<article>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#article10_01_12_1749257</id>
	<title>Boxee Opens Beta To All</title>
	<author>kdawson</author>
	<datestamp>1263284460000</datestamp>
	<htmltext>DeviceGuru writes <i>"Boxee has quietly <a href="http://openboxeebox.com/boxee-opens-beta-to-all/">moved its long-awaited Beta release onto its public download site</a>, reports OpenBoxeeBox.com. The new version of this free Internet- and local- A/V streaming player currently supports PCs running Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Ubuntu OSes, with an Apple TV version coming soon. Key enhancements include a vastly redesigned homescreen and new global menu, which collectively make it much quicker to locate content, an improved search function that now treats online and local media equivalently, so you can locate and play movie or TV show titles much faster, plus &mdash; at long last &mdash; a fully functional Netflix instant-downloads player appears in the Windows version (but not in the Linux version). Also of significance is that Boxee's graphical engine has migrated from from OpenGL to DirectX, allowing it to take advantage of Direct X video acceleration. The free public Boxee Beta A/V player software is available <a href="http://www.boxee.tv/">on Boxee's website</a>."</i></htmltext>
<tokenext>DeviceGuru writes " Boxee has quietly moved its long-awaited Beta release onto its public download site , reports OpenBoxeeBox.com .
The new version of this free Internet- and local- A/V streaming player currently supports PCs running Mac OS X , Windows XP , and Ubuntu OSes , with an Apple TV version coming soon .
Key enhancements include a vastly redesigned homescreen and new global menu , which collectively make it much quicker to locate content , an improved search function that now treats online and local media equivalently , so you can locate and play movie or TV show titles much faster , plus    at long last    a fully functional Netflix instant-downloads player appears in the Windows version ( but not in the Linux version ) .
Also of significance is that Boxee 's graphical engine has migrated from from OpenGL to DirectX , allowing it to take advantage of Direct X video acceleration .
The free public Boxee Beta A/V player software is available on Boxee 's website .
"</tokentext>
<sentencetext>DeviceGuru writes "Boxee has quietly moved its long-awaited Beta release onto its public download site, reports OpenBoxeeBox.com.
The new version of this free Internet- and local- A/V streaming player currently supports PCs running Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Ubuntu OSes, with an Apple TV version coming soon.
Key enhancements include a vastly redesigned homescreen and new global menu, which collectively make it much quicker to locate content, an improved search function that now treats online and local media equivalently, so you can locate and play movie or TV show titles much faster, plus — at long last — a fully functional Netflix instant-downloads player appears in the Windows version (but not in the Linux version).
Also of significance is that Boxee's graphical engine has migrated from from OpenGL to DirectX, allowing it to take advantage of Direct X video acceleration.
The free public Boxee Beta A/V player software is available on Boxee's website.
"</sentencetext>
</article>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30748822</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1263385080000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>http://xbmc.org/<br><br>I've only seen it used on someone's old Xbox, but it looked pretty good, and thus I'm about to install it on the new storage box I'm building.</htmltext>
<tokenext>http : //xbmc.org/I 've only seen it used on someone 's old Xbox , but it looked pretty good , and thus I 'm about to install it on the new storage box I 'm building .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>http://xbmc.org/I've only seen it used on someone's old Xbox, but it looked pretty good, and thus I'm about to install it on the new storage box I'm building.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30746822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742726</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>SlashdotOgre</author>
	<datestamp>1263290880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Previously the web site had a great intro video that actually explained it fairly well.  I'm not quite sure when that was changed, but since I've been running the alpha for roughly a year now, I can try taking a stab at it.</p><p>Boxee's goal is to be a "social media player" where you can watch media from various sources, see what your friends are watching, and let your friends know what you're watching.  By "media" it's referring to TV, movies, music, and pictures.  The source of most of the content comes from the Internet (although it definitely supports offline and local network content).  Boxee provides a framework to create native applications that allow aggregating and viewing of the online media (basically XBMC plugins if you're familiar with that app), for example there's apps for Hulu, Pandora, Flickr, etc.  Boxee automatically monitors what you and your friends watch, and allows you to browse the history of it as well.  Boxee also offers other cool features like grabbing metadata for local content.  E.g. if it detects a ripped copy of Season 1 of The Office, it will grab screen shots and descriptions of each episode from IMDB.</p><p>Personally I've found Boxee's primary benefit is for aggregating media.  With the new version, I can search a TV show title and it comes up with all the episodes I can stream regardless of the source (e.g. episodes from Hulu, nbc.com, etc.).  I'm not a big fan of the social aspect, but it's not a deal breaker (I just ignore it).  So far I've been very impressed with both the alpha and beta releases and would definitely recommend giving the software a go.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Previously the web site had a great intro video that actually explained it fairly well .
I 'm not quite sure when that was changed , but since I 've been running the alpha for roughly a year now , I can try taking a stab at it.Boxee 's goal is to be a " social media player " where you can watch media from various sources , see what your friends are watching , and let your friends know what you 're watching .
By " media " it 's referring to TV , movies , music , and pictures .
The source of most of the content comes from the Internet ( although it definitely supports offline and local network content ) .
Boxee provides a framework to create native applications that allow aggregating and viewing of the online media ( basically XBMC plugins if you 're familiar with that app ) , for example there 's apps for Hulu , Pandora , Flickr , etc .
Boxee automatically monitors what you and your friends watch , and allows you to browse the history of it as well .
Boxee also offers other cool features like grabbing metadata for local content .
E.g. if it detects a ripped copy of Season 1 of The Office , it will grab screen shots and descriptions of each episode from IMDB.Personally I 've found Boxee 's primary benefit is for aggregating media .
With the new version , I can search a TV show title and it comes up with all the episodes I can stream regardless of the source ( e.g .
episodes from Hulu , nbc.com , etc. ) .
I 'm not a big fan of the social aspect , but it 's not a deal breaker ( I just ignore it ) .
So far I 've been very impressed with both the alpha and beta releases and would definitely recommend giving the software a go .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Previously the web site had a great intro video that actually explained it fairly well.
I'm not quite sure when that was changed, but since I've been running the alpha for roughly a year now, I can try taking a stab at it.Boxee's goal is to be a "social media player" where you can watch media from various sources, see what your friends are watching, and let your friends know what you're watching.
By "media" it's referring to TV, movies, music, and pictures.
The source of most of the content comes from the Internet (although it definitely supports offline and local network content).
Boxee provides a framework to create native applications that allow aggregating and viewing of the online media (basically XBMC plugins if you're familiar with that app), for example there's apps for Hulu, Pandora, Flickr, etc.
Boxee automatically monitors what you and your friends watch, and allows you to browse the history of it as well.
Boxee also offers other cool features like grabbing metadata for local content.
E.g. if it detects a ripped copy of Season 1 of The Office, it will grab screen shots and descriptions of each episode from IMDB.Personally I've found Boxee's primary benefit is for aggregating media.
With the new version, I can search a TV show title and it comes up with all the episodes I can stream regardless of the source (e.g.
episodes from Hulu, nbc.com, etc.).
I'm not a big fan of the social aspect, but it's not a deal breaker (I just ignore it).
So far I've been very impressed with both the alpha and beta releases and would definitely recommend giving the software a go.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752696</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>Jon\_S</author>
	<datestamp>1263406620000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Just a wild stab: were you looking at boxee.tv as a website to view videos like hulu.com (since you compare it to hulu)?  That's not what it is.  It is an application you load onto your computer (like hulu desktop for example).</p><p>Hulu (the website) is a video streaming website, so it doesn't make sense to compare it to the boxee.tv website.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Just a wild stab : were you looking at boxee.tv as a website to view videos like hulu.com ( since you compare it to hulu ) ?
That 's not what it is .
It is an application you load onto your computer ( like hulu desktop for example ) .Hulu ( the website ) is a video streaming website , so it does n't make sense to compare it to the boxee.tv website .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Just a wild stab: were you looking at boxee.tv as a website to view videos like hulu.com (since you compare it to hulu)?
That's not what it is.
It is an application you load onto your computer (like hulu desktop for example).Hulu (the website) is a video streaming website, so it doesn't make sense to compare it to the boxee.tv website.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30746822</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263315180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Great summary, thanks. Now, a question, and I'm not being a smartass: is there any good software that does the exact opposite? I absolutely do not care about the built in social aspects of the software, nor do I use services like Hulu. (Internet connection and computers at home are on the slow side.) I do, however, have an extensive collection of video from various sources--ripped DVDs, captured from a TV card, etc. I just want something that lets me browse this with a good "ten foot interface" and do other useful things. (Playlists, searchable, etc.) I like Apple's Front Row but could go for something a little more powerful. Any suggestions?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Great summary , thanks .
Now , a question , and I 'm not being a smartass : is there any good software that does the exact opposite ?
I absolutely do not care about the built in social aspects of the software , nor do I use services like Hulu .
( Internet connection and computers at home are on the slow side .
) I do , however , have an extensive collection of video from various sources--ripped DVDs , captured from a TV card , etc .
I just want something that lets me browse this with a good " ten foot interface " and do other useful things .
( Playlists , searchable , etc .
) I like Apple 's Front Row but could go for something a little more powerful .
Any suggestions ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Great summary, thanks.
Now, a question, and I'm not being a smartass: is there any good software that does the exact opposite?
I absolutely do not care about the built in social aspects of the software, nor do I use services like Hulu.
(Internet connection and computers at home are on the slow side.
) I do, however, have an extensive collection of video from various sources--ripped DVDs, captured from a TV card, etc.
I just want something that lets me browse this with a good "ten foot interface" and do other useful things.
(Playlists, searchable, etc.
) I like Apple's Front Row but could go for something a little more powerful.
Any suggestions?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742726</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30749996</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263395820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>Boxee is a fork of XBMC, and is primarly focused on adding the 'social' bits. XBMC itself sounds like exactly what you want.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Boxee is a fork of XBMC , and is primarly focused on adding the 'social ' bits .
XBMC itself sounds like exactly what you want .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boxee is a fork of XBMC, and is primarly focused on adding the 'social' bits.
XBMC itself sounds like exactly what you want.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30746822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743358</id>
	<title>Re:DirectX on Linux?</title>
	<author>mmmbeer</author>
	<datestamp>1263293880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It is an upgrade because in the Win32 world the API for GPU video decompression acceleration is called DXVA.  Note the DX at the beginning.  It doesn't stand for OpenGL.</p><p>(Other than adding an additional HD decoder board)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is an upgrade because in the Win32 world the API for GPU video decompression acceleration is called DXVA .
Note the DX at the beginning .
It does n't stand for OpenGL .
( Other than adding an additional HD decoder board )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It is an upgrade because in the Win32 world the API for GPU video decompression acceleration is called DXVA.
Note the DX at the beginning.
It doesn't stand for OpenGL.
(Other than adding an additional HD decoder board)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742214</id>
	<title>The article forgot to mention</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263288180000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It supports not only Windows XP, but Vista and 7, but only 32-bit versions.</p><p>In contrast it supports Ubuntu 64-bit.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It supports not only Windows XP , but Vista and 7 , but only 32-bit versions.In contrast it supports Ubuntu 64-bit .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It supports not only Windows XP, but Vista and 7, but only 32-bit versions.In contrast it supports Ubuntu 64-bit.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752948</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263407400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Try XBMC<br>http://xbmc.org/</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Try XBMChttp : //xbmc.org/</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Try XBMChttp://xbmc.org/</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30746822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743038</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>Lumpy</author>
	<datestamp>1263292500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>XBMC gives you a 10 foot interface as well.   Boxee on the other hand frustrated my wife something fierce, so I stopped using it.  the latest XBMC release absolutely clobbers boxee though if you dont care about any of the social crap or trying to watch youtube and other low grade online media.  There is a podcast catcher you can install that grabs the high def podcasts automatically though.  She likes that.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>XBMC gives you a 10 foot interface as well .
Boxee on the other hand frustrated my wife something fierce , so I stopped using it .
the latest XBMC release absolutely clobbers boxee though if you dont care about any of the social crap or trying to watch youtube and other low grade online media .
There is a podcast catcher you can install that grabs the high def podcasts automatically though .
She likes that .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>XBMC gives you a 10 foot interface as well.
Boxee on the other hand frustrated my wife something fierce, so I stopped using it.
the latest XBMC release absolutely clobbers boxee though if you dont care about any of the social crap or trying to watch youtube and other low grade online media.
There is a podcast catcher you can install that grabs the high def podcasts automatically though.
She likes that.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742326</id>
	<title>Great! Now I can watch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263288660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boxxy on my Boxee</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boxxy on my Boxee</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boxxy on my Boxee</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742626</id>
	<title>Re:GNU/Ubuntu</title>
	<author>Chris Mattern</author>
	<datestamp>1263290400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>"Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Ubuntu OSes"</p><p>Not Linux?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p></div></blockquote><p>Nope, not Linux.</p><blockquote><div><p>So now Ubuntu is to Linux what Kleenex is to tissue?</p></div></blockquote><p>Nope, it's just not available to Linux at large.  It's not open source.  You can download an Ubuntu<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.deb of the binaries, but if you want to run it another distribution?  Sorry, Charlie.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>" Mac OS X , Windows XP , and Ubuntu OSes " Not Linux ?
: ) Nope , not Linux.So now Ubuntu is to Linux what Kleenex is to tissue ? Nope , it 's just not available to Linux at large .
It 's not open source .
You can download an Ubuntu .deb of the binaries , but if you want to run it another distribution ?
Sorry , Charlie .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Ubuntu OSes"Not Linux?
:)Nope, not Linux.So now Ubuntu is to Linux what Kleenex is to tissue?Nope, it's just not available to Linux at large.
It's not open source.
You can download an Ubuntu .deb of the binaries, but if you want to run it another distribution?
Sorry, Charlie.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30744268</id>
	<title>Outside the US</title>
	<author>DaveGod</author>
	<datestamp>1263298260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Does this have much value outside of the US? Here in UK our legit internet sources of actual TV and movies is quite limited and I see no sign of support for iPlayer, 4oD or Demand5. </p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Does this have much value outside of the US ?
Here in UK our legit internet sources of actual TV and movies is quite limited and I see no sign of support for iPlayer , 4oD or Demand5 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Does this have much value outside of the US?
Here in UK our legit internet sources of actual TV and movies is quite limited and I see no sign of support for iPlayer, 4oD or Demand5. </sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743564</id>
	<title>DirectX on MacOSX and Ubuntu!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263294780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So they mean that DirectX is now available for MacOSX and Ubuntu? I didn't know that.</p><p>Good move since OpenGL didn't provide any acceleration.</p><p>morons...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they mean that DirectX is now available for MacOSX and Ubuntu ?
I did n't know that.Good move since OpenGL did n't provide any acceleration.morons.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they mean that DirectX is now available for MacOSX and Ubuntu?
I didn't know that.Good move since OpenGL didn't provide any acceleration.morons...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742898</id>
	<title>Impressive</title>
	<author>beauman</author>
	<datestamp>1263291780000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>I just installed it on my Karmic netbook, and I have to say it really rocks!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I just installed it on my Karmic netbook , and I have to say it really rocks !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I just installed it on my Karmic netbook, and I have to say it really rocks!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742546</id>
	<title>Re:Damn it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289920000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When sufficient bribes are paid?</p><p>Moonlight probably could support the Netflix player, except for the DRM code wedged in that specifically blocks non-supported clients.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When sufficient bribes are paid ? Moonlight probably could support the Netflix player , except for the DRM code wedged in that specifically blocks non-supported clients .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When sufficient bribes are paid?Moonlight probably could support the Netflix player, except for the DRM code wedged in that specifically blocks non-supported clients.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745748</id>
	<title>Re:I've gone back to XBMC.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263306240000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>WAF</p></div></blockquote><p>
?</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>WAF ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>WAF
?
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742610</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30748814</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>vegiVamp</author>
	<datestamp>1263384960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Exactly the post I was hoping to find. Thanks<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Exactly the post I was hoping to find .
Thanks : - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Exactly the post I was hoping to find.
Thanks :-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742472</id>
	<title>Re:Great! Now I can watch</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sup dawg, I heard you like 4chan so we put a Boxxy on your Boxee so you can troll while you troll.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sup dawg , I heard you like 4chan so we put a Boxxy on your Boxee so you can troll while you troll .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sup dawg, I heard you like 4chan so we put a Boxxy on your Boxee so you can troll while you troll.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742326</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30747418</id>
	<title>Re:Damn it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263320820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext>I can't believe you had exactly the same problems as me, I've just fixed the MBR for XP from a failed Debian install in which I could not get an intel NIC to properly connect to anything come on, ubuntu it's cool and all but suspend it's a bitch and it's getting bloated, puppy it's a very nice distro and hardware support it's fine, would like to be an install tool that obey your commands and does not fucking rape your HD.<br><br>Sigh, this is frustration not hate, I love Linux but I value my time. Lets see: if I use a Mac I'm a locked down fag, If I use Linux I'll be wasting a lot of time and if I use Windows not only I will be a locked fag but I'll be losing time and money too<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:/ OSs suck.<br><br>I'd be posting non Anon but I've moderated, I give a fuck about troll mods, this is IT land 2k10! wintel will kill ARM, shills will kill google on the desktop and 7 seven will secure another 10 years of monopoly for MS.. move you fricken asses Linux devs, put your shit together I DON'T WANT A BAJZILLION OPTIONS I WANT AN "OUT OF THE BOX" LINUX FOR FUCK SAKES!!!</htmltext>
<tokenext>I ca n't believe you had exactly the same problems as me , I 've just fixed the MBR for XP from a failed Debian install in which I could not get an intel NIC to properly connect to anything come on , ubuntu it 's cool and all but suspend it 's a bitch and it 's getting bloated , puppy it 's a very nice distro and hardware support it 's fine , would like to be an install tool that obey your commands and does not fucking rape your HD.Sigh , this is frustration not hate , I love Linux but I value my time .
Lets see : if I use a Mac I 'm a locked down fag , If I use Linux I 'll be wasting a lot of time and if I use Windows not only I will be a locked fag but I 'll be losing time and money too : / OSs suck.I 'd be posting non Anon but I 've moderated , I give a fuck about troll mods , this is IT land 2k10 !
wintel will kill ARM , shills will kill google on the desktop and 7 seven will secure another 10 years of monopoly for MS.. move you fricken asses Linux devs , put your shit together I DO N'T WANT A BAJZILLION OPTIONS I WANT AN " OUT OF THE BOX " LINUX FOR FUCK SAKES ! !
!</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I can't believe you had exactly the same problems as me, I've just fixed the MBR for XP from a failed Debian install in which I could not get an intel NIC to properly connect to anything come on, ubuntu it's cool and all but suspend it's a bitch and it's getting bloated, puppy it's a very nice distro and hardware support it's fine, would like to be an install tool that obey your commands and does not fucking rape your HD.Sigh, this is frustration not hate, I love Linux but I value my time.
Lets see: if I use a Mac I'm a locked down fag, If I use Linux I'll be wasting a lot of time and if I use Windows not only I will be a locked fag but I'll be losing time and money too :/ OSs suck.I'd be posting non Anon but I've moderated, I give a fuck about troll mods, this is IT land 2k10!
wintel will kill ARM, shills will kill google on the desktop and 7 seven will secure another 10 years of monopoly for MS.. move you fricken asses Linux devs, put your shit together I DON'T WANT A BAJZILLION OPTIONS I WANT AN "OUT OF THE BOX" LINUX FOR FUCK SAKES!!
!</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742676</id>
	<title>Re:DirectX on Linux?</title>
	<author>guruevi</author>
	<datestamp>1263290580000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Probably only for Windows. The problem on Windows (at least XP) that OpenGL is not natively supported by the drivers provided from Microsoft and before that (Windows 95 -&gt; ME) OpenGL was not supported and later supported but boggled/expanded with proprietary calls by Microsoft.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Probably only for Windows .
The problem on Windows ( at least XP ) that OpenGL is not natively supported by the drivers provided from Microsoft and before that ( Windows 95 - &gt; ME ) OpenGL was not supported and later supported but boggled/expanded with proprietary calls by Microsoft .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Probably only for Windows.
The problem on Windows (at least XP) that OpenGL is not natively supported by the drivers provided from Microsoft and before that (Windows 95 -&gt; ME) OpenGL was not supported and later supported but boggled/expanded with proprietary calls by Microsoft.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745802</id>
	<title>Re:GNU/Ubuntu???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263306660000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>no no no, it's "GNUbuntu"</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>no no no , it 's " GNUbuntu "</tokentext>
<sentencetext>no no no, it's "GNUbuntu"</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742490</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743100</id>
	<title>Obligatory</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263292800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext>No Linux Netflix Streaming. Binary Deb Package. Lame.</htmltext>
<tokenext>No Linux Netflix Streaming .
Binary Deb Package .
Lame .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>No Linux Netflix Streaming.
Binary Deb Package.
Lame.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742824</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263291420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I echo this... is it supposed to be similar to Plex or Miro?  Or is it designed more to stream this amalgamated data to your TV?</p><p>After trying out all three in the past, I've always found Firefox to be a superior method of providing utility without degrading other computer functionality.</p><p>What I really want is a system-wide utility that enqueues anything I feel I want to watch in one or more custom playlists and cleanly starts/pauses/resumes that playlist when requested.  So far I do this with VLC and some watch scripts; I keep on coming back to this solution after trying out the other options every time they announce they're improved.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I echo this... is it supposed to be similar to Plex or Miro ?
Or is it designed more to stream this amalgamated data to your TV ? After trying out all three in the past , I 've always found Firefox to be a superior method of providing utility without degrading other computer functionality.What I really want is a system-wide utility that enqueues anything I feel I want to watch in one or more custom playlists and cleanly starts/pauses/resumes that playlist when requested .
So far I do this with VLC and some watch scripts ; I keep on coming back to this solution after trying out the other options every time they announce they 're improved .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I echo this... is it supposed to be similar to Plex or Miro?
Or is it designed more to stream this amalgamated data to your TV?After trying out all three in the past, I've always found Firefox to be a superior method of providing utility without degrading other computer functionality.What I really want is a system-wide utility that enqueues anything I feel I want to watch in one or more custom playlists and cleanly starts/pauses/resumes that playlist when requested.
So far I do this with VLC and some watch scripts; I keep on coming back to this solution after trying out the other options every time they announce they're improved.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742300</id>
	<title>DirectX on Linux?</title>
	<author>crow</author>
	<datestamp>1263288540000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>So they're moving to DirectX, but they're also running on Mac and Linux?  I don't get it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>So they 're moving to DirectX , but they 're also running on Mac and Linux ?
I do n't get it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>So they're moving to DirectX, but they're also running on Mac and Linux?
I don't get it.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742446</id>
	<title>Re:The article forgot to mention</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Have source: will 64'it</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Have source : will 64'it</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Have source: will 64'it</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30746986</id>
	<title>Still requires online registration</title>
	<author>Snaller</author>
	<datestamp>1263316680000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Sounds like big brother phoning home. No thanks. "But its a social" - NO. Make a player or a chat client, not both.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Sounds like big brother phoning home .
No thanks .
" But its a social " - NO .
Make a player or a chat client , not both .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Sounds like big brother phoning home.
No thanks.
"But its a social" - NO.
Make a player or a chat client, not both.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742486</id>
	<title>Linux 64 Bit Support</title>
	<author>SlashdotOgre</author>
	<datestamp>1263289560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm glad to see they've finally started offering a native 64 bit version for Linux.  Previously, I had been providing patches/scripts to allow folks to compile it themselves on their forums (I'm a moderator on their Linux forum).  There's currently a RPM on the Linux forum for Fedora 12, but as I don't run Fedora any more, I can't vouch for it.  I have personally compiled the latest Beta on Gentoo ~amd64 and it works fine with some minor tweaks (I plan to submit an ebuild to Gentoo Bug 258082).  One thing to note if you do compile from source is that their XULRunner included in the flashplayer portion of their source is missing 64 bit shared objects (this causes flash to break).  I've submitted a bug to get the XULRunner updated, but haven't heard anything.</p><p>I've ran the closed Beta for the last month and so far it's very promising.  I just wish Boxee's development process was more open.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm glad to see they 've finally started offering a native 64 bit version for Linux .
Previously , I had been providing patches/scripts to allow folks to compile it themselves on their forums ( I 'm a moderator on their Linux forum ) .
There 's currently a RPM on the Linux forum for Fedora 12 , but as I do n't run Fedora any more , I ca n't vouch for it .
I have personally compiled the latest Beta on Gentoo ~ amd64 and it works fine with some minor tweaks ( I plan to submit an ebuild to Gentoo Bug 258082 ) .
One thing to note if you do compile from source is that their XULRunner included in the flashplayer portion of their source is missing 64 bit shared objects ( this causes flash to break ) .
I 've submitted a bug to get the XULRunner updated , but have n't heard anything.I 've ran the closed Beta for the last month and so far it 's very promising .
I just wish Boxee 's development process was more open .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm glad to see they've finally started offering a native 64 bit version for Linux.
Previously, I had been providing patches/scripts to allow folks to compile it themselves on their forums (I'm a moderator on their Linux forum).
There's currently a RPM on the Linux forum for Fedora 12, but as I don't run Fedora any more, I can't vouch for it.
I have personally compiled the latest Beta on Gentoo ~amd64 and it works fine with some minor tweaks (I plan to submit an ebuild to Gentoo Bug 258082).
One thing to note if you do compile from source is that their XULRunner included in the flashplayer portion of their source is missing 64 bit shared objects (this causes flash to break).
I've submitted a bug to get the XULRunner updated, but haven't heard anything.I've ran the closed Beta for the last month and so far it's very promising.
I just wish Boxee's development process was more open.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742422</id>
	<title>hai.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289260000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Offtopic</modclass>
	<modscore>-1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>OK. My name is Boxee.<br>I'M NOT TROLLIN'!</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>OK. My name is Boxee.I 'M NOT TROLLIN ' !</tokentext>
<sentencetext>OK. My name is Boxee.I'M NOT TROLLIN'!</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742680</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>LWATCDR</author>
	<datestamp>1263290640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boxee gives you a 10 foot interface. It provides a nice interface to websites like Hulu, TV.com, and things like cnet TV.<br>It also supports audio and video podcasts and on Windows NetFlix.<br>If you want to build a media PC that works more like a set top box than a PC then Boxee is a great program to try.<br>They are also pushing a new BoxeeBox which looks really nice. The lack of mass storage and a bit torrent client is a slight downer but for a set top box it looks just about perfect. Well except that case is too cool IMHO. I would like something a bit plainer.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boxee gives you a 10 foot interface .
It provides a nice interface to websites like Hulu , TV.com , and things like cnet TV.It also supports audio and video podcasts and on Windows NetFlix.If you want to build a media PC that works more like a set top box than a PC then Boxee is a great program to try.They are also pushing a new BoxeeBox which looks really nice .
The lack of mass storage and a bit torrent client is a slight downer but for a set top box it looks just about perfect .
Well except that case is too cool IMHO .
I would like something a bit plainer .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boxee gives you a 10 foot interface.
It provides a nice interface to websites like Hulu, TV.com, and things like cnet TV.It also supports audio and video podcasts and on Windows NetFlix.If you want to build a media PC that works more like a set top box than a PC then Boxee is a great program to try.They are also pushing a new BoxeeBox which looks really nice.
The lack of mass storage and a bit torrent client is a slight downer but for a set top box it looks just about perfect.
Well except that case is too cool IMHO.
I would like something a bit plainer.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745138</id>
	<title>Re:The article forgot to mention</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1263302940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Troll</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It isn't a beta product. It is still alpha.  And alpha it is with tons of problems.  They need to hire some usability testers because they made some aweful mistakes that only a programmer would do.  As Dave Thomas says<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... they hired hackers.</p><p>If Boxee is to make it to retail in products they need a lot more work.  I used boxee from the time it was released to Alpha more than a year ago and it has been trimmed back as to what features it allows.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It is n't a beta product .
It is still alpha .
And alpha it is with tons of problems .
They need to hire some usability testers because they made some aweful mistakes that only a programmer would do .
As Dave Thomas says ... they hired hackers.If Boxee is to make it to retail in products they need a lot more work .
I used boxee from the time it was released to Alpha more than a year ago and it has been trimmed back as to what features it allows .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It isn't a beta product.
It is still alpha.
And alpha it is with tons of problems.
They need to hire some usability testers because they made some aweful mistakes that only a programmer would do.
As Dave Thomas says ... they hired hackers.If Boxee is to make it to retail in products they need a lot more work.
I used boxee from the time it was released to Alpha more than a year ago and it has been trimmed back as to what features it allows.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745224</id>
	<title>Re:The article forgot to mention</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1263303300000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>They support OpenGL unless it is on Windows, then it is DX9, or some variation of it.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>They support OpenGL unless it is on Windows , then it is DX9 , or some variation of it .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>They support OpenGL unless it is on Windows, then it is DX9, or some variation of it.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742650</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743414</id>
	<title>Re:Boxee with Revo?</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1263294060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Revo boxes are cool. The nv9400 means they can decode BD rips in hardware without a sweat.</p><p>Depending on your configuration you might want a beefier box due to how much memory will<br>end up allocated to the onboard GPU. What OS you run also might be a factor in terms of<br>memory.</p><p>Revos already come with Windows preloaded on them. Something like an Asrock 330 comes bare.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Revo boxes are cool .
The nv9400 means they can decode BD rips in hardware without a sweat.Depending on your configuration you might want a beefier box due to how much memory willend up allocated to the onboard GPU .
What OS you run also might be a factor in terms ofmemory.Revos already come with Windows preloaded on them .
Something like an Asrock 330 comes bare .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Revo boxes are cool.
The nv9400 means they can decode BD rips in hardware without a sweat.Depending on your configuration you might want a beefier box due to how much memory willend up allocated to the onboard GPU.
What OS you run also might be a factor in terms ofmemory.Revos already come with Windows preloaded on them.
Something like an Asrock 330 comes bare.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742764</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742764</id>
	<title>Boxee with Revo?</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263291120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been thinking about trying one of the $200 Acer Revo boxes (Atom+ION) with either Boxee or XBMC. Anyone have any opinion on that combo? It would be kinda like the Boxee box, except available now &amp; if you want to repurpose it down the road you have a nice little machine...</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been thinking about trying one of the $ 200 Acer Revo boxes ( Atom + ION ) with either Boxee or XBMC .
Anyone have any opinion on that combo ?
It would be kinda like the Boxee box , except available now &amp; if you want to repurpose it down the road you have a nice little machine.. .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been thinking about trying one of the $200 Acer Revo boxes (Atom+ION) with either Boxee or XBMC.
Anyone have any opinion on that combo?
It would be kinda like the Boxee box, except available now &amp; if you want to repurpose it down the road you have a nice little machine...</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742754</id>
	<title>Boxee Box</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263291060000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>The most intriguing part about boxee is the box by d-link... Such an awesome case. I've never used Boxee, but have used XBMC(What Boxee is based on)... I wonder how easy it would be to install XBMC-Live on it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</htmltext>
<tokenext>The most intriguing part about boxee is the box by d-link... Such an awesome case .
I 've never used Boxee , but have used XBMC ( What Boxee is based on ) ... I wonder how easy it would be to install XBMC-Live on it : )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The most intriguing part about boxee is the box by d-link... Such an awesome case.
I've never used Boxee, but have used XBMC(What Boxee is based on)... I wonder how easy it would be to install XBMC-Live on it :)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743022</id>
	<title>Re:Damn it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263292380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>There are lots of really awesome things about Linux. Running proprietary software and supporting DRM infested platforms are not among them.</htmltext>
<tokenext>There are lots of really awesome things about Linux .
Running proprietary software and supporting DRM infested platforms are not among them .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>There are lots of really awesome things about Linux.
Running proprietary software and supporting DRM infested platforms are not among them.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742444</id>
	<title>What's so special about Ubuntu &ldquo;Karmic&rdquo</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This wouldn't work on fedora 12? </p><p>I mean, the kernels are Linux - period. So, I'm not getting why the specification of Ubuntu here.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This would n't work on fedora 12 ?
I mean , the kernels are Linux - period .
So , I 'm not getting why the specification of Ubuntu here .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This wouldn't work on fedora 12?
I mean, the kernels are Linux - period.
So, I'm not getting why the specification of Ubuntu here.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30748834</id>
	<title>Re:I've gone back to XBMC.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263385200000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext>Hmm. I just noticed that Boxee is a sponsor of XBMC. You think they're using the engine ?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</htmltext>
<tokenext>Hmm .
I just noticed that Boxee is a sponsor of XBMC .
You think they 're using the engine ?
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Hmm.
I just noticed that Boxee is a sponsor of XBMC.
You think they're using the engine ?
:-)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742610</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743998</id>
	<title>Re:Damn it.</title>
	<author>Anachragnome</author>
	<datestamp>1263296940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"When the fuck will either Netflix move away from Silverlight or Moonlight support the Netflix player? This is currently my single biggest gripe on Linux by far."</p><p>Not gunna happen. Microsoft and Netflix have a VERY cozy relationship. I believe one of the Microsoft board members is also on the Netflix board. Not sure who and the Wiki entry doesn't state who.</p><p>Until these two companies part ways, Microsoft is going to be making things difficult for SOMEONE.<br>
&nbsp;</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" When the fuck will either Netflix move away from Silverlight or Moonlight support the Netflix player ?
This is currently my single biggest gripe on Linux by far .
" Not gunna happen .
Microsoft and Netflix have a VERY cozy relationship .
I believe one of the Microsoft board members is also on the Netflix board .
Not sure who and the Wiki entry does n't state who.Until these two companies part ways , Microsoft is going to be making things difficult for SOMEONE .
 </tokentext>
<sentencetext>"When the fuck will either Netflix move away from Silverlight or Moonlight support the Netflix player?
This is currently my single biggest gripe on Linux by far.
"Not gunna happen.
Microsoft and Netflix have a VERY cozy relationship.
I believe one of the Microsoft board members is also on the Netflix board.
Not sure who and the Wiki entry doesn't state who.Until these two companies part ways, Microsoft is going to be making things difficult for SOMEONE.
 </sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742270</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742532</id>
	<title>Totally awesome!</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289800000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>This is amazing, fantastic news! I'm overjoyed! Boxee is our queen!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>This is amazing , fantastic news !
I 'm overjoyed !
Boxee is our queen !
: - )</tokentext>
<sentencetext>This is amazing, fantastic news!
I'm overjoyed!
Boxee is our queen!
:-)</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30744044</id>
	<title>Downgrade for me</title>
	<author>shagrat</author>
	<datestamp>1263297120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm finding I liked the alpha better. One of my biggest gripes is that I can no longer tell boxee that the IMDB movie info its associated one of my files with isn't correct. In the alpha, there was a choice in the info screen of the file to say "Thats not the right info" whereupon I could choose again what movie it really was. Now I can't do that. In fact, I'm not sure what I need to do in that situation, and boxee has mislabled dozens of my files.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm finding I liked the alpha better .
One of my biggest gripes is that I can no longer tell boxee that the IMDB movie info its associated one of my files with is n't correct .
In the alpha , there was a choice in the info screen of the file to say " Thats not the right info " whereupon I could choose again what movie it really was .
Now I ca n't do that .
In fact , I 'm not sure what I need to do in that situation , and boxee has mislabled dozens of my files .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm finding I liked the alpha better.
One of my biggest gripes is that I can no longer tell boxee that the IMDB movie info its associated one of my files with isn't correct.
In the alpha, there was a choice in the info screen of the file to say "Thats not the right info" whereupon I could choose again what movie it really was.
Now I can't do that.
In fact, I'm not sure what I need to do in that situation, and boxee has mislabled dozens of my files.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743166</id>
	<title>why the fark</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263293040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>do you have to register to use this if you don't care about or don't want the "social networking" crap?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>do you have to register to use this if you do n't care about or do n't want the " social networking " crap ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>do you have to register to use this if you don't care about or don't want the "social networking" crap?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30828646</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>idlemachine</author>
	<datestamp>1263924960000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p><div class="quote"><p>I like Apple's Front Row but could go for something a little more powerful. Any suggestions?</p></div><p>I'm a big fan of <a href="http://xbmc.org/" title="xbmc.org">XBMC</a> [xbmc.org], which started out on the original Xbox but is now available for the major platforms.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>I like Apple 's Front Row but could go for something a little more powerful .
Any suggestions ? I 'm a big fan of XBMC [ xbmc.org ] , which started out on the original Xbox but is now available for the major platforms .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I like Apple's Front Row but could go for something a little more powerful.
Any suggestions?I'm a big fan of XBMC [xbmc.org], which started out on the original Xbox but is now available for the major platforms.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30746822</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743422</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>i\_ate\_god</author>
	<datestamp>1263294120000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Will Boxee be a good media PC application if you don't plan on streaming everything?</p><p>eg: if most of my content is on harddrives accessible over the LAN?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Will Boxee be a good media PC application if you do n't plan on streaming everything ? eg : if most of my content is on harddrives accessible over the LAN ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Will Boxee be a good media PC application if you don't plan on streaming everything?eg: if most of my content is on harddrives accessible over the LAN?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742680</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743248</id>
	<title>Re:What's so special about Ubuntu &ldquo;Karmic&am</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1263293400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>You're running Fedora. Take charge of the situation.</p><p>Crack the DEB open and take a look at the boxee binary and see what it links to.</p><p>There's a good chance that everything it needs is already installed on your system.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>You 're running Fedora .
Take charge of the situation.Crack the DEB open and take a look at the boxee binary and see what it links to.There 's a good chance that everything it needs is already installed on your system .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>You're running Fedora.
Take charge of the situation.Crack the DEB open and take a look at the boxee binary and see what it links to.There's a good chance that everything it needs is already installed on your system.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742444</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743362</id>
	<title>Nothing to do with OpenGL</title>
	<author>pavon</author>
	<datestamp>1263293880000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>The reporting on this has been extremely bad. This all has to doing video decoding in hardware. DirectX has <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DirectX\_Video\_Acceleration" title="wikipedia.org">APIs for that</a> [wikipedia.org], and they are now being used in the Windows version. The Linux version continues to use the relevant Xorg extensions (XvMC?) for video decoding.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>The reporting on this has been extremely bad .
This all has to doing video decoding in hardware .
DirectX has APIs for that [ wikipedia.org ] , and they are now being used in the Windows version .
The Linux version continues to use the relevant Xorg extensions ( XvMC ?
) for video decoding .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>The reporting on this has been extremely bad.
This all has to doing video decoding in hardware.
DirectX has APIs for that [wikipedia.org], and they are now being used in the Windows version.
The Linux version continues to use the relevant Xorg extensions (XvMC?
) for video decoding.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742606</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752866</id>
	<title>Re:I've gone back to XBMC.</title>
	<author>Jon\_S</author>
	<datestamp>1263407100000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Wife Acceptance Factor.</p><p>Or maybe it's the other way around: Wife Annoyance Factor (I forget).</p><p>I think it's mainly a MythTV mailing list acronym.</p><p>Basically, stuff that us geeks put up with without a second thought (e.g. just ssh into the box from the other computer and run alsamixer to change the volume - how hard is that?) but would annoy the hell out of a nontechnical user (e.g. one's wife) definitely lowers the WAF.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Wife Acceptance Factor.Or maybe it 's the other way around : Wife Annoyance Factor ( I forget ) .I think it 's mainly a MythTV mailing list acronym.Basically , stuff that us geeks put up with without a second thought ( e.g .
just ssh into the box from the other computer and run alsamixer to change the volume - how hard is that ?
) but would annoy the hell out of a nontechnical user ( e.g .
one 's wife ) definitely lowers the WAF .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Wife Acceptance Factor.Or maybe it's the other way around: Wife Annoyance Factor (I forget).I think it's mainly a MythTV mailing list acronym.Basically, stuff that us geeks put up with without a second thought (e.g.
just ssh into the box from the other computer and run alsamixer to change the volume - how hard is that?
) but would annoy the hell out of a nontechnical user (e.g.
one's wife) definitely lowers the WAF.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745748</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745164</id>
	<title>Re:The article forgot to mention</title>
	<author>HermMunster</author>
	<datestamp>1263303000000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Are you a moron Mr. AC?  STFU when you don't know what you are talking about.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Are you a moron Mr. AC ? STFU when you do n't know what you are talking about .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Are you a moron Mr. AC?  STFU when you don't know what you are talking about.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742480</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742430</id>
	<title>Re:DirectX on Linux?</title>
	<author>Tapewolf</author>
	<datestamp>1263289320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext>Abstraction layers.</htmltext>
<tokenext>Abstraction layers .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Abstraction layers.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743004</id>
	<title>Hardware requirements?</title>
	<author>Hatta</author>
	<datestamp>1263292320000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Assuming I don't need any HD content, what sort of hardware would I need to run Boxee?  I have an old P3 I'm currently using to view videos, play music, etc.  It works great, but I'd like a more task appropriate UI than XFCE.  Is Boxee likely to run OK?  I can imagine the database back end might take a bit of power to run smoothly.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Assuming I do n't need any HD content , what sort of hardware would I need to run Boxee ?
I have an old P3 I 'm currently using to view videos , play music , etc .
It works great , but I 'd like a more task appropriate UI than XFCE .
Is Boxee likely to run OK ?
I can imagine the database back end might take a bit of power to run smoothly .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Assuming I don't need any HD content, what sort of hardware would I need to run Boxee?
I have an old P3 I'm currently using to view videos, play music, etc.
It works great, but I'd like a more task appropriate UI than XFCE.
Is Boxee likely to run OK?
I can imagine the database back end might take a bit of power to run smoothly.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745420</id>
	<title>Re:GNU/Ubuntu</title>
	<author>antdude</author>
	<datestamp>1263304440000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>How about Debian? I was told using Ubuntu's *.deb file is a bad idea in Debian even if Ubuntu is based on Debian.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:(</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>How about Debian ?
I was told using Ubuntu 's * .deb file is a bad idea in Debian even if Ubuntu is based on Debian .
: (</tokentext>
<sentencetext>How about Debian?
I was told using Ubuntu's *.deb file is a bad idea in Debian even if Ubuntu is based on Debian.
:(</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560</id>
	<title>What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263290040000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I have zilch experience with boxee but did spend some time on it's site a couple of weeks ago to see if it might be of utility when viewing tv shows or movies online. For the life of me I could not figure out what its supposed to do 'for me'. The boxee website is a great example of what happens when they people involved are so deeply entrenched in whatever realm boxee is that they have no clue how to communicate to 'regular' people.</p><p>A site like hulu is easy to figure out. But it's got too many commercials and they seem to be adding more all the time. Boxee...someone tell me what it's good for? Like you were explaining to someone who didn't know already???</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I have zilch experience with boxee but did spend some time on it 's site a couple of weeks ago to see if it might be of utility when viewing tv shows or movies online .
For the life of me I could not figure out what its supposed to do 'for me' .
The boxee website is a great example of what happens when they people involved are so deeply entrenched in whatever realm boxee is that they have no clue how to communicate to 'regular ' people.A site like hulu is easy to figure out .
But it 's got too many commercials and they seem to be adding more all the time .
Boxee...someone tell me what it 's good for ?
Like you were explaining to someone who did n't know already ? ?
?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I have zilch experience with boxee but did spend some time on it's site a couple of weeks ago to see if it might be of utility when viewing tv shows or movies online.
For the life of me I could not figure out what its supposed to do 'for me'.
The boxee website is a great example of what happens when they people involved are so deeply entrenched in whatever realm boxee is that they have no clue how to communicate to 'regular' people.A site like hulu is easy to figure out.
But it's got too many commercials and they seem to be adding more all the time.
Boxee...someone tell me what it's good for?
Like you were explaining to someone who didn't know already??
?</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742270</id>
	<title>Damn it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263288420000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>When the fuck will either Netflix move away from Silverlight or Moonlight support the Netflix player? This is currently my single biggest gripe on Linux by far.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>When the fuck will either Netflix move away from Silverlight or Moonlight support the Netflix player ?
This is currently my single biggest gripe on Linux by far .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>When the fuck will either Netflix move away from Silverlight or Moonlight support the Netflix player?
This is currently my single biggest gripe on Linux by far.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742650</id>
	<title>Re:The article forgot to mention</title>
	<author>MBGMorden</author>
	<datestamp>1263290520000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>What I don't get is how Ubuntu 64-bit and OS X are supported if it's using DirectX?</p><p>I also don't like the sound of "online and local media being treated equally".  That just sounds like it's going to make sorting and locating my local network media much harder, which is the main reason I use Boxee.</p><p>Currently I'm using it on an Apple TV so this isn't quite available to me yet anyways, but depending on how they handle this I may just opt go install XBMC and use that.  I've used that on my Xbox with great success.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>What I do n't get is how Ubuntu 64-bit and OS X are supported if it 's using DirectX ? I also do n't like the sound of " online and local media being treated equally " .
That just sounds like it 's going to make sorting and locating my local network media much harder , which is the main reason I use Boxee.Currently I 'm using it on an Apple TV so this is n't quite available to me yet anyways , but depending on how they handle this I may just opt go install XBMC and use that .
I 've used that on my Xbox with great success .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>What I don't get is how Ubuntu 64-bit and OS X are supported if it's using DirectX?I also don't like the sound of "online and local media being treated equally".
That just sounds like it's going to make sorting and locating my local network media much harder, which is the main reason I use Boxee.Currently I'm using it on an Apple TV so this isn't quite available to me yet anyways, but depending on how they handle this I may just opt go install XBMC and use that.
I've used that on my Xbox with great success.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742728</id>
	<title>Proxies?</title>
	<author>stokessd</author>
	<datestamp>1263290940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I'm hoping for better proxy / VPN support.  I pay for a web proxy and a VPN to England so I can watch BBC, channel 4, etc from the USA.  The previous Boxee didn't handle the connection (with password authentication) well.  Frankly it was full of fail.  I am on the cusp of dumping cable and little things like a better boxee will get me there.</p><p>Sheldon</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 'm hoping for better proxy / VPN support .
I pay for a web proxy and a VPN to England so I can watch BBC , channel 4 , etc from the USA .
The previous Boxee did n't handle the connection ( with password authentication ) well .
Frankly it was full of fail .
I am on the cusp of dumping cable and little things like a better boxee will get me there.Sheldon</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I'm hoping for better proxy / VPN support.
I pay for a web proxy and a VPN to England so I can watch BBC, channel 4, etc from the USA.
The previous Boxee didn't handle the connection (with password authentication) well.
Frankly it was full of fail.
I am on the cusp of dumping cable and little things like a better boxee will get me there.Sheldon</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742606</id>
	<title>Re:DirectX on Linux?</title>
	<author>Nadaka</author>
	<datestamp>1263290280000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Interestin</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Neither do I, how is going from OpenGL to DirectX an "upgrade" either?</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Neither do I , how is going from OpenGL to DirectX an " upgrade " either ?</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Neither do I, how is going from OpenGL to DirectX an "upgrade" either?</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742300</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30744348</id>
	<title>Re:What exactly is boxee good for???</title>
	<author>dakameleon</author>
	<datestamp>1263298560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Boxee's a fork of XBMC, with <a href="http://lifehacker.com/396382/boxee-is-xbmc-with-newer-look-and-social-flair" title="lifehacker.com">"a new look and social flair"</a> [lifehacker.com]. Kinda like Flock vs Firefox (anyone remember Flock?)</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Boxee 's a fork of XBMC , with " a new look and social flair " [ lifehacker.com ] .
Kinda like Flock vs Firefox ( anyone remember Flock ?
)</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Boxee's a fork of XBMC, with "a new look and social flair" [lifehacker.com].
Kinda like Flock vs Firefox (anyone remember Flock?
)</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743038</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743310</id>
	<title>Re:I've gone back to XBMC.</title>
	<author>jedidiah</author>
	<datestamp>1263293640000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>&gt; 4) Not being able to watch videos, or listen to music until it had finished scanning my collection. I have 4TB of media, don't make me wait.</p><p>I ran the first Linux version I could get my hands on and I never had any trouble like this.</p><p>Admittedly, it had to have scanned something before I could watch it but I don't see that as a terribly unreasonable limitation.</p><p>Boxee does very well with the metadata. I wish MythTV did as well. Although I personally prefer the UI in MythTV.</p><p>However, having easy access to all of the web based content is cool (in boxee).</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>&gt; 4 ) Not being able to watch videos , or listen to music until it had finished scanning my collection .
I have 4TB of media , do n't make me wait.I ran the first Linux version I could get my hands on and I never had any trouble like this.Admittedly , it had to have scanned something before I could watch it but I do n't see that as a terribly unreasonable limitation.Boxee does very well with the metadata .
I wish MythTV did as well .
Although I personally prefer the UI in MythTV.However , having easy access to all of the web based content is cool ( in boxee ) .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>&gt; 4) Not being able to watch videos, or listen to music until it had finished scanning my collection.
I have 4TB of media, don't make me wait.I ran the first Linux version I could get my hands on and I never had any trouble like this.Admittedly, it had to have scanned something before I could watch it but I don't see that as a terribly unreasonable limitation.Boxee does very well with the metadata.
I wish MythTV did as well.
Although I personally prefer the UI in MythTV.However, having easy access to all of the web based content is cool (in boxee).</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742610</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742490</id>
	<title>GNU/Ubuntu</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>2</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>"Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Ubuntu OSes"</p><p>Not Linux?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)</p><p>So now Ubuntu is to Linux what Kleenex is to tissue?</p><p>GNU/Ubuntu sounds weird though.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>" Mac OS X , Windows XP , and Ubuntu OSes " Not Linux ?
: ) So now Ubuntu is to Linux what Kleenex is to tissue ? GNU/Ubuntu sounds weird though .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>"Mac OS X, Windows XP, and Ubuntu OSes"Not Linux?
:)So now Ubuntu is to Linux what Kleenex is to tissue?GNU/Ubuntu sounds weird though.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742718</id>
	<title>Re:Damn it.</title>
	<author>Sir\_Lewk</author>
	<datestamp>1263290820000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><blockquote><div><p>visual studio</p></div></blockquote><p>All OS, text editor, and compiler zealotry aside... WTF???</p><p>If you are doing Windows development, you should be doing it in Windows.  Expecting Linux to work for you if the tasks you need to preform are distinctly Windows related is just nuts.  Use the right tool for the job.</p></div>
	</htmltext>
<tokenext>visual studioAll OS , text editor , and compiler zealotry aside.. .
WTF ? ? ? If you are doing Windows development , you should be doing it in Windows .
Expecting Linux to work for you if the tasks you need to preform are distinctly Windows related is just nuts .
Use the right tool for the job .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>visual studioAll OS, text editor, and compiler zealotry aside...
WTF???If you are doing Windows development, you should be doing it in Windows.
Expecting Linux to work for you if the tasks you need to preform are distinctly Windows related is just nuts.
Use the right tool for the job.
	</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742452</id>
	<title>Best interface ever...</title>
	<author>Improv</author>
	<datestamp>1263289380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Funny</modclass>
	<modscore>3</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I really hope the new interface is based on Boxxy.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I really hope the new interface is based on Boxxy .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I really hope the new interface is based on Boxxy.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742480</id>
	<title>Re:The article forgot to mention</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289500000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>0</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>it's only 64bit native support is for Ubuntu, as 64bit ubuntu does not play nice with native 32bit apps like windows and mac.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>it 's only 64bit native support is for Ubuntu , as 64bit ubuntu does not play nice with native 32bit apps like windows and mac .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>it's only 64bit native support is for Ubuntu, as 64bit ubuntu does not play nice with native 32bit apps like windows and mac.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742214</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745144</id>
	<title>Re:Linux 64 Bit Support Ubutu 9.04 - Crash!</title>
	<author>MindPrison</author>
	<datestamp>1263302940000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>It just crashes for me.</p><p>The "Boxee" tries to load itself...takes 20 seconds or so...and then it just vanishes...just like a crashy piece of software that doesn't work...same way.<br>Nivida drivers and OpenGL are working, because I run Blender (opengl) on it...and opengl games + wine...</p><p>So for now...beta is indeed beta.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>It just crashes for me.The " Boxee " tries to load itself...takes 20 seconds or so...and then it just vanishes...just like a crashy piece of software that does n't work...same way.Nivida drivers and OpenGL are working , because I run Blender ( opengl ) on it...and opengl games + wine...So for now...beta is indeed beta .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>It just crashes for me.The "Boxee" tries to load itself...takes 20 seconds or so...and then it just vanishes...just like a crashy piece of software that doesn't work...same way.Nivida drivers and OpenGL are working, because I run Blender (opengl) on it...and opengl games + wine...So for now...beta is indeed beta.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742486</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742610</id>
	<title>I've gone back to XBMC.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263290400000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Insightful</modclass>
	<modscore>4</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I've been a faithful user of Boxee for the past year,  but the Beta convinced me to go back to XBMC.</p><p>Problems I had with Boxee:<br>1) Didn't expose all features of XBMC, such as Synch Display Refresh Rate to Media.  I've got a TV that can do 24hz, 50hz,60hz, etc, why should I see pull down artifacts?  I also wanted the Skip Direct to Menu option for DVD playback.<br>2) Boxee hasn't fixed problems from the Alpha - I've got some ISO rips which still fail to playback in Boxee.  XBMC and VLC have no problems with them.  This was a \_huge\_ WAF issue.  She had gone back to pulling the DVDs out of storage to watch them!<br>3) The Social Media aspect was pointless.  None of my friends were using Boxee, and aren't likely to.  It was pure clutter between me and my media.  Note: You can't unsubscribe from Avner's feed!<br>4) Not being able to watch videos, or listen to music until it had finished scanning my collection.  I have 4TB of media, don't make me wait.<br>5) When I upgraded to the Beta, my remote control stopped working.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)  The packages overwrote files that I had changed to get everything working.<br>6) Their releases are a long time apart.<br>7) Even when I submitted a patch for a bug, it didn't make it into the Beta.</p><p>The only thing I seem to be giving up is Hulu support, which if it really annoys me, I can port back into XBMC.</p><p>I wish them luck, the Boxee box announced at CES looks pretty cool, and the $200 price point is pretty compelling.  It's just not for me.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I 've been a faithful user of Boxee for the past year , but the Beta convinced me to go back to XBMC.Problems I had with Boxee : 1 ) Did n't expose all features of XBMC , such as Synch Display Refresh Rate to Media .
I 've got a TV that can do 24hz , 50hz,60hz , etc , why should I see pull down artifacts ?
I also wanted the Skip Direct to Menu option for DVD playback.2 ) Boxee has n't fixed problems from the Alpha - I 've got some ISO rips which still fail to playback in Boxee .
XBMC and VLC have no problems with them .
This was a \ _huge \ _ WAF issue .
She had gone back to pulling the DVDs out of storage to watch them ! 3 ) The Social Media aspect was pointless .
None of my friends were using Boxee , and are n't likely to .
It was pure clutter between me and my media .
Note : You ca n't unsubscribe from Avner 's feed ! 4 ) Not being able to watch videos , or listen to music until it had finished scanning my collection .
I have 4TB of media , do n't make me wait.5 ) When I upgraded to the Beta , my remote control stopped working .
: ) The packages overwrote files that I had changed to get everything working.6 ) Their releases are a long time apart.7 ) Even when I submitted a patch for a bug , it did n't make it into the Beta.The only thing I seem to be giving up is Hulu support , which if it really annoys me , I can port back into XBMC.I wish them luck , the Boxee box announced at CES looks pretty cool , and the $ 200 price point is pretty compelling .
It 's just not for me .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I've been a faithful user of Boxee for the past year,  but the Beta convinced me to go back to XBMC.Problems I had with Boxee:1) Didn't expose all features of XBMC, such as Synch Display Refresh Rate to Media.
I've got a TV that can do 24hz, 50hz,60hz, etc, why should I see pull down artifacts?
I also wanted the Skip Direct to Menu option for DVD playback.2) Boxee hasn't fixed problems from the Alpha - I've got some ISO rips which still fail to playback in Boxee.
XBMC and VLC have no problems with them.
This was a \_huge\_ WAF issue.
She had gone back to pulling the DVDs out of storage to watch them!3) The Social Media aspect was pointless.
None of my friends were using Boxee, and aren't likely to.
It was pure clutter between me and my media.
Note: You can't unsubscribe from Avner's feed!4) Not being able to watch videos, or listen to music until it had finished scanning my collection.
I have 4TB of media, don't make me wait.5) When I upgraded to the Beta, my remote control stopped working.
:)  The packages overwrote files that I had changed to get everything working.6) Their releases are a long time apart.7) Even when I submitted a patch for a bug, it didn't make it into the Beta.The only thing I seem to be giving up is Hulu support, which if it really annoys me, I can port back into XBMC.I wish them luck, the Boxee box announced at CES looks pretty cool, and the $200 price point is pretty compelling.
It's just not for me.</sentencetext>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752620</id>
	<title>Re:GNU/Ubuntu</title>
	<author>Jon\_S</author>
	<datestamp>1263406380000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>Which part of <a href="http://boxee.tv/download/?ver=source" title="boxee.tv">http://boxee.tv/download/?ver=source</a> [boxee.tv] isn't open source?</p><p><a href="http://dl.boxee.tv/boxee-0.9.20.10263-source.tar.bz2" title="boxee.tv">http://dl.boxee.tv/boxee-0.9.20.10263-source.tar.bz2</a> [boxee.tv]<br><a href="http://dl.boxee.tv/flashlib-shared-6684.tar.gz" title="boxee.tv">http://dl.boxee.tv/flashlib-shared-6684.tar.gz</a> [boxee.tv]</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>Which part of http : //boxee.tv/download/ ? ver = source [ boxee.tv ] is n't open source ? http : //dl.boxee.tv/boxee-0.9.20.10263-source.tar.bz2 [ boxee.tv ] http : //dl.boxee.tv/flashlib-shared-6684.tar.gz [ boxee.tv ]</tokentext>
<sentencetext>Which part of http://boxee.tv/download/?ver=source [boxee.tv] isn't open source?http://dl.boxee.tv/boxee-0.9.20.10263-source.tar.bz2 [boxee.tv]http://dl.boxee.tv/flashlib-shared-6684.tar.gz [boxee.tv]</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742626</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742930</id>
	<title>Re:Damn it.</title>
	<author>Seq</author>
	<datestamp>1263291900000</datestamp>
	<modclass>None</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>I know the feeling, but in reverse. I acquired a copy of Windows 7 recently, and decided to try it out. I couldn't find a mail client I like, and am far to used to having a CLI there. I tried a somewhat buggy evolution port, cygwin, and a coLinux system before giving up for the same reasons you are, I'm just used to what I'm used to, and changing platforms is difficult.</p><p>It worked out the same with hardware too. Everything works in Ubuntu (and I'm looking forward to it working better when nouveau starts shipping and I can get xrandr). Windows wouldn't even shut down, let alone suspend or hibernate. It seemed to shut down, but would stay on, while suspend would resume the machine immediately. Turns out I had to manually play with some setting on a firewire card or something (kind of weird since it was a microsoft-provided IEE-1394 driver, afaict).</p><p>There are some things I wish were easier on Linux systems, too. Having to rip HD-DVD and BluRays before watching them takes time and a lot of disk space. Being a second-class citizen when it comes to graphics and wireless drivers is somewhat of a pain. I also wish I could play some games (especially ones that I paid for expecting a Linux client "soon". I'm looking at you, UT3/Epic), but I've been getting around this by buying older ones from GOG.com and the steam sale which do work in dosbox and wine.</p><p>I'm hoping that projects such as Boxee bring a legitimacy to linux-based home media centres that Mythtv never managed to convey beyond the userbase, so at least one person, somewhere in the chain of decision-making might say "Hey, maybe silverlight isn't such a good idea". Ah, but I dream, I suppose.</p><p>I can't comment on Netflix. Unsupported Linux user is an upgrade from unsupported Canadian.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>I know the feeling , but in reverse .
I acquired a copy of Windows 7 recently , and decided to try it out .
I could n't find a mail client I like , and am far to used to having a CLI there .
I tried a somewhat buggy evolution port , cygwin , and a coLinux system before giving up for the same reasons you are , I 'm just used to what I 'm used to , and changing platforms is difficult.It worked out the same with hardware too .
Everything works in Ubuntu ( and I 'm looking forward to it working better when nouveau starts shipping and I can get xrandr ) .
Windows would n't even shut down , let alone suspend or hibernate .
It seemed to shut down , but would stay on , while suspend would resume the machine immediately .
Turns out I had to manually play with some setting on a firewire card or something ( kind of weird since it was a microsoft-provided IEE-1394 driver , afaict ) .There are some things I wish were easier on Linux systems , too .
Having to rip HD-DVD and BluRays before watching them takes time and a lot of disk space .
Being a second-class citizen when it comes to graphics and wireless drivers is somewhat of a pain .
I also wish I could play some games ( especially ones that I paid for expecting a Linux client " soon " .
I 'm looking at you , UT3/Epic ) , but I 've been getting around this by buying older ones from GOG.com and the steam sale which do work in dosbox and wine.I 'm hoping that projects such as Boxee bring a legitimacy to linux-based home media centres that Mythtv never managed to convey beyond the userbase , so at least one person , somewhere in the chain of decision-making might say " Hey , maybe silverlight is n't such a good idea " .
Ah , but I dream , I suppose.I ca n't comment on Netflix .
Unsupported Linux user is an upgrade from unsupported Canadian .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>I know the feeling, but in reverse.
I acquired a copy of Windows 7 recently, and decided to try it out.
I couldn't find a mail client I like, and am far to used to having a CLI there.
I tried a somewhat buggy evolution port, cygwin, and a coLinux system before giving up for the same reasons you are, I'm just used to what I'm used to, and changing platforms is difficult.It worked out the same with hardware too.
Everything works in Ubuntu (and I'm looking forward to it working better when nouveau starts shipping and I can get xrandr).
Windows wouldn't even shut down, let alone suspend or hibernate.
It seemed to shut down, but would stay on, while suspend would resume the machine immediately.
Turns out I had to manually play with some setting on a firewire card or something (kind of weird since it was a microsoft-provided IEE-1394 driver, afaict).There are some things I wish were easier on Linux systems, too.
Having to rip HD-DVD and BluRays before watching them takes time and a lot of disk space.
Being a second-class citizen when it comes to graphics and wireless drivers is somewhat of a pain.
I also wish I could play some games (especially ones that I paid for expecting a Linux client "soon".
I'm looking at you, UT3/Epic), but I've been getting around this by buying older ones from GOG.com and the steam sale which do work in dosbox and wine.I'm hoping that projects such as Boxee bring a legitimacy to linux-based home media centres that Mythtv never managed to convey beyond the userbase, so at least one person, somewhere in the chain of decision-making might say "Hey, maybe silverlight isn't such a good idea".
Ah, but I dream, I suppose.I can't comment on Netflix.
Unsupported Linux user is an upgrade from unsupported Canadian.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742488</parent>
</comment>
<comment>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742488</id>
	<title>Re:Damn it.</title>
	<author>Anonymous</author>
	<datestamp>1263289560000</datestamp>
	<modclass>Informativ</modclass>
	<modscore>1</modscore>
	<htmltext><p>ive about given up on linux for the time being. i love some things about it, and used it for a while. but between school and entertainment...its just not worth booting into. i cant watch my blu ray movies, streaming netflix movies, play my games, or run visual studio and dreamweaver properly in WINE. office 2007 worked at one point. in addition, when i tried debian it was a bitch to get my hardware going....when i tried ubuntu, hardware worked but getting sleep or hibernate was iffy, nevermind the other issues i already mentioned.</p><p>its just not a good fit for me right now. i wish it was, i far prefer compiz to the interface of windows 7.</p></htmltext>
<tokenext>ive about given up on linux for the time being .
i love some things about it , and used it for a while .
but between school and entertainment...its just not worth booting into .
i cant watch my blu ray movies , streaming netflix movies , play my games , or run visual studio and dreamweaver properly in WINE .
office 2007 worked at one point .
in addition , when i tried debian it was a bitch to get my hardware going....when i tried ubuntu , hardware worked but getting sleep or hibernate was iffy , nevermind the other issues i already mentioned.its just not a good fit for me right now .
i wish it was , i far prefer compiz to the interface of windows 7 .</tokentext>
<sentencetext>ive about given up on linux for the time being.
i love some things about it, and used it for a while.
but between school and entertainment...its just not worth booting into.
i cant watch my blu ray movies, streaming netflix movies, play my games, or run visual studio and dreamweaver properly in WINE.
office 2007 worked at one point.
in addition, when i tried debian it was a bitch to get my hardware going....when i tried ubuntu, hardware worked but getting sleep or hibernate was iffy, nevermind the other issues i already mentioned.its just not a good fit for me right now.
i wish it was, i far prefer compiz to the interface of windows 7.</sentencetext>
	<parent>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742270</parent>
</comment>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30747418
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_22</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743422
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30748834
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752948
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30746822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30828646
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30746822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743362
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_28</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745420
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743248
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742444
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_18</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745224
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742650
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30748822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30746822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_25</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30748814
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_26</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742472
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742326
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_17</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743998
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_31</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743414
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742764
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745138
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742824
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_21</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742930
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_23</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745164
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742480
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745802
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752620
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742626
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742490
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_29</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742430
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742446
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742214
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_20</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30744348
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743038
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742680
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743358
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742606
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742546
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752696
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_27</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30749996
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30746822
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742726
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_30</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743022
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_32</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745144
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742486
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_19</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752866
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745748
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_24</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742676
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742300
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743310
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742610
</commentlist>
</thread>
<thread>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#thread_10_01_12_1749257_14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742718
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742488
http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742270
</commentlist>
</thread>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.6</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742300
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742430
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742606
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743362
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743358
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742676
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.4</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30744044
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.9</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742452
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.13</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742490
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745802
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742626
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752620
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745420
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.7</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742764
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743414
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.11</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742270
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743998
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742488
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743022
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742718
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742930
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30747418
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742546
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.5</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742898
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.2</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742214
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742480
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745164
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745138
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742446
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742650
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745224
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.3</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743004
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.15</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30744268
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.0</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742754
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.12</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742560
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742726
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30746822
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30749996
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30748822
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752948
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30828646
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742824
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742680
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743038
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30744348
---http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30748814
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743422
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752696
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.10</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743100
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.16</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742444
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743248
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.1</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742326
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742472
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.14</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742486
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745144
</commentlist>
</conversation>
<conversation>
	<id>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#conversation10_01_12_1749257.8</id>
	<commentlist>http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30742610
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30745748
--http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30752866
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30743310
-http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/ConversationInstances.owl#comment10_01_12_1749257.30748834
</commentlist>
</conversation>
