<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_12_1932232</id>
	<title>Google Docs To Host Any File Type</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1263292620000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>ezabi writes <i>"According to a post on the official Google blog, in the coming weeks Google Docs will offer to <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/upload-your-files-and-access-them.html">host all file types with a limit of 250 MB</a>, which as they say is larger than the current limit for email attachments. This will have its consequences: paid file sharing will die, more shared pirated material, newer vulnerabilities and malware distribution channels..."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>ezabi writes " According to a post on the official Google blog , in the coming weeks Google Docs will offer to host all file types with a limit of 250 MB , which as they say is larger than the current limit for email attachments .
This will have its consequences : paid file sharing will die , more shared pirated material , newer vulnerabilities and malware distribution channels... "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ezabi writes "According to a post on the official Google blog, in the coming weeks Google Docs will offer to host all file types with a limit of 250 MB, which as they say is larger than the current limit for email attachments.
This will have its consequences: paid file sharing will die, more shared pirated material, newer vulnerabilities and malware distribution channels..."</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006</id>
	<title>About split</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263296940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; host all file types with a limit of 250 MB,</p><p>Can we just use split to store larger files ?</p><p>split -a 5 -b 250000000 bigfile</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; host all file types with a limit of 250 MB,Can we just use split to store larger files ? split -a 5 -b 250000000 bigfile</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; host all file types with a limit of 250 MB,Can we just use split to store larger files ?split -a 5 -b 250000000 bigfile</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748480</id>
	<title>Re:docs is getting some microsoft office flaws</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263379440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>The solution is fairly simple.</p></div><p>They could implement the Wave "version" system.  It is actually pretty damn decent at tracking changes.<br>A slider could easily fit in the the interface without taking up much space, on the same level as the menus in fact, fits nicely up there.<br>Instead of playback, they could just have arrows at either side to allow you to browse 1 change at a time.  (same goes for Wave actually, arrows would be much more useful)</p><p>See, Wave wasn't entirely porn, bombing and slow speeds... (well, admittedly all that on the public waves, private waves are fantastic)</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>The solution is fairly simple.They could implement the Wave " version " system .
It is actually pretty damn decent at tracking changes.A slider could easily fit in the the interface without taking up much space , on the same level as the menus in fact , fits nicely up there.Instead of playback , they could just have arrows at either side to allow you to browse 1 change at a time .
( same goes for Wave actually , arrows would be much more useful ) See , Wave was n't entirely porn , bombing and slow speeds... ( well , admittedly all that on the public waves , private waves are fantastic )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The solution is fairly simple.They could implement the Wave "version" system.
It is actually pretty damn decent at tracking changes.A slider could easily fit in the the interface without taking up much space, on the same level as the menus in fact, fits nicely up there.Instead of playback, they could just have arrows at either side to allow you to browse 1 change at a time.
(same goes for Wave actually, arrows would be much more useful)See, Wave wasn't entirely porn, bombing and slow speeds... (well, admittedly all that on the public waves, private waves are fantastic)
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30751518</id>
	<title>Re:applications</title>
	<author>marcosdumay</author>
	<datestamp>1263402120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Well, I carry my ssh home key and some Windows software (Portable Putty, WinSCP) for accessing it on a flash driver. Synchroniztion tools only work if you know beforehand what computer you want to sichronyze with.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Well , I carry my ssh home key and some Windows software ( Portable Putty , WinSCP ) for accessing it on a flash driver .
Synchroniztion tools only work if you know beforehand what computer you want to sichronyze with .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Well, I carry my ssh home key and some Windows software (Portable Putty, WinSCP) for accessing it on a flash driver.
Synchroniztion tools only work if you know beforehand what computer you want to sichronyze with.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744556</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744240</id>
	<title>Re:Will these be all public too?</title>
	<author>OakDragon</author>
	<datestamp>1263298080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Google's last foray into all-inclusive communications (Voice) resulted in lots of voicemails being made publicly searchable. I wonder if the same fate awaits all your documents...</p></div>
</blockquote><p>All your documents are belong to us?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google 's last foray into all-inclusive communications ( Voice ) resulted in lots of voicemails being made publicly searchable .
I wonder if the same fate awaits all your documents.. . All your documents are belong to us ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google's last foray into all-inclusive communications (Voice) resulted in lots of voicemails being made publicly searchable.
I wonder if the same fate awaits all your documents...
All your documents are belong to us?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744026</id>
	<title>Re:Will these be all public too?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263297060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What does it matter if the documents are encrypted? Paid file sharing dying would be a good thing, people shouldn't have to pay to share what is theirs. The only downside I see is increased vulnerabilities.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What does it matter if the documents are encrypted ?
Paid file sharing dying would be a good thing , people should n't have to pay to share what is theirs .
The only downside I see is increased vulnerabilities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What does it matter if the documents are encrypted?
Paid file sharing dying would be a good thing, people shouldn't have to pay to share what is theirs.
The only downside I see is increased vulnerabilities.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30750786</id>
	<title>Re:This changes things?</title>
	<author>tehcyder</author>
	<datestamp>1263399240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>p2p users are targeted heavily by the anti piracy groups because p2p users are comprised largly by individuals with very shallow pockets</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
That makes no sense, did you mean deep pockets?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>p2p users are targeted heavily by the anti piracy groups because p2p users are comprised largly by individuals with very shallow pockets That makes no sense , did you mean deep pockets ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>p2p users are targeted heavily by the anti piracy groups because p2p users are comprised largly by individuals with very shallow pockets

That makes no sense, did you mean deep pockets?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30777052</id>
	<title>Re:This changes things?</title>
	<author>Bert64</author>
	<datestamp>1263556740000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Reference the "shallow pockets" comment again... Many of these people simply cannot afford to buy the movies they watch... Unemployed people and kids typically have plenty of time to watch movies but insufficient money to pay for them etc.</p><p>When i was young, i could barely afford a computer, pirated games were the only way i could have anything to play on it, and there were people worse off than me who couldn't afford a computer at all. Hardware has got much cheaper, but software and movies haven't.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Reference the " shallow pockets " comment again... Many of these people simply can not afford to buy the movies they watch... Unemployed people and kids typically have plenty of time to watch movies but insufficient money to pay for them etc.When i was young , i could barely afford a computer , pirated games were the only way i could have anything to play on it , and there were people worse off than me who could n't afford a computer at all .
Hardware has got much cheaper , but software and movies have n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Reference the "shallow pockets" comment again... Many of these people simply cannot afford to buy the movies they watch... Unemployed people and kids typically have plenty of time to watch movies but insufficient money to pay for them etc.When i was young, i could barely afford a computer, pirated games were the only way i could have anything to play on it, and there were people worse off than me who couldn't afford a computer at all.
Hardware has got much cheaper, but software and movies haven't.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880</id>
	<title>Will these be all public too?</title>
	<author>counterplex</author>
	<datestamp>1263296400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google's last foray into all-inclusive communications (Voice) resulted in lots of voicemails being made publicly searchable.  I wonder if the same fate awaits all your documents.  It hasn't happened for the documents that exist already on Google docs but what of the ones that are not created by Google docs and don't have the same rights data associated with them?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google 's last foray into all-inclusive communications ( Voice ) resulted in lots of voicemails being made publicly searchable .
I wonder if the same fate awaits all your documents .
It has n't happened for the documents that exist already on Google docs but what of the ones that are not created by Google docs and do n't have the same rights data associated with them ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google's last foray into all-inclusive communications (Voice) resulted in lots of voicemails being made publicly searchable.
I wonder if the same fate awaits all your documents.
It hasn't happened for the documents that exist already on Google docs but what of the ones that are not created by Google docs and don't have the same rights data associated with them?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744908</id>
	<title>Re:About split</title>
	<author>isj</author>
	<datestamp>1263301680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><i>For that matter, how would a Linux user put it together? dd?</i><br>cat</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>For that matter , how would a Linux user put it together ?
dd ? cat</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For that matter, how would a Linux user put it together?
dd?cat</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747406</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263320760000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>There are plenty of free filesharing sites, and 250mb is pretty paltry by their standards</p></div></blockquote><p>250 millibits is paltry by anyone's standards.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are plenty of free filesharing sites , and 250mb is pretty paltry by their standards250 millibits is paltry by anyone 's standards .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are plenty of free filesharing sites, and 250mb is pretty paltry by their standards250 millibits is paltry by anyone's standards.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743992</id>
	<title>Re:Will these be all public too?</title>
	<author>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</author>
	<datestamp>1263296940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Nothing precludes them fucking up; but it should be no harder to attach permissions to an object you upload than to an object you create.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Nothing precludes them fucking up ; but it should be no harder to attach permissions to an object you upload than to an object you create .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Nothing precludes them fucking up; but it should be no harder to attach permissions to an object you upload than to an object you create.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744670</id>
	<title>Pricing info</title>
	<author>FleaPlus</author>
	<datestamp>1263300240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It doesn't seem that anyone else commenting on the article has noticed this yet, but if you click through to the Google Docs blog it has the pricing info:</p><p><a href="http://googledocs.blogspot.com/2010/01/upload-and-store-your-files-in-cloud.html" title="blogspot.com">http://googledocs.blogspot.com/2010/01/upload-and-store-your-files-in-cloud.html</a> [blogspot.com] </p><p><div class="quote"><p>Instead of emailing files to yourself, which is particularly difficult with large files, you can upload to Google Docs any file up to 250 MB. You'll have 1 GB of free storage for files you don't convert into one of the Google Docs formats (i.e. Google documents, spreadsheets, and presentations), and if you need more space, you can buy additional storage for <b>$0.25 per GB per year</b>. This makes it easy to backup more of your key files online, from large graphics and raw photos to unedited home videos taken on your smartphone. You might even be able to replace the USB drive you reserved for those files that are too big to send over email.</p><p>Combined with shared folders, you can store, organize, and collaborate on files more easily using Google Docs. For example, if you are in a club or PTA working on large graphic files for posters or a newsletter, you can upload them to a shared folder for collaborators to view, download, and print.</p></div><p>Again, after the 1gb limit, that $0.25 per gb-yr. By comparison, Amazon S3 is <a href="http://aws.amazon.com/s3/" title="amazon.com">$0.15*12=$1.80 per gb-yr</a> [amazon.com], almost an order of magnitude more expensive.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>It does n't seem that anyone else commenting on the article has noticed this yet , but if you click through to the Google Docs blog it has the pricing info : http : //googledocs.blogspot.com/2010/01/upload-and-store-your-files-in-cloud.html [ blogspot.com ] Instead of emailing files to yourself , which is particularly difficult with large files , you can upload to Google Docs any file up to 250 MB .
You 'll have 1 GB of free storage for files you do n't convert into one of the Google Docs formats ( i.e .
Google documents , spreadsheets , and presentations ) , and if you need more space , you can buy additional storage for $ 0.25 per GB per year .
This makes it easy to backup more of your key files online , from large graphics and raw photos to unedited home videos taken on your smartphone .
You might even be able to replace the USB drive you reserved for those files that are too big to send over email.Combined with shared folders , you can store , organize , and collaborate on files more easily using Google Docs .
For example , if you are in a club or PTA working on large graphic files for posters or a newsletter , you can upload them to a shared folder for collaborators to view , download , and print.Again , after the 1gb limit , that $ 0.25 per gb-yr. By comparison , Amazon S3 is $ 0.15 * 12 = $ 1.80 per gb-yr [ amazon.com ] , almost an order of magnitude more expensive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It doesn't seem that anyone else commenting on the article has noticed this yet, but if you click through to the Google Docs blog it has the pricing info:http://googledocs.blogspot.com/2010/01/upload-and-store-your-files-in-cloud.html [blogspot.com] Instead of emailing files to yourself, which is particularly difficult with large files, you can upload to Google Docs any file up to 250 MB.
You'll have 1 GB of free storage for files you don't convert into one of the Google Docs formats (i.e.
Google documents, spreadsheets, and presentations), and if you need more space, you can buy additional storage for $0.25 per GB per year.
This makes it easy to backup more of your key files online, from large graphics and raw photos to unedited home videos taken on your smartphone.
You might even be able to replace the USB drive you reserved for those files that are too big to send over email.Combined with shared folders, you can store, organize, and collaborate on files more easily using Google Docs.
For example, if you are in a club or PTA working on large graphic files for posters or a newsletter, you can upload them to a shared folder for collaborators to view, download, and print.Again, after the 1gb limit, that $0.25 per gb-yr. By comparison, Amazon S3 is $0.15*12=$1.80 per gb-yr [amazon.com], almost an order of magnitude more expensive.
	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744098</id>
	<title>Re:About split</title>
	<author>QuantumLeaper</author>
	<datestamp>1263297360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Zip, Rar or some of file compression program will split files will work also.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Zip , Rar or some of file compression program will split files will work also .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Zip, Rar or some of file compression program will split files will work also.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744106</id>
	<title>Think tabloid headlines</title>
	<author>SmallFurryCreature</author>
	<datestamp>1263297360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The headline and summary has to attract eyeballs, more eyeballs, more posts, more activity more ads being viewed, more income.
</p><p>I believe Miranda Hart's christmas special had a parody on a BBC prog, "Can twitter kill you". Reporter going around with ever more suggestive overvoice "do you know that right now your child is dying from twitter in this school", Worried Mom: "This isn't my child's school".
</p><p>Simply stating that you can now store 250mb on your google account in a single file (wonder what the total limit will be) is amazing. Some HD maker must have had a very nice christmas.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The headline and summary has to attract eyeballs , more eyeballs , more posts , more activity more ads being viewed , more income .
I believe Miranda Hart 's christmas special had a parody on a BBC prog , " Can twitter kill you " .
Reporter going around with ever more suggestive overvoice " do you know that right now your child is dying from twitter in this school " , Worried Mom : " This is n't my child 's school " .
Simply stating that you can now store 250mb on your google account in a single file ( wonder what the total limit will be ) is amazing .
Some HD maker must have had a very nice christmas .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The headline and summary has to attract eyeballs, more eyeballs, more posts, more activity more ads being viewed, more income.
I believe Miranda Hart's christmas special had a parody on a BBC prog, "Can twitter kill you".
Reporter going around with ever more suggestive overvoice "do you know that right now your child is dying from twitter in this school", Worried Mom: "This isn't my child's school".
Simply stating that you can now store 250mb on your google account in a single file (wonder what the total limit will be) is amazing.
Some HD maker must have had a very nice christmas.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748544</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing info</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263380400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is the thing that is kind of annoying, i'd honestly rather see Google Drive than just have it listed under something else.</p><p>I guess it depends how the do the interface for the external uploads.<br>I remember the mess of a page in Google Page Creator.  I hope they don't let it become that again.<br>Non-document files should be in a separate section preferably.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is the thing that is kind of annoying , i 'd honestly rather see Google Drive than just have it listed under something else.I guess it depends how the do the interface for the external uploads.I remember the mess of a page in Google Page Creator .
I hope they do n't let it become that again.Non-document files should be in a separate section preferably .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is the thing that is kind of annoying, i'd honestly rather see Google Drive than just have it listed under something else.I guess it depends how the do the interface for the external uploads.I remember the mess of a page in Google Page Creator.
I hope they don't let it become that again.Non-document files should be in a separate section preferably.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748442</id>
	<title>great for small businesses</title>
	<author>kuub</author>
	<datestamp>1263379020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>This will be great for small businesses, that want to host mail, webpages etc on google apps.<p>

Before, we had to either use a separate server, mail the documents to eachother, or use some *other* online hosting service for sharing files in the organization.</p><p>

Now everything is available at one place.</p><p>

Looks like a major step forward.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This will be great for small businesses , that want to host mail , webpages etc on google apps .
Before , we had to either use a separate server , mail the documents to eachother , or use some * other * online hosting service for sharing files in the organization .
Now everything is available at one place .
Looks like a major step forward .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This will be great for small businesses, that want to host mail, webpages etc on google apps.
Before, we had to either use a separate server, mail the documents to eachother, or use some *other* online hosting service for sharing files in the organization.
Now everything is available at one place.
Looks like a major step forward.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940</id>
	<title>What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263296700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Is the summary a troll or just an attempt at sarcasm?</p><p>There are plenty of free filesharing sites, and 250mb is pretty paltry by their standards, not to mention the fact that Google has pretty decent standards for who it lets have an account. Given the amount of information they have on everyone, it's the last site you want to know if you're doing something illegal.</p><p>Unless I guess you count<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.gov domains.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the summary a troll or just an attempt at sarcasm ? There are plenty of free filesharing sites , and 250mb is pretty paltry by their standards , not to mention the fact that Google has pretty decent standards for who it lets have an account .
Given the amount of information they have on everyone , it 's the last site you want to know if you 're doing something illegal.Unless I guess you count .gov domains .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the summary a troll or just an attempt at sarcasm?There are plenty of free filesharing sites, and 250mb is pretty paltry by their standards, not to mention the fact that Google has pretty decent standards for who it lets have an account.
Given the amount of information they have on everyone, it's the last site you want to know if you're doing something illegal.Unless I guess you count .gov domains.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745116</id>
	<title>Re:About split</title>
	<author>ls671</author>
	<datestamp>1263302820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>assuming that you are in an empty directory:</p><p>split -a 5 -b 250000000 sourcedir/bigfile</p><p>cat * &gt; bigfile</p><p>in Windows:</p><p>type * &gt; bigfile</p><p>Gzipped  version:</p><p>tar -zc sourcedir/bigfile | split -a 5 -b 250000000 -</p><p>cat * | tar -zt 1&gt; bigfile</p><p>P.S. I use -a 5 to backup entire disk images in 50MB files, -a 2 is usually the default. 2 will support up to 26*26 = 676 files in your archive.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>assuming that you are in an empty directory : split -a 5 -b 250000000 sourcedir/bigfilecat * &gt; bigfilein Windows : type * &gt; bigfileGzipped version : tar -zc sourcedir/bigfile | split -a 5 -b 250000000 -cat * | tar -zt 1 &gt; bigfileP.S .
I use -a 5 to backup entire disk images in 50MB files , -a 2 is usually the default .
2 will support up to 26 * 26 = 676 files in your archive .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>assuming that you are in an empty directory:split -a 5 -b 250000000 sourcedir/bigfilecat * &gt; bigfilein Windows:type * &gt; bigfileGzipped  version:tar -zc sourcedir/bigfile | split -a 5 -b 250000000 -cat * | tar -zt 1&gt; bigfileP.S.
I use -a 5 to backup entire disk images in 50MB files, -a 2 is usually the default.
2 will support up to 26*26 = 676 files in your archive.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744850</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744556</id>
	<title>applications</title>
	<author>bcrowell</author>
	<datestamp>1263299700000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>TFA says:<blockquote><div><p>More importantly, instead of carrying a USB drive, you can now use Google Docs as a more convenient option for accessing your files on different computers.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
I know very few people who use USB keychain drives for this kind of thing. I teach physics lab courses, and when students need to bring home a spreadsheets or something, they just email it to themselves. I don't think the size limit is the main reason they don't use flash drives. One reason is that they don't know in advance that they're going to need one. The other is that email is less of a hassle.
</p><p>
If you're getting up into the amounts of data that can't go in an email attachment, then you probably need a full-fledged file synchronization utility like <a href="http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/" title="upenn.edu">unison</a> [upenn.edu] anyway. Unison is smart about recognizing data that haven't changed, and it also takes away the hassle and confusion that people experience with trying to keep straight all the different versions of files they have when they try to use a keychain drive for this. If you don't have a decent tool like this, then mirroring large amounts of data is likely to be slow, labor-intensive, and error-prone. TFA says:
</p><blockquote><div><p>In addition to uploading any file into Google Docs, our Google Apps Premier Edition customers will be able to seamlessly upload many files at once and sync them with their desktop in real time using third party applications.</p></div>
</blockquote><p>
Presumably the "Premier Edition" part means you'll have to pay. So for the majority of applications where you have this much data, Google will give you convenience or zero cost, but not both.
</p><p>
One exception I can think of is that this could be a nice, convenient way to make off-site backups of a certain amount of personal data (that novel you've been writing,<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...) in case of fire or earthquake.
</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>TFA says : More importantly , instead of carrying a USB drive , you can now use Google Docs as a more convenient option for accessing your files on different computers .
I know very few people who use USB keychain drives for this kind of thing .
I teach physics lab courses , and when students need to bring home a spreadsheets or something , they just email it to themselves .
I do n't think the size limit is the main reason they do n't use flash drives .
One reason is that they do n't know in advance that they 're going to need one .
The other is that email is less of a hassle .
If you 're getting up into the amounts of data that ca n't go in an email attachment , then you probably need a full-fledged file synchronization utility like unison [ upenn.edu ] anyway .
Unison is smart about recognizing data that have n't changed , and it also takes away the hassle and confusion that people experience with trying to keep straight all the different versions of files they have when they try to use a keychain drive for this .
If you do n't have a decent tool like this , then mirroring large amounts of data is likely to be slow , labor-intensive , and error-prone .
TFA says : In addition to uploading any file into Google Docs , our Google Apps Premier Edition customers will be able to seamlessly upload many files at once and sync them with their desktop in real time using third party applications .
Presumably the " Premier Edition " part means you 'll have to pay .
So for the majority of applications where you have this much data , Google will give you convenience or zero cost , but not both .
One exception I can think of is that this could be a nice , convenient way to make off-site backups of a certain amount of personal data ( that novel you 've been writing , ... ) in case of fire or earthquake .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>TFA says:More importantly, instead of carrying a USB drive, you can now use Google Docs as a more convenient option for accessing your files on different computers.
I know very few people who use USB keychain drives for this kind of thing.
I teach physics lab courses, and when students need to bring home a spreadsheets or something, they just email it to themselves.
I don't think the size limit is the main reason they don't use flash drives.
One reason is that they don't know in advance that they're going to need one.
The other is that email is less of a hassle.
If you're getting up into the amounts of data that can't go in an email attachment, then you probably need a full-fledged file synchronization utility like unison [upenn.edu] anyway.
Unison is smart about recognizing data that haven't changed, and it also takes away the hassle and confusion that people experience with trying to keep straight all the different versions of files they have when they try to use a keychain drive for this.
If you don't have a decent tool like this, then mirroring large amounts of data is likely to be slow, labor-intensive, and error-prone.
TFA says:
In addition to uploading any file into Google Docs, our Google Apps Premier Edition customers will be able to seamlessly upload many files at once and sync them with their desktop in real time using third party applications.
Presumably the "Premier Edition" part means you'll have to pay.
So for the majority of applications where you have this much data, Google will give you convenience or zero cost, but not both.
One exception I can think of is that this could be a nice, convenient way to make off-site backups of a certain amount of personal data (that novel you've been writing, ...) in case of fire or earthquake.

	</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30750298</id>
	<title>"Every" file may not be accurate</title>
	<author>malaprohibita</author>
	<datestamp>1263397320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>For testing, I archived a bunch of old documents into one docs.7z file, 84mb in size, and tried to upload it.  After 20 minutes of watching the status bar creep, I got a message saying that Google does not yet support 7z files.</htmltext>
<tokenext>For testing , I archived a bunch of old documents into one docs.7z file , 84mb in size , and tried to upload it .
After 20 minutes of watching the status bar creep , I got a message saying that Google does not yet support 7z files .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>For testing, I archived a bunch of old documents into one docs.7z file, 84mb in size, and tried to upload it.
After 20 minutes of watching the status bar creep, I got a message saying that Google does not yet support 7z files.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747508</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>potat0man</author>
	<datestamp>1263321600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><i>we've all complained about the coworker who sends out a 15MB movie of their kids playing with the dog to a mailing list, but what option do most average users have?</i>
<br> <br>
<a href="http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=59208" title="google.com">youtube</a> [google.com]?</htmltext>
<tokenext>we 've all complained about the coworker who sends out a 15MB movie of their kids playing with the dog to a mailing list , but what option do most average users have ?
youtube [ google.com ] ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>we've all complained about the coworker who sends out a 15MB movie of their kids playing with the dog to a mailing list, but what option do most average users have?
youtube [google.com]?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744154</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746218</id>
	<title>Guess what, so does every webhoster out there.</title>
	<author>Hurricane78</author>
	<datestamp>1263309960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I put it on MY server, so that I own it.</p><p>I still don&rsquo;t get why anyone would be so crazy to host anything important on a company&rsquo;s server. Especially one that is known as the ultimate data kraken.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I put it on MY server , so that I own it.I still don    t get why anyone would be so crazy to host anything important on a company    s server .
Especially one that is known as the ultimate data kraken .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I put it on MY server, so that I own it.I still don’t get why anyone would be so crazy to host anything important on a company’s server.
Especially one that is known as the ultimate data kraken.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744756</id>
	<title>Torrent plz?</title>
	<author>jameskojiro</author>
	<datestamp>1263300780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>will now become "Gdoc plz?"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>will now become " Gdoc plz ?
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>will now become "Gdoc plz?
"</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744000</id>
	<title>Let's hope for djvu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263296940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>right now it still says<br>"Sorry, we do not currently support 'djvu' files"<br>All my textbooks are in djvu format and a google viewer for them would be great!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>right now it still says " Sorry , we do not currently support 'djvu ' files " All my textbooks are in djvu format and a google viewer for them would be great !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>right now it still says"Sorry, we do not currently support 'djvu' files"All my textbooks are in djvu format and a google viewer for them would be great!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744014</id>
	<title>with limit of 250MB</title>
	<author>SharpFang</author>
	<datestamp>1263297000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>...nothing of the stuff mentioned in summary will happen...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>...nothing of the stuff mentioned in summary will happen.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>...nothing of the stuff mentioned in summary will happen...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30749274</id>
	<title>Re:This changes things?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263390540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>thelen.shar@gmail.com - Thelen says:</p><p>The problem is many of the movies cannot be purchased in many countries. I love it how you think America is the only country....</p><p>How do you think Egyptians will get those movies???</p><p>I'm against stealing, but movie piracy is not stealing, it is piracy. And given those industries continue to post record profits, it is easy to see piracy has no affect....</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>thelen.shar @ gmail.com - Thelen says : The problem is many of the movies can not be purchased in many countries .
I love it how you think America is the only country....How do you think Egyptians will get those movies ? ?
? I 'm against stealing , but movie piracy is not stealing , it is piracy .
And given those industries continue to post record profits , it is easy to see piracy has no affect... .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>thelen.shar@gmail.com - Thelen says:The problem is many of the movies cannot be purchased in many countries.
I love it how you think America is the only country....How do you think Egyptians will get those movies??
?I'm against stealing, but movie piracy is not stealing, it is piracy.
And given those industries continue to post record profits, it is easy to see piracy has no affect....</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30773380</id>
	<title>Re:docs is getting some microsoft office flaws</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263475620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have you tried www.redliner.com? You can take a document and start a new editing "cycle" with other users, then once all the changes have been made and approved (or at some other interim point), "publish" a new version. It also has very powerful commenting, change-tracking, and collaboration features. You can also upload non-Redliner files to your shared workspace.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have you tried www.redliner.com ?
You can take a document and start a new editing " cycle " with other users , then once all the changes have been made and approved ( or at some other interim point ) , " publish " a new version .
It also has very powerful commenting , change-tracking , and collaboration features .
You can also upload non-Redliner files to your shared workspace .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have you tried www.redliner.com?
You can take a document and start a new editing "cycle" with other users, then once all the changes have been made and approved (or at some other interim point), "publish" a new version.
It also has very powerful commenting, change-tracking, and collaboration features.
You can also upload non-Redliner files to your shared workspace.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744790</id>
	<title>Why Would Any Company Use This?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263300900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are there ANY companies that are stupid enough to load their spreadsheets into google docs?<br>Is anyone out there using google docs in the workplace?  If so, why?<br>Are pointy haired bosses sending emails with google docs links in them instead of attachments?</p><p>If anyone wants to upload their drafts of SEC filings or preliminary earnings reports to my<br>FTP server for easy sharing within their companies, I'm happy to volunteer my server.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are there ANY companies that are stupid enough to load their spreadsheets into google docs ? Is anyone out there using google docs in the workplace ?
If so , why ? Are pointy haired bosses sending emails with google docs links in them instead of attachments ? If anyone wants to upload their drafts of SEC filings or preliminary earnings reports to myFTP server for easy sharing within their companies , I 'm happy to volunteer my server .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are there ANY companies that are stupid enough to load their spreadsheets into google docs?Is anyone out there using google docs in the workplace?
If so, why?Are pointy haired bosses sending emails with google docs links in them instead of attachments?If anyone wants to upload their drafts of SEC filings or preliminary earnings reports to myFTP server for easy sharing within their companies, I'm happy to volunteer my server.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743962</id>
	<title>This changes things?</title>
	<author>L3370</author>
	<datestamp>1263296820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>p2p users are targeted heavily by the anti piracy groups because p2p users are comprised largly by individuals with very shallow pockets.Google could potentially even the playing field here.<br> <br><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...Not to say that Google is doing it for this reason...or that piracy is justified. Just saying a company with this much influence could change the media industry's approach on combatting illegal activities.</htmltext>
<tokenext>p2p users are targeted heavily by the anti piracy groups because p2p users are comprised largly by individuals with very shallow pockets.Google could potentially even the playing field here .
...Not to say that Google is doing it for this reason...or that piracy is justified .
Just saying a company with this much influence could change the media industry 's approach on combatting illegal activities .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>p2p users are targeted heavily by the anti piracy groups because p2p users are comprised largly by individuals with very shallow pockets.Google could potentially even the playing field here.
...Not to say that Google is doing it for this reason...or that piracy is justified.
Just saying a company with this much influence could change the media industry's approach on combatting illegal activities.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744526</id>
	<title>I already paid for my bandwidth.</title>
	<author>sourICE</author>
	<datestamp>1263299520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>We already pay for our bandwidth usage through our phone/fiber companies. Why should I have to pay somebody else money to upload a file to a friend or even thousands of friends(in this day in age of torrents)?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>We already pay for our bandwidth usage through our phone/fiber companies .
Why should I have to pay somebody else money to upload a file to a friend or even thousands of friends ( in this day in age of torrents ) ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>We already pay for our bandwidth usage through our phone/fiber companies.
Why should I have to pay somebody else money to upload a file to a friend or even thousands of friends(in this day in age of torrents)?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30753464</id>
	<title>Re:So this is like Ubuntu One?</title>
	<author>benking</author>
	<datestamp>1263409560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Do the Math. Ubuntu One Chanrges $10 for 50GB. For the same 50 GB Google charges $12.50 a year.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Do the Math .
Ubuntu One Chanrges $ 10 for 50GB .
For the same 50 GB Google charges $ 12.50 a year .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Do the Math.
Ubuntu One Chanrges $10 for 50GB.
For the same 50 GB Google charges $12.50 a year.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744200</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744446</id>
	<title>Skydrive</title>
	<author>nurb432</author>
	<datestamp>1263299100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Guess that's Google's answer to things like Microsoft's Skydrive.</p><p>Wonder if it will be blocked from work too..<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Guess that 's Google 's answer to things like Microsoft 's Skydrive.Wonder if it will be blocked from work too.. : (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Guess that's Google's answer to things like Microsoft's Skydrive.Wonder if it will be blocked from work too.. :(</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744200</id>
	<title>So this is like Ubuntu One?</title>
	<author>Rix</author>
	<datestamp>1263297900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Except 1/8th the size?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Except 1/8th the size ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Except 1/8th the size?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746864</id>
	<title>Re:About split</title>
	<author>pydev</author>
	<datestamp>1263315600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.  I doubt the file size limit is there because Google doesn't like big files, it's there because it's hard on the infrastructure to upload/download bigger files in one step.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes .
I doubt the file size limit is there because Google does n't like big files , it 's there because it 's hard on the infrastructure to upload/download bigger files in one step .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.
I doubt the file size limit is there because Google doesn't like big files, it's there because it's hard on the infrastructure to upload/download bigger files in one step.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744856</id>
	<title>FUSE</title>
	<author>johnkzin</author>
	<datestamp>1263301440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How long before we see a FUSE plugin that lets you treat this like an NFS server?<br>(or did I miss it, and one already exists?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How long before we see a FUSE plugin that lets you treat this like an NFS server ?
( or did I miss it , and one already exists ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How long before we see a FUSE plugin that lets you treat this like an NFS server?
(or did I miss it, and one already exists?
)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744172</id>
	<title>Down with Rapidshare!</title>
	<author>epp\_b</author>
	<datestamp>1263297720000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I read "paid file sharing will die", yelped a heartfelt cheer and forgot to read the rest.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I read " paid file sharing will die " , yelped a heartfelt cheer and forgot to read the rest .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I read "paid file sharing will die", yelped a heartfelt cheer and forgot to read the rest.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747030</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1263317160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yeah, so tell us about some? They all allow you to download very little, unless you pay for it - if you don't you can download once an hour something like that. Knowing google, there won't be such limits.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yeah , so tell us about some ?
They all allow you to download very little , unless you pay for it - if you do n't you can download once an hour something like that .
Knowing google , there wo n't be such limits .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yeah, so tell us about some?
They all allow you to download very little, unless you pay for it - if you don't you can download once an hour something like that.
Knowing google, there won't be such limits.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747862</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing info</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263413040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You'll have 1 GB of free storage <b>for files you don't convert into one of the Google Docs formats</b></p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 'll have 1 GB of free storage for files you do n't convert into one of the Google Docs formats</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You'll have 1 GB of free storage for files you don't convert into one of the Google Docs formats</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748428</id>
	<title>Re:This changes things?</title>
	<author>the\_womble</author>
	<datestamp>1263378780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great way to miss the point.</p><p>He was talking about why the industry chooses to target a particular group of infringers.</p><p>You are talking about whether they are justified in infringing or not.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great way to miss the point.He was talking about why the industry chooses to target a particular group of infringers.You are talking about whether they are justified in infringing or not .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great way to miss the point.He was talking about why the industry chooses to target a particular group of infringers.You are talking about whether they are justified in infringing or not.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744304</id>
	<title>Goodbye Backpack.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263298440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Combined with <a href="http://www.google.com/enterprise/marketplace/viewListing?productListingId=5019093+13553431478272645297" title="google.com" rel="nofollow">Manymoon</a> [google.com] this looks like a serious contender to pricey online project management services like <a href="http://backpackit.com/" title="backpackit.com" rel="nofollow">Backpack</a> [backpackit.com]. Lack of artificial user limits is what makes Google strategy such an attractive proposition.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Combined with Manymoon [ google.com ] this looks like a serious contender to pricey online project management services like Backpack [ backpackit.com ] .
Lack of artificial user limits is what makes Google strategy such an attractive proposition .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Combined with Manymoon [google.com] this looks like a serious contender to pricey online project management services like Backpack [backpackit.com].
Lack of artificial user limits is what makes Google strategy such an attractive proposition.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743876</id>
	<title>fisrt!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263296400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>fisrt</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>fisrt</tokentext>
<sentencetext>fisrt</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745276</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing info</title>
	<author>CopaceticOpus</author>
	<datestamp>1263303660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Hopefully this will embarrass online storage services such as S3 into offering more reasonable prices. I've always through they were overpriced, and this seems to confirm it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Hopefully this will embarrass online storage services such as S3 into offering more reasonable prices .
I 've always through they were overpriced , and this seems to confirm it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hopefully this will embarrass online storage services such as S3 into offering more reasonable prices.
I've always through they were overpriced, and this seems to confirm it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744216</id>
	<title>Re:First Question,</title>
	<author>epp\_b</author>
	<datestamp>1263297960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>Torrents are easier.</p></div></blockquote><p>
Torrents are slower.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Torrents are easier .
Torrents are slower .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Torrents are easier.
Torrents are slower.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744110</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444</id>
	<title>Re:This changes things?</title>
	<author>AnotherUsername</author>
	<datestamp>1263304620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>Perhaps those p2p users could simply <i>purchase</i> those movies that they wish to have.  Or, even, get a Netflix account.  But I suppose that 'Fighting the Man' has a better ring to it.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Perhaps those p2p users could simply purchase those movies that they wish to have .
Or , even , get a Netflix account .
But I suppose that 'Fighting the Man ' has a better ring to it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Perhaps those p2p users could simply purchase those movies that they wish to have.
Or, even, get a Netflix account.
But I suppose that 'Fighting the Man' has a better ring to it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743962</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745342</id>
	<title>Re:with limit of 250MB</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263304080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I remember sharing Quake 1 with my friends via ~50 1.44" floppy discs.</htmltext>
<tokenext>I remember sharing Quake 1 with my friends via ~ 50 1.44 " floppy discs .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I remember sharing Quake 1 with my friends via ~50 1.44" floppy discs.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744014</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30749706</id>
	<title>Re:Will these be all public too?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263394140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Funny thing is that it's much more likely that <i>I'll</i> fuck up, rather than Google!<br>
<br>
It makes me feel safe and warm with Google managing my entire life, so, with that in mind:<br>
<br>
<strong>
I, for one, welcome our....yada yada
</strong></htmltext>
<tokenext>Funny thing is that it 's much more likely that I 'll fuck up , rather than Google !
It makes me feel safe and warm with Google managing my entire life , so , with that in mind : I , for one , welcome our....yada yada</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Funny thing is that it's much more likely that I'll fuck up, rather than Google!
It makes me feel safe and warm with Google managing my entire life, so, with that in mind:


I, for one, welcome our....yada yada
</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743992</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747350</id>
	<title>File sizes</title>
	<author>halcyon1234</author>
	<datestamp>1263320160000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>250MB-- large enough for a game patch, too small for a TV show. Seems right.<p>Wait, can I send<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.exe files through gmail now?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>250MB-- large enough for a game patch , too small for a TV show .
Seems right.Wait , can I send .exe files through gmail now ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>250MB-- large enough for a game patch, too small for a TV show.
Seems right.Wait, can I send .exe files through gmail now?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744222</id>
	<title>counterplex the idiot</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263298020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boggle.</p><p>It is so sad to get these reminders of just what a bunch of ignorant people fill the Net like counterplex.</p><p>Let's just refresh everyone's memory of searchable Google Voice:</p><p>* Google implemented search for Google Voice for people who decided to make their stuff public</p><p>* Dumbasses in the media tried to spin it as some sort of privacy violation</p><p>* Articles came out stating why the idiots babbling about privacy violation were spewing garbage since the only Google Voice stuff being indexed was stuff people decided to make public</p><p>* Same dumbasses in the media came out with 'yeah, but...I still want to be mad at Google followup articles'</p><p>Idiots like counterplex obviously just read the sensational headlines and parrot them as their own 'insight' into future stories.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boggle.It is so sad to get these reminders of just what a bunch of ignorant people fill the Net like counterplex.Let 's just refresh everyone 's memory of searchable Google Voice : * Google implemented search for Google Voice for people who decided to make their stuff public * Dumbasses in the media tried to spin it as some sort of privacy violation * Articles came out stating why the idiots babbling about privacy violation were spewing garbage since the only Google Voice stuff being indexed was stuff people decided to make public * Same dumbasses in the media came out with 'yeah , but...I still want to be mad at Google followup articles'Idiots like counterplex obviously just read the sensational headlines and parrot them as their own 'insight ' into future stories .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boggle.It is so sad to get these reminders of just what a bunch of ignorant people fill the Net like counterplex.Let's just refresh everyone's memory of searchable Google Voice:* Google implemented search for Google Voice for people who decided to make their stuff public* Dumbasses in the media tried to spin it as some sort of privacy violation* Articles came out stating why the idiots babbling about privacy violation were spewing garbage since the only Google Voice stuff being indexed was stuff people decided to make public* Same dumbasses in the media came out with 'yeah, but...I still want to be mad at Google followup articles'Idiots like counterplex obviously just read the sensational headlines and parrot them as their own 'insight' into future stories.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744236</id>
	<title>.exe</title>
	<author>Monkeedude1212</author>
	<datestamp>1263298020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this include executables? New Malware channels INDEED. I know a whole lot of people who wouldn't know what an extension is, besides pushing back a deadline.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this include executables ?
New Malware channels INDEED .
I know a whole lot of people who would n't know what an extension is , besides pushing back a deadline .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this include executables?
New Malware channels INDEED.
I know a whole lot of people who wouldn't know what an extension is, besides pushing back a deadline.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745486</id>
	<title>And let us edit them?</title>
	<author>Deanalator</author>
	<datestamp>1263304860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It would be nice if they started building editors for various file formats, so through google docs we could collaboratively do some video editing, programming, photo editing, etc</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It would be nice if they started building editors for various file formats , so through google docs we could collaboratively do some video editing , programming , photo editing , etc</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It would be nice if they started building editors for various file formats, so through google docs we could collaboratively do some video editing, programming, photo editing, etc</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744160</id>
	<title>docs is getting some microsoft office flaws</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263297660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>As in "bugs or missing features that are existing now for years without being addressed."</p><p>The biggest shortcoming I see is a lack of proper versioning. Docs will save every stupid edit you make every few seconds creating hundreds and hundreds of divergent versions. Utterly useless for tracking changes in drafts over time. The solution is fairly simple. You get a button up at the top that tells you which draft you're in. Click on it and you can spawn a new draft. So you start with your rough draft. When that's complete, you say "new draft" and here's your second draft. You can invite people to comment on a draft by draft basis. If you'd like, you could saw "I'm spawning off Joe's draft since he's going to make edits." If he's not going to edit, just comment, then you can let him have a go at the second draft. Then you can move on to your third draft, fourth, etc.</p><p>At this point in time the only solution is to manually create a new file called second draft, third draft, keep them all in the project folder and then manually compare changes. Kind of defeats the aweseomeness of docs here. Of the features I use in Word, this is the only place where Word has docs beat. Of course, nobody I know can use the comments and revisioning tools worth a damn so I'm not really getting proper mileage out of them. *sigh*</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>As in " bugs or missing features that are existing now for years without being addressed .
" The biggest shortcoming I see is a lack of proper versioning .
Docs will save every stupid edit you make every few seconds creating hundreds and hundreds of divergent versions .
Utterly useless for tracking changes in drafts over time .
The solution is fairly simple .
You get a button up at the top that tells you which draft you 're in .
Click on it and you can spawn a new draft .
So you start with your rough draft .
When that 's complete , you say " new draft " and here 's your second draft .
You can invite people to comment on a draft by draft basis .
If you 'd like , you could saw " I 'm spawning off Joe 's draft since he 's going to make edits .
" If he 's not going to edit , just comment , then you can let him have a go at the second draft .
Then you can move on to your third draft , fourth , etc.At this point in time the only solution is to manually create a new file called second draft , third draft , keep them all in the project folder and then manually compare changes .
Kind of defeats the aweseomeness of docs here .
Of the features I use in Word , this is the only place where Word has docs beat .
Of course , nobody I know can use the comments and revisioning tools worth a damn so I 'm not really getting proper mileage out of them .
* sigh *</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As in "bugs or missing features that are existing now for years without being addressed.
"The biggest shortcoming I see is a lack of proper versioning.
Docs will save every stupid edit you make every few seconds creating hundreds and hundreds of divergent versions.
Utterly useless for tracking changes in drafts over time.
The solution is fairly simple.
You get a button up at the top that tells you which draft you're in.
Click on it and you can spawn a new draft.
So you start with your rough draft.
When that's complete, you say "new draft" and here's your second draft.
You can invite people to comment on a draft by draft basis.
If you'd like, you could saw "I'm spawning off Joe's draft since he's going to make edits.
" If he's not going to edit, just comment, then you can let him have a go at the second draft.
Then you can move on to your third draft, fourth, etc.At this point in time the only solution is to manually create a new file called second draft, third draft, keep them all in the project folder and then manually compare changes.
Kind of defeats the aweseomeness of docs here.
Of the features I use in Word, this is the only place where Word has docs beat.
Of course, nobody I know can use the comments and revisioning tools worth a damn so I'm not really getting proper mileage out of them.
*sigh*</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744034</id>
	<title>Microsoft has something similar</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263297120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Microsoft is moving into the ad-supported online hosting biz with <a href="http://skydrive.live.com/" title="live.com">SkyDrive</a> [live.com]. Looking at my SkyDrive right now, it tells me I have 24.99GB available space (I'm not really using it for anything). Among other uses, once Office 2010 ships, SkyDrive will be a portal to the Office 2010 Web Apps. If you upload Office documents to your SkyDrive, you will be able to click on them and view/edit them in your browser, without owning your own copy of Office.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Microsoft is moving into the ad-supported online hosting biz with SkyDrive [ live.com ] .
Looking at my SkyDrive right now , it tells me I have 24.99GB available space ( I 'm not really using it for anything ) .
Among other uses , once Office 2010 ships , SkyDrive will be a portal to the Office 2010 Web Apps .
If you upload Office documents to your SkyDrive , you will be able to click on them and view/edit them in your browser , without owning your own copy of Office .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Microsoft is moving into the ad-supported online hosting biz with SkyDrive [live.com].
Looking at my SkyDrive right now, it tells me I have 24.99GB available space (I'm not really using it for anything).
Among other uses, once Office 2010 ships, SkyDrive will be a portal to the Office 2010 Web Apps.
If you upload Office documents to your SkyDrive, you will be able to click on them and view/edit them in your browser, without owning your own copy of Office.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743864</id>
	<title>kdawson</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263296340000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Flamebait</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>He does it again....</p><p>It's official: another biased summary from kdawson</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>He does it again....It 's official : another biased summary from kdawson</tokentext>
<sentencetext>He does it again....It's official: another biased summary from kdawson</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744278</id>
	<title>Re:Will these be all public too?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263298320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext>As usual, you can make things as public as you want. After all, they are on-line. If you want to keep them for yourself... keep them in your computer, not "in the cloud".<br>
Google offers e-mail, is it public? and can you search through it?<br>
Google offers picture albums (Picasa). Are they public? Can you make them private and unlisted?<br>
Google already offers google docs. The same thing, you can make them private or public.<br>
Google voicemail messages were public, because users configured they settings to make them public. Why would this case be different?</htmltext>
<tokenext>As usual , you can make things as public as you want .
After all , they are on-line .
If you want to keep them for yourself... keep them in your computer , not " in the cloud " .
Google offers e-mail , is it public ?
and can you search through it ?
Google offers picture albums ( Picasa ) .
Are they public ?
Can you make them private and unlisted ?
Google already offers google docs .
The same thing , you can make them private or public .
Google voicemail messages were public , because users configured they settings to make them public .
Why would this case be different ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>As usual, you can make things as public as you want.
After all, they are on-line.
If you want to keep them for yourself... keep them in your computer, not "in the cloud".
Google offers e-mail, is it public?
and can you search through it?
Google offers picture albums (Picasa).
Are they public?
Can you make them private and unlisted?
Google already offers google docs.
The same thing, you can make them private or public.
Google voicemail messages were public, because users configured they settings to make them public.
Why would this case be different?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746140</id>
	<title>Re:About split</title>
	<author>Sir\_Lewk</author>
	<datestamp>1263309420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Whenever I see those used, it's generally with files that are already compressed anyways.  Seems like it's just adding overhead and complication.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Whenever I see those used , it 's generally with files that are already compressed anyways .
Seems like it 's just adding overhead and complication .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Whenever I see those used, it's generally with files that are already compressed anyways.
Seems like it's just adding overhead and complication.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744098</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30757292</id>
	<title>Re:About split</title>
	<author>mrbobjoe</author>
	<datestamp>1263382140000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>type * &gt; bigfile</p></div></blockquote><p>
Is this binary safe? Windows stdout defaults to text mode, I assume type works that way too. On Windows I've always used copy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/b file1 + file2 bigfile</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>type * &gt; bigfile Is this binary safe ?
Windows stdout defaults to text mode , I assume type works that way too .
On Windows I 've always used copy /b file1 + file2 bigfile</tokentext>
<sentencetext>type * &gt; bigfile
Is this binary safe?
Windows stdout defaults to text mode, I assume type works that way too.
On Windows I've always used copy /b file1 + file2 bigfile
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745116</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744728</id>
	<title>Summary is troll.</title>
	<author>bmo</author>
	<datestamp>1263300600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt;newer vulnerabilities and malware distribution channels...</p><p>As if Rapidshare and the rest *aren't* copyright infringement, vulnerability, and malware distribution channels.</p><p>Unjustified smear, anyone?</p><p>&gt;Will decimate the paid file sharing market</p><p>No, it won't.  There will always be a market for paid file hosting, especially for files larger than 250MB.</p><p>Summary is troll.</p><p>Keep trollin', trollin' trollin'<br>Though they're disapprovin',<br>Keep those articles movin' Slashdot!<br>Don't try to understand 'em,<br>Just sum 'em up and post 'em,<br>Soon the bullshit'll be high and wide.<br>By my heart's calculatin'<br>Mod points will be flyin',<br>Karma will be higher by and by.</p><p>Sum 'em up, post 'em up,<br>Mod 'em up, mod 'em down,<br>Move 'em on, head 'em out Slashdot!<br>Cut the bait, bait the hook<br>Reel it in, let it out,<br>Set the hook, reel 'em in Slashdot!</p><p>Trollin', Trollin', trollin'<br>Trollin', trollin', trollin'<br>Trollin', trollin', trollin'<br>Trollin', trollin', trollin'<br>Slashdot!</p><p>Trollin', trollin', trollin'<br>Though the quality's fallin'<br>Keep them articles rollin'<br>Slashdot!<br>Eds on crack and cheetos<br>Logic's long gone, we know!<br>All the things I'm missin',<br>Fox News and Palin,<br>Are waiting for me at another website.</p><p>Sum 'em up, post 'em up,<br>Mod 'em up, mod 'em down,<br>Move 'em on, head 'em out Slashdot!<br>Cut the bait, bait the hook<br>Reel 'em in, let 'em out,<br>Set the hook, reel 'em in Slashdot!</p><p>Trollin', Trollin', trollin'<br>Trollin', trollin', trollin'<br>Trollin', trollin', trollin'<br>Trollin', trollin', trollin'<br>Slashdot!</p><p>Keep trollin', trollin' trollin'<br>Though they're disapprovin',<br>Keep them articles movin'<br>Slashdot!<br>Don't try to understand 'em,<br>Just sum 'em up and post 'em,<br>Soon the bullshit'll be high and wide.<br>By my heart's calculatin'<br>Mod points will be flyin',<br>Karma will be higher by and by.</p><p>Slashdot!<br>Slashdot!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; newer vulnerabilities and malware distribution channels...As if Rapidshare and the rest * are n't * copyright infringement , vulnerability , and malware distribution channels.Unjustified smear , anyone ? &gt; Will decimate the paid file sharing marketNo , it wo n't .
There will always be a market for paid file hosting , especially for files larger than 250MB.Summary is troll.Keep trollin ' , trollin ' trollin'Though they 're disapprovin',Keep those articles movin ' Slashdot ! Do n't try to understand 'em,Just sum 'em up and post 'em,Soon the bullshit 'll be high and wide.By my heart 's calculatin'Mod points will be flyin',Karma will be higher by and by.Sum 'em up , post 'em up,Mod 'em up , mod 'em down,Move 'em on , head 'em out Slashdot ! Cut the bait , bait the hookReel it in , let it out,Set the hook , reel 'em in Slashdot ! Trollin ' , Trollin ' , trollin'Trollin ' , trollin ' , trollin'Trollin ' , trollin ' , trollin'Trollin ' , trollin ' , trollin'Slashdot ! Trollin ' , trollin ' , trollin'Though the quality 's fallin'Keep them articles rollin'Slashdot ! Eds on crack and cheetosLogic 's long gone , we know ! All the things I 'm missin',Fox News and Palin,Are waiting for me at another website.Sum 'em up , post 'em up,Mod 'em up , mod 'em down,Move 'em on , head 'em out Slashdot ! Cut the bait , bait the hookReel 'em in , let 'em out,Set the hook , reel 'em in Slashdot ! Trollin ' , Trollin ' , trollin'Trollin ' , trollin ' , trollin'Trollin ' , trollin ' , trollin'Trollin ' , trollin ' , trollin'Slashdot ! Keep trollin ' , trollin ' trollin'Though they 're disapprovin',Keep them articles movin'Slashdot ! Do n't try to understand 'em,Just sum 'em up and post 'em,Soon the bullshit 'll be high and wide.By my heart 's calculatin'Mod points will be flyin',Karma will be higher by and by.Slashdot ! Slashdot !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt;newer vulnerabilities and malware distribution channels...As if Rapidshare and the rest *aren't* copyright infringement, vulnerability, and malware distribution channels.Unjustified smear, anyone?&gt;Will decimate the paid file sharing marketNo, it won't.
There will always be a market for paid file hosting, especially for files larger than 250MB.Summary is troll.Keep trollin', trollin' trollin'Though they're disapprovin',Keep those articles movin' Slashdot!Don't try to understand 'em,Just sum 'em up and post 'em,Soon the bullshit'll be high and wide.By my heart's calculatin'Mod points will be flyin',Karma will be higher by and by.Sum 'em up, post 'em up,Mod 'em up, mod 'em down,Move 'em on, head 'em out Slashdot!Cut the bait, bait the hookReel it in, let it out,Set the hook, reel 'em in Slashdot!Trollin', Trollin', trollin'Trollin', trollin', trollin'Trollin', trollin', trollin'Trollin', trollin', trollin'Slashdot!Trollin', trollin', trollin'Though the quality's fallin'Keep them articles rollin'Slashdot!Eds on crack and cheetosLogic's long gone, we know!All the things I'm missin',Fox News and Palin,Are waiting for me at another website.Sum 'em up, post 'em up,Mod 'em up, mod 'em down,Move 'em on, head 'em out Slashdot!Cut the bait, bait the hookReel 'em in, let 'em out,Set the hook, reel 'em in Slashdot!Trollin', Trollin', trollin'Trollin', trollin', trollin'Trollin', trollin', trollin'Trollin', trollin', trollin'Slashdot!Keep trollin', trollin' trollin'Though they're disapprovin',Keep them articles movin'Slashdot!Don't try to understand 'em,Just sum 'em up and post 'em,Soon the bullshit'll be high and wide.By my heart's calculatin'Mod points will be flyin',Karma will be higher by and by.Slashdot!Slashdot!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744850</id>
	<title>Re:About split</title>
	<author>Tubal-Cain</author>
	<datestamp>1263301380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How would our non-linux users put the file back together?</p><p>For that matter, how would a Linux user put it together? <tt>dd</tt>?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How would our non-linux users put the file back together ? For that matter , how would a Linux user put it together ?
dd ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How would our non-linux users put the file back together?For that matter, how would a Linux user put it together?
dd?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745530</id>
	<title>Re:Pricing info</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263305100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>And you're not even taking into account the bandwidth costs associated with Amazon S3.  Google Docs has no bandwidth cost (yet).</p><p>Amazon S3 is an amazing service, but it's quite expensive on a $/GB-YEAR ratio, especially once transfer costs are added in.  $0.25/GB-YEAR is quite reasonable.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>And you 're not even taking into account the bandwidth costs associated with Amazon S3 .
Google Docs has no bandwidth cost ( yet ) .Amazon S3 is an amazing service , but it 's quite expensive on a $ /GB-YEAR ratio , especially once transfer costs are added in .
$ 0.25/GB-YEAR is quite reasonable .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>And you're not even taking into account the bandwidth costs associated with Amazon S3.
Google Docs has no bandwidth cost (yet).Amazon S3 is an amazing service, but it's quite expensive on a $/GB-YEAR ratio, especially once transfer costs are added in.
$0.25/GB-YEAR is quite reasonable.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744670</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30749682</id>
	<title>Re:This changes things?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263394020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Netflix isn't available outside of the US.<br>Last time i checked US is quite small portion of all humans on this planet, and definitely not 100\% of internet users are in US.</p><p>So are you saying, move to the US, so we can sue your sorry ass?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Netflix is n't available outside of the US.Last time i checked US is quite small portion of all humans on this planet , and definitely not 100 \ % of internet users are in US.So are you saying , move to the US , so we can sue your sorry ass ?
; )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Netflix isn't available outside of the US.Last time i checked US is quite small portion of all humans on this planet, and definitely not 100\% of internet users are in US.So are you saying, move to the US, so we can sue your sorry ass?
;)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748056</id>
	<title>Pity uploading via browser still sucks.</title>
	<author>AaronLawrence</author>
	<datestamp>1263373260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Why are browsers so horribly unfriendly for uploads?</p><p>Perhaps Google could put some money into fixing Firefox:<br><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=249338" title="mozilla.org">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=249338</a> [mozilla.org]<br>or improving it<br><a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=243468" title="mozilla.org">https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=243468</a> [mozilla.org]</p><p>Does Chrome have a decent upload UI? I can't recall<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Why are browsers so horribly unfriendly for uploads ? Perhaps Google could put some money into fixing Firefox : https : //bugzilla.mozilla.org/show \ _bug.cgi ? id = 249338 [ mozilla.org ] or improving ithttps : //bugzilla.mozilla.org/show \ _bug.cgi ? id = 243468 [ mozilla.org ] Does Chrome have a decent upload UI ?
I ca n't recall .. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why are browsers so horribly unfriendly for uploads?Perhaps Google could put some money into fixing Firefox:https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=249338 [mozilla.org]or improving ithttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show\_bug.cgi?id=243468 [mozilla.org]Does Chrome have a decent upload UI?
I can't recall ...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744684</id>
	<title>Re:Will these be all public too?</title>
	<author>Dishevel</author>
	<datestamp>1263300360000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>So the fact that those idiots publicly posted those voice mails and then Google just indexed them off the site as usual just completely escaped you or did you just want to sound like you knew what you were talking about for some free mod points.<p>I hate fucking idiots.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So the fact that those idiots publicly posted those voice mails and then Google just indexed them off the site as usual just completely escaped you or did you just want to sound like you knew what you were talking about for some free mod points.I hate fucking idiots .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So the fact that those idiots publicly posted those voice mails and then Google just indexed them off the site as usual just completely escaped you or did you just want to sound like you knew what you were talking about for some free mod points.I hate fucking idiots.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744346</id>
	<title>I can see this being useful</title>
	<author>RESPAWN</author>
	<datestamp>1263298560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I can see this being a very useful tool in the future.  We currently use an internally developed tool to allow our users to upload and share large files.  Unfortunately, as with anything, we've run into a few external user issues with them running an older version of Flash or their virus scanner interfering with the file download.  Of course, the external user likes to blame us in these cases.  What the Google brand can do for us is provide us a standard.  It's a brand that people trust, and one that we can point to as a trusted standard.  Now, if an external user has issues, we can say "Hey.  It's Google.  I don't know what <i>you're</i> doing wrong."</p><p>Looks like I get to start playing the testing game soon.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I can see this being a very useful tool in the future .
We currently use an internally developed tool to allow our users to upload and share large files .
Unfortunately , as with anything , we 've run into a few external user issues with them running an older version of Flash or their virus scanner interfering with the file download .
Of course , the external user likes to blame us in these cases .
What the Google brand can do for us is provide us a standard .
It 's a brand that people trust , and one that we can point to as a trusted standard .
Now , if an external user has issues , we can say " Hey .
It 's Google .
I do n't know what you 're doing wrong .
" Looks like I get to start playing the testing game soon .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can see this being a very useful tool in the future.
We currently use an internally developed tool to allow our users to upload and share large files.
Unfortunately, as with anything, we've run into a few external user issues with them running an older version of Flash or their virus scanner interfering with the file download.
Of course, the external user likes to blame us in these cases.
What the Google brand can do for us is provide us a standard.
It's a brand that people trust, and one that we can point to as a trusted standard.
Now, if an external user has issues, we can say "Hey.
It's Google.
I don't know what you're doing wrong.
"Looks like I get to start playing the testing game soon.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744056</id>
	<title>This will also enable terrorists</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263297180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Before evil google did this evil thing, terrorists were forced to use rar to chunk their nefarious plans into sizes small enough for email attachments, or use horrible file sharing services like rapidshare which only makes them hate the west even more. Now their plans for global sharia will be made easier thanks to their malevolent brothers-in-arms over at google.</p><p>I hope those evil doers over at live workspace don't read this news because sharepoint is an even eviler tool for pirates and malware authors and satan himself.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Before evil google did this evil thing , terrorists were forced to use rar to chunk their nefarious plans into sizes small enough for email attachments , or use horrible file sharing services like rapidshare which only makes them hate the west even more .
Now their plans for global sharia will be made easier thanks to their malevolent brothers-in-arms over at google.I hope those evil doers over at live workspace do n't read this news because sharepoint is an even eviler tool for pirates and malware authors and satan himself .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Before evil google did this evil thing, terrorists were forced to use rar to chunk their nefarious plans into sizes small enough for email attachments, or use horrible file sharing services like rapidshare which only makes them hate the west even more.
Now their plans for global sharia will be made easier thanks to their malevolent brothers-in-arms over at google.I hope those evil doers over at live workspace don't read this news because sharepoint is an even eviler tool for pirates and malware authors and satan himself.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745076</id>
	<title>Re:About split</title>
	<author>rfugger</author>
	<datestamp>1263302640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Google docs even lets you organize split files in a folder and share the whole lot together.  Death to rapidshare!</htmltext>
<tokenext>Google docs even lets you organize split files in a folder and share the whole lot together .
Death to rapidshare !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Google docs even lets you organize split files in a folder and share the whole lot together.
Death to rapidshare!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746718</id>
	<title>Re:About split</title>
	<author>Blakey Rat</author>
	<datestamp>1263314280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Yes.</p><p>Someone explain to me why this is "insightful?" Please?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Yes.Someone explain to me why this is " insightful ?
" Please ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Yes.Someone explain to me why this is "insightful?
" Please?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744008</id>
	<title>First Question,</title>
	<author>Icegryphon</author>
	<datestamp>1263296940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>When do we start getting to download Fansubs from google too?</htmltext>
<tokenext>When do we start getting to download Fansubs from google too ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When do we start getting to download Fansubs from google too?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748050</id>
	<title>Re:docs is getting some microsoft office flaws</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263373200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>My absolute ABSOLUTE favorite is saving a one page resume to pdf...if you're anywhere near the bottom, you get a nice extra blank page....looks real professional.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>My absolute ABSOLUTE favorite is saving a one page resume to pdf...if you 're anywhere near the bottom , you get a nice extra blank page....looks real professional .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>My absolute ABSOLUTE favorite is saving a one page resume to pdf...if you're anywhere near the bottom, you get a nice extra blank page....looks real professional.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744160</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744110</id>
	<title>Re:First Question,</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263297420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Torrents are easier.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Torrents are easier .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Torrents are easier.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744008</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744154</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263297600000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>5</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>250mb is pretty paltry by their standards</p></div><p>It's not 250MB total storage space. It's 250MB maximum <i>per file.</i> It's probably true that most e-mail clients/servers do a poor job of handling 250MB attachments. In that sense, this is probably a good thing; we've all complained about the coworker who sends out a 15MB movie of their kids playing with the dog to a mailing list, but what option do most average users have? Even if they know what FTP is, they don't own any servers. If Google is going to handhold consumers through the process of storing big files in the Web instead of sending them as attachments, I say bravo.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>250mb is pretty paltry by their standardsIt 's not 250MB total storage space .
It 's 250MB maximum per file .
It 's probably true that most e-mail clients/servers do a poor job of handling 250MB attachments .
In that sense , this is probably a good thing ; we 've all complained about the coworker who sends out a 15MB movie of their kids playing with the dog to a mailing list , but what option do most average users have ?
Even if they know what FTP is , they do n't own any servers .
If Google is going to handhold consumers through the process of storing big files in the Web instead of sending them as attachments , I say bravo .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>250mb is pretty paltry by their standardsIt's not 250MB total storage space.
It's 250MB maximum per file.
It's probably true that most e-mail clients/servers do a poor job of handling 250MB attachments.
In that sense, this is probably a good thing; we've all complained about the coworker who sends out a 15MB movie of their kids playing with the dog to a mailing list, but what option do most average users have?
Even if they know what FTP is, they don't own any servers.
If Google is going to handhold consumers through the process of storing big files in the Web instead of sending them as attachments, I say bravo.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744232</id>
	<title>thwarting of malware and piracy by Google brains?</title>
	<author>adosch</author>
	<datestamp>1263298020000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Knowing Google, I'm sure they have actually thought about the repercussions of allowing all types of documents to be hosted/uploaded, or paving the way for mal/spy/shitware and alike or piracy.  As much as everyone is going to look at the negatives, I"m sure Google has developed some sort of scalable trolling application to look for patterns or heuristics for that type of thing.  After all, is Google not the king of the hill when it comes to data mining, pilfering, trends, habits, popularity of all of us already?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Knowing Google , I 'm sure they have actually thought about the repercussions of allowing all types of documents to be hosted/uploaded , or paving the way for mal/spy/shitware and alike or piracy .
As much as everyone is going to look at the negatives , I " m sure Google has developed some sort of scalable trolling application to look for patterns or heuristics for that type of thing .
After all , is Google not the king of the hill when it comes to data mining , pilfering , trends , habits , popularity of all of us already ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Knowing Google, I'm sure they have actually thought about the repercussions of allowing all types of documents to be hosted/uploaded, or paving the way for mal/spy/shitware and alike or piracy.
As much as everyone is going to look at the negatives, I"m sure Google has developed some sort of scalable trolling application to look for patterns or heuristics for that type of thing.
After all, is Google not the king of the hill when it comes to data mining, pilfering, trends, habits, popularity of all of us already?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748924</id>
	<title>Re:Guess what, so does every webhoster out there.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263386580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I still don&rsquo;t get why anyone would be so crazy to host anything important on a company&rsquo;s server.</p><p>For pretty much the same reason most that people, say, don't do their own peering at AMS-IX or DE-CIX or RIX or whatever your nearest IXP happens to be, and instead use a company's line.</p><p>It boils down to three things: time, money and expertise. Most people simply don't have the time to do these things (or would rather spend the time they have on other things - and no, I'm not talking about beer and football); many people also won't have the money, or at least not see why they should spend it on a server of their own, rackspace and so on, and finally, most people - normal people, not Slashdot readers - simply don't have the knowledge to pull this off.</p><p>And there's no need to, either. Just like with, say, terrorism, we always make security decisions, and there's always a trade-off. We (Slashdot readers) don't generally take terrorism very serious as a threat, simply because even though it can happen, it's so exceedingly rare; similarly, most people don't worry about Google starting to break the law and snoop through their files, for instance, simply because it doesn't appear to be a realistic scenario.</p><p>Of course it also depends on what you mean by "important"; for example, if I wanted to send a big file to my lawyer, I'd damn well make sure to do so in person, on a USB stick or so, and any sensible person, even a computer-illiterate one, would do the same. And of course, noone would store internal company documents etc. here, either.</p><p>But if you want to send the photos from your latest holiday trip to your family (arguably something that IS important to people, even if it might not meet *your* definition of "important"), for example - why not? And there's a lot of gray area in between these extremes were a service such as this would still be useful.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I still don    t get why anyone would be so crazy to host anything important on a company    s server.For pretty much the same reason most that people , say , do n't do their own peering at AMS-IX or DE-CIX or RIX or whatever your nearest IXP happens to be , and instead use a company 's line.It boils down to three things : time , money and expertise .
Most people simply do n't have the time to do these things ( or would rather spend the time they have on other things - and no , I 'm not talking about beer and football ) ; many people also wo n't have the money , or at least not see why they should spend it on a server of their own , rackspace and so on , and finally , most people - normal people , not Slashdot readers - simply do n't have the knowledge to pull this off.And there 's no need to , either .
Just like with , say , terrorism , we always make security decisions , and there 's always a trade-off .
We ( Slashdot readers ) do n't generally take terrorism very serious as a threat , simply because even though it can happen , it 's so exceedingly rare ; similarly , most people do n't worry about Google starting to break the law and snoop through their files , for instance , simply because it does n't appear to be a realistic scenario.Of course it also depends on what you mean by " important " ; for example , if I wanted to send a big file to my lawyer , I 'd damn well make sure to do so in person , on a USB stick or so , and any sensible person , even a computer-illiterate one , would do the same .
And of course , noone would store internal company documents etc .
here , either.But if you want to send the photos from your latest holiday trip to your family ( arguably something that IS important to people , even if it might not meet * your * definition of " important " ) , for example - why not ?
And there 's a lot of gray area in between these extremes were a service such as this would still be useful .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I still don’t get why anyone would be so crazy to host anything important on a company’s server.For pretty much the same reason most that people, say, don't do their own peering at AMS-IX or DE-CIX or RIX or whatever your nearest IXP happens to be, and instead use a company's line.It boils down to three things: time, money and expertise.
Most people simply don't have the time to do these things (or would rather spend the time they have on other things - and no, I'm not talking about beer and football); many people also won't have the money, or at least not see why they should spend it on a server of their own, rackspace and so on, and finally, most people - normal people, not Slashdot readers - simply don't have the knowledge to pull this off.And there's no need to, either.
Just like with, say, terrorism, we always make security decisions, and there's always a trade-off.
We (Slashdot readers) don't generally take terrorism very serious as a threat, simply because even though it can happen, it's so exceedingly rare; similarly, most people don't worry about Google starting to break the law and snoop through their files, for instance, simply because it doesn't appear to be a realistic scenario.Of course it also depends on what you mean by "important"; for example, if I wanted to send a big file to my lawyer, I'd damn well make sure to do so in person, on a USB stick or so, and any sensible person, even a computer-illiterate one, would do the same.
And of course, noone would store internal company documents etc.
here, either.But if you want to send the photos from your latest holiday trip to your family (arguably something that IS important to people, even if it might not meet *your* definition of "important"), for example - why not?
And there's a lot of gray area in between these extremes were a service such as this would still be useful.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746218</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744918</id>
	<title>Re:I already paid for my bandwidth.</title>
	<author>John Hasler</author>
	<datestamp>1263301860000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; Why should I have to pay somebody else money to upload a file to a friend...</p><p>You don't.  Just connect to your friend's server and upload away.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; Why should I have to pay somebody else money to upload a file to a friend...You do n't .
Just connect to your friend 's server and upload away .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; Why should I have to pay somebody else money to upload a file to a friend...You don't.
Just connect to your friend's server and upload away.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744526</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744794</id>
	<title>Re:What?</title>
	<author>Paradigm\_Complex</author>
	<datestamp>1263300960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>Is the summary a troll or just an attempt at sarcasm?</p></div><p>It's an attempt to rationalize the situation, while interpreting the facts as the "ezabi" and/or the editors see them.  Nothing so heinous as a troll, or overplayed as sarcasm.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>There are plenty of free filesharing sites</p></div><p>All of which that I've seen have some limitations.  Either you pay, or your bandwidth is capped, or you're limited to $files per $timeperiod, or $megabytes per $timeperiod, etc.  As ezabi and/or the editors and I see it, it's unlikely Google is going to be quite as annoying or limited as they are with this regard.  It's willing to subsidize the cost of the bandwidth for mindshare and long-term money.  (ie, "Google's file service is so great I'll probably just use their other services too").  A free service from a household name with less frustrating limitations could very well grab the market.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>and 250mb is pretty paltry by their standards</p></div><p>When you hit the filesize limit at most other file sharing sights, it's common to split the file into multiple files (usually via rar).  That should work here - the limit isn't a big issue if Google lets you download the partial-files one after another.  Consider youtube's length limit, and how it's circumvented by simply making a play list with multiple limited-length videos.<br> <br>

Even more important is the likely scenario that Google ups the limit as the service matures.  Remember how much gmail used to allow at first?  Take a look at what they offer now.  It's not a reach to imagine a similar thing happening here.  Harddrives are cheap, and Google has tones of experience scaling that up.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>not to mention the fact that Google has pretty decent standards for who it lets have an account.</p> </div><p>I'm guessing you've never read any comment ever on youtube?  Google fights bots, but with humans it plays fast and loose with accounts, I'm not sure where you got the idea otherwise.</p><p><div class="quote"><p>Given the amount of information they have on everyone, it's the last site you want to know if you're doing something illegal.</p></div><p>Despite the fact that they eventually gave in to China for censorship and various music and movie IP's on youtube, Google has been a pretty big advocate of such freedoms (well, from Big Brother and Big Media - not necessarily from Big Search Engine/Advertisement Service).  They fought China, Viacom, et al on the issues before giving in, and they've fought the US on such issue as well (no links handy, hopefully another<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/.'er can oblige).  Honestly, I'd be more inclined to trust Google with my info then a random filesharing service, if I had to trust anyone.<br> <br>

But here's the cool thing - you can log out, or make an account just for shady stuff and switch between the two.  Heck, doesn't Chrome have some sort of privacy mode?  Yes, Google could match the IP with past account info and maybe put two and two together.  Even so, the idea that you're using Google vs $random\_fileshare\_sight doesn't really increase the odds of getting caught.<br> <br>

Or you could just keep it legal d:<br> <br>

It's possible Google is willing to ruin its still pretty solid reputation for user-rights by using this to hunt down illegal file sharers, and it's possible that Google will put huge limits and allow other services to compete, but those are both pretty long shots if you think it through and don't know anything relevant that I don't.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>Is the summary a troll or just an attempt at sarcasm ? It 's an attempt to rationalize the situation , while interpreting the facts as the " ezabi " and/or the editors see them .
Nothing so heinous as a troll , or overplayed as sarcasm.There are plenty of free filesharing sitesAll of which that I 've seen have some limitations .
Either you pay , or your bandwidth is capped , or you 're limited to $ files per $ timeperiod , or $ megabytes per $ timeperiod , etc .
As ezabi and/or the editors and I see it , it 's unlikely Google is going to be quite as annoying or limited as they are with this regard .
It 's willing to subsidize the cost of the bandwidth for mindshare and long-term money .
( ie , " Google 's file service is so great I 'll probably just use their other services too " ) .
A free service from a household name with less frustrating limitations could very well grab the market.and 250mb is pretty paltry by their standardsWhen you hit the filesize limit at most other file sharing sights , it 's common to split the file into multiple files ( usually via rar ) .
That should work here - the limit is n't a big issue if Google lets you download the partial-files one after another .
Consider youtube 's length limit , and how it 's circumvented by simply making a play list with multiple limited-length videos .
Even more important is the likely scenario that Google ups the limit as the service matures .
Remember how much gmail used to allow at first ?
Take a look at what they offer now .
It 's not a reach to imagine a similar thing happening here .
Harddrives are cheap , and Google has tones of experience scaling that up.not to mention the fact that Google has pretty decent standards for who it lets have an account .
I 'm guessing you 've never read any comment ever on youtube ?
Google fights bots , but with humans it plays fast and loose with accounts , I 'm not sure where you got the idea otherwise.Given the amount of information they have on everyone , it 's the last site you want to know if you 're doing something illegal.Despite the fact that they eventually gave in to China for censorship and various music and movie IP 's on youtube , Google has been a pretty big advocate of such freedoms ( well , from Big Brother and Big Media - not necessarily from Big Search Engine/Advertisement Service ) .
They fought China , Viacom , et al on the issues before giving in , and they 've fought the US on such issue as well ( no links handy , hopefully another / .
'er can oblige ) .
Honestly , I 'd be more inclined to trust Google with my info then a random filesharing service , if I had to trust anyone .
But here 's the cool thing - you can log out , or make an account just for shady stuff and switch between the two .
Heck , does n't Chrome have some sort of privacy mode ?
Yes , Google could match the IP with past account info and maybe put two and two together .
Even so , the idea that you 're using Google vs $ random \ _fileshare \ _sight does n't really increase the odds of getting caught .
Or you could just keep it legal d : It 's possible Google is willing to ruin its still pretty solid reputation for user-rights by using this to hunt down illegal file sharers , and it 's possible that Google will put huge limits and allow other services to compete , but those are both pretty long shots if you think it through and do n't know anything relevant that I do n't .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Is the summary a troll or just an attempt at sarcasm?It's an attempt to rationalize the situation, while interpreting the facts as the "ezabi" and/or the editors see them.
Nothing so heinous as a troll, or overplayed as sarcasm.There are plenty of free filesharing sitesAll of which that I've seen have some limitations.
Either you pay, or your bandwidth is capped, or you're limited to $files per $timeperiod, or $megabytes per $timeperiod, etc.
As ezabi and/or the editors and I see it, it's unlikely Google is going to be quite as annoying or limited as they are with this regard.
It's willing to subsidize the cost of the bandwidth for mindshare and long-term money.
(ie, "Google's file service is so great I'll probably just use their other services too").
A free service from a household name with less frustrating limitations could very well grab the market.and 250mb is pretty paltry by their standardsWhen you hit the filesize limit at most other file sharing sights, it's common to split the file into multiple files (usually via rar).
That should work here - the limit isn't a big issue if Google lets you download the partial-files one after another.
Consider youtube's length limit, and how it's circumvented by simply making a play list with multiple limited-length videos.
Even more important is the likely scenario that Google ups the limit as the service matures.
Remember how much gmail used to allow at first?
Take a look at what they offer now.
It's not a reach to imagine a similar thing happening here.
Harddrives are cheap, and Google has tones of experience scaling that up.not to mention the fact that Google has pretty decent standards for who it lets have an account.
I'm guessing you've never read any comment ever on youtube?
Google fights bots, but with humans it plays fast and loose with accounts, I'm not sure where you got the idea otherwise.Given the amount of information they have on everyone, it's the last site you want to know if you're doing something illegal.Despite the fact that they eventually gave in to China for censorship and various music and movie IP's on youtube, Google has been a pretty big advocate of such freedoms (well, from Big Brother and Big Media - not necessarily from Big Search Engine/Advertisement Service).
They fought China, Viacom, et al on the issues before giving in, and they've fought the US on such issue as well (no links handy, hopefully another /.
'er can oblige).
Honestly, I'd be more inclined to trust Google with my info then a random filesharing service, if I had to trust anyone.
But here's the cool thing - you can log out, or make an account just for shady stuff and switch between the two.
Heck, doesn't Chrome have some sort of privacy mode?
Yes, Google could match the IP with past account info and maybe put two and two together.
Even so, the idea that you're using Google vs $random\_fileshare\_sight doesn't really increase the odds of getting caught.
Or you could just keep it legal d: 

It's possible Google is willing to ruin its still pretty solid reputation for user-rights by using this to hunt down illegal file sharers, and it's possible that Google will put huge limits and allow other services to compete, but those are both pretty long shots if you think it through and don't know anything relevant that I don't.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748364</id>
	<title>Re:This changes things?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263378000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Why didn't I think of that?! Let me register for Netflix.... oh wait, only available in USA.  No, I don't want to buy the DVD or Bluray, not at these prices - and how come all these newly released discs cost the same, don't most countries have laws against price fixing?</htmltext>
<tokenext>Why did n't I think of that ? !
Let me register for Netflix.... oh wait , only available in USA .
No , I do n't want to buy the DVD or Bluray , not at these prices - and how come all these newly released discs cost the same , do n't most countries have laws against price fixing ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Why didn't I think of that?!
Let me register for Netflix.... oh wait, only available in USA.
No, I don't want to buy the DVD or Bluray, not at these prices - and how come all these newly released discs cost the same, don't most countries have laws against price fixing?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747406
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745342
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744014
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744026
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30777052
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744216
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744110
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744008
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744106
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744908
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745530
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_35</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748544
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30749274
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30749706
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743992
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746140
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744098
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30750786
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747508
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744154
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_34</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744278
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744222
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748364
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747862
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30773380
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744684
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30749682
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744918
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744526
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748428
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743962
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748924
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746218
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30757292
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745116
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744850
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30753464
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744200
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744794
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30751518
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744556
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_33</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745076
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747030
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744240
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745276
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744670
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748050
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744160
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1932232_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746864
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743940
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744154
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747508
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744106
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747406
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744794
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747030
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744006
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744098
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746140
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745076
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746864
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746718
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744850
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744908
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745116
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30757292
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744160
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748480
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30773380
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748050
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744000
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743880
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743992
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30749706
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744684
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744026
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744240
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744278
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744222
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744056
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744232
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747350
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744556
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30751518
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743962
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745444
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30749274
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30749682
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748364
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748428
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30777052
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30750786
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744304
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744014
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745342
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30750298
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744526
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744918
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744856
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30743864
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744200
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30753464
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744670
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30747862
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748544
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745276
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30745530
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744034
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30746218
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30748924
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1932232.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744008
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744110
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1932232.30744216
</commentlist>
</conversation>
