<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_16_2342204</id>
	<title>The FBI's Newest Tool &mdash; Google Images</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1263642120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>lee317 writes <i>"The FBI recently used a photograph of Spanish politician Gaspar Llamazares as an example of what Osama Bin Laden might look like today.  According to Reuters, Special Agent Jason Pack said a forensic artist had been unable to find suitable features from the FBI's database of photographs and <a href="http://www.fullchannel.net/news/index.php?display=story&amp;article=TRE60F1WR">used a picture from the Internet instead</a>.  That photo turned out to be one of Llamazares, who apparently looks strikingly similar to what the FBI thinks Bin Laden would look like with a few extra years on him.  'I am stupefied the FBI has used my photo &mdash; but it could have been anyone's &mdash; to compose a picture of a terrorist. It affects my honor, my own image and also the security of all us,' Llamazares said."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>lee317 writes " The FBI recently used a photograph of Spanish politician Gaspar Llamazares as an example of what Osama Bin Laden might look like today .
According to Reuters , Special Agent Jason Pack said a forensic artist had been unable to find suitable features from the FBI 's database of photographs and used a picture from the Internet instead .
That photo turned out to be one of Llamazares , who apparently looks strikingly similar to what the FBI thinks Bin Laden would look like with a few extra years on him .
'I am stupefied the FBI has used my photo    but it could have been anyone 's    to compose a picture of a terrorist .
It affects my honor , my own image and also the security of all us, ' Llamazares said .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>lee317 writes "The FBI recently used a photograph of Spanish politician Gaspar Llamazares as an example of what Osama Bin Laden might look like today.
According to Reuters, Special Agent Jason Pack said a forensic artist had been unable to find suitable features from the FBI's database of photographs and used a picture from the Internet instead.
That photo turned out to be one of Llamazares, who apparently looks strikingly similar to what the FBI thinks Bin Laden would look like with a few extra years on him.
'I am stupefied the FBI has used my photo — but it could have been anyone's — to compose a picture of a terrorist.
It affects my honor, my own image and also the security of all us,' Llamazares said.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795300</id>
	<title>Are you him?</title>
	<author>Datamonstar</author>
	<datestamp>1263654060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is your skin anything but the purist of whites? Do you speak with an accent (from MY frame of reference)? Do you have a beard? Wear funny-looking clothes (again, from MY frame of reference)? <br>  <br>  Then congratulations! YOU can be our next international terrorist! But, don't count yourself out just because you look like a white American. If you've ever visited one of the countries on our list and especially if you happened to be photographed while wearing the local fashions (we really like turbans), then you can join in too!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is your skin anything but the purist of whites ?
Do you speak with an accent ( from MY frame of reference ) ?
Do you have a beard ?
Wear funny-looking clothes ( again , from MY frame of reference ) ?
Then congratulations !
YOU can be our next international terrorist !
But , do n't count yourself out just because you look like a white American .
If you 've ever visited one of the countries on our list and especially if you happened to be photographed while wearing the local fashions ( we really like turbans ) , then you can join in too !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is your skin anything but the purist of whites?
Do you speak with an accent (from MY frame of reference)?
Do you have a beard?
Wear funny-looking clothes (again, from MY frame of reference)?
Then congratulations!
YOU can be our next international terrorist!
But, don't count yourself out just because you look like a white American.
If you've ever visited one of the countries on our list and especially if you happened to be photographed while wearing the local fashions (we really like turbans), then you can join in too!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</id>
	<title>Indeed</title>
	<author>copponex</author>
	<datestamp>1263647100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But, Se&#241;or Llamazares is a Commie</p></div><p>Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding. In many parts of the world, you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.</p><p>Stateside, I bet many people would consider calling the police. But such is the state of our populace: hysterical cowards and uneducated drones, ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But , Se   or Llamazares is a CommieFortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding .
In many parts of the world , you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.Stateside , I bet many people would consider calling the police .
But such is the state of our populace : hysterical cowards and uneducated drones , ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But, Señor Llamazares is a CommieFortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding.
In many parts of the world, you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.Stateside, I bet many people would consider calling the police.
But such is the state of our populace: hysterical cowards and uneducated drones, ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30800466</id>
	<title>finding that picture</title>
	<author>idigitallDotCom</author>
	<datestamp>1263761460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But to find that picture, what did the FBI search for?</p><p>"pictures man looks like older osama bin laden lookalike" ?</p><p>What is the search strategy for finding a picture of the future Barak Obama?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But to find that picture , what did the FBI search for ?
" pictures man looks like older osama bin laden lookalike " ? What is the search strategy for finding a picture of the future Barak Obama ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But to find that picture, what did the FBI search for?
"pictures man looks like older osama bin laden lookalike" ?What is the search strategy for finding a picture of the future Barak Obama?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795490</id>
	<title>yuo Fai7 I7!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263656520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>80s, DARPA saw BSD to its laid-back i7 a break, if , a proud member Users of Ne7tBSD</htmltext>
<tokenext>80s , DARPA saw BSD to its laid-back i7 a break , if , a proud member Users of Ne7tBSD</tokentext>
<sentencetext>80s, DARPA saw BSD to its laid-back i7 a break, if , a proud member Users of Ne7tBSD</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796166</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263665820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I'm pretty sure the FBI knows that bin Laden is dead. I mean the man was once releasing more videos each week than Tupac until he started toting that kidney dialysis machine through the mountains. Then... nothing.</p></div><p>Maybe a few too many near misses made him decide shutting the fuck up was the thing to do.  Especially if the next try would not miss at all since they're probably intending to use Tomahawks with nuclear warheads.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm pretty sure the FBI knows that bin Laden is dead .
I mean the man was once releasing more videos each week than Tupac until he started toting that kidney dialysis machine through the mountains .
Then... nothing.Maybe a few too many near misses made him decide shutting the fuck up was the thing to do .
Especially if the next try would not miss at all since they 're probably intending to use Tomahawks with nuclear warheads .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm pretty sure the FBI knows that bin Laden is dead.
I mean the man was once releasing more videos each week than Tupac until he started toting that kidney dialysis machine through the mountains.
Then... nothing.Maybe a few too many near misses made him decide shutting the fuck up was the thing to do.
Especially if the next try would not miss at all since they're probably intending to use Tomahawks with nuclear warheads.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798550</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Lillebo</author>
	<datestamp>1263745560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But I guess if you can keep the myth alive, then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan.</p></div><p>So what if Osama bin Laden is dead? It's not as if the global terrorist networks are gonna suddenly collapse if he up and died.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I guess if you can keep the myth alive , then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan.So what if Osama bin Laden is dead ?
It 's not as if the global terrorist networks are gon na suddenly collapse if he up and died .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I guess if you can keep the myth alive, then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan.So what if Osama bin Laden is dead?
It's not as if the global terrorist networks are gonna suddenly collapse if he up and died.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30797632</id>
	<title>Better pictures</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263736740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There are better pictures for comparison in the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8463657.stm" title="bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">BBC article</a> [bbc.co.uk]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There are better pictures for comparison in the BBC article [ bbc.co.uk ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are better pictures for comparison in the BBC article [bbc.co.uk]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795234</id>
	<title>In the misquoted words of David Wong</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263653340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"For my part, I just hope Brad Pitt never does anything to piss off the Department of Homeland Security."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" For my part , I just hope Brad Pitt never does anything to piss off the Department of Homeland Security .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"For my part, I just hope Brad Pitt never does anything to piss off the Department of Homeland Security.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795724</id>
	<title>Just a cut and paste job?</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1263658980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>First of all, I don't think Gaspar has much to worry about. The primary facial features of bin Laden appear to have been pasted over his photo. Other then the hair, they don't loo alike at all.
</p><p>What does bother me is that; it takes quite a bit more than cut and paste (and throwing some gray into the hair) to properly 'age' a photograph. Changes to the nose, ears, winkles, creases, and bags under the eyes all have to be calculated and incorporated into the new photo. Was that actually done? Or did someone just put this together after taking the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You\_Suck\_At\_Photoshop\_(web\_series)" title="wikipedia.org">You Suck at Photoshop</a> [wikipedia.org] online course?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First of all , I do n't think Gaspar has much to worry about .
The primary facial features of bin Laden appear to have been pasted over his photo .
Other then the hair , they do n't loo alike at all .
What does bother me is that ; it takes quite a bit more than cut and paste ( and throwing some gray into the hair ) to properly 'age ' a photograph .
Changes to the nose , ears , winkles , creases , and bags under the eyes all have to be calculated and incorporated into the new photo .
Was that actually done ?
Or did someone just put this together after taking the You Suck at Photoshop [ wikipedia.org ] online course ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First of all, I don't think Gaspar has much to worry about.
The primary facial features of bin Laden appear to have been pasted over his photo.
Other then the hair, they don't loo alike at all.
What does bother me is that; it takes quite a bit more than cut and paste (and throwing some gray into the hair) to properly 'age' a photograph.
Changes to the nose, ears, winkles, creases, and bags under the eyes all have to be calculated and incorporated into the new photo.
Was that actually done?
Or did someone just put this together after taking the You Suck at Photoshop [wikipedia.org] online course?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795994</id>
	<title>Logic 101.</title>
	<author>TapeCutter</author>
	<datestamp>1263662700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Are you aware that you shot down your opening statement by linking to those stories?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you aware that you shot down your opening statement by linking to those stories ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you aware that you shot down your opening statement by linking to those stories?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796446</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>CAIMLAS</author>
	<datestamp>1263671160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>C'mon, man. Osama bin Laden is like... oh, Santa Claus. He's the guy who keeps on giving!</p><p>We've killed his #2, what, 10 times by now? Granted, they were different #2s, and were probably the #1 of some Taliban group not OBL's #2, but yeah, it's been a couple times by now.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>C'mon , man .
Osama bin Laden is like... oh , Santa Claus .
He 's the guy who keeps on giving ! We 've killed his # 2 , what , 10 times by now ?
Granted , they were different # 2s , and were probably the # 1 of some Taliban group not OBL 's # 2 , but yeah , it 's been a couple times by now .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>C'mon, man.
Osama bin Laden is like... oh, Santa Claus.
He's the guy who keeps on giving!We've killed his #2, what, 10 times by now?
Granted, they were different #2s, and were probably the #1 of some Taliban group not OBL's #2, but yeah, it's been a couple times by now.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30797128</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263727980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Obviously, you have never been in Spain.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Obviously , you have never been in Spain .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Obviously, you have never been in Spain.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440</id>
	<title>Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263645840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We should constantly live in fear of tribal men in caves 8000 miles away at all times. It's the new American way.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We should constantly live in fear of tribal men in caves 8000 miles away at all times .
It 's the new American way .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We should constantly live in fear of tribal men in caves 8000 miles away at all times.
It's the new American way.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794454</id>
	<title>Blame google not FBI</title>
	<author>140Mandak262Jamuna</author>
	<datestamp>1263645900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Come on, the FBI agent simply went to images.google.com and entered "osama bin laden now" and hit "I am feeling lucky". How could he know that he should not have been feeling lucky that day? Blame google, not the agent.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Come on , the FBI agent simply went to images.google.com and entered " osama bin laden now " and hit " I am feeling lucky " .
How could he know that he should not have been feeling lucky that day ?
Blame google , not the agent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Come on, the FBI agent simply went to images.google.com and entered "osama bin laden now" and hit "I am feeling lucky".
How could he know that he should not have been feeling lucky that day?
Blame google, not the agent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263653820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's like we're living in <i>"1984"</i> and news just gets erased from the collective mind.
<p>
This whole article is odd in light of the fact that I'm pretty sure the FBI knows that bin Laden is dead. I mean the man was once releasing more videos each week than Tupac until he started toting that kidney dialysis machine through the mountains. Then... nothing.
</p><p>
After all, the FBI's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, also <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south\_asia/2135473.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south\_asia/2135473.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]admitted to believing that bin laden was dead eight (8) years ago.<br>
Wait... and didn't Afghanistan's current president, Hamid Karzai, <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/" title="cnn.com">http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/</a> [cnn.com]admit to believing the same thing 8 years ago?<br>
Wait... and didn't Israeli Intelligence also <a href="http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2002/me\_terrorism\_10\_16.html" title="worldtribune.com">http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2002/me\_terrorism\_10\_16.html</a> [worldtribune.com]admit the same thing 8 years ago?
</p><p>
But I guess if you can keep the myth alive, then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's like we 're living in " 1984 " and news just gets erased from the collective mind .
This whole article is odd in light of the fact that I 'm pretty sure the FBI knows that bin Laden is dead .
I mean the man was once releasing more videos each week than Tupac until he started toting that kidney dialysis machine through the mountains .
Then... nothing .
After all , the FBI 's counter-terrorism chief , Dale Watson , also http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south \ _asia/2135473.stm [ bbc.co.uk ] admitted to believing that bin laden was dead eight ( 8 ) years ago .
Wait... and did n't Afghanistan 's current president , Hamid Karzai , http : //edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/ [ cnn.com ] admit to believing the same thing 8 years ago ?
Wait... and did n't Israeli Intelligence also http : //www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2002/me \ _terrorism \ _10 \ _16.html [ worldtribune.com ] admit the same thing 8 years ago ?
But I guess if you can keep the myth alive , then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's like we're living in "1984" and news just gets erased from the collective mind.
This whole article is odd in light of the fact that I'm pretty sure the FBI knows that bin Laden is dead.
I mean the man was once releasing more videos each week than Tupac until he started toting that kidney dialysis machine through the mountains.
Then... nothing.
After all, the FBI's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, also http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south\_asia/2135473.stm [bbc.co.uk]admitted to believing that bin laden was dead eight (8) years ago.
Wait... and didn't Afghanistan's current president, Hamid Karzai, http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/ [cnn.com]admit to believing the same thing 8 years ago?
Wait... and didn't Israeli Intelligence also http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2002/me\_terrorism\_10\_16.html [worldtribune.com]admit the same thing 8 years ago?
But I guess if you can keep the myth alive, then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795148</id>
	<title>Gray</title>
	<author>pgn674</author>
	<datestamp>1263652560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wow, that is some light grey text. The color of the date between the title and the main text is #999999, or 60\% white (with 0\% white being black). That text is more white than black, on a white background. The main text of the article isn't as bad, with the color #666666, or 40\% white. But still, that is really uncomfortable to read, especially if you have a display with small pixels. The 11px font size and normal font weight doesn't help.<br>
<br>
Has anyone else noticed the trend for news sites to make their text whiter and whiter, while maintaining a pure white background? I'm not a web designer, but as a user, this is getting really annoying.<br>
<br>
Oh, and strangely enough, the title of the article is actually the same exact color as the main text: #666666.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , that is some light grey text .
The color of the date between the title and the main text is # 999999 , or 60 \ % white ( with 0 \ % white being black ) .
That text is more white than black , on a white background .
The main text of the article is n't as bad , with the color # 666666 , or 40 \ % white .
But still , that is really uncomfortable to read , especially if you have a display with small pixels .
The 11px font size and normal font weight does n't help .
Has anyone else noticed the trend for news sites to make their text whiter and whiter , while maintaining a pure white background ?
I 'm not a web designer , but as a user , this is getting really annoying .
Oh , and strangely enough , the title of the article is actually the same exact color as the main text : # 666666 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, that is some light grey text.
The color of the date between the title and the main text is #999999, or 60\% white (with 0\% white being black).
That text is more white than black, on a white background.
The main text of the article isn't as bad, with the color #666666, or 40\% white.
But still, that is really uncomfortable to read, especially if you have a display with small pixels.
The 11px font size and normal font weight doesn't help.
Has anyone else noticed the trend for news sites to make their text whiter and whiter, while maintaining a pure white background?
I'm not a web designer, but as a user, this is getting really annoying.
Oh, and strangely enough, the title of the article is actually the same exact color as the main text: #666666.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794532</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263646440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look, if you're not careful, those terrorists could be in your pants next. They will launch terrorist attacks against your penis and scrotum, because they HATE YOUR FREEDOM.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look , if you 're not careful , those terrorists could be in your pants next .
They will launch terrorist attacks against your penis and scrotum , because they HATE YOUR FREEDOM .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look, if you're not careful, those terrorists could be in your pants next.
They will launch terrorist attacks against your penis and scrotum, because they HATE YOUR FREEDOM.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796294</id>
	<title>Space RFID laser</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263668040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This is nothing. The DOD has a space based submillimeter laser com system at about 850GHz that can lock onto your teeth. It is in fact being used right now in the San Fransisco Bay Area as a demo. Full video, sound, and body control. It can be used for com spy use, "war", and putting voices into your head as words (analog signals.) Who has a bolo meter, you are going to need one? Google directed energy weapons, submillimeter laser, radar.</htmltext>
<tokenext>This is nothing .
The DOD has a space based submillimeter laser com system at about 850GHz that can lock onto your teeth .
It is in fact being used right now in the San Fransisco Bay Area as a demo .
Full video , sound , and body control .
It can be used for com spy use , " war " , and putting voices into your head as words ( analog signals .
) Who has a bolo meter , you are going to need one ?
Google directed energy weapons , submillimeter laser , radar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is nothing.
The DOD has a space based submillimeter laser com system at about 850GHz that can lock onto your teeth.
It is in fact being used right now in the San Fransisco Bay Area as a demo.
Full video, sound, and body control.
It can be used for com spy use, "war", and putting voices into your head as words (analog signals.
) Who has a bolo meter, you are going to need one?
Google directed energy weapons, submillimeter laser, radar.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452</id>
	<title>But, Se&#241;or Llamazares is a Commie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263645900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaspar\_Llamazares" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaspar\_Llamazares</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaspar \ _Llamazares [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaspar\_Llamazares [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798422</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263744660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But he's dead now. Did you hear? Today on CNN, I heard it ust as I was coming out.  He was in Pakistan and something happened.  That's all I caught.  He was on a horse in Pakistan, something hit him or something.  No, he's all right! I think he's got a cold, that's what they said. No, a tan, that's it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But he 's dead now .
Did you hear ?
Today on CNN , I heard it ust as I was coming out .
He was in Pakistan and something happened .
That 's all I caught .
He was on a horse in Pakistan , something hit him or something .
No , he 's all right !
I think he 's got a cold , that 's what they said .
No , a tan , that 's it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But he's dead now.
Did you hear?
Today on CNN, I heard it ust as I was coming out.
He was in Pakistan and something happened.
That's all I caught.
He was on a horse in Pakistan, something hit him or something.
No, he's all right!
I think he's got a cold, that's what they said.
No, a tan, that's it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794652</id>
	<title>Re:Blame google not FBI</title>
	<author>MartinSchou</author>
	<datestamp>1263647220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Of course, the irony in that statement is that now the top link for <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;client=opera&amp;rls=en-GB&amp;hs=TBJ&amp;q=osama+bin+laden+now&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=&amp;aqi=" title="google.com"> <i>osama bin laden now</i>  HAS a picture of the Spanish politician.</a> [google.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , the irony in that statement is that now the top link for osama bin laden now HAS a picture of the Spanish politician .
[ google.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, the irony in that statement is that now the top link for  osama bin laden now  HAS a picture of the Spanish politician.
[google.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796976</id>
	<title>Error WTF?!?</title>
	<author>the person standing</author>
	<datestamp>1263724800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>From TFA:<p><div class="quote"><p>The embassy's Councilor for Public Affairs William Ostic told Reuters that he telephoned LLamazares Saturday to apologize for the error.</p></div><p>Calling this an error, while clearly occurred on intention, is again a defamation. Calling it an error because he's a politician is not better at all.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From TFA : The embassy 's Councilor for Public Affairs William Ostic told Reuters that he telephoned LLamazares Saturday to apologize for the error.Calling this an error , while clearly occurred on intention , is again a defamation .
Calling it an error because he 's a politician is not better at all .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From TFA:The embassy's Councilor for Public Affairs William Ostic told Reuters that he telephoned LLamazares Saturday to apologize for the error.Calling this an error, while clearly occurred on intention, is again a defamation.
Calling it an error because he's a politician is not better at all.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795622</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed</title>
	<author>PPH</author>
	<datestamp>1263657720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>In many parts of the world, you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.</p></div><p>But not in the good old USA. Where McCarthy wired electrodes to our testicles and successfully conditioned our response to the term "Communist".</p><p>Its interesting to note that the basis for McCarthy's witch hunt was never emphasized: The fear that a political party could be manipulated by foreign powers to influence our political system for their benefit. Which was a valid concern at the time. But we've conditioned people to jump at the word "Commie" while the political elite maintains the ability to inject the agenda of other foreign interests (Israel for example) into our political system without having anyone flinch.</p><p>And now we return you to your regularly scheduled program.<br>
&nbsp;</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>In many parts of the world , you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.But not in the good old USA .
Where McCarthy wired electrodes to our testicles and successfully conditioned our response to the term " Communist " .Its interesting to note that the basis for McCarthy 's witch hunt was never emphasized : The fear that a political party could be manipulated by foreign powers to influence our political system for their benefit .
Which was a valid concern at the time .
But we 've conditioned people to jump at the word " Commie " while the political elite maintains the ability to inject the agenda of other foreign interests ( Israel for example ) into our political system without having anyone flinch.And now we return you to your regularly scheduled program .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>In many parts of the world, you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.But not in the good old USA.
Where McCarthy wired electrodes to our testicles and successfully conditioned our response to the term "Communist".Its interesting to note that the basis for McCarthy's witch hunt was never emphasized: The fear that a political party could be manipulated by foreign powers to influence our political system for their benefit.
Which was a valid concern at the time.
But we've conditioned people to jump at the word "Commie" while the political elite maintains the ability to inject the agenda of other foreign interests (Israel for example) into our political system without having anyone flinch.And now we return you to your regularly scheduled program.
 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30797058</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>hanabal</author>
	<datestamp>1263726300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>see now, imagine the extra work old Winston will have to do because of new technology. When the war swaps over, will he have to go and change all the posts like the one above on all the forums. that would take a while</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>see now , imagine the extra work old Winston will have to do because of new technology .
When the war swaps over , will he have to go and change all the posts like the one above on all the forums .
that would take a while</tokentext>
<sentencetext>see now, imagine the extra work old Winston will have to do because of new technology.
When the war swaps over, will he have to go and change all the posts like the one above on all the forums.
that would take a while</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30797394</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed</title>
	<author>Nathrael</author>
	<datestamp>1263732120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding.</p></div><p>Heh, I wish.<br> <br>

Yes, it's completely true that communists (and all of them, including Stalinists) aren't inherently despised and feared here like they are in the US, and that they openly discuss their political believes without facing extremely strong opposition. In exchange, however, many people in many European countries despise neocons, strongly capitalist conservatives and libertarians (moderates and Ayn Rand-ite alikes) as "American scumbags" (or, if they are pro-military as well, "fucking Nazis"). "Free Speech? How could you *possibly* defend these racist fuckers? The government is right in censoring their hate speech!" Europe is just as extreme in many regards, it just has different "enemies" and acceptances.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding.Heh , I wish .
Yes , it 's completely true that communists ( and all of them , including Stalinists ) are n't inherently despised and feared here like they are in the US , and that they openly discuss their political believes without facing extremely strong opposition .
In exchange , however , many people in many European countries despise neocons , strongly capitalist conservatives and libertarians ( moderates and Ayn Rand-ite alikes ) as " American scumbags " ( or , if they are pro-military as well , " fucking Nazis " ) .
" Free Speech ?
How could you * possibly * defend these racist fuckers ?
The government is right in censoring their hate speech !
" Europe is just as extreme in many regards , it just has different " enemies " and acceptances .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding.Heh, I wish.
Yes, it's completely true that communists (and all of them, including Stalinists) aren't inherently despised and feared here like they are in the US, and that they openly discuss their political believes without facing extremely strong opposition.
In exchange, however, many people in many European countries despise neocons, strongly capitalist conservatives and libertarians (moderates and Ayn Rand-ite alikes) as "American scumbags" (or, if they are pro-military as well, "fucking Nazis").
"Free Speech?
How could you *possibly* defend these racist fuckers?
The government is right in censoring their hate speech!
" Europe is just as extreme in many regards, it just has different "enemies" and acceptances.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798004</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263740820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No.  We are at war with Eastasia.  Do keep up.  Eurasia (Russia) are our allies.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No .
We are at war with Eastasia .
Do keep up .
Eurasia ( Russia ) are our allies .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No.
We are at war with Eastasia.
Do keep up.
Eurasia (Russia) are our allies.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794494</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795342</id>
	<title>Compares photographies</title>
	<author>diegocg</author>
	<datestamp>1263654720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you take a look <a href="http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2010/01/16/internacional/1263598044.html" title="elmundo.es" rel="nofollow">here</a> [elmundo.es], you can compare both photographies. Note that the hair is the same...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you take a look here [ elmundo.es ] , you can compare both photographies .
Note that the hair is the same.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you take a look here [elmundo.es], you can compare both photographies.
Note that the hair is the same...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798408</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Dirtside</author>
	<datestamp>1263744540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I started having the same thought a couple of years ago; "bin Laden" supposedly released a "new" tape, except the tape's segments consisted either of old video of OBL talking, or new video of him "talking," except the video image froze while the new audio was playing. This happened a couple of times.</p><p>It's been years since there's been any verifiably new video of OBL, and as you say, the guy was putting out videos pretty regularly, then suddenly he stops for several years? Riiiight.</p><p>Dude died of kidney failure years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I started having the same thought a couple of years ago ; " bin Laden " supposedly released a " new " tape , except the tape 's segments consisted either of old video of OBL talking , or new video of him " talking , " except the video image froze while the new audio was playing .
This happened a couple of times.It 's been years since there 's been any verifiably new video of OBL , and as you say , the guy was putting out videos pretty regularly , then suddenly he stops for several years ?
Riiiight.Dude died of kidney failure years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I started having the same thought a couple of years ago; "bin Laden" supposedly released a "new" tape, except the tape's segments consisted either of old video of OBL talking, or new video of him "talking," except the video image froze while the new audio was playing.
This happened a couple of times.It's been years since there's been any verifiably new video of OBL, and as you say, the guy was putting out videos pretty regularly, then suddenly he stops for several years?
Riiiight.Dude died of kidney failure years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794698</id>
	<title>Re:Blame google not FBI</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263647700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what's the copyright angle on this story?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what 's the copyright angle on this story ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what's the copyright angle on this story?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796194</id>
	<title>so why not use president obama as osama LOL</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263666240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>/.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>/ .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>/.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795940</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Bartles</author>
	<datestamp>1263661800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>My sarcasm meter isn't sensitive enough.  Are you serious about this post, or is it tongue slightly in cheek?</htmltext>
<tokenext>My sarcasm meter is n't sensitive enough .
Are you serious about this post , or is it tongue slightly in cheek ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My sarcasm meter isn't sensitive enough.
Are you serious about this post, or is it tongue slightly in cheek?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796708</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263719520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>May be so, but here in Spain what you cannot call yourself without being frowned upon is "right winger". And that includes anyone that doesn't agree with socialism. Once you get branded as a right winger, conservative or economically liberal it's down the inevitable slope to being called fascist and then ostracized.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>May be so , but here in Spain what you can not call yourself without being frowned upon is " right winger " .
And that includes anyone that does n't agree with socialism .
Once you get branded as a right winger , conservative or economically liberal it 's down the inevitable slope to being called fascist and then ostracized .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>May be so, but here in Spain what you cannot call yourself without being frowned upon is "right winger".
And that includes anyone that doesn't agree with socialism.
Once you get branded as a right winger, conservative or economically liberal it's down the inevitable slope to being called fascist and then ostracized.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795766</id>
	<title>Yeah, in many parts of the world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263659460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>you can call yourself a National-Socialist and then have a discussion about what that means, too. In Germany, where people actually remember very well what this means, the discussion would be with the police.</p><p>As a Russian whose family members have been killed and whose country was seriously screwed up by Communists (who were also, of course, Marxists) I wish those societies where grandstanding as a Communist is acceptable would wake up before they get screwed up in their turn.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>you can call yourself a National-Socialist and then have a discussion about what that means , too .
In Germany , where people actually remember very well what this means , the discussion would be with the police.As a Russian whose family members have been killed and whose country was seriously screwed up by Communists ( who were also , of course , Marxists ) I wish those societies where grandstanding as a Communist is acceptable would wake up before they get screwed up in their turn .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>you can call yourself a National-Socialist and then have a discussion about what that means, too.
In Germany, where people actually remember very well what this means, the discussion would be with the police.As a Russian whose family members have been killed and whose country was seriously screwed up by Communists (who were also, of course, Marxists) I wish those societies where grandstanding as a Communist is acceptable would wake up before they get screwed up in their turn.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795274</id>
	<title>Me BAD</title>
	<author>omb</author>
	<datestamp>1263653700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>And now you wonder why people hate the USA?</htmltext>
<tokenext>And now you wonder why people hate the USA ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And now you wonder why people hate the USA?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794454</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795074</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263651660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding.</i></p><p>Well, to be fair, he doesn't. Here in Spain, politicians resorts way more often to childish games of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding than in USA or most of european countries (thanks to the damage that the civil war and 40 years of dictatorship did to our people. Not to mention the Basque Country, where hundreds of democratically elected politicians have been living (and still live) with bodyguards and are killed just because they didn't support independentism). The way Spain discusses about politics resembles a bit to what you see in many latinoamerican countries, rather to USA, or the most relevant european countries.  Communism just happens to be one of the tolerable alternatives, just like in other european countries. Probably because even the people who hate it see it as an impossible pseudo christian utopy. It seem to me that conservative parties in USA don't even look it as an impossible utopy, it seems a nightmare for them. Here you can discuss about communism, but there're many other things that you couldn't discuss here. For example, what USA knows as libertarianism (Ron Paul, etc), which is something almost completely unknow here.</p><p>And note that while Llamazares is pro-socialist, he is not 100\% communist. IU is a coalition, and while the communist party (PCE) is probably the biggest, their political agenda is very fuzzy. They know they hate capitalism (what they think capitalism is), but they don't really know what they should do, except raising taxes to rich people.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding.Well , to be fair , he does n't .
Here in Spain , politicians resorts way more often to childish games of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding than in USA or most of european countries ( thanks to the damage that the civil war and 40 years of dictatorship did to our people .
Not to mention the Basque Country , where hundreds of democratically elected politicians have been living ( and still live ) with bodyguards and are killed just because they did n't support independentism ) .
The way Spain discusses about politics resembles a bit to what you see in many latinoamerican countries , rather to USA , or the most relevant european countries .
Communism just happens to be one of the tolerable alternatives , just like in other european countries .
Probably because even the people who hate it see it as an impossible pseudo christian utopy .
It seem to me that conservative parties in USA do n't even look it as an impossible utopy , it seems a nightmare for them .
Here you can discuss about communism , but there 're many other things that you could n't discuss here .
For example , what USA knows as libertarianism ( Ron Paul , etc ) , which is something almost completely unknow here.And note that while Llamazares is pro-socialist , he is not 100 \ % communist .
IU is a coalition , and while the communist party ( PCE ) is probably the biggest , their political agenda is very fuzzy .
They know they hate capitalism ( what they think capitalism is ) , but they do n't really know what they should do , except raising taxes to rich people .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding.Well, to be fair, he doesn't.
Here in Spain, politicians resorts way more often to childish games of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding than in USA or most of european countries (thanks to the damage that the civil war and 40 years of dictatorship did to our people.
Not to mention the Basque Country, where hundreds of democratically elected politicians have been living (and still live) with bodyguards and are killed just because they didn't support independentism).
The way Spain discusses about politics resembles a bit to what you see in many latinoamerican countries, rather to USA, or the most relevant european countries.
Communism just happens to be one of the tolerable alternatives, just like in other european countries.
Probably because even the people who hate it see it as an impossible pseudo christian utopy.
It seem to me that conservative parties in USA don't even look it as an impossible utopy, it seems a nightmare for them.
Here you can discuss about communism, but there're many other things that you couldn't discuss here.
For example, what USA knows as libertarianism (Ron Paul, etc), which is something almost completely unknow here.And note that while Llamazares is pro-socialist, he is not 100\% communist.
IU is a coalition, and while the communist party (PCE) is probably the biggest, their political agenda is very fuzzy.
They know they hate capitalism (what they think capitalism is), but they don't really know what they should do, except raising taxes to rich people.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795896</id>
	<title>"hysterical cowards and uneducated drones,</title>
	<author>circletimessquare</author>
	<datestamp>1263661200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security"</p><p>this is true of every society on this planet, and every society that ever existed, and any society that ever will exist. its the trailing end of the bell curve, what can you do? so you don't have to like the usa, but don't single out the usa for the crimes of humanity itself</p><p>i'm an american, and i can have an open rational discussion of the benefits/ failures of communism, socialism, capitalism, libertarianism, marxism, authoritarianism, bring it on</p><p>oh, there's one more problem with humanity you should know about, that is not unique to the usa: the kind of person who over-generalizes and prejudicially judges an entire race or country, just because of the sins of a few loud few</p><p>you wouldn't perchance know an example of such a person's words, would you?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security " this is true of every society on this planet , and every society that ever existed , and any society that ever will exist .
its the trailing end of the bell curve , what can you do ?
so you do n't have to like the usa , but do n't single out the usa for the crimes of humanity itselfi 'm an american , and i can have an open rational discussion of the benefits/ failures of communism , socialism , capitalism , libertarianism , marxism , authoritarianism , bring it onoh , there 's one more problem with humanity you should know about , that is not unique to the usa : the kind of person who over-generalizes and prejudicially judges an entire race or country , just because of the sins of a few loud fewyou would n't perchance know an example of such a person 's words , would you ?
; - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security"this is true of every society on this planet, and every society that ever existed, and any society that ever will exist.
its the trailing end of the bell curve, what can you do?
so you don't have to like the usa, but don't single out the usa for the crimes of humanity itselfi'm an american, and i can have an open rational discussion of the benefits/ failures of communism, socialism, capitalism, libertarianism, marxism, authoritarianism, bring it onoh, there's one more problem with humanity you should know about, that is not unique to the usa: the kind of person who over-generalizes and prejudicially judges an entire race or country, just because of the sins of a few loud fewyou wouldn't perchance know an example of such a person's words, would you?
;-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796604</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Corbets</author>
	<datestamp>1263760500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>But I guess if you can keep the myth alive, then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan.</p></div><p>If the FBI has reason to believe he's dead and is still "keeping the myth alive", I'd guess the reason is much simpler. They're covering their own collective asses - if it turns out that he's not dead, and he pops up again, someone's going to get fired, at best. So it's better to keep going through the motions.</p><p>So many people here forget basic human nature when it comes to large organizations.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But I guess if you can keep the myth alive , then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan.If the FBI has reason to believe he 's dead and is still " keeping the myth alive " , I 'd guess the reason is much simpler .
They 're covering their own collective asses - if it turns out that he 's not dead , and he pops up again , someone 's going to get fired , at best .
So it 's better to keep going through the motions.So many people here forget basic human nature when it comes to large organizations .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But I guess if you can keep the myth alive, then it becomes that much easier to keep support going for spending money on the current military action in Afghanistan.If the FBI has reason to believe he's dead and is still "keeping the myth alive", I'd guess the reason is much simpler.
They're covering their own collective asses - if it turns out that he's not dead, and he pops up again, someone's going to get fired, at best.
So it's better to keep going through the motions.So many people here forget basic human nature when it comes to large organizations.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30799392</id>
	<title>Why him</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263752640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>A photo of Beyonc&#232; could have had an even better effect.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A photo of Beyonc   could have had an even better effect .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A photo of Beyoncè could have had an even better effect.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795512</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263656640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>We should constantly live in fear of tribal men in caves 8000 miles away at all times.</i> </p><p>Osama isn't tribal.</p><p>He's medieval.</p><p>His family made its fortune in heavy construction for the Saudi royal family. Net worth $7 billion.</p><p> Chicken feed. Prince Alwaleed alone is worth $18 billion. No Saudi whatever his merit or ambition can climb higher so long as his family rules.</p><p>Do I have to tell you how this story ends?</p><p>Neither is it psychologically insignificant that building the iconic mosque or royal palace was where the bin Ladens began.</p><p>Osama has spent his entire life on the outside looking in.</p><p>Close but no cigar.</p><p> <a href="http://www.arabianbusiness.com/richlist/profile/1944" title="arabianbusiness.com">Rich List 2009 -  7# The Bin Laden Family</a> [arabianbusiness.com] </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We should constantly live in fear of tribal men in caves 8000 miles away at all times .
Osama is n't tribal.He 's medieval.His family made its fortune in heavy construction for the Saudi royal family .
Net worth $ 7 billion .
Chicken feed .
Prince Alwaleed alone is worth $ 18 billion .
No Saudi whatever his merit or ambition can climb higher so long as his family rules.Do I have to tell you how this story ends ? Neither is it psychologically insignificant that building the iconic mosque or royal palace was where the bin Ladens began.Osama has spent his entire life on the outside looking in.Close but no cigar .
Rich List 2009 - 7 # The Bin Laden Family [ arabianbusiness.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We should constantly live in fear of tribal men in caves 8000 miles away at all times.
Osama isn't tribal.He's medieval.His family made its fortune in heavy construction for the Saudi royal family.
Net worth $7 billion.
Chicken feed.
Prince Alwaleed alone is worth $18 billion.
No Saudi whatever his merit or ambition can climb higher so long as his family rules.Do I have to tell you how this story ends?Neither is it psychologically insignificant that building the iconic mosque or royal palace was where the bin Ladens began.Osama has spent his entire life on the outside looking in.Close but no cigar.
Rich List 2009 -  7# The Bin Laden Family [arabianbusiness.com] </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795330</id>
	<title>Wow</title>
	<author>genmax</author>
	<datestamp>1263654540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This makes sharing your name with someone on the no-fly list sound like a lucky break!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This makes sharing your name with someone on the no-fly list sound like a lucky break !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This makes sharing your name with someone on the no-fly list sound like a lucky break!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30799396</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263752700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"hysterical cowards and uneducated drones, ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security."</p><p>Nah, you just get bombed, then you capitulate to the bombers demands, then complain heavily to another country that frowns upon you capitulation when they back away due to your actions.</p><p>Such is Spain to the US.</p><p>btw, with your name calling (and +4 Insightful on<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/. no less), so that's why Obama won.  Liberals and socialists are hysterical cowards and uneducated drones.  Because Obama said what they wanted to hear.</p><p>I guess people will continue to play that card of the others having no reason as long as it suits their political and mental ends.  To me, it seems very likely you are one of those people who make a living complaining the political landscape is such that we cannot have diverse discussion, while carrying on practices that make it exactly so.  So you understand, I'll resort to your methodology of insults--you are a hypocritical ass.</p><p>For every Communist "sympathizer," there's someone willing to mention McCarthy.  In fact, I think a followup already has.  For every socialist or progressive or communist, there's a right winger or militant conservative or reactionary.</p><p>The facts remain, you want to be CORRECT (I almost said RIGHT, but that would be an insult to you too), not that you've earned or analyzed all the options.  You just, well, took the low road and insulted your way into the argument, didn't you.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" hysterical cowards and uneducated drones , ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security .
" Nah , you just get bombed , then you capitulate to the bombers demands , then complain heavily to another country that frowns upon you capitulation when they back away due to your actions.Such is Spain to the US.btw , with your name calling ( and + 4 Insightful on / .
no less ) , so that 's why Obama won .
Liberals and socialists are hysterical cowards and uneducated drones .
Because Obama said what they wanted to hear.I guess people will continue to play that card of the others having no reason as long as it suits their political and mental ends .
To me , it seems very likely you are one of those people who make a living complaining the political landscape is such that we can not have diverse discussion , while carrying on practices that make it exactly so .
So you understand , I 'll resort to your methodology of insults--you are a hypocritical ass.For every Communist " sympathizer , " there 's someone willing to mention McCarthy .
In fact , I think a followup already has .
For every socialist or progressive or communist , there 's a right winger or militant conservative or reactionary.The facts remain , you want to be CORRECT ( I almost said RIGHT , but that would be an insult to you too ) , not that you 've earned or analyzed all the options .
You just , well , took the low road and insulted your way into the argument , did n't you .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"hysterical cowards and uneducated drones, ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security.
"Nah, you just get bombed, then you capitulate to the bombers demands, then complain heavily to another country that frowns upon you capitulation when they back away due to your actions.Such is Spain to the US.btw, with your name calling (and +4 Insightful on /.
no less), so that's why Obama won.
Liberals and socialists are hysterical cowards and uneducated drones.
Because Obama said what they wanted to hear.I guess people will continue to play that card of the others having no reason as long as it suits their political and mental ends.
To me, it seems very likely you are one of those people who make a living complaining the political landscape is such that we cannot have diverse discussion, while carrying on practices that make it exactly so.
So you understand, I'll resort to your methodology of insults--you are a hypocritical ass.For every Communist "sympathizer," there's someone willing to mention McCarthy.
In fact, I think a followup already has.
For every socialist or progressive or communist, there's a right winger or militant conservative or reactionary.The facts remain, you want to be CORRECT (I almost said RIGHT, but that would be an insult to you too), not that you've earned or analyzed all the options.
You just, well, took the low road and insulted your way into the argument, didn't you.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798590</id>
	<title>I wonder</title>
	<author>shitzu</author>
	<datestamp>1263745800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Could we enhance that?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Could we enhance that ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Could we enhance that?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796548</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed</title>
	<author>wall0159</author>
	<datestamp>1263759300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Fortunately for him..."<br>It's not just him that benefits -- everyone benefits when political and social ideas can be discussed openly without hysteria.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Fortunately for him... " It 's not just him that benefits -- everyone benefits when political and social ideas can be discussed openly without hysteria .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Fortunately for him..."It's not just him that benefits -- everyone benefits when political and social ideas can be discussed openly without hysteria.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795952</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed</title>
	<author>wisnoskij</author>
	<datestamp>1263662100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Indeed.
<br>
Most people definition of Communist government is "an evil and tyrannical government", which is pretty ridiculous.
<br>
It is amazing if you actually know what socialism or communism means, how often you hear anti socialism/communism people advocate socialism/communism ideas in complete ignorance.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Indeed .
Most people definition of Communist government is " an evil and tyrannical government " , which is pretty ridiculous .
It is amazing if you actually know what socialism or communism means , how often you hear anti socialism/communism people advocate socialism/communism ideas in complete ignorance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indeed.
Most people definition of Communist government is "an evil and tyrannical government", which is pretty ridiculous.
It is amazing if you actually know what socialism or communism means, how often you hear anti socialism/communism people advocate socialism/communism ideas in complete ignorance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798744</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263747000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Free speech, in my America?</p><p>Less likely than you think.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Free speech , in my America ? Less likely than you think .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Free speech, in my America?Less likely than you think.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30797394</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796112</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263664740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>After all, the FBI's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, also <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south\_asia/2135473.stm" title="bbc.co.uk">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south\_asia/2135473.stm</a> [bbc.co.uk]admitted to believing that bin laden was dead eight (8) years ago.</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p> <i><br>"Is (Bin Laden) alive or is he dead?" Mr Watson said. "I am not really sure of the answer... I personally think he is probably not with us anymore but I have no evidence to support that."<br></i></p> </div><p><div class="quote"><p>Wait... and didn't Afghanistan's current president, Hamid Karzai, <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/" title="cnn.com">http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/</a> [cnn.com]admit to believing the same thing 8 years ago?</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p> <i><br>"I would come to believe that [bin Laden] probably is dead," Karzai said on CNN's "Late Edition" on Sunday.</i></p><p><i>"But still, you never know. He might be alive. Five months ago, six months ago, I was thinking that he was alive.<br></i></p> </div><p><div class="quote"><p>Wait... and didn't Israeli Intelligence also <a href="http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2002/me\_terrorism\_10\_16.html" title="worldtribune.com">http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2002/me\_terrorism\_10\_16.html</a> [worldtribune.com]admit the same thing 8 years ago?</p></div><p><div class="quote"><p> <i><br>The Israeli sources said Israel and the United States assess that Bin Laden probably died in the U.S. military campaign in Afghanistan in December. They said the emergence of new messages by Bin Laden are probably fabrications, Middle East Newsline reported.<br></i></p> </div><p>Oh, yes.  The damning evidence is just piling up.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>After all , the FBI 's counter-terrorism chief , Dale Watson , also http : //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south \ _asia/2135473.stm [ bbc.co.uk ] admitted to believing that bin laden was dead eight ( 8 ) years ago .
" Is ( Bin Laden ) alive or is he dead ?
" Mr Watson said .
" I am not really sure of the answer... I personally think he is probably not with us anymore but I have no evidence to support that .
" Wait... and did n't Afghanistan 's current president , Hamid Karzai , http : //edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/ [ cnn.com ] admit to believing the same thing 8 years ago ?
" I would come to believe that [ bin Laden ] probably is dead , " Karzai said on CNN 's " Late Edition " on Sunday .
" But still , you never know .
He might be alive .
Five months ago , six months ago , I was thinking that he was alive .
Wait... and did n't Israeli Intelligence also http : //www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2002/me \ _terrorism \ _10 \ _16.html [ worldtribune.com ] admit the same thing 8 years ago ?
The Israeli sources said Israel and the United States assess that Bin Laden probably died in the U.S. military campaign in Afghanistan in December .
They said the emergence of new messages by Bin Laden are probably fabrications , Middle East Newsline reported .
Oh , yes .
The damning evidence is just piling up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>After all, the FBI's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, also http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south\_asia/2135473.stm [bbc.co.uk]admitted to believing that bin laden was dead eight (8) years ago.
"Is (Bin Laden) alive or is he dead?
" Mr Watson said.
"I am not really sure of the answer... I personally think he is probably not with us anymore but I have no evidence to support that.
" Wait... and didn't Afghanistan's current president, Hamid Karzai, http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/central/10/06/karzai.binladen/ [cnn.com]admit to believing the same thing 8 years ago?
"I would come to believe that [bin Laden] probably is dead," Karzai said on CNN's "Late Edition" on Sunday.
"But still, you never know.
He might be alive.
Five months ago, six months ago, I was thinking that he was alive.
Wait... and didn't Israeli Intelligence also http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2002/me\_terrorism\_10\_16.html [worldtribune.com]admit the same thing 8 years ago?
The Israeli sources said Israel and the United States assess that Bin Laden probably died in the U.S. military campaign in Afghanistan in December.
They said the emergence of new messages by Bin Laden are probably fabrications, Middle East Newsline reported.
Oh, yes.
The damning evidence is just piling up.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795218</id>
	<title>Indeed WTF?</title>
	<author>Ostracus</author>
	<datestamp>1263653160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>But, Se&#241;or Llamazares is a Commie</p></div><p>Fortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding. In many parts of the world, you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.</p><p>Stateside, I bet many people would consider calling the police. But such is the state of our populace: hysterical cowards and uneducated drones, ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security.</p></div><p>And yet for those who clicked on a Reuters story we didn't see this calling of the police by uneducated drones, and hysterical cowards. Of course we didn't have an intellectual discussion of what it means to be communist, but then the story was basically "we goofed" and an apology.</p><p>Sounds like some of you have too many axes to grind.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But , Se   or Llamazares is a CommieFortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding .
In many parts of the world , you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.Stateside , I bet many people would consider calling the police .
But such is the state of our populace : hysterical cowards and uneducated drones , ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security.And yet for those who clicked on a Reuters story we did n't see this calling of the police by uneducated drones , and hysterical cowards .
Of course we did n't have an intellectual discussion of what it means to be communist , but then the story was basically " we goofed " and an apology.Sounds like some of you have too many axes to grind .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But, Señor Llamazares is a CommieFortunately for him he lives in a society where you can formulate political opinion from a variety of sources and not resort to a childish game of name calling and vague nonsensical grandstanding.
In many parts of the world, you can call yourself a communist or a marxist or a socialist and then have a discussion about what that means.Stateside, I bet many people would consider calling the police.
But such is the state of our populace: hysterical cowards and uneducated drones, ready to plead fealty to whatever entity promises them the most convenience and security.And yet for those who clicked on a Reuters story we didn't see this calling of the police by uneducated drones, and hysterical cowards.
Of course we didn't have an intellectual discussion of what it means to be communist, but then the story was basically "we goofed" and an apology.Sounds like some of you have too many axes to grind.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30807102</id>
	<title>Re:Indeed</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1263824760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>here in Spain what you cannot call yourself without being frowned upon is "right winger"</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
As it wasn't that long ago that "right winger" in Spain meant "supporting Franco" this is hardly surprising.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>here in Spain what you can not call yourself without being frowned upon is " right winger " As it was n't that long ago that " right winger " in Spain meant " supporting Franco " this is hardly surprising .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>here in Spain what you cannot call yourself without being frowned upon is "right winger"

As it wasn't that long ago that "right winger" in Spain meant "supporting Franco" this is hardly surprising.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795198</id>
	<title>FBI must be legally blind</title>
	<author>Dracos</author>
	<datestamp>1263653040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That guy doesn't represent what bin Laden would look like now.  You can tell because:</p><ul>
<li>That guy looks nothing like bin Laden</li><li>That guy doesn't look like he's been in a shallow grave for 8 years</li></ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>That guy does n't represent what bin Laden would look like now .
You can tell because : That guy looks nothing like bin LadenThat guy does n't look like he 's been in a shallow grave for 8 years</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That guy doesn't represent what bin Laden would look like now.
You can tell because:
That guy looks nothing like bin LadenThat guy doesn't look like he's been in a shallow grave for 8 years</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795128</id>
	<title>Terrorists!!!-Butterfly Effect.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263652320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not the tribal man I fear. It's the crazies who listen to him, strap a suicide belt on and go blow innocents up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not the tribal man I fear .
It 's the crazies who listen to him , strap a suicide belt on and go blow innocents up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not the tribal man I fear.
It's the crazies who listen to him, strap a suicide belt on and go blow innocents up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30803148</id>
	<title>You look like...</title>
	<author>DeVilla</author>
	<datestamp>1263737100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <b>Count DeMonet:</b>  your majesty! You look like the piss boy!</p><p> <b>King Louis:</b><nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and you look like a bucket of shit!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Count DeMonet : your majesty !
You look like the piss boy !
King Louis : ... and you look like a bucket of shit !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> Count DeMonet:  your majesty!
You look like the piss boy!
King Louis: ... and you look like a bucket of shit!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795348</id>
	<title>This reminds me of...</title>
	<author>moose\_hp</author>
	<datestamp>1263654780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I used to have a spot on the 2th page of Google Images' query "los 10 mas buscados de la pgr" (the top ten wanted of the PGR (mexican federal police)), after a quick google, it seems that the photo was removed from the query (it is still on my flickr stream anyway).
<br>
<br>
It used to be a great conversation topic, something like "oh yeah, and I'm one of the top ten wanted of the PGR" "naw, you're joking" "you don't beleive me? google it yourself" "oh shit, you really are".</htmltext>
<tokenext>I used to have a spot on the 2th page of Google Images ' query " los 10 mas buscados de la pgr " ( the top ten wanted of the PGR ( mexican federal police ) ) , after a quick google , it seems that the photo was removed from the query ( it is still on my flickr stream anyway ) .
It used to be a great conversation topic , something like " oh yeah , and I 'm one of the top ten wanted of the PGR " " naw , you 're joking " " you do n't beleive me ?
google it yourself " " oh shit , you really are " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I used to have a spot on the 2th page of Google Images' query "los 10 mas buscados de la pgr" (the top ten wanted of the PGR (mexican federal police)), after a quick google, it seems that the photo was removed from the query (it is still on my flickr stream anyway).
It used to be a great conversation topic, something like "oh yeah, and I'm one of the top ten wanted of the PGR" "naw, you're joking" "you don't beleive me?
google it yourself" "oh shit, you really are".</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794494</id>
	<title>Re:Terrorists!!!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263646200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because we've always been at war with Eurasia?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because we 've always been at war with Eurasia ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because we've always been at war with Eurasia?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30797128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798550
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795074
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30807102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796112
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796194
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795128
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794532
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796604
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795512
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30797058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794698
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794494
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795622
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798408
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798744
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30797394
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794652
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794454
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_16_2342204_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30799396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_16_2342204.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796294
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_16_2342204.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794634
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796194
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795952
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795218
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795074
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30797394
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798744
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795896
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30799396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30797128
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796548
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795622
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796708
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30807102
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_16_2342204.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794440
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795128
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795512
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794494
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30797058
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795282
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796112
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798422
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795940
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796446
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796604
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798408
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30796166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795994
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30798550
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794532
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_16_2342204.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795148
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_16_2342204.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794454
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794652
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30794698
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795274
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_16_2342204.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_16_2342204.30795724
</commentlist>
</conversation>
