<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_12_204231</id>
	<title>Twitter Hackers Take Down Baidu</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1263289860000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>snydeq writes <i>"The group that took down Twitter last month has apparently claimed another victim: <a href="http://infoworld.com/d/security-central/group-behind-twitter-hack-takes-down-baidu-search-engine-383">China's largest search engine Baidu.com</a>. Offline late Monday, Baidu.com at one point displayed an image saying '<a href="http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90778/90860/6866089.html">This site has been hacked by Iranian Cyber Army</a>,' according to a report in the official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party and other Web sites. The Iranian Cyber Army first gained notoriety with its <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/091218/p5#a091218p5">Dec. 18 Twitter attack</a>. Baidu's domain name records were the focus of the hack. On Monday, the company was using domain name servers belonging to HostGator, a Florida ISP, instead of the Baidu.com nameservers the company normally uses."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>snydeq writes " The group that took down Twitter last month has apparently claimed another victim : China 's largest search engine Baidu.com .
Offline late Monday , Baidu.com at one point displayed an image saying 'This site has been hacked by Iranian Cyber Army, ' according to a report in the official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party and other Web sites .
The Iranian Cyber Army first gained notoriety with its Dec. 18 Twitter attack .
Baidu 's domain name records were the focus of the hack .
On Monday , the company was using domain name servers belonging to HostGator , a Florida ISP , instead of the Baidu.com nameservers the company normally uses .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>snydeq writes "The group that took down Twitter last month has apparently claimed another victim: China's largest search engine Baidu.com.
Offline late Monday, Baidu.com at one point displayed an image saying 'This site has been hacked by Iranian Cyber Army,' according to a report in the official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party and other Web sites.
The Iranian Cyber Army first gained notoriety with its Dec. 18 Twitter attack.
Baidu's domain name records were the focus of the hack.
On Monday, the company was using domain name servers belonging to HostGator, a Florida ISP, instead of the Baidu.com nameservers the company normally uses.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30745398</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263304380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hacking used to mean breaking into government databases, and pulling source code from software companies.  Now it means building toy robots from kits and making them dance.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hacking used to mean breaking into government databases , and pulling source code from software companies .
Now it means building toy robots from kits and making them dance .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hacking used to mean breaking into government databases, and pulling source code from software companies.
Now it means building toy robots from kits and making them dance.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743674</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263295320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When you have seen the same hack for the 1 billionth time it gets old...</p><p>This sort of thing is no longer a 'hack' but just ordinary vandalism.  Much as you would marvel at the spray paint on the underside of a bridge and think 'how did they do that' but then think 'what a jerk'...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When you have seen the same hack for the 1 billionth time it gets old...This sort of thing is no longer a 'hack ' but just ordinary vandalism .
Much as you would marvel at the spray paint on the underside of a bridge and think 'how did they do that ' but then think 'what a jerk'.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When you have seen the same hack for the 1 billionth time it gets old...This sort of thing is no longer a 'hack' but just ordinary vandalism.
Much as you would marvel at the spray paint on the underside of a bridge and think 'how did they do that' but then think 'what a jerk'...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743466</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>antifoidulus</author>
	<datestamp>1263294300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>No, you got older and your view of the world has changed significantly.  Teenagers, especially boys, just love to see the world burn.  As we get older and have more invested in said world, the fires tend to lose their luster.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No , you got older and your view of the world has changed significantly .
Teenagers , especially boys , just love to see the world burn .
As we get older and have more invested in said world , the fires tend to lose their luster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, you got older and your view of the world has changed significantly.
Teenagers, especially boys, just love to see the world burn.
As we get older and have more invested in said world, the fires tend to lose their luster.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30755822</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>retro.sufi</author>
	<datestamp>1263375660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>haha very well said.</htmltext>
<tokenext>haha very well said .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>haha very well said.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30745398</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744450</id>
	<title>Re:!Florida, Texas.</title>
	<author>maxwell demon</author>
	<datestamp>1263299160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>His fact-checking database was hacked by the Iranian Cyber Army.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>His fact-checking database was hacked by the Iranian Cyber Army .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>His fact-checking database was hacked by the Iranian Cyber Army.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743390</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744542</id>
	<title>Iranian Cyber Army?</title>
	<author>shutdown -p now</author>
	<datestamp>1263299580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><em>Iranian</em> Cyber Army, eh? Hacking a Chinese web site?</p><p>Looks like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7qc5GrcrkM" title="youtube.com">Mousavi's boys</a> [youtube.com].</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Iranian Cyber Army , eh ?
Hacking a Chinese web site ? Looks like Mousavi 's boys [ youtube.com ] .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iranian Cyber Army, eh?
Hacking a Chinese web site?Looks like Mousavi's boys [youtube.com].</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30747084</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263317700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hacking <b> China's </b> stuff will always be "cool" (or at least for the foreseeable future until China lightens up!).</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hacking China 's stuff will always be " cool " ( or at least for the foreseeable future until China lightens up !
) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hacking  China's  stuff will always be "cool" (or at least for the foreseeable future until China lightens up!
).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746812</id>
	<title>Re:Ho ho ho! But seriously...</title>
	<author>countertrolling</author>
	<datestamp>1263315120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>THAT might set some interesting precedents.</i></p><p><a href="//yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/11/26/2129212" title="slashdot.org" rel="nofollow">Naaah</a> [slashdot.org]... Just another knockoff of western ideas..</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>THAT might set some interesting precedents.Naaah [ slashdot.org ] ... Just another knockoff of western ideas. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>THAT might set some interesting precedents.Naaah [slashdot.org]... Just another knockoff of western ideas..</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743390</id>
	<title>!Florida, Texas.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263294000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>For the sake of accuracy:<br>Hostgator <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/stories/2006/09/25/story3.html" title="bizjournals.com">moved from to Houston over 3 years ago.</a> [bizjournals.com].</p><p>I dunno who Robert McMillan is.. but he needs to do a tiny bit updating his fact-checking database.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For the sake of accuracy : Hostgator moved from to Houston over 3 years ago .
[ bizjournals.com ] .I dunno who Robert McMillan is.. but he needs to do a tiny bit updating his fact-checking database .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For the sake of accuracy:Hostgator moved from to Houston over 3 years ago.
[bizjournals.com].I dunno who Robert McMillan is.. but he needs to do a tiny bit updating his fact-checking database.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746088</id>
	<title>Re:Baidu stuffed up</title>
	<author>jo42</author>
	<datestamp>1263308820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Makes one question why China's largest search engine isn't large enough to run their own DNS servers.</p><p>I'm one person and run my own DNS server...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Makes one question why China 's largest search engine is n't large enough to run their own DNS servers.I 'm one person and run my own DNS server.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Makes one question why China's largest search engine isn't large enough to run their own DNS servers.I'm one person and run my own DNS server...</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743668</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746278</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>The End Of Days</author>
	<datestamp>1263310560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So you were an asshole in high school?  Shocking.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So you were an asshole in high school ?
Shocking .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So you were an asshole in high school?
Shocking.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30748184</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1263375000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>No, you got older and your view of the world has changed significantly.  Teenagers, especially boys, just love to see the world burn.  As we get older and have more invested in said world, the fires tend to lose their luster.</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>No , you got older and your view of the world has changed significantly .
Teenagers , especially boys , just love to see the world burn .
As we get older and have more invested in said world , the fires tend to lose their luster .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No, you got older and your view of the world has changed significantly.
Teenagers, especially boys, just love to see the world burn.
As we get older and have more invested in said world, the fires tend to lose their luster.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30745536</id>
	<title>Don't buy it</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263305160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>1) taking twitter down isn't exactly hard, you just sneeze while loading their homepage<br>2) I don't buy that this was done by Iranians, what's their motive? It's much more likely to have been a US based group of hackers doing both and blaming Iranians just for kicks.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>1 ) taking twitter down is n't exactly hard , you just sneeze while loading their homepage2 ) I do n't buy that this was done by Iranians , what 's their motive ?
It 's much more likely to have been a US based group of hackers doing both and blaming Iranians just for kicks .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>1) taking twitter down isn't exactly hard, you just sneeze while loading their homepage2) I don't buy that this was done by Iranians, what's their motive?
It's much more likely to have been a US based group of hackers doing both and blaming Iranians just for kicks.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30745322</id>
	<title>"took down Twitter"? Come on!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263303960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>I understand Slashdot has lowered its standards, but such a post is embarassing. Twitter wasn't taken down. It was a case of local DNS servers poisoning. Bit of a difference.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I understand Slashdot has lowered its standards , but such a post is embarassing .
Twitter was n't taken down .
It was a case of local DNS servers poisoning .
Bit of a difference .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I understand Slashdot has lowered its standards, but such a post is embarassing.
Twitter wasn't taken down.
It was a case of local DNS servers poisoning.
Bit of a difference.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743482</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate Associated Press Article</title>
	<author>Ethanol-fueled</author>
	<datestamp>1263294360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFA:<blockquote><div><p>"Sex-specific abortions remained extremely commonplace, especially in rural areas," where the cultural preference for boys over girls is strongest, the study said, while noting the reasons for the gender imbalance were "complex."</p></div></blockquote><p>

One particularly ugly consequence that the articles does not mention is <a href="http://factsanddetails.com/china.php?itemid=1029&amp;catid=4&amp;subcatid=15" title="factsanddetails.com" rel="nofollow">this:</a> [factsanddetails.com] </p><blockquote><div><p>In some places men are marrying their first cousins and even their sisters through deals made with relatives because that is only way they can find a wife. The practice is so common that some communities are referred to as "incest villages."</p></div></blockquote></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA : " Sex-specific abortions remained extremely commonplace , especially in rural areas , " where the cultural preference for boys over girls is strongest , the study said , while noting the reasons for the gender imbalance were " complex .
" One particularly ugly consequence that the articles does not mention is this : [ factsanddetails.com ] In some places men are marrying their first cousins and even their sisters through deals made with relatives because that is only way they can find a wife .
The practice is so common that some communities are referred to as " incest villages .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA:"Sex-specific abortions remained extremely commonplace, especially in rural areas," where the cultural preference for boys over girls is strongest, the study said, while noting the reasons for the gender imbalance were "complex.
"

One particularly ugly consequence that the articles does not mention is this: [factsanddetails.com] In some places men are marrying their first cousins and even their sisters through deals made with relatives because that is only way they can find a wife.
The practice is so common that some communities are referred to as "incest villages.
"
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743648</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate Associated Press Article</title>
	<author>jhoegl</author>
	<datestamp>1263295200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Yeah this sucks.... if only they valued women over men there would be more sexy parties goin on.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah this sucks.... if only they valued women over men there would be more sexy parties goin on .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah this sucks.... if only they valued women over men there would be more sexy parties goin on.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746714</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1263314280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about "Jhackass", in honor of Oscar Leroy?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about " Jhackass " , in honor of Oscar Leroy ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about "Jhackass", in honor of Oscar Leroy?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743700</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744318</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate Associated Press Article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263298440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>If a couple abort a female child. Kill the male half of the couple and the abortionist and offer the wife up for sale.</p><p>That should stop that shit real quick.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>If a couple abort a female child .
Kill the male half of the couple and the abortionist and offer the wife up for sale.That should stop that shit real quick .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>If a couple abort a female child.
Kill the male half of the couple and the abortionist and offer the wife up for sale.That should stop that shit real quick.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744166</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>robot256</author>
	<datestamp>1263297660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Vandalism and attention seeking are probably cooler when you're 15 years old.  It's not that hacking is "less cool" than it used to be, you just grew up and didn't notice.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Vandalism and attention seeking are probably cooler when you 're 15 years old .
It 's not that hacking is " less cool " than it used to be , you just grew up and did n't notice .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Vandalism and attention seeking are probably cooler when you're 15 years old.
It's not that hacking is "less cool" than it used to be, you just grew up and didn't notice.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744442</id>
	<title>It's so kind of them to offer...</title>
	<author>zullnero</author>
	<datestamp>1263299100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Their security services basically for free (if you don't count the downtime).  They're doing a great job exposing all those backdoors to everyone who would otherwise be fine just quietly exploiting them as often as possible to potentially do things far more nefarious.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Their security services basically for free ( if you do n't count the downtime ) .
They 're doing a great job exposing all those backdoors to everyone who would otherwise be fine just quietly exploiting them as often as possible to potentially do things far more nefarious .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Their security services basically for free (if you don't count the downtime).
They're doing a great job exposing all those backdoors to everyone who would otherwise be fine just quietly exploiting them as often as possible to potentially do things far more nefarious.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30755660</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263375000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>A hacker is someone who tinkers with hardware or software that he has legal access to in an effort to make it do new, interesting and/or unintended things.</p><p>The "assholes" to which you refer are crackers.</p><p>The media has hijacked the term hacker for over 2 decades now and applied it to the wrong group of people proving yet again that journalism is rarely responsible and researched.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>A hacker is someone who tinkers with hardware or software that he has legal access to in an effort to make it do new , interesting and/or unintended things.The " assholes " to which you refer are crackers.The media has hijacked the term hacker for over 2 decades now and applied it to the wrong group of people proving yet again that journalism is rarely responsible and researched .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>A hacker is someone who tinkers with hardware or software that he has legal access to in an effort to make it do new, interesting and/or unintended things.The "assholes" to which you refer are crackers.The media has hijacked the term hacker for over 2 decades now and applied it to the wrong group of people proving yet again that journalism is rarely responsible and researched.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744396</id>
	<title>Its the cyber army of Iran!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263298800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Its not the "Iranian Cyber Army", it is the
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb\_qHP7VaZE" title="youtube.com">
"Cyber Army of Iran"</a> [youtube.com]!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Its not the " Iranian Cyber Army " , it is the " Cyber Army of Iran " [ youtube.com ] !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Its not the "Iranian Cyber Army", it is the

"Cyber Army of Iran" [youtube.com]!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744732</id>
	<title>faIlzors</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263300600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext>www.anti-slash.org as those Enon gay,</htmltext>
<tokenext>www.anti-slash.org as those Enon gay,</tokentext>
<sentencetext>www.anti-slash.org as those Enon gay,</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30748402</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>YankDownUnder</author>
	<datestamp>1263378420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Some folks get paid to "hack", as it were, for positive reasons. Forensics, for one.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Some folks get paid to " hack " , as it were , for positive reasons .
Forensics , for one .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Some folks get paid to "hack", as it were, for positive reasons.
Forensics, for one.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743546</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30747230</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate Associated Press Article</title>
	<author>indi0144</author>
	<datestamp>1263318900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>but, Does this happy Laozi look like he needed Baidu?</htmltext>
<tokenext>but , Does this happy Laozi look like he needed Baidu ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>but, Does this happy Laozi look like he needed Baidu?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743874</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate Associated Press Article</title>
	<author>Knara</author>
	<datestamp>1263296400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Marrying first cousins, at least, was commonplace throughout history.  Turns out that the rate of birth defects due to having offspring with your first cousin is very low.
</p><p>Sisters, not so common.  I can see it happening in extreme situations, though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Marrying first cousins , at least , was commonplace throughout history .
Turns out that the rate of birth defects due to having offspring with your first cousin is very low .
Sisters , not so common .
I can see it happening in extreme situations , though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Marrying first cousins, at least, was commonplace throughout history.
Turns out that the rate of birth defects due to having offspring with your first cousin is very low.
Sisters, not so common.
I can see it happening in extreme situations, though.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743482</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30751904</id>
	<title>Re:</title>
	<author>clint999</author>
	<datestamp>1263403800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><strong>Iran VS China in an contest to out censor each other?Whoever wins, we loose![/joke]</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>Iran VS China in an contest to out censor each other ? Whoever wins , we loose !
[ /joke ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iran VS China in an contest to out censor each other?Whoever wins, we loose!
[/joke]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743700</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263295500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about "AssHack".  It sounds like "Asshat", but it also implies that you are both an ass and a hack.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about " AssHack " .
It sounds like " Asshat " , but it also implies that you are both an ass and a hack .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about "AssHack".
It sounds like "Asshat", but it also implies that you are both an ass and a hack.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743464</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30749774</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate Associated Press Article</title>
	<author>hesaigo999ca</author>
	<datestamp>1263394680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Dude, I applaud your effort and wish to give you all my funny mod imaginary points (which I have 15 left)<br>so think of yourself as a +15 Funny man.</p><p>PS- on a serious note, I really feel disgusted by the link you sent about the gender selective abortions, I had never heard of that, thank you for that link, it makes me more aware of the oppression over there!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Dude , I applaud your effort and wish to give you all my funny mod imaginary points ( which I have 15 left ) so think of yourself as a + 15 Funny man.PS- on a serious note , I really feel disgusted by the link you sent about the gender selective abortions , I had never heard of that , thank you for that link , it makes me more aware of the oppression over there !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Dude, I applaud your effort and wish to give you all my funny mod imaginary points (which I have 15 left)so think of yourself as a +15 Funny man.PS- on a serious note, I really feel disgusted by the link you sent about the gender selective abortions, I had never heard of that, thank you for that link, it makes me more aware of the oppression over there!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743668</id>
	<title>Baidu stuffed up</title>
	<author>MichaelSmith</author>
	<datestamp>1263295320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>It looks like their domain account credentials may have been snagged</p></div><p>Thats a bit embarrassing for a major search engine. What was their password? baidu123?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It looks like their domain account credentials may have been snaggedThats a bit embarrassing for a major search engine .
What was their password ?
baidu123 ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It looks like their domain account credentials may have been snaggedThats a bit embarrassing for a major search engine.
What was their password?
baidu123?
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743546</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1263294660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hacking is cool. Trashing peoples stuff not so cool.<br>Hacking used to mean making systems do things they where never meant to do. Now it means being a hoodlum.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hacking is cool .
Trashing peoples stuff not so cool.Hacking used to mean making systems do things they where never meant to do .
Now it means being a hoodlum .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hacking is cool.
Trashing peoples stuff not so cool.Hacking used to mean making systems do things they where never meant to do.
Now it means being a hoodlum.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30750534</id>
	<title>Re:Ho ho ho! But seriously...</title>
	<author>clone53421</author>
	<datestamp>1263398280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>(Don't see why this was modded "interesting" rather than "funny".)</p></div><p>Because it <em>is</em> interesting, and not even to mention that a lot of humour is interesting just on the basis of why we find it funny.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>( Do n't see why this was modded " interesting " rather than " funny " .
) Because it is interesting , and not even to mention that a lot of humour is interesting just on the basis of why we find it funny .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(Don't see why this was modded "interesting" rather than "funny".
)Because it is interesting, and not even to mention that a lot of humour is interesting just on the basis of why we find it funny.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743536</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30745518</id>
	<title>As oldies say...</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1263305040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Get off my lawn."</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Get off my lawn .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Get off my lawn.
"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743536</id>
	<title>Ho ho ho!  But seriously...</title>
	<author>Ungrounded Lightning</author>
	<datestamp>1263294660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Chortle.  (Don't see why this was modded "interesting" rather than "funny".)</p><p>But seriously:</p><p>I'm wondering how long it would take for the Chinese authorities to notice if a similar hijack took the searchers to a site that LOOKED like the real one but:<br>
&nbsp; - gave them uncensored search results<br>
&nbsp; - with the links that would be blocked by the Great Firewall redirected through unblocked proxies.</p><p>Obviously launching this from anywhere INSIDE China would make the perpetrator a likely candidate for involuntary organ donation.  But can you imagine the trial of someone from OUTSIDE China who was caught after perpetrating such a thing?  THAT might set some interesting precedents.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Chortle .
( Do n't see why this was modded " interesting " rather than " funny " .
) But seriously : I 'm wondering how long it would take for the Chinese authorities to notice if a similar hijack took the searchers to a site that LOOKED like the real one but :   - gave them uncensored search results   - with the links that would be blocked by the Great Firewall redirected through unblocked proxies.Obviously launching this from anywhere INSIDE China would make the perpetrator a likely candidate for involuntary organ donation .
But can you imagine the trial of someone from OUTSIDE China who was caught after perpetrating such a thing ?
THAT might set some interesting precedents .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Chortle.
(Don't see why this was modded "interesting" rather than "funny".
)But seriously:I'm wondering how long it would take for the Chinese authorities to notice if a similar hijack took the searchers to a site that LOOKED like the real one but:
  - gave them uncensored search results
  - with the links that would be blocked by the Great Firewall redirected through unblocked proxies.Obviously launching this from anywhere INSIDE China would make the perpetrator a likely candidate for involuntary organ donation.
But can you imagine the trial of someone from OUTSIDE China who was caught after perpetrating such a thing?
THAT might set some interesting precedents.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314</id>
	<title>Alternate Associated Press Article</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263293640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>(AP) SHANGHAI - While the Iranian Cyber Army stymied Baidu engineers early Tuesday morning, a Chinese government official reportedly praised the Iranian Cyber Army and it's successful attempts at further curbing the dangers away from Chinese citizens.  After forcing Baidu to remove the ability to find porn or dissidant materials via searches, the Chinese government noted that the Iranian Cyber Army had finally successfully achieved that with absolutely no infractions.  <br> <br>

Cai Wu of The Ministry of Culture in China said, "We are impressed with preliminary reports of zero searches returning offensive materials while the Iranian Cyber Army improved the search page."  Wu also pointed out that nowhere in the Tao Te Ching is a reference to Baidu made and therefore it is one of the major factors in China losing its sense of nationality and pride.  Wu held up <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/Laozi.jpg" title="wikimedia.org">an image of Laozi</a> [wikimedia.org] and said, "Does this happy citizen look like he needed Baidu?  No.  All he needed was his government's ability to protect him from himself."  Wu's only criticism of the 'attack' was simply that he expressed lament "it was not a group of loyal Chinese citizens who made children friendly adjustments to the search engine."  Wu showed that the static page replacing the search page loaded on average 33\% faster and required no user interaction to facilitate.  <br> <br>

The Chinese government and the Iranian government have exchanged notes on how to keep their people from finding materials and lies that erode their ability to protect the cultures and citizens of their respective countries.  But with the recent cross country attacks, it appears as though a group in Iran has one-upped the Chinese and shown them the beautiful results of hacking in comparison to the oafish and ugly heavy handed government shutdowns.  This means, of course, that a stark internet censorship gap exists widely between the US and China.  And other world powers trail far behind Iran and China -- shining examples of the firm yet gentle hand of internet censorship.  Rest assured, this reporter has an inkling that a nationalistic competition could take hold similar to the space race or peace race.  If there's one sport the winter Olympics might add next, certainly it's the sport of suppressing information.  <br> <br>

China is not sitting idly by though, as strategic and selective abortions have left <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100111/lf\_afp/chinapopulationmenmarriage" title="yahoo.com">24 million men without mates</a> [yahoo.com].  The Chinese government believes this strategy will put them in solid first for socially awkward sexually frustrated males that must argue on internet forums while coding day and night taking breaks only for World of Warcraft (the most demanding mistress of them all).  An army of hackers angry at everyone else will undoubtedly arise form this group willing to stop the flow of information worldwide.</htmltext>
<tokenext>( AP ) SHANGHAI - While the Iranian Cyber Army stymied Baidu engineers early Tuesday morning , a Chinese government official reportedly praised the Iranian Cyber Army and it 's successful attempts at further curbing the dangers away from Chinese citizens .
After forcing Baidu to remove the ability to find porn or dissidant materials via searches , the Chinese government noted that the Iranian Cyber Army had finally successfully achieved that with absolutely no infractions .
Cai Wu of The Ministry of Culture in China said , " We are impressed with preliminary reports of zero searches returning offensive materials while the Iranian Cyber Army improved the search page .
" Wu also pointed out that nowhere in the Tao Te Ching is a reference to Baidu made and therefore it is one of the major factors in China losing its sense of nationality and pride .
Wu held up an image of Laozi [ wikimedia.org ] and said , " Does this happy citizen look like he needed Baidu ?
No. All he needed was his government 's ability to protect him from himself .
" Wu 's only criticism of the 'attack ' was simply that he expressed lament " it was not a group of loyal Chinese citizens who made children friendly adjustments to the search engine .
" Wu showed that the static page replacing the search page loaded on average 33 \ % faster and required no user interaction to facilitate .
The Chinese government and the Iranian government have exchanged notes on how to keep their people from finding materials and lies that erode their ability to protect the cultures and citizens of their respective countries .
But with the recent cross country attacks , it appears as though a group in Iran has one-upped the Chinese and shown them the beautiful results of hacking in comparison to the oafish and ugly heavy handed government shutdowns .
This means , of course , that a stark internet censorship gap exists widely between the US and China .
And other world powers trail far behind Iran and China -- shining examples of the firm yet gentle hand of internet censorship .
Rest assured , this reporter has an inkling that a nationalistic competition could take hold similar to the space race or peace race .
If there 's one sport the winter Olympics might add next , certainly it 's the sport of suppressing information .
China is not sitting idly by though , as strategic and selective abortions have left 24 million men without mates [ yahoo.com ] .
The Chinese government believes this strategy will put them in solid first for socially awkward sexually frustrated males that must argue on internet forums while coding day and night taking breaks only for World of Warcraft ( the most demanding mistress of them all ) .
An army of hackers angry at everyone else will undoubtedly arise form this group willing to stop the flow of information worldwide .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>(AP) SHANGHAI - While the Iranian Cyber Army stymied Baidu engineers early Tuesday morning, a Chinese government official reportedly praised the Iranian Cyber Army and it's successful attempts at further curbing the dangers away from Chinese citizens.
After forcing Baidu to remove the ability to find porn or dissidant materials via searches, the Chinese government noted that the Iranian Cyber Army had finally successfully achieved that with absolutely no infractions.
Cai Wu of The Ministry of Culture in China said, "We are impressed with preliminary reports of zero searches returning offensive materials while the Iranian Cyber Army improved the search page.
"  Wu also pointed out that nowhere in the Tao Te Ching is a reference to Baidu made and therefore it is one of the major factors in China losing its sense of nationality and pride.
Wu held up an image of Laozi [wikimedia.org] and said, "Does this happy citizen look like he needed Baidu?
No.  All he needed was his government's ability to protect him from himself.
"  Wu's only criticism of the 'attack' was simply that he expressed lament "it was not a group of loyal Chinese citizens who made children friendly adjustments to the search engine.
"  Wu showed that the static page replacing the search page loaded on average 33\% faster and required no user interaction to facilitate.
The Chinese government and the Iranian government have exchanged notes on how to keep their people from finding materials and lies that erode their ability to protect the cultures and citizens of their respective countries.
But with the recent cross country attacks, it appears as though a group in Iran has one-upped the Chinese and shown them the beautiful results of hacking in comparison to the oafish and ugly heavy handed government shutdowns.
This means, of course, that a stark internet censorship gap exists widely between the US and China.
And other world powers trail far behind Iran and China -- shining examples of the firm yet gentle hand of internet censorship.
Rest assured, this reporter has an inkling that a nationalistic competition could take hold similar to the space race or peace race.
If there's one sport the winter Olympics might add next, certainly it's the sport of suppressing information.
China is not sitting idly by though, as strategic and selective abortions have left 24 million men without mates [yahoo.com].
The Chinese government believes this strategy will put them in solid first for socially awkward sexually frustrated males that must argue on internet forums while coding day and night taking breaks only for World of Warcraft (the most demanding mistress of them all).
An army of hackers angry at everyone else will undoubtedly arise form this group willing to stop the flow of information worldwide.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743464</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>Yvan256</author>
	<datestamp>1263294300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>May I suggest "Hackoles"?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>May I suggest " Hackoles " ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>May I suggest "Hackoles"?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744162</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263297660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>so what about the next generation that still will want to see the world burn well into adulthood?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>so what about the next generation that still will want to see the world burn well into adulthood ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>so what about the next generation that still will want to see the world burn well into adulthood?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743366</id>
	<title>Iran VS China</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263293880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Iran VS China in an contest to out censor each other?</p><p>Whoever wins, we loose!<br>[/joke]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Iran VS China in an contest to out censor each other ? Whoever wins , we loose !
[ /joke ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Iran VS China in an contest to out censor each other?Whoever wins, we loose!
[/joke]</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420</id>
	<title>Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263294120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>When I was in high school, I'd read something like this and the first thing that would pop into my head would be: "cool!" Now the first thing that comes up is: "what a bunch of assholes." Has hacking* finally lost its mystique? I just see these guys as a bunch of idiots who enjoy defacing property and crave attention (ie. vandals).

* If the pejorative use of the term offends you, just pretend I used some other word that is more suiting</htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was in high school , I 'd read something like this and the first thing that would pop into my head would be : " cool !
" Now the first thing that comes up is : " what a bunch of assholes .
" Has hacking * finally lost its mystique ?
I just see these guys as a bunch of idiots who enjoy defacing property and crave attention ( ie .
vandals ) . * If the pejorative use of the term offends you , just pretend I used some other word that is more suiting</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was in high school, I'd read something like this and the first thing that would pop into my head would be: "cool!
" Now the first thing that comes up is: "what a bunch of assholes.
" Has hacking* finally lost its mystique?
I just see these guys as a bunch of idiots who enjoy defacing property and crave attention (ie.
vandals).

* If the pejorative use of the term offends you, just pretend I used some other word that is more suiting</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30748412</id>
	<title>Re:Alternate Associated Press Article - FAKE!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263378540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>this is fake!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>this is fake !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>this is fake!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744158</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>Antisyzygy</author>
	<datestamp>1263297660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I dont know if its true that teenagers want the world to burn so much as they don't want to obey the rules. I guess its due to puberty or something. It happens in Elephants as well. "Teenage" elephants will go on rampages, raping female elephants and attacking male ones unless older, stronger Male elephants are around to challenge them. I think its just part of growing up for us Humans. I agree that hacking is a just another asshole activity.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I dont know if its true that teenagers want the world to burn so much as they do n't want to obey the rules .
I guess its due to puberty or something .
It happens in Elephants as well .
" Teenage " elephants will go on rampages , raping female elephants and attacking male ones unless older , stronger Male elephants are around to challenge them .
I think its just part of growing up for us Humans .
I agree that hacking is a just another asshole activity .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I dont know if its true that teenagers want the world to burn so much as they don't want to obey the rules.
I guess its due to puberty or something.
It happens in Elephants as well.
"Teenage" elephants will go on rampages, raping female elephants and attacking male ones unless older, stronger Male elephants are around to challenge them.
I think its just part of growing up for us Humans.
I agree that hacking is a just another asshole activity.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743466</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746258</id>
	<title>What? Someone took down Twitter??</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263310320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Where can I send the money?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Where can I send the money ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Where can I send the money?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743520</id>
	<title>Re:Hackers are no longer "cool"</title>
	<author>paeanblack</author>
	<datestamp>1263294540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>When I was in high school, I'd read something like this and the first thing that would pop into my head would be: "cool!" Now the first thing that comes up is: "what a bunch of assholes." Has hacking* finally lost its mystique?</i></p><p>No, you just grew up. Welcome to having adult sensibilities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When I was in high school , I 'd read something like this and the first thing that would pop into my head would be : " cool !
" Now the first thing that comes up is : " what a bunch of assholes .
" Has hacking * finally lost its mystique ? No , you just grew up .
Welcome to having adult sensibilities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When I was in high school, I'd read something like this and the first thing that would pop into my head would be: "cool!
" Now the first thing that comes up is: "what a bunch of assholes.
" Has hacking* finally lost its mystique?No, you just grew up.
Welcome to having adult sensibilities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744072</id>
	<title>Re:Baidu stuffed up</title>
	<author>IndigoDarkwolf</author>
	<datestamp>1263297240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>That's amazing! I have the same combination on my luggage!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...too soon?</htmltext>
<tokenext>That 's amazing !
I have the same combination on my luggage !
...too soon ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>That's amazing!
I have the same combination on my luggage!
...too soon?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743668</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30755660
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30748412
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744166
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744450
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743390
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30748402
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743520
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30747230
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746088
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30747084
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30750534
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743648
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30749774
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743874
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743674
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744158
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746714
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743700
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744162
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30745518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743466
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746812
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743536
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744318
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743482
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30755822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30745398
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_204231_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744072
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743668
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_204231.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743366
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_204231.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743420
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30755660
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743464
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743700
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746714
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743466
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30745518
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744162
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744158
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743546
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30748402
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30747084
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30745398
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30755822
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743520
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743674
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744166
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_204231.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30745536
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_204231.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743390
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744450
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_204231.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743668
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746088
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744072
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_204231.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30745322
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_204231.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744396
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_204231.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743314
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30747230
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743536
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30746812
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30750534
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30749774
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743482
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743874
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30744318
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30743648
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_204231.30748412
</commentlist>
</conversation>
