<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_13_0212215</id>
	<title>2010 AL30, Asteroid Or Space Junk, To Pay a Close Visit</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1263378120000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>astroengine writes <i>"A near-Earth object that could be manmade has just been discovered hurtling toward us. On Wednesday (Jan. 13), an object called <a href="http://news.discovery.com/space/the-2010-al30-an-asteroid-or-man-made-object.html">2010 AL30 will fly by Earth</a> at a distance of just 130,000 km (80,000 miles). That's only one-third of the way from here to the moon, i.e. very close. It will miss us, and if it did hit us, it wouldn't do any damage anyway, but I managed to pick up on some chatter between planetary scientists and found out that the 'asteroid,' or whatever it is, gives us a new standard: a 10-meter-wide asteroid can be detected two days before it potentially hits Earth. A pretty useful warning if you ask me."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>astroengine writes " A near-Earth object that could be manmade has just been discovered hurtling toward us .
On Wednesday ( Jan. 13 ) , an object called 2010 AL30 will fly by Earth at a distance of just 130,000 km ( 80,000 miles ) .
That 's only one-third of the way from here to the moon , i.e .
very close .
It will miss us , and if it did hit us , it would n't do any damage anyway , but I managed to pick up on some chatter between planetary scientists and found out that the 'asteroid, ' or whatever it is , gives us a new standard : a 10-meter-wide asteroid can be detected two days before it potentially hits Earth .
A pretty useful warning if you ask me .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>astroengine writes "A near-Earth object that could be manmade has just been discovered hurtling toward us.
On Wednesday (Jan. 13), an object called 2010 AL30 will fly by Earth at a distance of just 130,000 km (80,000 miles).
That's only one-third of the way from here to the moon, i.e.
very close.
It will miss us, and if it did hit us, it wouldn't do any damage anyway, but I managed to pick up on some chatter between planetary scientists and found out that the 'asteroid,' or whatever it is, gives us a new standard: a 10-meter-wide asteroid can be detected two days before it potentially hits Earth.
A pretty useful warning if you ask me.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748828</id>
	<title>On Wednesday (Jan. 13),</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263385140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's Thursday here already. When will the rest of the world catch up with us?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's Thursday here already .
When will the rest of the world catch up with us ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's Thursday here already.
When will the rest of the world catch up with us?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748640</id>
	<title>2 days?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263382020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>2 days is good, but what about the object coming from behind the sun?</p><p>More work should be able to see what's coming from the 'blind spot'.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>2 days is good , but what about the object coming from behind the sun ? More work should be able to see what 's coming from the 'blind spot' .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>2 days is good, but what about the object coming from behind the sun?More work should be able to see what's coming from the 'blind spot'.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749112</id>
	<title>A what where now?!</title>
	<author>Provocateur</author>
	<datestamp>1263388800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Even more alarming is where I heard it first...<i>on frackin Slashdot!</i></p><p>* me nervous</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Even more alarming is where I heard it first...on frackin Slashdot !
* me nervous</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Even more alarming is where I heard it first...on frackin Slashdot!
* me nervous</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751244</id>
	<title>Re:Nobody asked you, thanks.</title>
	<author>kellyb9</author>
	<datestamp>1263401100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Mr President of Earth: Great Scott! Will it hit us?</p></div><p>President Doc Brown?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Mr President of Earth : Great Scott !
Will it hit us ? President Doc Brown ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Mr President of Earth: Great Scott!
Will it hit us?President Doc Brown?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30753632</id>
	<title>2010 AL30, Asteroid Or Space Junk</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263410280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>My AL840 printer is a piece of junk that takes up lot of space and sometimes it crash.  Yes, it's Han-made!</htmltext>
<tokenext>My AL840 printer is a piece of junk that takes up lot of space and sometimes it crash .
Yes , it 's Han-made !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My AL840 printer is a piece of junk that takes up lot of space and sometimes it crash.
Yes, it's Han-made!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662</id>
	<title>Not an asteroid?</title>
	<author>Rhaban</author>
	<datestamp>1263382320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Isn't a man-made space objet, like a satellite, much easier to detect than a piece of rock because it's all metally and shiny (except in the case of a secret orbtial space station with climate laser weapons used for the supremacy of an evil overlord ready to conquier the world, but it seems unlikely such a thing would just fall out of its orbit)?</p><p>If so, it doesn't really tell us anything about detecting a earth-crushing meteor far before the impact.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't a man-made space objet , like a satellite , much easier to detect than a piece of rock because it 's all metally and shiny ( except in the case of a secret orbtial space station with climate laser weapons used for the supremacy of an evil overlord ready to conquier the world , but it seems unlikely such a thing would just fall out of its orbit ) ? If so , it does n't really tell us anything about detecting a earth-crushing meteor far before the impact .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't a man-made space objet, like a satellite, much easier to detect than a piece of rock because it's all metally and shiny (except in the case of a secret orbtial space station with climate laser weapons used for the supremacy of an evil overlord ready to conquier the world, but it seems unlikely such a thing would just fall out of its orbit)?If so, it doesn't really tell us anything about detecting a earth-crushing meteor far before the impact.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749226</id>
	<title>Damn you, Superman!</title>
	<author>adosch</author>
	<datestamp>1263390180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Thank you Superman for throwing that Hydrogen bomb out into space in <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0081573/goofs" title="imdb.com" rel="nofollow">'Superman 2'</a> [imdb.com].  We're all potentially doomed by your stupidity and lack of knowledge in the realm of physics and astronomy.  I expected more out of a super hero.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Thank you Superman for throwing that Hydrogen bomb out into space in 'Superman 2 ' [ imdb.com ] .
We 're all potentially doomed by your stupidity and lack of knowledge in the realm of physics and astronomy .
I expected more out of a super hero .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Thank you Superman for throwing that Hydrogen bomb out into space in 'Superman 2' [imdb.com].
We're all potentially doomed by your stupidity and lack of knowledge in the realm of physics and astronomy.
I expected more out of a super hero.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749014</id>
	<title>Re:Not an asteroid?</title>
	<author>Suki I</author>
	<datestamp>1263387600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i>but it seems unlikely such a thing would just fall out of its orbit)?</i> </p><p>
Don't forget the James Bond possibility!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>but it seems unlikely such a thing would just fall out of its orbit ) ?
Do n't forget the James Bond possibility !</tokentext>
<sentencetext> but it seems unlikely such a thing would just fall out of its orbit)?
Don't forget the James Bond possibility!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749248</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>brunokummel</author>
	<datestamp>1263390300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not much of a sodding warning. Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days?</p></div><p>...humm you could get high...</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not much of a sodding warning .
Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days ? ...humm you could get high.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not much of a sodding warning.
Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days?...humm you could get high...
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749352</id>
	<title>Misplaced Confidence</title>
	<author>hyades1</author>
	<datestamp>1263391440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p> <i> "It will miss us, and if it did hit us, it wouldn't do any damage anyway, but I managed to pick up on some chatter between planetary scientists and found out that the 'asteroid,' or whatever it is, gives us a new standard: a 10-meter-wide asteroid can be detected two days before it potentially hits Earth. A pretty useful warning if you ask me." </i> </p><p>

Whether or not something that size, or even a lot larger, would get picked up depends on so many factors that being the least bit confident seems a bit premature.  Orbit, speed, albedo, whether or not the right telescope was pointing the right way under the right weather conditions...all these factors (and no doubt a whole bunch of others I didn't think of)...would determine whether or not the thing was spotted. And having noticed it, would there be time to do anything about it? </p><p> The author might be right that a new standard has been reached, though I wonder whether luck had more to do with it.  Whether that new standard has any practical value is another question entirely. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" It will miss us , and if it did hit us , it would n't do any damage anyway , but I managed to pick up on some chatter between planetary scientists and found out that the 'asteroid, ' or whatever it is , gives us a new standard : a 10-meter-wide asteroid can be detected two days before it potentially hits Earth .
A pretty useful warning if you ask me .
" Whether or not something that size , or even a lot larger , would get picked up depends on so many factors that being the least bit confident seems a bit premature .
Orbit , speed , albedo , whether or not the right telescope was pointing the right way under the right weather conditions...all these factors ( and no doubt a whole bunch of others I did n't think of ) ...would determine whether or not the thing was spotted .
And having noticed it , would there be time to do anything about it ?
The author might be right that a new standard has been reached , though I wonder whether luck had more to do with it .
Whether that new standard has any practical value is another question entirely .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>  "It will miss us, and if it did hit us, it wouldn't do any damage anyway, but I managed to pick up on some chatter between planetary scientists and found out that the 'asteroid,' or whatever it is, gives us a new standard: a 10-meter-wide asteroid can be detected two days before it potentially hits Earth.
A pretty useful warning if you ask me.
"  

Whether or not something that size, or even a lot larger, would get picked up depends on so many factors that being the least bit confident seems a bit premature.
Orbit, speed, albedo, whether or not the right telescope was pointing the right way under the right weather conditions...all these factors (and no doubt a whole bunch of others I didn't think of)...would determine whether or not the thing was spotted.
And having noticed it, would there be time to do anything about it?
The author might be right that a new standard has been reached, though I wonder whether luck had more to do with it.
Whether that new standard has any practical value is another question entirely. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752096</id>
	<title>Re:That's your own fault</title>
	<author>turbidostato</author>
	<datestamp>1263404520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>" I'm not a survivalist per se but we keep plenty of food stores and several gallons of potable water handy in case of a natural (or even unnatural) disaster."</p><p>You store the food, I'll store the weapons.  See what happens when I pay you a visit after the armaggedon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" I 'm not a survivalist per se but we keep plenty of food stores and several gallons of potable water handy in case of a natural ( or even unnatural ) disaster .
" You store the food , I 'll store the weapons .
See what happens when I pay you a visit after the armaggedon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>" I'm not a survivalist per se but we keep plenty of food stores and several gallons of potable water handy in case of a natural (or even unnatural) disaster.
"You store the food, I'll store the weapons.
See what happens when I pay you a visit after the armaggedon.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749664</id>
	<title>How Fast How Furious</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263393840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It all depends on how fast the object is traveling. It is very possible that an object 100m wide could slam into earth before we even know its there if it were traveling fast enough.  The universe is a very unpredictable place due to its complexity. So little is known. How do we know an object the size of a planet could not travel at three quarters the speed of light?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It all depends on how fast the object is traveling .
It is very possible that an object 100m wide could slam into earth before we even know its there if it were traveling fast enough .
The universe is a very unpredictable place due to its complexity .
So little is known .
How do we know an object the size of a planet could not travel at three quarters the speed of light ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It all depends on how fast the object is traveling.
It is very possible that an object 100m wide could slam into earth before we even know its there if it were traveling fast enough.
The universe is a very unpredictable place due to its complexity.
So little is known.
How do we know an object the size of a planet could not travel at three quarters the speed of light?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748948</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>Lord Bitman</author>
	<datestamp>1263386820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>more than enough time to plot where it will hit and be ready with a baseball bat.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>more than enough time to plot where it will hit and be ready with a baseball bat .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>more than enough time to plot where it will hit and be ready with a baseball bat.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750088</id>
	<title>Re:Nobody asked you, thanks.</title>
	<author>stjobe</author>
	<datestamp>1263396240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Scientician? WTF?</p><p>Ah:</p><p><div class="quote"><p>"According to The Simpsons, a "scientician" is "a scientist with questionable credentials who publicly supports spurious hypotheses."</p> </div></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientician ?
WTF ? Ah : " According to The Simpsons , a " scientician " is " a scientist with questionable credentials who publicly supports spurious hypotheses .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Scientician?
WTF?Ah:"According to The Simpsons, a "scientician" is "a scientist with questionable credentials who publicly supports spurious hypotheses.
" 
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748792</id>
	<title>Re:Not an asteroid?</title>
	<author>kalidasa</author>
	<datestamp>1263384540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Or, in somewhat more technical terms, the fact that they suspect it's manmade suggests it has a very high albedo, which would make it much easier to find.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Or , in somewhat more technical terms , the fact that they suspect it 's manmade suggests it has a very high albedo , which would make it much easier to find .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Or, in somewhat more technical terms, the fact that they suspect it's manmade suggests it has a very high albedo, which would make it much easier to find.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749004</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263387420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>short answer: yes</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>short answer : yes</tokentext>
<sentencetext>short answer: yes</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749758</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>CubicleView</author>
	<datestamp>1263394500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>You could get to both very quickly if you were near enough to ground zero. You, wouldn't need to worry about supplies then either.</htmltext>
<tokenext>You could get to both very quickly if you were near enough to ground zero .
You , would n't need to worry about supplies then either .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You could get to both very quickly if you were near enough to ground zero.
You, wouldn't need to worry about supplies then either.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749276</id>
	<title>It's the giant ball of garbage we launched years</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263390540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>ago.  Quick, deploy the smell-o-scope!</htmltext>
<tokenext>ago .
Quick , deploy the smell-o-scope !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ago.
Quick, deploy the smell-o-scope!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748704</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>TubeSteak</author>
	<datestamp>1263383100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I imagine an object that small can be blown to itty bitty pieces with conventional explosives.<br>The pieces would make a nice light show while burning up in the atmosphere, but that's about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I imagine an object that small can be blown to itty bitty pieces with conventional explosives.The pieces would make a nice light show while burning up in the atmosphere , but that 's about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I imagine an object that small can be blown to itty bitty pieces with conventional explosives.The pieces would make a nice light show while burning up in the atmosphere, but that's about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30760776</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263403320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's the mothership coming to get all senators and congressmen to take them back home, and oh yeah uhhhh barrack uhhhhhh obama uhhhhhhh (barracks favorite word) last three presidents favorite word</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's the mothership coming to get all senators and congressmen to take them back home , and oh yeah uhhhh barrack uhhhhhh obama uhhhhhhh ( barracks favorite word ) last three presidents favorite word</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's the mothership coming to get all senators and congressmen to take them back home, and oh yeah uhhhh barrack uhhhhhh obama uhhhhhhh (barracks favorite word) last three presidents favorite word</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749824</id>
	<title>All about speed</title>
	<author>Mirkman</author>
	<datestamp>1263394860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Depends on how fast the object is moving.  Who is to say that a 100m wide object could not conceivably travel at 3/4 the speed of light? Even an object the size of Jupiter is small relative to the expansiveness and energy contained within just our own tiny little galaxy. Lets think objectively here.  We do not only have to worry about NEO's.  Massive waves of gravity fluxuation, unimaginable blasts of radiation, and self assured destruction are all significant threats to life.  I have confidence we can track and mitigate NEO's within our own solar system.  Anything outside that is wishful thinking at this point in our existence.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Depends on how fast the object is moving .
Who is to say that a 100m wide object could not conceivably travel at 3/4 the speed of light ?
Even an object the size of Jupiter is small relative to the expansiveness and energy contained within just our own tiny little galaxy .
Lets think objectively here .
We do not only have to worry about NEO 's .
Massive waves of gravity fluxuation , unimaginable blasts of radiation , and self assured destruction are all significant threats to life .
I have confidence we can track and mitigate NEO 's within our own solar system .
Anything outside that is wishful thinking at this point in our existence .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Depends on how fast the object is moving.
Who is to say that a 100m wide object could not conceivably travel at 3/4 the speed of light?
Even an object the size of Jupiter is small relative to the expansiveness and energy contained within just our own tiny little galaxy.
Lets think objectively here.
We do not only have to worry about NEO's.
Massive waves of gravity fluxuation, unimaginable blasts of radiation, and self assured destruction are all significant threats to life.
I have confidence we can track and mitigate NEO's within our own solar system.
Anything outside that is wishful thinking at this point in our existence.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748868</id>
	<title>Constant Velocity</title>
	<author>icantbemiyu</author>
	<datestamp>1263385860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The two days advance notice should only apply to object's with a velocity/distance the same as this object.

Unless the object is farther away but moving faster, where the distance it takes for the object to get from point A to point B is exactly the same amount of time as the AL30.</htmltext>
<tokenext>The two days advance notice should only apply to object 's with a velocity/distance the same as this object .
Unless the object is farther away but moving faster , where the distance it takes for the object to get from point A to point B is exactly the same amount of time as the AL30 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The two days advance notice should only apply to object's with a velocity/distance the same as this object.
Unless the object is farther away but moving faster, where the distance it takes for the object to get from point A to point B is exactly the same amount of time as the AL30.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751294</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>mcgrew</author>
	<datestamp>1263401280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>Not much of a sodding warning. Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days?</i></p><p>You wouldn't have to, as TFS says it would do no damage if it did strike. The "two days" is important because the larger the object, the faster it can be detected.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Not much of a sodding warning .
Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days ? You would n't have to , as TFS says it would do no damage if it did strike .
The " two days " is important because the larger the object , the faster it can be detected .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not much of a sodding warning.
Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days?You wouldn't have to, as TFS says it would do no damage if it did strike.
The "two days" is important because the larger the object, the faster it can be detected.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750052</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>PacoCheezdom</author>
	<datestamp>1263396060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Ah yes, <a href="http://everything2.com/title/Standing+on+a+mountaintop+in+northern+Siberia+under+the+rapidly+descending+bulk+of+asteroid+McAlmont\%252C+with+a+calculating+expression+and+a+baseball+bat" title="everything2.com" rel="nofollow">standing on a mountaintop in northern Siberia under the rapidly descending bulk of asteroid McAlmont with a calculating expression and a baseball bat.</a> [everything2.com] It will be a good day to die.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah yes , standing on a mountaintop in northern Siberia under the rapidly descending bulk of asteroid McAlmont with a calculating expression and a baseball bat .
[ everything2.com ] It will be a good day to die .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah yes, standing on a mountaintop in northern Siberia under the rapidly descending bulk of asteroid McAlmont with a calculating expression and a baseball bat.
[everything2.com] It will be a good day to die.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748948</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752618</id>
	<title>Re:That's your own fault</title>
	<author>Bios\_Hakr</author>
	<datestamp>1263406380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I guess it depends on where you live, but having food and water stored isn't always useful.  In the event of a disaster, you may be required to move quickly.  Will you have time to gather supplies?</p><p>Water is, by far, the toughest problem.  You need about a gallon per day per person.  Each gallon is about, what, 8lb?  Very hard to move that.</p><p>Personally, I think that everyone needs, in this order:</p><p>1.  Water purification system (either a gallon of bleach or chlorine tablets)<br>2.  Case of MREs (12 packs per case and 1500 calories per pack)<br>3.  Pistol with ammunition<br>4.  Rifle with scope and ammunition<br>5.  Multi tool</p><p>Being able to filter and purify water will be much more useful in the long run.  Practice mixing bleach and water and get used to the taste.  It will smell and taste a bit like bleach, but it won't kill you.  Add some drink mix (from the MREs) to help the kids out.</p><p>A single MRE will last a single person 2 days.  It won't be pleasant, but it can be done.</p><p>The pistol is to keep anyone from taking your stuff.</p><p>The rifle is to hunt animals.  Learn to shoot, dress, and cook a rabbit.  Dogs and cats would be dressed in much the same way.  Just tell everyone it's a rabbit and they won't have to think about it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I guess it depends on where you live , but having food and water stored is n't always useful .
In the event of a disaster , you may be required to move quickly .
Will you have time to gather supplies ? Water is , by far , the toughest problem .
You need about a gallon per day per person .
Each gallon is about , what , 8lb ?
Very hard to move that.Personally , I think that everyone needs , in this order : 1 .
Water purification system ( either a gallon of bleach or chlorine tablets ) 2 .
Case of MREs ( 12 packs per case and 1500 calories per pack ) 3 .
Pistol with ammunition4 .
Rifle with scope and ammunition5 .
Multi toolBeing able to filter and purify water will be much more useful in the long run .
Practice mixing bleach and water and get used to the taste .
It will smell and taste a bit like bleach , but it wo n't kill you .
Add some drink mix ( from the MREs ) to help the kids out.A single MRE will last a single person 2 days .
It wo n't be pleasant , but it can be done.The pistol is to keep anyone from taking your stuff.The rifle is to hunt animals .
Learn to shoot , dress , and cook a rabbit .
Dogs and cats would be dressed in much the same way .
Just tell everyone it 's a rabbit and they wo n't have to think about it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I guess it depends on where you live, but having food and water stored isn't always useful.
In the event of a disaster, you may be required to move quickly.
Will you have time to gather supplies?Water is, by far, the toughest problem.
You need about a gallon per day per person.
Each gallon is about, what, 8lb?
Very hard to move that.Personally, I think that everyone needs, in this order:1.
Water purification system (either a gallon of bleach or chlorine tablets)2.
Case of MREs (12 packs per case and 1500 calories per pack)3.
Pistol with ammunition4.
Rifle with scope and ammunition5.
Multi toolBeing able to filter and purify water will be much more useful in the long run.
Practice mixing bleach and water and get used to the taste.
It will smell and taste a bit like bleach, but it won't kill you.
Add some drink mix (from the MREs) to help the kids out.A single MRE will last a single person 2 days.
It won't be pleasant, but it can be done.The pistol is to keep anyone from taking your stuff.The rifle is to hunt animals.
Learn to shoot, dress, and cook a rabbit.
Dogs and cats would be dressed in much the same way.
Just tell everyone it's a rabbit and they won't have to think about it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</id>
	<title>Two days?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263381960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>Not much of a sodding warning. Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not much of a sodding warning .
Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not much of a sodding warning.
Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749068</id>
	<title>That's your own fault</title>
	<author>dreamchaser</author>
	<datestamp>1263388440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you do not always have at least one (preferably at least four) weeks of food and water handy then you're daft anyways.  We've grown so complacent and soft.  I'm not a survivalist per se but we keep plenty of food stores and several gallons of potable water handy in case of a natural (or even unnatural) disaster.</p><p>As for getting to high ground, well you chose where you live<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you do not always have at least one ( preferably at least four ) weeks of food and water handy then you 're daft anyways .
We 've grown so complacent and soft .
I 'm not a survivalist per se but we keep plenty of food stores and several gallons of potable water handy in case of a natural ( or even unnatural ) disaster.As for getting to high ground , well you chose where you live : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you do not always have at least one (preferably at least four) weeks of food and water handy then you're daft anyways.
We've grown so complacent and soft.
I'm not a survivalist per se but we keep plenty of food stores and several gallons of potable water handy in case of a natural (or even unnatural) disaster.As for getting to high ground, well you chose where you live :)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751926</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>cichlid</author>
	<datestamp>1263403920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>get to high ground...?</p></div><p>For a really big one, you're only choice will be to get high.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>get to high ground... ? For a really big one , you 're only choice will be to get high .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>get to high ground...?For a really big one, you're only choice will be to get high.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750654</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't mean anything</title>
	<author>khallow</author>
	<datestamp>1263398700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The fact that we've detected a 10m wide object once, a couple of days before it hits (or doesn't hit), doesn't mean anything. It might be that we can detect every such object or one in a million.</p></div><p>Sure it does. It means we can detect objects 10m wide. And we already have a good idea of the frequency of an asteroid impact of this size (due to power law relationship between asteroid mass and impact frequency). Namely, a 5-10m wide asteroid hits the Earth roughly once every year. Asteroids passing within the Moon's orbital radius of Earth occur probably on the order of a thousand per year (I don't know the relative difference in cross-sectional area, the latter is roughly 2,000 times greater in area, but the Earth is at the bottom of a big gravity well). So at one in a million, this would be an event that happens roughly once every thousand years, plus or minus a large factor. My take is that this observation indicates we're getting significantly better at asteroid detection.<br> <br>

Further, it's worth noting that asteroids in this size category pose no serious threat to Earth. If our systems are sensitive enough to pick up asteroids much smaller than the minimal threat level, that is a good sign that we can pick up asteroids that are a threat to us.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that we 've detected a 10m wide object once , a couple of days before it hits ( or does n't hit ) , does n't mean anything .
It might be that we can detect every such object or one in a million.Sure it does .
It means we can detect objects 10m wide .
And we already have a good idea of the frequency of an asteroid impact of this size ( due to power law relationship between asteroid mass and impact frequency ) .
Namely , a 5-10m wide asteroid hits the Earth roughly once every year .
Asteroids passing within the Moon 's orbital radius of Earth occur probably on the order of a thousand per year ( I do n't know the relative difference in cross-sectional area , the latter is roughly 2,000 times greater in area , but the Earth is at the bottom of a big gravity well ) .
So at one in a million , this would be an event that happens roughly once every thousand years , plus or minus a large factor .
My take is that this observation indicates we 're getting significantly better at asteroid detection .
Further , it 's worth noting that asteroids in this size category pose no serious threat to Earth .
If our systems are sensitive enough to pick up asteroids much smaller than the minimal threat level , that is a good sign that we can pick up asteroids that are a threat to us .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that we've detected a 10m wide object once, a couple of days before it hits (or doesn't hit), doesn't mean anything.
It might be that we can detect every such object or one in a million.Sure it does.
It means we can detect objects 10m wide.
And we already have a good idea of the frequency of an asteroid impact of this size (due to power law relationship between asteroid mass and impact frequency).
Namely, a 5-10m wide asteroid hits the Earth roughly once every year.
Asteroids passing within the Moon's orbital radius of Earth occur probably on the order of a thousand per year (I don't know the relative difference in cross-sectional area, the latter is roughly 2,000 times greater in area, but the Earth is at the bottom of a big gravity well).
So at one in a million, this would be an event that happens roughly once every thousand years, plus or minus a large factor.
My take is that this observation indicates we're getting significantly better at asteroid detection.
Further, it's worth noting that asteroids in this size category pose no serious threat to Earth.
If our systems are sensitive enough to pick up asteroids much smaller than the minimal threat level, that is a good sign that we can pick up asteroids that are a threat to us.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748650</id>
	<title>Nobody asked you, thanks.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263382260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><ul>
<li> <b>Scientician</b>: Mr President of Earth, we've picked up an asteroid on a potential collision course with earth!</li>
<li> <b>Mr President of Earth</b>: Great Scott!  Will it hit us?</li>
<li> <b>Scientician</b>: Yes!  Maybe.  I mean, probably.  We're pretty sure that it might.</li>
<li> <b>Mr President of Earth</b>: And how much damage will it do?</li>
<li> <b>Scientician</b>: Ah, a good question.  That depends on what it's made of.</li>
<li> <b>Mr President of Earth</b>: What's it made of?</li>
<li> <b>Scientician</b>: We're 92\% confident that we'll learn that with a 57\% probability after it hits us.</li>
<li> <b>Mr President of Earth</b>:<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 'k.  And where will it hit?</li>
<li> <b>Scientician</b>: Well, if it hits the earth, it's more likely to hit a wet bit. Unless it doesn't.  And it'll probably be in the Northern hemisphere, unless it's not.</li>
<li> <b>Mr President of Earth</b>: So we should...?</li>
<li> <b>Scientician</b>: Well, gee, sir, that's your decision.  I just do the Science.</li>
</ul></htmltext>
<tokenext>Scientician : Mr President of Earth , we 've picked up an asteroid on a potential collision course with earth !
Mr President of Earth : Great Scott !
Will it hit us ?
Scientician : Yes !
Maybe. I mean , probably .
We 're pretty sure that it might .
Mr President of Earth : And how much damage will it do ?
Scientician : Ah , a good question .
That depends on what it 's made of .
Mr President of Earth : What 's it made of ?
Scientician : We 're 92 \ % confident that we 'll learn that with a 57 \ % probability after it hits us .
Mr President of Earth : ... 'k. And where will it hit ?
Scientician : Well , if it hits the earth , it 's more likely to hit a wet bit .
Unless it does n't .
And it 'll probably be in the Northern hemisphere , unless it 's not .
Mr President of Earth : So we should... ?
Scientician : Well , gee , sir , that 's your decision .
I just do the Science .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>
 Scientician: Mr President of Earth, we've picked up an asteroid on a potential collision course with earth!
Mr President of Earth: Great Scott!
Will it hit us?
Scientician: Yes!
Maybe.  I mean, probably.
We're pretty sure that it might.
Mr President of Earth: And how much damage will it do?
Scientician: Ah, a good question.
That depends on what it's made of.
Mr President of Earth: What's it made of?
Scientician: We're 92\% confident that we'll learn that with a 57\% probability after it hits us.
Mr President of Earth: ... 'k.  And where will it hit?
Scientician: Well, if it hits the earth, it's more likely to hit a wet bit.
Unless it doesn't.
And it'll probably be in the Northern hemisphere, unless it's not.
Mr President of Earth: So we should...?
Scientician: Well, gee, sir, that's your decision.
I just do the Science.
</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749508</id>
	<title>Close encounters</title>
	<author>Muad'Dave</author>
	<datestamp>1263392820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you can trust extrapolating the orbit backwards in time (you can't), <a href="http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/sbdb.cgi?sstr=2010\%20AL30;orb=1" title="nasa.gov">JPL's orbital tool</a> [nasa.gov] shows that this object had a 'close encounter' with Venus on Apr 15th, 2006. It also looks suspiciously like an Earth-Mars trajectory launched around Jan 12th, 2007. I was unable to find any corresponding launches, however.</p><p>Real Astronomers (TM) have now discounted the object being man-made, but it is interesting to speculate.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you can trust extrapolating the orbit backwards in time ( you ca n't ) , JPL 's orbital tool [ nasa.gov ] shows that this object had a 'close encounter ' with Venus on Apr 15th , 2006 .
It also looks suspiciously like an Earth-Mars trajectory launched around Jan 12th , 2007 .
I was unable to find any corresponding launches , however.Real Astronomers ( TM ) have now discounted the object being man-made , but it is interesting to speculate .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you can trust extrapolating the orbit backwards in time (you can't), JPL's orbital tool [nasa.gov] shows that this object had a 'close encounter' with Venus on Apr 15th, 2006.
It also looks suspiciously like an Earth-Mars trajectory launched around Jan 12th, 2007.
I was unable to find any corresponding launches, however.Real Astronomers (TM) have now discounted the object being man-made, but it is interesting to speculate.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750094</id>
	<title>JPL Close Earth Approaches</title>
	<author>dsvick</author>
	<datestamp>1263396360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Here is the JPL site that shows the recent misses and all the upcoming near earth approaches - I like to go here once in a while just to see how close we are to the world ending. This is the first time I've seen anything on the list within one lunar distance - srot of makes you go - wow!

<a href="http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/" title="nasa.gov" rel="nofollow">http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/</a> [nasa.gov]</htmltext>
<tokenext>Here is the JPL site that shows the recent misses and all the upcoming near earth approaches - I like to go here once in a while just to see how close we are to the world ending .
This is the first time I 've seen anything on the list within one lunar distance - srot of makes you go - wow !
http : //neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/ [ nasa.gov ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Here is the JPL site that shows the recent misses and all the upcoming near earth approaches - I like to go here once in a while just to see how close we are to the world ending.
This is the first time I've seen anything on the list within one lunar distance - srot of makes you go - wow!
http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca/ [nasa.gov]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30753690</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263410640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>No, but you can rape the fuck out of every cunt you like, and torture every ass you hate to death in those two days. ^^</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , but you can rape the fuck out of every cunt you like , and torture every ass you hate to death in those two days .
^ ^</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, but you can rape the fuck out of every cunt you like, and torture every ass you hate to death in those two days.
^^</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750574</id>
	<title>Re:Not an asteroid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263398400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Definitely.  Plus if this was detected something similar to radar it does tell us something about early detection, but if it was spotted by telescope it tells us nothing.  You can spot pretty small things at large distances if you point a big telescope right at it, but you have a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 chance that the rock is right where you're looking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Definitely .
Plus if this was detected something similar to radar it does tell us something about early detection , but if it was spotted by telescope it tells us nothing .
You can spot pretty small things at large distances if you point a big telescope right at it , but you have a .000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 chance that the rock is right where you 're looking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Definitely.
Plus if this was detected something similar to radar it does tell us something about early detection, but if it was spotted by telescope it tells us nothing.
You can spot pretty small things at large distances if you point a big telescope right at it, but you have a .000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 chance that the rock is right where you're looking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749096</id>
	<title>Re:Not an asteroid?</title>
	<author>Sockatume</author>
	<datestamp>1263388740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It's not thought to be "space junk" any more: it was thought it might be an old booster segment but apparently based on its path there's no rocket launch that it could've come from.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It 's not thought to be " space junk " any more : it was thought it might be an old booster segment but apparently based on its path there 's no rocket launch that it could 've come from .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It's not thought to be "space junk" any more: it was thought it might be an old booster segment but apparently based on its path there's no rocket launch that it could've come from.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748720</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>BarMonger</author>
	<datestamp>1263383280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why would you need to stock up and get to high ground, for an object this small?<br>It will most likely be destroyed in the atmosphere upon entry, should it "hit" the Earth.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why would you need to stock up and get to high ground , for an object this small ? It will most likely be destroyed in the atmosphere upon entry , should it " hit " the Earth .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why would you need to stock up and get to high ground, for an object this small?It will most likely be destroyed in the atmosphere upon entry, should it "hit" the Earth.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749118</id>
	<title>Could be manmade?</title>
	<author>Silpher</author>
	<datestamp>1263388860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This means we dont know if something that comes out of space could be ours? I mean at that distance? How much stuff have we launched that went there and could come back??</htmltext>
<tokenext>This means we dont know if something that comes out of space could be ours ?
I mean at that distance ?
How much stuff have we launched that went there and could come back ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This means we dont know if something that comes out of space could be ours?
I mean at that distance?
How much stuff have we launched that went there and could come back?
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748996</id>
	<title>Is that figure really relevant?</title>
	<author>RichiH</author>
	<datestamp>1263387300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I mean, sure, it's nice to know that they are able to detect such an object, but the key here is probability. Was this pure chance/luck that they found it or are they 99.999\% sure that they will detect any such object within the given timeframe?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I mean , sure , it 's nice to know that they are able to detect such an object , but the key here is probability .
Was this pure chance/luck that they found it or are they 99.999 \ % sure that they will detect any such object within the given timeframe ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I mean, sure, it's nice to know that they are able to detect such an object, but the key here is probability.
Was this pure chance/luck that they found it or are they 99.999\% sure that they will detect any such object within the given timeframe?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749146</id>
	<title>Colonel, you better have a look at this radar...</title>
	<author>franiu</author>
	<datestamp>1263389340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><em>Radar Operator:</em> Colonel, you better have a look at this radar.<br>
<em>Colonel:</em> What is it, son?<br>
<em>Radar Operator:</em> I don't know, sir, but it looks like a giant...<br>
<em>Jet Pilot:</em> Dick. Dick, take a look out of starboard.<br>
<em>Co-Pilot:</em> Oh my God, it looks like a huge...<br>
<em>Bird-Watching Woman:</em> Pecker.<br>
<em>Bird-Watching Man:</em> [raising binoculars] Ooh, Where?<br>
<em>Bird-Watching Woman:</em> Over there. What sort of bird is that? Wait, it's not a woodpecker, it looks like someone's...<br>
<em>Army Sergeant:</em> Privates. We have reports of an unidentified flying object. It has a long, smooth shaft, complete with...<br>
<em>Baseball Umpire:</em> Two balls.<br>
[looking up from game]<br>
<em>Baseball Umpire:</em> What is that. It looks just like an enormous...<br>
<em>Chinese Teacher:</em> Wang. pay attention.<br>
<em>Wang:</em> I was distracted by that giant flying...<br>
<em>Musician:</em> Willie.<br>
<em>Willie:</em> Yeah?<br>
<em>Musician:</em> What's that?<br>
<em>Willie:</em> [squints] Well, that looks like a huge...<br>
<em>Colonel:</em> Johnson.<br>
<em>Radar Operator:</em> Yes, sir?<br>
<em>Colonel:</em> Get on the horn to British Intelligence and let them know about this. <br>
<br>
We should get ready for Dr. Evil...</htmltext>
<tokenext>Radar Operator : Colonel , you better have a look at this radar .
Colonel : What is it , son ?
Radar Operator : I do n't know , sir , but it looks like a giant.. . Jet Pilot : Dick .
Dick , take a look out of starboard .
Co-Pilot : Oh my God , it looks like a huge.. . Bird-Watching Woman : Pecker .
Bird-Watching Man : [ raising binoculars ] Ooh , Where ?
Bird-Watching Woman : Over there .
What sort of bird is that ?
Wait , it 's not a woodpecker , it looks like someone 's.. . Army Sergeant : Privates .
We have reports of an unidentified flying object .
It has a long , smooth shaft , complete with.. . Baseball Umpire : Two balls .
[ looking up from game ] Baseball Umpire : What is that .
It looks just like an enormous.. . Chinese Teacher : Wang .
pay attention .
Wang : I was distracted by that giant flying.. . Musician : Willie .
Willie : Yeah ?
Musician : What 's that ?
Willie : [ squints ] Well , that looks like a huge.. . Colonel : Johnson .
Radar Operator : Yes , sir ?
Colonel : Get on the horn to British Intelligence and let them know about this .
We should get ready for Dr. Evil.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Radar Operator: Colonel, you better have a look at this radar.
Colonel: What is it, son?
Radar Operator: I don't know, sir, but it looks like a giant...
Jet Pilot: Dick.
Dick, take a look out of starboard.
Co-Pilot: Oh my God, it looks like a huge...
Bird-Watching Woman: Pecker.
Bird-Watching Man: [raising binoculars] Ooh, Where?
Bird-Watching Woman: Over there.
What sort of bird is that?
Wait, it's not a woodpecker, it looks like someone's...
Army Sergeant: Privates.
We have reports of an unidentified flying object.
It has a long, smooth shaft, complete with...
Baseball Umpire: Two balls.
[looking up from game]
Baseball Umpire: What is that.
It looks just like an enormous...
Chinese Teacher: Wang.
pay attention.
Wang: I was distracted by that giant flying...
Musician: Willie.
Willie: Yeah?
Musician: What's that?
Willie: [squints] Well, that looks like a huge...
Colonel: Johnson.
Radar Operator: Yes, sir?
Colonel: Get on the horn to British Intelligence and let them know about this.
We should get ready for Dr. Evil...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748888</id>
	<title>Re:Not an asteroid?</title>
	<author>mbone</author>
	<datestamp>1263386100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes. A 2 or 3 meter spacecraft could look like a 10 meter asteroid (and would typically not weigh much even for its size, being probably largely hollow).</p><p>Everything that leaves the Earth to go into solar orbit will return to the close vicinity of the Earth's orbit, unless the spacecraft has its orbit further modified. So, for example, the upper stages of spacecraft sent on to elsewhere will typically come back to the vicinity of our orbit. If there is any sort of orbit commensurability, periodically the Earth will also be at that point in its orbit at the same time, and so you will get a close approach.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
A 2 or 3 meter spacecraft could look like a 10 meter asteroid ( and would typically not weigh much even for its size , being probably largely hollow ) .Everything that leaves the Earth to go into solar orbit will return to the close vicinity of the Earth 's orbit , unless the spacecraft has its orbit further modified .
So , for example , the upper stages of spacecraft sent on to elsewhere will typically come back to the vicinity of our orbit .
If there is any sort of orbit commensurability , periodically the Earth will also be at that point in its orbit at the same time , and so you will get a close approach .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
A 2 or 3 meter spacecraft could look like a 10 meter asteroid (and would typically not weigh much even for its size, being probably largely hollow).Everything that leaves the Earth to go into solar orbit will return to the close vicinity of the Earth's orbit, unless the spacecraft has its orbit further modified.
So, for example, the upper stages of spacecraft sent on to elsewhere will typically come back to the vicinity of our orbit.
If there is any sort of orbit commensurability, periodically the Earth will also be at that point in its orbit at the same time, and so you will get a close approach.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749196</id>
	<title>Re:Not an asteroid?</title>
	<author>mpe</author>
	<datestamp>1263389880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>Isn't a man-made space objet, like a satellite, much easier to detect than a piece of rock because it's all metally and shiny</i> <br> <br>Natural objects can be made of the likes of iron. Not much oxygen in space to cause this to rust.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is n't a man-made space objet , like a satellite , much easier to detect than a piece of rock because it 's all metally and shiny Natural objects can be made of the likes of iron .
Not much oxygen in space to cause this to rust .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Isn't a man-made space objet, like a satellite, much easier to detect than a piece of rock because it's all metally and shiny  Natural objects can be made of the likes of iron.
Not much oxygen in space to cause this to rust.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30755320</id>
	<title>Re:Not an asteroid?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263373800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If you check launch history, there is, infact, two potential launches which could have.  A Russian precursor to Vostok failed, final result unknown but if it had bounced off the atmosphere instead of burned up it could have reached such an orbit.  The other result being part of Apollo 10, being awfully close to matching the orbit, close enough that it could have been perturbed into it's current orbit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If you check launch history , there is , infact , two potential launches which could have .
A Russian precursor to Vostok failed , final result unknown but if it had bounced off the atmosphere instead of burned up it could have reached such an orbit .
The other result being part of Apollo 10 , being awfully close to matching the orbit , close enough that it could have been perturbed into it 's current orbit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If you check launch history, there is, infact, two potential launches which could have.
A Russian precursor to Vostok failed, final result unknown but if it had bounced off the atmosphere instead of burned up it could have reached such an orbit.
The other result being part of Apollo 10, being awfully close to matching the orbit, close enough that it could have been perturbed into it's current orbit.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751070</id>
	<title>Potentially Man-Made? Wut?</title>
	<author>gimmebeer</author>
	<datestamp>1263400440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Is it possible that we just shot something 10 meters wide out of Earth orbit and forgot about it?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is it possible that we just shot something 10 meters wide out of Earth orbit and forgot about it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is it possible that we just shot something 10 meters wide out of Earth orbit and forgot about it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30753922</id>
	<title>Re:That's your own fault</title>
	<author>SQLGuru</author>
	<datestamp>1263411480000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>In terms of small objects that may or may not burn up in the atmosphere, wouldn't somewhat lower ground be better?  If you are on the top of Mt. McKinley vs sea level, how much less/more of the object in question would burn up (angle off of vertical would matter, I know).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>In terms of small objects that may or may not burn up in the atmosphere , would n't somewhat lower ground be better ?
If you are on the top of Mt .
McKinley vs sea level , how much less/more of the object in question would burn up ( angle off of vertical would matter , I know ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>In terms of small objects that may or may not burn up in the atmosphere, wouldn't somewhat lower ground be better?
If you are on the top of Mt.
McKinley vs sea level, how much less/more of the object in question would burn up (angle off of vertical would matter, I know).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749068</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750184</id>
	<title>I thank you for y0ur time</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263396840000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>BtSD ma3hines,</htmltext>
<tokenext>BtSD ma3hines,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>BtSD ma3hines,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748994</id>
	<title>Not this shit again!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263387300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>This science crap is boring. Please post another article about WoW, Star Wars or some comic books shit. Quickly please!</htmltext>
<tokenext>This science crap is boring .
Please post another article about WoW , Star Wars or some comic books shit .
Quickly please !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This science crap is boring.
Please post another article about WoW, Star Wars or some comic books shit.
Quickly please!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751092</id>
	<title>Thanks for clearing that up!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263400500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"<i>"According to The Simpsons, a "scientician" is "a scientist with questionable credentials who publicly supports spurious hypotheses."</i>"</p><p>Ah, so <b>that's</b> what that Monckton chap who claims to be in the House of Lords (<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/05/monckton\_caught\_making\_things.php" title="scienceblogs.com" rel="nofollow"> <b>and isn't</b> </a> [scienceblogs.com]) and a Nobel laureate (<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2008/10/monckton\_has\_a\_gold\_nobel\_priz.php" title="scienceblogs.com" rel="nofollow"> <b>and isn't</b> </a> [scienceblogs.com]) and a climate expert (<a href="http://www.altenergyaction.org/Monckton.html" title="altenergyaction.org" rel="nofollow"> <b>and isn't</b> </a> [altenergyaction.org]) actually is!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" " According to The Simpsons , a " scientician " is " a scientist with questionable credentials who publicly supports spurious hypotheses .
" " Ah , so that 's what that Monckton chap who claims to be in the House of Lords ( and is n't [ scienceblogs.com ] ) and a Nobel laureate ( and is n't [ scienceblogs.com ] ) and a climate expert ( and is n't [ altenergyaction.org ] ) actually is !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>""According to The Simpsons, a "scientician" is "a scientist with questionable credentials who publicly supports spurious hypotheses.
""Ah, so that's what that Monckton chap who claims to be in the House of Lords ( and isn't  [scienceblogs.com]) and a Nobel laureate ( and isn't  [scienceblogs.com]) and a climate expert ( and isn't  [altenergyaction.org]) actually is!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750088</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751822</id>
	<title>Man made?</title>
	<author>johnnyR</author>
	<datestamp>1263403380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"A near-Earth object that could be manmade has just been discovered hurtling toward us"</p><p>So what "man made" oject is out that far and is coming home?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" A near-Earth object that could be manmade has just been discovered hurtling toward us " So what " man made " oject is out that far and is coming home ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"A near-Earth object that could be manmade has just been discovered hurtling toward us"So what "man made" oject is out that far and is coming home?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750614</id>
	<title>Re:Not an asteroid?</title>
	<author>Waffle Iron</author>
	<datestamp>1263398580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And the weirdest thing is that on closer observation it seems to be a dark, perfectly rectangular prism.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And the weirdest thing is that on closer observation it seems to be a dark , perfectly rectangular prism .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And the weirdest thing is that on closer observation it seems to be a dark, perfectly rectangular prism.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748810</id>
	<title>Oblig. Futurama reference</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263384960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So should we send another ball of garbage to deflect it?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So should we send another ball of garbage to deflect it ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So should we send another ball of garbage to deflect it?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750664</id>
	<title>Re:Is that figure really relevant?</title>
	<author>ceoyoyo</author>
	<datestamp>1263398700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Ah, see the summary says "can be detected."  It can be.  We've done it.  You're thinking "will be detected," which nobody said anything about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Ah , see the summary says " can be detected .
" It can be .
We 've done it .
You 're thinking " will be detected , " which nobody said anything about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Ah, see the summary says "can be detected.
"  It can be.
We've done it.
You're thinking "will be detected," which nobody said anything about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748996</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748796</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>Krneki</author>
	<datestamp>1263384660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>More then enough to Duck &amp; Cover.</htmltext>
<tokenext>More then enough to Duck &amp; Cover .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>More then enough to Duck &amp; Cover.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751088</id>
	<title>Lucifer's Hammer?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263400500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so, let me get this straight...Hot Fudge Sundae falls on a Tuesday, right?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so , let me get this straight...Hot Fudge Sundae falls on a Tuesday , right ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so, let me get this straight...Hot Fudge Sundae falls on a Tuesday, right?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748940</id>
	<title>Re:Not an asteroid?</title>
	<author>Kentari</author>
	<datestamp>1263386700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You are correct. The size estimate based on the assumption that it is a natural object is 90-190m, depending on the albedo. It is derived of the absolute magnitude (22.453). If it is a man made object, it is a lot smaller that that, probably smaller than 20m and in the size range of the 3rd stage of a Saturn V. A radar was scheduled to ping the object  this morning and more information should follow soon...</p><p>An impact of a 100m object would be bad on a local scale, but not earth-crushing. Evacuating the affected area in 2 days would be near impossible if it were a densely populated area.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You are correct .
The size estimate based on the assumption that it is a natural object is 90-190m , depending on the albedo .
It is derived of the absolute magnitude ( 22.453 ) .
If it is a man made object , it is a lot smaller that that , probably smaller than 20m and in the size range of the 3rd stage of a Saturn V. A radar was scheduled to ping the object this morning and more information should follow soon...An impact of a 100m object would be bad on a local scale , but not earth-crushing .
Evacuating the affected area in 2 days would be near impossible if it were a densely populated area .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You are correct.
The size estimate based on the assumption that it is a natural object is 90-190m, depending on the albedo.
It is derived of the absolute magnitude (22.453).
If it is a man made object, it is a lot smaller that that, probably smaller than 20m and in the size range of the 3rd stage of a Saturn V. A radar was scheduled to ping the object  this morning and more information should follow soon...An impact of a 100m object would be bad on a local scale, but not earth-crushing.
Evacuating the affected area in 2 days would be near impossible if it were a densely populated area.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30753336</id>
	<title>Re:Doesn't mean anything</title>
	<author>SPickett</author>
	<datestamp>1263408960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Also, detecting objects depends a great deal on the direction it is coming from.  If it's coming from the vicinity of the Sun, it's much harder to see.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Also , detecting objects depends a great deal on the direction it is coming from .
If it 's coming from the vicinity of the Sun , it 's much harder to see .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Also, detecting objects depends a great deal on the direction it is coming from.
If it's coming from the vicinity of the Sun, it's much harder to see.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30759380</id>
	<title>Re:That's your own fault</title>
	<author>sznupi</author>
	<datestamp>1263391380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Cats?! You don't want to save <i>anything</i> that makes you human?!</p><p>PS. This one gallon per day per person isn't as bad as it sounds - it's a total water input necessary, including what you get in meals.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Cats ? !
You do n't want to save anything that makes you human ? ! PS .
This one gallon per day per person is n't as bad as it sounds - it 's a total water input necessary , including what you get in meals .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Cats?!
You don't want to save anything that makes you human?!PS.
This one gallon per day per person isn't as bad as it sounds - it's a total water input necessary, including what you get in meals.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30755658</id>
	<title>Re:That's your own fault</title>
	<author>Shakrai</author>
	<datestamp>1263375000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The pistol is to keep anyone from taking your stuff.</p></div><p>What are you gonna do when they show up with rifles?  Pistol doesn't do you much good in a real combat situation.  It's only real advantage is that it's small enough to conceal and you don't really have an excuse not to carry one.  There's an expression somewhere along the lines of "The pistol is the gun that you use to fight your way back to a real gun."  I'm somewhat surprised that you left the shotgun off your list.  Hard to get more versatile than a shotgun.
</p><p>My list would look like this:
</p><ol> <li>Pistol for concealable self-defense when the long guns can't accompany you.  Ideally this will be in a common caliber (.45 ACP or 9x19 are probably your best bets) that's easier to find if your own supplies should run low.</li><li>12 gauge pump action shotgun.  With the right loads you can hunt just about anything in North America with this weapon.  It also does double duty as a short range defensive weapon.</li><li>Service rifle for self-defense.  The AR-15 and civilian variants of the AK-47 both come to mind, as does the Ruger Mini-14 and Mini-30.  The AR and Mini-14 are probably better bets in the US as<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.223/5.56mm will be easier to come by.  If you live in a restrictive state that's afraid of black rifles then a M1 Garand will do in a pinch.  You lose some magazine capacity but gain a lot more range and stopping power.  The<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.30-06 Springfield is still the most common high power caliber in North America and will be easier to find supplies for than most other calibers.</li></ol><p>I would consider a bolt action rifle an optional addition to the above list.  The 12 gauge is a more useful tool.  You can hunt anything from varmint to birds to medium game with the shotgun.  If I was going to add a bolt action, I'd probably get a centerfire rifle in a common caliber (.30-06 would be my choice) for long range shooting and a rimfire rifle (.22LR) for varmint hunting and cheap training.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The pistol is to keep anyone from taking your stuff.What are you gon na do when they show up with rifles ?
Pistol does n't do you much good in a real combat situation .
It 's only real advantage is that it 's small enough to conceal and you do n't really have an excuse not to carry one .
There 's an expression somewhere along the lines of " The pistol is the gun that you use to fight your way back to a real gun .
" I 'm somewhat surprised that you left the shotgun off your list .
Hard to get more versatile than a shotgun .
My list would look like this : Pistol for concealable self-defense when the long guns ca n't accompany you .
Ideally this will be in a common caliber ( .45 ACP or 9x19 are probably your best bets ) that 's easier to find if your own supplies should run low.12 gauge pump action shotgun .
With the right loads you can hunt just about anything in North America with this weapon .
It also does double duty as a short range defensive weapon.Service rifle for self-defense .
The AR-15 and civilian variants of the AK-47 both come to mind , as does the Ruger Mini-14 and Mini-30 .
The AR and Mini-14 are probably better bets in the US as .223/5.56mm will be easier to come by .
If you live in a restrictive state that 's afraid of black rifles then a M1 Garand will do in a pinch .
You lose some magazine capacity but gain a lot more range and stopping power .
The .30-06 Springfield is still the most common high power caliber in North America and will be easier to find supplies for than most other calibers.I would consider a bolt action rifle an optional addition to the above list .
The 12 gauge is a more useful tool .
You can hunt anything from varmint to birds to medium game with the shotgun .
If I was going to add a bolt action , I 'd probably get a centerfire rifle in a common caliber ( .30-06 would be my choice ) for long range shooting and a rimfire rifle ( .22LR ) for varmint hunting and cheap training .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The pistol is to keep anyone from taking your stuff.What are you gonna do when they show up with rifles?
Pistol doesn't do you much good in a real combat situation.
It's only real advantage is that it's small enough to conceal and you don't really have an excuse not to carry one.
There's an expression somewhere along the lines of "The pistol is the gun that you use to fight your way back to a real gun.
"  I'm somewhat surprised that you left the shotgun off your list.
Hard to get more versatile than a shotgun.
My list would look like this:
 Pistol for concealable self-defense when the long guns can't accompany you.
Ideally this will be in a common caliber (.45 ACP or 9x19 are probably your best bets) that's easier to find if your own supplies should run low.12 gauge pump action shotgun.
With the right loads you can hunt just about anything in North America with this weapon.
It also does double duty as a short range defensive weapon.Service rifle for self-defense.
The AR-15 and civilian variants of the AK-47 both come to mind, as does the Ruger Mini-14 and Mini-30.
The AR and Mini-14 are probably better bets in the US as .223/5.56mm will be easier to come by.
If you live in a restrictive state that's afraid of black rifles then a M1 Garand will do in a pinch.
You lose some magazine capacity but gain a lot more range and stopping power.
The .30-06 Springfield is still the most common high power caliber in North America and will be easier to find supplies for than most other calibers.I would consider a bolt action rifle an optional addition to the above list.
The 12 gauge is a more useful tool.
You can hunt anything from varmint to birds to medium game with the shotgun.
If I was going to add a bolt action, I'd probably get a centerfire rifle in a common caliber (.30-06 would be my choice) for long range shooting and a rimfire rifle (.22LR) for varmint hunting and cheap training.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752618</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752212</id>
	<title>Re:Not an asteroid?</title>
	<author>An anonymous Frank</author>
	<datestamp>1263404940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If my calculations are correct it will turn out to be a jet engine from a passenger airline plane...</p><p>Just ask Frank (the rabbit).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If my calculations are correct it will turn out to be a jet engine from a passenger airline plane...Just ask Frank ( the rabbit ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If my calculations are correct it will turn out to be a jet engine from a passenger airline plane...Just ask Frank (the rabbit).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749096</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30755828</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263375720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>what, your bug out box isn't packed?<br>Did you not learn the parable of the grasshopper and the ant?<br>Hopefully this trait is genetic and we will but shut of your ilk in the post collision world.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>what , your bug out box is n't packed ? Did you not learn the parable of the grasshopper and the ant ? Hopefully this trait is genetic and we will but shut of your ilk in the post collision world .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>what, your bug out box isn't packed?Did you not learn the parable of the grasshopper and the ant?Hopefully this trait is genetic and we will but shut of your ilk in the post collision world.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748664</id>
	<title>Re:Two days?</title>
	<author>jamesh</author>
	<datestamp>1263382320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Not much of a sodding warning. Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days?</p></div><p>At least you can't say you weren't warned!</p><p>Besides, how much warning do you need to put your head between your legs and kiss your bum goodbye?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Not much of a sodding warning .
Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days ? At least you ca n't say you were n't warned ! Besides , how much warning do you need to put your head between your legs and kiss your bum goodbye ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Not much of a sodding warning.
Can you stock up &amp; get to high ground/underground in two days?At least you can't say you weren't warned!Besides, how much warning do you need to put your head between your legs and kiss your bum goodbye?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748632</id>
	<title>VGER</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263381900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>V*GER is coming home!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>V * GER is coming home !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>V*GER is coming home!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748726</id>
	<title>Doesn't mean anything</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263383400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The fact that we've detected a 10m wide object once, a couple of days before it hits (or doesn't hit), doesn't mean anything. It might be that we can detect every such object or one in a million.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The fact that we 've detected a 10m wide object once , a couple of days before it hits ( or does n't hit ) , does n't mean anything .
It might be that we can detect every such object or one in a million .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The fact that we've detected a 10m wide object once, a couple of days before it hits (or doesn't hit), doesn't mean anything.
It might be that we can detect every such object or one in a million.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748796
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748704
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749004
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30753922
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750574
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30755320
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30760776
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751244
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750654
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748792
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30753336
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748726
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749758
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30755828
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749014
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748720
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750614
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751294
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30759380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752212
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749096
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751926
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30753690
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750664
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748996
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751092
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748650
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749196
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748940
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30755658
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752618
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749068
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_13_0212215_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748888
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749118
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749226
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748650
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750088
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751092
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751244
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749276
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748640
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749146
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748810
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748638
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749068
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752618
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30759380
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30755658
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30753922
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752096
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749758
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748704
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748720
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748664
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30760776
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749004
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749248
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30753690
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748796
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30755828
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751294
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751926
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748948
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750052
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748662
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749096
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30755320
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750614
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30752212
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748792
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750574
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749196
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748888
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748828
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748632
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30751070
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749112
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749508
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748996
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750664
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30749824
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_13_0212215.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30748726
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30753336
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_13_0212215.30750654
</commentlist>
</conversation>
