<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_18_1623248</id>
	<title>Google Investigating Chinese Employees</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1263834120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>BluePeppers writes <i>"The Guardian is reporting that Google China is <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/18/china-google-cyber-attack">investigating its staff</a> about The Incident. '"We're not commenting on rumor and speculation. This is an ongoing investigation and we simply cannot comment on the details," a Google spokeswoman said. Security analysts told Reuters the malicious software or malware used in the attack was a modification of a trojan called Hydraq. A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer. The analysts said the sophistication in the attack was in knowing whom to attack, not the malware itself.'"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>BluePeppers writes " The Guardian is reporting that Google China is investigating its staff about The Incident .
' " We 're not commenting on rumor and speculation .
This is an ongoing investigation and we simply can not comment on the details , " a Google spokeswoman said .
Security analysts told Reuters the malicious software or malware used in the attack was a modification of a trojan called Hydraq .
A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer .
The analysts said the sophistication in the attack was in knowing whom to attack , not the malware itself .
' "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BluePeppers writes "The Guardian is reporting that Google China is investigating its staff about The Incident.
'"We're not commenting on rumor and speculation.
This is an ongoing investigation and we simply cannot comment on the details," a Google spokeswoman said.
Security analysts told Reuters the malicious software or malware used in the attack was a modification of a trojan called Hydraq.
A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer.
The analysts said the sophistication in the attack was in knowing whom to attack, not the malware itself.
'"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809754</id>
	<title>Poor Choice Of Phrasing</title>
	<author>xdroop</author>
	<datestamp>1263839160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Come on, guys, it's not "in lieu of".  "<a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/in\_lieu\_of" title="wiktionary.org" rel="nofollow">In lieu of</a> [wiktionary.org]" means "instead; in place of; as a substitute for".  So that description makes absolutely no sense.  The submitter probably means "in light of".</p><p>I know this is just slashdot, but we we have computers and the internet where all the grammar nazis have left us neat hints how to use language correctly, if not effectively.  Articles like this make us all look like gibbering chimps.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , guys , it 's not " in lieu of " .
" In lieu of [ wiktionary.org ] " means " instead ; in place of ; as a substitute for " .
So that description makes absolutely no sense .
The submitter probably means " in light of " .I know this is just slashdot , but we we have computers and the internet where all the grammar nazis have left us neat hints how to use language correctly , if not effectively .
Articles like this make us all look like gibbering chimps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, guys, it's not "in lieu of".
"In lieu of [wiktionary.org]" means "instead; in place of; as a substitute for".
So that description makes absolutely no sense.
The submitter probably means "in light of".I know this is just slashdot, but we we have computers and the internet where all the grammar nazis have left us neat hints how to use language correctly, if not effectively.
Articles like this make us all look like gibbering chimps.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809808</id>
	<title>The real WTF is...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263839340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why can't people tell the difference between it's and its?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ca n't people tell the difference between it 's and its ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why can't people tell the difference between it's and its?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30813942</id>
	<title>Re:Spies everywhere</title>
	<author>nortcele</author>
	<datestamp>1263816000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Oh yeah? Our company outsourced a bunch of IT functions to India.  I triple dog dare the Chinese to infiltrate those Indian machines and trash them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Oh yeah ?
Our company outsourced a bunch of IT functions to India .
I triple dog dare the Chinese to infiltrate those Indian machines and trash them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Oh yeah?
Our company outsourced a bunch of IT functions to India.
I triple dog dare the Chinese to infiltrate those Indian machines and trash them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812238</id>
	<title>Re:Somewhere in Mountain View...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263807540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...and serving them targeted ads.</p><p>Profit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...and serving them targeted ads.Profit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...and serving them targeted ads.Profit!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809530</id>
	<title>Re:Google is more powerful than I thought..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263838260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unfortunately only organic matter could be sent or machines covered with organic matter.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately only organic matter could be sent or machines covered with organic matter .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately only organic matter could be sent or machines covered with organic matter.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811324</id>
	<title>Re:Spies everywhere</title>
	<author>chiguy</author>
	<datestamp>1263846660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Google should also check where all their laptops were manufactured.  And make sure each BIOS is clean.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Google should also check where all their laptops were manufactured .
And make sure each BIOS is clean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google should also check where all their laptops were manufactured.
And make sure each BIOS is clean.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810252</id>
	<title>Re:Somewhere in Mountain View...</title>
	<author>hellraizer</author>
	<datestamp>1263841380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Somewhere in Mountain View, servers are now analyzing" servers that analize server traffic<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D

im getting dizzy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.....<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:P
one server to analize them all<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Somewhere in Mountain View , servers are now analyzing " servers that analize server traffic : D im getting dizzy ..... : P one server to analize them all : D .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Somewhere in Mountain View, servers are now analyzing" servers that analize server traffic :D

im getting dizzy ..... :P
one server to analize them all :D ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809744</id>
	<title>Re:it's aftermath!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263839100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, the first few responses are about nitpicking, rather than the <i>actual point of the article.</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , the first few responses are about nitpicking , rather than the actual point of the article .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, the first few responses are about nitpicking, rather than the actual point of the article.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814394</id>
	<title>Re:Trojan</title>
	<author>dintech</author>
	<datestamp>1263818940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And also, not the definition that most people learned decades ago. The whole concept of a concept of a Trojan is of course an innocuous piece of software masquerading as something useful that is invited into a system only then to unleash a nasty payload. If during the Trojan War, the horse had been hidden, that would have been a much cleverer attack. I guess the reporter didn't see the connection between Trojan and Trojan Horse. Also not all trojans allow access to the computer. Some just get in there to FSU.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And also , not the definition that most people learned decades ago .
The whole concept of a concept of a Trojan is of course an innocuous piece of software masquerading as something useful that is invited into a system only then to unleash a nasty payload .
If during the Trojan War , the horse had been hidden , that would have been a much cleverer attack .
I guess the reporter did n't see the connection between Trojan and Trojan Horse .
Also not all trojans allow access to the computer .
Some just get in there to FSU .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And also, not the definition that most people learned decades ago.
The whole concept of a concept of a Trojan is of course an innocuous piece of software masquerading as something useful that is invited into a system only then to unleash a nasty payload.
If during the Trojan War, the horse had been hidden, that would have been a much cleverer attack.
I guess the reporter didn't see the connection between Trojan and Trojan Horse.
Also not all trojans allow access to the computer.
Some just get in there to FSU.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520</id>
	<title>it's aftermath!</title>
	<author>bigmaddog</author>
	<datestamp>1263838200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Irregardless of the actual story content, I find the poster's use of "in lieu" to be the penultimate atrocity vis-a-vis the English language.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Irregardless of the actual story content , I find the poster 's use of " in lieu " to be the penultimate atrocity vis-a-vis the English language .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Irregardless of the actual story content, I find the poster's use of "in lieu" to be the penultimate atrocity vis-a-vis the English language.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809914</id>
	<title>Espionage Big risk of Overseas Outsourcing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263839880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Espionage is a BIG risk in all Overseas Outsourcing. The overseas employees (or foreigners brought in on L-1 or H-1b visas) are ultimately loyal to their home country. If their country orders them to spy, turn over Intellectual Property, etc., don't be surprised! Google is not the big risk. Microsoft, for example, has a big tech center in China. One must wonder what sorts of spying, back doors, trojans, are being planted in Windows!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Espionage is a BIG risk in all Overseas Outsourcing .
The overseas employees ( or foreigners brought in on L-1 or H-1b visas ) are ultimately loyal to their home country .
If their country orders them to spy , turn over Intellectual Property , etc. , do n't be surprised !
Google is not the big risk .
Microsoft , for example , has a big tech center in China .
One must wonder what sorts of spying , back doors , trojans , are being planted in Windows !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Espionage is a BIG risk in all Overseas Outsourcing.
The overseas employees (or foreigners brought in on L-1 or H-1b visas) are ultimately loyal to their home country.
If their country orders them to spy, turn over Intellectual Property, etc., don't be surprised!
Google is not the big risk.
Microsoft, for example, has a big tech center in China.
One must wonder what sorts of spying, back doors, trojans, are being planted in Windows!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809796</id>
	<title>Re:it's aftermath!</title>
	<author>demonlapin</author>
	<datestamp>1263839340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe you used vis-a-vis correctly there. Try vice versa.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe you used vis-a-vis correctly there .
Try vice versa .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe you used vis-a-vis correctly there.
Try vice versa.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814510</id>
	<title>Re:Spies everywhere</title>
	<author>Weezul</author>
	<datestamp>1263819840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>All the cynics will say that Google will fire them, China will execute them along with some hackers, and Google will return to censoring Chinese traffic.</p><p>China may execute their own "internet soldiers" who participated in the attacks just to save face internally, or even just personally, but I'd imagine that Google won't take China punishing the hackers as reason to stop censoring.</p><p>I'd say the most likely long term solution is that Google remains uncensored but China aggressively firewalls any undesirable search results, which both hurts the Chinese government and hurt Google's market share, so Google minimizes the number of blocked search results, while always returning some.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>All the cynics will say that Google will fire them , China will execute them along with some hackers , and Google will return to censoring Chinese traffic.China may execute their own " internet soldiers " who participated in the attacks just to save face internally , or even just personally , but I 'd imagine that Google wo n't take China punishing the hackers as reason to stop censoring.I 'd say the most likely long term solution is that Google remains uncensored but China aggressively firewalls any undesirable search results , which both hurts the Chinese government and hurt Google 's market share , so Google minimizes the number of blocked search results , while always returning some .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>All the cynics will say that Google will fire them, China will execute them along with some hackers, and Google will return to censoring Chinese traffic.China may execute their own "internet soldiers" who participated in the attacks just to save face internally, or even just personally, but I'd imagine that Google won't take China punishing the hackers as reason to stop censoring.I'd say the most likely long term solution is that Google remains uncensored but China aggressively firewalls any undesirable search results, which both hurts the Chinese government and hurt Google's market share, so Google minimizes the number of blocked search results, while always returning some.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811016</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the new world</title>
	<author>Inda</author>
	<datestamp>1263845160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why is everyone surprised at this? When I worked at Land Rover's design centre in Gaydon, England, there were always two cars from rivals, stripped down, Faro arms in each corner,... You could borrow the parts just like a lending library. Everyone does it. It's good to share.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is everyone surprised at this ?
When I worked at Land Rover 's design centre in Gaydon , England , there were always two cars from rivals , stripped down , Faro arms in each corner,... You could borrow the parts just like a lending library .
Everyone does it .
It 's good to share .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is everyone surprised at this?
When I worked at Land Rover's design centre in Gaydon, England, there were always two cars from rivals, stripped down, Faro arms in each corner,... You could borrow the parts just like a lending library.
Everyone does it.
It's good to share.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811002</id>
	<title>well I'm not surprised</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263845100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..about the treachery. I'm surprised at the naiivity of Google. Having Chinese people work for you in China is like have nazis in nazi germany work for u. What are they, stupid?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..about the treachery .
I 'm surprised at the naiivity of Google .
Having Chinese people work for you in China is like have nazis in nazi germany work for u. What are they , stupid ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..about the treachery.
I'm surprised at the naiivity of Google.
Having Chinese people work for you in China is like have nazis in nazi germany work for u. What are they, stupid?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30815100</id>
	<title>Re:What does this mean for Chinese seeking work?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263824280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Commie spies from China and North Korea have no problem getting South Korean and Taiwanese passports.  Those two countries would have as many commie spies as Saudi Arabia has CIA spies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Commie spies from China and North Korea have no problem getting South Korean and Taiwanese passports .
Those two countries would have as many commie spies as Saudi Arabia has CIA spies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Commie spies from China and North Korea have no problem getting South Korean and Taiwanese passports.
Those two countries would have as many commie spies as Saudi Arabia has CIA spies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468</id>
	<title>Spies everywhere</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1263837900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why should Google be surprised. The funny thing is that all Google will be able to do is fire that person. And then they will get to take a job with a Baidu (or may already be working for them).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why should Google be surprised .
The funny thing is that all Google will be able to do is fire that person .
And then they will get to take a job with a Baidu ( or may already be working for them ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why should Google be surprised.
The funny thing is that all Google will be able to do is fire that person.
And then they will get to take a job with a Baidu (or may already be working for them).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810498</id>
	<title>"A trojan is a hidden program allowing..."</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263842580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"...unauthorized access to a computer"</p><p>It's a good thing that this is put in the<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. summary, I mean, some<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. readers might not know it!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" ...unauthorized access to a computer " It 's a good thing that this is put in the / .
summary , I mean , some / .
readers might not know it !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"...unauthorized access to a computer"It's a good thing that this is put in the /.
summary, I mean, some /.
readers might not know it!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809664</id>
	<title>Re:it's aftermath!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263838800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; I find the poster's use of "in lieu" to be the penultimate atrocity<br>&gt; vis-a-vis the English language.</p><p>The ultimate one being use of "irregardless"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; I find the poster 's use of " in lieu " to be the penultimate atrocity &gt; vis-a-vis the English language.The ultimate one being use of " irregardless " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; I find the poster's use of "in lieu" to be the penultimate atrocity&gt; vis-a-vis the English language.The ultimate one being use of "irregardless"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811870</id>
	<title>Re:Espionage Big risk of Overseas Outsourcing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263805920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interesting? or Troll? <br> <br>
The fact that you don't share any interest in the H-1B program, doesn't give you any right to stereotype people's loyalty.<br>
Loyalty, to me, is something the company or even country has to gain. If your company/country standards don't make workers feel like part of them, they will not be loyal, no matter their citizenship status or their security clearance. So, stop your hate already.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interesting ?
or Troll ?
The fact that you do n't share any interest in the H-1B program , does n't give you any right to stereotype people 's loyalty .
Loyalty , to me , is something the company or even country has to gain .
If your company/country standards do n't make workers feel like part of them , they will not be loyal , no matter their citizenship status or their security clearance .
So , stop your hate already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interesting?
or Troll?
The fact that you don't share any interest in the H-1B program, doesn't give you any right to stereotype people's loyalty.
Loyalty, to me, is something the company or even country has to gain.
If your company/country standards don't make workers feel like part of them, they will not be loyal, no matter their citizenship status or their security clearance.
So, stop your hate already.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30825084</id>
	<title>Censor this?</title>
	<author>dreams2go</author>
	<datestamp>1263898260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Curious, is this<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. post and its subject, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/18/china-google-cyber-attack" title="guardian.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/18/china-google-cyber-attack</a> [guardian.co.uk], searchable within China?

"I do hope if this doesn't result in hiring discrimination against Chinese candidates"

"A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer."
A Trojan may also be an ethnic Chinese employee in US or China working for Google.

Things are not always what they appear to be.

What if Chinese students or employees still have family ties to China?  A good number of those ties either have Communist Party roots, coercive pressure. national loyalty, or subtle influence.  Some Chinese students were in the position to go to school, get visas, or come to the US inadvertently based on their family and political ties.  A background check will never uncover Party history or relationships that might make an employee a risk.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Curious , is this / .
post and its subject , http : //www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/18/china-google-cyber-attack [ guardian.co.uk ] , searchable within China ?
" I do hope if this does n't result in hiring discrimination against Chinese candidates " " A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer .
" A Trojan may also be an ethnic Chinese employee in US or China working for Google .
Things are not always what they appear to be .
What if Chinese students or employees still have family ties to China ?
A good number of those ties either have Communist Party roots , coercive pressure .
national loyalty , or subtle influence .
Some Chinese students were in the position to go to school , get visas , or come to the US inadvertently based on their family and political ties .
A background check will never uncover Party history or relationships that might make an employee a risk .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Curious, is this /.
post and its subject, http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/18/china-google-cyber-attack [guardian.co.uk], searchable within China?
"I do hope if this doesn't result in hiring discrimination against Chinese candidates"

"A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer.
"
A Trojan may also be an ethnic Chinese employee in US or China working for Google.
Things are not always what they appear to be.
What if Chinese students or employees still have family ties to China?
A good number of those ties either have Communist Party roots, coercive pressure.
national loyalty, or subtle influence.
Some Chinese students were in the position to go to school, get visas, or come to the US inadvertently based on their family and political ties.
A background check will never uncover Party history or relationships that might make an employee a risk.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810572</id>
	<title>Re:Spies everywhere</title>
	<author>whisper\_jeff</author>
	<datestamp>1263842940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I believe that industrial espionage is a crime. And I'm sure several other laws were broken along the way (computer hacking itself is a pretty serious crime). I don't know about the laws in China, but I suspect Google can do something beyond just firing the person.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I believe that industrial espionage is a crime .
And I 'm sure several other laws were broken along the way ( computer hacking itself is a pretty serious crime ) .
I do n't know about the laws in China , but I suspect Google can do something beyond just firing the person .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I believe that industrial espionage is a crime.
And I'm sure several other laws were broken along the way (computer hacking itself is a pretty serious crime).
I don't know about the laws in China, but I suspect Google can do something beyond just firing the person.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809654</id>
	<title>I'm not sure I get it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263838740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The analysts said the sophistication in the attack was in knowing whom to attack, not the malware itself</p></div><p>They were accessing mail, right?</p><p>C:\&gt; ping mail.google.com</p><p>pinging googlemail.l.google.com [74.125.127.18]</p><p>Point of entry, anyone?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The analysts said the sophistication in the attack was in knowing whom to attack , not the malware itselfThey were accessing mail , right ? C : \ &gt; ping mail.google.compinging googlemail.l.google.com [ 74.125.127.18 ] Point of entry , anyone ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The analysts said the sophistication in the attack was in knowing whom to attack, not the malware itselfThey were accessing mail, right?C:\&gt; ping mail.google.compinging googlemail.l.google.com [74.125.127.18]Point of entry, anyone?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809630</id>
	<title>Re:In lieu of?</title>
	<author>Bluesman</author>
	<datestamp>1263838620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, when an organization is investigating it is staff, there perfectly reasonable to do it in lieu of.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , when an organization is investigating it is staff , there perfectly reasonable to do it in lieu of .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, when an organization is investigating it is staff, there perfectly reasonable to do it in lieu of.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811406</id>
	<title>Re:Spies everywhere</title>
	<author>Machtyn</author>
	<datestamp>1263847020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, with <a href="http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/latest/~3/T2aoc8ys3HI/cto-googles-chinese-competitor-resigns" title="foxnews.com">top Baidu officials resigning</a> [foxnews.com] there should be some openings... but it's got to make you wonder why the rats are jumping off the ship.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , with top Baidu officials resigning [ foxnews.com ] there should be some openings... but it 's got to make you wonder why the rats are jumping off the ship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, with top Baidu officials resigning [foxnews.com] there should be some openings... but it's got to make you wonder why the rats are jumping off the ship.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809538</id>
	<title>Google employee here</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263838260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Full disclosure: I'm a Google employee in China. The truth is that 95\% of all Google employees in China work for the Chinese gNO CARRIER</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Full disclosure : I 'm a Google employee in China .
The truth is that 95 \ % of all Google employees in China work for the Chinese gNO CARRIER</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Full disclosure: I'm a Google employee in China.
The truth is that 95\% of all Google employees in China work for the Chinese gNO CARRIER</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809682</id>
	<title>and</title>
	<author>snarkh</author>
	<datestamp>1263838920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the ultimate atrocity is the poster's use of "it's"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the ultimate atrocity is the poster 's use of " it 's " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the ultimate atrocity is the poster's use of "it's"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811200</id>
	<title>Investigating? Why?</title>
	<author>Xeleema</author>
	<datestamp>1263846180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm leaving the "Post Anonymously" box unchecked deliberately here, so when I say this, pay attention;</p><p>I don't have a problem with Google extending their business out to the Chinese, ${DIETY} knows we have tons of American corporations outright outsourcing everything they can over there.  However, one thing I take offense to is this notion of "investigating" the matter.</p><p> <b>FIRE. THEM.</b> </p><p>Seriously, Google, there's an estimated 1.3 <b>billion</b> Chinese over there.  Even if half of a percent of the population is qualified to fill your cubicles, that means there's over 500,000 candidates. Half that, and you could staff Microsoft.  Realistically, I'd bet they only need something like 5,0000 employees, so this really can't be *that* hard.</p><p>What's that?  Not enough qualified technical people over there in the PRC?  Well, heck, what's the Chinese version of an H1-B?  Let's just import some employees from the States or something! Give 'em a dose of their own medicine!</p><p>While we're at it, use this opportunity to send a message to everyone in China that thinks is cool to f*ck with you; Kill. Every. PRC Employee. Bonus points if the PRC government gives you a "Best Place to Work in the Country!" award for the effort.  After all, the Chinese human rights movement hasn't exactly turned out to be the fad everyone was hoping for, and I'm pretty sure the penalty for uttering anything remotely negative about the People's Republic of China is an immediate <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curb-stomp" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">curb-stomping</a> [wikipedia.org].  So this amounts to a win-win (rounded off, of course).</p><p>P.S: To the 60-something grammar nazis that pointed out the incorrect usage of "in lieu".  Congratulations, you managed to briefly turn another article on something remotely interesting into yet another debate about the English language, and it's proper use thereof.  Next time I Mod, I'm torching the every post that attempts to be elitist via such corrections.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm leaving the " Post Anonymously " box unchecked deliberately here , so when I say this , pay attention ; I do n't have a problem with Google extending their business out to the Chinese , $ { DIETY } knows we have tons of American corporations outright outsourcing everything they can over there .
However , one thing I take offense to is this notion of " investigating " the matter .
FIRE. THEM .
Seriously , Google , there 's an estimated 1.3 billion Chinese over there .
Even if half of a percent of the population is qualified to fill your cubicles , that means there 's over 500,000 candidates .
Half that , and you could staff Microsoft .
Realistically , I 'd bet they only need something like 5,0000 employees , so this really ca n't be * that * hard.What 's that ?
Not enough qualified technical people over there in the PRC ?
Well , heck , what 's the Chinese version of an H1-B ?
Let 's just import some employees from the States or something !
Give 'em a dose of their own medicine ! While we 're at it , use this opportunity to send a message to everyone in China that thinks is cool to f * ck with you ; Kill .
Every. PRC Employee .
Bonus points if the PRC government gives you a " Best Place to Work in the Country !
" award for the effort .
After all , the Chinese human rights movement has n't exactly turned out to be the fad everyone was hoping for , and I 'm pretty sure the penalty for uttering anything remotely negative about the People 's Republic of China is an immediate curb-stomping [ wikipedia.org ] .
So this amounts to a win-win ( rounded off , of course ) .P.S : To the 60-something grammar nazis that pointed out the incorrect usage of " in lieu " .
Congratulations , you managed to briefly turn another article on something remotely interesting into yet another debate about the English language , and it 's proper use thereof .
Next time I Mod , I 'm torching the every post that attempts to be elitist via such corrections .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm leaving the "Post Anonymously" box unchecked deliberately here, so when I say this, pay attention;I don't have a problem with Google extending their business out to the Chinese, ${DIETY} knows we have tons of American corporations outright outsourcing everything they can over there.
However, one thing I take offense to is this notion of "investigating" the matter.
FIRE. THEM.
Seriously, Google, there's an estimated 1.3 billion Chinese over there.
Even if half of a percent of the population is qualified to fill your cubicles, that means there's over 500,000 candidates.
Half that, and you could staff Microsoft.
Realistically, I'd bet they only need something like 5,0000 employees, so this really can't be *that* hard.What's that?
Not enough qualified technical people over there in the PRC?
Well, heck, what's the Chinese version of an H1-B?
Let's just import some employees from the States or something!
Give 'em a dose of their own medicine!While we're at it, use this opportunity to send a message to everyone in China that thinks is cool to f*ck with you; Kill.
Every. PRC Employee.
Bonus points if the PRC government gives you a "Best Place to Work in the Country!
" award for the effort.
After all, the Chinese human rights movement hasn't exactly turned out to be the fad everyone was hoping for, and I'm pretty sure the penalty for uttering anything remotely negative about the People's Republic of China is an immediate curb-stomping [wikipedia.org].
So this amounts to a win-win (rounded off, of course).P.S: To the 60-something grammar nazis that pointed out the incorrect usage of "in lieu".
Congratulations, you managed to briefly turn another article on something remotely interesting into yet another debate about the English language, and it's proper use thereof.
Next time I Mod, I'm torching the every post that attempts to be elitist via such corrections.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809514</id>
	<title>trojan definition</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263838140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Thank God you explained what a trojan does.  I almost thought I was on a tech website and the community would know that definition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank God you explained what a trojan does .
I almost thought I was on a tech website and the community would know that definition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank God you explained what a trojan does.
I almost thought I was on a tech website and the community would know that definition.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809696</id>
	<title>the Chinese staffer's name ...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263838980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... is In Lieu, you insensitive clods!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... is In Lieu , you insensitive clods !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... is In Lieu, you insensitive clods!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810982</id>
	<title>What does this mean for Chinese seeking work?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263844980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If Google finds anything, this could have serious reprecussions for foreign companies hiring in China and Chinese students seeking green cards/employment in the US, especially in high-tech areas.  Does anyone else think that mandatory background checks might be put in place to screen candidates, beyond simply assessing technical skills?</p><p>If so, it's a good time to be Indian or Taiwanese/Korean, if you're competing with Chinese candidates.</p><p>Though I do hope if this doesn't result in hiring discrimination against Chinese candidates; most of them are bright cookies, and there may come a day when US tech companies need them more than they need us.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If Google finds anything , this could have serious reprecussions for foreign companies hiring in China and Chinese students seeking green cards/employment in the US , especially in high-tech areas .
Does anyone else think that mandatory background checks might be put in place to screen candidates , beyond simply assessing technical skills ? If so , it 's a good time to be Indian or Taiwanese/Korean , if you 're competing with Chinese candidates.Though I do hope if this does n't result in hiring discrimination against Chinese candidates ; most of them are bright cookies , and there may come a day when US tech companies need them more than they need us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If Google finds anything, this could have serious reprecussions for foreign companies hiring in China and Chinese students seeking green cards/employment in the US, especially in high-tech areas.
Does anyone else think that mandatory background checks might be put in place to screen candidates, beyond simply assessing technical skills?If so, it's a good time to be Indian or Taiwanese/Korean, if you're competing with Chinese candidates.Though I do hope if this doesn't result in hiring discrimination against Chinese candidates; most of them are bright cookies, and there may come a day when US tech companies need them more than they need us.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809826</id>
	<title>Re:it's aftermath!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263839460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>google.com in Liu of google.cn?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>google.com in Liu of google.cn ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>google.com in Liu of google.cn?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30813874</id>
	<title>Re:Trojan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263815640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but tell them it's also something you put over your penis during sexual intercourse and watch the jaws drop!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but tell them it 's also something you put over your penis during sexual intercourse and watch the jaws drop !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but tell them it's also something you put over your penis during sexual intercourse and watch the jaws drop!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809504</id>
	<title>And to present the results...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263838140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>After the investigation, of course they will invite every Google China employee to join them in the USA for a presentation of the results...!</p><p>Actually, that's the whole investigation.  People who have "family obligations" or who are "afraid of airplanes" are the ones to look at!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>After the investigation , of course they will invite every Google China employee to join them in the USA for a presentation of the results... ! Actually , that 's the whole investigation .
People who have " family obligations " or who are " afraid of airplanes " are the ones to look at !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After the investigation, of course they will invite every Google China employee to join them in the USA for a presentation of the results...!Actually, that's the whole investigation.
People who have "family obligations" or who are "afraid of airplanes" are the ones to look at!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810202</id>
	<title>Re:Spies everywhere</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263841140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unless this person were working for Baidu to start with, I bet Baidu wouldn't touch then with a 20ft pole. Who on earth would hire someone who had just planted a trojan in their last place of work?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless this person were working for Baidu to start with , I bet Baidu would n't touch then with a 20ft pole .
Who on earth would hire someone who had just planted a trojan in their last place of work ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless this person were working for Baidu to start with, I bet Baidu wouldn't touch then with a 20ft pole.
Who on earth would hire someone who had just planted a trojan in their last place of work?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814390</id>
	<title>Re:What does this mean for Chinese seeking work?</title>
	<author>plasticsquirrel</author>
	<datestamp>1263818940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I don't think Korea is competing with China and India in this field. South Korea is a wealthy country rather like Japan, and I don't believe that any computers exist in North Korea.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't think Korea is competing with China and India in this field .
South Korea is a wealthy country rather like Japan , and I do n't believe that any computers exist in North Korea .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't think Korea is competing with China and India in this field.
South Korea is a wealthy country rather like Japan, and I don't believe that any computers exist in North Korea.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810982</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810702</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the new world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263843540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>here is the link... from 2005!</p><p>http://www.autoblog.com/2005/04/16/chinese-copy-cats/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>here is the link... from 2005 ! http : //www.autoblog.com/2005/04/16/chinese-copy-cats/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>here is the link... from 2005!http://www.autoblog.com/2005/04/16/chinese-copy-cats/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809956</id>
	<title>Re:it's aftermath!</title>
	<author>Hal\_Porter</author>
	<datestamp>1263840000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It takes a while for the hive mind to digest the summary. Then its finely honed insight will amaze and scare you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It takes a while for the hive mind to digest the summary .
Then its finely honed insight will amaze and scare you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It takes a while for the hive mind to digest the summary.
Then its finely honed insight will amaze and scare you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498</id>
	<title>In lieu of?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263838080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I do not think that word means what you think it means.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do not think that word means what you think it means .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I do not think that word means what you think it means.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946</id>
	<title>Welcome to the new world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263840000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chinese companies copied part for part GM cars and as far as I know, nothing came of it. You could literally take the door off the Chevy and put a door from the Chinese car company on it. We don't impose any trade sanctions, we just keep buying their stuff.</p><p>I'd find the link but I don't have time.</p><p>Hopefully this google flap will get people to pay attention to how they are catching up.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chinese companies copied part for part GM cars and as far as I know , nothing came of it .
You could literally take the door off the Chevy and put a door from the Chinese car company on it .
We do n't impose any trade sanctions , we just keep buying their stuff.I 'd find the link but I do n't have time.Hopefully this google flap will get people to pay attention to how they are catching up .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chinese companies copied part for part GM cars and as far as I know, nothing came of it.
You could literally take the door off the Chevy and put a door from the Chinese car company on it.
We don't impose any trade sanctions, we just keep buying their stuff.I'd find the link but I don't have time.Hopefully this google flap will get people to pay attention to how they are catching up.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810272</id>
	<title>What's that sound?</title>
	<author>gbutler69</author>
	<datestamp>1263841500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>WHOOSH!</htmltext>
<tokenext>WHOOSH !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WHOOSH!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809884</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810632</id>
	<title>If Google wants to do this right...</title>
	<author>dwiget001</author>
	<datestamp>1263843240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>... they would interrogate these people like the ChiComs would. Make them feel right at home!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... they would interrogate these people like the ChiComs would .
Make them feel right at home !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... they would interrogate these people like the ChiComs would.
Make them feel right at home!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812154</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the new world</title>
	<author>Lakitu</author>
	<datestamp>1263807180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>same as the old world!</p><p><a href="http://www.rb-29.net/HTML/03RelatedStories/03.03shortstories/03.03.10contss.htm" title="rb-29.net">http://www.rb-29.net/HTML/03RelatedStories/03.03shortstories/03.03.10contss.htm</a> [rb-29.net]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>same as the old world ! http : //www.rb-29.net/HTML/03RelatedStories/03.03shortstories/03.03.10contss.htm [ rb-29.net ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>same as the old world!http://www.rb-29.net/HTML/03RelatedStories/03.03shortstories/03.03.10contss.htm [rb-29.net]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30826636</id>
	<title>Re:Espionage Big risk of Overseas Outsourcing</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263906060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My computer doesn't seem to work  right if there are   no backdoors or trojans.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My computer does n't seem to work right if there are no backdoors or trojans .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My computer doesn't seem to work  right if there are   no backdoors or trojans.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30818224</id>
	<title>Re:the Chinese staffer's name ...</title>
	<author>EdgeCreeper</author>
	<datestamp>1263909420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Unfortunately for him he did it for Lo Pei.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Unfortunately for him he did it for Lo Pei .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unfortunately for him he did it for Lo Pei.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809696</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809884</id>
	<title>Re:it's aftermath!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263839760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I find your use of "irregardless" an atrocity when criticizing one's use of the English language.

<a href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/IRREGARDLESS" title="merriam-webster.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/IRREGARDLESS</a> [merriam-webster.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>I find your use of " irregardless " an atrocity when criticizing one 's use of the English language .
http : //www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/IRREGARDLESS [ merriam-webster.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I find your use of "irregardless" an atrocity when criticizing one's use of the English language.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/IRREGARDLESS [merriam-webster.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809670</id>
	<title>Re:it's aftermath!</title>
	<author>bantab</author>
	<datestamp>1263838800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is actually an alternate reality fiction board. I think it's pretty imaginative stuff.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is actually an alternate reality fiction board .
I think it 's pretty imaginative stuff .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is actually an alternate reality fiction board.
I think it's pretty imaginative stuff.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810084</id>
	<title>Google seems more Authority than Corp.</title>
	<author>stimpleton</author>
	<datestamp>1263840600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Google Investigating Chinese Employees"<br> <br>
Something occurred to me after I read this. I get a slight twinge that Google is more an Authority, instead of a private corporation. Its odd, If I read "Microsoft investigates..." I envision some staid corporate fumbling about, yet with Google, I feel they are almost Law Enforcement like, with big tenticles of power Joe Bloggs couldnt understand.<br> <br>Sorry, I have watching <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The\_wire" title="wikipedia.org">"The Wire"</a> [wikipedia.org] on DVD. Its ruined my perceptions on how things (might) work.</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Google Investigating Chinese Employees " Something occurred to me after I read this .
I get a slight twinge that Google is more an Authority , instead of a private corporation .
Its odd , If I read " Microsoft investigates... " I envision some staid corporate fumbling about , yet with Google , I feel they are almost Law Enforcement like , with big tenticles of power Joe Bloggs couldnt understand .
Sorry , I have watching " The Wire " [ wikipedia.org ] on DVD .
Its ruined my perceptions on how things ( might ) work .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Google Investigating Chinese Employees" 
Something occurred to me after I read this.
I get a slight twinge that Google is more an Authority, instead of a private corporation.
Its odd, If I read "Microsoft investigates..." I envision some staid corporate fumbling about, yet with Google, I feel they are almost Law Enforcement like, with big tenticles of power Joe Bloggs couldnt understand.
Sorry, I have watching "The Wire" [wikipedia.org] on DVD.
Its ruined my perceptions on how things (might) work.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811100</id>
	<title>Re:Espionage Big risk of Overseas Outsourcing</title>
	<author>fluffy99</author>
	<datestamp>1263845580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For example, all of the cheap chinese knockoff of brand name stuff.  A large portion of it is dishonest suppliers simply doing their own runs of the product and selling it to the grey market.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For example , all of the cheap chinese knockoff of brand name stuff .
A large portion of it is dishonest suppliers simply doing their own runs of the product and selling it to the grey market .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For example, all of the cheap chinese knockoff of brand name stuff.
A large portion of it is dishonest suppliers simply doing their own runs of the product and selling it to the grey market.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860</id>
	<title>Somewhere in Mountain View...</title>
	<author>Animats</author>
	<datestamp>1263839580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>
Somewhere in Mountain View, servers are now analyzing all activity of Google's employees in China.  And their friend. And their friend's friends.  And the people they email.  And everyone who got in range of a Google security camera. And all the their friends.  And the people they email.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Somewhere in Mountain View , servers are now analyzing all activity of Google 's employees in China .
And their friend .
And their friend 's friends .
And the people they email .
And everyone who got in range of a Google security camera .
And all the their friends .
And the people they email .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Somewhere in Mountain View, servers are now analyzing all activity of Google's employees in China.
And their friend.
And their friend's friends.
And the people they email.
And everyone who got in range of a Google security camera.
And all the their friends.
And the people they email.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809604</id>
	<title>Re:In lieu of?</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1263838500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is Slashdot.  Every summary must have at least one grammatical error.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is Slashdot .
Every summary must have at least one grammatical error .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is Slashdot.
Every summary must have at least one grammatical error.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812570</id>
	<title>Re:Spies everywhere</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263809340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except of course nobody (afaik - according to media) placed a "trojan" anywhere. Snooping, pw theft, setting stuff to forward to 3rd party recipients etc.. no trojan, no pdf exploit, no virus. Just a social engineering / unauthenticated access to data hack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except of course nobody ( afaik - according to media ) placed a " trojan " anywhere .
Snooping , pw theft , setting stuff to forward to 3rd party recipients etc.. no trojan , no pdf exploit , no virus .
Just a social engineering / unauthenticated access to data hack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except of course nobody (afaik - according to media) placed a "trojan" anywhere.
Snooping, pw theft, setting stuff to forward to 3rd party recipients etc.. no trojan, no pdf exploit, no virus.
Just a social engineering / unauthenticated access to data hack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810678</id>
	<title>Bring the suspected employees to the States</title>
	<author>TexasTroy</author>
	<datestamp>1263843420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Anyone know if Google could bring their Google China employees to the US and then have them charged with industrial espionage?  I think a quick way of narrowing the field of candidates is to float this out there and see which rats leave the ship.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Anyone know if Google could bring their Google China employees to the US and then have them charged with industrial espionage ?
I think a quick way of narrowing the field of candidates is to float this out there and see which rats leave the ship .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Anyone know if Google could bring their Google China employees to the US and then have them charged with industrial espionage?
I think a quick way of narrowing the field of candidates is to float this out there and see which rats leave the ship.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811426</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the new world</title>
	<author>Alcohol Fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1263847140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here's a link showing the top 10 copycat cars produced in China, with pics of the real deal and the rip offs.

<a href="http://cars.uk.msn.com/features/photos.aspx?cp-documentid=150107488" title="msn.com">http://cars.uk.msn.com/features/photos.aspx?cp-documentid=150107488</a> [msn.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here 's a link showing the top 10 copycat cars produced in China , with pics of the real deal and the rip offs .
http : //cars.uk.msn.com/features/photos.aspx ? cp-documentid = 150107488 [ msn.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here's a link showing the top 10 copycat cars produced in China, with pics of the real deal and the rip offs.
http://cars.uk.msn.com/features/photos.aspx?cp-documentid=150107488 [msn.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810608</id>
	<title>Re:Somewhere in Mountain View...</title>
	<author>CFBMoo1</author>
	<datestamp>1263843180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>"Somewhere in Mountain View, servers are now analyzing all activity of Google's employees in China. And their friend. And their friend's friends. And the people they email. And everyone who got in range of a Google security camera. And all the their friends. And the people they email."<br><br>And then, suddenly the white vans with cameras and guys in colorful hats pulls up and surrounds someones house!</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Somewhere in Mountain View , servers are now analyzing all activity of Google 's employees in China .
And their friend .
And their friend 's friends .
And the people they email .
And everyone who got in range of a Google security camera .
And all the their friends .
And the people they email .
" And then , suddenly the white vans with cameras and guys in colorful hats pulls up and surrounds someones house !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Somewhere in Mountain View, servers are now analyzing all activity of Google's employees in China.
And their friend.
And their friend's friends.
And the people they email.
And everyone who got in range of a Google security camera.
And all the their friends.
And the people they email.
"And then, suddenly the white vans with cameras and guys in colorful hats pulls up and surrounds someones house!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809944</id>
	<title>Re:Poor Choice Of Phrasing</title>
	<author>xdroop</author>
	<datestamp>1263840000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Right, I get hit by my own irony stick.  I deserved that.  "we we" indeed.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , I get hit by my own irony stick .
I deserved that .
" we we " indeed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, I get hit by my own irony stick.
I deserved that.
"we we" indeed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809754</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809534</id>
	<title>Re:In lieu of?</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1263838260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unless he meant it in the proper meaning, in which case, Google has some very peculiar business practices.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unless he meant it in the proper meaning , in which case , Google has some very peculiar business practices .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unless he meant it in the proper meaning, in which case, Google has some very peculiar business practices.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814696</id>
	<title>Re:Espionage Big risk of Overseas Outsourcing</title>
	<author>non0score</author>
	<datestamp>1263821280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good job painting all L-1/H-1B employees as potential traitors.<br>
<br>
And to the moderators, remind me how Slashdot modding works? Is it "+1 Interesting" and "+1 Underrated" for being a xenophobic?<br>
<br>
Right, I forgot. USA! USA! USA! =P</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good job painting all L-1/H-1B employees as potential traitors .
And to the moderators , remind me how Slashdot modding works ?
Is it " + 1 Interesting " and " + 1 Underrated " for being a xenophobic ?
Right , I forgot .
USA ! USA !
USA ! = P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good job painting all L-1/H-1B employees as potential traitors.
And to the moderators, remind me how Slashdot modding works?
Is it "+1 Interesting" and "+1 Underrated" for being a xenophobic?
Right, I forgot.
USA! USA!
USA! =P</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809914</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812908</id>
	<title>Re:Somewhere in Mountain View...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263810840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yup, Google has all the user's activities in its databases since 1999.  All it has to do is to run some queries about what Hilliary Clinton was doing on the internet, which sites she visited (porn included) between the hours of 3:00 AM and 7:10 AM on the morning of June 6, 2006.  Bam!  Gotcha.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yup , Google has all the user 's activities in its databases since 1999 .
All it has to do is to run some queries about what Hilliary Clinton was doing on the internet , which sites she visited ( porn included ) between the hours of 3 : 00 AM and 7 : 10 AM on the morning of June 6 , 2006 .
Bam ! Gotcha .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yup, Google has all the user's activities in its databases since 1999.
All it has to do is to run some queries about what Hilliary Clinton was doing on the internet, which sites she visited (porn included) between the hours of 3:00 AM and 7:10 AM on the morning of June 6, 2006.
Bam!  Gotcha.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809710</id>
	<title>Re:Google is more powerful than I thought..</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263838980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Good point.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Good point .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Good point.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809524</id>
	<title>Re:In lieu of?</title>
	<author>garg0yle</author>
	<datestamp>1263838200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think they meant "in light of" (as in, in response to).  "In lieu of", as you know, means essentially "instead of", and would not make sense in this context.  So, you are correct.  I just hope you don't get modded down as "grammar police".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think they meant " in light of " ( as in , in response to ) .
" In lieu of " , as you know , means essentially " instead of " , and would not make sense in this context .
So , you are correct .
I just hope you do n't get modded down as " grammar police " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think they meant "in light of" (as in, in response to).
"In lieu of", as you know, means essentially "instead of", and would not make sense in this context.
So, you are correct.
I just hope you don't get modded down as "grammar police".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812018</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the new world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263806640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I agree with what you just mentioned.. but what I feel is more important to mention is that america is loosing its ability to be self sustaining and even more importantly retain the knowledge on how to develop and manufacture various goods ranging from insignificant trinkets to industrial items.. my fellow americans take a good look around your homes every electronic item, every toy, every phone, every computer, every tool is manufactured in china!! the ability and know-how to produce such goods has deteriorated and once all the baby boomers are dead and buried there will be very few people left in this country who actually know and understand the intricacies of actually manufacturing such goods.. even if we do retain the ability to manufacture some of these goods we still cannot match the sheer volume that is required for the american markets since developing the infrastructure will take decades.. in such a situation what happens if we are at war and supplies of such manufactured goods stops?? i feel a lot of american do not really comprehend the situation that we are getting ourselves into, its not like IT where we can just copy and paste the source code and get things running.. there are a number of groups out there that make a lot of noise about outsourcing of IT jobs but what about all the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs?? this is what has really hurt this country most!! most of the jobs that have been lost over the past decade have been in the manufacturing industry.. just imagine the number of jobs that we can generate if we can get the politicians to get these manufacturing jobs back, these are jobs that our everyday john and jane's can earn a good living on and keep their homes without requiring all those fancy degrees.. we need to get our manufacturing jobs back and we need to make sure that those corrupt politicians in washington give breaks to american companies that actually manufacture goods in america!!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I agree with what you just mentioned.. but what I feel is more important to mention is that america is loosing its ability to be self sustaining and even more importantly retain the knowledge on how to develop and manufacture various goods ranging from insignificant trinkets to industrial items.. my fellow americans take a good look around your homes every electronic item , every toy , every phone , every computer , every tool is manufactured in china ! !
the ability and know-how to produce such goods has deteriorated and once all the baby boomers are dead and buried there will be very few people left in this country who actually know and understand the intricacies of actually manufacturing such goods.. even if we do retain the ability to manufacture some of these goods we still can not match the sheer volume that is required for the american markets since developing the infrastructure will take decades.. in such a situation what happens if we are at war and supplies of such manufactured goods stops ? ?
i feel a lot of american do not really comprehend the situation that we are getting ourselves into , its not like IT where we can just copy and paste the source code and get things running.. there are a number of groups out there that make a lot of noise about outsourcing of IT jobs but what about all the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs ? ?
this is what has really hurt this country most ! !
most of the jobs that have been lost over the past decade have been in the manufacturing industry.. just imagine the number of jobs that we can generate if we can get the politicians to get these manufacturing jobs back , these are jobs that our everyday john and jane 's can earn a good living on and keep their homes without requiring all those fancy degrees.. we need to get our manufacturing jobs back and we need to make sure that those corrupt politicians in washington give breaks to american companies that actually manufacture goods in america ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I agree with what you just mentioned.. but what I feel is more important to mention is that america is loosing its ability to be self sustaining and even more importantly retain the knowledge on how to develop and manufacture various goods ranging from insignificant trinkets to industrial items.. my fellow americans take a good look around your homes every electronic item, every toy, every phone, every computer, every tool is manufactured in china!!
the ability and know-how to produce such goods has deteriorated and once all the baby boomers are dead and buried there will be very few people left in this country who actually know and understand the intricacies of actually manufacturing such goods.. even if we do retain the ability to manufacture some of these goods we still cannot match the sheer volume that is required for the american markets since developing the infrastructure will take decades.. in such a situation what happens if we are at war and supplies of such manufactured goods stops??
i feel a lot of american do not really comprehend the situation that we are getting ourselves into, its not like IT where we can just copy and paste the source code and get things running.. there are a number of groups out there that make a lot of noise about outsourcing of IT jobs but what about all the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs??
this is what has really hurt this country most!!
most of the jobs that have been lost over the past decade have been in the manufacturing industry.. just imagine the number of jobs that we can generate if we can get the politicians to get these manufacturing jobs back, these are jobs that our everyday john and jane's can earn a good living on and keep their homes without requiring all those fancy degrees.. we need to get our manufacturing jobs back and we need to make sure that those corrupt politicians in washington give breaks to american companies that actually manufacture goods in america!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810046</id>
	<title>Re:I'm not sure I get it.</title>
	<author>Dishevel</author>
	<datestamp>1263840420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Probably the IP is hardened against any normal attack. My guess is they found a system that has an attack vector into the gmail system that is not as difficult as the mail servers themselves.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably the IP is hardened against any normal attack .
My guess is they found a system that has an attack vector into the gmail system that is not as difficult as the mail servers themselves .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably the IP is hardened against any normal attack.
My guess is they found a system that has an attack vector into the gmail system that is not as difficult as the mail servers themselves.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809654</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30813614</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the new world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263814260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Chinese companies copied part for part GM cars and as far as I know, nothing came of it. You could literally take the door off the Chevy and put a door from the Chinese car company on it. We don't impose any trade sanctions, we just keep buying their stuff.</p></div><p>I agree with what you just mentioned.. but what I feel is more important to mention is that america is loosing its ability to be self sustaining and even more importantly retain the knowledge on how to develop and manufacture various goods ranging from insignificant trinkets to industrial items.. my fellow americans take a good look around your homes every electronic item, every toy, every phone, every computer, every tool is manufactured in china!! the ability and know-how to produce such goods has deteriorated and once all the baby boomers are dead and buried there will be very few people left in this country who actually know and understand the intricacies of actually manufacturing such goods.. even if we do retain the ability to manufacture some of these goods we still cannot match the sheer volume that is required for the american markets since developing the infrastructure will take decades.. in such a situation what happens if we are at war and supplies of such manufactured goods stops?? i feel a lot of american do not really comprehend the situation that we are getting ourselves into, its not like IT where we can just copy and paste the source code and get things running.. there are a number of groups out there that make a lot of noise about outsourcing of IT jobs but what about all the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs?? this is what has really hurt this country most!! most of the jobs that have been lost over the past decade have been in the manufacturing industry.. just imagine the number of jobs that we can generate if we can get the politicians to get these manufacturing jobs back, these are jobs that our everyday john and jane's can earn a good living on and keep their homes without requiring all those fancy degrees.. we need to get our manufacturing jobs back and we need to make sure that those corrupt politicians in washington give breaks to american companies that actually manufacture goods in america!!!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Chinese companies copied part for part GM cars and as far as I know , nothing came of it .
You could literally take the door off the Chevy and put a door from the Chinese car company on it .
We do n't impose any trade sanctions , we just keep buying their stuff.I agree with what you just mentioned.. but what I feel is more important to mention is that america is loosing its ability to be self sustaining and even more importantly retain the knowledge on how to develop and manufacture various goods ranging from insignificant trinkets to industrial items.. my fellow americans take a good look around your homes every electronic item , every toy , every phone , every computer , every tool is manufactured in china ! !
the ability and know-how to produce such goods has deteriorated and once all the baby boomers are dead and buried there will be very few people left in this country who actually know and understand the intricacies of actually manufacturing such goods.. even if we do retain the ability to manufacture some of these goods we still can not match the sheer volume that is required for the american markets since developing the infrastructure will take decades.. in such a situation what happens if we are at war and supplies of such manufactured goods stops ? ?
i feel a lot of american do not really comprehend the situation that we are getting ourselves into , its not like IT where we can just copy and paste the source code and get things running.. there are a number of groups out there that make a lot of noise about outsourcing of IT jobs but what about all the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs ? ?
this is what has really hurt this country most ! !
most of the jobs that have been lost over the past decade have been in the manufacturing industry.. just imagine the number of jobs that we can generate if we can get the politicians to get these manufacturing jobs back , these are jobs that our everyday john and jane 's can earn a good living on and keep their homes without requiring all those fancy degrees.. we need to get our manufacturing jobs back and we need to make sure that those corrupt politicians in washington give breaks to american companies that actually manufacture goods in america ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chinese companies copied part for part GM cars and as far as I know, nothing came of it.
You could literally take the door off the Chevy and put a door from the Chinese car company on it.
We don't impose any trade sanctions, we just keep buying their stuff.I agree with what you just mentioned.. but what I feel is more important to mention is that america is loosing its ability to be self sustaining and even more importantly retain the knowledge on how to develop and manufacture various goods ranging from insignificant trinkets to industrial items.. my fellow americans take a good look around your homes every electronic item, every toy, every phone, every computer, every tool is manufactured in china!!
the ability and know-how to produce such goods has deteriorated and once all the baby boomers are dead and buried there will be very few people left in this country who actually know and understand the intricacies of actually manufacturing such goods.. even if we do retain the ability to manufacture some of these goods we still cannot match the sheer volume that is required for the american markets since developing the infrastructure will take decades.. in such a situation what happens if we are at war and supplies of such manufactured goods stops??
i feel a lot of american do not really comprehend the situation that we are getting ourselves into, its not like IT where we can just copy and paste the source code and get things running.. there are a number of groups out there that make a lot of noise about outsourcing of IT jobs but what about all the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs??
this is what has really hurt this country most!!
most of the jobs that have been lost over the past decade have been in the manufacturing industry.. just imagine the number of jobs that we can generate if we can get the politicians to get these manufacturing jobs back, these are jobs that our everyday john and jane's can earn a good living on and keep their homes without requiring all those fancy degrees.. we need to get our manufacturing jobs back and we need to make sure that those corrupt politicians in washington give breaks to american companies that actually manufacture goods in america!!
!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809552</id>
	<title>Re:In lieu of?</title>
	<author>JustNilt</author>
	<datestamp>1263838320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Damn, beat me to it.  It took me a second to realize it wasn't my lack of comprehension due to a lack of coffee but was instead the complete lack of proofreading.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Damn , beat me to it .
It took me a second to realize it was n't my lack of comprehension due to a lack of coffee but was instead the complete lack of proofreading .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Damn, beat me to it.
It took me a second to realize it wasn't my lack of comprehension due to a lack of coffee but was instead the complete lack of proofreading.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30816826</id>
	<title>Re:Hate to say this...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263933000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And  this was modded 3 Interesting ??!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And this was modded 3 Interesting ? ? !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And  this was modded 3 Interesting ??!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810194</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810094</id>
	<title>Incident</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263840600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>I didn't know they could go back in time and undo the incident. Very impressive!</i> <br> <br>
It must have worked.  Apparently something so significant happened that people can just call it "The Incident" and expect others to know about it.  Yet I've never heard of anything happening to Google, or originating from Google significant enough and shocking enough to be titled "The Incident". (The worst I've heard is about their camera cars going up the occasional private road).  Their temporal cleanup crews must be pretty good.<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Although, if they had done a thorough job, there wouldn't be this Slashdot story, would there?</htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't know they could go back in time and undo the incident .
Very impressive !
It must have worked .
Apparently something so significant happened that people can just call it " The Incident " and expect others to know about it .
Yet I 've never heard of anything happening to Google , or originating from Google significant enough and shocking enough to be titled " The Incident " .
( The worst I 've heard is about their camera cars going up the occasional private road ) .
Their temporal cleanup crews must be pretty good .
...Although , if they had done a thorough job , there would n't be this Slashdot story , would there ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't know they could go back in time and undo the incident.
Very impressive!
It must have worked.
Apparently something so significant happened that people can just call it "The Incident" and expect others to know about it.
Yet I've never heard of anything happening to Google, or originating from Google significant enough and shocking enough to be titled "The Incident".
(The worst I've heard is about their camera cars going up the occasional private road).
Their temporal cleanup crews must be pretty good.
...Although, if they had done a thorough job, there wouldn't be this Slashdot story, would there?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809424</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810264</id>
	<title>Re:it's aftermath!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263841500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Irregardless of the actual story content, I find the poster's use of "in lieu" to be the penultimate atrocity vis-a-vis the English language.</p></div><p>You know what also is an atrocity?  You using the word "irregardless".  Double negative much?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Irregardless of the actual story content , I find the poster 's use of " in lieu " to be the penultimate atrocity vis-a-vis the English language.You know what also is an atrocity ?
You using the word " irregardless " .
Double negative much ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Irregardless of the actual story content, I find the poster's use of "in lieu" to be the penultimate atrocity vis-a-vis the English language.You know what also is an atrocity?
You using the word "irregardless".
Double negative much?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30815710</id>
	<title>That prove it again</title>
	<author>justkeeper</author>
	<datestamp>1263831300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That Google's plug-pulling is more about IP theft concern rather than any kind of moral concern. Otherwise where was Google's moral concern when NSA was found out to be monitoring (or spying on) all communications going in and out of the U.S?(Don't tell me Google wasn't affected). Meanwhile, I'm surprised to find out that keywords like "tiananmen", "massacre", "Mao Zedong" are searchable with Google.com from within China(confirmed in two far-away locations), which means GFW is not blocking them. Maybe there is some progress on the negotiations between Google and CCP?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That Google 's plug-pulling is more about IP theft concern rather than any kind of moral concern .
Otherwise where was Google 's moral concern when NSA was found out to be monitoring ( or spying on ) all communications going in and out of the U.S ?
( Do n't tell me Google was n't affected ) .
Meanwhile , I 'm surprised to find out that keywords like " tiananmen " , " massacre " , " Mao Zedong " are searchable with Google.com from within China ( confirmed in two far-away locations ) , which means GFW is not blocking them .
Maybe there is some progress on the negotiations between Google and CCP ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That Google's plug-pulling is more about IP theft concern rather than any kind of moral concern.
Otherwise where was Google's moral concern when NSA was found out to be monitoring (or spying on) all communications going in and out of the U.S?
(Don't tell me Google wasn't affected).
Meanwhile, I'm surprised to find out that keywords like "tiananmen", "massacre", "Mao Zedong" are searchable with Google.com from within China(confirmed in two far-away locations), which means GFW is not blocking them.
Maybe there is some progress on the negotiations between Google and CCP?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30815076</id>
	<title>Re:Somewhere in Mountain View...</title>
	<author>D H NG</author>
	<datestamp>1263824100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>During my orientation week in Mountain View, there was a joke about some hardware being stolen from campus.  The punchline? "If there's one thing that Google's good at, it's searching."</htmltext>
<tokenext>During my orientation week in Mountain View , there was a joke about some hardware being stolen from campus .
The punchline ?
" If there 's one thing that Google 's good at , it 's searching .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>During my orientation week in Mountain View, there was a joke about some hardware being stolen from campus.
The punchline?
"If there's one thing that Google's good at, it's searching.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809942</id>
	<title>Re:Spies everywhere</title>
	<author>Yvanhoe</author>
	<datestamp>1263840000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>IANAL but I think that if Google cannot do much, the USA can do : If it is proven they broke into computer systems in order to aid a foreign country against the interests of the United States, it can be considered as the crime of treason. (I am assuming they are American citizens). If they are citizens of China, they can still be judged on the ground of breaking into a computerized system and on the ground of conspiracy. <br> <br>
USA has no extradition treaties with China so I think they have no obligations to let China judge them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>IANAL but I think that if Google can not do much , the USA can do : If it is proven they broke into computer systems in order to aid a foreign country against the interests of the United States , it can be considered as the crime of treason .
( I am assuming they are American citizens ) .
If they are citizens of China , they can still be judged on the ground of breaking into a computerized system and on the ground of conspiracy .
USA has no extradition treaties with China so I think they have no obligations to let China judge them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>IANAL but I think that if Google cannot do much, the USA can do : If it is proven they broke into computer systems in order to aid a foreign country against the interests of the United States, it can be considered as the crime of treason.
(I am assuming they are American citizens).
If they are citizens of China, they can still be judged on the ground of breaking into a computerized system and on the ground of conspiracy.
USA has no extradition treaties with China so I think they have no obligations to let China judge them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811490</id>
	<title>Re:Spies everywhere</title>
	<author>eulernet</author>
	<datestamp>1263847380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>And then they will get to take a job with a Baidu.</p></div><p>I doubt so.<br>When you betray some company, you'll always be marked as a traitor.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>And then they will get to take a job with a Baidu.I doubt so.When you betray some company , you 'll always be marked as a traitor .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And then they will get to take a job with a Baidu.I doubt so.When you betray some company, you'll always be marked as a traitor.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809732</id>
	<title>...in lieu of...</title>
	<author>Ephemeriis</author>
	<datestamp>1263839100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Redundant</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Guardian is reporting that Google China is investigating it's staff in lieu of The Incident.</p></div><p>I do not think those words mean what you think they mean.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Guardian is reporting that Google China is investigating it 's staff in lieu of The Incident.I do not think those words mean what you think they mean .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Guardian is reporting that Google China is investigating it's staff in lieu of The Incident.I do not think those words mean what you think they mean.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30816528</id>
	<title>sophisticated?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263842580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So where are the genii now who said this is unprecedentedly sophisticated by a commercial standard?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So where are the genii now who said this is unprecedentedly sophisticated by a commercial standard ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So where are the genii now who said this is unprecedentedly sophisticated by a commercial standard?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810194</id>
	<title>Hate to say this...</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1263841140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hate to say this...as it does sound racist, but I know for a fact that most of the chinese employees within a company that deals with<br>china, will side to help the chinese side of the deal rather then their own company that is dealing with china, also even went so far as to give out confidential info and deal breaking intel to manufacturers so as to be able to charge top dollar when they could, based on types of situations that came up.</p><p>For me, it might sound racist, but I truly believe that they have been brainwashed to really stand by their country, even when they are of different citizenship, and even live abroad...they will still report back to the motherland to help in anyway they can.</p><p>Is this wrong, the jews have been doing this for eons, so I guess not really, as it would be hypocritical to say this, but<br>I do believe that a religion and way of life, is much different then a country's dictator's point of view of what life should be.<br>I know i might get spammed with a lot of comments on my view points, but I have to say, we did this to ourselves.</p><p>If we allow muslems to come into our country and force us to change our country's ways to allow them to continue living the way they lived back home, then why did they leave int he first place. If you want to join the RCMP and then tell them that they are not allowed to ask you to remove your turban to put on the proper RCMP uniform, you should understand that this is part of the RCMP religion, to wear the RCMP hat.</p><p>As for chinese, if they come into the country and work for a canadian/amercian country, why would they try to still make china the<br>more profitable partner in the deal....they left that country, for what ever reason...seems like they are almost doing this on purpose as if told to do so by the dictator himself...?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hate to say this...as it does sound racist , but I know for a fact that most of the chinese employees within a company that deals withchina , will side to help the chinese side of the deal rather then their own company that is dealing with china , also even went so far as to give out confidential info and deal breaking intel to manufacturers so as to be able to charge top dollar when they could , based on types of situations that came up.For me , it might sound racist , but I truly believe that they have been brainwashed to really stand by their country , even when they are of different citizenship , and even live abroad...they will still report back to the motherland to help in anyway they can.Is this wrong , the jews have been doing this for eons , so I guess not really , as it would be hypocritical to say this , butI do believe that a religion and way of life , is much different then a country 's dictator 's point of view of what life should be.I know i might get spammed with a lot of comments on my view points , but I have to say , we did this to ourselves.If we allow muslems to come into our country and force us to change our country 's ways to allow them to continue living the way they lived back home , then why did they leave int he first place .
If you want to join the RCMP and then tell them that they are not allowed to ask you to remove your turban to put on the proper RCMP uniform , you should understand that this is part of the RCMP religion , to wear the RCMP hat.As for chinese , if they come into the country and work for a canadian/amercian country , why would they try to still make china themore profitable partner in the deal....they left that country , for what ever reason...seems like they are almost doing this on purpose as if told to do so by the dictator himself... ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hate to say this...as it does sound racist, but I know for a fact that most of the chinese employees within a company that deals withchina, will side to help the chinese side of the deal rather then their own company that is dealing with china, also even went so far as to give out confidential info and deal breaking intel to manufacturers so as to be able to charge top dollar when they could, based on types of situations that came up.For me, it might sound racist, but I truly believe that they have been brainwashed to really stand by their country, even when they are of different citizenship, and even live abroad...they will still report back to the motherland to help in anyway they can.Is this wrong, the jews have been doing this for eons, so I guess not really, as it would be hypocritical to say this, butI do believe that a religion and way of life, is much different then a country's dictator's point of view of what life should be.I know i might get spammed with a lot of comments on my view points, but I have to say, we did this to ourselves.If we allow muslems to come into our country and force us to change our country's ways to allow them to continue living the way they lived back home, then why did they leave int he first place.
If you want to join the RCMP and then tell them that they are not allowed to ask you to remove your turban to put on the proper RCMP uniform, you should understand that this is part of the RCMP religion, to wear the RCMP hat.As for chinese, if they come into the country and work for a canadian/amercian country, why would they try to still make china themore profitable partner in the deal....they left that country, for what ever reason...seems like they are almost doing this on purpose as if told to do so by the dictator himself...?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810208</id>
	<title>Re:Somewhere in Mountain View...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263841140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>..and showing them text advertisements for criminal defence lawyers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>..and showing them text advertisements for criminal defence lawyers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>..and showing them text advertisements for criminal defence lawyers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30815562</id>
	<title>Re:Spies everywhere</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1263829560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Baidu works VERY close with the Chinese gov. In the same way that Pravda works with Russian Party, Fox with the republican party, or Air America Airlines with the CIA. As it is, Chinese gov. has strict penality for spying or causing harm against other Chinese (esp. gov or companies), but reward handsomely those that do the same against foreigners and then share the information. Basically, the gov has an X-Prize approach to spying on the west.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Baidu works VERY close with the Chinese gov .
In the same way that Pravda works with Russian Party , Fox with the republican party , or Air America Airlines with the CIA .
As it is , Chinese gov .
has strict penality for spying or causing harm against other Chinese ( esp .
gov or companies ) , but reward handsomely those that do the same against foreigners and then share the information .
Basically , the gov has an X-Prize approach to spying on the west .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Baidu works VERY close with the Chinese gov.
In the same way that Pravda works with Russian Party, Fox with the republican party, or Air America Airlines with the CIA.
As it is, Chinese gov.
has strict penality for spying or causing harm against other Chinese (esp.
gov or companies), but reward handsomely those that do the same against foreigners and then share the information.
Basically, the gov has an X-Prize approach to spying on the west.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810202</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812510</id>
	<title>Re:Welcome to the new world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263808980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes and in some of the cases the Chinese versions were better built and actually had solved some of the design problems of the original.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes and in some of the cases the Chinese versions were better built and actually had solved some of the design problems of the original .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes and in some of the cases the Chinese versions were better built and actually had solved some of the design problems of the original.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810568</id>
	<title>Re:Trojan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263842880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And it's wrong, too. A trojan (from "trojan horse") is a program which has hidden behavior(s). This hidden behavior may be enabling unauthorized access to the computer or it may be something else. The program as a whole is not hidden, but it pretends to do something non-malicious.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And it 's wrong , too .
A trojan ( from " trojan horse " ) is a program which has hidden behavior ( s ) .
This hidden behavior may be enabling unauthorized access to the computer or it may be something else .
The program as a whole is not hidden , but it pretends to do something non-malicious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And it's wrong, too.
A trojan (from "trojan horse") is a program which has hidden behavior(s).
This hidden behavior may be enabling unauthorized access to the computer or it may be something else.
The program as a whole is not hidden, but it pretends to do something non-malicious.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809624</id>
	<title>Loose lips sink ships.</title>
	<author>Mal-2</author>
	<datestamp>1263838620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bet it was your run of the mill social engineering. Someone on the attacking side befriended someone on the inside and either coaxed the information out, or just waited until they mentioned it in passing. Once they knew who to target, they could then pump this employee to see if the attack was having any effect, from the perspective of an insider.</p><p>It could be a Facebook friend, it could be a normal face-to-face friend, or it might be a <a href="http://jezebel.com/253094/among-cold-war-spies-swallow-had-a-whole-other-sexual-connotation" title="jezebel.com">"swallow"</a> [jezebel.com]. Governments certainly use this method of social engineering, but I would be quite surprised if companies do not do it as well.</p><p>Mal-2</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bet it was your run of the mill social engineering .
Someone on the attacking side befriended someone on the inside and either coaxed the information out , or just waited until they mentioned it in passing .
Once they knew who to target , they could then pump this employee to see if the attack was having any effect , from the perspective of an insider.It could be a Facebook friend , it could be a normal face-to-face friend , or it might be a " swallow " [ jezebel.com ] .
Governments certainly use this method of social engineering , but I would be quite surprised if companies do not do it as well.Mal-2</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bet it was your run of the mill social engineering.
Someone on the attacking side befriended someone on the inside and either coaxed the information out, or just waited until they mentioned it in passing.
Once they knew who to target, they could then pump this employee to see if the attack was having any effect, from the perspective of an insider.It could be a Facebook friend, it could be a normal face-to-face friend, or it might be a "swallow" [jezebel.com].
Governments certainly use this method of social engineering, but I would be quite surprised if companies do not do it as well.Mal-2</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811572</id>
	<title>Re:Loose lips sink ships.</title>
	<author>tomhath</author>
	<datestamp>1263847740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>They don't bother with social engineering. China's <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/22/germany-china-industrial-espionage" title="guardian.co.uk">industrial espionage</a> [guardian.co.uk] <a href="http://arstechnica.com/security/news/2007/11/report-chinese-conduct-aggressive-and-large-scale-espionage-against-us.ars" title="arstechnica.com">program is extensive</a> [arstechnica.com] <a href="http://homelandsecuritynewswire.com/intellectual-vacuum-cleaner-chinas-industrial-espionage-campaign-i" title="homelandse...wswire.com">and very well</a> [homelandse...wswire.com] <a href="http://www.travisdeyle.com/blog/2007/03/12/chinese-industrial-espionage-canada" title="travisdeyle.com">organized</a> [travisdeyle.com].</htmltext>
<tokenext>They do n't bother with social engineering .
China 's industrial espionage [ guardian.co.uk ] program is extensive [ arstechnica.com ] and very well [ homelandse...wswire.com ] organized [ travisdeyle.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They don't bother with social engineering.
China's industrial espionage [guardian.co.uk] program is extensive [arstechnica.com] and very well [homelandse...wswire.com] organized [travisdeyle.com].</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809624</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809906</id>
	<title>In communist china...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263839820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>google googles you!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>google googles you !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>google googles you!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809550</id>
	<title>Not "in lieu of"; you want "in light of"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263838320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you're trying to say that Google China is investigating their staff after the recent security breach, then you should say that they're doing so \_in light of\_ the breach.</p><p>If they were interviewing staff \_in lieu of\_ the breach, then it would mean that they wanted to have the breach, but decided to cancel it and replace it with interviews.</p><p>I'll ignore the misused "it's" in the first line, too.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you 're trying to say that Google China is investigating their staff after the recent security breach , then you should say that they 're doing so \ _in light of \ _ the breach.If they were interviewing staff \ _in lieu of \ _ the breach , then it would mean that they wanted to have the breach , but decided to cancel it and replace it with interviews.I 'll ignore the misused " it 's " in the first line , too .
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you're trying to say that Google China is investigating their staff after the recent security breach, then you should say that they're doing so \_in light of\_ the breach.If they were interviewing staff \_in lieu of\_ the breach, then it would mean that they wanted to have the breach, but decided to cancel it and replace it with interviews.I'll ignore the misused "it's" in the first line, too.
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809424</id>
	<title>Google is more powerful than I thought..</title>
	<author>brokenin2</author>
	<datestamp>1263837720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I didn't know they could go back in time and undo the incident. Very impressive!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I did n't know they could go back in time and undo the incident .
Very impressive !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I didn't know they could go back in time and undo the incident.
Very impressive!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809988</id>
	<title>Trojan</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263840180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer.</p></div><p>Yes thanks! This is definitely news to the average<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. reader. I never knew that!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer.Yes thanks !
This is definitely news to the average / .
reader. I never knew that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer.Yes thanks!
This is definitely news to the average /.
reader. I never knew that!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809710
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810264
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_46</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810568
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_48</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809630
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_51</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810094
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809424
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30826636
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_49</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30815100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_43</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811324
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811016
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_50</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809524
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30813874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811870
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812238
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30815076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812570
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809956
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30813614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809670
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809754
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_44</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809552
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811426
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30813942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30818224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809696
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_45</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_47</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811572
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809624
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809942
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_52</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810272
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809914
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_42</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810046
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809654
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30815562
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810202
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812510
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810608
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812018
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814390
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810982
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_18_1623248_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30816826
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810194
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809498
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809552
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809524
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809604
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809630
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809534
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809860
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810208
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810608
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30815076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810252
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812908
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809682
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809826
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810264
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809884
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809956
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809424
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810094
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809530
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809710
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810982
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30815100
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810194
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30816826
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809468
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810572
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811324
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30813942
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810202
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812570
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30815562
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811406
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809914
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30826636
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811870
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809946
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812510
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811426
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811016
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30813614
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30812018
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809624
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811572
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809504
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30814394
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30813874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809808
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809654
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810046
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809696
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30818224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809754
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30809944
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30810678
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_18_1623248.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_18_1623248.30811200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
