<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_20_2224247</id>
	<title>Correlation Found Between Brain Structure and Video Game Success</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1263984600000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://www.thekartel.com/kghapa/blog/2010/01/20/new\_research\_shows\_correlation\_between\_brain\_size\_and\_video\_games\_success" rel="nofollow">kghapa</a> writes <i>"Still want to argue that video games shrink your brain? While video games have been previously shown to stimulate brain activity and improve coordination skills, a recently published study has <a href="http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2010/01/20/2179437.aspx">directly linked structures in the human brain with video game aptitude</a>. And yes, apparently size does matter in this case. Quoting: '... each subject received 20 hours of training to play a video game specifically created for research purposes, called <em>Space Fortress</em>. It's basically an <em>Asteroids</em>-type arcade game, in which the object is to knock down and destroy an enemy fortress while dodging space mines. However, the game has lots of extra twists that require close attention. Some of the players were told to focus exclusively on running up a high score, while others were told to shift their priorities between several goals. The result? The subjects who had more volume in an area called the nucleus accumbens did significantly better in the early stages of training. Meanwhile, those who were well-endowed in different areas of the striatum, known as the caudate nucleus and putamen, handled the shifting strategies better.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>kghapa writes " Still want to argue that video games shrink your brain ?
While video games have been previously shown to stimulate brain activity and improve coordination skills , a recently published study has directly linked structures in the human brain with video game aptitude .
And yes , apparently size does matter in this case .
Quoting : '... each subject received 20 hours of training to play a video game specifically created for research purposes , called Space Fortress .
It 's basically an Asteroids-type arcade game , in which the object is to knock down and destroy an enemy fortress while dodging space mines .
However , the game has lots of extra twists that require close attention .
Some of the players were told to focus exclusively on running up a high score , while others were told to shift their priorities between several goals .
The result ?
The subjects who had more volume in an area called the nucleus accumbens did significantly better in the early stages of training .
Meanwhile , those who were well-endowed in different areas of the striatum , known as the caudate nucleus and putamen , handled the shifting strategies better .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kghapa writes "Still want to argue that video games shrink your brain?
While video games have been previously shown to stimulate brain activity and improve coordination skills, a recently published study has directly linked structures in the human brain with video game aptitude.
And yes, apparently size does matter in this case.
Quoting: '... each subject received 20 hours of training to play a video game specifically created for research purposes, called Space Fortress.
It's basically an Asteroids-type arcade game, in which the object is to knock down and destroy an enemy fortress while dodging space mines.
However, the game has lots of extra twists that require close attention.
Some of the players were told to focus exclusively on running up a high score, while others were told to shift their priorities between several goals.
The result?
The subjects who had more volume in an area called the nucleus accumbens did significantly better in the early stages of training.
Meanwhile, those who were well-endowed in different areas of the striatum, known as the caudate nucleus and putamen, handled the shifting strategies better.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839782</id>
	<title>The Story on Fox News:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263990840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In other news, the area of the brain linked to violent behavior found. Subjects with larger brain structures more successful at violence, more prone to murder.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In other news , the area of the brain linked to violent behavior found .
Subjects with larger brain structures more successful at violence , more prone to murder .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In other news, the area of the brain linked to violent behavior found.
Subjects with larger brain structures more successful at violence, more prone to murder.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839796</id>
	<title>That can't be it...</title>
	<author>Eberlin</author>
	<datestamp>1263990900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And here I thought my fast reflexes and hand-eye coordination were due to my abnormally large midi-chlorian count.  With this article, I'll never convince my brother that I'm a jedi knight!  Buzzkilled by science once again.  "This is not the article you're looking for."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And here I thought my fast reflexes and hand-eye coordination were due to my abnormally large midi-chlorian count .
With this article , I 'll never convince my brother that I 'm a jedi knight !
Buzzkilled by science once again .
" This is not the article you 're looking for .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And here I thought my fast reflexes and hand-eye coordination were due to my abnormally large midi-chlorian count.
With this article, I'll never convince my brother that I'm a jedi knight!
Buzzkilled by science once again.
"This is not the article you're looking for.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839604</id>
	<title>Download?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263989940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds good - where is the download?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds good - where is the download ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds good - where is the download?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839384</id>
	<title>I have a new pickup line</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263988860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Hey baby, let me show you how well endowed my caudate nucleus is."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Hey baby , let me show you how well endowed my caudate nucleus is .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Hey baby, let me show you how well endowed my caudate nucleus is.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839416</id>
	<title>Re:Correlation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263989040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I'm waiting for the correlation between video game success and getting laid."</p><p>Gamers who aren't getting laid are simply playing games too much, or as a substitute for their lack of effort even if that lack of effort is a result of a distorted view of themelves which creates anxiety, it isn't hard to get laid there are enormous amounts of resources now.  Anyone who isn't getting laid has few excuses.</p><p>http://www.fastseduction.com/<br>http://www.charismaarts.com/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm waiting for the correlation between video game success and getting laid .
" Gamers who are n't getting laid are simply playing games too much , or as a substitute for their lack of effort even if that lack of effort is a result of a distorted view of themelves which creates anxiety , it is n't hard to get laid there are enormous amounts of resources now .
Anyone who is n't getting laid has few excuses.http : //www.fastseduction.com/http : //www.charismaarts.com/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I'm waiting for the correlation between video game success and getting laid.
"Gamers who aren't getting laid are simply playing games too much, or as a substitute for their lack of effort even if that lack of effort is a result of a distorted view of themelves which creates anxiety, it isn't hard to get laid there are enormous amounts of resources now.
Anyone who isn't getting laid has few excuses.http://www.fastseduction.com/http://www.charismaarts.com/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30844924</id>
	<title>Please do not forget</title>
	<author>Aceticon</author>
	<datestamp>1264084020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With regards to the article title ("Correlation Found Between Brain Structure and Video Game Success"), after seeing that this article seems to be missing posts with the adequate meme, in the interest of completness and as per Slashdot tradition I would like to remind everybody that:</p><p><i>Correlation is not Causation</i></p><p>Thank you for your time.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With regards to the article title ( " Correlation Found Between Brain Structure and Video Game Success " ) , after seeing that this article seems to be missing posts with the adequate meme , in the interest of completness and as per Slashdot tradition I would like to remind everybody that : Correlation is not CausationThank you for your time .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With regards to the article title ("Correlation Found Between Brain Structure and Video Game Success"), after seeing that this article seems to be missing posts with the adequate meme, in the interest of completness and as per Slashdot tradition I would like to remind everybody that:Correlation is not CausationThank you for your time.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839340</id>
	<title>What this study proves is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263988740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That corporate video game companies will hire monkeys to test video games and pay them in peanuts to save the money for their annual bonuses.  Most gamers won't notice the quality difference.</htmltext>
<tokenext>That corporate video game companies will hire monkeys to test video games and pay them in peanuts to save the money for their annual bonuses .
Most gamers wo n't notice the quality difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That corporate video game companies will hire monkeys to test video games and pay them in peanuts to save the money for their annual bonuses.
Most gamers won't notice the quality difference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840132</id>
	<title>Re:Asteroids Type?</title>
	<author>MindlessAutomata</author>
	<datestamp>1263992280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How many people have heard of Asteroids versus "Star Castle?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How many people have heard of Asteroids versus " Star Castle ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How many people have heard of Asteroids versus "Star Castle?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839530</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840234</id>
	<title>Re:Correlation</title>
	<author>skine</author>
	<datestamp>1263992820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's like the Alphabet Game for nerds.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like the Alphabet Game for nerds .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like the Alphabet Game for nerds.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840888</id>
	<title>The Pinball Wizard.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263996780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What are the implications for that deaf, dumb and blind kid then?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What are the implications for that deaf , dumb and blind kid then ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What are the implications for that deaf, dumb and blind kid then?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30842636</id>
	<title>Re:Err... phallic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264012080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To be honest when I saw 'size' and 'gamers' my first thought was BMI.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To be honest when I saw 'size ' and 'gamers ' my first thought was BMI .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To be honest when I saw 'size' and 'gamers' my first thought was BMI.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839760</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839634</id>
	<title>Re:Correlation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263990060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm waiting for a correlation between those who 'get laid' with the implication that that means "sex is all I care about" to those who actually have dynamic lives above the reptilian brain stem...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for a correlation between those who 'get laid ' with the implication that that means " sex is all I care about " to those who actually have dynamic lives above the reptilian brain stem.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for a correlation between those who 'get laid' with the implication that that means "sex is all I care about" to those who actually have dynamic lives above the reptilian brain stem...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840936</id>
	<title>Re:So, theiy're saying --</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263997140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes they are, take yourself for instance, the part of your brain dedicated to trolling is much larger than the average.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes they are , take yourself for instance , the part of your brain dedicated to trolling is much larger than the average .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes they are, take yourself for instance, the part of your brain dedicated to trolling is much larger than the average.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839492</id>
	<title>Re:Correlation</title>
	<author>swanzilla</author>
	<datestamp>1263989340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>up up down down left right left right b a start</htmltext>
<tokenext>up up down down left right left right b a start</tokentext>
<sentencetext>up up down down left right left right b a start</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30842542</id>
	<title>Bigger How?</title>
	<author>DynaSoar</author>
	<datestamp>1264011360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not clear from TFA or the abstract whether the volumes measured were absolute or in proportion to overall brain volume. A bigger brain will have bigger parts usually, but it may need them all bigger to run the thing. A smaller brain with a larger part might have more of that function than it requires, lending to greater ability. Anyone got access to the PDF to see how they define volume?</p><p>Size itself can be a contributor to greater or lesser processing according to what and where. We found that the larger the cross section of the foremost part of the corpus callosum (larger taken as a fraction of overall volume) had greater attentional abilities, particularly disattention. We also found that the smaller the portion of Broca's area that became engaged, the greater the ability to read something cold and make themselves sound natural rather than stilted as though they were reading aloud. They both make sense in different ways -- the former is a collection connections between hemispheres, essentially a cable trunk, so greater volume = more neurons or bigger/more efficient/effective neurons, or something similar. In the latter, the smaller area is likely a function of greater interconnection allowing for more processing, more complex processing, faster processing due to less distance, or something like these.</p><p>In any case, all the parts examined in TFA are controlled in large part by the dopamine system, meaning they're involved in reward. That's reward in the Skinnerian sense -- reinforcement -- not in the sense of causing a good feeling. They're all involved in learning. The tasks measured were scored according to how well/fast someone learned the task or strategies/tactics that worked. So it all makes good plain old sense, as does much of the more nuts and bolts stuff in neuroscience.</p><p>A point of clarification vs. the Cosmic Log write up: they failed to find an interaction with the hippocampus, as opposed to finding none. Absence of evidence, etc.  That doesn't mean it's not there, just that they failed to detect it if it was.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not clear from TFA or the abstract whether the volumes measured were absolute or in proportion to overall brain volume .
A bigger brain will have bigger parts usually , but it may need them all bigger to run the thing .
A smaller brain with a larger part might have more of that function than it requires , lending to greater ability .
Anyone got access to the PDF to see how they define volume ? Size itself can be a contributor to greater or lesser processing according to what and where .
We found that the larger the cross section of the foremost part of the corpus callosum ( larger taken as a fraction of overall volume ) had greater attentional abilities , particularly disattention .
We also found that the smaller the portion of Broca 's area that became engaged , the greater the ability to read something cold and make themselves sound natural rather than stilted as though they were reading aloud .
They both make sense in different ways -- the former is a collection connections between hemispheres , essentially a cable trunk , so greater volume = more neurons or bigger/more efficient/effective neurons , or something similar .
In the latter , the smaller area is likely a function of greater interconnection allowing for more processing , more complex processing , faster processing due to less distance , or something like these.In any case , all the parts examined in TFA are controlled in large part by the dopamine system , meaning they 're involved in reward .
That 's reward in the Skinnerian sense -- reinforcement -- not in the sense of causing a good feeling .
They 're all involved in learning .
The tasks measured were scored according to how well/fast someone learned the task or strategies/tactics that worked .
So it all makes good plain old sense , as does much of the more nuts and bolts stuff in neuroscience.A point of clarification vs. the Cosmic Log write up : they failed to find an interaction with the hippocampus , as opposed to finding none .
Absence of evidence , etc .
That does n't mean it 's not there , just that they failed to detect it if it was .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not clear from TFA or the abstract whether the volumes measured were absolute or in proportion to overall brain volume.
A bigger brain will have bigger parts usually, but it may need them all bigger to run the thing.
A smaller brain with a larger part might have more of that function than it requires, lending to greater ability.
Anyone got access to the PDF to see how they define volume?Size itself can be a contributor to greater or lesser processing according to what and where.
We found that the larger the cross section of the foremost part of the corpus callosum (larger taken as a fraction of overall volume) had greater attentional abilities, particularly disattention.
We also found that the smaller the portion of Broca's area that became engaged, the greater the ability to read something cold and make themselves sound natural rather than stilted as though they were reading aloud.
They both make sense in different ways -- the former is a collection connections between hemispheres, essentially a cable trunk, so greater volume = more neurons or bigger/more efficient/effective neurons, or something similar.
In the latter, the smaller area is likely a function of greater interconnection allowing for more processing, more complex processing, faster processing due to less distance, or something like these.In any case, all the parts examined in TFA are controlled in large part by the dopamine system, meaning they're involved in reward.
That's reward in the Skinnerian sense -- reinforcement -- not in the sense of causing a good feeling.
They're all involved in learning.
The tasks measured were scored according to how well/fast someone learned the task or strategies/tactics that worked.
So it all makes good plain old sense, as does much of the more nuts and bolts stuff in neuroscience.A point of clarification vs. the Cosmic Log write up: they failed to find an interaction with the hippocampus, as opposed to finding none.
Absence of evidence, etc.
That doesn't mean it's not there, just that they failed to detect it if it was.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30842046</id>
	<title>Space Fortress? Neh.</title>
	<author>ub3r n3u7r4l1st</author>
	<datestamp>1264007040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Team Fortress will work much better.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Team Fortress will work much better .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Team Fortress will work much better.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839502</id>
	<title>Re:Correlation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263989400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm waiting for the correlation between video game success and getting laid.</p></div><p>Sadly the correlation is an inverse one. It's why jocks get laid more.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the correlation between video game success and getting laid.Sadly the correlation is an inverse one .
It 's why jocks get laid more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the correlation between video game success and getting laid.Sadly the correlation is an inverse one.
It's why jocks get laid more.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324</id>
	<title>Correlation</title>
	<author>amicusNYCL</author>
	<datestamp>1263988680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm waiting for the correlation between video game success and getting laid.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for the correlation between video game success and getting laid .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for the correlation between video game success and getting laid.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30841126</id>
	<title>HOLY SHIT!!!</title>
	<author>SeNtM</author>
	<datestamp>1263998820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A study which actually states its correlation and not causation!  With the gross misinterpretation of studies and statistics, I am surprised the headline didn't read "Study Finds Brain Structure is the Cause of Video Game Success!"</htmltext>
<tokenext>A study which actually states its correlation and not causation !
With the gross misinterpretation of studies and statistics , I am surprised the headline did n't read " Study Finds Brain Structure is the Cause of Video Game Success !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A study which actually states its correlation and not causation!
With the gross misinterpretation of studies and statistics, I am surprised the headline didn't read "Study Finds Brain Structure is the Cause of Video Game Success!
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839566</id>
	<title>Freud</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263989820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Somehow, the motherboard is a significant factor. And sometimes a joystick is just a joystick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somehow , the motherboard is a significant factor .
And sometimes a joystick is just a joystick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Somehow, the motherboard is a significant factor.
And sometimes a joystick is just a joystick.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839720</id>
	<title>I want to play!</title>
	<author>nilbog</author>
	<datestamp>1263990540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought the game sounded like fun so I looked it up.  You can find it here: <a href="http://cogworks.cogsci.rpi.edu/?view=modules.research.spec&amp;id=74" title="rpi.edu">http://cogworks.cogsci.rpi.edu/?view=modules.research.spec&amp;id=74</a> [rpi.edu]  The page is down, so you may need to check the Google Cache.  It does not appear to be available to the general public.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought the game sounded like fun so I looked it up .
You can find it here : http : //cogworks.cogsci.rpi.edu/ ? view = modules.research.spec&amp;id = 74 [ rpi.edu ] The page is down , so you may need to check the Google Cache .
It does not appear to be available to the general public .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought the game sounded like fun so I looked it up.
You can find it here: http://cogworks.cogsci.rpi.edu/?view=modules.research.spec&amp;id=74 [rpi.edu]  The page is down, so you may need to check the Google Cache.
It does not appear to be available to the general public.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839444</id>
	<title>Re:Correlation</title>
	<author>BigSlowTarget</author>
	<datestamp>1263989160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Expect a long wait</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Expect a long wait</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Expect a long wait</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30841040</id>
	<title>Man...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263998040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I read that as Dwarf Fortress, not Space Fortress. Just when I thought all those hours of DF might actually mean something...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I read that as Dwarf Fortress , not Space Fortress .
Just when I thought all those hours of DF might actually mean something.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read that as Dwarf Fortress, not Space Fortress.
Just when I thought all those hours of DF might actually mean something...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840664</id>
	<title>Re:More developed specialized area of the brain...</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1263995400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After beating a dungeon boss in Final Fantasy...</p><p>"I just leveled up in my brain!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After beating a dungeon boss in Final Fantasy... " I just leveled up in my brain !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After beating a dungeon boss in Final Fantasy..."I just leveled up in my brain!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839898</id>
	<title>Re:Correlation</title>
	<author>S77IM</author>
	<datestamp>1263991320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Correlation is not causation!!!!!</p><p>Wait, that doesn't even make sense here.</p><p>
&nbsp; -- 77IM</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Correlation is not causation ! ! ! !
! Wait , that does n't even make sense here .
  -- 77IM</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Correlation is not causation!!!!
!Wait, that doesn't even make sense here.
  -- 77IM</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840160</id>
	<title>Useful</title>
	<author>Amorymeltzer</author>
	<datestamp>1263992460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is fantastic information to have.  You know, because of all the times in everyday life where you need to either gets lots of points or do different things rapidly.  Let's see, there's sports and... sports?  People good at video games are good at sports?</p><p>Uh huh. *rolls eyes*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is fantastic information to have .
You know , because of all the times in everyday life where you need to either gets lots of points or do different things rapidly .
Let 's see , there 's sports and... sports ? People good at video games are good at sports ? Uh huh .
* rolls eyes *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is fantastic information to have.
You know, because of all the times in everyday life where you need to either gets lots of points or do different things rapidly.
Let's see, there's sports and... sports?  People good at video games are good at sports?Uh huh.
*rolls eyes*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839654</id>
	<title>Graphics?</title>
	<author>Froboz23</author>
	<datestamp>1263990180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The study is interesting enough, but they need to work on their visuals.  The game's graphics barely compete with <a href="http://www.atariage.com/forums/blog/138-trogblog/page\_\_tag\_\_Stellar\%20Fortress" title="atariage.com">Stellar Fortress for the Atari 2600...</a> [atariage.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>The study is interesting enough , but they need to work on their visuals .
The game 's graphics barely compete with Stellar Fortress for the Atari 2600... [ atariage.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The study is interesting enough, but they need to work on their visuals.
The game's graphics barely compete with Stellar Fortress for the Atari 2600... [atariage.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839312</id>
	<title>So, theiy're saying --</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1263988620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>-- people are different! OMFG!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>-- people are different !
OMFG !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>-- people are different!
OMFG!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840218</id>
	<title>Re:Asteroids Type?</title>
	<author>nedlohs</author>
	<datestamp>1263992700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have never heard of Star Castle. I know exactly what Asteroids.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have never heard of Star Castle .
I know exactly what Asteroids .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have never heard of Star Castle.
I know exactly what Asteroids.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839530</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840868</id>
	<title>Re:So, theiy're saying --</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263996660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You could say that about any study, including very important ones that have probably caused you to live as long as you have. Sure, this one doesn't seem as important but that's no way to dismiss it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You could say that about any study , including very important ones that have probably caused you to live as long as you have .
Sure , this one does n't seem as important but that 's no way to dismiss it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could say that about any study, including very important ones that have probably caused you to live as long as you have.
Sure, this one doesn't seem as important but that's no way to dismiss it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839312</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30846886</id>
	<title>Re:Correlation</title>
	<author>shabtai87</author>
	<datestamp>1264093980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>addqd</htmltext>
<tokenext>addqd</tokentext>
<sentencetext>addqd</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839492</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30844384</id>
	<title>Re:Correlation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264078320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm waiting for a correlation between those who 'get laid' with the implication that that means "sex is all I care about" to those who actually have dynamic lives above the reptilian brain stem...</p></div><p>This is slashdot, nobody here have dynamic lives above or below the reptilian brain stem assuming that by dynamic you mean (or include) some sort of social interaction not involving a keyboard.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm waiting for a correlation between those who 'get laid ' with the implication that that means " sex is all I care about " to those who actually have dynamic lives above the reptilian brain stem...This is slashdot , nobody here have dynamic lives above or below the reptilian brain stem assuming that by dynamic you mean ( or include ) some sort of social interaction not involving a keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm waiting for a correlation between those who 'get laid' with the implication that that means "sex is all I care about" to those who actually have dynamic lives above the reptilian brain stem...This is slashdot, nobody here have dynamic lives above or below the reptilian brain stem assuming that by dynamic you mean (or include) some sort of social interaction not involving a keyboard.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839892</id>
	<title>Meh</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1263991320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone has the same hormones. If some guys want to waste theirs growing big brains, that's their business.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone has the same hormones .
If some guys want to waste theirs growing big brains , that 's their business .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone has the same hormones.
If some guys want to waste theirs growing big brains, that's their business.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839400</id>
	<title>Re:Correlation</title>
	<author>Bragador</author>
	<datestamp>1263988920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the correlation you were looking for: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OzWIFX8M-Y" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OzWIFX8M-Y</a> [youtube.com] </p><p>Look at all those girls...</p><p>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the correlation you were looking for : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = 0OzWIFX8M-Y [ youtube.com ] Look at all those girls... : -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the correlation you were looking for: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OzWIFX8M-Y [youtube.com] Look at all those girls...:-P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30841132</id>
	<title>Where can I...</title>
	<author>v(*\_*)vvvv</author>
	<datestamp>1263998880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where can I get my brain size measured, and what can I take to make it bigger! Coming soon. Enzyte for gamers.</p><p>Watch me stroll through the arcades, as I intimidate you with my BIG head!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where can I get my brain size measured , and what can I take to make it bigger !
Coming soon .
Enzyte for gamers.Watch me stroll through the arcades , as I intimidate you with my BIG head !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where can I get my brain size measured, and what can I take to make it bigger!
Coming soon.
Enzyte for gamers.Watch me stroll through the arcades, as I intimidate you with my BIG head!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839760</id>
	<title>Err... phallic?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263990720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>size does matter</i> <br>
<i>those who were well-endowed</i> <br> <br>

What an incredibly phallic story.</htmltext>
<tokenext>size does matter those who were well-endowed What an incredibly phallic story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>size does matter 
those who were well-endowed  

What an incredibly phallic story.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839334</id>
	<title>I think I read this story...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263988740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When it was called Ender's Game.  Did he destroy the buggers?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When it was called Ender 's Game .
Did he destroy the buggers ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When it was called Ender's Game.
Did he destroy the buggers?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839298</id>
	<title>First(ish) Post</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263988560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>New research finds "First Posting linked to genius".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>New research finds " First Posting linked to genius " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>New research finds "First Posting linked to genius".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839998</id>
	<title>Re:More developed specialized area of the brain...</title>
	<author>interkin3tic</author>
	<datestamp>1263991740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Extra extra!</p><p>Slashdotter hears scientific finding loosely related to previously known scientific finding, can't think of immediate practical use for this knowledge, cynically implies said finding is trivial!</p><p>Slashdotter then likely returns to reloading the slashdot main page to read try to get another first post after skimming summary!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Extra extra ! Slashdotter hears scientific finding loosely related to previously known scientific finding , ca n't think of immediate practical use for this knowledge , cynically implies said finding is trivial ! Slashdotter then likely returns to reloading the slashdot main page to read try to get another first post after skimming summary !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Extra extra!Slashdotter hears scientific finding loosely related to previously known scientific finding, can't think of immediate practical use for this knowledge, cynically implies said finding is trivial!Slashdotter then likely returns to reloading the slashdot main page to read try to get another first post after skimming summary!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839386</id>
	<title>Oblig. PvP</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263988860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obligatory PvP reference:
<a href="http://www.pvponline.com/2004/04/06/tue-apr-06/" title="pvponline.com" rel="nofollow">"My brain is hung like a horse!"</a> [pvponline.com] </p><p>(Posting anonymously...)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obligatory PvP reference : " My brain is hung like a horse !
" [ pvponline.com ] ( Posting anonymously... )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obligatory PvP reference:
"My brain is hung like a horse!
" [pvponline.com] (Posting anonymously...)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30843998</id>
	<title>Re:More developed specialized area of the brain...</title>
	<author>bjourne</author>
	<datestamp>1264072980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You may want to shove your sarcasm up your butt because it is uncalled for.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You may want to shove your sarcasm up your butt because it is uncalled for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You may want to shove your sarcasm up your butt because it is uncalled for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839250</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840116</id>
	<title>Re:I want to play!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263992220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh ye of little research ability: <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/brain-training/browse\_thread/thread/458a2f4c212e86fb/954ef9456f6e7aca\%5C" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">http://groups.google.com/group/brain-training/browse\_thread/thread/458a2f4c212e86fb/954ef9456f6e7aca\%5C</a> [google.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh ye of little research ability : http : //groups.google.com/group/brain-training/browse \ _thread/thread/458a2f4c212e86fb/954ef9456f6e7aca \ % 5C [ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh ye of little research ability: http://groups.google.com/group/brain-training/browse\_thread/thread/458a2f4c212e86fb/954ef9456f6e7aca\%5C [google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839720</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839250</id>
	<title>More developed specialized area of the brain...</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263988380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...contributing to statistically greater success in tasks which might benefit from its function.</p><p>News at 11.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...contributing to statistically greater success in tasks which might benefit from its function.News at 11 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...contributing to statistically greater success in tasks which might benefit from its function.News at 11.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30844822</id>
	<title>Re:Correlation</title>
	<author>jimbolauski</author>
	<datestamp>1264083360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They started to scratch the surface on that study all ready
<br>
<br>FTA<p><div class="quote"><p>Meanwhile, those who were well-endowed in different areas...</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They started to scratch the surface on that study all ready FTAMeanwhile , those who were well-endowed in different areas.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They started to scratch the surface on that study all ready

FTAMeanwhile, those who were well-endowed in different areas...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839502</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839530</id>
	<title>Asteroids Type?</title>
	<author>Sponge Bath</author>
	<datestamp>1263989580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>Asteroids-type arcade game, in which the object is to knock down and destroy an enemy fortress while dodging space mines.</i></p><p>It sounds more like Star Castle, which *is* an Asteroids type game, but why not just come out and say Star Castle?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Asteroids-type arcade game , in which the object is to knock down and destroy an enemy fortress while dodging space mines.It sounds more like Star Castle , which * is * an Asteroids type game , but why not just come out and say Star Castle ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Asteroids-type arcade game, in which the object is to knock down and destroy an enemy fortress while dodging space mines.It sounds more like Star Castle, which *is* an Asteroids type game, but why not just come out and say Star Castle?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839530
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30844384
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839720
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839312
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30846886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839492
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30844822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839502
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30843998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839250
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2224247_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30842636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839760
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839400
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839416
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839502
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30844822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839634
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30844384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839898
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839492
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30846886
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840234
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839760
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30842636
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839312
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840868
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840116
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30841126
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30843998
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30844924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30842046
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839566
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30839530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30840132
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2224247.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2224247.30841132
</commentlist>
</conversation>
