<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_15_1740242</id>
	<title>"Doomsday Clock" Moves Away From Midnight</title>
	<author>ScuttleMonkey</author>
	<datestamp>1263543540000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Arvisp writes to tell us that the symbolic "Doomsday Clock," designed to represent how close civilization is to catastrophic destruction, has been <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/doomsday-clock-moves-midnight-minute/story?id=9560729">moved away from midnight</a>.  <i>"First set at seven minutes to midnight, the clock has been moved only 18 times since its creation in 1947.  The group, which includes more than a dozen Nobel laureates, last moved the hands of the clock in 2007, from seven to five minutes before midnight to reflect the threat of a 'second nuclear age' and the challenges presented by global warming.  Today, at a press conference in New York, the Bulletin announced that despite the looming threats of nuclear weapons and climate change, it would move the hands of the clock from five to six minutes before midnight."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Arvisp writes to tell us that the symbolic " Doomsday Clock , " designed to represent how close civilization is to catastrophic destruction , has been moved away from midnight .
" First set at seven minutes to midnight , the clock has been moved only 18 times since its creation in 1947 .
The group , which includes more than a dozen Nobel laureates , last moved the hands of the clock in 2007 , from seven to five minutes before midnight to reflect the threat of a 'second nuclear age ' and the challenges presented by global warming .
Today , at a press conference in New York , the Bulletin announced that despite the looming threats of nuclear weapons and climate change , it would move the hands of the clock from five to six minutes before midnight .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arvisp writes to tell us that the symbolic "Doomsday Clock," designed to represent how close civilization is to catastrophic destruction, has been moved away from midnight.
"First set at seven minutes to midnight, the clock has been moved only 18 times since its creation in 1947.
The group, which includes more than a dozen Nobel laureates, last moved the hands of the clock in 2007, from seven to five minutes before midnight to reflect the threat of a 'second nuclear age' and the challenges presented by global warming.
Today, at a press conference in New York, the Bulletin announced that despite the looming threats of nuclear weapons and climate change, it would move the hands of the clock from five to six minutes before midnight.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784986</id>
	<title>Bummer</title>
	<author>TheUlk</author>
	<datestamp>1263555060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>those wounderfull pink pills...</p><p>*SCNR*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>those wounderfull pink pills... * SCNR *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>those wounderfull pink pills...*SCNR*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783704</id>
	<title>A broken clock is cuckoo</title>
	<author>Bob\_Who</author>
	<datestamp>1263549180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The inevitability of bird brains.  Perhaps our future will routinely involve recalibration, or will chime like musical chairs.  If not a nuke, perhaps a comet, or just a sudden stall, like a snooze alarm.  5 more minutes....just a few moments more.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The inevitability of bird brains .
Perhaps our future will routinely involve recalibration , or will chime like musical chairs .
If not a nuke , perhaps a comet , or just a sudden stall , like a snooze alarm .
5 more minutes....just a few moments more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The inevitability of bird brains.
Perhaps our future will routinely involve recalibration, or will chime like musical chairs.
If not a nuke, perhaps a comet, or just a sudden stall, like a snooze alarm.
5 more minutes....just a few moments more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450</id>
	<title>Really?</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1263548160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>From the article:

[quote]Citing collaborative efforts by world leaders to reduce nuclear arsenals, secure nuclear bomb-making materials and pledge to limit greenhouse gas emissions, the group said the world was facing a "hopeful" state of affairs.

The Bulletin also said that the election of President Barack Obama, along with his efforts to initiate arms reduction talks with Russia and negotiations with Iran to close its nuclear enrichment program, affected its decision. [/quote]

Why does this sound more like it is about short-term political points rather than deep points about the fate of humanity?</div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>From the article : [ quote ] Citing collaborative efforts by world leaders to reduce nuclear arsenals , secure nuclear bomb-making materials and pledge to limit greenhouse gas emissions , the group said the world was facing a " hopeful " state of affairs .
The Bulletin also said that the election of President Barack Obama , along with his efforts to initiate arms reduction talks with Russia and negotiations with Iran to close its nuclear enrichment program , affected its decision .
[ /quote ] Why does this sound more like it is about short-term political points rather than deep points about the fate of humanity ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>From the article:

[quote]Citing collaborative efforts by world leaders to reduce nuclear arsenals, secure nuclear bomb-making materials and pledge to limit greenhouse gas emissions, the group said the world was facing a "hopeful" state of affairs.
The Bulletin also said that the election of President Barack Obama, along with his efforts to initiate arms reduction talks with Russia and negotiations with Iran to close its nuclear enrichment program, affected its decision.
[/quote]

Why does this sound more like it is about short-term political points rather than deep points about the fate of humanity?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30787152</id>
	<title>Popcorn</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263570180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll bring the popcorn one last time</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll bring the popcorn one last time</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll bring the popcorn one last time</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784680</id>
	<title>Read Waltz</title>
	<author>Nidi62</author>
	<datestamp>1263553380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or for that matter, read any of the prevailing paradigm regarding nuclear weapons and deterrence.  The more countries that have them, the less likely nukes are to be used.  In fact, according to Waltz in his article "Nuclear Myths and Political Realities"(APSR 1990), he finds that, when states have nuclear weapons, the probability of major war between them approaches zero.  The presence of nuclear weapons forces the participants in a conflict to find a way to DEESCALATE the conflict, rather than escalate it.  Now, what he finds as destabilizing are not nukes themselves, but rather defensive systems designed to destroy nukes.\</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or for that matter , read any of the prevailing paradigm regarding nuclear weapons and deterrence .
The more countries that have them , the less likely nukes are to be used .
In fact , according to Waltz in his article " Nuclear Myths and Political Realities " ( APSR 1990 ) , he finds that , when states have nuclear weapons , the probability of major war between them approaches zero .
The presence of nuclear weapons forces the participants in a conflict to find a way to DEESCALATE the conflict , rather than escalate it .
Now , what he finds as destabilizing are not nukes themselves , but rather defensive systems designed to destroy nukes. \</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or for that matter, read any of the prevailing paradigm regarding nuclear weapons and deterrence.
The more countries that have them, the less likely nukes are to be used.
In fact, according to Waltz in his article "Nuclear Myths and Political Realities"(APSR 1990), he finds that, when states have nuclear weapons, the probability of major war between them approaches zero.
The presence of nuclear weapons forces the participants in a conflict to find a way to DEESCALATE the conflict, rather than escalate it.
Now, what he finds as destabilizing are not nukes themselves, but rather defensive systems designed to destroy nukes.\</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783948</id>
	<title>Because...?</title>
	<author>LatencyKills</author>
	<datestamp>1263550200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is somehow less at risk now that 2007?  Because Iran is somehow farther away from nuclear enrichment than in 2007?  Because Russia and China have both become friendlier with the West since 2007?  Hmmm.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because Pakistan 's nuclear arsenal is somehow less at risk now that 2007 ?
Because Iran is somehow farther away from nuclear enrichment than in 2007 ?
Because Russia and China have both become friendlier with the West since 2007 ?
Hmmm .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is somehow less at risk now that 2007?
Because Iran is somehow farther away from nuclear enrichment than in 2007?
Because Russia and China have both become friendlier with the West since 2007?
Hmmm.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30787746</id>
	<title>Richard Feynman said</title>
	<author>pigwiggle</author>
	<datestamp>1263577020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy."</p><p>I agree with Feynman.  And I'll add - I've known buckets of physicists, and nearly without exception they are intoxicated by their own shiz.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy .
" I agree with Feynman .
And I 'll add - I 've known buckets of physicists , and nearly without exception they are intoxicated by their own shiz .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy.
"I agree with Feynman.
And I'll add - I've known buckets of physicists, and nearly without exception they are intoxicated by their own shiz.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30785126</id>
	<title>Nidnight doesn't mean anything in todays world</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263555720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is a silly metaphor these days.</p><p>I work night shift (11pm-7am) you insensitive clod!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is a silly metaphor these days.I work night shift ( 11pm-7am ) you insensitive clod !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is a silly metaphor these days.I work night shift (11pm-7am) you insensitive clod!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30790452</id>
	<title>Re:I'm not worried</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263658860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>But since man was created 6000 years ago we only have about 10 years left!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>But since man was created 6000 years ago we only have about 10 years left !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But since man was created 6000 years ago we only have about 10 years left!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30786910</id>
	<title>iran</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263567480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>but where did i go?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but where did i go ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but where did i go?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783402</id>
	<title>I'm not worried</title>
	<author>papa\_lizard</author>
	<datestamp>1263547920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>If humans first emerged 200,000 years ago, then six minutes left would indicate we have well over 800 years to go.  We should be able to get off-planet by then.

If humans emerged 50,000 years ago, then we have about 100 years, but I'll be dead by then anyway.

Either way, I'm not worried.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If humans first emerged 200,000 years ago , then six minutes left would indicate we have well over 800 years to go .
We should be able to get off-planet by then .
If humans emerged 50,000 years ago , then we have about 100 years , but I 'll be dead by then anyway .
Either way , I 'm not worried .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If humans first emerged 200,000 years ago, then six minutes left would indicate we have well over 800 years to go.
We should be able to get off-planet by then.
If humans emerged 50,000 years ago, then we have about 100 years, but I'll be dead by then anyway.
Either way, I'm not worried.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30804842</id>
	<title>Photo of Oxygen</title>
	<author>fireball84513</author>
	<datestamp>1263752880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I stand by Dr. Manhattan on this one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I stand by Dr. Manhattan on this one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I stand by Dr. Manhattan on this one.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784338</id>
	<title>Re:I'm not worried</title>
	<author>Culture20</author>
	<datestamp>1263551820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>If humans first emerged 200,000 years ago, then six minutes left would indicate we have well over 800 years to go. We should be able to get off-planet by then. If humans emerged 50,000 years ago, then we have about 100 years, but I'll be dead by then anyway. Either way, I'm not worried.</p></div><p>But 6000 years equates to 25 years... FYI</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>If humans first emerged 200,000 years ago , then six minutes left would indicate we have well over 800 years to go .
We should be able to get off-planet by then .
If humans emerged 50,000 years ago , then we have about 100 years , but I 'll be dead by then anyway .
Either way , I 'm not worried.But 6000 years equates to 25 years... FYI</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If humans first emerged 200,000 years ago, then six minutes left would indicate we have well over 800 years to go.
We should be able to get off-planet by then.
If humans emerged 50,000 years ago, then we have about 100 years, but I'll be dead by then anyway.
Either way, I'm not worried.But 6000 years equates to 25 years... FYI
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30785274</id>
	<title>Re:The value of an education.</title>
	<author>hackstraw</author>
	<datestamp>1263556560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner?</p></div><p>I dunno, what id being the crazy bum on the corner ever get the crazy bum on the corner?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner ? I dunno , what id being the crazy bum on the corner ever get the crazy bum on the corner ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner?I dunno, what id being the crazy bum on the corner ever get the crazy bum on the corner?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783452</id>
	<title>In 1947 the clock was at 7 minutes until doom....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263548160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In the span of roughly two decades we've gone from the most minutes until midnight (17 in 1991) to being 7 minutes from total annihilation (which is where the clock started at in 1947). So we're back at the default setting of the clock which is 7 minutes until midnight. Does that seem right? That we are in the same situation now, regarding our proximity to doomsday, than we were in 1947?</p><p>Think about that, the clock started at 7 minutes to midnight in 1947, a time when a global nuclear threat was far less realistic (as only one nuclear superpower existed). Now six decades and a few years later we have multiple countries, competing and even rival nations, that have nuclear weapons, and we have terrorists and militants who would love nothing more than acquiring a nuclear weapon, not to hold as a deterrent mind you...but to actually use.</p><p>Factor in that we have pandemics like AIDS and are always being warned of something like the Spanish flu coming back (swine flu hysteria). We have massive environmental catastrophes occurring, fish populations decreasing rapidly, and a growing water shortage.</p><p>For the threat of nuclear weapons alone the clock seems awfully inconsistent.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In the span of roughly two decades we 've gone from the most minutes until midnight ( 17 in 1991 ) to being 7 minutes from total annihilation ( which is where the clock started at in 1947 ) .
So we 're back at the default setting of the clock which is 7 minutes until midnight .
Does that seem right ?
That we are in the same situation now , regarding our proximity to doomsday , than we were in 1947 ? Think about that , the clock started at 7 minutes to midnight in 1947 , a time when a global nuclear threat was far less realistic ( as only one nuclear superpower existed ) .
Now six decades and a few years later we have multiple countries , competing and even rival nations , that have nuclear weapons , and we have terrorists and militants who would love nothing more than acquiring a nuclear weapon , not to hold as a deterrent mind you...but to actually use.Factor in that we have pandemics like AIDS and are always being warned of something like the Spanish flu coming back ( swine flu hysteria ) .
We have massive environmental catastrophes occurring , fish populations decreasing rapidly , and a growing water shortage.For the threat of nuclear weapons alone the clock seems awfully inconsistent .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In the span of roughly two decades we've gone from the most minutes until midnight (17 in 1991) to being 7 minutes from total annihilation (which is where the clock started at in 1947).
So we're back at the default setting of the clock which is 7 minutes until midnight.
Does that seem right?
That we are in the same situation now, regarding our proximity to doomsday, than we were in 1947?Think about that, the clock started at 7 minutes to midnight in 1947, a time when a global nuclear threat was far less realistic (as only one nuclear superpower existed).
Now six decades and a few years later we have multiple countries, competing and even rival nations, that have nuclear weapons, and we have terrorists and militants who would love nothing more than acquiring a nuclear weapon, not to hold as a deterrent mind you...but to actually use.Factor in that we have pandemics like AIDS and are always being warned of something like the Spanish flu coming back (swine flu hysteria).
We have massive environmental catastrophes occurring, fish populations decreasing rapidly, and a growing water shortage.For the threat of nuclear weapons alone the clock seems awfully inconsistent.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30795672</id>
	<title>Re:Iron Maiden</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263658140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wow, for someone who put so much time into typing those lyrics and adding those links you'd think you'd at least get one thing correctly linked (hint: you've got it all ass-backwards). Good job on being deceived though!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wow , for someone who put so much time into typing those lyrics and adding those links you 'd think you 'd at least get one thing correctly linked ( hint : you 've got it all ass-backwards ) .
Good job on being deceived though !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wow, for someone who put so much time into typing those lyrics and adding those links you'd think you'd at least get one thing correctly linked (hint: you've got it all ass-backwards).
Good job on being deceived though!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783546</id>
	<title>Hmmm</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263548520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Arvisp writes to tell us that the symbolic "Doomsday Clock," designed to represent how close civilization is to catastrophic destruction, has been moved away from midnight.</p></div><p>Sweet! Well, I think they've deserved their Nobel Peace Prize award, what do you think, guys? Hmm, yep. See you at the ceremony.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Arvisp writes to tell us that the symbolic " Doomsday Clock , " designed to represent how close civilization is to catastrophic destruction , has been moved away from midnight.Sweet !
Well , I think they 've deserved their Nobel Peace Prize award , what do you think , guys ?
Hmm , yep .
See you at the ceremony .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Arvisp writes to tell us that the symbolic "Doomsday Clock," designed to represent how close civilization is to catastrophic destruction, has been moved away from midnight.Sweet!
Well, I think they've deserved their Nobel Peace Prize award, what do you think, guys?
Hmm, yep.
See you at the ceremony.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30786754</id>
	<title>Just like at work!</title>
	<author>mshomphe</author>
	<datestamp>1263566340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's exactly like the clock at work: it doesn't move for what feels like years, and when it does, it's only a little bit.  Also, it's operated by Nobel laureates.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's exactly like the clock at work : it does n't move for what feels like years , and when it does , it 's only a little bit .
Also , it 's operated by Nobel laureates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's exactly like the clock at work: it doesn't move for what feels like years, and when it does, it's only a little bit.
Also, it's operated by Nobel laureates.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783522</id>
	<title>Science?</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1263548400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why is this listed under science? They&rsquo;re just a bunch of fear-mongering wackos with an agenda.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why is this listed under science ?
They    re just a bunch of fear-mongering wackos with an agenda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why is this listed under science?
They’re just a bunch of fear-mongering wackos with an agenda.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783894</id>
	<title>If I could move the minute hand...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263549960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I would place it closer to midnight. With the obvious onset of climate change in many parts of the world, the devastating rift between cultures, to companies like Monsanto genetically modifying food and patenting it, we humans are closer to extinction than ever before. Western societies, especially the USA, have completely lost touch with reality. We live in a fantasy world created for us by rich--therefore powerful--corporations. Just look around. Companies like Goldman Sachs just got away with swindling billions and billions of dollars from US taxpayers and the masses don't even have a clue what happened. All they want is their cellphone to work and genetically modified microwaveable "food" product stuffed in their mouths. Almost the entire human race should get the Darwin award next year, we've certainly earned it. For god's sake, the very fact that linux still hasn't "made it to the desktop" should be alarming in itself. The next 50 years are going to make the cold war look like a fucking paddy cake contest.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I would place it closer to midnight .
With the obvious onset of climate change in many parts of the world , the devastating rift between cultures , to companies like Monsanto genetically modifying food and patenting it , we humans are closer to extinction than ever before .
Western societies , especially the USA , have completely lost touch with reality .
We live in a fantasy world created for us by rich--therefore powerful--corporations .
Just look around .
Companies like Goldman Sachs just got away with swindling billions and billions of dollars from US taxpayers and the masses do n't even have a clue what happened .
All they want is their cellphone to work and genetically modified microwaveable " food " product stuffed in their mouths .
Almost the entire human race should get the Darwin award next year , we 've certainly earned it .
For god 's sake , the very fact that linux still has n't " made it to the desktop " should be alarming in itself .
The next 50 years are going to make the cold war look like a fucking paddy cake contest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I would place it closer to midnight.
With the obvious onset of climate change in many parts of the world, the devastating rift between cultures, to companies like Monsanto genetically modifying food and patenting it, we humans are closer to extinction than ever before.
Western societies, especially the USA, have completely lost touch with reality.
We live in a fantasy world created for us by rich--therefore powerful--corporations.
Just look around.
Companies like Goldman Sachs just got away with swindling billions and billions of dollars from US taxpayers and the masses don't even have a clue what happened.
All they want is their cellphone to work and genetically modified microwaveable "food" product stuffed in their mouths.
Almost the entire human race should get the Darwin award next year, we've certainly earned it.
For god's sake, the very fact that linux still hasn't "made it to the desktop" should be alarming in itself.
The next 50 years are going to make the cold war look like a fucking paddy cake contest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783548</id>
	<title>Re:Iron Maiden</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263548520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'll skip the rest of it, but... we don't dance to Israel's song. Other way around.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'll skip the rest of it , but... we do n't dance to Israel 's song .
Other way around .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'll skip the rest of it, but... we don't dance to Israel's song.
Other way around.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30785756</id>
	<title>we need it once in a while</title>
	<author>zorkdork</author>
	<datestamp>1263559260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>to cull the population and advance the human race in general, thermonuclear war is necessary.</p><p>look how far japan has come since that wake up call.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>to cull the population and advance the human race in general , thermonuclear war is necessary.look how far japan has come since that wake up call .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>to cull the population and advance the human race in general, thermonuclear war is necessary.look how far japan has come since that wake up call.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783974</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>phantomfive</author>
	<datestamp>1263550260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It always was about a political agenda. These guys have decided that nuclear weapons are evil and we should get rid of them, and the clock is a political device for drawing attention to their agenda.<br> <br>
Personally, I think the idea of negotiating a reduction of nuclear weapons is silly, when both sides retain enough weapons to destroy the other side completely.  Furthermore, no sane nation would get rid of their nuclear shield while another potentially hostile nation is around.<br> <br>
I advocate peace, and suggest everyone <a href="http://p5y.org/home" title="p5y.org">visit P5Y</a> [p5y.org], but reaching peace by trying to reduce the types of weapons you have will not achieve that goal.  Any serious peace effort must allow for self-defense, because we don't trust each other enough yet.  Nuclear disarmament will happen naturally in the future once peace happens, as citizens of countries would rather spend their taxes on things like healthcare instead of war machines.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It always was about a political agenda .
These guys have decided that nuclear weapons are evil and we should get rid of them , and the clock is a political device for drawing attention to their agenda .
Personally , I think the idea of negotiating a reduction of nuclear weapons is silly , when both sides retain enough weapons to destroy the other side completely .
Furthermore , no sane nation would get rid of their nuclear shield while another potentially hostile nation is around .
I advocate peace , and suggest everyone visit P5Y [ p5y.org ] , but reaching peace by trying to reduce the types of weapons you have will not achieve that goal .
Any serious peace effort must allow for self-defense , because we do n't trust each other enough yet .
Nuclear disarmament will happen naturally in the future once peace happens , as citizens of countries would rather spend their taxes on things like healthcare instead of war machines .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It always was about a political agenda.
These guys have decided that nuclear weapons are evil and we should get rid of them, and the clock is a political device for drawing attention to their agenda.
Personally, I think the idea of negotiating a reduction of nuclear weapons is silly, when both sides retain enough weapons to destroy the other side completely.
Furthermore, no sane nation would get rid of their nuclear shield while another potentially hostile nation is around.
I advocate peace, and suggest everyone visit P5Y [p5y.org], but reaching peace by trying to reduce the types of weapons you have will not achieve that goal.
Any serious peace effort must allow for self-defense, because we don't trust each other enough yet.
Nuclear disarmament will happen naturally in the future once peace happens, as citizens of countries would rather spend their taxes on things like healthcare instead of war machines.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783878</id>
	<title>Re:The value of an education.</title>
	<author>sorak</author>
	<datestamp>1263549840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner?</p></div><p>I don't think I've ever seen a bum on a street corner yelling "The end is less near than it was six months ago"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner ? I do n't think I 've ever seen a bum on a street corner yelling " The end is less near than it was six months ago "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner?I don't think I've ever seen a bum on a street corner yelling "The end is less near than it was six months ago"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30788638</id>
	<title>Re:As Dr. Manhattan said,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263633660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dr Manhattan only said that in the movie.</p><p>The Real Dr Manhattan said nothing of the sort. He wouldn't have been able to define intellect, nor understand that a photograph could represent oxygen.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dr Manhattan only said that in the movie.The Real Dr Manhattan said nothing of the sort .
He would n't have been able to define intellect , nor understand that a photograph could represent oxygen .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dr Manhattan only said that in the movie.The Real Dr Manhattan said nothing of the sort.
He wouldn't have been able to define intellect, nor understand that a photograph could represent oxygen.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783648</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784118</id>
	<title>Ultimate FUD</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263550860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not getting any FUD-dier than the doomsday clock.</p><p>Did they move it back because global warming is a hoax?  Or because the world now has less niggers because of haiti?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not getting any FUD-dier than the doomsday clock.Did they move it back because global warming is a hoax ?
Or because the world now has less niggers because of haiti ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not getting any FUD-dier than the doomsday clock.Did they move it back because global warming is a hoax?
Or because the world now has less niggers because of haiti?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30792702</id>
	<title>Re:Science?</title>
	<author>FoolishOwl</author>
	<datestamp>1263633060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The agenda in question is preventing the destruction of the world. A lot of us support that agenda.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The agenda in question is preventing the destruction of the world .
A lot of us support that agenda .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The agenda in question is preventing the destruction of the world.
A lot of us support that agenda.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30785406</id>
	<title>End of World Simulation</title>
	<author>BountyX</author>
	<datestamp>1263557340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is how the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45WkykXOhGs" title="youtube.com">nukes will end the world</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is how the nukes will end the world [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is how the nukes will end the world [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30786592</id>
	<title>Anonymous Coward</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263565080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This picture is no more nourishing to the intellect, as a picture of oxygen is to a drowning man.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This picture is no more nourishing to the intellect , as a picture of oxygen is to a drowning man .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This picture is no more nourishing to the intellect, as a picture of oxygen is to a drowning man.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30786426</id>
	<title>In other news:</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263564120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The Universal Bullshit Thermometer crawled ten degrees higher today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The Universal Bullshit Thermometer crawled ten degrees higher today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Universal Bullshit Thermometer crawled ten degrees higher today.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784530</id>
	<title>Seems rather unlikely</title>
	<author>Trerro</author>
	<datestamp>1263552600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The chances of a random terrorist group getting their hands on one of the many Russian nukes that they managed to lose are significant, and if not stopped in time, sure, I could see a city getting nuked. That's only going to result in the destruction of that city and that terrorist group (when basically every nation in existence works together to crush them.) Likewise, it's quite possible that a 2 nation nuclear war in the middle east could result in 2 destroyed nations, with fallout affecting nearby nations, and small climate effects reaching much further. While that would have a death toll similar to the world wars, that would not be an apocalypse any more than either of those wars were. It would truly suck as the civilian death toll would be insanely high, but the world would move on.</p><p>Worldwide nuclear war and annihilation of most intelligent life on Earth was a distant possibility even at the height of the Cold War (the US and USSR both had way too much to lose), and now I'd argue the odds are about as close to 0 as they can get without us colonizing other planets.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The chances of a random terrorist group getting their hands on one of the many Russian nukes that they managed to lose are significant , and if not stopped in time , sure , I could see a city getting nuked .
That 's only going to result in the destruction of that city and that terrorist group ( when basically every nation in existence works together to crush them .
) Likewise , it 's quite possible that a 2 nation nuclear war in the middle east could result in 2 destroyed nations , with fallout affecting nearby nations , and small climate effects reaching much further .
While that would have a death toll similar to the world wars , that would not be an apocalypse any more than either of those wars were .
It would truly suck as the civilian death toll would be insanely high , but the world would move on.Worldwide nuclear war and annihilation of most intelligent life on Earth was a distant possibility even at the height of the Cold War ( the US and USSR both had way too much to lose ) , and now I 'd argue the odds are about as close to 0 as they can get without us colonizing other planets .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The chances of a random terrorist group getting their hands on one of the many Russian nukes that they managed to lose are significant, and if not stopped in time, sure, I could see a city getting nuked.
That's only going to result in the destruction of that city and that terrorist group (when basically every nation in existence works together to crush them.
) Likewise, it's quite possible that a 2 nation nuclear war in the middle east could result in 2 destroyed nations, with fallout affecting nearby nations, and small climate effects reaching much further.
While that would have a death toll similar to the world wars, that would not be an apocalypse any more than either of those wars were.
It would truly suck as the civilian death toll would be insanely high, but the world would move on.Worldwide nuclear war and annihilation of most intelligent life on Earth was a distant possibility even at the height of the Cold War (the US and USSR both had way too much to lose), and now I'd argue the odds are about as close to 0 as they can get without us colonizing other planets.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783606</id>
	<title>Re:I'm not worried</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263548820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This attitude of "I'm not worried about it, I'll be dead by the time it gets bad anyway" is one of the most destructive things that impacts humanity.</p><p>Especially disgusting if held by people also holding dear "intellectual and moral demise of youth will doom the civilization", which do happen way too often for my taste.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This attitude of " I 'm not worried about it , I 'll be dead by the time it gets bad anyway " is one of the most destructive things that impacts humanity.Especially disgusting if held by people also holding dear " intellectual and moral demise of youth will doom the civilization " , which do happen way too often for my taste .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This attitude of "I'm not worried about it, I'll be dead by the time it gets bad anyway" is one of the most destructive things that impacts humanity.Especially disgusting if held by people also holding dear "intellectual and moral demise of youth will doom the civilization", which do happen way too often for my taste.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783840</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>(arg!)Styopa</author>
	<datestamp>1263549720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because attention-whore scientists have always been about the short-term political points, and not about their (stated) long term altruistic goals.</p><p>It was true in the 40's.  It was true in the 80s.  It's true today.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because attention-whore scientists have always been about the short-term political points , and not about their ( stated ) long term altruistic goals.It was true in the 40 's .
It was true in the 80s .
It 's true today .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because attention-whore scientists have always been about the short-term political points, and not about their (stated) long term altruistic goals.It was true in the 40's.
It was true in the 80s.
It's true today.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238</id>
	<title>Iron Maiden</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263547200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Kill for gain or shoot to maim, but we don't need a reason,<br>
The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Golden Goose</a> [wikipedia.org] is on the loose and never out of season,<br>
Blackened pride still burns inside this shell of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George\_w\_bush" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">bloody treason,</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>
Here's my gun for a barrel of fun for the love of living death.<br> <br>

The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">killer's breed</a> [wikipedia.org] or the demon's seed,<br>
The glamour, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackwater\_Worldwide" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">the fortune,</a> [wikipedia.org] the pain.<br>
Go to war again, blood is freedom's stain,<br>
But don't you pray for my soul anymore. <br> <br>

6 minutes to midnight, the hands that threaten doom,<br>
6 minutes to midnight, to kill the unborn in the womb.<br> <br>

The blind men shout let the creatures out, we'll show the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infidel" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">unbelievers,</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>
The napalm screams of human flames, of a prime time <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beslan\_school\_hostage\_crisis" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Belsan</a> [wikipedia.org] feast...YEAH!<br>
As the reasons for the carnage cut their meat and lick the gravy,<br>
We oil the jaws of the war machine and feed it with our <a href="http://patdollard.com/wp-content/uploads/hamas-baby.jpg" title="patdollard.com" rel="nofollow">babies.</a> [patdollard.com] <br> <br>

The body bags and little rags of children torn in two,<br>
And the jellied brains of those who remain to put the finger right on you,<br>
As the madmen play on words and make us all <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">dance to their song,</a> [wikipedia.org] <br>
To the tune of <a href="http://www.socialistappeal.org/usa/poverty\_and\_unemployment\_in\_amer.html" title="socialistappeal.org" rel="nofollow">starving millions,</a> [socialistappeal.org] to make a better kind of gun.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Kill for gain or shoot to maim , but we do n't need a reason , The Golden Goose [ wikipedia.org ] is on the loose and never out of season , Blackened pride still burns inside this shell of bloody treason , [ wikipedia.org ] Here 's my gun for a barrel of fun for the love of living death .
The killer 's breed [ wikipedia.org ] or the demon 's seed , The glamour , the fortune , [ wikipedia.org ] the pain .
Go to war again , blood is freedom 's stain , But do n't you pray for my soul anymore .
6 minutes to midnight , the hands that threaten doom , 6 minutes to midnight , to kill the unborn in the womb .
The blind men shout let the creatures out , we 'll show the unbelievers , [ wikipedia.org ] The napalm screams of human flames , of a prime time Belsan [ wikipedia.org ] feast...YEAH !
As the reasons for the carnage cut their meat and lick the gravy , We oil the jaws of the war machine and feed it with our babies .
[ patdollard.com ] The body bags and little rags of children torn in two , And the jellied brains of those who remain to put the finger right on you , As the madmen play on words and make us all dance to their song , [ wikipedia.org ] To the tune of starving millions , [ socialistappeal.org ] to make a better kind of gun .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Kill for gain or shoot to maim, but we don't need a reason,
The Golden Goose [wikipedia.org] is on the loose and never out of season,
Blackened pride still burns inside this shell of bloody treason, [wikipedia.org] 
Here's my gun for a barrel of fun for the love of living death.
The killer's breed [wikipedia.org] or the demon's seed,
The glamour, the fortune, [wikipedia.org] the pain.
Go to war again, blood is freedom's stain,
But don't you pray for my soul anymore.
6 minutes to midnight, the hands that threaten doom,
6 minutes to midnight, to kill the unborn in the womb.
The blind men shout let the creatures out, we'll show the unbelievers, [wikipedia.org] 
The napalm screams of human flames, of a prime time Belsan [wikipedia.org] feast...YEAH!
As the reasons for the carnage cut their meat and lick the gravy,
We oil the jaws of the war machine and feed it with our babies.
[patdollard.com]  

The body bags and little rags of children torn in two,
And the jellied brains of those who remain to put the finger right on you,
As the madmen play on words and make us all dance to their song, [wikipedia.org] 
To the tune of starving millions, [socialistappeal.org] to make a better kind of gun.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784596</id>
	<title>Re:Iron Maiden</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263552900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The will to greatness clouds the mind<br>Consumes the senses, veils the signs<br>We each are meant to recognise.<br>Redeeming graces casts aside<br>Enduring notions, new found promise,<br>That the end will never come.</p><p>We live in times when all seems lost,<br>But time will come when we'll look back,<br>Upon ourselves and on our failings.</p><p>Embrace the void even closer still,<br>Erase your doubts as you surrender everything:</p><p><b>We possess the power,<br>If this should start to fall apart,<br>To mend divides,<br>To change the world,<br>To reach the farthest star!<br>If we should stay silent,<br>If fear should win our hearts,<br>Our light will have long diminished,<br>Before it reaches the farthest star.</b></p><p>Wide awake in a world that sleeps<br>Enduring thoughts, enduring scenes.<br>The knowledge of what is yet to come.<br>From a time when all seems lost,<br>From a dead man to a world.<br>Without restraint, unafraid and free.</p><p>If we fall and break,<br>All the tears in the world cannot make<br>us whole<br>again.</p><p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bedj1qC\_jwg" title="youtube.com" rel="nofollow">VNV Nation - The Farthest Star</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>(Captcha: cometary)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The will to greatness clouds the mindConsumes the senses , veils the signsWe each are meant to recognise.Redeeming graces casts asideEnduring notions , new found promise,That the end will never come.We live in times when all seems lost,But time will come when we 'll look back,Upon ourselves and on our failings.Embrace the void even closer still,Erase your doubts as you surrender everything : We possess the power,If this should start to fall apart,To mend divides,To change the world,To reach the farthest star ! If we should stay silent,If fear should win our hearts,Our light will have long diminished,Before it reaches the farthest star.Wide awake in a world that sleepsEnduring thoughts , enduring scenes.The knowledge of what is yet to come.From a time when all seems lost,From a dead man to a world.Without restraint , unafraid and free.If we fall and break,All the tears in the world can not makeus wholeagain.VNV Nation - The Farthest Star [ youtube.com ] ( Captcha : cometary )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The will to greatness clouds the mindConsumes the senses, veils the signsWe each are meant to recognise.Redeeming graces casts asideEnduring notions, new found promise,That the end will never come.We live in times when all seems lost,But time will come when we'll look back,Upon ourselves and on our failings.Embrace the void even closer still,Erase your doubts as you surrender everything:We possess the power,If this should start to fall apart,To mend divides,To change the world,To reach the farthest star!If we should stay silent,If fear should win our hearts,Our light will have long diminished,Before it reaches the farthest star.Wide awake in a world that sleepsEnduring thoughts, enduring scenes.The knowledge of what is yet to come.From a time when all seems lost,From a dead man to a world.Without restraint, unafraid and free.If we fall and break,All the tears in the world cannot makeus wholeagain.VNV Nation - The Farthest Star [youtube.com](Captcha: cometary)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783648</id>
	<title>As Dr. Manhattan said,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263549060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>"I would only agree that a symbolic clock is as nourishing to the intellect as a photograph of oxygen to a drowning man. "</htmltext>
<tokenext>" I would only agree that a symbolic clock is as nourishing to the intellect as a photograph of oxygen to a drowning man .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I would only agree that a symbolic clock is as nourishing to the intellect as a photograph of oxygen to a drowning man.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30785606</id>
	<title>Re:Science?</title>
	<author>Tony Hoyle</author>
	<datestamp>1263558420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>They're just a bunch of fear-mongering wackos with an agenda.</i></p><p>That'll be why it's listed under science<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:p</p><p>I miss the days when science as about the scientific method and discovering stuff.. now it's about what gets the biggest headline and the biggest research grants.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They 're just a bunch of fear-mongering wackos with an agenda.That 'll be why it 's listed under science : pI miss the days when science as about the scientific method and discovering stuff.. now it 's about what gets the biggest headline and the biggest research grants .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They're just a bunch of fear-mongering wackos with an agenda.That'll be why it's listed under science :pI miss the days when science as about the scientific method and discovering stuff.. now it's about what gets the biggest headline and the biggest research grants.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783522</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783420</id>
	<title>The value of an education.</title>
	<author>Joucifer</author>
	<datestamp>1263548040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner?</htmltext>
<tokenext>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783560</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>royallthefourth</author>
	<datestamp>1263548580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><tt>It's a tiny step in the direction of nuclear disarmament, which is a deep point about the fate of humanity.</tt></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's a tiny step in the direction of nuclear disarmament , which is a deep point about the fate of humanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's a tiny step in the direction of nuclear disarmament, which is a deep point about the fate of humanity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783574</id>
	<title>Dimwits</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263548640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Nobel laureates or not, these people are dimwits.</p><p>For over <i>sixty years</i> these guys have been messing with this clock, and for <i>sixty years</i> they've been wrong every time.  Why do they think anyone cares what they have to say now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Nobel laureates or not , these people are dimwits.For over sixty years these guys have been messing with this clock , and for sixty years they 've been wrong every time .
Why do they think anyone cares what they have to say now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nobel laureates or not, these people are dimwits.For over sixty years these guys have been messing with this clock, and for sixty years they've been wrong every time.
Why do they think anyone cares what they have to say now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783434</id>
	<title>They called him mad...</title>
	<author>RealErmine</author>
	<datestamp>1263548040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Once again Professor Farnsworth's work has been overlooked by the scientific community.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Once again Professor Farnsworth 's work has been overlooked by the scientific community .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Once again Professor Farnsworth's work has been overlooked by the scientific community.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783242</id>
	<title>First thought...</title>
	<author>Em Emalb</author>
	<datestamp>1263547200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Holy pretentious old coots, batman!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Holy pretentious old coots , batman !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Holy pretentious old coots, batman!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783628</id>
	<title>6 Minute Abs?</title>
	<author>ground.zero.612</author>
	<datestamp>1263548940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No! No, no, not 6! I said 7. Nobody's comin' up with 6. Who works out in 6 minutes? You won't even get your heart goin, not even a mouse on a wheel.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No !
No , no , not 6 !
I said 7 .
Nobody 's comin ' up with 6 .
Who works out in 6 minutes ?
You wo n't even get your heart goin , not even a mouse on a wheel .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No!
No, no, not 6!
I said 7.
Nobody's comin' up with 6.
Who works out in 6 minutes?
You won't even get your heart goin, not even a mouse on a wheel.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783886</id>
	<title>Re:Iron Maiden</title>
	<author>Captain Splendid</author>
	<datestamp>1263549900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>2!<br> <br>

Minutes!<br> <br>

To Miiiiiiiidnight!</htmltext>
<tokenext>2 !
Minutes ! To Miiiiiiiidnight !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2!
Minutes! 

To Miiiiiiiidnight!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783764</id>
	<title>Climate change, now, huh?</title>
	<author>Korey Kaczor</author>
	<datestamp>1263549360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Climate change was included in the list.  Do giant squids need to be added on now, too?</p><p>Or do giant squids make the clock go back?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Climate change was included in the list .
Do giant squids need to be added on now , too ? Or do giant squids make the clock go back ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Climate change was included in the list.
Do giant squids need to be added on now, too?Or do giant squids make the clock go back?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783540</id>
	<title>Re:The value of an education.</title>
	<author>Vinegar Joe</author>
	<datestamp>1263548520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner?</p></div><p>Wangari Maathai is a Nobel laureate and she's nuttier than a fruitcake.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner ? Wangari Maathai is a Nobel laureate and she 's nuttier than a fruitcake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So does having a degree makes the laureates make them more or less credible then the crazy bum on the corner?Wangari Maathai is a Nobel laureate and she's nuttier than a fruitcake.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30789996</id>
	<title>Re:Iron Maiden</title>
	<author>Ginger Unicorn</author>
	<datestamp>1263654120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You linked the word Be<b>LS</b>an to an article about a place called Be<b>SL</b>an. You should have linked to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bergen-Belsen\_concentration\_camp" title="wikipedia.org">Belsen Concentration Camp</a> [wikipedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>You linked the word BeLSan to an article about a place called BeSLan .
You should have linked to Belsen Concentration Camp [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You linked the word BeLSan to an article about a place called BeSLan.
You should have linked to Belsen Concentration Camp [wikipedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783876</id>
	<title>Re:I'm not worried</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263549840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sorry to hurt your feeling but I really don't care! If you have any hope of a bright future for humankind just surf MySpace for a while and you just see that with those pathetic losers reproducing on the rate the reproduce we are already doomed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sorry to hurt your feeling but I really do n't care !
If you have any hope of a bright future for humankind just surf MySpace for a while and you just see that with those pathetic losers reproducing on the rate the reproduce we are already doomed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sorry to hurt your feeling but I really don't care!
If you have any hope of a bright future for humankind just surf MySpace for a while and you just see that with those pathetic losers reproducing on the rate the reproduce we are already doomed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783474</id>
	<title>UNIX timestamp in reverse</title>
	<author>gsgriffin</author>
	<datestamp>1263548220000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>If they really wanted to help us, give us a universal timestamp in reverse so we can sit and watch the end coming in real time.  Keeping a clock stationary for several years really doesn't excite the masses.</htmltext>
<tokenext>If they really wanted to help us , give us a universal timestamp in reverse so we can sit and watch the end coming in real time .
Keeping a clock stationary for several years really does n't excite the masses .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If they really wanted to help us, give us a universal timestamp in reverse so we can sit and watch the end coming in real time.
Keeping a clock stationary for several years really doesn't excite the masses.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783982</id>
	<title>actually, it's nine minutes until 4:20</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263550260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>You use your barometer; I'll use mine.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You use your barometer ; I 'll use mine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You use your barometer; I'll use mine.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783680</id>
	<title>watchmen</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263549120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>What?!  Are you telling me that the Watchmen isn't coming true?  And I spent all that time getting a rutherford-style hydrogen atom tattooed on my forehead and dyeing my skin blue.  Next thing you'll be telling me that I can't go out fighting crimes wearing a mask or making love to women while working on a fusion reactor at the same time...  I do get some looks walking down the street so maybe the prejudice part is right though.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What ? !
Are you telling me that the Watchmen is n't coming true ?
And I spent all that time getting a rutherford-style hydrogen atom tattooed on my forehead and dyeing my skin blue .
Next thing you 'll be telling me that I ca n't go out fighting crimes wearing a mask or making love to women while working on a fusion reactor at the same time... I do get some looks walking down the street so maybe the prejudice part is right though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What?!
Are you telling me that the Watchmen isn't coming true?
And I spent all that time getting a rutherford-style hydrogen atom tattooed on my forehead and dyeing my skin blue.
Next thing you'll be telling me that I can't go out fighting crimes wearing a mask or making love to women while working on a fusion reactor at the same time...  I do get some looks walking down the street so maybe the prejudice part is right though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784082</id>
	<title>More credible if they included a 'seconds' hand.</title>
	<author>CyberDong</author>
	<datestamp>1263550680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So this says to me that global catastrophe is 20\% less likely than it used to be, since they've moved it from 5 to 6 minutes... but still 14\% more likely than when it was 7 minutes in 1947.  How do they get such numbers?  Seems like huge jumps in probability.  I think they need a 'seconds' hand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So this says to me that global catastrophe is 20 \ % less likely than it used to be , since they 've moved it from 5 to 6 minutes... but still 14 \ % more likely than when it was 7 minutes in 1947 .
How do they get such numbers ?
Seems like huge jumps in probability .
I think they need a 'seconds ' hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So this says to me that global catastrophe is 20\% less likely than it used to be, since they've moved it from 5 to 6 minutes... but still 14\% more likely than when it was 7 minutes in 1947.
How do they get such numbers?
Seems like huge jumps in probability.
I think they need a 'seconds' hand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783626</id>
	<title>Nukes? Nukes, my ass...</title>
	<author>TiggertheMad</author>
	<datestamp>1263548940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why would nuclear weapon reduction have any bearing on doomsday scenarios? Sure, a full nuclear exchange would have drastic global impact, but if something is going to end life on earth, it will be either a) A massive impact from a meteor, or b) a massive gamma ray burst from some nearby star unexpectedly going full nova. And, I somehow doubt that either of these events are being actively prepared for.
<br> <br>
So why again were they moving the hands on their non-quantifiable imaginary model clock again?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would nuclear weapon reduction have any bearing on doomsday scenarios ?
Sure , a full nuclear exchange would have drastic global impact , but if something is going to end life on earth , it will be either a ) A massive impact from a meteor , or b ) a massive gamma ray burst from some nearby star unexpectedly going full nova .
And , I somehow doubt that either of these events are being actively prepared for .
So why again were they moving the hands on their non-quantifiable imaginary model clock again ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would nuclear weapon reduction have any bearing on doomsday scenarios?
Sure, a full nuclear exchange would have drastic global impact, but if something is going to end life on earth, it will be either a) A massive impact from a meteor, or b) a massive gamma ray burst from some nearby star unexpectedly going full nova.
And, I somehow doubt that either of these events are being actively prepared for.
So why again were they moving the hands on their non-quantifiable imaginary model clock again?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784686</id>
	<title>I hope they are right.</title>
	<author>csimpkin</author>
	<datestamp>1263553440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They are sure going to look silly if the world ends tomorrow.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They are sure going to look silly if the world ends tomorrow .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They are sure going to look silly if the world ends tomorrow.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30786938</id>
	<title>Re:I'm not worried</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263567840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That's stupid. Everyone knows humans were created 6,000 years ago.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's stupid .
Everyone knows humans were created 6,000 years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's stupid.
Everyone knows humans were created 6,000 years ago.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783402</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784398</id>
	<title>Consumer Device in the works</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263552060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So... this is a clock that only moves when you manually move it's hands with your own hands?</p><p>How useful. Where can I buy one of these devices?</p><p>I guess my question is: Why are they using a clock at all? What the heck does midnight have to do with anything? Why not a count-down mechanism with red LCD display, like hollywood attaches to all those bombs? At least the object would relate to what their trying to say.</p><p>I agree with what I think the common sentiment is here: this is just stupid and the minutes value has no comparative meaning.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So... this is a clock that only moves when you manually move it 's hands with your own hands ? How useful .
Where can I buy one of these devices ? I guess my question is : Why are they using a clock at all ?
What the heck does midnight have to do with anything ?
Why not a count-down mechanism with red LCD display , like hollywood attaches to all those bombs ?
At least the object would relate to what their trying to say.I agree with what I think the common sentiment is here : this is just stupid and the minutes value has no comparative meaning .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So... this is a clock that only moves when you manually move it's hands with your own hands?How useful.
Where can I buy one of these devices?I guess my question is: Why are they using a clock at all?
What the heck does midnight have to do with anything?
Why not a count-down mechanism with red LCD display, like hollywood attaches to all those bombs?
At least the object would relate to what their trying to say.I agree with what I think the common sentiment is here: this is just stupid and the minutes value has no comparative meaning.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783738</id>
	<title>Re:Really?</title>
	<author>Korey Kaczor</author>
	<datestamp>1263549240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Because it is run by a bunch of pretentious people who think they're more important than they really are.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Because it is run by a bunch of pretentious people who think they 're more important than they really are .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because it is run by a bunch of pretentious people who think they're more important than they really are.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30785588</id>
	<title>meh...</title>
	<author>GDawgGWC</author>
	<datestamp>1263558300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I say we just move it to 3pm and call it good.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I say we just move it to 3pm and call it good .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I say we just move it to 3pm and call it good.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784648</id>
	<title>Re:More credible if they included a 'seconds' hand</title>
	<author>Convector</author>
	<datestamp>1263553200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They need a watch with a second hand, millenium hand and an eon hand.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They need a watch with a second hand , millenium hand and an eon hand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They need a watch with a second hand, millenium hand and an eon hand.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784082</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30785274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783886
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783540
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30785606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784082
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30789996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30795672
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30792702
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783522
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30790452
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783878
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784596
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783548
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783840
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783560
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30788638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783648
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30786938
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783738
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784338
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783402
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_15_1740242_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783974
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783402
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30790452
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783606
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30786938
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784338
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783242
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783238
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30795672
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784596
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783886
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783548
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30789996
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783452
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783434
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783522
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30792702
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30785606
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783948
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783574
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30788638
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30785274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783878
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783540
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783680
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783764
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784082
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30784648
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_15_1740242.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783450
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783626
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783974
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_15_1740242.30783560
</commentlist>
</conversation>
