<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_13_166220</id>
	<title>India Developing Vehicle To Knock Enemy Satellites</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1263402900000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>Frankie70 writes <i>"Star Wars are back in fashion. With perennial (and nuclear armed) foe Pakistan always teetering on the brink of political collapse and neighboring regional superpower China taking greater strides into space technology, India has announced that it is developing <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-01/india-developing-kill-vehicle-knock-enemy-satellites-out-sky">an exo-atmospheric 'kill vehicle'</a> that will knock enemy satellites out of orbit."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>Frankie70 writes " Star Wars are back in fashion .
With perennial ( and nuclear armed ) foe Pakistan always teetering on the brink of political collapse and neighboring regional superpower China taking greater strides into space technology , India has announced that it is developing an exo-atmospheric 'kill vehicle ' that will knock enemy satellites out of orbit .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Frankie70 writes "Star Wars are back in fashion.
With perennial (and nuclear armed) foe Pakistan always teetering on the brink of political collapse and neighboring regional superpower China taking greater strides into space technology, India has announced that it is developing an exo-atmospheric 'kill vehicle' that will knock enemy satellites out of orbit.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30758100</id>
	<title>Re:The problem is</title>
	<author>couchslug</author>
	<datestamp>1263385860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>India needs a first strike capability should Pakistan government control collapse and the (more dedicated) Jihadists take over.</p><p>India is large enough to absorb a moderate number of Pak nukes and then finish the job with boots on the ground, but every advantage is to be sought in advance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>India needs a first strike capability should Pakistan government control collapse and the ( more dedicated ) Jihadists take over.India is large enough to absorb a moderate number of Pak nukes and then finish the job with boots on the ground , but every advantage is to be sought in advance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>India needs a first strike capability should Pakistan government control collapse and the (more dedicated) Jihadists take over.India is large enough to absorb a moderate number of Pak nukes and then finish the job with boots on the ground, but every advantage is to be sought in advance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752812</id>
	<title>Outsourced</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263406980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>And they will build it for 1/10th the price of American workers.  Except they will get the requirements wrong and literally build an "atmospheric kill vehicle"... leading to the wide spread destruction of Earth's atmosphere...</htmltext>
<tokenext>And they will build it for 1/10th the price of American workers .
Except they will get the requirements wrong and literally build an " atmospheric kill vehicle " ... leading to the wide spread destruction of Earth 's atmosphere.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And they will build it for 1/10th the price of American workers.
Except they will get the requirements wrong and literally build an "atmospheric kill vehicle"... leading to the wide spread destruction of Earth's atmosphere...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754284</id>
	<title>Re:Knock out of orbit?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1263412980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If the projectile arced, and hit the sattelite from above, it could cause it to enter the atmosphere and burn up.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If the projectile arced , and hit the sattelite from above , it could cause it to enter the atmosphere and burn up .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If the projectile arced, and hit the sattelite from above, it could cause it to enter the atmosphere and burn up.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759916</id>
	<title>Works both ways</title>
	<author>Nazlfrag</author>
	<datestamp>1263395400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And if they're already invading your cities, wouldn't it be nice to be able to take down their satellites.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And if they 're already invading your cities , would n't it be nice to be able to take down their satellites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And if they're already invading your cities, wouldn't it be nice to be able to take down their satellites.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753932</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263411480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>It's also seriously easy. Missiles shmissiles, kinetic energy weapons are cheap and effective.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's also seriously easy .
Missiles shmissiles , kinetic energy weapons are cheap and effective .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's also seriously easy.
Missiles shmissiles, kinetic energy weapons are cheap and effective.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753342</id>
	<title>Why use a Missile?</title>
	<author>mschirmer</author>
	<datestamp>1263408960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We already have the technology to destroy something using a high powered laser beam. Why use a laser to guide a missile when you can just shoot it down with a laser, all still from within space? Seems a little obsolete to me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We already have the technology to destroy something using a high powered laser beam .
Why use a laser to guide a missile when you can just shoot it down with a laser , all still from within space ?
Seems a little obsolete to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already have the technology to destroy something using a high powered laser beam.
Why use a laser to guide a missile when you can just shoot it down with a laser, all still from within space?
Seems a little obsolete to me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738</id>
	<title>Oh great, more orbital shooting gallery!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263406740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>With everyone "testing" their antisatellite weaponry and creating ever more orbital debris, pretty soon there'll be so much debris up there we won't be able to keep any satellites operational.</p><p>China's test of a year or two back may have already generated enough debris to start a chain reaction, any more and we may definitely go over the brink to where nothing is survivable in low earth orbit.</p><p>--PM</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>With everyone " testing " their antisatellite weaponry and creating ever more orbital debris , pretty soon there 'll be so much debris up there we wo n't be able to keep any satellites operational.China 's test of a year or two back may have already generated enough debris to start a chain reaction , any more and we may definitely go over the brink to where nothing is survivable in low earth orbit.--PM</tokentext>
<sentencetext>With everyone "testing" their antisatellite weaponry and creating ever more orbital debris, pretty soon there'll be so much debris up there we won't be able to keep any satellites operational.China's test of a year or two back may have already generated enough debris to start a chain reaction, any more and we may definitely go over the brink to where nothing is survivable in low earth orbit.--PM</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754260</id>
	<title>Re:Which will be immediately countered....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263412920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The U.S. will need to deploy these as soon as we can.  We'll need resources and know-how.   Some one call Tata.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The U.S. will need to deploy these as soon as we can .
We 'll need resources and know-how .
Some one call Tata .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The U.S. will need to deploy these as soon as we can.
We'll need resources and know-how.
Some one call Tata.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752718</id>
	<title>Knock</title>
	<author>Wonko the Sane</author>
	<datestamp>1263406680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This headline made me think of D&amp;D before anything else.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This headline made me think of D&amp;D before anything else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This headline made me think of D&amp;D before anything else.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753144</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>jayme0227</author>
	<datestamp>1263408180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Don't forget, the US already shot a satellite out of the sky. They tried to rationalize an attempt to get the satellite to hit water instead of land, but if you think it was anything less than a weapons test, you're being a bit naive. I was quite disappointed that this angle didn't get more play in the news.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget , the US already shot a satellite out of the sky .
They tried to rationalize an attempt to get the satellite to hit water instead of land , but if you think it was anything less than a weapons test , you 're being a bit naive .
I was quite disappointed that this angle did n't get more play in the news .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget, the US already shot a satellite out of the sky.
They tried to rationalize an attempt to get the satellite to hit water instead of land, but if you think it was anything less than a weapons test, you're being a bit naive.
I was quite disappointed that this angle didn't get more play in the news.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753252</id>
	<title>Re:India announces a lot.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263408660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Seriously! Indian govt has these awesome plans which are never actually put into action!<br>though i'm an Indian still announcing such stuff without some solid backing is much more demeaning!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Seriously !
Indian govt has these awesome plans which are never actually put into action ! though i 'm an Indian still announcing such stuff without some solid backing is much more demeaning !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Seriously!
Indian govt has these awesome plans which are never actually put into action!though i'm an Indian still announcing such stuff without some solid backing is much more demeaning!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753766</id>
	<title>The Bright Side</title>
	<author>happy\_place</author>
	<datestamp>1263410880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Look on the brightside. If they do end up screwing up space, and fullscale wars among satellites do occur, we can always market it as a new form of entertainment.</p><p>"Battlebots In SPACE!"</p><p>We could then all take turns designing new battlebot satellites to fight one another. Mine would have a long arm with a buzzsaw on it... and lazers and one that shoots bees (in little space suits)...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Look on the brightside .
If they do end up screwing up space , and fullscale wars among satellites do occur , we can always market it as a new form of entertainment .
" Battlebots In SPACE !
" We could then all take turns designing new battlebot satellites to fight one another .
Mine would have a long arm with a buzzsaw on it... and lazers and one that shoots bees ( in little space suits ) .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Look on the brightside.
If they do end up screwing up space, and fullscale wars among satellites do occur, we can always market it as a new form of entertainment.
"Battlebots In SPACE!
"We could then all take turns designing new battlebot satellites to fight one another.
Mine would have a long arm with a buzzsaw on it... and lazers and one that shoots bees (in little space suits)...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756</id>
	<title>Bad Idea</title>
	<author>zifferent</author>
	<datestamp>1263406800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea. The US, Russia, Japan and China are not going to like this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea .
The US , Russia , Japan and China are not going to like this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea.
The US, Russia, Japan and China are not going to like this.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752810</id>
	<title>Go Missiles!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263406920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Can't regular missiles do the job?</p><p>Won't somebody think of the missiles?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ca n't regular missiles do the job ? Wo n't somebody think of the missiles ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Can't regular missiles do the job?Won't somebody think of the missiles?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753964</id>
	<title>Kessler Syndrome</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263411660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess no one in India has ever heard of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler\_Syndrome" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow"> Kessler Syndrome </a> [wikipedia.org].</p><p>Shooting "down" satellites would likely cause just as much long term harm to the country launching the missile as the country losing the first satellite.</p><p>I would be intereseted to know if any astrophysicists have estimates on how many satellites have to be blown up before space is completely useless.  I would think stastics calculations involved would be fairly simple.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess no one in India has ever heard of Kessler Syndrome [ wikipedia.org ] .Shooting " down " satellites would likely cause just as much long term harm to the country launching the missile as the country losing the first satellite.I would be intereseted to know if any astrophysicists have estimates on how many satellites have to be blown up before space is completely useless .
I would think stastics calculations involved would be fairly simple .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess no one in India has ever heard of  Kessler Syndrome  [wikipedia.org].Shooting "down" satellites would likely cause just as much long term harm to the country launching the missile as the country losing the first satellite.I would be intereseted to know if any astrophysicists have estimates on how many satellites have to be blown up before space is completely useless.
I would think stastics calculations involved would be fairly simple.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753172</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>GreatBunzinni</author>
	<datestamp>1263408300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Space is already weaponized.  The only difference is that now some factions are managing to develop ways to put their enemy's weapons out of commission.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Space is already weaponized .
The only difference is that now some factions are managing to develop ways to put their enemy 's weapons out of commission .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Space is already weaponized.
The only difference is that now some factions are managing to develop ways to put their enemy's weapons out of commission.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753364</id>
	<title>The threat is real.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263409020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I live in the state of Punjab, which shares a border with Pakistan. The villages closet to the Pakistan territory are always at the receiving of rocket fire, mortars and indiscriminate open firing at night from the Pakistan side. As always, Pakistan denies it. 99\% of the times, the Indian Border Security Force does not retaliate and just issues a notice against the attacks. Considering the threat we have from our neighbor, any measure that strengthens our defense is always a good idea and is welcomed. Rest assured, India never restores to the attack first approach (from history).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I live in the state of Punjab , which shares a border with Pakistan .
The villages closet to the Pakistan territory are always at the receiving of rocket fire , mortars and indiscriminate open firing at night from the Pakistan side .
As always , Pakistan denies it .
99 \ % of the times , the Indian Border Security Force does not retaliate and just issues a notice against the attacks .
Considering the threat we have from our neighbor , any measure that strengthens our defense is always a good idea and is welcomed .
Rest assured , India never restores to the attack first approach ( from history ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I live in the state of Punjab, which shares a border with Pakistan.
The villages closet to the Pakistan territory are always at the receiving of rocket fire, mortars and indiscriminate open firing at night from the Pakistan side.
As always, Pakistan denies it.
99\% of the times, the Indian Border Security Force does not retaliate and just issues a notice against the attacks.
Considering the threat we have from our neighbor, any measure that strengthens our defense is always a good idea and is welcomed.
Rest assured, India never restores to the attack first approach (from history).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753340</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>tokul</author>
	<datestamp>1263408960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea. The US, Russia, Japan and China are not going to like this.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>Pot meets kettle. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almaz" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almaz</a> [wikipedia.org]</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea .
The US , Russia , Japan and China are not going to like this .
Pot meets kettle .
http : //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almaz [ wikipedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea.
The US, Russia, Japan and China are not going to like this.
Pot meets kettle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almaz [wikipedia.org]
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752946</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>mxh83</author>
	<datestamp>1263407400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why not?  If you're allowed to weaponize earth, why not space?  Is it some kind of holy shrine?  As for the 'bad idea' part- Well they should have thought of that when they created weapons in the first place right?  India is doing what it takes to protect itself from some sort of maniacal attack from the Amreicans and the ruskies who'll try to blame it on someone else.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why not ?
If you 're allowed to weaponize earth , why not space ?
Is it some kind of holy shrine ?
As for the 'bad idea ' part- Well they should have thought of that when they created weapons in the first place right ?
India is doing what it takes to protect itself from some sort of maniacal attack from the Amreicans and the ruskies who 'll try to blame it on someone else .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why not?
If you're allowed to weaponize earth, why not space?
Is it some kind of holy shrine?
As for the 'bad idea' part- Well they should have thought of that when they created weapons in the first place right?
India is doing what it takes to protect itself from some sort of maniacal attack from the Amreicans and the ruskies who'll try to blame it on someone else.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30756684</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263379260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Why not? If you're allowed to weaponize earth, why not space? Is it some kind of holy shrine?"</p><p>It's for practical reasons: because it makes for such a fricking mess of debris in orbit that using the area around the Earth for other satellite purposes (communication, weather monitoring, etc.) becomes increasingly difficult.  It's like pollution that "goes global" (circum-global).  It's the same sort of reason for banning atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons.  Or do you think it would be a good idea to resume that too?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Why not ?
If you 're allowed to weaponize earth , why not space ?
Is it some kind of holy shrine ?
" It 's for practical reasons : because it makes for such a fricking mess of debris in orbit that using the area around the Earth for other satellite purposes ( communication , weather monitoring , etc .
) becomes increasingly difficult .
It 's like pollution that " goes global " ( circum-global ) .
It 's the same sort of reason for banning atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons .
Or do you think it would be a good idea to resume that too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Why not?
If you're allowed to weaponize earth, why not space?
Is it some kind of holy shrine?
"It's for practical reasons: because it makes for such a fricking mess of debris in orbit that using the area around the Earth for other satellite purposes (communication, weather monitoring, etc.
) becomes increasingly difficult.
It's like pollution that "goes global" (circum-global).
It's the same sort of reason for banning atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons.
Or do you think it would be a good idea to resume that too?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753142</id>
	<title>Re:Oh great, more orbital shooting gallery!</title>
	<author>GreatBunzinni</author>
	<datestamp>1263408180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Well, that is the least of any government's worries if the alternative is letting his enemy freely communicate, spy, command and bomb their positions as they wish.  If you absolutely need to point out the responsibility of turning space (well, the earth's orbit) into a shooting gallery then put the blame where it should be put: those who started putting there military equipment/targets there and not the ones needing to take them down.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , that is the least of any government 's worries if the alternative is letting his enemy freely communicate , spy , command and bomb their positions as they wish .
If you absolutely need to point out the responsibility of turning space ( well , the earth 's orbit ) into a shooting gallery then put the blame where it should be put : those who started putting there military equipment/targets there and not the ones needing to take them down .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, that is the least of any government's worries if the alternative is letting his enemy freely communicate, spy, command and bomb their positions as they wish.
If you absolutely need to point out the responsibility of turning space (well, the earth's orbit) into a shooting gallery then put the blame where it should be put: those who started putting there military equipment/targets there and not the ones needing to take them down.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30760192</id>
	<title>Re:India announces a lot.</title>
	<author>shadowbearer</author>
	<datestamp>1263397920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome things, and then never actually doing them.</i></p><p>
&nbsp; So does the US.</p><p>SB</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome things , and then never actually doing them .
  So does the US.SB</tokentext>
<sentencetext>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome things, and then never actually doing them.
  So does the US.SB</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753494</id>
	<title>frist 45ot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263409740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><A HREF="http://goat.cx/" title="goat.cx" rel="nofollow">very+ sick and its b0th believed that</a> [goat.cx]</htmltext>
<tokenext>very + sick and its b0th believed that [ goat.cx ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>very+ sick and its b0th believed that [goat.cx]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753396</id>
	<title>Re:Oh great, more orbital shooting gallery!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263409260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wasn't there some talk of a garbage collection system?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Was n't there some talk of a garbage collection system ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wasn't there some talk of a garbage collection system?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752988</id>
	<title>The problem is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263407520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The problem is, even if you knock down their satellites they're going to retaliate on the ground in your largest populated cities. And they don't need their satellites to do that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem is , even if you knock down their satellites they 're going to retaliate on the ground in your largest populated cities .
And they do n't need their satellites to do that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem is, even if you knock down their satellites they're going to retaliate on the ground in your largest populated cities.
And they don't need their satellites to do that.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754078</id>
	<title>Re:The problem is</title>
	<author>LordAndrewSama</author>
	<datestamp>1263412080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I think the idea is to disable communications at a critical moment while the ground troops/navy/air force fight it out.  presumably this won't be a first strike weapon, it's more likely to be used after hostilities begin and before escalation to all out nuclear clusterfuck.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the idea is to disable communications at a critical moment while the ground troops/navy/air force fight it out .
presumably this wo n't be a first strike weapon , it 's more likely to be used after hostilities begin and before escalation to all out nuclear clusterfuck .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the idea is to disable communications at a critical moment while the ground troops/navy/air force fight it out.
presumably this won't be a first strike weapon, it's more likely to be used after hostilities begin and before escalation to all out nuclear clusterfuck.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752778</id>
	<title>Which will be immediately countered....</title>
	<author>gestalt\_n\_pepper</author>
	<datestamp>1263406860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>By putting up thousands of fake satellites and thousands of smaller real, but redundant satellites.<br>.<br>But hey, the Indians need stimulus spending thought the purchase of unnecessary military hardware too. After all, look how well it's worked for us in the USA?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>By putting up thousands of fake satellites and thousands of smaller real , but redundant satellites..But hey , the Indians need stimulus spending thought the purchase of unnecessary military hardware too .
After all , look how well it 's worked for us in the USA ?
: )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>By putting up thousands of fake satellites and thousands of smaller real, but redundant satellites..But hey, the Indians need stimulus spending thought the purchase of unnecessary military hardware too.
After all, look how well it's worked for us in the USA?
:)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752740</id>
	<title>Errr.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263406740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Sounds like a one-time use kinetic energy weapon would be suffice. A rod of (insert your favourite metal here).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like a one-time use kinetic energy weapon would be suffice .
A rod of ( insert your favourite metal here ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like a one-time use kinetic energy weapon would be suffice.
A rod of (insert your favourite metal here).</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30786160</id>
	<title>Re:Knock out of orbit?</title>
	<author>Gaffod</author>
	<datestamp>1263562260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Didn't China try blowing up a satellite a while ago, and end up making a huge mess? And now India's doing it too, and soon everybody and their brother is gonna act like drunk rednecks at a shooting gallery! No more Google maps, no more GPS. Great.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Did n't China try blowing up a satellite a while ago , and end up making a huge mess ?
And now India 's doing it too , and soon everybody and their brother is gon na act like drunk rednecks at a shooting gallery !
No more Google maps , no more GPS .
Great .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Didn't China try blowing up a satellite a while ago, and end up making a huge mess?
And now India's doing it too, and soon everybody and their brother is gonna act like drunk rednecks at a shooting gallery!
No more Google maps, no more GPS.
Great.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753250</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263408660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's almost like we <a href="http://www.scienceforpeace.ca/0206-organizing-a-campaign-against-space-weapons" title="scienceforpeace.ca" rel="nofollow">need a treaty or something</a> [scienceforpeace.ca].  Unfortunately, certain countries, including most of the ones on your list, apparently want to deploy space-based weapons, and the current <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer\_Space\_Treaty" title="wikipedia.org" rel="nofollow">Outer Space Treaty</a> [wikipedia.org] only prevents deployment of "weapons of mass destruction" there, such as nuclear weapons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's almost like we need a treaty or something [ scienceforpeace.ca ] .
Unfortunately , certain countries , including most of the ones on your list , apparently want to deploy space-based weapons , and the current Outer Space Treaty [ wikipedia.org ] only prevents deployment of " weapons of mass destruction " there , such as nuclear weapons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's almost like we need a treaty or something [scienceforpeace.ca].
Unfortunately, certain countries, including most of the ones on your list, apparently want to deploy space-based weapons, and the current Outer Space Treaty [wikipedia.org] only prevents deployment of "weapons of mass destruction" there, such as nuclear weapons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753818</id>
	<title>Re:Oh great, more orbital shooting gallery!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263411120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Wouldn't a giant magnet work, kinda like Katamari Damacy?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Would n't a giant magnet work , kinda like Katamari Damacy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wouldn't a giant magnet work, kinda like Katamari Damacy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753396</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752968</id>
	<title>Obligatory knock knock joke</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263407460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Indian exo-atmospheric 'kill vehicle': *knock* *knock*<br>Jim @ International Space Station: "WTF?! We didn't order any take-out! Goddamn annoying fuckards! *flushes* That'll teach ya!"<br>Bob @ ISS: "Holy fuck! You took 'em out with only one flush!"<br>Jim @ ISS: "Yeah... Had vindaloo for lunch."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Indian exo-atmospheric 'kill vehicle ' : * knock * * knock * Jim @ International Space Station : " WTF ? !
We did n't order any take-out !
Goddamn annoying fuckards !
* flushes * That 'll teach ya !
" Bob @ ISS : " Holy fuck !
You took 'em out with only one flush !
" Jim @ ISS : " Yeah... Had vindaloo for lunch .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Indian exo-atmospheric 'kill vehicle': *knock* *knock*Jim @ International Space Station: "WTF?!
We didn't order any take-out!
Goddamn annoying fuckards!
*flushes* That'll teach ya!
"Bob @ ISS: "Holy fuck!
You took 'em out with only one flush!
"Jim @ ISS: "Yeah... Had vindaloo for lunch.
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752944</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>Attila Dimedici</author>
	<datestamp>1263407400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea. The US, Russia, Japan and China are not going to like this.</p></div><p>China is already doing it. They demonstrated the ability to knock out a satellite similar to the GPS satellites a few years ago.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea .
The US , Russia , Japan and China are not going to like this.China is already doing it .
They demonstrated the ability to knock out a satellite similar to the GPS satellites a few years ago .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea.
The US, Russia, Japan and China are not going to like this.China is already doing it.
They demonstrated the ability to knock out a satellite similar to the GPS satellites a few years ago.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759034</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263389640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea. The US, Russia, Japan and China are not going to like this.</p></div></blockquote><p>

India is not weaponising space, India is developing ground based anti satellite weapons. This is perfectly acceptable as it's not banned by the treaty that prevents the militarisation of space (cant remember name).<br> <br>

Besides, Russia, China and the US (Japan by proxy of the US) already have this technology. In addition to this Russia and China don't give a crap what India is doing within it's own borders (and I don't think Japan does either).</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea .
The US , Russia , Japan and China are not going to like this .
India is not weaponising space , India is developing ground based anti satellite weapons .
This is perfectly acceptable as it 's not banned by the treaty that prevents the militarisation of space ( cant remember name ) .
Besides , Russia , China and the US ( Japan by proxy of the US ) already have this technology .
In addition to this Russia and China do n't give a crap what India is doing within it 's own borders ( and I do n't think Japan does either ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Weaponizing space is a seriously bad idea.
The US, Russia, Japan and China are not going to like this.
India is not weaponising space, India is developing ground based anti satellite weapons.
This is perfectly acceptable as it's not banned by the treaty that prevents the militarisation of space (cant remember name).
Besides, Russia, China and the US (Japan by proxy of the US) already have this technology.
In addition to this Russia and China don't give a crap what India is doing within it's own borders (and I don't think Japan does either).
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752840</id>
	<title>Ready set fight</title>
	<author>RedTeflon</author>
	<datestamp>1263407040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext>I personally cant wait for Dish &amp; Direct TV to start battling it out by shooting down each others satellites.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I personally cant wait for Dish &amp; Direct TV to start battling it out by shooting down each others satellites .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I personally cant wait for Dish &amp; Direct TV to start battling it out by shooting down each others satellites.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753212</id>
	<title>Re:India announces a lot.</title>
	<author>Alinabi</author>
	<datestamp>1263408480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You mean like SDI?</htmltext>
<tokenext>You mean like SDI ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You mean like SDI?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753802</id>
	<title>Buckshot orbital shooting gallery!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263411060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Any of the countries with space launch capability could ruin the party.  It was pointed out years ago that a vehicle loaded with ball bearings can be sent around the Moon and back toward Earth, releasing a load of shrapnel which would sweep across all Earth-based orbits.  Fortunately, space is big.  Really big.  So the damage would be spread out over time, depending upon how large the attack is.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Any of the countries with space launch capability could ruin the party .
It was pointed out years ago that a vehicle loaded with ball bearings can be sent around the Moon and back toward Earth , releasing a load of shrapnel which would sweep across all Earth-based orbits .
Fortunately , space is big .
Really big .
So the damage would be spread out over time , depending upon how large the attack is .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Any of the countries with space launch capability could ruin the party.
It was pointed out years ago that a vehicle loaded with ball bearings can be sent around the Moon and back toward Earth, releasing a load of shrapnel which would sweep across all Earth-based orbits.
Fortunately, space is big.
Really big.
So the damage would be spread out over time, depending upon how large the attack is.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753048</id>
	<title>Hope you hit the right satellite</title>
	<author>HockeyPuck</author>
	<datestamp>1263407820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cue classic scene from <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raWZraPHLqM" title="youtube.com">Spies like Us</a> [youtube.com]</p><p>Though this could never actually happen, because well, MTV doesn't play music videos anymore.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cue classic scene from Spies like Us [ youtube.com ] Though this could never actually happen , because well , MTV does n't play music videos anymore .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cue classic scene from Spies like Us [youtube.com]Though this could never actually happen, because well, MTV doesn't play music videos anymore.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753708</id>
	<title>Re:Knock</title>
	<author>SEWilco</author>
	<datestamp>1263410700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>"vehicle which will knock satellites" made me think of a contact communication method was involved.<p>
"Knock, knock."<br>
"Who's there?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" vehicle which will knock satellites " made me think of a contact communication method was involved .
" Knock , knock .
" " Who 's there ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"vehicle which will knock satellites" made me think of a contact communication method was involved.
"Knock, knock.
"
"Who's there?
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752718</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752752</id>
	<title>Not surprising</title>
	<author>charleste</author>
	<datestamp>1263406800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The technology is there.  But I wonder: will they have to modify the software at NORAD to take into account Big Objects that get transmuted to A Bunch Of Little Objects? I am a geek: I'm thinking about software updates.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The technology is there .
But I wonder : will they have to modify the software at NORAD to take into account Big Objects that get transmuted to A Bunch Of Little Objects ?
I am a geek : I 'm thinking about software updates .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The technology is there.
But I wonder: will they have to modify the software at NORAD to take into account Big Objects that get transmuted to A Bunch Of Little Objects?
I am a geek: I'm thinking about software updates.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753960</id>
	<title>Re:Oh great, more orbital shooting gallery!</title>
	<author>xeoron</author>
	<datestamp>1263411600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Then we will be forced to, finally, work on actual means of cleaning up the debris... perhaps some form of roomba satellites, gravity bombs, an atmosphere tether that is charged to attract low orbital debris, electromagnetic katamari democracy shooting stars,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.... I am open to suggestions, since I am out of silly ideas that sound appealing to me.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Then we will be forced to , finally , work on actual means of cleaning up the debris... perhaps some form of roomba satellites , gravity bombs , an atmosphere tether that is charged to attract low orbital debris , electromagnetic katamari democracy shooting stars , .... I am open to suggestions , since I am out of silly ideas that sound appealing to me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Then we will be forced to, finally, work on actual means of cleaning up the debris... perhaps some form of roomba satellites, gravity bombs, an atmosphere tether that is charged to attract low orbital debris, electromagnetic katamari democracy shooting stars, .... I am open to suggestions, since I am out of silly ideas that sound appealing to me.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753014</id>
	<title>Wonder if ...</title>
	<author>DeadDecoy</author>
	<datestamp>1263407700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>this was developed by some disgruntled IT employee. <br>
<br>
Hello, this is Bob your friendly local IT representative, how my I help you?<br>
Yes, my computer broke after spilling coffee in the cup-holder. Can you fix it?<br>
* facepalm <br>
* launches satellite displacement missile <br>
Ok, just give me a sec... ****CARRIER LOST****</htmltext>
<tokenext>this was developed by some disgruntled IT employee .
Hello , this is Bob your friendly local IT representative , how my I help you ?
Yes , my computer broke after spilling coffee in the cup-holder .
Can you fix it ?
* facepalm * launches satellite displacement missile Ok , just give me a sec... * * * * CARRIER LOST * * * *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this was developed by some disgruntled IT employee.
Hello, this is Bob your friendly local IT representative, how my I help you?
Yes, my computer broke after spilling coffee in the cup-holder.
Can you fix it?
* facepalm 
* launches satellite displacement missile 
Ok, just give me a sec... ****CARRIER LOST****</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753208</id>
	<title>Re:Knock out of orbit?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263408480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually yes you can just knock them out of orbit. All you need to do is speed them up or slow them down just a little and they will seek an now orbit radius but if there is continued change in speed they will either fly off into open space or slowly enter the atmospher and eaither burn up or skip off the atmosphere into space.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually yes you can just knock them out of orbit .
All you need to do is speed them up or slow them down just a little and they will seek an now orbit radius but if there is continued change in speed they will either fly off into open space or slowly enter the atmospher and eaither burn up or skip off the atmosphere into space .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually yes you can just knock them out of orbit.
All you need to do is speed them up or slow them down just a little and they will seek an now orbit radius but if there is continued change in speed they will either fly off into open space or slowly enter the atmospher and eaither burn up or skip off the atmosphere into space.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754416</id>
	<title>context</title>
	<author>astar</author>
	<datestamp>1263413520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You do not have it quite right.</p><p>The bigger picture is what counts.  Russia, China, and India, and I suspect Japan, are all strongly tending to very deep cooperation. This is not due to some historical friendship!</p><p>On space stuff, I think of the recent economic policy announcements by the Russians, which puts an emphasis, not the biggest emphasis, but an emphasis on space technology, and in context nuclear powered space tech.  And Russian and India just signed a nuclear deal that spits in the face of Obamba and happens to open up cooperation on light weight nuclear reactors.  that means launchable reactors</p><p>Less clear is the Japanese plan for a SPSS.  But again, context.  Japan and Russia and Japan and China are busy making very friendly nice talk and deals.</p><p>You might note that the russian-chinese rail deal required actions between the two peoples that are unique in human history for them.  so business as usual reasoning is best described as insane.  sort of like congress:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You do not have it quite right.The bigger picture is what counts .
Russia , China , and India , and I suspect Japan , are all strongly tending to very deep cooperation .
This is not due to some historical friendship ! On space stuff , I think of the recent economic policy announcements by the Russians , which puts an emphasis , not the biggest emphasis , but an emphasis on space technology , and in context nuclear powered space tech .
And Russian and India just signed a nuclear deal that spits in the face of Obamba and happens to open up cooperation on light weight nuclear reactors .
that means launchable reactorsLess clear is the Japanese plan for a SPSS .
But again , context .
Japan and Russia and Japan and China are busy making very friendly nice talk and deals.You might note that the russian-chinese rail deal required actions between the two peoples that are unique in human history for them .
so business as usual reasoning is best described as insane .
sort of like congress : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You do not have it quite right.The bigger picture is what counts.
Russia, China, and India, and I suspect Japan, are all strongly tending to very deep cooperation.
This is not due to some historical friendship!On space stuff, I think of the recent economic policy announcements by the Russians, which puts an emphasis, not the biggest emphasis, but an emphasis on space technology, and in context nuclear powered space tech.
And Russian and India just signed a nuclear deal that spits in the face of Obamba and happens to open up cooperation on light weight nuclear reactors.
that means launchable reactorsLess clear is the Japanese plan for a SPSS.
But again, context.
Japan and Russia and Japan and China are busy making very friendly nice talk and deals.You might note that the russian-chinese rail deal required actions between the two peoples that are unique in human history for them.
so business as usual reasoning is best described as insane.
sort of like congress:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759154</id>
	<title>Re:Which will be immediately countered....</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263390360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>But hey, the Indians need stimulus spending thought the purchase of unnecessary military hardware too.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Here's the thing about India's economy, they didn't have the GFC that western nations went through. They have enough of a strong economy that they have the highest paying professional sports league the IPA (Indian Premier League, they play cricket) which overtook the English Premier league (they play soccer) in 2008. Bollywood is nipping at Hollywood's heels, they are making a packet out of Outsourcing and manage to keep labour costs low. India can afford to support a military-industrial complex.<br> <br>

What I don't understand is why Washington hasn't tried to develop better relations with India, they are spending trillions of Rupee's on their military so why should this go to Russia instead of NATO nations. In the unlikely event that the proverbial its the fan in Asia, India is someone we'd really need on our side.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But hey , the Indians need stimulus spending thought the purchase of unnecessary military hardware too .
Here 's the thing about India 's economy , they did n't have the GFC that western nations went through .
They have enough of a strong economy that they have the highest paying professional sports league the IPA ( Indian Premier League , they play cricket ) which overtook the English Premier league ( they play soccer ) in 2008 .
Bollywood is nipping at Hollywood 's heels , they are making a packet out of Outsourcing and manage to keep labour costs low .
India can afford to support a military-industrial complex .
What I do n't understand is why Washington has n't tried to develop better relations with India , they are spending trillions of Rupee 's on their military so why should this go to Russia instead of NATO nations .
In the unlikely event that the proverbial its the fan in Asia , India is someone we 'd really need on our side .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>But hey, the Indians need stimulus spending thought the purchase of unnecessary military hardware too.
Here's the thing about India's economy, they didn't have the GFC that western nations went through.
They have enough of a strong economy that they have the highest paying professional sports league the IPA (Indian Premier League, they play cricket) which overtook the English Premier league (they play soccer) in 2008.
Bollywood is nipping at Hollywood's heels, they are making a packet out of Outsourcing and manage to keep labour costs low.
India can afford to support a military-industrial complex.
What I don't understand is why Washington hasn't tried to develop better relations with India, they are spending trillions of Rupee's on their military so why should this go to Russia instead of NATO nations.
In the unlikely event that the proverbial its the fan in Asia, India is someone we'd really need on our side.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30783166</id>
	<title>Re:Buckshot orbital shooting gallery!</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263546960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Launching small projectiles around the Moon would be very ineffective use of lifting capability of your rocket - because they would generally hit the area of interest only once.</p><p>It is much more sensible to launch your payload into LEO and detonate it there in controlled fashion (in a way that will spread the balls quickly but not direct larger number of them towards the atmosphere). After that they will stay in place, with many, MANY more potential for impacts. Plus there can be much more of them, without the energy waste of circumlunar flight.</p><p>Oh, and don't just use ball bearings, they reflect quite good light and radar.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Launching small projectiles around the Moon would be very ineffective use of lifting capability of your rocket - because they would generally hit the area of interest only once.It is much more sensible to launch your payload into LEO and detonate it there in controlled fashion ( in a way that will spread the balls quickly but not direct larger number of them towards the atmosphere ) .
After that they will stay in place , with many , MANY more potential for impacts .
Plus there can be much more of them , without the energy waste of circumlunar flight.Oh , and do n't just use ball bearings , they reflect quite good light and radar .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Launching small projectiles around the Moon would be very ineffective use of lifting capability of your rocket - because they would generally hit the area of interest only once.It is much more sensible to launch your payload into LEO and detonate it there in controlled fashion (in a way that will spread the balls quickly but not direct larger number of them towards the atmosphere).
After that they will stay in place, with many, MANY more potential for impacts.
Plus there can be much more of them, without the energy waste of circumlunar flight.Oh, and don't just use ball bearings, they reflect quite good light and radar.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753770</id>
	<title>Re:Oh great, more orbital shooting gallery!</title>
	<author>cellurl</author>
	<datestamp>1263410880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Since the US is at least 20 years ahead of this, I would venture a guess that transatlantic-fiber is in place to bypass satellite needs. <br> <br>

<a href="http://www.wikispeedia.org/" title="wikispeedia.org" rel="nofollow">Put your stinkin speed trap here</a> [wikispeedia.org]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Since the US is at least 20 years ahead of this , I would venture a guess that transatlantic-fiber is in place to bypass satellite needs .
Put your stinkin speed trap here [ wikispeedia.org ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Since the US is at least 20 years ahead of this, I would venture a guess that transatlantic-fiber is in place to bypass satellite needs.
Put your stinkin speed trap here [wikispeedia.org]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30756274</id>
	<title>Re:Buckshot orbital shooting gallery!</title>
	<author>Calinous</author>
	<datestamp>1263377520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ball bearings would be too few to interdict Earth-orbits when launched from Moon. Assuming the typical satellite is having a target area of 10 square meters, you'd want to be hit by at least two balls (to keep a bit of overkill). That means that you could use 10 millions balls to cover an area 10 by 10 kilometers.</p><p>
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Kinetic energy penetrators launched from space assume they are already there, on the perfect trajectory. How they get there is very very energy intensive, so much so that ground-based lasers might try thousands of shots for a lower energy use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ball bearings would be too few to interdict Earth-orbits when launched from Moon .
Assuming the typical satellite is having a target area of 10 square meters , you 'd want to be hit by at least two balls ( to keep a bit of overkill ) .
That means that you could use 10 millions balls to cover an area 10 by 10 kilometers .
      Kinetic energy penetrators launched from space assume they are already there , on the perfect trajectory .
How they get there is very very energy intensive , so much so that ground-based lasers might try thousands of shots for a lower energy use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ball bearings would be too few to interdict Earth-orbits when launched from Moon.
Assuming the typical satellite is having a target area of 10 square meters, you'd want to be hit by at least two balls (to keep a bit of overkill).
That means that you could use 10 millions balls to cover an area 10 by 10 kilometers.
      Kinetic energy penetrators launched from space assume they are already there, on the perfect trajectory.
How they get there is very very energy intensive, so much so that ground-based lasers might try thousands of shots for a lower energy use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753802</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753392</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263409200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's how you establish superiority, do something first and counter any attempt to do the same by anyone else. In other words a bit like 'king of the hill' or 'nuclear non-proliferation'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's how you establish superiority , do something first and counter any attempt to do the same by anyone else .
In other words a bit like 'king of the hill ' or 'nuclear non-proliferation' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's how you establish superiority, do something first and counter any attempt to do the same by anyone else.
In other words a bit like 'king of the hill' or 'nuclear non-proliferation'.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30783422</id>
	<title>Re:Oh great, more orbital shooting gallery!</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263548040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Some powers might see that as a good thing. Those without the capabilities to put up large fleet of satellites for example. Or, OTOH, those with big enough rockets, secure enough launch pads and good enough sensors; not limiting them to LEO.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Some powers might see that as a good thing .
Those without the capabilities to put up large fleet of satellites for example .
Or , OTOH , those with big enough rockets , secure enough launch pads and good enough sensors ; not limiting them to LEO .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some powers might see that as a good thing.
Those without the capabilities to put up large fleet of satellites for example.
Or, OTOH, those with big enough rockets, secure enough launch pads and good enough sensors; not limiting them to LEO.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30761986</id>
	<title>Re:Knock</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263463440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Knock, knock."<br>"Who's there?"</p><p>Paki.</p><p>Paki who?</p><p>Pack-it-in , this type of joke is not being funny already!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Knock , knock .
" " Who 's there ?
" Paki.Paki who ? Pack-it-in , this type of joke is not being funny already !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Knock, knock.
""Who's there?
"Paki.Paki who?Pack-it-in , this type of joke is not being funny already!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753708</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30762620</id>
	<title>Re:India announces a lot.</title>
	<author>bingoUV</author>
	<datestamp>1263473280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome things</p></div><p>Is there a problem with that? Vaporware works well to drive off Microsoft's business competitors. It might work in military arms race as well.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome thingsIs there a problem with that ?
Vaporware works well to drive off Microsoft 's business competitors .
It might work in military arms race as well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome thingsIs there a problem with that?
Vaporware works well to drive off Microsoft's business competitors.
It might work in military arms race as well.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754590</id>
	<title>Re:Oh great, more orbital shooting gallery!</title>
	<author>Efreet</author>
	<datestamp>1263414120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, its possible to shoot satellites as they're about to make a re-entry and be certain that any debris ends up hitting the earth within one orbital period.  That's what the US did in the Burnt Frost test.</p><p>Its still perfectly possible for flying debris to hit another satellite before hitting atmosphere and burning out, but that's very unlikely compared to the risks of other methods of testing ASAT weapons.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , its possible to shoot satellites as they 're about to make a re-entry and be certain that any debris ends up hitting the earth within one orbital period .
That 's what the US did in the Burnt Frost test.Its still perfectly possible for flying debris to hit another satellite before hitting atmosphere and burning out , but that 's very unlikely compared to the risks of other methods of testing ASAT weapons .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, its possible to shoot satellites as they're about to make a re-entry and be certain that any debris ends up hitting the earth within one orbital period.
That's what the US did in the Burnt Frost test.Its still perfectly possible for flying debris to hit another satellite before hitting atmosphere and burning out, but that's very unlikely compared to the risks of other methods of testing ASAT weapons.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759932</id>
	<title>Re:India announces a lot.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263395460000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Five aircraft carriers on the moon would do India a fat lot of good,<br>there's no atmosphere for the planes you dumbass.</p></div><p>Actually he said, 5 aircraft carriers "and" a man on the moon.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Five aircraft carriers on the moon would do India a fat lot of good,there 's no atmosphere for the planes you dumbass.Actually he said , 5 aircraft carriers " and " a man on the moon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Five aircraft carriers on the moon would do India a fat lot of good,there's no atmosphere for the planes you dumbass.Actually he said, 5 aircraft carriers "and" a man on the moon.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30755234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30760516</id>
	<title>Re:India announces a lot.</title>
	<author>nithinsujir</author>
	<datestamp>1263400740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not to mention we would be 4 men short</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not to mention we would be 4 men short</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not to mention we would be 4 men short</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30755234</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30757932</id>
	<title>Re:India announces a lot.</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1263385140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome things</p></div><p>The Americans started the tradition, at least with regard to anti-satellite and space based weapons, with the Strategic Defense Initiative (aka "Star Wars") under then president Ronald Reagan. It has been speculated by some that SDI hastened the decline of the Soviet Union by promoting even more military research and spending on counter-counter measures at a time when the Soviet Union could least afford to "keep up" with accelerated US defense spending. The Soviets bought the artist renderings and animations of SDI laser satellites (peew, peew, peew) hook, line and sinker. They thought that not only were the Americans capable of building such things, but that they would work exactly as advertised (the Soviets had long had an inferiority complex when it came to western technology). It worked for the US during the Cold War so now other countries are taking a page out of the US playbook and touting their own "advanced" weapons or counter-measures programs.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome thingsThe Americans started the tradition , at least with regard to anti-satellite and space based weapons , with the Strategic Defense Initiative ( aka " Star Wars " ) under then president Ronald Reagan .
It has been speculated by some that SDI hastened the decline of the Soviet Union by promoting even more military research and spending on counter-counter measures at a time when the Soviet Union could least afford to " keep up " with accelerated US defense spending .
The Soviets bought the artist renderings and animations of SDI laser satellites ( peew , peew , peew ) hook , line and sinker .
They thought that not only were the Americans capable of building such things , but that they would work exactly as advertised ( the Soviets had long had an inferiority complex when it came to western technology ) .
It worked for the US during the Cold War so now other countries are taking a page out of the US playbook and touting their own " advanced " weapons or counter-measures programs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome thingsThe Americans started the tradition, at least with regard to anti-satellite and space based weapons, with the Strategic Defense Initiative (aka "Star Wars") under then president Ronald Reagan.
It has been speculated by some that SDI hastened the decline of the Soviet Union by promoting even more military research and spending on counter-counter measures at a time when the Soviet Union could least afford to "keep up" with accelerated US defense spending.
The Soviets bought the artist renderings and animations of SDI laser satellites (peew, peew, peew) hook, line and sinker.
They thought that not only were the Americans capable of building such things, but that they would work exactly as advertised (the Soviets had long had an inferiority complex when it came to western technology).
It worked for the US during the Cold War so now other countries are taking a page out of the US playbook and touting their own "advanced" weapons or counter-measures programs.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754876</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263415140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why? It&rsquo;s the perfect excuse to start a &ldquo;preventive strike on the war on terror&rdquo;... Cheney, Putin and Jintao would cum at the moment of hearing it. (Warning: Do NOT attempt to imagine that! I repeat: Do NOT attempt to imagine that!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why ?
It    s the perfect excuse to start a    preventive strike on the war on terror    ... Cheney , Putin and Jintao would cum at the moment of hearing it .
( Warning : Do NOT attempt to imagine that !
I repeat : Do NOT attempt to imagine that !
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why?
It’s the perfect excuse to start a “preventive strike on the war on terror”... Cheney, Putin and Jintao would cum at the moment of hearing it.
(Warning: Do NOT attempt to imagine that!
I repeat: Do NOT attempt to imagine that!
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30756666</id>
	<title>Re:The problem is</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263379200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except the US does. Can't fly those precious Predator drones without a satellite network.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except the US does .
Ca n't fly those precious Predator drones without a satellite network .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except the US does.
Can't fly those precious Predator drones without a satellite network.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752988</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30755234</id>
	<title>Re:India announces a lot.</title>
	<author>MRe\_nl</author>
	<datestamp>1263373440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Five aircraft carriers on the moon would do India a fat lot of good,<br>there's no atmosphere for the planes you dumbass.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Five aircraft carriers on the moon would do India a fat lot of good,there 's no atmosphere for the planes you dumbass .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Five aircraft carriers on the moon would do India a fat lot of good,there's no atmosphere for the planes you dumbass.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753206</id>
	<title>Enemy?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263408480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>What defines that a satellite is "enemy"? Launched by a now-enemy state used for anything, like controlling the gps network, monitor climate or tv transmission? Or something passive like watching over your territory and transmits to your enemy sensible information? Or something more active like... mmm destroying your satelites and not sure if can be done anything else aggresive at this moment.<br><br>Don't worth to worry about the 1st kind (unless you are the aggressor), the 3rd kind is, for now, just you, and the 2nd one, well, there are plenty of probably neutral satellites looking down to all world (probably most sensible areas can be spotted by google earth, no need to launch your own satellites because of that) to worry in particular your enemiy ones. Looks like this kind of satellites announces that you are ready to take the aggresive role, dont look so particulary useful for defense.</htmltext>
<tokenext>What defines that a satellite is " enemy " ?
Launched by a now-enemy state used for anything , like controlling the gps network , monitor climate or tv transmission ?
Or something passive like watching over your territory and transmits to your enemy sensible information ?
Or something more active like... mmm destroying your satelites and not sure if can be done anything else aggresive at this moment.Do n't worth to worry about the 1st kind ( unless you are the aggressor ) , the 3rd kind is , for now , just you , and the 2nd one , well , there are plenty of probably neutral satellites looking down to all world ( probably most sensible areas can be spotted by google earth , no need to launch your own satellites because of that ) to worry in particular your enemiy ones .
Looks like this kind of satellites announces that you are ready to take the aggresive role , dont look so particulary useful for defense .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What defines that a satellite is "enemy"?
Launched by a now-enemy state used for anything, like controlling the gps network, monitor climate or tv transmission?
Or something passive like watching over your territory and transmits to your enemy sensible information?
Or something more active like... mmm destroying your satelites and not sure if can be done anything else aggresive at this moment.Don't worth to worry about the 1st kind (unless you are the aggressor), the 3rd kind is, for now, just you, and the 2nd one, well, there are plenty of probably neutral satellites looking down to all world (probably most sensible areas can be spotted by google earth, no need to launch your own satellites because of that) to worry in particular your enemiy ones.
Looks like this kind of satellites announces that you are ready to take the aggresive role, dont look so particulary useful for defense.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754310</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>The Grim Reefer2</author>
	<datestamp>1263413100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Don't forget, the US already shot a satellite <b>out of the sky</b>. They tried to rationalize an attempt to get the satellite to hit water instead of land, but if you think it was anything less than a weapons test, you're being a bit naive. I was quite disappointed that this angle didn't get more play in the news.</p></div><p>As far as I know the satellite you mentioned is, in fact, now out of the sky. Unlike the prior Chinese anti-satellite test or what the device in the article will do.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Do n't forget , the US already shot a satellite out of the sky .
They tried to rationalize an attempt to get the satellite to hit water instead of land , but if you think it was anything less than a weapons test , you 're being a bit naive .
I was quite disappointed that this angle did n't get more play in the news.As far as I know the satellite you mentioned is , in fact , now out of the sky .
Unlike the prior Chinese anti-satellite test or what the device in the article will do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Don't forget, the US already shot a satellite out of the sky.
They tried to rationalize an attempt to get the satellite to hit water instead of land, but if you think it was anything less than a weapons test, you're being a bit naive.
I was quite disappointed that this angle didn't get more play in the news.As far as I know the satellite you mentioned is, in fact, now out of the sky.
Unlike the prior Chinese anti-satellite test or what the device in the article will do.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753144</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752782</id>
	<title>Good or bad?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263406860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sadly it seems that a military space race might be exactly what the world needs to get behind space tech.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sadly it seems that a military space race might be exactly what the world needs to get behind space tech .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sadly it seems that a military space race might be exactly what the world needs to get behind space tech.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759192</id>
	<title>Re:Knock out of orbit?</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263390480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>You can't just 'knock something out of orbit,' like it's a porcelain vase on a mantelpiece.</p></div></blockquote><p>

Actually you can. Stable orbits are quite precarious. They are only easy to maintain because there are few external forces pushing against them. Push them out and they'll fly off into space, push them into a lower orbit and it will decay, even if you re-orient the satellite it will be rendered useless. Now if you were to ram these satellites with a slow moving rocket motor rather then an explosive warhead then you can easily "knock them out of orbit" without having to drag a heavy warhead out into space.<br> <br>

To knock something out of orbit does not imply that you will bring it back to the ground, you could push it out into space or send it into an unstable or useless orbit.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't just 'knock something out of orbit, ' like it 's a porcelain vase on a mantelpiece .
Actually you can .
Stable orbits are quite precarious .
They are only easy to maintain because there are few external forces pushing against them .
Push them out and they 'll fly off into space , push them into a lower orbit and it will decay , even if you re-orient the satellite it will be rendered useless .
Now if you were to ram these satellites with a slow moving rocket motor rather then an explosive warhead then you can easily " knock them out of orbit " without having to drag a heavy warhead out into space .
To knock something out of orbit does not imply that you will bring it back to the ground , you could push it out into space or send it into an unstable or useless orbit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't just 'knock something out of orbit,' like it's a porcelain vase on a mantelpiece.
Actually you can.
Stable orbits are quite precarious.
They are only easy to maintain because there are few external forces pushing against them.
Push them out and they'll fly off into space, push them into a lower orbit and it will decay, even if you re-orient the satellite it will be rendered useless.
Now if you were to ram these satellites with a slow moving rocket motor rather then an explosive warhead then you can easily "knock them out of orbit" without having to drag a heavy warhead out into space.
To knock something out of orbit does not imply that you will bring it back to the ground, you could push it out into space or send it into an unstable or useless orbit.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753044</id>
	<title>I saw this movie</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263407820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They plan on taking 9 year olds and putting them in bright yellow 1 man spacecrafts with a paylod of missiles and some laser capabilities.</p><p>They will then land/dock with the ISS, accidentally fire a pair of missiles, and return to Earth. There will then be a parade with a ridiculous amount of confetti.</p><p>I don't know what inspired them, but its genius.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They plan on taking 9 year olds and putting them in bright yellow 1 man spacecrafts with a paylod of missiles and some laser capabilities.They will then land/dock with the ISS , accidentally fire a pair of missiles , and return to Earth .
There will then be a parade with a ridiculous amount of confetti.I do n't know what inspired them , but its genius .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They plan on taking 9 year olds and putting them in bright yellow 1 man spacecrafts with a paylod of missiles and some laser capabilities.They will then land/dock with the ISS, accidentally fire a pair of missiles, and return to Earth.
There will then be a parade with a ridiculous amount of confetti.I don't know what inspired them, but its genius.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753888</id>
	<title>Re:Ready set fight</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263411360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And you think that hasn't already happened?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And you think that has n't already happened ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you think that hasn't already happened?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30758002</id>
	<title>Re:Ready set fight</title>
	<author>CodeBuster</author>
	<datestamp>1263385500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>It will sound something like this: peew, peew, peew.</htmltext>
<tokenext>It will sound something like this : peew , peew , peew .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It will sound something like this: peew, peew, peew.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752840</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753218</id>
	<title>Re:Bad Idea</title>
	<author>werfu</author>
	<datestamp>1263408540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Because space is for everyone and provides too much firepower ability. Placing a satellite the size of a school bus loaded with nuclear missile would lend it's owner with enough power to nuke most big cities in the world under 8 minutes. This goes completely contrary to non proliferation treaties. There's is also a domino effect. Almost no country in this world could survive on its own now. Everyone depends on someone else. If a third world war was to happens, the last things you want is to be alone. If every communication means goes down you won't be able to contact either allies or enemies.

Einstein said: I do not know how the Third World War will be fought, but I can tell you what they will use in the Fourth - rocks!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Because space is for everyone and provides too much firepower ability .
Placing a satellite the size of a school bus loaded with nuclear missile would lend it 's owner with enough power to nuke most big cities in the world under 8 minutes .
This goes completely contrary to non proliferation treaties .
There 's is also a domino effect .
Almost no country in this world could survive on its own now .
Everyone depends on someone else .
If a third world war was to happens , the last things you want is to be alone .
If every communication means goes down you wo n't be able to contact either allies or enemies .
Einstein said : I do not know how the Third World War will be fought , but I can tell you what they will use in the Fourth - rocks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Because space is for everyone and provides too much firepower ability.
Placing a satellite the size of a school bus loaded with nuclear missile would lend it's owner with enough power to nuke most big cities in the world under 8 minutes.
This goes completely contrary to non proliferation treaties.
There's is also a domino effect.
Almost no country in this world could survive on its own now.
Everyone depends on someone else.
If a third world war was to happens, the last things you want is to be alone.
If every communication means goes down you won't be able to contact either allies or enemies.
Einstein said: I do not know how the Third World War will be fought, but I can tell you what they will use in the Fourth - rocks!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752946</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744</id>
	<title>India announces a lot.</title>
	<author>tjstork</author>
	<datestamp>1263406740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome things, and then never actually doing them.  If India and Russia would have done everything they said, India would have five aircraft carriers and a man on the moon, Russia would have mach 15 planes for everyone, and more.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome things , and then never actually doing them .
If India and Russia would have done everything they said , India would have five aircraft carriers and a man on the moon , Russia would have mach 15 planes for everyone , and more .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>India and Russia both have this habit of announcing these awesome things, and then never actually doing them.
If India and Russia would have done everything they said, India would have five aircraft carriers and a man on the moon, Russia would have mach 15 planes for everyone, and more.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753008</id>
	<title>Re:Which will be immediately countered....</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263407640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>
But hey, the Indians need stimulus spending thought the purchase of unnecessary military hardware too. After all, look how well it's worked for us in the USA?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div><p>Apparently, someone failed their English class.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>But hey , the Indians need stimulus spending thought the purchase of unnecessary military hardware too .
After all , look how well it 's worked for us in the USA ?
: ) Apparently , someone failed their English class .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
But hey, the Indians need stimulus spending thought the purchase of unnecessary military hardware too.
After all, look how well it's worked for us in the USA?
:)Apparently, someone failed their English class.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752778</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780</id>
	<title>Knock out of orbit?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263406860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You can't just 'knock something out of orbit,' like it's a porcelain vase on a mantelpiece. Orbits do not work that way! They're building a kill vehicle to <i>blow up</i> satellites.</p><p>They're still going to be in orbit, just in lots of little pieces.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You ca n't just 'knock something out of orbit, ' like it 's a porcelain vase on a mantelpiece .
Orbits do not work that way !
They 're building a kill vehicle to blow up satellites.They 're still going to be in orbit , just in lots of little pieces .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You can't just 'knock something out of orbit,' like it's a porcelain vase on a mantelpiece.
Orbits do not work that way!
They're building a kill vehicle to blow up satellites.They're still going to be in orbit, just in lots of little pieces.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_41</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753960
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754416
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753392
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30756684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754590
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753218
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752946
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754876
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30783166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30756274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753208
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30760192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30756666
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30760516
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30755234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30783422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30761986
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753708
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752718
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30758100
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753770
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30755234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30762620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753340
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30758002
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752840
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759192
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752944
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753250
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753142
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753252
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753818
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753396
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753008
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30786160
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754260
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752778
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754284
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754078
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752988
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_166220_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30757932
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752756
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752944
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753250
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753144
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754876
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753340
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759034
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752946
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753392
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30756684
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754416
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752988
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30758100
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754078
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30756666
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752968
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752780
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754284
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30786160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753766
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753208
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752744
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30755234
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30760516
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30762620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30757932
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30760192
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753252
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753044
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752740
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752840
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30758002
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753206
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752812
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752778
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754260
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30759154
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753008
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752738
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753142
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753770
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30754590
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753960
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753802
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30783166
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30756274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30783422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753396
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753818
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_166220.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30752718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30753708
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_166220.30761986
</commentlist>
</conversation>
