<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_17_0724226</id>
	<title>Another Attack, On Law Firm Suing China</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1263719940000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>An anonymous reader writes <i>"In the wake of the <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/10/01/12/2329231/Google-Hacked-May-Pull-Out-of-China">attack on Google</a>, another company claims to be the victim of a similar attack. Gipson Hoffman &amp; Pancione is a Los Angeles law firm whose client, <a href="http://cybersitter.com/">CYBERsitter</a>, is suing the government of China and several Chinese companies for using their intellectual property in the infamous <a href="http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/06/08/053230/Chinese-Government-To-Mandate-PC-Censorware">Green Dam</a> censorship filter. <a href="http://www.techweb.com/article/showArticle?articleID=222301001">According to the firm, they have been targeted</a> by a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spear\_phishing">spear phishing</a> attack from China."</i> Relatedly, smartaleckkill writes with news that the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8462889.stm">US state department is to formally protest to China</a> over the alleged cyber-attacks on Google, "likely early next week."</htmltext>
<tokenext>An anonymous reader writes " In the wake of the attack on Google , another company claims to be the victim of a similar attack .
Gipson Hoffman &amp; Pancione is a Los Angeles law firm whose client , CYBERsitter , is suing the government of China and several Chinese companies for using their intellectual property in the infamous Green Dam censorship filter .
According to the firm , they have been targeted by a spear phishing attack from China .
" Relatedly , smartaleckkill writes with news that the US state department is to formally protest to China over the alleged cyber-attacks on Google , " likely early next week .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An anonymous reader writes "In the wake of the attack on Google, another company claims to be the victim of a similar attack.
Gipson Hoffman &amp; Pancione is a Los Angeles law firm whose client, CYBERsitter, is suing the government of China and several Chinese companies for using their intellectual property in the infamous Green Dam censorship filter.
According to the firm, they have been targeted by a spear phishing attack from China.
" Relatedly, smartaleckkill writes with news that the US state department is to formally protest to China over the alleged cyber-attacks on Google, "likely early next week.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797134</id>
	<title>Tread softly</title>
	<author>Dunbal</author>
	<datestamp>1263728040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>China now owns the US dollar, thanks to the Fed. But don't take <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/dollar-has-hit-bottom-china-says/article1427998/" title="theglobeandmail.com">my</a> [theglobeandmail.com] word for it. If I were the US I would invest in some lube and bend over quietly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>China now owns the US dollar , thanks to the Fed .
But do n't take my [ theglobeandmail.com ] word for it .
If I were the US I would invest in some lube and bend over quietly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>China now owns the US dollar, thanks to the Fed.
But don't take my [theglobeandmail.com] word for it.
If I were the US I would invest in some lube and bend over quietly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796944</id>
	<title>As far as lawsuits go</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263724200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I am actually glad to see that lawsuits over software patents aren't being used for silly purposes to remove competition. Cyber sitter could have put together this lawsuit long ago, but they go in on the heels of the google hacking fiasco they got caught in.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am actually glad to see that lawsuits over software patents are n't being used for silly purposes to remove competition .
Cyber sitter could have put together this lawsuit long ago , but they go in on the heels of the google hacking fiasco they got caught in .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am actually glad to see that lawsuits over software patents aren't being used for silly purposes to remove competition.
Cyber sitter could have put together this lawsuit long ago, but they go in on the heels of the google hacking fiasco they got caught in.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797092</id>
	<title>Just business as usual.</title>
	<author>VortexCortex</author>
	<datestamp>1263727140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Both large companies examine their large patent portfolios and threaten each other with any infringing patents found.</p><p>This effectively increases the chances they'll come to an agreement instead of fight out each "infringement" suit in court.  The costs of the lawsuits is always less than the price of coming to an agreement.  The real looser is the consumer who will now have to pay more for products due to the costs of the companies throwing around their patent weights.</p><p>(Also note: Lack of a huge patent portfolio ensures that inventors who naturally have less bargaining chips never win at the big boy's table.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Both large companies examine their large patent portfolios and threaten each other with any infringing patents found.This effectively increases the chances they 'll come to an agreement instead of fight out each " infringement " suit in court .
The costs of the lawsuits is always less than the price of coming to an agreement .
The real looser is the consumer who will now have to pay more for products due to the costs of the companies throwing around their patent weights .
( Also note : Lack of a huge patent portfolio ensures that inventors who naturally have less bargaining chips never win at the big boy 's table .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Both large companies examine their large patent portfolios and threaten each other with any infringing patents found.This effectively increases the chances they'll come to an agreement instead of fight out each "infringement" suit in court.
The costs of the lawsuits is always less than the price of coming to an agreement.
The real looser is the consumer who will now have to pay more for products due to the costs of the companies throwing around their patent weights.
(Also note: Lack of a huge patent portfolio ensures that inventors who naturally have less bargaining chips never win at the big boy's table.
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30801472</id>
	<title>Re:Why is this different than military attack?</title>
	<author>kevinNCSU</author>
	<datestamp>1263724800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because looking a nineteen year old kid in the eye and asking him to go kill and die for his country because some malicious packets got through a routers firewall at a private company and now China might be able build a better search engine is different then asking him to do it because foreigners with guns just landed on the beach where he played as a kid and claimed it as their own.  Any more ridiculous questions?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because looking a nineteen year old kid in the eye and asking him to go kill and die for his country because some malicious packets got through a routers firewall at a private company and now China might be able build a better search engine is different then asking him to do it because foreigners with guns just landed on the beach where he played as a kid and claimed it as their own .
Any more ridiculous questions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because looking a nineteen year old kid in the eye and asking him to go kill and die for his country because some malicious packets got through a routers firewall at a private company and now China might be able build a better search engine is different then asking him to do it because foreigners with guns just landed on the beach where he played as a kid and claimed it as their own.
Any more ridiculous questions?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799260</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799260</id>
	<title>Why is this different than military attack?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263751500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If China invaded Hawaii, California or Alaska, but did not kill any US citizens we would treat this very differently as the Fed would take this very seriously rather than saying, <i>Yeah, cyber attacks, they happen every day, nobody got hurt etc etc..</i>  Maybe if the Fed realized that when China steals intellectual property, it might not hurt the US today, but it enables China to get a free pass on research for which we had to invest our own time and money into.</p><p>During WWII there were many Germans immigrants that didn't support the Third Reich and many Japanese immigrants that didn't  support what Japan was doing in the Pacific.  I wish the US Gov't would <i>grow a pair</i> instead of saying, "Stop or I'll say stop again!" mentality.  When did the gov't become a bunch of pussies when it came down to this?  The US employs millions of people associated with the protection of property, both physical and intellectual.  Yet this is like the equivalent of some guy ignoring it when his boss gropes his wife because his boss signs his paychecks.</p><p>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If China invaded Hawaii , California or Alaska , but did not kill any US citizens we would treat this very differently as the Fed would take this very seriously rather than saying , Yeah , cyber attacks , they happen every day , nobody got hurt etc etc.. Maybe if the Fed realized that when China steals intellectual property , it might not hurt the US today , but it enables China to get a free pass on research for which we had to invest our own time and money into.During WWII there were many Germans immigrants that did n't support the Third Reich and many Japanese immigrants that did n't support what Japan was doing in the Pacific .
I wish the US Gov't would grow a pair instead of saying , " Stop or I 'll say stop again !
" mentality .
When did the gov't become a bunch of pussies when it came down to this ?
The US employs millions of people associated with the protection of property , both physical and intellectual .
Yet this is like the equivalent of some guy ignoring it when his boss gropes his wife because his boss signs his paychecks .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>If China invaded Hawaii, California or Alaska, but did not kill any US citizens we would treat this very differently as the Fed would take this very seriously rather than saying, Yeah, cyber attacks, they happen every day, nobody got hurt etc etc..  Maybe if the Fed realized that when China steals intellectual property, it might not hurt the US today, but it enables China to get a free pass on research for which we had to invest our own time and money into.During WWII there were many Germans immigrants that didn't support the Third Reich and many Japanese immigrants that didn't  support what Japan was doing in the Pacific.
I wish the US Gov't would grow a pair instead of saying, "Stop or I'll say stop again!
" mentality.
When did the gov't become a bunch of pussies when it came down to this?
The US employs millions of people associated with the protection of property, both physical and intellectual.
Yet this is like the equivalent of some guy ignoring it when his boss gropes his wife because his boss signs his paychecks.
 </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797288</id>
	<title>The US State Department will fix it all for us!</title>
	<author>gavron</author>
	<datestamp>1263730440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I'm so excited the US DoS is going to protest.  That's gotta go down in history as the most effective...<p>
Who am I kidding.</p><p>
E</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm so excited the US DoS is going to protest .
That 's got ta go down in history as the most effective.. . Who am I kidding .
E</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm so excited the US DoS is going to protest.
That's gotta go down in history as the most effective...
Who am I kidding.
E</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797156</id>
	<title>Re:That's right....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263728520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Lately you've been using the "can" jokes too much, it was funny at first, but now... just can it, ok?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Lately you 've been using the " can " jokes too much , it was funny at first , but now... just can it , ok ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Lately you've been using the "can" jokes too much, it was funny at first, but now... just can it, ok?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796970</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796994</id>
	<title>Just wait until the Chinese take over ECHELON</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263725100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the ensuing protests will be worth a laugh or two.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the ensuing protests will be worth a laugh or two .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the ensuing protests will be worth a laugh or two.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30800156</id>
	<title>Give China a computer....</title>
	<author>vettemph</author>
	<datestamp>1263758520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>and they will send you a spam.</p><p>Give China your entire manufacturing base<br>and they will crush your entire empty shell of a country.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>and they will send you a spam.Give China your entire manufacturing baseand they will crush your entire empty shell of a country .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and they will send you a spam.Give China your entire manufacturing baseand they will crush your entire empty shell of a country.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796970</id>
	<title>That's right....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263724620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>...we are gonna open a big ol' can o' formal protest on all y'all! Take that beeotch!</htmltext>
<tokenext>...we are gon na open a big ol ' can o ' formal protest on all y'all !
Take that beeotch !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...we are gonna open a big ol' can o' formal protest on all y'all!
Take that beeotch!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797100</id>
	<title>Another Attack, On Law Firm Suing China</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263727260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In the wake of the attack on Google, another company claims to be the victim of a similar attack. Gipson Hoffman &amp; Pancione is a Los Angeles law firm whose client, CYBERsitter is suing the government of China</p></div><p>Is, this some sort of, competition for most, confusing use of commas?</p><p>,</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In the wake of the attack on Google , another company claims to be the victim of a similar attack .
Gipson Hoffman &amp; Pancione is a Los Angeles law firm whose client , CYBERsitter is suing the government of ChinaIs , this some sort of , competition for most , confusing use of commas ? ,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the wake of the attack on Google, another company claims to be the victim of a similar attack.
Gipson Hoffman &amp; Pancione is a Los Angeles law firm whose client, CYBERsitter is suing the government of ChinaIs, this some sort of, competition for most, confusing use of commas?,
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797404</id>
	<title>Can Airbus Sue the US now?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263732300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can Airbus Sue the US now? After all, if hacking into communications is now a lawsuit offence that can be persued against a government, the US interception of Airbus negotiations to land a sale so that this could be leaked to Boeing and then let Boeing win the contract should likewise be open to lawsuit.</p><p>Will the US agree?</p><p>Or is it only bad when China does it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Can Airbus Sue the US now ?
After all , if hacking into communications is now a lawsuit offence that can be persued against a government , the US interception of Airbus negotiations to land a sale so that this could be leaked to Boeing and then let Boeing win the contract should likewise be open to lawsuit.Will the US agree ? Or is it only bad when China does it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can Airbus Sue the US now?
After all, if hacking into communications is now a lawsuit offence that can be persued against a government, the US interception of Airbus negotiations to land a sale so that this could be leaked to Boeing and then let Boeing win the contract should likewise be open to lawsuit.Will the US agree?Or is it only bad when China does it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799208</id>
	<title>Pointless</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263751080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We love been able to buy all sorts of widgets for cheap because they were built in China. We don't care if the workers are being explored, if the companies are polluting, if their government is a vicious dictatorship with a poor human rights record. We don't care about any of that. If we did, we would have already embargoed China. Don't we have an embargo on Cuba? But no... we don't do that. Just keep those cheap goods coming and we will be happy. We have blood in our hands as well.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We love been able to buy all sorts of widgets for cheap because they were built in China .
We do n't care if the workers are being explored , if the companies are polluting , if their government is a vicious dictatorship with a poor human rights record .
We do n't care about any of that .
If we did , we would have already embargoed China .
Do n't we have an embargo on Cuba ?
But no... we do n't do that .
Just keep those cheap goods coming and we will be happy .
We have blood in our hands as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We love been able to buy all sorts of widgets for cheap because they were built in China.
We don't care if the workers are being explored, if the companies are polluting, if their government is a vicious dictatorship with a poor human rights record.
We don't care about any of that.
If we did, we would have already embargoed China.
Don't we have an embargo on Cuba?
But no... we don't do that.
Just keep those cheap goods coming and we will be happy.
We have blood in our hands as well.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797542</id>
	<title>China seems to have a serious issue with.....</title>
	<author>3seas</author>
	<datestamp>1263735480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>.... the communication media of the internet.</p><p>I discovered I had a whole and large website installed within my own web site a couple years ago and from this I was able to determine that many otehr sites including many found on sourceforge to as well have had such hidden websites installed.</p><p>I was able to determine it was from china that this was happening.</p><p>Many of these hidden site installations are probably still existing today. I'd advize everyone with a site, individual to corporate to government to do a full inventory of their site directory and files.</p><p>What does that have to do with this story?</p><p>Its really quite simple, China persist with efforts to overrun and control the internet.<br>Do I believe its the people of china doing this or organized effort supported by their government?</p><p>The general population has their lives to live and could care less about such things as internet control, as is the case with over 99\% of the worlds population of near 7 billion people.</p><p>So how is it that such a fraction of 1\% of the population has such pain in the ass influence in screwing the rest of us up?</p><p>So here is the solution to the china effort to over run the internet and its open communication media, which BTW is needed in order to put out of business the fraction of 1\% PITA power/control mongers.</p><p>Identify them down to the organizations and individuals, publish this information and  turn their own practice on them, make their efforts backfire, censor them via public listing and filtering (we have spam and virus filters, we now need filters for these). Wide scope Public Exposure is a wonderful thing and is what the internet can achieve.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>.... the communication media of the internet.I discovered I had a whole and large website installed within my own web site a couple years ago and from this I was able to determine that many otehr sites including many found on sourceforge to as well have had such hidden websites installed.I was able to determine it was from china that this was happening.Many of these hidden site installations are probably still existing today .
I 'd advize everyone with a site , individual to corporate to government to do a full inventory of their site directory and files.What does that have to do with this story ? Its really quite simple , China persist with efforts to overrun and control the internet.Do I believe its the people of china doing this or organized effort supported by their government ? The general population has their lives to live and could care less about such things as internet control , as is the case with over 99 \ % of the worlds population of near 7 billion people.So how is it that such a fraction of 1 \ % of the population has such pain in the ass influence in screwing the rest of us up ? So here is the solution to the china effort to over run the internet and its open communication media , which BTW is needed in order to put out of business the fraction of 1 \ % PITA power/control mongers.Identify them down to the organizations and individuals , publish this information and turn their own practice on them , make their efforts backfire , censor them via public listing and filtering ( we have spam and virus filters , we now need filters for these ) .
Wide scope Public Exposure is a wonderful thing and is what the internet can achieve .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.... the communication media of the internet.I discovered I had a whole and large website installed within my own web site a couple years ago and from this I was able to determine that many otehr sites including many found on sourceforge to as well have had such hidden websites installed.I was able to determine it was from china that this was happening.Many of these hidden site installations are probably still existing today.
I'd advize everyone with a site, individual to corporate to government to do a full inventory of their site directory and files.What does that have to do with this story?Its really quite simple, China persist with efforts to overrun and control the internet.Do I believe its the people of china doing this or organized effort supported by their government?The general population has their lives to live and could care less about such things as internet control, as is the case with over 99\% of the worlds population of near 7 billion people.So how is it that such a fraction of 1\% of the population has such pain in the ass influence in screwing the rest of us up?So here is the solution to the china effort to over run the internet and its open communication media, which BTW is needed in order to put out of business the fraction of 1\% PITA power/control mongers.Identify them down to the organizations and individuals, publish this information and  turn their own practice on them, make their efforts backfire, censor them via public listing and filtering (we have spam and virus filters, we now need filters for these).
Wide scope Public Exposure is a wonderful thing and is what the internet can achieve.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30798078</id>
	<title>Not a serious security problem.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263741540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>These kind of attacks usually are only deployed against one country (namely, the US).</p><p>It's not like every country is being attacked by every other spying party.</p><p>As this affects just one country, it cannot be considered a general breach.</p><p>Windblows and Internets Exploder continue to be the dominant players.</p><p>Thank you.</p><p>@<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... free sarcasm sign (inverted)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>These kind of attacks usually are only deployed against one country ( namely , the US ) .It 's not like every country is being attacked by every other spying party.As this affects just one country , it can not be considered a general breach.Windblows and Internets Exploder continue to be the dominant players.Thank you .
@ ... free sarcasm sign ( inverted )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>These kind of attacks usually are only deployed against one country (namely, the US).It's not like every country is being attacked by every other spying party.As this affects just one country, it cannot be considered a general breach.Windblows and Internets Exploder continue to be the dominant players.Thank you.
@ ... free sarcasm sign (inverted)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30798018</id>
	<title>What do you expect when you give china source code</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263741000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are all of these attacks really a surprise?  Remember that Microsoft gave China access to the Windows source code years ago.
<a href="http://solarislackware.blogspot.com/2010/01/china-microsoft-and-why-you-should-be.html" title="blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://solarislackware.blogspot.com/2010/01/china-microsoft-and-why-you-should-be.html</a> [blogspot.com]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are all of these attacks really a surprise ?
Remember that Microsoft gave China access to the Windows source code years ago .
http : //solarislackware.blogspot.com/2010/01/china-microsoft-and-why-you-should-be.html [ blogspot.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are all of these attacks really a surprise?
Remember that Microsoft gave China access to the Windows source code years ago.
http://solarislackware.blogspot.com/2010/01/china-microsoft-and-why-you-should-be.html [blogspot.com]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30806894</id>
	<title>The most effective weapon</title>
	<author>ThatsNotPudding</author>
	<datestamp>1263823080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Would be Google dropping all Chinese and China-related websites from their search results (including AdSense if they really want to talk the talk).  They could easily justify such actions by pointing to the attacks they suffered from China and declare it a lawless no-commerce zone where no one can be trusted.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would be Google dropping all Chinese and China-related websites from their search results ( including AdSense if they really want to talk the talk ) .
They could easily justify such actions by pointing to the attacks they suffered from China and declare it a lawless no-commerce zone where no one can be trusted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Would be Google dropping all Chinese and China-related websites from their search results (including AdSense if they really want to talk the talk).
They could easily justify such actions by pointing to the attacks they suffered from China and declare it a lawless no-commerce zone where no one can be trusted.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30798834</id>
	<title>This is cyber terrorism.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263747900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is cyber terrorism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is cyber terrorism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is cyber terrorism.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30798288</id>
	<title>I don't think there was anything unusual</title>
	<author>EvilRyry</author>
	<datestamp>1263743640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>"There are attacks every day. I don't think there was anything unusual," Mr Ballmer added.</p></div><p> Seriously, Ballmer? Have you read the part where the Chinese government has been labelled as the attacker of over 30 international companies by Verisign? Not just some guy in China, but the Chinese government. I would consider that pretty damn unusual. </p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" There are attacks every day .
I do n't think there was anything unusual , " Mr Ballmer added .
Seriously , Ballmer ?
Have you read the part where the Chinese government has been labelled as the attacker of over 30 international companies by Verisign ?
Not just some guy in China , but the Chinese government .
I would consider that pretty damn unusual .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"There are attacks every day.
I don't think there was anything unusual," Mr Ballmer added.
Seriously, Ballmer?
Have you read the part where the Chinese government has been labelled as the attacker of over 30 international companies by Verisign?
Not just some guy in China, but the Chinese government.
I would consider that pretty damn unusual. 
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30802490</id>
	<title>Re:um...</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1263731580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Makes me wonder if youthful rebellion manifests itself in a society like that.</p></div><p>When it does, the Chinese government simply <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen\_square\_massacre#Government\_crackdown\_and\_deaths" title="wikipedia.org">machine guns the trouble makers</a> [wikipedia.org] and the rest fall into line. After all, they have millions of other youths (life is cheap in China) who will tow the party line; especially after the trouble makers, who conveniently gathered themselves together at the same place and time for a protest, are shot.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Makes me wonder if youthful rebellion manifests itself in a society like that.When it does , the Chinese government simply machine guns the trouble makers [ wikipedia.org ] and the rest fall into line .
After all , they have millions of other youths ( life is cheap in China ) who will tow the party line ; especially after the trouble makers , who conveniently gathered themselves together at the same place and time for a protest , are shot .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Makes me wonder if youthful rebellion manifests itself in a society like that.When it does, the Chinese government simply machine guns the trouble makers [wikipedia.org] and the rest fall into line.
After all, they have millions of other youths (life is cheap in China) who will tow the party line; especially after the trouble makers, who conveniently gathered themselves together at the same place and time for a protest, are shot.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797400</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797004</id>
	<title>um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263725400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>what the hell does China care about a protest in California?</htmltext>
<tokenext>what the hell does China care about a protest in California ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what the hell does China care about a protest in California?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797638</id>
	<title>Re:Another Attack, On Law Firm Suing China</title>
	<author>steeviant</author>
	<datestamp>1263736860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Captain Kirk, is that you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Captain Kirk , is that you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Captain Kirk, is that you?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797100</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797400</id>
	<title>Re:um...</title>
	<author>NonSequor</author>
	<datestamp>1263732240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's probably <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fenqing" title="wikipedia.org">these guys.</a> [wikipedia.org]</p><p>Kind of a weird phenomenon. Makes me wonder if youthful rebellion manifests itself in a society like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's probably these guys .
[ wikipedia.org ] Kind of a weird phenomenon .
Makes me wonder if youthful rebellion manifests itself in a society like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's probably these guys.
[wikipedia.org]Kind of a weird phenomenon.
Makes me wonder if youthful rebellion manifests itself in a society like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797078</id>
	<title>Technobabble has gone too far</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263726840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Spear phishing"</p><p>Really? <i>Really?</i></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Spear phishing " Really ?
Really ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Spear phishing"Really?
Really?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799968</id>
	<title>Re:export 'em</title>
	<author>lag10</author>
	<datestamp>1263757140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Q: what do you call 80 tons of lawyers on a slow boat to China?</p><p>A:  a good start.</p><p>Seriously though, if we really could figure out to export lawyers; it would balance the trade deficit, and just think what it would do for the quality of life domestically.</p></div><p>Wouldn't the idea of exporting lawyers for the purpose of balancing the trade deficit imply that such lawyers actually have value?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Q : what do you call 80 tons of lawyers on a slow boat to China ? A : a good start.Seriously though , if we really could figure out to export lawyers ; it would balance the trade deficit , and just think what it would do for the quality of life domestically.Would n't the idea of exporting lawyers for the purpose of balancing the trade deficit imply that such lawyers actually have value ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q: what do you call 80 tons of lawyers on a slow boat to China?A:  a good start.Seriously though, if we really could figure out to export lawyers; it would balance the trade deficit, and just think what it would do for the quality of life domestically.Wouldn't the idea of exporting lawyers for the purpose of balancing the trade deficit imply that such lawyers actually have value?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30800382</id>
	<title>Letters of Marque</title>
	<author>R2.0</author>
	<datestamp>1263760620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's time for Congress to exercise one of their little known powers and issue a letter of marque to Google, authorizing them to take action against Chinese nationals via the internet.  We are effectively in a state of conflict with China, with them attacking US interests via "private" proxies.  Google and other organizations could be allowed to exercise some self help and go on the offensive.</p><p>And it would make "Talk like a Pirate Day" really mean something.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's time for Congress to exercise one of their little known powers and issue a letter of marque to Google , authorizing them to take action against Chinese nationals via the internet .
We are effectively in a state of conflict with China , with them attacking US interests via " private " proxies .
Google and other organizations could be allowed to exercise some self help and go on the offensive.And it would make " Talk like a Pirate Day " really mean something .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's time for Congress to exercise one of their little known powers and issue a letter of marque to Google, authorizing them to take action against Chinese nationals via the internet.
We are effectively in a state of conflict with China, with them attacking US interests via "private" proxies.
Google and other organizations could be allowed to exercise some self help and go on the offensive.And it would make "Talk like a Pirate Day" really mean something.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797214</id>
	<title>export 'em</title>
	<author>mt1955</author>
	<datestamp>1263729240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Q: what do you call 80 tons of lawyers on a slow boat to China?</p><p>A:  a good start.</p><p>Seriously though, if we really could figure out to export lawyers; it would balance the trade deficit, and just think what it would do for the quality of life domestically.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Q : what do you call 80 tons of lawyers on a slow boat to China ? A : a good start.Seriously though , if we really could figure out to export lawyers ; it would balance the trade deficit , and just think what it would do for the quality of life domestically .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Q: what do you call 80 tons of lawyers on a slow boat to China?A:  a good start.Seriously though, if we really could figure out to export lawyers; it would balance the trade deficit, and just think what it would do for the quality of life domestically.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30800494</id>
	<title>Re:Propaganda Alert!</title>
	<author>funwithBSD</author>
	<datestamp>1263761700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If it was so common from US to China, it would have been nice if they blocked the import of poisoned pet food and Drywall made of industrial waste. (If we are not, it would be the first good use of spying!)</p><p>Got give it to the Chinese some credit. When they found milk was tainted, they executed the guy in charge of food safety.</p><p>Wish we could do that with a few incompetent bureaucrats here. Or at least they could sit on death row for the rest of their lives.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If it was so common from US to China , it would have been nice if they blocked the import of poisoned pet food and Drywall made of industrial waste .
( If we are not , it would be the first good use of spying !
) Got give it to the Chinese some credit .
When they found milk was tainted , they executed the guy in charge of food safety.Wish we could do that with a few incompetent bureaucrats here .
Or at least they could sit on death row for the rest of their lives .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If it was so common from US to China, it would have been nice if they blocked the import of poisoned pet food and Drywall made of industrial waste.
(If we are not, it would be the first good use of spying!
)Got give it to the Chinese some credit.
When they found milk was tainted, they executed the guy in charge of food safety.Wish we could do that with a few incompetent bureaucrats here.
Or at least they could sit on death row for the rest of their lives.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30801192</id>
	<title>Re:Tread softly</title>
	<author>ifwm</author>
	<datestamp>1263722820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"If I were the US I would invest in some lube and bend over quietly."</p><p>Then let's thank whatever we thanks in circumstances like this that an ignorant punk bitch like you isn't the US.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" If I were the US I would invest in some lube and bend over quietly .
" Then let 's thank whatever we thanks in circumstances like this that an ignorant punk bitch like you is n't the US .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"If I were the US I would invest in some lube and bend over quietly.
"Then let's thank whatever we thanks in circumstances like this that an ignorant punk bitch like you isn't the US.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30798346</id>
	<title>Re:As far as lawsuits go</title>
	<author>SimonTheSoundMan</author>
	<datestamp>1263744060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Unsure where patents come in to this. If there was a software patent being copied, which there isn't, it would not be valid in the EU, let alone China.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Unsure where patents come in to this .
If there was a software patent being copied , which there is n't , it would not be valid in the EU , let alone China .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Unsure where patents come in to this.
If there was a software patent being copied, which there isn't, it would not be valid in the EU, let alone China.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797834</id>
	<title>Re:Tread softly</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263739500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>."China now owns the US dollar</i>
<br> <br>
You don't need to understand anything about the <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1513670&amp;cid=30797270" title="slashdot.org">global economy</a> [slashdot.org] to realise that's bullshit. All you need to do is ask yourself if China could gain an advantage by using it's holdings to manipulate the value of the dollar then why has it not done so already? Surely your not suggesting that China is currently propping up the US out of the goodness of it's heart?
<br> <br>
The fact is that the Chinese and US economys are like two drunks leaning on each other, if one stumbles they both fall. I put it to you that your link is little more than an advert for something called "China Investment Corp".</htmltext>
<tokenext>.
" China now owns the US dollar You do n't need to understand anything about the global economy [ slashdot.org ] to realise that 's bullshit .
All you need to do is ask yourself if China could gain an advantage by using it 's holdings to manipulate the value of the dollar then why has it not done so already ?
Surely your not suggesting that China is currently propping up the US out of the goodness of it 's heart ?
The fact is that the Chinese and US economys are like two drunks leaning on each other , if one stumbles they both fall .
I put it to you that your link is little more than an advert for something called " China Investment Corp " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>.
"China now owns the US dollar
 
You don't need to understand anything about the global economy [slashdot.org] to realise that's bullshit.
All you need to do is ask yourself if China could gain an advantage by using it's holdings to manipulate the value of the dollar then why has it not done so already?
Surely your not suggesting that China is currently propping up the US out of the goodness of it's heart?
The fact is that the Chinese and US economys are like two drunks leaning on each other, if one stumbles they both fall.
I put it to you that your link is little more than an advert for something called "China Investment Corp".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797134</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797932</id>
	<title>Re:Propaganda Alert!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263740220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you a Chinese "Agent Mike"?<br><a href="http://wikiality.wikia.com/Agent\_Mike" title="wikia.com" rel="nofollow">http://wikiality.wikia.com/Agent\_Mike</a> [wikia.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you a Chinese " Agent Mike " ? http : //wikiality.wikia.com/Agent \ _Mike [ wikia.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you a Chinese "Agent Mike"?http://wikiality.wikia.com/Agent\_Mike [wikia.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797138</id>
	<title>"spear phishing"?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263728160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What, is "targeted" too many letters for you?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What , is " targeted " too many letters for you ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What, is "targeted" too many letters for you?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799086</id>
	<title>If they dont stop it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263750000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I say if they don't stop it we make them take Hilary.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I say if they do n't stop it we make them take Hilary .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say if they don't stop it we make them take Hilary.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797492</id>
	<title>How the mighty have fallen</title>
	<author>EvilDrMike</author>
	<datestamp>1263734280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember the good old days. America did not complain and write letters or stamp feet. I sent solders planes and bombs. Ah well I guess the recession really has hit the US hard.
<br>
<br>
-EDM<br> <br>
For the humor impaired the above is not serious. It was just my first thought when I saw the title.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember the good old days .
America did not complain and write letters or stamp feet .
I sent solders planes and bombs .
Ah well I guess the recession really has hit the US hard .
-EDM For the humor impaired the above is not serious .
It was just my first thought when I saw the title .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember the good old days.
America did not complain and write letters or stamp feet.
I sent solders planes and bombs.
Ah well I guess the recession really has hit the US hard.
-EDM 
For the humor impaired the above is not serious.
It was just my first thought when I saw the title.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30800420</id>
	<title>Re:Propaganda Alert!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263760980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course it's not news that this goes on, but that's not the story here--the story is that google went public with it, and that the administration called it--publicly--as 'more than a commercial dispute'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course it 's not news that this goes on , but that 's not the story here--the story is that google went public with it , and that the administration called it--publicly--as 'more than a commercial dispute' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course it's not news that this goes on, but that's not the story here--the story is that google went public with it, and that the administration called it--publicly--as 'more than a commercial dispute'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797266</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796984</id>
	<title>Re:As far as lawsuits go</title>
	<author>Jah-Wren Ryel</author>
	<datestamp>1263724860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I am actually glad to see that lawsuits over software patents aren't being used for silly purposes to remove competition. Cyber sitter could have put together this lawsuit long ago, but they go in on the heels of the google hacking fiasco they got caught in.</p></div><p>What do software patents have to do with anything?  This is a copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation lawsuit and it was filed BEFORE Google went public with their issues.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I am actually glad to see that lawsuits over software patents are n't being used for silly purposes to remove competition .
Cyber sitter could have put together this lawsuit long ago , but they go in on the heels of the google hacking fiasco they got caught in.What do software patents have to do with anything ?
This is a copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation lawsuit and it was filed BEFORE Google went public with their issues .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I am actually glad to see that lawsuits over software patents aren't being used for silly purposes to remove competition.
Cyber sitter could have put together this lawsuit long ago, but they go in on the heels of the google hacking fiasco they got caught in.What do software patents have to do with anything?
This is a copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation lawsuit and it was filed BEFORE Google went public with their issues.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796944</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797136</id>
	<title>Stop complaining if u want the big piece of pie.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263728100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dumb US firms!  You know better to work with the Chinese Communists before you went over there and do business!</p><p>Stop complaining if you want that 1.5 billion piece of pie.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dumb US firms !
You know better to work with the Chinese Communists before you went over there and do business ! Stop complaining if you want that 1.5 billion piece of pie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dumb US firms!
You know better to work with the Chinese Communists before you went over there and do business!Stop complaining if you want that 1.5 billion piece of pie.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797080</id>
	<title>Re:um...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263726840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So obviously, they doing for show to US citizens.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So obviously , they doing for show to US citizens .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So obviously, they doing for show to US citizens.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797004</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797440</id>
	<title>Re:Just wait until the Chinese take over ECHELON</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263732900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The NSA does not run MS, they just know how to use it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;) <br>
Lots of countries run mini Echelon like systems.<br>
"The message, a fax sent by satellite transmission from Egypt's foreign ministry to its embassy in London, was intercepted on November 15 by Swiss intelligence, the newspaper reported. The Swiss defence ministry said it was investigating the leak of the document."<br>
fromhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/jan/10/usa.mainsection <br>
China has in inward looking system, built by US/EU corps and telcos.<br>
What would an Echelon show?  A huge worldwide capture system, beaming down to a few US bases for sorting.<br>
The resulting stream of wanted info is encrypted and sent back to the US after heavy sorting.<br>
The NSA sucks in all, the swallow is the hidden art.<br>
Best to look for UFO's via MS and perl on 56k modems.<br>
That seems to have been more creative than any sat/golfball trace.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The NSA does not run MS , they just know how to use it ; ) Lots of countries run mini Echelon like systems .
" The message , a fax sent by satellite transmission from Egypt 's foreign ministry to its embassy in London , was intercepted on November 15 by Swiss intelligence , the newspaper reported .
The Swiss defence ministry said it was investigating the leak of the document .
" fromhttp : //www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/jan/10/usa.mainsection China has in inward looking system , built by US/EU corps and telcos .
What would an Echelon show ?
A huge worldwide capture system , beaming down to a few US bases for sorting .
The resulting stream of wanted info is encrypted and sent back to the US after heavy sorting .
The NSA sucks in all , the swallow is the hidden art .
Best to look for UFO 's via MS and perl on 56k modems .
That seems to have been more creative than any sat/golfball trace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The NSA does not run MS, they just know how to use it ;) 
Lots of countries run mini Echelon like systems.
"The message, a fax sent by satellite transmission from Egypt's foreign ministry to its embassy in London, was intercepted on November 15 by Swiss intelligence, the newspaper reported.
The Swiss defence ministry said it was investigating the leak of the document.
"
fromhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/jan/10/usa.mainsection 
China has in inward looking system, built by US/EU corps and telcos.
What would an Echelon show?
A huge worldwide capture system, beaming down to a few US bases for sorting.
The resulting stream of wanted info is encrypted and sent back to the US after heavy sorting.
The NSA sucks in all, the swallow is the hidden art.
Best to look for UFO's via MS and perl on 56k modems.
That seems to have been more creative than any sat/golfball trace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796994</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30801030</id>
	<title>Suing a *country*??</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263721800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are they drunk? How do you sue a <em>country</em>??</p><p>Which common law do they think both entities (China and CyberSitter) exist in and are forced to adhere to?<br>I don&rsquo;t see any multinational organization with the power of enforcing shit on China.<br>But I can see China&rsquo;s agents shooting the CyberSitter boss in the head on his next voyage to some small/shady country.</p><p>Dumb move. It&rsquo;s like taunting the USA to &ldquo;come get me, suckers&rdquo;! Basically, you&rsquo;re fucked.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p><p>There should be a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PEeKnQlVywU" title="youtube.com">Bad Idea Jeans advertisement</a> [youtube.com] with that story.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:D</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are they drunk ?
How do you sue a country ?
? Which common law do they think both entities ( China and CyberSitter ) exist in and are forced to adhere to ? I don    t see any multinational organization with the power of enforcing shit on China.But I can see China    s agents shooting the CyberSitter boss in the head on his next voyage to some small/shady country.Dumb move .
It    s like taunting the USA to    come get me , suckers    !
Basically , you    re fucked .
; ) There should be a Bad Idea Jeans advertisement [ youtube.com ] with that story .
: D</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are they drunk?
How do you sue a country?
?Which common law do they think both entities (China and CyberSitter) exist in and are forced to adhere to?I don’t see any multinational organization with the power of enforcing shit on China.But I can see China’s agents shooting the CyberSitter boss in the head on his next voyage to some small/shady country.Dumb move.
It’s like taunting the USA to “come get me, suckers”!
Basically, you’re fucked.
;)There should be a Bad Idea Jeans advertisement [youtube.com] with that story.
:D</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799974</id>
	<title>Why on a slow boat?</title>
	<author>WindBourne</author>
	<datestamp>1263757140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I want them there. Fast. Now.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I want them there .
Fast. Now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want them there.
Fast. Now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797266</id>
	<title>Propaganda Alert!</title>
	<author>kiwioddBall</author>
	<datestamp>1263730020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Don't be sucked in by the Propaganda!
<br> <br>
Why is this being treated like it is a big event? This sort of thing has been going on for years, probably more commonly from the US toward China.. How about some balanced reporting? Don't clog up Slashdot every time something technology related appears on the net!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't be sucked in by the Propaganda !
Why is this being treated like it is a big event ?
This sort of thing has been going on for years , probably more commonly from the US toward China.. How about some balanced reporting ?
Do n't clog up Slashdot every time something technology related appears on the net !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't be sucked in by the Propaganda!
Why is this being treated like it is a big event?
This sort of thing has been going on for years, probably more commonly from the US toward China.. How about some balanced reporting?
Don't clog up Slashdot every time something technology related appears on the net!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799730</id>
	<title>Re:Can Airbus Sue the US now?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263755580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>DUDE,<br>
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32690547/" title="msn.com" rel="nofollow">The UN has decided that Airbus plays dirty.</a> [msn.com]
Get over it and quite your GD European WHINING, you little fucking BITCH. Instead, you should be looking at your giving manufacturing secrets to China and that China has their money pegged to the dollar. As it sinks, so will your FUCKING job.<br>
Whiny little bastard.</htmltext>
<tokenext>DUDE , The UN has decided that Airbus plays dirty .
[ msn.com ] Get over it and quite your GD European WHINING , you little fucking BITCH .
Instead , you should be looking at your giving manufacturing secrets to China and that China has their money pegged to the dollar .
As it sinks , so will your FUCKING job .
Whiny little bastard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DUDE,
The UN has decided that Airbus plays dirty.
[msn.com]
Get over it and quite your GD European WHINING, you little fucking BITCH.
Instead, you should be looking at your giving manufacturing secrets to China and that China has their money pegged to the dollar.
As it sinks, so will your FUCKING job.
Whiny little bastard.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797404</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797210</id>
	<title>New law firm business model</title>
	<author>mbstone</author>
	<datestamp>1263729240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1. Set up honeypot and bogus law firm.<br>2. File big lawsuit against China.<br>3. Log sources and vectors during ensuing cyberattack.<br>4. Sell results to DoD.<br>5. Profit!!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 .
Set up honeypot and bogus law firm.2 .
File big lawsuit against China.3 .
Log sources and vectors during ensuing cyberattack.4 .
Sell results to DoD.5 .
Profit ! !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1.
Set up honeypot and bogus law firm.2.
File big lawsuit against China.3.
Log sources and vectors during ensuing cyberattack.4.
Sell results to DoD.5.
Profit!!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30806698</id>
	<title>China or Slashdot</title>
	<author>Dan541</author>
	<datestamp>1263821700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How do we know they didn't just get<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.ed? With all the publicity it's not that far fetched.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How do we know they did n't just get /.ed ?
With all the publicity it 's not that far fetched .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How do we know they didn't just get /.ed?
With all the publicity it's not that far fetched.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796944</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30801192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30802490
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797400
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796984
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797004
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30798346
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797404
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30800494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797440
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796994
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30801472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799260
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797156
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796970
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797100
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797134
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30800420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30806698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796944
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797266
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_17_0724226_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799968
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797638
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797266
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30800420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30800494
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797932
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796970
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797156
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30798078
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796994
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797440
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797400
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30802490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797092
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797134
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30801192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30797404
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799730
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30799260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30801472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_17_0724226.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30798346
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30806698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_17_0724226.30796984
</commentlist>
</conversation>
