<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_13_1332252</id>
	<title>The Worst Products of CES 2010</title>
	<author>CmdrTaco</author>
	<datestamp>1263393540000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>loose electron submitted a (sigh) slideshow page documenting 10 of the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/12/worst-ces-2010-products-t\_n\_419765.html">worst products from CES</a> this year.  Includes a baseball hat with a TV in the brim,  vibrating earbuds, an Android powered microwave, and what appears to be the next generation of Teddy Ruxpin.</htmltext>
<tokenext>loose electron submitted a ( sigh ) slideshow page documenting 10 of the worst products from CES this year .
Includes a baseball hat with a TV in the brim , vibrating earbuds , an Android powered microwave , and what appears to be the next generation of Teddy Ruxpin .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>loose electron submitted a (sigh) slideshow page documenting 10 of the worst products from CES this year.
Includes a baseball hat with a TV in the brim,  vibrating earbuds, an Android powered microwave, and what appears to be the next generation of Teddy Ruxpin.</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753356</id>
	<title>Teddy Ruxbin was before its time</title>
	<author>JoshuaZ</author>
	<datestamp>1263409020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>We had Teddy Ruxbin when I was a little kid, some of the first models. Unfortunately, they kept breaking. Sometimes Teddy would slowly die with his speech getting slower and slower. One time his lower jaw fell of and he kept talking apparently oblivious. That was slightly traumatizing. The technology really didn't exist to make that sort of robot that was both cheap and dependable. This newer toy sounds much more promising. The other gadgets not so much.</htmltext>
<tokenext>We had Teddy Ruxbin when I was a little kid , some of the first models .
Unfortunately , they kept breaking .
Sometimes Teddy would slowly die with his speech getting slower and slower .
One time his lower jaw fell of and he kept talking apparently oblivious .
That was slightly traumatizing .
The technology really did n't exist to make that sort of robot that was both cheap and dependable .
This newer toy sounds much more promising .
The other gadgets not so much .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We had Teddy Ruxbin when I was a little kid, some of the first models.
Unfortunately, they kept breaking.
Sometimes Teddy would slowly die with his speech getting slower and slower.
One time his lower jaw fell of and he kept talking apparently oblivious.
That was slightly traumatizing.
The technology really didn't exist to make that sort of robot that was both cheap and dependable.
This newer toy sounds much more promising.
The other gadgets not so much.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751024</id>
	<title>Re:Sick of the 'culture of fail.'</title>
	<author>jimicus</author>
	<datestamp>1263400260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Teddy Ruxbin? Kids love technology like this. A net enabled doll that could tell stories downloaded from the interent or created from parents sounds like the next xmas hot toy.</p></div><p>Already been done - though the item in the article was just an iPod dock built into a cuddly toy, something more akin to what you describe was on the UK version of Dragon's Den a couple of years back.  ISTR it was backed by Peter Jones.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Teddy Ruxbin ?
Kids love technology like this .
A net enabled doll that could tell stories downloaded from the interent or created from parents sounds like the next xmas hot toy.Already been done - though the item in the article was just an iPod dock built into a cuddly toy , something more akin to what you describe was on the UK version of Dragon 's Den a couple of years back .
ISTR it was backed by Peter Jones .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Teddy Ruxbin?
Kids love technology like this.
A net enabled doll that could tell stories downloaded from the interent or created from parents sounds like the next xmas hot toy.Already been done - though the item in the article was just an iPod dock built into a cuddly toy, something more akin to what you describe was on the UK version of Dragon's Den a couple of years back.
ISTR it was backed by Peter Jones.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30764130</id>
	<title>Re:Android Microwave is a GREAT product</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263484860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How are one button operations so complicated with a washer/dryer?  That's exactly how many presses you have to do to use the ones in my apartment building (excluding inserting a card so it can charge you for using the machine).  All you have to do is choose "colors", "whites" or some other one I've never used for the washing machine.  For the dryer, same thing: "normal", "permanent press", "delicates".  Sure, there might be complications with things like fabric softener, but it's not complicated.</p><p>For my oven, to cook something, press bake or broil, set the temperature, press bake or broil again.  Not complicated, and it took me all of a minute to figure it out.  For the range, you turn knobs to desired temperature; the same way it's worked for decades.  What the heck is so complicated with your stove?</p><p>I don't think you've looked hard enough to find something that suits your tastes.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How are one button operations so complicated with a washer/dryer ?
That 's exactly how many presses you have to do to use the ones in my apartment building ( excluding inserting a card so it can charge you for using the machine ) .
All you have to do is choose " colors " , " whites " or some other one I 've never used for the washing machine .
For the dryer , same thing : " normal " , " permanent press " , " delicates " .
Sure , there might be complications with things like fabric softener , but it 's not complicated.For my oven , to cook something , press bake or broil , set the temperature , press bake or broil again .
Not complicated , and it took me all of a minute to figure it out .
For the range , you turn knobs to desired temperature ; the same way it 's worked for decades .
What the heck is so complicated with your stove ? I do n't think you 've looked hard enough to find something that suits your tastes .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How are one button operations so complicated with a washer/dryer?
That's exactly how many presses you have to do to use the ones in my apartment building (excluding inserting a card so it can charge you for using the machine).
All you have to do is choose "colors", "whites" or some other one I've never used for the washing machine.
For the dryer, same thing: "normal", "permanent press", "delicates".
Sure, there might be complications with things like fabric softener, but it's not complicated.For my oven, to cook something, press bake or broil, set the temperature, press bake or broil again.
Not complicated, and it took me all of a minute to figure it out.
For the range, you turn knobs to desired temperature; the same way it's worked for decades.
What the heck is so complicated with your stove?I don't think you've looked hard enough to find something that suits your tastes.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752334</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752330</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>LatencyKills</author>
	<datestamp>1263405360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>A long time ago I was working on a program that used a large fixed telescope, and when the primary would collect dust rather than try and blow it off or wipe it off, both of which might damage the coating, we went with a product called collodian (it's sold as a special effect makeup).  It would pour on, something like runny snot, and quickly harden (it was alcohol based).  As it hardened it shrank, and it would pull off of the mirror in a sheet, taking any surface impurities with it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>A long time ago I was working on a program that used a large fixed telescope , and when the primary would collect dust rather than try and blow it off or wipe it off , both of which might damage the coating , we went with a product called collodian ( it 's sold as a special effect makeup ) .
It would pour on , something like runny snot , and quickly harden ( it was alcohol based ) .
As it hardened it shrank , and it would pull off of the mirror in a sheet , taking any surface impurities with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A long time ago I was working on a program that used a large fixed telescope, and when the primary would collect dust rather than try and blow it off or wipe it off, both of which might damage the coating, we went with a product called collodian (it's sold as a special effect makeup).
It would pour on, something like runny snot, and quickly harden (it was alcohol based).
As it hardened it shrank, and it would pull off of the mirror in a sheet, taking any surface impurities with it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751228</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263401040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except that they tested it, and it did <em>nothing at all</em>. (Damn, where is the video, when you need it!)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except that they tested it , and it did nothing at all .
( Damn , where is the video , when you need it !
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except that they tested it, and it did nothing at all.
(Damn, where is the video, when you need it!
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752854</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263407100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why do you need Android to program how long to cook your dishes in the microwave? In my day, we used to set the time (and power level) directly when nuking things, instead of relying on presets. As far as I know, all microwaves still allow you to do this.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why do you need Android to program how long to cook your dishes in the microwave ?
In my day , we used to set the time ( and power level ) directly when nuking things , instead of relying on presets .
As far as I know , all microwaves still allow you to do this .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why do you need Android to program how long to cook your dishes in the microwave?
In my day, we used to set the time (and power level) directly when nuking things, instead of relying on presets.
As far as I know, all microwaves still allow you to do this.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750686</id>
	<title>Re:Krave</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263398820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm not even positive that is a real advertisement or it's one of the "worst products" they're showcasing for their article.</p><p>In any event, I must cry foul on calling the iType a "worst product".  Maybe not for everyone, but I kinda want one of these for my iPod Touch.  On personal trips now I don't even carry my laptop (as typically what I use it for is doing things like pulling up Mapquest directions or Yahoo Yellow Pages to find a nearby Chinese place, which the iPod does just fine).  This would certainly make using it in such scenario's more comfortable.</p><p>Heck what I've REALLY love to see is a standardized docking station that allowed a full size keyboard/trackpad and monitor to dock to such phones and view the browser and such at higher resolutions.  If hotels could started to provide such docking stations I'd be in heaven (I'd certainly pay extra for it - not more than a few $$ extra per night, but it'll still be something I'd look for).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm not even positive that is a real advertisement or it 's one of the " worst products " they 're showcasing for their article.In any event , I must cry foul on calling the iType a " worst product " .
Maybe not for everyone , but I kinda want one of these for my iPod Touch .
On personal trips now I do n't even carry my laptop ( as typically what I use it for is doing things like pulling up Mapquest directions or Yahoo Yellow Pages to find a nearby Chinese place , which the iPod does just fine ) .
This would certainly make using it in such scenario 's more comfortable.Heck what I 've REALLY love to see is a standardized docking station that allowed a full size keyboard/trackpad and monitor to dock to such phones and view the browser and such at higher resolutions .
If hotels could started to provide such docking stations I 'd be in heaven ( I 'd certainly pay extra for it - not more than a few $ $ extra per night , but it 'll still be something I 'd look for ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm not even positive that is a real advertisement or it's one of the "worst products" they're showcasing for their article.In any event, I must cry foul on calling the iType a "worst product".
Maybe not for everyone, but I kinda want one of these for my iPod Touch.
On personal trips now I don't even carry my laptop (as typically what I use it for is doing things like pulling up Mapquest directions or Yahoo Yellow Pages to find a nearby Chinese place, which the iPod does just fine).
This would certainly make using it in such scenario's more comfortable.Heck what I've REALLY love to see is a standardized docking station that allowed a full size keyboard/trackpad and monitor to dock to such phones and view the browser and such at higher resolutions.
If hotels could started to provide such docking stations I'd be in heaven (I'd certainly pay extra for it - not more than a few $$ extra per night, but it'll still be something I'd look for).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751428</id>
	<title>Re:omg the phone broke...</title>
	<author>natehoy</author>
	<datestamp>1263401760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, my objection is to the term "caught", as if he was doing something wrong.  The only thing he did wrong was to apologize for breaking it.  I would have pointed to the phone and done my best Nelson impression:  "Ha-Ha!"</p><p>I do agree, however, that the phone isn't useless just because multiple direct hits of a pointy metal object to the LCD protection barrier eventually made it break.  I'd still choose one of these over my Blackberry Curve and a protective zip-loc baggie to accompany me on my next kayak expedition or camping trip in the rain.</p><p>But the guy who repeatedly said "unbreakable" on camera had better be prepared for a lot of laughter pointed his way when a reporter manages to break it in less than 20 seconds.  It's like saying "inedible" to a programmer just because the pizza's been out for a few weeks and is turning a bit fuzzy.  It's not a statement of fact any more, it's a CHALLENGE.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , my objection is to the term " caught " , as if he was doing something wrong .
The only thing he did wrong was to apologize for breaking it .
I would have pointed to the phone and done my best Nelson impression : " Ha-Ha !
" I do agree , however , that the phone is n't useless just because multiple direct hits of a pointy metal object to the LCD protection barrier eventually made it break .
I 'd still choose one of these over my Blackberry Curve and a protective zip-loc baggie to accompany me on my next kayak expedition or camping trip in the rain.But the guy who repeatedly said " unbreakable " on camera had better be prepared for a lot of laughter pointed his way when a reporter manages to break it in less than 20 seconds .
It 's like saying " inedible " to a programmer just because the pizza 's been out for a few weeks and is turning a bit fuzzy .
It 's not a statement of fact any more , it 's a CHALLENGE .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, my objection is to the term "caught", as if he was doing something wrong.
The only thing he did wrong was to apologize for breaking it.
I would have pointed to the phone and done my best Nelson impression:  "Ha-Ha!
"I do agree, however, that the phone isn't useless just because multiple direct hits of a pointy metal object to the LCD protection barrier eventually made it break.
I'd still choose one of these over my Blackberry Curve and a protective zip-loc baggie to accompany me on my next kayak expedition or camping trip in the rain.But the guy who repeatedly said "unbreakable" on camera had better be prepared for a lot of laughter pointed his way when a reporter manages to break it in less than 20 seconds.
It's like saying "inedible" to a programmer just because the pizza's been out for a few weeks and is turning a bit fuzzy.
It's not a statement of fact any more, it's a CHALLENGE.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752796</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>zerobytes</author>
	<datestamp>1263406860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Already out there: <a href="http://www.cyberclean.ch/page.php?lang\_id=2" title="cyberclean.ch" rel="nofollow">cyberclean.ch</a> [cyberclean.ch]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Already out there : cyberclean.ch [ cyberclean.ch ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Already out there: cyberclean.ch [cyberclean.ch]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750766</id>
	<title>Dishwasher Safe Keyboards</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263399180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'd rather see dishwasher safe keyboards than yet another cleaning thing for computers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'd rather see dishwasher safe keyboards than yet another cleaning thing for computers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'd rather see dishwasher safe keyboards than yet another cleaning thing for computers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750488</id>
	<title>I have one.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263398100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>the HuffingtonPost fucking slide show that had that stupid fucking login on every goddamn page!</p><p>Oh. When I saw the microwave with Android it reminded me of something. Why is it that kitchen appliances have to have a fucking chip in them?!? Toasters to coffee makers! WTF! I was staying at a friends house and they had this incredibly expensive electronic coffee maker. It has all these lights, LEDs, LCD displays, an incredible assortment of UI crap. I looked at it and was horribly confused. My friend just said, "What!? You don't know how to use it? Mr. Computer-programmer-IT-professional!"</p><p>I asked, "Does it have a fucking keyboard or an USB connector to plug one it!? Smart-ass!"</p><p>Anyway, after spending way too long to prep the fucking thing just to make a goddamn pot of coffee, it finally brewed. I could have walked to the corner store and come back with the coffees before the fucking thing was actually done. </p><p>The coffee didn't taste any better than a pot made in a Black&amp;Decker from Target.</p><p>I can understand a timer so that you can prep the night before and have it brew a pot in the morning so that it's ready for you when you get up. But all that other horseshit?!</p><p>Expensive coffee maker: $200+. B&amp;D: $30+ and the B&amp;D actually looks better!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-P</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>the HuffingtonPost fucking slide show that had that stupid fucking login on every goddamn page ! Oh .
When I saw the microwave with Android it reminded me of something .
Why is it that kitchen appliances have to have a fucking chip in them ? ! ?
Toasters to coffee makers !
WTF ! I was staying at a friends house and they had this incredibly expensive electronic coffee maker .
It has all these lights , LEDs , LCD displays , an incredible assortment of UI crap .
I looked at it and was horribly confused .
My friend just said , " What ! ?
You do n't know how to use it ?
Mr. Computer-programmer-IT-professional !
" I asked , " Does it have a fucking keyboard or an USB connector to plug one it ! ?
Smart-ass ! " Anyway , after spending way too long to prep the fucking thing just to make a goddamn pot of coffee , it finally brewed .
I could have walked to the corner store and come back with the coffees before the fucking thing was actually done .
The coffee did n't taste any better than a pot made in a Black&amp;Decker from Target.I can understand a timer so that you can prep the night before and have it brew a pot in the morning so that it 's ready for you when you get up .
But all that other horseshit ?
! Expensive coffee maker : $ 200 + .
B&amp;D : $ 30 + and the B&amp;D actually looks better !
: -P</tokentext>
<sentencetext>the HuffingtonPost fucking slide show that had that stupid fucking login on every goddamn page!Oh.
When I saw the microwave with Android it reminded me of something.
Why is it that kitchen appliances have to have a fucking chip in them?!?
Toasters to coffee makers!
WTF! I was staying at a friends house and they had this incredibly expensive electronic coffee maker.
It has all these lights, LEDs, LCD displays, an incredible assortment of UI crap.
I looked at it and was horribly confused.
My friend just said, "What!?
You don't know how to use it?
Mr. Computer-programmer-IT-professional!
"I asked, "Does it have a fucking keyboard or an USB connector to plug one it!?
Smart-ass!"Anyway, after spending way too long to prep the fucking thing just to make a goddamn pot of coffee, it finally brewed.
I could have walked to the corner store and come back with the coffees before the fucking thing was actually done.
The coffee didn't taste any better than a pot made in a Black&amp;Decker from Target.I can understand a timer so that you can prep the night before and have it brew a pot in the morning so that it's ready for you when you get up.
But all that other horseshit?
!Expensive coffee maker: $200+.
B&amp;D: $30+ and the B&amp;D actually looks better!
:-P</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752626</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>BigDXLT</author>
	<datestamp>1263406380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>8. Android Microwave... Why not... They have computer in them anyways just something with a little more juice.  Heck you can program how long you need to cook your dishes vs. risking the preprogrammed ones.</p></div><p>Want to cook spaghetti?  There's an app for that!</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>8 .
Android Microwave... Why not... They have computer in them anyways just something with a little more juice .
Heck you can program how long you need to cook your dishes vs. risking the preprogrammed ones.Want to cook spaghetti ?
There 's an app for that !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>8.
Android Microwave... Why not... They have computer in them anyways just something with a little more juice.
Heck you can program how long you need to cook your dishes vs. risking the preprogrammed ones.Want to cook spaghetti?
There's an app for that!
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751638</id>
	<title>Re:Krave</title>
	<author>rdavidson3</author>
	<datestamp>1263402600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah, I definitely would tap that... unfortunately, I doubt that she'd tap me<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I definitely would tap that... unfortunately , I doubt that she 'd tap me : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I definitely would tap that... unfortunately, I doubt that she'd tap me :(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751972</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>christopherfinke</author>
	<datestamp>1263404040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have some of this (or an identical competitor), and it works just fine.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have some of this ( or an identical competitor ) , and it works just fine .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have some of this (or an identical competitor), and it works just fine.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30757172</id>
	<title>Re:Krave</title>
	<author>uniquename72</author>
	<datestamp>1263381540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Krave is also the name of the <a href="http://www.kravelasvegas.com/" title="kravelasvegas.com">largest gay club in Vegas.</a> [kravelasvegas.com] Hope no CES-ers got confused...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Krave is also the name of the largest gay club in Vegas .
[ kravelasvegas.com ] Hope no CES-ers got confused.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Krave is also the name of the largest gay club in Vegas.
[kravelasvegas.com] Hope no CES-ers got confused...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751302</id>
	<title>Re:A matter of opinion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263401280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most microwaves I've seen in the shops lately (in the Netherlands that is) also contain oven-like functionality so you can make decent lasagne in it. And you'll probably place it in the kitchen next to the stove anyway, so a recipe viewer with a built-in kitchen-timer facility (tap the "rice" icon when your rice starts cooking and the thing will sound a bell when it's ready) would be very handy. (But what I really want is an Android-powered bidet.)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most microwaves I 've seen in the shops lately ( in the Netherlands that is ) also contain oven-like functionality so you can make decent lasagne in it .
And you 'll probably place it in the kitchen next to the stove anyway , so a recipe viewer with a built-in kitchen-timer facility ( tap the " rice " icon when your rice starts cooking and the thing will sound a bell when it 's ready ) would be very handy .
( But what I really want is an Android-powered bidet .
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most microwaves I've seen in the shops lately (in the Netherlands that is) also contain oven-like functionality so you can make decent lasagne in it.
And you'll probably place it in the kitchen next to the stove anyway, so a recipe viewer with a built-in kitchen-timer facility (tap the "rice" icon when your rice starts cooking and the thing will sound a bell when it's ready) would be very handy.
(But what I really want is an Android-powered bidet.
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753500</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>tgd</author>
	<datestamp>1263409800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I don't know if that has antibacterial stuff or not, but I've used silly putty to get crap out from the keys of my keyboard before.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I do n't know if that has antibacterial stuff or not , but I 've used silly putty to get crap out from the keys of my keyboard before .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I don't know if that has antibacterial stuff or not, but I've used silly putty to get crap out from the keys of my keyboard before.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750660</id>
	<title>The cigarette isn't for tobacco.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263398700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The cigarette isn't for tobacco.  "Vaporizer".  hint. hint.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The cigarette is n't for tobacco .
" Vaporizer " . hint .
hint .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The cigarette isn't for tobacco.
"Vaporizer".  hint.
hint.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751978</id>
	<title>Re:A matter of opinion</title>
	<author>The Hanna</author>
	<datestamp>1263404100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>An Android powered microwave could prove useful as well--perhaps with a list of accurate times for common microwavable items (Hot Pockets come to mind). Finding a market for something like that would be the difficult thing to do.</htmltext>
<tokenext>An Android powered microwave could prove useful as well--perhaps with a list of accurate times for common microwavable items ( Hot Pockets come to mind ) .
Finding a market for something like that would be the difficult thing to do .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>An Android powered microwave could prove useful as well--perhaps with a list of accurate times for common microwavable items (Hot Pockets come to mind).
Finding a market for something like that would be the difficult thing to do.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30754272</id>
	<title>vibrating earbuds?</title>
	<author>Khashishi</author>
	<datestamp>1263412920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Actually, I'd be more disappointed in earbuds that <i>didn't</i> vibrate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Actually , I 'd be more disappointed in earbuds that did n't vibrate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Actually, I'd be more disappointed in earbuds that didn't vibrate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752794</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>AtomicOrange</author>
	<datestamp>1263406860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I have seen that product too, and it's not crap.<br> <br>I still prefer turning the keyboard upside down and giving it a few good taps.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I have seen that product too , and it 's not crap .
I still prefer turning the keyboard upside down and giving it a few good taps .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have seen that product too, and it's not crap.
I still prefer turning the keyboard upside down and giving it a few good taps.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30761014</id>
	<title>Vibrating earbuds?</title>
	<author>seebs</author>
	<datestamp>1263406440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As opposed to non-vibrating earbuds, also known as "earplugs"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As opposed to non-vibrating earbuds , also known as " earplugs " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As opposed to non-vibrating earbuds, also known as "earplugs"?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751076</id>
	<title>Re:Sick of the 'culture of fail.'</title>
	<author>maxume</author>
	<datestamp>1263400440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Later on, you will want a microwave that doesn't insist on showing anything when it is not in use.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Later on , you will want a microwave that does n't insist on showing anything when it is not in use .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Later on, you will want a microwave that doesn't insist on showing anything when it is not in use.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751030</id>
	<title>Re:A matter of opinion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263400320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A computer, built for the kitchen environment would be valuable.</p></div><p>This is very true - at the moment I occasionally stick a laptop in there but find it is in the say and too small and kind of gets in the way... for example, when I'm doing an online food order I want to check my cupboards and the online shop at the same time. A decent sized splater proof tablet on the fridge or a cupboard door might work better rather than a screen you have to get up close to and a dinky keyboard.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A computer , built for the kitchen environment would be valuable.This is very true - at the moment I occasionally stick a laptop in there but find it is in the say and too small and kind of gets in the way... for example , when I 'm doing an online food order I want to check my cupboards and the online shop at the same time .
A decent sized splater proof tablet on the fridge or a cupboard door might work better rather than a screen you have to get up close to and a dinky keyboard .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A computer, built for the kitchen environment would be valuable.This is very true - at the moment I occasionally stick a laptop in there but find it is in the say and too small and kind of gets in the way... for example, when I'm doing an online food order I want to check my cupboards and the online shop at the same time.
A decent sized splater proof tablet on the fridge or a cupboard door might work better rather than a screen you have to get up close to and a dinky keyboard.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30754084</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263412080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Still no sexbots? Sigh... maybe next year...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Still no sexbots ?
Sigh... maybe next year.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Still no sexbots?
Sigh... maybe next year...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753134</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid article overall</title>
	<author>Syberz</author>
	<datestamp>1263408120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Although I mostly agree with you, there's one product that makes NO sense and simply exists to make money off of gullible parents: the Prenatal education system.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>The makers of the BabyPlus Prenatal Education System claim that their device, which emits a sounds similar to the mom's heartbeat [...]</p></div><p>So here we have a device that emits a sound similar to the mom's heartbeat for a baby which is in the womb... in the mom... close to her actual heart.</p><p>That's like listening to a song on a radio while wearing headphones which belt out the same song but not synched to the one on the radio.</p><p>The only way this makes sense is if the mom is dead or a zombie. Either way, you have bigger issues to worry about than "educating" your unborn child.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Although I mostly agree with you , there 's one product that makes NO sense and simply exists to make money off of gullible parents : the Prenatal education system.The makers of the BabyPlus Prenatal Education System claim that their device , which emits a sounds similar to the mom 's heartbeat [ ... ] So here we have a device that emits a sound similar to the mom 's heartbeat for a baby which is in the womb... in the mom... close to her actual heart.That 's like listening to a song on a radio while wearing headphones which belt out the same song but not synched to the one on the radio.The only way this makes sense is if the mom is dead or a zombie .
Either way , you have bigger issues to worry about than " educating " your unborn child .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Although I mostly agree with you, there's one product that makes NO sense and simply exists to make money off of gullible parents: the Prenatal education system.The makers of the BabyPlus Prenatal Education System claim that their device, which emits a sounds similar to the mom's heartbeat [...]So here we have a device that emits a sound similar to the mom's heartbeat for a baby which is in the womb... in the mom... close to her actual heart.That's like listening to a song on a radio while wearing headphones which belt out the same song but not synched to the one on the radio.The only way this makes sense is if the mom is dead or a zombie.
Either way, you have bigger issues to worry about than "educating" your unborn child.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30775524</id>
	<title>Strangely Appropriate</title>
	<author>Duggeek</author>
	<datestamp>1263493020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>There's a nice amount of irony. For those who can smell it, their failures makes for a satisfying zen-like feeling.</p><p>Allow me to elucidate:</p><p>Branding your cigarette-substitute product the "Krave" isn't exactly aligned with the "quit smoking" campaign. By making "crave" the central theme, and increasing the amount of harmful waste with each dose, it's actually making things worse. #quitfail</p><p>Let me get this straight; it's a baseball cap with a "bill" that's over 3x longer than regular caps, and all it does is hold your portable video device about a foot in front of you... with blinders. They call it the "As Seen On Television Cap" but I think an acronym is much more appropriate here: The ASOT cap. #hillbillychic</p><p>Vibrating ear-buds. I remember those in the 90's. They were cheap, they burnt-out after I turned my portable music to "7" or higher and they were painful. I understand the retro thing, but that really is going too far. #immersionfail</p><p>Ah yes, the iType. Let's take a perfectly portable platform, fasten it to a airline table-tray so that we can type like we do at our computer. Every major innovation truly needs something new to tether it to the past. #progressfail</p><p>Phubby&reg;, brought to you by the people that invented the Snuggie&reg;. (I bet!) Does that god-awful "robotic reading lamp" fit in there too so I can jog in the dark? #cultwarning</p><p>I got this great idea; let's make a device for expecting mothers... it sounds just like a mother's heartbeat! Why, it's proven science that a mother's heartbeat makes us more alert, responsive and aware while in the womb. So, since it has so many education-related benefits, we'll call it a Prenatal Education System! -- It would be brilliant, but only if the infant was developing while the mother is <i>dead</i>. #facepalm</p><p>The zen is right there in the video... try to break a phone, and it breaks. Impressive indeed. #fail2fail</p><p>I think the only tag for this is "too soon?" The Android platform is still in its infancy, so why should it be invading our kitchen like a rambunctious toddler? For that matter, why would you want to spend more time in front of your <i>microwave?</i> #toosoon</p><p>The bidet, hundreds of years old and works on a simple concept; a gentle spray of water will... ahem... clean you up. So now we add robotic probosces. Creepy! Also, I believe that the intensity of that jet may be just a bit uncomfortable for the average loo-goer. #hentaihorror</p><p>The parade of iPhone-junk just doesn't end, does it? It's not enough to air-guitar with an i-brick in one hand, now we should fasten it to a contraption that only makes it more cumbersome and louder... and still fails to look anything like a real guitar. #wegottacrapforthat</p><p>I don't know about you, but I find DIY aspects of technology maintenance to be a good thing. Cleaning keyboards can be an exercise in patience, diligence and attending to details. It also helps familiarize me with the placement of keys so I'm not searching the dimly-lit, off-color, 5-point type when I need to use the calculator. As for the goo... welcome to the 90's, and it's called "slime" not "keyboard cleaner." #toysRcheaper</p><p>For our latest achievement we give you... a video adapter. It can connect to your existing video device without the cumbersome convenience of owning yet another video device. #cablesnotincluded</p><p>At last! A way to bring the joy of music and (digitally managed and restricted) entertainment to your young children and give them nightmares of animatronic plushies... all at the same time! Personally, I'd love to watch as one of those things plays Metallica or Slayer... or MJ's PYT. #doyouknowwhatIamsaying</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>There 's a nice amount of irony .
For those who can smell it , their failures makes for a satisfying zen-like feeling.Allow me to elucidate : Branding your cigarette-substitute product the " Krave " is n't exactly aligned with the " quit smoking " campaign .
By making " crave " the central theme , and increasing the amount of harmful waste with each dose , it 's actually making things worse .
# quitfailLet me get this straight ; it 's a baseball cap with a " bill " that 's over 3x longer than regular caps , and all it does is hold your portable video device about a foot in front of you... with blinders .
They call it the " As Seen On Television Cap " but I think an acronym is much more appropriate here : The ASOT cap .
# hillbillychicVibrating ear-buds .
I remember those in the 90 's .
They were cheap , they burnt-out after I turned my portable music to " 7 " or higher and they were painful .
I understand the retro thing , but that really is going too far .
# immersionfailAh yes , the iType .
Let 's take a perfectly portable platform , fasten it to a airline table-tray so that we can type like we do at our computer .
Every major innovation truly needs something new to tether it to the past .
# progressfailPhubby   , brought to you by the people that invented the Snuggie   .
( I bet !
) Does that god-awful " robotic reading lamp " fit in there too so I can jog in the dark ?
# cultwarningI got this great idea ; let 's make a device for expecting mothers... it sounds just like a mother 's heartbeat !
Why , it 's proven science that a mother 's heartbeat makes us more alert , responsive and aware while in the womb .
So , since it has so many education-related benefits , we 'll call it a Prenatal Education System !
-- It would be brilliant , but only if the infant was developing while the mother is dead .
# facepalmThe zen is right there in the video... try to break a phone , and it breaks .
Impressive indeed .
# fail2failI think the only tag for this is " too soon ?
" The Android platform is still in its infancy , so why should it be invading our kitchen like a rambunctious toddler ?
For that matter , why would you want to spend more time in front of your microwave ?
# toosoonThe bidet , hundreds of years old and works on a simple concept ; a gentle spray of water will... ahem... clean you up .
So now we add robotic probosces .
Creepy ! Also , I believe that the intensity of that jet may be just a bit uncomfortable for the average loo-goer .
# hentaihorrorThe parade of iPhone-junk just does n't end , does it ?
It 's not enough to air-guitar with an i-brick in one hand , now we should fasten it to a contraption that only makes it more cumbersome and louder... and still fails to look anything like a real guitar .
# wegottacrapforthatI do n't know about you , but I find DIY aspects of technology maintenance to be a good thing .
Cleaning keyboards can be an exercise in patience , diligence and attending to details .
It also helps familiarize me with the placement of keys so I 'm not searching the dimly-lit , off-color , 5-point type when I need to use the calculator .
As for the goo... welcome to the 90 's , and it 's called " slime " not " keyboard cleaner .
" # toysRcheaperFor our latest achievement we give you... a video adapter .
It can connect to your existing video device without the cumbersome convenience of owning yet another video device .
# cablesnotincludedAt last !
A way to bring the joy of music and ( digitally managed and restricted ) entertainment to your young children and give them nightmares of animatronic plushies... all at the same time !
Personally , I 'd love to watch as one of those things plays Metallica or Slayer... or MJ 's PYT .
# doyouknowwhatIamsaying</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There's a nice amount of irony.
For those who can smell it, their failures makes for a satisfying zen-like feeling.Allow me to elucidate:Branding your cigarette-substitute product the "Krave" isn't exactly aligned with the "quit smoking" campaign.
By making "crave" the central theme, and increasing the amount of harmful waste with each dose, it's actually making things worse.
#quitfailLet me get this straight; it's a baseball cap with a "bill" that's over 3x longer than regular caps, and all it does is hold your portable video device about a foot in front of you... with blinders.
They call it the "As Seen On Television Cap" but I think an acronym is much more appropriate here: The ASOT cap.
#hillbillychicVibrating ear-buds.
I remember those in the 90's.
They were cheap, they burnt-out after I turned my portable music to "7" or higher and they were painful.
I understand the retro thing, but that really is going too far.
#immersionfailAh yes, the iType.
Let's take a perfectly portable platform, fasten it to a airline table-tray so that we can type like we do at our computer.
Every major innovation truly needs something new to tether it to the past.
#progressfailPhubby®, brought to you by the people that invented the Snuggie®.
(I bet!
) Does that god-awful "robotic reading lamp" fit in there too so I can jog in the dark?
#cultwarningI got this great idea; let's make a device for expecting mothers... it sounds just like a mother's heartbeat!
Why, it's proven science that a mother's heartbeat makes us more alert, responsive and aware while in the womb.
So, since it has so many education-related benefits, we'll call it a Prenatal Education System!
-- It would be brilliant, but only if the infant was developing while the mother is dead.
#facepalmThe zen is right there in the video... try to break a phone, and it breaks.
Impressive indeed.
#fail2failI think the only tag for this is "too soon?
" The Android platform is still in its infancy, so why should it be invading our kitchen like a rambunctious toddler?
For that matter, why would you want to spend more time in front of your microwave?
#toosoonThe bidet, hundreds of years old and works on a simple concept; a gentle spray of water will... ahem... clean you up.
So now we add robotic probosces.
Creepy! Also, I believe that the intensity of that jet may be just a bit uncomfortable for the average loo-goer.
#hentaihorrorThe parade of iPhone-junk just doesn't end, does it?
It's not enough to air-guitar with an i-brick in one hand, now we should fasten it to a contraption that only makes it more cumbersome and louder... and still fails to look anything like a real guitar.
#wegottacrapforthatI don't know about you, but I find DIY aspects of technology maintenance to be a good thing.
Cleaning keyboards can be an exercise in patience, diligence and attending to details.
It also helps familiarize me with the placement of keys so I'm not searching the dimly-lit, off-color, 5-point type when I need to use the calculator.
As for the goo... welcome to the 90's, and it's called "slime" not "keyboard cleaner.
" #toysRcheaperFor our latest achievement we give you... a video adapter.
It can connect to your existing video device without the cumbersome convenience of owning yet another video device.
#cablesnotincludedAt last!
A way to bring the joy of music and (digitally managed and restricted) entertainment to your young children and give them nightmares of animatronic plushies... all at the same time!
Personally, I'd love to watch as one of those things plays Metallica or Slayer... or MJ's PYT.
#doyouknowwhatIamsaying</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751916</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263403860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For those of you who missed the Fabulous Fifties, this goo is reminiscient of a product we had back then called wallpaper cleaner.  It was essentially a big handful of dark green goop that was supposed to smell fresh and piney but actually smelled more like sawdust. The idea was to smush it against a stain on your wallpaper then refold the ball so as to mix the stain into the rest of the goop; removing the green stain that replaced the original was up to your ingenuity.  AFAIK, the only good it did was to hasten the invention of washable wallpaper.</p><p>The goop, minus the green piney stuff, next materialized as a grey ball designed to clean the ink off your typewriter keys.  It usually resulted in a major pile-up of stuck-together keys, which you carefully unstuck, leaving the ink from them all over your hands and shirt.  I predict that this latest incarnation may have the ability to exceed its predecessors in causing more of a probelm than they did.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For those of you who missed the Fabulous Fifties , this goo is reminiscient of a product we had back then called wallpaper cleaner .
It was essentially a big handful of dark green goop that was supposed to smell fresh and piney but actually smelled more like sawdust .
The idea was to smush it against a stain on your wallpaper then refold the ball so as to mix the stain into the rest of the goop ; removing the green stain that replaced the original was up to your ingenuity .
AFAIK , the only good it did was to hasten the invention of washable wallpaper.The goop , minus the green piney stuff , next materialized as a grey ball designed to clean the ink off your typewriter keys .
It usually resulted in a major pile-up of stuck-together keys , which you carefully unstuck , leaving the ink from them all over your hands and shirt .
I predict that this latest incarnation may have the ability to exceed its predecessors in causing more of a probelm than they did .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For those of you who missed the Fabulous Fifties, this goo is reminiscient of a product we had back then called wallpaper cleaner.
It was essentially a big handful of dark green goop that was supposed to smell fresh and piney but actually smelled more like sawdust.
The idea was to smush it against a stain on your wallpaper then refold the ball so as to mix the stain into the rest of the goop; removing the green stain that replaced the original was up to your ingenuity.
AFAIK, the only good it did was to hasten the invention of washable wallpaper.The goop, minus the green piney stuff, next materialized as a grey ball designed to clean the ink off your typewriter keys.
It usually resulted in a major pile-up of stuck-together keys, which you carefully unstuck, leaving the ink from them all over your hands and shirt.
I predict that this latest incarnation may have the ability to exceed its predecessors in causing more of a probelm than they did.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30763234</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>rickyars</author>
	<datestamp>1263480000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just turn your keyboard upside down and shake</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>just turn your keyboard upside down and shake</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just turn your keyboard upside down and shake</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750476</id>
	<title>Advertising?</title>
	<author>badevlad</author>
	<datestamp>1263398040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Many companies do something absolutely unusable just to be famous because of such lists. What other can be the purpose of so stupid things?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Many companies do something absolutely unusable just to be famous because of such lists .
What other can be the purpose of so stupid things ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many companies do something absolutely unusable just to be famous because of such lists.
What other can be the purpose of so stupid things?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750780</id>
	<title>Stupid article overall</title>
	<author>SpeedyDX</author>
	<datestamp>1263399180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Many of the choices just seem to be because the idea is new or somehow "weird" to the author (the parent's synthetic snot example, the bidet example by another poster) or something that the author doesn't personally have a use for (the e-cigarette) or just something that has a target audience which doesn't include himself as a member ($200 Blackberry Presenter that enables users, presumably mainly businessmen, to plug their BBs wirelessly into projectors but doesn't actually project itself - do you expect a good projector inside a tiny box like that for just $200?!).</p><p>Anyway, there are more examples. Probably over half of the products in that article are actually quite viable and/or unique/innovative ideas. Some of them may not be implemented too well, but could still prove to be a launching pad for other good products (imagine an fold-up full-size keyboard for the iPhone that could work in any text field). This author is trying to be disparaging for the sake of being disparaging. Nothing wrong with many of the products he listed.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Many of the choices just seem to be because the idea is new or somehow " weird " to the author ( the parent 's synthetic snot example , the bidet example by another poster ) or something that the author does n't personally have a use for ( the e-cigarette ) or just something that has a target audience which does n't include himself as a member ( $ 200 Blackberry Presenter that enables users , presumably mainly businessmen , to plug their BBs wirelessly into projectors but does n't actually project itself - do you expect a good projector inside a tiny box like that for just $ 200 ? !
) .Anyway , there are more examples .
Probably over half of the products in that article are actually quite viable and/or unique/innovative ideas .
Some of them may not be implemented too well , but could still prove to be a launching pad for other good products ( imagine an fold-up full-size keyboard for the iPhone that could work in any text field ) .
This author is trying to be disparaging for the sake of being disparaging .
Nothing wrong with many of the products he listed .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Many of the choices just seem to be because the idea is new or somehow "weird" to the author (the parent's synthetic snot example, the bidet example by another poster) or something that the author doesn't personally have a use for (the e-cigarette) or just something that has a target audience which doesn't include himself as a member ($200 Blackberry Presenter that enables users, presumably mainly businessmen, to plug their BBs wirelessly into projectors but doesn't actually project itself - do you expect a good projector inside a tiny box like that for just $200?!
).Anyway, there are more examples.
Probably over half of the products in that article are actually quite viable and/or unique/innovative ideas.
Some of them may not be implemented too well, but could still prove to be a launching pad for other good products (imagine an fold-up full-size keyboard for the iPhone that could work in any text field).
This author is trying to be disparaging for the sake of being disparaging.
Nothing wrong with many of the products he listed.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751896</id>
	<title>Re:Dishwasher Safe Keyboards</title>
	<author>Jaysyn</author>
	<datestamp>1263403740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I thought you could wash just about any keyboard in the dishwasher as long as you let it dry out completely afterwards.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I thought you could wash just about any keyboard in the dishwasher as long as you let it dry out completely afterwards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I thought you could wash just about any keyboard in the dishwasher as long as you let it dry out completely afterwards.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750766</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386</id>
	<title>Krave</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263397680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>One look at that advertisement and I'm craving something other than an electronic cigarette.</htmltext>
<tokenext>One look at that advertisement and I 'm craving something other than an electronic cigarette .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One look at that advertisement and I'm craving something other than an electronic cigarette.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751602</id>
	<title>Re:omg the phone broke...</title>
	<author>dcarmi</author>
	<datestamp>1263402480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p><div class="quote"><p>a BBC reporter was caught live, on tape, accidentally breaking the 'unbreakable' phone</p></div><p>live, on tape?</p></div><p>ermm.. on tape?  At CES?  C90s are back?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>a BBC reporter was caught live , on tape , accidentally breaking the 'unbreakable ' phonelive , on tape ? ermm.. on tape ?
At CES ?
C90s are back ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>a BBC reporter was caught live, on tape, accidentally breaking the 'unbreakable' phonelive, on tape?ermm.. on tape?
At CES?
C90s are back?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753712</id>
	<title>Re:A matter of opinion</title>
	<author>dfenstrate</author>
	<datestamp>1263410700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've thought about retiring a laptop to kitchen service- I would just make a nice box for it, and then lay the computer out flat on the wall.</p><p>Sure, it wouldn't be comfortable to use it, but it would just be there for recipes and maybe streaming a show or something like that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've thought about retiring a laptop to kitchen service- I would just make a nice box for it , and then lay the computer out flat on the wall.Sure , it would n't be comfortable to use it , but it would just be there for recipes and maybe streaming a show or something like that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've thought about retiring a laptop to kitchen service- I would just make a nice box for it, and then lay the computer out flat on the wall.Sure, it wouldn't be comfortable to use it, but it would just be there for recipes and maybe streaming a show or something like that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30756132</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>aztracker1</author>
	<datestamp>1263376800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I was thinking that the microwave was a good idea, add in a barcode scanner, and you can put the dish in, scan the barcode on the outer box, and it'll do the instructions on-screen... 2 minutes, shows a picture, remove cover, stir, replace cover... (continue)...  It can know exactly how long to cook every product.  I know it's pretty lazy, but people are lazy and don't follow directions well.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I was thinking that the microwave was a good idea , add in a barcode scanner , and you can put the dish in , scan the barcode on the outer box , and it 'll do the instructions on-screen... 2 minutes , shows a picture , remove cover , stir , replace cover... ( continue ) ... It can know exactly how long to cook every product .
I know it 's pretty lazy , but people are lazy and do n't follow directions well .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I was thinking that the microwave was a good idea, add in a barcode scanner, and you can put the dish in, scan the barcode on the outer box, and it'll do the instructions on-screen... 2 minutes, shows a picture, remove cover, stir, replace cover... (continue)...  It can know exactly how long to cook every product.
I know it's pretty lazy, but people are lazy and don't follow directions well.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</id>
	<title>Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263397800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>That product, if done right (anti-bacterial stuff in the goo to get the keys actually clean, right consistency to not leave bits between keys) would actually be pretty useful in some environments.</p><p>For those who didn't RTFA, it's a keyboard cleaner via goo like substance that you push on and pull off and it takes the ick with it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>That product , if done right ( anti-bacterial stuff in the goo to get the keys actually clean , right consistency to not leave bits between keys ) would actually be pretty useful in some environments.For those who did n't RTFA , it 's a keyboard cleaner via goo like substance that you push on and pull off and it takes the ick with it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That product, if done right (anti-bacterial stuff in the goo to get the keys actually clean, right consistency to not leave bits between keys) would actually be pretty useful in some environments.For those who didn't RTFA, it's a keyboard cleaner via goo like substance that you push on and pull off and it takes the ick with it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750334</id>
	<title>how about</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263397500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this autamated frist psot gettor?!?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this autamated frist psot gettor ? !
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this autamated frist psot gettor?!
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751146</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>jellomizer</author>
	<datestamp>1263400800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Most of the products seemed like decent products.   The iPhone Guitar did look kinda crappy though, something that you would get kicked out of a nerd convention for being to nerdy.  But the rest of them he didn't seem to like them just because they were silly or dealt with taboo topics.</p><p>1. I am not a smoker but if I was and it was part of my identity I would want something that at least makes me look like I am smoking.  It isn't a bad idea and can probably help stop smoking as it gives more of the visuals that others products didn't have.</p><p>2. The TV hat is kinda silly too.  But I think it would be good for kids but it on their head and pacify them during long trips and have them watch a movie.</p><p>3. Virbrating earbuds. Yea I don't see them kicking off.  But it seemed as a good attempt on making a subwoofer on earbuds.</p><p>4. iType.  I would agree they really dropped the ball there.  If they made it work with any iphone app and on horizonatl/verticle  then it could be useful, yes it will loose some mobility... However if it cheaper then a laptop it might be good.</p><p>5. Phubby... Well the problem with putting your phone in you pocket has many issues... One you can sit on it or find other ways of breaking it and would fall out or you don't know if it is vibrating or not.  Low tech but good idea.</p><p>6. BabyPlus... There are enough neurotic moms out there to make it sell. There are a bunch of things like this already out. no big deal</p><p>7. Unbreakable Phone...  Nothing is unbreakable but it is a lot more study then most other phones just because the BBC guy hit it in the right spot they shouldn't be penalized much for it.</p><p>8. Android Microwave... Why not... They have computer in them anyways just something with a little more juice.  Heck you can program how long you need to cook your dishes vs. risking the preprogrammed ones.</p><p>9. Bedet... I guess the blogger doesn't like a clean ass.</p><p>10. Fingerest... Yea that is pretty bad.</p><p>11. CyberClean... What is wrong with that, if it works so what if it looks like slime.</p><p>12. BlackBerry presenter... Those mobile projecters are rather weak in power... That is not what it is for.  It is for being able to point on the screen and perform the action.</p><p>13. iMini Pets... It is a toy for kids, or people who like cute things... Silly but not bad.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the products seemed like decent products .
The iPhone Guitar did look kinda crappy though , something that you would get kicked out of a nerd convention for being to nerdy .
But the rest of them he did n't seem to like them just because they were silly or dealt with taboo topics.1 .
I am not a smoker but if I was and it was part of my identity I would want something that at least makes me look like I am smoking .
It is n't a bad idea and can probably help stop smoking as it gives more of the visuals that others products did n't have.2 .
The TV hat is kinda silly too .
But I think it would be good for kids but it on their head and pacify them during long trips and have them watch a movie.3 .
Virbrating earbuds .
Yea I do n't see them kicking off .
But it seemed as a good attempt on making a subwoofer on earbuds.4 .
iType. I would agree they really dropped the ball there .
If they made it work with any iphone app and on horizonatl/verticle then it could be useful , yes it will loose some mobility... However if it cheaper then a laptop it might be good.5 .
Phubby... Well the problem with putting your phone in you pocket has many issues... One you can sit on it or find other ways of breaking it and would fall out or you do n't know if it is vibrating or not .
Low tech but good idea.6 .
BabyPlus... There are enough neurotic moms out there to make it sell .
There are a bunch of things like this already out .
no big deal7 .
Unbreakable Phone... Nothing is unbreakable but it is a lot more study then most other phones just because the BBC guy hit it in the right spot they should n't be penalized much for it.8 .
Android Microwave... Why not... They have computer in them anyways just something with a little more juice .
Heck you can program how long you need to cook your dishes vs. risking the preprogrammed ones.9 .
Bedet... I guess the blogger does n't like a clean ass.10 .
Fingerest... Yea that is pretty bad.11 .
CyberClean... What is wrong with that , if it works so what if it looks like slime.12 .
BlackBerry presenter... Those mobile projecters are rather weak in power... That is not what it is for .
It is for being able to point on the screen and perform the action.13 .
iMini Pets... It is a toy for kids , or people who like cute things... Silly but not bad .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the products seemed like decent products.
The iPhone Guitar did look kinda crappy though, something that you would get kicked out of a nerd convention for being to nerdy.
But the rest of them he didn't seem to like them just because they were silly or dealt with taboo topics.1.
I am not a smoker but if I was and it was part of my identity I would want something that at least makes me look like I am smoking.
It isn't a bad idea and can probably help stop smoking as it gives more of the visuals that others products didn't have.2.
The TV hat is kinda silly too.
But I think it would be good for kids but it on their head and pacify them during long trips and have them watch a movie.3.
Virbrating earbuds.
Yea I don't see them kicking off.
But it seemed as a good attempt on making a subwoofer on earbuds.4.
iType.  I would agree they really dropped the ball there.
If they made it work with any iphone app and on horizonatl/verticle  then it could be useful, yes it will loose some mobility... However if it cheaper then a laptop it might be good.5.
Phubby... Well the problem with putting your phone in you pocket has many issues... One you can sit on it or find other ways of breaking it and would fall out or you don't know if it is vibrating or not.
Low tech but good idea.6.
BabyPlus... There are enough neurotic moms out there to make it sell.
There are a bunch of things like this already out.
no big deal7.
Unbreakable Phone...  Nothing is unbreakable but it is a lot more study then most other phones just because the BBC guy hit it in the right spot they shouldn't be penalized much for it.8.
Android Microwave... Why not... They have computer in them anyways just something with a little more juice.
Heck you can program how long you need to cook your dishes vs. risking the preprogrammed ones.9.
Bedet... I guess the blogger doesn't like a clean ass.10.
Fingerest... Yea that is pretty bad.11.
CyberClean... What is wrong with that, if it works so what if it looks like slime.12.
BlackBerry presenter... Those mobile projecters are rather weak in power... That is not what it is for.
It is for being able to point on the screen and perform the action.13.
iMini Pets... It is a toy for kids, or people who like cute things... Silly but not bad.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30759292</id>
	<title>Re:It's finally time for the Honeywell 316!</title>
	<author>ZosX</author>
	<datestamp>1263391080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The Honeywell Kitchen Computer or H316 pedestal model of 1969 was a short-lived product made by Honeywell and offered by Neiman Marcus. It sold for $10,000, weighed over 100 pounds, and was used for storing recipes (but reading or entering these recipes would have been very difficult for the average cook as the only "user interface" was the binary front panel lights and switches). It had a built in cutting board and had a few recipes built in. There is no evidence that any Honeywell Kitchen Computers were ever sold. [4]</p></div><p>"Honey? What do these switches do? MSTR? FETCH?"</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The Honeywell Kitchen Computer or H316 pedestal model of 1969 was a short-lived product made by Honeywell and offered by Neiman Marcus .
It sold for $ 10,000 , weighed over 100 pounds , and was used for storing recipes ( but reading or entering these recipes would have been very difficult for the average cook as the only " user interface " was the binary front panel lights and switches ) .
It had a built in cutting board and had a few recipes built in .
There is no evidence that any Honeywell Kitchen Computers were ever sold .
[ 4 ] " Honey ? What do these switches do ?
MSTR ? FETCH ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The Honeywell Kitchen Computer or H316 pedestal model of 1969 was a short-lived product made by Honeywell and offered by Neiman Marcus.
It sold for $10,000, weighed over 100 pounds, and was used for storing recipes (but reading or entering these recipes would have been very difficult for the average cook as the only "user interface" was the binary front panel lights and switches).
It had a built in cutting board and had a few recipes built in.
There is no evidence that any Honeywell Kitchen Computers were ever sold.
[4]"Honey? What do these switches do?
MSTR? FETCH?
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751034</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750950</id>
	<title>Re:Smart Microwave</title>
	<author>rfuilrez</author>
	<datestamp>1263399900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I actually saw on some gadget show a few years back the idea of having a Bar Code scanner on microwaves, and ovens and what not. The idea was to have a central database it could pull up after you scan the product, and know exactly how to prepare it. Just scan the box, put it in, and hit cook or whatever.<br> <br>That to me, seemed like a good idea. Though I never saw it come to fruition.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I actually saw on some gadget show a few years back the idea of having a Bar Code scanner on microwaves , and ovens and what not .
The idea was to have a central database it could pull up after you scan the product , and know exactly how to prepare it .
Just scan the box , put it in , and hit cook or whatever .
That to me , seemed like a good idea .
Though I never saw it come to fruition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I actually saw on some gadget show a few years back the idea of having a Bar Code scanner on microwaves, and ovens and what not.
The idea was to have a central database it could pull up after you scan the product, and know exactly how to prepare it.
Just scan the box, put it in, and hit cook or whatever.
That to me, seemed like a good idea.
Though I never saw it come to fruition.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750694</id>
	<title>omg the phone broke...</title>
	<author>gandhi\_2</author>
	<datestamp>1263398880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>just because it broke doesn't mean it's not rugged or useful.</p><p>the best part of TFA:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>a BBC reporter was caught live, on tape, accidentally breaking the 'unbreakable' phone</p></div><p>live, on tape?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>just because it broke does n't mean it 's not rugged or useful.the best part of TFA : a BBC reporter was caught live , on tape , accidentally breaking the 'unbreakable ' phonelive , on tape ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>just because it broke doesn't mean it's not rugged or useful.the best part of TFA:a BBC reporter was caught live, on tape, accidentally breaking the 'unbreakable' phonelive, on tape?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752174</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid article overall</title>
	<author>Steve Max</author>
	<datestamp>1263404760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>imagine an fold-up full-size keyboard for the iPhone that could work in any text field</p></div><p>You mean, like the fold-up (almost) full-size <a href="http://www.palminfocenter.com/news/9447/palm-bluetooth-wireless-keyboard-review/" title="palminfocenter.com">keyboard</a> [palminfocenter.com] for Palm OS devices that worked in any text field but sold almost nothing?</p><p>If you want a device with a keyboard, you get a device with a keyboard. Any external keyboard will add so much weight (and size) in your pocket that it's useless, and you end up never using it.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>imagine an fold-up full-size keyboard for the iPhone that could work in any text fieldYou mean , like the fold-up ( almost ) full-size keyboard [ palminfocenter.com ] for Palm OS devices that worked in any text field but sold almost nothing ? If you want a device with a keyboard , you get a device with a keyboard .
Any external keyboard will add so much weight ( and size ) in your pocket that it 's useless , and you end up never using it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>imagine an fold-up full-size keyboard for the iPhone that could work in any text fieldYou mean, like the fold-up (almost) full-size keyboard [palminfocenter.com] for Palm OS devices that worked in any text field but sold almost nothing?If you want a device with a keyboard, you get a device with a keyboard.
Any external keyboard will add so much weight (and size) in your pocket that it's useless, and you end up never using it.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752568</id>
	<title>Cyber Clean</title>
	<author>mmmmbeer</author>
	<datestamp>1263406200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I bought some Cyber Clean from Thinkgeek a while back and it's awesome.  Works just as described on my phone, keyboard, etc.  These retards picking it as one of the worst products have obviously never tried it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I bought some Cyber Clean from Thinkgeek a while back and it 's awesome .
Works just as described on my phone , keyboard , etc .
These retards picking it as one of the worst products have obviously never tried it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I bought some Cyber Clean from Thinkgeek a while back and it's awesome.
Works just as described on my phone, keyboard, etc.
These retards picking it as one of the worst products have obviously never tried it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752730</id>
	<title>Re:Krave</title>
	<author>Jesse\_vd</author>
	<datestamp>1263406740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>for $4.99 in the Cydia store, you can install the BT keyboard stack, and use (almost) any bluetooth keyboard with any app on your device. the mouse BT stack is free, and works awesome<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>for $ 4.99 in the Cydia store , you can install the BT keyboard stack , and use ( almost ) any bluetooth keyboard with any app on your device .
the mouse BT stack is free , and works awesome : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>for $4.99 in the Cydia store, you can install the BT keyboard stack, and use (almost) any bluetooth keyboard with any app on your device.
the mouse BT stack is free, and works awesome :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752334</id>
	<title>Android Microwave is a GREAT product</title>
	<author>stewbacca</author>
	<datestamp>1263405360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I completely disagree with the Android microwave being on this list. I wish ANY of my appliances had a usable/customizable interface. Putting Android on my appliances would be a progressive first step into improving my appliances!</p><p>This is seriously one of my largest pet-peeves in life. Why do we give washer/dryers/ovens etc. a pass when it comes to usability?  Why are most microwaves and ranges counter-intuitive?</p><p>Finally, wouldn't this sort of open design decrease production costs? Without the need for an embedded OS that is specific to the hardware configuration on which it resides, a single open system could be developed that could be put on all appliances then customized to control the one it currently resides on.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I completely disagree with the Android microwave being on this list .
I wish ANY of my appliances had a usable/customizable interface .
Putting Android on my appliances would be a progressive first step into improving my appliances ! This is seriously one of my largest pet-peeves in life .
Why do we give washer/dryers/ovens etc .
a pass when it comes to usability ?
Why are most microwaves and ranges counter-intuitive ? Finally , would n't this sort of open design decrease production costs ?
Without the need for an embedded OS that is specific to the hardware configuration on which it resides , a single open system could be developed that could be put on all appliances then customized to control the one it currently resides on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I completely disagree with the Android microwave being on this list.
I wish ANY of my appliances had a usable/customizable interface.
Putting Android on my appliances would be a progressive first step into improving my appliances!This is seriously one of my largest pet-peeves in life.
Why do we give washer/dryers/ovens etc.
a pass when it comes to usability?
Why are most microwaves and ranges counter-intuitive?Finally, wouldn't this sort of open design decrease production costs?
Without the need for an embedded OS that is specific to the hardware configuration on which it resides, a single open system could be developed that could be put on all appliances then customized to control the one it currently resides on.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751858</id>
	<title>Re:Krave</title>
	<author>shadowrat</author>
	<datestamp>1263403620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The problem with the iType was it only worked with the itype app. It's not anything the iphone considers a keyboard.
<br> <br>
Maybe you would want to just type into a word processor on the flight, but i'd rather just have a netbook if i were going to carry something that big.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The problem with the iType was it only worked with the itype app .
It 's not anything the iphone considers a keyboard .
Maybe you would want to just type into a word processor on the flight , but i 'd rather just have a netbook if i were going to carry something that big .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The problem with the iType was it only worked with the itype app.
It's not anything the iphone considers a keyboard.
Maybe you would want to just type into a word processor on the flight, but i'd rather just have a netbook if i were going to carry something that big.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751378</id>
	<title>Re:Krave</title>
	<author>anonymousbob22</author>
	<datestamp>1263401580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>According to TFA, the keyboard only worked with the app provided by the manufacturer.
<br> <br>
Also, the keyboard is very large and cumbersome, so any gain in portability by carrying an iPhone/iPod touch is lost because you still need to lug around the keyboard attachment in your backpack..</htmltext>
<tokenext>According to TFA , the keyboard only worked with the app provided by the manufacturer .
Also , the keyboard is very large and cumbersome , so any gain in portability by carrying an iPhone/iPod touch is lost because you still need to lug around the keyboard attachment in your backpack. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>According to TFA, the keyboard only worked with the app provided by the manufacturer.
Also, the keyboard is very large and cumbersome, so any gain in portability by carrying an iPhone/iPod touch is lost because you still need to lug around the keyboard attachment in your backpack..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750504</id>
	<title>Smart Microwave</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263398160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>huh, and no one has put android on the toaster yet?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>huh , and no one has put android on the toaster yet ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>huh, and no one has put android on the toaster yet?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30754492</id>
	<title>My thoughts</title>
	<author>Locke2005</author>
	<datestamp>1263413760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Krave -- Why not just inject the nicotine directly into your bloodstream?<br>
TV Hat -- I'm sure nobody will think of using this to watch porn while driving!<br>
EarVibe -- Wait... are you sure these are designed to be stuck in you ear, and not somewhere else?<br>
iType -- Actually not that bad an idea for those of us that have fingers larger than a Barbie, and thus problems typing on tiny touchscreens.<br>
Phubby -- Aside from being ugly as hell, actually not that bad. Any idea how many times my phone has fallen out of my shirt pocket? And when I wear it on my belt, I usually can't hear it.<br>
BabyPlus -- Why stick the headphones you already own on your stomach, when you can pay big bucks for this glorified speaker?<br>
Unbreakable Phone -- Geeks regard the word "unbreakable" as a challenge!<br>
Android Microwave -- It's need for voice recognition, 'cause telling your microwave "Please make popcorn now" is much easier than just pushing the Popcorn button! Unless this doubles as a refrigerator/freezer, I'm not sure what the added smarts buys you. Plus, using a touchscreen in a high-grease environment -- what a wonderful idea!<br>
Electronic bidet -- My wife gets pretty much the same results with a recycled plastic bottle.<br>
Fingerist -- If you'd like to feel like you're playing a real guitar, perhaps you should, you know... buy a real guitar!<br>
CyberClean -- What isn't clear is, after you get the crap out of your keyboard, how do you get the crap out of the CyberClean? I generally just turn my keyboard upside down and bang it on the desk a few times, and yes, it's amazing how much kruft can be in an old keyboard.<br>
Blackberry Presenter -- Couldn't you, um, just build this functionality into the projector?<br>
iMini Pet iPod Player -- Anybody who thinks this is a BAD idea obviously doesn't have children!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Krave -- Why not just inject the nicotine directly into your bloodstream ?
TV Hat -- I 'm sure nobody will think of using this to watch porn while driving !
EarVibe -- Wait... are you sure these are designed to be stuck in you ear , and not somewhere else ?
iType -- Actually not that bad an idea for those of us that have fingers larger than a Barbie , and thus problems typing on tiny touchscreens .
Phubby -- Aside from being ugly as hell , actually not that bad .
Any idea how many times my phone has fallen out of my shirt pocket ?
And when I wear it on my belt , I usually ca n't hear it .
BabyPlus -- Why stick the headphones you already own on your stomach , when you can pay big bucks for this glorified speaker ?
Unbreakable Phone -- Geeks regard the word " unbreakable " as a challenge !
Android Microwave -- It 's need for voice recognition , 'cause telling your microwave " Please make popcorn now " is much easier than just pushing the Popcorn button !
Unless this doubles as a refrigerator/freezer , I 'm not sure what the added smarts buys you .
Plus , using a touchscreen in a high-grease environment -- what a wonderful idea !
Electronic bidet -- My wife gets pretty much the same results with a recycled plastic bottle .
Fingerist -- If you 'd like to feel like you 're playing a real guitar , perhaps you should , you know... buy a real guitar !
CyberClean -- What is n't clear is , after you get the crap out of your keyboard , how do you get the crap out of the CyberClean ?
I generally just turn my keyboard upside down and bang it on the desk a few times , and yes , it 's amazing how much kruft can be in an old keyboard .
Blackberry Presenter -- Could n't you , um , just build this functionality into the projector ?
iMini Pet iPod Player -- Anybody who thinks this is a BAD idea obviously does n't have children !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Krave -- Why not just inject the nicotine directly into your bloodstream?
TV Hat -- I'm sure nobody will think of using this to watch porn while driving!
EarVibe -- Wait... are you sure these are designed to be stuck in you ear, and not somewhere else?
iType -- Actually not that bad an idea for those of us that have fingers larger than a Barbie, and thus problems typing on tiny touchscreens.
Phubby -- Aside from being ugly as hell, actually not that bad.
Any idea how many times my phone has fallen out of my shirt pocket?
And when I wear it on my belt, I usually can't hear it.
BabyPlus -- Why stick the headphones you already own on your stomach, when you can pay big bucks for this glorified speaker?
Unbreakable Phone -- Geeks regard the word "unbreakable" as a challenge!
Android Microwave -- It's need for voice recognition, 'cause telling your microwave "Please make popcorn now" is much easier than just pushing the Popcorn button!
Unless this doubles as a refrigerator/freezer, I'm not sure what the added smarts buys you.
Plus, using a touchscreen in a high-grease environment -- what a wonderful idea!
Electronic bidet -- My wife gets pretty much the same results with a recycled plastic bottle.
Fingerist -- If you'd like to feel like you're playing a real guitar, perhaps you should, you know... buy a real guitar!
CyberClean -- What isn't clear is, after you get the crap out of your keyboard, how do you get the crap out of the CyberClean?
I generally just turn my keyboard upside down and bang it on the desk a few times, and yes, it's amazing how much kruft can be in an old keyboard.
Blackberry Presenter -- Couldn't you, um, just build this functionality into the projector?
iMini Pet iPod Player -- Anybody who thinks this is a BAD idea obviously doesn't have children!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753742</id>
	<title>Re:Sick of the 'culture of fail.'</title>
	<author>swordgeek</author>
	<datestamp>1263410820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>"I would love if my appliances were net enabled. Android on a microwave? Thats perfect. Maybe I can see how much power its used that month or, heaven forbid, it friggin talk to NTP so it can set its own time. Sorry naysayers but this is great."</i></p><p>It's a question of implementation. An NTP clock would be nice, but what happens when it loses the signal? Does it have an internal clock which keeps counting, or does it give up entirely? Computers, in general, use NTP to adjust their clock; but some cell phones (for instance) don't \_have\_ an internal clock, and if you don't have a signal, you don't have a time. In the kitchen, that would suck.</p><p>Our microwave is the newest appliance in the kitchen, and was built in the era of cell phones with B&amp;W displays. The Android is going to be obsolete long before the microwave oven is.</p><p>Also, it's noise - more displays, more lights, more buttons, more STUFF. I'm a big fan of less stuff.</p><p>If you want a net-enabled microwave, fine. The problem is that technology tends to be 'rush to copy.' If these get popular, then appliances that function without a network connection will become nigh impossible to find.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I would love if my appliances were net enabled .
Android on a microwave ?
Thats perfect .
Maybe I can see how much power its used that month or , heaven forbid , it friggin talk to NTP so it can set its own time .
Sorry naysayers but this is great .
" It 's a question of implementation .
An NTP clock would be nice , but what happens when it loses the signal ?
Does it have an internal clock which keeps counting , or does it give up entirely ?
Computers , in general , use NTP to adjust their clock ; but some cell phones ( for instance ) do n't \ _have \ _ an internal clock , and if you do n't have a signal , you do n't have a time .
In the kitchen , that would suck.Our microwave is the newest appliance in the kitchen , and was built in the era of cell phones with B&amp;W displays .
The Android is going to be obsolete long before the microwave oven is.Also , it 's noise - more displays , more lights , more buttons , more STUFF .
I 'm a big fan of less stuff.If you want a net-enabled microwave , fine .
The problem is that technology tends to be 'rush to copy .
' If these get popular , then appliances that function without a network connection will become nigh impossible to find .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"I would love if my appliances were net enabled.
Android on a microwave?
Thats perfect.
Maybe I can see how much power its used that month or, heaven forbid, it friggin talk to NTP so it can set its own time.
Sorry naysayers but this is great.
"It's a question of implementation.
An NTP clock would be nice, but what happens when it loses the signal?
Does it have an internal clock which keeps counting, or does it give up entirely?
Computers, in general, use NTP to adjust their clock; but some cell phones (for instance) don't \_have\_ an internal clock, and if you don't have a signal, you don't have a time.
In the kitchen, that would suck.Our microwave is the newest appliance in the kitchen, and was built in the era of cell phones with B&amp;W displays.
The Android is going to be obsolete long before the microwave oven is.Also, it's noise - more displays, more lights, more buttons, more STUFF.
I'm a big fan of less stuff.If you want a net-enabled microwave, fine.
The problem is that technology tends to be 'rush to copy.
' If these get popular, then appliances that function without a network connection will become nigh impossible to find.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750768</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752576</id>
	<title>Re:omg the phone broke...</title>
	<author>Xugumad</author>
	<datestamp>1263406260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, I saw that video earlier. That phone looks easily rugged enough to withstand anything that might happen to it in a day to day environment except actually dropping into heavy machinery. Repeated hard impacts to the weakest surface from a single point managed to damage the screen - good grief, most phones I've gone near would have snapped like a twig on the first impact!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , I saw that video earlier .
That phone looks easily rugged enough to withstand anything that might happen to it in a day to day environment except actually dropping into heavy machinery .
Repeated hard impacts to the weakest surface from a single point managed to damage the screen - good grief , most phones I 've gone near would have snapped like a twig on the first impact !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, I saw that video earlier.
That phone looks easily rugged enough to withstand anything that might happen to it in a day to day environment except actually dropping into heavy machinery.
Repeated hard impacts to the weakest surface from a single point managed to damage the screen - good grief, most phones I've gone near would have snapped like a twig on the first impact!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750742</id>
	<title>Cigarettes and earbuds</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263399060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><b>Electronic cigarettes:</b> Not that bad.  I personally don't smoke, but a coworker who is a heavy smoker got adjusted to the electronic version quite well.  It also makes the air around the office better (even though he smokes outside, he used to reek of cigarette smoke before he switched).
<p>
<b>Vibrating earbuds:</b> I didn't try the insertable version, but I used to have a Panasonic walkman with large headphones that did just that.  I quickly got addicted to them; without them even the same music sounded somewhat "flat".  The in-ear version may itch a little, but I wouldn't dismiss it until I tried.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Electronic cigarettes : Not that bad .
I personally do n't smoke , but a coworker who is a heavy smoker got adjusted to the electronic version quite well .
It also makes the air around the office better ( even though he smokes outside , he used to reek of cigarette smoke before he switched ) .
Vibrating earbuds : I did n't try the insertable version , but I used to have a Panasonic walkman with large headphones that did just that .
I quickly got addicted to them ; without them even the same music sounded somewhat " flat " .
The in-ear version may itch a little , but I would n't dismiss it until I tried .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Electronic cigarettes: Not that bad.
I personally don't smoke, but a coworker who is a heavy smoker got adjusted to the electronic version quite well.
It also makes the air around the office better (even though he smokes outside, he used to reek of cigarette smoke before he switched).
Vibrating earbuds: I didn't try the insertable version, but I used to have a Panasonic walkman with large headphones that did just that.
I quickly got addicted to them; without them even the same music sounded somewhat "flat".
The in-ear version may itch a little, but I wouldn't dismiss it until I tried.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753274</id>
	<title>Re:A matter of opinion</title>
	<author>Abstrackt</author>
	<datestamp>1263408720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A computer, built for the kitchen environment would be valuable.</p></div><p>Just do what I do, use an old laptop.  It doesn't matter if the battery is shot since it will likely be plugged in all the time and you don't worry as much about getting it dirty because at least it's being used instead of rotting in a landfill.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A computer , built for the kitchen environment would be valuable.Just do what I do , use an old laptop .
It does n't matter if the battery is shot since it will likely be plugged in all the time and you do n't worry as much about getting it dirty because at least it 's being used instead of rotting in a landfill .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A computer, built for the kitchen environment would be valuable.Just do what I do, use an old laptop.
It doesn't matter if the battery is shot since it will likely be plugged in all the time and you don't worry as much about getting it dirty because at least it's being used instead of rotting in a landfill.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30759186</id>
	<title>Re:Synthetic Snot</title>
	<author>ZosX</author>
	<datestamp>1263390480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Most of the products seemed like decent products.   </p></div><p>No they seemed like total wastes of money to me, but to each his own.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>1. I am not a smoker but if I was and it was part of my identity I would want something that at least makes me look like I am smoking.  It isn't a bad idea and can probably help stop smoking as it gives more of the visuals that others products didn't have.</p></div><p> I smoke and I think the whole idea is retarded. If you are that worried about your health, just quit smoking. Nicotine isn't very good for you either.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>2. The TV hat is kinda silly too.  But I think it would be good for kids but it on their head and pacify them during long trips and have them watch a movie.</p></div><p>Yeah, that's always a good idea. Pacify the children with the magic video box. Yeah, I know its real hard to talk to your children and keep them engaged for more than  5 minutes. Thanks for doing your part to keep the next generation as stupid and unaware as the current one. I mean, who hell wants to think for themselves?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>3. Virbrating earbuds. Yea I don't see them kicking off.  But it seemed as a good attempt on making a subwoofer on earbuds.</p></div><p>Uh. The point was that it just vibrates and does not make sound, so you can "feel" the bass. RTFA. </p><p><div class="quote"><p>4. iType.  I would agree they really dropped the ball there.  If they made it work with any iphone app and on horizonatl/verticle  then it could be useful, yes it will loose some mobility... However if it cheaper then a laptop it might be good.</p></div><p>A typewriter is a lot cheaper and a lot more useful. The iphone needs a built in keyboard not a full sized one. A $20 486 laptop is more functional than this! </p><p><div class="quote"><p>5. Phubby... Well the problem with putting your phone in you pocket has many issues... One you can sit on it or find other ways of breaking it and would fall out or you don't know if it is vibrating or not.  Low tech but good idea.</p></div><p>A good idea if you want to look like a dork who straps their phone to their wrist. Would probably look great with an 80s style dayglo hip bag.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>6. BabyPlus... There are enough neurotic moms out there to make it sell. There are a bunch of things like this already out. no big deal</p></div><p>Snake oil was no big deal until it became outlawed. You do know that fraud is a crime, right? </p><p><div class="quote"><p>7. Unbreakable Phone...  Nothing is unbreakable but it is a lot more study then most other phones just because the BBC guy hit it in the right spot they shouldn't be penalized much for it.</p></div><p>It fails to deliver on its claims. Don't call something unbreakable, when it is, in fact, breakable. Calling the Titanic "unsinkable" worked out pretty well, didn't it?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>8. Android Microwave... Why not... They have computer in them anyways just something with a little more juice.  Heck you can program how long you need to cook your dishes vs. risking the preprogrammed ones.</p></div><p>Program? You mean like entering a time and maybe even a power setting? I don't know how you do use a microwave, but I just punch in the digits on the keypad like everyone else or turn the knob to the time I want on the oldschool microwaves. Does it really need to be more complicated than that? </p><p><div class="quote"><p>9. Bedet... I guess the blogger doesn't like a clean ass.</p></div><p>You are totally right. The blogger must love to just sit around in his own shit all day. God you are such a fucking genius!</p><p><div class="quote"><p>10. Fingerest... Yea that is pretty bad.</p></div><p>Alright I'll agree here at least. $150 can buy a fucking real guitar.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>11. CyberClean... What is wrong with that, if it works so what if it looks like slime.</p></div><p>Most of the crud accumulates under the keys. A $5 can of air would be a lot more effective. You can just take the keyboard and run it through a dishwasher too.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>12. BlackBerry presenter... Those mobile projecters are rather weak in power... That is not what it is for.  It is for being able to point on the screen and perform the action.</p></div><p>$200+expensive fullsize projector is a lot of money to get a tiny blackberry screen on the wall. I can see someone in business being marginally interested, but those people have notebooks with video out and powerpoint, so why bother? Part of the apparant novelty of the mini projectors is being able to display a movie or something in a somewhat viewable size that more than one person can see. That and they are really small and portable. But, you know, who would want that sort of thing?</p><p><div class="quote"><p>13. iMini Pets... It is a toy for kids, or people who like cute things... Silly but not bad.</p></div><p>Yeah. I'll give you that one too. Dancing stuffed animals are always cute and fun and anyone who says  otherwise is a straight up hater. Just playing devil's advocate here. I can totally see why they picked out of a lot of this stuff, though a few were certainly not all that terrible, and as you said, will probably make money anways.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Most of the products seemed like decent products .
No they seemed like total wastes of money to me , but to each his own.1 .
I am not a smoker but if I was and it was part of my identity I would want something that at least makes me look like I am smoking .
It is n't a bad idea and can probably help stop smoking as it gives more of the visuals that others products did n't have .
I smoke and I think the whole idea is retarded .
If you are that worried about your health , just quit smoking .
Nicotine is n't very good for you either.2 .
The TV hat is kinda silly too .
But I think it would be good for kids but it on their head and pacify them during long trips and have them watch a movie.Yeah , that 's always a good idea .
Pacify the children with the magic video box .
Yeah , I know its real hard to talk to your children and keep them engaged for more than 5 minutes .
Thanks for doing your part to keep the next generation as stupid and unaware as the current one .
I mean , who hell wants to think for themselves ? 3 .
Virbrating earbuds .
Yea I do n't see them kicking off .
But it seemed as a good attempt on making a subwoofer on earbuds.Uh .
The point was that it just vibrates and does not make sound , so you can " feel " the bass .
RTFA. 4. iType. I would agree they really dropped the ball there .
If they made it work with any iphone app and on horizonatl/verticle then it could be useful , yes it will loose some mobility... However if it cheaper then a laptop it might be good.A typewriter is a lot cheaper and a lot more useful .
The iphone needs a built in keyboard not a full sized one .
A $ 20 486 laptop is more functional than this !
5. Phubby... Well the problem with putting your phone in you pocket has many issues... One you can sit on it or find other ways of breaking it and would fall out or you do n't know if it is vibrating or not .
Low tech but good idea.A good idea if you want to look like a dork who straps their phone to their wrist .
Would probably look great with an 80s style dayglo hip bag.6 .
BabyPlus... There are enough neurotic moms out there to make it sell .
There are a bunch of things like this already out .
no big dealSnake oil was no big deal until it became outlawed .
You do know that fraud is a crime , right ?
7. Unbreakable Phone... Nothing is unbreakable but it is a lot more study then most other phones just because the BBC guy hit it in the right spot they should n't be penalized much for it.It fails to deliver on its claims .
Do n't call something unbreakable , when it is , in fact , breakable .
Calling the Titanic " unsinkable " worked out pretty well , did n't it ? 8 .
Android Microwave... Why not... They have computer in them anyways just something with a little more juice .
Heck you can program how long you need to cook your dishes vs. risking the preprogrammed ones.Program ?
You mean like entering a time and maybe even a power setting ?
I do n't know how you do use a microwave , but I just punch in the digits on the keypad like everyone else or turn the knob to the time I want on the oldschool microwaves .
Does it really need to be more complicated than that ?
9. Bedet... I guess the blogger does n't like a clean ass.You are totally right .
The blogger must love to just sit around in his own shit all day .
God you are such a fucking genius ! 10 .
Fingerest... Yea that is pretty bad.Alright I 'll agree here at least .
$ 150 can buy a fucking real guitar.11 .
CyberClean... What is wrong with that , if it works so what if it looks like slime.Most of the crud accumulates under the keys .
A $ 5 can of air would be a lot more effective .
You can just take the keyboard and run it through a dishwasher too.12 .
BlackBerry presenter... Those mobile projecters are rather weak in power... That is not what it is for .
It is for being able to point on the screen and perform the action. $ 200 + expensive fullsize projector is a lot of money to get a tiny blackberry screen on the wall .
I can see someone in business being marginally interested , but those people have notebooks with video out and powerpoint , so why bother ?
Part of the apparant novelty of the mini projectors is being able to display a movie or something in a somewhat viewable size that more than one person can see .
That and they are really small and portable .
But , you know , who would want that sort of thing ? 13 .
iMini Pets... It is a toy for kids , or people who like cute things... Silly but not bad.Yeah .
I 'll give you that one too .
Dancing stuffed animals are always cute and fun and anyone who says otherwise is a straight up hater .
Just playing devil 's advocate here .
I can totally see why they picked out of a lot of this stuff , though a few were certainly not all that terrible , and as you said , will probably make money anways .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Most of the products seemed like decent products.
No they seemed like total wastes of money to me, but to each his own.1.
I am not a smoker but if I was and it was part of my identity I would want something that at least makes me look like I am smoking.
It isn't a bad idea and can probably help stop smoking as it gives more of the visuals that others products didn't have.
I smoke and I think the whole idea is retarded.
If you are that worried about your health, just quit smoking.
Nicotine isn't very good for you either.2.
The TV hat is kinda silly too.
But I think it would be good for kids but it on their head and pacify them during long trips and have them watch a movie.Yeah, that's always a good idea.
Pacify the children with the magic video box.
Yeah, I know its real hard to talk to your children and keep them engaged for more than  5 minutes.
Thanks for doing your part to keep the next generation as stupid and unaware as the current one.
I mean, who hell wants to think for themselves?3.
Virbrating earbuds.
Yea I don't see them kicking off.
But it seemed as a good attempt on making a subwoofer on earbuds.Uh.
The point was that it just vibrates and does not make sound, so you can "feel" the bass.
RTFA. 4. iType.  I would agree they really dropped the ball there.
If they made it work with any iphone app and on horizonatl/verticle  then it could be useful, yes it will loose some mobility... However if it cheaper then a laptop it might be good.A typewriter is a lot cheaper and a lot more useful.
The iphone needs a built in keyboard not a full sized one.
A $20 486 laptop is more functional than this!
5. Phubby... Well the problem with putting your phone in you pocket has many issues... One you can sit on it or find other ways of breaking it and would fall out or you don't know if it is vibrating or not.
Low tech but good idea.A good idea if you want to look like a dork who straps their phone to their wrist.
Would probably look great with an 80s style dayglo hip bag.6.
BabyPlus... There are enough neurotic moms out there to make it sell.
There are a bunch of things like this already out.
no big dealSnake oil was no big deal until it became outlawed.
You do know that fraud is a crime, right?
7. Unbreakable Phone...  Nothing is unbreakable but it is a lot more study then most other phones just because the BBC guy hit it in the right spot they shouldn't be penalized much for it.It fails to deliver on its claims.
Don't call something unbreakable, when it is, in fact, breakable.
Calling the Titanic "unsinkable" worked out pretty well, didn't it?8.
Android Microwave... Why not... They have computer in them anyways just something with a little more juice.
Heck you can program how long you need to cook your dishes vs. risking the preprogrammed ones.Program?
You mean like entering a time and maybe even a power setting?
I don't know how you do use a microwave, but I just punch in the digits on the keypad like everyone else or turn the knob to the time I want on the oldschool microwaves.
Does it really need to be more complicated than that?
9. Bedet... I guess the blogger doesn't like a clean ass.You are totally right.
The blogger must love to just sit around in his own shit all day.
God you are such a fucking genius!10.
Fingerest... Yea that is pretty bad.Alright I'll agree here at least.
$150 can buy a fucking real guitar.11.
CyberClean... What is wrong with that, if it works so what if it looks like slime.Most of the crud accumulates under the keys.
A $5 can of air would be a lot more effective.
You can just take the keyboard and run it through a dishwasher too.12.
BlackBerry presenter... Those mobile projecters are rather weak in power... That is not what it is for.
It is for being able to point on the screen and perform the action.$200+expensive fullsize projector is a lot of money to get a tiny blackberry screen on the wall.
I can see someone in business being marginally interested, but those people have notebooks with video out and powerpoint, so why bother?
Part of the apparant novelty of the mini projectors is being able to display a movie or something in a somewhat viewable size that more than one person can see.
That and they are really small and portable.
But, you know, who would want that sort of thing?13.
iMini Pets... It is a toy for kids, or people who like cute things... Silly but not bad.Yeah.
I'll give you that one too.
Dancing stuffed animals are always cute and fun and anyone who says  otherwise is a straight up hater.
Just playing devil's advocate here.
I can totally see why they picked out of a lot of this stuff, though a few were certainly not all that terrible, and as you said, will probably make money anways.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751146</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620</id>
	<title>A matter of opinion</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263398580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I think the reviewer compiler just has issues with bidets. The Japanese have had robotic bidets for some time now. Chalk it up to "weird Japan" if you must. The android powered microwave is flawed because it's in a microwave, not in a stove. I love to cook, but there are occasions when I want, or need to consult my computer-- email, recipes, perhaps a podcast. But I don't want to get spattering spaghetti sauce on my electronics. A computer, built for the kitchen environment would be valuable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I think the reviewer compiler just has issues with bidets .
The Japanese have had robotic bidets for some time now .
Chalk it up to " weird Japan " if you must .
The android powered microwave is flawed because it 's in a microwave , not in a stove .
I love to cook , but there are occasions when I want , or need to consult my computer-- email , recipes , perhaps a podcast .
But I do n't want to get spattering spaghetti sauce on my electronics .
A computer , built for the kitchen environment would be valuable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I think the reviewer compiler just has issues with bidets.
The Japanese have had robotic bidets for some time now.
Chalk it up to "weird Japan" if you must.
The android powered microwave is flawed because it's in a microwave, not in a stove.
I love to cook, but there are occasions when I want, or need to consult my computer-- email, recipes, perhaps a podcast.
But I don't want to get spattering spaghetti sauce on my electronics.
A computer, built for the kitchen environment would be valuable.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752546</id>
	<title>Re:Krave</title>
	<author>nomadic</author>
	<datestamp>1263406140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>One look at that advertisement and I'm craving something other than an electronic cigarette.</i>
<br>
<br>
Tasteful green chairs?</htmltext>
<tokenext>One look at that advertisement and I 'm craving something other than an electronic cigarette .
Tasteful green chairs ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>One look at that advertisement and I'm craving something other than an electronic cigarette.
Tasteful green chairs?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751576</id>
	<title>wireless enabled apppliances good idea</title>
	<author>peter303</author>
	<datestamp>1263402360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>They can tweet you when then have finished doing something.
People talked about wiring up appliances to do this in the past,
but wires are too cumbersome.  Its likely you'll get the whole wireless device, CPU and OS on a single chip at some point for almost nothing.</htmltext>
<tokenext>They can tweet you when then have finished doing something .
People talked about wiring up appliances to do this in the past , but wires are too cumbersome .
Its likely you 'll get the whole wireless device , CPU and OS on a single chip at some point for almost nothing .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They can tweet you when then have finished doing something.
People talked about wiring up appliances to do this in the past,
but wires are too cumbersome.
Its likely you'll get the whole wireless device, CPU and OS on a single chip at some point for almost nothing.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750504</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750470</id>
	<title>Re:Krave</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263397980000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>One look at that advertisement and I'm craving something other than an electronic cigarette.</i>
</p><p>Hmm. Do you need to borrow my vibrating earbuds?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>One look at that advertisement and I 'm craving something other than an electronic cigarette .
Hmm. Do you need to borrow my vibrating earbuds ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext> One look at that advertisement and I'm craving something other than an electronic cigarette.
Hmm. Do you need to borrow my vibrating earbuds?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30766102</id>
	<title>MOD Parent Up</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263491100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I totally agree.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I totally agree .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I totally agree.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750686</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30759996</id>
	<title>Re:omg the phone broke...</title>
	<author>mjwx</author>
	<datestamp>1263396120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>live, on tape?</p></div></blockquote><p>

Well he wasn't dead, on tape when he broke the phone.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>live , on tape ?
Well he was n't dead , on tape when he broke the phone .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>live, on tape?
Well he wasn't dead, on tape when he broke the phone.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750694</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750768</id>
	<title>Sick of the 'culture of fail.'</title>
	<author>gad\_zuki!</author>
	<datestamp>1263399180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A lot of these are pretty good ideas. I would love if my appliances were net enabled.  Android on a microwave? Thats perfect.  Maybe I can see how much power its used that month or, heaven forbid, it friggin talk to NTP so it can set its own time.  Sorry naysayers but this is great.</p><p>The buzzing earbuds? I tried a demo of these about three or four years ago. Its an old idea. I actually like them. Its a gimmick, but the suggested retail price was only a few dollars more than Apple's bottom of the barrel quality ipod/iphone headsets.  They're no more silly than most audio applications and much less sillier than the people who pay hundreds of dollars for "audiophile" quality headphones.</p><p>Teddy Ruxbin? Kids love technology like this. A net enabled doll that could tell stories downloaded from the interent or created from parents sounds like the next xmas hot toy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A lot of these are pretty good ideas .
I would love if my appliances were net enabled .
Android on a microwave ?
Thats perfect .
Maybe I can see how much power its used that month or , heaven forbid , it friggin talk to NTP so it can set its own time .
Sorry naysayers but this is great.The buzzing earbuds ?
I tried a demo of these about three or four years ago .
Its an old idea .
I actually like them .
Its a gimmick , but the suggested retail price was only a few dollars more than Apple 's bottom of the barrel quality ipod/iphone headsets .
They 're no more silly than most audio applications and much less sillier than the people who pay hundreds of dollars for " audiophile " quality headphones.Teddy Ruxbin ?
Kids love technology like this .
A net enabled doll that could tell stories downloaded from the interent or created from parents sounds like the next xmas hot toy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A lot of these are pretty good ideas.
I would love if my appliances were net enabled.
Android on a microwave?
Thats perfect.
Maybe I can see how much power its used that month or, heaven forbid, it friggin talk to NTP so it can set its own time.
Sorry naysayers but this is great.The buzzing earbuds?
I tried a demo of these about three or four years ago.
Its an old idea.
I actually like them.
Its a gimmick, but the suggested retail price was only a few dollars more than Apple's bottom of the barrel quality ipod/iphone headsets.
They're no more silly than most audio applications and much less sillier than the people who pay hundreds of dollars for "audiophile" quality headphones.Teddy Ruxbin?
Kids love technology like this.
A net enabled doll that could tell stories downloaded from the interent or created from parents sounds like the next xmas hot toy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751034</id>
	<title>It's finally time for the Honeywell 316!</title>
	<author>name\_already\_taken</author>
	<datestamp>1263400320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>A computer, built for the kitchen environment would be valuable.</p></div><p>...and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeywell\_316" title="wikipedia.org">here it is</a> [wikipedia.org]!</p><p>I think the terminal can also be used as an island.  It looks like it's got room for use as a cutting board or for rolling out pastry too!  What more could you ask for?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>A computer , built for the kitchen environment would be valuable....and here it is [ wikipedia.org ] ! I think the terminal can also be used as an island .
It looks like it 's got room for use as a cutting board or for rolling out pastry too !
What more could you ask for ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A computer, built for the kitchen environment would be valuable....and here it is [wikipedia.org]!I think the terminal can also be used as an island.
It looks like it's got room for use as a cutting board or for rolling out pastry too!
What more could you ask for?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750420</id>
	<title>Vibrating earbuds...</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263397800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Interestingly enough, they weren't meant to go in your ears &gt;.&gt;</htmltext>
<tokenext>Interestingly enough , they were n't meant to go in your ears &gt; . &gt;</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Interestingly enough, they weren't meant to go in your ears &gt;.&gt;</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30755104</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid article overall</title>
	<author>Rich0</author>
	<datestamp>1263416100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hate to reply twice, but I noticed they also picked on the "unbreakable" phone - because it could be broken.</p><p>Did anybody really think that if you dropped the thing into the sun it would remain intact?</p><p>It looked like a fairly functional device that could be useful in a number of very practical jobs.  It would be far more survivable on a construction site than a regular phone, even if you couldn't whack it with a wedge and a 10 pound sledge.</p><p>I do agree that a few items were dubious, but technology doesn't need to be fashionable to be practical for many customers.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hate to reply twice , but I noticed they also picked on the " unbreakable " phone - because it could be broken.Did anybody really think that if you dropped the thing into the sun it would remain intact ? It looked like a fairly functional device that could be useful in a number of very practical jobs .
It would be far more survivable on a construction site than a regular phone , even if you could n't whack it with a wedge and a 10 pound sledge.I do agree that a few items were dubious , but technology does n't need to be fashionable to be practical for many customers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hate to reply twice, but I noticed they also picked on the "unbreakable" phone - because it could be broken.Did anybody really think that if you dropped the thing into the sun it would remain intact?It looked like a fairly functional device that could be useful in a number of very practical jobs.
It would be far more survivable on a construction site than a regular phone, even if you couldn't whack it with a wedge and a 10 pound sledge.I do agree that a few items were dubious, but technology doesn't need to be fashionable to be practical for many customers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750780</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753996</id>
	<title>Re:Stupid article overall</title>
	<author>Rich0</author>
	<datestamp>1263411780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Heard somewhere that the e-cigarette is probably intended to be drug paraphernalia, but obviously they can't market it as such.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Heard somewhere that the e-cigarette is probably intended to be drug paraphernalia , but obviously they ca n't market it as such .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Heard somewhere that the e-cigarette is probably intended to be drug paraphernalia, but obviously they can't market it as such.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750780</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_40</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751896
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750766
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752730
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752330
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_39</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751024
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751858
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751228
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30759186
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752174
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30756132
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750470
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751916
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751638
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752854
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751146
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_38</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751576
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30759996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753742
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750768
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751602
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_37</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_36</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30764130
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752334
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30757172
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751972
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751302
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30759292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751034
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30763234
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753712
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751378
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753500
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30755104
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750950
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750504
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753134
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750780
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751978
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750694
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_1332252_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30766102
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750686
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750660
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750504
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750950
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751576
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753356
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752568
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750780
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752174
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753134
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30755104
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752330
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751228
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753500
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751916
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30763234
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751972
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751146
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752626
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752854
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30756132
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30759186
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750766
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751896
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750620
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753712
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751978
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751034
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30759292
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753274
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751302
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750694
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30759996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751602
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752576
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751428
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752334
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30764130
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750768
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30753742
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751024
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30754492
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750488
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750334
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750742
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750386
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30757172
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750686
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751378
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751858
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752730
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30766102
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30751638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30752546
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750470
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30750420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_1332252.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_1332252.30754084
</commentlist>
</conversation>
