<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_18_235202</id>
	<title>Raw Therapee 3 Is Now Free Software</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1263819120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="mailto:asdkant@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">kantier</a> writes <i>"The only (as far as I know) usable and free (as in beer) program for processing RAW photos outside Windows or OS X is <a href="http://www.rawtherapee.com/?mitem=1&amp;artid=46">now also free as in freedom</a>. From version 3 onwards, <a href="http://code.google.com/p/rawtherapee/">the code</a> is licensed under the GPL v3. The main developer's reasons for opening up the program are a lack of time/resources for full dedication, and a lack of interest in some parts of the program (likes to fiddle with image-processing algorithms, not so much the GUI part) &mdash; so the F/OSS model seems to be a perfect fit for this project."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>kantier writes " The only ( as far as I know ) usable and free ( as in beer ) program for processing RAW photos outside Windows or OS X is now also free as in freedom .
From version 3 onwards , the code is licensed under the GPL v3 .
The main developer 's reasons for opening up the program are a lack of time/resources for full dedication , and a lack of interest in some parts of the program ( likes to fiddle with image-processing algorithms , not so much the GUI part )    so the F/OSS model seems to be a perfect fit for this project .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>kantier writes "The only (as far as I know) usable and free (as in beer) program for processing RAW photos outside Windows or OS X is now also free as in freedom.
From version 3 onwards, the code is licensed under the GPL v3.
The main developer's reasons for opening up the program are a lack of time/resources for full dedication, and a lack of interest in some parts of the program (likes to fiddle with image-processing algorithms, not so much the GUI part) — so the F/OSS model seems to be a perfect fit for this project.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815072</id>
	<title>Re:Oh sweet Jesus no</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263824040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>He opened up the code so other people could work on the GUI? This will end badly.</p></div><p>Pish - posh!</p><p>BTW, could someone point me to the original GIMP UI? I think that would be AWESOME for this project!</p><p>Thanks.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>He opened up the code so other people could work on the GUI ?
This will end badly.Pish - posh ! BTW , could someone point me to the original GIMP UI ?
I think that would be AWESOME for this project ! Thanks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He opened up the code so other people could work on the GUI?
This will end badly.Pish - posh!BTW, could someone point me to the original GIMP UI?
I think that would be AWESOME for this project!Thanks.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816746</id>
	<title>Re:RAW conversion for GIMP?</title>
	<author>dangitman</author>
	<datestamp>1263931800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Great news. For those who don't know, a digital camera's sensor is actually a monochrome sensor. It is not a true color sensor (except for Sigma cameras). Each seperate sensor cell (sensel) has a colored filter placed over it.</p></div><p>How is it a monochrome sensor if it has colored filters to sense different colors? Don't those filters turn it into a color sensor? </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Great news .
For those who do n't know , a digital camera 's sensor is actually a monochrome sensor .
It is not a true color sensor ( except for Sigma cameras ) .
Each seperate sensor cell ( sensel ) has a colored filter placed over it.How is it a monochrome sensor if it has colored filters to sense different colors ?
Do n't those filters turn it into a color sensor ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great news.
For those who don't know, a digital camera's sensor is actually a monochrome sensor.
It is not a true color sensor (except for Sigma cameras).
Each seperate sensor cell (sensel) has a colored filter placed over it.How is it a monochrome sensor if it has colored filters to sense different colors?
Don't those filters turn it into a color sensor? 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815232</id>
	<title>Re:RAW conversion for GIMP?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263825660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion? I sure hope so.</p></div><p>Only ever through import plugins that do the colour-space downsampling before giving GIMP the 24-bit colour bitmap data. GIMP's whole architecture is limited to 8-bit per channel, and would take a massive rewrite to support anything higher.</p><p>Unfortunately, that means it'll never be suitable for pro photographic work, as you often don't want to do the downsampling until after you've made other changes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion ?
I sure hope so.Only ever through import plugins that do the colour-space downsampling before giving GIMP the 24-bit colour bitmap data .
GIMP 's whole architecture is limited to 8-bit per channel , and would take a massive rewrite to support anything higher.Unfortunately , that means it 'll never be suitable for pro photographic work , as you often do n't want to do the downsampling until after you 've made other changes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion?
I sure hope so.Only ever through import plugins that do the colour-space downsampling before giving GIMP the 24-bit colour bitmap data.
GIMP's whole architecture is limited to 8-bit per channel, and would take a massive rewrite to support anything higher.Unfortunately, that means it'll never be suitable for pro photographic work, as you often don't want to do the downsampling until after you've made other changes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815334</id>
	<title>Uppercase "raw"???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263826800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why do people persist in uppercasing "raw" as if it were an acronym???  I suppose if you wanted to be sure people realized you were using a technical term, you could capitalize it: "The file is in Raw Format".  But uppercase???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do people persist in uppercasing " raw " as if it were an acronym ? ? ?
I suppose if you wanted to be sure people realized you were using a technical term , you could capitalize it : " The file is in Raw Format " .
But uppercase ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do people persist in uppercasing "raw" as if it were an acronym???
I suppose if you wanted to be sure people realized you were using a technical term, you could capitalize it: "The file is in Raw Format".
But uppercase??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815064</id>
	<title>Free as in 'Freedom'</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263824040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stallman's version is a proper noun because it's nothing like the dictionary definition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stallman 's version is a proper noun because it 's nothing like the dictionary definition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stallman's version is a proper noun because it's nothing like the dictionary definition.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815392</id>
	<title>Re:dcraw</title>
	<author>kantier</author>
	<datestamp>1263827760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's all right if you want to manage a couple of pictures with gimp, but try 100. or 300. For professional of serious amateur work, you need a GUI that can manage that with decent performance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's all right if you want to manage a couple of pictures with gimp , but try 100. or 300 .
For professional of serious amateur work , you need a GUI that can manage that with decent performance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's all right if you want to manage a couple of pictures with gimp, but try 100. or 300.
For professional of serious amateur work, you need a GUI that can manage that with decent performance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814938</id>
	<title>Fags and spics</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263823080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're a bunch of fags and spics.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're a bunch of fags and spics .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're a bunch of fags and spics.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30818922</id>
	<title>Freedom...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263915240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>is NOT free.</p><p>"... now also free as in freedom."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>is NOT free. " .. .
now also free as in freedom .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>is NOT free."...
now also free as in freedom.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816814</id>
	<title>Re:It's a frontend to dcraw</title>
	<author>beaviz</author>
	<datestamp>1263932880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The challenge isn't demosaicing the images, nor is there a need for the user to have control over it, assuming it works properly. It's reading the file format; Nikon encrypts theirs, and everyone else changes their formats seemingly with every new model/model year.</p></div></blockquote><p>Nikon only encrypts very specific metadata. As for other manufacturers, often it's just minor tweaks to support new camera features. Nothing you can't keep up with.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The challenge is n't demosaicing the images , nor is there a need for the user to have control over it , assuming it works properly .
It 's reading the file format ; Nikon encrypts theirs , and everyone else changes their formats seemingly with every new model/model year.Nikon only encrypts very specific metadata .
As for other manufacturers , often it 's just minor tweaks to support new camera features .
Nothing you ca n't keep up with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The challenge isn't demosaicing the images, nor is there a need for the user to have control over it, assuming it works properly.
It's reading the file format; Nikon encrypts theirs, and everyone else changes their formats seemingly with every new model/model year.Nikon only encrypts very specific metadata.
As for other manufacturers, often it's just minor tweaks to support new camera features.
Nothing you can't keep up with.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817522</id>
	<title>Re:Developer in for a shock</title>
	<author>jareth-0205</author>
	<datestamp>1263899520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Such naivety!</p><p>1. Author is very lucky he's had so much time on his hands up to the 10 month mark with his son. I've had very little time to myself since mine was born (almost 18 months). I think he's about to learn how much time and effort raising a child takes.</p></div><p>What? You don't know anything about the guy, what his setup is, who he's living with, who else is involved with the child. And yet you're judging him based on a throwaway comment that basically is only there to say: "there's other stuff in my life".</p><p><div class="quote"><p>2. I can't believe the author of such a mature and well known product has come up with the line "believe it or not, RT is stable on my PC". Or that he believes the first thing any other programmer is going to want to do is reproduce bugs they aren't experiencing themselves. Epic fail.</p></div><p> <i>Or...</i> he might be talking about the people who are experiencing bugs but who are also developers? What's your point anyway? Do you think he shouldn't even offer the source because obviously nobody else is interested? Or that he should have killed off the project in favour of his son when he was born? His message sounds an entirely reasonable response to the situation to me. "Epic fail" my arse.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Such naivety ! 1 .
Author is very lucky he 's had so much time on his hands up to the 10 month mark with his son .
I 've had very little time to myself since mine was born ( almost 18 months ) .
I think he 's about to learn how much time and effort raising a child takes.What ?
You do n't know anything about the guy , what his setup is , who he 's living with , who else is involved with the child .
And yet you 're judging him based on a throwaway comment that basically is only there to say : " there 's other stuff in my life " .2 .
I ca n't believe the author of such a mature and well known product has come up with the line " believe it or not , RT is stable on my PC " .
Or that he believes the first thing any other programmer is going to want to do is reproduce bugs they are n't experiencing themselves .
Epic fail .
Or... he might be talking about the people who are experiencing bugs but who are also developers ?
What 's your point anyway ?
Do you think he should n't even offer the source because obviously nobody else is interested ?
Or that he should have killed off the project in favour of his son when he was born ?
His message sounds an entirely reasonable response to the situation to me .
" Epic fail " my arse .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Such naivety!1.
Author is very lucky he's had so much time on his hands up to the 10 month mark with his son.
I've had very little time to myself since mine was born (almost 18 months).
I think he's about to learn how much time and effort raising a child takes.What?
You don't know anything about the guy, what his setup is, who he's living with, who else is involved with the child.
And yet you're judging him based on a throwaway comment that basically is only there to say: "there's other stuff in my life".2.
I can't believe the author of such a mature and well known product has come up with the line "believe it or not, RT is stable on my PC".
Or that he believes the first thing any other programmer is going to want to do is reproduce bugs they aren't experiencing themselves.
Epic fail.
Or... he might be talking about the people who are experiencing bugs but who are also developers?
What's your point anyway?
Do you think he shouldn't even offer the source because obviously nobody else is interested?
Or that he should have killed off the project in favour of his son when he was born?
His message sounds an entirely reasonable response to the situation to me.
"Epic fail" my arse.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815704</id>
	<title>RAW = Really Awkward Workflow</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1263831300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Why do people persist in uppercasing "raw" as if it were an acronym???</i></p><p>It is an acronymn. RAW = Really Awkward Workflow<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p><p>Actually when I use an SLR I almost strictly shoot RAW these days, because while it can be a pain it's worth it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do people persist in uppercasing " raw " as if it were an acronym ? ?
? It is an acronymn .
RAW = Really Awkward Workflow ; - ) Actually when I use an SLR I almost strictly shoot RAW these days , because while it can be a pain it 's worth it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do people persist in uppercasing "raw" as if it were an acronym??
?It is an acronymn.
RAW = Really Awkward Workflow ;-)Actually when I use an SLR I almost strictly shoot RAW these days, because while it can be a pain it's worth it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814964</id>
	<title>dcraw</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263823320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/" title="cybercom.net">http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/</a> [cybercom.net]</p><p>GPLv2</p><p>There is a gimp plugin that provides a very nice front end for it.</p><p>They've been in Debian for years.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //www.cybercom.net/ ~ dcoffin/dcraw/ [ cybercom.net ] GPLv2There is a gimp plugin that provides a very nice front end for it.They 've been in Debian for years .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/ [cybercom.net]GPLv2There is a gimp plugin that provides a very nice front end for it.They've been in Debian for years.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815362</id>
	<title>Re:Digikam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263827220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wasn't really clear in that sentence.</p><p>I do photography for free software related events, and when I have the 300-something RAWs for postprocessing I need something that can let me work with sets of images, not individual images. Currently I use Lightroom because it's the only thing that gets the job done in relaistic time, because of GUI issues. I used RawTherapee before but, despite being the best I could find, it wasn't there yet (I'm talking about 2.3, more or less). With the changes announced for 3.0 I think it may be usable again for that kind of work.</p><p> I used digikam before, but with JPEGs, with RAWs it was impossible.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I was n't really clear in that sentence.I do photography for free software related events , and when I have the 300-something RAWs for postprocessing I need something that can let me work with sets of images , not individual images .
Currently I use Lightroom because it 's the only thing that gets the job done in relaistic time , because of GUI issues .
I used RawTherapee before but , despite being the best I could find , it was n't there yet ( I 'm talking about 2.3 , more or less ) .
With the changes announced for 3.0 I think it may be usable again for that kind of work .
I used digikam before , but with JPEGs , with RAWs it was impossible .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wasn't really clear in that sentence.I do photography for free software related events, and when I have the 300-something RAWs for postprocessing I need something that can let me work with sets of images, not individual images.
Currently I use Lightroom because it's the only thing that gets the job done in relaistic time, because of GUI issues.
I used RawTherapee before but, despite being the best I could find, it wasn't there yet (I'm talking about 2.3, more or less).
With the changes announced for 3.0 I think it may be usable again for that kind of work.
I used digikam before, but with JPEGs, with RAWs it was impossible.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814980</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817974</id>
	<title>Re:Digikam</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263906000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can batch process all RAW photos at once in digiKam. With automatic or custom settings. I shoot almost every day about 8-12 Gb of RAW's, that is about 800 photos every day to go trought and process. The 5\% thumbrule applyis here as well. Only about 40 photos are those what really are developed to client and only few of those are used on marketing etc. I can do everything in digiKam and many studios who use only Macs have be very intrested software what I use. Before 0.10 this was much harder but now easy and I have big expections for 1.1 and on the christmas release of 1.0 added nice HDR function as well with automatic stiching etc. First time I have started to enjoy making HDR photos from multiple RAW's. Just selected all wanted RAW photos, apply wanted whitebalance etc and push to sthicing and blending and then you get wanted HDR out.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can batch process all RAW photos at once in digiKam .
With automatic or custom settings .
I shoot almost every day about 8-12 Gb of RAW 's , that is about 800 photos every day to go trought and process .
The 5 \ % thumbrule applyis here as well .
Only about 40 photos are those what really are developed to client and only few of those are used on marketing etc .
I can do everything in digiKam and many studios who use only Macs have be very intrested software what I use .
Before 0.10 this was much harder but now easy and I have big expections for 1.1 and on the christmas release of 1.0 added nice HDR function as well with automatic stiching etc .
First time I have started to enjoy making HDR photos from multiple RAW 's .
Just selected all wanted RAW photos , apply wanted whitebalance etc and push to sthicing and blending and then you get wanted HDR out .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can batch process all RAW photos at once in digiKam.
With automatic or custom settings.
I shoot almost every day about 8-12 Gb of RAW's, that is about 800 photos every day to go trought and process.
The 5\% thumbrule applyis here as well.
Only about 40 photos are those what really are developed to client and only few of those are used on marketing etc.
I can do everything in digiKam and many studios who use only Macs have be very intrested software what I use.
Before 0.10 this was much harder but now easy and I have big expections for 1.1 and on the christmas release of 1.0 added nice HDR function as well with automatic stiching etc.
First time I have started to enjoy making HDR photos from multiple RAW's.
Just selected all wanted RAW photos, apply wanted whitebalance etc and push to sthicing and blending and then you get wanted HDR out.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815362</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815230</id>
	<title>Re:RAW conversion for GIMP?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263825600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Thus most pros shoot in raw, as you can image PhotoShop, Lightroom, Aperture and others can do a much better job than the built-in processor.</i></p><p>IMO, the conversion from RAW -&gt; JPEG being done better than on the camera chip is by far the least compelling reason to shoot RAW, especially with Canons (where the on-camera processor already does a really job). 99\% of people would never be able to tell the difference between the two processing options, even on a properly calibrated screen.</p><p>The real reason to shoot RAW is the world of post-processing options that shooting RAW presents you. Because of the 12 bits of color depth you have more latitude with playing with the exposure controls; if you make sure that you don't overexpose anything (i.e. you "expose for the highlights") you can compress the dynamic range a bit to bring out more detail in the dark areas. Because white balance hasn't been applied yet, you can change white balance post-processing losslessly. (There's software that will give you white-balance controls over JPEG pictures in a similar manner, but it's lossy.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thus most pros shoot in raw , as you can image PhotoShop , Lightroom , Aperture and others can do a much better job than the built-in processor.IMO , the conversion from RAW - &gt; JPEG being done better than on the camera chip is by far the least compelling reason to shoot RAW , especially with Canons ( where the on-camera processor already does a really job ) .
99 \ % of people would never be able to tell the difference between the two processing options , even on a properly calibrated screen.The real reason to shoot RAW is the world of post-processing options that shooting RAW presents you .
Because of the 12 bits of color depth you have more latitude with playing with the exposure controls ; if you make sure that you do n't overexpose anything ( i.e .
you " expose for the highlights " ) you can compress the dynamic range a bit to bring out more detail in the dark areas .
Because white balance has n't been applied yet , you can change white balance post-processing losslessly .
( There 's software that will give you white-balance controls over JPEG pictures in a similar manner , but it 's lossy .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thus most pros shoot in raw, as you can image PhotoShop, Lightroom, Aperture and others can do a much better job than the built-in processor.IMO, the conversion from RAW -&gt; JPEG being done better than on the camera chip is by far the least compelling reason to shoot RAW, especially with Canons (where the on-camera processor already does a really job).
99\% of people would never be able to tell the difference between the two processing options, even on a properly calibrated screen.The real reason to shoot RAW is the world of post-processing options that shooting RAW presents you.
Because of the 12 bits of color depth you have more latitude with playing with the exposure controls; if you make sure that you don't overexpose anything (i.e.
you "expose for the highlights") you can compress the dynamic range a bit to bring out more detail in the dark areas.
Because white balance hasn't been applied yet, you can change white balance post-processing losslessly.
(There's software that will give you white-balance controls over JPEG pictures in a similar manner, but it's lossy.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817876</id>
	<title>Re:Only?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263904620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And how about digiKam <a href="http://digikam.org/" title="digikam.org" rel="nofollow">http://digikam.org/</a> [digikam.org] what use own implentation of dcraw called kdcraw? Different batch jobs, even multiple different batches are possible and even great kipi-plugins support to export/import to wanted place and the photo management part is just awesome.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And how about digiKam http : //digikam.org/ [ digikam.org ] what use own implentation of dcraw called kdcraw ?
Different batch jobs , even multiple different batches are possible and even great kipi-plugins support to export/import to wanted place and the photo management part is just awesome .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And how about digiKam http://digikam.org/ [digikam.org] what use own implentation of dcraw called kdcraw?
Different batch jobs, even multiple different batches are possible and even great kipi-plugins support to export/import to wanted place and the photo management part is just awesome.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30818284</id>
	<title>Re:RAW conversion for GIMP?</title>
	<author>mkuki</author>
	<datestamp>1263910260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yes, yes and yes. I'm an amateur photographer and I always shoot in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.NEF (Nikon's RAW) due to the latitude availed. Also, computer processing is always better than in-camera processing.

However, I am not happy about the proprietary nature of NEF (and lets not even get into Nikon encrypting the white balance issue). I have about 100GB of photos that I intend to run through a batch process to convert to Adobe's DNG (Digital Negative), which they are trying to turn into a standard. I don't want to be stuck 10 years down the line when CaptureNX2 doesn't run on a new O.S.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes , yes and yes .
I 'm an amateur photographer and I always shoot in .NEF ( Nikon 's RAW ) due to the latitude availed .
Also , computer processing is always better than in-camera processing .
However , I am not happy about the proprietary nature of NEF ( and lets not even get into Nikon encrypting the white balance issue ) .
I have about 100GB of photos that I intend to run through a batch process to convert to Adobe 's DNG ( Digital Negative ) , which they are trying to turn into a standard .
I do n't want to be stuck 10 years down the line when CaptureNX2 does n't run on a new O.S .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes, yes and yes.
I'm an amateur photographer and I always shoot in .NEF (Nikon's RAW) due to the latitude availed.
Also, computer processing is always better than in-camera processing.
However, I am not happy about the proprietary nature of NEF (and lets not even get into Nikon encrypting the white balance issue).
I have about 100GB of photos that I intend to run through a batch process to convert to Adobe's DNG (Digital Negative), which they are trying to turn into a standard.
I don't want to be stuck 10 years down the line when CaptureNX2 doesn't run on a new O.S.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815230</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815244</id>
	<title>RAWTherapee is a frontend for dcraw</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263825720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>RAWTherapee uses dcraw under the hood.</p><p>Changes to the underlying version of dcraw are referenced in the version history on the project website's front page<br><a href="http://www.rawtherapee.com/" title="rawtherapee.com">http://www.rawtherapee.com/</a> [rawtherapee.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>RAWTherapee uses dcraw under the hood.Changes to the underlying version of dcraw are referenced in the version history on the project website 's front pagehttp : //www.rawtherapee.com/ [ rawtherapee.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>RAWTherapee uses dcraw under the hood.Changes to the underlying version of dcraw are referenced in the version history on the project website's front pagehttp://www.rawtherapee.com/ [rawtherapee.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816286</id>
	<title>Ufraw *does* exist</title>
	<author>arose</author>
	<datestamp>1263838680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>The only (as far as I know) usable and free (as in beer) program for processing RAW photos outside Windows or OS X [..]</p></div></blockquote><p>
You might dislike the workflow of Ufraw, but there is no question about it being usable.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only ( as far as I know ) usable and free ( as in beer ) program for processing RAW photos outside Windows or OS X [ .. ] You might dislike the workflow of Ufraw , but there is no question about it being usable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only (as far as I know) usable and free (as in beer) program for processing RAW photos outside Windows or OS X [..]
You might dislike the workflow of Ufraw, but there is no question about it being usable.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817490</id>
	<title>Re:RAW conversion for GIMP?</title>
	<author>charlyw</author>
	<datestamp>1263898800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion? I sure hope so.</p></div><p>For that to be really useful the GIMP needs to finally get 16 bit colour depth support. Without that you might as well use an application such as digikam or lightroom or rawtherapee for all your editing needs, the GIMP doesn't cut it currently. rawtherapee is a nice one though and might prove the best for linux yet, the foundations for that are there...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion ?
I sure hope so.For that to be really useful the GIMP needs to finally get 16 bit colour depth support .
Without that you might as well use an application such as digikam or lightroom or rawtherapee for all your editing needs , the GIMP does n't cut it currently .
rawtherapee is a nice one though and might prove the best for linux yet , the foundations for that are there.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion?
I sure hope so.For that to be really useful the GIMP needs to finally get 16 bit colour depth support.
Without that you might as well use an application such as digikam or lightroom or rawtherapee for all your editing needs, the GIMP doesn't cut it currently.
rawtherapee is a nice one though and might prove the best for linux yet, the foundations for that are there...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30818076</id>
	<title>Colour management</title>
	<author>Geeky</author>
	<datestamp>1263907320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Raw conversion tool for Linux is good news, but the thing that really seems to be lacking is colour management. I'm a serious hobby photographer (exhibited and published), and I use Photoshop on Windows. Heresy on here? Well, it does colour management properly and supports profiling hardware. The Gimp is a great piece of software, and probably beats Photoshop Elements, but I need the pro features of Photoshop (mainly back to colour profiles again).</p><p>I'm a couple of years out of date on the state of the art under Linux, so await correction if things have changed recently.</p><p>And before anyone suggests a Mac would be a better option, I just can't justify the price premium.</p><p>Incidentally, since I returned to Windows out of need, for the photography, I've found everything else I need - I use WAMP for my web development, I've got Perl, there's cygwin if I really need it; at this point, the actual OS is pretty much irrelevant as long as I can get the userspace tools I need.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Raw conversion tool for Linux is good news , but the thing that really seems to be lacking is colour management .
I 'm a serious hobby photographer ( exhibited and published ) , and I use Photoshop on Windows .
Heresy on here ?
Well , it does colour management properly and supports profiling hardware .
The Gimp is a great piece of software , and probably beats Photoshop Elements , but I need the pro features of Photoshop ( mainly back to colour profiles again ) .I 'm a couple of years out of date on the state of the art under Linux , so await correction if things have changed recently.And before anyone suggests a Mac would be a better option , I just ca n't justify the price premium.Incidentally , since I returned to Windows out of need , for the photography , I 've found everything else I need - I use WAMP for my web development , I 've got Perl , there 's cygwin if I really need it ; at this point , the actual OS is pretty much irrelevant as long as I can get the userspace tools I need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Raw conversion tool for Linux is good news, but the thing that really seems to be lacking is colour management.
I'm a serious hobby photographer (exhibited and published), and I use Photoshop on Windows.
Heresy on here?
Well, it does colour management properly and supports profiling hardware.
The Gimp is a great piece of software, and probably beats Photoshop Elements, but I need the pro features of Photoshop (mainly back to colour profiles again).I'm a couple of years out of date on the state of the art under Linux, so await correction if things have changed recently.And before anyone suggests a Mac would be a better option, I just can't justify the price premium.Incidentally, since I returned to Windows out of need, for the photography, I've found everything else I need - I use WAMP for my web development, I've got Perl, there's cygwin if I really need it; at this point, the actual OS is pretty much irrelevant as long as I can get the userspace tools I need.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815390</id>
	<title>I SEE THE BUZZARDS CIRCLING OVERHEAD !!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263827760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The carcass must be pretty johnny rotten if not even the scavengers want some billy squire.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The carcass must be pretty johnny rotten if not even the scavengers want some billy squire .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The carcass must be pretty johnny rotten if not even the scavengers want some billy squire.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815580</id>
	<title>Re:RAW conversion for GIMP?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263829980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>rewrite is being done. When GEGL library taking care of non-destructive editing is mature and fully integrated, 16bit channels will be there too. Some stuff in GIMP already works with GEGL, but advanced color spaces should be implemented in v2.8, which is the next stable version after the current 2.6.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>rewrite is being done .
When GEGL library taking care of non-destructive editing is mature and fully integrated , 16bit channels will be there too .
Some stuff in GIMP already works with GEGL , but advanced color spaces should be implemented in v2.8 , which is the next stable version after the current 2.6 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>rewrite is being done.
When GEGL library taking care of non-destructive editing is mature and fully integrated, 16bit channels will be there too.
Some stuff in GIMP already works with GEGL, but advanced color spaces should be implemented in v2.8, which is the next stable version after the current 2.6.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815232</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816276</id>
	<title>Re:Only?</title>
	<author>deathguppie</author>
	<datestamp>1263838560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually  <a href="http://www.digikam.org/" title="digikam.org"> Digikam </a> [digikam.org] is currently the leading open source raw conversion utility IMHO.  My wife is a photographer (does some pay work but mostly play), and she prefers Digikam to lightroom hands down, and uses it all the time.  (yes she owns lightroom and doesn't use it)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually Digikam [ digikam.org ] is currently the leading open source raw conversion utility IMHO .
My wife is a photographer ( does some pay work but mostly play ) , and she prefers Digikam to lightroom hands down , and uses it all the time .
( yes she owns lightroom and does n't use it )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually   Digikam  [digikam.org] is currently the leading open source raw conversion utility IMHO.
My wife is a photographer (does some pay work but mostly play), and she prefers Digikam to lightroom hands down, and uses it all the time.
(yes she owns lightroom and doesn't use it)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815006</id>
	<title>Only?</title>
	<author>Xabraxas</author>
	<datestamp>1263823620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>What about <a href="http://rawstudio.org/" title="rawstudio.org">rawstudio</a> [rawstudio.org] and <a href="http://ufraw.sourceforge.net/" title="sourceforge.net">ufraw</a> [sourceforge.net]?  I have used all three and I can say that while I like the features that rawtherapee has I like it the least overall.  Everything is so slow that working on a RAW image takes forever.  Rawstudio has the least amount of features but is very fast and the SVN version has added a few very important features.  It is currently my favorite.  UFRaw is nice but the interface isn't as clean as rawstudio and there is no batch processing.  Every image has to be opened separately.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What about rawstudio [ rawstudio.org ] and ufraw [ sourceforge.net ] ?
I have used all three and I can say that while I like the features that rawtherapee has I like it the least overall .
Everything is so slow that working on a RAW image takes forever .
Rawstudio has the least amount of features but is very fast and the SVN version has added a few very important features .
It is currently my favorite .
UFRaw is nice but the interface is n't as clean as rawstudio and there is no batch processing .
Every image has to be opened separately .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What about rawstudio [rawstudio.org] and ufraw [sourceforge.net]?
I have used all three and I can say that while I like the features that rawtherapee has I like it the least overall.
Everything is so slow that working on a RAW image takes forever.
Rawstudio has the least amount of features but is very fast and the SVN version has added a few very important features.
It is currently my favorite.
UFRaw is nice but the interface isn't as clean as rawstudio and there is no batch processing.
Every image has to be opened separately.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815418</id>
	<title>Re:RAW conversion for GIMP?</title>
	<author>stephanruby</author>
	<datestamp>1263827940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Am I only the one who understood the summary to mean that he lacked interest in like image processing? And that the submitter/slashdot editor must have been like a valley girl?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Am I only the one who understood the summary to mean that he lacked interest in like image processing ?
And that the submitter/slashdot editor must have been like a valley girl ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Am I only the one who understood the summary to mean that he lacked interest in like image processing?
And that the submitter/slashdot editor must have been like a valley girl?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815108</id>
	<title>Re:RAW conversion for GIMP?</title>
	<author>tpwch</author>
	<datestamp>1263824340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If you read some of the other comments you'll see that linux has had multiple free software raw-processing programs for many years. There are at least two plugins for gimp, one for dcraw and one for ufraw. And there are professional photographers that use them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If you read some of the other comments you 'll see that linux has had multiple free software raw-processing programs for many years .
There are at least two plugins for gimp , one for dcraw and one for ufraw .
And there are professional photographers that use them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you read some of the other comments you'll see that linux has had multiple free software raw-processing programs for many years.
There are at least two plugins for gimp, one for dcraw and one for ufraw.
And there are professional photographers that use them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815462</id>
	<title>Re:Uppercase "raw"???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263828420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Strange. People do this with MAC too, of the Apple variety. I don't get it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Strange .
People do this with MAC too , of the Apple variety .
I do n't get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Strange.
People do this with MAC too, of the Apple variety.
I don't get it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815452</id>
	<title>It's a frontend to dcraw</title>
	<author>SuperBanana</author>
	<datestamp>1263828300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Raw Therapee is a frontend to DCraw, which has been around for at least 5 years.

</p><p>http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/

</p><p>The challenge isn't demosaicing the images, nor is there a need for the user to have control over it, assuming it works properly.  It's reading the file format; Nikon encrypts theirs, and everyone else changes their formats seemingly with every new model/model year.  Makes for an annoying moving target for most of the programs which support raw images, and the entire reason Adobe created an open raw image format, which few companies have moved to support.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Raw Therapee is a frontend to DCraw , which has been around for at least 5 years .
http : //www.cybercom.net/ ~ dcoffin/dcraw/ The challenge is n't demosaicing the images , nor is there a need for the user to have control over it , assuming it works properly .
It 's reading the file format ; Nikon encrypts theirs , and everyone else changes their formats seemingly with every new model/model year .
Makes for an annoying moving target for most of the programs which support raw images , and the entire reason Adobe created an open raw image format , which few companies have moved to support .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Raw Therapee is a frontend to DCraw, which has been around for at least 5 years.
http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/

The challenge isn't demosaicing the images, nor is there a need for the user to have control over it, assuming it works properly.
It's reading the file format; Nikon encrypts theirs, and everyone else changes their formats seemingly with every new model/model year.
Makes for an annoying moving target for most of the programs which support raw images, and the entire reason Adobe created an open raw image format, which few companies have moved to support.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815188</id>
	<title>Re:RAW conversion for GIMP?</title>
	<author>OverlordQ</author>
	<datestamp>1263825240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion? I sure hope so.</i></p><p>You mean a version besides UFRaw plugin that has been out for 5 years? Or do you mean built-in?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion ?
I sure hope so.You mean a version besides UFRaw plugin that has been out for 5 years ?
Or do you mean built-in ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion?
I sure hope so.You mean a version besides UFRaw plugin that has been out for 5 years?
Or do you mean built-in?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814934</id>
	<title>Oh sweet Jesus no</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263823080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>He opened up the code so other people could work on the GUI? This will end badly.</htmltext>
<tokenext>He opened up the code so other people could work on the GUI ?
This will end badly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He opened up the code so other people could work on the GUI?
This will end badly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816084</id>
	<title>Re:Developer in for a shock</title>
	<author>th3rmite</author>
	<datestamp>1263835440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Epic fail? This guy GPLs his software and you say "Epic fail"? I don't think it should matter what his reasons are, we should be happy that a formerly closed source application has embraced open source.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Epic fail ?
This guy GPLs his software and you say " Epic fail " ?
I do n't think it should matter what his reasons are , we should be happy that a formerly closed source application has embraced open source .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Epic fail?
This guy GPLs his software and you say "Epic fail"?
I don't think it should matter what his reasons are, we should be happy that a formerly closed source application has embraced open source.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30819810</id>
	<title>Re:Colour management</title>
	<author>Ltap</author>
	<datestamp>1263919440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You've outlined the one undeniable advantage of Windows - in the days when most OSs had very few third-party tools, its entire codebase WAS third-party tools. This is the main challenge of F/OSS and Linux - to create more and better tools, a constant process I think it gaining on the proprietary group every day.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You 've outlined the one undeniable advantage of Windows - in the days when most OSs had very few third-party tools , its entire codebase WAS third-party tools .
This is the main challenge of F/OSS and Linux - to create more and better tools , a constant process I think it gaining on the proprietary group every day .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You've outlined the one undeniable advantage of Windows - in the days when most OSs had very few third-party tools, its entire codebase WAS third-party tools.
This is the main challenge of F/OSS and Linux - to create more and better tools, a constant process I think it gaining on the proprietary group every day.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30818076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817618</id>
	<title>Re:Developer in for a shock</title>
	<author>vipw</author>
	<datestamp>1263900900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Developers do like reproducing bugs. That makes them much easier to fix.</p><p>Some people just like to help make something better. You'll find such people working on OSS projects.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Developers do like reproducing bugs .
That makes them much easier to fix.Some people just like to help make something better .
You 'll find such people working on OSS projects .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Developers do like reproducing bugs.
That makes them much easier to fix.Some people just like to help make something better.
You'll find such people working on OSS projects.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816140</id>
	<title>Re:RAWTherapee is a frontend for dcraw</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263836340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm sorry, I just can't read that as anything but, "Raw-the-rapee."</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm sorry , I just ca n't read that as anything but , " Raw-the-rapee .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm sorry, I just can't read that as anything but, "Raw-the-rapee.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30822496</id>
	<title>Free as in \_\_\_\_\_\_?  What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263930300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Free as in beer.  What?<br>Free as in freedom.  What?</p><p>I'm no closer to understand what "free as in beer" means now as when I first heard it.<br>Can we bury this stupid saying already?  Oh, my bad it's already a fail.</p><p>a what?  a FAILURE... a FAILure.  not a fail... a failure.  It has FAILed.  Get it?</p><p>good god.  I mean, jeepers creepers... wtf and cut it out already, ok?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Free as in beer .
What ? Free as in freedom .
What ? I 'm no closer to understand what " free as in beer " means now as when I first heard it.Can we bury this stupid saying already ?
Oh , my bad it 's already a fail.a what ?
a FAILURE... a FAILure .
not a fail... a failure .
It has FAILed .
Get it ? good god .
I mean , jeepers creepers... wtf and cut it out already , ok ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free as in beer.
What?Free as in freedom.
What?I'm no closer to understand what "free as in beer" means now as when I first heard it.Can we bury this stupid saying already?
Oh, my bad it's already a fail.a what?
a FAILURE... a FAILure.
not a fail... a failure.
It has FAILed.
Get it?good god.
I mean, jeepers creepers... wtf and cut it out already, ok?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815032</id>
	<title>The only free program for processing RAW?</title>
	<author>yankpop</author>
	<datestamp>1263823860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What does it do that puts it in a different category than Rawstudio or UFRaw?</p><p>yp.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What does it do that puts it in a different category than Rawstudio or UFRaw ? yp .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does it do that puts it in a different category than Rawstudio or UFRaw?yp.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815264</id>
	<title>Developer in for a shock</title>
	<author>syousef</author>
	<datestamp>1263826080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>License changes:</i></p><p><i>I decided to change the license to GPL and thus offer the source code to the open source community. This does not mean that I stop developing RawTherapee. I will invest as much time into the development as till now. I have three motivations for this decision: first, I love playing with image processing algorithms but I'm not keen on GUI development. Recently a huge amount of work had to be invested to develop a usable GUI and I had no time left to play with new algorithms. I hope to involve some new developers who help me to maintain and enhance the GUI. The second reason of licence change was that I am very frustrated by the huge amount of bug reports I can not reproduce (believe it or not, RT is stable on my PC). I hope that with the open source model some talented users can identify the problems and fix the bugs. The third (but maybe the most important) reason of switching to GPL is that our baby reached the age (10 month old) when he needs his father more and more. I dont want to disappoint him<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:). With more developers involved the development process will hopefully more smooth and wont stop when I am busy.</i></p><p>Such naivety!</p><p>1. Author is very lucky he's had so much time on his hands up to the 10 month mark with his son. I've had very little time to myself since mine was born (almost 18 months). I think he's about to learn how much time and effort raising a child takes.</p><p>2. I can't believe the author of such a mature and well known product has come up with the line "believe it or not, RT is stable on my PC". Or that he believes the first thing any other programmer is going to want to do is reproduce bugs they aren't experiencing themselves. Epic fail.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>License changes : I decided to change the license to GPL and thus offer the source code to the open source community .
This does not mean that I stop developing RawTherapee .
I will invest as much time into the development as till now .
I have three motivations for this decision : first , I love playing with image processing algorithms but I 'm not keen on GUI development .
Recently a huge amount of work had to be invested to develop a usable GUI and I had no time left to play with new algorithms .
I hope to involve some new developers who help me to maintain and enhance the GUI .
The second reason of licence change was that I am very frustrated by the huge amount of bug reports I can not reproduce ( believe it or not , RT is stable on my PC ) .
I hope that with the open source model some talented users can identify the problems and fix the bugs .
The third ( but maybe the most important ) reason of switching to GPL is that our baby reached the age ( 10 month old ) when he needs his father more and more .
I dont want to disappoint him : ) .
With more developers involved the development process will hopefully more smooth and wont stop when I am busy.Such naivety ! 1 .
Author is very lucky he 's had so much time on his hands up to the 10 month mark with his son .
I 've had very little time to myself since mine was born ( almost 18 months ) .
I think he 's about to learn how much time and effort raising a child takes.2 .
I ca n't believe the author of such a mature and well known product has come up with the line " believe it or not , RT is stable on my PC " .
Or that he believes the first thing any other programmer is going to want to do is reproduce bugs they are n't experiencing themselves .
Epic fail .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>License changes:I decided to change the license to GPL and thus offer the source code to the open source community.
This does not mean that I stop developing RawTherapee.
I will invest as much time into the development as till now.
I have three motivations for this decision: first, I love playing with image processing algorithms but I'm not keen on GUI development.
Recently a huge amount of work had to be invested to develop a usable GUI and I had no time left to play with new algorithms.
I hope to involve some new developers who help me to maintain and enhance the GUI.
The second reason of licence change was that I am very frustrated by the huge amount of bug reports I can not reproduce (believe it or not, RT is stable on my PC).
I hope that with the open source model some talented users can identify the problems and fix the bugs.
The third (but maybe the most important) reason of switching to GPL is that our baby reached the age (10 month old) when he needs his father more and more.
I dont want to disappoint him :).
With more developers involved the development process will hopefully more smooth and wont stop when I am busy.Such naivety!1.
Author is very lucky he's had so much time on his hands up to the 10 month mark with his son.
I've had very little time to myself since mine was born (almost 18 months).
I think he's about to learn how much time and effort raising a child takes.2.
I can't believe the author of such a mature and well known product has come up with the line "believe it or not, RT is stable on my PC".
Or that he believes the first thing any other programmer is going to want to do is reproduce bugs they aren't experiencing themselves.
Epic fail.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046</id>
	<title>RAW conversion for GIMP?</title>
	<author>MasterOfGoingFaster</author>
	<datestamp>1263823920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great news.  For those who don't know, a digital camera's sensor is actually a monochrome sensor.  It is not a true color sensor (except for Sigma cameras).  Each seperate sensor cell (sensel) has a colored filter placed over it.  So the color is actually calculated by compariing each sensel's value with the adjacent sensels.  Thus the demosaic process is very important.</p><p>All digital cameras have a built-in processor that processes the raw data the creates a JPEG file.  But the JPEG file has less data (8-bit vs. 12 to 14 bit RAW) and suffers when heavy post processing is applied.  Thus most pros shoot in raw, as you can image PhotoShop, Lightroom, Aperture and others can do a much better job than the built-in processor.</p><p>The availability of a RAW converter for Linux  is a big deal.  Without it, Linux is very limited it its usefulness to photographers.</p><p>Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion? I sure hope so.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great news .
For those who do n't know , a digital camera 's sensor is actually a monochrome sensor .
It is not a true color sensor ( except for Sigma cameras ) .
Each seperate sensor cell ( sensel ) has a colored filter placed over it .
So the color is actually calculated by compariing each sensel 's value with the adjacent sensels .
Thus the demosaic process is very important.All digital cameras have a built-in processor that processes the raw data the creates a JPEG file .
But the JPEG file has less data ( 8-bit vs. 12 to 14 bit RAW ) and suffers when heavy post processing is applied .
Thus most pros shoot in raw , as you can image PhotoShop , Lightroom , Aperture and others can do a much better job than the built-in processor.The availability of a RAW converter for Linux is a big deal .
Without it , Linux is very limited it its usefulness to photographers.Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion ?
I sure hope so .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great news.
For those who don't know, a digital camera's sensor is actually a monochrome sensor.
It is not a true color sensor (except for Sigma cameras).
Each seperate sensor cell (sensel) has a colored filter placed over it.
So the color is actually calculated by compariing each sensel's value with the adjacent sensels.
Thus the demosaic process is very important.All digital cameras have a built-in processor that processes the raw data the creates a JPEG file.
But the JPEG file has less data (8-bit vs. 12 to 14 bit RAW) and suffers when heavy post processing is applied.
Thus most pros shoot in raw, as you can image PhotoShop, Lightroom, Aperture and others can do a much better job than the built-in processor.The availability of a RAW converter for Linux  is a big deal.
Without it, Linux is very limited it its usefulness to photographers.Might GIMP soon include RAW conversion?
I sure hope so.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30828276</id>
	<title>Re:Plug for Bibblepro</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263921240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That should read "there is at least one really high quality *proprietary* tool for Linux users already"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That should read " there is at least one really high quality * proprietary * tool for Linux users already "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That should read "there is at least one really high quality *proprietary* tool for Linux users already"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815814</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30820102</id>
	<title>Re:Colour management</title>
	<author>neurovish</author>
	<datestamp>1263920640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Raw conversion tool for Linux is good news, but the thing that really seems to be lacking is colour management. I'm a serious hobby photographer (exhibited and published), and I use Photoshop on Windows</p></div><p>Tried cinepaint?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Raw conversion tool for Linux is good news , but the thing that really seems to be lacking is colour management .
I 'm a serious hobby photographer ( exhibited and published ) , and I use Photoshop on WindowsTried cinepaint ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Raw conversion tool for Linux is good news, but the thing that really seems to be lacking is colour management.
I'm a serious hobby photographer (exhibited and published), and I use Photoshop on WindowsTried cinepaint?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30818076</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815558</id>
	<title>Therapee seems to be working</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263829560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>for the developer, he seems to be completely cured of the idea that he can become rich writing closed source software. I just hope he's not suffering from MoWiGRiQiS (Monty Widenius Get Rich Quick Syndrome) because then we'd have to make rawhide out of his sorry ass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>for the developer , he seems to be completely cured of the idea that he can become rich writing closed source software .
I just hope he 's not suffering from MoWiGRiQiS ( Monty Widenius Get Rich Quick Syndrome ) because then we 'd have to make rawhide out of his sorry ass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for the developer, he seems to be completely cured of the idea that he can become rich writing closed source software.
I just hope he's not suffering from MoWiGRiQiS (Monty Widenius Get Rich Quick Syndrome) because then we'd have to make rawhide out of his sorry ass.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816592</id>
	<title>Re:Uppercase "raw"???</title>
	<author>im\_thatoneguy</author>
	<datestamp>1263843360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We persist because every similar word is also capitalized (even though most of them actually are acronyms) so it seems sensible to stay within conventions.</p><p>File formats are all capitalized:<br>TIFF<br>EXR<br>PNG<br>JPG<br>DPX<br>etc...</p><p>Colorspaces and gamma definitions are also often all caps as well:<br>sRGB<br>LOG<br>LIN</p><p>Since RGB is all caps it's just common practice to use RAW in all caps to make the distinction that you're referring to a bayer pattern image and not the raw unprocessed data.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We persist because every similar word is also capitalized ( even though most of them actually are acronyms ) so it seems sensible to stay within conventions.File formats are all capitalized : TIFFEXRPNGJPGDPXetc...Colorspaces and gamma definitions are also often all caps as well : sRGBLOGLINSince RGB is all caps it 's just common practice to use RAW in all caps to make the distinction that you 're referring to a bayer pattern image and not the raw unprocessed data .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We persist because every similar word is also capitalized (even though most of them actually are acronyms) so it seems sensible to stay within conventions.File formats are all capitalized:TIFFEXRPNGJPGDPXetc...Colorspaces and gamma definitions are also often all caps as well:sRGBLOGLINSince RGB is all caps it's just common practice to use RAW in all caps to make the distinction that you're referring to a bayer pattern image and not the raw unprocessed data.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815520</id>
	<title>Fotoxxx</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263829200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>don't forget Fotoxx, frequently updated<br>http://kornelix.squarespace.com/fotoxx</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do n't forget Fotoxx , frequently updatedhttp : //kornelix.squarespace.com/fotoxx</tokentext>
<sentencetext>don't forget Fotoxx, frequently updatedhttp://kornelix.squarespace.com/fotoxx</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815174</id>
	<title>Obviously...</title>
	<author>schon</author>
	<datestamp>1263825060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't say it's the <i>only</i> one, it says it's the only <i>usable</i> one.</p><p>As any True Scotsman could tell you, that's a highly significant difference.</p><p>(seriously though, I'm a die-hard UFRaw user - it does everything I need it to, although it is a little slow... I've never tried RAWStudio, and I can't as it doesn't support my camera.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't say it 's the only one , it says it 's the only usable one.As any True Scotsman could tell you , that 's a highly significant difference .
( seriously though , I 'm a die-hard UFRaw user - it does everything I need it to , although it is a little slow... I 've never tried RAWStudio , and I ca n't as it does n't support my camera .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't say it's the only one, it says it's the only usable one.As any True Scotsman could tell you, that's a highly significant difference.
(seriously though, I'm a die-hard UFRaw user - it does everything I need it to, although it is a little slow... I've never tried RAWStudio, and I can't as it doesn't support my camera.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815032</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814980</id>
	<title>Digikam</title>
	<author>thatkid\_2002</author>
	<datestamp>1263823500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The only (as far as I know) usable and free (as in beer) program for processing RAW photos outside Windows or OS X... DigiKam was the only one I knew about for AGES before I heard of Raw Therapee.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The only ( as far as I know ) usable and free ( as in beer ) program for processing RAW photos outside Windows or OS X... DigiKam was the only one I knew about for AGES before I heard of Raw Therapee .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The only (as far as I know) usable and free (as in beer) program for processing RAW photos outside Windows or OS X... DigiKam was the only one I knew about for AGES before I heard of Raw Therapee.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816192</id>
	<title>Re:Developer in for a shock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263837180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You need to re-read his words again. The baby *is* the software project. The baby has just been GPL'd. His words make that pretty clear.<p><div class="quote"><p>The third (but maybe the most important) reason of switching to GPL is that our baby reached the age (10 month old) when he needs his father more and more. I dont want to disappoint him<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:). With more developers involved the development process will hopefully more smooth and wont stop when I am busy.</p></div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You need to re-read his words again .
The baby * is * the software project .
The baby has just been GPL 'd .
His words make that pretty clear.The third ( but maybe the most important ) reason of switching to GPL is that our baby reached the age ( 10 month old ) when he needs his father more and more .
I dont want to disappoint him : ) .
With more developers involved the development process will hopefully more smooth and wont stop when I am busy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You need to re-read his words again.
The baby *is* the software project.
The baby has just been GPL'd.
His words make that pretty clear.The third (but maybe the most important) reason of switching to GPL is that our baby reached the age (10 month old) when he needs his father more and more.
I dont want to disappoint him :).
With more developers involved the development process will hopefully more smooth and wont stop when I am busy.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815264</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816924</id>
	<title>Re:dcraw</title>
	<author>TheQuantumShift</author>
	<datestamp>1263934320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also in the repos is <a href="http://rawstudio.org/" title="rawstudio.org">RawStudio</a> [rawstudio.org]. It uses dcraw to do conversions, but inside a lightroom-lite (as in it only has the basic abilities you actually use) interface. Unfortunately the "export to gimp" menu option is broken, but it still opens images faster, makes adjustments faster and exports to jpeg faster than lightroom under windows on the same hardware.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also in the repos is RawStudio [ rawstudio.org ] .
It uses dcraw to do conversions , but inside a lightroom-lite ( as in it only has the basic abilities you actually use ) interface .
Unfortunately the " export to gimp " menu option is broken , but it still opens images faster , makes adjustments faster and exports to jpeg faster than lightroom under windows on the same hardware .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also in the repos is RawStudio [rawstudio.org].
It uses dcraw to do conversions, but inside a lightroom-lite (as in it only has the basic abilities you actually use) interface.
Unfortunately the "export to gimp" menu option is broken, but it still opens images faster, makes adjustments faster and exports to jpeg faster than lightroom under windows on the same hardware.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814964</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816238</id>
	<title>Re:Uppercase "raw"???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263837840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it's a file format.  Some people do 'PDF', others go '.pdf' and still others '.PDF'.  This is common practice whether the file format/extension is an acronym, an initialism, or just a string of letters.  For example, see 'IMG file' in all kinds of open source documentation.  People are accustomed to seeing JPG (not strictly an acronym--that would be JPEG), PNG, TIFF, BMP (again, not an acronym), DOC (not an acronym), etc.</p><p>Instead of an insipid sentence ("this file is in raw format"), you could just say "RAW file" and it would be quite clear to everyone what you meant.  Moreover, in this particular case, "raw file" and "raw file" presents a disambiguation issue--do you mean the "raw file" as opposed to e.g. a finished or composited file or "raw file" as opposed to a JPEG?  While personally I prefer to say '.raw', RAW is just as effective.</p><p>What's more curious is why you chose to capitalize "format" in a post alleging curious capitalization.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it 's a file format .
Some people do 'PDF ' , others go '.pdf ' and still others '.PDF' .
This is common practice whether the file format/extension is an acronym , an initialism , or just a string of letters .
For example , see 'IMG file ' in all kinds of open source documentation .
People are accustomed to seeing JPG ( not strictly an acronym--that would be JPEG ) , PNG , TIFF , BMP ( again , not an acronym ) , DOC ( not an acronym ) , etc.Instead of an insipid sentence ( " this file is in raw format " ) , you could just say " RAW file " and it would be quite clear to everyone what you meant .
Moreover , in this particular case , " raw file " and " raw file " presents a disambiguation issue--do you mean the " raw file " as opposed to e.g .
a finished or composited file or " raw file " as opposed to a JPEG ?
While personally I prefer to say '.raw ' , RAW is just as effective.What 's more curious is why you chose to capitalize " format " in a post alleging curious capitalization .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it's a file format.
Some people do 'PDF', others go '.pdf' and still others '.PDF'.
This is common practice whether the file format/extension is an acronym, an initialism, or just a string of letters.
For example, see 'IMG file' in all kinds of open source documentation.
People are accustomed to seeing JPG (not strictly an acronym--that would be JPEG), PNG, TIFF, BMP (again, not an acronym), DOC (not an acronym), etc.Instead of an insipid sentence ("this file is in raw format"), you could just say "RAW file" and it would be quite clear to everyone what you meant.
Moreover, in this particular case, "raw file" and "raw file" presents a disambiguation issue--do you mean the "raw file" as opposed to e.g.
a finished or composited file or "raw file" as opposed to a JPEG?
While personally I prefer to say '.raw', RAW is just as effective.What's more curious is why you chose to capitalize "format" in a post alleging curious capitalization.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815300</id>
	<title>Re:RAWTherapee is a frontend for dcraw</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1263826560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The author says it is more than a front end:</p><p><a href="http://www.rawtherapee.com/?mitem=4&amp;faqid=17" title="rawtherapee.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.rawtherapee.com/?mitem=4&amp;faqid=17</a> [rawtherapee.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The author says it is more than a front end : http : //www.rawtherapee.com/ ? mitem = 4&amp;faqid = 17 [ rawtherapee.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The author says it is more than a front end:http://www.rawtherapee.com/?mitem=4&amp;faqid=17 [rawtherapee.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815244</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815622</id>
	<title>Re:Oh sweet Jesus no</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263830520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When I remember how my PHBs handled GUI interfaces in the past, my guess is:<br>- MOAR BUTTONZ!!!!!!111one(lim (x-&gt;0) (sin(x)/x))<br>- Highlight this! It is important!<br>- Oh noes! Now everything is highlighted!... Just make it red!<br>- My clickiez iz 2 smal! Iz maek it huuuugeee!<br>- Oh noes! No spaes left on full HD! Let&rsquo;s splitz, wif 1 button in every modal windowz!<br>- Nowz too <em>compleecat</em>ed!  We needz MOAR WEEZARDZ!!!!<br>- Yz ur program so sloow n stoopid! Me no can use! Plz 2 fix ASAP! U SUCK! KTHXBAI!<br>*Original developer starts crying about... now*</p><p>P.S.: Yes, my PHBs were very similar to cats. Their behavior made no sense at all, and they ignored every advice or information you gave them. Except when it was about money. They they were all over you. The rest of the time they were outside the house until late at night, or asleep in their office.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I remember how my PHBs handled GUI interfaces in the past , my guess is : - MOAR BUTTONZ ! ! ! ! !
! 111one ( lim ( x- &gt; 0 ) ( sin ( x ) /x ) ) - Highlight this !
It is important ! - Oh noes !
Now everything is highlighted ! .. .
Just make it red ! - My clickiez iz 2 smal !
Iz maek it huuuugeee ! - Oh noes !
No spaes left on full HD !
Let    s splitz , wif 1 button in every modal windowz ! - Nowz too compleecated !
We needz MOAR WEEZARDZ ! ! !
! - Yz ur program so sloow n stoopid !
Me no can use !
Plz 2 fix ASAP !
U SUCK !
KTHXBAI ! * Original developer starts crying about.. .
now * P.S. : Yes , my PHBs were very similar to cats .
Their behavior made no sense at all , and they ignored every advice or information you gave them .
Except when it was about money .
They they were all over you .
The rest of the time they were outside the house until late at night , or asleep in their office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I remember how my PHBs handled GUI interfaces in the past, my guess is:- MOAR BUTTONZ!!!!!
!111one(lim (x-&gt;0) (sin(x)/x))- Highlight this!
It is important!- Oh noes!
Now everything is highlighted!...
Just make it red!- My clickiez iz 2 smal!
Iz maek it huuuugeee!- Oh noes!
No spaes left on full HD!
Let’s splitz, wif 1 button in every modal windowz!- Nowz too compleecated!
We needz MOAR WEEZARDZ!!!
!- Yz ur program so sloow n stoopid!
Me no can use!
Plz 2 fix ASAP!
U SUCK!
KTHXBAI!*Original developer starts crying about...
now*P.S.: Yes, my PHBs were very similar to cats.
Their behavior made no sense at all, and they ignored every advice or information you gave them.
Except when it was about money.
They they were all over you.
The rest of the time they were outside the house until late at night, or asleep in their office.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814934</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815814</id>
	<title>Plug for Bibblepro</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263832440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Bibblepro is a great commercial RAW converter that runs quite well on Linux.  I've been using it for several years and really like both the job it does and the options it gives for structuring your workflow.

</p><p>Not to detract from this new open source tool (which I look forward to trying out), but I like to point out that there is at least one really high quality tool for Linux users already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Bibblepro is a great commercial RAW converter that runs quite well on Linux .
I 've been using it for several years and really like both the job it does and the options it gives for structuring your workflow .
Not to detract from this new open source tool ( which I look forward to trying out ) , but I like to point out that there is at least one really high quality tool for Linux users already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Bibblepro is a great commercial RAW converter that runs quite well on Linux.
I've been using it for several years and really like both the job it does and the options it gives for structuring your workflow.
Not to detract from this new open source tool (which I look forward to trying out), but I like to point out that there is at least one really high quality tool for Linux users already.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815196</id>
	<title>Re:RAW conversion for GIMP?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263825300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thanks for this post!  I read the web page, and part of the forums and still never understood that the goddamned program was good for. This is all too common in open source.</p><p>Folks- if you're going to put your code out there, then tell the world what the hell it <b>does</b> and what it's good for- not that you've improved the frobulation, and rejiggered the comblastictor.</p><p>grumpy</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thanks for this post !
I read the web page , and part of the forums and still never understood that the goddamned program was good for .
This is all too common in open source.Folks- if you 're going to put your code out there , then tell the world what the hell it does and what it 's good for- not that you 've improved the frobulation , and rejiggered the comblastictor.grumpy</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thanks for this post!
I read the web page, and part of the forums and still never understood that the goddamned program was good for.
This is all too common in open source.Folks- if you're going to put your code out there, then tell the world what the hell it does and what it's good for- not that you've improved the frobulation, and rejiggered the comblastictor.grumpy</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815300
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30820102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30818076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815580
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815232
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815188
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815108
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30819810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30818076
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30818284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817522
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815462
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30828276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815814
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816746
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814980
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814964
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815032
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814934
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815264
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816592
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_235202_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815462
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816592
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815704
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30828276
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814938
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814934
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815072
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815622
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815046
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815232
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815580
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816746
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815452
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816814
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815108
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815230
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30818284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815188
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817490
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815520
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815558
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815032
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815174
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30822496
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30818076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30820102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30819810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816084
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817618
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817876
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814980
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815362
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30817974
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_235202.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30814964
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815244
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816140
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30816924
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_235202.30815392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
