<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_19_1429258</id>
	<title>A Hyper-Velocity Impact In the Asteroid Belt?</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1263915480000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>astroengine writes <i>"Astronomers have spotted something rather odd in the asteroid belt. It looks like a comet, but it's got a circular orbit, similar to an asteroid. Whether it's an asteroid or a comet, it has a long, comet-like tail, suggesting something is being vented into space. Some experts think it could be a very rare comet/asteroid hybrid being heated by the sun, but there's an even more exciting possibility: It could be the first ever observation of <a href="http://news.discovery.com/space/mystery-object-behaves-both-like-a-comet-and-asteroid.html">two asteroids colliding in the asteroid belt</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>astroengine writes " Astronomers have spotted something rather odd in the asteroid belt .
It looks like a comet , but it 's got a circular orbit , similar to an asteroid .
Whether it 's an asteroid or a comet , it has a long , comet-like tail , suggesting something is being vented into space .
Some experts think it could be a very rare comet/asteroid hybrid being heated by the sun , but there 's an even more exciting possibility : It could be the first ever observation of two asteroids colliding in the asteroid belt .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>astroengine writes "Astronomers have spotted something rather odd in the asteroid belt.
It looks like a comet, but it's got a circular orbit, similar to an asteroid.
Whether it's an asteroid or a comet, it has a long, comet-like tail, suggesting something is being vented into space.
Some experts think it could be a very rare comet/asteroid hybrid being heated by the sun, but there's an even more exciting possibility: It could be the first ever observation of two asteroids colliding in the asteroid belt.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827564</id>
	<title>Re:The Aliens are coming</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263914100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>or Lister is just playing pool again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>or Lister is just playing pool again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>or Lister is just playing pool again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820096</id>
	<title>Okayy..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263920580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So what they are saying is comets usually orbit from the Oort cloud to the sun and back out again, while asteroids "usually" have a circular orbit as they are the left over bits from the solar systems creation and/or the by products of previous collisions between other asteroids. So there must be Nothing else flying around out there that may have both these characteristics?Nothing to see here, move along..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So what they are saying is comets usually orbit from the Oort cloud to the sun and back out again , while asteroids " usually " have a circular orbit as they are the left over bits from the solar systems creation and/or the by products of previous collisions between other asteroids .
So there must be Nothing else flying around out there that may have both these characteristics ? Nothing to see here , move along. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So what they are saying is comets usually orbit from the Oort cloud to the sun and back out again, while asteroids "usually" have a circular orbit as they are the left over bits from the solar systems creation and/or the by products of previous collisions between other asteroids.
So there must be Nothing else flying around out there that may have both these characteristics?Nothing to see here, move along..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819930</id>
	<title>If it's a result of a collision...</title>
	<author>FTWinston</author>
	<datestamp>1263919920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What way did <i>the other one</i> go? Time to call Bruce Willis, methinks.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What way did the other one go ?
Time to call Bruce Willis , methinks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What way did the other one go?
Time to call Bruce Willis, methinks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30850224</id>
	<title>Re:Hyper-Velocity</title>
	<author>DrVxD</author>
	<datestamp>1264064820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Eg. one coming in from the left at 3/4c and one coming in from the left at 3/4c.</p></div><p>If they're both coming from the left at 0.75c, then their relative velocity will be zero....</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Eg .
one coming in from the left at 3/4c and one coming in from the left at 3/4c.If they 're both coming from the left at 0.75c , then their relative velocity will be zero... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eg.
one coming in from the left at 3/4c and one coming in from the left at 3/4c.If they're both coming from the left at 0.75c, then their relative velocity will be zero....
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820956</id>
	<title>Probably not</title>
	<author>Angst Badger</author>
	<datestamp>1263924240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Everyone knows the asteroids pass right through each other. It's either been shot or it has collided with a ship.</p><p>Honestly, what kind of education are scientists getting these days?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Everyone knows the asteroids pass right through each other .
It 's either been shot or it has collided with a ship.Honestly , what kind of education are scientists getting these days ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Everyone knows the asteroids pass right through each other.
It's either been shot or it has collided with a ship.Honestly, what kind of education are scientists getting these days?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820290</id>
	<title>Even more exciting possibility!</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1263921300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>
If the scientists are coming up with such dull scenarios, how can they motivate the youngsters into science?<p>

It is well known that when rebels jump into hyperspace to escape the pursuing imperial battle cruisers, they might pop out in an asteroid belt. But most people think it is always possible to negotiate the craft around it and escape. Such false notions are strengthened by reports of more manuevrable craft deliberately entering asteroid belts to escape pursuit. But they don't always succeed and they might actually collide with an asteroid. The danger has always been there.</p><p>

Also there is an even more exciting possibility of cave dwelling gigantic worms that live in these asteroids might once in a while actually close their mouths well in time to trap the unwary spacecraft and digest the contents. The by products of such digestion are usually ejected with high velocity and can be seen for millions of miles. True Story. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the scientists are coming up with such dull scenarios , how can they motivate the youngsters into science ?
It is well known that when rebels jump into hyperspace to escape the pursuing imperial battle cruisers , they might pop out in an asteroid belt .
But most people think it is always possible to negotiate the craft around it and escape .
Such false notions are strengthened by reports of more manuevrable craft deliberately entering asteroid belts to escape pursuit .
But they do n't always succeed and they might actually collide with an asteroid .
The danger has always been there .
Also there is an even more exciting possibility of cave dwelling gigantic worms that live in these asteroids might once in a while actually close their mouths well in time to trap the unwary spacecraft and digest the contents .
The by products of such digestion are usually ejected with high velocity and can be seen for millions of miles .
True Story .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
If the scientists are coming up with such dull scenarios, how can they motivate the youngsters into science?
It is well known that when rebels jump into hyperspace to escape the pursuing imperial battle cruisers, they might pop out in an asteroid belt.
But most people think it is always possible to negotiate the craft around it and escape.
Such false notions are strengthened by reports of more manuevrable craft deliberately entering asteroid belts to escape pursuit.
But they don't always succeed and they might actually collide with an asteroid.
The danger has always been there.
Also there is an even more exciting possibility of cave dwelling gigantic worms that live in these asteroids might once in a while actually close their mouths well in time to trap the unwary spacecraft and digest the contents.
The by products of such digestion are usually ejected with high velocity and can be seen for millions of miles.
True Story. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820320</id>
	<title>SHI!T!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263921420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Whether you DOG THAT IT mIS. IT</htmltext>
<tokenext>Whether you DOG THAT IT mIS .
IT</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whether you DOG THAT IT mIS.
IT</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820474</id>
	<title>to heck with the star wars vernacular</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1263922260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>can you possibly understand what grave implications this has in store for superman? the kryptonite is coming!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>can you possibly understand what grave implications this has in store for superman ?
the kryptonite is coming !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>can you possibly understand what grave implications this has in store for superman?
the kryptonite is coming!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827584</id>
	<title>Re:Probably not</title>
	<author>Grim Leaper</author>
	<datestamp>1263914220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmm.  Has anyone done a physics-based remake of Asteroids?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm .
Has anyone done a physics-based remake of Asteroids ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm.
Has anyone done a physics-based remake of Asteroids?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820956</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819832</id>
	<title>Or, maybe...</title>
	<author>Jedi Holocron</author>
	<datestamp>1263919560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Alpha Centari battlestar is venting waste prior to invasion...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Alpha Centari battlestar is venting waste prior to invasion.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Alpha Centari battlestar is venting waste prior to invasion...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820000</id>
	<title>Like a big pool table....</title>
	<author>Fbelch</author>
	<datestamp>1263920220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So... did this collision send anything in our direction?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So... did this collision send anything in our direction ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... did this collision send anything in our direction?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821512</id>
	<title>Re:We need an asteroid in the face, folks.</title>
	<author>durrr</author>
	<datestamp>1263926640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Make it fall on the people handing out goverment cash, the irony would not go unnoticed among their replacements.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Make it fall on the people handing out goverment cash , the irony would not go unnoticed among their replacements .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Make it fall on the people handing out goverment cash, the irony would not go unnoticed among their replacements.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30824272</id>
	<title>Last stop!</title>
	<author>docwatson223</author>
	<datestamp>1263894420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I wonder if it's something braking before it gets into the inner planets...</htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder if it 's something braking before it gets into the inner planets.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder if it's something braking before it gets into the inner planets...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820930</id>
	<title>We need an asteroid in the face, folks.</title>
	<author>FreakerSFX</author>
	<datestamp>1263924120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously...not anything big but something Tunguska sized would do, especially over a moderately populated area.</p><p>We spend peanuts on detecting potential collisions that could be the cause of the next extinction event.  Mark my words, there'll be more money spent on earthquake analysis for Haiti and other "sensational" causes than will be spent on detecting PHOs (potentially hazardous objects) in the next 10 years.   I am not denigrating the need to spend money on Haiti - that's a tragedy for sure - but when you look at how reactive we are with public money (New Orleans, anyone? Despite warnings, no one saw this coming?) when a much smaller amount spent up-front would potentially save not just a lot more lives but a lot more money....if better building codes had been in force in Haiti - how many more people would have survived?  How much money would have been saved?</p><p>I despair for our race.  If we saw a dinosaur killer coming and had a program in place already we could probably survive it.  Asteroids move slowly but are heavy and require a lot of time/energy to deflect so we would see them early and be able to react...comets move much, much faster but are lighter so presumably if we had the detection gear and a few mass drivers in space already, we could deal with it in a safe time frame.</p><p>So give us our Haiti or Katrina from space, please.  Make it hurt but not too much - just enough to wake up the people handing out government cash.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously...not anything big but something Tunguska sized would do , especially over a moderately populated area.We spend peanuts on detecting potential collisions that could be the cause of the next extinction event .
Mark my words , there 'll be more money spent on earthquake analysis for Haiti and other " sensational " causes than will be spent on detecting PHOs ( potentially hazardous objects ) in the next 10 years .
I am not denigrating the need to spend money on Haiti - that 's a tragedy for sure - but when you look at how reactive we are with public money ( New Orleans , anyone ?
Despite warnings , no one saw this coming ?
) when a much smaller amount spent up-front would potentially save not just a lot more lives but a lot more money....if better building codes had been in force in Haiti - how many more people would have survived ?
How much money would have been saved ? I despair for our race .
If we saw a dinosaur killer coming and had a program in place already we could probably survive it .
Asteroids move slowly but are heavy and require a lot of time/energy to deflect so we would see them early and be able to react...comets move much , much faster but are lighter so presumably if we had the detection gear and a few mass drivers in space already , we could deal with it in a safe time frame.So give us our Haiti or Katrina from space , please .
Make it hurt but not too much - just enough to wake up the people handing out government cash .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously...not anything big but something Tunguska sized would do, especially over a moderately populated area.We spend peanuts on detecting potential collisions that could be the cause of the next extinction event.
Mark my words, there'll be more money spent on earthquake analysis for Haiti and other "sensational" causes than will be spent on detecting PHOs (potentially hazardous objects) in the next 10 years.
I am not denigrating the need to spend money on Haiti - that's a tragedy for sure - but when you look at how reactive we are with public money (New Orleans, anyone?
Despite warnings, no one saw this coming?
) when a much smaller amount spent up-front would potentially save not just a lot more lives but a lot more money....if better building codes had been in force in Haiti - how many more people would have survived?
How much money would have been saved?I despair for our race.
If we saw a dinosaur killer coming and had a program in place already we could probably survive it.
Asteroids move slowly but are heavy and require a lot of time/energy to deflect so we would see them early and be able to react...comets move much, much faster but are lighter so presumably if we had the detection gear and a few mass drivers in space already, we could deal with it in a safe time frame.So give us our Haiti or Katrina from space, please.
Make it hurt but not too much - just enough to wake up the people handing out government cash.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821924</id>
	<title>Re:Hyper-Velocity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263928380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Okay.  Apparently <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypervelocity" title="wikipedia.org">hypervelocity</a> [wikipedia.org] is an actual astronomy and/or material sciences term:<blockquote><div><p>The term hypervelocity usually refers to a very high velocity, approximately over 3,000 meters per second (6,700 mph, 11,000 km/h, 10,000 ft/s, or Mach 8.8). In particular, it refers to velocities so high that the strength of materials upon impact is very small compared to inertial stresses. Thus, even metals behave like fluids under hypervelocity impact. Extreme hypervelocity results in vaporization of the impactor and target.</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Okay .
Apparently hypervelocity [ wikipedia.org ] is an actual astronomy and/or material sciences term : The term hypervelocity usually refers to a very high velocity , approximately over 3,000 meters per second ( 6,700 mph , 11,000 km/h , 10,000 ft/s , or Mach 8.8 ) .
In particular , it refers to velocities so high that the strength of materials upon impact is very small compared to inertial stresses .
Thus , even metals behave like fluids under hypervelocity impact .
Extreme hypervelocity results in vaporization of the impactor and target .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Okay.
Apparently hypervelocity [wikipedia.org] is an actual astronomy and/or material sciences term:The term hypervelocity usually refers to a very high velocity, approximately over 3,000 meters per second (6,700 mph, 11,000 km/h, 10,000 ft/s, or Mach 8.8).
In particular, it refers to velocities so high that the strength of materials upon impact is very small compared to inertial stresses.
Thus, even metals behave like fluids under hypervelocity impact.
Extreme hypervelocity results in vaporization of the impactor and target.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820532</id>
	<title>Re:Asteroids boring?</title>
	<author>Suki I</author>
	<datestamp>1263922560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wrong Galaxy!

It's the RDA ship co0ming back from Pandora.  They picked a different time in the continuum to plot a new strategy for taking unobtanium from the Na'vi.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wrong Galaxy !
It 's the RDA ship co0ming back from Pandora .
They picked a different time in the continuum to plot a new strategy for taking unobtanium from the Na'vi .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wrong Galaxy!
It's the RDA ship co0ming back from Pandora.
They picked a different time in the continuum to plot a new strategy for taking unobtanium from the Na'vi.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30850286</id>
	<title>Re:We need an asteroid in the face, folks.</title>
	<author>DrVxD</author>
	<datestamp>1264065000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>especially over a moderately populated area.</p></div><p>I believe it's traditional for this kind of thing to land on Phoenix, AZ.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>especially over a moderately populated area.I believe it 's traditional for this kind of thing to land on Phoenix , AZ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>especially over a moderately populated area.I believe it's traditional for this kind of thing to land on Phoenix, AZ.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30832762</id>
	<title>Re:We need an asteroid in the face, folks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1264006500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The chance that the human race will be eradicated due to an asteroid impact within let's say the next thousand years is extremely low. I've once read an article about J. Richard Gott, who applied the doomsday argument / copernican principle to the survival of humanity.<br>It's a statistical method that allowed him to predict how long humanity will last, if you know nothing, except for how long it exists already. Well, guess there the problem was that human-made risks are probably increasing and everything goes at a faster pace, so I don't trust this...<br>But the risk to get hit by an asteroid probably hasn't changed at all during the last million years, so by knowing, how long ago the last asteroid impact was that had the potential to erradicate the human race, it should allow us to calculate the probabilty to go extinct because of an asteroid within the next thousand years or so, I haven't done it, but I suppose the chance is tiny.</p><p>We take risks all the time, so I think we she focus on those that are high and that we can technically handle. Imho spending billions on some anti-asteroid defense would be too early considering the risk. We most likely have enough time to deal with this.</p><p>Personally I rather believe that the technological revolution and limited resources will be a much bigger problem for our race. Within a rather short time-frame machines will most likely be able to surpass human intelligence, which has an impact on jobs and makes the whole human race rather obsolete from the perspective of such an artificial intelligence.<br>So by developing such AIs and letting it make decisions on a big system level for us with the goal to get things done as efficiently as possible, we might really lose control. Guess I don't live long enough to see that. Would be interesting though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The chance that the human race will be eradicated due to an asteroid impact within let 's say the next thousand years is extremely low .
I 've once read an article about J. Richard Gott , who applied the doomsday argument / copernican principle to the survival of humanity.It 's a statistical method that allowed him to predict how long humanity will last , if you know nothing , except for how long it exists already .
Well , guess there the problem was that human-made risks are probably increasing and everything goes at a faster pace , so I do n't trust this...But the risk to get hit by an asteroid probably has n't changed at all during the last million years , so by knowing , how long ago the last asteroid impact was that had the potential to erradicate the human race , it should allow us to calculate the probabilty to go extinct because of an asteroid within the next thousand years or so , I have n't done it , but I suppose the chance is tiny.We take risks all the time , so I think we she focus on those that are high and that we can technically handle .
Imho spending billions on some anti-asteroid defense would be too early considering the risk .
We most likely have enough time to deal with this.Personally I rather believe that the technological revolution and limited resources will be a much bigger problem for our race .
Within a rather short time-frame machines will most likely be able to surpass human intelligence , which has an impact on jobs and makes the whole human race rather obsolete from the perspective of such an artificial intelligence.So by developing such AIs and letting it make decisions on a big system level for us with the goal to get things done as efficiently as possible , we might really lose control .
Guess I do n't live long enough to see that .
Would be interesting though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The chance that the human race will be eradicated due to an asteroid impact within let's say the next thousand years is extremely low.
I've once read an article about J. Richard Gott, who applied the doomsday argument / copernican principle to the survival of humanity.It's a statistical method that allowed him to predict how long humanity will last, if you know nothing, except for how long it exists already.
Well, guess there the problem was that human-made risks are probably increasing and everything goes at a faster pace, so I don't trust this...But the risk to get hit by an asteroid probably hasn't changed at all during the last million years, so by knowing, how long ago the last asteroid impact was that had the potential to erradicate the human race, it should allow us to calculate the probabilty to go extinct because of an asteroid within the next thousand years or so, I haven't done it, but I suppose the chance is tiny.We take risks all the time, so I think we she focus on those that are high and that we can technically handle.
Imho spending billions on some anti-asteroid defense would be too early considering the risk.
We most likely have enough time to deal with this.Personally I rather believe that the technological revolution and limited resources will be a much bigger problem for our race.
Within a rather short time-frame machines will most likely be able to surpass human intelligence, which has an impact on jobs and makes the whole human race rather obsolete from the perspective of such an artificial intelligence.So by developing such AIs and letting it make decisions on a big system level for us with the goal to get things done as efficiently as possible, we might really lose control.
Guess I don't live long enough to see that.
Would be interesting though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820122</id>
	<title>No</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263920700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's Nibiru and the Anunnaki are going to conquer Earth on Dec 21, 2012!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Nibiru and the Anunnaki are going to conquer Earth on Dec 21 , 2012 !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Nibiru and the Anunnaki are going to conquer Earth on Dec 21, 2012!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30822042</id>
	<title>Re:Damn you spaceballs!</title>
	<author>MisterZimbu</author>
	<datestamp>1263928860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Please never spell "ludicrous" like that again.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Please never spell " ludicrous " like that again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Please never spell "ludicrous" like that again.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30829912</id>
	<title>Re:How is that more exciting?</title>
	<author>aug24</author>
	<datestamp>1263985920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Asteroid collisions can produce big delta-V effects.</p><p>Big lumps of rock fall towards sun.</p><p>Earth is in the way.</p><p>We live on Earth.</p><p>HTH.</p><p>J.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Asteroid collisions can produce big delta-V effects.Big lumps of rock fall towards sun.Earth is in the way.We live on Earth.HTH.J .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Asteroid collisions can produce big delta-V effects.Big lumps of rock fall towards sun.Earth is in the way.We live on Earth.HTH.J.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820784</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820784</id>
	<title>How is that more exciting?</title>
	<author>Maltheus</author>
	<datestamp>1263923580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How is an asteroid collision more exciting than some kind of funky, very rare asteroid/comet hybrid?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How is an asteroid collision more exciting than some kind of funky , very rare asteroid/comet hybrid ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How is an asteroid collision more exciting than some kind of funky, very rare asteroid/comet hybrid?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30822996</id>
	<title>Re:If it's a result of a collision...</title>
	<author>PGOER</author>
	<datestamp>1263931920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think we should call Harrison Ford and Aerosmith.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think we should call Harrison Ford and Aerosmith .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think we should call Harrison Ford and Aerosmith.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827532</id>
	<title>Re:Or, maybe...</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263913740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The Alpha Centari battlestar is venting waste prior to invasion...</p></div></blockquote><p>

Nonsense, we've been at peace with the Centari since 1947. They wouldn't dare invade now.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Alpha Centari battlestar is venting waste prior to invasion.. . Nonsense , we 've been at peace with the Centari since 1947 .
They would n't dare invade now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Alpha Centari battlestar is venting waste prior to invasion...

Nonsense, we've been at peace with the Centari since 1947.
They wouldn't dare invade now.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819876</id>
	<title>Asteroids boring?</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1263919740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>They don't generally collide!? What about when the Millenium Falcon hid in one? Does that mean the Empire Strikes Back was all made up? Next thing you're going to tell me that there aren't giant space eels living in the bigger rocks. (Places fingers in ears and sings loudly Star Wars theme song)</htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't generally collide ! ?
What about when the Millenium Falcon hid in one ?
Does that mean the Empire Strikes Back was all made up ?
Next thing you 're going to tell me that there are n't giant space eels living in the bigger rocks .
( Places fingers in ears and sings loudly Star Wars theme song )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't generally collide!?
What about when the Millenium Falcon hid in one?
Does that mean the Empire Strikes Back was all made up?
Next thing you're going to tell me that there aren't giant space eels living in the bigger rocks.
(Places fingers in ears and sings loudly Star Wars theme song)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30823964</id>
	<title>A video of it happening!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263893040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Someone achieved to capture it on video: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZfsnA7dAHI" title="youtube.com">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZfsnA7dAHI</a> [youtube.com]<br>Unbelievable. I wonder what that thing in the middle is...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Someone achieved to capture it on video : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = cZfsnA7dAHI [ youtube.com ] Unbelievable .
I wonder what that thing in the middle is.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Someone achieved to capture it on video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZfsnA7dAHI [youtube.com]Unbelievable.
I wonder what that thing in the middle is...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820670</id>
	<title>Re:Who was driving?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263923220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A collision between asteroids?  Who wants to bet a woman was driving one of them?</p></div><p>According to this recent article, <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=pregnant-brain-as-racecar" title="scientificamerican.com">http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=pregnant-brain-as-racecar</a> [scientificamerican.com] , they (at least the pregnant or postpartum) have a lot more on their minds than us simple menfolk.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A collision between asteroids ?
Who wants to bet a woman was driving one of them ? According to this recent article , http : //www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm ? id = pregnant-brain-as-racecar [ scientificamerican.com ] , they ( at least the pregnant or postpartum ) have a lot more on their minds than us simple menfolk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A collision between asteroids?
Who wants to bet a woman was driving one of them?According to this recent article, http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=pregnant-brain-as-racecar [scientificamerican.com] , they (at least the pregnant or postpartum) have a lot more on their minds than us simple menfolk.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820414</id>
	<title>Imprecise calculations from the navicomputer?</title>
	<author>jzarling</author>
	<datestamp>1263921900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Han said<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..."Without precise calculations... we'd fly right through a star, bounce too close to a supernova, and that'd end your trip real quick, wouldn't it?"</htmltext>
<tokenext>Han said ... " Without precise calculations... we 'd fly right through a star , bounce too close to a supernova , and that 'd end your trip real quick , would n't it ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Han said ..."Without precise calculations... we'd fly right through a star, bounce too close to a supernova, and that'd end your trip real quick, wouldn't it?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820404</id>
	<title>Hyper-Velocity</title>
	<author>camperdave</author>
	<datestamp>1263921840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What exactly do they mean by hyper-velocity?  Are we witnessing a collision between two objects whose velocities add up to more than the speed of light?  Eg. one coming in from the left at 3/4c and one coming in from the left at 3/4c.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What exactly do they mean by hyper-velocity ?
Are we witnessing a collision between two objects whose velocities add up to more than the speed of light ?
Eg. one coming in from the left at 3/4c and one coming in from the left at 3/4c .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What exactly do they mean by hyper-velocity?
Are we witnessing a collision between two objects whose velocities add up to more than the speed of light?
Eg. one coming in from the left at 3/4c and one coming in from the left at 3/4c.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827544</id>
	<title>Re:If it's a result of a collision...</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263913860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>What way did the other one go? Time to call Bruce Willis,</p></div> </blockquote><p>

Cant we send up John Travolta and Tom Cruise instead. There's still a chance Willis could make a decent movie.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>What way did the other one go ?
Time to call Bruce Willis , Cant we send up John Travolta and Tom Cruise instead .
There 's still a chance Willis could make a decent movie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What way did the other one go?
Time to call Bruce Willis, 

Cant we send up John Travolta and Tom Cruise instead.
There's still a chance Willis could make a decent movie.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819808</id>
	<title>Who was driving?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263919440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>A collision between asteroids?  Who wants to bet a woman was driving one of them?</htmltext>
<tokenext>A collision between asteroids ?
Who wants to bet a woman was driving one of them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A collision between asteroids?
Who wants to bet a woman was driving one of them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819898</id>
	<title>Missed Solution</title>
	<author>gregarican</author>
	<datestamp>1263919800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They just should have slammed down the 'Hyperspace' button...sigh...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They just should have slammed down the 'Hyperspace ' button...sigh.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They just should have slammed down the 'Hyperspace' button...sigh...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821402</id>
	<title>My insurance premium is going to kill me...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263926220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I forgot where I parked my ship, and now some idiot has ran into it... again!<br>My insurance agent has no sense of humor. (Or sense of smell for that matter.)<br>Guess I'll have to cut my anthropological survey of indigenous primitives short to deal with this. =:-(</p><p>(Hey!  You with the butterfly net, just calm down and take a seat, it's a joke. Yes, that's right, a joke, much like you. Only humans and really good chat-bots ever post to slashdot.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I forgot where I parked my ship , and now some idiot has ran into it... again ! My insurance agent has no sense of humor .
( Or sense of smell for that matter .
) Guess I 'll have to cut my anthropological survey of indigenous primitives short to deal with this .
= : - ( ( Hey ! You with the butterfly net , just calm down and take a seat , it 's a joke .
Yes , that 's right , a joke , much like you .
Only humans and really good chat-bots ever post to slashdot .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I forgot where I parked my ship, and now some idiot has ran into it... again!My insurance agent has no sense of humor.
(Or sense of smell for that matter.
)Guess I'll have to cut my anthropological survey of indigenous primitives short to deal with this.
=:-((Hey!  You with the butterfly net, just calm down and take a seat, it's a joke.
Yes, that's right, a joke, much like you.
Only humans and really good chat-bots ever post to slashdot.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820190</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820074</id>
	<title>Lateral spray</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263920520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Seems to me that an asteroid collision would most likely produce lateral debris spray that would be more tangential to the orbit than perpendicular to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Seems to me that an asteroid collision would most likely produce lateral debris spray that would be more tangential to the orbit than perpendicular to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seems to me that an asteroid collision would most likely produce lateral debris spray that would be more tangential to the orbit than perpendicular to it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821696</id>
	<title>Priorities are a function of Probabilities</title>
	<author>Orne</author>
	<datestamp>1263927420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scenario 1: Asteroid strike.  I defer to <a href="http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/sl9/back2.html" title="nasa.gov">NASA JPL</a> [nasa.gov], the Tunguska event (100-meter class = ~ 15 mil tons TNT) asteroid occurs once or twice / 1000 years.  A 1000-meter class is 1 in 15 million years.  An 8000-meter class (dinosaur killer) is 1 in 50-100 million years.</p><p>Scenario 2: Earthquake.  <a href="http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/nca/ucerf/" title="usgs.gov">San Francisco</a> [usgs.gov] has an annual forecast of earthquake probabilities, and they predict a 68\% probability of a 6.7 Magnitude or greater in the next 30 years.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richter\_magnitude\_scale" title="wikipedia.org">Wikipedia</a> [wikipedia.org] gives a probability scale for earthquakes, where a Magnitude 7 (similar to what struke Haiti) occurs 18 / year.  A single 6.7 earthquake (P = 120/year) is equivalent to 16 kilotons of energy, or about 1 Tungaska event (P = 0.004/year).</p><p>Given the disparity in the probability of asteroid strikes (on populated areas, no less) vs earthquakes, it should be no surprise that the world governments believe money is better spent on earthquake prediction and evacuation relief, not on asteroid strike detection.  The "bang for the buck" is clearly higher in earthquake spending.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scenario 1 : Asteroid strike .
I defer to NASA JPL [ nasa.gov ] , the Tunguska event ( 100-meter class = ~ 15 mil tons TNT ) asteroid occurs once or twice / 1000 years .
A 1000-meter class is 1 in 15 million years .
An 8000-meter class ( dinosaur killer ) is 1 in 50-100 million years.Scenario 2 : Earthquake .
San Francisco [ usgs.gov ] has an annual forecast of earthquake probabilities , and they predict a 68 \ % probability of a 6.7 Magnitude or greater in the next 30 years .
Wikipedia [ wikipedia.org ] gives a probability scale for earthquakes , where a Magnitude 7 ( similar to what struke Haiti ) occurs 18 / year .
A single 6.7 earthquake ( P = 120/year ) is equivalent to 16 kilotons of energy , or about 1 Tungaska event ( P = 0.004/year ) .Given the disparity in the probability of asteroid strikes ( on populated areas , no less ) vs earthquakes , it should be no surprise that the world governments believe money is better spent on earthquake prediction and evacuation relief , not on asteroid strike detection .
The " bang for the buck " is clearly higher in earthquake spending .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scenario 1: Asteroid strike.
I defer to NASA JPL [nasa.gov], the Tunguska event (100-meter class = ~ 15 mil tons TNT) asteroid occurs once or twice / 1000 years.
A 1000-meter class is 1 in 15 million years.
An 8000-meter class (dinosaur killer) is 1 in 50-100 million years.Scenario 2: Earthquake.
San Francisco [usgs.gov] has an annual forecast of earthquake probabilities, and they predict a 68\% probability of a 6.7 Magnitude or greater in the next 30 years.
Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] gives a probability scale for earthquakes, where a Magnitude 7 (similar to what struke Haiti) occurs 18 / year.
A single 6.7 earthquake (P = 120/year) is equivalent to 16 kilotons of energy, or about 1 Tungaska event (P = 0.004/year).Given the disparity in the probability of asteroid strikes (on populated areas, no less) vs earthquakes, it should be no surprise that the world governments believe money is better spent on earthquake prediction and evacuation relief, not on asteroid strike detection.
The "bang for the buck" is clearly higher in earthquake spending.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820190</id>
	<title>The Aliens are coming</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263920940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It could also be that a spaceship has arrived in our solar system and they are using the asteroid belt to decelerate...</htmltext>
<tokenext>It could also be that a spaceship has arrived in our solar system and they are using the asteroid belt to decelerate.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It could also be that a spaceship has arrived in our solar system and they are using the asteroid belt to decelerate...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819980</id>
	<title>Damn you spaceballs!</title>
	<author>jhoegl</author>
	<datestamp>1263920100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Silly spaceballs and their ludacris speed foiling our scientists and their methods.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Silly spaceballs and their ludacris speed foiling our scientists and their methods .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Silly spaceballs and their ludacris speed foiling our scientists and their methods.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820726</id>
	<title>I for one welcome our gas venting overlords!</title>
	<author>Phizzle</author>
	<datestamp>1263923460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What?! Someone was going to do this sooner or later... Don't kill the messenger!</htmltext>
<tokenext>What ? !
Someone was going to do this sooner or later... Do n't kill the messenger !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?!
Someone was going to do this sooner or later... Don't kill the messenger!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820262</id>
	<title>Why there's a difference.</title>
	<author>argent</author>
	<datestamp>1263921240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a reason you don't normally see icy bodies in circular orbits in the asteroid belt: they'd be blown clean of the ice within a fairly short period of time, astronomically speaking. that's what the tail consists of, dust embedded in the ice being released as the ice sublimes. Which means that the ice here has to have been exposed fairly recently.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a reason you do n't normally see icy bodies in circular orbits in the asteroid belt : they 'd be blown clean of the ice within a fairly short period of time , astronomically speaking .
that 's what the tail consists of , dust embedded in the ice being released as the ice sublimes .
Which means that the ice here has to have been exposed fairly recently .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a reason you don't normally see icy bodies in circular orbits in the asteroid belt: they'd be blown clean of the ice within a fairly short period of time, astronomically speaking.
that's what the tail consists of, dust embedded in the ice being released as the ice sublimes.
Which means that the ice here has to have been exposed fairly recently.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827322</id>
	<title>Re:Priorities are a function of Probabilities</title>
	<author>srothroc</author>
	<datestamp>1263911880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think the "bang for your buck" argument is silly because it's an incredibly common fallacy that no doubt affects the people making the decisions as well. The fact that it's fallacious makes it no less a motivating factor for those who control our money.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think the " bang for your buck " argument is silly because it 's an incredibly common fallacy that no doubt affects the people making the decisions as well .
The fact that it 's fallacious makes it no less a motivating factor for those who control our money .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think the "bang for your buck" argument is silly because it's an incredibly common fallacy that no doubt affects the people making the decisions as well.
The fact that it's fallacious makes it no less a motivating factor for those who control our money.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30823470</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30823470</id>
	<title>Re:Priorities are a function of Probabilities</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1263933960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Given the disparity in the probability of asteroid strikes (on populated areas, no less) vs earthquakes, it should be no surprise that the world governments believe money is better spent on earthquake prediction and evacuation relief, not on asteroid strike detection. The "bang for the buck" is clearly higher in earthquake spending.</i></p><p>1. An earthquake affects a relatively small population.</p><p>2. A single dinosaur killer could wipe out humanity.</p><p>3. Probability for all these events approaches 1 as time goes on.</p><p>In light of the above your "bang for buck" argument is silly. It's like counting the pennies while sitting on the railroad track with your back turned to a huge locomotive with blaring sirens that's about to hit you at 100km/hr and arguing that it costs too much to turn around and look at how close it is, never mind get off your ass and out of the way of the train.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Given the disparity in the probability of asteroid strikes ( on populated areas , no less ) vs earthquakes , it should be no surprise that the world governments believe money is better spent on earthquake prediction and evacuation relief , not on asteroid strike detection .
The " bang for the buck " is clearly higher in earthquake spending.1 .
An earthquake affects a relatively small population.2 .
A single dinosaur killer could wipe out humanity.3 .
Probability for all these events approaches 1 as time goes on.In light of the above your " bang for buck " argument is silly .
It 's like counting the pennies while sitting on the railroad track with your back turned to a huge locomotive with blaring sirens that 's about to hit you at 100km/hr and arguing that it costs too much to turn around and look at how close it is , never mind get off your ass and out of the way of the train .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Given the disparity in the probability of asteroid strikes (on populated areas, no less) vs earthquakes, it should be no surprise that the world governments believe money is better spent on earthquake prediction and evacuation relief, not on asteroid strike detection.
The "bang for the buck" is clearly higher in earthquake spending.1.
An earthquake affects a relatively small population.2.
A single dinosaur killer could wipe out humanity.3.
Probability for all these events approaches 1 as time goes on.In light of the above your "bang for buck" argument is silly.
It's like counting the pennies while sitting on the railroad track with your back turned to a huge locomotive with blaring sirens that's about to hit you at 100km/hr and arguing that it costs too much to turn around and look at how close it is, never mind get off your ass and out of the way of the train.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30824030</id>
	<title>Re:Or, maybe...</title>
	<author>tuxgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1263893340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're close, this is exactly how the movie Armageddon starts<br>A comet roaring through the asteroid belt knocks loose a chunk the size of texas and sends it hurdling towards earth</p><p>Anybody got the phone number of Bruce Willis?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're close , this is exactly how the movie Armageddon startsA comet roaring through the asteroid belt knocks loose a chunk the size of texas and sends it hurdling towards earthAnybody got the phone number of Bruce Willis ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're close, this is exactly how the movie Armageddon startsA comet roaring through the asteroid belt knocks loose a chunk the size of texas and sends it hurdling towards earthAnybody got the phone number of Bruce Willis?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821448</id>
	<title>Re:Asteroids boring?</title>
	<author>Gilmoure</author>
	<datestamp>1263926340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Here's a copy of the Star Wars Holiday Special. Art Carney ROCKS!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a copy of the Star Wars Holiday Special .
Art Carney ROCKS !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a copy of the Star Wars Holiday Special.
Art Carney ROCKS!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819876</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819942</id>
	<title>Re:Or, maybe...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263919980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You mean the Marcabian Invasion Fleet? XD</p><p>Of course commanded by Overlord Xenu.</p><p>SCNR</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean the Marcabian Invasion Fleet ?
XDOf course commanded by Overlord Xenu.SCNR</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean the Marcabian Invasion Fleet?
XDOf course commanded by Overlord Xenu.SCNR</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819832</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30822048</id>
	<title>Re:Who was driving?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263928860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>All asteriods could be women, up until now no asteroid has been seen venting gas.</htmltext>
<tokenext>All asteriods could be women , up until now no asteroid has been seen venting gas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All asteriods could be women, up until now no asteroid has been seen venting gas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819808</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819700</id>
	<title>Its Chang</title>
	<author>suso</author>
	<datestamp>1263919080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Spock: Gas! Gas Captain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Spock : Gas !
Gas Captain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Spock: Gas!
Gas Captain.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820186</id>
	<title>The Goa'uld are trying to kill us</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263920940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Goa'uld are trying to kill us</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Goa'uld are trying to kill us</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Goa'uld are trying to kill us</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820490</id>
	<title>Does it happen</title>
	<author>SnarfQuest</author>
	<datestamp>1263922320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does it happen to look like a Big Boy statue? Maybe it's Dr. Evil coming back.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does it happen to look like a Big Boy statue ?
Maybe it 's Dr. Evil coming back .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does it happen to look like a Big Boy statue?
Maybe it's Dr. Evil coming back.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821068</id>
	<title>Re:Hyper-Velocity</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263924720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't there always a frame of reference in which two objects' velocities add up to more than the speed of light? Unless they're completely stationary relative to each other...</p><p>If not (I'm just guessing), what velocity would they have to have relative to each other in order for there to be any frame of reference in which v1+v2&gt;c?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't there always a frame of reference in which two objects ' velocities add up to more than the speed of light ?
Unless they 're completely stationary relative to each other...If not ( I 'm just guessing ) , what velocity would they have to have relative to each other in order for there to be any frame of reference in which v1 + v2 &gt; c ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't there always a frame of reference in which two objects' velocities add up to more than the speed of light?
Unless they're completely stationary relative to each other...If not (I'm just guessing), what velocity would they have to have relative to each other in order for there to be any frame of reference in which v1+v2&gt;c?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821792</id>
	<title>Two asteroids colliding</title>
	<author>xupere</author>
	<datestamp>1263927960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, where do you think baby asteroids come from?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , where do you think baby asteroids come from ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, where do you think baby asteroids come from?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820448</id>
	<title>A complete sentence?</title>
	<author>AP31R0N</author>
	<datestamp>1263922080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Subby, what the fuck is so hard about forming a complete sentence? If you're going to resort to a lame ass question headline, could you at least make it a question that ASKS SOMETHING?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Subby , what the fuck is so hard about forming a complete sentence ?
If you 're going to resort to a lame ass question headline , could you at least make it a question that ASKS SOMETHING ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Subby, what the fuck is so hard about forming a complete sentence?
If you're going to resort to a lame ass question headline, could you at least make it a question that ASKS SOMETHING?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30822048
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30822996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820122
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819700
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30822042
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30824030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30829912
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820784
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821448
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30832762
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30850224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819808
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819876
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30850286
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827564
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820190
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820262
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820096
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819832
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827322
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30823470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_19_1429258_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820956
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820784
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30829912
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820262
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30822042
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820074
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819808
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30822048
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821068
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30850224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820726
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30832762
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821696
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30823470
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827322
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30850286
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821448
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30823964
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30822996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820190
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827564
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30821402
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820956
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819832
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30824030
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30827532
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819942
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30819700
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820122
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_19_1429258.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_19_1429258.30820448
</commentlist>
</conversation>
