<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_13_1818209</id>
	<title>One Variety of Sea Slugs Cuts Out the Energy Middleman</title>
	<author>timothy</author>
	<datestamp>1263409440000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>dragonturtle69 writes with this story, short on details but interesting: <i>"These sea slugs, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elysia\_chlorotica"> <em>Elysia chlorotica</em></a>, have evolved the <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34824610/ns/technology\_and\_science-science/?GT1=43001">ability to gain energy via photosynthesis</a>.  Forget about genetic modifications for sports enhancements.  I want to be able to never need to eat again &mdash; or do I?"</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>dragonturtle69 writes with this story , short on details but interesting : " These sea slugs , Elysia chlorotica , have evolved the ability to gain energy via photosynthesis .
Forget about genetic modifications for sports enhancements .
I want to be able to never need to eat again    or do I ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>dragonturtle69 writes with this story, short on details but interesting: "These sea slugs,  Elysia chlorotica, have evolved the ability to gain energy via photosynthesis.
Forget about genetic modifications for sports enhancements.
I want to be able to never need to eat again — or do I?
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754926</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>Broken scope</author>
	<datestamp>1263415440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I seriously doubt that we have enough surface area to replace eating with photosynthesis. We would also continue to need nutritional input.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I seriously doubt that we have enough surface area to replace eating with photosynthesis .
We would also continue to need nutritional input .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I seriously doubt that we have enough surface area to replace eating with photosynthesis.
We would also continue to need nutritional input.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756428</id>
	<title>Exactly right</title>
	<author>SteveFoerster</author>
	<datestamp>1263378120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I too think that ABC Family are a bunch of sea slugs for having canceled The Middleman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I too think that ABC Family are a bunch of sea slugs for having canceled The Middleman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I too think that ABC Family are a bunch of sea slugs for having canceled The Middleman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755872</id>
	<title>news?</title>
	<author>SerpensV</author>
	<datestamp>1263375780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>i've heard about this slug a few years ago. How is it news?</htmltext>
<tokenext>i 've heard about this slug a few years ago .
How is it news ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>i've heard about this slug a few years ago.
How is it news?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30760222</id>
	<title>Lamarckism</title>
	<author>Scarbo27</author>
	<datestamp>1263398160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to TFA: 'In fact, the slugs incorporate the genetic material so well, they pass it on to further generations of slugs."  Isn't this the long-discredited (allegedly) Lamarckism?  Passing on acquired characteristics to the next generation is Lamarckism.  And if this isn't Lamarckism, could someone explain why I am wrong?  And how can there be 210 comments and, as far as I can tell, no one else noticed this?</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to TFA : 'In fact , the slugs incorporate the genetic material so well , they pass it on to further generations of slugs .
" Is n't this the long-discredited ( allegedly ) Lamarckism ?
Passing on acquired characteristics to the next generation is Lamarckism .
And if this is n't Lamarckism , could someone explain why I am wrong ?
And how can there be 210 comments and , as far as I can tell , no one else noticed this ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to TFA: 'In fact, the slugs incorporate the genetic material so well, they pass it on to further generations of slugs.
"  Isn't this the long-discredited (allegedly) Lamarckism?
Passing on acquired characteristics to the next generation is Lamarckism.
And if this isn't Lamarckism, could someone explain why I am wrong?
And how can there be 210 comments and, as far as I can tell, no one else noticed this?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754718</id>
	<title>Re:Nitpick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263414540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>No I didn't read the article, MSNBC rarely loads properly here at work.</p><p>I believe that saying it gains energy via photosynthesis is incorrect.  Photosynthesis causes a chemical reaction that converts Carbon Dioxide and Water (CO2 and H2O) into Sugar and Oxygen (C6H12O6 and O2).  The sugar is then metabolized (correct term?) into energy.</p></div><p>Splitting hairs is more like it. By that same logic you can say that coal isn't an energy source because it's simply the result of a chemical reaction caused by the sun a 100+ million years ago. The slugs are using the sun's energy much as plants do to covert chemicals into sugars which they can use as fuel. If you had read the article the bigger issue is they may absorb the chlorophyll initially but they are able to reproduce it themselves from there. They are very close to being a hybrid between plants and animals and maybe in a few thousand years they will bridge that gap by being born with the ability to create chlorophyll. It's more about the plant and animal kingdoms than semantics about energy production processes.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>No I did n't read the article , MSNBC rarely loads properly here at work.I believe that saying it gains energy via photosynthesis is incorrect .
Photosynthesis causes a chemical reaction that converts Carbon Dioxide and Water ( CO2 and H2O ) into Sugar and Oxygen ( C6H12O6 and O2 ) .
The sugar is then metabolized ( correct term ?
) into energy.Splitting hairs is more like it .
By that same logic you can say that coal is n't an energy source because it 's simply the result of a chemical reaction caused by the sun a 100 + million years ago .
The slugs are using the sun 's energy much as plants do to covert chemicals into sugars which they can use as fuel .
If you had read the article the bigger issue is they may absorb the chlorophyll initially but they are able to reproduce it themselves from there .
They are very close to being a hybrid between plants and animals and maybe in a few thousand years they will bridge that gap by being born with the ability to create chlorophyll .
It 's more about the plant and animal kingdoms than semantics about energy production processes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No I didn't read the article, MSNBC rarely loads properly here at work.I believe that saying it gains energy via photosynthesis is incorrect.
Photosynthesis causes a chemical reaction that converts Carbon Dioxide and Water (CO2 and H2O) into Sugar and Oxygen (C6H12O6 and O2).
The sugar is then metabolized (correct term?
) into energy.Splitting hairs is more like it.
By that same logic you can say that coal isn't an energy source because it's simply the result of a chemical reaction caused by the sun a 100+ million years ago.
The slugs are using the sun's energy much as plants do to covert chemicals into sugars which they can use as fuel.
If you had read the article the bigger issue is they may absorb the chlorophyll initially but they are able to reproduce it themselves from there.
They are very close to being a hybrid between plants and animals and maybe in a few thousand years they will bridge that gap by being born with the ability to create chlorophyll.
It's more about the plant and animal kingdoms than semantics about energy production processes.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30760002</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>Narnie</author>
	<datestamp>1263396180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I guess that explains what all those guys are doing when they spend the whole day hanging out in front of 7-eleven. And I thought that they were illegals loitering around for manual labor type work. Shame on me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess that explains what all those guys are doing when they spend the whole day hanging out in front of 7-eleven .
And I thought that they were illegals loitering around for manual labor type work .
Shame on me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess that explains what all those guys are doing when they spend the whole day hanging out in front of 7-eleven.
And I thought that they were illegals loitering around for manual labor type work.
Shame on me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755120</id>
	<title>Actual evolution?</title>
	<author>DaveV1.0</author>
	<datestamp>1263416160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is this actual, observed evolution?<br>Is this the proof creationists are always demanding?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this actual , observed evolution ? Is this the proof creationists are always demanding ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this actual, observed evolution?Is this the proof creationists are always demanding?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30762268</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263468000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When this works for real, population shoots to 200 billion and we are killing each other for a spot in the sun. Live long and prosper. Sometimes I despair of humanity.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When this works for real , population shoots to 200 billion and we are killing each other for a spot in the sun .
Live long and prosper .
Sometimes I despair of humanity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When this works for real, population shoots to 200 billion and we are killing each other for a spot in the sun.
Live long and prosper.
Sometimes I despair of humanity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755386</id>
	<title>Never?</title>
	<author>TooMad</author>
	<datestamp>1263373980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No more Sushi, no more Chocolate, no more Carrabba's Cozze in bianco. Now if it were something you could switch on and off I would be all for it. No more military chow hall food. I could list more things you wouldn't have to eat but that alone is enough.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No more Sushi , no more Chocolate , no more Carrabba 's Cozze in bianco .
Now if it were something you could switch on and off I would be all for it .
No more military chow hall food .
I could list more things you would n't have to eat but that alone is enough .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No more Sushi, no more Chocolate, no more Carrabba's Cozze in bianco.
Now if it were something you could switch on and off I would be all for it.
No more military chow hall food.
I could list more things you wouldn't have to eat but that alone is enough.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30759282</id>
	<title>world food problems solved</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263391020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just implant this gene through vaccination and the world food problems are solved!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just implant this gene through vaccination and the world food problems are solved !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just implant this gene through vaccination and the world food problems are solved!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755044</id>
	<title>Re:Nitpick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263415800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well to properly nitpick - to take out the energy middleman you'd need to firstly be your own fusion device as the sun is the real middleman. The sun isn't the source of energy it is simply an energy source as atoms are a source of energy, the sun just brings them together.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well to properly nitpick - to take out the energy middleman you 'd need to firstly be your own fusion device as the sun is the real middleman .
The sun is n't the source of energy it is simply an energy source as atoms are a source of energy , the sun just brings them together .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well to properly nitpick - to take out the energy middleman you'd need to firstly be your own fusion device as the sun is the real middleman.
The sun isn't the source of energy it is simply an energy source as atoms are a source of energy, the sun just brings them together.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755080</id>
	<title>Re:Mail Order Monsters</title>
	<author>SydShamino</author>
	<datestamp>1263415980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Mod up for kickass game reference.  One of my favorites on the Commodore 64.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Mod up for kickass game reference .
One of my favorites on the Commodore 64 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mod up for kickass game reference.
One of my favorites on the Commodore 64.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30760684</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>alt154</author>
	<datestamp>1263402420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>so you harvest 1/3 of your caloric intake from light at the expense of having a green skin color.
bad investment.</htmltext>
<tokenext>so you harvest 1/3 of your caloric intake from light at the expense of having a green skin color .
bad investment .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so you harvest 1/3 of your caloric intake from light at the expense of having a green skin color.
bad investment.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755116</id>
	<title>Re:Nitpick</title>
	<author>Drethon</author>
	<datestamp>1263416100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Isn't that similar to normal digestion in a way?<br>
<br>
I know the stomach uses acid to break down food but I believe we use bacteria to actually process the food, we are not capable to do it without the help of another organism.<br>
<br>
So similarly the slug cannot processes the sun, water and carbon dioxide without the help of an outside source.  Though this source does not reproduce itself so must constantly be replenished.<br>
<br>
The above assumes I remember my biology correctly...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't that similar to normal digestion in a way ?
I know the stomach uses acid to break down food but I believe we use bacteria to actually process the food , we are not capable to do it without the help of another organism .
So similarly the slug can not processes the sun , water and carbon dioxide without the help of an outside source .
Though this source does not reproduce itself so must constantly be replenished .
The above assumes I remember my biology correctly.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't that similar to normal digestion in a way?
I know the stomach uses acid to break down food but I believe we use bacteria to actually process the food, we are not capable to do it without the help of another organism.
So similarly the slug cannot processes the sun, water and carbon dioxide without the help of an outside source.
Though this source does not reproduce itself so must constantly be replenished.
The above assumes I remember my biology correctly...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754892</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754892</id>
	<title>Re:Nitpick</title>
	<author>skine</author>
	<datestamp>1263415200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>To summarize the article:</p><p>Slugs have somehow included algae DNA with its own, and are now capable of actual photosynthesis. The DNA that was copied didn't code for the creation of chloroplasts, so the slugs have to consume a sufficient amount of algae before they can begin the process.</p><p>As long as they are exposed to light for 12 hours per day, they can live without the need for food.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>To summarize the article : Slugs have somehow included algae DNA with its own , and are now capable of actual photosynthesis .
The DNA that was copied did n't code for the creation of chloroplasts , so the slugs have to consume a sufficient amount of algae before they can begin the process.As long as they are exposed to light for 12 hours per day , they can live without the need for food .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>To summarize the article:Slugs have somehow included algae DNA with its own, and are now capable of actual photosynthesis.
The DNA that was copied didn't code for the creation of chloroplasts, so the slugs have to consume a sufficient amount of algae before they can begin the process.As long as they are exposed to light for 12 hours per day, they can live without the need for food.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756050</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>icantbemiyu</author>
	<datestamp>1263376500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>How come we only get 5\% conversion efficiency? I think we should be able to swing something higher than that. 10\% should cut it down to like..what? 1/3 Calorie consumtion? Your standard P-cell gets \%20.

In any case....eating is what needs to go. It's sleep. I want to evolve to be the creature that does not need sleep.</htmltext>
<tokenext>How come we only get 5 \ % conversion efficiency ?
I think we should be able to swing something higher than that .
10 \ % should cut it down to like..what ?
1/3 Calorie consumtion ?
Your standard P-cell gets \ % 20 .
In any case....eating is what needs to go .
It 's sleep .
I want to evolve to be the creature that does not need sleep .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How come we only get 5\% conversion efficiency?
I think we should be able to swing something higher than that.
10\% should cut it down to like..what?
1/3 Calorie consumtion?
Your standard P-cell gets \%20.
In any case....eating is what needs to go.
It's sleep.
I want to evolve to be the creature that does not need sleep.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30759026</id>
	<title>Re:So What, It would still be a good thing...</title>
	<author>BiggerIsBetter</author>
	<datestamp>1263389640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Sure their skin would be green, but that beats starving to death.</p></div><p>Maybe they could make an arrangement with Captain Kirk for the rest of their needs?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sure their skin would be green , but that beats starving to death.Maybe they could make an arrangement with Captain Kirk for the rest of their needs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sure their skin would be green, but that beats starving to death.Maybe they could make an arrangement with Captain Kirk for the rest of their needs?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30764190</id>
	<title>Re:So What, It would still be a good thing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263485040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except for one little detail people often overlook:</p><p>Photosynthesis requires water.. quite a lot of it actually. So in dry famine months, you'd be out of water anyway, people still couldn't use photosynthesis as a food source, and any available water would have to be used for growing crops.</p><p>Plants are a lot more efficient at this whole "sun into energy" thing than people could ever hope to be.</p><p>(It's the little things that get ya)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except for one little detail people often overlook : Photosynthesis requires water.. quite a lot of it actually .
So in dry famine months , you 'd be out of water anyway , people still could n't use photosynthesis as a food source , and any available water would have to be used for growing crops.Plants are a lot more efficient at this whole " sun into energy " thing than people could ever hope to be .
( It 's the little things that get ya )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except for one little detail people often overlook:Photosynthesis requires water.. quite a lot of it actually.
So in dry famine months, you'd be out of water anyway, people still couldn't use photosynthesis as a food source, and any available water would have to be used for growing crops.Plants are a lot more efficient at this whole "sun into energy" thing than people could ever hope to be.
(It's the little things that get ya)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755342</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756028</id>
	<title>Re:Actual evolution?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263376440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, God just invented them with the ability to do this to confuse us all.   God loves gettin' his jollies off keep mankind eternally confused.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , God just invented them with the ability to do this to confuse us all .
God loves gettin ' his jollies off keep mankind eternally confused .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, God just invented them with the ability to do this to confuse us all.
God loves gettin' his jollies off keep mankind eternally confused.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756040</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>by (1706743)</author>
	<datestamp>1263376500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Of course, your calculations of energy consumption are for a normal human. The gastrointestinal system not only produces energy, but consumes it as well. For a photosynthetic human, a smaller gastrointestinal system could result in less power consumption. Likewise, transporting energy could become more efficient, in that it could be less centralized; tasks such as hair growth could use the energy from the surrounding photosynthetic skin, rather than the food energy (of course, the actual material must be pulled from the food).

That said, I know zilch about biology, as I'm sure my post made evident.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Of course , your calculations of energy consumption are for a normal human .
The gastrointestinal system not only produces energy , but consumes it as well .
For a photosynthetic human , a smaller gastrointestinal system could result in less power consumption .
Likewise , transporting energy could become more efficient , in that it could be less centralized ; tasks such as hair growth could use the energy from the surrounding photosynthetic skin , rather than the food energy ( of course , the actual material must be pulled from the food ) .
That said , I know zilch about biology , as I 'm sure my post made evident .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Of course, your calculations of energy consumption are for a normal human.
The gastrointestinal system not only produces energy, but consumes it as well.
For a photosynthetic human, a smaller gastrointestinal system could result in less power consumption.
Likewise, transporting energy could become more efficient, in that it could be less centralized; tasks such as hair growth could use the energy from the surrounding photosynthetic skin, rather than the food energy (of course, the actual material must be pulled from the food).
That said, I know zilch about biology, as I'm sure my post made evident.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30757058</id>
	<title>Re:Actual evolution?</title>
	<author>osgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1263381000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Creationists demand proof of evolution in the way that I demand a pony when my kids are being whiny.  I don't really want a pony and I wouldn't know what to do with one if my demand was met.</p><p>If their demands reflected a sincere desire for proof, then they could <a href="http://www.talkorigins.org/" title="talkorigins.org">easily find and understand it.</a> [talkorigins.org].  No, what Creationists want is to have everyone adhere to their belief that the Bible is the inerrant word of God no matter what proof or common sense may contradict that belief.</p><p>Demanding proof is just an act of posturing to make it look like they're having a real battle of ideas about the nature of reality.  Proof is not what they're looking for.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Creationists demand proof of evolution in the way that I demand a pony when my kids are being whiny .
I do n't really want a pony and I would n't know what to do with one if my demand was met.If their demands reflected a sincere desire for proof , then they could easily find and understand it .
[ talkorigins.org ] . No , what Creationists want is to have everyone adhere to their belief that the Bible is the inerrant word of God no matter what proof or common sense may contradict that belief.Demanding proof is just an act of posturing to make it look like they 're having a real battle of ideas about the nature of reality .
Proof is not what they 're looking for .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Creationists demand proof of evolution in the way that I demand a pony when my kids are being whiny.
I don't really want a pony and I wouldn't know what to do with one if my demand was met.If their demands reflected a sincere desire for proof, then they could easily find and understand it.
[talkorigins.org].  No, what Creationists want is to have everyone adhere to their belief that the Bible is the inerrant word of God no matter what proof or common sense may contradict that belief.Demanding proof is just an act of posturing to make it look like they're having a real battle of ideas about the nature of reality.
Proof is not what they're looking for.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756158</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>JeanPaulBob</author>
	<datestamp>1263376920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wait... You're saying there's a <i>reason</i> plants don't move?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Wait... You 're saying there 's a reason plants do n't move ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wait... You're saying there's a reason plants don't move?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30759960</id>
	<title>Re:Mail Order Monsters</title>
	<author>obeythefist</author>
	<datestamp>1263395760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Stay out of the sun or you'll get fat!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Stay out of the sun or you 'll get fat !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Stay out of the sun or you'll get fat!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754680</id>
	<title>Star Trek IV</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263414420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"We are looking for the Nuclear Wessles."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" We are looking for the Nuclear Wessles .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"We are looking for the Nuclear Wessles.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755206</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>IndustrialComplex</author>
	<datestamp>1263373320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>One would hope that you could control the photosynthesis to keep from getting too fat, though.</i></p><p>Sunscreen.<br>SPF: Diet</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One would hope that you could control the photosynthesis to keep from getting too fat , though.Sunscreen.SPF : Diet</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One would hope that you could control the photosynthesis to keep from getting too fat, though.Sunscreen.SPF: Diet</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30758030</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>Hecatonchires</author>
	<datestamp>1263385620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thats why triffids started eating people</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thats why triffids started eating people</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thats why triffids started eating people</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756158</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754316</id>
	<title>Mail Order Monsters</title>
	<author>bigattichouse</author>
	<datestamp>1263413160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That was my totally favorite upgrade in Mail Order Monsters - recharge from the sub!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That was my totally favorite upgrade in Mail Order Monsters - recharge from the sub !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That was my totally favorite upgrade in Mail Order Monsters - recharge from the sub!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756722</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>Eponymous Bastard</author>
	<datestamp>1263379440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>obXKCD... err... <a href="http://www.schlockmercenary.com/d/20030311.html" title="schlockmercenary.com">obSchlockMercenary</a> [schlockmercenary.com]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>obXKCD... err... obSchlockMercenary [ schlockmercenary.com ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>obXKCD... err... obSchlockMercenary [schlockmercenary.com]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30757516</id>
	<title>Feedback loop</title>
	<author>DarkofPeace</author>
	<datestamp>1263383160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So, the fatter you get, the more skin, then more energy from the sun, more fat, more skin, ect...</htmltext>
<tokenext>So , the fatter you get , the more skin , then more energy from the sun , more fat , more skin , ect.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So, the fatter you get, the more skin, then more energy from the sun, more fat, more skin, ect...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30758616</id>
	<title>green chicks</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263387780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That green chick in the latest Star Trek didn't seem SLUGgish, and I'm assuming she was capable of photosythesis. You would probably see her running around outside nekked most of the time, which is just fine with me. The problem with me being green and nekked outside with the likes of her is that I'd be WOOD most of the time and I might be mistaken for a tree.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That green chick in the latest Star Trek did n't seem SLUGgish , and I 'm assuming she was capable of photosythesis .
You would probably see her running around outside nekked most of the time , which is just fine with me .
The problem with me being green and nekked outside with the likes of her is that I 'd be WOOD most of the time and I might be mistaken for a tree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That green chick in the latest Star Trek didn't seem SLUGgish, and I'm assuming she was capable of photosythesis.
You would probably see her running around outside nekked most of the time, which is just fine with me.
The problem with me being green and nekked outside with the likes of her is that I'd be WOOD most of the time and I might be mistaken for a tree.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755392</id>
	<title>How is this news?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263373980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Slugs have been around for millions of years!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Slugs have been around for millions of years !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slugs have been around for millions of years!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755766</id>
	<title>I know i do.</title>
	<author>unity100</author>
	<datestamp>1263375480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>if you take time to think how much of our time passes while doing mandatory eating, strenous digesting and dealing with the excrement and crapping it, you would be appalled.</p><p>in addition, a good deal of energy we take in by eating is spent on digesting the food itself. check your body in an atlas. almost 1/3 of the internal organs are allocated to digestion.</p><p>imagine cutting out the middleman.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>if you take time to think how much of our time passes while doing mandatory eating , strenous digesting and dealing with the excrement and crapping it , you would be appalled.in addition , a good deal of energy we take in by eating is spent on digesting the food itself .
check your body in an atlas .
almost 1/3 of the internal organs are allocated to digestion.imagine cutting out the middleman .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>if you take time to think how much of our time passes while doing mandatory eating, strenous digesting and dealing with the excrement and crapping it, you would be appalled.in addition, a good deal of energy we take in by eating is spent on digesting the food itself.
check your body in an atlas.
almost 1/3 of the internal organs are allocated to digestion.imagine cutting out the middleman.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754656</id>
	<title>Re:Nitpick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263414300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Photosynthesis causes a chemical reaction that uses ENERGY that is GAINED from sunlight to convert Carbon Dioxide and Water (CO2 and H2O) into Sugar and Oxygen (C6H12O6 and O2).</p></div><p>fixed that for ya</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Photosynthesis causes a chemical reaction that uses ENERGY that is GAINED from sunlight to convert Carbon Dioxide and Water ( CO2 and H2O ) into Sugar and Oxygen ( C6H12O6 and O2 ) .fixed that for ya</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Photosynthesis causes a chemical reaction that uses ENERGY that is GAINED from sunlight to convert Carbon Dioxide and Water (CO2 and H2O) into Sugar and Oxygen (C6H12O6 and O2).fixed that for ya
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755494</id>
	<title>forget absorbling light</title>
	<author>ajrs</author>
	<datestamp>1263374460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I want to emit light. at will.  So I don't need a flashlight, or could get a job as an organic tanning booth and loose weight at the same time.  Or, dare I say, sparkle when outdoors.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to emit light .
at will .
So I do n't need a flashlight , or could get a job as an organic tanning booth and loose weight at the same time .
Or , dare I say , sparkle when outdoors .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to emit light.
at will.
So I don't need a flashlight, or could get a job as an organic tanning booth and loose weight at the same time.
Or, dare I say, sparkle when outdoors.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30760278</id>
	<title>Lamarck was right?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263398940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"In fact, the slugs incorporate the genetic material so well, they pass it on to further generations of slugs."<br>This is huge news.  A demonstration of Lamarckism in action.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" In fact , the slugs incorporate the genetic material so well , they pass it on to further generations of slugs .
" This is huge news .
A demonstration of Lamarckism in action .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"In fact, the slugs incorporate the genetic material so well, they pass it on to further generations of slugs.
"This is huge news.
A demonstration of Lamarckism in action.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30761180</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263408240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Right, but it may keep me from starving to death. Sure I'll be braindead... but I don't see how that's any difference from my current condition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Right , but it may keep me from starving to death .
Sure I 'll be braindead... but I do n't see how that 's any difference from my current condition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Right, but it may keep me from starving to death.
Sure I'll be braindead... but I don't see how that's any difference from my current condition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755994</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>rickb928</author>
	<datestamp>1263376320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That covers my needs.  I'm in!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That covers my needs .
I 'm in !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That covers my needs.
I'm in!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756474</id>
	<title>Re:Mail Order Monsters</title>
	<author>Mister Whirly</author>
	<datestamp>1263378300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Loved that game!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Loved that game !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Loved that game!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754316</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755810</id>
	<title>Re:Actual evolution?</title>
	<author>osu-neko</author>
	<datestamp>1263375600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is this actual, observed evolution?
Is this the proof creationists are always demanding?</p></div><p>Yes and no.  It is one of thousands of examples of observed evolution, and the process is already well proved.  This will not stop the demands, however, since the demands are not made in good faith...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is this actual , observed evolution ?
Is this the proof creationists are always demanding ? Yes and no .
It is one of thousands of examples of observed evolution , and the process is already well proved .
This will not stop the demands , however , since the demands are not made in good faith.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is this actual, observed evolution?
Is this the proof creationists are always demanding?Yes and no.
It is one of thousands of examples of observed evolution, and the process is already well proved.
This will not stop the demands, however, since the demands are not made in good faith...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755120</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755300</id>
	<title>Congeress is doing what?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263373680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sea slugs eliminating middlemen?!?  Does this mean instead of private contracts they are just going to take control of entire industries?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sea slugs eliminating middlemen ? ! ?
Does this mean instead of private contracts they are just going to take control of entire industries ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sea slugs eliminating middlemen?!?
Does this mean instead of private contracts they are just going to take control of entire industries?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30758172</id>
	<title>Re:Actual evolution?</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1263386040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like God is a pretty big ass. Lemme outta here, I'm going to find us a better God, this one sucks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like God is a pretty big ass .
Lem me outta here , I 'm going to find us a better God , this one sucks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like God is a pretty big ass.
Lemme outta here, I'm going to find us a better God, this one sucks.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756028</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754588</id>
	<title>Re:Nitpick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263414120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>The sugar is then metabolized (correct term?) into energy.</i></p><p>This means, of course that you will <i>still need to eat.</i>  You won't need to eat carbs, but you will still need your protein, vitamins, etc.</p><p>Presumably you will eat a lot less, and will gain a lot more weight when you <i>do</i> eat carbs.</p><p>If humans could get photosynthetic skin, they would also need to get their taste buds altered to find straight protein delicious, or the current obesity epidemic will look like a famine by comparison.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The sugar is then metabolized ( correct term ?
) into energy.This means , of course that you will still need to eat .
You wo n't need to eat carbs , but you will still need your protein , vitamins , etc.Presumably you will eat a lot less , and will gain a lot more weight when you do eat carbs.If humans could get photosynthetic skin , they would also need to get their taste buds altered to find straight protein delicious , or the current obesity epidemic will look like a famine by comparison .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The sugar is then metabolized (correct term?
) into energy.This means, of course that you will still need to eat.
You won't need to eat carbs, but you will still need your protein, vitamins, etc.Presumably you will eat a lot less, and will gain a lot more weight when you do eat carbs.If humans could get photosynthetic skin, they would also need to get their taste buds altered to find straight protein delicious, or the current obesity epidemic will look like a famine by comparison.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30757868</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1263384780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>First, you need to assume a perfectly spherical human...</i></p><p>Judging from a few pics I've seen of the US population lately, they're working on that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>First , you need to assume a perfectly spherical human...Judging from a few pics I 've seen of the US population lately , they 're working on that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>First, you need to assume a perfectly spherical human...Judging from a few pics I've seen of the US population lately, they're working on that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756844</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756500</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>vlm</author>
	<datestamp>1263378480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>One would hope that you could control the photosynthesis to keep from getting too fat, though.</p></div><p>Wear variable amount of clothes.</p><p>Strange side effect -&gt; women in tiny bikinis would be fat, women in the cover it all up wetsuit like one pieces would be skinny.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>One would hope that you could control the photosynthesis to keep from getting too fat , though.Wear variable amount of clothes.Strange side effect - &gt; women in tiny bikinis would be fat , women in the cover it all up wetsuit like one pieces would be skinny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One would hope that you could control the photosynthesis to keep from getting too fat, though.Wear variable amount of clothes.Strange side effect -&gt; women in tiny bikinis would be fat, women in the cover it all up wetsuit like one pieces would be skinny.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754368</id>
	<title>No you don't</title>
	<author>kiick</author>
	<datestamp>1263413400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As everybody knows....<br>It's not easy being green.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As everybody knows....It 's not easy being green .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As everybody knows....It's not easy being green.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755342</id>
	<title>So What, It would still be a good thing...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263373800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Especially in Third world countries where there is plenty of sun, not much food and not much to do other than subsistence living,.   At least it would be enough to get a lot of starving humans through the dry famine months that they get in thrid world countries near the equator.</p><p>Sure their skin would be green, but that beats starving to death.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Especially in Third world countries where there is plenty of sun , not much food and not much to do other than subsistence living, .
At least it would be enough to get a lot of starving humans through the dry famine months that they get in thrid world countries near the equator.Sure their skin would be green , but that beats starving to death .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Especially in Third world countries where there is plenty of sun, not much food and not much to do other than subsistence living,.
At least it would be enough to get a lot of starving humans through the dry famine months that they get in thrid world countries near the equator.Sure their skin would be green, but that beats starving to death.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263415500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I just did a few quick calculations. Assuming humans have 2 square meters of skin, and stood naked in direct sunlight in the best conditions for 8 hours per day, and assuming 5\% efficiency for photosynthesis, we would only get enough energy to provide for 11 hours of sleep (250 BTU/hr), 7 hours of sitting still (400 BTU), 4 hours of light work (650 BTU) or 1 hour of heavy work (2400 BTU). We'd still probably need to consume 2/3 or so of our normal caloric intake from food.</p><p>Sources:<br><a href="http://www.solarexpert.com/Heat-theory.html" title="solarexpert.com">http://www.solarexpert.com/Heat-theory.html</a> [solarexpert.com]<br><a href="http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/IgorFridman.shtml" title="hypertextbook.com">http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/IgorFridman.shtml</a> [hypertextbook.com]<br><a href="http://www.answerbag.com/q\_view/514275" title="answerbag.com">http://www.answerbag.com/q\_view/514275</a> [answerbag.com]<br><a href="http://www.ccmr.cornell.edu/education/ask/index.html?quid=1021" title="cornell.edu">http://www.ccmr.cornell.edu/education/ask/index.html?quid=1021</a> [cornell.edu]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I just did a few quick calculations .
Assuming humans have 2 square meters of skin , and stood naked in direct sunlight in the best conditions for 8 hours per day , and assuming 5 \ % efficiency for photosynthesis , we would only get enough energy to provide for 11 hours of sleep ( 250 BTU/hr ) , 7 hours of sitting still ( 400 BTU ) , 4 hours of light work ( 650 BTU ) or 1 hour of heavy work ( 2400 BTU ) .
We 'd still probably need to consume 2/3 or so of our normal caloric intake from food.Sources : http : //www.solarexpert.com/Heat-theory.html [ solarexpert.com ] http : //hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/IgorFridman.shtml [ hypertextbook.com ] http : //www.answerbag.com/q \ _view/514275 [ answerbag.com ] http : //www.ccmr.cornell.edu/education/ask/index.html ? quid = 1021 [ cornell.edu ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just did a few quick calculations.
Assuming humans have 2 square meters of skin, and stood naked in direct sunlight in the best conditions for 8 hours per day, and assuming 5\% efficiency for photosynthesis, we would only get enough energy to provide for 11 hours of sleep (250 BTU/hr), 7 hours of sitting still (400 BTU), 4 hours of light work (650 BTU) or 1 hour of heavy work (2400 BTU).
We'd still probably need to consume 2/3 or so of our normal caloric intake from food.Sources:http://www.solarexpert.com/Heat-theory.html [solarexpert.com]http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/IgorFridman.shtml [hypertextbook.com]http://www.answerbag.com/q\_view/514275 [answerbag.com]http://www.ccmr.cornell.edu/education/ask/index.html?quid=1021 [cornell.edu]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320</id>
	<title>eating</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263413160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>I want to be able to never need to eat again -- or do I?</i></p><p>I'l like the ability to never HAVE to eat again, but I wouldn't want to lose the ability to eat at all. Eating is enjoyable. One would hope that you could control the photosynthesis to keep from getting too fat, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I want to be able to never need to eat again -- or do I ? I'l like the ability to never HAVE to eat again , but I would n't want to lose the ability to eat at all .
Eating is enjoyable .
One would hope that you could control the photosynthesis to keep from getting too fat , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I want to be able to never need to eat again -- or do I?I'l like the ability to never HAVE to eat again, but I wouldn't want to lose the ability to eat at all.
Eating is enjoyable.
One would hope that you could control the photosynthesis to keep from getting too fat, though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754610</id>
	<title>Re:Nitpick</title>
	<author>kmcarr</author>
	<datestamp>1263414180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, the statement is essentially correct.  The slugs harvest (i.e. gain) energy via trapping photons with chlorophyll.  They store that energy as chemical bonds in sugar molecules.  They then release the energy as needed by metabolizing the sugar.  Photosynthesis is the coupled capturing and storing of energy so saying that it "gains" energy via photosynthesis is a reasonable simplification.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , the statement is essentially correct .
The slugs harvest ( i.e .
gain ) energy via trapping photons with chlorophyll .
They store that energy as chemical bonds in sugar molecules .
They then release the energy as needed by metabolizing the sugar .
Photosynthesis is the coupled capturing and storing of energy so saying that it " gains " energy via photosynthesis is a reasonable simplification .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, the statement is essentially correct.
The slugs harvest (i.e.
gain) energy via trapping photons with chlorophyll.
They store that energy as chemical bonds in sugar molecules.
They then release the energy as needed by metabolizing the sugar.
Photosynthesis is the coupled capturing and storing of energy so saying that it "gains" energy via photosynthesis is a reasonable simplification.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30764340</id>
	<title>We still get surprised</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263485580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>....and it taste like chicken</p><p>There's so much about animal biology we don't understand.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>....and it taste like chickenThere 's so much about animal biology we do n't understand .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>....and it taste like chickenThere's so much about animal biology we don't understand.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755222</id>
	<title>Re:Nitpick</title>
	<author>DahGhostfacedFiddlah</author>
	<datestamp>1263373380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You might want to look up the word "via".</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You might want to look up the word " via " .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You might want to look up the word "via".</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>confused one</author>
	<datestamp>1263414180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Slugs aren't very energetic.  It's doubtful that photosynthesis alone will provide the energy necessary to power your body <i>and</i> that meat based computer in your head.  You would still need to ingest a fair amount of food, in order to extract the concentrated energy contained in it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Slugs are n't very energetic .
It 's doubtful that photosynthesis alone will provide the energy necessary to power your body and that meat based computer in your head .
You would still need to ingest a fair amount of food , in order to extract the concentrated energy contained in it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Slugs aren't very energetic.
It's doubtful that photosynthesis alone will provide the energy necessary to power your body and that meat based computer in your head.
You would still need to ingest a fair amount of food, in order to extract the concentrated energy contained in it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754578</id>
	<title>Re:Nitpick</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263414060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well it gains chemical energy which can be stored or transformed into mechanical energy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well it gains chemical energy which can be stored or transformed into mechanical energy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well it gains chemical energy which can be stored or transformed into mechanical energy.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30760770</id>
	<title>From TFA "turning sunlight into energy"</title>
	<author>jamesswift</author>
	<datestamp>1263403320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I hate it when it's phrased like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I hate it when it 's phrased like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I hate it when it's phrased like that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754362</id>
	<title>They're Zerg.  Duh.</title>
	<author>Rei</author>
	<datestamp>1263413340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Any other questions that could be easily answered by playing Starcraft?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Any other questions that could be easily answered by playing Starcraft ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any other questions that could be easily answered by playing Starcraft?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756152</id>
	<title>See, this is why we shouldn't discount cannibalism</title>
	<author>macraig</author>
	<datestamp>1263376920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Eating the brains of our slain foes is probably as close as we'll ever get to a Highlander quickening.  These slugs are already workin' their way up the ladder, and they just might be coming for YOUR brains in a few years....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Eating the brains of our slain foes is probably as close as we 'll ever get to a Highlander quickening .
These slugs are already workin ' their way up the ladder , and they just might be coming for YOUR brains in a few years... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Eating the brains of our slain foes is probably as close as we'll ever get to a Highlander quickening.
These slugs are already workin' their way up the ladder, and they just might be coming for YOUR brains in a few years....</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755874</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>Z00L00K</author>
	<datestamp>1263375780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You will probably need to eat something to gain minerals, but eating for energy can be restricted.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You will probably need to eat something to gain minerals , but eating for energy can be restricted .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You will probably need to eat something to gain minerals, but eating for energy can be restricted.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30760438</id>
	<title>Never eat again?  Ask Roger Ebert about that.</title>
	<author>lpaul55</author>
	<datestamp>1263400200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Roger Ebert recently wrote about his life after surgery.  He can no longer take anything by mouth.  I can't imagine life without taste, but he lives it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Roger Ebert recently wrote about his life after surgery .
He can no longer take anything by mouth .
I ca n't imagine life without taste , but he lives it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Roger Ebert recently wrote about his life after surgery.
He can no longer take anything by mouth.
I can't imagine life without taste, but he lives it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756844</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1263380040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>come on now, you know thats not how you do back of the napkin math. First, you need to assume a perfectly spherical human...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>come on now , you know thats not how you do back of the napkin math .
First , you need to assume a perfectly spherical human.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>come on now, you know thats not how you do back of the napkin math.
First, you need to assume a perfectly spherical human...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30757768</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>Opportunist</author>
	<datestamp>1263384300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would sure give the growing up basement dweller an excuse "No MOOOOOOM, going out does not make me burn fat, it makes me put it ON, don't you remember, photosynthesis?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would sure give the growing up basement dweller an excuse " No MOOOOOOM , going out does not make me burn fat , it makes me put it ON , do n't you remember , photosynthesis ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would sure give the growing up basement dweller an excuse "No MOOOOOOM, going out does not make me burn fat, it makes me put it ON, don't you remember, photosynthesis?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384</id>
	<title>Nitpick</title>
	<author>Drethon</author>
	<datestamp>1263413460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>No I didn't read the article, MSNBC rarely loads properly here at work.<br>
<br>
I believe that saying it gains energy via photosynthesis is incorrect.  Photosynthesis causes a chemical reaction that converts Carbon Dioxide and Water (CO2 and H2O) into Sugar and Oxygen (C6H12O6 and O2).  The sugar is then metabolized (correct term?) into energy.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No I did n't read the article , MSNBC rarely loads properly here at work .
I believe that saying it gains energy via photosynthesis is incorrect .
Photosynthesis causes a chemical reaction that converts Carbon Dioxide and Water ( CO2 and H2O ) into Sugar and Oxygen ( C6H12O6 and O2 ) .
The sugar is then metabolized ( correct term ?
) into energy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No I didn't read the article, MSNBC rarely loads properly here at work.
I believe that saying it gains energy via photosynthesis is incorrect.
Photosynthesis causes a chemical reaction that converts Carbon Dioxide and Water (CO2 and H2O) into Sugar and Oxygen (C6H12O6 and O2).
The sugar is then metabolized (correct term?
) into energy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755388</id>
	<title>The Nigerian leader in District 9 was right!</title>
	<author>JoshDM</author>
	<datestamp>1263373980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>FTA: "The sneaky slugs seem to have stolen the genes that enable this skill from algae that they've eaten."
<br> <br>
I'm gonna go find and chow down on some ninjas right now, so I gain <b>Real Ultimate Power!!</b></htmltext>
<tokenext>FTA : " The sneaky slugs seem to have stolen the genes that enable this skill from algae that they 've eaten .
" I 'm gon na go find and chow down on some ninjas right now , so I gain Real Ultimate Power !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>FTA: "The sneaky slugs seem to have stolen the genes that enable this skill from algae that they've eaten.
"
 
I'm gonna go find and chow down on some ninjas right now, so I gain Real Ultimate Power!
!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756534</id>
	<title>Re:eating</title>
	<author>jschen</author>
	<datestamp>1263378600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>and assuming 5\% efficiency for photosynthesis</p></div><p>Interestingly, this estimate is right around the theoretical maximal efficiency of photosynthesis. As outlined in <i>Current Opinion in Biotechnology</i> <b>2008</b>, vol. 19, pp. 153-159 (sorry, subscription only), the maximum theoretical efficiency of C3 photosynthesis is a mere 4.6\%. C4 photosynthesis has a bit higher potential at 6.0\%.</p><p>We can't even reach these efficiencies in plants (best for crops in a growing season is 2.4\% for C3 or 3.7\% for C4; see above reference), so sarahbau is right in saying that the amount of energy we could hope to get from this is quite low.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>and assuming 5 \ % efficiency for photosynthesisInterestingly , this estimate is right around the theoretical maximal efficiency of photosynthesis .
As outlined in Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2008 , vol .
19 , pp .
153-159 ( sorry , subscription only ) , the maximum theoretical efficiency of C3 photosynthesis is a mere 4.6 \ % .
C4 photosynthesis has a bit higher potential at 6.0 \ % .We ca n't even reach these efficiencies in plants ( best for crops in a growing season is 2.4 \ % for C3 or 3.7 \ % for C4 ; see above reference ) , so sarahbau is right in saying that the amount of energy we could hope to get from this is quite low .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>and assuming 5\% efficiency for photosynthesisInterestingly, this estimate is right around the theoretical maximal efficiency of photosynthesis.
As outlined in Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2008, vol.
19, pp.
153-159 (sorry, subscription only), the maximum theoretical efficiency of C3 photosynthesis is a mere 4.6\%.
C4 photosynthesis has a bit higher potential at 6.0\%.We can't even reach these efficiencies in plants (best for crops in a growing season is 2.4\% for C3 or 3.7\% for C4; see above reference), so sarahbau is right in saying that the amount of energy we could hope to get from this is quite low.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755080
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755994
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756040
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30760002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30759960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30764190
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755206
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755044
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755810
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30757768
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30758172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756028
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30762268
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30759026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30757058
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755120
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754892
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30760684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30761180
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754610
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756722
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754588
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754578
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754656
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756474
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754316
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30758030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1818209_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30757868
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756844
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1818209.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754316
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30759960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756474
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754680
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755080
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1818209.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755120
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755810
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30757058
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756028
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30758172
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1818209.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754362
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1818209.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755494
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1818209.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755388
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1818209.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754384
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754892
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755116
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754588
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754578
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755044
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754656
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1818209.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755872
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1818209.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30757516
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1818209.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754320
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755874
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756722
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30757768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755206
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754618
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30761180
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30754952
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756040
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756844
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30757868
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30760002
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756050
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755342
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30759026
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30764190
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30762268
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756534
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30760684
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30755994
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30756158
----http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30758030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1818209.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1818209.30760222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
