<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_19_1738246</id>
	<title>US Military Weapons Inscribed With Secret Bible Codes<span class="vballoon-marquee rd\_5"><span>Comments:</span><a href="#">93</a></span></title>
	<author>samzenpus</author>
	<datestamp>1263924300000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Trijicon, a Michigan company that makes high-powered rifle sights for the military, has come under fire for <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/us-military-weapons-inscribed-secret-jesus-bible-codes/story?id=9575794&amp;page=2">inscribing coded references to New Testament Bible passages about Jesus Christ on their products</a>. The sights contain references to Second Corinthians 4:6, "For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ" and John 8:12, "Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life." The company has acknowledged that it adds the biblical codes to the sights sold to the US military, but says there is nothing wrong or illegal about adding them. Spokespeople for the US Army and the Marine Corps both say that they were unaware of the biblical markings, and are discussing what steps, if any, to take. I personally think this is ridiculous. Everyone knows that Jesus was such a good shot he never used sights.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Trijicon , a Michigan company that makes high-powered rifle sights for the military , has come under fire for inscribing coded references to New Testament Bible passages about Jesus Christ on their products .
The sights contain references to Second Corinthians 4 : 6 , " For God , who commanded the light to shine out of darkness , hath shined in our hearts , to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ " and John 8 : 12 , " Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness , but will have the light of life .
" The company has acknowledged that it adds the biblical codes to the sights sold to the US military , but says there is nothing wrong or illegal about adding them .
Spokespeople for the US Army and the Marine Corps both say that they were unaware of the biblical markings , and are discussing what steps , if any , to take .
I personally think this is ridiculous .
Everyone knows that Jesus was such a good shot he never used sights .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trijicon, a Michigan company that makes high-powered rifle sights for the military, has come under fire for inscribing coded references to New Testament Bible passages about Jesus Christ on their products.
The sights contain references to Second Corinthians 4:6, "For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ" and John 8:12, "Whoever follows me will never walk in darkness, but will have the light of life.
" The company has acknowledged that it adds the biblical codes to the sights sold to the US military, but says there is nothing wrong or illegal about adding them.
Spokespeople for the US Army and the Marine Corps both say that they were unaware of the biblical markings, and are discussing what steps, if any, to take.
I personally think this is ridiculous.
Everyone knows that Jesus was such a good shot he never used sights.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30840034</id>
	<title>Their motivation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263991860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the most part, Trijicon sells "night sights": tritium lit, light amplification, etc. Given that, their choices of quotes (about shining light) seem apropos. If it had been a Shakespeare quote about light, would anybody be complaining? Before crying about religious oppression, realize that the Bible is a work of literature. Quotes from it are not necessarily for religious purposes.
</p><p>If you really want to get upset about something military related, might I suggest the expense of trillions of borrowed dollars to kill unthreatening foreigners and police the world?
</p><p>I have Trijicon tritium sights on most of my pistols, and a Trijicon ACOG on one of my AR-15s. I've never noticed the quotes (I'll look tonight), but they haven't subliminally converted me to Christianity yet. The only people who really have any justification to complain would be the customers, and most gun owners I know (Christian or not) wouldn't care.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>For the most part , Trijicon sells " night sights " : tritium lit , light amplification , etc .
Given that , their choices of quotes ( about shining light ) seem apropos .
If it had been a Shakespeare quote about light , would anybody be complaining ?
Before crying about religious oppression , realize that the Bible is a work of literature .
Quotes from it are not necessarily for religious purposes .
If you really want to get upset about something military related , might I suggest the expense of trillions of borrowed dollars to kill unthreatening foreigners and police the world ?
I have Trijicon tritium sights on most of my pistols , and a Trijicon ACOG on one of my AR-15s .
I 've never noticed the quotes ( I 'll look tonight ) , but they have n't subliminally converted me to Christianity yet .
The only people who really have any justification to complain would be the customers , and most gun owners I know ( Christian or not ) would n't care .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the most part, Trijicon sells "night sights": tritium lit, light amplification, etc.
Given that, their choices of quotes (about shining light) seem apropos.
If it had been a Shakespeare quote about light, would anybody be complaining?
Before crying about religious oppression, realize that the Bible is a work of literature.
Quotes from it are not necessarily for religious purposes.
If you really want to get upset about something military related, might I suggest the expense of trillions of borrowed dollars to kill unthreatening foreigners and police the world?
I have Trijicon tritium sights on most of my pistols, and a Trijicon ACOG on one of my AR-15s.
I've never noticed the quotes (I'll look tonight), but they haven't subliminally converted me to Christianity yet.
The only people who really have any justification to complain would be the customers, and most gun owners I know (Christian or not) wouldn't care.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30893550</id>
	<title>Replace it with this...</title>
	<author>cavis</author>
	<datestamp>1264447800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about "Kill em all, let ME sort them out" written in red?</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about " Kill em all , let ME sort them out " written in red ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about "Kill em all, let ME sort them out" written in red?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30849314</id>
	<title>Re:Typical</title>
	<author>g0bshiTe</author>
	<datestamp>1264104240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What I would love to know is how many of those "captured" rifles have been used by the enemy.<br> <br>I mean how stunned would they be to learn that was on the weapon?</htmltext>
<tokenext>What I would love to know is how many of those " captured " rifles have been used by the enemy .
I mean how stunned would they be to learn that was on the weapon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I would love to know is how many of those "captured" rifles have been used by the enemy.
I mean how stunned would they be to learn that was on the weapon?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30834992</id>
	<title>Wait!</title>
	<author>CBob</author>
	<datestamp>1264014900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just wait till they find out that "Have a Nice Day" is inscribed around the muzzles of some<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.50 caliber rifles. (another not joking, sorry)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just wait till they find out that " Have a Nice Day " is inscribed around the muzzles of some .50 caliber rifles .
( another not joking , sorry )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just wait till they find out that "Have a Nice Day" is inscribed around the muzzles of some .50 caliber rifles.
(another not joking, sorry)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823508</id>
	<title>Oh that sure helps the Islamists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263934140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By reinforcing the notion that the US and other NATO forces engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan are in fact "Crusaders" there to forcibly convert people to Christianity. There have been a few comments of a religious nature from US commanders in the past that probably helped reinforce the other sides propaganda efforts but this goes a step further. What more proof that we are engaged in fighting "Islam" the religion (and not Islamist terrorists) do you need to give to Al Qaida propagandists? What about the Muslim (or any other non-Christian religion) members of the US/NATO forces who suddenly discover they have been using a weapon with a religious quote that they might find personally find offensive?</p><p>You will never win the hearts and minds of a population by making them think you are there to completely uproot their lives, starting with telling them their religion is wrong, and that getting your help is conditional on them converting to your religion. What you will do is help create even more opposition to your presence.</p><p>I think the directors of this company should be fined the entire cost of the items sold to the military so far, from their own personal pocketbooks. What a hairbrained assinine and offensive stupid thing to do. I hope they pay for it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>By reinforcing the notion that the US and other NATO forces engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan are in fact " Crusaders " there to forcibly convert people to Christianity .
There have been a few comments of a religious nature from US commanders in the past that probably helped reinforce the other sides propaganda efforts but this goes a step further .
What more proof that we are engaged in fighting " Islam " the religion ( and not Islamist terrorists ) do you need to give to Al Qaida propagandists ?
What about the Muslim ( or any other non-Christian religion ) members of the US/NATO forces who suddenly discover they have been using a weapon with a religious quote that they might find personally find offensive ? You will never win the hearts and minds of a population by making them think you are there to completely uproot their lives , starting with telling them their religion is wrong , and that getting your help is conditional on them converting to your religion .
What you will do is help create even more opposition to your presence.I think the directors of this company should be fined the entire cost of the items sold to the military so far , from their own personal pocketbooks .
What a hairbrained assinine and offensive stupid thing to do .
I hope they pay for it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By reinforcing the notion that the US and other NATO forces engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan are in fact "Crusaders" there to forcibly convert people to Christianity.
There have been a few comments of a religious nature from US commanders in the past that probably helped reinforce the other sides propaganda efforts but this goes a step further.
What more proof that we are engaged in fighting "Islam" the religion (and not Islamist terrorists) do you need to give to Al Qaida propagandists?
What about the Muslim (or any other non-Christian religion) members of the US/NATO forces who suddenly discover they have been using a weapon with a religious quote that they might find personally find offensive?You will never win the hearts and minds of a population by making them think you are there to completely uproot their lives, starting with telling them their religion is wrong, and that getting your help is conditional on them converting to your religion.
What you will do is help create even more opposition to your presence.I think the directors of this company should be fined the entire cost of the items sold to the military so far, from their own personal pocketbooks.
What a hairbrained assinine and offensive stupid thing to do.
I hope they pay for it.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30910476</id>
	<title>Re:Oh that sure helps the Islamists...</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1264502880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Who fucking cares? *Ring-Ring* Hi it's 2010 calling, the US is a Christian country. Yes you have the freedom of religion, but failing to recognize the <em> <strong>fact</strong> </em> that we are a Christian country gives you a fake and made up reason to be upset. Instead, you should simply ignore it, or be grateful for it.</p><p>

Also, I notice you seem to be intentionally avoiding mentioning the fact that <em>many</em> of the terrorists and/or people we are at war with are fighting a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">jihad</a> [wikipedia.org] against the US. I'm not exactly sure if it's factually correct to say the US troops are Crusaders forcing people to convert. I'm not even sure it's correct to say they are Crusaders simply <em>because</em> they are fighting mujahideen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Who fucking cares ?
* Ring-Ring * Hi it 's 2010 calling , the US is a Christian country .
Yes you have the freedom of religion , but failing to recognize the fact that we are a Christian country gives you a fake and made up reason to be upset .
Instead , you should simply ignore it , or be grateful for it .
Also , I notice you seem to be intentionally avoiding mentioning the fact that many of the terrorists and/or people we are at war with are fighting a jihad [ wikipedia.org ] against the US .
I 'm not exactly sure if it 's factually correct to say the US troops are Crusaders forcing people to convert .
I 'm not even sure it 's correct to say they are Crusaders simply because they are fighting mujahideen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Who fucking cares?
*Ring-Ring* Hi it's 2010 calling, the US is a Christian country.
Yes you have the freedom of religion, but failing to recognize the  fact  that we are a Christian country gives you a fake and made up reason to be upset.
Instead, you should simply ignore it, or be grateful for it.
Also, I notice you seem to be intentionally avoiding mentioning the fact that many of the terrorists and/or people we are at war with are fighting a jihad [wikipedia.org] against the US.
I'm not exactly sure if it's factually correct to say the US troops are Crusaders forcing people to convert.
I'm not even sure it's correct to say they are Crusaders simply because they are fighting mujahideen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30902720</id>
	<title>Re:Good work, guys.</title>
	<author>Jesus\_666</author>
	<datestamp>1264513620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>John 15:14 would work rather well, though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>John 15 : 14 would work rather well , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>John 15:14 would work rather well, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30825792</id>
	<title>Reminds me of "Private Jackson"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263901320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think it's great - the manufacturer of the sights, being both religious and (apparently) proud of their work have rolled the two together.  (Reminds me of the sniper in Saving Private Ryan - and how can *that* be a bad thing?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think it 's great - the manufacturer of the sights , being both religious and ( apparently ) proud of their work have rolled the two together .
( Reminds me of the sniper in Saving Private Ryan - and how can * that * be a bad thing ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think it's great - the manufacturer of the sights, being both religious and (apparently) proud of their work have rolled the two together.
(Reminds me of the sniper in Saving Private Ryan - and how can *that* be a bad thing?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30831658</id>
	<title>Adeptus Astartes</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264001880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is this CEO of this company Roboute Guilliman of the Adeptus Astartes?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this CEO of this company Roboute Guilliman of the Adeptus Astartes ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this CEO of this company Roboute Guilliman of the Adeptus Astartes?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30885788</id>
	<title>Re:This is no big deal</title>
	<author>iamhassi</author>
	<datestamp>1264352580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>"This is *really* stretching for a church/state link."</i>
<br> <br>
Agreed.  It's not forcing a religion on anyone.  I really don't understand this quote from the article:<br>
<i>""It's wrong, it violates the Constitution, it violates a number of federal laws," said Michael "Mikey" Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, an advocacy group that seeks to preserve the separation of church and state in the military....."This is probably the best example of violation of the separation of church and state in this country," said Weinstein. "It's literally pushing fundamentalist Christianity at the point of a gun against the people that we're fighting. We're emboldening an enemy." "</i>
<br> <br>
Huh?  How does this violate the constitution?  Sure I could see how some soldiers might be upset, I wouldn't want to carry around a weapon with part numbers referring to verses in the Koran, but I don't think it violates the Constitution.  Just ask the company not to offer any more sights for the military with the verse numbers in the part number or risk losing their contract.  I think they'll remove them to keep their 500 million dollar contract, and if any soldiers are really complaining allow them to swap for a different sight.  Not that huge of a deal really.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" This is * really * stretching for a church/state link .
" Agreed .
It 's not forcing a religion on anyone .
I really do n't understand this quote from the article : " " It 's wrong , it violates the Constitution , it violates a number of federal laws , " said Michael " Mikey " Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation , an advocacy group that seeks to preserve the separation of church and state in the military..... " This is probably the best example of violation of the separation of church and state in this country , " said Weinstein .
" It 's literally pushing fundamentalist Christianity at the point of a gun against the people that we 're fighting .
We 're emboldening an enemy .
" " Huh ?
How does this violate the constitution ?
Sure I could see how some soldiers might be upset , I would n't want to carry around a weapon with part numbers referring to verses in the Koran , but I do n't think it violates the Constitution .
Just ask the company not to offer any more sights for the military with the verse numbers in the part number or risk losing their contract .
I think they 'll remove them to keep their 500 million dollar contract , and if any soldiers are really complaining allow them to swap for a different sight .
Not that huge of a deal really .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"This is *really* stretching for a church/state link.
"
 
Agreed.
It's not forcing a religion on anyone.
I really don't understand this quote from the article:
""It's wrong, it violates the Constitution, it violates a number of federal laws," said Michael "Mikey" Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, an advocacy group that seeks to preserve the separation of church and state in the military....."This is probably the best example of violation of the separation of church and state in this country," said Weinstein.
"It's literally pushing fundamentalist Christianity at the point of a gun against the people that we're fighting.
We're emboldening an enemy.
" "
 
Huh?
How does this violate the constitution?
Sure I could see how some soldiers might be upset, I wouldn't want to carry around a weapon with part numbers referring to verses in the Koran, but I don't think it violates the Constitution.
Just ask the company not to offer any more sights for the military with the verse numbers in the part number or risk losing their contract.
I think they'll remove them to keep their 500 million dollar contract, and if any soldiers are really complaining allow them to swap for a different sight.
Not that huge of a deal really.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30837820</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30827204</id>
	<title>BBC Article Link</title>
	<author>Phrogman</author>
	<datestamp>1263910560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here:<br><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8468981.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8468981.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p><p>Seems the issue came up when some muslim members of the forces complained and asked why these inscriptions were there. Article has some good comments.</p><p>Why is this in Idle btw? Its not all that geeky but its not trivially unimportant either.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here : http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8468981.stm [ bbc.co.uk ] Seems the issue came up when some muslim members of the forces complained and asked why these inscriptions were there .
Article has some good comments.Why is this in Idle btw ?
Its not all that geeky but its not trivially unimportant either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8468981.stm [bbc.co.uk]Seems the issue came up when some muslim members of the forces complained and asked why these inscriptions were there.
Article has some good comments.Why is this in Idle btw?
Its not all that geeky but its not trivially unimportant either.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30910356</id>
	<title>Re:Oh that sure helps the Islamists...</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1264502400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>what [if] their religion really IS wrong?</p></div><p>We would like to take this moment to point out to all viewers that Islam, Judaism, and Christianity all worship the same 1 higher being. They have, in the past, lived in peace with each other.</p><p>If it were not for the Israelis and Palestinians fighting over a piece of land, there would be very little war today that would even involve religion as an anecdote. The States picked a side in a religious conflict thousands of miles away, and ever since then any of their actions have been percieved as religious in nature.<br>Terrorists are given a voice by exploiting these facts.</p><p>You only begin to realize how ridiculous the notion is when you know that those 3 religions are from the same fundamental background (monotheism) and that Islamic Terrorists are attacking fellow Monotheists ACROSS THE GLOBE instead of those crazy Buddhist, Toaist, or Confucians right next door to their east.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>what [ if ] their religion really IS wrong ? We would like to take this moment to point out to all viewers that Islam , Judaism , and Christianity all worship the same 1 higher being .
They have , in the past , lived in peace with each other.If it were not for the Israelis and Palestinians fighting over a piece of land , there would be very little war today that would even involve religion as an anecdote .
The States picked a side in a religious conflict thousands of miles away , and ever since then any of their actions have been percieved as religious in nature.Terrorists are given a voice by exploiting these facts.You only begin to realize how ridiculous the notion is when you know that those 3 religions are from the same fundamental background ( monotheism ) and that Islamic Terrorists are attacking fellow Monotheists ACROSS THE GLOBE instead of those crazy Buddhist , Toaist , or Confucians right next door to their east .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what [if] their religion really IS wrong?We would like to take this moment to point out to all viewers that Islam, Judaism, and Christianity all worship the same 1 higher being.
They have, in the past, lived in peace with each other.If it were not for the Israelis and Palestinians fighting over a piece of land, there would be very little war today that would even involve religion as an anecdote.
The States picked a side in a religious conflict thousands of miles away, and ever since then any of their actions have been percieved as religious in nature.Terrorists are given a voice by exploiting these facts.You only begin to realize how ridiculous the notion is when you know that those 3 religions are from the same fundamental background (monotheism) and that Islamic Terrorists are attacking fellow Monotheists ACROSS THE GLOBE instead of those crazy Buddhist, Toaist, or Confucians right next door to their east.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30883222</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30839358</id>
	<title>Re:Why not?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263988800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"In God We Trust" was added in the fifties by McCarthyites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" In God We Trust " was added in the fifties by McCarthyites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"In God We Trust" was added in the fifties by McCarthyites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30832608</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30828162</id>
	<title>Re:Good work, guys.</title>
	<author>Darinbob</author>
	<datestamp>1263920220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exodus 20:13</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exodus 20 : 13</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exodus 20:13</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30883222</id>
	<title>Re:Oh that sure helps the Islamists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264334460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what is their religion really IS wrong?  Getting our help IS conditional, not necessarily on converting, but certainly on ignoring some of the more violent tenants of their religion.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what is their religion really IS wrong ?
Getting our help IS conditional , not necessarily on converting , but certainly on ignoring some of the more violent tenants of their religion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what is their religion really IS wrong?
Getting our help IS conditional, not necessarily on converting, but certainly on ignoring some of the more violent tenants of their religion.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30905586</id>
	<title>Re:Typical anti-christian ignorant response</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264525920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>19 January nydailynews.com/ had the news correct.  2 days ago Trijicon was in news as rushing replacement optics mounts to USA (US Army).  Now you can't use Google to find the correct news that Samsenpus took his slanted writings from?<br>Do you hate God so much that you must make wild accusations?  Aggressive stupidity on your part only inflames situation within the US of A.  All Christian haters are not Islamic.  Many are indoctrinated in our colleges to crusade against our Christian heritage.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>19 January nydailynews.com/ had the news correct .
2 days ago Trijicon was in news as rushing replacement optics mounts to USA ( US Army ) .
Now you ca n't use Google to find the correct news that Samsenpus took his slanted writings from ? Do you hate God so much that you must make wild accusations ?
Aggressive stupidity on your part only inflames situation within the US of A. All Christian haters are not Islamic .
Many are indoctrinated in our colleges to crusade against our Christian heritage .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>19 January nydailynews.com/ had the news correct.
2 days ago Trijicon was in news as rushing replacement optics mounts to USA (US Army).
Now you can't use Google to find the correct news that Samsenpus took his slanted writings from?Do you hate God so much that you must make wild accusations?
Aggressive stupidity on your part only inflames situation within the US of A.  All Christian haters are not Islamic.
Many are indoctrinated in our colleges to crusade against our Christian heritage.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30859722</id>
	<title>Thou Shalt Not Kill</title>
	<author>Errol backfiring</author>
	<datestamp>1264177380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Thou Shalt Not Kill" would be by far more appropriate. But then, they would not produce those arms anyway, would they?<br>
It seems to pay to be a hypocrite.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Thou Shalt Not Kill " would be by far more appropriate .
But then , they would not produce those arms anyway , would they ?
It seems to pay to be a hypocrite .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Thou Shalt Not Kill" would be by far more appropriate.
But then, they would not produce those arms anyway, would they?
It seems to pay to be a hypocrite.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30888722</id>
	<title>Re:Oh that sure helps the Islamists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264428420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't think the enemy gives two shits about what we put on our reflex optics. You're an outsider and a fucking moron.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think the enemy gives two shits about what we put on our reflex optics .
You 're an outsider and a fucking moron .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think the enemy gives two shits about what we put on our reflex optics.
You're an outsider and a fucking moron.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30928200</id>
	<title>Constitutionality</title>
	<author>Anomalyx</author>
	<datestamp>1264600680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>People complaining about this being unconstitutional are blowing smoke.  Find something from the text of the constitution that says a business cannot put references to a passage of a book on their products.  If the complaint only exists because this product is being used by the government, then go complain to the government for buying that product instead of a different one.  Don't put all the heat on the company when the government is the one that chose to spend money on it.
And anyone who says this infringes upon freedom of religion is quite wrong.  Not allowing them to do this would be instead infringing upon the scope makers' freedom of religion.<br>
<br>
My philosophy on "offensive products" is simple.  Don't buy it or support the company.  If it offends YOU, then YOU just don't have to buy it.  If it offends you that someone else is buying it, well that's just your problem. If it offends you that someone else is using your money to buy it (gov't using your tax $) then take issue with the ones spending your money (this means if you want to do anything, let gov't know.  Until you at least try that, quit complaining).  If it offends you, but it's otherwise the best choice for your application, then you have to choose between the importance of your beliefs and the importance of your goods.<br>
<br>
And on a side note, to the comments about how this makes Muslims think it's an America vs Islam war... While that's not what America fights specifically against, that's what it ends up being anyways.  This is due to the fact that Islam teaches that all who don't convert to Islam must be killed.  In order to be a good Muslim, you must convert others and kill those that won't convert.  Therefore, I can quite easily predict that there will never be a resolution.</htmltext>
<tokenext>People complaining about this being unconstitutional are blowing smoke .
Find something from the text of the constitution that says a business can not put references to a passage of a book on their products .
If the complaint only exists because this product is being used by the government , then go complain to the government for buying that product instead of a different one .
Do n't put all the heat on the company when the government is the one that chose to spend money on it .
And anyone who says this infringes upon freedom of religion is quite wrong .
Not allowing them to do this would be instead infringing upon the scope makers ' freedom of religion .
My philosophy on " offensive products " is simple .
Do n't buy it or support the company .
If it offends YOU , then YOU just do n't have to buy it .
If it offends you that someone else is buying it , well that 's just your problem .
If it offends you that someone else is using your money to buy it ( gov't using your tax $ ) then take issue with the ones spending your money ( this means if you want to do anything , let gov't know .
Until you at least try that , quit complaining ) .
If it offends you , but it 's otherwise the best choice for your application , then you have to choose between the importance of your beliefs and the importance of your goods .
And on a side note , to the comments about how this makes Muslims think it 's an America vs Islam war... While that 's not what America fights specifically against , that 's what it ends up being anyways .
This is due to the fact that Islam teaches that all who do n't convert to Islam must be killed .
In order to be a good Muslim , you must convert others and kill those that wo n't convert .
Therefore , I can quite easily predict that there will never be a resolution .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People complaining about this being unconstitutional are blowing smoke.
Find something from the text of the constitution that says a business cannot put references to a passage of a book on their products.
If the complaint only exists because this product is being used by the government, then go complain to the government for buying that product instead of a different one.
Don't put all the heat on the company when the government is the one that chose to spend money on it.
And anyone who says this infringes upon freedom of religion is quite wrong.
Not allowing them to do this would be instead infringing upon the scope makers' freedom of religion.
My philosophy on "offensive products" is simple.
Don't buy it or support the company.
If it offends YOU, then YOU just don't have to buy it.
If it offends you that someone else is buying it, well that's just your problem.
If it offends you that someone else is using your money to buy it (gov't using your tax $) then take issue with the ones spending your money (this means if you want to do anything, let gov't know.
Until you at least try that, quit complaining).
If it offends you, but it's otherwise the best choice for your application, then you have to choose between the importance of your beliefs and the importance of your goods.
And on a side note, to the comments about how this makes Muslims think it's an America vs Islam war... While that's not what America fights specifically against, that's what it ends up being anyways.
This is due to the fact that Islam teaches that all who don't convert to Islam must be killed.
In order to be a good Muslim, you must convert others and kill those that won't convert.
Therefore, I can quite easily predict that there will never be a resolution.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823504</id>
	<title>Good work, guys.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263934140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Way to just go out and hand a propaganda victory to every two-bit "zOMG the Americans are Crusaders!" holy warrior in the whole bloody sand trap.<br> <br>

Also, I'm guessing that we won't be seeing any "Matthew 26:54" gunsights...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Way to just go out and hand a propaganda victory to every two-bit " zOMG the Americans are Crusaders !
" holy warrior in the whole bloody sand trap .
Also , I 'm guessing that we wo n't be seeing any " Matthew 26 : 54 " gunsights.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Way to just go out and hand a propaganda victory to every two-bit "zOMG the Americans are Crusaders!
" holy warrior in the whole bloody sand trap.
Also, I'm guessing that we won't be seeing any "Matthew 26:54" gunsights...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586</id>
	<title>Typical</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263934500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else. If they can't do it overtly, they'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way. Telling of their convictions is the fact that while they say they've done nothing wrong, they never bothered to tell the army exactly what they were getting.</p><p>The rifles should all be refunded. They've essentially all got graffiti on them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else .
If they ca n't do it overtly , they 'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way .
Telling of their convictions is the fact that while they say they 've done nothing wrong , they never bothered to tell the army exactly what they were getting.The rifles should all be refunded .
They 've essentially all got graffiti on them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else.
If they can't do it overtly, they'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way.
Telling of their convictions is the fact that while they say they've done nothing wrong, they never bothered to tell the army exactly what they were getting.The rifles should all be refunded.
They've essentially all got graffiti on them.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30825682</id>
	<title>Great</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1263900780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Now, if I could only get them to inscribe 1 Timothy 5:23 on my wine bottles. ("Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy
stomach's sake and thine often infirmities.") I believe my father had this quote on the front of his wine log.</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Now , if I could only get them to inscribe 1 Timothy 5 : 23 on my wine bottles .
( " Drink no longer water , but use a little wine for thy stomach 's sake and thine often infirmities .
" ) I believe my father had this quote on the front of his wine log .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Now, if I could only get them to inscribe 1 Timothy 5:23 on my wine bottles.
("Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy
stomach's sake and thine often infirmities.
") I believe my father had this quote on the front of his wine log.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30835182</id>
	<title>Sepoy Mutiny.</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1264015560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>The Muslim and Hindu soldiers of the British Raj rose up in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian\_Rebellion\_of\_1857" title="wikipedia.org"> mutiny </a> [wikipedia.org] because lard was used to lubricate the cartridges. Pig fat is haram for Muslims. All animal fats were haram for Hindus.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Muslim and Hindu soldiers of the British Raj rose up in mutiny [ wikipedia.org ] because lard was used to lubricate the cartridges .
Pig fat is haram for Muslims .
All animal fats were haram for Hindus .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Muslim and Hindu soldiers of the British Raj rose up in  mutiny  [wikipedia.org] because lard was used to lubricate the cartridges.
Pig fat is haram for Muslims.
All animal fats were haram for Hindus.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30852518</id>
	<title>FYI</title>
	<author>jockeys</author>
	<datestamp>1264071960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Trijicon does NOT make rifles, they make illuminated sights and illuminated 'scopes.  (all of their products are luminous, hence the choice of verses, I imagine.)

anyhow, they have not marked any rifles.  RTFA</htmltext>
<tokenext>Trijicon does NOT make rifles , they make illuminated sights and illuminated 'scopes .
( all of their products are luminous , hence the choice of verses , I imagine .
) anyhow , they have not marked any rifles .
RTFA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Trijicon does NOT make rifles, they make illuminated sights and illuminated 'scopes.
(all of their products are luminous, hence the choice of verses, I imagine.
)

anyhow, they have not marked any rifles.
RTFA</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30864988</id>
	<title>Re:Oh that sure helps the Islamists...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264163280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I think the directors of this company should be fined the entire cost of the items sold to the military so far, from their own personal pocketbooks. What a hairbrained assinine and offensive stupid thing to do. I hope they pay for it.</p></div><p>Sure, a stupid thing to do, but that would be a ridiculous course of action.  They broke no law, and the military was free *at any time* to examine the weapons for any such inscriptions, offensive or otherwise, and choose another manufacturer if they felt like it.  People are free to be offensive (at least for the moment).  Sure, it's not nice, but we can't exactly criminalize "not being nice."  You sound like one of those gun control people, looking for any excuse to shut down the manufacturers so that guns will only be available to criminals.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the directors of this company should be fined the entire cost of the items sold to the military so far , from their own personal pocketbooks .
What a hairbrained assinine and offensive stupid thing to do .
I hope they pay for it.Sure , a stupid thing to do , but that would be a ridiculous course of action .
They broke no law , and the military was free * at any time * to examine the weapons for any such inscriptions , offensive or otherwise , and choose another manufacturer if they felt like it .
People are free to be offensive ( at least for the moment ) .
Sure , it 's not nice , but we ca n't exactly criminalize " not being nice .
" You sound like one of those gun control people , looking for any excuse to shut down the manufacturers so that guns will only be available to criminals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the directors of this company should be fined the entire cost of the items sold to the military so far, from their own personal pocketbooks.
What a hairbrained assinine and offensive stupid thing to do.
I hope they pay for it.Sure, a stupid thing to do, but that would be a ridiculous course of action.
They broke no law, and the military was free *at any time* to examine the weapons for any such inscriptions, offensive or otherwise, and choose another manufacturer if they felt like it.
People are free to be offensive (at least for the moment).
Sure, it's not nice, but we can't exactly criminalize "not being nice.
"  You sound like one of those gun control people, looking for any excuse to shut down the manufacturers so that guns will only be available to criminals.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823508</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30852346</id>
	<title>Re:Typical</title>
	<author>Actually, I do RTFA</author>
	<datestamp>1264071480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>They've essentially all got graffiti on them.</p></div></blockquote><p>They have part numbers on them (which end in a reference to bible verses).  It's up the manufacturer to come up with part numbers.  There's no graffiti or anything like it.  Looking at the part number, I couldn't figure out what the big deal was until someone literally pointed at the offensive portion.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>They 've essentially all got graffiti on them.They have part numbers on them ( which end in a reference to bible verses ) .
It 's up the manufacturer to come up with part numbers .
There 's no graffiti or anything like it .
Looking at the part number , I could n't figure out what the big deal was until someone literally pointed at the offensive portion .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They've essentially all got graffiti on them.They have part numbers on them (which end in a reference to bible verses).
It's up the manufacturer to come up with part numbers.
There's no graffiti or anything like it.
Looking at the part number, I couldn't figure out what the big deal was until someone literally pointed at the offensive portion.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30832608</id>
	<title>Why not?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264005960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exept for close analogy with German Forces in WWII I do not see there anything really bad.

If US dollars were signed with "In God We Trust", why US weapons cannot contain Bible citations? At least something inspirational for soldiers who must keep their humanity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exept for close analogy with German Forces in WWII I do not see there anything really bad .
If US dollars were signed with " In God We Trust " , why US weapons can not contain Bible citations ?
At least something inspirational for soldiers who must keep their humanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exept for close analogy with German Forces in WWII I do not see there anything really bad.
If US dollars were signed with "In God We Trust", why US weapons cannot contain Bible citations?
At least something inspirational for soldiers who must keep their humanity.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30826064</id>
	<title>Re:Typical</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263902580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else. If they can't do it overtly, they'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way.</p></div></blockquote><p>To be fair, the 'rest of the world' does this to Christians through TV, Internet and other forms of communication and media. 'Indoctrination' is the word you might be searching for. Its not only Christians that do it, the whole world does. Ignore it if you want.......at your own peril! =D</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else .
If they ca n't do it overtly , they 'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way.To be fair , the 'rest of the world ' does this to Christians through TV , Internet and other forms of communication and media .
'Indoctrination ' is the word you might be searching for .
Its not only Christians that do it , the whole world does .
Ignore it if you want.......at your own peril !
= D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else.
If they can't do it overtly, they'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way.To be fair, the 'rest of the world' does this to Christians through TV, Internet and other forms of communication and media.
'Indoctrination' is the word you might be searching for.
Its not only Christians that do it, the whole world does.
Ignore it if you want.......at your own peril!
=D
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30900696</id>
	<title>As an ex Marine Commando</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264444980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Listen, there is nothing funny about warfare. Adding biblical inscriptions just really is not funny at all. I have been a frontline combat soldier and seen things that would make politicians sick and make them think twice about war.  Do you know what?, adding religious inscribtions is bad news indeed.  Enough wars are over religion, just do not go there.

I can tell you if you even think you are doing "Gods Work" you need your head testing and need to get a reality check. War is NOT funny! I have already been slotted a few times and am still suffering the consequences physically, however I try and remain optimistic and I am still deeply traumatised by war and have terrible flashbacks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Listen , there is nothing funny about warfare .
Adding biblical inscriptions just really is not funny at all .
I have been a frontline combat soldier and seen things that would make politicians sick and make them think twice about war .
Do you know what ? , adding religious inscribtions is bad news indeed .
Enough wars are over religion , just do not go there .
I can tell you if you even think you are doing " Gods Work " you need your head testing and need to get a reality check .
War is NOT funny !
I have already been slotted a few times and am still suffering the consequences physically , however I try and remain optimistic and I am still deeply traumatised by war and have terrible flashbacks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Listen, there is nothing funny about warfare.
Adding biblical inscriptions just really is not funny at all.
I have been a frontline combat soldier and seen things that would make politicians sick and make them think twice about war.
Do you know what?, adding religious inscribtions is bad news indeed.
Enough wars are over religion, just do not go there.
I can tell you if you even think you are doing "Gods Work" you need your head testing and need to get a reality check.
War is NOT funny!
I have already been slotted a few times and am still suffering the consequences physically, however I try and remain optimistic and I am still deeply traumatised by war and have terrible flashbacks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30852206</id>
	<title>Re:Their motivation</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264071060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Good luck finding the quotes.  It's not in text, but rather the end of the part number.  That is, \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_JN316 as a part number (I don't know if that was a real verse, but it is the convention</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Good luck finding the quotes .
It 's not in text , but rather the end of the part number .
That is , \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _ \ _JN316 as a part number ( I do n't know if that was a real verse , but it is the convention</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good luck finding the quotes.
It's not in text, but rather the end of the part number.
That is, \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_JN316 as a part number (I don't know if that was a real verse, but it is the convention</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30840034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30836290</id>
	<title>Re:Typical</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1264019880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've seen lots of 'citation needed' posts, but this is the first I've seen that goes on to provide one in the next sentence.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've seen lots of 'citation needed ' posts , but this is the first I 've seen that goes on to provide one in the next sentence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've seen lots of 'citation needed' posts, but this is the first I've seen that goes on to provide one in the next sentence.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30827352</id>
	<title>Typically overblown</title>
	<author>Littleman\_TAMU</author>
	<datestamp>1263912060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The manufacturer put abbreviated Scripture references on its parts.  So what?  If you didn't know anything about the Bible, it could easily be seen as just another part number.  They're not forcing anyone to read the Bible or look up the Scripture reference.  If a manufacturer wanted to put HHGTTG42 or THX1138 on parts or some other geeky reference, people would think it's cool.  It's just as cryptic to anyone without "inside knowledge", but since it's a Bible reference, everyone gets their undergarments in a twist.  It's not an endorsement of Christianity as an official religion by any government.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The manufacturer put abbreviated Scripture references on its parts .
So what ?
If you did n't know anything about the Bible , it could easily be seen as just another part number .
They 're not forcing anyone to read the Bible or look up the Scripture reference .
If a manufacturer wanted to put HHGTTG42 or THX1138 on parts or some other geeky reference , people would think it 's cool .
It 's just as cryptic to anyone without " inside knowledge " , but since it 's a Bible reference , everyone gets their undergarments in a twist .
It 's not an endorsement of Christianity as an official religion by any government .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The manufacturer put abbreviated Scripture references on its parts.
So what?
If you didn't know anything about the Bible, it could easily be seen as just another part number.
They're not forcing anyone to read the Bible or look up the Scripture reference.
If a manufacturer wanted to put HHGTTG42 or THX1138 on parts or some other geeky reference, people would think it's cool.
It's just as cryptic to anyone without "inside knowledge", but since it's a Bible reference, everyone gets their undergarments in a twist.
It's not an endorsement of Christianity as an official religion by any government.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30836928</id>
	<title>Re:Sepoy Mutiny.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263979380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The Muslim and Hindu soldiers of the British Raj rose up in  mutiny  because lard was used to lubricate the cartridges. Pig fat is haram for Muslims. All animal fats were haram for Hindus.</i></p><p>Hindus don't use animal fats? Since when?</p><p>Hindus don't use beef fat, which is quite different from "all animal fats".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Muslim and Hindu soldiers of the British Raj rose up in mutiny because lard was used to lubricate the cartridges .
Pig fat is haram for Muslims .
All animal fats were haram for Hindus.Hindus do n't use animal fats ?
Since when ? Hindus do n't use beef fat , which is quite different from " all animal fats " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Muslim and Hindu soldiers of the British Raj rose up in  mutiny  because lard was used to lubricate the cartridges.
Pig fat is haram for Muslims.
All animal fats were haram for Hindus.Hindus don't use animal fats?
Since when?Hindus don't use beef fat, which is quite different from "all animal fats".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30835182</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829146</id>
	<title>Re:Typical</title>
	<author>clarkn0va</author>
	<datestamp>1264019280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else.</p></div><p>Citation needed. Seriously, if it offends you to learn that somebody put a nearly-invisible bible reference on a rifle sight, I would love to see your reaction when you find out that American currency has "In God we trust" stamped on it.</p><p>And now this from the BBC article:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"Everyone is worried that if they were captured in combat that the enemy would use the Bible quotes against them in captivity or some other form of propaganda."</p></div><p>That's just retarded. Now I'm sitting here trying to imagine how the enemy is going to use a scripture reference on my rifle sight against me. Please, help me out here.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else.Citation needed .
Seriously , if it offends you to learn that somebody put a nearly-invisible bible reference on a rifle sight , I would love to see your reaction when you find out that American currency has " In God we trust " stamped on it.And now this from the BBC article : " Everyone is worried that if they were captured in combat that the enemy would use the Bible quotes against them in captivity or some other form of propaganda .
" That 's just retarded .
Now I 'm sitting here trying to imagine how the enemy is going to use a scripture reference on my rifle sight against me .
Please , help me out here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else.Citation needed.
Seriously, if it offends you to learn that somebody put a nearly-invisible bible reference on a rifle sight, I would love to see your reaction when you find out that American currency has "In God we trust" stamped on it.And now this from the BBC article:"Everyone is worried that if they were captured in combat that the enemy would use the Bible quotes against them in captivity or some other form of propaganda.
"That's just retarded.
Now I'm sitting here trying to imagine how the enemy is going to use a scripture reference on my rifle sight against me.
Please, help me out here.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30906302</id>
	<title>Here's an idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264528620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you don't like the script on the scope.. buy another and leave your anti-religious nonsense at the door.  </p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; Bottom line.. it sounds good on these scopes.</p><p>I would like a little customization etched in mine personally.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do n't like the script on the scope.. buy another and leave your anti-religious nonsense at the door .
    Bottom line.. it sounds good on these scopes.I would like a little customization etched in mine personally .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you don't like the script on the scope.. buy another and leave your anti-religious nonsense at the door.
    Bottom line.. it sounds good on these scopes.I would like a little customization etched in mine personally.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30827684</id>
	<title>blasphemy!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263915300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>blasphemy i say!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>blasphemy i say !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>blasphemy i say!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829174</id>
	<title>Re:Typical</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264019760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most hardcore math types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else. If they can't do it overtly, they'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way. Telling of their convictions is the fact that while they say they've done nothing wrong, they never bothered to tell the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. crowd exactly what they were getting. The sigs should all be refunded. They've essentially all got graffiti on them.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most hardcore math types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else .
If they ca n't do it overtly , they 'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way .
Telling of their convictions is the fact that while they say they 've done nothing wrong , they never bothered to tell the / .
crowd exactly what they were getting .
The sigs should all be refunded .
They 've essentially all got graffiti on them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most hardcore math types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else.
If they can't do it overtly, they'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way.
Telling of their convictions is the fact that while they say they've done nothing wrong, they never bothered to tell the /.
crowd exactly what they were getting.
The sigs should all be refunded.
They've essentially all got graffiti on them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30825558</id>
	<title>Could be worse</title>
	<author>OhHellWithIt</author>
	<datestamp>1263900240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>At least the manufacturer isn't inscribing &quot;JN3:16&quot; or &quot;MAT6:27-31&quot;.</htmltext>
<tokenext>At least the manufacturer is n't inscribing " JN3 : 16 " or " MAT6 : 27-31 " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>At least the manufacturer isn't inscribing "JN3:16" or "MAT6:27-31".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30848402</id>
	<title>BS!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264100040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously?  Who cares?  I buy AKMAK crackers and EZEKIEL bread that both have bible inscriptions on it, our fav. private bank writes "In God We Trust" on all our money.  It's not like the rifle says JesusFTW or has a virgin mary on it...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously ?
Who cares ?
I buy AKMAK crackers and EZEKIEL bread that both have bible inscriptions on it , our fav .
private bank writes " In God We Trust " on all our money .
It 's not like the rifle says JesusFTW or has a virgin mary on it.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously?
Who cares?
I buy AKMAK crackers and EZEKIEL bread that both have bible inscriptions on it, our fav.
private bank writes "In God We Trust" on all our money.
It's not like the rifle says JesusFTW or has a virgin mary on it...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30847138</id>
	<title>Folks need to lighten up</title>
	<author>wAnder</author>
	<datestamp>1264095060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>People need to lighten up.</p><p>If the quotes were instead from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Universe, perhaps something pithy like "Mostly Harmless", we'd be applauding their sense of irony.  Instead they were from another book, just one arguably more well-read.</p><p>The issue here is that these sorts of things will be taken as evidence of some sort of religious crusade.  But Muslims around the world already have more than enough justification to be pissed off, this is just another drop in the bucket.  And even if they didn't, Dutch cartoonists and Salman Rushdie have already stepped on enough toes to merit the occasional assassination attempt for their own politically incorrect behaviour.</p><p>Which is to reiterate: people need to lighten up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>People need to lighten up.If the quotes were instead from the Hitchhiker 's Guide to the Universe , perhaps something pithy like " Mostly Harmless " , we 'd be applauding their sense of irony .
Instead they were from another book , just one arguably more well-read.The issue here is that these sorts of things will be taken as evidence of some sort of religious crusade .
But Muslims around the world already have more than enough justification to be pissed off , this is just another drop in the bucket .
And even if they did n't , Dutch cartoonists and Salman Rushdie have already stepped on enough toes to merit the occasional assassination attempt for their own politically incorrect behaviour.Which is to reiterate : people need to lighten up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>People need to lighten up.If the quotes were instead from the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Universe, perhaps something pithy like "Mostly Harmless", we'd be applauding their sense of irony.
Instead they were from another book, just one arguably more well-read.The issue here is that these sorts of things will be taken as evidence of some sort of religious crusade.
But Muslims around the world already have more than enough justification to be pissed off, this is just another drop in the bucket.
And even if they didn't, Dutch cartoonists and Salman Rushdie have already stepped on enough toes to merit the occasional assassination attempt for their own politically incorrect behaviour.Which is to reiterate: people need to lighten up.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30837820</id>
	<title>This is no big deal</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263983100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is *really* stretching for a church/state link.  The manufacturers are clearly believers, and they put references to their beliefs in their products.  The references aren't even intolerant or violent ones.</p><p>Anyone crying about this is just keeping in practice at crying about stuff.</p><p>Sure, it's silly.  But it's just free expression.  You can't tell me with a straight face that this is coercive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is * really * stretching for a church/state link .
The manufacturers are clearly believers , and they put references to their beliefs in their products .
The references are n't even intolerant or violent ones.Anyone crying about this is just keeping in practice at crying about stuff.Sure , it 's silly .
But it 's just free expression .
You ca n't tell me with a straight face that this is coercive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is *really* stretching for a church/state link.
The manufacturers are clearly believers, and they put references to their beliefs in their products.
The references aren't even intolerant or violent ones.Anyone crying about this is just keeping in practice at crying about stuff.Sure, it's silly.
But it's just free expression.
You can't tell me with a straight face that this is coercive.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30902734</id>
	<title>Jules 0:0</title>
	<author>laejoh</author>
	<datestamp>1264513800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>a.k.a. Ezekiel 25:17.</htmltext>
<tokenext>a.k.a .
Ezekiel 25 : 17 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a.k.a.
Ezekiel 25:17.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30835912</id>
	<title>Five is right out</title>
	<author>Hognoxious</author>
	<datestamp>1264018200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do they produce grenades (hand), holy, Antiochish, blowing thine enemies to bits in Thy mercy for the purpose of?</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOrgLj9lOwk" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOrgLj9lOwk</a> [youtube.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do they produce grenades ( hand ) , holy , Antiochish , blowing thine enemies to bits in Thy mercy for the purpose of ? http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = xOrgLj9lOwk [ youtube.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do they produce grenades (hand), holy, Antiochish, blowing thine enemies to bits in Thy mercy for the purpose of?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOrgLj9lOwk [youtube.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829176</id>
	<title>Re:Typical</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264019760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else. If they can't do it overtly, they'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way. Telling of their convictions is the fact that while they say they've done nothing wrong, they never bothered to tell the army exactly what they were getting.</p><p>The rifles should all be refunded. They've essentially all got graffiti on them.</p></div><p>Suck it you commie bastard!  A big shout-out to the Mitten... A.K.A. Michigan, The US ARMY/US military, all the warriors who use these weapons to keep ass clowns like you alive and free &amp; the fine people of Trijicon who provide great products for my/our/US warriors!  "ObsessiveMathsFreak"... more like Obsessive liberal douche!  I would love to see you do a little less "math" and make a commitment such as that of the many fine US warriors, who primarily, very much believe in God, the Bible and thank the lord for what they have/he has given them and for looking after them.  If you have any doubt, you liberal, snotty, snarky, pfc (poor fucking civilian), I am an ex-warrior and very much thank God, for allowing me to continue on and our fine warriors who have fought, bled, died and thanked God repeatedly to allow me to exercise my right to speak my mind as I see fit.  I would be very proud to have a Bible scripture on my weapon/scope/etc.   I think your spew of crap/statement in this thread is graffiti !</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else .
If they ca n't do it overtly , they 'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way .
Telling of their convictions is the fact that while they say they 've done nothing wrong , they never bothered to tell the army exactly what they were getting.The rifles should all be refunded .
They 've essentially all got graffiti on them.Suck it you commie bastard !
A big shout-out to the Mitten... A.K.A. Michigan , The US ARMY/US military , all the warriors who use these weapons to keep ass clowns like you alive and free &amp; the fine people of Trijicon who provide great products for my/our/US warriors !
" ObsessiveMathsFreak " ... more like Obsessive liberal douche !
I would love to see you do a little less " math " and make a commitment such as that of the many fine US warriors , who primarily , very much believe in God , the Bible and thank the lord for what they have/he has given them and for looking after them .
If you have any doubt , you liberal , snotty , snarky , pfc ( poor fucking civilian ) , I am an ex-warrior and very much thank God , for allowing me to continue on and our fine warriors who have fought , bled , died and thanked God repeatedly to allow me to exercise my right to speak my mind as I see fit .
I would be very proud to have a Bible scripture on my weapon/scope/etc .
I think your spew of crap/statement in this thread is graffiti !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most hardcore religious types typically seek to impose their beliefs on everyone else.
If they can't do it overtly, they'll adopt this kind of passive aggressive nonsense to get their way.
Telling of their convictions is the fact that while they say they've done nothing wrong, they never bothered to tell the army exactly what they were getting.The rifles should all be refunded.
They've essentially all got graffiti on them.Suck it you commie bastard!
A big shout-out to the Mitten... A.K.A. Michigan, The US ARMY/US military, all the warriors who use these weapons to keep ass clowns like you alive and free &amp; the fine people of Trijicon who provide great products for my/our/US warriors!
"ObsessiveMathsFreak"... more like Obsessive liberal douche!
I would love to see you do a little less "math" and make a commitment such as that of the many fine US warriors, who primarily, very much believe in God, the Bible and thank the lord for what they have/he has given them and for looking after them.
If you have any doubt, you liberal, snotty, snarky, pfc (poor fucking civilian), I am an ex-warrior and very much thank God, for allowing me to continue on and our fine warriors who have fought, bled, died and thanked God repeatedly to allow me to exercise my right to speak my mind as I see fit.
I would be very proud to have a Bible scripture on my weapon/scope/etc.
I think your spew of crap/statement in this thread is graffiti !
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30859456</id>
	<title>It's not the weapon...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264176060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The optic's model type portion of the serial number is a reference to the bible. No need to swap out the whole rifle, just swap out the optic. I, for one, welcome the opportunity to buy a ton of surplus Trijicon optics at discount prices from the US Military. They're the best gun site optics out there.<br>Way to have a misleading headline... again...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The optic 's model type portion of the serial number is a reference to the bible .
No need to swap out the whole rifle , just swap out the optic .
I , for one , welcome the opportunity to buy a ton of surplus Trijicon optics at discount prices from the US Military .
They 're the best gun site optics out there.Way to have a misleading headline... again.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The optic's model type portion of the serial number is a reference to the bible.
No need to swap out the whole rifle, just swap out the optic.
I, for one, welcome the opportunity to buy a ton of surplus Trijicon optics at discount prices from the US Military.
They're the best gun site optics out there.Way to have a misleading headline... again...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30865104</id>
	<title>Re:Could be worse</title>
	<author>ModernGeek</author>
	<datestamp>1264164120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think you mean Luke 6:27-31</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think you mean Luke 6 : 27-31</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think you mean Luke 6:27-31</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30825558</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30826064
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30905586
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30828162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30902720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30836290
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30852206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30840034
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30910356
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30883222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30865104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30825558
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30852346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30864988
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30888722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30885788
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30837820
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30836928
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30835182
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30849314
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829176
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30839358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30832608
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1738246_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30910476
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823508
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30840034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30852206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30832608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30839358
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30835182
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30836928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30828162
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30902720
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30835912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30831658
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30864988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30888722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30883222
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30910356
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30910476
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30827352
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30837820
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30885788
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30825792
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30823586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829174
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30826064
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829176
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30829146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30849314
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30836290
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30905586
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30852346
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1738246.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30825558
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1738246.30865104
</commentlist>
</conversation>
