<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_17_1714204</id>
	<title>Lacking Buyers, NASA Cuts Prices On Shuttles and Old Engines</title>
	<author>Soulskill</author>
	<datestamp>1263752940000</datestamp>
	<htmltext><a href="http://hughpickens.com/" rel="nofollow">Hugh Pickens</a> writes <i>"Russia's Space Shuttle, Buran, ended its days at a theme park in Moscow and was once <a href="http://www.spacedaily.com/news/buran-00a.html">offered for sale</a> on the Internet for 3 million dollars. Now the NY Times reports that when the National Aeronautics and Space Administration <a href="https://science.slashdot.org/story/08/12/17/2356259/Start-Saving-To-Buy-Your-Space-Shuttle-Now">put out the call in December 2008</a> seeking buyers for US shuttles from museums, schools and elsewhere, the agency didn't get as much interest as expected, so now <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/17/science/space/17nasa.html">NASA has slashed the price of the 1970s-era spaceships</a>, available for sale this fall once their flying days are over, from $42 million to just $28.8 million apiece. 'We're confident that we'll get other takers,' says agency spokesman Mike Curie. The Discovery is already promised to the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum but the Atlantis and the Endeavour are still up for grabs and it is possible that the Enterprise, a shuttle prototype that never made it to space, will also be available. The lower price is based on NASA's estimate of the cost for transporting a shuttle from Kennedy Space Center to a major airport, and for displaying it indoors in a climate-controlled building. As for the space shuttle main engines, those are now free. NASA advertised them in December 2008 for $400,000 to $800,000 each, but no one expressed interest. So now the engines are available, along with other shuttle artifacts, for the cost of transportation and handling."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hugh Pickens writes " Russia 's Space Shuttle , Buran , ended its days at a theme park in Moscow and was once offered for sale on the Internet for 3 million dollars .
Now the NY Times reports that when the National Aeronautics and Space Administration put out the call in December 2008 seeking buyers for US shuttles from museums , schools and elsewhere , the agency did n't get as much interest as expected , so now NASA has slashed the price of the 1970s-era spaceships , available for sale this fall once their flying days are over , from $ 42 million to just $ 28.8 million apiece .
'We 're confident that we 'll get other takers, ' says agency spokesman Mike Curie .
The Discovery is already promised to the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum but the Atlantis and the Endeavour are still up for grabs and it is possible that the Enterprise , a shuttle prototype that never made it to space , will also be available .
The lower price is based on NASA 's estimate of the cost for transporting a shuttle from Kennedy Space Center to a major airport , and for displaying it indoors in a climate-controlled building .
As for the space shuttle main engines , those are now free .
NASA advertised them in December 2008 for $ 400,000 to $ 800,000 each , but no one expressed interest .
So now the engines are available , along with other shuttle artifacts , for the cost of transportation and handling .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hugh Pickens writes "Russia's Space Shuttle, Buran, ended its days at a theme park in Moscow and was once offered for sale on the Internet for 3 million dollars.
Now the NY Times reports that when the National Aeronautics and Space Administration put out the call in December 2008 seeking buyers for US shuttles from museums, schools and elsewhere, the agency didn't get as much interest as expected, so now NASA has slashed the price of the 1970s-era spaceships, available for sale this fall once their flying days are over, from $42 million to just $28.8 million apiece.
'We're confident that we'll get other takers,' says agency spokesman Mike Curie.
The Discovery is already promised to the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum but the Atlantis and the Endeavour are still up for grabs and it is possible that the Enterprise, a shuttle prototype that never made it to space, will also be available.
The lower price is based on NASA's estimate of the cost for transporting a shuttle from Kennedy Space Center to a major airport, and for displaying it indoors in a climate-controlled building.
As for the space shuttle main engines, those are now free.
NASA advertised them in December 2008 for $400,000 to $800,000 each, but no one expressed interest.
So now the engines are available, along with other shuttle artifacts, for the cost of transportation and handling.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800478</id>
	<title>That's the proof there are no real rich geeks</title>
	<author>GuerreroDelInterfaz</author>
	<datestamp>1263761580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As I'm into house automation and such, I mostly work for filthy rich people. And those people really buy lots of incredibly expensive unuseful crap like hand-made custom choppers to display in their living room (I'm a biker and that pains me), castles as country house, Juan Mir&#243; paintings for the crapper and such.</p><p>If I was that rich, I'll *ride* the chops and I'll certainly never miss the opportunity of having my own space shuttle on my back yard. Don't you too?</p><p>--<br>El Guerrero del Interfaz</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As I 'm into house automation and such , I mostly work for filthy rich people .
And those people really buy lots of incredibly expensive unuseful crap like hand-made custom choppers to display in their living room ( I 'm a biker and that pains me ) , castles as country house , Juan Mir   paintings for the crapper and such.If I was that rich , I 'll * ride * the chops and I 'll certainly never miss the opportunity of having my own space shuttle on my back yard .
Do n't you too ? --El Guerrero del Interfaz</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As I'm into house automation and such, I mostly work for filthy rich people.
And those people really buy lots of incredibly expensive unuseful crap like hand-made custom choppers to display in their living room (I'm a biker and that pains me), castles as country house, Juan Miró paintings for the crapper and such.If I was that rich, I'll *ride* the chops and I'll certainly never miss the opportunity of having my own space shuttle on my back yard.
Don't you too?--El Guerrero del Interfaz</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799938</id>
	<title>Hollywood?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263756900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What Hollywood doesn't want one or two - at least the rental shops for movie makers?</p><p>Good god! I can think of a shit load of porn movies to make with them!</p><p>"Debbie does the ISS."</p><p>Moonfucker.</p><p>it goes on...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What Hollywood does n't want one or two - at least the rental shops for movie makers ? Good god !
I can think of a shit load of porn movies to make with them !
" Debbie does the ISS .
" Moonfucker.it goes on.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What Hollywood doesn't want one or two - at least the rental shops for movie makers?Good god!
I can think of a shit load of porn movies to make with them!
"Debbie does the ISS.
"Moonfucker.it goes on...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800050</id>
	<title>Mouse On The Moon</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263757740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A small European country accepts NASA's offer then requests US funding for "it's" space program hoping to use the funding to provide indoor plumbing for the royal castle.</p><p>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057328/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A small European country accepts NASA 's offer then requests US funding for " it 's " space program hoping to use the funding to provide indoor plumbing for the royal castle.http : //www.imdb.com/title/tt0057328/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A small European country accepts NASA's offer then requests US funding for "it's" space program hoping to use the funding to provide indoor plumbing for the royal castle.http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0057328/</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800028</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect geek storm!</title>
	<author>jgardia</author>
	<datestamp>1263757560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah...
like this?
<a href="http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1995-04.html" title="darwinawards.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1995-04.html</a> [darwinawards.com]

Much better than the old JATO!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah.. . like this ?
http : //www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1995-04.html [ darwinawards.com ] Much better than the old JATO !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah...
like this?
http://www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin1995-04.html [darwinawards.com]

Much better than the old JATO!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801546</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect geek storm!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263725340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And so America slips into third world status.</p><p>I'm sure your children will be so proud that mummy and daddy would rather have died than even DISCUSS what was actually happening all around them - you know, the massive influx of third worlders, which was FORCED onto you, against your will.</p><p>So what are the chances of the 'new' America putting a man on the moon again, when the country is 99.9\% non-white? Slim to none?</p><p>Anybody care to discuss? Or will you 'scientists' prefer to deny reality and resort to name calling? Truly pathetic.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And so America slips into third world status.I 'm sure your children will be so proud that mummy and daddy would rather have died than even DISCUSS what was actually happening all around them - you know , the massive influx of third worlders , which was FORCED onto you , against your will.So what are the chances of the 'new ' America putting a man on the moon again , when the country is 99.9 \ % non-white ?
Slim to none ? Anybody care to discuss ?
Or will you 'scientists ' prefer to deny reality and resort to name calling ?
Truly pathetic .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And so America slips into third world status.I'm sure your children will be so proud that mummy and daddy would rather have died than even DISCUSS what was actually happening all around them - you know, the massive influx of third worlders, which was FORCED onto you, against your will.So what are the chances of the 'new' America putting a man on the moon again, when the country is 99.9\% non-white?
Slim to none?Anybody care to discuss?
Or will you 'scientists' prefer to deny reality and resort to name calling?
Truly pathetic.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799918</id>
	<title>first bid!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263756720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bid $1 for the Enterprise!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bid $ 1 for the Enterprise !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bid $1 for the Enterprise!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800040</id>
	<title>Sell it to Bill Gates</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263757620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And put himself and Balmer in it...  Wait lets throw in a few PETA people also.. oh and Leo Laporte -- just because...point it at the moon and just go away.. Oh dam was I dreaming again?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And put himself and Balmer in it... Wait lets throw in a few PETA people also.. oh and Leo Laporte -- just because...point it at the moon and just go away.. Oh dam was I dreaming again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And put himself and Balmer in it...  Wait lets throw in a few PETA people also.. oh and Leo Laporte -- just because...point it at the moon and just go away.. Oh dam was I dreaming again?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800662</id>
	<title>Didn't...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263719520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Peter Griffin already buy one in one episode of Family Guy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Peter Griffin already buy one in one episode of Family Guy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Peter Griffin already buy one in one episode of Family Guy?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30806990</id>
	<title>Re:Put it on eBay!</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1263823680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Think of the PayPal fees though...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Think of the PayPal fees though.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Think of the PayPal fees though...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800112</id>
	<title>Keep them for reference</title>
	<author>2phar</author>
	<datestamp>1263758160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>We dont want <a href="http://www.pbs.org/kcet/wiredscience/video/282-space\_junkyard.html" title="pbs.org">this</a> [pbs.org] happening again..</htmltext>
<tokenext>We dont want this [ pbs.org ] happening again. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We dont want this [pbs.org] happening again..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800158</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect geek storm!</title>
	<author>LostCluster</author>
	<datestamp>1263758580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They called to say "permission denied"... twice!</htmltext>
<tokenext>They called to say " permission denied " ... twice !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They called to say "permission denied"... twice!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800194</id>
	<title>How about a piece of Columbia?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263758880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll take two.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll take two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll take two.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800200</id>
	<title>all in the marketing</title>
	<author>JackSpratts</author>
	<datestamp>1263758880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>paint them black and ming the merciless will buy the whole fleet.</htmltext>
<tokenext>paint them black and ming the merciless will buy the whole fleet .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>paint them black and ming the merciless will buy the whole fleet.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801302</id>
	<title>Re:Milage? MPG?</title>
	<author>imsabbel</author>
	<datestamp>1263723540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Better than you may expect.</p><p>Just add up how much distance it is crossing while orbiting the earth...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Better than you may expect.Just add up how much distance it is crossing while orbiting the earth.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Better than you may expect.Just add up how much distance it is crossing while orbiting the earth...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30804076</id>
	<title>Re:That's the proof there are no real rich geeks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263745620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I understand about budget cuts, but NASA needed to hold on to the guy who could call Paul Allen, Charles Simonyi, Larry Ellison, and Jim Clark, and knows what to say and how to say it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand about budget cuts , but NASA needed to hold on to the guy who could call Paul Allen , Charles Simonyi , Larry Ellison , and Jim Clark , and knows what to say and how to say it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand about budget cuts, but NASA needed to hold on to the guy who could call Paul Allen, Charles Simonyi, Larry Ellison, and Jim Clark, and knows what to say and how to say it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800340</id>
	<title>Welcome to the last Days of The United States ....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263760200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where all our greatest technology, as well as our morals, are all up for sale.</p><p>IMHO this is a landmark in our history and portends our own breakup much like the old U.S.S.R.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where all our greatest technology , as well as our morals , are all up for sale.IMHO this is a landmark in our history and portends our own breakup much like the old U.S.S.R .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where all our greatest technology, as well as our morals, are all up for sale.IMHO this is a landmark in our history and portends our own breakup much like the old U.S.S.R.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30808678</id>
	<title>Re:Buran flight test article at Technikmuseum Spey</title>
	<author>Painted</author>
	<datestamp>1263834420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>OMG mene is Anonymous Coward! Look- the exact same post, one AC, one mene- methinks someone slipped up and now we KNOW who AC is!
<br> <br>
I know I'm going to sleep easier tonight knowing this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>OMG mene is Anonymous Coward !
Look- the exact same post , one AC , one mene- methinks someone slipped up and now we KNOW who AC is !
I know I 'm going to sleep easier tonight knowing this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OMG mene is Anonymous Coward!
Look- the exact same post, one AC, one mene- methinks someone slipped up and now we KNOW who AC is!
I know I'm going to sleep easier tonight knowing this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800704</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30805470</id>
	<title>Re:MythBusters</title>
	<author>jhylkema</author>
	<datestamp>1263847620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Jamie Hyneman:  "This is turning out to be a lot more work than we thought, but we bought an SSME and gosh darnit, we're going to get it into pieces.  When in doubt, C4!"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Jamie Hyneman : " This is turning out to be a lot more work than we thought , but we bought an SSME and gosh darnit , we 're going to get it into pieces .
When in doubt , C4 !
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Jamie Hyneman:  "This is turning out to be a lot more work than we thought, but we bought an SSME and gosh darnit, we're going to get it into pieces.
When in doubt, C4!
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800632</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800082</id>
	<title>Milage? MPG?</title>
	<author>marciot</author>
	<datestamp>1263757920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What's the millage on those things? And how many MPG does it get?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What 's the millage on those things ?
And how many MPG does it get ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What's the millage on those things?
And how many MPG does it get?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801898</id>
	<title>Re:More than one Buran out there...</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1263727440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A failed prototype is still a prototype.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A failed prototype is still a prototype .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A failed prototype is still a prototype.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30806444</id>
	<title>Old News!</title>
	<author>SeaFox</author>
	<datestamp>1263818460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It was on DealNews yesterday.</p><p><a href="http://dealnews.com/32-off-Space-Shuttles-at-NASA-Deals-from-28-800-000-free-shipping-more/342463.html" title="dealnews.com">http://dealnews.com/32-off-Space-Shuttles-at-NASA-Deals-from-28-800-000-free-shipping-more/342463.html</a> [dealnews.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It was on DealNews yesterday.http : //dealnews.com/32-off-Space-Shuttles-at-NASA-Deals-from-28-800-000-free-shipping-more/342463.html [ dealnews.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It was on DealNews yesterday.http://dealnews.com/32-off-Space-Shuttles-at-NASA-Deals-from-28-800-000-free-shipping-more/342463.html [dealnews.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30802798</id>
	<title>Rocketeer!</title>
	<author>rrohbeck</author>
	<datestamp>1263733980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A SSME for free, add some small tankage and off you go. A parachute might be nice too.<br>Iron Man, you suck!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A SSME for free , add some small tankage and off you go .
A parachute might be nice too.Iron Man , you suck !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A SSME for free, add some small tankage and off you go.
A parachute might be nice too.Iron Man, you suck!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800884</id>
	<title>Re:Keep them for reference</title>
	<author>janwedekind</author>
	<datestamp>1263721020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is crazy. It is as if a software engineer instead of implementing a new algorithm would wrap old LAPACK functions written in Fortran, oh wait<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is crazy .
It is as if a software engineer instead of implementing a new algorithm would wrap old LAPACK functions written in Fortran , oh wait .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is crazy.
It is as if a software engineer instead of implementing a new algorithm would wrap old LAPACK functions written in Fortran, oh wait ...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800112</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30804284</id>
	<title>Re:Perfect geek storm!</title>
	<author>Nazlfrag</author>
	<datestamp>1263747480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=\_b4WzWFKQ20" title="youtube.com">Top Gear</a> [youtube.com] did it already.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Top Gear [ youtube.com ] did it already .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Top Gear [youtube.com] did it already.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30804644</id>
	<title>Cash for clunkers</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263750780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The hunk of junk is a gas guzzler.  Trade it in for a Corolla.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The hunk of junk is a gas guzzler .
Trade it in for a Corolla .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The hunk of junk is a gas guzzler.
Trade it in for a Corolla.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801446</id>
	<title>Re-gifting the Enterprise</title>
	<author>john82</author>
	<datestamp>1263724620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>... and it is possible that the Enterprise, a shuttle prototype that never made it to space, will also be available.</i></p><p>Really, the Enterprise? And does Mr Pickens suppose that the <a href="http://www.nasm.si.edu/imagedetail.cfm?imageID=987" title="si.edu">National Air and Space Museum</a> [si.edu] will give it <i>back</i> to NASA so that it can be sold? Somehow I find that highly unlikely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>... and it is possible that the Enterprise , a shuttle prototype that never made it to space , will also be available.Really , the Enterprise ?
And does Mr Pickens suppose that the National Air and Space Museum [ si.edu ] will give it back to NASA so that it can be sold ?
Somehow I find that highly unlikely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>... and it is possible that the Enterprise, a shuttle prototype that never made it to space, will also be available.Really, the Enterprise?
And does Mr Pickens suppose that the National Air and Space Museum [si.edu] will give it back to NASA so that it can be sold?
Somehow I find that highly unlikely.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800110</id>
	<title>scrap steel</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263758160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I wonder how many tons the space shuttle and/or the engines are?  Can one make money by<br>selling them as scrap steel?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I wonder how many tons the space shuttle and/or the engines are ?
Can one make money byselling them as scrap steel ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I wonder how many tons the space shuttle and/or the engines are?
Can one make money byselling them as scrap steel?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801936</id>
	<title>Re:Eternal glory awaits the astronaut farmer</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1263727740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is getting these to orbit costs more than any of them whole.</p><p>Likely, you'd be better off designing one from scratch. That's why they are getting scrapped too...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is getting these to orbit costs more than any of them whole.Likely , you 'd be better off designing one from scratch .
That 's why they are getting scrapped too.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is getting these to orbit costs more than any of them whole.Likely, you'd be better off designing one from scratch.
That's why they are getting scrapped too...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30806382</id>
	<title>Re:More than one Buran out there...</title>
	<author>icebrain</author>
	<datestamp>1263817800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know for sure, but I think I remember reading before that one of the conditions of purchase is that you will display the orbiter in a climate-controlled facility open to the public.  Don't like it?  Then you can't buy it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know for sure , but I think I remember reading before that one of the conditions of purchase is that you will display the orbiter in a climate-controlled facility open to the public .
Do n't like it ?
Then you ca n't buy it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know for sure, but I think I remember reading before that one of the conditions of purchase is that you will display the orbiter in a climate-controlled facility open to the public.
Don't like it?
Then you can't buy it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799940</id>
	<title>Put it on eBay!</title>
	<author>K. S. Kyosuke</author>
	<datestamp>1263756900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>'nuff said.</htmltext>
<tokenext>'nuff said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>'nuff said.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801346</id>
	<title>Re:What about already submitted proposals?</title>
	<author>AnotherUsername</author>
	<datestamp>1263723960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm surprised the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago didn't go for it.  This is right up its alley.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm surprised the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago did n't go for it .
This is right up its alley .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm surprised the Museum of Science and Industry in Chicago didn't go for it.
This is right up its alley.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800272</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800548</id>
	<title>Re:More than one Buran out there...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263718920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A worthy place for Enterprise might be next to the Buran at the <a href="http://speyer.technik-museum.de/exhibits/spaceshuttle-buran/sp\_610.html" title="technik-museum.de" rel="nofollow">http://speyer.technik-museum.de/exhibits/spaceshuttle-buran/sp\_610.html</a> [technik-museum.de](Germany). At Sinsheim <a href="http://sinsheim.technik-museum.de/node/27" title="technik-museum.de" rel="nofollow">http://sinsheim.technik-museum.de/node/27</a> [technik-museum.de], they already have a Russian Tupolev TU-144 and an Air France CONCORDE on display.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A worthy place for Enterprise might be next to the Buran at the http : //speyer.technik-museum.de/exhibits/spaceshuttle-buran/sp \ _610.html [ technik-museum.de ] ( Germany ) .
At Sinsheim http : //sinsheim.technik-museum.de/node/27 [ technik-museum.de ] , they already have a Russian Tupolev TU-144 and an Air France CONCORDE on display .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A worthy place for Enterprise might be next to the Buran at the http://speyer.technik-museum.de/exhibits/spaceshuttle-buran/sp\_610.html [technik-museum.de](Germany).
At Sinsheim http://sinsheim.technik-museum.de/node/27 [technik-museum.de], they already have a Russian Tupolev TU-144 and an Air France CONCORDE on display.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800824</id>
	<title>You could probably build a replica from LEGOs</title>
	<author>syntheticmemory</author>
	<datestamp>1263720420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>$28 million would buy a lot of LEGOs- who will build the first full scale shuttle replica?</htmltext>
<tokenext>$ 28 million would buy a lot of LEGOs- who will build the first full scale shuttle replica ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>$28 million would buy a lot of LEGOs- who will build the first full scale shuttle replica?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988</id>
	<title>More than one Buran out there...</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263757260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The summary seems to imply otherwise. And not only almost finished or barely finished orbiters, also models for static tests, etc. Those also ended up as tourist attractions or in museums (or rusting in scrapyard)</p><p>In fact, <i>the</i> Buran, the one that made orbital flight, was probably destroyed by a hangar collapse in 2002... (along with the remaining Energia mock-up on which it was laid to rest...)<br><a href="http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/bbur90.jpg" title="buran.ru">http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/bbur90.jpg</a> [buran.ru]<br><a href="http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/bbur89.jpg" title="buran.ru">http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/bbur89.jpg</a> [buran.ru]</p><p>BTW, Should we really count Enterprise as a prototype? It couldn't made it into space...Columbia seems more appropriate. Or, if insisting on rules lax enough to include Enterprise, Endeavor seems a better choice as the "first", actually. Since it's a rebuild structural "airframe" that was used for static tests (so likely before Enterprise), to replenish the fleet with fully capable orbiter after Challenger disaster.</p><p>PS. <b>Free Shuttle parts for the cost of transport?!</b> Please, will somebody in the know confirm you don't have to be some large educational institution or venerable museum?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The summary seems to imply otherwise .
And not only almost finished or barely finished orbiters , also models for static tests , etc .
Those also ended up as tourist attractions or in museums ( or rusting in scrapyard ) In fact , the Buran , the one that made orbital flight , was probably destroyed by a hangar collapse in 2002... ( along with the remaining Energia mock-up on which it was laid to rest... ) http : //www.buran.ru/images/jpg/bbur90.jpg [ buran.ru ] http : //www.buran.ru/images/jpg/bbur89.jpg [ buran.ru ] BTW , Should we really count Enterprise as a prototype ?
It could n't made it into space...Columbia seems more appropriate .
Or , if insisting on rules lax enough to include Enterprise , Endeavor seems a better choice as the " first " , actually .
Since it 's a rebuild structural " airframe " that was used for static tests ( so likely before Enterprise ) , to replenish the fleet with fully capable orbiter after Challenger disaster.PS .
Free Shuttle parts for the cost of transport ? !
Please , will somebody in the know confirm you do n't have to be some large educational institution or venerable museum ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The summary seems to imply otherwise.
And not only almost finished or barely finished orbiters, also models for static tests, etc.
Those also ended up as tourist attractions or in museums (or rusting in scrapyard)In fact, the Buran, the one that made orbital flight, was probably destroyed by a hangar collapse in 2002... (along with the remaining Energia mock-up on which it was laid to rest...)http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/bbur90.jpg [buran.ru]http://www.buran.ru/images/jpg/bbur89.jpg [buran.ru]BTW, Should we really count Enterprise as a prototype?
It couldn't made it into space...Columbia seems more appropriate.
Or, if insisting on rules lax enough to include Enterprise, Endeavor seems a better choice as the "first", actually.
Since it's a rebuild structural "airframe" that was used for static tests (so likely before Enterprise), to replenish the fleet with fully capable orbiter after Challenger disaster.PS.
Free Shuttle parts for the cost of transport?!
Please, will somebody in the know confirm you don't have to be some large educational institution or venerable museum?
;)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801050</id>
	<title>Paid by the tax payer ....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263721920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It should be given to public museums, not sold to private collectors.</p><p>Unless they want to return the money back to the tax payers, the parts should be given back to the community.  Distribute the history around the country so that children from all locations and economical backgrounds can be inspired by the past.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It should be given to public museums , not sold to private collectors.Unless they want to return the money back to the tax payers , the parts should be given back to the community .
Distribute the history around the country so that children from all locations and economical backgrounds can be inspired by the past .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It should be given to public museums, not sold to private collectors.Unless they want to return the money back to the tax payers, the parts should be given back to the community.
Distribute the history around the country so that children from all locations and economical backgrounds can be inspired by the past.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799928</id>
	<title>low-cost housing for the homeless!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263756840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>set a couple up on the Mall in DC, where i'm sure they'll be put to great use!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>set a couple up on the Mall in DC , where i 'm sure they 'll be put to great use !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>set a couple up on the Mall in DC, where i'm sure they'll be put to great use!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30803476</id>
	<title>Price/Performance Ratio</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1263739980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How would this compare with a SU-27 for $5Mil?</p><p>Personally, I can find a place to garage the SU-27.  But they don't have room for a Shuttle, and you're not going to toll around Mesa in one.  The SU-27, OTOH, that I can see buzzing the orchards around here.  I'll have to sell a kidney for 3 hours of fuel, and sell my wife for ground school but hey, it's doable.  The Shuttle, I need 2 more guys and a relly big candle to get it up high enough to just turn around and crash-land.</p><p>So it's the SU-27.  Fair deal.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How would this compare with a SU-27 for $ 5Mil ? Personally , I can find a place to garage the SU-27 .
But they do n't have room for a Shuttle , and you 're not going to toll around Mesa in one .
The SU-27 , OTOH , that I can see buzzing the orchards around here .
I 'll have to sell a kidney for 3 hours of fuel , and sell my wife for ground school but hey , it 's doable .
The Shuttle , I need 2 more guys and a relly big candle to get it up high enough to just turn around and crash-land.So it 's the SU-27 .
Fair deal .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would this compare with a SU-27 for $5Mil?Personally, I can find a place to garage the SU-27.
But they don't have room for a Shuttle, and you're not going to toll around Mesa in one.
The SU-27, OTOH, that I can see buzzing the orchards around here.
I'll have to sell a kidney for 3 hours of fuel, and sell my wife for ground school but hey, it's doable.
The Shuttle, I need 2 more guys and a relly big candle to get it up high enough to just turn around and crash-land.So it's the SU-27.
Fair deal.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30804282</id>
	<title>Re:More than one Buran out there...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263747480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>BTW, Should we really count Enterprise as a prototype? It couldn't made it into space...Columbia seems more appropriate. Or, if insisting on rules lax enough to include Enterprise, Endeavor seems a better choice as the "first", actually. Since it's a rebuild structural "airframe" that was used for static tests (so likely before Enterprise), to replenish the fleet with fully capable orbiter after Challenger disaster.</p></div><p>Enterprise is a prototype, it can be converted to a space worthy craft, just as Challenger was.  Columbia wasn't a prototype, as it was a fully functioning and operational shuttle throughout it's lifespan, and the design of Challenger, Atlantis, &amp; Endeavour all are based on the same design, with obvious upgrades, also, Columbia was lost in the second Shuttle Accident, and therefore obviously isn't available.  Endeavour was built from surplus parts that were stocked as replacement parts for Columbia, Challenger, Discovery, &amp; Atlantis, it was never a test article, just as Atlantis was built from surplus parts, and was also never a test article.  Challenger was built from a test article that was made after Enterprise, and therefore shouldn't be considered to be older then Columbia, by this line of thinking, and was lost in the first Shuttle Accident, and also therefore obviously isn't available.  Pathfinder was a static test article that wasn't airworthy, built prior after Enterprise, however it is not air worthy, and was only used for static tests, and cannot be converted to be air or space worthy as Challenger was, so I'm sure that would be why it didn't make the list.</p><p>So what we walk away with is that the oldest surviving Shuttle, if considered as an actual Shuttle, is Enterprise, followed by Discovery, Atlantis, and then Endeavour. Pathfinder should be considered as the oldest Shuttle, if Enterprise is considered to be a Shuttle.  Challenger should be considered the oldest non-surviving Shuttle, as it was built prior to any of the others, followed by Enterprise, Pathfinder, Columbia, and then Discovery.</p><p>Rant complete, lol</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>BTW , Should we really count Enterprise as a prototype ?
It could n't made it into space...Columbia seems more appropriate .
Or , if insisting on rules lax enough to include Enterprise , Endeavor seems a better choice as the " first " , actually .
Since it 's a rebuild structural " airframe " that was used for static tests ( so likely before Enterprise ) , to replenish the fleet with fully capable orbiter after Challenger disaster.Enterprise is a prototype , it can be converted to a space worthy craft , just as Challenger was .
Columbia was n't a prototype , as it was a fully functioning and operational shuttle throughout it 's lifespan , and the design of Challenger , Atlantis , &amp; Endeavour all are based on the same design , with obvious upgrades , also , Columbia was lost in the second Shuttle Accident , and therefore obviously is n't available .
Endeavour was built from surplus parts that were stocked as replacement parts for Columbia , Challenger , Discovery , &amp; Atlantis , it was never a test article , just as Atlantis was built from surplus parts , and was also never a test article .
Challenger was built from a test article that was made after Enterprise , and therefore should n't be considered to be older then Columbia , by this line of thinking , and was lost in the first Shuttle Accident , and also therefore obviously is n't available .
Pathfinder was a static test article that was n't airworthy , built prior after Enterprise , however it is not air worthy , and was only used for static tests , and can not be converted to be air or space worthy as Challenger was , so I 'm sure that would be why it did n't make the list.So what we walk away with is that the oldest surviving Shuttle , if considered as an actual Shuttle , is Enterprise , followed by Discovery , Atlantis , and then Endeavour .
Pathfinder should be considered as the oldest Shuttle , if Enterprise is considered to be a Shuttle .
Challenger should be considered the oldest non-surviving Shuttle , as it was built prior to any of the others , followed by Enterprise , Pathfinder , Columbia , and then Discovery.Rant complete , lol</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BTW, Should we really count Enterprise as a prototype?
It couldn't made it into space...Columbia seems more appropriate.
Or, if insisting on rules lax enough to include Enterprise, Endeavor seems a better choice as the "first", actually.
Since it's a rebuild structural "airframe" that was used for static tests (so likely before Enterprise), to replenish the fleet with fully capable orbiter after Challenger disaster.Enterprise is a prototype, it can be converted to a space worthy craft, just as Challenger was.
Columbia wasn't a prototype, as it was a fully functioning and operational shuttle throughout it's lifespan, and the design of Challenger, Atlantis, &amp; Endeavour all are based on the same design, with obvious upgrades, also, Columbia was lost in the second Shuttle Accident, and therefore obviously isn't available.
Endeavour was built from surplus parts that were stocked as replacement parts for Columbia, Challenger, Discovery, &amp; Atlantis, it was never a test article, just as Atlantis was built from surplus parts, and was also never a test article.
Challenger was built from a test article that was made after Enterprise, and therefore shouldn't be considered to be older then Columbia, by this line of thinking, and was lost in the first Shuttle Accident, and also therefore obviously isn't available.
Pathfinder was a static test article that wasn't airworthy, built prior after Enterprise, however it is not air worthy, and was only used for static tests, and cannot be converted to be air or space worthy as Challenger was, so I'm sure that would be why it didn't make the list.So what we walk away with is that the oldest surviving Shuttle, if considered as an actual Shuttle, is Enterprise, followed by Discovery, Atlantis, and then Endeavour.
Pathfinder should be considered as the oldest Shuttle, if Enterprise is considered to be a Shuttle.
Challenger should be considered the oldest non-surviving Shuttle, as it was built prior to any of the others, followed by Enterprise, Pathfinder, Columbia, and then Discovery.Rant complete, lol
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30814584</id>
	<title>Re:scrap steel</title>
	<author>riverat1</author>
	<datestamp>1263820440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I doubt they used steel any place on the shuttle they didn't absolutely have to.  I think the structure is mostly aluminum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I doubt they used steel any place on the shuttle they did n't absolutely have to .
I think the structure is mostly aluminum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I doubt they used steel any place on the shuttle they didn't absolutely have to.
I think the structure is mostly aluminum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800266</id>
	<title>Barrett-Jackson</title>
	<author>zwede</author>
	<datestamp>1263759540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't Barrett jackson holding another collector's auction next week? If people are willing to pay millions for an old car the space shuttle should be a hit!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't Barrett jackson holding another collector 's auction next week ?
If people are willing to pay millions for an old car the space shuttle should be a hit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't Barrett jackson holding another collector's auction next week?
If people are willing to pay millions for an old car the space shuttle should be a hit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801148</id>
	<title>Re:More than one Buran out there...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263722520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It counts:</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkEUBBlIjUA</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It counts : http : //www.youtube.com/watch ? v = CkEUBBlIjUA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It counts:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkEUBBlIjUA</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30810424</id>
	<title>Cowboy Bebop</title>
	<author>Idiomatick</author>
	<datestamp>1263842220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>We already know that Doohan is going to pick up one of these babies, get it working again to save spike with. duhhh....<br> <br>Also, at that shipping price it is way easier to buy land right beside NASA...</htmltext>
<tokenext>We already know that Doohan is going to pick up one of these babies , get it working again to save spike with .
duhhh.... Also , at that shipping price it is way easier to buy land right beside NASA.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already know that Doohan is going to pick up one of these babies, get it working again to save spike with.
duhhh.... Also, at that shipping price it is way easier to buy land right beside NASA...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800338</id>
	<title>Re:More than one Buran out there...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263760200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Endeavor seems a better choice as the "first", actually. Since it's a rebuild structural "airframe" that was used for static tests (so likely before Enterprise), to replenish the fleet with fully capable orbiter after Challenger disaster.</p></div><p>That is incorrect, you have conflated the histories of two different orbiters.  Challenger was built out of a Static Test Article (STA-099).  Endeavour (with a 'u') was built to replace Challenger and was made out of structural spares left over from the construction of Discovery and Atlantis.  You are also forgetting the Space Shuttle Pathfinder, the first prototype.</p><p>For more information see:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbiter\_Vehicle\_Designation</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Endeavor seems a better choice as the " first " , actually .
Since it 's a rebuild structural " airframe " that was used for static tests ( so likely before Enterprise ) , to replenish the fleet with fully capable orbiter after Challenger disaster.That is incorrect , you have conflated the histories of two different orbiters .
Challenger was built out of a Static Test Article ( STA-099 ) .
Endeavour ( with a 'u ' ) was built to replace Challenger and was made out of structural spares left over from the construction of Discovery and Atlantis .
You are also forgetting the Space Shuttle Pathfinder , the first prototype.For more information see : http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbiter \ _Vehicle \ _Designation</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Endeavor seems a better choice as the "first", actually.
Since it's a rebuild structural "airframe" that was used for static tests (so likely before Enterprise), to replenish the fleet with fully capable orbiter after Challenger disaster.That is incorrect, you have conflated the histories of two different orbiters.
Challenger was built out of a Static Test Article (STA-099).
Endeavour (with a 'u') was built to replace Challenger and was made out of structural spares left over from the construction of Discovery and Atlantis.
You are also forgetting the Space Shuttle Pathfinder, the first prototype.For more information see:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbiter\_Vehicle\_Designation
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801046</id>
	<title>Might be a good replacement for my doublewide...</title>
	<author>kimgkimg</author>
	<datestamp>1263721860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hopefully it has a working bathroom...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully it has a working bathroom.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully it has a working bathroom...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30811420</id>
	<title>Re:Milage? MPG?</title>
	<author>danbert8</author>
	<datestamp>1263847140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well according to <a href="http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/~ssa/docs/Space.Shuttle/general.shtml#four" title="arizona.edu" rel="nofollow">http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/~ssa/docs/Space.Shuttle/general.shtml#four</a> [arizona.edu] the capacity of the fuel tank is 500,000 gallons, and the solid rocket boosters have about a million pounds of fuel.  Assuming the fuel has a similar density to gasoline, that's another 162,000 gallons...  Total of 662,000 gallons.  The orbiter generally operates at about 190 miles above the surface of the earth, so it's a circle with a diameter of 8116 miles, so about 25,500 miles covered per orbit...</p><p>If you want to match current cars (around 30mpg highway), you'd need 779 orbits, which with an orbital period of 90 minutes, that's a mission of around 49 days.  So yeah, I think your car gets better mileage than the shuttle...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well according to http : //seds.lpl.arizona.edu/ ~ ssa/docs/Space.Shuttle/general.shtml # four [ arizona.edu ] the capacity of the fuel tank is 500,000 gallons , and the solid rocket boosters have about a million pounds of fuel .
Assuming the fuel has a similar density to gasoline , that 's another 162,000 gallons... Total of 662,000 gallons .
The orbiter generally operates at about 190 miles above the surface of the earth , so it 's a circle with a diameter of 8116 miles , so about 25,500 miles covered per orbit...If you want to match current cars ( around 30mpg highway ) , you 'd need 779 orbits , which with an orbital period of 90 minutes , that 's a mission of around 49 days .
So yeah , I think your car gets better mileage than the shuttle.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well according to http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/~ssa/docs/Space.Shuttle/general.shtml#four [arizona.edu] the capacity of the fuel tank is 500,000 gallons, and the solid rocket boosters have about a million pounds of fuel.
Assuming the fuel has a similar density to gasoline, that's another 162,000 gallons...  Total of 662,000 gallons.
The orbiter generally operates at about 190 miles above the surface of the earth, so it's a circle with a diameter of 8116 miles, so about 25,500 miles covered per orbit...If you want to match current cars (around 30mpg highway), you'd need 779 orbits, which with an orbital period of 90 minutes, that's a mission of around 49 days.
So yeah, I think your car gets better mileage than the shuttle...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800082</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30805572</id>
	<title>Shuttle for Sale</title>
	<author>matrix28au</author>
	<datestamp>1263806280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>mmm.. I'm sure there are a few Star-trekkie fans just itching to get there hands on the 'real enterprise!'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>..</htmltext>
<tokenext>mmm.. I 'm sure there are a few Star-trekkie fans just itching to get there hands on the 'real enterprise !
' . .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>mmm.. I'm sure there are a few Star-trekkie fans just itching to get there hands on the 'real enterprise!
' ..</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799934</id>
	<title>First!!!!!!!1one11!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263756840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First bid!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First bid !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First bid!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800346</id>
	<title>Unite it with the Buran!</title>
	<author>mattMad</author>
	<datestamp>1263760260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How about uniting one with a Buran:<br>

<a href="http://speyer.technik-museum.de/node/649" title="technik-museum.de" rel="nofollow">http://speyer.technik-museum.de/node/649</a> [technik-museum.de] <br>

Admitted, the cost of transporting it to Germany might be significant...</htmltext>
<tokenext>How about uniting one with a Buran : http : //speyer.technik-museum.de/node/649 [ technik-museum.de ] Admitted , the cost of transporting it to Germany might be significant.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about uniting one with a Buran:

http://speyer.technik-museum.de/node/649 [technik-museum.de] 

Admitted, the cost of transporting it to Germany might be significant...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30803404</id>
	<title>They already belong to the nation</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1263739380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Put one one the east coast(Aeronautics museum is right), one on the west coast (SD or Boeing's), and one in the middle (say Denver's Aeronautical).
We need kids to get interested in Space again.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Put one one the east coast ( Aeronautics museum is right ) , one on the west coast ( SD or Boeing 's ) , and one in the middle ( say Denver 's Aeronautical ) .
We need kids to get interested in Space again .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Put one one the east coast(Aeronautics museum is right), one on the west coast (SD or Boeing's), and one in the middle (say Denver's Aeronautical).
We need kids to get interested in Space again.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30807396</id>
	<title>Re:Sell it to Bill Gates</title>
	<author>RackinFrackin</author>
	<datestamp>1263826860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget the telephone sanitizers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget the telephone sanitizers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget the telephone sanitizers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800040</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799958</id>
	<title>It's a trap</title>
	<author>ZeroExistenZ</author>
	<datestamp>1263757020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>We're confident that we'll get other takers</p></div></blockquote><p>To try to arrest the terrorist to trying to terrorize space.</p><p>I suspect they sabotaged the things and make a buck out of it, while stopping terrorism. Brilliance!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>We 're confident that we 'll get other takersTo try to arrest the terrorist to trying to terrorize space.I suspect they sabotaged the things and make a buck out of it , while stopping terrorism .
Brilliance !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We're confident that we'll get other takersTo try to arrest the terrorist to trying to terrorize space.I suspect they sabotaged the things and make a buck out of it, while stopping terrorism.
Brilliance!
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30805306</id>
	<title>geek use</title>
	<author>smash</author>
	<datestamp>1263845220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><ul>
<li>Replace windows with LCDs</li><li>Install x-plane</li><li>Play authentic shuttle sim</li></ul><p><nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Replace windows with LCDsInstall x-planePlay authentic shuttle sim : D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
Replace windows with LCDsInstall x-planePlay authentic shuttle sim :D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799970</id>
	<title>There would be international buyers I am sure</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263757140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could probably sell one Shuttle to the Chinese or the Indians. The SSME engine is leading edge technology even today. But that would not go down well, would it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could probably sell one Shuttle to the Chinese or the Indians .
The SSME engine is leading edge technology even today .
But that would not go down well , would it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could probably sell one Shuttle to the Chinese or the Indians.
The SSME engine is leading edge technology even today.
But that would not go down well, would it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30803392</id>
	<title>enterprise ALREADY in smithsonian.</title>
	<author>Chanc\_Gorkon</author>
	<datestamp>1263739320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whoever wrote this didn't do their work...the smithsonian already owns the Enterprise:  <a href="http://www.nasm.si.edu/UdvarHazy/" title="si.edu">http://www.nasm.si.edu/UdvarHazy/</a> [si.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whoever wrote this did n't do their work...the smithsonian already owns the Enterprise : http : //www.nasm.si.edu/UdvarHazy/ [ si.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whoever wrote this didn't do their work...the smithsonian already owns the Enterprise:  http://www.nasm.si.edu/UdvarHazy/ [si.edu]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800960</id>
	<title>Re:That's the proof there are no real rich geeks</title>
	<author>srussia</author>
	<datestamp>1263721380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Juan Mir&#243; paintings for the crapper and such.</p></div><p>I guess you did Juan Antonio Roca's house then.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Juan Mir   paintings for the crapper and such.I guess you did Juan Antonio Roca 's house then .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Juan Miró paintings for the crapper and such.I guess you did Juan Antonio Roca's house then.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800478</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800198</id>
	<title>Re:More than one Buran out there...</title>
	<author>Colonel Korn</author>
	<datestamp>1263758880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>PS. <b>Free Shuttle parts for the cost of transport?!</b> Please, will somebody in the know confirm you don't have to be some large educational institution or venerable museum?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></div><p>Confirmed. And if you have Amazon Prime, it's free 2-day shipping.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>PS .
Free Shuttle parts for the cost of transport ? !
Please , will somebody in the know confirm you do n't have to be some large educational institution or venerable museum ?
; ) Confirmed. And if you have Amazon Prime , it 's free 2-day shipping .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>PS.
Free Shuttle parts for the cost of transport?!
Please, will somebody in the know confirm you don't have to be some large educational institution or venerable museum?
;)Confirmed. And if you have Amazon Prime, it's free 2-day shipping.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800160</id>
	<title>Eternal glory awaits the astronaut farmer</title>
	<author>192939495969798999</author>
	<datestamp>1263758580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eternal fame and fortune await the first of us to privately assemble, launch, orbit the earth at least once, and return safely.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eternal fame and fortune await the first of us to privately assemble , launch , orbit the earth at least once , and return safely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eternal fame and fortune await the first of us to privately assemble, launch, orbit the earth at least once, and return safely.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800272</id>
	<title>What about already submitted proposals?</title>
	<author>EsJay</author>
	<datestamp>1263759600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Does this mean they rejected all the existing bids? I thought about 20 applied, including:<br>
National Museum of the United States Air Force, Dayton OH<br>
Intrepid Sea, Air and Space Museum, NYC<br>
Kennedy Space Center, Florida<br>
Space Center Houston<br>
Evergreen Aviation &amp; Space Museum, Oregon<br>
Tulsa Air and Space Museum<br>
Museum of Flight, Seattle<br>
Columbia Memorial Space Science Learning Center, Downey CA<br>
Air Force Flight Test Center Museum, Edwards AFB, CA<br>
San Diego Air and Space Museum<br>
Palmdale Plant 42, CA</htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this mean they rejected all the existing bids ?
I thought about 20 applied , including : National Museum of the United States Air Force , Dayton OH Intrepid Sea , Air and Space Museum , NYC Kennedy Space Center , Florida Space Center Houston Evergreen Aviation &amp; Space Museum , Oregon Tulsa Air and Space Museum Museum of Flight , Seattle Columbia Memorial Space Science Learning Center , Downey CA Air Force Flight Test Center Museum , Edwards AFB , CA San Diego Air and Space Museum Palmdale Plant 42 , CA</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this mean they rejected all the existing bids?
I thought about 20 applied, including:
National Museum of the United States Air Force, Dayton OH
Intrepid Sea, Air and Space Museum, NYC
Kennedy Space Center, Florida
Space Center Houston
Evergreen Aviation &amp; Space Museum, Oregon
Tulsa Air and Space Museum
Museum of Flight, Seattle
Columbia Memorial Space Science Learning Center, Downey CA
Air Force Flight Test Center Museum, Edwards AFB, CA
San Diego Air and Space Museum
Palmdale Plant 42, CA</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800632</id>
	<title>MythBusters</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263719340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>NARRATOR: Unfortunately, while it may be easy to purchase a used surplus NASA space engine, some of the logistics aren't turning out to be easy to handle!<br> <br>
Adam Savage: <i>[Jamie's stupid toy space suit in background]</i> When we bought this thing, we figured, great! Now we don't need to build our own engine. Unfortunately, it seems that the engines are actually too big to transport on any truck we've been able to find. So that's going to be a problem, but we'll handle it.<br> <br>
[Cut to scene of Jamie Hyneman wearing a welder's face helmet and blasting through sheet metal emblazoned "NASA" in those funny letters]<br> <br>
NARRATOR: So while the rest of the guys are getting the lot ready for the explosion, Jamie is busy disassembling the engine into parts!<br> <br>
Jamie Hyneman: <i>[Lifts up welder's mask]</i> This is turning out to be a lot of work, but if we're going to test this myth, we've got to get our water recycling machine up into space, bwwwwssssh <i>[makes vertical "blast-off" gestures]</i> and we'll be drinking our own pee and sweat in no time!</htmltext>
<tokenext>NARRATOR : Unfortunately , while it may be easy to purchase a used surplus NASA space engine , some of the logistics are n't turning out to be easy to handle !
Adam Savage : [ Jamie 's stupid toy space suit in background ] When we bought this thing , we figured , great !
Now we do n't need to build our own engine .
Unfortunately , it seems that the engines are actually too big to transport on any truck we 've been able to find .
So that 's going to be a problem , but we 'll handle it .
[ Cut to scene of Jamie Hyneman wearing a welder 's face helmet and blasting through sheet metal emblazoned " NASA " in those funny letters ] NARRATOR : So while the rest of the guys are getting the lot ready for the explosion , Jamie is busy disassembling the engine into parts !
Jamie Hyneman : [ Lifts up welder 's mask ] This is turning out to be a lot of work , but if we 're going to test this myth , we 've got to get our water recycling machine up into space , bwwwwssssh [ makes vertical " blast-off " gestures ] and we 'll be drinking our own pee and sweat in no time !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>NARRATOR: Unfortunately, while it may be easy to purchase a used surplus NASA space engine, some of the logistics aren't turning out to be easy to handle!
Adam Savage: [Jamie's stupid toy space suit in background] When we bought this thing, we figured, great!
Now we don't need to build our own engine.
Unfortunately, it seems that the engines are actually too big to transport on any truck we've been able to find.
So that's going to be a problem, but we'll handle it.
[Cut to scene of Jamie Hyneman wearing a welder's face helmet and blasting through sheet metal emblazoned "NASA" in those funny letters] 
NARRATOR: So while the rest of the guys are getting the lot ready for the explosion, Jamie is busy disassembling the engine into parts!
Jamie Hyneman: [Lifts up welder's mask] This is turning out to be a lot of work, but if we're going to test this myth, we've got to get our water recycling machine up into space, bwwwwssssh [makes vertical "blast-off" gestures] and we'll be drinking our own pee and sweat in no time!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30803112</id>
	<title>Re:What about already submitted proposals?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263736860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where would they put it? It's simply too big for the space that MSI has (or Boston Museum of Science, another possibility). I imagine the Smithsonian will put Discovery where the Enterprise is now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where would they put it ?
It 's simply too big for the space that MSI has ( or Boston Museum of Science , another possibility ) .
I imagine the Smithsonian will put Discovery where the Enterprise is now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where would they put it?
It's simply too big for the space that MSI has (or Boston Museum of Science, another possibility).
I imagine the Smithsonian will put Discovery where the Enterprise is now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801346</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800704</id>
	<title>Buran flight test article at Technikmuseum Speyer</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263719700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>The perfect place for Enterprise might be next to the Buran at <a href="http://speyer.technik-museum.de/exhibits/spaceshuttle-buran/sp\_610.html" title="technik-museum.de" rel="nofollow">http://speyer.technik-museum.de/exhibits/spaceshuttle-buran/sp\_610.html</a> [technik-museum.de]. At <a href="http://sinsheim.technik-museum.de/node/27" title="technik-museum.de" rel="nofollow">http://sinsheim.technik-museum.de/node/27</a> [technik-museum.de], they have both a Russian Tupolev TU-144 and an Air France CONCORDE on display.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The perfect place for Enterprise might be next to the Buran at http : //speyer.technik-museum.de/exhibits/spaceshuttle-buran/sp \ _610.html [ technik-museum.de ] .
At http : //sinsheim.technik-museum.de/node/27 [ technik-museum.de ] , they have both a Russian Tupolev TU-144 and an Air France CONCORDE on display .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The perfect place for Enterprise might be next to the Buran at http://speyer.technik-museum.de/exhibits/spaceshuttle-buran/sp\_610.html [technik-museum.de].
At http://sinsheim.technik-museum.de/node/27 [technik-museum.de], they have both a Russian Tupolev TU-144 and an Air France CONCORDE on display.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800380</id>
	<title>plus 5, Troll)</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263760560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>core teamo. They coomunity at</htmltext>
<tokenext>core teamo .
They coomunity at</tokentext>
<sentencetext>core teamo.
They coomunity at</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800894</id>
	<title>I wonder...</title>
	<author>HangingChad</author>
	<datestamp>1263721020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>So now the engines are available, along with other shuttle artifacts, for the cost of transportation and handling.</i>

</p><p>I wonder if you could make lamps, phone holsters and other geek baubles from the recycled parts and sell them with a certificate of authenticity that they were made from space shuttle parts?

</p><p>I've got a two story garage already set up for metal fabrication...hmmmm.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So now the engines are available , along with other shuttle artifacts , for the cost of transportation and handling .
I wonder if you could make lamps , phone holsters and other geek baubles from the recycled parts and sell them with a certificate of authenticity that they were made from space shuttle parts ?
I 've got a two story garage already set up for metal fabrication...hmmmm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext> So now the engines are available, along with other shuttle artifacts, for the cost of transportation and handling.
I wonder if you could make lamps, phone holsters and other geek baubles from the recycled parts and sell them with a certificate of authenticity that they were made from space shuttle parts?
I've got a two story garage already set up for metal fabrication...hmmmm.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801570</id>
	<title>Vegas</title>
	<author>soundguy</author>
	<datestamp>1263725460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This thing really needs to be sitting in the middle of a Las Vegas casino. They could line it with slot machines and run high-stakes card games in the cargo bay.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This thing really needs to be sitting in the middle of a Las Vegas casino .
They could line it with slot machines and run high-stakes card games in the cargo bay .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This thing really needs to be sitting in the middle of a Las Vegas casino.
They could line it with slot machines and run high-stakes card games in the cargo bay.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800874</id>
	<title>Re:More than one Buran out there...</title>
	<author>Teancum</author>
	<datestamp>1263720840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In regards to the Enterprise, it was intended to make it into space.  The original plan by NASA was to retro-fit the Enterprise to fly into space once the initial landing and approach tests were completed.  An older vehicle that was used as a test article was eventually converted into the Challenger, and the Endeavor had a somewhat similar history.  Both when the Challenger blew up and the Columbia burned up, the thought of finishing the job to make the Enterprise fully spaceflight worthy had been brought up, but rejected due to the costs involved in such a conversion.  That is certainly much closer to going into space than most other vehicles that I can think of.</p><p>Clearly the Enterprise did fly on its own as an independent vehicle on at least three different occasions, and did contribute significantly to the development of the Space Shuttle program that we know today.  For me, it clearly belongs in any list of shuttles that you could mention, and does count as a prototype by every definition of the word.</p><p>Now if you want to quibble over the Pathfinder, that is one you can certainly debate.  That is the vehicle which was used to be a full mock-up of the Shuttle that could be used to train technicians assembling the parts of the Shuttle and to check ground clearances for moving the Shuttle around if they just wanted to see if it could fit or not.  It certainly seems better to screw up on a cheap hunk of steel that won't ever go into space than to make a mistake on a vehicle that cost over a billion dollars to build in the first place.  That hunk of steel was never intended to go into space at any time, and barely looks like a Shuttle.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In regards to the Enterprise , it was intended to make it into space .
The original plan by NASA was to retro-fit the Enterprise to fly into space once the initial landing and approach tests were completed .
An older vehicle that was used as a test article was eventually converted into the Challenger , and the Endeavor had a somewhat similar history .
Both when the Challenger blew up and the Columbia burned up , the thought of finishing the job to make the Enterprise fully spaceflight worthy had been brought up , but rejected due to the costs involved in such a conversion .
That is certainly much closer to going into space than most other vehicles that I can think of.Clearly the Enterprise did fly on its own as an independent vehicle on at least three different occasions , and did contribute significantly to the development of the Space Shuttle program that we know today .
For me , it clearly belongs in any list of shuttles that you could mention , and does count as a prototype by every definition of the word.Now if you want to quibble over the Pathfinder , that is one you can certainly debate .
That is the vehicle which was used to be a full mock-up of the Shuttle that could be used to train technicians assembling the parts of the Shuttle and to check ground clearances for moving the Shuttle around if they just wanted to see if it could fit or not .
It certainly seems better to screw up on a cheap hunk of steel that wo n't ever go into space than to make a mistake on a vehicle that cost over a billion dollars to build in the first place .
That hunk of steel was never intended to go into space at any time , and barely looks like a Shuttle .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In regards to the Enterprise, it was intended to make it into space.
The original plan by NASA was to retro-fit the Enterprise to fly into space once the initial landing and approach tests were completed.
An older vehicle that was used as a test article was eventually converted into the Challenger, and the Endeavor had a somewhat similar history.
Both when the Challenger blew up and the Columbia burned up, the thought of finishing the job to make the Enterprise fully spaceflight worthy had been brought up, but rejected due to the costs involved in such a conversion.
That is certainly much closer to going into space than most other vehicles that I can think of.Clearly the Enterprise did fly on its own as an independent vehicle on at least three different occasions, and did contribute significantly to the development of the Space Shuttle program that we know today.
For me, it clearly belongs in any list of shuttles that you could mention, and does count as a prototype by every definition of the word.Now if you want to quibble over the Pathfinder, that is one you can certainly debate.
That is the vehicle which was used to be a full mock-up of the Shuttle that could be used to train technicians assembling the parts of the Shuttle and to check ground clearances for moving the Shuttle around if they just wanted to see if it could fit or not.
It certainly seems better to screw up on a cheap hunk of steel that won't ever go into space than to make a mistake on a vehicle that cost over a billion dollars to build in the first place.
That hunk of steel was never intended to go into space at any time, and barely looks like a Shuttle.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800430</id>
	<title>Enterprise</title>
	<author>danielobvt</author>
	<datestamp>1263761160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is already on display.  I don't think it is going anywhere.  It is at the Udzar Hazey Annex to the Air and Space Museum.  Though it would be cool for the main downtown site to have on that actually went into space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is already on display .
I do n't think it is going anywhere .
It is at the Udzar Hazey Annex to the Air and Space Museum .
Though it would be cool for the main downtown site to have on that actually went into space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is already on display.
I don't think it is going anywhere.
It is at the Udzar Hazey Annex to the Air and Space Museum.
Though it would be cool for the main downtown site to have on that actually went into space.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930</id>
	<title>Perfect geek storm!</title>
	<author>houstonbofh</author>
	<datestamp>1263756840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>One free shuttle engine.<br>
One old impala.<br>
Mythbusters<br>
Best Show EVER!</htmltext>
<tokenext>One free shuttle engine .
One old impala .
Mythbusters Best Show EVER !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One free shuttle engine.
One old impala.
Mythbusters
Best Show EVER!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800136</id>
	<title>China will likely buy it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263758400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Though not sure why, they just steal what they need.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Though not sure why , they just steal what they need .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Though not sure why, they just steal what they need.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799944</id>
	<title>Maybe they should put up an ad on craigslist.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263756960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Keep an eye on <a href="http://spacecoast.craigslist.org/zip/" title="craigslist.org" rel="nofollow">http://spacecoast.craigslist.org/zip/</a> [craigslist.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Keep an eye on http : //spacecoast.craigslist.org/zip/ [ craigslist.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Keep an eye on http://spacecoast.craigslist.org/zip/ [craigslist.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30805470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800632
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30804282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30806382
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30807396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800040
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30806990
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30808678
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801148
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30802798
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800198
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800884
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800112
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30804284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30803112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800272
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30804076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30811420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801898
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800478
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801936
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_1714204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30814584
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800110
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800340
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799958
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799930
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30804284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800028
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30802798
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800632
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30805470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800110
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30814584
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799970
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801936
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799928
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801148
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800198
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800338
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800704
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30808678
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30806382
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30804282
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800040
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30807396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800478
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30804076
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800200
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801446
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30811420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799938
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30803392
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800272
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30801346
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30803112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800430
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800112
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30800884
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799918
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_1714204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30799940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_1714204.30806990
</commentlist>
</conversation>
