<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_20_2141205</id>
	<title>NASA Will Crowdsource Its Photos of Mars</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1263981060000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>tedlistens writes <i>"NASA is <a href="http://www.motherboard.tv/2010/1/20/nasa-will-crowdsource-its-photos-of-mars">asking the public to suggest subjects for the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment</a>, or HiRISE, its super powerful camera currently orbiting Mars. Since it arrived there in 2006, the HiRISE camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has seen more success than that <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/01/12/1524216/NASA-Satellite-Looks-For-Response-From-Dead-Mars-Craft">lost lander</a>, recording nearly 13,000 observations of Martian terrain, with each image covering dozens of square miles and revealing details as small as a desk. By <a href="http://uahirise.org/suggest/">letting the public in on the Martian photo shoot</a>, scientists aren't just getting more people excited about space exploration. They're hoping that crowdsourcing imaging targets will increase the camera's already bountiful science return. Despite the thousands of pictures already taken, less than 1 percent of the Martian surface has been imaged."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>tedlistens writes " NASA is asking the public to suggest subjects for the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment , or HiRISE , its super powerful camera currently orbiting Mars .
Since it arrived there in 2006 , the HiRISE camera on NASA 's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has seen more success than that lost lander , recording nearly 13,000 observations of Martian terrain , with each image covering dozens of square miles and revealing details as small as a desk .
By letting the public in on the Martian photo shoot , scientists are n't just getting more people excited about space exploration .
They 're hoping that crowdsourcing imaging targets will increase the camera 's already bountiful science return .
Despite the thousands of pictures already taken , less than 1 percent of the Martian surface has been imaged .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>tedlistens writes "NASA is asking the public to suggest subjects for the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment, or HiRISE, its super powerful camera currently orbiting Mars.
Since it arrived there in 2006, the HiRISE camera on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has seen more success than that lost lander, recording nearly 13,000 observations of Martian terrain, with each image covering dozens of square miles and revealing details as small as a desk.
By letting the public in on the Martian photo shoot, scientists aren't just getting more people excited about space exploration.
They're hoping that crowdsourcing imaging targets will increase the camera's already bountiful science return.
Despite the thousands of pictures already taken, less than 1 percent of the Martian surface has been imaged.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30855828</id>
	<title>Re:Second Priority</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264090080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That is like so last year already....<br>http://mblogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/17/apollo-landing-sites-imaged-by-lro/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That is like so last year already....http : //mblogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/17/apollo-landing-sites-imaged-by-lro/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That is like so last year already....http://mblogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/07/17/apollo-landing-sites-imaged-by-lro/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30852708</id>
	<title>getting the public to look at Mars photos is easy.</title>
	<author>KiwiCanuck</author>
	<datestamp>1264072620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Just put a naked photo of Jessica Alba in the foreground.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Just put a naked photo of Jessica Alba in the foreground .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just put a naked photo of Jessica Alba in the foreground.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734</id>
	<title>Re:Second Priority</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263986160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since they are now claiming its possible to notice things as small as a Desk,</p><p>They need to send one of these up around the moon and prove the moon lander is there.</p><p>I don't know would be more annoying - finding out its faked or seeing conspiracy theorists reject it as evidence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since they are now claiming its possible to notice things as small as a Desk,They need to send one of these up around the moon and prove the moon lander is there.I do n't know would be more annoying - finding out its faked or seeing conspiracy theorists reject it as evidence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since they are now claiming its possible to notice things as small as a Desk,They need to send one of these up around the moon and prove the moon lander is there.I don't know would be more annoying - finding out its faked or seeing conspiracy theorists reject it as evidence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30843654</id>
	<title>Re:Second Priority</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264068180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If you are going to refer to something, please get it right.</p><p>The actual conspiracy theory is that we did indeed send men to the moon (Armstrong, Aldrin, et al).  However, what we found there indicated the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations, either artifacts or real living beings.  This information was immediately classified at the highest levels.  The photographic evidence of men on the moon was faked not because we didn't really go there, but because we found things there that NASA decided the public could not handle knowing.</p><p>That's how the conspiracy theory goes.  So, finding that the moon lander is there neither proves nor disproves it.  It would be evidence, but evidence of what?</p></div><p>You're thinking of the 1989 movie "Moontrap", starring Walter Koenig.</p><p>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097911/</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you are going to refer to something , please get it right.The actual conspiracy theory is that we did indeed send men to the moon ( Armstrong , Aldrin , et al ) .
However , what we found there indicated the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations , either artifacts or real living beings .
This information was immediately classified at the highest levels .
The photographic evidence of men on the moon was faked not because we did n't really go there , but because we found things there that NASA decided the public could not handle knowing.That 's how the conspiracy theory goes .
So , finding that the moon lander is there neither proves nor disproves it .
It would be evidence , but evidence of what ? You 're thinking of the 1989 movie " Moontrap " , starring Walter Koenig.http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0097911/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you are going to refer to something, please get it right.The actual conspiracy theory is that we did indeed send men to the moon (Armstrong, Aldrin, et al).
However, what we found there indicated the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations, either artifacts or real living beings.
This information was immediately classified at the highest levels.
The photographic evidence of men on the moon was faked not because we didn't really go there, but because we found things there that NASA decided the public could not handle knowing.That's how the conspiracy theory goes.
So, finding that the moon lander is there neither proves nor disproves it.
It would be evidence, but evidence of what?You're thinking of the 1989 movie "Moontrap", starring Walter Koenig.http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097911/
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30840674</id>
	<title>Re:Wait....</title>
	<author>RockWolf</author>
	<datestamp>1263995460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>They've found desks on Mars?!</p></div><p>There's definitely no intelligent life on Mars, then. Just paper-pushers.</p><p>Or whatever it is they use instead of paper.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've found desks on Mars ?
! There 's definitely no intelligent life on Mars , then .
Just paper-pushers.Or whatever it is they use instead of paper .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've found desks on Mars?
!There's definitely no intelligent life on Mars, then.
Just paper-pushers.Or whatever it is they use instead of paper.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838686</id>
	<title>Wait....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263985980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They've found desks on Mars?!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've found desks on Mars ?
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've found desks on Mars?
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839506</id>
	<title>Would you like to see Rock number 31455 or 98110?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263989460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course the images are beautiful and all, but the range in that 1\% probably represents the majority of terrain one would find on Mars. I wonder what exciting development they could possibly expect.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course the images are beautiful and all , but the range in that 1 \ % probably represents the majority of terrain one would find on Mars .
I wonder what exciting development they could possibly expect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course the images are beautiful and all, but the range in that 1\% probably represents the majority of terrain one would find on Mars.
I wonder what exciting development they could possibly expect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30840168</id>
	<title>Re:Second Priority</title>
	<author>gstoddart</author>
	<datestamp>1263992460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>I don't know would be more annoying - finding out its faked or seeing conspiracy theorists reject it as evidence.</p></div></blockquote><p>Well, until someone can refute the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar\_Laser\_Ranging\_experiment" title="wikipedia.org">Lunar Laser Ranging</a> [wikipedia.org] data (and do it using actual science instead of wacky conspiracy logic), I'm still putting my money on the landing being real.</p><p>If you <em>could</em> fake the lunar laser ranging stuff<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... well, you'd have made it to the moon, actually.  And, you'd have installed retroreflectors exactly where they are supposed to be.</p><p>What with the known speed of light and all of the other physics involved in this, I consider that to be fairly irrefutable.  Of course, that doesn't mean someone out there isn't going to try -- but it does mean they don't understand the physics they're trying to refute.</p><p>Cheers</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know would be more annoying - finding out its faked or seeing conspiracy theorists reject it as evidence.Well , until someone can refute the Lunar Laser Ranging [ wikipedia.org ] data ( and do it using actual science instead of wacky conspiracy logic ) , I 'm still putting my money on the landing being real.If you could fake the lunar laser ranging stuff ... well , you 'd have made it to the moon , actually .
And , you 'd have installed retroreflectors exactly where they are supposed to be.What with the known speed of light and all of the other physics involved in this , I consider that to be fairly irrefutable .
Of course , that does n't mean someone out there is n't going to try -- but it does mean they do n't understand the physics they 're trying to refute.Cheers</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know would be more annoying - finding out its faked or seeing conspiracy theorists reject it as evidence.Well, until someone can refute the Lunar Laser Ranging [wikipedia.org] data (and do it using actual science instead of wacky conspiracy logic), I'm still putting my money on the landing being real.If you could fake the lunar laser ranging stuff ... well, you'd have made it to the moon, actually.
And, you'd have installed retroreflectors exactly where they are supposed to be.What with the known speed of light and all of the other physics involved in this, I consider that to be fairly irrefutable.
Of course, that doesn't mean someone out there isn't going to try -- but it does mean they don't understand the physics they're trying to refute.Cheers
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839202</id>
	<title>Re:Second Priority</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1263988080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They need to send one of these up around the moon and prove the moon lander is there.</i></p><p>I'm not sure how that's supposed to be better evidence than the presence of mirrors for laser range-finding placed there by the astronauts that a variety of institutions around the world have used to measure the earth-moon distance (and of course in the process verifying their presence) would be.</p><p><i>I don't know would be more annoying - finding out its faked or seeing conspiracy theorists reject it as evidence.</i></p><p>Annoying?  If the probe provided evidence that the landings were "faked", meaning we could no longer see the landers that <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission\_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html" title="nasa.gov">the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter imaged only months ago</a> [nasa.gov] that wouldn't be <i>annoying</i>.  It'd be one of the most baffling mysteries in modern history!</p><p>The question wouldn't be "does this mean we never landed on the moon?", it'd be "who landed on the moon without telling anyone and stole the fucking landers?!"</p><p>Oh and obviously if the conspiracy theorists are not satisfied with the existing evidence, they will never be satisfied, because they simply don't want to be satisfied.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They need to send one of these up around the moon and prove the moon lander is there.I 'm not sure how that 's supposed to be better evidence than the presence of mirrors for laser range-finding placed there by the astronauts that a variety of institutions around the world have used to measure the earth-moon distance ( and of course in the process verifying their presence ) would be.I do n't know would be more annoying - finding out its faked or seeing conspiracy theorists reject it as evidence.Annoying ?
If the probe provided evidence that the landings were " faked " , meaning we could no longer see the landers that the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter imaged only months ago [ nasa.gov ] that would n't be annoying .
It 'd be one of the most baffling mysteries in modern history ! The question would n't be " does this mean we never landed on the moon ?
" , it 'd be " who landed on the moon without telling anyone and stole the fucking landers ? !
" Oh and obviously if the conspiracy theorists are not satisfied with the existing evidence , they will never be satisfied , because they simply do n't want to be satisfied .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need to send one of these up around the moon and prove the moon lander is there.I'm not sure how that's supposed to be better evidence than the presence of mirrors for laser range-finding placed there by the astronauts that a variety of institutions around the world have used to measure the earth-moon distance (and of course in the process verifying their presence) would be.I don't know would be more annoying - finding out its faked or seeing conspiracy theorists reject it as evidence.Annoying?
If the probe provided evidence that the landings were "faked", meaning we could no longer see the landers that the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter imaged only months ago [nasa.gov] that wouldn't be annoying.
It'd be one of the most baffling mysteries in modern history!The question wouldn't be "does this mean we never landed on the moon?
", it'd be "who landed on the moon without telling anyone and stole the fucking landers?!
"Oh and obviously if the conspiracy theorists are not satisfied with the existing evidence, they will never be satisfied, because they simply don't want to be satisfied.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30840912</id>
	<title>Google Mars maps upgrade</title>
	<author>Tuqui</author>
	<datestamp>1263996960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just waiting for the Google Mars upgrade.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just waiting for the Google Mars upgrade .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just waiting for the Google Mars upgrade.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839432</id>
	<title>Why the Phoenix Negativity?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263989160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Phoenix Lander was extremely successful.  It found exactly what it was sent to look for.  I don't know any better definition of success that that.  It was never designed to survive the winter... they are just looking to see if somehow it did.  The writer should be a little less cavalier.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Phoenix Lander was extremely successful .
It found exactly what it was sent to look for .
I do n't know any better definition of success that that .
It was never designed to survive the winter... they are just looking to see if somehow it did .
The writer should be a little less cavalier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Phoenix Lander was extremely successful.
It found exactly what it was sent to look for.
I don't know any better definition of success that that.
It was never designed to survive the winter... they are just looking to see if somehow it did.
The writer should be a little less cavalier.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839284</id>
	<title>As much land area as Earth</title>
	<author>Jeff1946</author>
	<datestamp>1263988500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Remember there is a lot to cover.  Mars has a similar land area to Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Remember there is a lot to cover .
Mars has a similar land area to Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Remember there is a lot to cover.
Mars has a similar land area to Earth.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30843366</id>
	<title>Glass worms of Mars</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264107540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about some hi res images of the glass worms of Mars <a href="http://www.enterprisemission.com/can.htm" title="enterprisemission.com">http://www.enterprisemission.com/can.htm</a> [enterprisemission.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about some hi res images of the glass worms of Mars http : //www.enterprisemission.com/can.htm [ enterprisemission.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about some hi res images of the glass worms of Mars http://www.enterprisemission.com/can.htm [enterprisemission.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839260</id>
	<title>Re:First Priority</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1263988440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is it really all that useful having 100,000 people <i>with zero technical experience or knowledge</i> looking at these pictures?<br>We might be able to identify gross features, but the nuances will be glossed over entirely.</p><p>But if it doesn't require any technical knowledge, NASA should start pumping out lesson plans and get school kids do the bulk of the dirty work.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it really all that useful having 100,000 people with zero technical experience or knowledge looking at these pictures ? We might be able to identify gross features , but the nuances will be glossed over entirely.But if it does n't require any technical knowledge , NASA should start pumping out lesson plans and get school kids do the bulk of the dirty work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it really all that useful having 100,000 people with zero technical experience or knowledge looking at these pictures?We might be able to identify gross features, but the nuances will be glossed over entirely.But if it doesn't require any technical knowledge, NASA should start pumping out lesson plans and get school kids do the bulk of the dirty work.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838900</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838816</id>
	<title>Re:Second Priority</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263986460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you are going to refer to something, please get it right.
<br> <br>
The actual conspiracy theory is that we did indeed send men to the moon (Armstrong, Aldrin, et al).  However, what we found there indicated the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations, either artifacts or real living beings.  This information was immediately classified at the highest levels.  The photographic evidence of men on the moon was faked not because we didn't really go there, but because we found things there that NASA decided the public could not handle knowing.
<br> <br>
That's how the conspiracy theory goes.  So, finding that the moon lander is there neither proves nor disproves it.  It would be evidence, but evidence of what?</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you are going to refer to something , please get it right .
The actual conspiracy theory is that we did indeed send men to the moon ( Armstrong , Aldrin , et al ) .
However , what we found there indicated the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations , either artifacts or real living beings .
This information was immediately classified at the highest levels .
The photographic evidence of men on the moon was faked not because we did n't really go there , but because we found things there that NASA decided the public could not handle knowing .
That 's how the conspiracy theory goes .
So , finding that the moon lander is there neither proves nor disproves it .
It would be evidence , but evidence of what ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you are going to refer to something, please get it right.
The actual conspiracy theory is that we did indeed send men to the moon (Armstrong, Aldrin, et al).
However, what we found there indicated the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations, either artifacts or real living beings.
This information was immediately classified at the highest levels.
The photographic evidence of men on the moon was faked not because we didn't really go there, but because we found things there that NASA decided the public could not handle knowing.
That's how the conspiracy theory goes.
So, finding that the moon lander is there neither proves nor disproves it.
It would be evidence, but evidence of what?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839028</id>
	<title>My vote would be</title>
	<author>MyBrotherSteve</author>
	<datestamp>1263987300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they've imaged 1\% of the surface of Mars, then my vote for new pictures would be (drum roll..................!) the OTHER 99\%

Thank you - no applause, please.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they 've imaged 1 \ % of the surface of Mars , then my vote for new pictures would be ( drum roll.................. !
) the OTHER 99 \ % Thank you - no applause , please .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they've imaged 1\% of the surface of Mars, then my vote for new pictures would be (drum roll..................!
) the OTHER 99\%

Thank you - no applause, please.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838904</id>
	<title>Re:Second Priority</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1263986820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You have weird priorities.</p><p>I would be outraged to learn that the landings were fake and don't care what fringe lunatics have to say.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You have weird priorities.I would be outraged to learn that the landings were fake and do n't care what fringe lunatics have to say .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You have weird priorities.I would be outraged to learn that the landings were fake and don't care what fringe lunatics have to say.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839192</id>
	<title>Find The Beagle2!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263988020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Kudos to the first person to find the Beagle2 (or the crater it made)</p><p>Sort of like finding Waldo on a much bigger scale.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Kudos to the first person to find the Beagle2 ( or the crater it made ) Sort of like finding Waldo on a much bigger scale .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kudos to the first person to find the Beagle2 (or the crater it made)Sort of like finding Waldo on a much bigger scale.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30841034</id>
	<title>Re:Second Priority</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1263997980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The actual conspiracy theory is that we did indeed send men to the moon (Armstrong, Aldrin, et al).</p></div></blockquote><p>It is?  The ones I remember were more along the lines that they didn't go at all - look at the flag, it's standing up even though there can't be a wind if there's no atmosphere yadda fucking yadda.</p><p>Coathangers schmoathangers and chickenwire schmickenwire already.  And a big hahahah to Mrs. Gorsky.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The actual conspiracy theory is that we did indeed send men to the moon ( Armstrong , Aldrin , et al ) .It is ?
The ones I remember were more along the lines that they did n't go at all - look at the flag , it 's standing up even though there ca n't be a wind if there 's no atmosphere yadda fucking yadda.Coathangers schmoathangers and chickenwire schmickenwire already .
And a big hahahah to Mrs. Gorsky .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The actual conspiracy theory is that we did indeed send men to the moon (Armstrong, Aldrin, et al).It is?
The ones I remember were more along the lines that they didn't go at all - look at the flag, it's standing up even though there can't be a wind if there's no atmosphere yadda fucking yadda.Coathangers schmoathangers and chickenwire schmickenwire already.
And a big hahahah to Mrs. Gorsky.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838816</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30842396</id>
	<title>Re:Second Priority</title>
	<author>RockDoctor</author>
	<datestamp>1264010280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Annoying? If the probe provided evidence that the landings were "faked", meaning we could no longer see the landers that the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter imaged only months ago [nasa.gov] that wouldn't be annoying. It'd be one of the most baffling mysteries in modern history!</p><p>The question wouldn't be "does this mean we never landed on the moon?", it'd be "who landed on the moon without telling anyone and stole the fucking landers?!"</p></div></blockquote><p>Brennan. He <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protector\_(novel)" title="wikipedia.org">does</a> [wikipedia.org] things like that. All he needs to have had done will be to will have had invented a time machine. The timing is right given the startup of the LHC a few months ago (even if I haven't got the grammar of time travel sufficiently deobfusticated).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Annoying ?
If the probe provided evidence that the landings were " faked " , meaning we could no longer see the landers that the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter imaged only months ago [ nasa.gov ] that would n't be annoying .
It 'd be one of the most baffling mysteries in modern history ! The question would n't be " does this mean we never landed on the moon ?
" , it 'd be " who landed on the moon without telling anyone and stole the fucking landers ? ! " Brennan .
He does [ wikipedia.org ] things like that .
All he needs to have had done will be to will have had invented a time machine .
The timing is right given the startup of the LHC a few months ago ( even if I have n't got the grammar of time travel sufficiently deobfusticated ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Annoying?
If the probe provided evidence that the landings were "faked", meaning we could no longer see the landers that the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter imaged only months ago [nasa.gov] that wouldn't be annoying.
It'd be one of the most baffling mysteries in modern history!The question wouldn't be "does this mean we never landed on the moon?
", it'd be "who landed on the moon without telling anyone and stole the fucking landers?!"Brennan.
He does [wikipedia.org] things like that.
All he needs to have had done will be to will have had invented a time machine.
The timing is right given the startup of the LHC a few months ago (even if I haven't got the grammar of time travel sufficiently deobfusticated).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839012</id>
	<title>Suggestion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263987240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not buy a rocket, round up Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh, put them in it, blast it off towards Mars, and have it crash land, scattering their corpses' body parts across the Martian plains, and take a picture of that. I bet I could find quite a few people that would pay good money to see that,...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not buy a rocket , round up Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh , put them in it , blast it off towards Mars , and have it crash land , scattering their corpses ' body parts across the Martian plains , and take a picture of that .
I bet I could find quite a few people that would pay good money to see that,.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not buy a rocket, round up Pat Robertson and Rush Limbaugh, put them in it, blast it off towards Mars, and have it crash land, scattering their corpses' body parts across the Martian plains, and take a picture of that.
I bet I could find quite a few people that would pay good money to see that,...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839556</id>
	<title>John Cleese</title>
	<author>fyoder</author>
	<datestamp>1263989760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>with each image covering dozens of square miles and revealing details as small as a desk.</p></div><p>Yes, the desk please.  I expect John Cleese will be sitting at it saying, "And now for something completely different."</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>with each image covering dozens of square miles and revealing details as small as a desk.Yes , the desk please .
I expect John Cleese will be sitting at it saying , " And now for something completely different .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>with each image covering dozens of square miles and revealing details as small as a desk.Yes, the desk please.
I expect John Cleese will be sitting at it saying, "And now for something completely different.
"
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838768</id>
	<title>13k pictures, and ....</title>
	<author>JWSmythe</author>
	<datestamp>1263986280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>  13,000 pictures of the surface of mars, and still no clear photos of the aliens.  It's a coverup I tell you.  The government doesn't want us to know the <a href="http://www.iwatchstuff.com/2007/11/26/avatar-creature.jpg" title="iwatchstuff.com">truth</a> [iwatchstuff.com]!  They're hiding <a href="http://www.iwatchstuff.com/2009/03/31/star-trek-orion-slave-girl.jpg" title="iwatchstuff.com">it</a> [iwatchstuff.com] until they can <a href="http://www.interviewmagazine.com/files/2008/12/03/img-celeb-book-cover-3\_200637538690.jpg" title="interviewmagazine.com">take these natural resources for themselves</a> [interviewmagazine.com].  It's the man taking away from us what rightfully belongs to all of us!  If you let them get their way, well, just be left with <a href="http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00537/ALIEN\_380x380\_537526a.jpg" title="thesun.co.uk">these</a> [thesun.co.uk].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>13,000 pictures of the surface of mars , and still no clear photos of the aliens .
It 's a coverup I tell you .
The government does n't want us to know the truth [ iwatchstuff.com ] !
They 're hiding it [ iwatchstuff.com ] until they can take these natural resources for themselves [ interviewmagazine.com ] .
It 's the man taking away from us what rightfully belongs to all of us !
If you let them get their way , well , just be left with these [ thesun.co.uk ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  13,000 pictures of the surface of mars, and still no clear photos of the aliens.
It's a coverup I tell you.
The government doesn't want us to know the truth [iwatchstuff.com]!
They're hiding it [iwatchstuff.com] until they can take these natural resources for themselves [interviewmagazine.com].
It's the man taking away from us what rightfully belongs to all of us!
If you let them get their way, well, just be left with these [thesun.co.uk].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30842928</id>
	<title>Re:Why the Phoenix Negativity?</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1264015260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's all true but I can't act surprised when they name their lander the <i>Phoenix</i> and some people are disappointed when it looks like it isn't going to rise from the dead.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's all true but I ca n't act surprised when they name their lander the Phoenix and some people are disappointed when it looks like it is n't going to rise from the dead .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's all true but I can't act surprised when they name their lander the Phoenix and some people are disappointed when it looks like it isn't going to rise from the dead.
:)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839432</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838416</id>
	<title>ESA Mars Webcam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263985020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a similar thing going on for some time on ESA Mars Express mission, where public is invited to participate in obtaining, processing, etc. of images taken with a camera that was meant originally to observe Beagle separation.</p><p><a href="http://www.esa.int/esaMI/VMC/index.html" title="esa.int">http://www.esa.int/esaMI/VMC/index.html</a> [esa.int]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a similar thing going on for some time on ESA Mars Express mission , where public is invited to participate in obtaining , processing , etc .
of images taken with a camera that was meant originally to observe Beagle separation.http : //www.esa.int/esaMI/VMC/index.html [ esa.int ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a similar thing going on for some time on ESA Mars Express mission, where public is invited to participate in obtaining, processing, etc.
of images taken with a camera that was meant originally to observe Beagle separation.http://www.esa.int/esaMI/VMC/index.html [esa.int]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30844788</id>
	<title>Re:Second Priority</title>
	<author>calanor</author>
	<datestamp>1264082880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>even india's chandrayaan has confirmed the trip to moon was NOT faked, so you can stop this conspiracy bullshit</htmltext>
<tokenext>even india 's chandrayaan has confirmed the trip to moon was NOT faked , so you can stop this conspiracy bullshit</tokentext>
<sentencetext>even india's chandrayaan has confirmed the trip to moon was NOT faked, so you can stop this conspiracy bullshit</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838900</id>
	<title>Re:First Priority</title>
	<author>QuantumLeaper</author>
	<datestamp>1263986820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here you go,  start looking...  <a href="http://beamartian.jpl.nasa.gov/welcome/" title="nasa.gov">http://beamartian.jpl.nasa.gov/welcome/</a> [nasa.gov]  <br> Right now you can help look for crater or map mars.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here you go , start looking... http : //beamartian.jpl.nasa.gov/welcome/ [ nasa.gov ] Right now you can help look for crater or map mars .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here you go,  start looking...  http://beamartian.jpl.nasa.gov/welcome/ [nasa.gov]   Right now you can help look for crater or map mars.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30856372</id>
	<title>Map the whole planet, please</title>
	<author>Pearson</author>
	<datestamp>1264095540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't really get the point of this.  The goal should be to map the entire surface of the planet using a system that maximizes each pass as much as possible.  Crowd sourcing the poking around for interesting details is fine once you have those pictures, but people are only going to be interested in doing this for a short while.  Having them work on low-res proxies for the short duration of their interest is failing to utilize their energy properly, imho.<br> <br>
What I'm saying is that if responding to user requests means failing to take as many useful pictures as possible, then that is a waste.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't really get the point of this .
The goal should be to map the entire surface of the planet using a system that maximizes each pass as much as possible .
Crowd sourcing the poking around for interesting details is fine once you have those pictures , but people are only going to be interested in doing this for a short while .
Having them work on low-res proxies for the short duration of their interest is failing to utilize their energy properly , imho .
What I 'm saying is that if responding to user requests means failing to take as many useful pictures as possible , then that is a waste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't really get the point of this.
The goal should be to map the entire surface of the planet using a system that maximizes each pass as much as possible.
Crowd sourcing the poking around for interesting details is fine once you have those pictures, but people are only going to be interested in doing this for a short while.
Having them work on low-res proxies for the short duration of their interest is failing to utilize their energy properly, imho.
What I'm saying is that if responding to user requests means failing to take as many useful pictures as possible, then that is a waste.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839112</id>
	<title>Science by popular opinion?</title>
	<author>Tetsujin</author>
	<datestamp>1263987720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So, what, are we gonna end up with like 10,000 photos of the face on Mars, or the "pyramids"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So , what , are we gon na end up with like 10,000 photos of the face on Mars , or the " pyramids " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, what, are we gonna end up with like 10,000 photos of the face on Mars, or the "pyramids"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30841086</id>
	<title>Great idea - Horrible term</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263998520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What Einstein came up with "crowdsourcing"?  I put that up there with "core competencies", "stakeholders", and "rightsizing" as jargonny business babble.  If I were an evil overlord, I would instantly put to death any underlings who dared utter those terms in my presence.</p><p>Yes, I think I need a hug.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What Einstein came up with " crowdsourcing " ?
I put that up there with " core competencies " , " stakeholders " , and " rightsizing " as jargonny business babble .
If I were an evil overlord , I would instantly put to death any underlings who dared utter those terms in my presence.Yes , I think I need a hug .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What Einstein came up with "crowdsourcing"?
I put that up there with "core competencies", "stakeholders", and "rightsizing" as jargonny business babble.
If I were an evil overlord, I would instantly put to death any underlings who dared utter those terms in my presence.Yes, I think I need a hug.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30841076</id>
	<title>Be ready.</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1263998400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I suggest they photograph a Martian city.<br>
Then keep an eye on the shipyards.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I suggest they photograph a Martian city .
Then keep an eye on the shipyards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I suggest they photograph a Martian city.
Then keep an eye on the shipyards.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30842560</id>
	<title>Mars Odyssey THEMIS did this a year ago</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264011540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With nice Google Maps integration:</p><p>http://suggest.mars.asu.edu</p><p>THEMIS isn't as sexy, as it's a lot lower resolution imagery than HiRISE, but it's been done.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With nice Google Maps integration : http : //suggest.mars.asu.eduTHEMIS is n't as sexy , as it 's a lot lower resolution imagery than HiRISE , but it 's been done .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With nice Google Maps integration:http://suggest.mars.asu.eduTHEMIS isn't as sexy, as it's a lot lower resolution imagery than HiRISE, but it's been done.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838396</id>
	<title>Umm...</title>
	<author>verbalcontract</author>
	<datestamp>1263984960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>...NASA has heard of 4chan, right? I don't want to see thousands of "crowdsourced" pictures of the robot's crotch.</htmltext>
<tokenext>...NASA has heard of 4chan , right ?
I do n't want to see thousands of " crowdsourced " pictures of the robot 's crotch .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...NASA has heard of 4chan, right?
I don't want to see thousands of "crowdsourced" pictures of the robot's crotch.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839608</id>
	<title>Re:Wait....</title>
	<author>Chris Burke</author>
	<datestamp>1263990000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't be silly.  It can only see objects the approximate <i>size</i> of desks.  For example refrigerators or golf carts, of which there are plenty.  No desks have been found yet though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't be silly .
It can only see objects the approximate size of desks .
For example refrigerators or golf carts , of which there are plenty .
No desks have been found yet though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't be silly.
It can only see objects the approximate size of desks.
For example refrigerators or golf carts, of which there are plenty.
No desks have been found yet though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838418</id>
	<title>Crowdsource this</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263985020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who's up for a little ass fucking? 17 big black boys against your anus. Bring yo Tears.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who 's up for a little ass fucking ?
17 big black boys against your anus .
Bring yo Tears .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who's up for a little ass fucking?
17 big black boys against your anus.
Bring yo Tears.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839120</id>
	<title>Re:Second Priority</title>
	<author>Third Position</author>
	<datestamp>1263987720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Since they are now claiming its possible to notice things as small as a Desk</p></div><p>Good. That might go a long way in explaining where my supervisor has been hiding for the last month.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since they are now claiming its possible to notice things as small as a DeskGood .
That might go a long way in explaining where my supervisor has been hiding for the last month .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since they are now claiming its possible to notice things as small as a DeskGood.
That might go a long way in explaining where my supervisor has been hiding for the last month.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30840100</id>
	<title>Just do the rest</title>
	<author>Amorymeltzer</author>
	<datestamp>1263992160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are they trying to suggest that only about 1\% of Mars is obviously interesting to Martian scientists?  There's really nothing else they know they want to look at?  Okay sure, the PR could be a good thing and they might get some cool suggestions, but honestly:</p><p>- Pictures of the rovers<br>- Pictures of the canals<br>- Pictures of the mountains<br>- Pictures of the ice caps</p><p>Outside of that, everything is just "more red sand."  Nobody really cares which small portion of the planet it is as long as they get cool desktop photos in a handy resolution (1680x1050, please).  Do your own damn work and figure out what deserves to be photographed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they trying to suggest that only about 1 \ % of Mars is obviously interesting to Martian scientists ?
There 's really nothing else they know they want to look at ?
Okay sure , the PR could be a good thing and they might get some cool suggestions , but honestly : - Pictures of the rovers- Pictures of the canals- Pictures of the mountains- Pictures of the ice capsOutside of that , everything is just " more red sand .
" Nobody really cares which small portion of the planet it is as long as they get cool desktop photos in a handy resolution ( 1680x1050 , please ) .
Do your own damn work and figure out what deserves to be photographed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they trying to suggest that only about 1\% of Mars is obviously interesting to Martian scientists?
There's really nothing else they know they want to look at?
Okay sure, the PR could be a good thing and they might get some cool suggestions, but honestly:- Pictures of the rovers- Pictures of the canals- Pictures of the mountains- Pictures of the ice capsOutside of that, everything is just "more red sand.
"  Nobody really cares which small portion of the planet it is as long as they get cool desktop photos in a handy resolution (1680x1050, please).
Do your own damn work and figure out what deserves to be photographed.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839142</id>
	<title>Re:First Priority</title>
	<author>amn108</author>
	<datestamp>1263987780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Since you believe in fantasy anyway, why not wish for finding (and returning to owner - you) the Silk Spectre II. Without Dr. Manhattan - far too reliable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Since you believe in fantasy anyway , why not wish for finding ( and returning to owner - you ) the Silk Spectre II .
Without Dr. Manhattan - far too reliable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since you believe in fantasy anyway, why not wish for finding (and returning to owner - you) the Silk Spectre II.
Without Dr. Manhattan - far too reliable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384</id>
	<title>First Priority</title>
	<author>VoiceInTheDesert</author>
	<datestamp>1263984900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Find Dr Manhattan and that cool floating ice scupture thing of his.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Find Dr Manhattan and that cool floating ice scupture thing of his .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Find Dr Manhattan and that cool floating ice scupture thing of his.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30841034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30844788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839120
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30855828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30842928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839432
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30843654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838816
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30842396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838904
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838900
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30840168
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_20_2141205_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30840674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838686
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2141205.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2141205.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2141205.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839284
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2141205.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838686
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30840674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839608
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2141205.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839432
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30842928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2141205.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839012
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2141205.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2141205.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30840100
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2141205.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30840912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2141205.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838734
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839202
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30842396
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30844788
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30855828
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839120
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30840168
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838816
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30843654
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30841034
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838904
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30838900
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30839260
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_20_2141205.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_20_2141205.30843366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
