-get-apps-and-games.aspx">which goes into beta next month</a>, says Wired, will allow software developers to create a variety of different applications. Amazon has already confirmed a Zagat guide for restaurant reviews from Hallmark and a selection of word games and puzzles, such as Sudoku, from Sonic Boom. EA Mobile is also set to release games on the Kindle."</i>The kit itself is expected to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html/?ie=UTF8&amp;docId=1000476231">be available next month</a>.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Lanxon writes " Amazon currently encourages publishers and authors to sell their books and magazines digitally , but the upcoming Kindle Development Kit ( KDK ) , which goes into beta next month , says Wired , will allow software developers to create a variety of different applications .
Amazon has already confirmed a Zagat guide for restaurant reviews from Hallmark and a selection of word games and puzzles , such as Sudoku , from Sonic Boom .
EA Mobile is also set to release games on the Kindle .
" The kit itself is expected to be available next month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lanxon writes "Amazon currently encourages publishers and authors to sell their books and magazines digitally, but the upcoming Kindle Development Kit (KDK), which goes into beta next month, says Wired, will allow software developers to create a variety of different applications.
Amazon has already confirmed a Zagat guide for restaurant reviews from Hallmark and a selection of word games and puzzles, such as Sudoku, from Sonic Boom.
EA Mobile is also set to release games on the Kindle.
"The kit itself is expected to be available next month.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845748</id>
	<title>Re:games?</title>
	<author>mdwh2</author>
	<datestamp>1264088880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Choose Your Own Adventure games.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Choose Your Own Adventure games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Choose Your Own Adventure games.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847028</id>
	<title>Re:No "generic readers"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264094580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, lets say they don't support<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.blah files, you can create a BlahReader app---that's not generic, it's very specific to just that file type.</p><p>I find the 100k/user/month limit more disturbing. That implies no free SSH clients, no free web-browsers, etc.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , lets say they do n't support .blah files , you can create a BlahReader app---that 's not generic , it 's very specific to just that file type.I find the 100k/user/month limit more disturbing .
That implies no free SSH clients , no free web-browsers , etc .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, lets say they don't support .blah files, you can create a BlahReader app---that's not generic, it's very specific to just that file type.I find the 100k/user/month limit more disturbing.
That implies no free SSH clients, no free web-browsers, etc.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846094</id>
	<title>Re:Interesting, but I'm skeptical</title>
	<author>Zerth</author>
	<datestamp>1264090320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The Kindle's battery is actually very, very small. The reason it lasts so long is that only page turns draw current, and even then only a small amount of current, and then you have to read a whole page before you draw current again. If you're refreshing every three seconds instead of every two minutes, you're going to see a serious drop in battery life, especially if the apps expect wireless connectivity. My two week Kindle battery could drop to two days easily.</p></div></blockquote><p>Turn the page every two minutes?  So that's why I don't get the week+ everyone else gets.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Kindle 's battery is actually very , very small .
The reason it lasts so long is that only page turns draw current , and even then only a small amount of current , and then you have to read a whole page before you draw current again .
If you 're refreshing every three seconds instead of every two minutes , you 're going to see a serious drop in battery life , especially if the apps expect wireless connectivity .
My two week Kindle battery could drop to two days easily.Turn the page every two minutes ?
So that 's why I do n't get the week + everyone else gets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Kindle's battery is actually very, very small.
The reason it lasts so long is that only page turns draw current, and even then only a small amount of current, and then you have to read a whole page before you draw current again.
If you're refreshing every three seconds instead of every two minutes, you're going to see a serious drop in battery life, especially if the apps expect wireless connectivity.
My two week Kindle battery could drop to two days easily.Turn the page every two minutes?
So that's why I don't get the week+ everyone else gets.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846500</id>
	<title>When did "Hallmark" start developing software?!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264092120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Maybe you mean HandMark!!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Maybe you mean HandMark ! !
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Maybe you mean HandMark!!
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845872</id>
	<title>M]ARE</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264089480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>All Major surveys</htmltext>
<tokenext>All Major surveys</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All Major surveys</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845440</id>
	<title>games?</title>
	<author>rhainman</author>
	<datestamp>1264087440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>With the refresh rate of the Kindle, and FPS will involve you shooting at the place where the bad guy was 5 seconds before.</htmltext>
<tokenext>With the refresh rate of the Kindle , and FPS will involve you shooting at the place where the bad guy was 5 seconds before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With the refresh rate of the Kindle, and FPS will involve you shooting at the place where the bad guy was 5 seconds before.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845862</id>
	<title>Re:Convergence</title>
	<author>XxtraLarGe</author>
	<datestamp>1264089420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just wait until <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/18/AR2010011803662.html" title="washingtonpost.com">January 27th</a> [washingtonpost.com]. I hope you have about $1000 to drop. Or you could just get an iPhone now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just wait until January 27th [ washingtonpost.com ] .
I hope you have about $ 1000 to drop .
Or you could just get an iPhone now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just wait until January 27th [washingtonpost.com].
I hope you have about $1000 to drop.
Or you could just get an iPhone now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30848758</id>
	<title>Technical Details?</title>
	<author>Jonathan A</author>
	<datestamp>1264101660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The article seems to be pretty light on technical details.  I wonder what the API will be like.  What language will they use?  What kind of application framework will be available?  Will they develop their own IDE?  How much access does the developer have to the hardware?  How does the developer distribute software for testing?</p><p>Perhaps all of these questions and more will be answered in the next episode of Soap?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The article seems to be pretty light on technical details .
I wonder what the API will be like .
What language will they use ?
What kind of application framework will be available ?
Will they develop their own IDE ?
How much access does the developer have to the hardware ?
How does the developer distribute software for testing ? Perhaps all of these questions and more will be answered in the next episode of Soap ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The article seems to be pretty light on technical details.
I wonder what the API will be like.
What language will they use?
What kind of application framework will be available?
Will they develop their own IDE?
How much access does the developer have to the hardware?
How does the developer distribute software for testing?Perhaps all of these questions and more will be answered in the next episode of Soap?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845628</id>
	<title>Text adventures</title>
	<author>Mr. Moose</author>
	<datestamp>1264088340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I haven't got a Kindle, but if I will be able to play my Infocom text adventures on it, then I might consider getting one.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have n't got a Kindle , but if I will be able to play my Infocom text adventures on it , then I might consider getting one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I haven't got a Kindle, but if I will be able to play my Infocom text adventures on it, then I might consider getting one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845514</id>
	<title>Re:games?</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1264087800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm hoping the first game is entitled "DRM Busters".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm hoping the first game is entitled " DRM Busters " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm hoping the first game is entitled "DRM Busters".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30853384</id>
	<title>Re:Language?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264075020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Kindle interface was written in Java ( http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580\_3-9838934-39.html ), so I wouldn't discount the possibility.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Kindle interface was written in Java ( http : //news.cnet.com/8301-13580 \ _3-9838934-39.html ) , so I would n't discount the possibility .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Kindle interface was written in Java ( http://news.cnet.com/8301-13580\_3-9838934-39.html ), so I wouldn't discount the possibility.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847894</id>
	<title>Re:games?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Start with the Scott Adams games.</p></div><p>That would be most <a href="http://www.xkcd.com/548/" title="xkcd.com" rel="nofollow">appropriate...</a> [xkcd.com]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Start with the Scott Adams games.That would be most appropriate... [ xkcd.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Start with the Scott Adams games.That would be most appropriate... [xkcd.com]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845910</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30858318</id>
	<title>Re:Convergence</title>
	<author>jseale</author>
	<datestamp>1264166580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Let's not joke about this too much. The PSP turned out like this and it ain't all that bad. I mean, it's a great media player in addition to playing games, and the internet radio player is quite nice too (if you like Shoutcast's offerings, that is). Can't say anything nice about the web browser though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Let 's not joke about this too much .
The PSP turned out like this and it ai n't all that bad .
I mean , it 's a great media player in addition to playing games , and the internet radio player is quite nice too ( if you like Shoutcast 's offerings , that is ) .
Ca n't say anything nice about the web browser though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Let's not joke about this too much.
The PSP turned out like this and it ain't all that bad.
I mean, it's a great media player in addition to playing games, and the internet radio player is quite nice too (if you like Shoutcast's offerings, that is).
Can't say anything nice about the web browser though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846284</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845786</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>ddxexex</author>
	<datestamp>1264089000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could play something like Zork or another IF game, I don't think that should kill the battery that badly. And the choices in the summary also seem very basic, crossword puzzles and sudoku, it'd only drain your battery if you are really really bad at it or try to.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could play something like Zork or another IF game , I do n't think that should kill the battery that badly .
And the choices in the summary also seem very basic , crossword puzzles and sudoku , it 'd only drain your battery if you are really really bad at it or try to .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could play something like Zork or another IF game, I don't think that should kill the battery that badly.
And the choices in the summary also seem very basic, crossword puzzles and sudoku, it'd only drain your battery if you are really really bad at it or try to.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845940</id>
	<title>EA Games?</title>
	<author>idontusenumbers</author>
	<datestamp>1264089720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>E-paper: the ultimate in gaming display technology. What's the refresh rate on those, 1hz?</htmltext>
<tokenext>E-paper : the ultimate in gaming display technology .
What 's the refresh rate on those , 1hz ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>E-paper: the ultimate in gaming display technology.
What's the refresh rate on those, 1hz?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847048</id>
	<title>Re:One step closer to jailbreak</title>
	<author>cdrguru</author>
	<datestamp>1264094700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There is nothing to prevent you from putting non-Amazon content on a Kindle already.  The device is completely "open" as far as that is concerned.</p><p>You can even (gasp!) download books using the Amazon-provided wireless connection from places like manybooks.net for free.  At least half of the books on my Kindle have been either downloaded free from non-Amazon sites or placed on the device through the USB connection.</p><p>People that think the Kindle is somehow locked down for Amazon only have been reading some conspiracy theory web site rather than getting an uncomfortable dose of reality.</p><p>The latest Kindle software now supports some PDF documents (not all of them) but the viewing is so incredibly difficult that nobody is going to want to do it unless they absolutely have to.  Not that this is any big surprise.  PDF is a page-description language and if you aren't displaying on a screen big enough to hold a page you are pretty much out of luck.  The Kindle (rightfully) doesn't scroll around a zoomed page view - they just let you rotate the screen to get a "landscape" width of the page rather than the standard "portrait" view.  It works, but it isn't great.  And it can't be great with PDF unless the PDF was originally designed for a reader device.  Which is what other PDF-displaying Adobe based devices are counting on as well.</p><p>No, I do not believe the Kindle supports locked-down Adobe content.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There is nothing to prevent you from putting non-Amazon content on a Kindle already .
The device is completely " open " as far as that is concerned.You can even ( gasp !
) download books using the Amazon-provided wireless connection from places like manybooks.net for free .
At least half of the books on my Kindle have been either downloaded free from non-Amazon sites or placed on the device through the USB connection.People that think the Kindle is somehow locked down for Amazon only have been reading some conspiracy theory web site rather than getting an uncomfortable dose of reality.The latest Kindle software now supports some PDF documents ( not all of them ) but the viewing is so incredibly difficult that nobody is going to want to do it unless they absolutely have to .
Not that this is any big surprise .
PDF is a page-description language and if you are n't displaying on a screen big enough to hold a page you are pretty much out of luck .
The Kindle ( rightfully ) does n't scroll around a zoomed page view - they just let you rotate the screen to get a " landscape " width of the page rather than the standard " portrait " view .
It works , but it is n't great .
And it ca n't be great with PDF unless the PDF was originally designed for a reader device .
Which is what other PDF-displaying Adobe based devices are counting on as well.No , I do not believe the Kindle supports locked-down Adobe content .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There is nothing to prevent you from putting non-Amazon content on a Kindle already.
The device is completely "open" as far as that is concerned.You can even (gasp!
) download books using the Amazon-provided wireless connection from places like manybooks.net for free.
At least half of the books on my Kindle have been either downloaded free from non-Amazon sites or placed on the device through the USB connection.People that think the Kindle is somehow locked down for Amazon only have been reading some conspiracy theory web site rather than getting an uncomfortable dose of reality.The latest Kindle software now supports some PDF documents (not all of them) but the viewing is so incredibly difficult that nobody is going to want to do it unless they absolutely have to.
Not that this is any big surprise.
PDF is a page-description language and if you aren't displaying on a screen big enough to hold a page you are pretty much out of luck.
The Kindle (rightfully) doesn't scroll around a zoomed page view - they just let you rotate the screen to get a "landscape" width of the page rather than the standard "portrait" view.
It works, but it isn't great.
And it can't be great with PDF unless the PDF was originally designed for a reader device.
Which is what other PDF-displaying Adobe based devices are counting on as well.No, I do not believe the Kindle supports locked-down Adobe content.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845472</id>
	<title>One step closer to jailbreak</title>
	<author>goldaryn</author>
	<datestamp>1264087620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>People can already <a href="http://www.thekindlewiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Getting\_Started" title="thekindlewiki.com">SSH</a> [thekindlewiki.com] into their Kindles. If I were Amazon, I would be worried about this kind of support making jailbreaks more attractive, possibly putting a nail into the coffin of their future ebook sales.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People can already SSH [ thekindlewiki.com ] into their Kindles .
If I were Amazon , I would be worried about this kind of support making jailbreaks more attractive , possibly putting a nail into the coffin of their future ebook sales .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People can already SSH [thekindlewiki.com] into their Kindles.
If I were Amazon, I would be worried about this kind of support making jailbreaks more attractive, possibly putting a nail into the coffin of their future ebook sales.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846348</id>
	<title>I can see it now...</title>
	<author>AverageJoe8686</author>
	<datestamp>1264091400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And the Spike VGA award for the Kindle goes toooo NHL 2010!</htmltext>
<tokenext>And the Spike VGA award for the Kindle goes toooo NHL 2010 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the Spike VGA award for the Kindle goes toooo NHL 2010!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846744</id>
	<title>Reactionary, not visionary</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264093260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I agree that Amazon is reacting to competition, but I don't think it's mainly from Apple as much as from B&amp;N's nook. The iPhone and the Kindle are starting from opposite ends of the spectrum. The Kindle is a gradual technology improvement (debatable) over a paper book, and is slowly growing in capabilities, whereas the iPhone was a fully-loaded device just begging for apps.

The iPhone was overbuilt with graphics capabilities, so lots of people saw the obvious possibilities. Consumers and developers begged and pleaded with Apple to LET them develop for the iPhone, and in typical Apple fashion, they kept everybody locked out for a long time just to heighten the anticipation. (You don't really think Apple didn't plan an SDK from the beginning, do you?)

I mean, who looked at a Kindle and thought, "Wow, that would be great for games!" ??? As far as I can tell, nobody. Amazon is mirroring the incremental improvements of the early computers- monochrome, small screens, closed systems gradually improve to more shades of grey, larger screens, and somewhat open platforms.

Nobody in the market for portable games (or photos, or video, or web surfing) is going to choose a Kindle over, say, and iPod touch or iPhone.

No, Amazon isn't reacting to Apple, but is just trying to stay one very small step ahead of the nook. If the Apple tablet does have e-book support, then the Kindle will only be able to compete on price, battery life, and catalog, but it will remain a niche device.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree that Amazon is reacting to competition , but I do n't think it 's mainly from Apple as much as from B&amp;N 's nook .
The iPhone and the Kindle are starting from opposite ends of the spectrum .
The Kindle is a gradual technology improvement ( debatable ) over a paper book , and is slowly growing in capabilities , whereas the iPhone was a fully-loaded device just begging for apps .
The iPhone was overbuilt with graphics capabilities , so lots of people saw the obvious possibilities .
Consumers and developers begged and pleaded with Apple to LET them develop for the iPhone , and in typical Apple fashion , they kept everybody locked out for a long time just to heighten the anticipation .
( You do n't really think Apple did n't plan an SDK from the beginning , do you ?
) I mean , who looked at a Kindle and thought , " Wow , that would be great for games !
" ? ? ?
As far as I can tell , nobody .
Amazon is mirroring the incremental improvements of the early computers- monochrome , small screens , closed systems gradually improve to more shades of grey , larger screens , and somewhat open platforms .
Nobody in the market for portable games ( or photos , or video , or web surfing ) is going to choose a Kindle over , say , and iPod touch or iPhone .
No , Amazon is n't reacting to Apple , but is just trying to stay one very small step ahead of the nook .
If the Apple tablet does have e-book support , then the Kindle will only be able to compete on price , battery life , and catalog , but it will remain a niche device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree that Amazon is reacting to competition, but I don't think it's mainly from Apple as much as from B&amp;N's nook.
The iPhone and the Kindle are starting from opposite ends of the spectrum.
The Kindle is a gradual technology improvement (debatable) over a paper book, and is slowly growing in capabilities, whereas the iPhone was a fully-loaded device just begging for apps.
The iPhone was overbuilt with graphics capabilities, so lots of people saw the obvious possibilities.
Consumers and developers begged and pleaded with Apple to LET them develop for the iPhone, and in typical Apple fashion, they kept everybody locked out for a long time just to heighten the anticipation.
(You don't really think Apple didn't plan an SDK from the beginning, do you?
)

I mean, who looked at a Kindle and thought, "Wow, that would be great for games!
" ???
As far as I can tell, nobody.
Amazon is mirroring the incremental improvements of the early computers- monochrome, small screens, closed systems gradually improve to more shades of grey, larger screens, and somewhat open platforms.
Nobody in the market for portable games (or photos, or video, or web surfing) is going to choose a Kindle over, say, and iPod touch or iPhone.
No, Amazon isn't reacting to Apple, but is just trying to stay one very small step ahead of the nook.
If the Apple tablet does have e-book support, then the Kindle will only be able to compete on price, battery life, and catalog, but it will remain a niche device.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845910</id>
	<title>Re:games?</title>
	<author>jgagnon</author>
	<datestamp>1264089660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Start with the Scott Adams games.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Start with the Scott Adams games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Start with the Scott Adams games.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30848240</id>
	<title>Re:No "generic readers"?</title>
	<author>fermion</author>
	<datestamp>1264099260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>It pretty much sounds like the Apple iPhone limitations.  They won't allow something that simply duplicates the functionality of the Kindle, which is a generic reader.  Apps have to do something more.
<p>
I also see offensive material, which again is the iPhone catchall for 'if we don't like, it won't be on the device.' I wonder if they are going to be as liberal in the active content evaluation as they are <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Basics-Glamour-Nude-Photography-ebook/dp/B0011D5C5I/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;m=AG56TWVU5XWC2&amp;s=digital-text&amp;qid=1264095661&amp;sr=1-1" title="amazon.com">for</a> [amazon.com] <a href="http://www.amazon.com/God-Not-Great-Everything-ebook/dp/B000QUCO4Y/ref=sr\_1\_1?ie=UTF8&amp;m=AG56TWVU5XWC2&amp;s=digital-text&amp;qid=1264095578&amp;sr=1-1" title="amazon.com">books</a> [amazon.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It pretty much sounds like the Apple iPhone limitations .
They wo n't allow something that simply duplicates the functionality of the Kindle , which is a generic reader .
Apps have to do something more .
I also see offensive material , which again is the iPhone catchall for 'if we do n't like , it wo n't be on the device .
' I wonder if they are going to be as liberal in the active content evaluation as they are for [ amazon.com ] books [ amazon.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It pretty much sounds like the Apple iPhone limitations.
They won't allow something that simply duplicates the functionality of the Kindle, which is a generic reader.
Apps have to do something more.
I also see offensive material, which again is the iPhone catchall for 'if we don't like, it won't be on the device.
' I wonder if they are going to be as liberal in the active content evaluation as they are for [amazon.com] books [amazon.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845436</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845494</id>
	<title>Interesting timing</title>
	<author>nscheffey</author>
	<datestamp>1264087680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wonder if it has anything to do with <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/01/apple-special-event/" title="wired.com" rel="nofollow">this</a> [wired.com]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wonder if it has anything to do with this [ wired.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wonder if it has anything to do with this [wired.com]?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845624</id>
	<title>Interesting, but I'm skeptical</title>
	<author>Brandee07</author>
	<datestamp>1264088280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm excited about the possibilities, but worried that some developers will port their apps to Kindle because they can, without considering if it's a good match for Kindle. The Kindle really is a content consumption platform, not a content creation platform (you read, not write, on it). I can see a Twitter client working, however, since 140 characters is about the most I'd ever want to type on a Kindle keyboard. I think Amazon is conscious of this, as they are avoiding the term "app" in favor of "active content."</p><p>In any case, the Kindle's very slow refresh rate poses UI challenges that haven't really been faced before. I'm interested to see how developers contend with it. Another possible issue is battery life. The Kindle's battery is actually very, very small. The reason it lasts so long is that only page turns draw current, and even then only a small amount of current, and then you have to read a whole page before you draw current again. If you're refreshing every three seconds instead of every two minutes, you're going to see a serious drop in battery life, especially if the apps expect wireless connectivity. My two week Kindle battery could drop to two days easily.</p><p>The Kindle for me is still just for reading. While it CAN do email and web browsing and minesweeper, I use my iPhone for all those things. And while my iPhone CAN read my Kindle books, I use my Kindle for that. Reading is so central a part of my life that I'm not willing to sacrifice the quality of the experience on a convergence device- especially one that will start ringing or flash push notifications in the middle of a very suspenseful book.</p><p>But really, the whole thing reeks of Apple envy. This and the royalties change tells me that they feel VERY threatened by the Apple tablet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm excited about the possibilities , but worried that some developers will port their apps to Kindle because they can , without considering if it 's a good match for Kindle .
The Kindle really is a content consumption platform , not a content creation platform ( you read , not write , on it ) .
I can see a Twitter client working , however , since 140 characters is about the most I 'd ever want to type on a Kindle keyboard .
I think Amazon is conscious of this , as they are avoiding the term " app " in favor of " active content .
" In any case , the Kindle 's very slow refresh rate poses UI challenges that have n't really been faced before .
I 'm interested to see how developers contend with it .
Another possible issue is battery life .
The Kindle 's battery is actually very , very small .
The reason it lasts so long is that only page turns draw current , and even then only a small amount of current , and then you have to read a whole page before you draw current again .
If you 're refreshing every three seconds instead of every two minutes , you 're going to see a serious drop in battery life , especially if the apps expect wireless connectivity .
My two week Kindle battery could drop to two days easily.The Kindle for me is still just for reading .
While it CAN do email and web browsing and minesweeper , I use my iPhone for all those things .
And while my iPhone CAN read my Kindle books , I use my Kindle for that .
Reading is so central a part of my life that I 'm not willing to sacrifice the quality of the experience on a convergence device- especially one that will start ringing or flash push notifications in the middle of a very suspenseful book.But really , the whole thing reeks of Apple envy .
This and the royalties change tells me that they feel VERY threatened by the Apple tablet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm excited about the possibilities, but worried that some developers will port their apps to Kindle because they can, without considering if it's a good match for Kindle.
The Kindle really is a content consumption platform, not a content creation platform (you read, not write, on it).
I can see a Twitter client working, however, since 140 characters is about the most I'd ever want to type on a Kindle keyboard.
I think Amazon is conscious of this, as they are avoiding the term "app" in favor of "active content.
"In any case, the Kindle's very slow refresh rate poses UI challenges that haven't really been faced before.
I'm interested to see how developers contend with it.
Another possible issue is battery life.
The Kindle's battery is actually very, very small.
The reason it lasts so long is that only page turns draw current, and even then only a small amount of current, and then you have to read a whole page before you draw current again.
If you're refreshing every three seconds instead of every two minutes, you're going to see a serious drop in battery life, especially if the apps expect wireless connectivity.
My two week Kindle battery could drop to two days easily.The Kindle for me is still just for reading.
While it CAN do email and web browsing and minesweeper, I use my iPhone for all those things.
And while my iPhone CAN read my Kindle books, I use my Kindle for that.
Reading is so central a part of my life that I'm not willing to sacrifice the quality of the experience on a convergence device- especially one that will start ringing or flash push notifications in the middle of a very suspenseful book.But really, the whole thing reeks of Apple envy.
This and the royalties change tells me that they feel VERY threatened by the Apple tablet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30849298</id>
	<title>Re:Language?</title>
	<author>pcosta</author>
	<datestamp>1264104180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Kindle application framework is Java based. You write "booklets" that work like Java applets. Under the hood the Kindle runs a Linux kernel, so in theory you could just write native C apps, but I doubt Amazon will give developers access to that.<br>Some more info about hacking your Kindle:</p><p><a href="http://igorsk.blogspot.com/2007/12/hacking-kindle-part-3-root-shell-and.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://igorsk.blogspot.com/2007/12/hacking-kindle-part-3-root-shell-and.html</a> [blogspot.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Kindle application framework is Java based .
You write " booklets " that work like Java applets .
Under the hood the Kindle runs a Linux kernel , so in theory you could just write native C apps , but I doubt Amazon will give developers access to that.Some more info about hacking your Kindle : http : //igorsk.blogspot.com/2007/12/hacking-kindle-part-3-root-shell-and.html [ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Kindle application framework is Java based.
You write "booklets" that work like Java applets.
Under the hood the Kindle runs a Linux kernel, so in theory you could just write native C apps, but I doubt Amazon will give developers access to that.Some more info about hacking your Kindle:http://igorsk.blogspot.com/2007/12/hacking-kindle-part-3-root-shell-and.html [blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846664</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845436</id>
	<title>No "generic readers"?</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1264087380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Voice over IP functionality, advertising, offensive materials, collection of customer information without express customer knowledge and consent, or usage of the Amazon or Kindle brand in any way are not allowed. In addition, active content must meet all Amazon technical requirements, not be a generic reader, and not contain malicious code.</i></p><p>So if you want to add support for a file format the Kindle doesn't currently support you're out of luck?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Voice over IP functionality , advertising , offensive materials , collection of customer information without express customer knowledge and consent , or usage of the Amazon or Kindle brand in any way are not allowed .
In addition , active content must meet all Amazon technical requirements , not be a generic reader , and not contain malicious code.So if you want to add support for a file format the Kindle does n't currently support you 're out of luck ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Voice over IP functionality, advertising, offensive materials, collection of customer information without express customer knowledge and consent, or usage of the Amazon or Kindle brand in any way are not allowed.
In addition, active content must meet all Amazon technical requirements, not be a generic reader, and not contain malicious code.So if you want to add support for a file format the Kindle doesn't currently support you're out of luck?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846284</id>
	<title>Re:Convergence</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264091100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait, it gets better! Next iteration of Kindle will have extra circuitry, a microphone and speaker so you can... MAKE PHONE CALLS!!!<br> <br>Oh to be alive in such an age of wonders..</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait , it gets better !
Next iteration of Kindle will have extra circuitry , a microphone and speaker so you can... MAKE PHONE CALLS ! ! !
Oh to be alive in such an age of wonders. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait, it gets better!
Next iteration of Kindle will have extra circuitry, a microphone and speaker so you can... MAKE PHONE CALLS!!!
Oh to be alive in such an age of wonders..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846470</id>
	<title>EA games? Makes sense</title>
	<author>blind biker</author>
	<datestamp>1264091940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seeing as though the Kindle is heavily DRM encumbered, and that EA games are similarly DRM-laden softwares, I guess the target audience for the Kindle would be tolerant of DRM to the extent that EA finds desirable.</p><p>I am not a customer of either Kindle or EA games.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seeing as though the Kindle is heavily DRM encumbered , and that EA games are similarly DRM-laden softwares , I guess the target audience for the Kindle would be tolerant of DRM to the extent that EA finds desirable.I am not a customer of either Kindle or EA games .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seeing as though the Kindle is heavily DRM encumbered, and that EA games are similarly DRM-laden softwares, I guess the target audience for the Kindle would be tolerant of DRM to the extent that EA finds desirable.I am not a customer of either Kindle or EA games.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846112</id>
	<title>Oh boy!</title>
	<author>Chas</author>
	<datestamp>1264090440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can haz Madden 2011??<br>Or Madden 2012?<br>No Madden 2013 because the world's ending but hey...</p><p>Oh yeah, and I can hope that EA puts out NON-SPORTS games and have that futile hope rubbed in my face.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can haz Madden 2011 ?
? Or Madden 2012 ? No Madden 2013 because the world 's ending but hey...Oh yeah , and I can hope that EA puts out NON-SPORTS games and have that futile hope rubbed in my face .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can haz Madden 2011?
?Or Madden 2012?No Madden 2013 because the world's ending but hey...Oh yeah, and I can hope that EA puts out NON-SPORTS games and have that futile hope rubbed in my face.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846980</id>
	<title>Re:One step closer to jailbreak</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1264094400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do you think it will hurt sales? It is already possible to drop drm free<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.mobi and text files onto the device using a USB cable, so people interested in dinking around already have a path to read any book they have lying around on the device.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you think it will hurt sales ?
It is already possible to drop drm free .mobi and text files onto the device using a USB cable , so people interested in dinking around already have a path to read any book they have lying around on the device .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you think it will hurt sales?
It is already possible to drop drm free .mobi and text files onto the device using a USB cable, so people interested in dinking around already have a path to read any book they have lying around on the device.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846770</id>
	<title>Re:One step closer to jailbreak</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264093440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>come on... have you looked at the iPhone jailbroken equivalent to the appstore? they actually sell high quality apps there too... and believe it or not, people pay real $$$ for them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>come on... have you looked at the iPhone jailbroken equivalent to the appstore ?
they actually sell high quality apps there too... and believe it or not , people pay real $ $ $ for them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>come on... have you looked at the iPhone jailbroken equivalent to the appstore?
they actually sell high quality apps there too... and believe it or not, people pay real $$$ for them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845472</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845656</id>
	<title>Apple Competition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264088460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somebody seems a little threatened by Apple's 'slate' introduction next week...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody seems a little threatened by Apple 's 'slate ' introduction next week.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody seems a little threatened by Apple's 'slate' introduction next week...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846664</id>
	<title>Language?</title>
	<author>FyRE666</author>
	<datestamp>1264092900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Anyone know what language(s) will be used for app development on this device? Assuming it has a very slow CPU, so Java is probably out?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know what language ( s ) will be used for app development on this device ?
Assuming it has a very slow CPU , so Java is probably out ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know what language(s) will be used for app development on this device?
Assuming it has a very slow CPU, so Java is probably out?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845506</id>
	<title>First Application</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264087740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Phone to make free calls on whispernet.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Phone to make free calls on whispernet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Phone to make free calls on whispernet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847788</id>
	<title>Everybody is so terrified of personal computers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264097460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It started with the video game consoles.  And that turned me off of video game consoles.  (Nintendo was my first corporate enemy, even predating my hatred of Microsoft.)</p><p>I thought it was dead, but then Apple came along with their iShit portable devices.  That's when I realized the idea never died; I had just kept it out of my life.  Now Amazon wants to sell sucky PCs too, where the software market is tightly controlled and the users can't run just whatever they want to.</p><p>Fuck 'em.  The personal computer revolution is not dead, and you cockroaches are going to be up against the wall some day.  Anything your iKindle can do, my generic programmable thing can do <em>better</em> so that's where all my money goes.  <em>You</em> don't get a fucking cent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It started with the video game consoles .
And that turned me off of video game consoles .
( Nintendo was my first corporate enemy , even predating my hatred of Microsoft .
) I thought it was dead , but then Apple came along with their iShit portable devices .
That 's when I realized the idea never died ; I had just kept it out of my life .
Now Amazon wants to sell sucky PCs too , where the software market is tightly controlled and the users ca n't run just whatever they want to.Fuck 'em .
The personal computer revolution is not dead , and you cockroaches are going to be up against the wall some day .
Anything your iKindle can do , my generic programmable thing can do better so that 's where all my money goes .
You do n't get a fucking cent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It started with the video game consoles.
And that turned me off of video game consoles.
(Nintendo was my first corporate enemy, even predating my hatred of Microsoft.
)I thought it was dead, but then Apple came along with their iShit portable devices.
That's when I realized the idea never died; I had just kept it out of my life.
Now Amazon wants to sell sucky PCs too, where the software market is tightly controlled and the users can't run just whatever they want to.Fuck 'em.
The personal computer revolution is not dead, and you cockroaches are going to be up against the wall some day.
Anything your iKindle can do, my generic programmable thing can do better so that's where all my money goes.
You don't get a fucking cent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846246</id>
	<title>Re:Convergence</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1264091040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Your choice of words made me throw up a little.</p><p>That in itself isn't so bad, but I didn't want to get it all over the keyboard so I had to retain it in my mouth till I could stomach it back down in there.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Your choice of words made me throw up a little.That in itself is n't so bad , but I did n't want to get it all over the keyboard so I had to retain it in my mouth till I could stomach it back down in there .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Your choice of words made me throw up a little.That in itself isn't so bad, but I didn't want to get it all over the keyboard so I had to retain it in my mouth till I could stomach it back down in there.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424</id>
	<title>Convergence</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264087320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can we get on with it already? I have a drawer full of devices.....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can we get on with it already ?
I have a drawer full of devices.... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can we get on with it already?
I have a drawer full of devices.....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845654</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>Ephemeriis</author>
	<datestamp>1264088460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the kindle (and E Ink in general) most efficient as displaying the same thing?  Why would I want something with a frame rate killing my kindle battery?</p></div><p>That was my first thought as well.</p><p>I don't know about the battery life...  It'll certainly go down...  But the refresh rate is going to be crap.</p><p>I'm not sure why they want to release the Zagat guide as an app...  I guess so it's more searchable?  Or it can update in real-time?  Seems like that would work pretty well as just a standard ebook...  Or an emagazine subscription...</p><p>As far as games go...  Something like sudoku or crosswords or something will probably work reasonably ok...  But the refresh rate is not going to be very good, and the UI is going to be very clunky.</p><p>I dunno...  The Kindle is fairly specialized hardware...  I'm not sure how well it will handle something other than displaying text.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct me if I 'm wrong but is n't the kindle ( and E Ink in general ) most efficient as displaying the same thing ?
Why would I want something with a frame rate killing my kindle battery ? That was my first thought as well.I do n't know about the battery life... It 'll certainly go down... But the refresh rate is going to be crap.I 'm not sure why they want to release the Zagat guide as an app... I guess so it 's more searchable ?
Or it can update in real-time ?
Seems like that would work pretty well as just a standard ebook... Or an emagazine subscription...As far as games go... Something like sudoku or crosswords or something will probably work reasonably ok... But the refresh rate is not going to be very good , and the UI is going to be very clunky.I dunno... The Kindle is fairly specialized hardware... I 'm not sure how well it will handle something other than displaying text .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the kindle (and E Ink in general) most efficient as displaying the same thing?
Why would I want something with a frame rate killing my kindle battery?That was my first thought as well.I don't know about the battery life...  It'll certainly go down...  But the refresh rate is going to be crap.I'm not sure why they want to release the Zagat guide as an app...  I guess so it's more searchable?
Or it can update in real-time?
Seems like that would work pretty well as just a standard ebook...  Or an emagazine subscription...As far as games go...  Something like sudoku or crosswords or something will probably work reasonably ok...  But the refresh rate is not going to be very good, and the UI is going to be very clunky.I dunno...  The Kindle is fairly specialized hardware...  I'm not sure how well it will handle something other than displaying text.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30850112</id>
	<title>Re:Apple Competition</title>
	<author>DragonWriter</author>
	<datestamp>1264107540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Somebody seems a little threatened by Apple's 'slate' introduction next week...</p></div></blockquote><p>Or, concerned that the Kindle isn't making as much money as they'd like, and that there are lots of <i>existing, available</i> mobile products that can be used as ebook readers <i>and</i> app platforms (netbooks, smartphones, tablets that consumers can buy today) that compete with it for consumers attention (and, more importantly, money), as well as a number of new announcements of such products <i>that have recently been made</i> (e.g., at CES).</p><p>Not everything in the world is about Apple.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Somebody seems a little threatened by Apple 's 'slate ' introduction next week...Or , concerned that the Kindle is n't making as much money as they 'd like , and that there are lots of existing , available mobile products that can be used as ebook readers and app platforms ( netbooks , smartphones , tablets that consumers can buy today ) that compete with it for consumers attention ( and , more importantly , money ) , as well as a number of new announcements of such products that have recently been made ( e.g. , at CES ) .Not everything in the world is about Apple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somebody seems a little threatened by Apple's 'slate' introduction next week...Or, concerned that the Kindle isn't making as much money as they'd like, and that there are lots of existing, available mobile products that can be used as ebook readers and app platforms (netbooks, smartphones, tablets that consumers can buy today) that compete with it for consumers attention (and, more importantly, money), as well as a number of new announcements of such products that have recently been made (e.g., at CES).Not everything in the world is about Apple.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845656</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845726</id>
	<title>Re:Convergence</title>
	<author>jgagnon</author>
	<datestamp>1264088820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That would be a lot easier to pull off if everything happened at the same time.  Therefore, the key to convergence is time travel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That would be a lot easier to pull off if everything happened at the same time .
Therefore , the key to convergence is time travel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That would be a lot easier to pull off if everything happened at the same time.
Therefore, the key to convergence is time travel.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845490</id>
	<title>Wait, what?</title>
	<author>Drethon</author>
	<datestamp>1264087680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the kindle (and E Ink in general) most efficient as displaying the same thing?  Why would I want something with a frame rate killing my kindle battery?<br>
<br>
Just my bent $0.02</htmltext>
<tokenext>Correct me if I 'm wrong but is n't the kindle ( and E Ink in general ) most efficient as displaying the same thing ?
Why would I want something with a frame rate killing my kindle battery ?
Just my bent $ 0.02</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the kindle (and E Ink in general) most efficient as displaying the same thing?
Why would I want something with a frame rate killing my kindle battery?
Just my bent $0.02</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846802</id>
	<title>What about opening the Java application?</title>
	<author>Giordano</author>
	<datestamp>1264093620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>One thing that is an absolute pain is that the Kindle has no folder management, and as such, no way to organize the books that are downloaded. Sure, it'll hold 3000 e-books, but try paging through the list. And the startup time is proportional to the length of the list.</p><p>Opening up the e-book application interface would go a long way to getting features that Amazon seems disinclined to provide themselves.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One thing that is an absolute pain is that the Kindle has no folder management , and as such , no way to organize the books that are downloaded .
Sure , it 'll hold 3000 e-books , but try paging through the list .
And the startup time is proportional to the length of the list.Opening up the e-book application interface would go a long way to getting features that Amazon seems disinclined to provide themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One thing that is an absolute pain is that the Kindle has no folder management, and as such, no way to organize the books that are downloaded.
Sure, it'll hold 3000 e-books, but try paging through the list.
And the startup time is proportional to the length of the list.Opening up the e-book application interface would go a long way to getting features that Amazon seems disinclined to provide themselves.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845518</id>
	<title>You can play DOOM on a Kindle</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264087860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..at 0.2 FPS</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..at 0.2 FPS</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..at 0.2 FPS</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846848</id>
	<title>Simple apps, but this could be good.</title>
	<author>bhartman34</author>
	<datestamp>1264093800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I see EA Games maybe releasing Scrabble, but I think the big draw for the development kit will be things like notes applications, calendars, and the like.  Hopefully a decent e-mail client, too (although I wonder how much they'll allow with the Internet connection, since they're currently footing the bill for Internet charges on the cell radio).</htmltext>
<tokenext>I see EA Games maybe releasing Scrabble , but I think the big draw for the development kit will be things like notes applications , calendars , and the like .
Hopefully a decent e-mail client , too ( although I wonder how much they 'll allow with the Internet connection , since they 're currently footing the bill for Internet charges on the cell radio ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I see EA Games maybe releasing Scrabble, but I think the big draw for the development kit will be things like notes applications, calendars, and the like.
Hopefully a decent e-mail client, too (although I wonder how much they'll allow with the Internet connection, since they're currently footing the bill for Internet charges on the cell radio).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845480</id>
	<title>EA games on the Kindle?</title>
	<author>alen</author>
	<datestamp>1264087620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Madden 2011 in black and white? is it 3d accelerated like on the iphone?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Madden 2011 in black and white ?
is it 3d accelerated like on the iphone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Madden 2011 in black and white?
is it 3d accelerated like on the iphone?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845584</id>
	<title>Re:games?</title>
	<author>Deag</author>
	<datestamp>1264088100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree any app that has any sort of interactivity will be sluggish. It does sequential reading well</p><p>The refresh rate on current models will really limit this. Might be ok for crossword puzzles and sudoku.</p><p>Although the current way it allows books to be read is fairly limited, (table of contents, basic search) the article mentioned more interactive books, such as cookbooks. And this might be where it will be useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree any app that has any sort of interactivity will be sluggish .
It does sequential reading wellThe refresh rate on current models will really limit this .
Might be ok for crossword puzzles and sudoku.Although the current way it allows books to be read is fairly limited , ( table of contents , basic search ) the article mentioned more interactive books , such as cookbooks .
And this might be where it will be useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree any app that has any sort of interactivity will be sluggish.
It does sequential reading wellThe refresh rate on current models will really limit this.
Might be ok for crossword puzzles and sudoku.Although the current way it allows books to be read is fairly limited, (table of contents, basic search) the article mentioned more interactive books, such as cookbooks.
And this might be where it will be useful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847346</id>
	<title>Re:Wait, what?</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1264095840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who cares about battery life? It's PORN after all!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who cares about battery life ?
It 's PORN after all !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who cares about battery life?
It's PORN after all!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847392</id>
	<title>I Don't Believe It</title>
	<author>ideonexus</author>
	<datestamp>1264095960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Let me get this straight. My Kindle doesn't have the functionality to store my library in categories, meaning I have to hack in metatags on all my ebooks using the note-taking feature and search that if I wan't find just my books on Computer Science or Science Fiction, the recent upgrade to my Kindle allows me to view PDF files, but not zoom in on their page content, meaning I still can't read PDF's on it unless I pack a magnifying glass, and I have no way of exporting the personal notes I take on it to a text file or other non-kindle-readable format.
</p><p>
I don't mind these shortcomings, because the whole point of my Kindle is not having to reading books on my cellphone or computer monitor, but now I'm supposed to believe I will soon be getting games on this device currently lacking so many basic features? I'm not drinking this kool aide.
</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Let me get this straight .
My Kindle does n't have the functionality to store my library in categories , meaning I have to hack in metatags on all my ebooks using the note-taking feature and search that if I wa n't find just my books on Computer Science or Science Fiction , the recent upgrade to my Kindle allows me to view PDF files , but not zoom in on their page content , meaning I still ca n't read PDF 's on it unless I pack a magnifying glass , and I have no way of exporting the personal notes I take on it to a text file or other non-kindle-readable format .
I do n't mind these shortcomings , because the whole point of my Kindle is not having to reading books on my cellphone or computer monitor , but now I 'm supposed to believe I will soon be getting games on this device currently lacking so many basic features ?
I 'm not drinking this kool aide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Let me get this straight.
My Kindle doesn't have the functionality to store my library in categories, meaning I have to hack in metatags on all my ebooks using the note-taking feature and search that if I wan't find just my books on Computer Science or Science Fiction, the recent upgrade to my Kindle allows me to view PDF files, but not zoom in on their page content, meaning I still can't read PDF's on it unless I pack a magnifying glass, and I have no way of exporting the personal notes I take on it to a text file or other non-kindle-readable format.
I don't mind these shortcomings, because the whole point of my Kindle is not having to reading books on my cellphone or computer monitor, but now I'm supposed to believe I will soon be getting games on this device currently lacking so many basic features?
I'm not drinking this kool aide.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845672</id>
	<title>I'm not really sure what good does this do</title>
	<author>defireman</author>
	<datestamp>1264088580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't the point of the kindle to display static content really well, thus minimizing battery consumption? With games being developed for the Kindle, I can't help but wonder what that does do to the batter life expectancy of the device. On top of that, the Kindle has a monochrome screen - it'd be like shelling out $259 for a game boy all over again. <br>
Add on the other restrictions, such as no VOIP or no generic reader software, and the whole endeavor seems kinda pointless.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't the point of the kindle to display static content really well , thus minimizing battery consumption ?
With games being developed for the Kindle , I ca n't help but wonder what that does do to the batter life expectancy of the device .
On top of that , the Kindle has a monochrome screen - it 'd be like shelling out $ 259 for a game boy all over again .
Add on the other restrictions , such as no VOIP or no generic reader software , and the whole endeavor seems kinda pointless .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't the point of the kindle to display static content really well, thus minimizing battery consumption?
With games being developed for the Kindle, I can't help but wonder what that does do to the batter life expectancy of the device.
On top of that, the Kindle has a monochrome screen - it'd be like shelling out $259 for a game boy all over again.
Add on the other restrictions, such as no VOIP or no generic reader software, and the whole endeavor seems kinda pointless.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845514
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846980
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845472
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30853384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30858318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30848240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847894
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845910
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30849298
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845436
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30850112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845656
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_21_1331223_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846246
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845786
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30850112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845436
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30848240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847028
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846246
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846284
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30858318
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846664
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30853384
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30849298
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845862
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845628
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30848758
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846744
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845480
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846094
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845514
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845584
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845748
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845910
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847894
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_21_1331223.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30845472
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30847048
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_21_1331223.30846980
</commentlist>
</conversation>
